Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

(Mark one)

 

  x   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

 

or

 

  ¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                                 to                                 

 

Commission file number 0-30287

 


 

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XII, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Georgia   58-2438242
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6200 The Corners Parkway,

Norcross, Georgia

  30092-3365
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number including area code   (770) 449-7800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

   
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
None   None

 

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

 

CASH PREFERRED UNITS

(Title of class)

 

TAX PREFERRED UNITS

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

 

Not Applicable

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

 

Yes  ¨    No  x

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

 

Not Applicable

 

Note.—If a determination as to whether a particular person or entity is an affiliate cannot be made without involving unreasonable effort and expense, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates may be calculated on the basis of assumptions reasonable under the circumstances, provided that the assumptions are set forth in this Form.

 



Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the “Partnership”) other than historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” or other similar words. Specifically, among others, we consider statements concerning projections of future operating results and cash flows, our ability to meet future obligations, and the amount and timing of future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements.

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Neither the Partnership nor the general partners make any representations or warranties (expressed or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

Any such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations; provide distributions to limited partners; and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered. Some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking statements follow:

 

General economic risks

 

    Adverse changes in general or local economic conditions;

 

    Adverse economic conditions affecting the particular industry of one or more of our tenants;

 

Real estate risks

 

    Ability to achieve appropriate occupancy levels resulting in rental amounts sufficient to cover operating costs ;

 

    Supply of or demand for similar or competing rentable space, which may adversely impact retaining or obtaining new tenants at lease expiration at acceptable rental amounts;

 

    Tenant ability or willingness to satisfy obligations relating to our existing lease agreements;

 

    Potential need to fund tenant improvements, lease-up costs, or other capital expenditures out of operating cash flow;

 

    Increases in property operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance, and other costs not recoverable from tenants;

 

    Ability to secure adequate insurance at reasonable and appropriate rates to avoid uninsured losses or losses in excess of insured amounts;

 

Page 2


Table of Contents
    Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous or other undetected adverse conditions;

 

    Unexpected costs of capital expenditures related to tenant build-out projects or other unforeseen capital expenditures;

 

    Ability to sell a property when desirable at an acceptable return, including the ability of the purchaser to satisfy any continuing obligations;

 

Other operational risks

 

    Our dependency on Wells Capital, Inc. (“Wells Capital”), the corporate general partner of one of our General Partners, its key personnel, and its affiliates for various administrative services;

 

    Wells Capital’s ability to attract and retain high-quality personnel who can provide acceptable service levels to us and generate economies of scale for us over time;

 

    Increases in our administrative operating expenses, including increased expenses associated with operating as a public company in the current regulatory environment;

 

    Changes in governmental, tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance;

 

    Our ability to prove compliance with any governmental, tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning in the event that any such position is questioned by the respective authority; and

 

    Actions of our joint venture partners including potential bankruptcy, business interests differing from ours, or other actions that may adversely impact the operations of joint ventures.

 

Page 3


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.       BUSINESS.

 

General

 

Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Georgia public limited partnership having Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Partners, L.P. (“Wells Partners”), a Georgia non-public limited partnership, as its general partners (collectively, the “General Partners”). Wells Capital, Inc. (“Wells Capital”) serves as the corporate general partner of Wells Partners. Wells Capital is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the sole owner of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. The Partnership was formed on September 15, 1998 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, constructing, owning, operating, improving, leasing and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription, limited partners elect to have their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. Thereafter, the limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. The limited partners may vote to, among other things: (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; and (f) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets, subject to certain limitations. The majority vote on any of the matters described above will bind the Partnership without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights regardless of class.

 

On March 22, 1999, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $70,000,000 of Cash Preferred or Tax Preferred limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership commenced active operations upon receiving and accepting subscriptions for 125,000 Units on June 1, 1999. The offering was terminated on March 21, 2001 at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 2,688,861 Cash Preferred Units and 872,258 Tax Preferred Units representing capital contributions of $35,611,192.

 

Management believes that the Partnership typically operates through the following five key life cycle phases. The time spent in each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.

 

    Fund-raising phase

The period during which the Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public

 

    Investing phase

The period during which the Partnership invests the capital raised during the fund-raising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets

 

    Holding phase

The period during which real estate assets are owned and operated by the Partnership during the initial lease terms of the tenants

 

    Positioning-for-sale phase

The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, the Partnership continues to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale.

 

Page 4


Table of Contents
    Disposition-and-liquidation phase

The period during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.

 

The Partnership is currently in the holding phase of its life cycle. Accordingly, we will focus resources on managing the Partnership’s existing portfolio and locating suitable replacement tenants for vacant space as necessary.

 

Employees

 

The Partnership has no direct employees. The employees of Wells Capital and Wells Management Company, Inc. (“Wells Management”), an affiliate of the General Partners, perform a full range of real estate services including leasing and property management, accounting, asset management, and investor relations for the Partnership. See Item 13, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” for a summary of the compensation and fees paid to the General Partners and their affiliates during the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

Insurance

 

Wells Management carries comprehensive liability and extended coverage with respect to the properties owned by the Partnership through investments in the joint ventures described in Item 2. In the opinion of management, all such properties are adequately insured.

 

Competition

 

The Partnership will experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects, which may include the General Partners and their affiliates. As a result, in connection with negotiating leases, the Partnership may offer rental concessions, reduced charges for tenant improvements and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on the results of operations. The Partnership is also in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for its properties.

 

Web Site Address

 

Access to copies of each of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) may be obtained free of charge from the following website, http://www.wellsref.com, through a link to the http://www.sec.gov website.

 

ITEM   2.    PROPERTIES.

 

The Partnership owns interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the “Joint Ventures”) and properties:

 

Page 5


Table of Contents
               Leased % As of December 31,

 

Joint Venture


  

Joint Venture Partners


  

Properties


   2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

The Wells Fund XI–Fund XII–REIT Joint Venture

(“Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates”)

  

•   Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P.

•   Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.

•   Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (1)

  

1. 111 Southchase Boulevard
(formerly known as the “EYBL CarTex Building”)

A two-story manufacturing and office building located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina

   0 %   0 %   0 %   100 %   100 %
         

2. 20/20 Building
(formerly known as the “Sprint Building”)

A three-story office building located in Leawood, Kansas

   0 %   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
         

3. Johnson Matthey Building (2)

A one-story office building and warehouse located in Wayne, Pennsylvania

   —       100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
         

4. Gartner Building

A two-story office building located in Ft. Myers, Florida

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %

Wells Fund XII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership

(“Fund XII-REIT Associates”)

  

•   Wells Real Estate Fund XII, L.P.

•   Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (1)

  

5. Siemens Building

A three-story office building located in Troy, Michigan

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
         

6. AT&T Oklahoma Building

A one-story office building and a two-story office building located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %
         

7. Comdata Building

A three-story office building located in Brentwood, Tennessee

   100 %   100 %   100 %   100 %   —    

 

  (1)   Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Wells OP”) is a Delaware limited partnership with Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“Wells REIT”) serving as its general partner; Wells REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust.

 

  (2)   This property was sold in October 2004.

 

Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. is affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis.

 

As of December 31, 2004, the lease expirations scheduled during the following ten years for all properties in which the Partnership held an interest through the Joint Ventures, assuming no exercise of renewal options or termination rights, are summarized below:

 

Page 6


Table of Contents

   Year of   

    Lease    

Expiration


   Number of
Leases Expiring


  

Square Feet

Expiring


   Annualized
Gross Base
Rent in Year of
Expiration


  

Partnership

Share of

Annualized

Gross Base

Rent in Year of
Expiration (1)


   Percentage
of Total
Square Feet
Expiring


   

Percentage

of Total

Annualized

Gross Base

Rent in Year
of Expiration


 

2008(2)

     1    25,000    $ 332,004    $ 149,369    9.3 %   7.6 %

2010(3)

     2    180,554      2,998,432      1,348,994    67.4     68.6  

2013(4)

     1    62,400      1,037,642      177,437    23.3     23.8  
    
  
  

  

  

 

       4    267,954    $ 4,368,078    $ 1,675,800    100.0 %   100.0 %
    
  
  

  

  

 

 

  (1)   The Partnership’s share of annualized gross base rent in year of expiration is calculated based on the Partnership’s ownership percentage in the Joint Venture that owns the leased property.

 

  (2)   Expiration of Jordan Associates lease at the AT&T Oklahoma Building (approximately 25,000 square feet).

 

  (3)   Expiration of AT&T lease (approximately 103,500 square feet) and Siemens lease (approximately 77,000 square feet).

 

  (4)   Expiration of Gartner lease (approximately 62,400 square feet).

 

Additional information about the Joint Ventures and properties in which the Partnership owned interests during the periods presented is provided below:

 

Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates

 

On June 21, 1999, Wells Fund XI-REIT Joint Venture (“Fund XI-REIT Associates”), a joint venture between the Well Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. and Wells OP, was amended and restated to admit the Partnership and became known as Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates. During the periods presented, Wells Real Estate Fund, XI, L.P., the Partnership, and Wells OP owned equity interests of approximately 26%, 17%, and 57%, respectively, in the following properties based on their respective cumulative capital contributions to Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates:

 

111 Southchase Boulevard

 

On May 18, 1999, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates purchased 111 Southchase Boulevard, a manufacturing and office building located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina. 111 Southchase Boulevard is a manufacturing building including approximately 169,000 rentable square feet, comprised of approximately 141,000 square feet of manufacturing space, 25,000 square feet of two-story office space, and 3,000 square feet of cafeteria/training space.

 

The entire rentable area of 111 Southchase Boulevard was under a lease with EYBL CarTex, Inc. for an initial term of ten years, which commenced on March 1, 1998 and was to expire on February 29, 2008. EYBL CarTex, Inc., the sole tenant of 111 Southchase Boulevard, did not fulfill the terms of the lease and vacated in November 2002.

 

20/20 Building

 

On July 2, 1999, the Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates acquired the 20/20 Building, a three-story office building including approximately 68,900 rentable square feet on a 7.12-acre tract of land located in Leawood, Kansas.

 

The entire rentable area of the 20/20 Building was under a lease with Sprint Communications, Inc. (“Sprint”) for an initial term of ten years, which commenced on May 19, 1997 and was to expire on May 18, 2007. The monthly base rent payable under the lease was approximately $83,254 through May 18, 2002 and approximately $91,867 for the remainder of the lease term.

 

Sprint, the sole tenant of the 20/20 Building, exercised an early lease termination and vacated in May 2004. Under the terms of the lease, Sprint paid Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates approximately $450,000 in early lease termination fees.

 

Page 7


Table of Contents

Johnson Matthey Building

 

On August 17, 1999, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates acquired the Johnson Matthey Building, an office and warehouse building including approximately 130,000 square feet located in Wayne, Pennsylvania. The Johnson Matthey Building was first constructed in 1973 as a multi-tenant facility and was subsequently converted into a single-tenant facility in 1998.

 

The entire rentable area of the Johnson Matthey Building was leased to Johnson Matthey, which commenced on July 1, 1998 and was to expire on June 30, 2007.

 

On October 5, 2004, the Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates sold Johnson Matthey Building to the current sole tenant Johnson Matthey, Inc., for a gross sale price of $10,000,000. As a result of the sale of the Johnson Matthey Building, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $1,653,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $413,000.

 

Gartner Building

 

On September 20, 1999, Fund XI-XII-REIT Associates acquired the Gartner Building, a two-story office building with approximately 62,400 rentable square feet on a 4.9-acre tract of land located in Fort Myers, Florida.

 

The entire rentable area of the Gartner Building is currently under a lease agreement with Gartner, Inc (“Gartner”). The initial term of the lease was ten years, which commenced on February 1, 1998 and was set to expire on January 31, 2008. Gartner has executed the right to extend the lease for a five-year period. The current lease expires January 31, 2013. Gartner has the right to extend the Gartner lease for one additional five-year period. The annual base rent payable under the Gartner lease is approximately $872,720 through January 2005, increased by 2.5% annually through January 31, 2008 and 2% annually through the remainder of the lease term. The annualized base rent in 2013 is $1,037,642.

 

Fund XII-REIT Associates

 

On April 10, 2000, Fund XII-REIT Associates was formed for the purpose of acquiring owning, leasing, operating and managing real properties. As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership and Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. owned equity interests of approximately 45% and 55%, respectively, in the following properties based on their respective cumulative capital contributions to Fund XII-REIT Associates:

 

Siemens Building

 

On May 10, 2000, Fund XII-REIT Associates purchased the Siemens Building, a three-story office building containing approximately 77,000 rentable square feet on an approximate 5.3-acre tract of land located in Troy, Michigan.

 

The entire Siemens Building is currently under a lease agreement with Siemens Automotive Corporation (“Siemens”), which expires on August 31, 2010. Siemens has the right to extend the lease for two additional five-year periods at 95% of the then current fair market rental rates. As of December 31, 2004, the annualized base rent payable under the Siemens’ lease was approximately $1,439,000. The base rent increases annually each February until 2009, when the annualized base rent will be approximately $1,601,000.

 

Siemens has a one-time right to cancel the lease effective after the 90th month of the term (June 2007) upon (a) providing written notice of such cancellation on or before the last day of the 78th month (June 2006) and (b) paying a cancellation fee to Fund XII-REIT Associates equal to the amount of unamortized cost of brokerage commissions paid by the landlord, plus the amount of unamortized landlord-funded tenant improvements constructed as of the cancellation date.

 

Page 8


Table of Contents

AT&T Oklahoma Building

 

On December 28, 2000, Fund XII-REIT Associates purchased the AT&T Oklahoma Building, a one-story office building and a two-story office building containing an aggregate of approximately 128,500 rentable square feet on an approximate 11.34-acre tract of land located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

 

The entire 78,500 rentable square feet of the two-story office building and 25,000 rentable-square-feet of the one-story office building are currently under a net lease agreement with AT&T Corporation (“AT&T”). The AT&T lease commenced on June 5, 2000 and expires on November 30, 2010. AT&T has the right to extend the AT&T lease for two additional five-year periods at the then current fair market rental rate upon delivering written notice within 240 days prior to expiration of the lease. As of December 31, 2004, the monthly base rent was approximately $108,000 and continues through November 4, 2005. Monthly base rent increases on November 5, 2005 to approximately $112,000 and again on April 5, 2008 to approximately $116,400. AT&T has a right of first offer to lease the space currently occupied by Jordan Associates, Inc. (“Jordan”) should Jordan decide to vacate the premises.

 

Jordan currently occupies the 25,000 rentable square feet within the one-story office building under a lease agreement. The initial term of the Jordan lease commenced on December 21, 2000 and expires on December 31, 2008. Jordan has the right to extend the lease for one five-year period at the then current fair market rental rate upon delivering written notice within 240 days prior to expiration of the initial lease term. As of December 31, 2004, the annual base rent was approximately $332,000. The annual base rent will remain the same through the remainder of the lease term.

 

Comdata Building

 

On May 15, 2001, Fund XII-REIT Associates purchased the Comdata Building, a three-story office building comprised of approximately 201,000 rentable square feet on a 12.3 acre tract of land in Brentwood, Tennessee.

 

The entire Comdata Building is currently under a triple-net lease agreement with Comdata Network, Inc. (“Comdata”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ceridian Corporation. Ceridian Corporation is the guarantor of the Comdata lease. The Comdata lease commenced on May 16, 2001 and expires on May 31, 2016. Comdata has the right to extend the lease for one additional five-year period at a rate equal to the greater of the base rent for the final year of the initial term or 90% of the then-current fair market rental rate. As of December 31, 2004, the annual base rent was approximately $2,458,600 and continues through March 2007. Annual base rent increases in April 2007 to approximately $2,518,600 and again in April 2012 to approximately $2,578,600 through the remainder of the lease term.

 

ITEM   3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of its business. We are not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us. In addition, no legal proceedings were terminated during the fourth quarter of 2004.

 

ITEM   4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of the limited partners during the fourth quarter of 2004.

 

Page 9


Table of Contents

PART II

 

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR PARTNERSHIP’S UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS.

 

Summary

 

As of February 28, 2005, 2,944,050 Cash Preferred Units and 617,069 Tax Preferred Units, held by a total of 1,244 and 111 limited partners, respectively, were outstanding. Capital contributions are equal to $10.00 per each limited partnership unit. A public trading market has not been established for the Partnership’s limited partnership units, nor is such a market anticipated to develop in the future. The partnership agreement provides the General Partners with the right to prohibit transfers of units at their discretion.

 

Unit Valuation

 

Because fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to ERISA and IRA custodians are required to determine and report the value of the assets held in their respective plans or accounts on an annual basis, the General Partners are required under the partnership agreement to report estimated unit values to the limited partners each year in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K. The methodology to be utilized for determining such estimated unit values under the partnership agreement requires the General Partners to estimate the amount a unit holder would receive assuming that the Partnership’s properties were sold at their estimated fair market values as of the end of the Partnership’s fiscal year and the proceeds therefrom (without any reduction for selling expenses) plus the amount of net sale proceeds held by the Partnership at year-end from previous property sales, if any, were distributed to the limited partners in liquidation. The estimated unit valuations are intended to be an estimate of the distributions that would be made to limited partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnership’s original public offering of units, and who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement.

 

Utilizing the foregoing methodology and based upon market conditions existing in early December 2004, the General Partners have estimated the Partnership’s unit valuations, based upon their estimates of property values as of December 31, 2004, to be approximately $8.39 per “Cash-Preferred” Unit and $12.75 per “Tax-Preferred” Unit, based upon market conditions existing in early December 2004. These estimates should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners’ units, what limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of the Partnership’s properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if the Partnership’s properties were sold and the proceeds distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership. There is no established public trading market for the Partnership’s limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will ever develop. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. While, as required by the partnership agreement, the General Partners have obtained an opinion from The David L. Beal Company, an independent MAI appraiser, to the effect that such estimates of value were deemed reasonable and were prepared in accordance with appropriate methods for valuing real estate, no actual appraisals were obtained due to the inordinate expense which would be involved in obtaining appraisals for all of the Partnership’s properties.

 

The valuations performed by the General Partners are estimates only, and are based on a number of assumptions which may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units. For example, as a result of the availability of conversion elections under the partnership agreement and the resulting complexities involved relating to the distribution methodology under the partnership agreement, each limited partnership unit of the Partnership potentially has its own unique characteristics as to distributions and value. These estimated valuations assume, and are applicable only to, limited partners who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement and who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnership’s original public offering of units. Further, as set forth above, no third-party appraisals have or will be obtained. For these reasons, the estimated unit valuations set forth above should not be used by or relied upon by investors, other than fiduciaries of retirement plans and IRA custodians for limited ERISA and IRA reporting purposes, as any

 

Page 10


Table of Contents

indication of the fair market value of their units. In addition, it should be noted that ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians may use estimated unit valuations obtained from other sources, such as prices paid for the Partnership’s units in secondary market trades, and that such estimated unit valuations may well be lower than those estimated by the General Partners using the methodology required by the partnership agreement.

 

It should also be noted that once the Partnership begins the process of selling certain of its properties and that, as properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to limited partners, the remaining value of the Partnership’s portfolio of properties, and resulting value of Partnership’s limited partnership units, will naturally decline.

 

Operating cash available for distribution to the limited partners is generally distributed on a quarterly basis. Under the partnership agreement, distributions from net cash from operations are allocated first to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units (and limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units that have elected a conversion right that allows them to share in the distribution rights of limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units) until they have received 10% of their adjusted capital contributions. Cash available for distribution is then distributed to the General Partners until they have received an amount equal to 10% of cash distributions previously distributed to the limited partners. Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units and the General Partners on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.

 

Operating cash distributions made to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units during 2003 and 2004 are summarized below:

 

Operating

Distributions for

Quarter Ended


   Per Cash Preferred Unit

  

Return
of
Capital


  

General
Partner


   Total
Operating
Cash
Distributed


   Investment
Income


     

March 31, 2003

   $ 624,940    $ 0.22    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

June 30, 2003

   $ 587,500    $ 0.21    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

September 30, 2003

   $ 645,727    $ 0.23    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

December 31, 2003

   $ 660,161    $ 0.21    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

March 31, 2004

   $ 621,360    $ 0.21    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

June 30, 2004

   $ 438,807    $ 0.15    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

September 30, 2004

   $ 438,409    $ 0.15    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

December 31, 2004

   $ 440,857    $ 0.15    $ 0.00    $ 0.00

 

Fourth quarter 2004 operating distributions were accrued for accounting purposes in 2004 and paid to the Cash Preferred limited partners in February 2005. No operating cash distributions were paid to holders of Tax Preferred Units or to the General Partners in 2004 or 2003.

 

Page 11


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

The following sets forth a summary of the selected financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, and 2000.

 

     2004 (1)

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 

Total assets

     $28,380,032       $28,569,712       $29,625,341       $30,726,203       $22,251,384  

Equity in income of Joint Ventures

     2,162,669       1,634,000       1,726,553       1,577,523       664,401  

Net income

     1,948,163       1,450,772       1,547,894       1,555,418       856,228  

Net loss allocated to General Partners

     0       0       0       0       0  

Net income (loss) allocated to Limited Partners:

                                        

Cash Preferred

     2,489,975       2,563,592       2,655,622       2,591,027       1,209,438