Back to GetFilings.com




SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2003

[  ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 
For the transition period from ______ to ______

 
Commission file number: 0-23322

 
CASCADE BANCORP

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Oregon
              
93-1034484
(State of incorporation)
              
(IRS Employer Identification #)
 
1100 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon
              
97701
(Address of principal executive offices)
              
(Zip Code)
 
(541) 385-6205
(Registrant’s telephone number)
 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
 
Common Stock, no par value
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [  ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant registrant at June 30, 2003 (the last business day of the most recent second quarter) was $201,517,683 (based on the closing price as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market on that date.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 13,266,378 shares of no par value Common Stock on February 27, 2004.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III is incorporated by reference from the issuer’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 27, 2004.





CASCADE BANCORP
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
 
              
 
          Page    
Item 1.
              
BUSINESS
          3    
Item 2.
              
PROPERTIES
          9    
Item 3
              
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
          9    
Item 4
              
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
          9    
PART II
Item 5.
              
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
          10    
Item 6.
              
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
          10    
Item 7.
              
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
          13    
Item 7A.
              
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
          27    
Item 8.
              
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
          30    
Item 9.
              
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
          57    
Item 9A.
              
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
          57    
PART III
Item 10
through 14
              
Part III, items 10 through 14 are incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement issued in conjunction with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2004. (Directors and Executive Officers; Executive Compensation; Director and Management Ownership; Related Party Transactions; and Principal Accountant Fees and Services).
                   
PART IV
Item 15.
              
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
          57    
SIGNATURES
     58    
 


PART I

Item 1.    BUSINESS

Company

Cascade Bancorp (Bancorp) is an Oregon chartered Financial Holding Company formed in 1990 and headquartered in Bend, Oregon, with its principal subsidiary Bank of the Cascades (the Bank). Together these entities are referred to as (“the Company”). At December 31, 2003 the Company had total consolidated assets of approximately $735 million, net loans of approximately $578 million and deposits of approximately $651 million.

Bank of the Cascades

The Bank was chartered as an Oregon State bank in 1976 and opened for business in 1977, with headquarters in Bend, Oregon. The Bank is a community bank offering a full range of financial services to its business and consumer clients, including residential mortgage, trust and investments. At the beginning of 2003, the Bank had a total of twelve branches serving the communities in Central Oregon and Salem/Keizer.

During 2003, the Bank expanded into Southern Oregon with a branch in Medford and, late in the year added a new Portland, Oregon branch targeting the downtown business and professional banking market. In addition, the Bank expanded its presence in Salem with a West Salem branch that opened in July, 2003. On January 1, 2004 the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of the single branch office of Community Bank of Grants Pass, Oregon to further its presence in Southern Oregon. These actions have diversified the Bank’s markets, expanded its growth potential and increased its branch total to sixteen locations. The Company announced plans to open up to five new offices between its Central and Southern Oregon markets in 2004, including in the Old Mill district of Bend which opened February 2, 2004.

A predominate share of the Bank’s assets are in Deschutes County, where it is the market share leader in customer deposits holding 31% market share. Additionally, the Bank is the county market share leader in construction and commercial real estate lending as well as in residential mortgage origination. Over the past decade the population of Deschutes County has grown at a rate among the fastest of all counties in the United States. This rapid growth has been driven by in-migration of persons seeking a higher quality of life. The Region is ranked in the “Six Best Vacation Destinations and Hometowns” by Time Magazine and as one of the “Five Best Places to Retire” and the “Fourth Best Place for Families to Recreate in the United States” by Money Magazine. With this growth has come increasing real estate, service, healthcare, professional, and tourism/recreational industries.

With a personal-touch relationship banking strategy, the Bank offers a broad range of commercial and retail banking services to its customers. Lending activities serve small to medium-sized businesses, municipalities and public entities, professional and consumer clientele. The Bank provides commercial real estate loans, real estate construction and development loans, commercial and industrial loans as well as consumer installment, line-of-credit, credit card, and home equity loans. The Bank originates and services residential mortgage loans that are typically sold on the secondary market. The Bank provides consumer and business deposit services including checking, money market, and time deposit accounts and related payment services such as cash management, lock box, internet banking and electronic bill payment.

Employees

The Company views its employees as an integral resource in achieving its strategies and long term goals, and considers its relationship with its employees to be good. Bancorp has no employees other than its executive officers, who are also employees of the Bank. The Company had 283 full-time employees as of December 31, 2003, up from 238 at the prior year end. This increase is primarily related to expanding into new markets in Southern Oregon and Portland, Oregon during the year. None of the employees of the Company are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

Business Strategy

The Company deploys a distinctive community banking strategy in its markets of Central Oregon, Salem, Southern Oregon and Portland. A key component of the Company’s business strategy is to recruit and retain the best in-market bankers for competitive advantage. The business strategy is focused on personal-touch relationship

3



banking, featuring premier customer service and competitive financial products. The Company is strategically committed to utilizing advanced technology for the convenience of customers, including “customer choice” access through branches, ATMs, Internet, and telephone.

The Company’s expansion into Southern Oregon is based upon a community banking strategy, similar to the Company’s strategy in its Central Oregon and Salem regions. The Medford branch was opened in mid-2003, after hiring a well-known banking executive from the area. With the closing of its acquisition of the former Community Bank of Grants Pass on January 1, 2004, the Company added to its Southern Oregon presence, and is targeting additional branch locations in Medford and Grants Pass in 2004.

The Company is deploying a niche strategy in Portland, focusing its delivery of banking services to business and professional customers in the downtown core. Key to the deployment of this strategy was the hiring of an experienced Portland banking team from another financial institution in September, 2003.

In addition to targeting growth and increased market share in its existing locations, the Company may also consider future expansion by de novo branching when it identifies market opportunities, as occurred in Southern Oregon and Portland in 2003. The Company may also consider strategic partnerships or business acquisitions to expand its market opportunities.

Risk Management

The Company’s risk management objectives include loan policies and underwriting practices designed to prudently manage credit risk. Funding policies are designed to maintain an appropriate volume and mix of core relationship deposits augmented by time deposit balances to efficiently fund its loan and investment activities. The Company may utilize borrowings or other wholesale funding from reliable counterparties such as the Federal Home Loan Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company monitors and manages its sensitivity to changing interest rates by utilizing simulation analysis and scenario modeling.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

 
Competition

Commercial and consumer banking in Central Oregon, as well as in the State of Oregon and the nation as a whole, is highly competitive. The Company competes principally with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage companies, brokers and other non-bank financial service providers. In addition to price competition for deposits and loans, competition exists with respect to the scope and type of services offered, customer service levels, convenience, as well as competition in fees and service charges. In addition, improvements in technology, communications and the Internet have intensified delivery channel competition. Competitor behavior may result in heightened competition for banking and financial services and thus affect future profitability.

The Company competes for customers principally through the effectiveness and professionalism of its bankers and its commitment to customer service. In addition, it competes by offering attractive financial products and services, and by the convenient and flexible delivery of those products and services. The Company believes its community banking philosophy, technology investments and focus on small and medium-sized business, professional and consumer accounts, enables it to compete effectively with other financial service providers. In addition, the Company’s lending officers and senior managers have significant experience in their respective marketplaces. This enables them to maintain close working relationships with their customers. In able to compete for larger loans, the Bank may participate loans to other financial institutions for customers whose borrowing requirements exceed its lending limits.

Geographic Concentration

The Company generates substantially all of its loans and deposits from customers located within the Company’s Central Oregon, Salem, Medford and Portland service areas. As of December 31, 2003, approximately 78% of total loans and 84% of deposits are attributable to its Central Oregon banking business, while the remaining 22% and 16%, respectively, stem from Salem area business and the new markets of Medford and Portland. The Company is thus subject to and is directly affected by the trends and changes in the economic vitality of these regions. Because

4



of the rapid population growth of Central Oregon over the past decade, and the tourism and service nature of the economy in its primary Central Oregon market, its loan concentration has historically been in real estate construction and commercial real estate loans.

Effects of Government Monetary Policy

The earnings and growth of the Company are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government, particularly the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve can and does implement national monetary policy for such purposes as curbing inflation and combating recession, by its open market operations in U.S. Government securities, control of the discount rate applicable to borrowings from the Federal Reserve, and establishment of reserve requirements against certain deposits. These activities influence growth of bank loans, investments and deposits, and also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. Future changes in monetary policies and their impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Bancorp and the Bank are extensively regulated under Federal and Oregon law. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors and the deposit insurance fund, not shareholders of the Company. To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on the business and prospects of the Company. The operations of the Company may be affected by legislative changes and by the policies of various regulatory authorities. Management is unable to predict the nature or the extent of the effects on its business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, economic control or new Federal or State legislation may have in the future.

Federal Bank Holding Company Regulation

The Company is a one-bank financial holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act (“Act”), and as such, it is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”). The Company has been designated a Financial Holding Company as defined in the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (see description below). The Company is required to file annual reports with the FRB and to provide the FRB such additional information as the FRB may require.

The Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before (1) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5% of such shares (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares); (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. The FRB will not approve any acquisition, merger or consolidation that would have a substantial anticompetitive result, unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by a greater public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The FRB also considers capital adequacy and other financial and managerial factors in reviewing acquisitions or mergers.

With certain exceptions, the Act also prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities, which by statute or by FRB regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or of managing or controlling banks. In making this determination, the FRB considers whether the performance of such activities by a bank holding company can be expected to produce benefits to the public such as greater convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency in resources, which can be expected to outweigh the risks of possible adverse effects such as decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In July 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOA”) was enacted with the intent of protecting investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures. The SOA, among other things: requires enhanced financial disclosures; certifications by chief executive officer and chief financial officer as to the accuracy of financial

5



statements; completeness of disclosure and effectiveness of internal controls; greater independence of audit functions; and increased penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies. The SOA directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and securities exchanges to adopt rules that implement these and other requirements. A number of rules have been adopted and continue to be proposed and implemented pursuant to the SOA.

USA Patriot Act

Under the USA Patriot Act of 2001, adopted by the U.S. Congress on October 26, 2001 to combat terrorism, FDIC insured banks and commercial banks were required to increase their due diligence efforts for correspondent accounts and private banking customers. The USA Patriot Act requires the Bank to engage in additional record keeping or reporting, requiring identification of owners of accounts, or of the customers of foreign banks with accounts, and restricting or prohibiting certain correspondent accounts.

Financial Modernization Act

On November 12, 1999 the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act became law, repealing the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act’s separation of the commercial and investment banking industries. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act expands the range of nonbanking activities a bank holding company may engage in, while reserving existing authority for bank holding companies to engage in activities that are closely related to banking. The new legislation creates a new category of holding company called a “Financial Holding Company,” a subset of bank holding companies that satisfy the following criteria:

•  
  All of the depository institution subsidiaries must be well capitalized and well managed;

•  
  The holding company must file a declaration with the Federal Reserve Board that it elects to be a financial holding company to engage in activities that would not have been permissible before the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; and

•  
  All of the depository institution subsidiaries must have a Community Reinvestment Act rating of “satisfactory” or better.

Financial holding companies may engage in any activity that (1) is financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity (2) is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act specifies certain activities that are financial in nature. These activities include:

•  
  acting as a principal, agent or broker for insurance;

•  
  underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities; and

•  
  providing financial and investment advice.

The Federal Reserve Board and the Secretary of the Treasury have authority to decide whether other activities are also financial in nature or incidental to financial activity, taking into account changes in technology, changes in the banking marketplace and competition for banking services.

The Company became a designated “Financial Holding Company” in 2000, but does not expect such designation to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Federal and State Bank Regulation

The Bank, as a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured bank which is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, is subject to the supervision and regulation of the State of Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Division of Finance and Corporate Securities, and to the supervision and regulation of the FDIC. These agencies may prohibit the Bank from engaging in what they believe constitute unsafe or unsound banking practices.

6



The Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their jurisdiction, the FRB or the FDIC evaluate the record of the financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of those banks. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility. The Bank’s current CRA rating is “Satisfactory”.

The Bank is also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders or any related interest of such persons. Extensions of credit (1) must be made on substantially the same terms, collateral and following credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not described above, and (2) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. The Bank is also subject to certain lending limits and restrictions on overdrafts to such persons. A violation of these restrictions may result in the assessment of substantial civil monetary penalties on the Bank or any officer, director, employee, agent or other person participating in the conduct of the affairs of the Bank, the imposition of a cease and desist order, and other regulatory sanctions.

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”), each Federal banking agency is required to prescribe by regulation, non-capital safety and soundness standards for institutions under its authority. These standards are to cover internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, such other operational and managerial standards as the agency determines to be appropriate, and standards for asset quality, earnings and stock valuation. An institution, which fails to meet these standards, must develop a plan acceptable to the agency, specifying the steps that the institution will take to meet the standards. Failure to submit or implement such a plan may subject the institution to regulatory sanctions. The Company believes that the Bank meets substantially all the standards that have been adopted.

Interstate Banking Legislation

Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Interstate Act”), bank holding companies are permitted to acquire banks located in any state regardless of the state law in effect at the time. The Interstate Act also provides for the nationwide interstate branching of banks. Under the Interstate Act, both national and state chartered banks, including Oregon banks, are permitted to merge across state lines and thereby create interstate branch networks.

Deposit Insurance

As a member institution of the FDIC, the deposits of the Bank are currently insured to a maximum of $100,000 per depositor through the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”), and the Bank is required to pay semiannual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC.

The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 (“Funds Act”) eliminated the statutorily imposed minimum assessment amount, effective January 1, 1997. The Funds Act also authorizes assessments on Bank Insurance Fund-assessable deposits and stipulates that the rate of assessment must equal one-fifth the Financing Corporation assessment rate that is applied to deposits assessable by the Savings Association Insurance Fund. The Financing Corporation assessment rate for Bank Insurance Fund-assessable deposits is 1.296 cents per $100 of deposits per year. The Bank’s FDIC insurance expense for 2003 was approximately $81,000.

Regulatory Capital

The Federal bank regulatory agencies use capital adequacy guidelines in their examination and regulation of bank holding companies and banks. If the capital falls below the minimum levels established by these guidelines, the bank holding company or bank may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses or to open facilities. At December 31, 2003 the Company is considered “well capitalized” according to these regulatory capital guidelines. See footnote 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

The FRB and FDIC promulgate risk-based capital guidelines for banks and bank holding companies. Risk-based capital guidelines are designed to make capital requirements sensitive to differences in risk profiles

7



among banks and bank holding companies, to account for off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items. The guidelines are minimums, and the FRB has noted that bank holding companies contemplating significant expansion programs should not allow expansion to diminish their capital ratios and should maintain ratios well in excess of the minimum. The current guidelines require all bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum risk-based total capital ratio equal to 8%, of which at least 4% must be Tier 1 capital.

Tier 1 capital for bank holding companies includes common stockholders’ equity, qualifying perpetual preferred stock (up to 25% of total Tier 1 capital, if cumulative; under a FRB rule, redeemable perpetual preferred stock may not be counted as Tier 1 capital unless the redemption is subject to the prior approval of the FRB) and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles. Tier 2 capital includes: (1) the allowance for loan losses of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets; (2) any qualifying perpetual preferred stock which exceeds the amount which may be included in Tier 1 capital; (3) hybrid capital instrument; (4) perpetual debt; (5) mandatory convertible securities and (6) subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred stock of up to 50% of Tier 1 capital. Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital less reciprocal holdings of other banking organizations, capital instruments and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries.

Banks’ and bank holding companies’ assets are given risk-weights of 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%. In addition, certain off-balance sheet items are given credit conversion factors to convert them to asset equivalent amounts to which an appropriate risk-weight will apply. These computations result in the total risk-weighted assets.

Loans are generally assigned to the 100% risk category, except for first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property, which carry a 50% rating. The Company’s investment securities, mainly U.S. Government sponsored agency obligations, are assigned to the 20% category, except for municipal or state revenue bonds, which have a 50% risk-weight, and direct obligations of or obligations fully guaranteed by the United States Treasury or United States Government, which have 0% risk-weight. Off-balance sheet items, direct credit substitutes, including general guarantees and standby letters of credit backing financial obligations, are given a 100% conversion factor. Transaction related contingencies such as bid bonds, other standby letters of credit and undrawn commitments, including commercial credit lines with an initial maturity of more than one year, have a 50% conversion factor. Short-term, self-liquidating trade contingencies are converted at 20%, and short-term commitments have a 0% factor.

The FRB also has implemented a leverage ratio, which is Tier 1 capital as a percentage of average total assets less intangibles, to be used as a supplement to risk-based guidelines. The principal objective of the leverage ratio is to place a constraint on the maximum degree to which a bank holding Company may leverage its equity capital base. The FRB requires a minimum leverage ratio of 3%. However, for all but the most highly rated bank holding companies and for bank holding companies seeking to expand, the FRB expects an additional cushion of at least 1% to 2%.

At December 31, 2003, the Company’s Tier 1 capital, total risked-based capital and leverage ratios were 9.88%, 11.21% and 8.55%, respectively.

The FDICIA also created a new statutory framework of supervisory actions indexed to the capital level of the individual institution. Under regulations adopted by the FDIC, an institution is assigned to one of five capital categories depending on its total risk-based capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and leverage ratio, together with certain subjective factors. Institutions that are deemed “undercapitalized”, depending on the category to which they are assigned, are subject to certain mandatory supervisory corrective actions. At December 31, 2003, the Company is considered “Well-capitalized”.

State Regulations Concerning Cash Dividends

The principal source of Bancorp’s cash revenues have been provided from dividends received from the Bank. The Oregon banking laws impose the following limitations on the payment of dividends by Oregon state chartered banks. The amount of the dividend shall not be greater than its unreserved retained earnings, deducting from there, to the extent not already charged against earnings or reflected in a reserve, the following: (1) all bad debts, which are debts on which interest is past due and unpaid for at least six months, unless the debt is fully secured and in the process of collection; (2) all other assets charged off as required by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services or a state or federal examiner; (3) all accrued expenses, interest and taxes of the institution.

8



In addition, the appropriate regulatory authorities are authorized to prohibit banks and bank holding companies from paying dividends, which would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The Bank and Bancorp are not currently subject to any regulatory restrictions on their dividends other than those noted above.

Item 2.    PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2003, the Company conducted banking services in fifteen locations throughout Oregon. Nine located in Central Oregon, four in Salem/Keizer, one each in Medford and Portland. Oregon. All offices are free standing buildings except two locations, one is leased space in a supermarket in Bend and the other is located on the 10th floor of the Pioneer Tower in Portland. The main office and three other branch buildings are owned and are situated on leased land. The Bank owns land and buildings at three branch locations. The Bank leases land and buildings at five branch locations. In addition, the Bank leases space for its Information Systems/Operation Center and Mortgage Center, located in Bend, Oregon. All leases include multiple renewal options. With the completion of the previously announced acquisition of Community Bank of Grants Pass on January 1, 2004, the Company acquired a branch office which is a free-standing building, totaling 5,000 square feet of space, which is owned and is situated on owned land and an undeveloped property in South Grants Pass. In addition, the Bank opened its seventeenth location in February 2004 at the Old Mill district in Bend. This Old Mill building contains approximately 21,800 square feet of leasable space of which the Bank occupies 2,000 square feet and is seeking tenants for the remainder.

The Bank’s main office is located at 1100 NW Wall Street, Bend, Oregon, and consists of approximately 15,000 square feet. The building is owned by the Bank and is situated on leased land. The ground lease term is for 30 years and commenced June 1, 1989. There are ten renewal options of five years each. Monthly rental is $5,290 per month with adjustments every five years by mutual agreement of landlord and tenant. The main bank branch occupies the ground floor. Human resources, trust & investments and credit functions occupy approximately 8,400 square feet. A separate drive-up facility is also located on site. In 1999 the Bank acquired a 3,000 square foot adjacent building and land for future expansion.

In the opinion of management all of the Bank’s properties are adequately insured.

Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is from time to time a party to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Management believes that there are no threatened or pending proceedings against the Company, which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business or financial position of the Company.

Item 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2003.

9



PART II

Item 5.       MARKET FOR CASCADE BANCORP’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Cascade Bancorp common stock trades on The NASDAQ Small Cap Market tier of The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol CACB. The primary market makers are: RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., Wells Fargo Investments-Ragen MacKenzie Division, D.A. Davidson & Co., Hoefer & Arnett Inc., Pacific Crest Securities Inc., FTN Midwest Research Securities Corp., and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.

The high and low sales prices shown below are retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and splits and are based on actual trade statistical information provided by The NASDAQ Stock Market for the periods indicated.


 
         First Quarter
     Second Quarter
     Third Quarter
     Fourth Quarter
2003
                                                                                         
High
                 $ 15.41           $ 18.49           $ 18.85           $ 20.79   
Low
                 $ 13.99           $ 14.50           $ 16.75           $ 17.90   
2002
                                                                                     
High
                 $ 12.30           $ 18.38           $ 18.09           $ 15.25   
Low
                 $ 10.40           $ 12.47           $ 13.51           $ 12.42   
 

The Company declared a 50% (3:2) stock split in May 2002. The Company announced the establishment of regular quarterly cash dividends in 1997. The dividends declared and paid listed below have been retroactively adjusted for past stock dividends and stock splits.


 
         First Quarter
     Second Quarter
     Third Quarter
     Fourth Quarter

 
         Per Share
     Per Share
     Per Share
     Per Share
2004
                 $ .08               N/A               N/A               N/A    
2003
                 $ .08            $ .08            $ .08            $ .08    
2002
                 $ .06            $ .06            $ .07            $ .07    
 

At February 28, 2004, the Company had 13,266,378 shares of common stock outstanding held by approximately 4,700 shareholders of record.

Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
Cautionary Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

The following section contains forward-looking statements which are not historical facts and pertain to our future operating results. These statements include, but are not limited to, our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and are not statements of historical fact. When used in this report, the word “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Specific risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general business and economic conditions, changes in interest rates including timing or relative degree of change, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business conditions, strategies and decisions, and such assumptions are subject to change.

Results may differ materially from the results discussed due to changes in business and economic conditions that negatively affect credit quality, which may be exacerbated by our concentration of operations in the areas of Central Oregon, Salem, Southern Oregon and Portland. Likewise, competition or changes in interest rates could negatively affect the net interest margin, as could other factors listed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date hereof.

10



The following tables present certain financial and statistical information with respect to the Company for the periods indicated. Most of the information is required by Guide 3, “Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies”, published by the SEC. At the beginning of each table, information is presented as to the nature of data disclosed in the table.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policy upon which our financial condition depends, and which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments is as follows:

Reserve for Loan Losses:  Arriving at an appropriate level of reserve for loan losses involves a high degree of judgment. The Company’s reserve for loan losses provides for probable losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. Management uses historical information to assess the adequacy of the reserve for loan losses as well as the prevailing business environment; as it is affected by changing economic conditions and various external factors, which may impact the portfolio in ways currently unforeseen. The reserve is increased by provisions for loan losses and by recoveries of loans previously charged-off and reduced by loans charged-off. For a full discussion of the Company’s methodology of assessing the adequacy of the reserve for loan losses, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs):  Determination of the fair value of MSRs requires the estimation of multiple interdependent variables, the most impactful of which is mortgage prepayment speeds. Prepayment speeds are estimates of the pace and magnitude of future mortgage payoff or refinance behavior of customers whose loans are serviced by the Company. Errors in estimation of prepayment speeds or other key servicing variables could subject MSRs to impairment risk. At least quarterly, the Company engages a qualified third party to provide an estimate of the fair value of MSRs using a discounted cash flow model with assumptions and estimates based upon observable market-based data and methodology common to the mortgage servicing market. Management believes it applies reasonable assumptions under the circumstances, however, because of possible volatility in the market price of MSRs, and the vagaries of any relatively illiquid market, there can be no assurance that risk management and existing accounting practices will result in the avoidance of possible impairment charges in future periods. See also Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, and footnote 6 of the Financial Statements.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, which are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, (in thousands, except per share data and ratios; unaudited):


 
         Years ended December 31,
    

 
         2003
     2002
     2001
     2000
     1999
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
                                                                                                             
    Investment securities
                 $ 34,271           $ 28,571           $ 25,885           $ 24,293           $ 30,136   
    Loans, gross
                    587,200              500,924              423,172              358,674              280,103   
    Total assets
                    734,712              578,359              488,753              423,293              347,904   
    Total deposits
                    651,155              501,962              425,258              358,198              285,313   
    Non-interest bearing deposits
                    245,378              209,524              162,676              128,249              107,188   
    Core Deposits (1)
                    635,177              483,505              391,443              333,150              271,240   
    Total shareholders’ equity (2)
                    61,756              51,188              41,680              34,981              29,571   

11




 
         Years ended December 31,
    

 
         2003
     2002
     2001
     2000
     1999
Income Statement Data
                                                                                                             
Interest income
                 $ 40,835           $ 37,897           $ 38,298           $ 35,523           $ 28,076   
Interest expense
                    4,003              4,657              8,771              9,959              6,337   
Net interest income
                    36,832              33,240              29,527              25,564              21,739   
Loan loss provision
                    2,695              2,680              3,690              2,751              2,110   
Net interest income after loan loss provision
                    34,137              30,560              25,837              22,813              19,629   
Non-interest income
                    13,400              9,663              7,829              5,983