Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                 

Commission File Number 1-11277

VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

973-305-8800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  þ             No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registration is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)

Yes  þ             No  ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $2.3 billion on June 30, 2004.

There were 98,877,262 shares of Common Stock outstanding at February 18, 2005.

Documents incorporated by reference:

Certain portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement (the “2005 Proxy Statement”) for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 6, 2005 will be incorporated by reference in Part III.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.     Business

Valley National Bancorp (“Valley”) is a New Jersey corporation registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“Holding Company Act”). At December 31, 2004, Valley had consolidated total assets of $10.8 billion, total deposits of $7.5 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $707.6 million. In addition to its principal subsidiary, Valley National Bank (“VNB”), Valley owns 100 percent of the voting shares of VNB Capital Trust I, through which it issued trust preferred securities. VNB Capital Trust I is not a consolidated subsidiary. See Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

VNB is a national banking association chartered in 1927 under the laws of the United States. VNB provides a full range of commercial and retail banking services. At December 31, 2004, VNB maintained 133 branch offices located in northern New Jersey and Manhattan. These services include the following: the acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits; extension of consumer, real estate, Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and other commercial credits; equipment leasing; and personal and corporate trust, as well as pension and fiduciary services. VNB also provides through wholly-owned subsidiaries the services of an all-line insurance agency, a title insurance agency, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registered investment advisors and a registered securities broker-dealer.

VNB’s subsidiaries are all included in the consolidated financial statements of Valley. These subsidiaries include a mortgage servicing company; a title insurance agency; asset management advisors which are SEC registered investment advisors; an all-line insurance agency offering property and casualty, life and health insurance; a subsidiary which holds, maintains and manages investment assets for VNB; a subsidiary which owns and services auto loans; a subsidiary which specializes in asset-based lending; a subsidiary which offers both commercial equipment leases and financing for general aviation aircraft; and a subsidiary which is a registered broker-dealer. VNB’s subsidiaries also include a real estate investment trust subsidiary (“REIT”) which owns real estate related investments and a REIT subsidiary which owns some of the real estate utilized by VNB and related real estate investments. All subsidiaries mentioned above are wholly-owned by VNB, except Valley owns less than 1 percent of the holding company for the REIT subsidiary which owns some of the real estate utilized by VNB and related real estate investments. Each REIT must have 100 or more shareholders to qualify as a REIT, and therefore, both have issued less than 20 percent of their outstanding non-voting preferred stock to individuals, most of whom are non-senior management VNB employees.

VNB has four business segments it monitors and reports on to manage its business operations. These segments are consumer lending, commercial lending, investment management, and corporate and other adjustments. For financial data on the four business segments see Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Valley makes its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments thereto available on its website at www.valleynationalbank.com without charge as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing them to the SEC. Also available on the website are Valley’s corporate code of ethics that applies to all of Valley’s employees including principal officers and directors, Valley’s Audit Committee Charter, Compensation and Human Resources Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter as well as a copy of Valley’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Additionally, Valley will provide without charge, a copy of its Form 10-K to any shareholder by mail. Requests should be sent to Valley National Bancorp, Attention: Shareholder Relations, 1455 Valley Road, Wayne, NJ 07470.

Competition

The market for banking and bank-related services is highly competitive. Valley and VNB compete with other providers of financial services such as other bank holding companies, commercial and savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, money market and mutual funds, mortgage companies, title agencies, asset managers, insurance companies and a growing list of other local, regional and national institutions which offer financial services. Mergers between financial institutions within New Jersey and in neighboring

3

Table of Contents

states have added competitive pressure. Competition intensified as a consequence of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (discussed below) and interstate banking laws now in effect. Valley and VNB compete by offering quality products and convenient services at competitive prices. In order to maintain and enhance its competitive position, Valley regularly reviews its products, locations, alternative delivery channels and various acquisition prospects and periodically engages in discussions regarding possible acquisitions.

Employees

At December 31, 2004, VNB and its subsidiaries employed 2,345 full-time equivalent persons. Management considers relations with its employees to be satisfactory.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

The banking industry is highly regulated. Statutory and regulatory controls increase a bank holding company’s cost of doing business and limit the options of its management to deploy assets and maximize income. The following discussion is not intended to be a complete list of all the activities regulated by the banking laws or of the impact of such laws and regulations on VNB. It is intended only to briefly summarize some material provisions.

Bank Holding Company Regulation

Valley is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Holding Company Act. As a bank holding company, Valley is supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and is required to file reports with the FRB and provide such additional information as the FRB may require.

The Holding Company Act prohibits Valley, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank and from engaging in any business other than that of banking, managing and controlling banks or furnishing services to subsidiary banks, except that it may, upon application, engage in, and may own shares of companies engaged in, certain businesses found by the FRB to be so closely related to banking “as to be a proper incident thereto.” The Holding Company Act requires prior approval by the FRB of the acquisition by Valley of more than five percent of the voting stock of any additional bank. Satisfactory capital ratios and Community Reinvestment Act ratings and anti-money laundering policies are generally prerequisites to obtaining federal regulatory approval to make acquisitions. The policy of the FRB provides that a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support the subsidiary bank in circumstances in which it might not do so absent that policy. Acquisitions through VNB require approval of the office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States (“OCC”). The Holding Company Act does not place territorial restrictions on the activities of non-bank subsidiaries of bank holding companies. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, discussed below, allows Valley to expand into insurance, securities, merchant banking activities, and other activities that are financial in nature.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Interstate Banking and Branching Act”) enables bank holding companies to acquire banks in states other than its home state, regardless of applicable state law. The Interstate Banking and Branching Act also authorizes banks to merge across state lines, thereby creating interstate banks with branches in more than one state. Under the legislation, each state had the opportunity to “opt-out” of this provision. Furthermore, a state may “opt-in” with respect to de novo branching, thereby permitting a bank to open new branches in a state in which the bank does not already have a branch. Without de novo branching, an out-of-state commercial bank can enter the state only by acquiring an existing bank or branch. The vast majority of states have allowed interstate banking by merger but have not authorized de novo branching.

New Jersey enacted legislation to authorize interstate banking and branching and the entry into New Jersey of foreign country banks. New Jersey did not authorize de novo branching into the state. However, under federal law, federal savings banks which meet certain conditions may branch de novo into a state, regardless of state law.

4

Table of Contents

Regulation of Bank Subsidiary

VNB is subject to the supervision of, and to regular examination by, the OCC. Various laws and the regulations thereunder applicable to Valley and its bank subsidiary impose restrictions and requirements in many areas, including capital requirements, the maintenance of reserves, establishment of new offices, the making of loans and investments, consumer protection, employment practices and entry into new types of business. There are various legal limitations, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which govern the extent to which a bank subsidiary may finance or otherwise supply funds to its holding company or its holding company’s non-bank subsidiaries. Under federal law, no bank subsidiary may, subject to certain limited exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in the securities of, its parent or the non-bank subsidiaries of its parent (other than direct subsidiaries of such bank which are not financial subsidiaries) or take their securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Each bank subsidiary is also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.

Dividend Limitations

Valley is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. Valley’s revenues (on a parent company only basis) result in substantial part from dividends paid to Valley by VNB. Payment of dividends to Valley by its subsidiary bank, without prior regulatory approval, is subject to regulatory limitations. Under the National Bank Act, dividends may be declared only if, after payment thereof, capital would be unimpaired and remaining surplus would equal 100 percent of capital. Moreover, a national bank may declare, in any one year, dividends only in an amount aggregating not more than the sum of its net profits for such year and its retained net profits for the preceding two years. In addition, the bank regulatory agencies have the authority to prohibit a bank subsidiary from paying dividends or otherwise supplying funds to Valley if the supervising agency determines that such payment would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.

Loans to Related Parties

VNB’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10 percent stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of the National Bank Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Regulation O of the FRB thereunder. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders (i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of VNB’s capital. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by VNB’s Board of Directors. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Valley and its subsidiaries, other than VNB, may not extend or arrange for any personal loans to its directors and executive officers.

Community Reinvestment

Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by OCC regulations, a national bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the OCC, in connection with its examination of a national bank, to assess the association’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such association. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings. VNB received a “satisfactory” CRA rating in its most recent examination.

Recent Legislation

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), added new legal requirements for public companies affecting corporate governance, accounting and corporate reporting.

5

Table of Contents

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides for, among other things:

Each of the national stock exchanges, including the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) where Valley’s securities are listed, have implemented new corporate governance listing standards, including rules strengthening director independence requirements for boards, and requiring the adoption of charters for the nominating, corporate governance and audit committees. These rules require Valley to certify to the NYSE that there are no violations of any corporate listing standards. Valley has provided the NYSE with the certification required by NYSE Rule 303A(12). Valley’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have also filed certifications regarding the quality of Valley’s public disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

USA PATRIOT Act

As part of the USA PATRIOT Act, signed into law on October 26, 2001, Congress adopted the International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Act”). The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of other government agencies, to adopt special measures applicable to financial institutions such as banks, bank holding companies, broker-dealers and insurance companies. Among its other provisions, the Act requires each financial institution: (i) to establish an anti-money laundering program; (ii) to establish due diligence policies, procedures and controls that are reasonably designed to detect and report instances of money laundering in United States private banking accounts and correspondent accounts maintained for non-United States persons or their representatives; and (iii) to avoid establishing, maintaining, administering, or managing correspondent accounts in the United States for, or on behalf of, a foreign shell bank that does not have a physical presence in any country. In addition, the Act expands the circumstances under which funds in a bank account may be forfeited and requires covered financial institutions to respond under certain circumstances to requests for information from federal banking agencies within 120 hours.

6

Table of Contents

The Department of Treasury issued regulations implementing the due diligence requirements. These regulations require minimum standards to verify customer identity and maintain accurate records, encourage cooperation among financial institutions, federal banking agencies, and law enforcement authorities regarding possible money laundering or terrorist activities, prohibit the anonymous use of “concentration accounts,” and requires all covered financial institutions to have in place an anti-money laundering compliance program.

Significantly, the Act amended the Bank Holding Company Act and the Bank Merger Act to require the federal banking agencies to consider the effectiveness of any financial institution involved in a proposed merger transaction in combating money laundering activities when reviewing an application under these acts.

Regulatory Relief Law

In late 2000, the American Home Ownership and Economic Act of 2000 instituted a number of regulatory relief provisions applicable to national banks, such as permitting national banks to have classified directors and to merge their business subsidiaries into the bank.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (“Modernization Act”) became effective in early 2000. The Modernization Act:

If a bank holding company elects to become a financial holding company, it files a certification, effective in 30 days, and thereafter may engage in certain financial activities without further approvals.

The OCC adopted rules to allow national banks to form subsidiaries to engage in financial activities allowed for financial holding companies. Electing national banks must meet the same management and capital standards as financial holding companies but may not engage in insurance underwriting, real estate development or merchant banking. Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act apply to financial subsidiaries and the capital invested by a bank in its financial subsidiaries will be eliminated from the bank’s capital in measuring all capital ratios. VNB owns one financial subsidiary—Glen Rauch Securities, Inc. (“Glen Rauch”) Valley has not elected to become a financial holding company.

The Modernization Act modified other financial laws, including laws related to financial privacy and community reinvestment.

Additional proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking and financial services industry are frequently introduced in Congress, in the state legislatures and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any such changes and the impact such changes might have on Valley cannot be determined at this time.

FIRREA

Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), a depository institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (“FDIC”) can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled

7

Table of Contents

FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution in danger of default. These provisions have commonly been referred to as FIRREA’s “cross guarantee” provisions. Further, under FIRREA, the failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal regulatory authorities.

FIRREA also imposes certain independent appraisal requirements upon a bank’s real estate lending activities and further imposes certain loan-to-value restrictions on a bank’s real estate lending activities. The bank regulators have promulgated regulations in these areas.

FDICIA

Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), each federal banking agency has promulgated regulations, specifying the levels at which a financial institution would be considered “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized,” and to take certain mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions based on the capital level of the institution. To qualify to engage in financial activities under the Modernization Act, all depository institutions must be “well capitalized.” The financial holding company of a national bank will be put under directives to raise its capital levels or divest its activities if the depository institution falls from that level.

The OCC’s regulations implementing these provisions of FDICIA provide that an institution will be classified as “well capitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0 percent, (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent, and (iv) meets certain other requirements. An institution will be classified as “adequately capitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4.0 percent, (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) at least 4.0 percent or (b) at least 3.0 percent if the institution was rated 1 in its most recent examination, and (iv) does not meet the definition of “well capitalized.” An institution will be classified as “undercapitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0 percent, or (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) less than 4.0 percent or (b) less than 3.0 percent if the institution was rated 1 in its most recent examination. An institution will be classified as “significantly undercapitalized” if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0 percent, or (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of less than 3.0 percent. An institution will be classified as “critically undercapitalized” if it has a tangible equity to total assets ratio that is equal to or less than 2.0 percent. An insured depository institution may be deemed to be in a lower capitalization category if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating. Similar categories apply to bank holding companies.

In addition, significant provisions of FDICIA required federal banking regulators to impose standards in a number of other important areas to assure bank safety and soundness, including internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, credit underwriting, asset growth, compensation, loan documentation and interest rate exposure.

Item 2.     Properties

VNB’s corporate headquarters consist of three office buildings located adjacent to each other in Wayne, New Jersey. These headquarters encompass commercial, mortgage and consumer lending, the operations and data processing center, and the executive offices of both Valley and VNB. Two of the three buildings are owned by a subsidiary of VNB and leased to VNB, the other building is leased by VNB from an independent third party.

VNB owns two other office buildings in Wayne, New Jersey, one of which is occupied by those departments and subsidiaries providing trust and investment management services; the other is a newly purchased office building to be utilized for additional office space. It is anticipated that occupancy will begin during the second quarter of 2005. A subsidiary of VNB also owns an office building and a condominium office in Manhattan, which are leased to VNB and which house a portion of its New York lending and operations. In addition, Valley 747 Acquisition LLC, a subsidiary of VNB, owns a building in Chestnut Ridge, NY, primarily occupied by Masters Coverage Corp., also a subsidiary of VNB.

8

Table of Contents

VNB provides banking services at 133 locations of which 62 locations are owned by VNB or a subsidiary of VNB and leased to VNB, and 71 locations are leased from independent third parties.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

There were no material pending legal proceedings to which Valley or any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries were a party, or to which their property was subject, other than ordinary routine litigations incidental to business and which are not expected to have any material effect on the business or financial condition of Valley.

The anti-money laundering (“AML”) and bank secrecy (“BSA”) laws have imposed far-reaching and substantial requirements on financial institutions. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) stated during the third quarter of 2004, that because of the legislative response to the OCC’s enforcement action and lapses with respect to Riggs National Bank, the OCC’s enforcement policy with respect to AML/BSA compliance will be more forcefully applied.

Valley National Bank’s AML/BSA compliance program has been subject to a recent regulatory examination by the OCC, the results of which have not yet been finalized. While Valley believes that its policies and procedures with respect to combating money laundering were effective and that Valley’s AML/BSA policies and procedures were reasonably designed to comply with applicable standards, it cannot provide assurance that at some point in the future it will not face a regulatory action resulting from such regulatory examination, adversely affecting its ability to acquire banks and thrifts, or open new branches.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 4A.    Executive Officers of the Registrant

All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

9

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Valley’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol VLY. The following table sets forth for each quarter period indicated the high and low sales prices for the common stock of Valley, as reported by the NYSE, and the cash dividends declared per share for each quarter. The amounts shown in the table below have been adjusted for all stock dividends and stock splits.

Federal laws and regulations contain restrictions on the ability of Valley and VNB to pay dividends. For information regarding restrictions on dividends, see Part I, Item 1, “Business—Dividend Limitations” and Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” In addition, under the terms of the preferred securities issued by VNB Capital Trust I, Valley could not pay dividends on its common stock if it deferred payments on the junior subordinated debentures which provide the cash flow for the payments on the trust preferred securities.

There were 9,184 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2004.

In 2000, Valley issued 83,387 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of Hallmark Capital Management, Inc. (“Hallmark”) pursuant to a merger of Hallmark into a subsidiary of Valley. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, Valley issued an additional 48,585, 49,890 and 36,285 shares or $1.3 million, $1.2 million and $728 thousand, respectively, of its common stock pursuant to subsequent earn-out payments. No additional earn-out payments are required pursuant to this merger. All shares reflect the 5 percent stock dividend issued in May 2004 and all prior splits and dividends. These shares were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 because they were issued in a Private Placement under Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D thereunder. These shares have been subsequently registered for resale on Form S-3 under the Securities Act.

Pursuant to an existing contractual agreement, Valley issued 5,250 shares of its common stock with a value of $132,450 on October 22, 2003, to Michael Guilfoile, president of MG Advisors, Inc., for his consulting services in connection with Valley’s acquisition of NIA/Lawyers Title Agency, LLC (“NIA/Lawyers”) and Glen Rauch. These shares were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 because they were issued in a Private Placement under Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D thereunder.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers

Publicly announced on August 21, 2001 to repurchase 11,025,000 shares.

10

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Valley’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein.

11

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The purpose of this analysis is to provide the reader with information relevant to understanding and assessing Valley’s results of operations for each of the past three years and financial condition for each of the past two years. In order to fully appreciate this analysis the reader is encouraged to review the consolidated financial statements and statistical data presented in this document.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K, both in the MD&A and elsewhere, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are not historical facts and include expressions about management’s confidence and strategies and management’s expectations about new and existing programs and products, acquisitions, relationships, opportunities, taxation, technology, market conditions and economic expectations. These statements may be identified by an (*) or such forward-looking terminology as “expect,” “anticipate,” “look,” “view,” “opportunities,” “allow,” “continues,” “reflects,” “believe,” “may,” “should,” “will” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, unanticipated changes in the direction of interest rates, changes in loan, investment and mortgage prepayment assumptions, relationships with major customers, changes in effective income tax rates, higher or lower cash flow levels than anticipated, slowdown in levels of deposit growth, a decline in the economy in New Jersey and New York, a decrease in loan origination volume, as well as a change in legal and regulatory barriers including compliance issues related to AML/BSA compliance, the development of new tax strategies or the disallowance of prior tax strategies, consummation of the acquisitions of NorCrown and Shrewsbury including the receipt of regulatory approval for NorCrown and the ability of Valley to successfully integrate NorCrown and Shrewsbury without the loss of significant loan and deposit business. Valley assumes no obligation for updating any such forward-looking statement at any time.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies followed by Valley conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Valley’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The most significant accounting policies followed by Valley are presented in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Valley has identified its policies on the allowance for loan losses and income tax liabilities to be critical because management has to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Additional information on these policies can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and a discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in this MD&A.

12

Table of Contents

The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in Valley’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact Valley’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.* Notes 1 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include additional discussion on the accounting for income taxes.

Executive Summary

In a challenging interest rate, regulatory and competitive environment, Valley earned record earnings per share, expanded customer service initiatives and announced the acquisition of two commercial banks. Net income was $154.4 million or $1.56 per diluted share, return on average assets was 1.51 percent and return on average equity was 22.77 percent for 2004. This compares with net income of $153.4 million or $1.55 per diluted share, return on average assets of 1.63 percent and return on average equity of 24.21 percent in 2003.

The loan portfolio grew year over year by approximately 12.3 percent, deposits increased almost 5 percent while non-interest bearing and low cost savings deposits showed the greatest growth. The positive increases in the balance sheet during the year translated into smaller gains in net interest income than traditionally experienced by Valley due to a lower net interest margin. The margin contracted as a result of compression in interest rates between short-term rates and long-term rates during the second half of 2004. The Federal Reserve began increasing short-term interest rates in the second half of 2004 paving the way for raising the interest rates on loans tied to the prime rate. This was not enough to offset the low level of long-term interest rates earned on the balance of Valley’s loans and investments. This flattening of the yield curve is making it more difficult to earn the traditional spreads that Valley is accustomed to earning, in addition to diminishing the positive effect of Valley’s interest sensitive balance sheet. However, Valley’s balance sheet does continue to remain asset sensitive and Valley anticipates it will react positively, should the yield curve become steeper.*

The announced acquisitions in 2004 of Shrewsbury State Bank and NorCrown Bank, anticipated to close during the late first quarter or second quarter of 2005, respectively, are both expected to be accretive within one year, expand Valley’s market presence and accordingly increase Valley’s franchise value. Since beginning Valley’s 24/7 customer service hours and Sunday branch banking initiative in November 2003, Valley has seen an increase in customer lobby traffic, an increase in accounts per household and a significant decrease in deposit account turnover as evidenced by approximately a 50 percent decrease in checking account closings.

Earnings for 2004 were impacted by the decreases in non-interest income of gains on sales of securities, gains on sales of loans and fee income from service charges and Valley’s wealth management and insurance services operations. These decreases were partially offset by the benefit of a lower effective income tax rate and management’s control over the increase in operating expenses.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the largest component of Valley’s operating income and as a result, is the area that management focuses most of its efforts. Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased to $378.7 million for 2004 compared with $354.7 million for 2003. Higher average balances in loans and investments increased interest income during 2004 compared with 2003 and was partly offset by lower average interest rates for these interest earning assets. For 2004, total average interest bearing liabilities increased while total interest expense declined as a result of lower interest rates.

Average loans increased $485.6 million or 8.0 percent, for the twelve months of 2004, while average taxable investments increased $332.3 million or 13.8 percent over the same period in 2003. Interest on loans increased $6.8 million for the twelve months of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003, due to the increased volume of loans. Interest on taxable investments increased $14.3 million for the twelve months in 2004 over the same period in 2003, mainly due to higher average balances and lower amortization expense offset by lower interest rates.

13

Table of Contents

Average interest bearing liabilities for 2004 increased $649.7 million or 9.1 percent from 2003. Average savings deposits increased $319.2 million or 10.2 percent and continue to provide a low cost source of funding. This increase was attributed to the addition of new branches, the growth in municipal deposits, the continued increases in customer activity as well as advertising and promotional efforts. Average time deposits decreased $54.3 million or 2.4 percent from 2003, due to Valley’s strategy to fund with lower cost deposits and borrowings. The decline in interest rates on deposits in conjunction with the decline in time deposits caused a net decrease in interest expense on deposits by $1.0 million. Average short-term borrowings increased $52.4 million or 15.0 percent over 2003 balances. Average long-term debt increased $332.5 million, or 23.7 percent and includes mostly Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and repurchase agreements. The increase in borrowings is used as an alternative to deposits and is evaluated based upon need, cost and term.

The net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis was 3.94 percent for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 compared with 4.04 percent for the same period in 2003. The change was mainly attributable to interest rates declining to historic low levels during 2004. Average interest rates on loans and investments declined 28 basis points while average interest rates on interest bearing liabilities declined 20 basis points causing a compression in the net interest margin for Valley and the banking industry. Increased loan and investment volume partially mitigated the negative impact of low interest rates.

During the second half of 2004, the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) increased short-term interest rates five times. Valley’s prime rate moved in conjunction with each interest rate increase which resulted in higher net interest income during the second half of the year. While this helped the interest on loans which adjust with the prime rate, it also increased Valley’s cost of funding. Long-term interest rates did not increase in conjunction with the five federal funds rate increases, in fact it declined from the prior year and therefore, had no positive impact on interest rates for new fixed rate long-term loans and investments. This flattening of the yield curve is making it more difficult to earn the traditional spreads that Valley is accustomed to earning in addition to diminishing the positive effect of Valley’s asset sensitive balance sheet position. If short-term interest rates continue an upward movement and long-term rates remain the same, it is anticipated that Valley’s cost of deposits and borrowings will increase, negatively affecting net interest income during 2005.* However, Valley’s balance sheet does continue to remain asset sensitive and Valley anticipates it will react positively, should the yield curve become steeper.*

The average interest rate for loans decreased 35 basis points to 5.67 percent and the average interest rate for taxable investments decreased 9 basis points to 4.96. Average interest rates on total interest earning assets of $9.6 billion decreased 28 basis points to 5.46 percent. Average interest rates also decreased on total interest bearing liabilities of $7.8 billion by 20 basis points to 1.89 percent from 2.09 percent. The average interest rate for deposits decreased by 8 basis points to 1.24 percent during 2004 compared to 2003.

Valley entered into cash flow hedges on July 28, 2004, which increased net interest income by $1.6 million and the net interest margin by 2 basis points during the year. While the cash flow hedges are expected to have a positive effect on net interest income and the net interest margin during the first half of 2005, Valley anticipates that the interest benefit received will be less than that received in 2004 as a result of increases in the prime rate. This benefit will become negative during the second half of 2005 until it expires in July of 2006, if the prime rate continues to increase.*

14

Table of Contents

The following table reflects the components of net interest income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND

NET INTEREST INCOME ON A TAX EQUIVALENT BASIS

15

Table of Contents

The following table demonstrates the relative impact on net interest income of changes in volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and changes in rates earned and paid by Valley on such assets and liabilities.

CHANGE IN NET INTEREST INCOME ON A TAX EQUIVALENT BASIS