Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - CEO & CFO SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPex32.htm
EX-31.1 - CEO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - CFO SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION - GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPex31-2.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2009
   
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the transition period from ______________ to _____________

Commission File Number  000-50643
 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
86-0933274
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
1600 N Desert Drive, Suite 301, Tempe, AZ
85281
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(480) 994-0772
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code )

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o  No x

At October 12, 2009, 6,633,112 shares of Global Entertainment Corporation common stock were outstanding.

 
 

 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
INDEX
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 2009

 
 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
   
3
   
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – As of August 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and May 31, 2009
3
   
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three Months Ended
 
    August 31, 2009 and 2008
4
   
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity – Year Ended May 31, 2009
 
    and Three Months Ended August 31, 2009 (Unaudited)
  5
   
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Three Months Ended
 
    August 31, 2009 and 2008
6
   
    Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
  7
   
18
   
23
   
23
   
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
24
   
24
   
24
   
24
   
24
   
24
   
24
 
 
2

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of August 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and May 31, 2009
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


   
August 31,
   
May 31,
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
ASSETS
 
Current Assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 756     $ 1,111  
Accounts receivable, net of $5 allowance at May 31, 2009
    3,359       2,220  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    252       281  
Property held for sale - food service equipment
    577        
    Total Current Assets
    4,944       3,612  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    138       708  
Goodwill
    519       519  
Other assets
    295       329  
    Total Assets
  $ 5,896     $ 5,168  
                 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 1,817     $ 1,132  
Accrued liabilities
    487       588  
Deferred revenues
    458       64  
Note payable - current portion
    113       111  
    Total Current Liabilities
    2,875       1,895  
                 
Deferred income tax liability, net
    5       5  
Note payable - long-term portion
    40       69  
    Total Liabilities
    2,920       1,969  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies
               
                 
Equity:
               
Global Entertainment Corporation Equity -
               
Preferred stock - $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
               
  no shares issued or outstanding
           
Common stock - $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
               
  6,633,112  shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2009
               
  and May 31, 2009
    7       7  
Paid-in capital
    10,970       10,961  
Retained deficit
    (8,037 )     (7,788 )
    Total Global Entertainment Corporation Equity
    2,940       3,180  
Noncontrolling interest
    36       19  
    Total Equity
    2,976       3,199  
    Total Liabilities and Equity
  $ 5,896     $ 5,168  




The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
3

 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


   
2009
   
2008
 
Revenues:
           
Project development fees
  $ 50     $ 209  
Project management fees
    446       465  
Facility management fees
    904       445  
Ticket service fees
    199       620  
Food service revenue
    72        
Advertising sales commissions
    71       245  
License fees - league dues and other
    374       274  
License fees - initial and transfer
    100        
Other revenue
    154       101  
    Total Revenues
    2,370       2,359  
                 
Operating Costs:
               
Cost of revenues
    1,136       979  
General and administrative costs
    1,464       1,496  
    Total Operating Costs
    2,600       2,475  
                 
Operating Loss
    (230 )     (116 )
Other Income (Expense):
               
Interest income
    1       3  
Interest expense
    (3 )     (7 )
    Total Other Expense
    (2 )     (4 )
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Tax
    (232 )     (120 )
Income Tax Benefit
           
Loss from Continuing Operations, net of tax
    (232 )     (120 )
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
          (48 )
Net Loss
    (232 )     (168 )
Net Income (Loss), attributable to noncontrolling interest
    17       (8 )
Net Loss, attributable to Global
  $ (249 )   $ (160 )
                 
Loss Per Share - basic and diluted:
               
Loss from continuing operations, attributable to Global common shareholders
  $ (0.04 )   $ (0.02 )
Loss from discontinued operations, attributable to Global common shareholders
           
Net loss, attributable to Global common shareholders
  $ (0.04 )   $ (0.02 )
                 
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - basic and diluted
    6,633,112       6,625,114  
                 
Amounts attributable to Global common shareholders
               
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to Global common shareholders
  $ (249 )   $ (112 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to Global common shareholders
          (48 )
Net loss, attributable to Global common shareholders
  $ (249 )   $ (160 )




The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
4

 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the Year Ended May 31, 2009 and the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share amounts)


   
Global Entertainment Corporation
   
 
       
   
Common Stock
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
         
Non-Controlling
   
Total
 
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Deficit
   
Total
   
Interest
   
Equity
 
                                           
Balance at May 31, 2008
    6,625,114     $ 7     $ 10,930     $ (7,815 )   $ 3,122     $ (38 )   $ 3,084  
                                                         
Issuance of restricted stock
    8,000                                      
                                                         
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
                31             31             31  
                                                         
Other
    (2 )                                    
                                                         
Net income
                      27       27       57       84  
                                                         
Balance at May 31, 2009
    6,633,112       7       10,961       (7,788 )     3,180       19       3,199  
                                                         
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
                9             9             9  
                                                         
Net income (loss)
                      (249 )     (249 )     17       (232 )
                                                         
Balance at August 31, 2009
    6,633,112     $ 7     $ 10,970     $ (8,037 )   $ 2,940     $ 36     $ 2,976  




The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
5

 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended August 31, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited) (in thousands)


   
2009
   
2008
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net loss, attributable to Global
  $ (249 )   $ (160 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities-
               
Depreciation
    42       34  
Unbilled earnings on Wenatchee project
          (174 )
Provision for doubtful accounts
    18       8  
Noncontrolling interest
    17       (8 )
Stock-based compensation - restricted stock
    9       8  
Discontinued operations and related impairment charges
          5  
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of businesses disposed-
               
Accounts receivable
    (1,157 )     (64 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    63       (217 )
Accounts payable
    685       (443 )
Accrued liabilities
    (101 )     240  
Deferred revenues
    394       503  
       Net cash used in operating activities
    (279 )     (268 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Investment in Wenatchee project
          (12,556 )
Deposit of restricted cash
          (1,250 )
Purchase of fixed assets
    (49 )      
Proceeds from disposition of Our Old Car Company assets, net of expenses
          1,790  
       Net cash used in investing activities
    (49 )     (12,016 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Notes payable proceeds
          12,679  
Notes payable payments
    (27 )     (275 )
       Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (27 )     12,404  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (355 )     120  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    1,111       443  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 756     $ 563  
                 
Supplemental Disclosures:
               
Interest  paid
  $ 3     $ 7  
Income taxes paid (received)
  $     $  




The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
6

 

GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
 


Description of the Company

Global Entertainment Corporation (referred to in this report as “we,” “us,” “Global”) is an integrated event and entertainment company that is engaged, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, in sports management, multipurpose events center development, facility and venue management and marketing, and venue ticketing.  We are primarily focused on projects located in mid-size communities.

Our current principal operating subsidiaries are Western Professional Hockey League, Inc., Global Properties I, International Coliseums Company, Inc., Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc., Global Entertainment Ticketing, Encore Facility Management and GEC Food Service, LLC.

We, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Western Professional Hockey League, Inc. (WPHL), operate the Western Professional Hockey League, a minor league professional hockey organization, and are the licensor of the independently owned hockey teams which participate in the league.  WPHL has entered into a joint operating agreement with the Central Hockey League, Inc. (CHL, Inc.).  The effect of the joint operating agreement is that the two leagues had their respective teams join together and operate under the “Central Hockey League” name (as the League).  The terms of the joint operating agreement define how the League will operate.

The League currently consists of seventeen (17) teams, (fifteen (15) expected to play in the 2009-2010 season) located in mid-market communities throughout the Central, Western and Southern regions of the United States.  Three teams, each of which was an original CHL, Inc. team, continue to operate under a sanction agreement that requires direct payments to the League pursuant to the terms and conditions of the original CHL, Inc. agreements.

Global Properties I (GPI) provides services in targeted mid-sized communities across the United States related to the development of multipurpose events centers.  GPI's development of multipurpose events centers promotes the development of the League by assisting potential licensees in securing quality venues in which to play minor professional hockey league games.

International Coliseums Company, Inc. (ICC) manages the construction of multipurpose events centers in mid-market communities.

Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc. (GEMS), promotes, markets, and sells various services related to multipurpose entertainment facilities, including all contractually obligated income (COI) sources such as facility naming rights, luxury suite sales, premium seat license sales, and facility sponsorship agreements.

Global Entertainment Ticketing (GetTix) provides ticketing services for the multipurpose events centers developed by GPI, existing League licensees, and various other entertainment venues, theaters, concert halls, and other facilities and event coordinators.  GetTix provides a full ticketing solution by way of box office, outlet, phone, internet and print-at-home service that utilizes distribution outlets in each market.  GetTix uses third-party, state-of-the-art software to deliver ticketing capabilities that include database flexibility, easy season and group options, financial reporting and marketing resources.

Encore Facility Management (Encore) provides a full complement of multipurpose events center operational services.  These services include providing administrative oversight in the areas of facility/property management and finance, event bookings, and food and beverage.  Encore is currently involved with facility management of multipurpose events centers developed by GPI.  Facility management operations are conducted under separate limited liability companies.

 
7

 

GEC Food Service, LLC (formerly Global Food Service, LLC) (Food Service), formed in fiscal 2009, manages facility food service operations.

On August 1, 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets of Our Old Car Company (formerly known as Cragar Industries, Inc.).

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Global Entertainment Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, WPHL, GPI, ICC, GEMS, Encore, GetTix, Food Service and Our Old Car Company (formerly known as Cragar Industries, Inc.), as well as the limited liability companies formed for facility management.  Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included.

Operating results for the three month period ended August 31, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending May 31, 2010, or for any other period.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009.

Certain reclassifications are reflected in prior periods for the purpose of consistent presentation.

Subsequent events have been evaluated and disclosed through the date of this filing, which is the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Use of Estimates

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses.  Actual results may vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We believe our critical accounting policies and material estimates include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, arena guarantees and other contingencies, the carrying value of goodwill, the realization of deferred income tax assets, the fair value of a liability related to the secondary guarantee related to a worker’s compensation program, and the allocation of expenses and division of profit or loss relating to the joint operating agreement.  Due to the uncertainties inherent in the estimation process and the significance of these items, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates in connection with these items could be materially revised within the next year.

Accounting Developments

In November 2007, the EITF modified GAAP to prohibit application of the equity method of accounting to activities performed outside of a separate legal entity and requires revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative agreements be presented gross or net based on other applicable accounting literature.  Payments to or from collaborators should be presented in an income statement based on the nature of the arrangement, whether the payments are within the scope of other accounting literature, and certain other criteria.  We adopted these standards effective June 1, 2009, and applied the standards to our accounting for CHL, Inc.’s interest in the League effective June 1, 2009.  Based on the nature of our arrangement with CHL, Inc., its interest is accounted for by analogy to the standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests.

 
8

 

In December 2007, the FASB modified GAAP by establishing accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  The standards also provide income statement presentation guidance and require expanded disclosures.  We adopted these standards effective June 1, 2009, prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which have been applied retrospectively for all periods presented.  We account for CHL, Inc.’s interest in the League in accordance with these new standards effective June 1, 2009.  The impact on our financial position and results of operations was as follows:

 
·
CHL, Inc.’s share of the results of League operations is reflected separately on the face of the consolidated statements of operations below net income (loss) rather than in other income (expense).
 
 
·
CHL, Inc.’s undistributed earnings (loss) in the League is presented as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, for all periods presented.  Prior to adoption of these standards, CHL, Inc.’s undistributed earnings (loss) in the League had been presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a liability as of May 31, 2009, and an asset as of August 31, 2008.

In September 2009, the EITF issued a consensus which revises the standards for recognizing revenue on arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Before evaluating how to recognize revenue for transactions with multiple revenue generating activities, an entity should identify all the deliverables in the arrangement and, if there are multiple deliverables, evaluate each deliverable to determine the unit of accounting and whether it should be treated separately or in combination.  The consensus removes certain thresholds for separation, provides criteria for allocation of revenue amongst deliverables and expands disclosure requirements.  The standards will be effective June 1, 2010, for our fiscal year 2011, unless we elect to early adopt the standards effective June 1, 2009.  We have not yet evaluated the impact these standards will have on our financial position or results of operations.  We have not determined if we will early adopt the standards.

In June 2009, the FASB changed the consolidation rules as they relate to variable interest entities.  The standards change the model for determining who should consolidate a variable interest entity, and require ongoing reassessment of whether we should consolidate a variable interest entity.  The standards will be effective June 1, 2010, for our fiscal year 2011.  We have not yet evaluated the impact these standards will have on our financial position or results of operations.



Earnings (Loss) Per Share (EPS)
 


Basic EPS is computed by dividing the applicable numerator for earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted EPS is computed by dividing the applicable numerator for earnings (loss) by the total of the weighted average number of shares of common stock securities outstanding during the period and the effect of dilutive securities outstanding during the period.  The effect of dilutive securities is not included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding when inclusion would increase the earnings per share or decrease the loss per share for income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax.  The computation of diluted EPS equals the basic calculation in the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, because common stock equivalents were antiduilutive due to the loss from continuing operations, net of tax, in those periods.

Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators in the EPS computations for loss from continuing operations, net of tax, for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, follow:

 
9

 


   
2009
   
2008
 
NUMERATOR- basic and diluted (in thousands):
           
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to Global
           
   common shareholders
  $ (249 )   $ (112 )
                 
DENOMINATOR:
               
Basic EPS - weighted average shares outstanding
    6,633,112       6,625,114  
Effect of dilutive securities
           
Diluted EPS - weighted average shares outstanding
    6,633,112       6,625,114  
                 
Number of shares of common stock which could have been
               
purchased with average outstanding securities not included in
               
diluted EPS because effect would be antidilutive-
               
Stock options (average price of $4.99 and $4.89 for the three
    294,761       390,148  
   months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008)
               
Warrants (average price of $7.10 and $6.32 for the three months
    215,800       275,760  
   ended August 31, 2009 and 2008)
               
Restricted stock
    25,900       20,500  

The impacts of all outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock outstanding at August 31, 2009, were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS for the three months ended August 31, 2009, because to do so would be antidilutive.  Outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock could potentially dilute EPS in the future.



Note Payable
 


As of August 31, 2009, note payable consists entirely of a note payable we entered into in fiscal year 2008 in connection with settlement of a legal matter.  The note calls for 36 payments of $10 thousand monthly through December 2010.  We recorded the present value of the payments, discounted at 7.0%, as notes payable and general and administrative costs. The note had an initial present value of $0.3 million.

We had a $1.75 million line of credit that expired October 1, 2009.  The line of credit bore interest at a daily adjusting LIBOR rate plus 2%, subject to certain adjustments.  As of August 31, 2009, and through the date of this filing, we had received no cash advances on this credit facility.

The credit facility had been secured by substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets.  In order to borrow, we had to meet certain financial covenants, including maintaining a minimum current ratio (current assets compared to current liabilities) of 1.05 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of $1.75 million as of May 31, 2009, increasing by 75% of consolidated net income and 100% of all other increases of equity (including the amount of any stock offering or issuance) on each anniversary date after May 31, 2009.  We were required to maintain a zero balance for a consecutive 30 day period during the term of the facility.  As of August 31, 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants.

 
10

 


 
PVEC, LLC Joint Venture



During fiscal year 2006, we entered into an agreement with Prescott Valley Signature Entertainment, LLC (PVSE, LLC) to form Prescott Valley Events Center, LLC (PVEC, LLC) to engage in the business of developing, managing, and leasing the Prescott Valley Events Center in Prescott Valley, Arizona (the Town).  We are the managing member of PVEC, LLC.  Construction of the center, which opened in November 2006, was funded by proceeds from the issuance of $35 million in Industrial Development Authority of the County of Yavapai Convention Center Facilities Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 (the Bonds).

We account for our investment in PVEC, LLC under the equity method.  Our interest in this entity is not a controlling one, as we do not own a majority voting interest and our ability to affect the business operations is significantly limited by the PVEC, LLC operating agreement.  The operating agreement also provides that a majority-in-interest of the members may replace the managing member, or if the managing member is in default, a majority-in-interest of the remaining members may replace the managing member.

In addition to a $1 thousand initial capital contribution, we contributed $250 thousand as an initial preferred capital contribution and PVSE, LLC contributed land with an approximate value of $1.5 million as an initial preferred capital contribution.  Payment of the $250 thousand was made to PVEC, LLC in December 2008.  We recorded losses on our investment in fiscal 2008, in the amount of $251 thousand, to bring our investment to zero.  Our investment was zero at May 31, 2009, and remains zero at August 31, 2009.

Lease payments on the facility are equal to debt service payments on the Bonds.  In the event of any shortfalls in debt service payments, amounts will be paid by the Town from transaction privilege tax (TPT) collected from the surrounding project area.

Operating revenues of the center, as defined, are first used to pay operating expenses, as defined, second to pay our base management fee (4% of the center’s operating revenue), third to pay debt service, then to fund other items.  As a result, we may defer receipt of our management fees should operating revenues, as defined, be insufficient to pay operating expenses, as defined.  Through May 31, 2009, no management fees had been deferred.

Cash distributions and distributions in liquidation are to be made to each member in the following priority: 1) to the extent needed to pay taxes, 2) to each member to the extent of loans in the form of our unpaid management fees and PVSE, LLC’s unpaid parking fees, and 3) to PVSE, LLC, until their preferred account equals ours (including preferred returns of 5% thereon) and then 50/50.  Therefore, in fiscal 2008 we recognized 100% of PVEC, LLC’s losses to the extent of our funding commitment ($251 thousand).  We will recognize additional losses to the extent of any loans to PVEC, LLC, should they accumulate, in the form of deferred management fees.

PVEC, LLC’s unaudited financial information for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, follows (in thousands):


   
2009
   
2008
 
Operating revenue
  $ 343     $ 615  
Operating loss
    309       228  
Net loss
    319       241  

 
11

 

Selected PVEC, LLC unaudited financial information as of August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, follows (In thousands):

   
August 31,
   
May 31,
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
Property and equipment,net
  $ 28,870     $ 29,251  
Receivable from Town
    7,227       6,558  
Total assets
    39,292       38,758  
Debt payable
    35,000       35,000  
Retained deficit
    1,375       1,054  
Members' equity
    366       685  

Our consolidated financial statements reflect the following related to transactions between us and PVEC, LLC (in thousands).
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
   
August 31,
   
August 31,
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Facility management fees, exclusive of payroll costs (Encore)
  $ 2     $ 17  
Facility management fees, payroll costs (Encore)
    134       155  
Facility management fees, reimbursed expenses (Encore)
    10       19  
Advertising sales commission (GEMS)
    40       67  
Ticket service fees (GetTix)
    20       41  
Cost of revenues, facility payroll (Encore)
    134       155  
Cost of revenues, reimbursed expenses (Encore)
    10       19  

 
    August 31,     May 31,  
    2009     2009  
 Accounts receivable   $ 298     $ 100  
 
 

 
Commitments and Contingencies



Operating Leases

We lease 10,392 square feet of office space for our Tempe, Arizona headquarters pursuant to a lease with a sixty-six month initial term beginning January 2008.  The lease is renewable for an additional sixty-month period.  Leasehold improvements at the location are depreciated over the initial lease term.  Non-level rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease term.  Liabilities related to non-level rents of $92 thousand and $96 thousand were included in accrued liabilities at August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009.

In addition we are committed under an equipment and maintenance contract to pay $1 thousand monthly through December 2010.

Litigation

As with all entertainment facilities there exists a degree of risk that the general public may be accidentally injured.  As of August 31, 2009, there were various claims outstanding in this regard that management does not believe will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  To mitigate this risk, we maintain insurance coverage, which we believe effectively covers any reasonably foreseeable potential liability.  There is no assurance that our insurance coverage will adequately cover all liabilities to which we may be exposed.

 
12

 

We are a plaintiff and a counter-defendant in a lawsuit involving the City of Rio Rancho, New Mexico filed in the New Mexico 13th Judicial District, Sandoval County, Case No. 01329 CV091504.  Our claim seeks resolution of matters stemming from the time during which we managed the events center in Rio Rancho, New Mexico.  Specifically, our claim is based on breach of contract and other matters.  The complaint seeks payment of monies due in excess of $0.3 million and declaratory judgment that we have no liability to third-party creditors of the center.  The city’s counterclaim alleges breach of contract, among other claims, and seeks judgment in excess of $0.2 million.  We believe the counterclaim is without merit.

Global Entertainment Corporation, PVEC, LLC and two of our directors (James Treliving and Richard Kozuback) are four of sixteen defendants in Allstate Life Insurance Company (Allstate) v. Global Entertainment Corporation et. al.  This suit, Case No. CV1962-JWS, was filed in United States District Court, District of Arizona.  The litigation relates to the offering for the Bonds, issued to support the construction of the events center in Prescott Valley, Arizona.  Allstate is a bond holder and the complaint alleges the bond offering failed to properly disclose certain facts, that the underwriters and certain law firms acted with deliberate recklessness and that the bond documents are defective.  Allstate seeks unspecified damages and/or reimbursement of its investment, in excess of $26 million.  We believe the claims against Global Entertainment Corporation, PVEC, LLC and the two directors are without merit.  Our insurance carrier has been notified and we believe defense costs will be limited to the amount of our insurance deductible, $100 thousand or less.

All litigation settlement expenses are included in general and administrative costs.  The following summarizes litigation settlement activity for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, and the balance sheet classification of litigation settlement liabilities at August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009 (in thousands).
 
   
2009
   
2008
 
Litigation settlement liabilities, beginning of period
  $ 330     $ 283  
Cash payments
    (127 )     (25 )
Litigation settlement liabilities, end of period
  $ 203     $ 258  
                 
 
   
August 31,
   
May 31,
 
   
2009
   
2009
 
Accounts payable
  $ 50     $ 125  
Accrued liabilities
          25  
Note payable - current portion
    113       111  
Note payable - long-term portion
    40       69  
    $ 203     $ 330  

Legal services costs are expensed as incurred.  At August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, accounts payable included $195 thousand and $176 thousand in legal services costs.  At August 31, 2009 and May 31, 2009, accrued liabilities included $23 thousand and $21 thousand in legal services costs.

Contingencies

We enter into indemnification provisions under our agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business, typically with business partners and customers.  Under these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities.  The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited.  We have not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements.  As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal.  Accordingly, we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of August 31, 2009.

As of August 31, 2009, we have entered into various employment contracts with key employees.  Under certain circumstances we may be liable to pay amounts based on the related contract terms.

 
13

 

Guarantees

In February 2008, we entered into an agreement to manage a multi-purpose events center to be constructed in Texas.  The initial term of this agreement is fifteen years, with an option by the city to renew for an additional five years under certain conditions.  This agreement includes a guarantee that the events center will operate at a break-even point and without cost to the city, not including any capital reserves and any other off-sets described in the agreement.  This guarantee requires that all amounts reasonably required for the operation and maintenance of the events center will be generated by the operation of the events center, or otherwise paid by us.  Should we be obligated to fund any operational shortfalls, the agreement provides for reimbursement to us from future profits from the events center.  The maximum amount of future payments we could be required to make under this operational guarantee is theoretical due to various unknown factors.  However, the guarantee would be limited to the operational loss from the facility for each year of the guarantee, less any reimbursements from the facility.  We do not believe, however no assurance can be made, that any potential guarantee payments would be material based on the operating results of similar facilities.  The facility is expected to open in the fall of 2009.

In April 2009, we entered into an agreement with the city in Texas to fund a performance reserve related to having a hockey team play in the facility.  Under the agreement we delay receipt of advertising sales commissions otherwise payable to us to fund a performance reserve.  To the extent the performance reserve falls below the required reserve, we must fund cash.  The required performance reserve levels are as follows:

 
·
November 1, 2009 - $200,000, reduced to $150,000 when a hockey team plays the 2009-2010 season opener
 
 
·
November 1, 2010 - $150,000, reduced to $100,000 when a hockey team plays the 2010-2011 season opener
 
 
·
November 1, 2011 - $100,000, reduced to $50,000 when a hockey team plays the 2011-2012 season opener
 
 
·
November 1, 2012 - $50,000, reduced to zero when a hockey team plays 2012-2013 season opener.

If no hockey team plays a season opener through the 2018-2019 season opener, the amount then in the reserve account is forfeited and future advertising sales commission are forfeited until either a hockey team plays in a season opener or a total of $300 thousand is forfeited.  In no event is the amount forfeited to exceed $300 thousand.  A hockey team is currently scheduled to play the 2009-2010 season and we believe the likelihood we will forfeit anything under this guarantee is remote.

In May 2008, we entered into an agreement to manage a multi-purpose events center to be constructed in Missouri.  The initial term of this agreement ends fifteen years from facility opening, and the city may renew the agreement for an additional five years under the same terms.  The facility is expected to open in the fall of 2009.  Our compensation under the agreement may only come from the facility operating account, which is to be funded by facility operations, as defined in the agreement.  The management agreement includes a guarantee that we will subsidize the operations of the facility to the extent that funds in the facility operating account and a temporary operating account are not adequate.  Under the terms of the agreement the city shall advance $0.5 million to fund a temporary operating reserve account, which may be used to fund shortfalls in the facility operations account.  Excess funds in the facility operating account each operating year, after paying operating expenses, our base Encore fee and GEMS commission, are to be used in the following priority: 1) to reimburse us for any subsidy payments we have made, 2) to replenish the temporary operating reserve account, 3) to fund the capital reserve account and 4) to pay on a co-equal basis our incentive fee and deposits to three additional reserve accounts.  The maximum amount of future payments we could be required to make under the guarantee is theoretical due to various unknown factors.  However, once the temporary operating reserve account is depleted, the guarantee subsidy payments would be limited to the operational loss each operating year, plus the amount of our facility management fees and advertising sales commissions.  We do not expect to make guarantee subsidy payments based on operating results of similar facilities, however, no assurance can be made that a payment pursuant to this guarantee would not be paid in the future and that such payment would not be material.

In addition, under the terms of the management agreement, an amount not to exceed $0.50 per ticket, and excess operating funds, are to be used to fund a capital reserve account up to $150 thousand in each of the first five operating years and up to $250 thousand thereafter.  Should the capital reserve account not be fully funded for two consecutive years, the management agreement terminates, unless the city elects to renew the agreement.

 
14

 

We provide a secondary guarantee on a standby letter of credit in favor of Ace American Insurance Company for $1.5 million related to a guarantee under a workers compensation program.  This letter of credit is fully collateralized by third parties.  No amounts have been drawn on this letter of credit as of August 31, 2009.  We believe the amount of payments under this guarantee will be negligible, and as such, have assigned no value to this guarantee at August 31, 2009.

We have guaranteed payment of a lease for equipment used by PVEC, LLC.  As of August 31, 2009, twenty-nine payments averaging $13 thousand per month, including principal and interest were outstanding.  The fair value of the lease obligation at August 31, 2009, was approximately $340 thousand.  The lease is secured by the equipment.  We believe the amount of payments under this guarantee will be negligible, and as such, have assigned no value to this guarantee at August 31, 2009.

In addition to our commitments and guarantees described above we also have the commitments and guarantees described in the PVEC, LLC Joint Venture Note.



Discontinued Operations
 


On August 1, 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets of Our Old Car Company (formerly known as Cragar Industries, Inc).  The assets consisted primarily of intangibles, including trademarks, service marks and domain names.  The cash from the transaction of approximately $1.8 million, net of transaction costs, was allocated primarily to the intangibles, with the remainder to tooling, inventory and other assets.

The following table presents selected operating data for Our Old Car Company for the three months ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

   
2009
   
2008
 
Revenues
  $ ¾     $ 60  
Loss on disposal
    ¾       (51 )
Loss before income taxes
    ¾       (48 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax
    ¾       (48 )



Credit Risk
 


Our business activities and accounts receivable are with customers in various industries located throughout the United States.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for potential credit losses.

The League operates primarily in mid-sized communities in the Central, Western and Southern regions of the United States, including Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas in fiscal 2010.  Our facility management fees and project management fees are derived from events centers currently operating in, or being constructed in, Arizona, Missouri, Texas and Washington in fiscal 2010.  The economic downturn which has affected these markets has negatively impacted our operating results and will most likely continue to do so until an economic recovery is complete.

We depend on contracts with cities or related governmental entities to design, develop, and manage new multipurpose facilities and adjacent real estate.  Typically we must expend 20-30 months of effort to obtain such contracts.  We depend on these contracts for the revenue they generate and the facilities resulting from these contracts are potential facilities in which our licensees may operate.  Failure to timely secure these contracts may negatively impact our results.  Many governments are struggling to maintain tax revenue and raise capital in the current economic environment and may have less interest in developing new multipurpose facilities or less ability to finance construction of new multipurpose facilities.  Our revenues, project development fees and project management fees in particular, could be negatively impacted.
 
 
15

 
 
Purchasing a League license requires significant capital and commencing operation is a significant expense which limits the pool of potential licensees.  We depend on a critical mass of licensees to capture the economies of scale inherent in the League’s operations and to facilitate intra-league play.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract qualified candidates for licenses.  We anticipate that expansion of the League will be difficult because of the high capital costs of licenses, competitive pressures from sports leagues and entertainment providers both within and outside of the markets where we currently operate, and the lack of arenas for new licensees.

The minor league hockey industry in which we conduct business is subject to significant competition from other sports and entertainment alternatives as well as both the National Hockey League and its minor league hockey system, the American Hockey League, and other independent minor hockey leagues.  Even teams of the National Hockey League, which is the largest professional hockey league with the greatest attendance, have struggled to remain financially viable.  A significant portion of our revenues result from payments made by our licensees.  There can be no assurance that licensees will not default under their license agreements.

The League may be unable to attract new licensees and existing licensees may not be able to make the continuing payments required by their license agreements in the current economic environment.  There can be no assurance that any payments will be made by new or current licensees.



Segment Information



Each of our subsidiaries is a separate legal entity with a separate management structure.  Our corporate operations exist solely to support our subsidiary segments.  As such, certain corporate overhead costs are allocated to the operating segments.  There are no differences in accounting principles between the operations.

At August 31, 2009 and 2008, and at May 31, 2009, goodwill relates to our International Coliseums segment.

The Food Service segment began operations in fiscal 2009.

No interest expense was allocated to discontinued operations in fiscal 2009 or fiscal 2008.

 
16

 


   
Three Months Ended
         
   
Gross Revenues
   
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Tax
   
Identifiable Assets
   
August 31, 2009
                   
Global Entertainment Corporate Operations
  $ 154     $ (342 )   $ 1,628  
(a)
Global Food Service (b)
    72       (26 )     598    
Central Hockey League/WPHL
    474       192       846    
Global Properties I
    50       (72 )     150    
International Coliseums
    446       271       1,808  
(c)
Encore Facility Management
    904       (22 )     484    
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems
    71       (30 )     212    
Global Entertainment Ticketing
    199       (203 )     170    
Global Entertainment Coporation Consolidated
  $ 2,370     $ (232 )   $ 5,896    
                           
August 31, 2008
                         
Global Entertainment Corporate Operations
  $ 101     $ (445 )   $ 49,426  
(a)
Central Hockey League/WPHL
    274       (5 )     445    
Global Properties I
    209       27       408    
International Coliseums
    463       337       662    
Encore Facility Management
    445       (51 )     91    
Global Entertainment Marketing Systems
    245       150       144    
Global Entertainment Ticketing
    622       (133 )     467    
Global Entertainment Coporation Consolidated
  $ 2,359     $ (120 )   $ 51,643    
 
      
(a)
Global Entertainment Corporate Operations assets include the investment in Wenatchee project of $47.2 million at August 31, 2008.  The investment was sold in December 2008.  Global Entertainment Corporate Operations assets include cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $0.8 million and $0.6 million at August 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
(b)
The Global Food Service segment began operations October 2008 in Wenatchee, Washington.  The Wenatchee food service contract ended effective August 31, 2009.  We have contracted to manage food service operations in the Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri facilities, which are scheduled to open in November 2009, using equipment owned by the cities.
 
(c)
The International Coliseums segment assets at August 31, 2009, include $1.0 million in accounts receivable from a city to fund furniture, fixture and equipment purchases made as agent for the city.  August 31, 2008 assets included no comparable amounts.



Property Held for Sale
 


The City of Wenatchee, Washington has agreed to purchase our food service equipment, in its entirety for $0.6 million.  We discontinued depreciation of the equipment in July 2009 and the net book value of the equipment is classified as property held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  We expect to receive the purchase price in October 2009.  We have contracted to provide food service operations for the facilities in Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri, using those cities’ food service equipment.

 
17

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Disclosure

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events, including statements concerning our future operating results and financial condition and our future capital needs and sources.  These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections as well as our beliefs and assumptions.  Words such as “outlook”, “believes”, “expects”, “appears”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “anticipates” or the negatives thereof or comparable terminology, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.  Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed in our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009.  You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report.  We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, unless otherwise required by law.

General

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors affecting our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Description of the Company

Our current operating subsidiaries are Western Professional Hockey League, Inc., Global Properties I, International Coliseums Company, Inc., Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc., Global Entertainment Ticketing, Encore Facility Management and GEC Food Service, LLC.

Pursuant to a joint operating agreement between us and Central Hockey League Inc. (CHL, Inc.), WPHL operates and manages a minor professional hockey league known as the Central Hockey League (the League), which currently consists of seventeen teams (fifteen expected to play in the 2009-2010 season) located in mid-market communities throughout the Central, Western and Southern regions of the United States.

Global Properties I (GPI) provides services in targeted mid-sized communities across the United States related to the development of multipurpose events centers.  GPI's development of multipurpose events centers promotes the development of the League by assisting potential licensees in securing quality venues in which to play minor professional hockey league games.

International Coliseums Company, Inc. (ICC) manages the construction of multipurpose events centers in mid-market communities.

Global Entertainment Marketing Systems, Inc. (GEMS), promotes, markets, and sells various services related to multipurpose entertainment facilities, including all contractually obligated income (COI) sources such as facility naming rights, luxury suite sales, premium seat license sales, and facility sponsorship agreements.

Global Entertainment Ticketing (GetTix) provides ticketing services for the multipurpose events centers developed by GPI, existing League licensees, and various other entertainment venues, theaters, concert halls, and other facilities and event coordinators.  GetTix provides a full ticketing solution by way of box office, outlet, phone, internet and print-at-home service that utilizes distribution outlets in each market.  GetTix uses third-party, state-of-the-art software to deliver ticketing capabilities that include database flexibility, easy season and group options, financial reporting and marketing resources.

 
18

 

Encore Facility Management (Encore) provides a full complement of multipurpose events center operational services.  These services include providing administrative oversight in the areas of facility/property management and finance, event bookings, and food and beverage.  Encore is currently involved with facility management of multipurpose events centers developed by GPI.  Facility management operations are conducted under separate limited liability companies.

GEC Food Service, LLC (formerly Global Food Service, LLC) (Food Service), formed in fiscal 2009, manages facility food service operations.

On August 1, 2008, we sold substantially all of the assets of Our Old Car Company (formerly known as Cragar Industries, Inc.).

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Judgments

Significant accounting policies are described in the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009.  We believe our most critical accounting policies and estimates relate to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, arena guarantees and other contingencies, the carrying value of goodwill, the realization of deferred income tax assets, the fair value of a liability related to the secondary guarantee related to a worker’s compensation program, and the allocation of expenses and division of profit or loss relating to the joint operating agreement.  Due to the uncertainties inherent in the estimation process and the significance of these items, it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates in connection with these items could be materially revised within the next year.

Overview and Forward Looking Information

During fiscal year 2008 we decided to divest of Our Old Car Company (formerly Cragar Industries, Inc.).  As a result, the operations of Our Old Car Company have been classified as loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.  Revenues and operating costs in the consolidated statements of operations now exclude all accounts of Our Old Car Company.

Total revenue in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, included $0.3 million in facility management fees, ticket service fees, and food service revenues from contracts with the facility in Wenatchee, Washington, which opened in October 2008.  The contracts related to that facility were terminated effective August 31, 2009.

We are currently managing construction projects for facilities in Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri.  We have contracted to provide facility management service, food service, ticket service and advertising sales at those facilities.  The facilities in Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri are scheduled to open in November 2009.  We expect to obtain food service revenues from those facilities beginning in November.  We earned advertising sales commissions and certain pre-opening related facility management fees from the facilities in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, and expect to earn advertising sales commissions and facility management fees after the openings under our multi-year contracts.

Ground breaking on the facility in Dodge City, Kansas is scheduled for October 2009.  Under our agreements related to the facility we expect to earn $50 thousand in project development fees in our second quarter ended November 30, 2009.  We began earning project management fees related to this project in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and fees are expected to be earned over a total of twenty-two months.

Our multi-year contracts with PVEC, LLC to provide facility management services, ticket services and advertising sales were active in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, and remain active through the date of this filing.

We believe high unemployment levels and continued economic weakness have impacted our revenues and, in particular, contributed to 1) a decline in our ticket service fees and advertising sales commissions in the first quarter ended August 31, 2009, compared to the prior year quarter and 2) our inability to enter into arrangements to generate additional project development fees.

 
19

 

Three Months Ended August 31, 2009, Compared to Three Months Ended August 31, 2008

Revenues (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
             
   
August 31, 2009
   
% of Revenue
   
August 31, 2008
   
% of Revenue
   
Change
   
% Change
 
                                     
Project development fees
  $ 50       2.1     $ 209       8.9     $ (159 )     (76.1 )
Project management fees
    446       18.8       465       19.7       (19 )     (4.1 )
Facility management fees
    904       38.1       445       18.9       459       103.1  
Ticket service fees
    199       8.4       620       26.3       (421 )     (67.9 )
Food service revenue
    72       3.0                   72    
NM
 
Advertising sales commissions
    71       3.0       245       10.4       (174 )     (71.0 )
License fees - league dues and other
    374       15.8       274       11.6       100       36.5  
License fees - initial and transfer
    100       4.2                   100    
NM
 
Other
    154       6.5       101       4.3       53       52.5  
Total Revenues
  $ 2,370       100.0     $ 2,359       100.0     $ 11       0.5  

At $2.4 million, total revenues were 0.5% higher in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, compared to the quarter ended August 31, 2008.

Project development fees for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, relate to the project for the facility in Dodge City, Kansas, signed in fiscal 2009.  Project development fees in the prior year quarter related to the project for the facility in Allen, Texas.  The Dodge City related agreement is currently the only active contract providing for development fees.

Project management fees of $0.4 million were 4.1% lower for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, than the prior year quarter.  Project management fees related to the Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri projects for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, approximated the fees on those projects in the prior year quarter.  The Dodge City, Kansas project management fees in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, approximated the Wenatchee, Washington project management fees in the prior year quarter.

Facility management fees were $0.9 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, compared to $0.4 million in the quarter ended August 31, 2008.  Facility management fees include both recurring fees for management of facilities and fees for preopening services.  The $0.5 million increase in facility management fees is the result of fees for preopening services on the Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri projects in the quarter ended August 31, 2009.  There were no comparable fees in the prior year quarter.  The year-over-year increase in recurring fees from the Wenatchee, Washington facility, which opened in October 2008, was offset by a decline in monthly management fees from the Rio Rancho, New Mexico facility, which ended in January 2009.

Ticket service fees decreased $0.4 million, to $0.2 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, from $0.6 million in the prior year quarter.  This decrease in ticket service fees reflects decreases from a continued decline in the number of events held, attendance at events and venues under contract, offset by an increase in fees from services to the facility in Wenatchee, Washington.

Advertising sales commissions were $0.1 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, and $0.2 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2008.  Sales commissions decreased at all facilities which were under management in both periods.  Sales commissions from the Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri projects in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, were not sufficient to offset the decrease from the loss of sales commissions from the Rio Rancho, New Mexico and Hidalgo, Texas facilities, no longer under contract.

 
20

 

License fees – league dues and other increased $0.1 million to $0.4 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, from $0.3 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2008.  Other license fees include an additional $0.1 million of sponsorship revenue in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, than in the prior year quarter.

License fees – initial and transfer, include fees from a transfer in the quarter ended August 31, 2009.  Since initial and transfer fees are not regularly recurring and are difficult to predict, there is no assurance that we will be able to increase or sustain our operating capital through this source.

Operating Costs (in thousands):

   
Three Months Ended
             
   
August 31, 2009
   
% of Revenue
   
August 31, 2008
   
% of Revenue
   
Change
   
% Change
 
                                     
Cost of revenues
  $ 1,136       47.9     $ 979       41.5     $ 157       16.0  
General and administrative costs
    1,464       61.8       1,496       63.4       (32 )     (2.1 )
Total Operating Costs
  $ 2,600       109.7     $ 2,475       104.9     $ 125       5.1  

Total operating costs increased $0.1 million to $2.6 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, from $2.5 million in the prior year quarter.  The quarter ended August 31, 2009, included $0.4 million of preopening costs for the Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri projects.  There were no comparable costs in the prior year quarter.  That increase in cost of revenues was offset by a $0.3 million decrease in ticket servicing costs related to the decline in ticket service fees.

Loss from Continuing Operations (in thousands):
 
   
Three Months Ended
             
   
August 31, 2009
   
% of Revenue
   
August 31, 2008
   
% of Revenue
   
Change
   
% Change
 
                                     
Loss from continuing operations, before tax
   $ (232)        (9.8)       $ (120)        (5.1)       $ (112)       $ 93.3   

Loss from continuing operations, before tax was $0.2 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, compared to a loss from continuing operations, before tax of $0.1 million for the quarter ended August 31, 2008.  The increased loss was primarily a result of the change in mix of revenues: a higher percentage of revenues was derived from facility management fees in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, than in the prior year quarter and a lower percentage of revenues was derived from ticket service fees in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, than in the prior year quarter.  Operating costs as a percentage of revenues are higher on facility management fees than on ticket service fees.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of August 31, 2009, we had $0.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, including cash collected for GetTix tickets of less than $0.1 million for events scheduled to occur in the future.

On September 1, 2009, we collected $625 thousand on an account receivable included in our August 31, 2009, balance sheet, which was in payment of the final installment of an initial license fee, included in revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

Under our performance guarantee related to the hockey team in Texas, we expect $150 thousand of working capital, in the form of cash and accounts receivable, will be unavailable to us from November 2009 until November 2010, when we expect $50 thousand will be released.

 
21

 

Cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million in the quarter ended August 31, 2009.  During the quarter ended August 31, 2009, we began receiving furniture, fixture and equipment on the project in Allen, Texas.  We generally pay the vendors for these items after obtaining funds from the city.  This furniture, fixture and equipment activity increased accounts receivable $1.0 million between May 31, 2009, and August 31, 2009, and increased accounts payable $0.9 million between May 31, 2009 and August 31, 2009.

Cash used in investing activities in the quarter ended August 31, 2009, was limited to fixed asset purchases.  We expect to receive $0.6 million when we sell our food service equipment to the City of Wenatchee, Washington in October 2009.  Food service operations in the cities of Allen, Texas and Independence, Missouri are scheduled to begin in November 2009.  We will use the cities’ equipment to conduct those food service operations and thus do not expect to make any material capital expenditures in the remainder of fiscal 2010.

Cash used in financing activities for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, consisted entirely of scheduled payments on our note payable.  We do not currently have any intentions of entering into any additional financing arrangements.

We had a $1.75 million line of credit that expired October 1, 2009.  The line of credit bore interest at a daily adjusting LIBOR rate plus 2%, subject to certain adjustments.  As of August 31, 2009, and through the date of this filing, we had received no cash advances on this credit facility.  We did not renew the facility.

The credit facility had been secured by substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets.  In order to borrow, we had to meet certain financial covenants, including maintaining a minimum current ratio (current assets compared to current liabilities) of 1.05 as of the end of each fiscal quarter, a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of $1.75 million as of May 31, 2009, increasing by 75% of consolidated net income and 100% of all other increases of equity (including the amount of any stock offering or issuance) on each anniversary after May 31, 2009.  We were required to maintain a zero balance for a consecutive 30 day period during the term of the facility.  As of August 31, 2009, we were in compliance with these covenants.

We continue to evaluate the profitability of, and synergies among, our various subsidiaries and may determine to dispose of one or more of them, as we move forward with our business plan.  Based on our current forecast and historical results, we expect to have adequate cash flow from available sources to fund our operating needs through August 31, 2010.  If our business or profitability deteriorates or we incur unexpected expenses or asset impairments, it could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial resources.  We cannot guarantee that we would be able to obtain financing, if needed, on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Accounting Developments

In November 2007, the EITF modified GAAP to prohibit application of the equity method of accounting to activities performed outside of a separate legal entity and requires revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative agreements be presented gross or net based on other applicable accounting literature.  Payments to or from collaborators should be presented in an income statement based on the nature of the arrangement, whether the payments are within the scope of other accounting literature, and certain other criteria.  We adopted these standards effective June 1, 2009, and applied the standards to our accounting for CHL, Inc.’s interest in the League effective June 1, 2009.  Based on the nature of our arrangement with CHL, Inc., its interest is accounted for by analogy to the standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests.

In December 2007, the FASB modified GAAP by establishing accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  The standards also provide income statement presentation guidance and require expanded disclosures.  We adopted these standards effective June 1, 2009, prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively for all periods presented.  We account for CHL, Inc.’s interest in the League in accordance with these new standards effective June 1, 2009.  The impact on our financial position and results of operations was as follows:

 
·
CHL, Inc.’s share of the results of League operations is reflected separately on the face of the consolidated statements of operations below net income (loss) rather than in other income (expense).

 
22

 

 
·
CHL, Inc.’s undistributed earnings (loss) in the League is presented as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, for all periods presented.  Prior to adoption of these standard CHL, Inc.’s undistributed earnings (loss) in the League had been presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a liability as of May 31, 2009, and as an asset as of August, 31 2008.

In September 2009, the EITF issued a consensus which revises the standards for recognizing revenue on arrangements with multiple deliverables.  Before evaluating how to recognize revenue for transactions with multiple revenue generating activities, an entity should identify all the deliverables in the arrangement and, if there are multiple deliverables, evaluate each deliverable to determine the unit of accounting and whether it should be treated separately or in combination.  The consensus removes certain thresholds for separation, provides criteria for allocation of revenue amongst deliverables and expands disclosure requirements.  The standards will be effective June 1, 2010, for our fiscal year 2011, unless we elect to early adopt the standards effective June 1, 2009.  We have not yet evaluated the impact these standards will have on our financial position or results of operations.  We have not determined if we will early adopt the standards.

In June 2009, the FASB changed the consolidation rules as they relate to variable interest entities.  The standards change the model for determining who should consolidate a variable interest entity, and require ongoing reassessment of whether we should consolidate a variable interest entity.  The standards will be effective June 1, 2010, for our fiscal year 2011.  We have not yet evaluated the impact these standards will have on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4T.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 as of August 31, 2009.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our management, including its principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.  We monitor our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls and make modifications as necessary; our intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures will be maintained as dynamic systems that change (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant.

 
23

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There have not been changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

We are a plaintiff and a counter-defendant in a lawsuit involving the City of Rio Rancho, New Mexico filed in the New Mexico 13th Judicial District, Sandoval County, Case No. 01329 CV091504.  Our claim seeks resolution of matters stemming from the time during which we managed the events center in Rio Rancho, New Mexico.  Specifically, our claim is based on breach of contract and other matters.  The complaint seeks payment of monies due in excess of $0.3 million and declaratory judgment that we have no liability to third-party creditors of the center.  The city’s counterclaim alleges breach of contract, among other claims, and seeks judgment in excess of $0.2 million.  We believe the counterclaim is without merit.

Global Entertainment Corporation, PVEC, LLC and two of our directors (James Treliving and Richard Kozuback) are four of sixteen defendants in Allstate Life Insurance Company (Allstate) v. Global Entertainment Corporation et. al.  This suit, Case No. CV1962-JWS, was filed in United States District Court, District of Arizona.  The litigation relates to the offering for the Bonds, issued to support the construction of the events center in Prescott Valley, Arizona.  Allstate is a bond holder and the complaint alleges the bond offering failed to properly disclose certain facts, that the underwriters and certain law firms acted with deliberate recklessness and that the bond documents are defective.  Allstate seeks unspecified damages and/or reimbursement of its investment, in excess of $26 million.  We believe the claims against Global Entertainment Corporation, PVEC, LLC and the two directors are without merit.  Our insurance carrier has been notified and we believe defense costs will be limited to the amount of our insurance deductible, $100 thousand or less.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5.  Other Information

None.

Item 6.  Exhibits

See Exhibit Index attached.

 
24

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


   
GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
   
(Registrant)
     
     
     
October 15, 2009
 By
/s/Richard Kozuback
   
Richard Kozuback
   
President & Chief Executive Officer
     
     
     
October 15, 2009
 By
s/James Yeager
   
James Yeager
   
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 
25

 

Exhibit Index
 
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601:
 
 
      
*
Filed herewith.