Back to GetFilings.com




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


 

|X|    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003

OR

|_|    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number 0-21342

WIND RIVER SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
94-2873391
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

500 Wind River Way, Alameda, California 94501
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(510) 748-4100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |X|

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes |X| No |_|

     The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the closing price on July 31, 2002, was $328,435,201. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock and shares held by officers and directors of the registrant have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

     As of April 25, 2003, there were 79,658,637 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Certain information called for by Part III is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for the Registrant’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after January 31, 2003.



     WIND RIVER SYSTEMS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page  
   
 
Part I.      
Item 1. Business 1  
Item 2. Properties 8  
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 8  
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 8  
Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant 8  
       
Part II.      
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 10  
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 11  
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of    
       Operations 12  
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 40  
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 42  
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial    
       Disclosure 77  
       
Part III.           
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 78  
Item 11. Executive Compensation 78  
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 78  
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 79  
Item 14. Controls and Procedures 79  
       
Part IV.      
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K 80  
Signatures 85  

     Unless stated otherwise, references in this report to “Wind River,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Wind River Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     Wind River Systems and the Wind River Systems logo are trademarks of Wind River Systems, Inc. and Wind River, VxWorks, Tornado and Wind are registered trademarks of Wind River Systems, Inc. All other names mentioned are trademarks, registered trademarks or service marks of their respective companies or organizations.


PART I

     This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When used in this annual report on Form 10-K, the words “could,” “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions as they relate to our management or the company are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements address our expected business, results of operations, future financial position, business strategy, financing plans and capital requirements, forecasted trends relating to our services or the markets in which we operate and similar matters and include statements based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the economies and markets in which we operate and our beliefs and assumptions regarding these economies and markets. This information and such statements are subject to important risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict. The results or events predicted in these statements may differ materially from actual results or events. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the continuing weakness in the economy generally, our ability to align our costs with decreased revenue levels, the impact of competitive products and pricing, the success of our implementation of our new business model and the rate of its adoption, potential slow downs in customer sales, the impact of charges for restructuring and other costs, political and economic conditions, intellectual property disputes, litigation and other factors discussed under the caption “Factors That May Affect Future Results” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

     These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date this report was filed and of information currently and actually known. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the filing of this report or to reflect the occurrence or effect of anticipated events, except as required by law.

ITEM 1.   Business

Overview

     Wind River is a leading supplier of embedded software and services for embedded systems. An embedded system consists of a microprocessor, or a series of microprocessors, and related software and is used to control, monitor or assist the operation of electronic devices, equipment and machinery. Embedded systems are used in diverse products such as digital imaging products, auto braking systems, internet routers, jet fighter control panels and factory automation devices. Our products help customers to enhance product performance, standardize designs across projects, reduce research and development costs and shorten product development cycles.

     We simplify our customers’ process of programming for these embedded systems by providing platform solutions targeted to specific markets, off-the-shelf software and programming tools. Our platform products integrate the operating systems with tools and middleware to meet the requirements of specific industries. Our off-the-shelf software includes operating systems and middleware applications, such as networking and security protocols, that offer additional capabilities beyond those in the operating systems. Our software programming tools help customers write their own applications for embedded systems. We also offer a range of hardware reference designs that customers can incorporate into their products or use as a development platform before a customer’s custom boards are available.

     To complement our broad range of software products and hardware reference designs, our professional services team provides comprehensive design engineering services and technical support. These services help customers complete a product specification, design critical drivers, ports or interfaces, and/or provide a complete design for the customer’s product or application. We offer training through partners who provide a series of formal technical courses designed to help teach developers the basics of embedded software development and the effective use of our tools, operating systems and middleware. We also provide worldwide maintenance and support for our products.

     We sell our products to customers in a variety of markets, including the aerospace and defense, automotive, digital imaging, industrial measurement and networking markets. Our top ten customers for fiscal 2003 were: Alcatel, Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Lockheed-Martin Corporation, Motorola, Inc., Nortel Networks Corporation, Philips Electronics N.V., Raytheon Company, Redlake MASD, Inc. and Siemens AG. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in any of the fiscal years ended January 31, 2003, 2002 or 2001.

1


     Wind River was incorporated in California in February 1983 and reincorporated in Delaware in April 1993. Our principal executive offices are located at 500 Wind River Way, Alameda, California 94501, and the telephone number at that location is (510) 748-4100.

Background

     Embedded systems are incorporated into a larger device and are used to control, monitor or assist the operation of that device. As a result, embedded systems are designed to provide an immediate, predictable response to an unpredictable sequence of external events. As more powerful microprocessors have become available and have decreased in price, embedded systems are being used in a wider range of applications and digital appliances and are facilitating the development of entirely new products.

     To succeed in today’s increasingly competitive markets, manufacturers using embedded systems must bring complex applications for new products to market rapidly and economically. Developing embedded software applications has evolved from a relatively modest programming task to a complex engineering effort. As more powerful and affordable 32-bit microprocessors have become available, products based on these microprocessors have become richer in features and functions. Increasingly, embedded applications are being designed for 64-bit microprocessors, digital signal processors and programmable logic devices. In addition, the embedded software required for the increased functionality of end devices is becoming more complex. Software with a higher degree of sophistication is required to develop these more complex applications, frequently including an integrated platform that provides developers far more features, higher performance and greater productivity than was necessary or feasible for programming prior generations of microprocessors. We provide end-to-end product solutions, including reference designs and tools to integrate software and hardware architectures, integrated development environments, operating systems, networking protocols, and “stand-alone” tools that can be used with non-Wind River operating systems. These flexible solutions allow customers to purchase specific products for their particular needs, while improving product reliability and time to market.

     As embedded applications increase in complexity, the costs associated with providing software development, support and training of engineers continue to rise. In addition, time to market, conformance to standards, product reliability and limited internal resources have become critical issues for companies developing embedded applications.

Products and Services

   Overview

     Our products help customers to create complex embedded software applications more quickly, more economically, and with less risk than creating such applications using internally developed systems and tools. We market our software products in a variety of ways designed to address the needs of a wide range of customers. The requirements of these customers vary significantly. Customers seeking to design their own target applications entirely may work with Wind River as a component supplier, while those looking to outsource a larger portion of their software development effort may look to Wind River as a strategic partner.

     Our product family is comprised of platforms, operating systems, operating system extensions and middleware, including networking technologies, protocols, IDE and stand-alone development tools, as well as hardware tools.

     The cornerstone of our software products is our suite of embedded operating systems, which includes VxWorks, our flagship product and most advanced family of operating systems. To complement our operating system products, we also license the Tornado integrated development environment (IDE), which consists of a development platform and associated tools allowing customers to design, develop and test their new products on their developers’ workstations. The Tornado IDE includes a set of core and optional cross-development tools and utilities along with the VxWorks operating system, and allows for the integration of a wide variety of third-party tools. We also provide a line of standalone development tools that customers can use with their own proprietary operating systems or with other third-party operating systems.

     We provide optional extensions or middleware to our operating systems, which provide additional capabilities to developers, such as networking and security protocols, device management and Java virtual machines. Our

2


middleware products act as an interface between the operating system software and specific software applications. Customers can license and incorporate these extensions and middleware into the underlying operating system to provide features required for their specific applications. As applications become more complex, especially for Web-enabled products, prepackaged middleware solutions such as those offered by Wind River have become more widely used to simplify development.

     Our product family also includes a range of hardware reference designs that help customers design and implement software solutions. Through the use of these hardware products, customers can incorporate portions of the reference design into their products or use the entire design as a development platform before a customer’s custom boards are available. This allows software programming to be tested for operability and functionality, and to be corrected for errors early in the design cycle, thereby advancing overall product development, improving product quality and accelerating time-to-market.

     To complement our broad range of software products and hardware reference designs, we provide comprehensive design services and technical support. These services help customers complete a product specification, design critical drivers, ports or interfaces, and/or provide a complete design for the customer’s product or application. These design services are offered on either a time-and-materials or fixed-price basis and can encompass a broad range of services, including fully project-managed custom hardware development, software development and product integration. We offer training through partners who provide a series of formal technical courses designed to help teach developers the basics of embedded software development and the effective use of our tools, operating systems and middleware. We also provide worldwide maintenance and support for our products.

   Market-Specific Platforms

     In November 2002, we introduced our Integrated Embedded Platforms, in which we bundle our software technology into market specific platforms and license these platforms using an enterprise license model. With this new product strategy, we are consolidating a large number of products and services into a few highly integrated major platforms, each targeted to a specific market. Our platforms provide customers with a set of comprehensive integrated platform development tools, operating systems, source code components and services. Our Integrated Embedded Platforms are as follows:

3


     Platform DO-178B, Platform IA and Platform CI are expected to be commercially available by the second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2004. Each integrated platform product is based on our embedded operating system and includes advanced development tools, middleware and services. Each developer licensed to use a platform product receives a set number of service credits per year, which can be redeemed by customers for installation, start-up, training, ad-hoc technical consulting, and other types of services during the term of the agreement. Each developer licensed to use an Integrated Embedded Platform is entitled to receive full support and maintenance services from us, along with all platform-related updates and upgrades.

     Our platforms and development tools help customers to create complex embedded software applications more efficiently and securely than creating such applications using their own internally-developed systems and tools.

   Licensing Models

     Our Integrated Embedded Platforms are licensed under an enterprise license model, which includes an annual subscription-based development license and aggregated production licensing and eliminates our traditional “project” and “site” restrictions. At the end of the subscription period, the customer’s right to use the platform products expires unless renewed. Most enterprise licenses (i) have an initial duration of one year, with annual renewals, (ii) include payment terms for the annual subscription within 30-60 days after entering into the enterprise license agreement, (iii) include a number of services credits for field engineering support and (iv) include production license reporting and payment in-arrears once a customer makes a commercial release of its end product.

     We believe that the enterprise license model will allow us to:

     During the transition of our business model from project-based licensing to the enterprise license model, we expect the timing of our reported revenue to be impacted because under the enterprise license model revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription period. By contrast, our traditional project-based license requires a majority of license revenue to be recognized in the quarter in which the products are delivered and a much smaller amount relating to the fair value of the maintenance being deferred and recognized subsequently over the maintenance period. Therefore, an order for a subscription license will result in lower current-quarter revenue than an equal-sized order for a project-based license. As a result, the impact on near-term and deferred revenue will depend on the rate at which customers transition from our project-based model to our enterprise license model. To the extent that the adoption rate is higher than we expect, we may experience a greater decline in near-term revenue, as well as an increase in deferred revenue.

     We also provide our software to customers through several forms of perpetual license agreements that grant the customer the right to use and distribute our products. Traditionally, operating systems were generally licensed on a per-project basis and distributed by the customer for a per-unit, per-project royalty fee based on the number of target applications running the operating system and placed in distribution. The Tornado development tools were licensed for a fee based on the number of developer “seats” using the tools.

Strategic Alliances

     We believe that having many strategic relationships with semiconductor manufacturers, board manufacturers, system manufacturers, and other software companies is important to our future success in the embedded systems

4


marketplace. These relationships help us leverage significant investments made to drive innovation and standards across the industry and to better serve our customers’ overall needs. In support of our strategic alliances, we have entered into a number of different partnership agreements and we offer certain corporate programs, including:

     We have strategic relationships with many of the major semiconductor companies including ARM Holdings plc, Broadcom Corporation, Hitachi, Inc., IBM Corporation, Intel Corporation, MIPS Technologies, Inc., Motorola, Inc., NEC Corp., Philips Electronics N.V., Texas Instruments Incorporated, Toshiba Corporation and Xilinx, Inc. We have ported our technologies to their semiconductors, allowing us to leverage our partners’ sales channels to give our products broader market exposure. Our gross research and development expenses in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 were offset by $3.6 million, $4.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of funded research and development related to our Center of Excellence program.

     These strategic relationships are complex because some of the companies that are our strategic partners in certain business areas are also our competitors in other business areas. Our strategic partners may also have concurrent relationships with companies that provide open-source and in-house solutions, which may put pressure on our product development roadmaps, timelines and prices. If we are not successful in developing and maintaining these strategic relationships, our business may be harmed. If our collaborative marketing and distribution agreements terminate or expire, the scope of our product offerings may be restricted, and the distribution of our products and revenues may be adversely impacted.

Customers

     Our products have been deployed by a broad range of organizations, including companies in the following industries: global networking (both data and voice), digital imaging, digital consumer electronics, computers and peripherals, defense electronics and aerospace, research, automotive control and telematics, and industrial measurement and control. Our customers consist of end-users, distributors, original equipment manufacturers, system integrators and value-added resellers. No single customer has accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues in any of fiscal years 2003, 2002 or 2001.

Marketing, Sales and Distribution

     We market our products and services in North America, Europe (including the Middle East and Africa, “EMEA”), Japan and the Asia Pacific region, primarily through our own direct sales organization, which consists of salespersons, field application engineers and support staff. Our direct sales force presents Wind River and our products for licensing to prospective customers, while application engineers provide technical pre-sales and post-sales support. As of January 31, 2003, we had 234 sales employees located throughout North America, 112 sales employees throughout EMEA, 48 sales employees in Japan and 30 sales employees in the Asia Pacific region. As of January 31, 2003, we had 74 employees in marketing, 183 employees in professional services and 78 employees in customer support. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we implemented a restructuring program that included a reduction-in-force, and notified approximately 188 employees in sales, marketing, professional services and customer support that their employment would terminate, generally during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

     Historically, we have licensed certain international distributors to serve customers in regions not serviced by our direct sales force. Recently, we expanded our distributor channel to include our first North American distributor, The Memec Group, and several additional international distributors. We have also established strategic relationships with computer, semiconductor, and software vendors, as well as a number of system integrators worldwide that enable us to further broaden the geographic and market scope for our products. Additionally, during fiscal 2002, we completed the transition to a direct sales model in Japan from our joint venture arrangement with three master distributors.

5


     Revenues from sales to customers outside of North America represented $103.6 million, $135.8 million and $137.3 million, or approximately 42%, 39% and 31% of total revenue, in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. See Note 15, “Segment and Geographic Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about our international sales and see “Factors That May Affect Future Results — Our significant international business activities subject us to increased costs and economic risks” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for further discussion of the risks associated with our international operations generally. Prices for international customers for our project-based licenses are generally quoted in local currency and are based on the United States price list adjusted to reflect the higher cost of doing business outside the United States. In connection with our introduction of our Integrated Embedded Platforms and our enterprise license model in November 2002, we introduced a global pricing policy in which the price of our Integrated Embedded Platform products is set globally, and customers are quoted in United States dollars, Euros, United Kingdom Sterling or Japanese Yen. International customers are generally invoiced in the currency in which they are quoted. See Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for a discussion of the foreign currency fluctuation risks we face.

     We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, seasonality resulting primarily from customer buying patterns and product development cycles. We have generally experienced the strongest demand for our products in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and the weakest demand in the first quarter of each fiscal year. Historically, quarterly revenue levels have increased over the levels for like quarters in the prior fiscal years, but have typically decreased in the first quarter of each fiscal year from the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year. However, due primarily to the recent general economic downturn, our revenues for each quarter in fiscal 2003 decreased from the levels of like quarters in fiscal 2002 and our revenues for the last three quarters in fiscal 2002 decreased from the levels of like quarters in fiscal 2001. The transition to our enterprise license model may also impact the manner in which seasonality affects quarterly trends in our revenue. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for more information about the impact of our transition to an enterprise license model. See also Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Factors That May Affect Future Results — Numerous factors may cause our total revenues and operating results to fluctuate significantly from period to period.”

Competition

     The embedded software industry is highly competitive. See “Factors That May Affect Future Results — We face intense competition in the embedded software industry, which could decrease demand for our products or cause us to reduce our prices” under Item 7 for a further description of factors that may impact our competitive position.

     Our primary competition comes from internal research and development departments of companies that develop embedded systems in-house. In many cases, companies that develop embedded systems in-house have already made significant investments of time and effort in developing their own internal systems, making acceptance of our products as a replacement more difficult. Additionally, many of these in-house departments may increasingly choose to use open-source software, such as the Linux operating system. We also compete with independent software vendors, including ENEA OSE Systems AB, Green Hills Software, Inc., Mentor Graphics, Microsoft Corporation and QNX Software Systems, Ltd., as well as a number of other vendors that address one or more segments of the embedded system design process. To a limited extent, we also compete with vendors of Linux-based products such as Metrowerks (a subsidiary of Motorola, Inc.), Red Hat, Inc. and MontaVista Software, Inc. Some of the companies that develop embedded systems in-house and some of these independent software vendors, such as Microsoft Corporation, may have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, sales and other resources and significantly greater name recognition than we do.

     We believe that the primary competitive factors in the industry center around the way customers and potential customers manage their process of software development. Key factors driving their approach to software development include managing limited internal resources, controlling costs, minimizing development time and limiting their risks. As a result, the major competitive factors in our industry are reliability, performance, price and customer support. We believe that we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors.

Product Development and Engineering

     We believe that our success will continue to depend primarily on our ability to maintain and enhance our current product line, develop new products, maintain technological competitiveness and meet an ever-expanding range of

6


customer and market requirements. As of January 31, 2003, our product development and engineering group included 488 full-time employees. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we implemented a restructuring program that included a reduction-in-force, and notified approximately 134 employees in the product development and engineering group that their employment would terminate, generally during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

     During fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, product development and engineering expenses were $74.0 million, $88.7 million, and $83.0 million, respectively, excluding capitalized software development costs. During the fiscal years ended January 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, we incurred product and development and engineering expenses that qualified for capitalization of $969,000, $852,000 and $1.0 million, respectively. See “— Strategic Alliances” above for information on research and development funded by third parties through our Center of Excellence program.

Proprietary Rights

     Our success is heavily dependent upon our proprietary technology. To protect our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws. As a part of our regular business processes, we generally enter into nondisclosure agreements with employees, consultants, distributors, customers and corporate partners, as appropriate, and thereby limit access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Furthermore, our licensing agreements provide for protection of our intellectual property both in terms of source code handling and underlying intellectual property ownership of modifications to the Wind River code. See “Factors That May Affect Future Results — The rights we rely upon to protect the intellectual property underlying our products may not be adequate, which could enable third parties to use our technology and reduce our ability to compete” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

     Wind River and the Wind River logo are registered trademarks in the United States and other countries worldwide. We have used, registered, and/or applied to register specific trademarks and service marks to distinguish many of our products, technologies and services from those of our competitors in the U.S. and in foreign countries and jurisdictions. We enforce our trademark, service mark and trade name rights in the U.S. and abroad.

     We have filed and obtained a number of patents and patent applications in the United States and abroad that relate to various aspects of our products and technology. As of January 31, 2003, we held 16 issued patents in the United States, none of which have expired. The expiration dates of these patents range from 2006 to 2021. While we believe that patent protection of our products is important, any patents obtained may not provide substantial protection or be of commercial benefit to us. It is also possible that their validity will be challenged.

Manufacturing

     Our manufacturing operation consists of assembling, packaging and shipping the software products and documentation needed to fulfill each order. Outside vendors provide tape and CD duplication, printing of documentation and manufacturing of packaging materials. We also manufacture and assemble our hardware development tools at our factory in Canton, Massachusetts and at certain subcontractor facilities. We do not believe that backlog is a meaningful indicator of sales that can be expected in future periods, particularly in view of the fast pace of technological change in the software industry.

Employees

     As of January 31, 2003, we had 1,507 employees, including 498 in sales and marketing, 261 in professional services and support activities, 488 in product development and engineering and 260 in management, operations, finance and administration. Of these employees, 1,110 were located in North America and 397 were located outside of North America. None of our employees is represented by a labor union or is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced a work stoppage. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we implemented a restructuring program that included a reduction-in-force, and notified approximately 372 employees across all business functions that their employment would terminate, generally in the quarter ending April 30, 2003.

     Our employees are vital to our success, and our key management, engineering, sales and other employees are difficult to replace. We generally do not have employment contracts with our key employees or maintain key person

7


life insurance on any of our employees. If we are unable to attract, assimilate, retain or motivate highly qualified technical and sales employees in the future through competitive compensation and employment policies, our ability to develop and introduce competitive new products in a timely manner may suffer.

ITEM 2.   Properties

     Our corporate headquarters are based in Alameda, California. The campus provides approximately 273,000 square feet of space. See Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as well as “Liquidity and Capital Resources” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of the synthetic lease agreements related to the Alameda facility. We also own approximately 150,000 square feet of office space in Sunnyvale, California.

     We also lease a number of sales, services, customer training, manufacturing, and research and development offices in North America, EMEA, Japan and the Asia Pacific region.

ITEM 3.   Legal Proceedings

     On June 21, 2002, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed suit against Wind River and The MathWorks, Inc. (“TMW”) alleging that the exclusive distribution agreement entered into between Wind River and TMW in February 2001 constituted per se illegal market allocation and price-fixing agreement, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended. Concurrently, Wind River and the DOJ entered into a consent decree settling the lawsuit against Wind River. Pursuant to the consent decree, Wind River agreed that in the event the Department obtains a final judgment against TMW requiring a divestiture of the MATRIXx software, Wind River would cooperate fully to effect the divestiture. Pursuant to a separate consent decree entered into between the DOJ and TMW, Wind River and TMW completed the divestiture in January 2003. In March 2003, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia approved the settlement reached between the DOJ and Wind River.

ITEM 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     Not applicable.

ITEM 4A.   Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The names of our executive officers, their ages and their positions are shown below:

      Name Age   Title
 

 
  Jerry L. Fiddler 51       Chairman of the Board
  Thomas St. Dennis 49   President and Chief Executive Officer
  David G. Fraser 39   Group Vice President, Products
  Stephen A. Kennedy 43   Group Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing
  Marla Ann Stark 50   Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
  Michael W. Zellner 47   Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
     Secretary

     Mr. Fiddler co-founded Wind River in February 1983, and currently serves as Chairman of the Board. From February 1983 to March 1994, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Wind River. He served as interim Chief Executive Officer from April to September 1999. Prior to founding Wind River, he was a computer scientist in the Real-Time Systems Group at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Mr. Fiddler holds a B.A. in music and photography and a M.S. in computer science from the University of Illinois.

     Mr. St. Dennis joined Wind River in September 1999 as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors. From July 1992 to September 1999, Mr. St. Dennis was at Applied Materials, Inc., a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, where he last served as Group Vice President and President of the Planarization and Dielectric Deposition Products Business Group. From 1987 to 1992, Mr. St. Dennis was Vice President of Technology at the Silicon Valley Group, Inc., also a semiconductor equipment manufacturer. From 1983 to 1987, he served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Semiconductor Systems, Inc., a semiconductor company. Mr. St. Dennis has a B.S. and a M.S. in physics from the University of California at Los Angeles.

8


     Mr. Fraser joined Wind River in September 1991 and currently serves as Group Vice President, Products. Mr. Fraser has previously held a number of positions at Wind River, including Vice President and General Manager of the Networks business unit, Vice President of Engineering and Director of Product Development. From 1988 to 1991, he served as a Product Marketing Manager at Unisys Corporation, an information services and technology company. From 1985 to 1988, he was a software engineer at Hewlett-Packard Corporation, a provider of computing and imaging solutions and services, in England. Mr. Fraser holds a B.S. in computing science from Glasgow University, Scotland.

     Mr. Kennedy joined Wind River in May 2001 and currently serves as Group Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing. From December 1999 until May 2001, Mr. Kennedy was Senior Vice President Worldwide Sales and Marketing at SONICblue, Incorporated, a manufacturer of digital media, consumer electronic, Internet appliance and home networking products. Prior to that, Mr. Kennedy spent 10 years at Quantum Corporation, a manufacturer of data storage and protection products, where he most recently served as the Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales and Marketing. Mr. Kennedy holds a B.A. in business with a concentration in sales and marketing from Portsmouth University, Portsmouth, England.

     Ms. Stark joined Wind River in September 1999 and currently serves as Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. Previously, Ms. Stark was Vice President of Intellectual Property and Legal Affairs. From 1995 to 1999, she served as the Managing Director of Intellectual Property Litigation at Applied Materials, a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, and from 1993 to 1995, as Vice President and General Counsel of Conner Peripherals Inc., a supplier of disk drives and memory storage management systems. Prior to that, Ms. Stark was in private practice as an attorney at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a Professional Corporation, and Brown & Bain. Ms. Stark holds a B.A. from Stanford University and a J.D. from the University of California, Hastings School of Law.

     Mr. Zellner joined Wind River in September 2000 as Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. From 1991 to 2000, Mr. Zellner was at Applied Materials, Inc., a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, where he last served as a Senior Director of Finance. Prior to joining Applied Materials, from 1979 to 1991, he served in various financial roles at Unisys Corporation, a computer systems and information management company. Mr. Zellner has completed the Stanford Executive Program at Stanford University Graduate School of Business and holds a B.B.A. in accounting from Florida Atlantic University.

9


PART II

ITEM 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol WIND. At April 25, 2003, there were approximately 807 stockholders of record of our common stock. The last sale price of our common stock as reported by The Nasdaq National Market on April 25, 2003 was $2.90 per share. The following table sets forth the low and high sales prices on The Nasdaq National Market for the quarters indicated:

      Fiscal 2002 Low   High
   
 
     First quarter ended April 30, 2001 $ 17.50     $ 37.75
     Second quarter ended July 31, 2001   14.05     29.25
     Third quarter ended October 31, 2001   9.70     16.23
     Fourth quarter ended January 31, 2002   14.23     20.14
             
  Fiscal 2003          
     First quarter ended April 30, 2002 $ 9.92   $ 18.35
     Second quarter ended July 31, 2002   4.18     10.90
     Third quarter ended October 31, 2002   2.03     5.80
     Fourth quarter ended January 31, 2003   3.21     6.44

     We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock to date. Our loan facility with Wells Fargo Bank prohibits us from declaring or paying any dividend or distribution either in cash, stock or any other property on our common stock without the prior written consent of the lender. We presently intend to retain all of our earnings for use in our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock within the foreseeable future.

     See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” for information about our equity compensation plans.

10


ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

     The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the more detailed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial data for periods prior to the financial statements presented in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are derived from audited Consolidated Financial Statements not included herein and have been restated to reflect historical financial information of RouterWare, Inc. and Integrated Systems, Inc. through 1999. We acquired RouterWare, Inc. in June 1999 and Integrated Systems, Inc. in February 2000; both acquisitions were accounted for as poolings of interests.

  Years Ended January 31,  
 
 
  2003     2002     2001     2000     1999  
 
   
   
   
   
 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:                            
   Revenues $ 249,121       $ 351,072       $ 437,984       $ 316,054       $ 265,156  
   Income (loss) from operations (98,476 )(1)   (374,952 )(3)   (86,332 )(5)   16,212 (7)   42,284 (9)
   Net income (loss) (106,864 )(2)   (375,634 )(4)   (76,391 )(6)   10,363 (8)   35,256 (10)
   Net income (loss) per share:                            
      Basic (1.35 )(2)   (4.84 )(4)   (1.05 )(6)   0.16 (8)   0.57 (10)
      Diluted (1.35 )(2)   (4.84 )(4)   (1.05 )(6)   0.15 (8)   0.54 (10)
     
  As of January 31,  
 
 
  2003     2002     2001     2000     1999  
 
   
   
   
   
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                            
   Working capital $  28,411       $ 126,460     $   145,227     $ 106,749     $   80,569  
   Total assets 490,454     606,733     1,002,847     569,090     472,748  
   Convertible subordinated notes and                            
      other long-term debt 150,000     150,000     140,000     140,598     140,000  
   Stockholders’ equity 251,925     348,141     706,747     301,216     252,683  

(1)      Loss from operations includes amortization of purchased intangibles of $10.5 million, impairment of purchased intangibles of $4.3 million, restructuring costs of $32.7 million, acquisition related reversals of $406,000 and litigation costs of $3.7 million.
 
(2) Net loss and net loss per share includes those items stated in (1) above, together with a charge for the settlement of our swap liability of $3.9 million, write down of private and publicly held investments of $4.5 million and loss on the disposition of assets from acquired businesses of $1.3 million.
 
(3) Loss from operations includes amortization of goodwill and purchased intangibles of $81.2 million, impairment of goodwill and purchased intangibles of $257.4 million, restructuring costs of $21.7 million and acquisition-related net reversals of $761,000.
 
(4) Net loss and net loss per share includes those items stated in (3) above, together with a write down of private and publicly held investments of $11.3 million and loss on the disposition of assets from acquired businesses of $1.3 million, offset by a gain on the sale of publicly traded investments of $1.4 million.
 
(5) Loss from operations includes amortization of goodwill and purchased intangibles of $95.8 million and acquisition-related charges of $33.3 million associated with the purchase of Integrated Systems, Inc., Embedded Support Tools Corporation, AudeSi Technologies Inc., ICESoft AS and Rapid Logic, Inc.
 
(6) Net loss and net loss per share includes those items stated in (5) above, together with a gain on the sale of publicly traded investments of $10.5 million.
 
(7) Income from operations includes amortization of goodwill and purchased intangibles of $6.3 million, acquisition related and other charges of $9.9 million, costs associated with the retirement package for the former Chief Executive Officer of $1.2 million and costs of $1.3 million associated with the hiring of our new Chief Executive Officer.

11


(8)      Net income and net income per share includes those items stated in (7) above, together with a charge of $500,000 relating to the write-off of an investment in Xact, Inc.
 
(9) Income from operations includes the effect of $780,000 of amortization of goodwill, purchased technology and other intangibles, $6.3 million in other charges associated with arbitration expenses from a legal settlement and $2.2 million incurred for the retirement package of the former chief executive officer of Integrated Systems, Inc.
 
(10) Net income and net income per share includes those items stated in (9) above, together with a one-time tax benefit of $2.4 million.

ITEM 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

     Wind River is a leading supplier of embedded software and services for embedded systems. An embedded system consists of a microprocessor, or a series of microprocessors, and related software and is used to control, monitor or assist the operation of electronic devices, equipment and machinery. Embedded systems are used in diverse products such as digital imaging products, auto braking systems, internet routers, jet fighter control panels and factory automation devices. Our products help customers to enhance product performance, standardize designs across projects, reduce research and development costs and shorten product development cycles. We sell our products to customers in a variety of markets, including the aerospace and defense, automotive, digital consumer, industrial measurement and networking markets.

Recent Events

     In November 2002, we introduced our Integrated Embedded Platforms, in which we bundle our software technology into market specific platforms and license these platforms using an enterprise license model. These market specific platforms include a combination of development tools, an operating system and various protocols and interfaces. Under the enterprise license model, we license these market specific platforms under an annual subscription-based development license and aggregated production licenses, while eliminating our traditional “project” and “site” restrictions. See Item 1, “Business — Products and Services” for further information on our Integrated Embedded Platform products.

     During the transition of our business model from project-based licensing to the enterprise license model, we expect the timing of our reported revenue to be impacted because under the enterprise license model revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription period. At the end of the subscription period the customer’s usage rights to the products expire unless renewed. By contrast, our traditional project-based license requires a majority of license revenue to be recognized in the quarter in which the products are delivered and a much smaller amount relating to the fair value of the maintenance being deferred and recognized subsequently over the maintenance period. Therefore, an order for a subscription license will result in lower current-quarter revenue than an equal-sized order for a project-based license. As a result, the impact on near-term and deferred revenue will depend on the rate at which customers transition from our project-based model to our enterprise license model. To the extent that the adoption rate is higher than we expect, we may experience a greater decline in near-term revenue, as well as an increase in deferred revenue.

     Due to a combination of our transition to the enterprise license model, general economic factors affecting the technology sector and the impact of seasonality on our first quarter revenues, we believe that our reported revenue will decline in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, as compared to both the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and the first quarter of fiscal 2003. See “— Results of Operations — Revenues” for further information on our revenue expectations. See also, “Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results — We have recently adopted a new business model including a new type of licensing arrangement, and cannot be sure that the new model will be successful” for a discussion of risks associated with the adoption of the enterprise license model.

     During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we implemented a restructuring plan, which included a reduction-in-force of approximately 372 full-time equivalent employee positions as well as the implementation of other cost control measures such as facilities closures. In connection with the restructuring, we recorded a net charge of $18.7

12


million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. Additionally, as a result of the restructuring plan, we undertook an impairment review of our intangible assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and recorded a charge of $4.3 million. See “— Results of Operations — Years Ended January 31, 2003 and 2002 — Restructuring and Other Costs” below for more information on our restructuring plan, and “— Results of Operations — Years Ended January 31, 2003 and 2002 — Impairment of Goodwill and Purchased Intangibles” below for more information regarding the impairment review.

     On March 21, 2003, we announced a voluntary stock option exchange program for employees. Under the program, eligible employees were offered the opportunity to exchange outstanding options to purchase 7.7 million shares of Wind River common stock with exercise prices equal to or greater than $11.00 per share for new stock options to be granted at least six months and one day after the existing options are cancelled. The number of shares subject to the new options will depend on the applicable exchange ratio determined by the exercise price of the exchanged stock options and the number of participating employees. Participating employees will receive new stock options in exchange for outstanding stock options at an exchange ratio of either 3 for 4, 1 for 2, or 1 for 3, depending on exercise price of the exchanged stock option. In accordance with the program, on April 18, 2003, we cancelled outstanding options to purchase approximately 7.4 million shares of our common stock. We expect to grant new options to purchase a total of approximately 3.8 million shares of Wind River common stock no earlier than October 20, 2003, which is the first business day that is six months and one day after the cancellation of the exchanged options, but no later than November 30, 2003. The exercise price per share of the new options will be equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined in accordance with our applicable option plans. Based on the number of options cancelled and the applicable exchange ratios, the new stock options represent approximately 4.7% of the total shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 25, 2003, and could have a dilutive impact on our future earnings per share.

     In September 1997 and November 1999, we entered into two operating leases for our headquarters facility constructed on land owned by us in Alameda, California. In January 2003, we notified the lessor of our intent to exercise the purchase option under the leases, and, in April 2003, we completed the transactions, terminated the operating leases and purchased the buildings for $57.4 million. In connection with the termination of these operating leases, in April 2003, we entered into a loan facility for a total commitment of $57.4 million, of which we have drawn $40.0 million. See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Commitments” below for more information about the exercise of the purchase options under these operating leases and the loan facility.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes our significant accounting policies. However, those policies and estimates that we believe are most critical to an understanding of our financial results and condition and that require a higher degree of judgment and complexity are as follows and are discussed below.

   Revenue Recognition

     We derive revenues from two sources: (i) product revenues and (ii) service revenues. Product revenues consist of royalties and fees for operating systems and fees for the use of development tools. We license our software products under perpetual licenses as well as time-based term licenses, such as the subscription-based arrangements in our newly introduced Integrated Embedded Platform products. Service revenues are derived from fees from

13


professional services, which include design and development fees, software maintenance contracts, and customer training and consulting. Maintenance contract renewals are generally sold separately from our products. Our customers consist of end users, distributors, original equipment manufacturers, system integrators and value-added resellers. Agreements generally do not allow the right of return or sales price adjustments.

     We recognize revenues in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended (“SOP 97-2”), SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts,” (“SOP 81-1”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 101”).

     We recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable and vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) exists to allocate the total fee to all undelivered elements of the arrangement and collection is determined to be probable. These four criteria are further defined as follows:

     

     Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. It is our customary practice to have written non-cancelable contracts and a customer purchase order prior to recognizing revenues on an arrangement.

     Delivery has occurred. Product revenues for software and hardware are recognized at the time of shipment or upon the delivery of a product master, with standard transfer terms of FOB shipping point. If undelivered products or services exist that are essential to the functionality of the delivered product in an arrangement, delivery is not considered to have occurred. If only non-essential products or services are undelivered and if evidence of fair value of all undelivered elements exists, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the recognition of fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.

     We recognize revenues from one-year time-based and subscription-based licenses ratably over the term of the agreement. For multi-year time-based licenses, we defer recognition of the fees associated with the VSOE of the maintenance and support over the term of the license and recognize the residual contract amount in the period in which the agreement is signed, so long as we have VSOE for undelivered elements, which typically consist of maintenance and support. Where VSOE does not exist for undelivered elements, we recognize the fees ratably over the term of the multi-year license.

     Our enterprise license model agreements require that we deliver unspecified future products during the one-year term. Accordingly, fees from our enterprise licenses agreements are recognized ratably over their term.

     Sales to distributors, original equipment manufacturers, system integrators and value-added resellers are recognized either at the time the risks of ownership have transferred or upon receipt of royalty reports related to the sale of product to an end-user, depending on our historical experience with these customers.

     Professional service revenues are separately priced, are generally available from a number of suppliers, and are typically not essential to the functionality of our software products. Revenue from these services is recognized separately from the license fee because the arrangements qualify as “service transactions” as defined by SOP 97-2. Generally, revenue from time-and-materials consulting contracts are recognized as services are performed.

     Contract accounting is utilized for service revenues from fixed-price contracts and those requiring significant software modification, development or customization. In such instances, the arrangement fee is accounted for in accordance with SOP 81-1, whereby the arrangement fee is recognized, generally using the percentage-of-completion method measured on labor input costs. If increases in projected costs-to-complete are sufficient to create a loss contract, the entire estimated loss is charged to operations in the period the loss first becomes known. The complexity of the estimation process and judgments related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting affect the amounts of revenue and related expenses reported in our consolidated financial statements. A number of internal and external factors can affect our estimates, including labor rates, utilization, changes to specification and testing requirements and collectibility of unbilled receivables.

14


     

     Service revenues from time-and-materials professional services contracts are recognized as the services are performed.

     Service revenues from software maintenance, support and update fees are recognized ratably over the contract period, which in most instances is one year. Service revenues from training and consulting are recognized when the services are provided.

     The vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable. At the time of each transaction, we assess whether the fee associated with a revenue transaction is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. If a significant portion of a fee is due after our standard payment terms, which are generally no greater than 90 days from invoice date, we account for the fee as not being fixed or determinable. In these cases, revenue is recognized as the fees become due.

     Collection is probable. We assess probability of collection based on a number of factors, including our past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. New customers and certain existing customers are subject to a credit review process that evaluates each customer’s financial position and ultimately its ability to pay according to the original terms of the arrangement. Based on our review process, if it is determined from the outset of an arrangement that collection of the resulting receivable is not probable, then revenue is recognized on a cash-collected basis.

     Significant management judgments and estimates are made in connection with the revenues recognized in any accounting period. We must assess whether the fee associated with a revenue transaction is fixed or determinable and whether or not collection is probable and, for fixed-price contracts, make estimates of costs to complete. Material differences could result in the amount and timing of revenues for any period if management were to make different judgments or utilize different estimates.

   Estimating sales returns and other allowances, and allowance for doubtful accounts

     We record estimated reductions in revenue for potential returns of products by customers and other allowances. As a result, management must make estimates of potential future product returns and other allowances related to current period product revenue. In making such estimates, management analyzes historical returns, current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products. If management were to make different judgments or utilize different estimates, material differences in the amount of reported revenue could result. The provision for sales returns is recorded as an offset to revenue.

     Similarly, management makes estimates of the uncollectability of accounts receivables, specifically analyzing accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms, when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition to the identification of specific doubtful accounts receivable, we provide allowances for approximately 1% of other accounts receivable. If management were to make different judgments or utilize different estimates, material differences in the amount of our reported operating expenses could result.

   Valuation of investments and long-lived assets, including goodwill and purchased intangibles

     Our long-lived assets include goodwill and other purchased intangible assets, which totaled $94.4 million and $108.4 million as of January 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In determining the fair value of these assets, we assess the recoverability of goodwill and other purchased intangibles. That assessment requires that management make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows associated with such assets and other factors. We review such assets for impairment when a change in circumstances indicates a potential decline in value and, if they are determined to be impaired, we record an impairment charge. The impairment charge for assets held for use is determined based upon the estimated discounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the goodwill and other intangibles using an appropriate discount rate that incorporates our cost of capital and the risk profile of the associated investment. The assumptions supporting the cash flows, including the discount rates, are determined using our best estimates as of the date of the impairment review. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record additional impairment charges for these assets not previously recorded. During fiscal 2003 and 2002, we recorded an aggregate charge of $4.3 million and $257.4 million, respectively, related to impairment of goodwill and purchased intangibles. For details about the impairment charges

15


we recorded during fiscal 2003 and 2002, please see “— Results of Operations — Years Ended January 31, 2003 and 2002 — Impairment of Goodwill and Purchased Intangibles” below.

     We have made long-term minority investments in a number of private and publicly traded companies. We record an impairment charge when an investment has experienced a decline in value that is judged to be other-than-temporary. We monitor our investments for impairment by considering current factors, including economic environment, market conditions and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the business underlying the investment. As of January 31, 2003, we had no remaining investment book value on our balance sheet relating to private companies and our public investments have a fair value of approximately $214,000.

   Restructuring charges

     Restructuring charges are comprised primarily of severance and associated employee termination costs related to the reduction of our workforce in fiscal 2003 and 2002, and costs associated with the consolidation of excess facilities. We account for each of these costs in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges” (“SAB 100”). In addition, we account for the individual components of our restructuring activities as discussed further below.

     We account for the costs associated with the reduction of our workforce in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3 “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF 94-3”) and SAB 100. Accordingly, we record the liability related to these termination costs when the following conditions have been met: (i) management with the appropriate level of authority approves a termination plan that commits us to such plan and establishes the benefits the employees will receive upon termination; (ii) the benefit arra