Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

Commission File Number: 000-30928

PATH 1 NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

6215 FERRIS SQUARE, SUITE 140

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121

(858) 450-4220

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2003, was approximately $3,110,000. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of March 12, 2004 was 6,685,640

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Report. Such definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes restated consolidated financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. In addition, we have restated our financial results for the last three quarters of 2002 and the first three quarters of 2003 from our previously reported unaudited financial results. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further detail. Financial statement information and related disclosures included in this Form 10-K reflect, as noted, changes as a result of the restatement.

This restatement results from recording the embedded beneficial conversion feature related to convertible promissory notes we issued in 2002 and 2003. The related debt discount resulted from the conversion price of the notes being less than the fair value of our common stock on the date the notes were issued, which resulted in the embedded beneficial conversion feature. We had initially determined fair value based on a discount to the market price of the underlying common stock which was then trading on the over-the-counter market. This discount was determined based on independent valuations of our common stock. This accounting treatment was formulated in 2000 in connection with the filing of our Form 10 and had been consistently applied.

In connection with a review of Forms S-3 recently filed by us, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission informed us that, rather than determine fair value of our common stock underlying the convertible promissory notes by applying a discount to the market trading price of our common stock, the terms of EITF 98-5, “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Rates,” instead required that we rely on the market trading price. EITF 98-5 states generally that the trading price on an active market is the best evidence of fair value. Our previous accounting methodology was based on the view that an active trading market for our common stock did not exist at the time the promissory notes were issued and that reliance solely on the over-the-counter trading price would not yield fair value. The financial restatement described in this Form 10-K results from a change in our accounting methodology towards reliance on the market trading prices as quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board to determine fair value.

The effects of this restatement are non-cash and non-operating, and only require adjustments to interest expense, notes payable and stockholders’ equity. The significant effects of the restatement are as follows:

For more information regarding EITF 98-5 and the restatement, see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

PATH 1 NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I

OVERVIEW

We are an industry leader in developing and supplying products that enable the transportation and distribution of real-time, high-quality video over Internet Protocol (IP) or packet-based networks, such as the networks that comprise the Internet. Our products are currently used in two different segments of the video market. Our products are used by cable companies to supply video-on-demand services. Our products are also used by a variety of providers to transmit high-quality, real-time video to one or more locations throughout the United States or the world (which we refer to as “long-haul transmission”). Since our products transmit video content using IP communication networks, our customers can use existing infrastructure, thus lowering their costs and permitting them greater flexibility in the delivery of video content. Our customers include cable, broadcast and satellite companies, movie studios, carriers and government and educational institutions.

Our principal executive offices are located at 6215 Ferris Square, Suite 140, San Diego, California 92121. Our telephone number is (858) 450-4220, and our Internet website address is www.path1.com. We were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998.

In July 2003 we effected a 1-for-6 reverse split of our Common Stock. All share and share price numbers in this Form 10-K annual report are adjusted to reflect the reverse split.

INDUSTRY BACKGROUND

Current technologies for transmitting real-time, high-quality video over long distances require establishment and full dedication of a circuit for the duration of a transmission, regardless of whether the circuit is being used by the end-user. The concept is similar to a traditional telephone network—a call is placed, a circuit between two (or multiple) points is established and thereafter remains open for the duration of the call (regardless of whether anyone is speaking). These technologies typically require that the network be designed to be able to handle twice the expected average capacity in order to prevent congestion during peak usage. These technologies also require procuring expensive, dedicated bandwidth that remains open at all times regardless of usage. Dedicated bandwidth is often priced on a monthly basis, requiring significant cost regardless of usage.

Cable and satellite companies have historically used technologies that typically require all available packages of programs be broadcast to every subscriber. As a result, limited bandwidth remains available for video on demand and similar interactive services requiring two-way communication. As a result, such services are currently available only on a limited basis and in select markets. Satellite companies are unable to deliver services that require two-way communications.

The rise of IP and packet-based networks

The advent of IP and packet-based networks has resulted in a dramatic increase in the transmission and exchange of data, information and ideas. IP networks chop data into small packets that are addressed to and received by designated addresses. These packets are capable of being transmitted over networks independent of one another. Divided and reassembled by switches and directed from source to destination by routers, IP networks minimize wasted bandwidth by using bandwidth in quick bursts and only when needed. In contrast to the design parameters noted above, IP networks typically require a design that only increases total network capacity by approximately 25% to handle peak load conditions. In addition, IP networks were designed to overcome failure of any particular portion of the network. In the event a particular pathway on the network fails, alternate routes to the same destination are available. Because, however, each packet travels independent of the others and possibly by a different pathway, certain packets can be delayed or delivered out of order relative to others, or may not ever arrive at the intended destination.

3

Table of Contents

The impact of late or missing packets on a transmission depends in large part on the form of communication. With respect to written text, for instance, delay in the arrival of packets will likely not be noticed by the recipient. For this reason, email is an ideal form of communication for IP networks.

For transmissions that must be delivered continuously, such as real-time, high-quality video, even a few milliseconds of delay may be noticeable by the viewer. As the majority of video consumers have become accustomed to high-quality delivery, new service offerings must provide quality at least as good as that to which the target viewing audience has become accustomed. Thus, IP networks have historically not been well-suited for delivery of real-time, high-quality video. While it is currently possible to view video clips (such as movie trailers) over the Internet, the inability of current IP networks to deliver real-time, broadcast quality video requires that the clips first be downloaded, and then played. This download-and-play approach has limited application because, for instance, a 2.5-hour movie may generally take 6 hours to download over a T1 or DSL line.

THE PATH 1 SOLUTION

By enabling the transportation and distribution of real-time, high-quality video over existing IP networks, our products provide significant benefits to those with a need to distribute or contribute video. Our products perform three primary functions. First, they process and prepare multiple video feeds for delivery over an IP network. Second, they combine video streams arriving over the IP network into single streams for delivery to the end-viewer. Third, and perhaps most important, they condition the video data to avoid impairments or disruptions that would otherwise deteriorate the quality of the video signal. Our products provide benefits and enable services as follows:

We believe our technology can be used for a wide variety of purposes by communication service providers. Our current business model calls for us to seek representative customers in various market segments who will use our products. Often, these initial segment penetrations involve tests and/or trials by the customer. The sales process for both direct and indirect sales typically includes a product demonstration both at the customer’s facility and sometimes at our facility. After a product demonstration, a customer may often request a trial period during which the customer can evaluate our products. These product evaluations may run in length of a week to sometimes as much as a month or more. Often, our products are run in trials by prospective customers while they also are evaluating our competitors’ products. At the end of the trial, a customer will decide whether to purchase

4

Table of Contents

our products. Our sales cycle can thus be lengthy. Specific services and applications our technology can enable include the following:

Long Haul & Broadcast Service

Broadcasters and news organizations need to move high quality video over long distances. In the broadcast industry, video is both distributed (for example, a video program that a broadcaster broadcasts to its viewers) as well as contributed (for instance, the video clips from multiple sources that are transported between and among broadcast studios or affiliates to be assembled into a video segment such as a news report or feature story that is, in turn, distributed for broadcast to viewers). For both the distribution and contribution of broadcast quality video, broadcasters have traditionally used satellite links or procured dedicated bandwidth on fiber lines, both of which are very expensive and usually require multi-year contracts. Our products now allow the same video to be moved over existing IP networks at significantly reduced cost. In 2003, roughly 50% of our product revenues were derived from the long haul broadcast market.

Our Cx1000 product is currently being used by dedicated bandwidth providers to deliver broadcast video in key US and international cities. Customers using our products for long-haul transmission include the Vyvx division of WilTel Communications which recently used our Cx1000 to carry both the live primary and backup high definition (“HD”) broadcasts of Super Bowl XXXVIII^® over Vyvx’s HD VenueNet at 40.5 Mpbs and 270 Mbps, respectively. Vyvx accounted for 17% of our product revenue in 2003. C-SPAN uses our products to televise real-time, interactive classrooms between Washington, D.C. and the University of Denver. RTVI, a Russian television network, runs live broadcast-quality Russian language programming between Moscow and New York using our long haul product, and is expanding its network internationally. Currently, Level (3) offers full and part-time video services using our Cx1000 product to deliver broadcast video in key US and European cities.

Cable Companies

The versions of our Chameleon vidX^™ product line designed for cable companies allow them to use existing digital set-top boxes already in consumer homes to provide video-on-demand services, a significant competitive advantage over satellite providers. The more efficient use of existing bandwidth (both into the home and within the network) allows cable companies to increase the volume of content (whether movies, television or live events) available for delivery whenever requested by the cable subscriber, or to increase the number of subscribers served with existing content volume.

Today, consumers who desire to have personalized video recording in the home must purchase the necessary digital video recorder (“DVR”) and subscribe to a service. We believe that the drawbacks to DVRs are requiring the purchase of additional equipment in the home or the swapping out of the existing in-home set top box for a new set top box with local storage. Using our products, cable companies could in the future offer network-based (with our equipment sitting at the edge of the network) personalized video recorder capabilities to their subscribers to compete with in-home DVR service providers. Cable company subscribers in this case would not require a DVR in the home to enjoy on-demand viewing.

We believe that the desire for video-on-demand—indeed, all content-on-demand—will continue to rise as consumers become increasingly aware of its availability and benefits, and as IP networks enabled by our products provide access to significant amounts of interactive programming previously unavailable. Cable companies currently using our products include companies such as Time-Warner and Cablevision.

Additionally, our products enable cable companies to deliver HD television that can potentially overwhelm the bandwidth capacity of current delivery technologies. HD television requires at least five times the bandwidth currently required for standard television transmissions. Using our products, providers can avoid incurring significant capital expenditures to increase the capacity of existing infrastructure, and can avoid significant

5

Table of Contents

recurring costs to maintain and support the expanded networks resulting from HD television and increased numbers of channels. Should these providers use existing methods of transmission, they might eventually be forced to decrease programming or other services to conserve bandwidth.

Satellite Providers

Satellite providers broadcast signals to earth from satellites 22,000 miles above sea level. Because of the coverage area (or “footprint”) from that altitude, satellite broadcasts are capable of reaching vast areas. Uplinking content to the satellite for subsequent broadcast back to Earth, however, must be done at earth stations located in areas with characteristics favorable for uplinking. Currently, many satellite providers collect content at these uplink earth stations. As a result, information often “hops” from its source to and from the Earth via interim earth stations and satellites until its reaches the uplink earth station positioned to deliver the content to the end-user. Satellites have a maximum 15-year useful life, requiring satellite providers to periodically revisit the extreme expense of launching and maintaining a satellite in orbit.

Our Cx1000 product line allows satellite providers to gather content at uplink earth stations without the need to hop the content through interim satellites, reducing the strain on, and cost of, satellite networks and their maintenance. In addition to the cost-savings, collecting information at uplink earth stations via IP networks, as opposed to satellite hops, increases the speed by which information moves from source to consumer. Use of our products enables satellite providers to avoid some of the delay associated with “live” satellite feeds. Each satellite hop introduces a half-second delay whereas an existing terrestrial fiber international circuit has less than a quarter-second delay. PanAmSat is an example of a satellite provider using our Cx1000 product over terrestrial fiber to interconnect earth stations for video routing with the least delay.

Movie Studios and Government Agencies

Certain industries require delivery of exceptionally high resolution, real-time video. Military and other government units require a unique level of sound and picture quality upon which they can make critical, high-consequence decisions. Movie studios demand similar standards upon which to make artistic or editorial decisions regarding their multi-million dollar productions.

To attain the level of resolution required by studios and for government applications requires data to be delivered uncompressed. Compression, a common means for transporting high-resolution data, is designed to eliminate what would typically be redundant or unnecessary information, or to allow data to fit on satellites’ limited bandwidth. Because of the unerring detail required by these industries, what is generally acceptable TV-quality degradation becomes unacceptable. The opposing requirements of exceptionally high resolution and high bit-rate make most delivery methods (such as satellite) unusable. Our Cx1000 product enables the delivery of exceptionally high resolution, high bit-rate, and real-time video. Our products are currently in limited use by DreamWorks SKG for domestic and international creative collaborations using high-definition video cameras. DreamWorks SKG accounted for 5% of our 2003 revenues. Additionally, C-Span, which accounted for 3% of our 2002 sales, has used our Cx1000 product to televise real-time, interactive classrooms between Washington, D.C. and the University of Denver.

OUR TECHNOLOGY

Product Architecture

We employ a unique software-driven, network-processor-based architecture. Most existing product designs are based largely on hardware or less flexible chipsets, which require hands-on manipulation in the field, or return to the factory to correct errors or provide upgrades. We use a mixed architecture that relies on software algorithms calculated on a network processor for more complex tasks and hardware for more basic functions. This approach speeds product development times and reduces both development and production costs when compared to designs that are based largely on hardware.

6

Table of Contents

Our software-driven, network-processor-based architecture also allows us to offer feature upgrades to our customers without requiring the return of equipment. For example, a customer may begin with a 4 port software-enabled version of our Chameleon products. The same hardware platform supports from one to eight inputs and outputs in IP networks with feature sets licensed by the customer. Over time the customer can choose to software-enable additional input ports, increase video stream counts or rates, or add output port capability—all without returning the installed equipment. Alternatively, our products can be licensed to transport only standard definition TV or both standard definition and high definition TV over IP networks.

Our products are also capable of assuming a larger role in the delivery of real-time, high-quality video. The process by which video is transmitted to the end viewer or user is complex and involves numerous networks, systems and components. The flexible architecture of our products can allow them to perform functions such as file caching and serving, whereby files can be temporarily stored in our products for quick delivery to the consumer or user without the need to access large video servers. Today, separate large and expensive video servers are necessary to provide video on demand services to a discrete number of homes. By implementing caching and serving capabilities, our products can move some of the necessary functions of video delivery to the periphery of networks, thus reducing the strain on core portions of networks, and reducing the need for numerous expensive video servers.

Our products easily integrate into existing networks enabling real-time, high-quality video service in IP access networks.

Product Development

Our product development efforts are continuous and based on customer requirements for increased performance, flexibility and functionality. To increase performance, we intend to move to next generation network processor designs developed by Intel as needed to provide increased throughput and processing capabilities. To increase flexibility, we intend to bring to market new products that provide scaleable solutions that can be deployed under initial conditions of throughput and other critical parameters, yet grow as requirements change due to increases in demand or number of subscribers. To increase functionality, we will evaluate logical additions to our products that will better fit customers’ evolving needs. For example, our Chameleon product line has already changed from a pure multiplexer/de-multiplexer family of products delivering video-on-demand to one that also delivers regular broadcast channels over IP networks. In some cases we are able to offer entirely new products and in many cases we are able to offer significant enhancements to existing products by developing additional software without the need to design new, or change existing, hardware.

OUR STRATEGY

We believe that our technology and our products can be used in many different applications by broadcasters, cable companies, DSL providers, entertainment companies, and other communication services providers. Our strategy is to aggressively pursue (within our financial and other means) resources that introduce our products into the market and to create demand for our products to enable transporting broadcast quality video over IP networks. We intend to pursue strategic relationships with major equipment providers and content providers, as well as building a direct sales and marketing staff within the company. We are a small, cohesive company, able to react quickly to changes in market conditions. Our flexibility has in the past enabled us to successfully redirect our efforts as circumstances required.

COMPETITION

We face competition in each of the target markets for our products, services and products in development, including but not limited to companies such as Scientific-Atlanta, Harmonic Inc., and Tandberg Television. A number of established and development-stage or start-up companies in these markets offer similar or alternative

7

Table of Contents

technological solutions for convergence of real-time data, such as audio and video, over IP networks as well as real-time, high-quality transition of video over IP networks. We anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as competitors enhance their product offerings and new competitors emerge. Scientific- Atlanta, which in 2002 was our largest single customer, now competes with us very aggressively in the cable market, and our level of business with Scientific-Atlanta has declined substantially. Scientific-Atlanta has a product that competes with our Chameleon vidX product line. Scientific-Atlanta has significant greater resources and industry clout and, therefore, could threaten the viability of our business, and could have an adverse material impact on our business.

Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry than we do. As a result, certain of these competitors may be able to develop products that directly compete with ours and may be able to succeed with inferior product offerings. These competitors may also be able to adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more readily, take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more effectively, devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. In addition, these competitors have entered and will likely continue to enter into joint ventures or consortiums to provide additional value-added services competitive with those provided by us.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and agreements to protect our proprietary technology and brands. We also rely on patent protection. We have been issued three patents and have several other patent applications pending.

We have trademarked the name TrueCircuit^®, which identifies technology used in certain of our products. We expect also to register trademarks for other technology and product names, as we deem it appropriate. We rely on trade secrets to protect certain areas of our technology, including the areas of fast context switching in embedded operating systems, real-time embedded architectures, signal processing techniques for artifact-free signals, and low-latency software drivers. In addition, we rely on three issued patents covering aspects of our technology and have filed applications for several additional patents. We believe that factors such as the creativity and technological skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, reliable customer service and product maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position.

Our policy is to enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with all employees and consultants, and nondisclosure agreements with all other parties to whom we disclose confidential information. These protections, however, may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property rights.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2003, we had 29 employees in the United States: 12 were engineers, 10 were marketing and sales personnel, 5 were finance and administration personnel and 2 were employed in operations. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit. We have never experienced a work stoppage.

WEBSITE ACCESS TO SEC FILINGS

We maintain an Internet website at www.path1.com. We make available free of charge on our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

8

Table of Contents

We lease approximately 15,000 square feet of office space within one facility. The San Diego offices are used for research and development, prototype production, sales and marketing and administration. We believe our current U.S. facilities are adequate to meet our near-term space requirements.

There are no material legal proceedings pending against us.

On March 22, 2002, we filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of San Diego County, California against Mr. Meeuwi J. deKraker, a European national, for $3,500,000 stemming from a material breach of contract of a promissory note in connection with a subscription agreement for the Company’s stock. On October 21, 2002, the Superior Court awarded us a default judgment against the defendant in the sum of $3,500,000 plus interest and court costs. In early 2003, we filed suit in Belgium, the defendant’s country of residence, seeking to have the judgment of the Superior Court of California recognized and enforced against defendant. In April 2003, Defendant then petitioned the Superior Court of California to set aside the default judgment against him. The Superior Court denied his petition to have the judgment set aside. Defendant has appealed the decision of the Superior Court to the California Court of Appeals. On February 24, 2004, the Court of First Instance of Brugge, FIFTH CHAMBER, in Belgium, refused to enforce the judgment of the California Superior Court. We plan to appeal the decision of the Belgian court. We will continue to vigorously pursue this litigation both in the United States and in Belgium.

The United States presently is not a party to any international convention governing the recognition and enforcement of judgments by a foreign court, and whether a judgment from a court in the United States will be recognized and enforced in Belgium or in any other foreign country is generally determined by that foreign country’s domestic laws. While we intend to pursue our claim and to enforce this judgment against the defendant, there can be no assurance that the default judgment will be recognized or enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction in Belgium (or in any other country where the defendant might be found or in which a court would have jurisdiction), or if so recognized, whether we will succeed in collecting the judgment.

9

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

Investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information included in this Form 10-K, in evaluating our business and future prospects and in evaluating any “forward-looking” statements that we make in this Form 10-K or elsewhere.

OUR LIMITED SALES HISTORY AND LIMITED REVENUES TO DATE MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE OUR PROSPECTS.

We were founded in January 1998 and have only been selling our products commercially since 2002. This short history makes an evaluation of our prospects difficult. Because of our limited sales history, we have limited insight into trends that may emerge and affect our business. Indeed, in 2003, nearly 50% of our product sales was to long haul and broadcast customers, and the balance was to customers in the cable market, whereas nearly two-thirds of our product sales in 2002 were to cable market customers. Our product mix may change significantly from year to year or quarter to quarter, thereby having a possible negative impact on our ability to forecast market demand and the results of our operations. In addition, we have generated only limited revenues to date from sales of our products, and the income potential of our business and market are unproven. An investor in our securities must consider the challenges, expenses and difficulties we face as our sales and marketing efforts mature.

PRICING PRESSURE ON OUR PRODUCTS HAS PLACED US AT A COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE.

We have recently experienced significant pricing pressure in some of the markets for our products. Due to competitive factors, cable customers have been willing to pay only reduced amounts for our products. This has placed us at a competitive disadvantage with our competitors who have the financial strength to withstand pricing pressures. If we are unable to regain larger margins on our product sales, we may be forced to exit certain market segments and our results of operations and profitability will be negatively affected.

WE RECENTLY LAUNCHED OUR INITIAL COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES AND THEY MAY NOT GAIN CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE.

In 2002, we launched our two primary commercial products into the long haul video transport market, and also announced the deployment of our Chameleon vidX^™ product line in our first quarter of 2003. These products are in the early stages of commercial deployment. We may not be able to gain customer acceptance of any of our products due to our lack of an established track record, our financial condition, competition, price or a variety of other factors. If our products and services are not accepted by potential customers, or if these customers do not purchase our products and services at the levels we anticipate, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.

OUR QUARTERLY FINANCIAL RESULTS ARE LIKELY TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY.

Our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly from period to period, particularly because our sales prospects are uncertain and our sales are made on a purchase order basis. In addition, we have not proven our ability to execute our business strategy with respect to establishing and expanding sales and distribution channels. Fluctuations may result from:

10

Table of Contents

As a result, we may experience significant, unanticipated quarterly losses.

WE FACE COMPETITION FROM ESTABLISHED AND DEVELOPING COMPANIES, MANY OF WHICH HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY GREATER RESOURCES, AND WE EXPECT SUCH COMPETITION TO GROW.

The markets for our products, future products and services are competitive. We face direct and indirect competition from a number of established companies, including but not limited to: Scientific-Atlanta, Motorola, Harmonic Inc., and Tandberg Television, as well as development stage and start-up companies. We also anticipate that we will face increased competition in the future as existing competitors seek to enhance their product offerings and new competitors emerge. Many of our competitors have greater resources, higher name recognition, better established reputations within the industry, and stronger manufacturing, distribution, sales and customer service capabilities than we do.

The technologies that our competitors and we offer are expensive to design, develop, manufacture and distribute. Competitive technologies may be owned and distributed by established companies that possess substantially greater financial, technical and other resources than we do and, as a result, such companies may be able to develop their products more rapidly and market their products more extensively than we can.

Competitive technologies that offer a similar or superior capacity to converge and transmit audio, video and telephonic data on a real-time basis over existing networks may currently exist or may be developed in the future. We cannot assure you that any technology currently being developed by us is not being developed by others or that our technology development efforts will result in products that are competitive in terms of price or performance. If our competitors develop products or services that offer significant price or performance advantages as compared to our current and proposed products and services, or if we are unable to improve our technology or develop or acquire more competitive technology, we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage and our business could be adversely affected. In addition, competitors with greater financial, marketing, distribution and other resources than we have may be able to leverage such resources to gain wide acceptance of products inferior to ours.

OUR CUSTOMER BASE IS CONCENTRATED AND THE LOSS OF ONE OR MORE OF OUR KEY CUSTOMERS WOULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.

Historically, a significant majority of our sales have been to relatively few customers, including Scientific-Atlanta. In 2003, our revenues from Scientific-Atlanta declined by nearly 68% compared to revenues from this customer in 2002, as we experienced both a decline in overall sales to Scientific-Atlanta as well as an increase in overall sales into the long haul and broadcast markets. We expect that sales to relatively few customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales for the foreseeable future. Almost all of our sales are made on a purchase order basis, and none of our customers has entered into a long-term agreement requiring it to purchase our products. The loss of, or any reduction in orders from, a significant customer would harm our business.

11

Table of Contents

THE INCREASED COMPETITIVE NATURE OF OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA MAY JEOPARDIZE OUR SUCCESS.

In 2002, approximately 66% of our total revenues were from sales to Scientific-Atlanta and its subsidiary, BarcoNet N.V. In 2003, our revenues from Scientific-Atlanta accounted for 20% of our product revenues, and 21% of our total revenues, respectively. We anticipate that our 2004 revenues from Scientific-Atlanta will, in absolute terms and as a percentage of our total revenues, will be lower than in previous periods as Scientific- Atlanta now competes against us more aggressively than in prior periods. Because of the increased competitive nature of our relationship with Scientific-Atlanta, we anticipate that our level of business with Scientific-Atlanta will decline, and our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Our technology uses non-proprietary industry standard interfaces and designs for video transport (known as IP/gigabit Ethernet). Scientific-Atlanta has developed a product line that operates with an alternative to the open industry standard of IP/gigabit Ethernet. We believe transporting video directly over a proprietary standard eliminates the flexibility offered through open standards such as IP/gigabit Ethernet. Nonetheless, Scientific-Atlanta’s development, marketing and sale of its proprietary standard-based products may compete directly with our development, marketing and sales efforts. Since Scientific-Atlanta has greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do, Scientific-Atlanta may be able to develop its products more rapidly and market its products more extensively than we can. Because of Scientific-Atlanta’s name recognition, industry-reputation and other reasons, Scientific-Atlanta’s products could become the standard for delivery of real-time, broadcast-quality video, in which case the sale of our products could materially suffer. Scientific-Atlanta’s products may be superior to ours in terms of price or performance, or inferior to ours but backed by superior marketing and support capabilities. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully with Scientific-Atlanta, and our ability to gain market share for our products could be adversely affected.

THE RATE OF MARKET ADOPTION OF OUR TECHNOLOGY IS UNCERTAIN AND WE COULD EXPERIENCE LONG AND UNPREDICTABLE SALES CYCLES, ESPECIALLY IF THE SLOWDOWN IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY PERSISTS.

Our products are based on new technology and, as a result, it is extremely difficult to predict the timing and rate of market adoption of our products, as well the rate of market adoption of applications enhanced by our products such as video-on-demand. Accordingly, we have limited visibility into when we might realize substantial revenue from product sales. This is compounded by our inability to foresee when, if ever, delivery of video over IP networks will be significantly embraced by communication service providers.

We are providing new and highly technical products and services to enable new applications. Thus, the duration of our sales efforts with prospective customers in all market segments is likely to be lengthy as we seek to educate them on the uses and benefits of our products. This sales cycle could be lengthened even further by potential delays related to product implementation as well as delays over which we have little or no control, including:

These uncertainties, combined with the worldwide slowdown in capital spending in the telecommunications business that began in 2001, and the slowdown in corporate spending on technology generally as well as new technologies such as ours, substantially complicate our planning and may reduce prospects for sales of our products. If our prospective customers curtail or eliminate their purchasing programs, decrease their budgets or reduce their purchasing priority, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

12

Table of Contents

WE HAVE INCURRED LOSSES SINCE INCEPTION AND WILL LIKELY NOT BE PROFITABLE AT LEAST FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL QUARTERS.

We have incurred operating losses since our inception in January 1998, and we expect to incur losses and negative cash flow for at least the next several quarters. Our accumulated deficit at December 31, 2003 was $38.4 million. We expect to continue to incur significant operating, sales, marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses and, as a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we cannot assure you that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.

OUR RECENT CHANGE IN SENIOR MANAGEMENT MAY RESULT IN DIFFICULTIES.

On March 29, 2004, Frederick Cary resigned as our chief executive officer and president and was replaced by John Zavoli. Changes in senior management of small companies are inherently disruptive, and efforts to implement any new strategic or operating goals may also prove to be disruptive. We intend to hire a new chief financial officer to allow Mr. Zavoli to concentrate on his new duties as chief executive officer and president.

THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS IS DEPENDENT ON ESTABLISHING AND EXPANDING SALES AND DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS FOR OUR PRODUCTS.

Third-Party Collaborations. We intend to partner with the leading suppliers to communication service providers to promote and distribute our products, both as an outside equipment manufacturer to suppliers and with suppliers acting as resellers of our products. We may not be able to identify adequate partners, and even if identified, we may not be able to enter into agreements with these entities on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. To the extent that we enter into any such agreements with third parties, any revenues we receive from sales of our products in those markets will depend upon the efforts of such third parties, which in most instances will not be within our control. If we are unable to effectively leverage a partner to market our products more broadly than we can through our internal sales force, our business could be adversely affected.

Internal Sales Force. We have limited experience in marketing and selling our products. We may seek to expand our direct and indirect sales force and independent channel partners domestically and internationally for the promotion of our product lines and other future products to suppliers and communication service providers of all kinds. Competition for quality sales and marketing personnel and channel partners is intense. In addition, new employees, particularly new sales and marketing employees, will require training and education concerning our products and will also increase our operating expenses. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining qualified sales and marketing personnel and partners. As a result, there can be no assurance that the sales force we are able to build will be of a sufficient size or quality to effectively market our products.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL IN THE FUTURE WHEN NEEDED, WHICH COULD PREVENT US FROM GROWING.

In the third quarter of 2003, we completed a public offering resulting in gross proceeds of $15.5 million. However, we have not yet achieved profitability, and we cannot be certain that such financing will be adequate or sufficient for our future needs. We may be required to raise additional capital, and we cannot ensure that financing would be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Our inability to raise capital when needed could seriously harm our business. In addition, additional equity financing may dilute our stockholders’ interest, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and could result in a substantial portion of our operating cash flow being dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on debt. If adequate funds are not available, we may need to curtail our operations significantly.

13

Table of Contents

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROFIT FROM GROWTH IF WE ARE UNABLE TO EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE GROWTH.

We anticipate that we will need to grow in the future. This anticipated growth will place strain on our managerial, financial and personnel resources. The pace of our anticipated expansion, together with the complexity of the technology involved in our products and the level of expertise and technological sophistication incorporated into the provision of our design, engineering, implementation and support services, demands an unusual amount of focus on the operational needs of our future customers for quality and reliability, as well as timely delivery and post-installation and post-consultation field and remote support. We also anticipate the need to expand our operations internationally. In addition, new customers, especially customers that purchase novel and technologically sophisticated products such as ours, generally require significant engineering support. Therefore, adoption of our platforms and products by customers would increase the strain on our resources.

To reach our goals, we will need to hire rapidly, while at the same time investing in our infrastructure. We expect that we will also have to expand our facilities and possibly maintain presence in other countries. In addition, we will need to successfully train, motivate and manage new employees; expand our sales and support organization; integrate new management and employees into our overall operations; and establish improved financial and accounting systems. Indeed, even without consideration of future needs imposed by any future growth of our business, we need to upgrade several of these areas even to support our present levels of business, because during the pre-IPO periods of tight cash, we focused our resources on areas other than business infrastructure.

We may not succeed in anticipating all of the changing demands that growth would impose on our systems, procedures and structure. If we fail to effectively manage our expansion, if any, our business may suffer.

WE WILL DEPEND ON BROADCASTING, SATELLITE AND CABLE INDUSTRY SPENDING FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF OUR REVENUE, AND ANY DECREASE OR DELAY IN SPENDING IN THESE INDUSTRIES WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR RESOURCES, OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Demand for our products will depend on the magnitude and timing of spending by cable television operators, broadcasters, satellite operators and carriers for adopting new products for installation with their networks.

These spending patterns are dependent on a variety of factors, including:

Recent developments in capital markets have reduced access to funding for potential and existing customers causing delays in the timing and scale of deployments of our equipment, as well as the postponement of certain projects by our customers. The timing of deployment of our equipment can be subject to a number of other risks, including the availability of skilled engineering and technical personnel.

14

Table of Contents

WE NEED TO DEVELOP AND INTRODUCE NEW AND ENHANCED PRODUCTS IN A TIMELY MANNER TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE.

Broadband communications markets are characterized by continuing technological advancement, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. To compete successfully, we must design, develop, manufacture and sell new or enhanced products that provide increasingly higher levels of performance and reliability. However, in addition to the technological and managerial risks inherent in any product development effort, we may not be able to successfully develop or introduce these products if the development effort requires more financial resources than we are able to bring to bear, or if our products:

In order to develop and market successfully certain of our planned products for digital applications, we may be required to enter into technology development or licensing agreements with third parties. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into any necessary technology development or licensing agreement on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The failure to enter into technology development or licensing agreements when necessary could limit our ability to develop and market new products and, accordingly, could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

DELIVERY OF REAL-TIME, BROADCAST-QUALITY VIDEO VIA IP NETWORKS IS A NEW MARKET AND SUBJECT TO EVOLVING STANDARDS.

Delivery of real-time, broadcast-quality video over IP networks is novel and evolving, and it is possible that communication service providers or their suppliers will adopt alternative architectures and technologies for delivering real-time, broadcast-quality video over IP networks that are in compatible with our current or future products. If we are unable to design, develop, manufacture and sell products that incorporate or are compatible with these new architectures or technologies, our business could suffer.

WE RELY ON SEVERAL KEY SUPPLIERS OF COMPONENTS, SUB-ASSEMBLIES AND MODULES THAT WE USE TO MANUFACTURE OUR PRODUCTS, AND WE ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCT SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS.

We purchase components, sub-assemblies and modules from a limited number of vendors and suppliers that we use to manufacture and test our products. Our reliance on these vendors and suppliers involves several risks including, but not limited to, the inability to purchase or obtain delivery of adequate supplies of such components, sub-assemblies or modules, increases in the prices of such items, quality of materials and manufacturing, and overall reliability of our vendors and suppliers. Although in many cases we use standard parts and components for our products, certain components are presently available only from a single source or limited sources. Some of the materials used to produce our products are purchased from foreign suppliers. We do not generally maintain long-term agreements with any of our vendors or suppliers. Thus we may thus be unable to procure necessary components, sub-assemblies or modules in time to manufacture and ship our products, thereby harming our business.

We manufacture our products through a leading parts vendor that provides us with turnkey outsourced manufacturing services. To reduce manufacturing lead times and to ensure adequate component supply, we may instruct our vendor to procure inventory based on criteria and forecasts as defined by us. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, we may experience parts shortages or, conversely, an oversupply of parts. In either case, our results from operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted.

15

Table of Contents

We may also be subject to disruptions in our manufacturing and product-testing operations that could have a material adverse affect on our operating results.

UNANTICIPATED DELAYS OR PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR PRODUCTS AND IMPROVEMENTS MAY CAUSE CUSTOMER DISSATISFACTION OR DEPRIVE US OF OUR “FIRST TO MARKET” ADVANTAGE.

Delays in developing and releasing products and improvements are not uncommon in the industry in which we compete. In the event of performance problems with our product offerings, delays of more than a few months in releasing improvements could result in decreased demand for a particular product and adverse publicity, which could further reduce demand for particular products or our products generally.

PRODUCT QUALITY PROBLEMS MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR REVENUES AND RESULTS FROM OPERATIONS.

We produce highly complex products that incorporate leading edge technology including hardware, software and embedded firmware. In addition to other kinds of manufacturing quality problems, our software and other technology may contain “bugs” that can prevent our products from performing as intended. There can be no assurance that our pre-shipment testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects either in individual products or which could affect numerous shipments that, in turn, could create customer dissatisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or affect gross margins if the cost of remedying the problems exceed our reserves established for this purpose. Our inability to cure a product defect may result in the failure of a product line, serious damage to our reputation, and increased engineering and product re-engineering costs that individually or collectively would have a material adverse impact on our revenues and operating results.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO HIRE AND ASSIMILATE KEY EMPLOYEES.

Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees, including management, technical and sales personnel. Significant competition exists for employees in our industry and in our geographic region. We may be unable to identify and attract highly qualified employees in the future. In addition, we may not be able to successfully assimilate these employees or hire qualified personnel to replace them. The loss of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain key personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objectives such as timely and effective product introductions.

WE ARE DEPENDENT ON OUR KEY EMPLOYEES FOR OUR FUTURE SUCCESS.

Our success depends on the efforts and abilities of our senior management and certain other key personnel. If any of these key employees leaves or is seriously injured and unable to work and we are unable to find a qualified replacement, then our business and results of operations could be materially harmed.

CHANGES IN THE MIX OF OUR PRODUCT SALES, PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION MODEL OR CUSTOMER BASE COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR SALES AND MARGINS.

We may encounter a shift the mix of the various products that we sell – products that have varying selling prices based in part on the type of product sold, applicable volume or other sales discounts, licensed product feature sets, whether we sell our products as an OEM, and whether the sale is a direct sale or an indirect channel sale through our VARs and resellers. In 2003, nearly 50% of our product sales were to long haul and broadcast customers, and the balance was to cable customers, whereas in 2002, nearly 75% of our product sales were made to cable customers. Moreover, the prices of our products sold to the long haul broadcast customers generally command higher prices and gross margins than do our products sold to the cable market. We have experienced significant pressure in the cable industry to reduce the selling prices of our products sold to cable companies, and we have had to sell our products at lower prices than we contemplated. Any change in any of these variables could result in a material adverse impact on our gross sales, gross margins and operating results.

16

Table of Contents

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO OBTAIN FULL PATENT PROTECTION FOR OUR CORE TECHNOLOGY AND THERE IS A RISK OF INFRINGEMENT.

Since the beginning of 2001, we have submitted several patent applications and provisional patent applications on topics surrounding our core technologies to supplement our existing patent portfolio. There can be no assurance that these or other patents will be issued to us, or, if additional patents are issued, that they or our three existing patents will be broad enough to prevent significant competition or that third parties (including powerful competitors) will not infringe upon or design around such patents to develop competing products. In addition, we have filed patent applications in several foreign countries. There is no assurance that these or any future patent applications will be granted, or if granted, that they will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented.

In addition to seeking patent protection for our products, we intend to rely upon a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights in our products. There can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate or that competitors have not or will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours.

There has been a trend toward litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the telecommunications indus