Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     .

Commission file number: 000-49793

ALTIRIS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Altiris, Inc.

588 West 400 South

Lindon, Utah 84042

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(801) 805-2400

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing sale price of the Registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2003, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, was approximately $221,876,046. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who may be deemed to be an affiliate of the Registrant have been excluded from this computation. The determination of affiliate status for this purpose is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of June 30, 2003, the Registrant had 21,547,623 shares of its common stock, $0.0001 par value, issued and outstanding.

There were 26,208,327 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding on March 10, 2004.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The Registrant has incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Table of Contents

ALTIRIS, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section in Item 7 of this report, and other materials accompanying this Annual Report Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to our, and in some cases our customers’ or partners’, future plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and financial performance and the assumptions that underlie these statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following: operating expenses; the impact of quarterly fluctuations of revenue and operating results; the dependence of our products on the Microsoft Windows market; our expectations concerning our relationships with HP, Dell and Microsoft; levels of software license revenue; future acquisitions of or investments in complementary companies, products or technologies; our expectations concerning relationships with distributors, resellers and systems integrators; levels of capital expenditures; staffing and expense levels; international operations; adequacy of our internal systems to manage our growth; fluctuations in interest rates; effects of current or future legal proceedings; effects of changes in accounting standards; our ability to develop products; and any statements of expectation or belief. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause industry trends or our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. For a detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see the “Business” and “Factors That Could Affect Future Results” sections in Items 1 and 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Altiris, Inc. undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I

Overview

Altiris began operations in 1996 as the software division of KeyLabs Corporation. We were incorporated in Utah in August 1998 and reincorporated in Delaware in February 2002.

We are a leading provider of software products and services that enable organizations to manage IT assets throughout their lifecycles. Our comprehensive client management, server provisioning and asset management suites are designed to address the challenges that IT professionals face in deploying, migrating, backing up and restoring software settings on multiple hardware devices; provisioning and managing servers; tracking performance and diagnostic metrics for hardware and software; taking inventory of existing IT assets; and facilitating problem resolution for hardware or software failures. We have designed our software for use by organizations of all sizes to manage the efficiency and ensure the reliability and availability of complex and distributed IT environments. We believe that the comprehensive functionality of our products, combined with their ease of use, allows an organization to lower its total cost of IT ownership. Our products are used by businesses in a wide variety of industries and computing environments.

Industry Background

Businesses increasingly rely on IT to gain a competitive advantage in a constantly changing global business environment. In particular, businesses are leveraging IT to reduce costs, enhance overall productivity and improve customer satisfaction by enabling customers, business partners and employees to receive a broad range of information and services in a timely manner. As a result, efficiently managing IT assets is mission-critical to an organization’s success.

The elevated role of IT, combined with rapid advances in underlying technologies, has resulted in a complex IT environment. The complexity is driven in part by the proliferation of distributed computing systems, lack of

1

Table of Contents

adopted standards and the heterogeneity of hardware, software assets and operating environments, including Windows, UNIX, Linux, Macintosh and Palm. A business’s IT infrastructure now is required to integrate multiple layers of networks, operating systems, databases, applications, servers and computing devices and accommodate the increase in remote access over the Internet and extranets.

The mission-critical nature of IT infrastructure, combined with the increase in technological and operational complexity, has made IT assets more difficult and costly to manage. IT professionals are required to service and support a growing number of on-site and remote users with increasingly unique requirements while maintaining knowledge of, and taking advantage of, advances in hardware, software, systems and network technologies. Further, the ongoing need to continuously configure, upgrade, migrate, provision and manage IT assets, and the failure to maintain service levels and infrastructure uptime, can be costly. Indirect costs stemming from downtime, underutilization of IT assets and reduced productivity can be even more costly. In addition, the recent economic downturn and related IT budget constraints have forced businesses to prioritize spending, resulting in the selection of fewer technology vendors, the deployment of technology initiatives only with compelling return on investment and the use of fewer qualified professionals to manage IT assets.

In order to align IT resources with these broader competitive objectives and cost constraints, businesses are investing in management software to improve the reliability and availability of IT assets through all phases of an asset’s useful life and reduce the large competitive and financial costs of poorly managed IT. This lifecycle management approach focuses on integrating functionality to track and manage IT assets from initial deployment through retirement, including maintenance and upgrade cycles, as well as the capability to continuously diagnose and resolve user problems.

Businesses are confronted with the challenge of managing their IT infrastructure using disparate systems management software products from a variety of vendors. The resulting IT environments have created a number of unique implementation and systems management challenges, largely unaddressed by other vendors’ offerings.

Lack of product integration. Many products are designed to address a single or limited set of IT management issues. These point products typically do not integrate easily with existing IT investments or management systems and have difficulty scaling to support infrastructure complexity, the heterogeneity of different operating environments and an increasingly diverse set of user needs.

Complexity of product and difficulty of deployment. Many products designed to manage IT infrastructure require the adoption of inflexible, complex and often proprietary systems management software. These products are costly, time-consuming to install, difficult to scale or duplicate and do not adequately address the breadth and depth of IT infrastructure management needs. In addition, many products do not address the most immediate and demanding needs of enterprises, such as deploying and migrating software configurations and settings.

Limited ability to address new technologies. The rapid advancement of hardware and software technologies and the increasing diversity of IT assets have outpaced the ability of many organizations to easily incorporate new technologies into their IT environments. Legacy solutions often are incapable of being extended to address the deployment, management and tracking of new IT assets, while newer products that enable the management of current technologies often do not leverage an enterprise’s existing IT management solutions. These challenges have made it difficult for support personnel to cost-effectively deploy new technologies and manage their impact on the overall IT infrastructure.

We believe that a significant opportunity exists for a comprehensive, integrated and cost-effective IT solution that addresses the business need to manage and ensure the reliability and availability of complex IT environments. Such a solution must easily integrate with existing IT investments, track and maintain IT asset productivity and enable problem identification and resolution throughout an asset’s lifecycle. This solution must also be able to accommodate rapidly changing IT infrastructures and technologies.

2

Table of Contents

The Altiris Solution

Our software products and related services provide a comprehensive solution for managing the complete IT lifecycle. Our solution manages IT assets including desktop PCs, portables, handhelds, and servers throughout their lifecycle from procurement to staging, production and retirement. Key features of our solution include:

Comprehensive functionality. Our client management, server management and asset management suites consist of 18 modules that provide comprehensive functionality for managing the critical aspects of the IT lifecycle. These modules enable IT professionals to deploy, migrate, patch and restore software on servers, desktop and notebook computers, and mobile devices. Using our suites or modules, IT professionals can also track performance and diagnostic metrics of hardware and software and determine what IT assets reside in the enterprise. Finally, our suites or modules facilitate end user problem resolution by providing IT professionals with remote access capabilities and allowing them to correct software configuration problems.

Lower total cost of IT ownership. Our solution automates the manual processes associated with initial deployment, system migration, ongoing maintenance, asset management, problem resolution, and migration of software. Our customers can access these capabilities from any Web-browser on a broad range of devices, including desktops, laptops and personal digital assistants, or PDAs. Using our products, customers can increase the productivity of their skilled IT professionals and reduce overall IT costs. In addition, by improving utilization of purchased technology and reducing IT infrastructure downtime, our solution enables our customers to leverage their existing IT assets. As a result, customers can realize a rapid return on their investment in our products and an improved return on their other IT investments.

Integrated, scalable, Web-based infrastructure. Our multi-tier, Web-based architecture scales to meet the needs of organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to large enterprises. Our modules can be deployed individually on an as-needed basis or as integrated suites to meet our customers’ changing IT requirements. By using a common database, our software allows cross product reports and data analysis and provides a foundation for integration and presentation consistency. Our solution requires minimal maintenance and is designed to reduce the cost of managing distributed computing environments.

Ease of installation and use. Our products are designed to install quickly and easily into our customers’ existing IT environments without business disruption. This characteristic enables our customers to minimize their upfront implementation and training costs and quickly realize the benefits of our products. Further, our products are easy to use because they are based upon widely accepted technologies and employ a consistent, Web-based interface. Our products can be used remotely to maximize flexibility and minimize end user downtime. The combination of ease of installation and use allows our customers to focus on maximizing their return on IT asset investments rather than on implementation and training. In complex environments, we also offer a variety of services for those customers who wish to have assistance in installation and training for our products.

Built upon Microsoft technology and open standards. Our solution utilizes and builds upon leading Microsoft technology and standards, protocols and application programming interfaces. This enables us to provide compatible products with, and extend the functionality of, Microsoft Windows, the most widely used desktop platform. In addition, our products incorporate open Web-based standards, such as HTTP, XML and FTP, simplifying the customization and implementation of our solution across Windows, UNIX, Linux, Macintosh and Palm operating environments.

Strategy

Our objective is to be the leading provider of software and related services for managing the complete IT lifecycle. Our strategy includes the following key elements:

Extend our technology leadership. We intend to leverage our internal development efforts, customer deployments, strategic relationships and acquisitions to extend our technology leadership. In addition, we plan to

3

Table of Contents

continue to develop products that utilize current and emerging communications protocols and support a diverse range of computing platforms, including current and future releases of Windows, UNIX, Linux, Java and Microsoft .NET. Our integrated, scalable and Web-based architecture enables us to meet our customers’ changing IT requirements by offering individual modules or integrated suites. We intend to continue to offer leading IT lifecycle management products to support hardware that becomes important to our customers.

Extend our leadership on Windows to other operating environments. Early in our development, we targeted the Windows market because it represented the largest opportunity for our early products. We intend to maintain our position in the dominant Windows market as corporations continue to migrate to Windows XP and other Microsoft-based environments. The underlying architecture of our products facilitates its porting to other operating environments. We have extended our deployment and management solutions from Windows to UNIX and Linux servers as well as other devices. Our flexible, Web-based infrastructure is designed to support the implementation of our product suites and modules in a wide range of computing environments.

Expand our strategic relationships with industry leaders. We plan to extend, enhance and develop relationships with leading technology companies, including desktop, server and handheld computer manufacturers as well as systems integrators, value added resellers (“VARs”) and distributors. We currently have formalized strategic relationships with HP and Dell and an informal strategic relationship with Microsoft. We recently began developing a formal relationship with Fujitsu-Siemens. We believe that these types of relationships will allow us to package and distribute our software products to our partners’ customers, increase sales of our products through joint selling and marketing arrangements and increase our insight into future industry needs. We plan to continue to add new relationships and extend our existing relationships with VARs, OEMs, systems integrators, distributors and industry leading technology companies to further our sales and marketing efforts.

Pursue strategic acquisitions. We have acquired and integrated core technologies from HP, Computing Edge, Tekworks, Previo and Wise Solutions. We intend to opportunistically acquire businesses and technologies that will expand and add functionality to our product offerings, augment our distribution channels, expand our market opportunity or broaden our customer base.

Expand our worldwide presence. We believe that international markets present a substantial growth opportunity for us as the worldwide market for IT lifecycle management products continues to grow. We are currently selling our products in Europe, Australia, Asia, Canada, Mexico, South and Central America and Africa and plan to expand our sales, marketing and support functions in those areas by expanding our direct sales force, improving our customer service capabilities and developing relationships with international resellers, distributors and OEMs.

Further enhance customer satisfaction. We are committed to providing world-class technical support, training, consulting and professional services and view building long-term customer relationships as a critical component of growing our business. We believe servicing our existing customer base will allow us to more easily up-sell and cross-sell additional products, features and customer service offerings.

4

Table of Contents

Products and Customer Services

Products

We develop, market and support software products designed to allow users to deploy and manage mission critical applications throughout the IT lifecycle on distributed Windows servers, desktop computers, notebook computers and handheld devices, as well as UNIX, Linux, Macintosh, RIM and Palm systems. The following diagram illustrates the phases of the IT lifecycle that our products are designed to address:

Our products are licensed to customers as integrated suites or as separate modules, depending on customer requirements. We believe this scaleable approach to IT lifecycle management enables us to meet the needs of organizations of all sizes. The following table summarizes our primary product suites, their functionality and the individual modules included in each suite:

5

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our target segments and corresponding product offerings:

6

Table of Contents

Customer Services

In complex environments, a high level of technical support and customer services is critical to the successful marketing and sale of our products and the development of long-term customer relationships. Our customer services group provides all of our customers with complementary access to our user forum, as well as e-mail support. For customers needing a higher level of support, we provide a range of services that include:

On-site services. Our on-site professional services include pre- and post-sales consulting services, as well as implementation and integration assistance. Consulting services include planning, design and integration performed by our experienced consultants or software engineers.

Training and education. We offer product education courses to train our business partners and customers on the implementation and use of our products. Product training is provided at our headquarters, as well as at customer sites and other regional and international locations. Individuals who have received our product education course may also take an authorized exam to qualify for the Altiris Certified Professional and/or Altiris Certified Engineer designation.

Premium support. We provide additional premium support services. Premium support includes priority telephone support and after-hours support services. We also offer on-site and assigned engineer support, which provides access to an assigned support contact, and standby engagement support, which is designed for large, global enterprise customers.

We provide customer services from our headquarters in Lindon, Utah, and our other support offices located in Norwood, Massachusetts; Plymouth, Michigan; Landau, Germany; Sydney, Australia and Tallinn, Estonia. As of December 31, 2003, we had 102 customer services personnel worldwide. We intend to hire additional customer services personnel and establish new support sites to meet our customers’ needs.

Customers

As of December 31, 2003, we had licensed our products to more than 11,000 customers in a broad range of industries, including communications, energy, financial/consulting services, healthcare/pharmaceuticals, information technology, insurance and manufacturing/retail. The number of customers who purchased more than $100,000 of our software licenses and services increased from 26 to 80 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2003, 167 customers purchased more than $100,000 of our software licenses and services.

Strategic Relationships

An important element of our strategy is to establish relationships with third parties to assist us in developing, marketing, selling and implementing our products. This approach enhances our ability to expand our product offerings and customer base and to enter new markets, while seeking to increase the number of qualified personnel available to implement and support our products. We have established the following types of strategic relationships:

Technology-based relationships. To help ensure that our products are based on industry standards and take advantage of current and emerging technologies, we seek to enter into alliances with leading technology companies. We believe this approach will enable us to focus on our core competencies, reduce the time to market for our new product releases and simplify the task of designing and developing our products.

For example, we have an agreement with HP to develop and market an integrated product combining our server deployment and provisioning technology with an HP line of servers. This agreement continues to strengthen our position in the server market. Under a separate agreement, HP has licensed to us certain of its technology for integration into the HP Client Manager Software module. In addition, we have an agreement with HP to provide management solutions for HP thin clients. We are currently engaged in discussions with HP to further combine Altiris and HP technologies to help extend the functionality and value of HP’s products.

7

Table of Contents

In addition, we work with Microsoft to facilitate our ability to build software products that tightly integrate with Microsoft products. We have several Altiris employees working to facilitate the compatibility of our current and future Microsoft-based products with Microsoft technology as well as to coordinate our sales and marketing efforts with the Microsoft product groups and field organizations.

OEMs, distributors and VARs. Building upon our established relationship with Dell, we entered into an agreement in May 2002 by which we granted to Dell a nonexclusive license to distribute certain of our software products. Recently, our product offering through this agreement has been expanded to include our Recovery Solution software. Dell accounted for approximately 8% of our revenue in 2002 and 15% of our revenue in 2003.

In addition, we use a variety of distributors to distribute our software products to our VAR and reseller channel partners. We also offer channel partner programs that provide sales and technical training, technical support and priority communications to qualified VARs regarding our new products, promotions, pricing and sales tools. In particular, the Altiris Business Partner program requires that each VAR have at least one systems engineer who is certified as an Altiris Certified Engineer. Through this program, we have agreements with more than 70 Altiris Business Partners throughout North America. In addition, we have over 300 resellers in North America who have registered through our Web site to distribute our products. We also have over 130 international VARs and resellers in over 40 countries that deliver our products and related services.

We also have a license and distribution agreement with HP under which HP distributes certain of our products to customers directly or through HP’s distributors and resellers. Recently, our product offering through this agreement has been expanded to include our Deployment Solution software for HP’s thin client and our Recovery Solution software for HP’s business desktops and notebooks. HP accounted for 30% of our revenue in 2002 and 27% of our revenue in 2003.

Systems integrators. We work with a number of firms providing systems integration services that have selected our products as a component of delivering services to their customers. Accenture, CompuCom Systems, Inc., CSC, Dell Consulting Services, EDS, GE ITS, Getronics, HP, IBM Global Services, Northrop Grumman, SAIC, Syntegra and Unisys have used our products in delivering services. We are also pursuing relationships with other systems integrators. These firms complement our internal consulting teams with a substantial network of expertise, as well as the ability to lead large and complex projects.

8

Table of Contents

Technology

Our Web-based infrastructure is designed to support implementations of our product suites and modules in a wide range of computing environments. Our technology leverages a number of commercially available technologies and includes proprietary technology for Web reports, clients, notifications, directories and communications. The following diagram illustrates our product architecture, which allows individual modules to snap into a set of common services and extend a single Web console, database and agent infrastructure.

Web console. Our Web console has a Web-browser based user interface. It supports tables, charts, graphs and pivot table views with drill-down capabilities for progressive discovery and context sensitive hyper-links to other functions within the Web console. Secure report views allow the user to limit access to select reports. As individual modules are installed, the Web console is automatically extended with new views, functions, collections, policies and reports. A user-defined collection represents a group of machines and/or users accessing any information available in the database. Policies are used to define standard operations and automate management. Collection-based policies enable administrators to establish different sets of policies for notebook computers and servers, or specific users.

Common services. Our product architecture includes common services that are utilized by individual modules. Support for Microsoft Active Directory enables modules to discover machines, users, groups and group membership and to link solution policies with policies defined in the Active Directory. Notification policies automate detection and correction of problems, or alert administrators to problems that require manual intervention. A built in alert manager with wireless handheld interface enables workers to share critical status information and for management to track and manage the resolution of problems that require manual intervention. Notification policies include a number of built-in handlers including database logging, SNMP trap forwarding, e-mail and pager support, Web report creation and e-mail distribution.

9

Table of Contents

Common services provide support for Intel’s Wired-for-Management, or WfM, standard including pre-boot execution environment, or PXE, and wake on LAN, or WOL, technologies, which enables deployment of WfM enabled machines directly from the network. Distributed package servers provide replication across a company-wide site hierarchy for system images and application packages. Package servers include support for poorly connected, remote sites and enable efficient source routing of images and packages to mobile users.

Database. Our extensible database enables us to manage new classes of assets and events without any database programming or maintenance. All extensions and customizations are made available via the Web console and common services to individual modules.

Agent. Our agent supports real-time systems as well as sometimes-connected mobile users. Our agent uses Web-based protocols for communications and supports bandwidth throttling, checkpoint recovery, delta distribution and network block-out. Bandwidth throttling limits network resource usage and preserves bandwidth for business critical operations. Checkpoint recovery permits failed software distributions to restart from the point of interruption, which ensures data is communicated only once from source to destination. Delta distribution saves network bandwidth by forwarding only changes from source to destination. Network block-out prohibits software distribution or all management activity to preserve bandwidth during business hours. For mobile users, our agent will resume communications from the nearest, fastest network resource. For example, a mobile user can begin a software distribution in the California office, shutdown the PC, and resume in the Boston office.

Technology features

Integration. Our product architecture supports the seamless integration of individual modules. When an additional module is installed, the Web console, common services, database and agent are automatically extended. This model allows for quick deployment of new modules and reduces the need for re-training as new modules are introduced. Our product architecture enables partners to develop complementary solutions, such as HP Client Manager, that integrates their proprietary technology seamlessly into the solution. Our common services include native integration for inventory and software delivery with Microsoft’s systems management server, or SMS, and SNMP trap forwarding for integration with existing network management and enterprise management systems.

Connectors. Our native integration with SMS extends SMS management functions for Windows such as deployment and migration, and extends the reach of SMS to other non-Windows platforms such as UNIX/Linux, Macintosh and Palm. Our growing list of connectors for third-party products includes HP OpenView, HP Systems Insight Manager, Remedy Help Desk, and Microsoft Active Directory. Connectors can reduce the cost of system integration projects, and can enable customers to leverage existing business processes.

Customizable. Our product architecture includes an extensible database. Customers can add new classes of assets and add new attributes to existing assets without database maintenance. All of the extensions and customizations are made available via the Web console and common services to installed modules. Policies and reports are held in XML documents and can easily be customized, exported and imported to other systems. New policies and reports can also be cloned and customized without the use of programming tools.

Scalable. Our common services support a multi-tier site hierarchy that can be configured to meet the needs of organizations of all sizes. Our agent minimizes network traffic which enables more systems to be managed by a single server. Individual modules automatically deploy required components to managed systems. Collection based policies enable IT administrators to define effective management policies for different systems, applications and departments. Notification policies automate the detection and correction of problems. Inventory can be forwarded up the site hierarchy into a central reporting database, including Microsoft SMS, and historical recording can be used to track changes across the environment.

10

Table of Contents

Industry standards. We utilize open standards such as TCP/IP, PXE, WOL, SNMP, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP and XML to support communications between Windows, Macintosh, UNIX/Linux, and Network Devices (for example, switches). Our common services use standard Microsoft technology such as IIS, SQL Server, Active Directory, .NET services, COM object model, Windows Management Instrumentation, or WMI, and Visual Basic for Applications scripting. Our use of widely accepted open standards and Microsoft technology makes our products easy to implement in existing IT environments. As new and emerging standards and technologies develop, we intend to incorporate these standards and features into our product architecture.

Sales and Marketing

Sales. We sell and market our IT lifecycle management products and services primarily through VARs, distributors, OEMs, systems integrators, online sales and our direct sales force. As of December 31, 2003, we had 204 sales and marketing employees, including pre-sales technical support personnel. These sales people are located in major metropolitan areas in the United States such as Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Ft. Lauderdale, Houston, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, Newark, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, and Washington D.C. We also have sales people located internationally in Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Also supporting these efforts are 102 customer services and support personnel. The majority of our revenue has been generated in the United States. Revenue from customers outside of the United States accounted for 16% of our revenue in 2001, 20% of our revenue in 2002 and 33% of our revenue in 2003. We plan to continue to expand our direct sales force in the Americas, the Asia Pacific region, and in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region, or EMEA. We currently target senior executives, especially chief information officers, for our large, enterprise-wide sales and directors or project managers in IT departments for our module sales. Typically, our sales process will include an initial sales presentation, a product demonstration, a product evaluation period and a purchase process.

Marketing. We have a variety of marketing programs designed to create global brand recognition and market awareness for our product offerings. We market our products and services through our Web site, online and magazine advertising, directed advertising in e-mail newsletters and mailings, as well as press tours. In addition, our marketing efforts include active participation at tradeshows, technical conferences and technology seminars, publication of technical and education articles in industry journals, sales training and preparation of competitive analyses. Our customers and strategic partners provide references, and we feature customer recommendations in our advertising and other promotional activities.

Research and Development

Our research and development organization is responsible for the design, development and release of our products, documentation and product management. We have made substantial investments in research and development. As of December 31, 2003, we had 229 employees in our research and development group, which is organized into sub-groups focused on development, quality assurance, product management, documentation and localizing products for non-English environments. Members from each discipline also form separate product teams that work closely with sales, marketing and customer support to better address market needs and user requirements.

We maintain a central database for storing and organizing feedback from our customers in order to identify and address their changing system and application management requirements. This feedback database is supplemented by input from an advisory board composed of many of our key customers. When appropriate, we also utilize third parties to expand our capacity and to provide additional technical expertise on a consulting, work-for-hire basis.

Competition

The market for IT lifecycle management software is highly fragmented, rapidly evolving and highly competitive, and we expect competition in this market to persist and intensify. Consolidation among companies

11

Table of Contents

competing in the systems management market adds complexity to the dynamic nature of the market. Other vendors focusing on multiple aspects of IT lifecycle management include Computer Associates, HP, Microsoft and IBM (Tivoli). Our strategy with respect to the offerings of IT lifecycle management software vendors is not to displace them, but instead to add value by developing and marketing software solutions that extend, enhance and complement their solutions. Other competitors with respect to various phases of IT lifecycle management include InstallShield, LANDesk, Marimba, Novadigm (subject to its pending acquisition by HP), Novell, Peregrine Systems, Symantec, and Tally Systems.

We compete primarily on the following bases:

We may face future competition in the IT lifecycle management market from large, established companies, such as Microsoft, as well as from emerging companies. Barriers to entry in the lifecycle management market are relatively low, new software products are frequently introduced and existing products are continually enhanced. In addition, we believe that consolidation in our markets is likely to continue, which could lead to increased price competition and other forms of competition. Established companies may develop their own competitive products, but may also acquire or establish cooperative relationships with our current or future competitors, including cooperative relationships between larger, established and smaller public and private companies.

In addition, our ability to sell our products will depend, in part, on the compatibility of our products with other third-party products. Third-party software developers may change their products so that they will no longer be compatible with our products. If our competitors were to bundle their products in this manner or make their products non-compatible with ours, this could harm our ability to sell our products and could lead to price reductions for our products, which could reduce our profit margins. For example, Microsoft may not only develop its own IT lifecycle management solution, but may also acquire or establish cooperative relationships with our competitors.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

Our success and ability to compete depend on our continued development and protection of our proprietary software and other technologies. We rely primarily on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws as well as contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We currently have five patents issued in the United States. We also have patent applications pending in the United States and under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Although we believe that our patents are important intellectual property assets that can give us a competitive advantage, we do not believe that any one of our five patents is material to our business as a whole. We will continue to assess appropriate occasions to seek patent and other intellectual property protection for innovative aspects of our technology that we believe provide us a significant competitive advantage.

We provide our software products to customers pursuant to license agreements that impose restrictions on use. These license agreements are primarily in the form of shrink-wrap or click-wrap licenses, which are not negotiated with or signed by our end user customers and purport to take effect upon downloading, installing or using the software. In some jurisdictions, these measures may afford only limited protection of our intellectual property and proprietary rights associated with our products. We also enter into confidentiality agreements with employees and consultants involved in product development. We routinely require our employees, customers and potential business partners to enter into confidentiality agreements before we disclose any sensitive aspects of our products, technology or business plans. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights through license and confidentiality agreements, unauthorized parties may still attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products and technology. In addition, we conduct business internationally, and effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may not be available or may be limited in foreign countries. If we fail to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights, our business could be harmed.

12

Table of Contents

We have also licensed certain technology from HP for integration into our HP Client Manager module. This license agreement had an initial term that expired in February 2002, which automatically renewed for a six-month period, and which will continue to automatically renew for six-month periods unless terminated by HP upon three months notice. We also license other third-party technologies to enhance our products. Failure to license, or the loss of any license of, technologies could result in development or shipment delays until equivalent software is identified, licensed and integrated or developed by us.

Trademarks

As of December 31, 2003, we owned 20 United States trademark registrations, including Altiris, Inventory Solution, PC Transplant, RapidDeploy, RapidInstall, and Wise Solutions. Altiris is also a registered trademark in other countries. We also own a perpetual license to use the registered trademark, Carbon Copy, which is a registered trademark of Altiris in some foreign jurisdictions. We have several other trademarks and are actively pursuing trademark registrations in several foreign jurisdictions. All other trademarks, trade names or service marks appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.

Available Information

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports filed purusant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available on our website at www.altiris.com, as soon as reasonably practicable aftersuch reports are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Recent Events

On December 1, 2003, we acquired Wise Solutions, Inc., a privately held company located in the State of Michigan, in a combined cash and stock transaction pursuant to which we agreed to pay $31.5 million in cash and issue 348,794 shares of our common stock to the former shareholders of Wise Solutions. A portion of the consideration has been placed in escrow to satisfy certain indemnification obligations of the former shareholders of Wise Solutions.

Employees

As of December 31, 2003, we had 600 employees, including 204 in sales and marketing, 102 in customer services and support, 229 in research and development and 65 in general administration. We have never experienced a work stoppage and believe our relationship with our employees is good.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information with respect to our executive officers:

Gregory S. Butterfield has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2000 and as a director since May 2000. Prior to joining Altiris, Mr. Butterfield served as Vice President, Sales for Legato Systems, Inc., a backup software company, from July 1999 to February 2000. From June 1996 to July 1999, Mr. Butterfield served as Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales for Vinca, a fault tolerance and high availability company. From June 1994 to June 1996, Mr. Butterfield was the Regional Director of the Rocky Mountain Region for Novell, Inc., a provider of Internet business solutions. From January 1992 to June 1994, Mr. Butterfield was Vice President of North American Sales for WordPerfect Corporation, a software company.

13

Table of Contents

Stephen C. Erickson has served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2000. Before joining Altiris, from May 1996 to August 2000, Mr. Erickson was the Chief Financial Officer and Controller for the Newspaper Agency Corporation, a newspaper publisher. From September 1989 to May 1996, Mr. Erickson was employed as an accountant at Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Erickson is a certified public accountant.

Dwain A. Kinghorn has served as our Vice President and Chief Strategy and Technology Officer since October 2000. Mr. Kinghorn was the founder of Computing Edge, a software company, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from May 1994 to September 2000, when Computing Edge was purchased by Altiris. From May 1989 to May 1994, Mr. Kinghorn was employed by Microsoft, a software company, and was one of the original three members of Microsoft’s SMS development team.

Michael R. Samuelian has served as our Vice President, Sales since March 2000. Prior to joining Altiris, from September 1999 to March 2000, Mr. Samuelian served as the Director of Strategic Alliances at Legato. From January 1994 to September 1999, Mr. Samuelian was Director of International Software Sales and later Director of Strategic Alliances at Vinca, a fault tolerance and high availability company.

Jan E. Newman, one of our founders, served as a director of Altiris since August 1998 until February 2002 and as our Vice President, Corporate Development since January 2002. From May 2000 to December 2001, Mr. Newman served as Vice President, Business Development for Canopy, a management and resource company. From August 1998 to February 2000, Mr. Newman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Altiris. From January 1996 to August 1998, Mr. Newman served as President and Chief Executive Officer of KeyLabs, an independent software quality and e-commerce testing company.

Poul E. Nielsen has served as our Vice President, Marketing and Product Strategy since April 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Nielsen served as our Vice President, Product Strategy from October 2000. Before joining Altiris, Mr. Nielsen served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Computing Edge Corporation from January 1999. Mr. Nielsen served as Assistant Vice President, Research & Development for Computer Associates, from August 1996 to January 1999. From February 1981 to August 1996, Mr. Nielsen held software development, management, and technical director positions with Digital Equipment Corporation, focusing on distributed systems management.

Our principal administrative, sales, marketing, customer support and research and development facility is located in our headquarters facility in Lindon, Utah. We currently occupy approximately 63,000 square feet of office space in the Lindon facility under the terms of an operating lease expiring in December 2006. This facility should be adequate to meet our needs for at least the next 12 months. We believe that suitable additional facilities will be available as needed on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, we have offices in Australia, Estonia, France, Germany, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Michigan, the Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

On December 23, 1999, we commenced a patent infringement suit against Symantec Corporation, or Symantec, in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, or District Court, requesting compensatory damages and injunctive relief. In its response to our complaint, Symantec denied our claim of infringement and brought a counterclaim against us asserting that our patent is invalid and that we are infringing and diluting Symantec’s trademarks.

In July 2001, the District Court conducted a hearing for the purpose of construing or interpreting the claims comprising our patent, and in August 2001, the District Court issued an order that narrowly construed these claims. In an effort to facilitate our appeal from the order, we entered into a stipulation with Symantec that, based on the order, Symantec’s products do not infringe our patent. The stipulation also provided that Symantec’s counterclaims of trademark infringement and dilution would be dismissed and the remainder of the lawsuit would be stayed. Symantec’s only remaining counterclaim requests a judgment that our patent is invalid.

14

Table of Contents

In November 2001, the District Court entered a final judgment based on our stipulation, ruling that Symantec did not infringe our patent and dismissing Symantec’s counterclaims for trademark infringement and dilution. We and Symantec each appealed the District Court’s ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or Court of Appeals, and on February 12, 2003, the Court of Appeals ruled that the District Court erred in its construction of the claims comprising our patent and instructed the District Court to reconsider the question of infringement by Symantec based upon the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of the patent. Although we believe that this patent is an important intellectual property asset, we do not believe that it is material to our business as a whole. Accordingly, we do not believe that an adverse ruling would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

In June 2003, InstallShield Software Technologies, Inc., or InstallShield, filed suit against Wise Solutions, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. In December 2003, we acquired Wise Solutions by means of a merger transaction, with Wise Solutions becoming our wholly owned subsidiary. InstallShield claims that its suit arises out of a criminal investigation of Wise Solutions conducted by the U.S. Attorney and FBI, which investigation has not resulted in any criminal charges and we believe is no longer being actively conducted, but which has not been formally concluded. We believe the investigation concerns the same facts and circumstances upon which the civil suit is based.

InstallShield claims, among other things, that Wise Solutions violated copyright, computer fraud and trade secret laws by improperly accessing and downloading certain InstallShield documents and materials via the Internet from an FTP server used by InstallShield. InstallShield requests statutory and compensatory damages and injunctive relief. In response, Wise Solutions has admitted accessing and downloading some publicly available documents and information from InstallShield’s FTP server, but has denied any liability under applicable law.

In March 2004, InstallShield amended its complaint to add former officers and certain employees of Wise Solutions as co-defendants in the suit. Although we have not formed an opinion as to the likely outcome of these proceedings, we do not believe that an adverse ruling would have a material effect on our overall results of operations or financial condition, in part due to contractual protections, including indemnification and escrow provisions.

We are involved in claims, including those identified above, which arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting Contingencies,” we make a provision for a liability when it is both probable that the liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We believe we have adequate provisions for any such matters. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust these provisions to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. However, in our opinion, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

There were no matters submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

15

Table of Contents

PART II

Our common stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “ATRS” since our initial public offering in May 2002. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, th