WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP - 10-K Annual Report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of September 30, 2003, computed by reference to the closing sale price on such date, was 232,254,787. (For purposes of calculating this amount only, all directors and executive officers are treated as affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.) As of June 2, 2004, 18,556,397 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding.

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement pertaining to the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“the Proxy Statement”) and filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated herein by reference into Parts hereof.

World Acceptance Corporation, a South Carolina corporation, operates a small-loan consumer finance business in eleven states. As used herein, the “Company” includes World Acceptance Corporation and each of its subsidiaries, except that when used with reference to the Common Stock or other securities described herein and in describing the positions held by management or agreements of the Company, it includes only World Acceptance Corporation. All references in this report to “fiscal 2004” are to the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.

The Company maintains an Internet website, www.worldacceptance.com”, where interested persons will be able to access free of charge, among other information, the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and its current reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments to these filings, via a link to a third party website. These documents are available for access as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these documents with the SEC. The Company files these reports with the SEC via the SEC’s EDGAR filing system, and such reports also may be accessed via the SEC’s EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. The Company will also provide either electronic or paper copes free to charge upon written request to P.O. Box 6429, Greenville, SC 29606-6429.

General. The Company is engaged in the small-loan consumer finance business, offering short-term small loans, medium-term larger loans, related credit insurance and ancillary products and services to individuals. The Company generally offers standardized installment loans of between $130 to $3,000 through 526 offices in South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Tennessee, Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, Kentucky, and Alabama as of March 31, 2004. The Company generally serves individuals with limited access to other sources of consumer credit from banks, savings and loans, other consumer finance businesses and credit card lenders. The Company also offers income tax return preparation services and refund anticipation loans to its customers and others.

Small-loan consumer finance companies operate in a highly structured regulatory environment. Consumer loan offices are individually licensed under state laws, which, in many states, establish allowable interest rates, fees and other charges on small loans made to consumers and maximum principal amounts and maturities of these loans. The Company believes that virtually all participants in the small-loan consumer finance industry charge the maximum rates permitted under applicable state laws in those states with usury limitations.

The small-loan consumer finance industry is a highly fragmented segment of the consumer lending industry. Small-loan consumer finance companies generally make loans to individuals of up to $1,000 with maturities of one year or less. These companies approve loans on the basis of the personal creditworthiness of their customers and maintain close contact with borrowers to encourage the repayment or refinancing of loans. By contrast, commercial banks, savings and loans and other consumer finance businesses typically make loans of more than $1,000 with maturities of more than one year. Those financial institutions generally approve consumer loans on the security of qualifying personal property pledged as collateral or impose more stringent credit requirements than those of small-loan consumer finance companies. As a result of their higher credit standards and specific collateral requirements, commercial banks, savings and loans and other consumer finance businesses typically charge lower interest rates and fees and experience lower delinquency and charge-off rates than do small-loan consumer finance companies. Small-loan consumer finance companies generally charge higher interest rates and fees to compensate for the greater credit risk of delinquencies and charge-offs and increased loan administration and collection costs.

Expansion. During fiscal 2004, the Company opened twenty-one new offices. Thirty-nine other offices were purchased and four offices were closed, merged into other existing offices, or sold due to their inability to grow to profitable levels. The Company plans to open or acquire at least 25 new offices in each of the next two fiscal years by increasing the number of offices in its existing market areas and in new states where it believes demographic profiles and state regulations are attractive. The Company’s ability to expand operations into new states is dependent upon its ability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals and licenses, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any such approvals or consents.

The Company’s expansion is also dependent upon its ability to identify attractive locations for new offices and hire suitable personnel to staff, manage and supervise new offices. In evaluating a particular community, the Company examines several factors, including the demographic profile of the community, the existence of an established small-loan consumer finance market and the availability of suitable personnel to staff, manage and supervise the new offices. The Company generally locates new offices in communities already served by at least one small-loan consumer finance company.

The small-loan consumer finance industry is highly fragmented in the ten states in which the Company currently operates. The Company believes that its competitors in these markets are principally independent operators with fewer than 20 offices. The Company also believes that attractive opportunities to acquire offices from competitors in its existing markets and to acquire offices in communities not currently served by the Company will become available as conditions in the local economies and the financial circumstances of the owners change.

The following table sets forth the number of offices of the Company at the dates indicated:

Loan and Other Products. In each state in which it operates, the Company offers loans that are standardized by amount and maturity in an effort to reduce documentation and related processing costs. Substantially all of the Company’s loans are payable in monthly installments with terms of four to fifteen months, and all loans are prepayable at any time without penalty. In fiscal 2004, the Company’s average originated loan size and term were approximately $709 and nine months, respectively. State laws regulate lending terms, including the maximum loan amounts and interest rates and the types and maximum amounts of fees, insurance premiums and other costs that may be charged. As of March 31, 2004, the annual percentage rates on loans offered by the Company, which include interest, fees and other charges as calculated for the purposes of federal consumer loan disclosure requirements, ranged from 30% to 215% depending on the loan size, maturity and the state in which the loan is made. In addition, in certain states, the Company sells credit insurance in connection with its loans as agent for an unaffiliated insurance company, which may increase its returns on loans originated in those states.

Specific allowable charges vary by state and, consistent with industry practice, the Company generally charges the maximum rates allowable under applicable state law. Statutes in Texas and Oklahoma allow for indexing the maximum loan amounts to the Consumer Price Index. Fees charged by the Company include origination and account maintenance fees, monthly handling charges and, in South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Missouri, Kentucky and Alabama, non-file fees, which are collected by the Company and paid as premiums to an unaffiliated insurance company for non-recording insurance.

The Company, as an agent for an unaffiliated insurance company, markets and sells credit life, credit accident and health, credit property, and unemployment insurance in connection with its loans in states where the sale of such insurance is permitted by law. Credit life insurance provides for the payment in full of the borrower’s credit obligation to the lender in the event of death. Credit accident and health insurance provides for repayment of loan installments to the lender that come due during the insured’s period of income interruption resulting from disability from illness or injury. Credit property insurance insures payment of the borrower’s credit obligation to the lender in the event that the personal property pledged as security by the borrower is damaged or destroyed. Unemployment insurance provides for repayment of loan installments to the lender that come due during the insured’s period of involuntary unemployment. The Company requires each customer to obtain credit insurance in the amount of the loan for all loans originated in Georgia, and encourages customers to obtain credit insurance for loans originated in South Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama and Kentucky and on a limited basis in Tennessee, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. Customers in those states typically obtain such credit insurance through the Company. Charges for such credit insurance are made at maximum authorized rates and are stated separately in the Company’s disclosure to customers, as required by the Truth-in-Lending Act. In the sale of insurance policies, the Company as agent writes policies only within limitations established by its agency contracts with the insurer. The Company does not sell credit insurance to non-borrowers.

The Company also markets automobile club memberships to its borrowers in Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama and Kentucky as an agent for an unaffiliated automobile club. Club memberships entitle members to automobile breakdown and towing insurance and related services. The Company is paid a commission on each membership sold, but has no responsibility for administering the club, paying insurance benefits or providing services to club members. The Company generally does not market automobile club memberships to non-borrowers.

In fiscal 1995 the Company implemented its World Class Buying Club, and began marketing certain electronic products and appliances to its Texas borrowers. Since implementation, the Company has expanded this program to Georgia, Tennessee, New Mexico and Missouri. The program is not offered in the other states where the Company operates as it is not permitted by the various state regulations. Borrowers participating in this program can purchase a product from a catalog available at a branch office or by direct mail and finance the purchase with a retail installment sales loan provided by the Company. Products sold through this program are shipped directly by the suppliers to the Company’s customers and, accordingly, the Company is not required to maintain any inventory to support the program. During fiscal 2004, however, the company tried, on a limited basis, to maintain a few inventory items in each of its branch offices participating in the program. Having certain items on hand enhanced sales and may be done on a limited basis in the future. Also, beginning in fiscal 2005, the Company will add a limited number of furniture items to its product line.

Since fiscal 1997, the Company has expanded its product line to include larger balance, lower risk, and lower yielding individual consumer loans. These loans typically average $2,500 to $3,000, with terms of 18 to 24 months, compared to $300 to $500, with 8 to 12 month terms for the smaller loans. The Company offers these loans in all states except Texas, where they are not profitable under the Company’s lending criteria and strategy. Additionally, the Company has purchased numerous larger loan offices and has made several bulk purchases of larger loans receivable. As of March 31, 2004, the larger class of loans amounted to approximately $86.7 million of gross loans receivable, a 15.1% increase over the balance outstanding at March 31, 2003. This portfolio now represents 28.0% of the total loan balances as of the end of the fiscal year. Management believes that these loans provide lower expense and loss ratios, thus providing positive contributions. While the Company does not intend to change its primary lending focus from its small-loan business, it does intend to continue expanding the larger loan product line as part of its ongoing growth strategy.

Another service offered by the Company is income tax return preparation, electronic filing and refund anticipation loans. Begun as an experiment in fiscal 1999, this program is now provided in all but a few of the Company’s offices. The number of returns completed has grown from 16,000 in fiscal 2000 to approximately 50,000 in fiscal 2004, and the net revenues to the Company from this service grew from approximately $1.0 million to approximately $5.4 million over this same period. The Company believes that this is a beneficial service for its existing customer base and plans to continue to promote and expand the program.

Loan Activity and Seasonality. The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s gross loans receivable by state at March 31 of each year from 1995 through 2004:

The following table sets forth the total number of loans and the average loan balance by state at March 31, 2004:

The Company’s highest loan demand occurs generally from October through December, its third fiscal quarter. Loan demand is generally lowest and loan repayment highest from January to March, its fourth fiscal quarter. Consequently, the Company experiences significant seasonal fluctuations in its operating results and cash needs. Operating results from the Company’s third fiscal quarter are generally lower than in other quarters and operating results for its fourth fiscal quarter are generally higher than in other quarters.

Lending and Collection Operations. The Company seeks to provide short-term loans to the segment of the population that has limited access to other sources of credit. In evaluating the creditworthiness of potential customers, the Company primarily examines the individual’s discretionary income, length of current employment, duration of residence and prior credit experience. Loans are made to individuals on the basis of the customer’s discretionary income and other factors and are limited to amounts that the customer can reasonably be expected to repay from that

income. All of the Company’s new customers are required to complete standardized credit applications in person or by telephone at local Company offices. Each of the Company’s local offices is equipped to perform immediate background, employment and credit checks and approve loan applications promptly, often while the customer waits. The Company’s employees verify the applicant’s employment and credit histories through telephone checks with employers, other employment references and a variety of credit services. Substantially all new customers are required to submit a listing of personal property that will be pledged as collateral to secure the loan, but the Company does not rely on the value of such collateral in the loan approval process and generally does not perfect its security interest in that collateral. Accordingly, if the customer were to default in the repayment of the loan, the Company may not be able to recover the outstanding loan balance by resorting to the sale of collateral. The Company generally approves less than 50% of applications for loans to new customers.

The Company believes that the development and continual reinforcement of personal relationships with customers improve the Company’s ability to monitor their creditworthiness, reduce credit risk and generate repeat loans. It is not unusual for the Company to have made a number of loans to the same customer over the course of several years, many of which were refinanced with a new loan after two or three payments. In determining whether to refinance existing loans, the Company typically requires loans to be current on a recency basis, and repeat customers are generally required to complete a new credit application if they have not completed one within the prior two years.

In fiscal 2004, approximately 87% of the Company’s loans were generated through refinancings of outstanding loans and the origination of new loans to previous customers. A refinancing represents a new loan transaction with a present customer in which a portion of the new loan proceeds is used to repay the balance of an existing loan and the remaining portion is advanced to the customer. The Company actively markets the opportunity to refinance existing loans prior to maturity, thereby increasing the amount borrowed and increasing the fees and other income realized. For fiscal 2002, 2003, and 2004, the percentages of the Company’s loan originations that were refinancings of existing loans were 79.0%, 77.1%, and 77.2%, respectively.

The Company allows refinancing of delinquent loans on a case-by-case basis for those customers who otherwise satisfy the Company’s credit standards. Each such refinancing is carefully examined before approval to avoid increasing credit risk. A delinquent loan may generally be refinanced only if the customer has made payments which, together with any credits of insurance premiums or other charges to which the customer is entitled in connection with the refinancing, reduce the balance due on the loan to an amount equal to or less than the original cash advance made in connection with the loan. The Company does not allow the amount of the new loan to exceed the original amount of the existing loan. The Company believes that refinancing delinquent loans for certain customers who have made periodic payments allows the Company to increase its average loans outstanding and its interest, fee and other income without experiencing a material increase in loan losses. These refinancings also provide a resolution to temporary financial setbacks for these borrowers and sustain their credit rating. While allowed on a selective basis, refinancings of delinquent loans amounted to less than 3% of the Company’s loan volume in fiscal 2004.

To reduce late payment risk, local office staff encourage customers to inform the Company in advance of expected payment problems. Local office staff also promptly contact delinquent customers following any payment due date and thereafter remain in close contact with such customers through phone calls, letters or personal visits to the customer’s residence or place of employment until payment is received or some other resolution is reached. When representatives of the Company make personal visits to delinquent customers, the Company’s policy is to encourage the customers to return to the Company’s office to make payment. Company employees are instructed not to accept payment outside of the Company’s offices except in unusual circumstances. In Georgia, Oklahoma, and Illinois, the Company is permitted under state laws to garnish customers’ wages for repayment of loans, but the Company does not otherwise generally resort to litigation for collection purposes, and rarely attempts to foreclose on collateral.

Insurance-related Operations. In Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Kentucky, Alabama and on a limited basis, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, the Company sells credit insurance to customers in connection with its loans as an agent for an unaffiliated insurance company. These insurance policies provide for the payment of the outstanding balance of the Company’s loan upon the occurrence of an insured event. The Company earns a commission on the sale of such credit insurance, which is based in part on the claims experience of the insurance company on policies sold on its behalf by the Company.

The Company has a wholly-owned, captive insurance subsidiary that reinsures a portion of the credit insurance sold in connection with loans made by the Company. Certain coverages currently sold by the Company on behalf of the unaffiliated insurance carrier are ceded by the carrier to the captive insurance subsidiary, providing the Company with an additional source of income derived from the earned reinsurance premiums. In fiscal 2004, the captive insurance subsidiary reinsured approximately 2.7% of the credit insurance sold by the Company and contributed approximately $548,000 to the Company’s total revenues.

The Company typically does not perfect its security interest in collateral securing its smaller loans by filing Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) financing statements. Statutes in Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky and Alabama permit the Company to charge a non-file or non-recording insurance fee in connection with loans originated in these states. These fees are equal in aggregate amount to the premiums paid by the Company to purchase non-file insurance coverage from an unaffiliated insurance company. Under its non-file insurance coverage, the Company is reimbursed for losses on loans resulting from its policy not to perfect its security interest in collateral pledged to secure the loans. The Company generally perfects its security interest in collateral on larger loan transactions (typically greater than $1,000) by filing UCC financing statements.

Monitoring and Supervision. The Company’s loan operations are organized into Southern, Central and Western Divisions, with the Southern Division consisting of South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama; the Central Division of Tennessee, Illinois, Missouri, and Kentucky; and the Western Division of Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. Several levels of management monitor and supervise the operations of each of the Company’s offices. Branch managers are directly responsible for the performance of their respective offices and must approve all credit applications. District supervisors are responsible for the performance of eight to ten offices in their districts, typically communicate with the branch managers of each of their offices at least weekly and visit the offices monthly. Each of the state Vice Presidents of Operations monitor the performance of all offices within their states (or partial state in the case of Texas), primarily through communication with district supervisors. These Vice Presidents of Operations typically communicate with the district supervisors of each of their districts weekly and visit each office in their states quarterly.

Senior management receives daily delinquency, loan volume, charge-off, and other statistical reports consolidated by state and has access to these daily reports for each branch office. At least monthly, district supervisors audit the operations of each office in their geographic area and submit standardized reports detailing their findings to the Company’s senior management. At least once per year, each office undergoes an audit by the Company’s internal auditors. These audits include an examination of cash balances and compliance with Company loan approval, review and collection procedures and compliance with federal and state laws and regulations.

In fiscal 1994 the Company converted all of its loan offices to a new computer system following its acquisition of Paradata Financial Systems, a small software company located near St. Louis, Missouri. This system uses a proprietary data processing software package developed by Paradata, and has enabled the Company to fully automate all loan account processing and collection reporting. The system also provides significantly enhanced management information and control capabilities. The Company also markets the system to other finance companies, but experiences significant fluctuations from year to year in the amount of revenues generated from sales of the system to third parties and does not expect such revenues to be material.

Staff and Training. Local offices are generally staffed with three employees. The branch manager supervises operations of the office and is responsible for approving all loan applications. Each office generally has one assistant manager who contacts delinquent customers, reviews loan applications and prepares operational reports and one customer service representative who takes and processes loan applications and payments and assists in the preparation of operational reports and collection and marketing activities. Large offices may employ additional assistant managers and service representatives.

New employees are required to review a detailed training manual that outlines the Company’s operating policies and procedures. The Company tests each employee on the training manual during the first year of employment. In addition, each branch provides in-office training sessions once every week and training sessions outside the office for one full day every two months.

Compensation. The Company administers a performance-based compensation program for all of its district supervisors and branch managers. The Company annually reviews the performance of branch managers and adjusts their base salaries based upon a number of factors, including office loan growth, delinquencies and profitability.

Branch managers also receive incentive compensation based upon office profitability and delinquencies. In addition, branch managers are paid a cash bonus for training personnel who are promoted to branch manager positions. Assistant managers and service representatives are paid a base salary and incentive compensation based primarily upon their office’s loan volume and delinquency ratio.

Advertising. The Company actively advertises through direct mail, targeting both its present and former customers and potential customers who have used other sources of consumer credit. The Company creates mailing lists from public records of collateral filings by other consumer credit sources, such as furniture retailers and other consumer finance companies and obtains or acquires mailing lists from other sources. In addition to the general promotion of its loans for vacations, back-to-school needs and other uses, the Company advertises extensively during the October through December holiday season and in connection with new office openings. The Company believes its advertising contributes significantly to its ability to compete effectively with other providers of small-loan consumer credit. In fiscal 2004, advertising expenses were approximately 4.0% of total revenues.

Competition. The small-loan consumer finance industry is highly fragmented, with numerous competitors. The majority of the Company’s competitors are independent operators with fewer than 20 offices. Competition from nationwide consumer finance businesses is limited because these companies typically do not make loans of less than $1,000.

The Company believes that competition between small-loan consumer finance companies occurs primarily on the basis of the strength of customer relationships, customer service and reputation in the local community, rather than pricing, as participants in this industry generally charge comparable interest rates and fees. The Company believes that its relatively larger size affords it a competitive advantage over smaller companies by increasing its access to, and reducing its cost of, capital.

Several of the states in which the Company currently operates limit the size of loans made by small-loan consumer finance companies and prohibit the extension of more than one loan to a customer by any one company. As a result, many customers borrow from more than one finance company, enabling the Company to obtain information on the credit history of specific customers from other consumer finance companies. The Company generally seeks to open new offices in communities already served by at least one other small-loan consumer finance company.

Government Regulation. Small-loan consumer finance companies are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and licensing under various federal and state statutes, ordinances and regulations. In general, these statutes establish maximum loan amounts and interest rates and the types and maximum amounts of fees, insurance premiums and other costs that may be charged. In addition, state laws regulate collection procedures, the keeping of books and records and other aspects of the operation of small-loan consumer finance companies. Generally, state regulations also establish minimum capital requirements for each local office. State agency approval is required to open new branch offices. Accordingly, the ability of the Company to expand by acquiring existing offices and opening new offices will depend in part on obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals.

A Texas regulation requires the approval of the Texas Consumer Credit Commissioner for the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of the voting or common stock of a consumer finance company. A Louisiana statute prohibits any person from acquiring control of 50% or more of the shares of stock of a licensed consumer lender, such as the Company, without first obtaining a license as a consumer lender. The overall effect of these laws, and similar laws in other states, is to make it more difficult to acquire a consumer finance company than it might be to acquire control of a nonregulated corporation.

Each of the Company’s branch offices is separately licensed under the laws of the state in which the office is located. Licenses granted by the regulatory agencies in these states are subject to renewal every year and may be revoked for failure to comply with applicable state and federal laws and regulations. In the states in which the Company currently operates, licenses may be revoked only after an administrative hearing.

The Company and its operations are regulated by several state agencies, including the Industrial Loan Division of the Office of the Georgia Insurance Commissioner, the Consumer Finance Division of the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions, the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs, the Texas Office of the Consumer Credit Commission, the Oklahoma Department of Consumer Credit, the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions, the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, the Missouri Division of Finance, the Consumer Credit Division of the Illinois Department of Financial Institutions, the Consumer Credit Bureau of the New Mexico Financial Institutions Division, and the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the Alabama State Banking Department. These state regulatory agencies audit the Company’s local offices from time to time, and each state agency performs an annual compliance audit of the Company’s operations in that state.

The Company is also subject to state regulations governing insurance agents in the states in which it sells credit insurance. State insurance regulations require that insurance agents be licensed, govern the commissions that may be paid to agents in connection with the sale of credit insurance and limit the premium amount charged for such insurance. The Company’s captive insurance subsidiary is regulated by the insurance authorities of the Turks and Caicos Islands of the British West Indies, where the subsidiary is organized and domiciled.

The Company is subject to extensive federal regulation as well, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the regulations thereunder and the Federal Trade Commission’s Credit Practices Rule. These laws require the Company to provide complete disclosure of the principal terms of each loan to every prospective borrower, prohibit misleading advertising, protect against discriminatory lending practices and proscribe unfair credit practices. Among the principal disclosure items under the Truth-in-Lending Act are the terms of repayment, the final maturity, the total finance charge and the annual percentage rate charged on each loan. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against loan applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age or marital status. Pursuant to Regulation B promulgated under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, creditors are required to make certain disclosures regarding consumer rights and advise consumers whose credit applications are not approved of the reasons for the rejection. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires the Company to provide certain information to consumers whose credit applications are not approved on the basis of a report obtained from a consumer reporting agency. The Credit Practices Rule limits the types of property a creditor may accept as collateral to secure a consumer loan. Violations of the statutes and regulations described above may result in actions for damages, claims for refund of payments made, certain fines and penalties, injunctions against certain practices and the potential forfeiture of rights to repayment of loans.

Consumer finance companies are affected by changes in state and federal statutes and regulations. The Company actively participates in trade associations and in lobbying efforts in the states in which it operates. Although the Company is not aware of any pending or proposed legislation that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, there can be no assurance that future regulatory changes will not adversely affect the Company’s lending practices, operations, profitability or prospects.

Employees. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had 1,646 employees, none of whom were represented by labor unions. The Company considers its relations with its personnel to be good. The Company seeks to hire people who will become long-term employees. The Company experiences a high level of turnover among its entry-level personnel, which the Company believes is typical of the small-loan consumer finance industry.

Executive Officers. The names and ages, positions, terms of office and periods of service of each of the Company’s executive officers (and other business experience for executive officers who have served as such for less than five years) are set forth below. The term of office for each executive officer expires upon the earlier of the appointment and qualification of a successor or such officers’ death, resignation, retirement or removal.

The Company owns its headquarters facility of approximately 14,000 square feet and a printing and mailing facility of approximately 13,000 square feet in Greenville, South Carolina, and all of the furniture, fixtures and computer terminals located in each branch office. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had 526 branch offices, most of which are leased pursuant to short-term operating leases. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, total lease expense was approximately $5.3 million, or an average of approximately $10,874 per office. The Company’s leases generally provide for an initial three- to five-year term with renewal options. The Company’s branch offices are typically located in shopping centers, malls and the first floors of downtown buildings. Branch offices generally have a uniform physical layout and range in size from 800 to 1,200 square feet.

From time to time the Company is involved in routine litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business in which damages in various amounts are claimed. However, the Company believes that it is not presently a party to any such other pending legal proceedings that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.

This report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) and other information incorporated herein by reference, may contain various “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are based on management’s belief and assumptions, as well as information currently available to management. When used in this document, the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” any variations of the foregoing, and any similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in any such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Any such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual financial results, performance or financial condition may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or expected. Among the key factors that could cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance or condition to differ from the expectations expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements are the following: changes in interest rates; risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and value of collateral; recently-enacted or proposed legislation; the timing and amount of revenues that may be recognized by the Company; changes in current revenue and expense trends (including trends affecting charge-offs); changes in the Company’s markets and general changes in the economy (particularly in the markets served by the Company); the unpredictable nature of litigation; and other matters discusses in this Report and the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements it makes.

There were no matters submitted to the Company’s security holders during the fourth fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Since November 26, 1991, the Company’s Common Stock has traded on the NASDAQ National Market System (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol WRLD. As of June 2, 2004, there were 112 holders of record of Common Stock and approximately 2,000 persons or entities who hold their stock in nominee or “street” names through various brokerage firms.

Since April 1989, the Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. Its policy has been to retain earnings for use in its business and on occasion, repurchase it’s common stock on the open market. In the future, the Company’s Board of Directors will determine whether to pay cash dividends based on conditions then existing, including the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. In addition, the Company’s credit agreements with its lenders impose restrictions on the amount of cash dividends that may be paid on its capital stock.

The table below reflects the stock prices published by Nasdaq by quarter for the last two fiscal years. The last reported sale price on June 2, 2004, was $18.17.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Company’s financial performance continues to be dependent in large part upon the growth in its outstanding loans receivable, the ongoing introduction of new products and services for marketing to its customer base, the maintenance of loan quality and acceptable levels of operating expenses. Since March 31, 1999, gross loans receivable have increased at a 15.7% annual compounded rate from $149.6 million to $310.1 million at March 31, 2004. The increase reflects both the higher volume of loans generated through the Company’s existing offices and the contribution of loans generated from new offices opened or acquired over the period. During this same five-year period, the Company has grown from 379 offices to 526 offices as of March 31, 2004. The Company plans to open or acquire at least 25 new offices in each of the next two fiscal years.

The Company continues to identify new products and services for marketing to its customer base. In addition to new insurance-related products, which have been introduced in selected states over the last several years, the Company sells and finances electronic items and appliances to its existing customer base. This program is called the “World Class Buying Club.” Total loan volume under this program amounted to $6.5 million during fiscal 2004, a 5.2% increase from the prior fiscal year. While this represents less than 1% of the Company’s total loan volume, it remains a very profitable program, which the Company plans to continue to emphasize in fiscal 2004 and beyond.

The Company’s ParaData Financial Systems subsidiary provides data processing systems to 115 separate finance companies, including the Company, and currently supports approximately 1,109 individual branch offices in 45 states. ParaData’s revenue is highly dependent upon its ability to attract new customers, which often requires substantial lead time, and as a result its revenue may fluctuate greatly from year to year. During fiscal 2004, its net revenues from system sales and support amounted to $2.3 million, approximately the same as in fiscal 2003. ParaData’s pretax income contribution to the Company also can fluctuate greatly and was $288,000, $486,000, and $773,000, in fiscal 2004, fiscal 2003, and fiscal 2002, respectively. ParaData’s net revenue and resulting net contribution to the Company will continue to fluctuate on a year to year basis, but management believes this business should remain profitable over the long term. Additionally, and more importantly, ParaData continues to provide state-of-the-art data processing support for the Company’s in-house integrated computer system at little or no net costs to the Company.

Since fiscal 1997, the Company has expanded its product line to include larger balance, lower risk, and lower yielding individual consumer loans. These loans typically average $2,500 to $3,000, with terms of 18 to 24 months compared to smaller loans, which average $300 to $500, with 8 to 12 month terms. The Company offers the larger loans in all states except Texas, where they are not profitable under our lending criteria and strategy. Additionally, the Company has purchased numerous larger loan offices and has made several bulk purchases of larger loans receivable. As of March 31, 2004, the larger loan category amounted to approximately $86.7 million of gross loans receivable, a 15.1% increase over the balance outstanding at March 31, 2003. At the end of the current fiscal year, this portfolio was 28.0% of the total loan balances, a slight decrease from the end of the previous year. Management believes that these loans provide lower expense and loss ratios, thus providing positive contributions. While the Company does not intend to change its primary lending focus from its small-loan business, it does intend to continue expanding the larger loan product line as part of its ongoing growth strategy.

In fiscal 1999, the Company tested an income tax return preparation and refund anticipation loan program in 40 of its offices. Based on the results of this test, the Company expanded this program in fiscal 2000 into substantially all of its offices. Since that time, the program has grown dramatically, with the Company preparing approximately, 40,000, 45,000, and 50,000 returns in fiscal 2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively. Net revenue generated by the Company from this program during fiscal 2004 amounted to approximately $5.4 million. The Company believes that this profitable business provides a beneficial service to its existing customer base and plans to continue to promote and expand the program in the future.

The following table sets forth certain information derived from the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets, as well as operating data and ratios, for the periods indicated.

Net income amounted to $28.8 million in fiscal 2004, a 25.8% increase over the $22.9 million earned during fiscal 2003. This increase resulted from an increase of $9.0 million, or 22.3%, in operating income (revenues less provision for loan losses and general and administrative expenses) combined with a reduction in interest expense of $551,000, or 12.3%, offset by a $3.7 million increase in income taxes.

Interest and fee income during fiscal 2004 increased by $18.2 million, or 13.7%, over fiscal 2003. This increase resulted primarily from an increase of $26.1 million, or 13.4%, in average loans receivable between the two fiscal years. This increase in loans receivable resulted form growth in our existing offices, new offices opened during the fiscal year and acquisitions. As in the prior year, acquisitions continued to play an important role in our overall growth strategy. During fiscal 2004, $24.5 million of gross loans were purchased in 21 separate transactions. These loans were added to 37 new offices and 29 existing offices.

Insurance commissions and other income amounted to $27.7 million in fiscal 2004, a $5.2 million, or 23.4%, increase over the $22.4 million earned in fiscal 2003. Insurance commissions increased by $3.1 million, or 29.4%, and other income increased by $2.1 million, or 18.1%. The increase in insurance commissions resulted from the growth in the loan portfolio in those states where credit insurance may be sold in conjunction with the loan transaction. Other income, which consists primarily of commissions from the sale of Motor Club memberships and AD&D insurance, revenues from ParaData, the gross profit on the sale of items through the Company’s World Class buying Club, and fees from the tax preparation business, were up mainly from an increase in the net fees generated from tax preparation and electronic filing.

Total revenues were $179.2 million during fiscal 2004, a 15.1% increase over the $155.7 million in the prior fiscal year. Revenues from the 433 offices that were open throughout both fiscal years increased by 9.8%.

The provision for loan losses during fiscal 2004 increased by $3.9 million, or 13.2%, from the previous year. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in loan losses over the two fiscal periods. As a percentage of average loans receivable, net charge-offs rose slightly to 14.7% during fiscal 2004 from 14.6% during fiscal 2003.

General and administrative expenses increased by $10.6 million, or 12.3%, over the two fiscal years. The Company’s profitability benefited by improved expense ratios as total general and administrative expense as a percent of total revenues decreased from 55.1% in fiscal 2003 to 53.8% in fiscal 2004. This ratio improved because of the average general and administrative expense per open office rose by 5.1% over the two fiscal years, while the average revenue increased 9.8%.

Interest expense was $3.9 million in fiscal 2004, a decrease of $551,000, or 12.3%, from $4.5 million in fiscal 2003. This decrease was due to reductions in average debt outstanding as well as overall interest rates when comparing the two fiscal years. Average debt outstanding decreased by 4.8% and the average interest rate decreased from 4.2% in fiscal 2003 to 3.8% in fiscal 2004.

The Company’s effective income tax rate increased from 36.2% in fiscal 2003 to 36.7% in fiscal 2004 primarily due to an increase in state income taxes.

Net income was $22.9 million during fiscal 2003, an 18.2% increase over the $19.3 million earned during fiscal 2002. This increase resulted from an increase in operating income of $4.9 million, or 13.8%, combined with a decrease in interest expense and partially offset by an increase in income taxes.

Interest and fee income during fiscal 2003 increased by $16.1 million, or 13.7%, over fiscal 2002. This increase resulted from an increase of $20.7 million, or 12.0%, in average loans receivable between the two fiscal years. The increase in average loans receivable, especially the larger loans, was partially due to several acquisitions during the year. The Company acquired approximately $16.7 million in net loans in 42 separate transactions during fiscal 2003.

Insurance commissions and other income increased by $3.1 million, or 15.8%, over the two fiscal years. Insurance commissions increased by $1.8 million, or 20.8%, as a result of the increase in loan volume in states where credit insurance may be sold. Other income increased by $1.2 million, or 11.7%, over the two years.

Total revenues increased to $155.7 million in fiscal 2003, a $19.1 million, or 14.0%, increase over the $136.6 million in fiscal 2002. Revenues from the 412 offices open throughout both fiscal years increased by 8.5%. At March 31, 2003, the Company had 470 offices in operation, an increase of 29 net offices from March 31, 2002.

The provision for loan losses during fiscal 2003 increased by $3.9 million, or 15.1%, from the previous year. This increase resulted from a combination of increases in both the general allowance for loan losses and the amount of loans charged off. Net charge-offs for fiscal 2003 amounted to $28.4 million, a 10.8% increase over the $25.7 million charged off during fiscal 2002, and net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans declined slightly from 14.8% to 14.6% when comparing the two annual periods.

General and administrative expenses during fiscal 2003 increased by $10.3 million, or 13.7%, over the previous fiscal year. This increase was due primarily to costs associated with the new offices opened or acquired during the fiscal year. General and administrative expenses, when divided by average open offices, increased by 6.8% when comparing the two fiscal years and, overall, general and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues decreased from 55.2% in fiscal 2002 to 55.1% during fiscal 2003.

Interest expense decreased by $922,000, or 17.0%, during fiscal 2003, as compared to the previous fiscal year as a result of the continued decline in interest rates.

The Company’s effective income tax rate increased to 36.2% during fiscal 2003 from 35.6% during the previous fiscal year. This increase resulted primarily from increased state income taxes.

The Company’s accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices within the finance company industry. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain critical accounting policies involve significant judgment by the Company’s management, including the use of estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. As a result, changes in these estimates and assumptions could significantly affect the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The Company considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses to be its most critical accounting policy due to the significant degree of management judgment. The Company has developed policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which takes into consideration various assumptions and estimates with respect to the loan portfolio. The Company’s assumptions and estimates may be affected in the future by changes in economic conditions, among other factors. For additional discussion concerning the allowance for loan losses, see “Credit Quality” below.

The Company’s delinquency and net charge-off ratios reflect, among other factors, changes in the mix of loans in the portfolio, the quality of receivables, the success of collection efforts, bankruptcy trends and general economic conditions.

Delinquency is computed on the basis of the date of the last full contractual payment on a loan (known as the recency method) and on the basis of the amount past due in accordance with original payment terms of a loan (known as the contractual method). Management closely monitors portfolio delinquency using both methods to measure the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio and the probability of credit losses.

The following table classifies the gross loans receivable of the Company that were delinquent on a recency and contractual basis for at least 60 days at March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:

Loans are charged off at the earlier of when such loans are deemed to be uncollectible or when six months have elapsed since the date of the last full contractual payment. The Company’s charge-off policy has been consistently applied, and no significant changes have been made to the policy during the periods reported. Management considers the charge-off policy when evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses.

At the end of fiscal 2004, the Company experienced a decrease in contractual delinquency from 4.2% at March 31, 2003 to 3.8% at the end of the current fiscal year. The delinquency rate also decreased from 2.5% at the end of fiscal 2003 to 2.3% at the end of the current fiscal year on a recency basis. Charge-offs as a percent of average loans increased from 14.6% in fiscal 2003 to 14.7% in fiscal 2004.

In fiscal 2004, approximately 86.8% of the Company’s loans were generated through renewals of outstanding loans and the origination of new loans to previous customers. A renewal represents a new loan transaction with a present customer in which a portion of the new loan proceeds is used to repay the balance of an existing loan and the remaining portion is advanced to the customer. For fiscal 2002, 2003, and 2004, the percentages of the Company’s loan originations that were renewals of existing loans were 79.0%, 77.1%and 77.2%, respectively. The Company’s renewal policies are determined based on state regulations and customer payment history. A renewal is considered a current renewal if the customer is no more than 45 days delinquent on a contractual basis. Delinquent renewals may be extended to customers that are more than 45 days past due on a contractual basis if the customer completes a new application and the manager believes that the customer’s ability and intent to repay has improved. It is the Company’s policy to not renew delinquent loans in amounts greater than the original amounts financed. In all cases, a customer must complete a new application every two years. During fiscal 2004, delinquent renewals represented less than 3% of the Company’s total loan volume.

Charge-offs, as a percentage of loans made by category, are greatest on loans made to new borrowers and less on loans made to former borrowers and renewals. This is as expected due to the payment history experience available on repeat borrowers. However, as a percentage of total loans charged off, renewals represent the greatest percentage due to the volume of loans made in this category. The following table depicts the charge-offs as a percent of loans made by category and as a percent of total charge-offs during fiscal 2004:

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an amount that, in management’s opinion, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. The Company charges against current earnings, as a provision for loan losses, amounts added to the allowance to maintain it at levels expected to cover probable losses of principal. When establishing the allowance for loan losses, the Company takes into consideration the growth of the loan portfolio, the mix of the loan portfolio, current levels of charge-offs, current levels of delinquencies, and current economic factors. In accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies” (SFAS No. 5), the Company accrues an estimated loss if it is probable and can be reasonably estimated. It is probable that there are losses in the existing portfolio. To estimate the losses, the Company uses historical information for net charge-offs and average loan life by loan type. This methodology is based on the fact that many customers renew their loans prior to the contractual maturity. Average contractual loan terms are approximately nine months and the average life is approximately four months. Based on this methodology, the Company had an allowance for loan losses that approximated six months of average net charge-offs at March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002. Therefore, at each year end the Company had an allowance for loan losses that covers estimated losses for its existing loans based on historical charge-offs and average lives. In addition, the entire loan portfolio turns over approximately 3.5 times during a typical twelve-month period. Therefore, a large percentage of loans that are charged off during any fiscal year are not on the Company’s books at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company believes that it is not appropriate to provide for losses on loans that have not been originated, that twelve months of net charge-offs is not needed in the allowance, and that the methodology employed is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded adjustments of approximately $1.3 million, $1.0 million, and $889,000, respectively, to the allowance for loan losses in connection with acquisitions in accordance generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments represent the allowance for loan losses on acquired loans.

The Company records acquired loans at fair value based on current interest rates, less allowances for uncollectibility and collection costs. The Company normally records all acquired loans on its books; however, the acquired loan portfolios generally include some loans that the Company deems uncollectible but which do not have an allowance assigned to them. An allowance for loan losses is then estimated based on a review of the loan portfolio, considering delinquency levels, charge-offs, loan mix and other current economic factors. The Company then records the acquired loans at their gross value and records the related allowance for loan losses as an adjustment to their allowance for loan losses. This is reflected as purchase accounting acquisitions in the table below. Subsequent charge-offs related to acquired loans are reflected in the purchase accounting acquisition adjustment in the year of acquisition.

The Company believes that its allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover losses in the existing portfolio at March 31, 2004.

The following is a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:

The Company’s loan volume and corresponding loans receivable follow seasonal trends. The Company’s highest loan demand typically occurs from October through December, its third fiscal quarter. Loan demand has generally been the lowest and loan repayment highest from January to March, its fourth fiscal quarter. Loan volume and average balances typically remain relatively level during the remainder of the year. This seasonal trend affects quarterly operating performance through

corresponding fluctuations in interest and fee income and insurance commissions earned and the provision for loan losses recorded, as well as fluctuations in the Company’s cash needs. Consequently, operating results for the Company’s third fiscal quarter generally are significantly lower than in other quarters and operating results for its fourth fiscal quarter significantly higher than in other quarters.

The following table sets forth, on a quarterly basis, certain items included in the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements and shows the number of offices open during fiscal years 2003 and 2004.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosure to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FIN 45 clarifies that a guarantor is required to disclose (a) the nature of the guarantee; (b) the maximum potential amount of future payments under the guarantee; (c) the carrying amount of the liability; and (d) the nature and extent of any recourse provisions or available collateral that would enable the guarantor to recover the amounts paid under the guarantee. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the obligation it has undertaken in issuing the guarantee at its inception.

The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of FIN 45 effective as of January 1, 2003, and adopted the disclosure requirements effective as of March 31, 2003.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities. Under FIN 46, an enterprise that holds significant variable interest in a variable interest entity but is not the primary beneficiary is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, its exposure to loss as a result of the variable interest holder’s involvement with the entity, and the nature of its involvement with the entity and date when the involvement began. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, the carrying amount and classification of consolidated assets that are collateral for the variable interest entity’s obligations, and any lack of recourse by creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of a consolidated variable interest entity to the general creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of a consolidated variable entity to the general creditor of the primary beneficiary. FIN 46 was effective for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has no interest in any variable interest entities, so there was no impact upon adoption.

In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 (“FIN 46R”). Under the new FIN 46R guidance, application of FIN 46R is required in financial statements of entities that have interests in structures that are commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003. Application for all other types of variable interest entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. This revision will not impact the Company upon adoption.

In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”). SAB 104 summarizes certain of the SEC staff’s views on applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The adoption of SAB 104 did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity

In May 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS 150”). SFAS 150 establishes standards for classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 149”). SFAS 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting of derivatives, including instruments embedded in other contracts, which are collectively referred to as derivatives, and for hedging activities under SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

SFAS 149 was effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Position 03-1 addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes such loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. This SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. This SOP limits the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) to the excess of the investor’s estimate of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (cash flows expected at acquisition to be collected) over the investor’s initial investment in the loan. This SOP requires that the excess of contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference) not be recognized as an adjustment of yield loss accrual, or valuation allowance.

This SOP prohibits “carrying over” or creation of valuation allowances in the initial accounting of all loans acquired in a transfer that are within the scope of this SOP. The prohibition of the valuation allowance carryover applies to the purchase of an individual loan, a pool of loans, a group of loans, and loans acquired in a purchase business combination. This SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004.

The Company has financed its operations, acquisitions and office expansion through a combination of cash flow from operations and borrowings from its institutional lenders. The Company has generally applied its cash flow from operations to fund its increasing loan volume, fund acquisitions, repay long-term indebtedness, and repurchase its common stock. As the

Company’s gross loans receivable increased from $210.9 million at March 31, 2001 to $310.1 million at March 31, 2004, net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004 was $48.3 million, $55.1 million, and $70.4 million, respectively.

The Company’s primary ongoing cash requirements relate to the funding of new offices and acquisitions, the overall growth of loans outstanding, the repayment of long-term indebtedness and the repurchase of its common stock. The Company repurchased 1,986,000 shares of its common stock under its repurchase program, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $16.0 million, between February 1996 and October 1996. Because of certain loan agreement restrictions, the Company suspended its stock repurchases in October 1996. The stock repurchase program was reinstated in January 2000, and 144,000 shares were repurchased in fiscal 2000, 275,000 shares in fiscal 2001, 252,000 shares in fiscal 2002 and 1,623,549 shares in fiscal 2003 for respective aggregate purchase prices of $724,000, $1,434,000, $2,179,000 and $12,000,000. The Company believes stock repurchases to be a viable component of the Company’s long-term financial strategy and an excellent use of excess cash when the opportunity arises. In addition, the Company plans to open or acquire at least 25 new offices in each of the next two fiscal years. Expenditures by the Company to open and furnish new offices generally averaged approximately $20,000 per office during fiscal 2004. New offices have also required from $100,000 to $400,000 to fund outstanding loans receivable originated during their first 12 months of operation.

The Company acquired 39 offices and a number of loan portfolios from competitors in 10 states in 21 separate transactions during fiscal 2004. Gross loans receivable purchased in these transactions were approximately $24.5 million in the aggregate at the dates of purchase. The Company believes that attractive opportunities to acquire new offices or receivables from its competitors or to acquire offices in communities not currently served by the Company will continue to become available as conditions in local economies and the financial circumstances of owners change.

The Company has a $152.0 million base credit facility with a syndicate of banks. In addition to the base revolving credit commitment, there is a $15 million seasonal revolving credit commitment available November 15 of each year through March 31 of the immediately succeeding year to cover the increase in loan demand during this period. The credit facility will expire on September 30, 2005. Funds borrowed under the revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either the agent bank’s prime rate per annum or the LIBOR rate plus 2.00% per annum. At March 31, 2004, the interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit facility was 3.20%. The Company pays a commitment fee equal to 0.375% per annum of the daily unused portion of the revolving credit facility. Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility may not exceed specified percentages of eligible loans receivable. On March 31, 2004, $91.4 million was outstanding under this facility, and there was $60.6 million of unused borrowing availability under the borrowing base limitations.

The Company is currently in negotiations with its banks to extend the maturity date of its credit facility to September 30, 2006. The Company does not anticipate any problems in getting this extension approved, but will not know definitely until some time in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

The Company has $2.0 million of senior subordinated secured notes with an insurance company. These notes mature on June 30, 2004, and bear interest at 10.0%, payable quarterly. The notes were issued at a discounted price equal to 99.6936% and may be prepaid subject to certain prepayment penalties. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the senior subordinated notes are secured by a lien on substantially all the tangible and intangible assets of the Company and its subsidiaries pursuant to various security agreements.

The Company’s credit agreements contain a number of financial covenants, including minimum net worth and fixed charge coverage requirements. The credit agreements also contain certain other covenants, including covenants that impose limitations on the Company with respect to (i) declaring or paying dividends or making distributions on or acquiring common or preferred stock or warrants or options; (ii) redeeming or purchasing or prepaying principal or interest on subordinated debt; (iii) incurring additional indebtedness; and (iv) entering into a merger, consolidation or sale of substantial assets or subsidiaries. The senior subordinated notes are also subject to prepayment penalties. The Company was in compliance with these agreements at March 31, 2004 and does not believe that these agreements will materially limit its business and expansion strategy.

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual cash obligations by period (in thousands):

The Company believes that cash flow from operations and borrowings under its revolving credit facility will be adequate to fund the expected cost of opening or acquiring new offices, including funding initial operating losses of new offices and funding loans receivable originated by those offices and the Company’s other offices and the scheduled repayment of the senior subordinated notes. Management is not currently aware of any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that it believes will result in, or are reasonably likely to result in, the Company’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. From time to time, the Company has needed and obtained, and expects that it will continue to need on a periodic basis, an increase in the borrowing limits under its revolving credit facility. The Company has successfully obtained such increases in the past and anticipates that it will be able to do so in the future as the need arises; however, there can be no assurance that this additional funding will be available (or available on reasonable terms) if and when needed.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of the following: cash, loans receivable, senior notes payable, subordinated notes payable and other notes payable. Fair value approximates carrying value for all of these instruments. Loans receivable are originated at prevailing market rates and have an average life of approximately four months. Given the short-term nature of these loans, they are continually repriced at current market rates. Our revolving credit facility has a variable rate based on a margin over LIBOR and reprices with any changes in LIBOR. The interest rate on the subordinated notes is 10%, which is considered to be a market rate for this type of instrument. The Company’s outstanding debt under its revolving credit facility and one of its other notes payable was $92.6 million at March 31, 2004. Interest on borrowings under this facility is based, at the Company’s option, on the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.00%. Based on the outstanding balance at March 31, 2004, a change of 1% in the interest rates would cause a change in interest expense of approximately $926,000 on an annual basis.

The Company does not believe that inflation has a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. The primary impact of inflation on the operations of the Company is reflected in increased operating costs. While increases in operating costs would adversely affect the Company’s operations, the consumer lending laws of three of the ten states in which the Company operates allow indexing of maximum loan amounts to the Consumer Price Index. These provisions will allow the Company to make larger loans at existing interest rates in those states, which could partially offset the potential increase in operating costs due to inflation.

At March 31, 2004, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions arising from their normal business activities in which damages in various amounts are claimed. Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to such matters cannot be determined, the Company believes that any such liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

This annual report, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may contain various “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, as well as information currently available to management. When used in this document, the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in any such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Any such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual financial results, performance or financial condition may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or expected. Among the key factors that could cause the Company’s actual financial results, performance or condition to differ from the expectations expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements are the following: changes in interest rates; risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and value of collateral; recently enacted or proposed legislation; the timing and amount of revenues that may be recognized by the Company; changes in current revenue and expense trends (including trends affecting charge-offs); changes in the Company’s markets and general changes in the economy (particularly in the markets served by the Company); the unpredictable nature of litigation; and other matters discussed in this annual report and the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements it may make.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” of this report is incorporated by reference in response to this Item 7A.

The Company’s accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and conform to general practices within the finance company industry. The following is a description of the more significant of these policies used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

The Company is a small-loan consumer finance company head-quartered in Greenville, South Carolina that offers short-term small loans, medium-term larger loans, related credit insurance products and ancillary products and services to individuals who have limited access to other sources of consumer credit. It also offers income tax return preparation services and refund anticipation loans (through a third party bank) to its customer base and to others.

The Company also markets computer software and related services to finance companies through its ParaData Financial Systems (“ParaData”) subsidiary.

As of March 31, 2004, the Company operated 526 offices in South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Tennessee, Missouri, Illinois, New Mexico, Kentucky and Alabama.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of World Acceptance Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). Subsidiaries consist of operating entities in various states, ParaData, a software company acquired during fiscal 1994, and WAC Insurance Company, Ltd., a captive reinsurance company established in fiscal 1994. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company reports operating segments in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS No. 131”). Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. SFAS 131 requires that a public enterprise report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain specific revenue and expense items, segment assets, information about the way that the operating segments were determined and other items.

The Company has one reportable segment, which is the consumer finance company. The other revenue generating activities of the Company, including the sale of insurance products, income tax preparation, buying club and the automobile club, are done in the existing branch network in conjunction with or as a compliment to the lending operation. There is no discrete financial information available for these activities and they do not meet the criteria under SFAS 131 to be reported separately.

ParaData provides data processing systems to 115 separate finance companies, including the Company. At March 31, 2004 and 2003, ParaData had total assets of $3,765,000 and $3,351,000, respectively, which represented less than 2.0% of total consolidated assets at each fiscal year end. Total net revenues (system sales and support) for

ParaData for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $2,251,000, $2,268,000, and $2,522,000, respectively, which represented less than 3% of consolidated revenue for each year. For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, ParaData had income before income taxes of $288,000, $486,000, and $773,000, respectively. Although ParaData is an operating segment under SFAS 131, it does not meet the criteria to require separate disclosure.

The Company is licensed to originate direct cash consumer loans in the states of Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Tennessee, Missouri, Illinois, New Mexico, Kentucky and Alabama. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, the Company originated loans generally ranging up to $3,000, with terms of 24 months or less. Experience indicates that a majority of the direct cash consumer loans are renewed.

Fees received and direct costs incurred for the origination of loans are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual lives of the loans. Unamortized amounts are recognized in income at the time that loans are renewed or paid in full.

Loans are carried at the gross amount outstanding reduced by unearned interest and insurance income, net deferred origination fees and direct costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Unearned interest is deferred at the time the loans are made and accreted to income on a collection method, which approximates the level yield method. Charges for late payments are credited to income when collected.

The Company generally offers its loans at the prevailing statutory rates for terms not to exceed 24 months. Management believes that the carrying value approximates the fair value of its loan portfolio.

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an amount that, in management’s opinion, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. The Company charges against current earnings, as a provision for loan losses, amounts added to the allowance to maintain it at levels expected to cover probable losses of principal. When establishing the allowance for loan losses, the Company takes into consideration the growth of the loan portfolio, the mix of the loan portfolio, current levels of charge-offs, current levels of delinquencies, and current economic factors. The allowance for loan losses has an allocated and an unallocated component. The Company uses historical information for net charge-offs by loan type and average loan life by loan type to estimate the allocated component of the allowance for loan losses. This methodology is based on the fact that many customers renew their loans prior to the contractual maturity. Average contractual loan terms are approximately nine months and the average loan life is approximately four months. The allowance for loan loss model also reserves 100% of the principal on loans greater than 90 days past due on a recency basis. Loans are charged off at the earlier of when such loans are deemed to be uncollectible or when six months have elapsed since the date of the last full contractual payment. The Company’s charge-off policy has been consistently applied and no significant changes have been made to the policy during the periods reported. Management considers the charge-off policy when evaluating the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses is for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio that are not captured in the allocated allowance and amounted to approximately $3.0 million and $2.8 million at March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The Company records acquired loans at fair value based on current interest rates, less allowances for uncollectibility and collection costs. The Company normally records all acquired loans on its books; however, the acquired loan portfolios generally include some loans that the Company deems uncollectible but which do not have an allowance assigned to them. An allowance for loan losses is then estimated based on a review of the loan portfolio, considering delinquency levels, charge-offs, loan mix and other current economic factors. The Company then records the acquired loans at their gross value and records the related allowance for loan losses as an adjustment to their allowance for loan losses. This is reflected as purchase accounting acquisitions. Subsequent charge-offs related to acquired loans are reflected in the purchase accounting acquisition adjustment in the year of acquisition.

At March 31, 2004 and 2003, there were no concentrations of loans in any local economy, type of property, or to any one borrower.

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset as follows: building, 40 years; furniture and fixtures, 5 to 10 years; equipment, 3 to 7 years; and vehicles, 3 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is recorded using the straight-line method over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. Additions to premises and equipment and major replacements or betterments are added at cost. Maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements are charged to operating expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in income.

Other assets include costs incurred in connection with originating long-term debt. Such remaining unamortized costs aggregated $31,079, and $171,564, at March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are amortized as interest expense over the life of the respective indebtedness.

Intangible assets include the cost of acquiring existing customers, the value assigned to noncompete agreements, and goodwill (the excess cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired). These assets are being amortized as follows: customer lists, 10 years; and non-compete agreements, the term of agreement, which approximates the estimated useful lives. Effective April 1, 2002, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill. Management periodically evaluates the recoverability of the unamortized balances of these assets and adjusts them as necessary.

The Company tests for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). Potential impairment of goodwill exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its implied fair value. The fair value for each reporting unit is computed using one or a combination of the following three methods; income, market value, or cost method. The income method uses a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair value by considering a reporting unit’s capital structure and applying a risk-adjusted discount rate to forecast earnings based on a capital asset pricing model. The market value method used recent transaction analysis or publicly traded comparable analysis for similar assets and liabilities to determine fair value. The cost method assumes the net assets of a recent business combination accounted for under the purchase method of accounting will be recorded at fair value if no event or circumstance has occurred triggering a decline in the value. To the extent a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit’s goodwill may be impaired, and a second step of impairment test will be performed. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test, is compared to its carrying amount. If the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill is impaired and is written down to its implied fair value. The loss recognized is limited to the carrying amount of goodwill. Once an impairment loss is recognized, future increases in fair value will not result in the reversal of previously recognized losses.

Following the April 1, 2002 adoption of SFAS 142, the Company had unamortized goodwill in the amount of $774,000 and unamortized identifiable intangible assets in the amount of $13.2 million related to loan office purchases. Under SFAS 142, the goodwill will no longer be amortized. Amortization expense related to goodwill was $166,000 ($107,000 after tax) for 2002. The Company will continue to amortize the identifiable intangible assets, which relate to non-compete agreements and customer lists.

The following presents the details for goodwill amortization expense and net income (in thousands, except share data) for the years ended March 31:

SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments” requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. The Company’s financial instruments consist of the following: cash, loans receivable, senior notes payable, subordinated notes payable, and other notes payable. Fair value approximates carrying value for all of these instruments. Loans receivable are originated at prevailing market rates and have an average life of approximately four months. Given the short-term nature of these loans, they are continually repriced at current market rates. The Company’s revolving credit facility and other notes payable have a variable rate based on a margin over LIBOR and reprices with any changes in LIBOR. The interest rate on the subordinated notes is 10%, which is considered to be a market rate for this type of instrument.

Insurance premiums for credit life, accident and health, property and unemployment insurance written in connection with certain loans, net of refunds and applicable advance insurance commissions retained by the Company, are remitted monthly to an insurance company. All commissions are credited to unearned insurance commissions and recognized as income over the life of the related insurance contracts using a method similar to that used for the recognition of interest income.

Non-file premiums are charged on certain loans at inception and renewal in lieu of recording and perfecting the Company’s security interest in the assets pledged on certain loans and are remitted to a third-party insurance company for non-file insurance coverage. Such insurance and the related insurance premiums, claims, and recoveries are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements except as a reduction in loan losses (see note 6).

Certain losses related to such loans, which are not recoverable through life, accident and health, property, or unemployment insurance claims are reimbursed through non-file insurance claims subject to policy limitations. Any remaining losses are charged to the allowance for loan losses.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company paid interest of $3,747,688, $4,448,128, and $5,305,890, respectively.

For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company paid income taxes of $15,457,676, $14,847,574, and $10,591,108, respectively.

Supplemental non-cash financing activities for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, consist of:

Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic EPS includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company. Potential common stock included in the diluted EPS computation consists of stock options, which are computed using the treasury stock method.

Certain reclassification entries have been made for fiscal 2003 and 2002 to conform with fiscal 2004 presentation. There was no impact on shareholders’ equity or net income previously reported as a result of these reclassifications.

At March 31, 2003, the Company had three stock-based employee compensation option plans, which are described more fully in Note 10. The Company accounts for its option plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations (“APB Opinion 25”). No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income related to these plans, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) to stock-based employee compensation option plans for the years ended March 31.

Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity

SFAS 149 was effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 149 did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The following is a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:

For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded adjustments of approximately $1.3 million, $1.0 million, and $889,000, respectively, to the allowance for loan losses in connection with its acquisitions in accordance generally accepted accounting principles. These adjustments represent the allowance for loan losses on acquired loans.

The following summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended March 31, 2004:

The estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ended March 31 is as follows: $2,437,879 for 2005, $2,366,787 for 2006, $2,100,198 for 2007, $1,646,956 for 2008, $1,435,096 for 2009, and an aggregate of $2,473,261 for the years thereafter.

$152,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility – This facility provides for borrowings of up to $152.0 million, with $91.4 million outstanding at March 31, 2004, subject to a borrowing base formula. The Company may borrow, at its option, at the rate of prime or LIBOR plus 2.00%. At March 31, 2004, the Company’s interest rate was 3.20% and the unused amount available under the revolver was $60.6 million. The revolving credit facility has a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum on the unused portion of the commitment. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility mature on September 30, 2005.

A member of the Company’s Board of Directors serves as an Executive Vice President of The South Financial Group, which is the Parent of Carolina First Bank. As of March 31, 2004 Carolina First Bank had committed to fund up to $20.0 million under the credit facility and had outstanding $1.2 million in other notes payable.

$2,000,000 Senior Subordinated Secured Notes - These notes mature on June 30, 2004, and bear interest at 10.0%, payable quarterly. The notes were issued at a discounted price equal to 99.6936% and may be prepaid subject to certain prepayment penalties.

Substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral for borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The Company’s assets are also pledged as collateral for the senior subordinated notes on a subordinated basis.

The Company has a $482,000 note payable to an unaffiliated insurance company, bearing interest at 10%, payable annually, which matures in September 2004.

The Company also has a $1.2 million note payable to a bank, bearing interest of LIBOR plus 2.00% payable monthly, which is to be repaid in five annual installments of $200,000 beginning on May 1, 2004.

The various debt agreements contain restrictions on the amounts of permitted indebtedness, investments, working capital, repurchases of common stock and cash dividends. At March 31, 2004, $41.2 million was available under these covenants for the payment of cash dividends, or the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the agreements restrict liens on assets and the sale or transfer of subsidiaries. The Company was in compliance with the various debt covenants for all periods presented.

The aggregate annual maturities of the notes payable for each of the fiscal years subsequent to March 31, 2004, are as follows: 2005, $2,682,000; 2006, $91,550,000; 2007, $200,000; 2008, $200,000; 2009, $200,000; thereafter, $200,000.

The Company maintains non-file insurance coverage with an unaffiliated insurance company. The following is a summary of the non-file insurance activity for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:

The Company conducts most of its operations from leased facilities, except for its owned corporate office building. It is expected that in the normal course of business, expiring leases will be renewed at the Company’s option or replaced by other leases or acquisitions of other properties. All of the Company’s leases are operating leases.

The future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases as of March 31, 2004, are as follows:

Rental expense for cancelable and noncancelable operating leases for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, was $5,460,005, $4,830,932, and $4,266,549, respectively.

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations consists of:

Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations was $16,650,000, $12,987,000, and $10,695,000, for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to pretax income from continuing operations as a result of the following:

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at March 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented below:

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 was $412,000 and $290,000, respectively. The valuation allowance against the potential total deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 relates to state net operating losses. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset, the Company will need to generate future taxable income prior to the expiration of the deferred tax assets governed by the tax code. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods, which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the

existing valuation allowances at March 31, 2004. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

The Internal Revenue Service has examined the Company’s federal income tax returns for the fiscal years 1994 through 1996. Tax returns for fiscal 2000 and subsequent years are subject to examination by taxing authorities.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations.

Options to purchase 50,000, 591,115, and 1,185,815, shares of common stock at various prices were outstanding during the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. The options, which expire on various dates, were still outstanding as of March 31, 2004.

The Company provides a defined contribution employee benefit plan (401(k) plan) covering full-time employees, whereby employees can invest up to 15% of their gross pay. The Company makes a matching contribution equal to 50% of the employees’ contributions for the first 6% of gross pay. The Company’s expense under this plan was $594,430, $430,530, and $423,145, for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

The Company has instituted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which is a non-qualified executive benefit plan in which the Company agrees to pay the executive additional benefits in the future, usually at retirement, in return for continued employment by the executive. The Company selects the key executives who participate in the SERP. The SERP is an unfunded plan, which means there are no specific assets set aside by the Company in connection with the establishment of the plan. The executive has no rights under the agreement beyond those of a general creditor of the Company. For the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, contributions of $588,021, $515,394, and $447,520, respectively were charged to operations related to the SERP.

The Company has an Executive Deferral Plan. Eligible executives may elect to defer all or a portion of their incentive compensation to be paid under the Executive Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2004, $285,000 had been deferred under this plan.

The Company has a 1992 Stock Option Plan, a 1994 Stock Option Plan and a 2002 Stock Option Plan for the benefit of certain directors, officers, and key employees. Under these plans, 4,350,000 shares of authorized common stock have been reserved for issuance pursuant to grants approved by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. The options have a maximum duration of 10 years, may be subject to certain vesting requirements, and are priced at the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of the option.

The Company applies APB Opinion 25 in accounting for the stock option plans, described in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for the stock-based option plans.

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively: dividend yield of zero; expected volatility of 39.6%, 47.5%, and 46.5%; risk-free interest rate of 3.9%, 3.9%, and 5.19%; and expected lives of 10 years for all plans in all three years. The fair values of options granted in 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $9.63, $4.99, and $4.33, respectively.

The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding at March 31, 2004:

The following table sets forth the acquisition activity of the Company for the last three fiscal years:

The Company evaluates each acquisition to determine if the acquired enterprise meets the definition of a business. Those that meet the definition of a business are accounted for under SFAS No. 141 and those that do not meet the definition of a business combination are accounted for as asset purchases. The results of all acquisitions have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the respective acquisition dates. The pro forma impact of these purchases as though they had been acquired at the beginning of the periods presented would not have a material effect on the results of operations as reported.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain key executive employees. The employment agreements have terms of two or three years and call for aggregate minimum annual base salaries of $743,400, adjusted annually as determined by the Company’s Compensation and Stock Option Committee. The agreements also provide for annual incentive bonuses, which are based on the achievement of certain predetermined operational goals.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of World Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004. The consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of World Acceptance Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, on April 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

The Company had no disagreements on accounting or financial disclosure matters with its independent registered public accountants to report under this Item 9.

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision with the participation of the Company’s management, including its chief executive officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2004. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Information contained under the caption “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 10. The information in response to this Item 10 regarding the executive officers of the Company is contained in Item 1, Part I hereof under the caption “Executive Officers.”

The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Mr. Way, Mr. Bramlett and Mr. Hummers, is an audit committee financial expert. Each of these members is also “independent” as that term is defined in accordance with the new independence requirements of NASDAQ.

The Company has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to all directors, employees and officers of the Company (including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)). The Code of Ethics has been filed as an exhibit to this report and print copies are available to any shareholder that requests a copy by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at P.O. Box 6429, Greenville, South Carolina 29606.

Information contained under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement, except for the information therein under the subcaption “Report of Compensation and Stock Option Committee,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 11.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information contained under the captions “Executive Compensation – Equity Plan Compensation Information,” “Ownership of Shares by Certain Beneficial Owners as of June 18, 2004” and “Ownership of Common Stock of Management as of June 18, 2004” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference herein in response to this Item 12.

Information contained under the caption “Appointment of Independent Public Accountants,” except for the information therein under the subcaption “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors,” is incorporated by reference herein in response to this Item 14.

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or the required information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or, where so indicated, have been previously filed and are incorporated herein by reference.

The Company furnished one report on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This report, furnished January 20, 2004, attached the terms of the Company’s earnings press release the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

By:		/s/ A. Alexander McLean, III
		A. Alexander McLean, III
		Executive Vice President and CFO
		Date: June 4, 2004

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


South Carolina		570425114
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

108 Frederick Street Greenville, South Carolina		29607
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


	Total Number of Loans	Average Gross Loan Balance
South Carolina	58,588	$	737
Georgia	49,471		816
Texas	160,691		416
Oklahoma	29,189		520
Louisiana	13,798		611
Tennessee	50,105		950
Illinois	22,097		718
Missouri	18,906		969
New Mexico	14,865		622
Kentucky	28,485		1,274
Alabama	7,682		1,138

Total	453,877


Name and Age	Position	Period of Service as Executive Officer and Pre-executive Officer Experience (if an Executive Officer for Less Than Five Years)
Charles D. Walters (65)	Chairman and Director	Chairman since July 1991; CEO between July 1991 and August 2003; President between July 1986 and August 2003; Director since April 1989

Douglas R. Jones (52)	President and Chief Executive Officer; Director	CEO since August 2003; President since August 1999; Chief Operating Officer from August 1999 until August 2003; from October 1977 until August 1999, various positions with Associates Financial Services, Inc., Dallas, Texas with most recent being Regional Operations Director

A. Alexander McLean, III (53)	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; Director	Executive Vice President since August 1996; Senior Vice President since July 1992; CFO and Director since July 1989



Mark C. Roland (48)	Executive Vice President, Southern Division	Executive Vice President since April 2002; Senior Vice President from January 1996 to April 2002; Senior Vice President – Operations Support, Fleet Finance, Atlanta, Georgia, from January 1993 to January 1996

Charles F. Gardner, Jr. (42)	Senior Vice President, Western Division	Since April 2000; Vice President, Operations – Southeast Texas and New Mexico from December 1996 to April 2000; Supervisor of West Texas from July 1987 to December 1996

Greg L. Thompson (34)	Senior Vice President, Central Division	Since April 2002; Vice President of Operations - Tennessee and Kentucky from August 1998 to April 2002; Supervisor, South Houston District from February 1996 to August 1998.


Fiscal 2004
Quarter	High		Low
First	$	16.35	$	9.00
Second		16.68		12.74
Third		20.23		14.38
Fourth		24.40		17.98

Fiscal 2003
Quarter	High		Low
First	$	9.15	$	7.06
Second		8.72		6.50
Third		9.20		6.93
Fourth		9.14		7.61


Item No.		Page
PART I

1.	Description of Business	1

2.	Properties	9

3.	Legal Proceedings	9

4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	10

PART II

5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10

6.	Selected Financial Data	11

7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11

7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21

8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	22

9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	42

9A.	Disclosure Controls and Procedures	42

PART III

10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	42

11.	Executive Compensation	43

12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Management, and Related Stockholder Matters	43

13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	43

14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	43

PART IV

15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K	44


	At March 31,
State	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004
South Carolina	59	62	68	64	63	63	62	62	65	65
Georgia	38	39	45	49	49	48	48	52	52	74
Texas	93	104	131	128	131	135	135	136	142	150
Oklahoma	33	39	40	41	40	43	43	46	45	47
Louisiana (1)	15	20	18	21	20	21	20	20	20	20
Tennessee (2)	6	18	24	28	30	35	38	40	45	51
Illinois (3)	—	-3	11	20	30	30	29	28	30	30
Missouri (4)	—	—	1	9	16	18	22	22	22	26
New Mexico (5)	—	—	6	9	10	13	12	12	16	19
Kentucky (6)	—	—	—	—	—	4	10	13	30	30
Alabama (7)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	5	14

Total	244	282	336	360	379	410	420	441	470	526


	Years Ended March 31,
	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Statement of Operations Data:
Interest and fee income	$	151,499		$	133,256		$	117,193		$	103,412		$	89,052
Insurance commissions and other income		27,653			22,415			19,362			17,132			16,224

Total revenues		179,152			155,671			136,555			120,544			105,276

Provision for loan losses		33,481			29,570			25,688			19,749			15,697
General and administrative expenses		96,313			85,757			75,418			68,264			61,835
Interest expense		3,943			4,493			5,415			8,260			6,015

Total expenses		133,737			119,820			106,521			96,273			83,547

Income before income taxes		45,415			35,851			30,034			24,271			21,729
Income taxes		16,650			12,987			10,695			8,670			7,560

Net income	$	28,765		$	22,864		$	19,339		$	15,601		$	14,169

Net income per common share (diluted)	$	1.49		$	1.25		$	1.00		$	.83		$	.74

Diluted weighted average common equivalent shares		19,347			18,305			19,340			18,840			19,155

Balance Sheet Data (end of period):
Loans receivable	$	236,528		$	203,175		$	172,637		$	162,389		$	135,660
Allowance for loan losses		(17,261	)		(15,098	)		(12,926	)		(12,032	)		(10,008	)

Loans receivable, net		219,267			188,077			159,711			150,357			125,652
Total assets		261,969			228,317			195,247			183,160			153,473
Total debt		95,032			102,532			83,382			91,632			78,382
Shareholders’ equity		156,580			116,041			102,433			82,727			68,192
Other Operating Data:
As a percentage of average loans receivable:
Provision for loan losses		15.1	%		15.2	%		14.8	%		12.6	%		12.3	%
Net charge-offs		14.7	%		14.6	%		14.8	%		12.0	%		12.0	%
Number of offices open at year-end		526			470			441			420			410


	Loan Volume by Category		Percent of Total Charge-offs		Percent of Loans Made
Renewals	77.2	%	61.6	%	4.0	%
Former Borrowers	9.6	%	6.0	%	3.4	%
New Borrowers	13.2	%	32.4	%	19.9	%

	100.0	%	100.0	%


	March 31,
	2004			2003		2002
Balance at the beginning of the year	$	15,097,780		12,925,644		12,031,622
Provision for loan losses		33,481,447		29,569,889		25,687,989
Loan losses		(35,731,794	)	(30,987,772	)	(27,774,830	)
Recoveries		3,118,924		2,541,785		2,092,032
Purchase accounting acquisitions		1,294,393		1,048,234		888,831

Balance at the end of the year	$	17,260,750		15,097,780		12,925,644

Allowance as a percentage of loans receivable, net of unearned and deferred fees		7.3	%	7.4	%	7.5	%
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans receivable ⁽¹⁾		14.7	%	14.6	%	14.8	%


	At or for the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2002		Sept. 30, 2002	Dec. 31, 2002	March 31, 2003	June 30, 2003	Sept. 30, 2003	Dec. 31, 2003	March 31, 2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total revenues	$	34,819	36,146	39,034	45,672	40,263	41,676	44,285	52,928
Provision for loan losses		6,363	7,605	10,209	5,393	7,929	9,328	11,077	5,147
General and administrative expenses		20,186	20,205	22,451	22,915	22,643	21,961	25,074	26,635
Net income		4,668	4,624	3,352	10,220	5,611	6,101	4,604	12,449

Gross loans receivable	$	247,203	255,187	300,751	266,753	279,805	283,485	334,485	310,131
Number of offices open		454	461	470	470	473	486	516	526


	Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
	2005		2006	2007	2008	2009	Thereafter	Total
Maturities of Notes Payable	$	2,682	91,550	200	200	200	200	95,032
Minimum Lease Payments		4,658	2,862	1,048	150	62	1	8,781

Total	$	7,340	94,412	1,248	350	262	201	103,813


	Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Total
Balances at March 31, 2001	$	313,655		82,412,879		82,726,534

Proceeds from exercise of stock options (442,136 shares), including tax benefits of $526,469		2,546,634		—		2,546,634
Common stock repurchases (251,891 shares)		(2,178,935	)	—		(2,178,935	)
Net income		—		19,339,147		19,339,147

Balances at March 31, 2002		681,354		101,752,026		102,433,380

Proceeds from exercise of stock options (416,734 shares), including tax benefits of $392,945		2,745,120		—		2,745,120
Common stock repurchases (1,623,549 shares)		(2,377,753	)	(9,623,240	)	(12,000,993	)
Net income		—		22,863,523		22,863,523

Balances at March 31, 2003		1,048,721		114,992,309		116,041,030

Proceeds from exercise of stock options (1,238,146 shares), including tax benefits of $3,774,332		11,774,185		—		11,774,185
Net income		—		28,765,122		28,765,122

Balances at March 31, 2004	$	12,822,906		143,757,431		156,580,337


(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)	2004		2003	2002
Net income
As reported	$	28,765	22,864	19,339
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effect		1,080	806	885

Pro forma net income	$	27,685	22,058	18,454

Basic earnings per share
As reported	$	1.58	1.28	1.03

Pro forma	$	1.52	1.24	.98

Diluted earnings per share
As reported	$	1.49	1.25	1.00

Pro forma	$	1.43	1.21	.95


Balance at March 31, 2003	$	1,788,420
Goodwill acquired during the year		1,265,406

Balance at March 31, 2004	$	3,053,826


	At March 31,
	2004			2003		2002
	(Dollars in thousands)
Recency basis:
60-89 days past due	$	5,190		4,960		4,010
90 days or more past due		1,916		1,661		1,627

Total	$	7,106		6,621		5,637

Percentage of period-end gross loans receivable		2.3	%	2.5	%	2.5	%

Contractual basis:
60-89 days past due	$	6,474		6,169		5,111
90 days or more past due		5,259		5,060		4,708

Total	$	11,733		11,229		9,819

Percentage of period-end gross loans receivable		3.8	%	4.2	%	4.3	%


2005	$	4,657,761
2006		2,862,442
2007		1,047,908
2008		150,078
2009		62,170
Thereafter		1,400

Total future minimum lease payments	$	8,781,759


	Current		Deferred		Total
Year ended March 31, 2004:
U.S. Federal	$	16,182,000	(813,000	)	15,369,000
State and local		1,386,000	(105,000	)	1,281,000

	$	17,568,000	(918,000	)	16,650,000

Year ended March 31, 2003:
U.S. Federal	$	13,577,000	(1,468,000	)	12,109,000
State and local		1,095,000	(217,000	)	878,000

	$	14,672,000	(1,685,000	)	12,987,000

Year ended March 31, 2002:
U.S. Federal	$	10,883,000	(824,000	)	10,059,000
State and local		726,000	(90,000	)	636,000

	$	11,609,000	(914,000	)	10,695,000


	2004			2003
Deferred tax assets:

Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	6,368,000		5,554,000
Unearned insurance commissions		3,309,000		2,873,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily related to employee benefits		1,534,000		1,186,000
Tax over book accrued interest receivable		1,200,000		1,141,000
Other		415,000		290,000

Gross deferred tax assets		12,826,000		11,044,000
Less valuation allowance		(412,000	)	(290,000	)

Net deferred tax assets		12,414,000		10,754,000

Deferred tax liabilities:

Tax over book basis of depreciable assets		(942,000	)	(589,000	)
Intangible assets		(1,130,000	)	(840,000	)
Discount of purchased loans		(90,000	)	(72,000	)
Deferred net loan origination fees		(717,000	)	(593,000	)
Other		—		(43,000	)

Gross deferred liabilities		(2,879,000	)	(2,137,000	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	9,535,000		8,617,000


	For the year ended March 31, 2004
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic EPS
Income available to common shareholders	$	28,765,122	18,251,639	$	1.58

Effect of Dilutive Securities
Options		—	1,095,441

Diluted EPS
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	28,765,122	19,347,080	$	1.49


	For the year ended March 31, 2003
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic EPS
Income available to common shareholders	$	22,863,523	17,860,101	$	1.28

Effect of Dilutive Securities
Options		—	444,875

Diluted EPS
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	22,863,523	18,304,976	$	1.25


	For the year ended March 31, 2002
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)	Per Share Amount
Basic EPS
Income available to common shareholders	$	19,339,147	18,786,529	$	1.03

Effect of Dilutive Securities
Options		—	553,235

Diluted EPS
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	19,339,147	19,339,764	$	1.00


Range of Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Options Exercisable	Weighted Average Option Price
$ 2.90-$ 4.99	7,799	6.01	$	4.91	7,799	$	4.91
$ 5.00-$ 5.99	518,829	4.95	$	5.32	420,079	$	5.35
$ 6.00-$ 7.99	156,322	3.54	$	6.82	156,322	$	6.82
$ 8.00-$ 9.99	440,218	6.49	$	8.53	173,718	$	8.62
$ 10.00-$12.99	304,073	4.09	$	11.28	244,073	$	11.24
$ 13.00-$23.00	221,750	9.61	$	17.84	—	$	—

$ 2.90-$ 23.00	1,648,991	5.70	$	9.10	1,001,991	$	7.58


	2004					2003
	First		Second	Third	Fourth	First	Second	Third	Fourth
	(Dollars in thousands, except earnings per share data)
Total revenues	$	40,263	41,676	44,285	52,928	34,819	36,146	39,034	45,672

Provision for loan losses		7,929	9,328	11,077	5,147	6,363	7,605	10,209	5,393
General and administrative expenses		22,643	21,961	25,074	26,635	20,186	20,205	22,451	22,915
Interest expense		991	928	997	1,027	1,032	1,169	1,176	1,116
Income tax expense		3,089	3,358	2,533	7,670	2,570	2,543	1,846	6,028

Net income	$	5,611	6,101	4,604	12,449	4,668	4,624	3,352	10,220

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	.32	.34	.25	.67	.25	.26	.19	.58

Diluted	$	.30	.32	.23	.63	.25	.26	.19	.57


Exhibit Number	Description	Filed Herewith (*), Non Applicable (NA), or Incorporated by Reference Previous Exhibit Number	Company Registration No. or Report
3.1	Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended	3.1	333-107426

3.2	Amended Bylaws of the Company	3.4	33-42879

4.1	Specimen Share Certificate	4.1	33-42879

4.2	Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the Form of Company’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (as amended)	3.1	333-107426

4.3	Article II, Section 9 of the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws	3.2	33-42879

4.4	Amended and restated Revolving Credit Agreements, dated as of June 30, 1997, as amended between Harris Trust and Savings Bank, the Banks signatory thereto from time to time and the Company	4.4	9-30-03 10-Q

4.5	Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreements, dated as of August 21, 2003	4.5	9-30-03 10-Q

4.6	Note Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1997, between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Company re: 10% Senior Subordinated Secured Notes	4.7	9-30-97 10-Q

4.7	First Amendment to Note Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2003, between Principal Life Insurance Company (f/k/a Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company) and the Company	4.7	9-30-03 10-Q

4.8	Amended and Restated Security Agreement, Pledge and Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 30, 1997, between the Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Security Trustee	4.8	9-30-97 10-Q

4.9	Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Security Agreement, Pledge and Indenture of Trust	4.9	9-30-03 10-Q

4.10	Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Security Agreement, Pledge and Indenture of Trust, dated as of August 21, 2003	4.10	9-30-03 10-Q

10.1+	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Charles D. Walters, effective as of June 1, 2003	10.1	6-30-03 10-Q

10.2+	Employment Agreement of A. Alexander McLean, III, effective April 1, 1994	10.2	1994 10-K


Exhibit Number	Description	Filed Herewith (*), Non-Applicable (NA), or Incorporated by Reference Previous Exhibit Number	Company Registration No. or Report
10.3+	First Amendment to Employment Agreement of A. Alexander McLean, III, effective as of June 1, 2003	10.3	6-30-03 10-Q

10.4+	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Douglas R. Jones, effective as of June 1, 2003	10.4	6-30-03 10-Q

10.5+	Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of September 19, 1991, between the Company and certain of its securityholders	10.5	33-42879

10.6+	World Acceptance Corporation Supplemental Income Plan	10.7	2000 10-K

10.7+	Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan	10.6	2000 10-K

10.8+	1992 Stock Option Plan of the Company	4	33-52166

10.9+	1994 Stock Option Plan of the Company, as amended	10.6	1995 10-K

10.10+	2002 Stock Option Plan of the Company	Appendix A	Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2002 Annual Meeting

10.11+	The Company’s Executive Incentive Plan	10.6	1994 10-K

10.12+	World Acceptance Corporation Retirement Savings Plan	4.1	333-14399

10.13+	Executive Deferral Plan	10.12	2001 10-K

14	Code of Ethics	*	NA

21	Schedule of Company’s subsidiaries	*	NA

23	Consent of KPMG LLP in connection with the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8	*	NA

31.1	Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer	*	NA

31.2	Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer	*	NA

32.1	Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer	*	NA

32.2	Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer	*	NA