Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

 

Or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission File Number 1-16735

 


 

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 


 

Virginia   23-3087517

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation of Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

THREE RADNOR CORPORATE CENTER, SUITE 230

100 MATSONFORD ROAD

RADNOR, PA 19087

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(610) 687-8900

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

 

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report.)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

As of May 2, 2005, 14,875,300 common and 5,737,410 subordinated limited partner units were outstanding.

 



Table of Contents

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

INDEX

 

     PAGE

PART I. Financial Information

    
Item 1. Financial Statements    3
     Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004    3
     Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004    4
     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004    5
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk    27
Item 4. Controls and Procedures    29

PART II. Other Information

   30
Item 6. Exhibits    30

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. Financial Information

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - unaudited

(in thousands, except per unit data)

 

    

Three Months

Ended March 31,


 
     2005

    2004

 

Revenues

                

Natural gas midstream

   $ 26,278     $ —    

Coal royalties

     18,053       16,860  

Other

     1,859       1,103  
    


 


Total revenues

     46,190       17,963  
    


 


Expenses

                

Cost of gas purchased

     21,837       —    

Operating

     1,827       1,749  

Taxes other than income

     382       284  

General and administrative

     2,765       1,973  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     5,079       4,769  
    


 


Total operating expenses

     31,890       8,775  
    


 


Operating income

     14,300       9,188  

Other income (expense)

                

Interest expense

     (3,114 )     (1,329 )

Interest income

     279       268  

Unrealized loss on derivatives

     (13,936 )     —    
    


 


Net income (loss)

   $ (2,471 )   $ 8,127  
    


 


General partner’s interest in net income (loss)

   $ (58 )   $ 163  
    


 


Limited partner’s interest in net income (loss)

   $ (2,413 )   $ 7,964  
    


 


Basic and diluted net income (loss) per limited partner unit, common and subordinated

   $ (0.13 )   $ 0.44  
    


 


Weighted average number of units outstanding, basic and diluted:

                

Common

     12,618       10,407  

Subordinated

     5,737       7,650  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

 

    

March 31,

2005


  

December 31,

2004


     (unaudited)     

ASSETS

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 22,801    $ 20,997

Accounts receivable

     50,327      8,668

Other current assets

     5,387      541
    

  

Total current assets

     78,515      30,206
    

  

Property and equipment

     426,244      271,546

Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

     54,257      49,931
    

  

Net property and equipment

     371,987      221,615
    

  

Equity investments

     28,239      27,881

Goodwill

     7,958      —  

Intangibles

     39,642      —  

Other long-term assets

     5,541      4,733
    

  

Total assets

   $ 531,882    $ 284,435
    

  

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

             

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

   $ 35,568    $ 1,046

Accrued liabilities

     2,261      2,943

Current portion of long-term debt

     6,496      4,800

Deferred income

     1,430      1,207

Derivative liabilities

     11,108      —  
    

  

Total current liabilities

     56,863      9,996
    

  

Deferred income

     9,365      8,726

Other liabilities

     3,950      2,803

Derivative liabilities

     8,662      —  

Long-term debt

     190,936      112,926
               

Commitments and contingencies

             
               

Partners’ capital

     262,106      149,984
    

  

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

   $ 531,882    $ 284,435
    

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Unaudited

(in thousands)

 

    

Three Months

Ended March 31,


 
     2005

    2004

 

Cash flows from operating activities

                

Net income (loss)

   $ (2,471 )   $ 8,127  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

                

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     5,079       4,769  

Unrealized loss on derivatives

     13,936       —    

Gain on sale of property and equipment

     (8 )     (3 )

Noncash interest expense

     1,225       126  

Equity earnings

     (298 )     —    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

     (6,018 )     (2,748 )
    


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

     11,445       10,271  
    


 


Cash flows from investing activities

                

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

     (204,984 )     —    

Additions to property and equipment

     (289 )     (404 )

Other

     52       169  
    


 


Net cash used in investing activities

     (205,221 )     (235 )
    


 


Cash flows from financing activities

                

Payments for debt issuance costs

     (2,039 )     —    

Proceeds from borrowings

     211,800       —    

Repayments of borrowings

     (131,500 )     —    

Proceeds from issuance of partners’ capital

     127,730       —    

Distributions to partners

     (10,411 )     (9,676 )
    


 


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     195,580       (9,676 )
    


 


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     1,804       360  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     20,997       9,066  
    


 


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 22,801     $ 9,426  
    


 


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

                

Cash paid for interest

   $ 3,105     $ 2,515  

Noncash investing and financing activities

                

Issuance of partners’ capital for acquisition

   $ —       $ 1,060  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Unaudited

 

March 31, 2005

 

1. ORGANIZATION

 

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership,” “we,” “our” or “us”), is a Delaware limited partnership formed by Penn Virginia Corporation in 2001 primarily to engage in the business of managing coal properties in the United States. Since the acquisition of a natural gas midstream business in March 2005, we conduct operations in two business segments: coal royalty, land leasing and coal services (for our lessees and third party end-users) and natural gas midstream.

 

In our coal royalty, land leasing and coal services segment, we do not operate any mines. Instead, we enter into leases with various third-party operators which give those operators the right to mine coal reserves on our land in exchange for royalty payments. We also provide fee-based infrastructure facilities to some of our lessees and third parties to generate coal services revenues. These facilities include coal loading facilities, preparation plants and coal handling facilities located at end-user industrial plants. We also sell timber growing on our land.

 

We purchased our midstream business on March 3, 2005 through the acquisition of Cantera Gas Resources, LLC (See Note 4.). As a result of this acquisition, we own and operate a significant set of midstream assets. Our midstream business derives revenues primarily from gas processing and gas purchase contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services.

 

The general partner of the Partnership is Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn Virginia Corporation (“Penn Virginia”).

 

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting and Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. These statements involve the use of estimates and judgments where appropriate. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2005. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation.

 

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Accounting polices are consistent with those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, except as discussed below. Please refer to such Form 10-K for a further discussion of those policies.

 

Natural Gas Midstream Revenues

 

Revenues from the sale of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and residue gas is recognized when the NGLs and residue gas produced at our gas processing plants are sold. Gathering and transportation revenues are recognized based upon actual volumes delivered. Because it takes time to gather information from various purchasers and measurement locations and to calculate volumes delivered, the collection of natural gas midstream revenues may take up to 30 days following the month of production. Therefore, accruals for revenues and accounts receivable and the related cost of gas purchased and accounts payable are made based on estimates of natural gas purchased and NGLs and natural gas sold. Since the settlement process may take up to 30 days following the month of actual production, our financial results include estimates of production and revenues for the period of actual production. Any differences, which are not expected to be significant, between the actual amounts ultimately received or paid and the original estimates are recorded in the period they become finalized.

 

Goodwill

 

We had approximately $8.0 million of goodwill at March 31, 2005, based on the preliminary purchase price allocation for the Cantera Acquisition (as defined in Note 4). This amount may change based on the final purchase

 

6


Table of Contents

price allocation. The goodwill has been allocated to the midstream segment. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill will be assessed at least annually for impairment. We intend to test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.

 

Intangibles

 

Intangible assets at March 31, 2005, included $35.5 million for customer contracts and relationships and $4.6 million for rights of way. These amounts may change based on the final purchase price allocation as described in Note 4. Customer contracts and relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of the individual contracts and relationships, which do not exceed 15 years. Rights of way are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 15 years. Total intangible amortization was approximately $0.4 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2005. There were no intangible assets or related amortization in 2004. As of March 31, 2005, accumulated amortization of intangible assets was $0.4 million.

 

Aggregate amortization expense for the year ending December 31, 2005, is estimated to be approximately $4.1 million. The following table summarizes our estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years (in thousands):

 

2006

   $ 4,859

2007

     3,960

2008

     3,339

2009

     3,072

2010

     2,859

Thereafter

     17,863
    

Total

   $ 35,952
    

 

4. ACQUISITION OF NATURAL GAS MIDSTREAM BUSINESS

 

On March 3, 2005, we completed our acquisition (the “Cantera Acquisition”) of Cantera Gas Resources, LLC (“Cantera”), a midstream gas gathering and processing company with primary locations in the mid-continent area of Oklahoma and the panhandle of Texas. The midstream business operates as PVR Midstream LLC, a subsidiary of Penn Virginia Operating Co. LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. As a result of the Cantera Acquisition, we own and operate a significant set of midstream assets that include approximately 3,400 miles of gas gathering pipelines and three natural gas processing facilities, which have 160 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of total capacity. Our midstream business derives revenues primarily from gas processing and gas purchase contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services. We believe the Cantera Acquisition will establish a platform for future growth in the natural gas midstream sector and will diversify our cash flows into another long-lived asset base. The results of operations of PVR Midstream LLC since March 3, 2005, the closing date of the Cantera Acquisition, are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

 

Total cash paid for the Cantera Acquisition was approximately $196 million, which we funded with a $110 million term loan and with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The purchase price allocation for the Cantera Acquisition has not been finalized because we are still in the process of settling various post-closing adjustments with the seller and obtaining final appraisals of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We used proceeds of $127.7 million from our sale of common units in a subsequent public offering in March 2005 to repay our term loan in full and to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and the liabilities assumed in the Cantera Acquisition based upon preliminary fair values on the date of acquisition, as follows (in thousands):

 

Cash consideration paid for Cantera

   $ 200,303  

Plus: Acquisition costs *

     2,740  
    


Total purchase price

     203,043  

Less: Cash acquired

     (5,378 )
    


Total purchase price, net of cash acquired

   $ 197,665  
    


Current assets acquired

   $ 39,148  

Property and equipment acquired

     145,448  

Other assets acquired

     645  

Liabilities assumed

     (35,586 )

Intangible assets

     40,052  

Goodwill

     7,958  
    


Total purchase price, net of cash acquired

   $ 197,665  
    



* Includes $2 million in acquisition costs incurred but not paid as of March 31, 2005.

 

7


Table of Contents

The preliminary purchase price allocation includes approximately $8.0 million of goodwill. The significant factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill include entering into the natural gas midstream business and the ability to acquire an established business with an assembled workforce. Under SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill recorded in connection with a business combination is not amortized, but rather is tested for impairment at least annually. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma financial information presented below does not include amortization of the goodwill recorded in the acquisition.

 

The preliminary purchase price allocation includes approximately $40.1 million of intangible assets that are primarily associated with assumed customer contracts, customer relationships and rights of way. These intangible assets are being amortized over periods of up to 15 years, the period in which benefits are derived from the contracts and relationships assumed, and will be reviewed for impairment under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

 

The following unaudited pro forma financial information reflects the consolidated results of operations of the Partnership as if the Cantera Acquisition, the closing of the amended credit facility and the public offering of common units had occurred on January 1 of the reported period. The pro forma information includes primarily adjustments for depreciation of acquired property and equipment, amortization of intangibles, interest expense for acquisition debt and the change in weighted average common units resulting from the public offering. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as it would have been had these transactions been effected on the assumed date.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,

     2005

    2004

     (in thousands, except share data)

Revenues

   $ 118,632     $ 82,472

Net income (loss)

   $ (2,113 )   $ 6,886

Net income (loss) per limited partner unit, basic and diluted

   $ (0.10 )   $ 0.33

 

5. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

 

We account for asset retirement obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal use of such assets.

 

The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is also added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted through charges to accretion expense, which are recorded as additional depreciation, depletion and amortization. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, a gain or loss on settlement will be recognized.

 

8


Table of Contents

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amount of our asset retirement obligations, which are included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands).

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,

     2005

   2004

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 723    $ 666

Accretion expense

     14      14
    

  

Balance at end of period

   $ 737    $ 680
    

  

 

6. HEDGING ACTIVITIES

 

Commodity Cash Flow Hedges

 

When we agreed to acquire the midstream business from Cantera, one of our objectives was to support the economics of that acquisition. We achieved this objective by entering into pre-closing commodity price hedging agreements covering approximately 75 percent of the net volume of NGLs expected to be sold from April 2005 through December 2006. Rising commodity prices resulted in an increase in the market value of those hedging agreements before they qualified for hedge accounting. This change in market value resulted in a $13.9 million non-cash charge to earnings for the unrealized loss on derivatives. Subsequent to the Cantera Acquisition, we evaluated the effectiveness of the derivative contracts in relation to the underlying commodities and designated the contracts as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Upon qualifying for hedge accounting, changes in the derivative contracts’ market value are accounted for as other comprehensive income or loss to the extent they are effective rather than a direct impact on net income. SFAS No. 133 requires us to continue to measure the effectiveness of the derivative contracts in relation to the underlying commodity being hedged, and we will be required to record the ineffective portion of the contracts in our net income for the respective period. Cash settlements with the counterparties to the hedging agreements will occur monthly in the future over the life of the agreements, with PVR receiving a correspondingly higher or lower amount for the physical sale of the commodity over the same period. Several derivative contracts for ethane, propane, crude oil and natural gas entered into subsequent to the Cantera Acquisition have been designated as cash flow hedges.

 

The fair values of our hedging instruments are determined based on third party forward price quotes for the respective commodities as of March 31, 2005. The following table sets forth our positions as of March 31, 2005:

 

    

Average

Volume

Per Day


   

Weighted
Average

Price


   

Estimated

Fair Value

(in thousands)


 

Ethane Swaps

   (in gallons )     (per gallon )   $ (4,360 )

Second Quarter 2005 through Fourth Quarter 2006

   68,880     $ 0.4770          

First Quarter 2007 through Fourth Quarter 2007

   34,440     $ 0.5050          

First Quarter 2008 through Fourth Quarter 2008

   34,440     $ 0.4700          

Propane Swaps

   (in gallons )     (per gallon )     (5,771 )

Second Quarter 2005 through Fourth Quarter 2006

   52,080     $ 0.7060          

First Quarter 2007 through Fourth Quarter 2007

   26,040     $ 0.7550          

First Quarter 2008 through Fourth Quarter 2008

   26,040     $ 0.7175          

Crude Oil Swaps

   (in Bbls )     (per Bbl )     (8,271 )

Second Quarter 2005 through Fourth Quarter 2006

   1,100     $ 44.45          

First Quarter 2007 through Fourth Quarter 2007

   560     $ 50.80          

First Quarter 2008 through Fourth Quarter 2008

   560     $ 49.27          

Natural Gas Swaps

   (in MMbtu )     (per MMbtu )     1,740  

Second Quarter 2005 through Fourth Quarter 2008

   4,000     $ 6.9675          
                  


                   $ (16,662 )
                  


 

9


Table of Contents

Based upon our assessment of our derivative contracts designated as cash flow hedges at March 31, 2005, we reported (i) a net hedging liability of approximately $16.7 million and (ii) a loss in accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.7 million. Because all hedged volumes relate to April 1, 2005, and later periods, we had no monthly settlements and recognized no net hedging losses in natural gas midstream revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Based upon future commodity prices as of March 31, 2005, $9.4 million of hedging losses are expected to be realized within the next 12 months. The amounts that we will ultimately realize will vary due to changes in the fair value of the open derivative contracts prior to settlement.

 

In May 2005, we entered into another contract to hedge 3,500 MMbtu per day of natural gas at $7.15 per MMbtu in the form of a fixed price swap for third quarter 2005 through fourth quarter 2006.

 

Interest Rate Swap

 

In connection with our senior unsecured notes, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with an original notional amount of $30 million to hedge a portion of the fair value of those notes. The notional amount decreases by one-third of each principal payment. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the counterparty pays a fixed rate of 5.77 percent on the notional amount and receives a variable rate equal to the floating interest rate which will be determined semi-annually and will be based on the six month London Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.36 percent. Settlements on the swap are recorded as interest expense. In conjunction with the closing of the Cantera acquisition on March 3, 2005, we entered into an amendment in which we agreed to a 0.25 percent increase in the fixed interest rate on the notes, from 5.77 percent to 6.02 percent. At March 31, 2005, the notional amount was $29 million. This swap was designated as a fair value hedge because it has been determined that it is highly effective in mitigating the change in fair value of the hedged portion of the notes, and it has been reflected as a decrease in long-term debt of approximately $1.4 million as of March 31, 2005.

 

7. LONG-TERM DEBT

 

At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

    

March 31,

2005


   

December 31,

2004


 
     (Unaudited)        

Senior unsecured notes*

   $ 85,632     $ 87,726  

Revolving credit facility

     111,800       30,000  
    


 


       197,432       117,726  

Less: Current maturities

     (6,496 )     (4,800 )
    


 


     $ 190,936     $ 112,926  
    


 



* Includes negative fair value adjustments of $1.4 million as of March 31, 2005, and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2004, related to interest rate swap designated as a fair value hedge.

 

Concurrent with the closing of the Cantera Acquisition, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC, the parent of PVR Midstream LLC and a subsidiary of the Partnership, entered into a new unsecured $260 million, five-year credit agreement. The new credit agreement consists of a $150 million revolving credit facility and a $110 million term loan. The term loan and a portion of the revolving credit facility were used to fund the Cantera Acquisition and to repay borrowings under our previous credit facility. The revolving credit facility is available for general partnership purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions, and includes a $10 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. We have a one-time option under the revolving credit facility to increase the facility by up to $100 million upon receipt by the credit facility’s administrative agent of commitments from one or more lenders.

 

Proceeds of $127.7 million, including a $2.5 million contribution from our general partner, received from a subsequent public offering of 2,511,842 common units in March 2005 were used to repay the $110 million term loan and a portion of the amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The term loan cannot be re-borrowed.

 

The interest rate under the credit agreement will fluctuate based on the Partnership’s ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA. At our option, interest shall be payable at a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging up to 1.00 percent or a rate derived from the London Interbank Offering Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00 percent to 2.00 percent.

 

In conjunction with the closing of the Cantera Acquisition, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC, also amended its senior unsecured notes to allow us to enter the natural gas midstream business and to increase certain covenant

 

10


Table of Contents

coverage ratios, including the debt to EBITDA test. In exchange for this amendment, we agreed to a 0.25 percent increase in the fixed interest rate on the notes, from 5.77 percent to 6.02 percent. The amendment to the notes also requires that we obtain an annual confirmation of our credit rating, with a 1.00 percent increase in the interest rate payable on the notes in the event our credit rating falls below investment grade. On March 15, 2005, our investment grade credit rating was confirmed by Dominion Bond Rating Services.

 

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Legal

 

We are involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes these claims will not have a material effect on our financial position, liquidity or operations.

 

Environmental Compliance

 

The operations of our lessees are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these operations are conducted. The terms of our coal property leases impose liability for all environmental and reclamation liabilities arising under those laws and regulations on the relevant lessees. The lessees are bonded and have indemnified us against any and all future environmental liabilities. We regularly visit coal properties under lease to monitor lessee compliance with environmental laws and regulations and to review mine activities. Management believes that our lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and does not expect any material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

As of March 31, 2005, we had certain reclamation bonding requirements with respect to certain of our unleased and inactive coal properties. As of March 31, 2005, our environmental liabilities for coal properties totaled $1.5 million, which represents our best estimate of these liabilities as of that date. Given the uncertainty of when the reclamation area will meet regulatory standards, a change in this estimate could occur in the future.

 

Mine Health and Safety Laws

 

There are numerous mine health and safety laws and regulations applicable to the coal mining industry. However, since we do not operate any mines and do not employ any coal miners, we are not subject to such laws and regulations. Accordingly, no related liabilities are accrued.

 

9. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit is determined by dividing net income (loss), after deducting the general partner’s two percent interest, by the weighted average number of outstanding common units and subordinated units. At March 31, 2005, there were no dilutive units outstanding.

 

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

 

Penn Virginia charges us for certain corporate administrative expenses, which are allocable to its subsidiaries. When allocating general corporate expenses, consideration is given to property and equipment, payroll and general corporate overhead. Any direct costs are paid by the Partnership. Total corporate administrative expenses charged to the Partnership totaled $0.4 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These costs are reflected in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Management believes the allocation methodologies used are reasonable.

 

11. DISTRIBUTIONS

 

We make quarterly cash distributions of our available cash, generally defined as consolidated cash receipts less consolidated cash disbursements and cash reserves established by the general partner at its sole discretion. According to the Partnership Agreement, the general partner receives incremental incentive cash distributions if cash distributions exceed certain target thresholds as follows:

 

     Unitholders

    General
Partner


 

Quarterly cash distribution per unit:

            

First target - up to $0.55 per unit

   98 %   2 %

Second target - above $0.55 per unit up to $0.65 per unit

   85 %   15 %

Third target - above $0.65 per unit up to $0.75 per unit

   75 %   25 %

Thereafter - above $0.75 per unit

   50 %   50 %

 

11


Table of Contents

The following table reflects the allocation of total cash distributions paid during the three months ended March 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per unit information):

 

Limited partner units

   $ 10,168

General partner ownership interest

     203

General partner incentive

     40
    

Total cash distributions

   $ 10,411
    

Total cash distributions paid per unit

   $ 0.5625
    

 

In February 2005, we paid a quarterly distribution of $0.5625 per unit, with the amount in excess of $0.55 per unit paid 85 percent to all units, pro rata, and 15 percent to the general partner. In March 2005, we announced a $0.0575 per unit increase in our quarterly distribution to $0.62 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, or $2.48 per unit on an annualized basis. The distribution will be paid on May 13, 2005, to unitholders of record on May 3, 2005. The amount in excess of $0.55 per unit will be paid 85 percent to all units, pro rata, and 15 percent to the general partner.

 

12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) represents changes in partners’ capital during the reporting period, including net income (loss) and charges directly to partners’ capital which are excluded from net income (loss). For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended

March 31,


     2005

    2004

Net income (loss)

   $ (2,471 )   $ 7,964

Unrealized holding losses on hedging activities

     (2,726 )     —  
    


 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (5,197 )   $ 7,964
    


 

 

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

Segment information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Under SFAS No. 131, operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision-making group consists of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior officials. This group routinely reviews and makes operating and resource allocation decisions among our coal royalty, land leasing and coal services operations and natural gas midstream operations. Accordingly, our reportable segments are as follows:

 

Coal Royalty, Land Leasing and Coal Services

 

The coal royalty, land leasing and coal services segment includes:

 

    management of coal properties located in the Appalachian region of the United States and New Mexico;

 

    other land management activities such as selling standing timber and real estate rentals;

 

    fee-based infrastructure facilities leased to certain lessees; and

 

    our investment in a joint venture which provides coal handling facilities to end-user industrial plants.

 

Natural Gas Midstream

 

The natural gas midstream segment derives revenues primarily from gas processing and gas purchase contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services.

 

12


Table of Contents

In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, we reported two segments – coal royalty and coal services. As a result of the Cantera Acquisition, our chief operating decision maker now reviews operating results of our coal royalty, land management and coal services business on an aggregated basis in addition to the new natural gas midstream business. Accordingly, we now report these businesses as our segments. The following segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2004, has been restated to conform to the current period’s presentation. The following is a summary of certain financial information relating to the Partnership’s segments:

 

     Coal Royalty,
Land Leasing
and Coal
Services


  

(a)

Natural Gas
Midstream


   Consolidated

 
          (in thousands)       

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005:

                      

Revenues

   $ 19,812    $ 26,378    $ 46,190  

Cost of gas purchased

     —        21,837      21,837  

Operating costs and expenses

     3,663      1,311      4,974  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     3,855      1,224      5,079  
    

  

  


Operating income

   $ 12,294    $ 2,006    $ 14,300  
    

  

        

Interest expense, net

                   (2,835 )

Unrealized loss on derivatives

                   (13,936 )
                  


Net loss

                 $ (2,471 )
                  


Total assets

   $ 290,017    $ 241,865    $ 531,882  
    

  

  


Additions to property and equipment

   $ 38    $ 251    $ 289  
    

  

  


For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004:

                      

Revenues

   $ 17,963    $ —      $ 17,963  

Operating costs and expenses

     4,006      —        4,006  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     4,769      —        4,769  
    

  

  


Operating income

   $ 9,188    $ —      $ 9,188  
    

  

        

Interest expense, net

                   (1,061 )
                  


Net income

                 $ 8,127  
                  


Total assets

   $ 258,360    $ —      $ 258,360  
    

  

  


Additions to property and equipment (b)

   $ 1,464    $ —      $ 1,464  
    

  

  



(a) Represents the results of operations of the natural gas midstream segment since March 3, 2005, the closing date of the Cantera Acquisition.
(b) Includes noncash expenditures of $1.1 million.

 

14. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In March 2005, the FASB released Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47), which provides guidance for applying SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005 (December 31, 2005, for calendar-year companies). We expect no change to our results of operations or financial position as a result of implementing FIN 47.

 

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

 

In April 2005, we acquired approximately 13 million tons of coal reserves for $15 million (the “Alloy Acquisition”). The reserves, located on approximately 8,300 acres in the Central Appalachian region of West Virginia, will be produced from deep and surface mines with production anticipated to start in late 2005. Revenues will be earned initially from transportation-related fees on coal mined from an adjacent property, followed by royalty revenues as the mines commence production. The seller will remain on the property as the lessee and operator. The acquisition was funded with long-term debt under our revolving credit facility.

 

13


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following review of the financial condition and results of operations of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership,” “we,” “our” or “us”) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

 

Overview

 

We are a Delaware limited partnership formed by Penn Virginia Corporation (“Penn Virginia”) in 2001 primarily to engage in the business of managing coal properties in the United States. Since the acquisition of a natural gas midstream business in March 2005, we conduct operations in two business segments: coal royalty, land leasing and coal services (for our lessees and other third party end-users) and natural gas midstream.

 

Coal Royalty, Land Leasing and Coal Services Segment Overview

 

In our coal royalty and land leasing operations, we enter into long-term leases with experienced, third-party mine operators providing them the right to mine our coal reserves in exchange for royalty payments. We do not operate any mines. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our lessees produced 6.7 million tons of coal from our properties and paid us coal royalty revenues of $18.1 million, for an average gross coal royalty per ton of $2.69. Approximately 83 percent of our coal royalty revenues for the first quarter of 2005 and 79 percent of our first quarter 2004 coal royalty revenues were derived from coal mined on our properties and sold by our lessees multiplied by a royalty rate per ton resulting from the higher of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of coal, with pre-established minimum monthly or annual rental payments. The balance of our coal royalty revenues for the respective periods was derived from coal mined on two of our properties under leases containing fixed royalty rates per ton of coal mined and sold. The royalty rates under those leases escalate annually, with pre-established minimum monthly payments. In managing our properties, we actively work with our lessees to develop efficient methods to exploit our reserves and to maximize production from our properties. Included in our coal royalty and land leasing operations are revenues earned from the sale of standing timber on our properties. In our coal services operations, we generate revenues from providing fee-based coal preparation and transportation services to our lessees, which enhance their production levels and generate additional coal royalty revenues. We also earn revenues from third party end-users by owning and operating coal handling facilities through our joint venture with Massey Energy Company.

 

Our coal reserves, coal infrastructure and timber assets are located on the following six properties:

 

    the Wise property, located in Wise and Lee Counties, Virginia, and Letcher and Harlan Counties, Kentucky;

 

    the Coal River property, located in Boone, Fayette, Kanawha, Lincoln and Raleigh Counties, West Virginia;

 

    the New Mexico property, located in McKinley County, New Mexico;

 

    the northern Appalachia property, located in Barbour, Harrison, Lewis, Monongalia and Upshur Counties, West Virginia;

 

    the Spruce Laurel property, located in Boone and Logan Counties, West Virginia; and

 

    the Buchanan property, located in Buchanan County, Virginia.

 

Coal is the most abundant fossil fuel energy resource in the United States, and it continues to be substantially more economical than other fossil fuel alternatives in generating electricity. Although coal represents fuel for about half of the nation’s electricity, coal combustion emits sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides and carbon dioxide, all of which are considered pollutants. A challenge for the industry is to continue to reduce emissions while maintaining coal’s cost advantage. As environmental regulations evolve, we expect the coal industry to become increasingly environmentally friendly, and we are optimistic, therefore, that coal will continue to play a vital role in the generation of electricity. Many of our lessees have favorable transportation options to their customers, which are mostly major utilities.

 

We are not an operating company and do not employ any coal miners. There are several key distinctions between our coal royalty business and a coal operating business which include:

 

    we have higher operating margins than coal mine operators because we have no risk in variable mining costs;

 

    we have fewer capital reinvestment requirements than coal mine operators because we do not maintain coal mining or preparation equipment;

 

14


Table of Contents
    we are not subject to the social obligations under the numerous mine health and safety laws and regulations applicable to the coal mine operators; and

 

    we have no significant exposure to the reclamation obligations incurred by coal mine operators because our lessees assume, and post performance bonds for, those obligations.

 

Our lessees are obligated to conduct mining operations in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Because of extensive and comprehensive regulatory requirements, violations during mining operations are not unusual in the industry and, notwithstanding compliance efforts, we do not believe violations by our lessees can be eliminated completely. None of our lessees’ violations to date, or the monetary penalties assessed, have had a material adverse effect on us or, to our knowledge, on our lessees. We do not currently expect that future compliance will have a material adverse effect on us.

 

While it is not possible to quantify the costs of compliance by our lessees with all applicable federal and state laws, those costs have been and are expected to continue to be significant. The lessees post performance bonds pursuant to federal and state mining laws and regulations for the estimated costs of reclamation and mine closings, including the cost of treating mine water discharge when necessary. We do not accrue for such costs because our lessees are contractually liable for all costs relating to their mining operations, including the costs of reclamation and mine closure. Compliance with these laws has substantially increased the cost of coal mining for all domestic coal producers.

 

In addition, the utility industry, which is the most significant end-user of coal, is subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generation activities which could affect demand for our lessees’ coal. The possibility exists that new legislation or regulations may be adopted which may have a significant impact on the mining operations of our lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and may require us, our lessees or their customers to change operations significantly or incur substantial costs.

 

Our revenues and profitability will be adversely affected in the future if we are unable to replace or increase our reserves through acquisitions. Our management continues to focus on acquisitions of assets and energy sources necessary to meet the requirements of diverse markets and environmental regulations. Personnel were added in 2003 to evaluate acquisitions of coal reserves and coal industry-related infrastructure, and two acquisitions were completed in March and April 2005, respectively.

 

Natural Gas Midstream Segment Overview

 

On March 3, 2005, we completed the acquisition of Cantera Gas Resources, LLC (“Cantera”), a midstream gas gathering and processing company with primary locations in the mid-continent area of Oklahoma and the panhandle of Texas (the “Cantera Acquisition”). As a result of the Cantera Acquisition, we own and operate a significant set of midstream assets that includes approximately 3,400 miles of gas gathering pipelines and three natural gas processing facilities, which have 160 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of total capacity. Our midstream business derives revenues primarily from gas processing and gas purchase contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services. We also acquired Cantera’s natural gas marketing business, which aggregates third-party volumes and sells those volumes into intrastate pipeline systems, such as Enogex and ONEOK, and at market hubs accessed by various interstate pipelines. We believe the Cantera Acquisition will establish a platform for future growth in the natural gas midstream sector and will diversify our cash flows into another long-lived asset base. The total cash paid for the Cantera Acquisition was approximately $196 million, which we funded with a $110 million term loan and with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We used the proceeds from our sale of common units in a subsequent public offering in March 2005 to repay our term loan in full and to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility.

 

15


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information regarding our midstream assets:

 

Asset


  

Type


  

Approximate
Length

(Miles)


  

Approximate

Wells

Connected


  

Processing

Capacity

(Mmcfd)(1)


  

Year Ended

December 31, 2004


 
              

Average Plant

Throughput

(Mmcfd)


   

Utilization

of Processing

Capacity (%)


 

Beaver/Perryton System

   Gathering pipelines and processing facility    1,160    664    100    80.9     80.9 %

Crescent System

   Gathering pipelines and processing facility    1,670    804    40    19.3     48.3 %

Hamlin System

   Gathering pipelines and processing facility    515    857    20    5.1     25.5 %

Arkoma System

   Gathering pipelines    78    56    —      16.9 (2)(3)   —    

(1) Many capacity values are based on current operating configurations and could be increased through additional compression, increased delivery meter capacity and/or other facility upgrades.
(2) Gathering only volumes.
(3) Reported in MMBtu.

 

The natural gas midstream industry is the link between the exploration and production of natural gas and the delivery of its components to end-use markets. It consists of natural gas gathering, dehydration, compression, treating, processing and transportation and natural gas liquid (“NGL”) fractionation and transportation. The midstream industry is generally characterized by regional competition based on the proximity of gathering systems and processing plants to natural gas producing wells.

 

Of the services illustrated in the following diagram, we provide natural gas gathering, dehydration, compression, processing, transportation and related services to our customers.

 

LOGO

 

These services are described below:

 

    Natural Gas Gathering. The natural gas gathering process begins with the drilling of wells into gas bearing rock formations. Once a well has been completed, it is connected to a gathering system. Gathering systems generally consist of a network of small diameter pipelines and, if necessary, compression systems that collect natural gas from the wells and transport it to larger pipelines for further transportation.

 

16


Table of Contents
    Natural Gas Compression. Gathering systems are designed to maximize the total throughput from all connected wells. Specifically, lower pressure gathering systems allow wells, which produce at progressively lower field pressures as they age, to remain connected to gathering systems and continue to produce for longer periods of time. As the pressure of a well declines, it becomes more difficult to deliver its production into a higher pressure gathering system. Field compression is typically used to lower the pressure of a gathering system.

 

    Natural Gas Dehydration. Some produced natural gas is saturated with water, which must be removed because the combination of natural gas and water can form ice that can plug the pipeline gathering and transportation system. Water in a natural gas stream can also cause corrosion when combined with carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide in natural gas, and condensed water in the pipeline can raise pipeline pressure. To avoid these potential issues and to meet downstream pipeline and end-user gas quality standards, natural gas is dehydrated to remove the excess water.

 

    Natural Gas Treating. We do not currently treat natural gas. Natural gas has a varied composition depending on the field, the formation and the reservoir from which it is produced. Natural gas from certain formations can be high in carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide or certain other contaminants. Treating plants remove contaminants from natural gas to ensure that it meets pipeline quality specifications.

 

    Natural Gas Processing. Some natural gas production does not meet pipeline quality specifications or is not suitable for commercial use and must be processed to remove the NGLs. In addition, some natural gas, while not required to be processed, can be processed to take advantage of favorable processing margins.

 

    Natural Gas Fractionation. We do not own or operate fractionation facilities. NGL fractionation facilities separate mixed NGL streams into discrete NGL products: ethane, propane, isobutane, normal butane and natural gasoline. Ethane is primarily used in the petrochemical industry as feedstock for ethylene, one of the basic building blocks for a wide range of plastics and other chemical products. Isobutane is primarily used to enhance the octane content of motor gasoline. Normal butane is used as a petrochemical feedstock in the production of ethylene and butadiene (a key ingredient in synthetic rubber), as a blendstock for motor gasoline and to derive isobutane through isomerization. Natural gasoline, a mixture of pentanes and heavier hydrocarbons, is used primarily as motor gasoline blend stock or petrochemical feedstock.

 

    Natural Gas Transportation. Natural gas transportation pipelines receive natural gas from gathering systems and other mainline transportation pipelines and deliver the natural gas to industrial end-users, utilities and other pipelines.

 

Acquisitions and Investments

 

Capital expenditures, including noncash items, were as follows:

 

    

Three Months Ended

March 31,


     2005

   2004

     (in thousands)

Acquisition of natural gas midstream business, net of cash acquired

   $ 195,651    $ —  

Acquisitions of coal reserves *

     9,333      1,060

Coal services and land management additions

     —        404

Other property and equipment expenditures

     289      —  
    

  

Total capital expenditures

   $ 205,273    $ 1,464
    

  


* Amount in 2004 includes noncash expenditure of $1.1 million to acquire additional reserves on our northern Appalachia properties in exchange for equity issued in the form of PVR common and Class B units.

 

Cantera Acquisition

 

On March 3, 2005, we completed our acquisition of Cantera, a midstream gas gathering and processing company with primary locations in the mid-continent area of Oklahoma and the panhandle of Texas. See the description of the acquisition in the “Natural Gas Midstream Segment Overview” above. The total cash paid for the Cantera Acquisition was approximately $196 million, which we funded with a $110 million term loan and with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The purchase price allocation for the Cantera Acquisition has not been finalized because we are still in the process of settling various post-closing adjustments with the seller, and we are waiting on final appraisals of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We used the proceeds from our sale of common units in a

 

17


Table of Contents

subsequent public offering in March 2005 to repay our term loan in full and to reduce outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. See Note 4 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for pro forma financial information.

 

Coal River Acquisition

 

In March 2005, we acquired lease rights to approximately 36 million tons of undeveloped coal reserves and royalty interests in 73 producing oil and natural gas wells for $9.3 million (the “Coal River Acquisition”). The coal reserves are located adjacent to the Bull Creek tract on our Coal River property in southern West Virginia. The oil and gas wells are located in eastern Kentucky and southwestern Virginia. The acquisition was funded with long-term debt under our existing credit facility.

 

The coal reserves are predominantly low sulfur and high BTU content; development will occur in conjunction with our Bull Creek reserves and loadout facility that was placed into service in 2004. The oil and gas property contains approximately 2.8 billion cubic feet equivalent of net proved oil and gas reserves and current net production of approximately 166 million cubic feet equivalent on an annualized basis.

 

Alloy Acquisition

 

In April 2005, we acquired fee ownership of approximately 13 million tons of coal reserves for $15 million (the “Alloy Acquisition”). The reserves, located on approximately 8,300 acres in the Central Appalachian region of West Virginia, will be produced from deep and surface mines with production anticipated to start in late 2005. Revenues will be earned initially from transportation-related fees on coal mined from an adjacent property, followed by royalty revenues as the mines commence production. The seller will remain on the property as the lessee and operator. The acquisition was funded with long-term debt under our revolving credit facility.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Natural Gas Midstream Revenues. Revenue from the sale of NGLs and residue gas is recognized when the NGLs and residue gas produced at our gas processing plants are sold. Gathering and transportation revenue is recognized based upon actual volumes delivered. Due to the time involved in gathering information from various purchasers and measurement locations and calculating volumes delivered, the collection of natural gas midstream revenues may take up to 30 days following the month of production. Therefore, accruals for revenues and accounts receivable and the related cost of gas purchased and accounts payable are made based on estimates of natural gas purchased and NGLs and natural gas sold, and our financial results include estimates of production and revenues for the period of actual production. Any differences between the actual amounts ultimately received or paid and the original estimates are recorded in the period they become finalized.

 

Coal Royalty Revenues. Coal royalty revenues are recognized on the basis of tons of coal sold by our lessees and the corresponding revenues from those sales. Since we do not operate any coal mines, we do not have access to actual production and revenues information until approximately 30 days following the month of production. Therefore, our financial results include estimated revenues and accounts receivable for the month of production. Any differences, which are not expected to be significant, between the actual amounts ultimately received and the original estimates are recorded in the period they become finalized.

 

Depletion. Coal properties are depleted on an area-by-area basis at a rate based on the cost of the mineral properties and the number of tons of estimated proven and probable coal reserves contained therein. Proven and probable reserves have been estimated internally by our geologists. Our estimates of coal reserves are updated annually and may result in adjustments to coal reserves and depletion rates that are recognized prospectively. The Partnership estimates its timber inventory using statistical information and data obtained from physical measurements, site maps, photo-types and other information gathering techniques. These estimates are updated annually and may result in adjustments of timber volumes and depletion rates, which are recognized prospectively.

 

Goodwill. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill recorded in connection with a business combination is not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. Accordingly, we do not amortize goodwill. We intend to test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.

 

Intangibles. Intangible assets are primarily associated with assumed contracts and customer relationships. These intangible assets are being amortized over periods of up to 15 years, the period in which benefits are derived from the contracts and relationships assumed, and will be reviewed for impairment under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

 

18


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

Selected Financial Data – Consolidated

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,

     2005

    2004

     (in thousands, except per unit data)

Revenues

   $ 46,190     $ 17,963

Operating expenses

   $ 31,890     $ 8,775

Operating income

   $ 14,300     $ 9,188

Net income (loss)

   $ (2,471 )   $ 8,127

Net income (loss) per limited partner unit, basic and diluted

   $ (0.13 )   $ 0.44

Cash flows provided by operating activities

   $ 11,445     $ 10,271

 

The decrease in net income was primarily attributable to a one-time $13.9 million non-cash charge to earnings for an unrealized loss on derivatives in our natural gas midstream segment and a $1.8 million increase in interest expense, partially offset by a $5.1 million, or 56 percent, increase in operating income. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to the contribution of the newly acquired natural gas midstream segment and increased coal royalty revenue resulting from higher coal prices.

 

Coal Royalty, Land Leasing and Coal Services Segment

 

The coal royalty, land leasing and coal services segment includes our coal reserves, timber assets and other land assets. We enter into leases with various third-party operators for the right to mine coal reserves on the Partnership’s properties in exchange for royalty payments. We do not operate any mines. In addition to coal royalty revenues, we generate coal services revenues from fees charged to lessees for the use of coal preparation and transloading facilities. We also generate revenues from the sale of standing timber on our properties.

 

Coal royalties are impacted by several factors that we generally cannot control. The number of tons mined annually is determined by an operator’s mining efficiency, labor availability, geologic conditions, access to capital, ability to market coal and ability to arrange reliable transportation to the end-user. The possibility exists that new legislation or regulations may be adopted which may have a significant impact on the mining operations of our lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and which may require us, our lessees or our lessee’s customers to change operations significantly or incur substantial costs.

 

19


Table of Contents

Operations and Financial Summary – Coal Royalty, Land Leasing and Coal Services Segment

 

    

Three Months

Ended March 31,


   

Percentage

Change


 
     2005

    2004

   
     (in thousands)        

Financial Highlights

              

Revenues

                      

Coal royalties

   $ 18,053     $ 16,860     7 %

Coal services

     1,270       784     62 %

Timber

     219       153     43 %

Other

     270       166     63 %
    


 


     

Total revenues

     19,812       17,963     10 %
    


 


     

Operating costs and expenses

                      

Operating

     1,032       1,749     (41 )%

Taxes other than income

     278       284     (2 )%

General and administrative

     2,353       1,973     19 %

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     3,855       4,769     (19 )%
    


 


     

Total operating expenses

     7,518       8,775     (14 )%
    


 


     

Operating income

     12,294       9,188     34 %

Interest expense

     (3,114 )     (1,329 )   134 %

Interest income and other

     279       268     4 %
    


 


     

Net income

   $ 9,459     $ 8,127     16 %
    


 


     

Operating Statistics

                      

Royalty coal tons produced by lessees (tons in thousands)

     6,715       7,953     (16 )%

Average royalty per ton ($/ton)

   $ 2.69     $ 2.12     27 %

 

Revenues. Coal royalty revenues increased due to higher royalties per ton despite a decrease in production. Average royalties per ton increased to $2.69 in the first quarter of 2005 from $2.12 in the comparable 2004 period. The increase in the average royalties per ton was primarily due to stronger market conditions for coal and the resulting higher coal prices. Production decreased by 16 percent primarily as a result of the factors discussed below.

 

    Production on the Coal River property decreased by 0.5 million tons, and revenues decreased by $0.4 million. One lessee moved its longwall mining to an adjacent property from one of our subleased properties during the first quarter of 2005, which resulted in a decrease of 0.8 million tons of coal production, or $2.3 million in revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase at our West Coal River property where operations commenced in third quarter 2003, and production has steadily increased, contributing an additional 0.2 million tons, or $0.7 million of revenue, in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004. Increased demand also fueled a coal sales price increase in the region, which in turn resulted in a 24 percent increase in our average gross royalty per ton on the Coal River property, from $2.51 per ton in the first quarter of 2004 to $3.11 per ton in the first quarter of 2005.

 

    Production on the Wise property decreased by 0.2 million tons, primarily as a result of the termination of a surface mine by one of our lessees and adverse mining conditions. Despite this production decrease, revenues increased by $1.4 million. The revenue increase was primarily due to an increase in the average royalty rate received from our lessees. Increased coal sales prices fueled by stronger demand in the region resulted in higher price realizations by our lessees. This caused a 34 percent increase in the average gross royalty per ton from $2.47 per ton in the first quarter of 2004 to $3.32 per ton in the first quarter of 2005.

 

    Production on the Spruce Laurel property remained consistent from first quarter 2004 to first quarter 2005, with a decrease in production at one mine due to adverse mining conditions being offset by production from a new mine in first quarter 2005. Revenues increased by $0.5 million, primarily due to increased coal sales prices fueled by a stronger demand in the region. The higher royalty rates received from our lessees resulted in a 35 percent increase in the average gross royalty per ton on the Spruce Laurel property, from $2.46 per ton in the first quarter of 2004 to $3.32 per ton in the first quarter of 2005.

 

    Production on our Northern Appalachian properties decreased by 0.2 million tons, and revenues decreased by $0.1 million, due to timing of sales. Lessees continue to mine coal, but that coal is being placed in inventory rather than being sold.

 

20


Table of Contents
    Production on the New Mexico property decreased by 0.3 million tons, and revenues decreased by $0.3 million, due to the inability of our lessee’s customer to receive shipments because of an operating problem at its power generation facility.

 

Coal services revenues increased primarily as a result of equity earnings from the coal handling joint venture we acquired in July 2004 and start-up operations at our West Coal River and Bull Creek facilities in July 2003 and February 2004, respectively.

 

Operating Costs and Expenses. The decrease in aggregate operating costs and expenses primarily relates to decreases in operating expenses and depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”), which were partially offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses.

 

Operating expenses decreased due to a decrease in royalty expense resulting from decreased production on the subleased portion of the Coal River property as previously described in the “Revenues” paragraphs above.

 

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to increased payroll costs allocated to the Partnership by the general partner.

 

DD&A expense decreased primarily as a result of lower production.

 

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased primarily due to interest incurred on additional borrowings on our revolving credit facility and a new term loan in March 2005 to finance the Cantera Acquisition.

 

Natural Gas Midstream Segment

 

We purchased our natural gas midstream business on March 3, 2005. The results of operations of the natural gas midstream segment since that date are included in the operations and financial summary table below.

 

The natural gas midstream segment derives revenues primarily from gas processing and gas purchase contracts with natural gas producers and from fees charged for gathering natural gas volumes and providing other related services. Revenues, profitability and future rate of growth of the natural gas midstream segment are highly dependent on market demand and prevailing NGL and natural gas prices. Historically, changes in the prices of most NGL products have generally correlated with changes in the price of crude oil. NGL and natural gas prices have been subject to significant volatility in recent years in response to changes in the supply and demand for NGL products and natural gas market uncertainty.

 

21


Table of Contents

Operations and Financial Summary – Natural Gas Midstream Segment

 

    

Three Months Ended March 31,

2005 *


     Amount

    (per Mcf)

     (in thousands)      

Financial Highlights

              

Revenues

              

Residue gas

   $ 17,040     $ 4.36

Natural gas liquids

     8,275       2.12

Gathering and transportation fees

     963       0.25

Marketing revenue, net

     100       0.02
    


 

Total revenues

     26,378       6.75
    


 

Operating costs and expenses

              

Cost of gas purchased

     21,837       5.59

Operating

     795       0.20

Taxes other than income

     104       0.03

General and administrative

     412       0.11

Depreciation and amortization

     1,224       0.31
    


 

Total operating expenses

     24,372       6.24
    


 

Operating income

     2,006     $ 0.51
            

Unrealized loss on derivatives

     (13,936 )      
    


     

Net loss

   $ (11,930 )      
    


     

Operating Statistics

              

Plant inlet volumes (MMcf)

     3,907        

Midstream processing margin

   $ 4,441     $ 1.14

* Represents the results of operations of the natural gas midstream segment since March 3, 2005, the closing date of the Cantera Acquisition.

 

Revenues. Revenues for the first quarter of 2005 included residue gas sold from processing plants after NGLs have been removed, NGLs sold after being removed from inlet plant volumes received, condensate collected and sold, gathering and other fees primarily from volumes connected to our gas processing plants and the purchase and resale of natural gas not connected to the gathering systems and processing plants.

 

Average realized sales prices were $6.73 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) in the first quarter of 2005. Natural gas plant inlet volumes at our three gas processing plants were approximately 3.9 billion cubic feet (Bcf) during March.

 

Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses primarily consist of the cost of gas purchased and also include operating expenses, taxes other than income, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization.

 

Cost of gas purchased for the first quarter of 2005 consisted of amounts payable to third-party producers for gas purchased under percentage of proceeds and keep-whole contracts. The average purchase price for gas in the first quarter of 2005 was $5.59 per Mcf. The midstream processing margin, consisting of midstream revenues minus marketing revenues and the cost of gas purchased, was $4.4 million, or $1.14 per Mcf of plant inlet gas in March 2005.

 

Operating expenses are costs directly associated with the operations of the natural gas midstream segment and include direct labor and supervision, property insurance, repair and maintenance expenses, measurement and utilities. These costs are generally fixed across broad volume ranges. The fuel expense to operate pipelines and plants is more variable in nature and is sensitive to changes in volume and commodity prices; however, a large portion of the fuel cost is generally borne by our producers.

 

General and administrative expenses consist of our costs to manage the midstream assets as well as integration costs.

 

22


Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005, included $0.4 million in amortization of intangibles recognized with the Cantera Acquisition and $0.8 million of depreciation on property, plant and equipment.

 

The non-cash unrealized loss on derivatives represents the change in the market value of derivative contracts between the time we entered into the contracts in January 2005 and the time they qualified for hedge accounting after closing the Cantera Acquisition in March 2005. When we agreed to acquire the midstream business from Cantera, one of our objectives was to support the economics of that acquisition. We achieved this objective by entering into pre-closing commodity price hedging agreements covering approximately 75 percent of the net volume of NGLs expected to be sold from April 2005 through December 2006. Rising commodity prices resulted in an increase in the market value of those hedging agreements before they qualified for hedge accounting. This change in market value resulted in a non-cash charge to earnings for the unrealized loss on derivatives. Upon qualifying for hedge accounting, changes in the derivative contracts’ market value are accounted for as other comprehensive income or loss to the extent they are effective rather than a direct effect on net income. Cash settlements with the counterparties to the hedging agreements will occur monthly in the future over the life of the agreements, with PVR receiving a correspondingly higher or lower amount for the physical sale of the commodity over the same period.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Since closing our initial public offering in October 2001, cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity, supplemented with the issuance of new common units, have been sufficient to meet our scheduled distributions, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Our primary cash requirements consist of distributions to our general partner and unitholders, normal operating expenses, interest and principal payments on our long-term debt and acquisitions of new assets or businesses.

 

Cash Flows. Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.4 million in the first quarter of 2005 compared with $10.3 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase was largely due to higher average gross royalties per ton and accretive cash flows from our newly acquired natural gas midstream segment.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $205.2 million in the first quarter of 2005 compared with $0.2 million in first quarter of 2004. Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005, primarily related to $195.7 million paid for the Cantera Acquisition, net of cash received and including capitalized acquisition costs. The balance of cash used in investing activities represents a $9.3 million acquisition of coal property and oil and gas royalty interests on March 31, 2005. Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily related to the completion of a new coal loading facility on our Coal River property in West Virginia.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities was $195.6 million in the first quarter of 2005 compared with $9.7 million used in financing activities in the first quarter of 2004. We had borrowings, net of repayments, of $80.3 million in the first quarter of 2005 to finance the Cantera Acquisition compared to no net borrowings in the first quarter of 2004. We received proceeds of $127.7 million from our sale of common units in a public offering which was completed in March 2005. Distributions to partners increased to $10.4 million for the first three months of 2005 from $9.1 million in the same period of 2004.

 

In March 2005, we announced a $0.0575 per unit increase in our quarterly distribution to $0.62 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, or $2.48 per unit on an annualized basis. The distribution will be paid on May 13, 2005, to unitholders of record on May 3, 2005. This increase is expected to continue in future quarters as approved by the board of directors of the general partner.

 

Long-Term Debt. As of March 31, 2005, we had outstanding borrowings of $197.4 million, consisting of $111.8 million borrowed under our revolving credit facility and $85.6 million of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”), partially offset by $1.4 million fair value of the interest rate swap described below. The current portion of the Notes as of March 31, 2005, was $6.5 million.

 

Concurrent with the closing of the Cantera Acquisition, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC, the parent of PVR Midstream LLC and a subsidiary of the Partnership, entered into a new unsecured $260 million, five-year credit agreement. The new credit agreement consists of a $150 million revolving credit facility and a $110 million term loan. The term loan and a portion of the revolving credit facility were used to fund the Cantera Acquisition and to repay borrowings under our previous credit facility. The revolving credit facility is available for general partnership purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions, and includes a $10 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. We have a one-time option under the revolving credit facility to increase the facility by up to $100 million upon receipt by the credit facility’s administrative agent of commitments from one or more lenders.

 

23


Table of Contents

Proceeds received from the March 2005 public offering of common units were used to repay the $110 million term loan and a portion of the amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The term loan cannot be re-borrowed.

 

The interest rate under the credit agreement will fluctuate based on our ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA. At our option, interest shall be payable at a base rate plus an applicable margin ranging up to 1.00 percent or at a rate derived from the London Interbank Offering Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00 percent to 2.00 percent.

 

In conjunction with the closing of the Cantera Acquisition, Penn Virginia Operating Co., LLC, also amended its $88 million senior unsecured notes to allow us to enter the natural gas midstream business and to increase certain covenant coverage ratios, including the debt to EBITDA test. In exchange for this amendment, we agreed to a 0.25 percent increase in the fixed interest rate on the notes, from 5.77 percent to 6.02 percent. The amendment to the notes also requires that we obtain an annual confirmation of our credit rating, with a 1.00 percent increase in the interest rate payable on the notes in the event our credit rating falls below investment grade. On March 15, 2005, our investment grade credit rating was confirmed by Dominion Bond Rating Services.

 

Interest Rate Swap. In March 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with an original notional amount of $30 million to hedge a portion of the fair value of the senior unsecured notes. The notional amount decreases by one-third of each principal payment. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the counterparty pays a fixed rate of 5.77 percent on the notional amount and receives a variable rate equal to the floating interest rate which will be determined semi-annually and will be based on the six month London Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.36 percent. Settlements on the swap are recorded as interest expense. In conjunction with the closing of the Cantera Acquisition on March 3, 2005, we entered into an amendment in which we agreed to a 0.25 percent increase in the fixed interest rate on the notes, from 5.77 percent to 6.02 percent. At March 31, 2005, the notional amount was $29 million. This swap was designated as a fair value hedge because it has been determined that it is highly effective, and it has been reflected as a decrease in long-term debt of approximately $1.4 million as of March 31, 2005.

 

Future Capital Needs and Commitments. For the remainder of 2005, we anticipate making additional capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, of up to approximately $5 million, primarily for system expansion and enhancement projects in our midstream segment. Part of our strategy is to make acquisitions which increase cash available for distribution to our unitholders. Our ability to make these acquisitions in the future will depend in part on the availability of debt financing and on our ability to periodically use equity financing through the issuance of new units.

 

We believe that we will continue to have adequate liquidity to fund future recurring operating and investing activities. Short-term cash requirements, such as operating expenses and quarterly distributions to our general partner and unitholders, are expected to be funded through operating cash flows. Long-term cash requirements for asset acquisitions are expected to be funded by several sources, including cash flows from operating activities, borrowings under credit facilities and the issuance of additional equity and debt securities. Our ability to complete future debt and equity offerings will depend on various factors, including prevailing market conditions, interest rates and our financial condition and credit rating at the time.

 

Environmental

 

Surface Mining Valley Fills. Over the course of the last several years, opponents of surface mining have filed three lawsuits challenging the legality of permits authorizing the construction of valley fills for the disposal of coal mining overburden under federal and state laws applicable to surface mining activities. Although two of these challenges were successful in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (the “District Court”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturned both of those decisions in Bragg v. Robertson in 2001 and in Kentuckians For The Commonwealth v. Rivenburgh in 2003.

 

A ruling on July 8, 2004, which was made by the District Court in connection with a third lawsuit, may impair our lessees’ ability to obtain permits that are needed to conduct surface mining operations. In this case, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Bulen, the District Court determined that the Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) violated the Clean Water Act (“the Clean Water Act”) and other federal statutes when it issued Nationwide Permit 21. This ruling is currently on appeal, but no decision has been issued by the appeals court as of yet.

 

In January of 2005, Kentucky Riverkeepers, Inc. and several other groups filed suit in federal district court in Kentucky challenging the legality of Nationwide Permit 21 and seeking to enjoin the Corp from issuing any general permits thereunder for fills associated with coal mining in Kentucky. Should the district court hearing this case follow the reasoning of Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Bulen and similarly enjoin the Corps from issuing general permits for coal mining under that general permit, companies seeking permits under Section 404 of the

 

24


Table of Contents

Clean Water Act in Kentucky may have to file for individual permits that may result in increases in coal mining costs. We do not have a substantial amount of reserves in Kentucky and do not expect that our lessees would be affected significantly by the outcome in this case.

 

Mine Health and Safety Laws. The operations of our lessees are subject to stringent health and safety standards that have been imposed by federal legislation since the adoption of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. The Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 resulted in increased operating costs and reduced productivity. The Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which significantly expanded the enforcement of health and safety standards of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, imposes comprehensive health and safety standards on all mining operations. In addition, as part of the Mine Health and Safety Acts of 1969 and 1977, the Black Lung Acts require payments of benefits by all businesses conducting current mining operations to coal miners with black lung or pneumoconiosis and to some beneficiaries of miners who have died from this disease.

 

Environmental Compliance. The operations of our lessees are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these operations are conducted. The terms of the Partnership’s coal property leases impose liability for all environmental and reclamation liabilities arising under those laws and regulations on the relevant lessees. The lessees are bonded and have indemnified the Partnership against any and all future environmental liabilities. The Partnership regularly visits coal properties under lease to monitor lessee compliance with environmental laws and regulations and to review mining activities. Management believes that the Partnership’s lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and does not expect any material impact on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

We have certain reclamation bonding requirements with respect to certain of our unleased and inactive properties. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Partnership’s environmental liabilities totaled $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Given the uncertainty of when the reclamation area will meet regulatory standards, a change in this estimate could occur in the future.

 

Clean Air Act. Our midstream operations are subject to the federal Clean Air Act and comparable state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern emissions of pollutants into the air resulting from our activities, for example in relation to our processing plants and compressor stations, and also impose procedural requirements on how we conduct our operations. Such laws and regulations may include requirements that we obtain pre-approval for the construction or modification of certain projects or facilities expected to produce air emissions, strictly comply with the emissions and operational limitations of air emissions permits we are required to obtain, or utilize specific equipment or technologies to control emissions. Our failure to comply with these requirements could subject us to monetary penalties, injunctions, conditions or restrictions on operations, and potentially criminal enforcement actions. We will be required to incur certain capital expenditures in the future for air pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining operating permits and approvals for air emissions. We believe, however, that our operations will not be materially adversely affected by such requirements, and the requirements are not expected to be any more burdensome to us than to any other similarly situated companies.

 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Our midstream operations generate wastes, including some hazardous wastes, that are subject to the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state laws. However, RCRA currently exempts many natural gas gathering and field processing wastes from classification as hazardous waste. Specifically, RCRA excludes from the definition of hazardous waste produced waters and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil, natural gas or geothermal energy. Unrecovered petroleum product wastes, however, may still be regulated under RCRA as solid waste. Moreover, ordinary industrial wastes such as paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes and waste compressor oils, may be regulated as hazardous waste. The transportation of natural gas and NGLs in pipelines may also generate some hazardous wastes. Although we believe it is unlikely that the RCRA exemption will be repealed in the near future, repeal would increase costs for waste disposal and environmental remediation at our facilities.

 

CERCLA. Our midstream operations could incur liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, referred to as CERCLA and also known as Super Fund, and comparable state laws regardless of our fault, in connection with the disposal or other release of hazardous substances or wastes, including those arising out of historical operations conducted by Cantera, Cantera’s predecessors or third parties on properties formerly owned by Cantera. Although “petroleum” as well as natural gas and NGLs are excluded from CERCLA’s definition of “hazardous substance,” in the course of its ordinary operations Cantera has generated and we will generate wastes that may fall within the definition of a “hazardous substance.” CERCLA authorizes the EPA and, in some cases, third parties to take actions in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. It is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances or other wastes released into the environment. If we were to incur liability under CERCLA, we could be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies.

 

25


Table of Contents

We currently own or lease, and Cantera has in the past owned or leased, numerous properties that for many years have been used for the measurement, gathering, field compression and processing of natural gas and NGLs. Although Cantera used operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, hydrocarbons or wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties owned or leased by Cantera or on or under other locations where such wastes have been taken for disposal. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or release of hydrocarbons or wastes was not under Cantera’s control. These properties and the substances disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes (including waste disposed of or released by prior owners or operators) or property contamination (including groundwater contamination, whether from prior owners or operators or other historic activities or spills) or to perform remedial plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future contamination. Third parties and we have ongoing remediations underway at several sites, but we do not believe that the associated costs will have a material impact on our operations.

 

Clean Water Act. Our operations can result in discharges of pollutants to waters. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended (“FWPCA”), also known as the Clean Water Act, and analogous state laws impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of pollutants into state waters or waters of the United States. The unpermitted discharge of pollutants such as from spill or leak incidents is prohibited. The FWPCA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of fill material and certain other activities in wetlands unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. Any unpermitted release of pollutants, including NGLs or condensates, from our systems or facilities could result in fines or penalties as well as significant remedial obligations.

 

OSHA. We are subject to the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, referred to as OSHA, and comparable state laws that regulate the protection of the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard requires that information be maintained about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 14 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.

 

26


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The principal market risks to which we are exposed are interest rate risk and NGL, natural gas and coal price risks.

 

We are also indirectly exposed to the credit risk of our lessees. If our lessees become financially insolvent, our lessees may not be able to continue operating or meeting their minimum lease payment obligations. As a result, our coal royalty revenues could decrease due to lower production volumes.

 

As of March 31, 2005, $85.6 million of our borrowings were financed with debt which has a fixed interest rate throughout its term. In connection with this financing, we executed an interest rate derivative transaction to effectively convert the interest rate on one-third of the amount financed from a fixed rate of 6.02 percent to a floating rate of LIBOR plus 2.36 percent. The interest rate swap has been accounted for as a fair value hedge in compliance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138.

 

When we agreed to acquire the midstream business from Cantera, one of our objectives was to support the economics of that acquisition. We achieved this objective by entering into pre-closing commodity price hedging agreements covering approximately 75 percent of the net volume of NGLs expected to be sold from April 2005 through December 2006. Rising commodity prices resulted in an increase in the market value of those hedging agreements before they qualified for hedge accounting. This change in market value resulted in a $13.9 million non-cash charge to earnings for the unrealized loss on derivatives. Subsequent to the Cantera Acquisition, we evaluated the effectiveness of the derivative contracts in relation to the underlying commodities and designated the contracts as cash flow hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Upon qualifying for hedge accounting, changes in the derivative contracts’ market value are accounted for as other comprehensive income or loss to the extent they are effective rather than a direct impact on net income. SFAS No. 133 requires us to continue to measure the effectiveness of the derivative contracts in relation to the underlying commodity being hedged, and we will be required to record the ineffective portion of the contracts in our net income for the respective period. Cash settlements with the counterparties to the hedging agreements will occur monthly in the future over the life of the agreements, with PVR receiving a correspondingly higher or lower amount for the physical sale of the commodity over the same period. Several derivative contracts for ethane, propane, crude oil and natural gas entered into subsequent to the Cantera Acquisition have been designated as cash flow hedges. See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our hedging program and a listing of open hedging contracts and their fair value.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements included in this report which are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) are forward-looking statements. In addition, the Partnership and its representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are also forward-looking statements. These statements use forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “project” or other similar words. These statements discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to future trends, plans, events, results of operations or financial condition or state other “forward looking” information.

 

A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. However, we caution you that assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material, depending on the circumstances. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this report and the documents we have incorporated by reference. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions including, but not limited, to the following:

 

    our ability to generate sufficient cash from our midstream and coal businesses to pay the minimum quarterly distribution;

 

    energy prices generally and specifically, the respective prices of natural gas, NGLs and coal;

 

    the relationship between natural gas and NGL prices;

 

    the relationship between the price of coal and the prices of natural gas and oil;

 

    the volatility of commodity prices for coal, natural gas and NGLs;

 

27


Table of Contents
    the projected supply of and demand for coal, natural gas and NGLs;

 

    the ability to successfully integrate and manage our new midstream business;

 

    the ability to acquire new coal reserves on satisfactory terms;

 

    the price for which new coal reserves can be acquired;

 

    the ability to lease new and existing coal reserves;

 

    the ability to continually find and contract for new sources of natural gas supply;

 

    the ability to retain our existing or acquire new midstream customers;

 

    the ability of our coal lessees to produce sufficient quantities of coal on an economic basis from our reserves;

 

    the ability of our coal lessees to obtain favorable contracts for coal produced from our reserves;

 

    competition among producers in the coal industry generally and among midstream companies;

 

    the exposure we have to the credit risk of our coal lessees and our midstream customers;

 

    the experience and financial condition of our coal lessees, including their ability to satisfy their royalty, environmental, reclamation and other obligations to us and others;

 

    the ability to expand our midstream business by constructing new gathering systems, pipelines and processing facilities on an economic basis and in a timely manner;

 

    the extent to which the amount and quality of actual coal production differs from estimated recoverable proved coal reserves;

 

    unanticipated geological problems;

 

    the dependence of our midstream business on having connections to third party pipelines;

 

    availability of required materials and equipment;

 

    the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, including force majeure events;

 

    the failure of our coal infrastructure or our coal lessees’ mining equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations;

 

    delays in anticipated start-up dates of our coal lessees’ mining operations and related coal infrastructure projects;

 

    environmental risks affecting the mining of coal reserves and the production, gathering and processing of natural gas;

 

    the timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits by our coal lessees;

 

    the risks associated with having or not having price risk management programs;

 

    labor relations and costs;

 

    accidents;

 

    changes in governmental regulation or enforcement practices, especially with respect to environmental, health and safety matters;

 

    uncertainties relating to the outcome of litigation regarding permitting of the disposal of coal overburden;

 

    risks and uncertainties relating to general domestic and international economic (including inflation and interest rates) and political conditions (including the impact of potential terrorist attacks);

 

28


Table of Contents
    coal handling joint venture operations;

 

    changes in financial market conditions; and

 

    other risk factors as detailed in the our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to the officers who certify the Partnership’s financial reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In addition, since the Partnership acquired its natural gas midstream business on March 3, 2005, our ability to effectively apply our disclosure controls and procedures to the acquired business is inherently limited by the short period of time we have had to evaluate those midstream operations since the acquisition.

 

The Partnership, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management and made known to the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, during the period for which this periodic report was being prepared.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

No changes were made in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except that we are in the process of integrating the newly acquired natural gas midstream business into our existing internal control structure.

 

29


Table of Contents

PART II. Other Information

 

Items 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

12   Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Calculation.
31.1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

30


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report

to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

PENN VIRGINIA RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P.

Date: May 6, 2005

 

By:

  

/s/ Frank A. Pici


        

Frank A. Pici, Vice President and

        

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 6, 2005

 

By:

  

/s/ Forrest W. McNair


        

Forrest W. McNair, Vice President and

        

Controller

 

31