UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 |
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 1-6324
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 41-6034000 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2650 Lou Menk Drive
Fort Worth, Texas 76131-2830
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(800) 795-2673
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
The securities listed below are registered on the New York Stock Exchange.
| Title of each class |
||
| Burlington Northern, Inc. | Northern Pacific Railway Company | |
| (Now The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company) | General Lien Railway and Land Grant 3% Bonds, due 2047 | |
| Consolidated Mortgage Bonds | ||
| 9.25%, Series H, due 2006 | ||
| 6.55%, Series K, due 2020 | St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company Income | |
| 3.80%, Series L, due 2020 | Debentures, 5%, Series A, due 2006 | |
| 3.20%, Series M, due 2045 | ||
| 8.15%, Series N, due 2020 | ||
| 6.55%, Series O, due 2020 | ||
| 8.15%, Series P, due 2020 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 1,000 shares of Outstanding Common Stock, $1.00 par value, as of February 2, 2004.
*The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF); as a result, there is no market data with respect to registrants shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION (I)(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.
| Page | ||||
| PART I | ||||
| Items 1 and 2. |
1 | |||
| Item 3. |
6 | |||
| PART II | ||||
| Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
7 | ||
| Item 7. |
7 | |||
| Item 7A. |
10 | |||
| Item 8. |
11 | |||
| Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
39 | ||
| Item 9A. |
39 | |||
| Item 14. |
39 | |||
| PART IV | ||||
| Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K |
40 | ||
| S-1 | ||||
| Exhibits |
E-1 | |||
i
PART I
| ITEMS 1 and 2. | Business and Properties |
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF Railway or Company), formerly known as the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BNRR) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on January 13, 1961, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF). On September 22, 1995, the stockholders of Burlington Northern, Inc. (BNI) and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation (SFP) became the stockholders of BNSF pursuant to a business combination of the two companies. To effect the combination, BNSF was formed to act as the parent holding company of BNI and SFP. BNI and SFP each owned a large, Class I railroad: the BNRR and The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (ATSF), respectively.
On December 30, 1996, BNI merged with and into SFP. On December 31, 1996, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (ATSF) merged with and into BNRR, and BNRR changed its name to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company. On January 2, 1998, BNSF Railways parent, SFP, merged with and into BNSF Railway.
BNSF Railway operates one of the largest railroad systems in North America. At December 31, 2003, BNSF Railway had approximately 36,500 employees.
BNSF Railways Internet address is www.bnsf.com. Through this internet website (found in the Investors link) BNSF Railway makes available, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Track Configuration
As of December 31, 2003, BNSF Railway operates over a railroad system consisting of approximately 32,500 route miles of track (excluding second, third and fourth main tracks, yard tracks, and sidings), approximately 24,500 miles of which are owned route miles, including easements, through 28 states and two Canadian provinces. Approximately 8,000 route miles of BNSF Railways system consist of trackage rights that permit BNSF Railway to operate its trains with its crews over another railroads tracks. BNSF Railway operates over other trackage through lease or other contractual arrangements.
As of December 31, 2003, the total BNSF Railway system, including first, second, third and fourth main tracks, yard tracks, and sidings, consists of approximately 50,000 operated miles of track, all of which are owned by or held under easement by BNSF Railway except for approximately 8,500 route miles operated under trackage rights. At December 31, 2003, approximately 26,500 miles of BNSF Railways track consists of 112-pound per yard or heavier rail, including approximately 19,500 track miles of 131-pound per yard or heavier rail.
1
Equipment Configuration
BNSF Railway owned or had under non-cancelable leases exceeding one year the following units of railroad rolling stock as of the dates shown below:
| At December 31, | ||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 | ||||
| Locomotives |
5,377 | 5,226 | 5,357 | |||
| Freight Cars: |
||||||
| Covered Hopper |
36,255 | 37,609 | 38,007 | |||
| Gondola |
15,327 | 14,942 | 15,075 | |||
| Box-specially equipped |
10,021 | 9,612 | 9,641 | |||
| Open Hopper |
10,866 | 10,848 | 11,094 | |||
| Flat |
7,854 | 7,946 | 7,844 | |||
| Refrigerator |
5,427 | 5,588 | 5,554 | |||
| Autorack |
827 | 843 | 877 | |||
| Tank |
639 | 501 | 506 | |||
| Box-general purpose |
31 | 559 | 581 | |||
| Other |
302 | 319 | 343 | |||
| Total Freight Cars |
87,549 | 88,767 | 89,522 | |||
| Domestic Containers |
10,627 | 8,197 | 8,259 | |||
| Domestic Chassis |
9,864 | 8,180 | 8,205 | |||
| Company Service Cars |
4,028 | 4,035 | 4,132 | |||
| Trailers |
2,152 | 2,163 | 2,200 | |||
| Commuter Passenger Cars |
163 | 160 | 160 | |||
The average age from date of manufacture of the locomotive fleet at December 31, 2003, was 15 years; the average age from date of manufacture or remanufacture of the freight car fleet at December 31, 2003, was 16 years. These averages are not weighted to reflect the greater capacities of the newer equipment.
Capital Expenditures and Maintenance
A breakdown of cash capital expenditures during 2003, 2002 and 2001 is set forth in the following table:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
| (in millions) | |||||||||
| Maintenance of way: |
|||||||||
| Rail |
$ | 202 | $ | 193 | $ | 233 | |||
| Ties |
227 | 222 | 254 | ||||||
| Surfacing |
160 | 161 | 146 | ||||||
| Other |
337 | 325 | 335 | ||||||
| Total maintenance of way |
$ | 926 | $ | 901 | $ | 968 | |||
| Mechanical |
133 | 168 | 183 | ||||||
| Information services |
63 | 79 | 69 | ||||||
| Other |
115 | 107 | 113 | ||||||
| Total maintenance of business |
$ | 1,237 | $ | 1,255 | $ | 1,333 | |||
| New locomotive acquisitions |
270 | | | ||||||
| Terminal and line expansion and other |
218 | 103 | 126 | ||||||
| Total |
$ | 1,725 | $ | 1,358 | $ | 1,459 | |||
2
The table above does not include expenditures for equipment financed through operating leases (principally locomotive and rolling stock). BNSF Railways planned 2004 cash capital expenditures approximate $1.9 billion. Approximately $1.2 billion of the total planned capital expenditures will be for maintenance of business activities, primarily consisting of expenditures to maintain BNSF Railways track, signals, bridges and tunnels. The Company plans to spend approximately $0.5 billion on the purchase and maintenance of locomotives. The remaining $0.2 billion is planned to be spent on terminal and line expansions, as well as other projects.
As of December 31, 2003, General Electric Company, Alstom Transportation Inc., OmniTRAX Locomotive Services, LLC and the Electro-Motive Division of General Motors Corporation performed locomotive maintenance and overhauls for BNSF Railway at its facilities under various maintenance agreements that covered approximately 3,200 locomotives.
The extent of the BNSF Railways track maintenance program is depicted in the following table:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 | ||||
| Track miles of rail laid (a) |
749 | 685 | 891 | |||
| Cross ties inserted (thousands) (a) |
2,353 | 2,248 | 2,704 | |||
| Track resurfaced (miles) |
12,399 | 12,499 | 11,011 | |||
| (a) | Includes expenditures for both maintenance of existing route system and expansion projects. These expenditures are primarily capitalized. |
BNSF Railways planned 2004 track maintenance of way program will result in the installation of approximately 570 track miles of rail, the replacement of about 2.4 million ties, and the resurfacing of approximately 12,000 miles of track.
Property and Facilities
BNSF Railway operates various facilities and equipment to support its transportation system, including its infrastructure and locomotives and freight cars as previously described. It also owns or leases other equipment to support rail operations, including highway trailers, containers and vehicles. Support facilities for rail operations include yards and terminals throughout its rail network, system locomotive shops to perform locomotive servicing and maintenance, a centralized network operations center for train dispatching and network operations monitoring and management in Fort Worth, Texas, regional dispatching centers, computers, telecommunications equipment, signal systems, and other support systems. Transfer facilities are maintained for rail-to-rail as well as intermodal transfer of containers, trailers and other freight traffic. These facilities include 36 major intermodal hubs located across the system and one intermodal hub center off-line used in connection with haulage agreements with other railroads. BNSF Railways largest intermodal facilities in terms of 2003 volume were:
| Intermodal Facilities |
Lifts | |
| Hobart Yard (Los Angeles, California) |
1,217,000 | |
| Corwith Yard (Chicago, Illinois) |
697,000 | |
| Willow Springs (Illinois) |
658,000 | |
| San Bernardino (California) |
497,000 | |
| Alliance (Fort Worth, Texas) |
476,000 | |
| Cicero (Illinois) |
454,000 | |
| Argentine (Kansas City, Kansas) |
273,000 | |
BNSF Railway owns 25 automotive distribution facilities where automobiles are loaded or unloaded from multi-level rail cars and serves eight port facilities in the United States and Canada.
BNSF Railways largest freight car classification yards based on the average daily number of cars processed (excluding cars that do not change trains at the terminal and intermodal and coal cars) are shown below:
| Classification Yard |
Daily Average Cars Processed | |
| Argentine (Kansas City, Kansas) |
1,814 | |
| Galesburg (Illinois) |
1,590 | |
| Barstow (California) |
1,323 | |
| Pasco (Washington) |
1,210 | |
| Memphis (Tennessee) |
938 | |
3
As of December 31, 2003, certain BNSF Railway properties and other assets are subject to liens securing $391 million of mortgage debt. Certain locomotives and rolling stock of BNSF Railway are subject to equipment obligations and leases, as referred to in Notes 9 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Productivity
Productivity, as measured by thousand gross ton miles per employee, has risen steadily in the last three years as shown in the table below.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 | ||||
| Thousand gross ton miles divided by average number of employees |
24,906 | 23,374 | 22,862 | |||
Business Mix
In serving the Midwest, Pacific Northwest and the Western, Southwestern, and Southeastern regions and ports of the country, BNSF Railway transports, through one operating transportation services segment, a range of products and commodities derived from manufacturing, agricultural, and natural resource industries. Accordingly, its financial performance is influenced by, among other things, general and industry economic conditions at the international, national, and regional levels. The map below illustrates the Companys primary routes, including trackage rights, which allow BNSF Railway to access major cities and ports in the western United States as well as Canadian and Mexican traffic. In addition to major cities and ports, BNSF Railway efficiently serves many smaller markets by working closely with the Companys more than 200 shortline partners. BNSF Railway has also entered into marketing agreements with Canadian National Railway Company and Kansas City Southern Railway Company expanding the marketing reach for the organizations.
4
Consumer Products: The Consumer Products freight business provided approximately 39 percent of freight revenues in 2003.
Industrial Products: Industrial Products freight business provided approximately 23 percent of BNSF Railways freight revenues in 2003.
Coal: In 2003, the transportation of coal contributed about 22 percent of freight revenues.
Agricultural Products: The transportation of Agricultural Products provided approximately 16 percent of 2003 total freight revenues.
Freight Statistics: The following table sets forth certain freight statistics relating to rail operations for the periods indicated:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2001 | |||||||
| Revenue ton miles (millions) |
508,200 | 490,234 | 501,829 | ||||||
| Freight revenue per thousand revenue ton miles |
$ | 18.26 | $ | 18.10 | $ | 18.11 | |||
| Average length of haul (miles) |
1,014 | 992 | 992 | ||||||
Revenue, cars/units and average revenue per car/unit information for the two years ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated by reference from a table in Item 7, Managements Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations, under the headings Results of Operations; Revenue Table.
Government Regulation and Legislation
Rail operations are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board (STB) of the United States Department of Transportation (DOT), the Federal Railroad Administration of DOT, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as state regulatory agencies. The STB has jurisdiction over disputes and complaints involving certain rates, routes and services, the sale or abandonment of rail lines, applications for line extensions and construction, and consolidation or merger with, or acquisition of control of, rail common carriers. The outcome of STB proceedings can affect the costs and profitability of BNSF Railways business.
DOT and OSHA have jurisdiction under several federal statutes over a number of safety and health aspects of rail operations. State agencies regulate some aspects of rail operations with respect to health and safety in areas not otherwise preempted by federal law.
BNSF Railways rail operations, as well as those of its competitors, are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental regulation. These laws cover discharges to waters, air emissions, toxic substances, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of waste and hazardous materials. This regulation has the effect of increasing the cost and liabilities associated with rail operations. Environmental risks are also inherent in rail operations, which frequently involve transporting chemicals and other hazardous materials.
Many of BNSF Railways land holdings are and have been used for industrial or transportation-related purposes or leased to commercial or industrial companies whose activities may have resulted in discharges onto the property. As a result, BNSF Railway is now subject and will from time to time continue to be subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. In particular, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, generally imposes joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on current and former owners and operators of a site. Accordingly, BNSF Railway may be responsible under CERCLA and other federal and state statutes for all or part of the costs to cleanup sites at which certain substances may have been released by BNSF Railway, its current lessees, former owners or lessees of properties, or other third parties. Further discussion is incorporated by reference from Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Competition
The business environment in which BNSF Railway operates remains highly competitive. Depending on the specific market, deregulated motor carriers, other railroads and river barges may exert pressure on price and service levels. The presence of advanced, high service truck lines with expedited delivery, subsidized infrastructure and minimal empty mileage continues to affect the market for non-bulk, time sensitive freight. The potential expansion of longer combination vehicles could further encroach upon markets traditionally served by railroads. In order to remain competitive, BNSF Railway and other railroads continue to develop and implement operating efficiencies to improve productivity.
As railroads streamline, rationalize and otherwise enhance their franchises, competition among rail carriers intensifies. BNSF Railways primary rail competitor in the western region of the United States is the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP). Other Class I railroads and numerous regional railroads and motor carriers also operate in parts of the same territories served by BNSF Railway.
Based on weekly reporting to the Association of American Railroads, in 2003, BNSF Railways share of the western United States rail traffic was approximately 45 percent.
| ITEM 3. | Legal Proceedings |
Ray Ridgeway, et al. v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, No. 48-185170-00 (District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 48th Judicial District) is a state court action filed on October 27, 2000. The plaintiffs causes of action include alleged breach of contract, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duties with respect to a special dividend that was paid in 1988 by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (BNSF) predecessor, Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation (SFSP). The complaint alleges that SFSP erroneously informed shareholders as to the tax treatment of the dividendspecifically, the apportionment of the dividend as either a distribution of earnings and profits or a return of capitalwhich allegedly caused some shareholders to overpay their income taxes. The plaintiffs assert through their experts report, that SFSP had essentially no accumulated earnings and profits and that the entire dividend distribution should have been treated as a return of capital, rather than the approximately 34 percent that SFSP determined was a return of capital. BNSF Railway believes these claims lack merit and that it has substantial defenses on both the merits of these claims and the attempted class action, and it is defending these claims vigorously.
In 2002, BNSF Railway was sued by the North Dakota Department of Health (DOH), and a number of private intervenors, including the City of Mandan, regarding the scope of BNSFs obligation to remediate all or part of a diesel plume or plumes in Mandan, North Dakota. Proceedings were brought in state court, North Dakota Department of Health, et al. v. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company; District Court, State of North Dakota, County of Morton, South Central Judicial District Civil No. 02-C-1174, and in an administrative proceeding (Case No. 84-400 WPC). In both proceedings, DOH is seeking injunctive relief and compensatory damages as well as unspecified penalties that could exceed $100,000 due to alleged, historic spills of fuel. The intervenors are seeking injunctive relief and personal injury and property damages. In August 2002, the administrative law judge recommended granting the plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment but that penalties were inappropriate against BNSF Railway. The subsequent administrative order issued on February 5, 2003, granted Partial Summary Judgment on liability and denied BNSFs Motion to Stay the Administrative Proceeding but did not include the administrative law judges recommendation regarding penalties. BNSF appealed the order in May 2003. On October 21, 2003, the state court reversed the order and the administrative proceeding was stayed pending outcome of the state court lawsuit.
BNSF Railway and its subsidiaries are parties to a number of legal actions and claims, various governmental proceedings and private civil suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including those related to environmental matters, Federal Employers Liability Act claims by BNSF Railway employees, other personal injury claims, and disputes and complaints involving certain transportation rates and charges (including complaints seeking refunds of prior charges paid for coal transportation and the prescription of future rates for such movements). Some of the legal proceedings include claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages, and a few proceedings purport to be class actions. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, considering among other things the meritorious legal defenses available and liabilities that have been recorded along with applicable insurance, it is the opinion of BNSF Railways management that none of these items will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position or liquidity of BNSF Railway. However, an unexpected adverse resolution of one or more of these items could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year.
Reference is made to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning certain pending tax related administrative or adjudicative state proceedings or appeals.
6
PART II
| ITEM 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
BNSF Railways common stock is owned by BNSF and therefore is not traded on any market.
| ITEM 7. | Managements Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations |
Managements narrative analysis relates to the results of operations of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, BNSF Railway or Company). BNSF Railway is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BNSF. The following narrative analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes.
Results of Operations
Revenue Table
The following table presents BNSF Railways revenue information by commodity for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenues |
Cars/Units |
Average Revenue Per Car/Unit | ||||||||||||||
| 2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||||
| (in millions) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer Products |
$ | 3,650 | $ | 3,345 | 4,336 | 3,880 | $ | 842 | $ | 862 | ||||||
| Industrial Products |
2,138 | 2,041 | 1,428 | 1,415 | 1,497 | 1,442 | ||||||||||
| Coal |
2,025 | 2,071 | 2,048 | 2,097 | 989 | 988 | ||||||||||
| Agricultural Products |
1,465 | 1,408 | 834 | 794 | 1,757 | 1,773 | ||||||||||
| Total Freight Revenues |
9,278 | 8,865 | 8,646 | 8,186 | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,083 | ||||||||
| Other Revenues |
102 | 98 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Revenues |
$ | 9,380 | $ | 8,963 | ||||||||||||
Expense Table
The following table presents BNSF Railways expense information for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
| 2003 |
2002 | |||||
| (in millions) | ||||||
| Compensation and benefits |
$ | 2,960 | $ | 2,893 | ||
| Purchased services |
1,232 | 1,139 | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
909 | 930 | ||||
| Equipment rents |
705 | 698 | ||||
| Fuel |
1,073 | 833 | ||||
| Materials and other |
811 | 794 | ||||
| Total operating expenses |
$ | 7,690 | $ | 7,287 | ||
| Interest expense |
$ | 144 | $ | 153 | ||
| Other expense, net |
$ | 13 | $ | 12 | ||
| Income tax expense |
$ | 574 | $ | 570 | ||
7
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2002
BNSF Railway recorded net income for 2003 of $1,023 million, which includes the favorable cumulative effect of an accounting change of $39 million, net of tax, compared with net income for 2002 of $961 million. Operating income of $1,690 million in 2003 was $14 million higher than 2002.
Revenues
Freight revenues of $9,278 million were $413 million, or 5 percent, higher than 2002. Freight revenues in 2003 included fuel surcharges of $110 million, compared with $26 million in the prior year. Average revenue per car/unit decreased 1 percent in 2003 to $1,073 from $1,083 in 2002.
Consumer Products revenues of $3,650 million for 2003 were $305 million, or 9 percent, greater than 2002. The increase in Consumer Products revenue is primarily due to increased volumes in the international, truckload and perishable sectors. The reduction in average revenue per unit of 2 percent is primarily related to the strong growth in the international sector, which has lower average revenue per unit.
Industrial Products revenues increased $97 million, or 5 percent, to $2,138 million for 2003. The revenue increase is primarily due to increased business in steel, taconite, clay and minerals in the construction products sector and increased military, lumber, plywood, particle board and paper traffic in the building products sector, which were somewhat offset by lower plastics traffic. Rate increases along with some fuel surcharges contributed to a 4 percent increase in average revenue per car.
Coal revenues of $2,025 million for 2003 decreased $46 million, or 2 percent, versus a year ago. The decrease is primarily a result of lower volumes from the first quarter draw-down of utility stockpiles, weaker demand due to milder weather