Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended July 3, 2004

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-10031

NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (484) 947-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.001 per share

(Title of each class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 31, 2003 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $22,828,050 (based upon the closing sale price of these shares on such date as reported by the Nasdaq National Market). Calculation of the number of shares held by non-affiliates is based on the assumption that the affiliates of the Company include the directors, executive officers and stockholders who have filed a Schedule 13D or 13G with the Company which reflects ownership of at least 5% of the outstanding common stock or have the right to designate a member of the Board of Directors, and no other persons. The information provided shall in no way be construed as an admission that any person whose holdings are excluded from the figure is an affiliate or that any person whose holdings are included is not an affiliate and any such admission is hereby disclaimed. The information provided is included solely for record keeping purposes of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding at September 7, 2004, was 6,679,407.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on October 6, 2004 (the “Proxy Statement”) and to be filed within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended July 3, 2004 are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Statements included or incorporated herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When we use words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “may,” “intends,” “seeks” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements, but these terms are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance, and are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data and management’s views and assumptions regarding future events. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied herein. In connection with the “safe harbor provisions” of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we note the following factors which, among others, could cause future results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, expectations and assumptions expressed or implied herein. Among the factors that could impact our ability to achieve our stated goals are competitive conditions in the pre-elementary and elementary school education and services industry, including advertising and tuition price sensitivity; various factors affecting occupancy levels, including, but not limited to, the reduction in or changes to the general labor force that would reduce the need or demand for private schools; the establishment of governmentally mandated universal pre-K programs that do not allow for participation by for-profit operators; our inability successfully to defend against or counter negative publicity associated with claims involving alleged incidents at our schools; and the acceptance of our newly developed schools and businesses and performance of recently acquired businesses. In addition, our results may be affected by general factors, such as economic conditions, political developments, interest and inflation rates, accounting standards, taxes, and laws and regulations affecting us in markets where we compete.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements except as statements of our present intentions and of our present expectations that may or may not occur. You should read these cautionary statements as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Readers are cautioned that the forward-looking statements reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update or revise these statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Table of Contents

PART I

General

Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “NLCI” or “the Company”) is a leading non-sectarian, for-profit provider of education and educational services for the pre-elementary through 12^th grade market. Our programs are offered through a network of general education pre-elementary, elementary, and middle schools, programs for learning challenged students, and special purpose high schools. These schools operate under various local brand names. Our schools additionally provide enrichment, summer and before- and after-school programs. In 1993, we changed our business focus from a child care company to a curriculum-based private school and education company. In 1998, we changed our name to Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. to reflect the organizational model that we use today, which supports cross-marketing and operational synergies within the “Nobel Learning Communities.”

Our corporate office is located at 1615 West Chester Pike, West Chester, PA 19382. Our telephone number is (484) 947-2000.

Educational Philosophy and Implementation

Our educational philosophy is based on a foundation of sound research, innovative instructional techniques and quality practices and curricula developed by experienced educators. Our programs stress the development of the whole child and are based on concepts of integrated and age-appropriate learning. Our curricula are designed to allow each child to develop according to his or her own abilities and timetable, but also seek to prepare every student for achievement in accordance with national content standards and goals. Each child’s individual educational needs and skills are considered upon entrance into one of our schools. Progress is monitored regularly in terms of both the child’s cognitive, social, emotional and physical skill development and the curriculum’s objectives. The result is the opportunity for each of our students to develop a strong foundation in academic learning, positive self-esteem and emotional and physical well-being.

We have created developmental goals and curriculum guidelines for each age level, grade level and content area to assist principals and teachers in planning their daily and weekly programs. We maintain that small schools, small classes, clearly articulated curricular guidelines and excellent educational materials, delivered by qualified, innovative and enthusiastic teachers, comprise the basic ingredients of a quality education. Our philosophy is based on personalized instruction that leads to a student’s active involvement in learning and understanding. The program for our schools is a skills-based and developmentally-appropriate comprehensive curriculum. We implement the curriculum in ways that stimulate the learner’s curiosity, support the student’s individual learning style and employ processes that contribute to lifelong achievement. Academic areas addressed include reading, writing, spelling, mathematics, science, social studies, visual and graphic arts, music, physical education/wellness and world language. The critical areas of technology literacy and study skills are integrated into the program, as appropriate, in all content areas, with many schools incorporating a media center.

We offer athletic activities and supplemental programs, which include day field trips coordinated with curriculum to zoos, libraries, museums and theaters and, at the middle schools, overnight trips to such places as Yosemite National Park, California and Washington, D.C.. Schools arrange classroom presentations by parents, community leaders and other volunteers. We also organize programs that allow students to present to community groups and organizations. To enhance the child’s physical, social, emotional and intellectual growth, schools may provide extra-curricular experiences (some fee-based) tailored to particular families’ interests in such activities as dance, gymnastics and instrumental music lessons.

We recognize that maintaining the quality of our teachers’ capabilities and professionalism is essential to sustaining our students’ high level of academic achievement and our profitability. We sponsor professional

1

Table of Contents

development days covering various aspects of teaching and education, using both internal trainers and external consultants. Our educators serve on Company task forces and committees that regularly review and revise curricular guidelines, programs, tools and current teaching methods.

We seek to ensure that our schools meet or exceed the standards of appropriate accrediting agencies through an internal quality assurance program. Although not mandated by any governmental or regulatory authority, many of our schools are accredited, or are currently seeking accreditation, by the Commission on International and Trans-Regional Accreditation (CITA).

Operations/School Systems

In order to maintain uniform standards, our schools share consistent educational goals and operating procedures. While we have a national curriculum, principals tailor curricula, within the standards of Nobel Learning Communities, to meet local and state requirements. Members of our management team visit schools and centers on a regular basis to review program and facility quality.

Our school principals and assistant principals are critical to our educational and financial success. They are responsible for managing school personnel and finances, ensuring teacher adherence to our curricular guidelines, enforcing codes of conduct, discipline and ethics, and implementing local sales and marketing strategies. We treat each school as a separate cost center, holding each school accountable for its performance. Each school has an annual budget and submits weekly financial data to the corporate office and to appropriate district managers. Tuition revenue, operating costs and student census are monitored, with each school measured periodically in relation to our objectives. Executive Directors, another critical component to our success, oversee the principals and schools, and report to divisional Vice Presidents of Operations. School principals and Executive Directors work closely with regional and corporate management, particularly in the regular assessment of program quality and school performance.

We hire qualified candidates and look to promote from within whenever possible. Candidate credentials are reviewed through employment references, criminal background checks and appropriate education verification in order to establish an understanding of the candidates’ skills, professionalism and character. After hiring, it is our policy that employees receive regular performance feedback including a formal annual performance evaluation. All of our Principals and Executive Directors are eligible for incentive compensation based on the performance of their schools.

Pre-Elementary Schools and Elementary Schools

Our pre-elementary and elementary strategy is based on clustering a number of pre-elementary schools around an elementary school in order to provide a continuum of education and consistent curriculum for a child from infancy through 5^th, or in some cases 8^th, grade. Through the use of strategically placed clusters, we seek to increase market awareness, achieve operating efficiencies, and provide cross-marketing opportunities, by providing feeder populations from pre-elementary to elementary school, and elementary to middle school, as well as to and from our other specialty programs.

We also operate schools which are not part of a geographic cluster. The majority of these schools were built or purchased prior to the implementation of our cluster strategy. In some cases these schools may become part of a cluster to the extent that we determine that geographic market to be a growth opportunity.

We distinguish our schools from our competition with qualitative and quantitative program outcomes. At each age and grade level, we support a child’s development with appropriate curriculum-based programs. We foster an individualized approach to learning through small schools and small classes and by using multi-sensory, integrated curricula that blends each of the core curricular subjects (e.g., reading, language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) with special area subjects such as art, music, technology, physical education/wellness, and world language. Further, in certain locations, we provide programs and schools for the learning

2

Table of Contents

challenged as well as special purpose high schools. We believe that empirical results support the quality of our programs. Standardized test results have consistently shown that our students perform above national grade equivalent norms in reading and mathematics.

Many of our pre-elementary and elementary schools operate from 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., allowing early drop-off and late pick-up by working parents. In most pre-elementary locations, programs are available for children starting at six weeks of age. Parents can feel comfortable leaving their children at one of our schools knowing the children will receive both a quality education and engage in well-supervised developmental and recreational activities.

Most of our pre-elementary and elementary schools complement their educational programs with enrichment programs, arts programs, before- and after-school programs and summer programs or camps. In addition to those revenue generating programs, our schools seek to improve margins by providing ancillary services and products, such as portrait service, book and uniform sales. Our corporate office centrally manages several significant ancillary revenue programs. This centralized management has enabled us to obtain more favorable terms from vendors and to encourage more active participation from schools.

Paladin Academy^®

Our Paladin Academy^® schools and programs serve the needs of children with mild to moderate learning challenges from kindergarten through high school. Our mission is to improve the learning process and achievement levels of children with dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, dysgraphia and other mild learning difficulties through stand-alone schools and school programs. We offer developmental testing, school-year full-day clinics and summer programs. The primary goal of our Paladin Academy^® program is to enable students to mainstream back into the general education population.

As of September 7, 2004, we operated two stand-alone Paladin Academy^® schools and 13 programs or clinics located within our elementary schools. Paladin Academy^® schools and/or programs are now located in Florida, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington.

Charter Schools

We currently have multi-year contracts providing limited management services to four charter schools in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Under these charter school contracts, we provide administrative, accounting and construction management services. The actual holders of the charters are non-profit entities managed by a board of directors or trustees. The charter schools fund their own operations through payments from the School District of Philadelphia. In some cases, we lease the charter school premises from a third party and sublease the premises to the non-profit entity.

The Company made a short foray into the business of operating charter schools in 2000. In May 2000, we acquired two charter schools in Arizona: the Fletcher Heights Charter Elementary School in Peoria, Arizona, and the Desert Heights Elementary School, which opened in Glendale, Arizona in August 2000. In contrast to our Philadelphia charter school contracts, we held the charter and owned and operated these Arizona charter schools independently, as Arizona law permits the charter funds to be paid directly to a for-profit corporation.

In May 2003, we subleased to the Unified School District No. 11, of Maricopa County, Arizona, the premises at which we had previously operated our Fletcher Heights Charter Elementary School, and in August 2003, we sold to Partnership With Parents, Inc. (an Arizona non-profit corporation) the premises at which we had previously owned and operated our Desert Heights Charter Elementary School. As a result of these two transactions in 2003, we exited both the Arizona market and our direct ownership of charter schools.

While we do not currently intend to own and operate charter schools directly, we do plan to pursue growth in the charter school management business by competing for contracts at charter schools owned and operated by

3

Table of Contents

others. Since the charter schools for which we provide services operate under a charter granted by a state or school board authority, we would lose the right to provide those services if the charter authority were to revoke the charter. Typically, the charter holder is a community group that engages us to manage portions of the school operation under a management agreement. As such, the charter authority could base such revocation on actions of the charter holder, which are outside of our control. Also, many state charter school statutes require periodic reauthorization. If state charter school legislation in such states were not reauthorized or were substantially altered, our management service opportunities in the charter school market could be materially adversely affected.

Houston Learning Academy

In September 1999, we acquired all the capital stock of Houston Learning Academy (“HLA”), an operator of five special purpose high schools and one special purpose high school program in the Houston metropolitan marketplace. HLA schools, which are fully accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, offer a half-day high school program, as well as evening and summer school programs. These schools also provide tutorials and special education classes to residential hospitals. HLA schools and programs feature small class sizes and individualized attention, primarily for those students who are at risk of not completing their high school requirements in a more traditional setting, and/or are attracted to the schools’ program and flexible hours of service. We are currently reviewing the HLA concept and strategy. Depending upon the performance of our HLA schools and programs, we may expand this concept through its introduction into existing and future Company markets.

The Activities Club^®

In December 1999, we entered into a transaction to form The Activities Club^®. At the time of its inception, we owned 80% of The Activities Club^®, and in May 2003, we acquired the remaining 20%. The Activities Club^® provides materials and products for before- and after-school programs, summer camps, and theme-based programs offered by public schools, private schools, non-profit organizations and corporations. The Activities Club^® is being repositioned by management to support the growing need for extended day learning and research-based programming that correlates with specific state standards, grant and government funding requirements and the need to improve student performance.

Principal Markets

Our schools are located in California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia and Washington. The schools operate under well-known local trade names, including Chesterbrook Academy^® (East, South and Midwest), Merryhill School^tm (West), Evergreen Academy (Northwest), Paladin Academy^® (learning challenged) and Houston Learning Academy (special purpose high schools). As of September 7, 2004, we operated 151 schools in 13 states, with an aggregate capacity of approximately 23,900 children.

Marketing

We have historically relied on and generated a significant portion of new enrollments from our reputation in the communities that we serve, primarily through word-of-mouth recommendations of the parents of our students. We market our services through school open houses, yellow page advertising, print ads in local publications, radio and direct mail. Local marketing campaigns are conducted throughout the year, and have been planned and implemented primarily by our regional Executive Directors and principals.

We recently began to develop a more sophisticated, centralized marketing team and expertise. We are organizing our marketing efforts to support a multi-unit service organization. This strategy promotes consistent brand positioning and brand development and a more integrated marketing approach to customer acquisition and retention.

4

Table of Contents

Our annual customer acquisition cycle has one large enrollment period and several smaller demand periods. We market heavily during the spring period to drive enrollment for the beginning of the academic year for kindergarten through 8^th grade. Enrollment periods for the pre-elementary schools also tend to peak at the beginning of the academic year, but have some constant demand throughout the year.

Corporate Development—Strategy and Implementation

Our growth strategy in the private education market includes internal growth of our existing schools, and may also include expansion of current facilities, new school development in both existing and new markets, and strategic acquisitions.

Historically, our growth has been a function of new school development and strategic acquisitions. Our current emphasis is on increasing occupancy in our existing schools and leveraging the investment in those assets. While a significant portion of our current efforts focus on improving the performance of existing schools, we will pursue advantageous opportunities to acquire or develop schools in support of our geographic cluster strategy.

While we do not currently anticipate exiting any of our geographic markets, we regularly analyze the profitability of our existing school and real estate portfolio to identify schools that are underperforming and/or do not fit our business model or geographic cluster strategies. We then develop plans either to improve these schools or remove them from our portfolio. This represents an important activity in reallocating capital to the balance of our schools or other opportunities in order to ensure the continued improvement of our program offerings.

New School Development

During the fiscal year ended July 3, 2004 (“Fiscal 2004”), we opened one pre-elementary school, and during the period from July 4, 2004 through September 7, 2004, we opened one pre-elementary school and one elementary school. The funds used to open these schools were provided by cash flow from operations. There are no other school openings planned for the fiscal year ending July 2, 2005 (“Fiscal 2005”).

After identifying regions for development, proposed sites for new schools are presented to us by developers and realtors. After site selection, we engage a developer or contractor to build a facility to our specifications. We currently work with several developers who purchase the land, build the facility and lease the premises to us under a long-term lease. Alternatively, we may purchase land, construct the building with our own or borrowed funds and then seek to enter into a sale and lease-back transaction with an investor.

Acquisitions

Historically, we have used strategic acquisitions to expand our market offerings. Key acquisition criteria include reputation, geographic location in markets with excellent demographics and growth prospects, ability to integrate into existing, or become the foundation for new, Nobel Learning Communities clusters, and quality of personnel. We believe that acquisitions may continue to be a viable alternative for growth. We will focus any near-term acquisitions on schools that fit our geographic and cluster strategy and which serve the pre-elementary and/or elementary market.

Service Marks

We have registered various service marks in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including, but not limited to Chesterbrook Academy^®, Merryhill Country School^®, Paladin Academy^®, Camp Zone^®, Rocking Horse Child Care Centers^® and The Activities Club^®. We believe that certain of our service marks have substantial value in our marketing in the respective areas in which our schools operate.

5

Table of Contents

Seasonality

Our elementary and middle schools historically have lower operating revenues in the summer due to the end of the traditional academic year and seasonally lower enrollment in summer programs. Summer revenues of pre-elementary schools are, to a lesser degree, subject to the same seasonality.

Industry and Competition

Education reform movements in the United States are providing new alternatives to the public schools. These reforms include charter schools, private management of public schools, home schooling, private schools, virtual schools and voucher programs. Our strategy is to provide parents a quality alternative to public schools through our privately owned and operated schools, utilizing a proven curriculum in a safe and challenging environment. While our schools do not currently reside in any school voucher markets, we believe voucher programs would be a positive development for our schools.

To attract school age children, we compete with other for-profit private schools, charter schools, non-profit schools, sectarian schools and home schooling. In some markets, we also face competition with respect to pre-elementary services and before- and after-school programs from public schools, government-based providers, and religiously-affiliated, community-based or other non-profit programs that offer such services at little or no cost to parents. We anticipate that, given the perceived potential of the education market, well-financed competition may emerge, including possible competition from the large for-profit child care companies. The only material for-profit competitor that integrates elementary and pre-elementary schools of which we are aware which currently competes beyond a regional level are Children’s World Learning Centers, which was acquired in 2003 by Knowledge Learning Corp. and Bright Horizons. We also face competition on each of our geographic markets from local operators of individually owned private schools. Finally, public school systems may become a potential competitor at the pre-elementary school level if more states pass universal pre-K legislation that provides public funds for pre-school for three and four year olds and do not allow for-profit pre-elementary operators to participate in these programs.

While price is an important factor in competing in both the pre-elementary and elementary school markets, we believe that other competitive factors also are important, including professionally developed educational programs, well-equipped facilities, trained teachers and a broad range of ancillary services, including before-and after- school programs, transportation and infant care. Many of these services are not offered by many of our competitors, particularly in the pre-elementary school market. We believe we are competitively priced with our competition in each of our markets.

Regulation

Our schools are subject to numerous state and local regulations and licensing requirements. We have policies and procedures in place to assist in complying with such regulations and requirements. These regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and may apply differently within the same jurisdiction to a pre-elementary, elementary or middle school. Although the regulatory and licensing requirements tend to be more stringent with respect to pre-elementary schools, government agencies generally review the fitness and adequacy of buildings and equipment, the ratio of staff personnel to enrolled children, staff training, record keeping, children’s’ dietary program, daily curriculum, and compliance with health and safety standards. In most jurisdictions, these agencies conduct scheduled and unscheduled inspections of the schools and licenses must be renewed periodically. Most jurisdictions establish requirements for background checks or other clearance procedures for new employees of schools. Repeated failures of a school to comply with applicable regulations can subject the school to sanctions, which might include probation or, in more serious cases, suspension or revocation of the school’s license to operate, and could also lead to investigations of our other schools located in the same jurisdiction. In addition, this type of action could lead to negative publicity extending beyond that jurisdiction affecting our other locations.

6

Table of Contents

We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with all material regulations applicable to our business. However, there is no assurance that a licensing authority will not determine a particular school to be in violation of applicable regulations and take action against that school and possibly other schools in the same jurisdiction. In addition, there may be unforeseen changes in regulations and licensing requirements, such as changes in the required ratio of child center staff personnel to enrolled children, that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. States in which we operate routinely review the adequacy of regulatory and licensing requirements and implement changes which may significantly increase our costs to operate in those states.

Environmental Compliance

We are not aware of any existing environmental conditions that currently or in the future could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, operating results or cash flows, and we have not incurred material expenditures to address environmental conditions at any school. Although we have periodically conducted limited environmental investigations and remedial activities at some of our schools, we have not undertaken an in-depth environmental review of all of our schools, and accordingly, there may be material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware. In addition, no assurances can be given that future laws or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability.

Insurance

We currently maintain comprehensive general liability, workers’ compensation, automobile liability, property, excess umbrella liability, student accident insurance and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. The policies provide a variety of coverages and limits. Companies involved in the education and care of children, however, may not be able to obtain insurance for the total risks inherent in their operations. In particular, general liability coverage can have sublimits per claim for child abuse. Although we believe we have adequate insurance coverage at this time, claims in excess of, or not included within, our coverage may be asserted. In addition, there can be no assurance that in future years we will not become subject to lower limits or substantial increase in insurance premiums.

Employees

On September 7, 2004, we employed approximately 3,870 persons, approximately 930 of whom were employed on a part-time or seasonal basis. We believe that our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.

Available Information

We file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The public may read or copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

A free copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports may be obtained (as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with the SEC) on our website at http://www.nobellearning.com. The information on our website is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference in this report. This website is and is only intended to be an inactive textual reference.

7

Table of Contents

At September 7, 2003, we operated 151 schools on eight owned and 143 leased properties in 13 states. Our schools are geographically distributed as follows: 29 in California, 10 in Florida, 14 in Illinois, one in Maryland, six in Nevada, 12 in New Jersey, 20 in North Carolina, three in Oregon, 20 in Pennsylvania, two in South Carolina, nine in Texas, 19 in Virginia and six in Washington. Our schools generally are located in suburban settings.

The land and buildings which we own are subject to security interests on the real property. Our leased properties are leased under long-term leases which are typically triple-net leases requiring us to pay all applicable real estate taxes, utility expenses and insurance costs. These leases usually contain inflation related rent escalators.

From time to time, we purchase undeveloped land for future development.

We lease 22,500 square feet of space for our corporate offices in West Chester, Pennsylvania.

We are a party in various suits and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Our management currently believes that the ultimate disposition of all such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. The significance of these pending matters on our future operating results and cash flows depends on the level of future results of operations and cash flows as well as on the timing and amounts, if any, of the ultimate outcome.

None

8

Table of Contents

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol NLCI.

The table below sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported by Nasdaq for each quarter during the period from July 1, 2002 through July 3, 2004.

Holders

At September 7, 2004, there were approximately 323 holders of record of shares of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid a dividend on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Although the payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, we intend to retain our earnings in order to finance our ongoing operations and to develop and expand our business. Our credit facility with our senior lender, as well as our agreement with our senior subordinated lenders prohibit us from paying dividends on our common stock or making other cash distributions on our common stock without the lenders’ consent. Further, our financing documents relating to our private placement of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to Edison Venture Fund II, L.P. prohibit us from paying cash dividends on our common stock, unless the dividend is permitted under our bank agreement and the amount of the dividend is less than or equal to 50% of our operating income less income tax.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On May 27, 2003, the Company issued 57,143 shares of its common stock, in connection with the acquisition of the remaining 20% of The Activities Club, Inc. not already owned by the Company, and the settlement of related litigation involving Children’s Out-of-School Time, Inc., Joan Bergstrom, William D. Putt, Craig Bergstrom, the Company and The Activities Club, Inc.

On June 17, 2003, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,333,333 shares of its Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value, in exchange for an investment of $6,000,000 pursuant to a Series E Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 17, 2003 by and among the Company, Camden Partners Strategic Fund II-A, L.P. and Camden Partners Strategic Fund II-B, L.P. Proceeds were used to repay

9

Table of Contents

debt, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. The Series E Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of one share of common stock for each share of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. The Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock is filed as Exhibit 3.6 hereto.

On September 9, 2003, the Company issued an aggregate of 588,236 shares of its Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, in exchange for an investment of $3,000,000, net of expenses of $106,000, pursuant to a Series F Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of September 9, 2003 by and among the Company, Camden Partners Strategic Fund II-A, L.P., Camden Partners Strategic Fund II-B, L.P., Allied Capital Corporation, Mollusk Holdings, LLC and Blesbok, LLC. Proceeds were used to repay debt, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. The Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of one share of common stock for each share of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. The Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is filed as Exhibit 3.7 hereto.

The foregoing sales of the Company’s common stock were made in reliance upon the exemptions from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder for transactions not involving a public offering. No underwriters were engaged in connection with the foregoing sales of securities. These sales were made without general solicitation or advertising. Each purchaser was an accredited investor or a sophisticated investor with access to all relevant information necessary to evaluate the investment who represented to the Company that the shares were being acquired for investment.

10

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial and other data, with dollars in thousands, except per share amounts. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” included elsewhere in this report. The historical operating results below have been reclassified to reflect the results of continuing operations and (loss) income from discontinued operations.

11

Table of Contents

Introduction

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Historical Consolidated Financial and Other Data” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” included elsewhere in this report.

Management Changes

On July 10, 2003, Mr. A.J. Clegg resigned as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and on August 28, 2003, Mr. Frock resigned as the Company’s Vice Chairman of Corporate Development. On August 13, 2003, Mr. Frock and on August 18, 2003, Mr. A. J. Clegg resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company.

On July 25, 2003, George Bernstein was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and was appointed to its Board of Directors on July 31, 2004.

On September 3, 2003, Jeanne Marie Welsko was hired as the Company’s Vice President of Human Resources.

12

Table of Contents

On October 17, 2003 the Company announced that Scott Clegg was resigning as Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, effective October 31, 2003.

On October 23, 2003, the Company announced that it had hired Osborne F. Abbey, Jr., Ed.D. as its new Vice President of Education, effective December 1, 2003.

On January 7, 2004, the Company announced that it had hired Thomas Frank as its new Chief Financial Officer.

On January 12, 2004, the Company announced that it had hired Patricia Miller as its new Chief Operating Officer.

Change in Fiscal Year End

Effective for Fiscal 2004, the Company changed to a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest June 30. For Fiscal 2004, the fiscal year ended on July 3, 2004. For prior years, the fiscal year ended on June 30. The fiscal year ended July 3, 2004 contained 53 weeks.

Reclassifications

As a result of the 20 schools closed or held for sale since the beginning of Fiscal 2004, we have reclassified amounts previously reported in our consolidated statements of operations for Fiscal years 2004 and 2003 to reflect the results of discontinued operations separate from continuing operations.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2004 compared to Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2003 (“Fiscal 2003”)

At July 3, 2004, the Company operated 149 schools in 13 states. During Fiscal 2004, the Company opened one pre-elementary school and closed nine schools which are included in discontinued operations. In addition, the Company added one new charter school management contract.

Revenues

Revenues from continuing operations for Fiscal 2004 increased $8,473,000 or 5.8% to $155,158,000 from $146,685,000 for Fiscal 2003. The increase in revenues is primarily attributable to tuition increases, a full year of operations for schools opened in Fiscal 2003, the effect of the change in fiscal period end and the opening of one new school and one charter school management contract in Fiscal 2004. The revenue increase for Fiscal 2004 as compared to Fiscal 2003 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Revenues for schools opened before June 30, 2002 increased $3,458,000 in Fiscal 2004 compared to Fiscal 2003. This increase was due to tuition increases, offset by a decrease in enrollment and/or shift from full time attendance to part time enrollment in certain pre-elementary and elementary schools. The decrease in enrollment

13

Table of Contents

was due to economic conditions that are forcing parents to consider pre-elementary school and elementary school alternatives such as fewer days in attendance in the Company’s pre-elementary schools and public school alternatives for elementary schools. The schools that opened in Fiscal 2003 had an increase in revenues of $2,570,000 due to normal ramp up in enrollment for newer schools and an annual tuition increase. The new school and other programs opened in Fiscal 2004 had revenues of $600,000. The change in the fiscal year end resulted in a net four additional days for Fiscal 2004 or additional revenues of $1,934,000.

School Operating Profit

School operating profit from continuing operations in Fiscal 2004 increased $1,551,000 or 8.4% to $19,929,000 from $18,378,000 for Fiscal 2003. Total school operating profit as a percentage of revenue increased from 12.5% for Fiscal 2003 to 12.8% for Fiscal 2004. The increase in school operating profit for Fiscal 2004 as compared to Fiscal 2003 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Operating profit from schools opened before June 30, 2002 increased $190,000 in Fiscal 2004 compared to Fiscal 2003. School operating profit as a percentage of applicable revenue for these schools decreased from 14.1% in Fiscal 2003 to 13.9% in Fiscal 2004. This decrease is primarily due to increases in school labor cost related to annual employee wage increase that were not offset by expected increases in tuition revenue due to decreases in enrollment in certain pre-elementary and elementary schools. In addition, the decrease in school operating profit was also due to increases in insurance costs for health care benefits, property and casualty insurance and annual rent increases.

The new schools that opened in Fiscal 2003 had increases in school operating profit of $1,138,000 due in part to normal ramp up in enrollment for schools in their second year of operations as well as an increase in tuition. New schools and programs opened in Fiscal 2004 had first year losses of $295,000 due in part to the lower enrollment new schools as they enter the normal enrollment ramp up period. Losses in Fiscal 2003 for schools opened in Fiscal 2004 are related to pre-opening expenses incurred prior to the opening of a school. Fiscal 2004 pre-opening expense for the two new schools that will open at the beginning of Fiscal 2005 was $153,000.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Impairment

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company performed its annual impairment test as required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The Company estimated fair values as of July 3, 2004 for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential impairment charge. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 as of July 3, 2004 indicated that one of the Company’s 10 reporting units was impaired. The results of the Company’s level one test were reviewed by an independent consultant. Based on the consultant’s independent valuation and completion of the level two analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss in Fiscal 2004 related to this reporting unit of $2,273,000 as a result of continuing deteriorating operating performance. The Company also incurred a goodwill impairment charge of $1,053,000 directly related to a school closure. This impairment is included in discontinued operations.

14

Table of Contents

In addition, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $1,095,000 related to the tangible assets at underperforming schools. This impairment charge was to record the asset to its fair value in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” and included in continuing operations.

During Fiscal 2003, the Company had impairment charges related to its goodwill and other intangibles totaling $8,715,000.

The Company was required by SFAS 142 to evaluate the Company’s goodwill for recovery based on the facts and circumstances at December 31, 2002. This test was required as a result of the termination of the merger agreement with Socrates Acquisition Corporation and the decline in the price of the Company’s common stock. The Company estimated fair values as of December 31, 2003 for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential level one impairment charge. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 as of December 31, 2002 indicated that two of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired. The results of the Company’s level one test were reviewed by an independent consultant. Based on the consultant’s independent valuation and completion of the level two analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss in the second quarter of Fiscal 2003 related to these two reporting units of $2,200,000.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company performed its annual impairment test as required under SFAS 142. The Company estimated fair values as of June 30, 2003 for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential impairment charge. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 indicated that three of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired as a result of deteriorating operating performance since December 2002. The results of the Company’s level one test were reviewed by an independent consultant. Based on the consultant’s independent valuation and completion of the level two analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss in Fiscal 2003 related to these three reporting units of $5,500,000. The Company also incurred a goodwill impairment charge of $710,000 directly related to two schools, one of which has been closed and the other is held for sale. This impairment is included in discontinued operations.

In addition, in Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1,015,000 related to the intangible assets of The Activities Club, a school products company owned by the Company. This impairment charge was to record the asset to its fair value in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.

Transaction Related Costs

Transaction related costs for Fiscal 2003 of $1,168,000 are related to legal, and professional and other registration fees and expenses associated with a merger agreement that was terminated on February 3, 2003.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $371,000 or 2.7% from $13,885,000 in Fiscal 2003 to $14,256,000 in Fiscal 2004. The largest portion of this increase was a $1,500,000 charge related to the present value of the future payments to be made with respect to consulting agreements with two former executives of approximately $1,290,000 and charges for future health insurance coverage for these individuals of approximately $210,000. This charge was offset by a charge in Fiscal 2003 that related to a $1,000,000 allowance recorded against the Company’s $2,500,000 note receivable from Total Education Solutions (“TES”). As part of the evaluation of the carrying value of TES, a number of positive and negative factors affecting TES were considered including: (i) operating results and outlook for TES, (ii) expected future cash flows, (iii) current conditions and trends in the industry; (iv) other industry comparables, and (v) the Company’s plans and ability to hold this investment. As a result of this evaluation, a valuation allowance of $1,000,000 was recorded during Fiscal 2003 to reflect the current net realizable value of the Company’s note receivable with TES.

15

Table of Contents

During Fiscal 2004, the Company re-evaluated the note receivable with TES. Based on the above factors and improved operating performance of TES, the Company concluded that the valuation allowance of $1,000,000 is still appropriate.

Operating Income

Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, operating income was $2,305,000 in Fiscal 2004 and an operating loss in Fiscal 2003 of $5,390,000.

Other Income

Other income decreased $144,000 during Fiscal 2004 as compared to the comparable period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in interest income from investments and notes receivable.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $108,000 or 2.9% from $3,740,000 for Fiscal 2003 to $3,632,000 for Fiscal 2004. The decrease in interest expense is primarily related to the reduction in amounts outstanding under the Company’s senior bank credit facility. Total amounts outstanding under the Company’s senior bank credit facilities decreased $9,495,000 from $23,990,000 at June 30, 2003 to $14,495,000 at July 3, 2004. In addition, interest expense for Fiscal 2003 included a charge of $356,000 related to the write off of deferred debt issuance fees caused by amendments to the Company’s senior credit facility with Fleet Bank during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003.

These decreases were offset by $720,000 in charges related to the February 20, 2004 refinancing of the Company’s senior debt and senior subordinated note. These charges include $466,000 in additional fees paid to Fleet Bank in connection with amendments to the Company’s senior credit facility, $83,000 related to the write-off of debt issuance cost and $171,000 related to the write-off of original issued discount that was issued in connection with the senior subordinated debt held by Allied Capital Corporation.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

Income tax expense totaled $34,000 for Fiscal 2004 as compared to income tax benefit of $2,315,000 for Fiscal 2003. The income tax benefit for Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003 is less than the combined statutory income tax rate of 38% due to the non-deductibility of a portion of the goodwill that was impaired. Goodwill associated with the acquisition of the stock of a company that is written-down is not deductible for tax purposes.

Losses From Discontinued Operations

Losses from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit, were $4,765,000 in Fiscal 2004 and $4,908,000 in Fiscal 2003.

The Company has developed exit plans for schools identified as under-performing and/or which do not fit with the Company’s business or geographic strategies. Discontinued operations consist of twenty schools and one undeveloped property which is held for sale. Of the twenty schools, nine ceased operations in Fiscal 2004 (eight in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004) and in Fiscal 2003, six ceased operations and five were placed as held for sale.

The twenty schools consist of fifteen closed schools and five operating (held for sale) schools. Of the fifteen closed schools, eight were subleased, five are vacant, one was sold, and one was returned to the landlord under a lease buyout and early termination.

16

Table of Contents

Four of the vacant schools are available for sublease or sale by the landlord and may reduce or terminate our related lease obligations. One vacant school owned by the Company was sold subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2004.

In Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, the Company recorded charges of $3,404,000 and $1,996,000, respectively, for future lease obligations included in discontinued operations. These charges include accruals for future lease obligations related to the eight subleased, four vacant and one lease terminated schools. The charges are calculated using the discounted present values of future lease payments, net of estimated future sublease amounts and time to potential sale by landlord (which would eliminate the Company’s future rent and related obligations).

The operating results for these schools are classified as discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods presented, net of tax. A summary of discontinued operations is as follows (dollars in thousands):

For the Fiscal 2004 and 2003, the table below shows revenue and operating results for schools held for sale and closed schools (dollars in thousands):

Net (Loss) Income

As a result of the above factors, the net loss decreased $5,453,000 from $11,534,000 in Fiscal 2003 to $6,081,000 in Fiscal 2004.

Results of Operations

Fiscal 2003 compared to Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2002 (“Fiscal 2002”)

At June 30, 2003, the Company operated 158 schools in 14 states. During Fiscal 2003, the Company opened five pre-elementary schools, two elementary schools and closed eight schools. From July 1, 2003 through September 29, 2003, the Company opened one pre-elementary school. Six of the schools closed during Fiscal 2003 are included in discontinued operations and were closed prior to the expiration of their lease terms. Two additional schools closed at the end of their lease term during Fiscal 2003.

17

Table of Contents

Revenues

Revenues from continuing operations for Fiscal 2003 increased $4,705,000 or 3.3% to $146,685,000 from $141,980,000 for Fiscal 2002. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to a full year of operations for schools opened in Fiscal 2002 and the opening of seven new schools. The revenue increase for Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Revenues for schools opened before June 30, 2001 decreased $518,000 in Fiscal 2003 compared to Fiscal 2002. This decrease was due a decrease in enrollment in certain pre-elementary and elementary schools. The decrease in enrollment was due to economic conditions that are forcing parents to consider pre-elementary school and elementary school alternatives such as fewer days in attendance in the Company’s pre-elementary schools and public school alternatives for elementary schools. This decrease was offset by tuition increases. The four schools that opened in Fiscal 2002 and the one new charter school management contract entered into in Fiscal 2002 had an increase in revenues of $1,189,000 due to a full year of operating results in Fiscal 2003. The seven new schools opened in Fiscal 2003 had revenues of $4,679,000.

School Operating Profit

School operating profit from continuing operations in Fiscal 2003 decreased $3,782,000 or 17.1% to $18,378,000 from $22,160,000 for Fiscal 2002. Total school operating profit as a percentage of revenue decreased from 15.6% for Fiscal 2002 to 12.5% for Fiscal 2003. The decrease in school operating profit for Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Operating profit from schools opened before June 30, 2001 decreased $3,624,000 in Fiscal 2003 compared to Fiscal 2002. School operating profit as a percentage of applicable revenue for these schools decreased from 16.7% in Fiscal 2002 to 14.1% in Fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily due to increases in school labor cost related to annual employee wage increases that were not offset by expected increases in tuition revenue due to decreases in enrollment in certain pre-elementary and elementary schools. In addition, the decrease in school operating profit was also due to increases in insurance costs for health care benefits, property and casualty insurance and annual rent increases.

The four schools that opened in Fiscal 2002 had increases in school operating profit of $495,000 due to a full year of operating results in Fiscal 2003. New schools opened in Fiscal 2003 had first year losses of

18

Table of Contents

$1,656,000 due in part to the normal new school enrollment ramp up period. Losses in Fiscal 2002 for schools opened in Fiscal 2003 are related to pre-opening expenses incurred prior to the opening of a school. Fiscal 2003 pre-opening expense for the one school that opened at the beginning of Fiscal 2004 was $23,000.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Impairment

During Fiscal 2003, the Company had impairment charges related to its goodwill and other intangibles totaling $8,715,000.

The Company was required by SFAS 142 to evaluate the Company’s goodwill for recovery based on the facts and circumstances at December 31, 2002. This test was required as a result of the termination of the merger agreement with Socrates Acquisition Corporation and the decline in the price of the Company’s common stock. The Company estimated fair values December 31, 2002 for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential level one impairment charge. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 as of December 31, 2002 indicated that two of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired. The results of the Company’s level one test were reviewed by an independent consultant. Based on the consultant’s independent valuation and completion of the level two analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss in the second quarter of Fiscal 2003 related to these two reporting units of $2,200,000.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company performed its annual impairment test as required under SFAS 142. The Company estimated fair values as of June 30, 2003 for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential impairment charge. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 indicated that three of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired as a result of deteriorating operating performance since December 2002. The results of the Company’s level one test were reviewed by an independent consultant. Based on the consultant’s independent valuation and completion of the level two analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss related to these three reporting units of $5,500,000. The Company also incurred a goodwill impairment charge of $710,000 directly related to two schools, one of which has been closed and the other is held for sale. This impairment is included in discontinued operations.

In addition, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $1,015,000 related to the intangible assets of The Activities Club, a school products company owned by the Company. This impairment charge was to record the asset to its fair value in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.

Transaction Related Costs

Transaction related costs of $1,168,000 were related to legal, professional and registration fees and expenses associated with a merger agreement that was terminated on February 3, 2003.

On August 5, 2002, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Socrates Acquisition Corporation (“Socrates”), a corporation formed by Gryphon Partners II, L.P. and Cadigan Investment Partners, Inc. That agreement (as amended by a First Amendment thereto, dated as of October 2, 2002, the “Merger Agreement”) contemplated that Socrates would be merged into the Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation.

The Company’s Board of Directors, acting upon the unanimous recommendation of a special committee of the Board comprised of three disinterested directors (the “Special Committee”), approved the Merger Agreement and the proposed merger. In reaching its decision, the Special Committee and the Board received a fairness opinion from the Company’s financial advisor, Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated.

As part of the negotiation and execution of the Merger Agreement, the stockholder rights plan previously adopted by the Company in May 2000 was amended, by Amendment No. 1 on August 4, 2002 (so that the

19

Table of Contents

diluted effect of the rights was not triggered by the announcement of a public bid), and by Amendment No. 2 on August 5, 2002 (so that the diluted effect of the rights would not be triggered by the consummation of the proposed merger).

Under the Merger Agreement, Socrates’ obligation to consummate the proposed merger was subject to its ability to obtain financing, and at the time the Merger Agreement was signed, Socrates had received signed commitment letters providing for the necessary debt and equity financing, subject to certain conditions. However, Socrates did not ultimately receive the financing necessary to consummate the proposed merger. Accordingly, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement, in accordance with its terms, on February 3, 2003.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $2,109,000 or 17.9% from $11,776,000 in Fiscal 2002 to $13,885,000 in Fiscal 2003. The largest portion of this increase in general and administrative expenses was related to a $1,000,000 allowance recorded against the Company’s $2,500,000 note receivable from TES. As part of the evaluation of the carrying value of TES, a number of positive and negative factors affecting TES were considered including: (i) operating results and outlook for TES, (ii) expected future cash flows, (iii) current conditions and trends in the industry; (iv) other industry comparables, and (v) the Company’s plans and ability to hold this investment. As a result of this evaluation, a valuation allowance of $1,000,000 was recorded during Fiscal 2003 to reflect the current net realizable value of the Company’s note receivable with TES. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased over Fiscal 2002 due to $286,000 in expenses related to deferred development fees, and an increase related to the use of various recruiting, accounting and legal services of $481,000.

Operating Income

Primarily as a result of the factors mentioned above, operating income decreased $15,774,000 from $10,384,000 in Fiscal 2002 to a loss of $5,390,000 in Fiscal 2003.

Other Income

Other income increased $63,000 during Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. This increase was primarily due to an increase in interest income from investments and notes receivable. Other income for Fiscal 2002 also includes the gain recognized on the settlement of a promissory note of $383,000, offset by the write-off of expenses of $344,000 related to acquisition transactions that were not consumated.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $103,000 or 2.8% from $3,637,000 for Fiscal 2002 to $3,740,000 for Fiscal 2003. The increase is related to the write-off of $356,000 related to deferred debt fees caused by amendments to the Company’s senior credit facility. This increase is offset by decreases in interest rates and repayments on the Company’s senior credit facility and a decrease in interest associated with subordinated notes due to repayments.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

Income tax benefit totaled $2,315,000 for Fiscal 2003 as compared to income tax expense of $2,728,000 in Fiscal 2002. The income tax benefit for Fiscal 2003 is less than the combined statutory income tax rate of 38% due to the non-deductibility of a portion of the goodwill that was impaired. Some goodwill associated with the acquisition of the stock of a company is not deductible for tax purposes. As a result of the losses incurred in Fiscal 2003, the Company has carried these losses to Fiscal 2001.

20

Table of Contents

Loss From Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit, was $4,908,000 in Fiscal 2003 and $1,311,000 in Fiscal 2002.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company discontinued the operations of a leased school in Sarasota, Florida. In January 2003, the Company entered into a sublease agreement for the remaining term of that lease in excess of the future lease payment obligations.

In May 2003, the Company subleased to the Unified School District No. 11, of Maricopa County, Arizona, the premises at which the Company had previously operated its Fletcher Heights Charter Elementary School. In the second quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Desert Heights Charter Elementary School and reduced the carrying value of that property to its net realizable value of $3,850,000. The Company recorded a charge of $2,297,000 for the write-down of that asset to its net realizable value of $3,850,000. In August 2003, the Company sold to Partnership With Parents, Inc. (an Arizona non-profit corporation) the premises at which the Company had previously owned and operated its Desert Heights Charter Elementary School. As a result of these two transactions in 2003, the Company exited both the Arizona market and its direct ownership of charter schools in general.

In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company created a plan to develop exit strategies for schools identified as under-performing and/or which do not fit well with the Company’s business or geographic strategies. The plan includes 10 schools (two of which are owned and the rest leased) and one undeveloped school location. The Company is actively seeking buyers for these schools and will continue to operate these schools until disposal or the expiration of their lease terms. As part of this plan, in June 2003 the Company closed an elementary school located in Wilmington, North Carolina and in August 2003, the Company closed a preschool located in Cary, North Carolina.

All of these schools meet the criteria for discontinued operations. The operating results for these schools are classified as discontinued operations in the statements of operations for all periods presented, net of tax. A summary of discontinued operations is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Accrual for future lease obligations is calculated using discounted present values of future rent payments, net of sublease payments and expected losses from the sale of an undeveloped school property.

Net (loss) income

As a result of the above factors, the Company had a net loss for Fiscal 2003 of $11,534,000 as compared to net income of $2,834,000 in Fiscal 2002.

21

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Refinancing

On February 20, 2004, the Company completed a refinancing of its senior credit facility and its senior subordinated debt. The Company entered into a $22,995,000 Credit Agreement with Harris Trust and Savings Bank (the “Credit Agreement”) which provides for a $14,995,000 term loan (the “Term Loan”) and an $8,000,000 working capital line (the “Working Capital Line”). Proceeds from the Term Loan were used by the Company to retire approximately $15,000,000 in obligations outstanding under the Company’s previous Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Fleet Bank. The Term Loan will mature on February 15, 2009 and provides for $2,000,000 annual amortization with the balance paid at maturity. The Working Capital Line is scheduled to terminate on February 15, 2009. Up to $3,000,000 of the Working Capital Line may be used for the issuance of letters of credit. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by subsidiaries which are 80% or more owned by the Company, and are collateralized by a pledge of stock of the Company’s subsidiaries. In addition, the Credit Agreement is secured by liens on real property owned by the Company. At July 3, 2004, the Company had $14,495,000 outstanding under the Term Loan and no amounts outstanding under the Working Capital Line.

The Credit Agreement bears interest, at the Company’s option, at either of the following rates, which may be adjusted in quarterly increments based on the achievement of performance goals: (1) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a debt to EBITDA-dependent rate ranging from 3.25% to 3.75%, or (2) base rate plus a debt to EBITDA-dependent rate ranging from 1.00% to 1.5%. At July 3, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on the Credit Agreement was 7.9%.

The Company also pays a letter of credit fee based on the face amount of each letter of credit calculated at the rate per year then applicable to loans under the Credit Agreement bearing interest based on an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a debt to EBITDA-dependent rate ranging from 3.0% to 3.5%. At July 3, 2004, the Company had $1,246,000 committed under outstanding letters of credit. At July 3, 2004, the letter of credit fee was 3.5%.

In July 1998, the Company issued a $10,000,000 senior subordinated note to Allied Capital Corporation. On February 20, 2004, the Company retired the $10,000,000 senior subordinated debt outstanding with Allied Capital Corporation by issuing a $5,000,000 senior subordinated note to Blesbok LLC and a $5,000,000 senior subordinated note to Mollusk Holdings LLC (the “Notes”). The Notes are due August 15, 2009 and bear interest at the rate of 13.25%. The Company may make prepayments (without penalty) on the Notes, in whole or in part, after February 20, 2005.

The Credit Agreement and the Notes contain customary covenants and provisions that restrict the Company’s ability to change its business, declare dividends, grant liens, incur additional indebtedness and make capital expenditures. In addition, the Credit Agreement and the Notes provide that the Company must meet or exceed defined amounts for EBITDA and fixed charges and must not exceed leverage ratios. At July 3, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all required covenants under the Credit Agreement and the Notes.

In connection with the issuance of the Credit Agreement and the Notes, the Company incurred $1,364,000 of cost related to legal, investment banking and commitment fees. The fees have been capitalized and will be amortized over the term of the agreements. In addition, the Company expensed $83,000 of unamortized debt fees and $171,000 of original issued discount related to the retirement of the senior subordinated note issued to Allied Capital Corporation.

Amendments Related to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Fleet Bank Retired by the February 20, 2004 Refinancing

In May 2001, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, which increased the Company’s borrowing capacity to $40,000,000. Three separate facilities were established under the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement: (1) $10,000,000 Working Capital Credit Facility (2) $15,000,000 Acquisition Credit Facility, and (3) $15,000,000 Term Loan.

22

Table of Contents

On May 28, 2003, the Company entered into its fifth amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Fleet Bank. This amendment (i) waived the Company’s noncompliance with its financial ratios for the periods ending December 31, 2002 and March 31, 2003, (ii) reset future required financial covenant ratios, (iii) changed the maturity of the acquisition credit facility to December 31, 2003, (iv) increased the interest rate spread over the prime rate, required a capital infusion of at least $5,000,000 by June 30, 2003, (v) required that a minimum of $4,000,000 of additional capital infusion be received by the Company with the proceeds applied against the acquisition credit facility by August 30, 2003, and (vi) placed a limitation on capital expenditures.

On September 29, 2003, the Company entered into its sixth amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with Fleet Bank. This amendment (i) modified the definition of EBITDA (defined as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and excludes certain one time charges) to allow for additional non-cash expenses associated with the Company’s Fiscal 2003 and its first quarter Fiscal 2004 results to be excluded from EBITDA, (ii) required a $1,000,000 pay down on the acquisition credit facility, (iii) reduced its working capital line of Credit from $10,000,000 to $5,000,000, (iv) required the Company to have a commitment by October 31, 2003 for refinancing of its existing senior credit facility, and (v) required that all of the Company’s senior debt be paid off by December 31, 2003. On October 31, 2003, the Company received a commitment letter to refinance its existing debt.

On October 24, 2003, the Company and its senior lenders agreed to replace Exhibit I (which defined non-cash charges excluded from the definition of EBITDA) to the sixth amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, to further modify the definition of EBITDA to allow the exclusion of additional non-cash expenses related to certain non-compete and consulting agreements.

In connection with the above amendments, the Company incurred $466,000 in fees paid to Fleet Bank which are reflected in interest expense for Fiscal 2004.

Issuance of Preferred Stock

On June 17, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of an aggregate of 1,333,333 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, for a purchase price of $6,000,000. The Series E Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion rate of one share of common stock for each share of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. The proceeds from the issuance of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock were used to pay down the Company’s then-current Working Capital Line of Credit by $4,543,000 with the remainder being available for working capital purposes.

On September 9, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of an aggregate of 588,236 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, for a purchase price of $3,000,000, net of expenses of $106,000. The Series F Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at a conversion rate of one share of common stock for each share of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock. The proceeds from the issuance of the Series F Convertible Preferred Stock were used to pay down the Company’s then-current Working Capital Line of Credit, and for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Sale of Property

On August 28, 2003, the Company completed the sale of an owned school located in the greater Phoenix, Arizona area and received net proceeds of $3,935,000. On September 2, 2003, the Company used the proceeds from the sale of the Arizona property to make a required $4,000,000 payment against the then-current acquisition credit facility.

On August 27, 2004, the Company completed the sale of a closed facility in Northfield, New Jersey with a book value of $909,000. The net proceeds from the sale of this property were $1,131,000. All of the proceeds were used to pay down the Company’s senior term debt.

23

Table of Contents

As a result of these events and schedule repayments, the total amount outstanding under the Company’s senior credit facility was $12,864,000 at September 7, 2004 as compared to $14,495,000 at July 3, 2004 and $23,990,000 at June 30, 2003, as shown below (dollars in thousands):

Cash Flow

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash flow from operations and amounts available under its Working Capital Line. In addition, the Company uses third parties and site developers to build new schools and lease them to the Company. Principal uses of liquidity are debt service and capital expenditures related to the maintenance of its existing schools. At July 3, 2004 and September 7, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under the Working Capital Line and there was $1,246,000 outstanding for letters of credit. The total unused portion of the Working Capital Line, after allowance for the letters of credit, at July 3, 2004 was $6,754,000. The Company’s loan covenants under its Credit Agreement limit the amount of senior debt borrowings. At July 3, 2004, additional borrowings available under the Credit Agreement were $1,678,000.

Net cash flow provided by operating activities for Fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $11,056,000, $7,807,000 and $10,548,000, respectively. The $3,249,000 increase in Fiscal 2004 as compared to Fiscal 2003 was primarily due to an increase in school operating profit of $1,551,000 and a reduction in transaction related fees of $1,168,000 that were incurred in Fiscal 2003. In Fiscal 2003, net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $2,741,000 due primarily as a result of the decrease in school operating profit and transaction related fees.

Total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2,006,000 from $4,722,000 at June 30, 2003 to $2,716,000 at July 3, 2004. The decrease was primarily related to $5,663,000 in capital expenditures, net repayments on senior and subordinated debt of $10,136,000, a decrease in cash overdraft of $3,110,000 and debt issuance cost of $1,364,000. The use of cash was offset by cash provided from operations totaling $11,056,000, proceeds of $2,894,000 from the sale of preferred stock, $4,057,000 in proceeds from the sale of schools and proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $544,000.

Long-Term Obligations and Commitments

The Company has certain contractual obligations and commercial commitments. Contractual obligations are those that will require cash payments in accordance with the terms of a contract, such as a loan agreement or lease agreement. Commercial commitments represent potential obligations for performance in the event of demands by third parties, such as letters of credit. The Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments at July 3, 2004 were as follows: (dollars in thousands)

24

Table of Contents

Capital Expenditures

During Fiscal 2004, the Company placed one new school in operation. The new school opened in Fiscal 2004 was financed by a developer and leased to the Company. Capital expenditures for new school development include school equipment furniture and fixtures and curricula purchased by the Company for the operations of the school. During Fiscal 2005, the Company plans to open one pre-elementary schools and one elementary school. The funds to open these schools will be provided by cash flow from operations. Renovations and equipment purchases are expenditures incurred for existing schools in order to maintain the operations and, where necessary, upgrade the school facility. The Company’s current senior bank credit facility has annual limitations on the amount of capital expenditures. For Fiscal 2004, this limitation was $6,000,000.

In April 2001, the Company entered into a lease agreement to lease and open a school in the Atlanta, Georgia area by October 1, 2003. The Company decided not to pursue the development of this school and as a result, the Company was required to purchase the property on October 1, 2003 for approximately $1,860,000. The Company has listed the property with a real estate broker and currently has an offer for $1,200,000. At June 30, 2003, the Company recorded an expected loss on the sale of this property of $594,000, which amount was included in losses from discontinued operations. At July 3, 2004, the Company recorded an additional charge of $161,000 to reflect the value of the property at $1,200,000 less broker fees.

Capital expenditures are as follows: (dollars in thousands):

Insurance

Companies involved in the education and care of children may not be able to obtain insurance for the total risks inherent in their operations. In particular, general liability coverage can have insurance sub-limits per claim for child abuse. The Company believes it has adequate insurance coverage at this time. There can be no assurance that in future years the Company will not become subject to lower limits or substantial increases in insurance premiums.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS 150”). SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset ins some circumstances). Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 149”). SFAS 149 amends SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to clarify the financial accounting and reporting for derivative

25

Table of Contents

instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 149 is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring comparable accounting methods for similar contracts. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified subsequent to June 30, 2003. The requirements of SFAS 149 do not affect the Company’s current accounting for derivative instruments or hedging activities; therefore, it had no effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2003 the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of certain variable interest entities where there is a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity or where the variable interest entity does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parities. The interpretation applies in the first year or interim period beginning after January 31, 2003 and applies in the first year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 to variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Currently the Company does not have any variable rate interest in entities. The Company will apply the consolidation requirement of FIN 46 in future periods if the Company should own any interest in any variable interest entity.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Predicting future events is inherently an imprecise activity and as such requires the use of judgment. Actual results may vary from estimates in amounts that may be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The following accounting policies are considered critical to the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements due to the estimation processes and business judgment involved in their application.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s recognition of net revenues meets the following criteria: the existence of an arrangement through an enrollment agreement or contract, the rendering of educational services, a specific tuition rate and/or fee, and probable collection. Net revenues include tuition, fees and other income, reduced by discounts. Fees are received for registration, other educational services and charter school management fees. Other income is primarily comprised of supplemental fees from summer programs or camps and field trips. Tuition revenues, net of discounts, and other revenues are recognized as services are performed. Any tuition payments received in advance of the time period for which service is to be performed is recorded as unearned revenue. Charter school management fees are recognized based on a contractual relationship with the charter school and do not include any tuition revenue received by the charter school. Certain fees may be received in advance of services being rendered, in which case the fee revenue is deferred and recognized over the appropriate period of service.

Accounts Receivable

The Company’s accounts receivable are comprised primarily of tuition due from parents and governmental agencies. Accounts receivable are presented at estimated net realizable value. The Company uses estimates in determining the collectibility of its accounts receivable and must rely on its evaluation of historical trends, governmental funding processes, specific customer issues and current economic trends to arrive at appropriate reserves. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of bad debt expense if actual experience differs significantly from management estimates.

26

Table of Contents

The Company provides its services to the parents and guardians of the children attending its schools. The Company does not extend credit for an extended period of time, nor does it require collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on the financial condition of each parent/guardian. The Company also has investments in other entities. The collectibility of such investments is dependent upon the financial performance of these entities. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses.

Long-lived and Intangible Assets

Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An asset’s value is impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows, undiscounted and without interest charges, to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. Such cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income and historical trends, as well as the effects of demand and competition. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over the fair value of the asset. Such estimates require the use of judgment and numerous subjective assumptions, which, if actual experience varies, could result in material differences in the requirements for impairment charges.

During Fiscal 2004, impairment charges of $1,095,000 included in continuing operations were recorded with respect to certain underperforming schools. In Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred impairment charges of $2,907,000 included in discontinued operations and $1,015,000 included in continuing operations.

Goodwill

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective July 1, 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if certain indicators arise.

The Company estimates fair values for each reporting unit using discounted cash flow projections in evaluating and measuring a potential impairment charge on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The Company engages an independent third party consultant to review its calculations required by SFAS 142 and if necessary the level two analysis in order to determine the amount of goodwill impaired. Any impairment of goodwill resulting from the required testing by SFAS 142 is recorded as a component of income from operations.

Fiscal 2004 test

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2004, the Company performed its annual impairment test as required by SFAS 142. The level one impairment test for Fiscal 2004 indicated that one of the Company’s 10 reporting units was impaired as a result of deteriorating operating performance. The Company recorded an impairment loss related to this reporting unit of $2,273,000.

Fiscal 2003 test

Due to the termination of the Merger Agreement and the decline in the price of the Company’s common stock, the Company was required by SFAS 142 to evaluate the Company’s goodwill for recovery based on the facts and circumstances at December 31, 2002. The level one impairment test as required under SFAS 142 as of December 31, 2002 indicated that two of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired. The Company recorded an impairment loss related to these two reporting units of $2,200,000.

During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2003, the Company performed its annual impairment test as required by SFAS 142. The level one impairment test for Fiscal 2003 indicated that three of the Company’s 10 reporting units were impaired as a result of deteriorating operating performance since December 2002. The Company recorded an impairment loss related to these three reporting units of $5,500,000.

27

Table of Contents

In addition, goodwill specifically related to closed schools or in connection with the Company’s plan to sell schools identified as under-performing and/or which do not fit well with the Company’s business or geographic strategies resulted in an impairment of $1,053,000 and $711,000 in Fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Goodwill impairment for these schools is included in loss from discontinued operations.

Long Term Note Receivable

The Company has a $2,500,000 note receivable pursuant to a Credit Agreement with TES due May 2005, of which $2,250,000 is convertible into 30.0% ownership of TES. In connection with the note receivable, the Company also has warrants to purchase an additional 10% of TES common stock at $100 per share, provided that $3,500,000 of senior secured financing has been made available to TES on competitive terms. TES, established in 1997, provides special education staffing and compliance solutions to charter schools and public schools which, because of a lack of internal capabilities or other reasons, wish to out-source their provision of special education programs. The proceeds received by TES have been used for the expansion of its product throughout California and its planned entry into other states. Although TES’s revenues have grown since the origination of the credit agreement, TES has also incurred losses as a result of building the infrastructure to service other regions.

As part of the evaluation of the carrying value of TES, a number of positive and negative factors affecting TES were considered including:

As a result of this evaluation, a valuation allowance of $1,000,000 was recorded during Fiscal 2003 to reflect the current net realizable value of the Company’s note receivable with TES.

During Fiscal 2004, the Company re-evaluated the note receivable with TES. Based on the above factors and improved operating performance of TES, the Company concluded that the valuation allowance of $1,000,000 is still appropriate.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, in accordance with FAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of “temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rate is recognized as income in the period of enactment. A valuation allowance is recorded based on the uncertainty regarding the ultimate realizability of deferred tax assets.

The Company files a U.S. federal income tax return and various state income tax returns, which are subject to examination by tax authorities. This process involves estimating the actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The Company’s estimated tax liability is subject to change as examinations of specific tax years are completed in the respective jurisdictions including possible adjustments related to the nature and timing of deductions and the local attribution of income.

28

Table of Contents

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. The Company is exposed to market risk in the areas of interest rates and interest rate swaps agreements.

Interest Rates

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relate primarily to debt obligations. The Company has no cash flow exposure due to rate changes on its 13.25%, $10,000,000 senior subordinated notes. The Company also has no cash flow exposure on certain mortgages, notes payable, capital leases and subordinated debt agreements aggregating $845,000 and $1,731,000 at July 3, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively. However, the Company does have cash flow exposure on its Credit Agreement, since the Working Capital Line and the Term Loan are subject to variable prime base rate pricing. Accordingly, a 1.0% change in the LIBOR rate and the prime rate would have resulted in interest expense changing by approximately $73,000 and $173,000 in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2003, respectively.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

In connection with the May 2001 amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, the Company entered an interest rate swap agreement on the $15,000,000 Term Loan Facility.

On February 20, 2004, the Company transferred it rights under the interest rate swap agreement to Harris Trust and Savings Bank which continues the existence of the interest rate swap. Under the assignment, $9,643,000 of the term loan has been allocated to the swap agreement, which retains the same terms and conditions.

The Company uses this derivative financial instrument to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The instrument involves, to varying degrees, market risk, as the instrument is subject to rate and price fluctuations, and elements of credit risk in the event the counterparty should default. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes. At July 3, 2004, the Company’s interest rate swap contract outstanding had a total notional amount of $8,571,000. Under the interest rate swap contract, the Company agrees to pay a fixed rate of 5.46% and the counterparty agrees to make payments based on 3-month LIBOR. The market value of the interest rate swap agreement at July 3, 2004 was a liability of $330,000 and is included as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

Financial statements and supplementary financial information specified by this Item, together with the Reports of the Company’s independent accountants thereon, are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on pages F-1 through F-33 below.

On March 28, 2003, the Company, upon the recommendation and approval of its Audit Committee, dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s principal independent accountant. On April 4, 2003, the Company engaged BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO Seidman”) to serve as the Company’s principal independent public accountant, effective immediately. The decision to dismiss PwC was recommended by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

In connection with the audits for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and the subsequent interim period through April 4, 2003, there were no disagreements between the Company and PwC on any matter

29

Table of Contents

of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in connection with its reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such years. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and the subsequent interim period through April 4, 2003, there were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The reports of PwC on the consolidated financial statements of the Company, as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

The foregoing disclosures were previously reported in Item 4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2003. The Company provided PwC with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested that PwC furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating that it agreed with such statements. A copy of such letter, dated April 1, 2003, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to Form 8-K, dated April 4, 2003.

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 and through April 4, 2003, neither the Company nor someone on its behalf consulted BDO Seidman regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or (iii) any other matters or reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(1)(iv) and (a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 3, 2004 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that all material information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act have been made known to them in a timely fashion.

During the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2004, no significant change occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially effected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, our internal control over financial reporting.

30

Table of Contents

PART III

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the Proxy Statement.