Back to GetFilings.com




================================================================================

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

--------------------------

Form 10-K

|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002
Commission File Number 0-10763

-----------------------

Atrion Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 63-0821819
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

One Allentown Parkway,
Allen, Texas 75002
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (972) 390-9800

SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:


Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
NONE NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT:

Title of Class
Common Stock, $.10 Par Value

-----------------------

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES |X| NO |_|

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. |X|

The aggregate market value of the voting Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of
the registrant at March 3, 2003 was $32,886,105 based on the last reported sales
price of the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on such date.

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at March 3, 2003: 1,833,571.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference
information from the Company's definitive proxy statement relating to the 2003
annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed with the Commission not later than
120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

================================================================================




ATRION CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

--------

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
---- ----

PART I.........................................................................1

ITEM 1. BUSINESS........................................................1
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES......................................................9
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS...............................................9
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.............9
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY...........................................9

PART II.......................................................................10

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS............................................10
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA........................................12
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS............................12
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK....................................................17
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA....................18
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.........................40

PART III......................................................................40

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.............40
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.........................................40
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT.................................................40
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.................41
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES........................................41

PART IV.......................................................................41

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8--K......................................................41

SIGNATURES....................................................................45

EXHIBIT INDEX.................................................................49





ATRION CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Atrion Corporation ("Atrion" or the "Company") designs, develops, manufactures,
markets, sells and distributes products and components, primarily for the
medical and health care industry. The Company's products and services range from
ophthalmology and cardiovascular products to fluid delivery devices, contract
manufacturing and kitting services. The Company has a line of non-medical
components that are sold for use in aviation and marine safety products. The
Company also owns and maintains a gaseous oxygen pipeline and is engaged in
leasing activities. The pipeline and leasing activities are small and incidental
to the overall operations of the Company.

The Company's ophthalmic products accounted for 29 percent, 31 percent and 26
percent of net revenues for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Atrion is a
leading manufacturer of soft contact lens storage and disinfection cases. Atrion
produces a complete line of products which are compatible with all solutions for
use with soft or rigid gas permeable lenses. The Company also works with
customers to provide customized distribution of products. As a registered
pharmaceutical reseller, Atrion provides custom packaging, including component
purchasing as well as labeling. Warehousing as well as inventory management is
included in Atrion's complete kitting services. The Company also designs,
manufactures and markets the LacriCATH(R) product line, a line of balloon
catheters that is used in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in
children and adults. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction can cause a condition called
epiphora (chronic tearing). Children and adults affected by this condition
experience excessive and uncontrollable tearing and often encounter infection as
a result of the nasolacrimal blockage. LacriCATH balloon catheters are the only
balloon catheters with Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approval for use in
this application.

The Company's cardiovascular products accounted for 22 percent, 20 percent and
22 percent of net revenues for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. At the heart
of the Company's cardiovascular products is the MPS(R) Myocardial Protection
System ("MPS"), a proprietary technology that delivers essential fluids and
medications to the heart during open-heart surgery. The MPS integrates key
functions relating to the delivery of solutions to the heart, such as varying
the rate and ratio of oxygenated blood, crystalloid, potassium and other
additives, and controlling temperature, pressure and other variables to allow
simpler, more flexible management of this process indicating improved patient
outcomes. The MPS is the only device used in open-heart surgery that allows for
the mixing of drugs into the bloodstream without diluting the blood. The MPS
employs advanced pump, temperature control and microprocessor technologies and
includes a line of disposable products. The Company also develops, manufactures
and markets other cardiovascular products which consist principally of the


-1-



following: cardiac surgery vacuum relief valves; Retract-O-Tape(R) silicone
vessel loops for retracting and occluding vessels in minimally invasive surgical
procedures; and Clean-Cut(R) rotating aortic punch, used in heart bypass surgery
to make a precision opening in the heart for attachment of the bypass vessels.

The Company's fluid delivery products accounted for 24 percent, 24 percent and
25 percent of net revenues for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company
develops, manufactures and markets several specialized intravenous fluid
delivery tubing sets and accessories. The intravenous fluid delivery line
includes more than 50 distinct models used for complex therapy procedures
employed in anesthesia administration, intravenous feeding, intensive care and
cancer therapy. The Company is an industry leader in the manufacturing of
medical tubing clamps. These products include clamps offering such features as
six match-to-fit sizes with compatibility to all grades of medical tubing,
molding in a variety of materials, and compatibility with different
sterilization processes. The Company has developed a wide variety of luer
syringe check valves and one-way valves designed to fill, hold and release
controlled amounts of fluids or gasses on demand for use in various intubation,
catheter and other applications. The Company's swabbable luer valve was
developed as a substitute for needle ports in IV applications. These valves
provide an economical replacement for needle access ports in drug delivery and
IV applications.

The Company's other medical and non-medical products and services accounted for
25 percent, 25 percent and 27 percent of net revenues for 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. Atrion is the leading manufacturer of valves and inflation devices
used in marine and aviation safety products. The Company manufactures valves,
tubing flanges, right angle connectors, and closures for life vests, life rafts,
inflatable boats, inflatable toys, survival equipment, and other inflatable
structures. Atrion also produces many one-way and two-way "Breather" valves for
use on electronics cases, munitions cases, pressure vessels, lift bags, space
suits, mattresses, escape slides, and any other application requiring pressure
relief. Atrion provides contract manufacturing services for other major original
equipment manufacturers of medical devices. The Company has the ability to take
a product from concept through design, development and prototype all the way to
full-scale production manufacturing. Core competencies include engineering
product design & development, prototyping, assembly, insert & injection molding,
automation, RF-welding, ultrasonic & heat sealing, and sterile packaging.

The Company designs, manufactures and markets a line of pressure monitoring kits
for use in labor and delivery procedures and various critical care applications.
The Company's intrauterine pressure monitoring devices are used to determine
pressure within the mother's uterus primarily during high risk labor and
delivery. The Company's ACTester product line consists of instrumentation and
associated disposables used to measure the activated clotting time of blood.

The Company owns and maintains a 22-mile high-pressure steel pipeline in north
Alabama that is leased to an industrial gas producer that transports gaseous
oxygen to one of its customers.

Marketing and Major Customers

The Company markets components to other equipment manufacturers for
incorporation in their products and sells finished devices to physicians,
hospitals, clinics and other treatment centers. Sales managers working with a
direct sales force, commissioned sales agents, and distributors handle these
sales. The Company's sales managers work closely with major customers in
designing and developing products to meet customer requirements. The Company
sponsors


-2-



scientific symposia as a means of disseminating product information and
participates in industry trade shows.

During 2002, approximately 25 percent of the Company's total revenues were from
sales to parties outside the United States. These sales are marketed primarily
by distributors in over fifty countries outside the United States.

The Company offers customer service, training and education, and technical
support such as field service, spare parts, maintenance and repair for certain
of its products. The Company periodically advertises its products in trade
journals. The Company routinely attends and participates in trade shows
throughout the United States and internationally. The Company provides
supportive literature on the benefits of its business products.

During 2002, Novartis was the Company's only customer accounting for more than
10 percent of the Company's revenues, with various products sold to several
divisions of Novartis accounting for approximately 12 percent of the Company's
revenues. The loss of this customer would have a material adverse impact on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Manufacturing

The Company's medical products and other components are produced at plants in
Arab, Alabama, St. Petersburg, Florida and Allen, Texas. The plants in Arab and
St. Petersburg both utilize plastic injection molding and specialized assembly
as their primary manufacturing processes. The Company's other manufacturing
processes consist of the assembly of standard and custom component parts and the
testing of completed products.

The Company devotes significant attention to quality assurance. Its quality
assurance measures begin with the suppliers which participate in the Company's
supplier quality assurance program. It continues at the manufacturing level
where many components are assembled in a "clean room" environment designed and
maintained to reduce product exposure to particulate matter. Products are tested
throughout the manufacturing process for adherence to specifications. Most
finished products are then shipped to outside processors for sterilization by
radiation or ethylene oxide gas. After sterilization, the products are
quarantined and tested before they are shipped to customers.

Skills of assembly workers required for the manufacture of medical products are
similar to those required in typical assembly operations. The Company currently
employs workers with the skills necessary for its assembly operations and
believes that additional workers with these skills are readily available in the
areas where the Company's plants are located.

The Company's medical device operations are ISO9001 and EN46001 certified and
are subject to FDA jurisdiction.

Research and Development

The Company believes that a well-targeted research and development program is an
essential part of the Company's activities, and the Company is currently engaged
in a number of research and development projects. The objective of the Company's
program is to develop new products in the Company's current product lines,
improve current products and develop new product


-3-



lines. Recent major development projects include, but are not limited to, a
needleless injection site product designed to eliminate the use of needles by
health care providers, a product designed for safe needle containment, a balloon
catheter for use during balloon incisional dacryocystorhinosotomy surgery, a new
inflator system for use with recreational and commercial life vests, an
anti-retrograde flow check valve for medical infusion and fluid delivery
applications and a silicone vessel loop for retracting and occluding vessels
with improved securement capabilities. The Company expects to incur additional
research and development expenses in 2003 for various projects, including
further development of features and functionality of the MPS.

The Company's consolidated research and development expenditures for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $2,180,000, $1,911,000, and
$2,054,000 respectively.

Availability of Supplies and Raw Materials

The Company subcontracts with various suppliers to provide it with the quantity
of component parts necessary to assemble its products. Almost all of these
components are available from a number of different suppliers, although certain
components are purchased from single sources that manufacture these components
from the Company's toolings. The Company believes that there are satisfactory
alternative sources for single-sourced components, although a sudden disruption
in supply from one of these suppliers could adversely affect the Company's
ability to deliver finished products on time. The Company owns the molds used
for production of a majority of its components. Consequently, in the event of
supply disruption, the Company would be able to fabricate its own components or
subcontract with another supplier, albeit after a delay in the production
process. The Company purchases various types of high-grade resins and other
components for its manufacturing processes from various suppliers. The resins
are readily available materials and, while the Company is selective in its
choice of suppliers, it believes that there are no significant restrictions or
limitations on supply.

Patents and License Agreements

The commercial success of the Company is dependent, in part, on its ability to
continue to develop patentable products, to preserve its trade secrets and to
operate without infringing or violating the proprietary rights of third parties.
The Company currently has 186 active patents and patent applications pending on
products that are either being sold or are in development. The Company receives
royalty payments on three patents that are licensed to outside parties. The
Company pays royalties to outside parties for two patents. All of these patents
and patents pending relate to current products being sold by the Company or to
products in evaluation stages.

Others may challenge the validity of any patents issued to the Company, and the
Company could encounter legal and financial difficulties in enforcing its patent
rights against infringers. In addition, there can be no assurance that other
technologies cannot or will not be developed or that patents will not be
obtained by others which would render the Company's patents less valuable or
obsolete. Although the Company does not believe that patents are the sole
determinant in the commercial success of its products, the loss of a significant
percentage of its patents or of its patents relating to a specific major product
line could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.


-4-



The Company has developed technical knowledge which, although non-patentable, is
considered by the Company to be significant in enabling it to compete. However,
the proprietary nature of such knowledge may be difficult to protect. The
Company has entered into agreements with key employees prohibiting them from
disclosing any confidential information or trade secrets of the Company. In
addition, these agreements also provide that any inventions or discoveries
relating to the business of the Company by these individuals will be assigned to
the Company and become the Company's sole property.

The medical device industry is characterized by extensive intellectual property
litigation, and companies in the medical products industry sometimes use
intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage. Intellectual
property litigation, regardless of outcome, is often complex and expensive, and
the outcome of this litigation is generally difficult to predict. While the
Company is not currently involved in any significant litigation, an adverse
determination in any such proceeding could subject the Company to significant
liabilities to third parties, or require the Company to seek licenses from third
parties or pay royalties that may be substantial. Furthermore, there can be no
assurance that necessary licenses would be available to the Company on
satisfactory terms or at all. Accordingly, an adverse determination in a
judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses
could prevent the Company from manufacturing or selling certain of its products,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.

Competition

Depending on the product and the nature of the project, the Company competes on
the basis of its ability to provide engineering and design expertise, quality,
service, product and price. As such, successful competitors must have technical
strength, responsiveness and scale. The Company believes that its expertise and
reputation for quality medical products have allowed it to compete favorably
with respect to each such factor and to maintain long-term relationships with
its customers. However, in many of the Company's markets, the Company competes
with numerous other companies that have substantially greater financial
resources and engage in substantially more research and development activities
than the Company. Furthermore, innovations in surgical techniques or medical
practices could have the effect of reducing or eliminating market demand for one
or more of the Company's products.

Numerous companies compete with the Company in the sale of health care products.
These markets are dominated by established manufacturers that have broader
product lines, greater distribution capabilities, substantially greater capital
resources and larger marketing, research and development staffs and facilities
than the Company. Many of these competitors offer broader product lines within
the specific product market and in the general field of medical devices and
supplies. Broad product lines give many of the Company's cardiovascular and
fluid delivery competitors the ability to negotiate exclusive, long-term medical
device supply contracts and, consequently, the ability to offer comprehensive
pricing of their competing products. By offering a broader product line in the
general field of medical devices and supplies, competitors may also have a
significant advantage in marketing competing products to group purchasing
organizations, HMOs and other managed care organizations that are increasingly
seeking to reduce costs through centralization of purchasing functions. In
addition, the Company's competitors may use price reductions to preserve market
share in their product markets.


-5-



Depending on the product and the nature of the project, the Company competes in
contract manufacturing on the basis of its ability to provide engineering and
design expertise as well as on the basis of product and price. The Company
frequently designs products for a customer or potential customer prior to
entering into long-term development and manufacturing agreements with that
customer. Because these products are somewhat limited in number and normally are
only a component of the ultimate product sold by its customers, the Company is
dependent on its ability to meet the requirements of those major health care
companies and must continually be attentive to the need to manufacture such
products at competitive prices and in compliance with strict manufacturing
standards. The Company competes with a number of contract manufacturers of
medical products. Most of these competitors are small companies that do not
offer the breadth of services offered by the Company to its customers.

The Company competes in the market for inflation devices used in marine and
aviation equipment. The Company is the dominant provider in this market area.

Government Regulation

Products

The manufacture and sale of medical products are subject to regulation by
numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA, and corresponding
foreign agencies. The research and development, manufacturing, promotion,
marketing and distribution of medical products in the United States are governed
by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the regulations promulgated
thereunder ("FDC Act and Regulations"). The Company's medical product
subsidiaries and certain of their customers are subject to inspection by the FDA
for compliance with such regulations and procedures. The Company's medical
products manufacturing facilities are subject to regulation by the FDA.

The FDA has traditionally pursued a rigorous enforcement program to ensure that
regulated entities comply with the FDC Act and Regulations. A company not in
compliance may face a variety of regulatory actions, including warning letters,
product detentions, device alerts, mandatory recalls or field corrections,
product seizures, total or partial suspension of production, injunctive actions
or civil penalties and criminal prosecutions of the company or responsible
employees, officers and directors. The Company's medical products subsidiaries
and certain of their customers are subject to these inspections. The Company
believes that it has met all FDA requirements, and it also believes that its
medical device OEM customers are in compliance; however, if the Company or its
OEM medical device customers should fail the FDA inspections, it could have a
material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.

Under the FDA's requirements, if a manufacturer can establish that a
newly-developed device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed
device, the manufacturer may seek marketing clearance from the FDA to market the
device by filing a 510(k) premarket notification with the FDA. The 510(k)
premarket notification must be supported by data establishing the claim of
substantial equivalence to the satisfaction of the FDA. The process of obtaining
a 510(k) clearance typically can take several months to a year or longer. If
substantial equivalence cannot be established or if the FDA determines that the
device requires a more rigorous review, the FDA will require that the
manufacturer submit a premarket approval ("PMA") that must be reviewed and
approved by the FDA prior to marketing and sale of the device in the United
States. The process of obtaining a PMA can be expensive, uncertain and lengthy,
frequently


-6-



requiring anywhere from one to several or more years from the date of FDA
submission. Both a 510(k) and a PMA, if granted, may include significant
limitations on the indicated uses for which a product may be marketed. FDA
enforcement policy strictly prohibits the promotion of approved medical devices
for unapproved uses. In addition, product approvals can be withdrawn for failure
to comply with regulatory requirements or the occurrence of unforeseen problems
following initial marketing. The Company believes that it and all of its current
medical device OEM customers are in compliance with these rules; however, there
is no assurance that the Company or its OEM customers are now, or will continue
to be, in compliance with such rules. If the Company or its customers do not
meet these standards, the Company's financial performance could be adversely
affected. Furthermore, delays by the FDA in approving a product or a customer's
product could delay the Company's expectations for future sales of certain
products.

Certain aviation and marine safety products are also subject to regulation by
the Coast Guard and the Federal Aviation Administration and similar
organizations in foreign countries which regulate the safety of marine and
aviation equipment.

Third-Party Reimbursement and Cost Containment

In the United States, health care providers, including hospitals and physicians,
that purchase medical products for treatment of their patients generally rely on
third-party payors, principally federal Medicare, state Medicaid and private
health insurance plans, to reimburse all or a part of the costs and fees
associated with the procedures performed using these products. Accordingly, the
Company is dependent, in part, upon the ability of health care providers to
obtain satisfactory reimbursement from third-party payors for medical procedures
in which the Company's products are used. Third-party payors may deny
reimbursement if they determine that a prescribed product has not received
appropriate regulatory clearances or approvals, is not used in accordance with
cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payor, or is experimental,
unnecessary or inappropriate.

Reimbursement systems in international markets vary significantly by country and
by region within some countries, and reimbursement approvals must be obtained on
a country-by-country basis. Many international markets have government-managed
health care systems that control reimbursement for new products and procedures.
In most markets, there are private insurance systems as well as
government-managed systems. Market acceptance of the Company's products in
international markets depends, in part, on the availability and level of
reimbursement. Implementation of health care reforms in these markets may limit
the price of, or the level at which reimbursement is provided for, the Company's
products.

Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for hospitals is generally based on a fixed
amount for admitting a patient with a specific diagnosis. Because of this fixed
reimbursement method, hospitals may seek to use less costly methods in treating
Medicare and Medicaid patients. Frequently, reimbursement is reduced to reflect
the availability of a new procedure or technique, and as a result hospitals are
generally willing to implement new cost saving technologies before these
downward adjustments take effect. Likewise, because the rate of reimbursement
for certain physicians who perform certain procedures has been and may in the
future be reduced, physicians may seek greater cost efficiency in treatment to
minimize any negative impact of reduced reimbursement. Third-party payors may
challenge the prices charged for medical products and services and may deny
reimbursement if they determine


-7-



that a device was not used in accordance with cost-effective treatment methods
as determined by the payor, was experimental or was used for an unapproved
application.

Failure by hospitals and other users of the Company's products to obtain
reimbursement from third-party payors, or adverse changes in government and
private third-party payors' policies toward reimbursement for procedures
employing the Company's products, could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, the
Company is unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if any,
relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement
may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation
would have on the Company.

The Company anticipates that Congress, state legislatures and the private sector
will continue to review and assess alternative health care delivery and payment
systems. Potential approaches that have been considered include mandated basic
health care benefits, controls on health care spending through limitations on
the growth of private health insurance premiums and Medicare and Medicaid
spending, the creation of large insurance purchasing groups, price controls and
other fundamental changes to the health care delivery system. The Company cannot
predict what impact the adoption of any federal or state health care reform
measures, future private sector reform or market forces may have on its
business.

Product Liability and Insurance

The design, manufacture and marketing of products of the types the Company
produces entail an inherent risk of product liability claims. A problem with one
of the Company's products could result in product liability claims or a recall
of, or safety alert or advisory notice relating to, the product. While the
amount of product liability insurance the Company maintains has been adequate in
the past, the Company cannot assure that the amount of insurance will be
adequate to satisfy future claims or that the Company will be able to obtain
insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts.

Advisory Board

Several physicians and perfusionists with substantial expertise in the field of
myocardial protection serve as Clinical Advisors for the Company. These Clinical
Advisors have assisted in the identification of the market need for MPS and its
subsequent design and development. Members of the Company's management and
scientific and technical staff from time to time consult with these Clinical
Advisors to better understand the technical and clinical requirements of the
cardiovascular surgical team and product functionality needed to meet those
requirements. The Company anticipates that these Clinical Advisors will play a
similar role with respect to other products and may assist the Company in
educating other physicians in the use of the MPS and related products.

Certain of the Clinical Advisors are employed by academic institutions and may
have commitments to, or consulting or advisory agreements with, other entities
that may limit their availability to the Company. The Clinical Advisors may also
serve as consultants to other medical device companies. The Clinical Advisors
are not expected to devote more than a small portion of their time to the
Company.


-8-



People

At February 28, 2003, the Company had 420 full-time employees. Employee
relations are good and there has been no work stoppage due to labor
disagreements. None of the Company's employees is represented by any labor
union.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The headquarters of the Company are located in Allen, Texas. The Company
maintains office, manufacturing and warehousing facilities in Texas, Alabama and
Florida. The Company-owned Texas facility consists of a 108,000-square-foot
office, manufacturing and warehouse building situated on approximately 14.8
acres in Allen, Texas, and 4.3 acres adjacent to such property which are
unimproved. The Company-owned Alabama facilities consist of three office
buildings and a manufacturing facility that are located on a 67-acre site in
Arab, Alabama. The three office buildings house administrative, engineering and
design operations, and the manufacturing facility contains approximately 112,000
square feet of manufacturing space. The Florida facility has a ten-year
operating lease that commenced in May 1996. This manufacturing and
administrative facility consists of approximately 72,000 square feet and is
located on a 7-acre site in St. Petersburg, Florida.

The Company owns and maintains a 22-mile high-pressure steel pipeline that
transports gaseous oxygen between Decatur and Courtland, Alabama.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There were no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of
its subsidiaries was a party or of which any of their property was the subject
as of February 28, 2003.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of 2002, no matters were submitted to a vote of
security holders.

Executive Officers of the Company

Name Age Title
---- --- -----

Emile A. Battat 65 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and Chairman or President of all
subsidiaries



Jeffery Strickland 44 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company and Vice
President or Secretary-Treasurer of all
subsidiaries

The persons who are identified as executive officers of the Company currently
serve as officers of the Company and all subsidiaries. The officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries are elected annually by the respective Boards of
Directors of the Company and its subsidiaries at


-9-



the first meeting of such Boards of Directors held after the annual meetings of
stockholders of such entities. Accordingly, the terms of office of the current
officers of the Company and its subsidiaries will expire at the time such
meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company and its subsidiaries are held,
which is anticipated to be in May 2003.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any officer and any other
person pursuant to which the officer was elected. There are no family
relationships between any of the executive officers or directors.

There have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and
no judgments or injunctions material to the evaluation of the ability and
integrity of any executive officers during the past five years.

Brief Account of Business Experience During the Past Five Years

Mr. Battat has been a director of the Company since 1987 and has served as
Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 1998. Mr. Battat has served
as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Chairman or
President of all subsidiaries since October 1998. From March 1994 to October
1998, Mr. Battat served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Piedmont
Enterprises, Inc., a privately held consulting firm.

Mr. Strickland has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since February 1, 1997 and has served as
Vice President or Secretary-Treasurer for all the Company's subsidiaries since
January 1997.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market (Symbol
ATRI). As of March 3, 2003, the Company had approximately 1,400 stockholders,
including beneficial owners holding shares in "nominee" or "street" name. The
high and low closing prices as reported by Nasdaq for each quarter of 2001 and
2002 are shown below.

Year Ended
December 31, 2001: High Low
- ------------------ ---- ---
First Quarter $ 15.88 $ 13.75
Second Quarter $ 25.74 $ 15.19
Third Quarter $ 25.70 $ 19.51
Fourth Quarter $ 38.05 $ 23.39

Year Ended
December 31, 2002: High Low
- ------------------ ---- ---
First Quarter $ 38.14 $ 26.91
Second Quarter $ 32.51 $ 26.82
Third Quarter $ 28.09 $ 18.31
Fourth Quarter $ 23.90 $ 17.31


-10-



No dividends were declared or paid during 2002, and the Company presently has no
plans to pay cash dividends. See Item 7: "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

The following table provides certain information about securities authorized for
issuance under the Company's equity compensation plan as of December 31, 2002:



Number of securities
Number of remaining available for
securities to be future issuance under
issued upon Weighted-average equity
exercise of exercise price of compensation plans
outstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securities
warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a))
Plan Category (a) (b) (c)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders 452,050 $15.94 81,984(1)

Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders 15,300(2) $12.25 --
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total 467,350 $15.82 81,984
------------------------------------------------------------------------


(1) Consists of shares of the Company's common stock authorized for issuance
under the Company's 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, which provides for the grant of
Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights,
Restricted Stock and Performance Shares. The number of shares available for
issuance under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan increases by the number of shares
subject to options granted under the Company's 1990 Stock Option Plan and 1994
Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan that lapse, expire, terminate or are canceled.
The number of shares available for issuance under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan
is also subject to equitable adjustment by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors in the event of any change in the Company's capitalization,
including, without limitation, a stock dividend or stock split.


(2) Consists of shares of the Company's common stock authorized for issuance
upon exercise of nonqualified options granted to certain of the Company's
clinical advisors on February 10, 1998. Such options vest as follows: one-third
one year from the grant date, one-third three years from the grant date, and
one-third five years from the grant date. All options so granted expire ten
years from the grant date. The exercise price of the options is the closing
price on the Nasdaq National Market of the Company's common stock on the grant
date.


-11-



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except per share amounts)



- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revenues $59,533 $57,605 $51,447 $49,917 $43,397

Income from continuing
operations 4,065 4,262 2,663 2,128 1,478

Net income 2,589 (a) 9,754 (b) 2,792 2,293 2,140

Total assets 60,807 65,555 63,690 64,640 60,415

Long-term debt 10,337 17,125 7,400 10,417 --

Income from continuing
operations, per basic share 2.37 2.10 1.30 .82 .46

Net income per basic share 1.51 (a) 4.80 (b) 1.36 .88 .67

Dividends per share -- -- -- -- --

Average basic shares outstanding 1,711 2,033 2,047 2,593 3,203
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(a) Includes a $1.6 million after-tax goodwill impairment charge ($ .96 per
share) (see Note 2)

(b) Includes a $5.5 million after-tax gain ($ 2.70 per share) from
discontinued operations (See Note 3)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

The Company's income from continuing operations was $4.1 million, or $2.37 per
basic and $2.18 per diluted share, in 2002, compared to income from continuing
operations of $4.3 million, or $2.10 per basic and $1.88 per diluted share, in
2001 and $2.7 million, or $1.30 per basic and $1.25 per diluted share, in 2000.
Net income, including discontinued operations and cumulative effect of
accounting change, totaled $2.6 million, or $1.51 per basic and $1.39 per
diluted share, in 2002, compared with $9.8 million, or $4.80 per basic and $4.30
per diluted share, in 2001 and $2.8 million, or $1.36 per basic and $1.31 per
diluted share, in 2000. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. The required adoption of
SFAS No. 142 as discussed in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements included herein is considered a change in accounting principle and
the cumulative effect of adopting this standard resulted in a $1.6 million, or
$0.96 per basic and $0.88 per diluted share, non-cash, after-tax charge in 2002.

Operating revenues were $59.5 million in 2002, compared with $57.6 million in
2001 and $51.4 million in 2000. The 3 percent revenue increase in 2002 over the
prior year reflected increases in revenues primarily in products used by
hospitals and surgeons partially offset by a decline in sales of contact lens
disinfection cases that the Company's customers distribute through retail
outlets. The areas which realized the greatest percentage increases in 2002 were
the


-12-



Company's fluid delivery products, kitting operations and cardiovascular
products. The 12 percent revenue increase in 2001 over 2000 reflected increases
in revenues in most of the Company's major product lines. The areas which
realized the greatest percentage increases during 2001 were the Company's
ophthalmology products, kitting operations and cardiovascular products.

The Company's cost of goods sold was $39.2 million in 2002, compared with $35.8
million in 2001 and $31.6 million in 2000. The increase in cost of goods sold
for 2002 over 2001 was primarily related to a shift in product mix to products
with lower gross margins and the increase in revenues discussed above. The
increase in cost of goods sold for 2001 over 2000 was primarily related to the
increased sales mentioned above and increased costs of a specialty resin used in
one of the Company's major products. This increase was caused by a temporary
shortage of supply of the resin caused by an explosion at the supplier's plant.
This problem was resolved at the end of 2001 and prices for this resin have
since returned to normal.

Gross profit was $20.3 million in 2002, compared with $21.8 million in 2001 and
$19.9 million in 2000. The decrease in gross profit in 2002 from 2001 was
primarily due to the above-mentioned shift in product mix to products with lower
gross margins. The increase in gross profit in 2001 over 2000 was primarily
related to increased revenues. The Company's gross profit in 2002 was 34 percent
of revenues compared with 38 percent of revenues in 2001 and 39 percent of
revenues in 2000. The decline in gross profit percentage in 2002 from the prior
year was primarily due to the above-mentioned shift in product mix. The decline
in gross profit percentage in 2001 from the prior year was primarily due to
increased costs of a specialty resin used in one of the Company's major products
mentioned above.

Operating expenses were $14.5 million in 2002, compared with $16.0 million in
2001 and $15.6 million in 2000. The decrease in operating expenses in 2002 from
2001 was primarily attributable to decreased general and administrative ("G&A")
and selling ("Selling") expenses partially offset by increased research and
development ("R&D") expenses. G&A expenses for 2002 were $857,000 lower than G&A
expenses for 2001, primarily due to a decrease in amortization expense as a
result of a reduction in goodwill amortization in 2002 due to the adoption of
SFAS No. 142 as discussed in Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements included herein. In 2002, G&A expense savings from restructuring
certain of the Company's operations and reduced compensation and outside
services were partially offset by increases in insurance costs. The decrease in
Selling expenses of $905,000 in 2002 from 2001 was primarily related to the
full-year impact of restructuring the sales force which began in 2001, and
continuing cost reduction efforts. R&D expenses were $269,000 higher for 2002
compared with 2001. This increase was primarily related to increased product
development activities. The increase in operating expenses in 2001 from 2000 was
primarily attributable to increased G&A expenses offset partially by reductions
in Selling expenses and, to a lesser extent, R&D expenses. G&A expenses for 2001
were $1.3 million higher than the prior year primarily as a result of higher
spending on outside services, compensation and benefit programs. The decrease in
Selling expenses of $762,000 in 2001 from 2000 was primarily related to
restructuring of the sales force and reduced travel-related expenses. R&D
expenses were $143,000 lower for 2001 compared with 2000, primarily as a result
of reduced spending on outside services and qualification materials.

The Company's operating income for 2002 was $5.8 million, compared with $5.8
million in 2001 and $4.2 million in 2000. Revenue growth, cost containment and
cost reduction activities during 2002 were offset by lower gross margins, which
combined to cause relatively flat operating


-13-



results. Revenue growth, cost containment and cost reduction activities were the
major contributors to the operating income improvements during 2001.

Interest expense was $432,000 in 2002, compared to $300,000 in 2001 and $748,000
in 2000. The increase in 2002 is primarily related to higher average borrowings
during 2002 as compared with 2001 partially offset by a significant reduction in
interest rates in 2002. The higher average borrowing during 2002 is primarily
related to borrowing of funds under the Company's revolving credit facility in
late December 2001 in connection with its repurchase of outstanding common stock
of the Company under a tender offer. The reduction in 2001 from 2000 was
primarily related to lower interest rates and the Company's lower average
borrowing level in 2001. The other income in 2001 was primarily related to the
Company's one-time pre-tax gain of $428,000 on the sale of a patent.

Income tax expense in 2002 totaled $1,403,000, compared with $1,803,000 in 2001
and $923,000 in 2000. The effective tax rates for 2002, 2001 and 2000 were 25.7
percent, 29.7 percent and 25.7 percent, respectively. Benefits from tax
incentives for exports and R&D expenditures totaled $408,000 in 2002, $404,000
in 2001 and $395,000 in 2000. The lower effective tax rate in 2002 is primarily
a result of benefits from tax incentives for exports and R&D expenditures being
a larger percentage of taxable income in 2002 than in 2001 and the utilization
of capital loss carryforwards in 2002. The higher effective tax rate in 2001 is
primarily a result of benefits from tax incentives for exports and R&D
expenditures being a lesser percentage of taxable income in 2001 than in 2000.

The Company believes that 2003 revenues will be higher than 2002 revenues and
that the cost of goods sold, gross profit, operating income and income from
continuing operations will each be higher in 2003 than in 2002. The Company
further believes that it will have continuing growth in most of its product
lines in 2003, complemented by the introduction of new products, and that it
will have annual growth in earnings per share from continuing operations of 15
percent or more for at least the next several years.

Discontinued Operations

During 1997, the Company sold all of its natural gas operations. The financial
statements presented herein reflect the Company's natural gas operations as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. The financial statements also
reflect an after-tax gain on disposal of these discontinued operations of $.2
million, or $.10 per basic and $.09 per diluted share, in 2002; $5.5 million, or
$2.70 per basic and $2.42 per diluted share, in 2001; and $.1 million, or $.06
per basic and diluted share, in 2000.

In addition to the initial consideration received in 1997 upon the sale of the
natural gas operations, certain annual contingent deferred payments of up to
$250,000 per year were to be paid to the Company over an eight-year period which
began in 1999, with the amount paid each year to be dependent upon revenues
received by the purchaser from certain gas transportation contracts. The Company
received deferred payments of $250,000 each, before tax, from the purchaser in
April 2002, 2001 and 2000 which are reflected in each year as a gain from
discontinued operations of $165,000, net of tax. The 2001 gain also includes a
$5,327,000 non-cash gain from reversal of a reserve established when the Company
disposed of its natural gas operations in 1997. This reversal in the third
quarter of 2001


-14-



followed the resolution of an outstanding contingency related to the sale of
those assets. The 2000 gain reflected above is net of a $36,000 loss, net of
tax, related to the sale of certain residual properties associated with the
Company's natural gas operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has a $25 million revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility")
with a regional bank to be utilized for the funding of operations and for major
capital projects or acquisitions subject to certain limitations and restrictions
(see Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Borrowings under the
Credit Facility bear interest that is payable monthly at 30-day, 60-day or
90-day LIBOR, as selected by the Company, plus one percent. At December 31,
2002, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $10.3 million under the Credit
Facility. The Credit Facility, which expires November 12, 2004, and may be
extended under certain circumstances, contains various restrictive covenants,
none of which is expected to impact the Company's liquidity or capital
resources.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $353,000,
compared with $542,000 at December 31, 2001. The Company had long-term debt as
of December 31, 2002, of $10.3 million compared with $17.1 million as of
December 31, 2001. The decrease in long-term debt in 2002 from 2001 is primarily
attributable to the Company's use of cash flows from continuing operations to
reduce its borrowing level. The long-term debt at December 31, 2001, was
primarily related to a $17.4 million repurchase by the Company of outstanding
common stock of the Company under a tender offer in December 2001. Cash provided
by continuing operations increased to $9.9 million in 2002, compared to $8.7
million in 2001 and $7.4 million in 2000. Capital expenditures for property,
plant and equipment for continuing operations totaled $3.3 million in 2002,
compared with $2.8 million in 2001 and $3.3 million in 2000.

The table below summarizes debt, lease and other minimum contractual obligations
outstanding at December 31, 2002:

Payments due by year
-------------------------------------------------
Contractual Obligations Total 2003 2004 2005 2006
-------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)

Credit Facility $10,337 -- $ 75 $916 $9,346

Operating Leases $ 1,393 $396 $409 $422 $ 166

The payment schedule for the Credit Facility assumes at maturity, November 2004,
the Company would convert this outstanding debt to a two year term note as
allowed by the terms of the agreement.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. The required
adoption of SFAS No. 142 is considered a change in accounting principle and the
cumulative effect of adopting this standard resulted in a $1.6 million non-cash,
after-tax charge in 2002. This charge had no effect on the Company's cash
position or the balance of its outstanding indebtedness,


-15-



and it did not have any impact on earnings from continuing operations in 2002.
As previously discussed, the Company recorded a non-cash gain from discontinued
operations during 2001 related to the reversal of a reserve established when the
Company disposed of its natural gas operations in 1997. This gain had no effect
on the Company's cash position or the balance of its outstanding indebtedness,
and it did not have any impact on earnings from continuing operations in 2001.

The Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flows
from operations and borrowings available under the Company's Credit Facility,
supplemented, if necessary, with equity or debt financing, which the Company
believes would be available, will be sufficient to fund the Company's cash
requirements for at least the foreseeable future.

Companies sometimes establish legal entities for a specific business transaction
or activity in the form of a Special Purpose Entity ("SPE"). SPEs may be used to
facilitate off-balance sheet financing, acquiring financial assets, raising cash
from owned assets and similar transactions. The Company has no SPEs, no
off-balance sheet financing arrangements or any derivative financial
instruments.

In January 1998, the Board of Directors discontinued the payment of quarterly
cash dividends. Such action was taken to facilitate the Company's growth
strategy as well as to bring the Company's dividend policy more in line with
other companies in the medical products industry.

Impact of Inflation

The Company experiences the effects of inflation primarily in the prices it pays
for labor, materials and services. Over the last three years, the Company has
experienced the effects of moderate inflation in these costs. At times, the
Company has been able to offset a portion of these increased costs by increasing
the sales prices of its products. However, competitive pressures have not
allowed for full recovery of these cost increases.

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued SFAS No.148. The
impact to the Company for this item is described in Note 1 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial
condition in the preparation of its financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
Company believes the following discussion addresses the Company's most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of
the Company's financial condition and results and require management's most
difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to
make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual
results could differ significantly from those estimates under different
assumptions and conditions.

The Company assesses the impairment of its long-lived identifiable assets,
excluding goodwill which is tested for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 142 as
explained below, whenever

-16-



events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. This review is based upon projections of anticipated future cash
flows. While the Company believes that its estimates of future cash flows are
reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows or future changes in
the Company's business plan could materially affect its evaluations. No such
changes are anticipated at this time.

The Company assesses goodwill for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 142 which
requires that the goodwill be assessed whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, or, at a
minimum, on an annual basis by applying a fair value test.

Forward-looking Statements

The statements in this Management's Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere in
this Annual Report that are forward-looking are based upon current expectations,
and actual results may differ materially. Therefore, the inclusion of such
forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the
Company that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved. Such
statements include, but are not limited to, the Company's expectations regarding
future revenues, cost of goods sold, gross profit, operating income, income from
continuing operations, cash flows from operations, growth in product lines,
annual growth in earnings per share from continuing operations, and availability
of equity and debt financing. Words such as "anticipates," "believes,"
"intends," "expects" and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
contained herein involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and there are a
number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially,
including, but not limited to, the following: changing economic, market and
business conditions; acts of war or terrorism; the effects of governmental
regulation; the impact of competition and new technologies;
slower-than-anticipated introduction of new products or implementation of
marketing strategies; implementation of new manufacturing processes or
implementation of new information systems; the Company's ability to protect its
intellectual property; changes in the prices of raw materials; changes in
product mix; product liability claims and product recalls; the ability to
attract and retain qualified personnel and the loss of any significant
customers. In addition, assumptions relating to budgeting, marketing, product
development and other management decisions are subjective in many respects and
thus susceptible to interpretations and periodic review which may cause the
Company to alter its marketing, capital expenditures or other budgets, which in
turn may affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rates

The Company has a $25.0 million credit facility with a regional bank. Borrowings
under the Credit Facility bear interest at 30-day, 60-day or 90-day LIBOR, as
selected by the Company, plus one percent. The Company is subject to interest
rate risk based on an adverse change in the 30-day, 60-day or the 90-day LIBOR.
At December 31, 2002, the Company had borrowings under the Credit Facility of
$10.3 million. A one percent increase in the market interest rate would reduce
the Company's annual pretax income by approximately $103,000 at the current
borrowing level.


-17-



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Atrion Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Atrion
Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial
statements of Atrion Corporation and Subsidiaries as of and for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2001, were audited by Arthur Andersen LLP
who has ceased operations. Arthur Andersen LLP expressed an unqualified opinion
on those financial statements in their report dated February 25, 2002.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Atrion Corporation
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and the consolidated results of their
operations and their consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

As discussed above, the financial statements of Atrion Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and for the two years in the period then
ended were audited by Arthur Andersen LLP who has ceased operations. As
described in Note 2, these financial statements have been revised to include the
transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the
Company as of January 1, 2002. Our audit procedures with respect to the
disclosures in Note 2 with respect to 2001 and 2000 included agreeing the
previously reported net income to the previously issued financial statements and
the adjustments to reported net income representing amortization expense
(including any related tax effects) recognized in those periods related to
goodwill to the Company's underlying records obtained from management. We also
tested the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net income to
reported net income, and the related income-per-share amounts. In our opinion,
the disclosures for 2001 and 2000 in Note 2 are appropriate. However, we were
not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 or 2000
financial statements of the Company other than with respect to such disclosures
and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on
the 2001 or 2000 financial statements taken as a whole.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 7, 2003


-18-



This is a copy of the audit report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP in
connection with Atrion Corporation and Subsidiaries Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001. This audit report has not been reissued by
Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with this filing on Form 10-K. The
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 and the consolidated
statements of income and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999
referred to in this report have not been included in the accompanying financial
statements.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Atrion Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atrion
Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001
and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Atrion Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States.


Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 25, 2002


-19-



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000)



- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)


Revenues $ 59,533 $ 57,605 $ 51,447
Cost of Goods Sold 39,236 35,777 31,561
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross Profit 20,297 21,828 19,886
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Expenses:
Selling 5,343 6,248 7,010
General and administrative 6,992 7,849 6,576
Research and development 2,180 1,911 2,054
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14,515 16,008 15,640
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operating Income 5,782 5,820 4,246

Interest Income 78 77 94
Interest Expense (432) (300) (748)
Other Income (Expense), net 40 468 (6)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Continuing Operations before Provision
for Income Taxes 5,468 6,065 3,586

Income Tax Provision (1,403) (1,803) (923)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Income from Continuing Operations 4,065 4,262 2,663

Gain on Disposal of Discontinued Operations,
net of tax 165 5,492 129

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, net of tax (1,641) -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income $ 2,589 $ 9,754 $ 2,792
==============================================================================================

Income Per Basic Share:
Continuing operations $ 2.37 $ 2.10 $ 1.30
Discontinued operations .10 2.70 .06
Cumulative effect of accounting change (.96) -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income Per Basic Share $ 1.51 $ 4.80 $ 1.36
==============================================================================================

Weighted Average Basic Shares Outstanding 1,711 2,033 2,047
==============================================================================================

Income Per Diluted Share:
Continuing operations $ 2.18 $ 1.88 $ 1.25
Discontinued operations .09 2.42 .06
Cumulative effect of accounting change (.88) -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net Income Per Diluted Share $ 1.39 $ 4.30 $ 1.31
==============================================================================================

Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding 1,863 2,272 2,135
==============================================================================================


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


-20-



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assets: 2002 2001
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 353 $ 542
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $151 and $113 in 2002 and 2001, respectively 6,721 7,559
Inventories 10,311 11,114
Prepaid expenses 2,273 1,463
Deferred income taxes 1,018 1,268
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20,676 21,946
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Property, Plant and Equipment 42,661 39,866
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 18,211 14,488
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24,450 25,378
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Assets and Deferred Charges:
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $6,847 and
$6,543 in 2002 and 2001, respectively 2,403 2,707
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $6,600 and
$4,114 in 2002 and 2001, respectively 9,730 12,216
Other 3,548 3,308
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15,681 18,231
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$60,807 $65,555
================================================================================

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


-21-



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2002 and 2001

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity: 2002 2001
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 5,030 $ 5,337
Accrued income and other taxes 859 109
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5,889 5,446
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Line of Credit 10,337 17,125
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Liabilities and Deferred Credits:
Deferred income taxes 2,115 2,844
Other 775 965
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,890 3,809
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commitments and Contingencies -- --

Stockholders' Equity:
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share, authorized
10,000 shares, issued 3,420 shares 342 342
Additional paid-in capital 8,222 7,991
Retained earnings 64,249 61,660
Treasury shares, 1,714 shares in 2002 and 1,732 shares
in 2001, at cost (31,122) (30,818)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
41,691 39,175
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 60,807 $ 65,555
===============================================================================

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


-22-



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000)



- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income $ 2,589 $ 9,754 $ 2,792
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax 1,641 -- --
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (165) (5,492) (129)
Depreciation and amortization 4,384 4,569 4,119
Deferred income taxes 366 316 77
Tax benefit related to stock plans 82 1,238 13
Other 127 (428) 164
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9,024 9,957 7,036
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 838 (384) 592
Inventories 803 (1,004) (1,004)
Prepaid expenses (810) (888) 252
Other non-current assets (240) 301 (43)
Accounts payable and current liabilities (307) 934 582
Accrued income and other taxes 750 (78) 166
Other non-current liabilities (190) (135) (199)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by continuing operations 9,868 8,703 7,382
Net cash provided by discontinued operations 165 165 165
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10,033 8,868 7,547
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Property, plant and equipment additions (3,279) (2,808) (3,289)
Patent sale -- 428 --
Proceeds from disposal of discontinued operations -- -- 199
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3,279) (2,380) (3,090)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net change in line of credit (6,788) 9,725 (3,017)
Issuance of treasury stock 409 1,778 85
Purchase of treasury stock (564) (17,608) (1,436)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6,943) (6,105) (4,368)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net change in cash and cash equivalents (189) 383 89

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 542 159 70
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 353 $ 542 $ 159
==========================================================================================

Cash paid for:
Interest $ 418 $ 272 $ 746
Income taxes (net of refunds) (340) 1,217 4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


-23-





CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000)
(in thousands)

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock Treasury Stock
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Additional
Shares Paid-in Retained
Outstanding Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Total
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance, January 1, 2000 2,098 $ 342 1,322 $ (13,287) $ 6,403 $ 49,114 $ 42,572

Net income 2,792 2,792
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options 13 13
Exercise of stock options 9 (9) 70 2 72
Purchase of treasury stock (115) 115 (1,436) (1,436)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 2000 1,992 342 1,428 (14,653) 6,418 51,906 44,013

Net income 9,754 9,754
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options 1,238 1,238
Exercise of stock options 235 (235) 2,077 335 2,412
Shares surrendered in option
exercises (27) 27 (634) (634)
Purchase of treasury stock (512) 512 (17,608) (17,608)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 2001 1,688 342 1,732 (30,818) 7,991 61,660 39,175

Net income 2,589 2,589
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options 82 82
Exercise of stock options 53 (53) 443 149 592
Shares surrendered in option
exercises (9) 9 (183) (183)
Purchase of treasury stock (26) 26 (564) (564)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 2002 1,706 $ 342 1,714 $ (31,122) $ 8,222 $ 64,249 $ 41,691
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.


-24-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Atrion Corporation designs, develops, manufactures and markets products
primarily for the medical and health care industry. The Company markets its
products throughout the United States and internationally. The Company's
customers include hospitals, distributors, and other manufacturers. As of
December 31, 2002, the principal subsidiaries of the Company through which it
conducted its operations were Atrion Medical Products, Inc. ("Atrion Medical
Products"), Halkey-Roberts Corporation ("Halkey-Roberts") and Quest Medical,
Inc. ("Quest Medical").

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Atrion Corporation
and its subsidiaries (the "Company"). All significant intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fair Value

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these
items. The carrying amount of debt approximates fair value as the interest rate
is tied to market rates.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Financial Presentation

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current-year
presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Trade Receivables

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the original sales price to the
customer. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect
estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required
payments. On an ongoing basis, the collectibility of accounts receivable is
assessed, based upon historical collection trends, current economic factors, and
the assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts. The Company evaluates
the collectibility of specific accounts using a combination of factors,
including the age of the outstanding balances, evaluation of customers' current
and past financial condition, recent payment history, current economic
environment, and discussions with appropriate Company personnel and with the
customers directly. Accounts are written off when it is determined the
receivable will not be collected.


-25-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by
using the first-in, first-out method. The following table details the major
components of inventory (in thousands):

December 31,
2002 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------------
Raw materials $ 6,082 $ 6,089
Finished goods 2,818 4,136
Work in process 1,411 889
- ----------------------------------------------------------
Total inventories $10,311 $11,114
- ----------------------------------------------------------

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability approach to financial accounting
and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
computed annually for differences between the financial reporting basis and the
tax basis of the Company's other assets and liabilities. These amounts are based
on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences
are expected to affect taxable income.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The
following table represents a summary of property, plant and equipment at
original cost (in thousands):

December 31,
------------------- Useful
2002 2001 Lives
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land $ 1,506 $ 1,506 --
Buildings 8,683 8,576 30-40 yrs
Machinery and equipment 32,472 29,784 3-10 yrs
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total property, plant and equipment $42,661 $39,866
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Depreciation expense of $4,080,000, $3,743,000 and $3,225,000 was recorded for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Patents

Cost for patents acquired is determined at acquisition date. Patents are being
amortized over the remaining lives of the individual patents, which are five to
15 years. Patents are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be
recoverable.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of tangible
and identifiable intangible net assets acquired. Through December 31, 2001,
goodwill was being amortized over 25 years. Beginning January 1, 2002,
accounting for goodwill was changed to conform to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" as
outlined below and in Note 2. Annual impairment testing for goodwill is done in
accordance with SFAS No. 142 using a fair


-26-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

value-based test. Goodwill is also reviewed periodically for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate a change in value may have occurred.

Revenues

Revenue is recognized at the time products are shipped and title has passed to
the customer. Net sales represent gross sales invoiced to customers, less
certain related charges, including discounts, returns and other allowances.

Shipping and Handling Policy

Shipping and handling fees charged to customers are reported as revenue and all
shipping and handling costs incurred related to products sold are reported as
cost of goods sold.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs relating to the development of new products and
improvements of existing products are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2002, the Company had three stock-based employee compensation
plans, which are described more fully in Note 8. The Company accounts for those
plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and
related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected
in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price
equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and income per share if
the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," to stock-based employee compensation:



Year ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)


Net income, as reported $ 2,589 $ 9,754 $ 2,792

Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under
fair value-based methods for all awards,
net of tax effects (691) (275) (518)
-------- -------- --------

Pro forma net income $ 1,898 $ 9,479 $ 2,274
======== ======== ========

Income per share:

Basic - as reported $ 1.51 $ 4.80 $ 1.36
======== ======== ========
Basic - pro forma $ 1.11 $ 4.66 $ 1.11
======== ======== ========
Diluted - as reported $ 1.39 $ 4.30 $ 1.31
======== ======== ========
Diluted - pro forma $ 1.02 $ 4.17 $ 1.07
======== ======== ========



-27-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS
No. 142. SFAS No. 141 eliminates pooling of interest accounting and requires
that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, be accounted for
using the purchase method. SFAS No. 142 eliminates the amortization of goodwill
and certain other intangible assets and requires the Company to evaluate
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis by applying a fair value test. SFAS
No. 142 also requires that an identifiable intangible asset which is determined
to have an indefinite useful economic life not be amortized, but separately
tested for impairment using a fair value-based approach. As of December 31,
2002, the Company had not recorded any identifiable intangible assets other than
goodwill that have an indefinite useful life. See Note 2 below for a review of
the impact on the Company from the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS No. 123." SFAS No.
148 was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary
change to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123 to require disclosures in both annual and interim financial
statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
and the effect of the method used on reported results. Entities are still
permitted to account for stock-based compensation programs using the intrinsic
value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25. The Company currently accounts
for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method. The interim
disclosure requirements prescribed by SFAS No. 148 are required for interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2002.


-28-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

(2) Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002, and has identified
three reporting units where goodwill was recorded for purposes of testing
goodwill impairment: (1) Atrion Medical Products (2) Halkey-Roberts and (3)
Quest Medical. The Company completed its impairment analysis by obtaining an
independent third party valuation of the fair value of the reporting units. This
analysis revealed that the Quest Medical reporting unit was impaired, resulting
in a write-down of goodwill in the first quarter of 2002 of $1.6 million, net of
an income tax benefit of $845,000. The charge reflected a $2.5 million reduction
in the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of Quest Medical in February
1998. The remaining goodwill asset balance for the Company totaled $9.7 million
at December 31, 2002. The impairment loss was recorded as a cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle. Net income from continuing operations for the
years 2002, 2001 and 2000 adjusted as though the non-amortization provisions of
SFAS No. 142 had been in effect at January 1, 2000, are as follows:



Year ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
--------- --------- ---------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Income from continuing operations $ 4,065 $ 4,262 $ 2,663
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax -- 425 425
---------------------------------------
Adjusted income from continuing operations $ 4,065 $ 4,687 $ 3,088
=======================================

Adjusted income per basic share:
Income from continuing operations $ 2.37 $ 2.10 $ 1.30
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax -- .21 .21
---------------------------------------
Adjusted income from continuing operations $ 2.37 $ 2.31 $ 1.51
=======================================

Adjusted income per diluted share:
Income from continuing operations $ 2.18 $ 1.88 $ 1.25
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of tax -- .19 .20
---------------------------------------
Adjusted income from continuing operations $ 2.18 $ 2.07 $ 1.45
=======================================


Intangible assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):



December 31, 2002 December 31, 2001
---------------------------------- -----------------------
Average Gross Gross
Life Carrying Accumulated Carrying Accumulated
(years) Amount Amortization Amount Amortization
---------------------------------- -----------------------

Amortizable intangible assets:
Patents 12.85 $ 9,250 $ 6,847 $ 9,250 $ 6,543

Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Goodwill $16,330 $ 6,600 $16,330 $ 4,114



-29-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

Aggregate amortization expense for patents and goodwill was $304,000, $907,000
and $907,000 for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Estimated future amortization expense for each of the years ending December 31,
is as follows (in thousands):

2003 $ 304
2004 $ 304
2005 $ 271
2006 $ 169
2007 $ 144


The change in the carrying amounts of goodwill for 2002 is as follows (in
thousands):

Balance as of January 1, 2002 $12,216
Impairment loss 2,486
-------
Balance as of December 31, 2002 $ 9,730
=======

(3) Discontinued Operations

During 1997, the Company sold all of its natural gas operations. The
consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect the Company's natural
gas operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The
consolidated financial statements reflect a gain on disposal of these
discontinued operations of $165,000, $5,492,000 and $129,000 in 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. These amounts include an income tax benefit of $5,126,000 in
2001, and are net of income tax expense of $85,000 and $67,000 in 2002 and 2000,
respectively.

In addition to the initial consideration received in 1997 upon the sale of the
natural gas operations, certain annual contingent deferred payments of up to
$250,000 per year were to be paid to the Company over an eight-year period which
began in 1999, with the amount paid each year to be dependent upon revenues
received by the purchaser from certain gas transportation contracts. The Company
received deferred payments of $250,000 each, before tax, from the purchaser in
April 2002, 2001 and 2000 which are reflected in each year as a gain from
discontinued operations of $165,000, net of tax. The 2001 gain also includes a
$5,327,000 non-cash gain from reversal of a reserve established when the Company
disposed of its natural gas operations in 1997. This reversal in the third
quarter of 2001 followed the resolution of an outstanding contingency related to
the sale of those assets. The 2000 gain reflected above is net of a $36,000
loss, net of tax, related to the sale of certain residual properties associated
with the Company's natural gas operations.

(4) Line of Credit

The Company has a revolving credit facility ("Credit Facility") with a regional
bank. In December 2001, the Credit Facility arrangement was amended to increase
the credit line under the Credit Facility from $18.5 million to $25.0 million.
Under the Credit Facility, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have a
line of credit which is secured by substantially all inventory, equipment and
accounts receivable of the Company. Interest under the Credit Facility is
assessed at 30-day, 60-day or 90-day LIBOR, as selected by


-30-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

the Company, plus one percent (2.425 percent at December 31, 2002) and is
payable monthly. At December 31, 2002, and 2001, $10.3 million and $17.1
million, respectively, was outstanding under the line of credit. The Credit
Facility expires November 12, 2004, and may be extended under certain
circumstances. At any time during the term, the Company may convert any or all
outstanding amounts under the Credit Facility to a term loan with a maturity of
two years. The Company's ability to borrow funds under the Credit Facility from
time to time is contingent on meeting certain covenants in the loan agreement,
the most restrictive of which is the ratio of total debt to earnings before
interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization. At December 31, 2002, the
Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.

(5) Income Taxes

The items comprising income tax expense for continuing operations are as follows
(in thousands):

Year ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Current -- Federal $ 1,081 $ 1,520 $ 579
-- State (44) 188 85
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
1,037 1,708 664

Deferred -- Federal 327 74 225
-- State 39 21 34
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
366 95 259
- ----------------------------------------------------------------

Total income tax expense $ 1,403 $ 1,803 $ 923
- ----------------------------------------------------------------


-31-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

Temporary differences and carryforwards which have given rise to deferred income
tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in
thousands):

2002 2001
------------------
Deferred tax assets:
Patents and goodwill $ 1,041 $ 628
Benefit plans 639 620
Inventories 342 222
Tax credits 451 816
Other 60 55
------------------
Total deferred tax assets $ 2,533 $ 2,341
==================
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment 3,253 2,654
Pensions 362 333
Other 15 930
------------------
Total deferred tax liabilities $ 3,630 $ 3,917
==================

Net deferred tax liability $ 1,097 $ 1,576
==================

Balance Sheet classification:
Non-current deferred income tax liability $ 2,115 $ 2,844
Current deferred income tax asset 1,018 1,268
------------------
Net deferred tax liability $ 1,097 $ 1,576
==================

The deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2002 reflected in the table above
include alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $415,000 and research
and development (R&D) tax credit carryforwards of $36,000. The R&D tax credit
carryforwards expire in 2022.

Total income tax expense for continuing operations differs from the amount that
would be provided by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to pretax
earnings as illustrated below (in thousands):

Year ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income tax expense at the statutory
federal income tax rate $ 1,858 $ 2,062 $ 1,219
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State income taxes 80 220 141
Decrease in valuation allowance -- (68) (63)
R&D credit (164) (52) (130)
Foreign sales benefit (244) (352) (265)
Other, net (127) (7) 21
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total income tax expense $ 1,403 $ 1,803 $ 923
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------


-32-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

(6) Common Stock

The Board of Directors of the Company has at various times authorized
repurchases of Company stock in open-market or negotiated transactions at such
times and at such prices as management may from time to time decide. The Company
has effected a number of open-market or negotiated transactions to purchase its
stock during the past three years. These repurchases totaled 26,000, 10,300 and
114,500 shares during the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, at per share
prices ranging from $7.77 to $23.32. As of December 31, 2002, authorization for
the repurchase of 114,200 additional shares remained. The Company purchased
502,229 shares of its common stock at $34.50 per share in December 2001 pursuant
to a tender offer. All shares purchased in the tender offer and in the
open-market or negotiated transactions became treasury shares upon repurchase by
the Company.

The Company has a Common Share Purchase Rights Plan, which is intended to
protect the interests of stockholders in the event of a hostile attempt to take
over the Company. The rights, which are not presently exercisable and do not
have any voting powers, represent the right of the Company's stockholders to
purchase at a substantial discount, upon the occurrence of certain events,
shares of common stock of the Company or of an acquiring company involved in a
business combination with the Company. In January 2000, this plan, which was
adopted in February 1990, was extended until February 2005.

(7) Income Per Share

The following is the computation for basic and diluted income per share from
continuing operations:



Year ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)


Income from continuing operations $4,065 $4,262 $2,663

Weighted average basic shares outstanding 1,711 2,033 2,047
Add: Effect of dilutive securities (options) 152 239 88
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 1,863 2,272 2,135
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Income per share from continuing operations:
Basic $ 2.37 $ 2.10 $ 1.30
Diluted $ 2.18 $ 1.88 $ 1.25
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, stock options of
approximately 40,625, 7,800 and 241,775, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted income per share because their effect would have been
antidilutive.

(8) Stock Option Plans

The Company's 1997 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the grant to key employees
of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock and


-33-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

performance shares. In addition, under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, outside
directors (directors who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary)
receive automatic annual grants of nonqualified stock options to purchase 2,000
shares of common stock. There are 624,425 shares in the aggregate of common
stock reserved for grants under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan. The purchase
price of shares issued on the exercise of incentive options must be at least
equal to the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. The purchase
price for shares issued on the exercise of nonqualified options and restricted
and performance shares is fixed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The options granted become exercisable as determined by the
Compensation Committee and expire no later than 10 years after the date of
grant.

During 1994, the stockholders of the Company approved the adoption of the
Company's 1994 Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan, which provided for the grant
to key employees of incentive and nonqualified options to purchase shares of
common stock of the Company. During 1998, the Company's stockholders approved
the adoption of the Company's 1998 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan which, as
amended, provided for the automatic grant on February 1, 1998 and February 1,
1999 of nonqualified stock options to the Company's outside directors. Although
no additional options may be granted under the 1994 Key Employee Stock Incentive
Plan or the 1998 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, all outstanding options
under those plans continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of those
plans and the existing option agreements for those grants.

Option transactions for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002
are as follows:

Weighted Average
Shares Exercise Price
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at January 1, 2000 491,550 $10.38
Granted in 2000 48,300 $11.75
Expired in 2000 (38,300) $11.11
Exercised in 2000 (9,200) $ 7.79
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2000 492,350 $10.50
Granted in 2001 81,000 $15.31
Expired in 2001 (13,600) $10.84
Exercised in 2001 (234,900) $10.46
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2001 324,850 $11.62
Granted in 2002 201,500 $21.05
Expired in 2002 (5,500) $ 8.34
Exercised in 2002 (53,500) $11.06
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options outstanding at December 31, 2002 467,350 $15.82
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exercisable options at December 31, 2000 356,100 $10.57
Exercisable options at December 31, 2001 174,350 $11.89
Exercisable options at December 31, 2002 261,100 $13.81
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-34-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

As of December 31, 2002, there remained 81,984 shares for which options may be
granted in the future under the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan. The following table
summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002:



Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
----------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted
average Weighted Weighted
remaining average average
Number contractual exercise Number exercise
Range of exercise prices outstanding life price exercisable price
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------

$6.875-$14.063 247,850 6.2 years $11.33 156,100 $10.28
$14.875-$22.50 168,000 5.0 years $18.05 93,000 $18.15
$26.13-$31.39 51,500 5.6 years $30.16 12,000 $26.13
------- -------
467,350 261,100
======= =======


Pro forma information regarding net income and income per share as required by
SFAS No. 123 has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock
options under the fair value method of that statement. The fair value for these
options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2002, 2001 and 2000:

2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Risk-free interest rate 2.7% 5.2% 6.6%
Dividend yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Volatility factor 50.3% 33.0% 30.0%
Expected life 2.7 years 7 years 7 years
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------

The resulting estimated weighted average fair values of the options granted in
2002, 2001 and 2000 were $7.25, $7.06 and $5.57, respectively.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility.

(9) Revenues From Major Customers

The Company had one major customer which represented approximately $7.4 million
(12.4 percent), $11.0 million (19.1 percent), and $8.9 million (17.3 percent) of
the Company's operating revenues during the years 2002, 2001 and 2000,
respectively.

(10) Industry Segment and Geographic Information

SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information," establishes standards for reporting information about operating
segments in annual financial statements and requires reporting selected
information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to
stockholders. The Company operates in one reportable industry segment:
designing, developing, manufacturing and marketing products for the medical and
health care industry and has no foreign operating subsidiaries. The Company's
product lines include pressure relief valves and inflation systems which are
sold primarily to the aviation and marine industries. Due to the similarities in
product technologies and manufacturing processes, these products are


-35-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

managed as part of the medical products segment. The Company recorded incidental
revenues from its oxygen pipeline, which totaled approximately $950,000 in each
of the years of 2002, 2001 and 2000. Pipeline net assets totaled $2,664,000 and
$2,737,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Company revenues from
sales to parties outside the United States totaled approximately 25, 33 and 22
percent of the Company's total revenues in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. No
Company assets are located outside the United States. A summary of revenues by
geographic territory for the three years 2002, 2001 and 2000 is as follows (in
thousands):

Year ended December 31,
-------------------------------

2002 2001 2000
- --------------------------------------------------------
United States $44,454 $38,805 $40,085
Canada 6,938 10,635 5,446
United Kingdom 1,693 2,182 1,837
Other 6,448 5,983 4,079
- --------------------------------------------------------

Total $59,533 $57,605 $51,447
- --------------------------------------------------------

(11) Employee Retirement and Benefit Plans

A noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan is maintained for all regular
employees of the Company except those of Quest Medical. This plan was amended
effective January 1, 1998 to become a cash balance pension plan. The Company's
funding policy is to make the annual contributions required by applicable
regulations and recommended by its actuary.

The changes in the plan's projected benefit obligation ("PBO") as of December
31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

2002 2001
------ ------
Change in Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation, January 1 $4,599 $4,268
Service cost 320 369
Interest cost 307 296
Amendments (616) --
Actuarial (gain)/loss (93) 12
Benefits paid (347) (346)
- ----------------------------------------------------------
Benefit obligation, December 31 $4,170 $4,599
- ----------------------------------------------------------

In December 2002, the plan was amended to reduce benefit accruals for future
service by plan participants by approximately 50 percent. This amendment caused
a reduction in the PBO of approximately $616,000, and is reflected as a
reduction in pension expense over the estimated employee service lives.


-36-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

The changes in the fair value of plan assets, funded status of the plan and the
status of the prepaid pension benefit recognized, which is included in the
Company's balance sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in
thousands):

2002 2001
------- -------
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of plan assets, January 1 $ 4,550 $ 5,497
Actual return on plan assets (750) (601)
Actual contributions 930 --
Benefits paid (347) (346)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair value of plan assets, December 31 $ 4,383 $ 4,550
- --------------------------------------------------------------------

Funded status of plan $ 213 $ (49)
Unrecognized actuarial loss 2,154 1,118
Unrecognized prior service cost (539) 84
Unrecognized net transition obligation (132) (175)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Net amount recognized as other assets $ 1,696 $ 978
- --------------------------------------------------------------------

The components of net periodic pension cost for 2002, 2001 and 2000 were as
follows (in thousands):

Year ended December 31,
--------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------ ------ ------
Components of Net Periodic
Pension Cost:
Service cost $ 320 $ 369 $ 383
Interest cost 307 296 271
Expected return on assets (405) (477) (506)
Prior service cost amortization 7 6 6
Actuarial (gain)/loss 28 -- (9)
Transition amount amortization (44) (44) (44)
- --------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic pension cost $ 213 $ 150 $ 101
- --------------------------------------------------------------

Actuarial assumptions used to determine the values of the PBO at December 31,
2002 and 2001 and the benefits cost for 2002, 2001 and 2000 included the
following: a discount rate of 7.0 percent for 2002, and a discount rate of 7.25
percent for 2001 and 2000; an estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets
of 9 percent in 2002, 2001 and 2000; and an estimated weighted average rate of
compensation increase of 5 percent in 2002, 2001 and 2000. As of December 31,
2002, the plan's assets were invested in mutual funds as follows: equity, 64
percent; fixed income, 28 percent; and money market, 8 percent.


-37-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

The Company also sponsors a defined contribution plan for all employees. Each
participant may contribute certain amounts of eligible compensation. The Company
makes a matching contribution to the plan. The Company's contribution under this
plan was $302,000 in 2002, $258,000 in 2001 and $272,000 in 2000.

(12) Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings, third-party claims and other
contingencies related to product liability, regulatory, employee and other
matters that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the amount of potential liability with respect to these actions will
not materially affect the Company's financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.

The Company has arrangements with its executive officers (the "Executives")
pursuant to which the termination of their employment under certain
circumstances would result in lump sum payments to the Executives. Termination
under such circumstances in 2003 could result in payments aggregating $2.6
million, excluding any excise tax that may be reimbursable by the Company.

In May 1996, Halkey-Roberts began leasing the land, building and building
improvements in St. Petersburg, Florida, which serve as Halkey-Roberts'
headquarters and manufacturing facility, under a 10-year lease. The lease
provides for monthly payments, including certain lease payment escalators, and
provides for certain sublease and assignment rights. The lease also provides the
right of either the landlord or Halkey-Roberts to terminate the lease on 12
months notice effective at any time after May 21, 2003. The Company has
guaranteed Halkey-Roberts' payment and performance obligations under the lease.
The lease is being accounted for as an operating lease, and the rental expense
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $384,000, $372,000 and
$361,000, respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under this lease are
$396,000, $409,000, $422,000 and $166,000 in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively.


-38-



Atrion Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--(Continued)

(13) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Quarterly financial data for 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

Quarter Operating Operating Income/(Loss)
Ended Revenue Income Net Income/(Loss) Per Basic Share
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
03/31/02 $ 14,825 $ 1,554 $ (634) (a) $ (.37) (a)
06/30/02 14,775 1,401 1,095 .64
09/30/02 14,662 1,385 1,097 .64
12/31/02 15,271 1,442 1,031 .60
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

03/31/01 $ 14,803 $ 1,413 $ 905 $ .45
06/30/01 14,776 1,513 1,433 (b) .71 (b)
09/30/01 15,418 1,733 6,503 (c) 3.17 (c)
12/31/01 12,608 1,161 913 .44
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Includes a $1.6 million after-tax charge ($ .96 per share) from goodwill
impairment (See Note 2)

(b) Includes a $.3 million after-tax gain ($.13 per share) from the sale of a
patent

(c) Includes a $5.3 million after-tax gain ($ 2.60 per share) from
discontinued operations (See Note 3)


-39-



ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

As discussed in the Company's Proxy Statement with respect to the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders as filed with the Commission on April 18, 2002, during 2002 the
Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP and engaged Grant Thornton, LLP to serve
as the Company's independent accountants.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Directors

The information for this item relating to directors of the Company is
incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for its
2003 annual meeting of stockholders.

Executive Officers

The information for this item relating to executive officers of the Company is
set forth on pages 9 through 10 of this report.

The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by
reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2003 annual
meeting of stockholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information for this item is incorporated by reference from the Company's
definitive proxy statement for its 2003 annual meeting of stockholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The information for this item is incorporated by reference from the Company's
definitive proxy statement for its 2003 annual meeting of stockholders.

Security Ownership of Management

The information for this item is incorporated by reference from the Company's
definitive proxy statement for its 2003 annual meeting of stockholders.

Changes in Control

The Company knows of no arrangements that may at a subsequent date result in a
change in control of the Company.


-40-



ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

None

ITEM 14. Controls and Procedures

With the participation of management, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
its Chief Financial Officer evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures within 90 days of the filing of this report. Based upon this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely
alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the reports that the
Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission

There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in the Company's internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the evaluation date.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8--K

(a) 1. Financial Statements:

See Item 8: "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" and financial
statement pages attached hereto.

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL SCHEDULE

Board of Directors
Atrion Corporation

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
Atrion Corporation and subsidiaries referred to in our report dated
February 7, 2003, which is included in Part II of this form, we have also
audited Schedule II for the year ended December 31, 2002. In our opinion,
this schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information
required to be set for therein.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 7, 2003


-41-



Schedule II - Consolidated Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002
(in thousands)

Allowance for
Doubtful
Receivables
-------
Balance, December 31, 2001 $ 113
Additions charged to expense 62
Deductions from reserve (24)
-------
Balance, December 31, 2002 $ 151
=======

All other financial statement schedules have been omitted since the
required information is included in the consolidated financial statements
or the notes thereto or is not applicable or required.

3. Exhibits: (Numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K) The
exhibits listed below are filed as part of this 2002 Form 10-K Report.
Those exhibits previously filed and incorporated herein by reference are
identified by a note reference to the previous filing.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None

Exhibit
Numbers Description
- ------- -----------

2a Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 19, 1997, between Atrion
Corporation and Midcoast Energy Resources, Inc. (1)
2b Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 29, 1997, by and among
Quest Medical, Inc., QMI Acquisition Corp. and Atrion Corporation (2)
3a Certificate of Incorporation of Atrion Corporation, dated
December 30, 1996(3)
3b Amended and Restated Bylaws of Atrion Corporation (18)
4a Rights Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1990, between AlaTenn
Resources, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company which
includes the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit A and the
Summary of Rights to Purchase Common Shares as Exhibit B (5)
4b Second Amendment to Rights Agreement (6)
10a* 1990 Stock Option Plan (7)
10b* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (8)
10c* 1994 Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan (9)
10d* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (10)
10e* Atrion Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (11)
10f* Form of Award Agreement for Incentive Stock Option (12)
10g* Form of Award Agreement for Nonqualified Stock Option for Key
Employee (13)
10h* Form of Award Agreement for Nonqualified Stock Option for
Director (14)


-42-



10i* Atrion Corporation 1998 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (15)
10j* Form of Stock Option Agreement (16)
10k* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Executive
Officer (17)
10l* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Financial
Officer (18)
10m* Severance Plan for Chief Financial Officer (19)
10n* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Financial
Officer (20)
10o* Agreement regarding the nullification of Incentive Compensation Plan
for Chief Executive Officer (21)
10p* Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement (22)
10q* Amendment to Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement (23)
21 Subsidiaries of Atrion Corporation as of December 31, 2002 (23)
23 Consent of Grant Thornton LLP (23)
99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002 (23)
99.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002 (23)

Notes
-----
(1) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated April 23, 1997.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Form 8-K of Atrion
Corporation dated February 17, 1998.
(3) Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated January 10, 1997.
(4) Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated January 10, 1997.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registration Statement on
Form 8-A of AlaTenn Resources, Inc. dated February 15, 1990.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 29, 2000.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated April 6, 1990.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of AlaTenn Resources, Inc., filed May 17, 1991
(File No. 33-40639).
(9) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated March 28, 1994.
(10) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to the Form S-8 of AlaTenn
Resources, Inc., filed July 26, 1995 (File No. 33-61309).
(11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(b) to the Form S-8 of
Atrion Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(13) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).


-43-



(15) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation, filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56511).
(16) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation, filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56511).
(17) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated November 15, 1999.
(18) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated May 12, 2000.
(19) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10b to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated May 12, 2000.
(20) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10k to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 30, 2001.
(21) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10l to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 26, 2002.
(22) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10m to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated march 26, 2002.
(23) Filed herewith.

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement


-44-



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Atrion Corporation


By: /s/ Emile A. Battat
-------------------
Emile A. Battat
Chairman,
President and Chief
Executive Officer

Dated: March 13, 2003

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Emile A. Battat, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Atrion Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly represent in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent


-45-



evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls;

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: March 13, 2003

/s/ Emile A. Battat
-------------------
Emile A. Battat
Chief Executive Officer

I, Jeffery Strickland, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Atrion Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly represent in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent


-46-



evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls;

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: March 13, 2003

/s/ Jeffery Strickland
----------------------
Jeffery Strickland
Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----


/s/ Emile A. Battat Chairman, President and Chief Executive March 13, 2003
- -------------------------- Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Emile A. Battat


/s/ Jeffery Strickland Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and March 13, 2003
- -------------------------- Secretary-Treasurer (Principal Financial
Jeffery Strickland and Accounting Officer)


/s/ Richard O. Jacobson Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
Richard O. Jacobson


/s/ John H. P. Maley Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
John H. P. Maley



-47-





Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----


Jerome J. McGrath Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
Jerome J. McGrath


/s/ Hugh J. Morgan, Jr. Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
Hugh J. Morgan, Jr.


/s/ Roger F. Stebbing Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
Roger F. Stebbing


/s/ John P. Stupp, Jr. Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
John P. Stupp, Jr.


/s/ Margaret Maxwell Zagel Director March 13, 2003
- --------------------------
Margaret Maxwell Zagel



-48-



EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
Numbers Description Page
- ------- ----------- ----


2a Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 19, 1997, between Atrion
Corporation and Midcoast Energy Resources, Inc. (1)
2b Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 29, 1997, by and among
Quest Medical, Inc., QMI Acquisition Corp. and Atrion Corporation (2)
3a Certificate of Incorporation of Atrion Corporation, dated
December 30, 1996(3)
3b Amended and Restated Bylaws of Atrion Corporation (18)
4a Rights Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1990, between AlaTenn
Resources, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company which
includes the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit A and the Summary
of Rights to Purchase Common Shares as Exhibit B (5)
4b Second Amendment to Rights Agreement (6)
10a* 1990 Stock Option Plan (7)
10b* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (8)
10c* 1994 Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan (9)
10d* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (10)
10e* Atrion Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (11)
10f* Form of Award Agreement for Incentive Stock Option (12)
10g* Form of Award Agreement for Nonqualified Stock Option for Key
Employee (13)
10h* Form of Award Agreement for Nonqualified Stock Option for Director
(14)
10i* Atrion Corporation 1998 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (15)
10j* Form of Stock Option Agreement (16)
10k* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Executive
Officer ( 17)
10l* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Financial
Officer (18)
10m* Severance Plan for Chief Financial Officer (19)
10n* Atrion Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Chief Financial
Officer (20)
10o* Agreement regarding the nullification of Incentive Compensation Plan
for Chief Executive Officer (21)
10p* Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement (22)
10q* Amendment to Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement (23) 51
21 Subsidiaries of Atrion Corporation as of December 31, 2002 (23) 53
23 Consent of Grant Thornton LLP (23) 54
99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002 (23) 55
99.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of The Sarbanes - Oxley Act Of 2002 (23) 56


Notes
-----
(1) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated April 23, 1997.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Form 8-K of Atrion
Corporation dated February 17, 1998.


-49-



(3) Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated January 10, 1997.
(4) Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated January 10, 1997.
(5) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registration Statement on
Form 8-A of AlaTenn Resources, Inc. dated February 15, 1990.
(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 29, 2000.
(7) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated April 6, 1990.
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of AlaTenn Resources, Inc., filed May 17, 1991
(File No. 33-40639).
(9) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Definitive Proxy
Statement of the Company dated March 28, 1994.
(10) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to the Form S-8 of AlaTenn
Resources, Inc., filed July 26, 1995 (File No. 33-61309).
(11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4(b) to the Form S-8 of
Atrion Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(13) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56509).
(15) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation, filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56511).
(16) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Form S-8 of Atrion
Corporation, filed June 10, 1998 (File No. 333-56511).
(17) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated November 15, 1999.
(18) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated May 12, 2000.
(19) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10b to Form 10-Q of Atrion
Corporation dated May 12, 2000.
(20) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10k to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 30, 2001.
(21) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10l to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated March 26, 2002.
(22) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10m to Form 10-K of Atrion
Corporation dated march 26, 2002.
(23) Filed herewith.

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement


-50-