UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-16496
Constar International Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 13-1889304 | |
| (State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
| One Crown Way, Philadelphia, PA | 19154 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
(215) 552-3700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class |
| Common Stock, $.01 Par Value |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨
As of June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of the shares of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (treating Crown Holdings, Inc. and the Companys directors and executive officers as the Companys only affiliates for these purposes) was approximately $49,964,250 (based on the closing price of $4.65).
As of March 29, 2005, 12,560,103 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, excluding shares held in Treasury, were issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement will be incorporated by Reference into Part III hereof. Only those portions specifically cited in Part III hereof as being so incorporated are to be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
This annual report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as anticipate, believe, expect, intend, plan, project, will, may, could, should, pro forma, continues, estimates, potential, predicts, goal, objective or similar expressions. Statements made regarding future results are subject to numerous assumptions, uncertainties and risks that may cause future results to be materially different from the results stated or implied in this document. The following are among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any results projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted:
| | The Companys debt level and its ability to service existing debt or, if necessary, to refinance that debt; |
| | The impact of the Companys debt on liquidity; |
| | The Companys expectation that it will be cash flow negative at least into the second half of 2006, and the Companys plans to fund operations using a credit facility that is subject to conditions and borrowing base limitations; |
| | Indebtedness under the Companys $220,000,000 of notes issued in 2004, and borrowings under the Companys credit facility, are subject to floating interest rates that may cause interest expense to increase; |
| | The Companys ability to comply with the covenants in the instruments governing its indebtedness; |
| | The Companys ability to compete successfully against competitors; |
| | The impact of price competition on gross margins and profitability; |
| | The level of demand for conventional PET packaging and custom PET packaging requiring the Companys proprietary technologies and know-how; |
| | Conventional PET containers, which comprise the bulk of the Companys business, generally carry low profit margins, and the market for conventional soft drink containers is not expected to grow appreciably in the near term; |
| | Continued conversion from metal, glass and other materials for packaging to plastic packaging; |
| | The Companys relationships with its largest customers; |
| | The success of the Companys customers in selling their products in their markets; |
| | The Companys ability to manage inventory levels based on its customers projected sales; |
| | Risks associated with the Companys international operations; |
| | The terms upon which the Company acquires resin and its ability to reflect price increases in its sales; |
| | The Companys ability to obtain resin from suppliers on a timely basis; |
| | The impact of consolidation of the Companys customers on sales and profitability; |
| | The Companys ability to fund capital expenditures in the future; |
| | General economic and political conditions; |
| | Recent increases in the price of petrochemical products such as PET resin and the effect of such increases on the demand for PET products; |
| | The Companys ability to protect its existing technologies and to develop new technologies; |
| | The Companys ability to timely market products incorporating MonOxbar technology and the realization of the expected benefits of the MonOxbar technology; |
1
| | The Companys ability to control costs; |
| | The Companys ability to maintain an effective system of internal control; |
| | Legal and regulatory proceedings and developments; |
| | Seasonal fluctuations in demand and the impact of weather on sales; |
| | The Companys ability to identify trends in the markets in which it competes and to offer new solutions that address the changing needs of these markets; |
| | The Companys ability to successfully execute its business model and enhance its product mix; |
| | The Companys ability to successfully prosecute or defend the legal proceedings to which it is a party; and |
| | The other factors disclosed from time to time by the Company in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information or future events.
2
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
General
Constar International Inc. (the Company or Constar) is a global producer of PET, or polyethylene terephthalate, plastic containers for food and beverages. Constar manufactures PET containers for conventional PET applications in soft drinks and water and for custom PET applications. Custom PET container applications include food, juices, teas, sport drinks, new age beverages, beer and flavored alcoholic beverages, most of which require a combination of advanced technologies, processing know-how and innovative designs.
Constars technologies are aimed at enabling the Company to meet the specific needs of products being converted from other forms of packaging to PET. Oxbar, Constars oxygen-scavenging technology, enables the Company to produce the special packaging required to extend the shelf life of oxygen sensitive products. The Company believes that Oxbar is the PET industrys best performing oxygen barrier technology. Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration recently approved for commercial use Constars next-generation monolayer Oxbar technology. The Company has also developed methods for addressing the challenges of hot-filling containers. Constar is focused on providing its customer base with the best service through technological innovation, new product development and lowest-cost production. The Company actively seeks new business where its technologies and other competitive strengths can yield attractive and sustainable profitability.
History
Constar is a Delaware corporation. Originally incorporated in 1927, the Company was an independent publicly held corporation from 1969 to 1992, when it was purchased by Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (Crown). Constar has been a public company since its initial public offering in November 2002. The Companys principal executive office is located at One Crown Way, Philadelphia, PA 19154-4599, and its telephone number is (215) 552-3700.
The PET Container Industry
The PET container industry is generally divided into two product types: conventional PET, which includes beverage containers for soft drinks and water, and custom PET, which includes containers that generally require specialized performance characteristics.
The conventional PET container industry consists of high volume production of containers for use in packaging soft drinks and water. The industry is supplied by independent producers, as well as captive manufacturers.
The custom PET container industry is characterized by complex manufacturing processes, unique materials, innovative product designs and technological know-how for products with special requirements. Because of the greater required manufacturing complexity, many custom PET applications have greater profitability and higher barriers to entry than conventional PET.
PET products include both bottles and preforms. Preforms are test-tube shaped intermediate products in the bottle manufacturing process. Some companies purchase preforms that they process into bottles at their own manufacturing facilities. Preforms are utilized in both conventional and custom applications. In the United States, manufacturers generally sell completed bottles. In Europe, manufacturers generally sell preforms.
The PET container business is a rapidly growing component of the United States packaging market due to continued growth in water and isotonics, conversion opportunities from other forms of packaging and the introduction of smaller sized soft drink containers. Many of these conversion opportunities involve the use of advanced or proprietary PET technologies.
3
PET competes in the packaging market against a number of materials including glass, metal, paperboard and other plastics. Various factors affect the choice of packaging material. In the food and beverage markets, PET containers have been gaining market share due to consumer preference for PET containers transparency, resealability, light weight and shatter resistance. PET bottles and jars have also gained acceptance due to PETs custom molding potential, which allows customers to differentiate their products using innovative designs and shapes that increase promotional appeal.
Historically, conversions to PET from glass have occurred first in larger size bottles within a product category, and then proliferated to smaller sizes. This was the case for two liter soft drinks in the late 1970s, hot-fill gallon juices in the late 1980s, and 1.5 liter water bottles in the mid-1990s, as well as in many food conversions such as edible oil, salad dressings, peanut butter, and mayonnaise. The four main reasons for this phenomenon are:
| | Because larger bottles have less surface area in proportion to volume contained, permeation rates for oxygen and carbon dioxide are less critical to shelf life. |
| | The cost of the package in relation to the cost of the product contained is lower in larger bottles. The higher per-bottle costs needed to achieve specialized properties in a large bottle have less impact on a products cost per ounce. |
| | Larger glass bottles are proportionately heavier because strength is achieved partly by increasing the thickness of the glass, while PETs intrinsic strength does not require significantly greater wall thickness for large bottles. This issue makes PET bottles cost competitive with, and lighter than, glass bottles. |
| | Larger glass bottles are more prone to breakage because of their greater wall surface and weight. Because of their greater mass, they are potentially more damaging when dropped and broken. The shatter resistant nature of PET has even greater importance in larger bottle applications. |
Glass conversions in large bottles have typically been followed by conversions of small size bottles. This has resulted from both lower costs achieved over time by scale advantages and new technology, and from stronger demand arising when consumer familiarity and preference for larger sized bottles in PET transfers to smaller sizes.
Key Markets and Products
The Company is a leading producer of PET containers for food and beverages. The Companys products are used in a variety of end-use markets, including soft drinks, water, peanut butter, edible oils, salad dressing, juices, teas, beer and flavored alcoholic beverages. The Company supplies PET products for such well-known brands as Pepsi, Coca-Cola, Dr. Pepper, 7Up, Motts, Shasta, Peter Pan, Aquafina, Wishbone, Smuckers, Veryfine, Snapple and Smirnoff Ice. The Company primarily manufactures and sells bottles in the United States. In Europe, the Company primarily sells preforms. Approximately 74% of the Companys 2004 revenue was attributable to sales in the United States and the remainder was attributable to sales in Europe.
The Company supplies bottles and preforms in both the conventional and custom PET markets. Preforms are test-tube shaped intermediate products that are purchased by manufacturers for processing into finished bottles at their manufacturing facilities.
Conventional PET
The Companys conventional PET sales relate primarily to containers for use in packaging soft drinks and water. In 2004, conventional PET products represented approximately 80% of the Companys sales.
Soft Drinks. Constar is a leading independent provider of PET containers to the United States soft drinks market. The Company is a leading U.S. supplier of PET containers to PepsiCo, as well as a leading supplier to
4
Cadbury Schweppes plc, the maker of Dr. Pepper and 7Up. Constars strategy in this market segment is to maintain its relatonships with major customers, improve margins and only invest when projects improve overall conventional margins.
Water. The Company is the largest supplier to PepsiCos water brand, Aquafina, in the United States. Other large water bottlers, including Nestlé S.A., Groupe Danone and Coca-Cola, predominantly manufacture their own containers. Constar maintains a strong position with a number of independent water bottlers. Constars strategy in this market is to maintain current relationships and grow profitability along with its customers growth within this market.
Custom PET
Custom PET products represented approximately 15% of Constars sales in 2004. The Company believes that custom PET applications represent significant growth opportunities for the Company. Additionally, custom PET applications generally provide higher margins and have higher barriers to entry than conventional PET, due to greater manufacturing complexity.
Propietary Technologies
Custom PET technologies are necessary to produce PET bottles for foods and beverages that require advanced technologies for packaging, such as oxygen-scavenger and hot-fill. Scavenger technologies inhibit oxygen from penetrating the packaging, which can cause the flavor and the color of the product to degrade. Hot-fill technologies are used to allow pouring of heat processed beverages into bottles that can withstand high temperatures without deforming. In the past, products requiring these characteristics were generally packaged in glass. Currently available technologies allow these products to be packaged in PET, which is more desirable than glass because of PETs light weight and shatter resistance.
Oxygen Scavenger. The Companys Oxbar technology increases product shelf life by inhibiting oxygen from entering the packaging. An additional benefit of Oxbar is that the barrier technology can be incorporated in the preforms from which plastic bottles are blown. This is an important competitive advantage since preforms can be shipped more economically than bottles and allow for the blowing of oxygen-scavenger bottles on the worlds existing base of blow-molding equipment without modification.
The Company has recently developed monolayer oxygen-scavenging bottles as an addition to its multi-layer product offering. Multi-layer oxygen-scavenging bottles have Oxbar between two layers of PET. Monolayer bottles incorporate the scavenging technology into a single layer container. This introduces oxygen-scavenging properties into preforms made on conventional injection presses, eliminating significant incremental costs of multi-layer injection molding. Combined with monolayer Oxbars outstanding oxygen barrier performance, Constar believes monolayer Oxbar has both a cost and performance advantage over competing technologies. Monolayer Oxbar bottles are not as transparent as multi-layer bottles, so customers desiring glass-like clarity may prefer multi-layer products. The Companys existing Oxbar patents cover monolayer oxygen-scavenging technology. Constar expects to begin shipping its first monolayer bottles in the second quarter of 2005.
Food. Constar manufactures containers for well-known brands including ConAgra Grocery Products Wesson Oil, Healthy Choice peanut butter, Unilivers Wishbone Salad Dressings, and Smuckers Toppings. Constar also produces bottles for some of the largest producers of quality private-labeled food products.
Hot-fill. The Company possesses expertise and patents that enable it to manufacture bottles that can withstand the hot-fill process. Products within this market are filled at temperatures in excess of 180 degrees Fahrenheit. Hot-fill bottles require specialized equipment and processes that allow the bottles to withstand this heat without deforming. Hot-fill bottles also use structural design features that absorb and withstand vacuum
5
created inside the bottle when the contents cool after filling. In response to customer requests for new hot-fill packages, the Company has developed a next generation heat-set container that allows the Company to produce creative product designs without the structural design features that meet customer requirements and offer the potential for lighter-weight bottles. Constar is also working to expand other applications of hot-fill technology. The Company supplies hot-fill bottles for brands such as Arizona Iced Tea, Snapple, Gatorade Propel and Veryfine. The Company supplies a full range of sizes, from gallon bottles for juices to single serve bottles.
Pasteurization. The Company has expertise and proprietary functional design features that enable its PET bottles to be filled on the same filling lines as glass bottles for pasteurized beer. During pasteurization, the sealed bottle and its contents are subjected to heat, which both increases the internal pressure of the bottle and decreases the rigidity of the bottle. The Companys pasteurizable bottle has a proprietary base design that resists deformation during this process, and a proprietary neck design that expands slightly under heat and pressure to reduce stress on the base. In line with the Companys strategy for capturing conversion opportunities, Constar plans to apply its Oxbar technology first to target larger capacity, multiserve bottle glass conversions and then target smaller, single serve bottle conversions as the market expands.
Customers
Generally, Constar supplies its customers pursuant to contracts with terms of one year or longer. Substantially all of the Companys sales are under contracts containing provisions that allow for the pass through of changes in the price of PET resin. In 2004, the Companys top five customers accounted for approximately 60% of the Companys sales, while the Companys top ten customers accounted for approximately 75% of the Companys sales. During the same period, purchases by PepsiCo accounted for approximately 30% of the Companys sales while Coca-Cola accounted for approximately 13% of the Company sales. Other than PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, no customer accounted for more than 10% of the Companys sales in 2004. The Company is continually seeking ways to expand its customer base.
Sales and Marketing
The Companys management structure includes a senior vice president of sales and marketing, three regional vice presidents of sales and a vice president of marketing. In addition to having responsibility for overseeing regional sales, each vice president of sales also has product line management responsibilities for certain product lines.
Research and Development
The Company conducts its major technology and product development work, as well as testing and product qualification, at in-house laboratories. From laboratory locations in Alsip, Illinois and Sherburn, United Kingdom, Constars research and development staff provides project support for the design and development needs of its existing and potential customers, and is responsible for the full range of development activity from concept to commercialization. The Companys research and development staff have advanced degrees in chemical engineering, mechanical engineering and polymer science. Typical activities of the staff include:
| | determination of ideal design, lightest weight, and optimum finish; |
| | design development to enhance product preference; |
| | use of predictive tools to minimize development cycle; |
| | unit cavity production and the making of samples; |
| | blow-mold trials in the process lab and in the field; |
| | setting process parameters and specifications; and |
| | assisting its customers tests of new containers. |
6
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
The Company buys PET resin directly from a diversed base of leading resin suppliers in the United States, Europe and Asia. While specialized PET resin is required for some hot-fill and other specific applications, most of the major PET manufacturers supply a full range of resin specifications. The Company believes that the large volume of resin that it purchases provides leverage that assists it in negotiating favorable resin purchasing agreements.
The Company buys labels from several suppliers, mostly in the United States, for application to bottles for its customers. The Companys ability to work closely with its customers to forecast, order, and stock the large number of different labels they need and to deliver labeled bottles as needed is an important element of the service it provides.
Competition
PET containers compete with glass bottles, metal cans, paperboard containers and other packaging materials. The Companys major PET industry competitors in the United States are Amcor Ltd., Ball Corporation, Graham Packaging Company and Plastipak Holdings, Inc. In Europe, the competitive landscape is much more fragmented.
Competition in the PET industry is intense. In all of the Companys markets, high standards of service, reliability, and quality performance are prerequisites to obtaining significant awards of business from customers. Margins are tight in the conventional soft drink and water business, and differentiation is obtained by cost advantage of scale, design and execution capability, and the ability to bring synergies to the supply relationship through innovation and organizational integration. While these capabilities are also valuable for custom PET, the major basis for competition in custom PET applications is technology, since patent protection, know-how, and highly specialized equipment and process techniques are required to manufacture custom PET products. Some of this technology, however, is commercially available.
The PET business is highly capital intensive, with whole manufacturing lines often committed to the requirements of a single customer. An important element of competition is the strength of each companys process for evaluation, design, presentation and execution of new product development opportunities presented by the packaging needs of customers. Product design, engineering and investment decisions made when new capacity is acquired, and the financial and contractual terms obtained with customers to support that investment, are key determinants of a companys success in this market. Flexibility of the manufacturing platform, large scale plants that distribute overhead costs broadly and continuous improvement are sources of competitive cost advantage.
Intellectual Property
The Companys portfolio of intellectual property assets includes U.S. and foreign utility and design patents and patent applications. Among these assets are a number of patents on its oxygen-scavenging technology, as well as patents related to its line of hot-fill bottles. The earliest of the U.S. oxygen-scavenging patents is not due to expire for approximately three years. The earliest of the Companys European patents is not due to expire for approximately two years. The Company also owns registrations of, and/or pending applications for registration of, the trademarks CONSTAR, OXBAR and other marks in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions.
The Companys OXBAR technology is subject to a worldwide royalty-free cross-license with Rexam AB, which owns several patents relating to oxygen-scavenging technology. The cross-license agreement gives both parties the right to use and sublicense each others oxygen-scavenging technology patents but not each others know-how. Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP holds a royalty-based, exclusive, worldwide license to the Oxbar patents, but not for rigid polyester packages such as PET containers. Constar has granted royalty-bearing licenses to some of its competitors for certain applications of the Oxbar patents.
7
The Company relies on proprietary know-how, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop products and maintain its competitive position. The Company attempts to protect its proprietary know-how and its other trade secrets by executing, when appropriate, confidentiality agreements with its customers and employees. The Company cannot assure you that its competitors will not discover comparable or the same knowledge and techniques through independent development or other means.
Environmental Liabilities and Costs
The Companys facilities and operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to air emissions, wastewater discharges and chemical and hazardous waste management and disposal and remediation of environmental sites. The Company is also subject to employee health and safety laws. The nature of its operations exposes the Company to the risk of liabilities or claims with respect to environmental and worker health and safety matters Constar believes its operations are in material compliance with applicable requirements; however, there can be no assurance that material costs will not be incurred in connection with these liabilities or claims. Based on the Companys experiences to date, it believes that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental and employee safety laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect. Future events, including changes in laws and regulations or their interpretations and the discovery of presently unknown conditions, may nevertheless give rise to additional costs that could be material.
Certain environmental laws hold current owners or operators of land or businesses liable for their own and for previous owners or operators releases of hazardous or toxic substances. Because of Constars operations, the long history of industrial operations at some of its facilities, the operations of predecessor owners or operators of certain of its businesses, and the use, production and release of hazardous substances at these sites and at surrounding sites, the Company may be affected by liability provisions of environmental laws. Various facilities have experienced some level of regulatory scrutiny in the past and are, or may become, subject to further regulatory inspections, future requests for investigation or liability for past practices.
The Didam, Netherlands facility has been identified as having impacts to soil and groundwater from volatile organic compounds at concentrations that exceed those permissible under Dutch law. The main body of the groundwater plume is beneath Constars Didam facility but it also appears to extend from an upgradient neighboring property. Following the results of recent testing, remediation is not required to begin until 2007. The Company records an environmental liability on an undiscounted basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable. The Company has an accrual of $0.2 million for costs associated with completing the required investigations and certain other activities that may be required at the Didam facility. The Company has no other accruals for environmental matters.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, or CERCLA, provides for responses to and joint and several liability for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Constar has received requests for information or notifications of potential liability from the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, under CERCLA and certain state environmental agencies under state superfund laws for off-site locations. Constar has been identified by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources as a potentially responsible party at three related sites in Wisconsin and agreed to share in the remediation costs with one other party. Remediation is ongoing at two of these sites and remediation has been completed at the third site. Constar has also been identified as a potentially responsible party at the Bush Valley Landfill site in Abingdon, Maryland and entered into a settlement agreement with the EPA in July 1997. The activities required under that agreement are ongoing. The Company has not incurred any significant costs relating to these matters to date and does not believe that it will incur material costs in the future in responding to conditions at these sites.
8
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed 2,004 employees, with 1,678 in the United States and 326 in Europe. None of its U.S. employees are unionized, but there are union workers at its Sherburn, United Kingdom plant and its Didam, Netherlands plant. The Company believes that its employee relations are good and that its practices in the areas of training, progression, retention, and team involvement foster continuous improvement in capabilities and satisfaction levels throughout its workforce.
Securities Exchange Act Reports
Constar maintains an Internet website at the following address: www.constar.net. The information on the Companys website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K. Constar makes available on or through its website certain reports and amendments to those reports that Constar files with or furnishes to the SEC in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. Constar makes this information available on its website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files the information with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. You may also read and copy any materials Constar files with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room that is located at 450 Fifth Street, NE, Washington DC 20549. Information about the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also access Constars filings through the SECs internet site: www.sec.gov.
9
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
The Companys corporate headquarters are located at One Crown Way, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Company maintains facilities in the United States and Europe, and has a joint venture interest in Turkey. The locations of these facilities, their respective sizes and ownership/lease status are as follows:
| Location |
Type of Facility |
Size(1) |
Ownership Status | |||
| North America | ||||||
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
Headquarters | 23,000 | Leased | |||
| Alsip, Illinois |
Research and Development | 33,300 | Leased | |||
| Atlanta, Georgia |
Warehouse | 202,607 | Leased | |||
| Atlanta, Georgia |
Plant and Warehouse | 121,704 | Owned | |||
| Atlanta, Georgia |
Administrative | 38,438 | Owned | |||
| Belcamp, Maryland(3) |
Warehouse | 140,000 | Leased | |||
| Birmingham, Alabama(4) |
Plant | 184,723 | Leased | |||
| Charlotte, North Carolina |
Warehouse | 185,768 | Leased | |||
| Charlotte, North Carolina(5) |
Plant and Warehouse | 142,500 | Owned/Leased | |||
| Cheraw, South Carolina |
Plant and Warehouse | 134,236 | Leased | |||
| Collierville, Tennessee(6) |
Plant | 200,001 | Owned/Leased | |||
| Collierville, Tennessee(2) |
Warehouse | 136,847 | Leased | |||
| Dallas, Texas(7) |
Plant | 198,099 | Leased | |||
| Dallas, Texas |
Plant and Warehouse | 636,480 | Leased | |||
| Dallas, Texas(8) |
Warehouse | 201,661 | Leased | |||
| Havre de Grace, Maryland |
Plant and Warehouse | 437,564 | Owned | |||
| Havre de Grace, Maryland(9) |
Plant and Warehouse | 175,200 | Owned/Leased | |||
| Building 8, Houston, Texas |
Plant and Warehouse | 191,537 | Leased | |||
| Houston, Texas(2) |
Warehouse | 44,050 | Leased | |||
| Jackson, Mississippi(10) |
Plant and Warehouse | 127,043 | Owned/Leased | |||
| Jackson, Mississippi(11) |
Sidetrack | 800 ft | Leased | |||
| Kansas City, Kansas |
Warehouse | 47,277 | Leased | |||
| Kansas City, Kansas |
Plant and Warehouse | 236,633 | Leased | |||
| Hebron, Ohio(3) |
Warehouse | 211,200 | Leased | |||
| Hebron, Ohio |
Plant | 109,800 | Leased | |||
| Orlando, Florida |
Plant and Warehouse | 180,000 | Leased | |||
| Orlando, Florida |
Plant and Warehouse | 180,332 | Leased | |||
| Reserve, Louisiana(2)(4)(12) |
Plant | 187,000 | Owned/Leased | |||
| Salt Lake City, Utah |
Warehouse | 80,713 | Leased | |||
| West Chicago, Illinois(2) |
Warehouse | 57,823 | Leased | |||
| West Chicago, Illinois |
Plant and Warehouse | 123,100 | Owned | |||
| Europe | ||||||
| Didam, Netherlands |
Plant | 22,188 | Owned | |||
| Izmir, Turkey(13) |
Plant | 10,772 | Owned | |||
| Sherburn, England |
Plant | 51,500 | Owned |
| (1) | In square feet for the properties located in North America and in square meters for the properties located in Europe, unless otherwise noted. |
| (2) | Lease is expiring within 12 months and is not expected to be renewed. |
| (3) | Oral lease. |
| (4) | As part of the 2003 restructuring plan, the Company closed manufacturing facilities at Birmingham, Alabama and Reserve, Louisiana. Other properties held subject to leases but where the Company no longer operates are not listed above. |
| (5) | Includes 83,250 square feet of owned space and 59,250 square feet of leased space. |
10
| (6) | Includes 118,791 square feet of owned space and 81,210 square feet of leased space. |
| (7) | Operated as a plant from lease inception in 1992 contrary to restriction in lease to use as warehouse. |
| (8) | Property is vacant and the lease is scheduled for termination. |
| (9) | Includes 108,000 square feet of owned space and 67,200 square feet of leased space. |
| (10) | Includes 36,608 square feet of owned space and 90,435 square feet of leased space. |
| (11) | Sidetrack consists of 800 feet of rail track. |
| (12) | Includes 86,968 square feet of owned space and 100,032 of leased space. |
| (13) | This property is owned by a joint venture, in which the Company owns a 55% equity interest. |
The Company from time to time secures additional warehouse space on a short-term basis as needed to meet inventory storage requirements.
11
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On November 1, 2004, Constar settled its Oxbar® patent infringement action against Continental PET Technologies, Inc. Constar was paid $25.1 million, which was applied to Constars revolving loan facility. In addition, Constar granted Continental PET Technologies, Inc. and its former parent company, Owens-Illinois, Inc., global licenses to multilayer applications of the Oxbar® patents. Constar also settled the related dispute with Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP. Constar and Rexam have entered into a new license going forward that grants Chevron rights to practice the Oxbar® patents, but not for rigid polyester packages such as PET containers. The original license agreement with Chevron survives only for purposes of a sublicense agreement between Chevron and a third party.
Constar is one of 42 defendants in a patent infringement action seeking unspecified monetary damages brought on August 3, 1999 by North American Container, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas based on its patent for a certain plastic container base design. The other defendants include many of the principal plastic container manufacturers, various food and beverage companies, and three grocery store chains. On November 28, 2003, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The parties dismissed without prejudice certain remaining unadjudicated claims in order to position the case for appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals by the plaintiff. On February 24, 2004, judgment was entered in accordance with the November 28, 2003 ruling and an appeal was filed. Briefing in the Federal Circuit was completed December 15, 2004, and argument is currently scheduled for April 4, 2005.
The Company and certain of its present and former directors, along with Crown Holdings, Inc., as well as various underwriters, have been named as defendants in a consolidated putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the United Sates District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, In re Constar International Inc. Securities Litigation (Master File No. 03-CV-05020). This action consolidates previous lawsuits, namely Parkside Capital LLC v. Constar International Inc et al.(Civil Action No. 03-5020), filed on September 5, 2003 and Walter Frejek v. Constar International Inc. et al. (Civil Action No.03-5166), filed on September 15, 2003. The consolidated and amended complaint, filed June 17, 2004, generally alleges that the registration statement and prospectus for the Companys initial public offering of its common stock on November 14, 2002 contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions. Plaintiffs claim that defendants in these lawsuits violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. Plaintiffs seek class action certification and an award of damages and litigation costs and expenses. Under the Companys charter documents, an agreement with Crown and an underwriting agreement with Crown and the underwriters, Constar has incurred certain indemnification and contribution obligations to the other defendants with respect to this lawsuit. The Company believes the claims in the action are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously.
The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit that was filed in the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida on January 9, 2001 by former and current employees of its Orlando, Florida facility seeking unspecified monetary damages. The lawsuit alleges bodily injury as a result of exposure to off-gasses from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) during the manufacture of plastic bottles from 1980-1987. PVC suppliers and a manufacturer of the manufacturing equipment used to process the PVC are also defendants. The litigation is currently in the discovery stage. The Company believes the claims are without merit and is aggressively defending against the claims. A trial with respect to one of the plaintiffs, which had been docketed for the fourth quarter of 2004, has been removed from the courts calendar. A new date has not been scheduled.
The Company is subject to other lawsuits and claims in the normal course of business and related to businesses operated by predecessor corporations. Management believes that the ultimate liabilities resulting from these lawsuits and claims will not materially impact its results of operations or financial position.
| ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.
12
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The Companys Common Stock is listed on the National Market segment of The Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq National Market) under the symbol CNST. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices per share of the Companys Common Stock, as quoted on The Nasdaq National Market.
| 2004 |
High |
Low | ||||
| Quarter ended December 31, 2004 |
$ | 7.75 | $ | 4.10 | ||
| Quarter ended September 30, 2004 |
||||||