Back to GetFilings.com




UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

(Mark One)

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number: 000-30928

 


 

PATH 1 NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

DELAWARE   13-3989885
(State of incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6215 FERRIS SQUARE, SUITE 140

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121

(858) 450-4220

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2004, was approximately $19,711,000. 1,291,966 shares of Common Stock held by officers, directors and holders of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of March 28, 2005 was 6,861,606.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Report. Such definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

 



PATH 1 NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

 

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

 

INDEX

 

          PAGE

     PART I     

Item 1.

  

Business

   3

Item 2.

  

Properties

   19

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   19

Item 4.

  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   19
     PART II     

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

   20

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   21

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   22

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   32

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements

   32

Item 9.

  

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   32

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   32

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   32
     PART III     

Item 10.

  

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant*

   33

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation*

   33

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters*

   33

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions*

   33

Item 14.

  

Principal Accounting Fees and Services*

   33
     PART IV     

Item 15.

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

   33
    

Signatures

   38

 

Financial Statements


* Incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before May 2, 2005.


PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

OVERVIEW

 

We are an industry pioneer and leader in designing, developing and supplying products that enable the adaptation, transportation and delivery of broadcast-quality real-time video over private and public Internet Protocol (IP) networks, such as the networks that comprise the Internet. We currently offer two primary product lines that cater to different segments of the video market. Our Video Over IP gateway products are used by broadcasters and video service providers to transport live video content in real time between different locations, within a region, a country or even between countries—a process known as “long-haul transmission”. Since our products transmit video content over widely available IP communication networks, our customers can use existing infrastructure, thus lowering their costs and permitting them greater flexibility in the delivery of video content. Our Network Access Gateway products are primarily used by cable companies to supply video-on-demand, or VOD services. Our markets include cable, broadcast, satellite, telco, video carriers, mobile operators and enterprises.

 

Our principal executive offices are located at 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140, San Diego, California 92121. Our telephone number is (858) 450-4220, and our Internet website address is www.path1.com. We were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998.

 

In July 2003, we effected a 1-for-6 reverse split of our Common Stock. All share and share price numbers in this Form 10-K annual report are adjusted to reflect the reverse split.

 

INDUSTRY BACKGROUND

 

Current technologies for transmitting real-time, high-quality video over long distances require an established and fully dedicated circuit for the duration of a transmission, regardless of whether the circuit is being used by the end-user. The concept is similar to a traditional telephone network—a call is placed, a circuit between two (or multiple) points is established and thereafter remains open for the duration of the call (regardless of whether anyone is speaking). These technologies typically require that the network be designed to be able to handle twice the expected average capacity in order to prevent congestion during peak usage. These technologies also require procuring expensive, dedicated bandwidth that remains open at all times regardless of usage. Dedicated bandwidth is often priced on a monthly basis, requiring significant cost regardless of usage.

 

Cable and satellite companies have historically used technologies that typically require all available packages of programs be broadcast to every subscriber. As a result, limited bandwidth remains available for video on demand and similar interactive services requiring two-way communication. As a result, such services are currently available only on a limited basis and in select markets.

 

The rise of IP and packet-based networks

 

IP networks have been predominantly used to carry data traffic such as web site pages, e-mail and file transfers. Over the past few years, voice traffic, or VoIP, has been added to these networks as a replacement for more expensive circuit-switched telephony networks. Video is the most recent extension of data types that can be transported over IP networks. As a result, IP networks have become a powerful and flexible platform capable of supporting data, voice and video, all converged on the same network infrastructure.

 

The advent of IP and packet-based networks has resulted in a dramatic increase in the transmission and exchange of data, information and ideas. IP networks chop data into small packets that are addressed to and received by designated addresses. These packets are capable of being transmitted over networks independent of one another. Divided and reassembled by switches and directed from source to destination by routers, IP

 

3


networks minimize wasted bandwidth by using bandwidth in quick bursts and only when needed. IP networks typically require a design that only increases total network capacity by approximately 25% to handle peak load conditions. In addition, IP networks were designed to overcome failure of any particular portion of the network. In the event a particular pathway on the network fails, alternate routes to the same destination are available. But because each packet travels independent of the others and possibly by a different pathway, certain packets can be delayed or delivered out of order relative to others, or may not ever arrive at the intended destination.

 

The impact of late or missing packets on a transmission depends in large part on the form of communication. With respect to written text, for instance, delay in the arrival of packets will likely not be noticed by the recipient. For this reason, email is an ideal form of communication for IP networks. But in the case of transmissions that must be delivered continuously, such as real-time, high-quality video, even a few milliseconds of delay may be noticeable by the viewer. As the majority of video consumers have become accustomed to high-quality delivery, new service offerings must provide quality at least as good as that to which the target viewing audience has become accustomed. Thus, IP networks have historically not been well-suited for delivery of real-time, high-quality video. While it is currently possible to view video clips (such as movie trailers) over the Internet, the inability of current IP networks to deliver real-time, broadcast quality video requires that the clips first be downloaded, and then played. This download-and-play approach has limited application because, for instance, a 2.5-hour movie may generally take 6 hours to download over T1 or some types of DSL lines.

 

THE PATH 1 SOLUTION

 

We have developed the technologies and products that have overcome the above mentioned inherent limitations of IP networks for transporting live, broadcast quality video, thereby enabling broadcasters, telecos, carriers, satellite operators and cable companies to transport live video over these types of networks and thus enjoy the significant lower capital and operating costs of video transport, higher reliability and quality and other benefits over legacy circuit switched networks, satellite, ATM and other platforms. Our products provide significant benefits for contribution and primary distribution of video. Our products perform three primary functions: First, they process and prepare multiple video feeds for delivery over an IP network. Second, they combine video streams arriving over the IP network into single streams for delivery to the end-viewer. Third, and perhaps most important, they condition the video data to avoid impairments or disruptions that would otherwise deteriorate the quality of the video signal. Our products provide benefits and enable services as follows:

 

    Feasibility—IP offers wider bandwidths than are currently available on alternate video transmission methods (such as satellite and DS-3);

 

    Efficiency—by using bandwidth only when needed, a greater amount of content can be passed over a provider’s network.

 

    Decreased capital costs—the extensive installed base of IP networks and the equipment used to support them results in economies of scale and the availability of cost-effective products;

 

    Decreased operations costs—IP networks, designed to be fault-tolerant and self-correcting, reduce the need for redundant back-up networks and significantly reduce maintenance and support costs; and

 

    Customization and flexibility—the software architecture underpinning our products allows providers to increase the volume of video traffic being delivered simply by the remote activation of additional ports or features within our products, rather than incurring costs associated with new equipment installation.

 

    Content on demand—no longer compelled to broadcasting content uniformly to all end-users, providers can send specific content to only those requesting it, further reducing bandwidth constraints (both into the home and within the network);

 

We believe our technology can be used for a wide variety of purposes by communication service providers.

 

4


MARKETS WE SERVE

 

Broadcast TV

 

Broadcasters and news organizations often gather their live content outside the studio, and they may need to move this high quality video in real time over long distances to reach production and aggregation facilities. In the broadcast industry, video is both distributed (for example, a video program that a broadcaster broadcasts to its viewers) as well as contributed (for instance, the video clips from multiple sources that are transported between and among broadcast studios or affiliates to be assembled into a video segment such as a news report or feature story that is, in turn, distributed for broadcast to viewers). For both the distribution and contribution of broadcast quality video, broadcasters have traditionally used satellite links or procured dedicated bandwidth on fiber lines, both of which are very expensive and usually require multi-year contracts. Our products allow the same video to be moved over existing IP networks at significantly reduced cost. In 2004, roughly 50% of our product revenues were derived from the long haul broadcast market.

 

Video Carriers

 

Video carriers offer permanent and temporary video transport solutions to broadcasters as an outsourced, bundled service. These carriers own or lease the network infrastructure and rent time and capacity to content owners for delivery of live video material that may be delivered to studios, network affiliates, broadcast centers or headend facilities for ultimate distribution into homes. Our Cx1000 and Ax100 products are currently being used by video carriers to deliver broadcast video in key US and international cities. Customers using our products for long-haul transmission include the Vyvx division of WilTel Communications which used our Cx1000 product to carry both the live primary and backup high definition (“HD”) broadcasts of Super Bowl XXXIX® and Super Bowl XXXVIII® over Vyvx’s HD VenueNet. Vyvx accounted for approximately 8% and 17% of our product revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

Satellite Providers

 

Satellite providers broadcast signals to earth from satellites nearly 22,000 miles above sea level. Because of the coverage area (or “footprint”) from that altitude, satellite broadcasts are capable of reaching vast areas. Uplinking content to the satellite for subsequent broadcast back to Earth, however, must be done at earth stations located in areas with characteristics favorable for uplinking. Currently, many satellite providers collect content at these uplink earth stations. As a result, content often “hops” from its source to and from the Earth via interim earth stations and interim satellites until its reaches the uplink earth station positioned to deliver the content up to the intended satellite for broadcast to satellite subscribers. Moreover, satellites have a maximum 15-year useful life, requiring satellite providers to periodically revisit the extreme expense of launching and maintaining a satellite in orbit.

 

Our Cx1000 product line allows satellite providers to gather content at uplink earth stations without the need to hop the content through interim satellites, reducing the strain on, and cost of, satellite networks and their maintenance. In addition to the cost-savings, collecting information at uplink earth stations via IP networks, as opposed to satellite hops, increases the speed by which information moves from source to consumer. Use of our products enables satellite providers to avoid some of the delay associated with “live” satellite feeds. Each satellite hop introduces a half-second delay whereas an existing terrestrial fiber international circuit has less than a quarter-second delay. PanAmSat is an example of a satellite provider using our Cx1000 product over terrestrial fiber to interconnect earth stations for video routing with the least delay.

 

As cable operators expand the number of channels offered and introduce services such as VOD and HDTV, satellite providers are seeking to protect and expand their subscriber base in a number of ways. Satellite operators now have the right to provide local channels to local markets in the United States and have made available local channels in most of the largest metropolitan markets. Recent advances in digital compression technology and terrestrial transport now allow satellite operators to cost-effectively add new high definition channels to their line-up to further expand their video entertainment offerings.

 

5


Mobile Video

 

Mobile operators are launching video content services for their subscribers. Our products enable content owners, mobile content aggregators and wireless carriers to offer live video to mobile devices in addition to the streaming media content in their current offerings. Path 1 products can be used to transport over IP networks a variety of compressed videos that can be carried over MPEG-2 transport streams, including MPEG-2, MPEG-4, and VC-1 videos, at speeds of up to 214 Mbps. Our products serve as the critical quality of service assurance, preserving the quality of the video content throughout the entire network up to the point of handoff to a transcoder in the local wireless network. Transcoding further compresses the video to data rates from 40 to 200 Kbps for transmission over the cellular network. Because of the significant compression required to transport video to a mobile device, our products are critical for preserving the quality of the video prior to transcoding.

 

Cable Companies

 

Cable companies are quickly migrating to an all-digital environment. However, they still have to contend with a large portion of their infrastructure using legacy analog technologies. Our products can play a key role in the digital migration plan for cable operators. Our Chameleon vidX products are designed for cable companies to allow them to use existing digital set-top boxes already in consumer homes to provide video-on-demand services, a significant competitive advantage over satellite providers. The more efficient use of existing bandwidth (both into the home and within the network) allows cable companies to increase the volume of content (whether movies, television or live events) available for delivery whenever requested by the cable subscriber, or to increase the number of subscribers served with existing content volume.

 

Our products enable cable companies to deliver HD television that can potentially overwhelm the bandwidth capacity of current delivery technologies. Using our products, providers can avoid incurring significant capital expenditures to increase the capacity of existing infrastructure, and can avoid significant recurring costs to maintain and support the expanded networks resulting from HD television and increased numbers of channels.

 

Enterprise

 

Certain industries require delivery of exceptionally high resolution, real-time video. Military and other government units require a unique level of sound and picture quality upon which they can make critical, high-consequence decisions. Movie studios demand similar standards upon which to make artistic or editorial decisions regarding their multi-million dollar productions.

 

To attain the level of resolution required by studios and for government applications requires data to be delivered uncompressed. Compression, a common means for transporting high-resolution data, is designed to eliminate what would typically be redundant or unnecessary information, or to allow data to fit on satellites’ limited bandwidth. Because of the unerring detail required by these industries, what is generally acceptable TV-quality degradation becomes unacceptable. The opposing requirements of exceptionally high resolution and high bit-rate make most delivery methods (such as satellite) unusable. Our Cx1000 product enables the delivery of exceptionally high resolution, high bit-rate, and real-time video.

 

OUR SALES AND MARKETING STRATEGY

 

In the United States, we have historically sold our products principally through our own direct sales force which is organized geographically to support customer requirements. In 2004, we initiated a new sales and marketing strategy that focuses on building partnering relationships with key industry partners where our products are complementary and can be sold as a solution. We also established new partnering relationships with Harmonic Inc. and Packet Video Network Solutions, an Alcatel company. We are continuing to develop similar type partnering relationships where we expect to engage in joint sales and marketing efforts with our partners in pursuing new business opportunities.

 

6


We sell to international customers through independent distributors and integrators. International distributors are generally responsible for importing the products and providing certain installation, technical support and other services to customers in their territory. Our direct sales force and distributors are supported by a highly trained technical staff including sales engineers who work closely with operators to develop technical proposals and design systems to optimize system performance and economic benefits to operators.

 

An element of our strategy is to aggressively pursue (within our financial and other means) opportunities to introduce our products into the market and that create demand for our products. As such, we have entered into selling arrangements with major equipment providers and system integrators, both domestically and abroad, to enable greater market penetration of our products. We intend to continue our pursuit of those strategic relationships where we believe we are capable of expanding our sales opportunities within the markets we currently serve as well as those markets that may emerge in the future.

 

Our marketing organization develops strategies for product lines and, in conjunction with our sales force, identifies evolving technical and application needs of customers so that our product development resources can be most effectively and efficiently deployed to meet anticipated product requirements. Our marketing organization is also responsible for setting price levels, demand forecasting and general support of the sales force, particularly at major accounts.

 

OUR TECHNOLOGY

 

Flexible Product Architecture

 

In a market that is largely comprised of equipment based on fixed hardware designs, Path 1 has chosen to utilize designs based on high-powered network processors with specialized applications software (firmware) to implement a wide variety of products without requiring an equally large number of unique hardware platforms. Our common hardware platform is scalable, and helps to control product cost and reduce inventory risk while also minimizing time to market for new features and functions.

 

Path 1 products can be field-upgraded, field repaired and even re-purposed for different uses by changing the firmware loaded into the same hardware platform. In most cases these changes can be made through the network, rather than requiring on-site personnel or factory returns. This product architecture, and the resulting flexibility it affords, has proven to be a unique differentiator for us.

 

The video over IP network environment is still considered to be a mix of the video world with its hundreds of standards and proprietary approaches, and the IP/data world with its much more regularized standards and proprietary implementations. Path 1 products bridge between these two worlds, so flexibility to deal with non-standard, proprietary implementations in different networks has been a major Path 1 strength. This flexibility allows us to provide our customers with quick product changes that allow video to be sent over IP networks in spite of equipment and network design idiosyncrasies that would otherwise prevent proper communications from taking place.

 

As network changes take place, either on a planned or an emergency basis, Path 1 boxes can be upgraded to meet the new needs with minimal impact to the networks. For example, a customer may begin with a 4 port software-enabled version of our Chameleon products. At any point the same equipment can be field-upgraded to add input or output ports or increase video stream counts or rates—through network-downloaded licensing changes. In the case of our Cx1000 and Ax100 products, these products can be upgraded with our RepliCaster upgrade to provide for video stream replication.

 

7


Product Technology – Long Haul

 

Path 1 products are designed to overcome the inherent limitations in IP networks that would otherwise make it difficult if not impossible to transport live, broadcast quality video over these networks. IP networks, in general, are not perfect in their timing and in their ability to prevent packet loss. Through the use of proprietary technologies, however, our long-haul products restore timing that may have been skewed as the packets traveled through the networks. Our products also have the ability to restore lost or out of order packets through the use of either Path 1 proprietary forward error correction or through Pro-MPEG standards-based forward error correction. Packet loss often occurs in large blocks, due to a variety of network problems. Path 1 proprietary forward error correction and transport restore losses of thousands of consecutive packets, which is extremely valuable in networks that are particularly “bursty” in nature. This resiliency has allowed some of our customers to transport high quality video over the public Internet. Moreover, our customers can send live video over MPLS networks without concern for the impact of network fast re-routing.

 

Even in the case of the emerging international standards for transporting live video over IP networks, Path 1 provides a unique differentiated solution. In contrast to most of our competitors, our implementation of Pro-MPEG standard forward error correction in the Vx8000, our first standards-based transport gateway, enables handling the maximum allowed number of consecutive lost packets. This is possible due to the large memory buffers and processor-driven implementation in our products.

 

Our Cx1000 is one of the few products in the market that is capable of SDI data rates. With advanced features, such as the ability to replicate a single SDI stream into three streams, a Cx1000 can transmit a full 1 Gigabit/second stream of video into the network. The RepliCaster feature has been especially useful when MPLS networks are not appropriate.

 

Product Technology – Multiplexing, De-multiplexing, and Pass-thru

 

A large amount of legacy equipment used in video transport networks has been designed to output or input in video ASI format. Our Chameleon vidX products can convert multiple ASI video streams to Ethernet-based Internet Protocol and can also take Ethernet-based Internet Protocol streams containing MPEG 2 video and convert to ASI video. Doing so allows legacy equipment to be used in today’s IP networks. The flexibility provided by the Path 1 technology provides multiplexing, de-multiplexing and pass-thru of ASI streams utilizing a Chameleon vidX unit at both ends of the IP network.

 

Product Development

 

Our product development efforts are continuous, and are based on customer requirements for increased performance, flexibility and functionality. These efforts include upgrades and functional enhancements to current products and ultimately the development of a new generation of products.

 

Our most recent new product is the Vx8000, a multi port ASI and IP product capable of handling up to 8 ports of ASI video for long haul IP transport. This product makes use of the latest Pro-MPEG Code of Practice #3 forward error correction and RTP transport.

 

Our next generation products will make use of higher performance network processors developed by Intel and FPGAs by Xilinx and Altera. The use of higher performance electronics will increase flexibility of our products and also increase capacity to handle uncompressed High Definition video as well as an increased number of High Definition and Standard Definition streams.

 

COMPETITION

 

We face competition in each of the target markets for our products, services and products in development. Our competition includes vendors that produce products for legacy video transport networks such as satellite,

 

8


circuit switch, Radio Frequency (RF), ATM and other transport platforms. We also compete with vendors that produce products that enable the transport of video over IP networks including, but not limited to, companies such as Scientific-Atlanta, Tandberg Television, Thomson, Harris and Aastra. A number of established and development-stage or start-up companies in these markets offer similar or alternative technological solutions for convergence of real-time data, such as audio and video over IP networks, as well as real-time, high-quality transition of video over IP networks. We anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as adoption rates for video over IP transport increase, and as competitors offering video over IP products and solutions enhance their product offerings and new competitors emerge. Our competitors have significantly greater resources and industry clout and, therefore, could threaten the viability of our business.

 

Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry than we do. As a result, certain of these competitors may be able to develop products that directly compete with ours and may be able to succeed with inferior product offerings. These competitors may also be able to adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more readily, take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more effectively, devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. In addition, these competitors have entered and will likely continue to enter into joint ventures or consortiums to provide additional value-added services competitive with those provided by us.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

 

We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and agreements to protect our proprietary technology and brands. We also rely on patent protection. We have been issued three patents and have several other patent applications pending.

 

We rely on trade secrets to protect certain areas of our technology, including the areas of fast context switching in embedded operating systems, real-time embedded architectures, signal processing techniques for artifact-free signals, and low-latency software drivers. We believe that factors such as the creativity and technological skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, reliable customer service and product maintenance are essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position.

 

Our policy is to enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with all employees and consultants, and nondisclosure agreements with all other parties to whom we disclose confidential information. These protections, however, may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property rights.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

As of December 31, 2004, we had 32 employees: 13 were engineers, 10 were marketing and sales personnel, 4 were finance and administration personnel, 1 in customer service, 1 in corporate development and 3 were employed in operations. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit. We have never experienced a work stoppage.

 

WEBSITE ACCESS TO SEC FILINGS

 

We maintain an Internet website at www.path1.com. We make available free of charge on our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

 

9


RISK FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

 

Investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer.

 

Our limited sales history and limited revenues to date make it difficult to evaluate our prospects.

 

We were founded in January 1998 and have only been selling our products commercially since 2002, which makes an evaluation of our prospects difficult. Because of our limited sales history, and the often uncertain sales cycles we face selling our products, we have limited insight into trends that may emerge and affect our business. In addition, we have generated only limited revenues to date from sales of our products, and the income potential of our business and market are unproven. An investor in our securities must consider the challenges, expenses and difficulties we face as our sales and marketing efforts mature.

 

We have incurred losses since inception and will likely not be profitable at least for the next several quarters.

 

We have incurred operating losses since our inception in January 1998, and we expect to incur losses and negative cash flow for at least the next several quarters. As of December 31, 2004, our accumulated deficit was approximately $45.5 million. We expect to continue to incur significant operating, sales, marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses and, as a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we cannot assure you that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.

 

We face competition from established and developing companies, many of which have significantly greater resources, and we expect such competition to grow.

 

The markets for our products, future products and services are competitive. We face direct and indirect competition from a number of established companies, including Tandberg Television, Thomson, Harris, Aastra, and Scientific-Atlanta, as well as development stage companies, and we anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as existing competitors seek to enhance their product offerings and new competitors emerge. Many of our competitors have greater resources, sell a more complete product line or solution, have higher name recognition, have more established reputations within the industry and maintain stronger marketing, manufacturing, distribution, sales and customer service capabilities than we do.

 

The technologies that our competitors and we offer are expensive to design, develop, manufacture and distribute. Competitive technologies may be owned and distributed by established companies that possess substantially greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources than we do and, as a result, such companies may be able to develop their products more rapidly and market their products more extensively than we can.

 

Competitive technologies that offer a similar or superior capacity to converge and transmit audio, video and telephonic data on a real-time basis over existing networks may currently exist or may be developed in the future. We cannot assure you that any technology currently being developed by us is not being developed by others or that our technology development efforts will result in products that are competitive in terms of price or performance. If our competitors develop products or services that offer significant price or performance advantages as compared to our current and proposed products and services, or if we are unable to improve our technology or develop or acquire more competitive technology, we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage and our business could be adversely affected. In addition, competitors with greater financial, marketing, distribution and other resources than we have may be able to leverage such resources to gain wide acceptance of products inferior to ours.

 

10


Our product line is relatively narrow, whereas many of our competitors can offer customers a complete solution. This is a significant competitive disadvantage for us.

 

We need to raise additional capital in the near future.

 

Our net losses have reduced our cash position to $929,000 at December 31, 2004. Even after taking into account the proceeds from our first quarter 2005 private placement financing, we believe that in order to execute our ambitious growth plans, we will need to to raise additional capital in the near term given our projected cash burn rate. We cannot ensure that financing would be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Our investment bankers, Silverwood Partners LLC, may not be able to help us successfully find any additional financing or other strategic opportunities for us. Our inability to raise capital when needed would seriously affect our ability to execute our growth plans and would harm our business. In addition, additional equity financing may dilute our stockholders’ interest, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and could result in a substantial portion of our operating cash flow being dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on debt.

 

We need to develop and introduce new and enhanced products in a timely manner to remain competitive.

 

Broadband communications markets are characterized by continuing technological advancement, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. To compete successfully, we must design, develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly higher levels of performance and reliability. However, in addition to the technological and managerial risks inherent in any product development effort, we may not be able to develop or introduce successfully these products if the development effort requires more financial resources than we are able to bring to bear, or if our products:

 

    are not cost effective,

 

    are not brought to market in a timely manner,

 

    are not in accordance with evolving industry standards and architectures, or

 

    fail to achieve market acceptance.

 

Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new products that will use next generation Intel IXP processors and other key components. These technologies are changing rapidly, and we will be required to spend significant sums on research and development – particularly for new hardware designs and software development – to produce these next generation products. Our existing products may soon become difficult to produce because of end-of life components, because of emerging governmental restrictions on the manufacture and sale of electronic products containing lead parts and components, and because of increasing demand in the market for new standards-based products.

 

In order to develop and market successfully certain of our planned products for digital applications, we may be required to enter into technology development or licensing agreements with third parties. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into any necessary technology development or licensing agreement on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The failure to enter into technology development or licensing agreements when necessary could limit our ability to develop and market new products and, accordingly, could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

 

Delivery of real-time, broadcast-quality video via IP networks is a new market and subject to evolving standards.

 

Delivery of real-time, broadcast-quality video over IP networks is novel and evolving, and it is possible that communication service providers or their suppliers will adopt alternative architectures and technologies for delivering real-time, broadcast-quality video over IP networks or other types of networks that are incompatible with our current or future products. In addition to competing with video over IP vendors, we compete with

 

11


existing alternative technologies and architectures for transporting live broadcast video that have existed for many years such as satellite, circuit switched networks and ATM, and our customers may not be willing to move to using an IP network for transporting live video.

 

If we are unable to design, develop, manufacture and sell products that incorporate or are compatible with these new or existing architectures or technologies, our business could suffer. Moreover, our industry is rapidly adopting technical standards for transporting video over IP networks, and many customers appear to prefer standards-based or “open standards” products such as, for example, those operating the PRO-MPEG Code of Practice. Our Vx8000 is the first product we are launching that will be Pro-MPEG standards-based. This move towards offering standards-based products for transporting video over IP networks may result in increased competition, and may also have a negative impact on our ability to offer differentiated products incorporating our proprietary technology, thereby causing a negative impact to our gross profit margins and results of operations.

 

Pricing pressure on our products has placed us at a competitive disadvantage.

 

We have recently experienced significant pricing pressure in some of the markets for our products, predominantly the cable market. Due to competitive factors, cable customers have been willing to pay only reduced amounts for our products. This has placed us at a competitive disadvantage with our competitors which have the financial strength to withstand pricing pressures. Most of our competitors in the cable market sell a broader array of products as a bundled solution to cable customers, and these competitors can offer substantial discounts to cable customers on products that compete directly with ours, sometimes even as loss leaders. If we are unable to regain larger margins on such products, we may be forced to exit certain market segments and our results of operations and profitability will be negatively affected.

 

Our quarterly financial results are likely to fluctuate significantly.

 

Our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly from period to period, particularly because our sales prospects are uncertain and our sales are made on a purchase order basis. In addition, we have not proven our ability to execute our business strategy with respect to establishing and expanding sales and distribution channels. Fluctuations may result from:

 

    decreased spending on new products such as ours by communication service providers or their suppliers,

 

    the timing of new product offerings, acquisitions, licenses or other significant events by us or our competitors,

 

    problems in our execution of key functions such as manufacturing, marketing and/or sales,

 

    our ability to establish a productive sales force or partner with communication service providers or their suppliers,

 

    demand and pricing of the products we offer,

 

    purchases of our products by communication service providers in large, infrequent amounts consistent with past practice,

 

    consumer acceptance of the services our products enable,

 

    interruption in the manufacturing or distribution of our products,

 

    the willingness and ability of customers to conduct necessary trials and tests of our products prior to sale, and

 

    general economic and market conditions, including war, and other conditions specific to the telecommunications industry.

 

As a result, we may experience significant, unanticipated (or unexpectedly large) quarterly losses.

 

12


The sales cycle for certain of our products is lengthy, which makes forecasting of our customer orders and revenues difficult.

 

The sales cycle for certain of our products is lengthy, often lasting six months to more than a year. Our customers generally conduct significant technical evaluations, including customer trials, of our products as well as competing products prior to making a purchasing decision. In addition, purchasing decisions may also be delayed because of a customer’s internal budget approval processes. Because of the lengthy sales cycle and the size of customer orders, if orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular period do not occur in that period, our revenues and operating results for that particular quarter could suffer. Moreover, a portion of our expenses related to an anticipated order is fixed and difficult to reduce or change, which may further impact our revenues and operating results for a particular period.

 

The rate of market adoption of our technology is uncertain and we could experience long and unpredictable sales cycles.

 

Our products are based on new technology and, as a result, it is extremely difficult to predict the timing and rate of market adoption of our products, as well the rate of market adoption of applications enhanced by our products such as video-on-demand. Accordingly, we have limited visibility into when we might realize substantial revenue from product sales. Our limited visibility is compounded by our inability to foresee when, if ever, delivery of video over IP networks will be significantly embraced by communication service providers.

 

We are providing new and highly technical products and services to enable new applications. Thus, the duration of our sales efforts with prospective customers in all market segments is likely to be lengthy as we seek to educate them on the uses and benefits of our products. This sales cycle could be lengthened even further by potential delays related to product implementation as well as delays over which we have little or no control, including:

 

    the length or total dollar amount of our prospective customers’ planned purchasing programs contemplating our products;

 

    changes in prospective customers’ capital equipment budgets or purchasing priorities;

 

    prospective customers’ internal acceptance reviews; and

 

    the complexity of prospective customers’ technical needs.

 

These uncertainties, combined with many potential customers’ measured approaches to corporate spending on technology generally (as well as new technologies such as ours), substantially complicate our planning and may reduce prospects for sales of our products. If our prospective customers curtail or eliminate their purchasing programs, decrease their budgets or reduce their purchasing priority, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

Changes in senior management may result in difficulties.

 

On March 29, 2004, Frederick Cary resigned as our chief executive officer and president and was replaced by John Zavoli. On April 26, 2004, Patrick Bohana accepted early retirement from his position as Vice President, Sales and General Manager; on September 1, 2004, we hired Jeff Hale to replace Mr. Bohana as Vice President, Sales. Changes in senior management of small companies are inherently disruptive, and efforts to implement any new strategic or operating goals may also prove to be disruptive. In addition, until we hire new senior executives to assist him, there is a risk that Mr. Zavoli’s many responsibilities (he is also serving as our chief financial officer, general counsel and secretary) will overwhelm him to the point that he will not be able to devote sufficient attention to one or more of his important roles. We are seeking, but may not be able to successfully hire, a new chief financial officer.

 

13


Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of one or more of our key customers would harm our business.

 

Historically, a significant majority of our sales have been to relatively few customers. We expect that sales to relatively few customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales for the foreseeable future. Almost all of our sales are made on a purchase order basis, and none of our customers has entered into a long-term agreement requiring it to purchase our products. The loss of, or any reduction in orders from, a significant customer would harm our business.

 

The success of our business is dependent on establishing and expanding sales and distribution channels for our products.

 

Third-Party Collaborations. Although we intend to establish strategic relationships with leading suppliers, integrators and resellers to promote and distribute our products, we may not succeed. We may not be able to identify adequate partners, and even if identified, we may not be able to enter into agreements with these entities on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. To the extent that we enter into any such agreements with third parties, any revenues we receive from sales of our products in those markets will depend upon the efforts of such third parties, which in most instances will not be within our control. If we are unable to leverage effectively a partner to market our products more broadly than we can through our internal sales force, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Internal Sales Force. We have limited experience in marketing and selling our products. We intend to expand our direct and indirect sales force and independent channel partners domestically and internationally for the promotion of our product lines and other future products to suppliers and communication service providers of all kinds. Competition for quality sales and marketing personnel and channel partners is intense. In addition, new employees, particularly new sales and marketing employees, will require training and education concerning our products and will also increase our operating expenses. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining qualified sales and marketing personnel and partners. As a result, there can be no assurance that the sales force we are able to build will be of a sufficient size or quality to effectively market our products.

 

We may not be able to profit from growth if we are unable to manage effectively the growth.

 

We anticipate that we will need to grow in the future. This anticipated growth will place strain on our managerial, financial and personnel resources. The pace of our anticipated expansion, together with the complexity of the technology involved in our products and the level of expertise and technological sophistication incorporated into the provision of our design, engineering, implementation and support services, demands an unusual amount of focus on the operational needs of our future customers for quality and reliability, as well as timely delivery and post-installation and post-consultation field and remote support. In addition, new customers, especially customers that purchase novel and technologically sophisticated products such as ours, generally require significant engineering support. Therefore, adoption of our platforms and products by customers would increase the strain on our resources.

 

To reach our goals, we may need to hire rapidly, while at the same time investing in our infrastructure. We expect that we will also have to expand our facilities. In addition, we will need to successfully train, motivate and manage new employees; expand our sales and support organization; integrate new management and employees into our overall operations; and establish improved financial and accounting systems. Indeed, even without consideration of future needs imposed by any future growth of our business, we need to upgrade several of these areas even to support our present levels of business, because during the pre-IPO periods of tight cash, we focused our resources on areas other than business infrastructure.

 

We may not succeed in anticipating all of the changing demands that growth would impose on our systems, procedures and structure. If we fail to effectively manage our expansion, if any, our business may suffer.

 

14


We will depend on broadcasting, cable and satellite industry spending for a substantial portion of our revenue and any decrease or delay in spending in these industries would negatively impact our resources, operating results and financial condition.

 

Demand for our products will depend on the magnitude and timing of spending by cable television operators, broadcasters, satellite operators and carriers for adopting new products for installation with their networks.

 

Spending by customers in these sectors is dependent on a variety of factors, including:

 

    overall demand for communication services and the acceptance of new video, voice and data services;

 

    annual budget cycles;

 

    the status of federal, local and foreign government regulation of telecommunications and television broadcasting;

 

    access to financing;

 

    evolving industry standards and network architectures;

 

    competitive pressures;

 

    discretionary customer spending patterns;

 

    general economic conditions.

 

Recent developments in capital markets have reduced access to funding for potential and existing customers causing delays in the timing and scale of deployments of our equipment, as well as the postponement of certain projects by our customers. The timing of deployment of our equipment can be subject to a number of other risks, including the availability of skilled engineering and technical personnel.

 

Product quality problems may negatively affect our revenues and results from operations, as well as disrupt our research and development efforts.

 

We produce highly complex products that incorporate leading edge technology including hardware, software and embedded firmware. In addition to problems relating to the physical quality of manufacturing, our software and other technology may contain “bugs” that can prevent our products from performing as intended. There can be no assurance that our pre-shipment testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects either in individual products or which could affect numerous shipments that, in turn, could create customer dissatisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or affect gross margins if the cost of remedying the problems exceed our reserves established for this purpose. Our inability to cure a product defect may result in the failure of a product line, serious damage to our reputation, and increased engineering and product re-engineering costs that individually or collectively would have a material adverse impact on our revenues and operating results.

 

In 2004, we had to focus some of our engineering personnel from their research and development efforts in favor of sustaining engineering efforts to satisfy our customers’ needs relative to existing products. This use of engineering resources could harm our development of new products.

 

We rely on several key suppliers of components, sub-assemblies and modules that we use to manufacture our products, and we are subject to manufacturing and product supply chain risks.

 

We purchase components, sub-assemblies and modules from a limited number of vendors and suppliers that we use to manufacture and test our products. Our reliance on these vendors and suppliers involves several risks including, but not limited to, the inability to purchase or obtain delivery of adequate supplies of such components, sub-assemblies or modules, increases in the prices of such items, quality, and overall reliability of our vendors and suppliers. Although in many cases we use standard parts and components for our products,

 

15


certain components are presently available only from a single source or limited sources. Some of the materials used to produce our products are purchased from foreign suppliers. We do not generally maintain long-term agreements with any of our vendors or suppliers. Thus we may thus be unable to procure necessary components, sub-assemblies or modules in time to manufacture and ship our products, thereby harming our business.

 

Our existing products may be subject to growing “lead-free” legislative efforts in the United States and abroad which restrict or prohibit the manufacture and/or sale of electronic products that contain lead. Our current products do contain various lead-based components. We will be required to redesign our products to eliminate lead components by 2006, and we may face difficulty in procuring lead-free parts and components and reengineering our products resulting in our inability to successfully complete such product re-designs which, in turn, could have a material negative impact on our results of operations.

 

We operate under an agreement with a leading parts vendor to provide turnkey outsourced manufacturing services. To reduce manufacturing lead times and to ensure adequate component supply, we have instructed our vendor to procure inventory based on criteria and forecasts as defined by us. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, an oversupply of parts, obsolete components or finished goods could result, thereby adversely affecting our gross margins and results of operations.

 

We may also be subject to disruptions in our manufacturing and product-testing operations that could have a material adverse affect on our operating results.

 

We may not be able to hire and assimilate key employees.

 

Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees, including management, technical and sales personnel. Significant competition exists for employees in our industry and in our geographic region. We may be unable to identify and attract highly qualified employees in the future. In addition, we may not be able to assimilate successfully these employees or hire qualified personnel to replace them. The loss of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain key personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objectives such as timely and effective product introductions.

 

We are dependent on our key employees for our future success.

 

Our success depends on the efforts and abilities of our senior management, in particular John R. Zavoli, and certain other key personnel. If any of these key employees leaves or is seriously injured and unable to work and we are unable to find a qualified replacement, then our business and results of operations could be materially harmed.

 

Changes in the mix of product sales, product distribution model or customer base could negatively impact our sales and margins.

 

We may encounter a shift in the mix of the various products that we sell – products that have varying selling prices based in part on the type of product sold, competitive conditions in the particular market into which the product is sold, applicable sales discounts, licensed product feature sets, whether we sell our products as an OEM, and whether the sale is a direct sale or an indirect channel sale through our VARs and resellers. Any change in any of these variables could result in a material adverse impact on our gross sales, gross margins and operating results.

 

We may be unable to obtain full patent protection for our core technology and there is a risk of infringement.

 

Since 2001, we have submitted several patent applications and provisional patent applications on topics surrounding our core technologies to supplement our existing patent portfolio. There can be no assurance that

 

16


these or other patents will be issued to us, or, if additional patents are issued, that they or our three existing patents will be broad enough to prevent significant competition or that third parties will not infringe upon or design around such patents to develop competing products. There is no assurance that these or any future patent applications will be granted, or if granted, that they will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented.

 

In addition to seeking patent protection for our products, we intend to rely upon a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights in our products.

 

We have to vigorously enforce our rights to, and protect our interests in, our intellectual property, and we may not be successful. For example, in March 2005, we filed suit in California Superior Court against QVidia Technologies, Inc. and Ronald Fellman for alleged misappropriation of our proprietary and confidential information. Discovery has not commenced and the case is now pending. There can be no assurance that these efforts will be adequate or prove successful, or that competitors have not or will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours.

 

There has been a trend toward litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the telecommunications industry. Although there are currently no lawsuits pending against us regarding possible infringement claims, there can be no assurance such claims will not be asserted in the future or that such assertions will not materially adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations. Any such suit, whether or not it has merit, would be costly to us in terms of employee time and defense costs and could materially adversely affect our business.

 

If an infringement or misappropriation claim is successfully asserted against us, we may need to obtain a license from the claimant to use the intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that such a license will be available on reasonable terms if at all.

 

We are subject to local, state and federal regulation.

 

Legislation affecting us (or the markets in which we compete) could adversely impact our ability to implement our business plan on a going-forward basis. The telecommunications industry in which we operate is heavily regulated and these regulations are subject to frequent change. Future changes in local, state, federal or foreign regulations and legislation pertaining to the telecommunications field may adversely affect prospective purchasers of telecommunications equipment, which in turn would adversely affect our business.

 

The market price of our common stock could be volatile and your investment could suffer a decline in value.

 

The market prices for our common stock is likely to be volatile and could be susceptible to wide price fluctuations due to a number of internal and external factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

 

    quarterly variations in operating results and overall financial condition;

 

    economic and political developments affecting technology spending generally and adoption of new technologies and products such as ours;