Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED: MARCH 31, 2005

OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO             

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-28009

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1800 Green Hills Road

Scotts Valley, California 95066

(address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (831) 430-3800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

(1)    Yes  x    No  ¨

(2)    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    ¨   Yes    x  No

As of April 29, 2005, the registrant had 47,764,132 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

— UNAUDITED —

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Rainmaker Systems, Inc. is a provider of outsource sales and marketing programs. Our cost-effective programs generate service revenue and promote customer retention for our clients. Core services include professional telesales, direct marketing, hosted e-commerce, strategic lead generation services and applications that include outsourced call center services, lead/campaign management, training workshops, database and list management services, and web-based lead management campaigns.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Rainmaker”, “we”, “our” or “the Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The interim financial statements are unaudited but reflect all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the results of these periods.

These interim financial statements reflect Rainmaker’s purchase of Quarter End, Inc. (“Quarter End”) and include Quarter End’s financial results from the date of acquisition, February 8, 2005, through March 31, 2005. Quarter End conducted business under the name Sunset Direct and changed its name to Sunset Direct, Inc. (“Sunset Direct”) in connection with the transaction. Accordingly, herein after in this Form 10-Q, Quarter End is referred to as Sunset Direct. See Note 3 below for the terms of the transaction.

The results of our operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005, or any other period. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Rainmaker’s financial statements and notes thereto included in Rainmaker’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Certain amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements for 2004 have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations, total assets or accumulated deficit.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting practices requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates are based on historical experience, input from sources outside the Company, and other relevant facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas that are particularly significant include the assessment of the recoverability and measuring impairment of fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill, allocation of purchase price in business combinations, revenue recognition and presentation policies, and the valuation of accounts receivable.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable based on our assessment of collectibility. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past history, the number of days an amount is past due (based on invoice due date), credit ratings of our client’s customers, current events and circumstances regarding the business of our client’s customers and other factors that we believe are relevant. Charges for uncollectible accounts are included as a component of costs of services in our statement of operations. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our allowance for potentially uncollectible accounts was $538,000 and $208,000, respectively.

6

Table of Contents

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Computer equipment and capitalized software are depreciated over two years and furniture and fixtures are depreciated over five years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is recorded using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Amortization of fixed assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.

Costs of internal use software are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1 (“SOP 98-1”), “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use” and Emerging Issue Task Force Issue No. 00-02 (“EITF 00-02”), “Accounting for Website Development Costs.” SOP 98-1 and EITF 00-02 require that we expense computer software and website development costs as they are incurred during the preliminary project stage. Once the capitalization criteria of SOP 98-1 and EITF 00-02 have been met, external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software, including website development, and the payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the internal use computer software, are capitalized. Capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the term of the related client agreement, if such development relates to a specific outsource client, or the software’s estimated useful life, ranging from two to five years. Capitalized internal use software and website development costs are included in property and equipment in the accompanying balance sheets.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition purchase price over the estimated fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and are reviewed for impairment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with Statement No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two steps. First, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit and compares it to its carrying amount. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill.

Revenue Recognition and Presentation

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we reevaluated our application of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (EITF 99-19), to the presentation of our revenues generated from the sale of our client’s products and services. Based on our evaluation, we have changed the manner in which we report revenues earned from certain client contracts in the Statement of Operations to the “Net” basis. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2004, we reported such revenues on a “Gross” basis. In order to provide consistency in all periods presented, revenues and costs of revenues for all prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of

7

Table of Contents

operations, total assets or accumulated deficit. The effect of such reclassification on the Company’s net revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

Substantially all of our revenues are generated from the sale of service contracts and maintenance renewals, and performance of lead generation services. We recognize revenue from the sale of our client’s service contracts and maintenance renewals under the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104 “Revenue Recognition” and on the “net basis” in accordance with EITF Issue No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”. Revenue from the sale of service contracts and maintenance renewals is recognized when a purchase order from the client’s customer is received; the service contract or maintenance agreement is delivered; the fee is fixed or determinable; the collection of the receivable is reasonably assured; and no significant post-delivery obligations remain unfulfilled. Revenue from product sales is recognized at the time of shipment of the product directly to the client’s customer. Revenue from services we perform is recognized as the services are accepted. Revenue from fee-based activities is recognized once these services have been delivered. We generally do not enter into multiple-element revenue arrangements with our clients.

Our revenue recognition policy involves significant judgments and estimates about collectibility. We assess the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and/or the creditworthiness of our clients’ customers, which is based on current published credit ratings, current events and circumstances regarding the business of our client’s customer and other factors that we believe are relevant. If we determine that collection is not reasonably assured, we defer revenue recognition until such time as collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash payment.

Costs of Services

Costs of services consist of costs associated with promoting and selling our clients’ products and services including compensation costs of sales personnel, sales commissions and bonuses, costs of designing, producing and delivering marketing services, and salaries and other personnel expenses related to fee-based activities. Costs of services also include the cost of inbound and outbound shipping, net of amounts recovered from our client’s customers. Most of the costs are personnel related and may fluctuate in absolute dollars based on our client mix. Bonuses and sales commissions will typically change in proportion to revenue or profitability.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, we reclassified our direct costs associated with promoting and selling our clients’ products and services from Sales and Marketing expense to Costs of Services. Sales and Marketing expenses now primarily represent our corporate sales and marketing efforts to secure new clients. This reclassification has been made for all financial periods presented herein.

Advertising

We expense advertising costs as incurred. These costs were not material and are included in Sales and Marketing expense.

Stock-Based Compensation

As of March 31, 2005, we had two active stock-based compensation plans, the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which are more fully described in Note 7 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004. We account for our stock-based awards to employees in accordance with the intrinsic value method and disclose the pro forma effect on operations of using the fair value method of valuing these awards. The fair value of these awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires that we estimate the volatility of our stock, an appropriate risk-free interest rate, and our dividend yield. The calculation of fair value is highly sensitive to the expected life of the stock-based award and the volatility of our stock, both of which we estimate based primarily on historical experience.

8

Table of Contents

As permitted under FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), the Company has elected to continue to follow APB No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based awards to employees. Under APB No. 25, the Company generally recognizes no compensation expense with respect to such awards.

Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share is required by SFAS No. 148 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for awards to employees under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of stock options under the Company’s 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and stock purchase rights under the Company’s 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Had we recognized compensation expense for the grant date fair value of stock-based awards granted to employees and non-employee members of our Board of Directors in accordance with SFAS 123, our net loss and net loss per share would have increased to the pro forma amounts below (in thousands, except per share data):