| (Mark One) | |
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 or |
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-5287 PATHMARK STORES, INC. |
| Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
22-2879612 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
200 Milik Street Carteret, New Jersey (Address of principal executive office) |
07008 (Zip Code) |
(732) 499-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Warrants to purchase Common Stock
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ý No o
As of July 30, 2004, which was the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock was $214,532,381 (based upon the closing price as reported by the Nasdaq National Market), excluding outstanding shares deemed beneficially owned by directors and officers. As of April 20, 2005, 30,071,192 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.
This report and the documents incorporated by reference into this report contain both historical and forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements appear in a number of places in this report and include statements regarding our intent, belief and current expectations with respect to, among other things, capital expenditures and technology initiatives, the ability to borrow funds under our credit facilities, the ability to successfully implement our operating strategies, including trends affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. The words anticipate, believe, expect, forecast, guidance, intend, may, plan, project, will and other similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. While these forward-looking statements and the related assumptions are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. These statements are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and reflect future business decisions which are subject to change. Some of these assumptions inevitably will not materialize, and unanticipated events will occur which will affect our results. Some important factors (but not necessarily all factors) that could negatively affect our revenues, growth strategies, future profitability and operating results, or that otherwise could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statement, include the following:
For a discussion of these factors, see Item 1 Business Factors Affecting Our Business and Prospects.
2
Pathmark Stores, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1987 and is the successor by merger to a business established in 1966. In October 1987, our predecessor companies were acquired in a leveraged buyout pursuant to which substantial indebtedness was incurred. While our core supermarket operations remained sound following this leveraged buyout, the additional indebtedness and associated interest expense ultimately led us and our then parent companies to file a prepackaged plan of reorganization in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware on July 12, 2000. On September 7, 2000, the Court entered an order confirming our plan of reorganization, which became effective on September 19, 2000, at which time we formally exited Chapter 11. As part of the plan of reorganization, approximately $1 billion of our subordinated debt was cancelled, with the holders receiving 100% of our common stock. Our principal executive office is located at 200 Milik Street, Carteret, NJ 07008 (telephone: (732) 499-3000). Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms Company, Pathmark, we and our as used in this report, mean Pathmark Stores, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We are a leading supermarket chain, operating as a single segment, in the densely populated New York New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas, operating 143 stores. We pioneered the development of the large supermarket/drugstore format in the Northeast, opening our first store of this kind in 1977. Operating in the New York New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas for over 38 years, we have successfully developed a leading supermarket franchise with strong brand name recognition and customer loyalty. We believe we are the largest supermarket chain operating under a single banner in our market area in terms of sales. We focus our operations on this market area, where we believe we can maintain and build upon our strong market presence and achieve additional operating economies. All of our stores are located within 100 miles of our corporate office in Carteret, New Jersey and of our company-operated and outsourced distribution facilities. Proximity of these distribution facilities to our stores assists us in in-stock conditions and distribution costs. Our market area includes some of the most densely populated regions of the United States, representing approximately 10% of the U.S. population and encompassing two of the five largest U.S. metropolitan areas by population, namely New York and Philadelphia. We believe that the high population density in our markets coupled with the geographic concentration of our stores provide substantial opportunities for economies of scale.
On March 23, 2005, Pathmark and The Yucaipa Companies, LLC (Yucaipa), a Los Angeles based private equity firm, entered into a stock purchase agreement under which Yucaipa will invest $150 million in Pathmark and executed a five-year management agreement pursuant to which Yucaipa will provide consulting services following the closing on corporate strategy, marketing, operations, finance and retail development to Pathmark.
Under the terms of the agreement, Yucaipa will purchase 20,000,000 newly-issued shares of our common stock, 10,060,000 Series A warrants, and 15,046,350 Series B warrants (collectively, the Yucaipa Transaction). The shares will represent approximately 40% of our outstanding common stock. The Series A warrants have an exercise price of $8.50 per share and a three-year term. The Series B warrants have an exercise price of $15.00 per share and a ten-year term, but will not become exercisable until certain conditions are satisfied. Upon closing, we expect our Board of Directors will be comprised of six current or new independent directors and five additional directors nominated by Yucaipa. The independent directors will have the right to nominate their successors.
The transaction, which was unanimously approved by our Board of Directors, is subject to customary closing conditions and approval by our stockholders. The transaction is expected to close in the summer of fiscal 2005. The remainder of this Form 10-K does not include the effects nor consider the expectations from this proposed transaction.
3
At Pathmark, our Shared Purpose is to win the respect and loyalty of our customers and the communities we serve by providing a superior shopping experience while striving to be a great place to work. As we strive to achieve our Shared Purpose, the Shared Values below define the way we conduct ourselves consistent with our operating strategy:
Highly Productive, Modern-Format Store Base. Our stores are among the most productive in the industry. During fiscal 2004, we generated sales per store and sales per selling square foot of $28.1 million and $724, respectively, compared to industry averages of approximately $18.1 million and $483, respectively. Our stores average approximately 52,400 square feet in size and are approximately 19% larger than the average U.S. supermarket. We design our stores to provide customers with one-stop shopping with a wide assortment of foods and general merchandise, as well as a host of additional conveniences, including 130 in-store full-service pharmacies and a wide array of financial services offered by 83 in-store banks. We are a leading filler of prescriptions among our supermarket competitors in the New York New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas and, through our agreements with Bank of America and New York Community Bank, we believe we are the leading provider of in-store banking services in our market area.
Below is a summary of the range of our store sizes as of January 29, 2005:
| Total Square Feet |
Number of Stores | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater than 60,000 | 17 | |||
| 50,001 - 60,000 | 78 | |||
| 40,000 - 50,000 | 37 | |||
| Less than 40,000 | 11 | |||
| Total | 143 | |||
Prime Real Estate Locations. 114 of our stores are in the greater New York New Jersey metropolitan area and 29 of our stores are in the greater Philadelphia metropolitan area. Our stores are generally well situated in high traffic urban and suburban locations where we have established a loyal customer base and where we believe we are well positioned against new competitive entrants, as our store portfolio would be difficult to replicate. Given the prime locations of our stores coupled with a format that offers our customers a convenient, one-stop shopping experience, our stores are among the most productive in our industry.
Provide Superior Customer Service and Store-Level Execution. We believe we differentiate ourselves by, among other things, our focus on customer service. To ensure the implementation of our high customer service standards, we rely on a store evaluation program whereby mystery shoppers visit our stores and rate each store on a variety of customer service attributes. One of our top priorities is to continue our strong execution in the area of food safety, which, through our surveys, we have found to be one of the top criterion by which customers choose a supermarket. We intend to continue to develop and improve store-level execution through programs that emphasize proactive, interpersonal communication between store associates and customers.
4
Reduce Operating Expenses. We consistently evaluate our business in an effort to reduce operating expenses without affecting our overall objective of providing a high level of customer service. Currently, we have a number of initiatives in place to accomplish this goal. We also have a program called Best Ball, which is designed to identify the best operating practices in use by certain stores and implement these best practices throughout our chain. These operating practices include maximizing efficient use of supplies and minimizing workers compensation and customer accident claims.
Differentiated Merchandising. We believe that our merchandising and marketing programs allow us to differentiate our product and service offering to our customers. We also believe that our large stores and the experience of our category managers and store operators allow us to respond to the varying product demands of our customers with effective merchandising, which is important given the diverse cultural makeup of the communities in which we operate. In addition, we offer over 3,500 private label products under the Pathmark name. Given our leading position in our market area, our high customer count and our established marketing expertise, we are also able to offer vendors significant opportunities to market their products effectively in a desirable market area. As a result, we believe we are well-positioned to continue to realize purchasing and cooperative marketing benefits from vendors.
Our merchandising strategy is designed to offer a one-stop shopping experience that leverages our large store format and strong category management skills to provide a differentiated product and service offering for our customers, while allowing us to merchandise our higher margin products more effectively. In addition, we believe our focus on perishables, micro merchandising and private label has increased customer loyalty, and will provide higher margins. We recently have begun implementing our brand repositioning initiative designed to align with the demands of todays time-compressed consumers. By providing a shopping experience that respects and values the customers time, Pathmark will successfully differentiate itself from its competition.
Perishables. We believe that the quality of perishable items, particularly produce, is an important factor for consumers when choosing where to shop. We continue to focus on produce by utilizing Produce Pete, a local television personality who appears on a television show on weekend mornings devoted to tips on shopping for fresh fruits and vegetables, as an integral part of our advertisements. In addition, we plan to enhance our deli department offerings by adding cold-prepared meats, custom sandwiches, and soup bars to many of our stores.
Micro Merchandising. Being located in the New York New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas, we serve a highly diverse customer base, very often within the neighborhood of a given store. We effectively vary our product offerings across our store base in order to satisfy the various food preferences of our diverse customer base. We believe that our large stores and the experience of our category managers and store operators allow us to respond to the varying product demands of our customers with effective merchandising, which is especially important given the diversity of the communities in which we operate.
Private Label. We have a large variety of private label products under the Pathmark name, which we continuously update. Over 3,500 Pathmark private label products are currently available, which we believe provide substantial value to our customers and increase overall customer loyalty.
Gross Profit. We intend to continue to focus on improving our profitability by capitalizing on our large store format, which affords us the flexibility to more effectively merchandise a broad array of products and services, including higher margin products. An integral part of our merchandising and marketing efforts is to promote increased customer traffic for our stores through our various convenience service departments, such as in-store pharmacies and banks. Furthermore, we plan to leverage the Pathmark Advantage Card loyalty program, which facilitates more effective category management and offers us the opportunity to more efficiently target sales promotions while strengthening our customer base. We also intend to increase our focus on, and merchandising for, our private label products. Gross profit improvement initiatives will also include a focus on inventory control, efficient ordering and shrink reduction.
5
We continue to renovate and expand our store base since we believe that keeping our stores fresh and up-to-date is critically important. During fiscal 2004, we opened three new stores, one of which was formerly operated by a joint venture and was previously included in our store count, closed two stores, one of which was formerly operated by a joint venture, and completed 19 store renovations At the end of fiscal 2004, approximately 80% of our stores were either new or had been renovated over the last five years. In addition to continually renovating our stores, we intend to further strengthen our position in our market area by selectively increasing our store base. During fiscal 2005, we plan to open two new stores, close two stores and complete eight store renovations. One of the new stores is a replacement for one of the stores being closed. By opening stores in our existing trade area, we believe we can increase our already strong market presence and achieve additional operating economies.
We continuously evaluate our stores for necessary renovations. A typical store renovation requires a capital expenditure of approximately $1.5 million to $2.5 million and generally increases customer traffic and sales, responds to customer demand, competes more effectively against existing and new competitors or updates a particular format to our current prototype. In certain circumstances, we may decide to replace a store instead of conducting a major renovation due to population shifts, availability of a more attractive site or cost considerations.
We spent approximately $119 million on capital expenditures, including property acquired under capital leases and technology investments, in fiscal 2004. We expect to spend approximately $67 million on capital expenditures in fiscal 2005.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our store development and renovation activities:
| Fiscal Year |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
| Stores in operation at beginning of the period | 143 | 144 | 141 | 138 | 135 | ||||||
| Opened or acquired during the period | 2 | (a) | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | |||||
| Closed during the period | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | |
| Stores in operation at end of the period | 143 | 143 | 144 | 141 | 138 | ||||||
| Stores renovated during the period | 19 | 16 | 11 | 34 | 19 | ||||||
| (a) | Does not include the opening of a former joint venture which was already included in our store count. |
As part of our marketing strategy, we emphasize value through competitive pricing and weekly sales and promotions, supported by extensive advertising. Our advertising expenditures are concentrated on print advertising, including advertisements and circulars in local and area newspapers, with an accent on radio and ad flyers distributed in stores.
We plan to continue to increase our focus on the Pathmark Advantage Card program to enhance our understanding of customer purchasing patterns and develop targeted sales promotions to our customer base. In addition, we have a website (www.pathmark.com) which offers promotional discounts and assorted on-line services.
Given our leading position in our trade area, our large customer base and our established marketing expertise, we are able to offer vendors significant opportunities to feature their products effectively in a desirable market area. As a result, we are well-positioned to continue to realize purchasing and cooperative marketing benefits from our vendors.
6
We have outsourced a major portion of our distribution function and all of our trucking function. This approach allows us to focus on our customers and stores. We have a long-term agreement expiring in February 2013 with C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (C&S), the nations second largest grocery wholesale company in terms of sales, to supply us with substantially all of our products other than general merchandise, pharmacy, health and beauty care and tobacco products as well as products delivered by vendors directly to our stores. This agreement may only be terminated for cause or certain events of bankruptcy by either party. Under our arrangement with C&S, we negotiate prices, discounts and promotions directly with vendors and pay C&S an agreed upon rate per case.
AmeriSource-Bergen Corp., one of the nations leading pharmaceutical wholesalers, currently supplies all of our pharmacy products. In addition, we have an agreement with Grocery Haulers, Inc. (GHI), a third-party trucking company, to transport our products from our outsourced and internally operated warehouse and distribution facilities to our stores. Our general merchandise and health and beauty care products are self-distributed from our 290,000 square foot leased distribution center in Edison, New Jersey. We believe that our warehouse and distribution facilities contain sufficient capacity for the continued expansion of our store base for the foreseeable future. All of our stores are within 100 miles of these distribution facilities.
Many of our various systems initiatives were incorporated as part of our International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) outsourcing agreement in April 2001. Pursuant to this agreement, IBM operates our data center operations and mainframe processing and information system functions and provides business applications and systems designed to enhance our efficiency and customer service. The charges under this agreement were based upon the services requested at predetermined rates. We believe that this arrangement allows us to focus our management resources on our customers and stores. In February 2005, we entered into a new seven-year outsourcing agreement with IBM that continues to provide substantially similar services.
We implemented a new financial system in fiscal 2001 that enhanced our operational reporting and analytical tools. Similarly, our Wide Area Network was upgraded to take advantage of more reliable and faster frame relay technology that improved communications with stores. In fiscal 2002, we installed the latest point-of-sale technology from IBM in all our stores, which improved cashier productivity and customer service.
Additionally, we installed self-checkout equipment in 75 stores, which we believe improves our customers shopping experience and lowers store-level operating costs. In fiscal 2003, we commenced a multi-year project to upgrade our current merchandising system, which we believe will maximize SKU level profitability, increase sales and improve in-store merchandising. During 2004 we completed the first phase of this project with the implementation of a new Direct Store Delivery System.
In 2004 we embarked on a development effort to replace our Point-of-Sale (POS) software. In addition we also began a project to replace our Electronic Payments Switch that we use for processing Debit, Credit, Electronic Benefit Transfer, and Gift Card transactions.
The supermarket business is highly competitive. Our earnings are primarily dependent on the maintenance of relatively high sales volume per supermarket, efficient product acquisition and distribution and cost-effective store operations. Principal competitive factors include price, store location, advertising and promotion, product mix, quality and service. We compete against national, regional and local supermarkets, club stores, drug stores, convenience stores, discount merchandisers and other local retailers in our market area. Our principal supermarket competitors include Acme, A&P (trading under several banners), Foodtown, King Kullen, ShopRite and Stop & Shop.
7
We have registered a variety of trade names, service marks and trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, including Pathmark. We consider our Pathmark service marks to be of material importance to our business and actively defend and enforce such service marks.
Our business requires us to hold licenses and to register certain of our facilities with state and federal health, drug and alcoholic beverage regulatory agencies. By virtue of these licenses and registration requirements, we are obliged to observe certain rules and regulations, and a violation of such rules and regulations could result in a suspension of our licenses or registrations. In addition, most of our licenses require periodic renewals. We have experienced no material difficulties with respect to obtaining or retaining our licenses and registrations.
We are recognized as a long-standing, important member of the communities which we serve. This recognition is based upon our associates involvement in important community outreach efforts, as well as our support, both financial and in kind, of numerous nonprofit charitable organizations. These include both large (e.g., American Cancer Society, Childrens Miracle Network and the March of Dimes) and small (e.g., local little leagues, scouts and religious institutions) charities, as well as Community Food Banks throughout our trade area.
As of January 29, 2005, we employed approximately 25,000 people, of whom approximately 16,000 were employed on a part-time basis. Approximately 90% of our associates are covered by 14 collective bargaining agreements (typically having four-year terms) negotiated with 12 different local unions. During fiscal 2004, collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 2,500 associates were ratified. During fiscal 2005, one collective bargaining agreement, covering approximately 6,000 associates, has been settled, subject to ratification, and three others, covering approximately 2,000 associates, will come up for renewal.
We routinely file reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including Forms 8-K, 10-K, 10-Q and DEF 14A. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.
We maintain an internet website on which we make available, free of charge, copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These materials may be accessed by going to our website at www.pathmark.com and selecting Investor Relations. Paper copies of these documents also may be obtained, free of charge, by writing to us at Pathmark Stores, Inc., Office of Investor Relations, M-409, 200 Milik Street, Carteret, NJ 07008.
Our industry is intensely competitive and the competition we encounter may have a negative impact on the prices we may charge for our products, our revenues and profitability. The supermarket business is highly competitive and is characterized by high inventory turnover and narrow profit margins. Results of operations are therefore sensitive to, and may be materially adversely impacted by, among other things, competitive pricing and promotional programs and competitor store openings. We compete with national and regional supermarkets, club stores, drug stores, convenience stores, discount merchandisers and other local retailers in the market areas we serve. Competition with these outlets is based on price, store location, advertising and promotion, product mix, quality and service. Some of these competitors may have greater financial resources, lower merchandise acquisition cost and lower operating expenses than we do, and we may be unable to compete successfully in the future.
8
We are concentrated in the New York New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas. We are vulnerable to economic downturns in that region, in addition to those that may affect the country as a whole, as well as natural and other catastrophic events that may impact that region. These events may adversely affect our sales which may lead to lower earnings, or losses, and may also adversely affect our future growth and expansion. Further, since we are concentrated in densely populated metropolitan areas, opportunities for future store expansion may be limited, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our renovation and expansion plans may not be successful, which may adversely affect our business and financial condition. A key to our business strategy has been, and will continue to be, the renovation and expansion of total selling square footage. Although we expect cash flows generated from operations, supplemented by the unused borrowing capacity under our bank credit facility and the availability of capital lease financing, will be sufficient to fund our capital renovation and expansion programs, sufficient funds may not be available. In addition, the greater financial resources of some of our competitors for real estate sites could adversely affect our ability to open new stores. The inability to renovate our existing stores, add new stores or increase the selling area of existing stores could adversely affect our business, our results of operations and our ability to compete successfully.
We rely on C&S for supply of a majority of our products. Pursuant to the terms of a long-term supply agreement, we rely on C&S for supply of substantially all of the products we sell other than direct store deliveries, general merchandise, pharmacy, health and beauty care and tobacco products. During fiscal 2004, the products supplied from C&S accounted for approximately 60% of all of our supermarket inventory purchases. Although we have not experienced difficulty in the supply of these products to date, supply interruptions by C&S may occur in the future. Any significant interruption in this supply stream, either as a result of disruptions at C&S or if the C&S agreement were terminated for any reason, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are affected by increasing labor and benefit costs and a competitive labor market and are subject to the risk of unionized labor disruptions. Our continued success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified associates. We compete with other businesses within our markets with respect to attracting and retaining qualified associates. A shortage of qualified associates may require us to enhance our wage and benefits package in order to compete effectively in the hiring and retention of qualified associates. Our labor and benefit costs may continue to increase, and such increases may not be recovered. If we fail to attract and retain qualified associates, to control our labor and benefit costs or to recover increased labor and benefit costs through increased prices, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In addition, approximately 90% of our associates are covered by collective bargaining agreements with local labor unions. Although we do not anticipate any difficulty renegotiating these contracts as they expire, a labor-related work stoppage by these unionized associates could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We face the risk of being held liable for environmental damages that may occur. Our operations subject us to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous materials and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Under some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, also known as CERCLA or the Superfund law, and similar state statues, responsibility for the entire cost of cleanup of a contaminated site can be imposed upon any current or former site owners or operators, or upon any party who sent waste to the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that lead to the contamination. From time to time we have been named as one of many potentially responsible parties at Superfund sites, although our share of liability has typically been de minimis. We believe we are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements. However, future developments such as more aggressive enforcement policies, new laws or discoveries of unknown conditions may require expenditures that may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
9
As of January 29, 2005, we operated 143 supermarkets located in New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Delaware as follows:
| State |
Number of Stores | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | 66 | |||
| New York | 55 | |||
| Pennsylvania | 18 | |||
| Delaware | 4 | |||
| Total | 143 | |||
Our 143 supermarkets have total square footage of approximately 7.5 million square feet with an aggregate selling area of approximately 5.5 million square feet. Fifteen of these stores are owned and the remaining 128 are leased. These supermarkets are either freestanding stores or are located in shopping centers. Forty-nine leases will expire through fiscal 2009. There are options to renew 48 of these leases the 49th store was closed in February 2005.
We lease our corporate headquarters in Carteret, New Jersey in premises totaling approximately 150,000 square feet in size. Our lease will expire in fiscal 2011. We have five five-year options remaining on this property.
All of the facilities owned by us are subject to mortgages. We plan to acquire leasehold or fee interests in any property on which new stores or other facilities are opened and will consider entering into sale-leaseback or mortgage transactions with respect to owned properties if we believe such transactions are financially advantageous.
We operate a 290,000 square foot leased general merchandise and health and beauty care products distribution center in Edison, New Jersey. Our lease will expire in fiscal 2009. We have two five-year options remaining on this property.
We are subject to claims and suits against us in the ordinary cause of our business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
None.
10
Market for Common Stock. Common stock and warrants are currently trading on the Nasdaq National Market under the ticker symbols PTMK and PTMKW, respectively. The following table represents the high and low closing prices for our common stock for each quarter in the two fiscal years ended January 29, 2005, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
| High |
Low | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2004: | ||||||||
| 1st quarter | $ | 9.19 | $ | 7.40 | ||||
| 2nd quarter | 8.83 | 6.45 | ||||||
| 3rd quarter | 7.43 | 3.50 | ||||||
| 4th quarter | 5.97 | 4.37 | ||||||
| Fiscal 2003: | ||||||||
| 1st quarter | $ | 7.48 | $ | 4.53 | ||||
| 2nd quarter | 8.25 | 6.72 | ||||||
| 3rd quarter | 9.07 | 6.26 | ||||||
| 4th quarter | 8.19 | 6.65 | ||||||
Holders of Record. As of April 28, 2005, there were 46 holders of record of our common stock; however, over 99% of the Companys outstanding common stock is held in street name by depositories or nominees on behalf of beneficial holders.
Dividends. We paid no cash dividends to our stockholders and do not currently anticipate paying cash dividends during fiscal 2005. We are prohibited from paying cash dividends to holders of our common stock under terms of our amended and restated $250 million senior secured credit facility dated as of October 1, 2004 (the Credit Agreement) with a group of lenders led by Fleet Retail Group, a Bank of America company. We are restricted from paying cash dividends to holders of our common stock under the indenture governing our $350 million 8.75% Senior Subordinated Notes, due 2012 (the Senior Subordinated Notes).
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans. For information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, please refer to Item 12, Equity Compensation Plans.
11
The following table presents selected historical financial and other data. The periods prior to our exit from bankruptcy have been designated Predecessor Company and the periods subsequent to that date have been designated Successor Company. The statement of operations data for the 52 weeks ended January 29, 2005, January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 and the balance sheet data as of January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004 are derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The statement of operations data for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2002, the 20 weeks ended February 3, 2001 and the 33 weeks ended September 16, 2000 and the balance sheet data as of February 1, 2003, February 2, 2002 and February 3, 2001 are derived from our audited financial statements not included in this report.
The following table (in millions, except per share amounts) should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our financial statements included elsewhere in this report:
| Successor Company (a) |
Predecessor Company (a) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2005 |
52 Weeks Ended January 31, 2004 |
52 Weeks Ended February 1, 2003 |
52 Weeks Ended February 2, 2002 |
20 Weeks Ended February 3, 2001 |
33 Weeks Ended September 16, 2000 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 3,978.5 | $ | 3,991.3 | $ | 3,937.7 | $ | 3,963.3 | $ | 1,493.7 | $ | 2,348.2 | |||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | (2,846.1 | ) | (2,852.6 | ) | (2,816.7 | ) | (2,855.6 | ) | (1,072.6 | ) | (1,688.5 | ) | |||||||||||
| Gross profit | 1,132.4 | 1,138.7 | 1,121.0 | 1,107.7 | 421.1 | 659.7 | |||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses (b) | (984.9 | ) | (953.9 | ) | (944.4 | ) | (920.4 | ) | (339.3 | ) | (549.7 | ) | |||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization (c) | (89.4 | ) | (84.0 | ) | (84.6 | ) | (76.7 | ) | (25.8 | ) | (48.0 | ) | |||||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets (d) | (309.0 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill amortization (d) | | | | (265.5 | ) | (98.5 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
| Reorganization income (e) | | | | | 7.4 | 359.4 | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating earnings (loss) | (250.9 | ) | 100.8 | 92.0 | (154.9 | ) | (35.1 | ) | 421.4 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense (f) | (67.0 | ) | (72.5 | ) | (65.1 | ) | (70.9 | ) | (27.7 | ) | (99.1 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of an accounting change | (317.9 | ) | 28.3 | 26.9 | (225.8 | ) | (62.8 | ) | 322.3 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit (provision) | 9.3 | (11.8 | ) | (13.0 | ) | (16.2 | ) | (14.7 | ) | (46.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of an accounting change | (308.6 | ) | 16.5 | 13.9 | (242.0 | ) | (77.5 | ) | 275.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net of tax (g) | | | (0.6 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | $ | (308.6 | ) | $ | 16.5 | $ | 13.3 | $ | (242.0 | ) | $ | (77.5 | ) | $ | 275.6 | ||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - basic (h) Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of an accounting change | $ | (10.26 | ) | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.46 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | (2.58 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net of tax | | | (0.02 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - basic | $ | (10.26 | ) | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.44 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | (2.58 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted (h) Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of an accounting change | $ | (10.26 | ) | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.46 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | (2.58 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net of tax | | | (0.02 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) per share - diluted | $ | (10.26 | ) | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.44 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | (2.58 | ) | ||||||||||
See notes on the following pages.
12
| Successor Company (a) |
Predecessor Company (a) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2005 |
52 Weeks Ended January 31, 2004 |
52 Weeks Ended February 1, 2003 |
52 Weeks Ended February 2, 2002 |
20 Weeks Ended February 3, 2001 |
33 Weeks Ended September 16, 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data (end of period): Total assets | $ | 1,253.4 | $ | 1,520.9 | $ | 1,522.6 | $ | 1,495.5 | $ | 1,725.4 | |||||||||||||
| Debt (excluding lease obligations) | 481.2 | 428.4 | 451.7 | 448.5 | 452.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lease obligations | 193.4 | 196.5 | 201.2 | 191.1 | 195.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total debt, including lease obligations | 674.6 | 624.9 | 652.9 | 639.6 | 647.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders' equity | 65.2 | 375.0 | 356.8 | 344.4 | 589.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other Data: Same-store sales increase (decrease) | (0.8 | )% | 1.2 | % | (1.7 | )% | 2.5 | % | 0.9 | % | (0.2 | )% | |||||||||||
| Capital expenditures, including property acquired under capital leases and technology investments | $ | 119.0 | $ | 79.3 | $ | 121.1 | $ | 130.5 | $ | 24.4 | $ | 42.5 | |||||||||||
| (a) | The Company completed its plan of reorganization (the Plan of Reorganization) and formally exited Chapter 11 on September 19, 2000 (the Plan Effective Date). Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company's direct and indirect parent companies merged with the Company, which became the surviving entity. Such mergers are being accounted for in the historical financial statements at historical cost in a manner similar to pooling-of-interests accounting. As a result, we adopted fresh-start reporting in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting By Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code (Fresh-Start Reporting). In connection with the adoption of Fresh-Start Reporting, a new entity had been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the implementation of Fresh-Start Reporting and the substantial debt reduction from the completion of the Plan of Reorganization, the Statement of Operations Data of the Successor Company and the Predecessor Company are not comparable. |
| (b) | Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) in fiscal 2004 are net of a $1.4 million credit to correct, on a cumulative basis, the accounting related to straight-line rent expense and long-term disability (see Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Summary of Operations) and a $1.5 million gain from the disposition of real estate. SG&A in fiscal 2003 included a $13.7 million gain from the disposition of real estate related to the assignment of two real estate leases and a $8.1 million charge related to our store labor buyout initiative and corporate headcount reduction program. Fiscal 2002 included a $2.0 million charge related to a store labor buyout program. |
| (c) | Depreciation and amortization in fiscal 2004 included a non-cash charge of $2.0 million to correct, on a cumulative basis, the amortization of certain leasehold improvements. |
| (d) | Goodwill of $798.0 million, resulting from Fresh-Start Reporting, was being amortized over three years. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company's goodwill balance is no longer being amortized for periods subsequent to fiscal 2001 but rather is being evaluated for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective with the beginning of fiscal 2002. Based on an independent evaluation of its fair value in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, the Company concluded that there was no impairment of its goodwill. |
13
| Based on the Company's valuation of its goodwill and long-lived assets performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $309.0 million. The goodwill impairment of $293.8 million, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, represents the write down of the carrying value of the Company's goodwill to its implied fair value and is due to the Company's declining operating performance in fiscal 2004 and the reduced valuation multiples in the retail grocery industry. Such negative factors are reflected in the Company's stock price and market capitalization. The long-lived assets impairment of $15.2 million represents the write downs of under-performing stores to their fair market values. |
| (e) | The Successor Company's reorganization income of $7.4 million for the 20 weeks ended February 3, 2001 represented a gain related to the difference between the settled lessor claims for rejected leases and the liability previously recorded for such claims. In the 33 weeks ended September 16, 2000, the Predecessor Company's reorganization income of $359.4 million represented income from the cancellation of debt related to the exchange of bond indebtedness, accrued interest for common stock and warrants in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization and a gain related to the difference between the estimated lessor claims for rejected leases and the liabilities previously recorded for such leases; such income was reduced by the write off of deferred financing costs related to the former bank credit facility and bond indebtedness subject to change, and the cost of employee retention bonuses and professional fees related to legal, accounting and consulting services directly attributable to the Plan of Reorganization. |
| (f) | Interest expense in fiscal 2004 included a write-off of deferred financing costs of $1.7 million related to the refinancing and pay down of the Company's 2000 Credit Agreement. Interest expense in fiscal 2003 included a derivative settlement charge of $3.7 million related to the termination and settlement of our $150 million interest rate zero-cost collar and the write off of deferred financing costs of $2.1 million as a result of the repayment of $153 million of our term loan primarily from proceeds from the issuance of an additional $150 million ($100 million on September 19, 2003 and $50 million on December 18, 2003) aggregate principal amount of Senior Subordinated Notes. Interest expense in fiscal 2003 also included the write off of deferred financing costs of $0.5 million as a result of the repayment in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 of $18 million of our term loan. Interest expense in fiscal 2002 included the reversal of an accrued interest liability of $2.2 million related to the favorable resolution of certain tax issues. |
| (g) | The Company adopted, as of the beginning of fiscal 2002, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. In adopting EITF Issue No. 02-16, vendor payments related to advertising reimbursements are recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold when both the required advertising is performed and the inventory is sold; prior to this change, these reimbursements were recorded as a reduction of advertising expense when the required advertising was performed. As a result, the Company recorded a charge, as of the first quarter of fiscal 2002, of $0.6 million, net of an income tax benefit of $0.4 million, for the cumulative effect of an accounting change. |
| (h) | The weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic were 30.1 million shares for fiscal 2004, for fiscal 2003 and for fiscal 2002 and 30.0 million shares for fiscal 2001 and for the 20 weeks ended February 3, 2001. The weighted-average number of shares outstanding - diluted were 30.1 million shares for fiscal 2004, 30.4 million shares for fiscal 2003 and for fiscal 2002 and 30.0 million shares for fiscal 2001 and for the 20 weeks ended February 3, 2001. For fiscal 2004, for fiscal 2001 and for the 20 weeks ended February 3, 2001, all stock options, warrants and restricted stock were excluded from the computation of weighted-average number of shares outstanding - diluted because their effect would have been anti-diluted. Data is not presented for the Predecessor Company due to the significant change in our capital structure. |
14
We are a leading supermarket chain in the densely populated New York - New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas, operating 143 supermarkets. These metropolitan areas contain over 10% of the population in the United States. All of our supermarkets are located within 100 miles of our corporate headquarters in Carteret, New Jersey and our Company-operated and outsourced distribution facilities. We design our stores to provide customers with one-stop shopping with a wide assortment of foods and general merchandise, as well as additional conveniences, including 130 in-store full-service pharmacies and a wide array of financial services offered by 83 in-store banks. We are a leading filler of prescriptions among our supermarket competitors in the New York - New Jersey and Philadelphia metropolitan areas and, through our agreements with Bank of America and New York Community Bank, we believe we are the leading provider of in-store banking services in our market area.
Our sales are derived from the retail sale of products at our stores. Internally, we look to a variety of indicators to evaluate our sales and gross profit performance, including, among others: comparable store sales; sales per store; sales per selling square foot; percentage of total sales by department; shrink and department gross margins. We focus on increasing comparable store sales, sales per selling square foot and sales per store through programs focused on greater customer service and better store-level execution, promotional activities and merchandising, as well as a continued focus on our high sanitation standards.
Our operating expenses are primarily incurred from selling, general and administrative costs. Over 70% of these costs are for labor and labor-related benefits. Internally, we focus on a variety of indicators to evaluate our expense performance, including, among others: labor costs, including labor hours and hourly labor rates and labor-related expenses such as welfare costs, pension costs, payroll taxes and workers' compensation costs. In fiscal 2003, we focused on controlling labor costs through a labor buyout initiative and implementation of a new time and attendance system. Selling, general and administrative expenses other than labor and labor-related costs include occupancy expenses, supplies and customer accident claims, among others. In fiscal 2004, we continued to focus on other expense control initiatives through our Best Ball and Focus Store programs in which best operating practices are implemented throughout our chain.
Major initiatives currently in place or implemented during fiscal 2004 include:
We believe these programs, together with overall operational improvements, resulted in increased sales metrics and improved productivity. These gains were largely offset by increases in pension and welfare costs.
15
As has been our practice in the past, we will continue to evaluate the profitability, strategic positioning, impact of potential competition, and sales growth potential of all our stores on an ongoing basis. We may, from time to time, make decisions regarding acquisitions, closures, relocations or renovations in accordance with such evaluations. On February 20, 2004, we purchased the remaining 67% of the common stock of Community Supermarket Corporation (CSC) that we did not already own from the other shareholder for $4.5 million in cash (the Acquisition). As a result of the Acquisition, the Company owns 100% of CSC (now known as Bergen Street Pathmark, Inc.). CSC has been a tenant under a lease for a supermarket in Newark, New Jersey (the Newark Store). During fiscal 2004, we opened three new stores, including the Newark Store which was previously included in our store count, closed two stores, one of which was operated by a joint venture, and completed 19 store renovations. During fiscal 2005, we plan to open two new stores, close two stores and complete eight store renovations. One of the new stores is a replacement for one of the stores being closed.
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations data (dollars in millions):
| 52 Weeks Ended |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 29, 2005 |
January 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||
| Amount |
% |
Amount |
% | |||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 3,978.5 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,991.3 | 100.0 | % | ||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 1,132.4 | 28.5 | % | $ | 1,138.7 | 28.5 | % | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | (984.9 | ) | (24.8 | ) | (953.9 | ) | (23.9 | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | (89.4 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (84.0 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets | (309.0 | ) | (7.8 | ) | | | ||||||||
| Operating earnings (loss) | (250.9 | ) | (6.3 | ) | 100.8 | 2.5 | ||||||||
| Interest expense | (67.0 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (72.5 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||
| Earnings (loss) before income taxes | (317.9 | ) | (8.0 | ) | 28.3 | 0.7 | ||||||||
| Income tax benefit (provision) | 9.3 | 0.2 | (11.8 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
| Net earnings (loss) | $ | (308.6 | ) | (7.8 | )% | $ | 16.5 | 0.4 | % | |||||
Sales. The following table sets forth data related to sales for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003: