Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
- ------- EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001
OR
_____ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-20476
INDEPENDENCE TAX CREDIT PLUS L.P.
---------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 13-3589920
- ----------------------------------------- ---------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification
No.)
625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022
- -------------------------------------- --------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (212) 421-5333
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Beneficial Assignment Certificates (including underlying Limited
Partnership Interests)
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF
THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF
THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
WHEN USED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, THE WORDS "BELIEVES,"
"ANTICIPATES," "EXPECTS" AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. STATEMENTS LOOKING FORWARD IN TIME ARE INCLUDED IN
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K PURSUANT TO THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISION OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO
CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES WHICH COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER
MATERIALLY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE SET FORTH IN "MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS."
READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS, WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF.
PART I
Item 1. Business.
General
- -------
Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership
which was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on November 7, 1990.
The general partner of the Partnership is Related Independence Associates L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership (the "General Partner"). The general partner of
the General Partner is Related Independence Associates Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
On July 1, 1991, the Partnership commenced a public offering (the "Offering") of
Beneficial Assignment Certificates ("BACs") representing assignments of limited
partnership interests in the Partnership ("Limited Partnership Interests"),
managed by Related Equities Corporation (the "Dealer Manager"), pursuant to a
prospectus dated July 1, 1991, as supplemented by Master Supplement No. 1a
thereto dated April 28, 1992 and Master Supplement No. 2a thereto dated November
3, 1992 (as so supplemented, the "Prospectus").
The Partnership received $76,786,000 of Gross Proceeds from the Offering from
5,351 investors and no further issuance of BACs is anticipated.
The Partnership's was formed to invest as a limited partner in other
partnerships ("Local Partnerships") owning apartment complexes ("Apartment
Complexes" or "Properties") that are eligible for the low-income housing tax
credit ("Housing Tax Credit") enacted in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, some of
which may also be eligible for the historic rehabilitation tax credit ("Historic
Tax Credit" and together with Housing Tax Credits, "Tax Credits"). The
partnership investment in each Local Partnership represents from 98% to 98.99%
of the Partnership's interests in the Local Partnership. As of March 31, 2001,
the Partnership had acquired interests in twenty-eight Local Partnerships. As of
March 31, 2001, approximately $59,700,000 (not including acquisition fees of
approximately $4,500,000) of net proceeds have been invested in Local
Partnerships of which approximately $92,000 remains to be paid to the Local
Partnerships, as certain benchmarks such as occupancy levels must be attained
prior to the release of the funds. The Partnership does not intend to acquire
additional properties. See Item 2, Properties, below.
The investment objectives of the Partnership are to:
1. Entitle qualified BACs holders to Tax Credits over the period of the
Partnership's entitlement to claim Tax Credits (for each Property, generally ten
years from the date of investment or, if later, the date the Property is placed
in service; referred to herein as the "Credit Period") with respect to each
Apartment Complex.
2. Preserve and protect the Partnership's capital.
3. Participate in any capital appreciation in the value of the Properties and
provide distributions of Sale or Refinancing Proceeds upon the disposition of
the Properties.
4. Allocate passive losses to individual BACs holders to offset passive income
that they may realize from rental real estate investments and other passive
activities, and allocate passive losses to corporate BACs holders to offset
business income.
One of the Partnership's objectives is to entitle qualified BACs holders to Tax
Credits over the Credit Period. Each of the Local Partnerships in which the
Partnership has acquired an interest has been allocated by the relevant state
credit agencies the authority to recognize Tax Credits during the Credit Period
provided that the Local Partnership satisfies the rent restriction, minimum
set-aside and other requirements for recognition of the Tax Credits at all times
during such period. Once a Local Partnership has become eligible to recognize
Tax Credits, it may lose such eligibility and suffer an event of "recapture" if
its Property fails to remain in compliance with the Tax Credit requirements.
None of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has acquired an interest
has suffered an event of recapture.
There can be no assurance that the Partnership will achieve its investment
objectives as described above.
The Partnership is subject to the risks incident to potential losses arising
from the management and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership can
also be affected by poor economic conditions generally, however no more than 21%
of the properties are located in any single state. There are also substantial
risks associated with owning properties receiving government assistance, for
example the possibility that Congress may not appropriate funds to enable HUD to
make rental assistance payments. HUD also restricts annual cash distributions to
partners based on operating results and a percentage of the owner's equity
contribution. The Partnership cannot sell or substantially liquidate its
investments in subsidiary partnerships during the period that the subsidy
agreements are in existence, without HUD's approval. Furthermore, there may not
be market demand for apartments at full market rents when the rental assistance
contracts expire.
Competition
- -----------
The real estate business is highly competitive and substantially all of the
properties acquired by the Partnership are subject to active competition from
similar properties in their respective vicinities. In addition, various other
limited partnerships may, in the future, be formed by the General Partner and/or
its affiliates to engage in businesses which may be competitive with the
Partnership.
Employees
- ---------
The Partnership does not have any direct employees. All services are performed
for the Partnership by its General Partner and its affiliates. The General
Partner receives compensation in connection with such activities as set forth in
Items 11 and 13. In addition, the Partnership reimburses the General Partner and
certain of its affiliates for expenses incurred in connection with the
performance by their employees of services for the Partnership in accordance
with the Partnership's Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
(the "Partnership Agreement").
Item 2. Properties.
The Partnership holds a 98.99% limited partnership interest in twenty-seven and
a 98% limited partnership interest in one Local Partnership as of March 31,
2001. Set forth below is a schedule of the Local Partnerships including certain
information concerning their respective Apartment Complexes (the "Local
Partnership Schedule"). Further information concerning these Local Partnerships
and their properties, including any encumbrances affecting the properties, may
be found in Item 14, Schedule III.
Local Partnership Schedule
--------------------------
Name and Location % of Units Occupied at May 1,
-------------------------------
(Number of Units) Date Acquired 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
- ----------------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Harbor Court Limited Partnership December 1991 100% 98% 95% 93% 98%
Staten Island, NY (40)
Old Public Limited Partnership December 1991 85% 48% 87% 80% 76%
Lawrenceburg, TN (30)
Lancaster Terrace Limited Partnership February 1992 91% 97% 99% 97% 98%
Salem, OR (104)
655 North Street Limited Partnership March 1992 85% 80% 74% 81% 84%
Baton Rouge, LA (195)
Landreth Venture March 1992 90% 90% 90% 94% 94%
Philadelphia, PA (47)
Homestead Apartments Associates Ltd. March 1992 98% 96% 94% 91% 94%
Homestead, FL (123)
Bethel Villa Associates, L.P. April 1992 99% 96% 100% 100% 100%
Wilmington, DE (150)
West Diamond Street Associates May 1992 96% 100% 93% 100% 89%
Philadelphia, PA (28)
Susquehanna Partners May 1992 100% 85% 87% 94% 96%
Philadelphia, PA (47)
Boston Bay Limited Partnership August 1992 96% 98% 98% 98% 99%
Boston, MA (88)
Morrant Bay Limited Partnership August 1992 96% 98% 99% 97% 100%
Boston, MA (130)
Hope Bay Limited Partnership August 1992 100% 98% 98% 100% 98%
Boston, MA (45)
Lares Apartments Limited Partnership August 1992 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Lares, PR (102)
Lajas Apartments Limited Partnership August 1992 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Lajas, PR (99)
Arlington-Rodeo Properties August 1992 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Los Angeles, CA (29)
Conifer Bateman Associates August 1992 83% 83% 92% 88% 100%
Lowville, NY (24)
Hampden Hall Associates, L.P. September 1992 97% 100% 93% 97% 100%
St. Louis, MO (75)
Chester Renaissance Associates September 1992 95% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Chester, PA (20)
Homestead Apts. II LTD. October 1992 95% 96% 94% 94% 95%
Homestead, FL (112)
P.S. 157 Associates, L.P. November 1992 100% 100% 100% 99% 100%
New York, NY (73)
Cloisters Limited Partnership II November 1992 100% 95% 100% 94% 100%
Philadelphia, PA (65)
Creative Choice Homes II, LTD. December 1992 94% 97% 98% 98% 99%
Opa-Locka, FL (328)
Milford Crossing Associates L.P. December 1992 99% 100% 99% 95% 99%
Milford, DE (73)
BX-7F Associates, L.P. January 1993 99% 95% 99% 94% 95%
Bronx, NY (85)
Los Angeles Limited Partnership May 1993 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Rio Piedras, PR (124)
Christine Apartments, L.P. June 1993 100% 88% 94% 97% 97%
Buffalo, NY (32)
Plainsboro Housing Partners, L.P. July 1993 98% 98% 98% 99% 100%
Plainsboro, NJ (126)
Rolling Green Associates, L.P. October 1993 91% 94% 92% 96% 91%
Syracuse, NY (395)
All leases are generally for periods not exceeding one to two years and no
tenant occupies more than 10% of the rentable square footage.
Rents from commercial tenants (to which average rental per square foot applies)
comprise less than 5% of the rental revenues of the Partnership. Maximum rents
for the residential units are determined annually by HUD and reflect
increases/decreases in consumer price indices in various geographic areas.
Market conditions, however, determine the amount of rent actually charged.
Management annually reviews the physical state of the properties and suggests to
the respective general partners of the Local Partnerships ("Local General
Partners") budget improvements, which are generally funded from cash flow from
operations or release of replacement reserve escrows to the extent available.
Management annually reviews the insurance coverage of the properties and
believes such coverage is adequate.
See Item 1, Business, above, for the general competitive conditions to which the
properties described above are subject.
Real estate taxes are calculated using rates and assessed valuations determined
by the township or city in which the property is located. Such taxes have
approximated 1% of the aggregate cost of the properties as shown in Schedule III
to the financial statements included herein.
Tax Credits with respect to a given Apartment Complex are available for a
ten-year period that commences when the property is placed into service.
However, the annual Tax Credits available in the year in which the Apartment
Complex is placed in service must be prorated based upon the months remaining in
the year. The amount of the annual Tax Credit not available in the first year
will be available in the eleventh year. In certain cases, the Partnership
acquired its interest in a Local Partnership after the Local Partnership had
placed its Apartment Complex in service. In these cases, the Partnership may be
allocated Tax Credits only beginning in the month following the month in which
it acquired its interest and Tax Credits allocated in any prior period are not
available to the Partnership.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
This information is incorporated by reference to the discussion of Old Public in
the Results of Operations of Certain Local Partnerships contained in Item 7,
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Security Holder
Matters.
As of March 31, 2001, the Partnership had issued and outstanding 76,786 Limited
Partnership Interests, each representing a $1,000 capital contribution to the
Partnership, or an aggregate capital contribution of $76,786,000. All of the
issued and outstanding Limited Partnership Interests have been issued to
Independence Assignor Inc. (the "Assignor Limited Partner"), which has in turn
issued 76,786 BACs to the purchasers thereof for an aggregate purchase price of
$76,786,000. Each BAC represents all of the economic and virtually all of the
ownership rights attributable to a Limited Partnership Interest held by the
Assignor Limited Partner. BACs may be converted into Limited Partnership
Interests at no cost to the holder (other than the payment of transfer costs not
to exceed $100), but Limited Partnership Interests so acquired are not
thereafter convertible into BACs.
Neither the BACs nor the Limited Partnership Interests are traded on any
established trading market. The Partnership does not intend to include the BACs
for quotation on NASDAQ or for listing on any national or regional stock
exchange or any other established securities market. The Revenue Act of 1987
contained provisions which have an adverse impact on investors in "publicly
traded partnerships." Accordingly, the General Partner has imposed limited
restrictions on the transferability of the BACs and the Limited Partnership
Interests in secondary market transactions. These restrictions should prevent a
public trading market from developing but may adversely affect the ability of an
investor to liquidate his or her investment quickly. It is expected that such
procedures will remain in effect until such time, if ever, as further revision
of the Revenue Act of 1987 may permit the Partnership to lessen the scope of the
restrictions.
As of May 6, 2001, the Partnership has approximately 4,576 registered holders of
an aggregate of 76,786 BACs.
All of the Partnership's general partnership interests, representing an
aggregate capital contribution of $1,000, are held by the General Partner.
There are no material legal restrictions in the Partnership Agreement on the
ability of the Partnership to make distributions. The Partnership has made no
distributions to the BACs holders as of March 31, 2001. The Partnership does not
anticipate providing cash distributions to its BACs holders other than from net
refinancing or sales proceeds.
In January 2001, affiliates of Everest Properties, Inc. ("Everest") conducted a
tender offer for up to 1,578 BACs. In connection with a prior tender offer for
BACs, an affiliate of the General Partner entered into a standstill agreement
dated as of April 23, 1997 (the "Standstill"), which precluded Everest from
independently soliciting BACs (by tender offer or otherwise). At Everest's
request, the General Partner caused its affiliate to release Everest from the
Standstill for the limited purpose of permitting Everest to make its tender
offer. In connection with such arrangements, Everest agreed to cover all of the
Partnership's expenses with respect to processing the tender offer including
mailing costs, legal fees and other administrative cost incurred by the
Partnership. These reimbursements resulted in aggregate payments to the
Partnership of $38,004 which are reflected as "other income" on the financial
statements for Fiscal Year 2000.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The information set forth below presents selected financial data of the
Partnership. Additional financial information is set forth in the audited
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 hereof.
Year Ended March 31,
OPERATIONS
- ---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
2001 2000 1999 1998* 1997*
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----
Revenues $20,741,395 $20,786,356 $20,525,657 $20,204,698 $19,663,105
Operating expenses(26,200,525) (26,611,223)(25,708,315)(24,944,950)(24,926,568)
------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Loss before (5,459,130) (5,824,867) (5,182,658)(4,740,252) (5,263,463)
minority interest
Minority interest
in loss of 15,252 20,636 17,208 35,144 33,343
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
subsidiaries
Net loss
$(5,443,878) $(5,804,231)$(5,165,450)$(4,705,108) $(5,230,120)
=========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net loss per
weighted average BAC $ (70.20) $ (74.85) $ (66.61) $ (60.66) $ (67.43)
========== ========= ========= ========== ========
*Reclassified for comparative purposes.
March 31,
FINANCIAL POSITION
- ------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----
Total assets $153,954,157 $159,362,792 $164,969,973 $170,786,367 $177,448,837
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Total liabilities $117,841,568 $117,620,369 $117,234,753 $118,016,288 $119,748,949
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
Minority interest
$ 6,226,648 $ 6,412,604 $ 6,601,170 $6,470,579 $ 6,695,280
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Total partners'
capital $ 29,885,941 $ 35,329,819 $ 41,134,050 $ 46,299,500 $ 51,004,608
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
During the years ended March 31, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1997, respectively, total
assets and liabilities decreased primarily due to depreciation partially offset
by a mortgage refinancing (see Note 7). During the year ended March 31, 1998,
total assets decreased primarily due to depreciation and a loss on impairment of
assets.
Cash Distributions
- ------------------
The Partnership has made no distributions to the BACs holders as of March 31,
2001.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
- -------------------------------
The Partnership's primary source of funds is the cash distributions from the
operations of the Local Partnerships. These cash distributions, which remain
relatively immaterial, are available to meet obligations of the Partnership.
Cash distributions received from the Local Partnerships remain relatively
immaterial. Distributions of approximately $288,000, $34,000 and $66,000 were
received during the years ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
However, management expects that the distributions received from the Local
Partnerships will increase, although not to a level sufficient to permit
providing cash distributions to BACs holders. These distributions, as well as
the working capital reserves and the continued deferral of fees payable to the
General Partner discussed below, will be used to meet the operating expenses of
the Partnership.
As of March 31, 2001, the Partnership has invested all of the net proceeds in
twenty-eight Local Partnerships. Approximately $92,000 of the purchase price
remains to be paid (all of which is held in escrow). During the year ended March
31, 2001, $200,000 was paid from escrow.
During the year ended March 31, 2001, cash and cash equivalent decreased
approximately $425,000. This decrease is due to acquisition of property and
equipment ($437,000), a decrease in due to Local General Partners and affiliates
relating to investing and financing activities ($185,000), an increase in
deferred costs ($52,000), repayment of construction loan ($6,740,000) and a
decrease in capitalization of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to minority
interest ($171,000) which exceeded cash provided by operating activities
($2,255,000), net proceeds and principal payments of mortgage loans ($4,851,000)
and a decrease in cash held in escrow relating to investing activities
($54,000). Included in the adjustments to reconcile the net loss to cash
provided by operating activities is depreciation and amortization ($5,750,000).
The Partnership's unconsolidated working capital reserve at March 31, 2001 was
approximately $332,000.
Partnership management fees owed to the General Partner amounting to
approximately $3,179,000 were accrued and unpaid as of March 31, 2001. Without
the General Partner's advances and continued accrual without payment of certain
fees and expense reimbursements, the Partnership will not be in a position to
meet its obligations. The General Partner has continued to advance and allow the
accrual without payment of these amounts but is under no obligation to continue
to do so.
For a discussion of contingencies affecting certain Local Partnerships, see
Results of Operations of Certain Local Partnerships, below. Since the maximum
loss the Partnership would be liable for is its net investment in the respective
subsidiary partnerships, the resolution of the existing contingencies is not
anticipated to impact future results of operations, liquidity or financial
condition in a material way. However, the Partnership's loss of its investment
in a Local Partnership will eliminate the ability to generate future tax credits
from such Local Partnership and may also result in recapture of tax credits if
the investment is lost before expiration of the credit period.
Management is not aware of any trends or events, commitments or uncertainties,
which have not otherwise been disclosed, that will or are likely to impact
liquidity in a material way. Management believes the only impact would be from
laws that have not yet been adopted. The portfolio is diversified by the
location of the properties around the United States so that if one area of the
country is experiencing downturns in the economy, the remaining properties in
the portfolio may be experiencing upswings. However, the geographic
diversification of the portfolio may not protect against a general downturn in
the national economy. The Partnership has fully invested the proceeds of its
offering in 28 Local Partnerships, all of which fully have their Tax Credits in
place. The Tax Credits are attached to the property for a period of ten years,
and are transferable with the property during the remainder of the ten-year
period. If trends in the real estate market warranted the sale of a property,
the remaining Tax Credits would transfer to the new owner; thereby adding
significant value to the property on the market, which are not included in the
financial statement carrying amount.
Results of Operations
- ---------------------
Property and equipment to be held and used are carried at cost which includes
the purchase price, acquisition fees and expenses, construction period interest
and any other costs incurred in acquiring the properties. The cost of property
and equipment is depreciated over their estimated useful lives using accelerated
and straight-line methods. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged
to expense as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the
time property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the assets and accumulated
depreciation accounts and the profit or loss on such disposition is reflected in
earnings. A loss on impairment of assets is recorded when management estimates
amounts recoverable through future operations and sale of the property on an
undiscounted basis are below depreciated cost. At that time property investments
themselves are reduced to estimated fair value (generally using discounted cash
flows) when the property is considered to be impaired and the depreciated cost
exceeds estimated fair value.
At the time management commits to a plan to dispose of assets, said assets are
adjusted to the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. These
assets are classified as property and equipment-held for sale and are not
depreciated.
Through March 31, 2001, the Partnership has recorded approximately $500,000 as a
loss on impairment of assets.
The following is a summary of the results of operations of the Partnership for
the years ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 (the 2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal
Years, respectively.)
The Partnership's results of operations for the 2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal Years
consisted primarily of the results of the Partnership's investment in the
twenty-eight Local Partnerships. The majority of Local Partnership income
continues to be in the form of rental income with the corresponding expenses
being divided among operations, depreciation and mortgage interest.
The net loss for the 2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal Years totaled $5,443,878,
$5,804,231 and $5,165,450, respectively.
The Partnership and BACs holders began to recognize Housing Tax Credits with
respect to a Property when the Credit Period for such Property commenced.
Because of the time required for the acquisition, completion and rent-up of
Properties, the amount of Tax Credits per BAC gradually increased over the first
three years of the Partnership. Housing Tax Credits not recognized in the first
three years will be recognized in the 11th through 13th years. The Partnership
generated $11,986,066, $11,986,066 and $11,979,284 of Housing Tax Credits during
the 2000, 1999 and 1998 tax years, respectively.
2000 vs. 1999
- -------------
Rental income remained fairly consistent with a decrease of less than 1% for the
2000 Fiscal Year as compared to the 1999 Fiscal Year.
Total expenses, excluding repairs and maintenance, remained fairly consistent
with a decrease of approximately 4% for the 2000 Fiscal Year as compared to the
1999 Fiscal Year.
Repairs and maintenance increased approximately $435,000 for the 2000 Fiscal
Year as compared to the 1999 Fiscal Year primarily due to roof repairs and
replacement of water heaters at one Local Partnership, increased plumbing,
electrical, flooring and cleaning expenses due to hurricane damage at a second
Local Partnership and miscellaneous repairs at two other Local Partnerships.
1999 vs. 1998
- -------------
Rental income remained fairly consistent with an increase of approximately 1%
for the 1999 Fiscal Year as compared to the 1998 Fiscal Year due primarily to
rental rate increases.
Total expenses, excluding general and administrative, remained fairly consistent
with an increase of approximately 2%.
General and administrative increased approximately $495,000 for the 1999 Fiscal
Year as compared to the 1998 Fiscal Year primarily due to the write off of
organization costs that were expensed at one Local Partnership as well as an
increase in payroll and renting expenses at a second Local Partnership.
Results of Operations of Certain Local Partnerships
- ---------------------------------------------------
Los Angeles Limited Partnership
- -------------------------------
The Local Partnership is a defendant in a civil action. The Local Partnership
intends to vigorously defend this action which is considered groundless. The
ultimate resolution of this matter is not ascertainable at this time. No
provision has been made in the financial statements related to this claim. The
Local Partnership has referred this matter to its liability insurance company
and believes that most if not all of the claim which might be asserted would be
covered by the applicable insurance.
Old Public Limited Partnership
- ------------------------------
Old Public Limited Partnership (the "Debtor") originally filed its bankruptcy
case in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
on November 17, 1998. The case was transferred to the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Columbia Division before Judge
George Paine, presiding as the result of a venue motion filed by the First
National Bank of Pulaski, Tennessee, the sole secured creditor of the Debtor
(the "Bank"). On or about February 9, 2001, the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee entered a final decree closing the Old
Public bankruptcy case. As of March 31, 2001, Old Public owes the Partnership
approximately $594,000.
Other
- -----
The Partnership's investment as a limited partner in the Local Partnerships is
subject to the risks incident to the potential losses arising from management
and ownership of improved real estate. The Partnership's investments also could
be adversely affected by poor economic conditions, generally, which could
increase vacancy levels and rental payment defaults and by increased operating
expenses, any or all of which could threaten the financial viability of one or
more of the Local Partnerships.
There also are substantial risks associated with the operations of Apartment
Complexes receiving government assistance. These include governmental
regulations concerning tenant eligibility, which may make it more difficult to
rent apartments in the complexes; difficulties in obtaining government approval
for rent increases; limitations on the percentage of income which low and
moderate-income tenants may pay as rent; the possibility that Congress may not
appropriate funds to enable the Department of Housing and Urban Development to
make the rental assistance payments it has contracted to make; and that when the
rental assistance contracts expire there may not be market demand for apartments
at full market rents in a Local Partnership's Apartment Complex.
The Local Partnerships are impacted by inflation in several ways. Inflation
allows for increases in rental rates generally to reflect the impact of higher
operating and replacement costs. Inflation also affects the Local Partnerships
adversely by increasing operating costs, such as fuel, utilities and labor.
Item7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
Not Applicable.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Sequential
Page
----------
(a) 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report 15
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2001 and 2000 77
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 78
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital
(Deficit) for the Years Ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 79
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 80
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 82
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. and Subsidiaries
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Independence Tax Credit Plus
L.P. and Subsidiaries (A Delaware Limited Partnership) as of March 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999 (the 2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal Years). These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not
audit the financial statements for twenty-eight (2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal
Years) subsidiary partnerships whose losses aggregated $4,195,591, $3,986,583
and $3,805,935 for the 2000, 1999 and 1998 Fiscal Years, respectively, and whose
assets constituted 99% of the Partnership's assets at March 31, 2001 and 2000,
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The financial
statements for twenty-seven of these subsidiary partnerships were audited by
other auditors whose reports thereon have been furnished to us and our opinion
expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for these
subsidiary partnerships is based solely upon the reports of the other auditors.
The financial statements for one of these subsidiary partnerships were
unaudited.
We conducted our audits in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based upon our audits, and the reports of the other auditors
referred to above, the consolidated financial statements referred to in the
first paragraph present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. and Subsidiaries at March 31, 2001 and
2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years
ended March 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
TRIEN ROSENBERG ROSENBERG
WEINBERG CIULLO & FAZZARI LLP
New York, New York
June 12, 2001
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Harbor Court L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Harbor Court L.P. as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Harbor Court L.P., as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations, the changes in
partners' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Bethesda, Maryland
February 1, 2001
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Harbor Court L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Harbor Court L.P. as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, partners'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Harbor Court L.P., as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations, the changes in
partners' equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Boston, Massachusetts
January 24, 2000
[Letterhead of Mack Roberts & Company, L.L.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
The Partners
Lancaster Terrace Limited Partnership
Salem, Oregon
We have audited the balance sheets of Lancaster Terrace Limited Partnership as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, changes
in partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Lancaster Terrace Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Mack, Roberts & Co., L.L.C.
Portland, Oregon
February 6, 2001
[Letterhead of Mack Roberts & Company, L.L.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
The Partners
Lancaster Terrace Limited Partnership
Salem, Oregon
We have audited the balance sheets of Lancaster Terrace Limited Partnership as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, changes
in partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Lancaster Terrace Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Mack, Roberts & Co., L.L.C.
February 15, 2000
[Letterhead of Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
of 655 North Street Limited Partnership
New Orleans, Louisiana
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 655 North Street Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. 064-12001, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of 655 North Street Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. 064-12001, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
results of its operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, we have also issued a report dated January 30, 2001, on our
consideration of 655 North Street Limited Partnership's internal control, and
reports dated January 30, 2001, on its compliance with specific requirements
applicable to major HUD programs and specific requirements applicable to
Affirmative Fair Housing.
/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Metairie, Louisiana
January 30, 2001
[Letterhead of Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
of 655 North Street Limited Partnership
New Orleans, Louisiana
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of 655 North Street Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. 064-12001, as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and
the related statements of income, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of 655 North Street Limited
Partnership, HUD Project No. 064-12001, as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
results of its operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows for the
years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, we have also issued a report dated February 23, 2000, on our
consideration of 655 North Street Limited Partnership's internal control, and
reports dated February 23, 2000, on its compliance with specific requirements
applicable to major HUD programs and specific requirements applicable to
Affirmative Fair Housing.
/s/ Pailet, Meunier and LeBlanc, L.L.P.
Metairie, Louisiana
February 23, 2000
[Letterhead of Ziner, Kennedy, Lehan LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Landreth Venture
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Landreth Venture (a
Pennsylvania limited partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Landreth Venture as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ziner, Kennedy, Lehan LLP
February 9, 2001
Boston, Massachusetts
[Letterhead of Ziner, Kennedy, Lehan LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Landreth Venture
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Landreth Venture (a
Pennsylvania limited partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partners and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Landreth Venture as of December
31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ziner, Kennedy, Lehan LLP
Quincy, Massachusetts
January 20,2000
[Letterhead of Friedman, Alpren & Green LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Homestead Apartments Associates, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of HOMESTEAD APARTMENTS
ASSOCIATES, LTD.(a limited partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and the related
statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of HOMESTEAD APARTMENTS
ASSOCIATES, LTD. as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, and
its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/Friedman, Alpren & Green LLP
New York, New York
February 1, 2001
[Letterhead of Friedman, Alpren & Green LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Homestead Apartments Associates, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Homestead Apartments
Associates, Ltd.(a limited partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and the related
statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Homestead Apartments
Associates, Ltd. as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations, and
its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/Friedman, Alpren & Green LLP
New York, New York
January 26, 2000
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Homestead Apartments Associates, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Homestead Apartments
Associates, Ltd., as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related statements
of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Homestead Apartments
Associates, Ltd. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its
operations, and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 16
and 17 is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Atlanta, Georgia
January 27, 1999
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the related statements of operations,
partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
as of December 31, 2000, and 1999 and the results of its operations, the changes
in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 26
through 30 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated January 23,
2001 on our consideration of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.'s internal control
and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD and
DSHA programs, and fair housing and non-discrimination. Those reports are an
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing
Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the
results of our audit.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Bethesda, Maryland
Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-1088612
January 23, 2001
Lead Auditor: Robert J. Denmark
[Letterhead of Reznick Fedder & Silverman]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, the related statements of operations,
partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.
as of December 31, 1999, and 1998 and the results of its operations, the changes
in partners' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on pages 26
through 30 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the "Consolidated Audit
Guide for Audits of HUD Programs," we have also issued reports dated January 18,
2000 on our consideration of Bethel Villa Associates, L.P.'s internal control
and on its compliance with specific requirements applicable to major HUD and
DSHA programs, and fair housing and non-discrimination.
/s/ Reznick Fedder & Silverman
Lead Auditor: Robert J. Denmark
Bethesda, Maryland
Federal Employer Identification Number: 52-1088612
January 18, 2000
[Letterhead of Asher & Company Ltd.]
Independent Auditors' Report
The Partners
West Diamond Street Associates
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments
Marlton, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Diamond Street
Associates T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No.
O-0198, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements of profit
and loss, Partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of West Diamond Street Associates
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. O-0198, as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in its
Partners' capital and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 31, 2001 on our consideration of West Diamond Street Associates'
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. O-0198,
internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an
integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing
Standards and should be read in conjunction with this report in considering the
results of our audit.
/s/ Asher & Company, Ltd.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 31, 2001
[Letterhead of Asher & Company Ltd.]
Independent Auditors' Report
The Partners
West Diamond Street Associates
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments
Marlton, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of West Diamond Street
Associates T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No.
O-0198, as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related statements of profit
and loss, Partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of West Diamond Street Associates
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. O-0198, as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in its
Partners' capital and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a
required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 13, 2000 on our consideration of West Diamond Street Associates'
T/A Sedgley Park Apartments (A Limited Partnership), PHFA Project No. O-0198,
internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants.
/s/ Asher & Company, Ltd.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 13, 2000
[Letterhead of J.H. Williams & Co., LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Susquehanna Partners (a Limited Partnership)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Susquehanna Partners (a
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements
of (loss), changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's general
partner and contracted management agent. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by the Partnership's general partner and contracted
management agent, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Susquehanna Partners (a Limited
Partnership) at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and its results of operations,
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ J.H. Williams & Co., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
February 9, 2001
[Letterhead of J.H. Williams & Co., LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners
Susquehanna Partners (a Limited Partnership)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Susquehanna Partners (a
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related statements
of (loss), changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's general
partner and contracted management agent. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the
Partnership's general partner and contracted management agent, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Susquehanna Partners (a Limited
Partnership) at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and its results of operations,
changes in partners' equity and cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ J.H. Williams & Co., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
February 1, 2000
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Boston Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-071-R, as of December
31, 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial
statement audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 16, 2001 on our consideration of Boston Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 16, 2001 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 16, 2001 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 15 through 28) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) and is not a required part of the basic financial
statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 16, 2001
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Boston Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-071-R, as of December
31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 20, 2000 on our consideration of Boston Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 20, 2000 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 20, 2000 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) and is not a required part of the basic financial
statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 20, 2000
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Boston Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-071-R, as of December
31, 1998, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Boston Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 17, 1999 on our consideration of Boston Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 17, 1999 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 17, 1999 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) and is not a required part of the basic financial
statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 17, 1999
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Morrant Bay Limited
Partnership (a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-095-R, as
of December 31, 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of
the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 19, 2001 on our consideration of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 19, 2001 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 19, 2001 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 15 through 28) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 2001
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Morrant Bay Limited
Partnership (a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-095-R, as
of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 22, 2000 on our consideration of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 22, 2000 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 22, 2000 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 22, 2000
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Morrant Bay Limited
Partnership (a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-095-R, as
of December 31, 1998, and the related statements of operations, partners'
capital, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership
as of December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 19, 1999 on our consideration of Morrant Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 19, 1999 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 19, 1999 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 1999
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Hope Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hope Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-168-R, as of December
31, 2000, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of
the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hope Bay Limited Partnership as
of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 15, 2001 on our consideration of Hope Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 15, 2001 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 15, 2001 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 15 through 28) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 15, 2001
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Hope Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hope Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-168-R, as of December
31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hope Bay Limited Partnership as
of December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 21, 2000 on our consideration of Hope Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 21,2000 on its compliance with laws and
regulations, and reports dated January 21,2000 on its compliance with specific
requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 21, 2000
[Letterhead of Robert Ercolini & Company LLP]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners of
Hope Bay Limited Partnership
Boston, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hope Bay Limited Partnership
(a Massachusetts Limited Partnership), MHFA Project No. 70-168-R, as of December
31, 1998, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash
flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hope Bay Limited Partnership,
as of December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations, changes in partners'
capital, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report
dated January 19, 1999 on our consideration of Hope Bay Limited Partnership's
internal control, a report dated January 19, 1999 on its compliance with laws
and regulations, and reports dated January 19, 1999 on its compliance with
specific requirements applicable to HUD programs.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements taken as a whole. The additional information included in this report
(shown on pages 14 through 27) is presented for the purpose of additional
analysis and to comply with reporting requirements of the Massachusetts Housing
Finance Agency and is not a required part of the basic financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Robert Ercolini & Company LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 1999
[Letterhead of Armando A. Suarez, CPA]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
Lares Apartments Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lares Apartments Limited
Partnership, Rural Development Project No.: 63-034-660467896, as of December 31,
2000 and 1999, and the related statements of income, changes in partners'
capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Lares Apartments Limited
Partnership, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information on pages 20 thru 31 is presented for purposes of additional analysis
and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Armando A. Suarez, CPA
San Juan, Puerto Rico
The stamp #1684722 of the CPA's College of PR was affixed to the original of
this report.
February 1, 2001
[Letterhead of Armando A. Suarez, CPA]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
Lares Apartments Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lares Apartments Limited
Partnership, Rural Development Project No.: 63-034-660467896, as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the related statements of income, changes in partners'
capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Lares Apartments Limited
Partnership, as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information on pages 20 thru 31 is presented for purposes of additional analysis
and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Armando A. Suarez, CPA
San Juan, Puerto Rico
The stamp #1478493 of the CPA's College of PR was affixed to the original of
this report.
January 25, 2000
[Letterhead of Armando A. Suarez, CPA]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
Lajas Apartments Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lajas Apartments Limited
Partnership, Rural Development Project No.: 63-017-0660422313, as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, changes in
partners' capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Lajas Apartments Limited
Partnership, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information on pages 20 thru 31 is presented for purposes of additional analysis
and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Armando A. Suarez, CPA
San Juan, Puerto Rico
The stamp #1684725 of the CPA's College of PR was affixed to the original of
this report.
February 1, 2001
[Letterhead of Armando A. Suarez, CPA]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
Lajas Apartments Limited Partnership
I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Lajas Apartments Limited
Partnership, Rural Development Project No.: 63-017-660422313, as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners'
capital (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. My
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my
opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Lajas Apartments Limited
Partnership, as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its
operations, changes in partners' capital (deficit) and cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
My audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary
information on pages 20 thru 31 is presented for purposes of additional analysis
and is not a required part of the basic financial statements of the Partnership.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the
audit of the basic financial statements and, in my opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Armando A. Suarez, CPA
San Juan, Puerto Rico
The stamp #1478496 of the CPA's College of PR was affixed to the original of
this report.
January 25, 2000
[Letterhead of Ree & Kim]
To the Partners
Arlington - Rodeo Properties
(A California Limited Partnership)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Arlington - Rodeo Properties
(A California Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows
for the years then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audit.
We have conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Arlington - Rodeo Properties as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and its results of operations, changes in
partner's equity and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ree & Kim
Los Angeles, California
February 15, 2001
[Letterhead of Ree & Kim]
To the Partners
Arlington - Rodeo Properties
(A California Limited Partnership)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Arlington - Rodeo Properties
(A California Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related statements of operations, changes in partners' equity, and cash flows
for the year then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audit.
We have conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Arlington - Rodeo Properties as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and its results of operations, changes in
partner's equity and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ree & Kim
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2000
[Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Conifer Bateman Associates
(A Limited Partnership)
Lowville, New York
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Bateman Associates (A
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related statements
of changes in partners' equity, operations, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Bateman Associates (A
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its
operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Rochester, New York
January 29, 2001
[Letterhead of Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Partners of
Conifer Bateman Associates
(A Limited Partnership)
Lowville, New York
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Conifer Bateman Associates (A
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related statements
of changes in partners' equity, operations, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Conifer Bateman Associates (A
Limited Partnership) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its
operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Insero, Kasperski, Ciaccia & Co., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
Rochester, New York
January 25, 2000
[Letterhead of Mortland & Co. P.C.]
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Partners'
Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.
St. Louis, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 2000 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital,
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 2000 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Mortland & Co. P.C.
St. Louis, Missouri
February 17, 2001
[Letterhead of Mortland & Co. P.C.]
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Partners'
Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.
St. Louis, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 1999 and the related statements of loss, partners' capital,
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 1999 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Mortland & Co. P.C.
St. Louis, Missouri
February 15, 2000
[Letterhead of Mortland & Co. P.C.]
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Partners'
Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.
St. Louis, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 1998 and the related statements of income, partners' capital,
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hampden Hall Associates, L.P.,
as of December 31, 1998 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Mortland & Co. P.C.
St. Louis, Miss