Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark one)
|x| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to
Commission File Number: 333-58675
---------
KEY COMPONENTS, LLC
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware 04-3425424
- ------------------------------- -----------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
200 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591
- -------------------------------------------- -------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(914) 332-8088
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Commission File Number: 333-58675-01
KEY COMPONENTS FINANCE CORP.*
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware 14-1805946
- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
200 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591
- ------------------------------------------- ---------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(914) 332-8088
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_| No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any other
amendment to this Form 10-K. Not Applicable
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes__ No X_
State the aggregate market value of common equity held by
non-affiliates as of June 30, 2003: Not applicable since the membership
interests in Key Components, LLC were owned by Key Components, Inc., a privately
held New York corporation, and all of the shares of common stock of Key
Components Finance Corp. were owned by Key Components, LLC.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
* Key Components Finance Corp. meets the conditions set forth in
General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this
form with the reduced disclosure format.
PART I
Key Components LLC ("KCLLC"), a Delaware limited liability corporation, is the
parent holding company for its wholly owned subsidiaries, including Key
Components Finance Corp. ("Finance Corp."). KCLLC, together with such
subsidiaries, including Finance Corp., are collectively referred to herein as
the "Company." Key Components, Inc. ("KCI"), a New York corporation, is the sole
member of KCLLC. KCI has no other assets other than its interest in KCLLC and
has no operations. Accordingly, any transactions of KCI or obligations related
to KCI are reflected in the consolidated financials statements of the Company
and are reflected in the disclosures in this Form 10-K.
Item 1. Business
KCLLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation organized on May 15, 1998,
maintains its principal office at 200 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, New York
10591 and its telephone number is (914) 332-8088. The Company files current,
quarterly and annual reports on Form 8-K, Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, respectively.
They can be accessed through the EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. Any debenture
holder can request a copy of filings in writing to the Company's principal
office.
The Company is a leading manufacturer of custom engineered essential componentry
for application in a diverse array of end-use products. The Company targets
original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") markets where the Company believes its
value-added engineering and manufacturing capabilities, along with its timely
delivery, reliability and customer service, enable it to differentiate the
Company from its competitors and enhance profitability. The Company conducts its
operations through its two businesses, its electrical components ("EC") business
and its mechanical engineered components ("MEC") business. The EC business
product offerings include power conversion products, specialty electrical wiring
devices and connectors and high-voltage utility switches which are manufactured
by its subsidiaries Acme Electric Corporation ("Acme"), Marine Industries, LLC
("Marinco"), Atlantic Guest, Inc. ("Guest") and Turner Electric, LLC ("Turner").
The product offerings of the MEC business consist primarily of flexible shaft
and remote valve control components, turbo-charger components and medium
security lock products and accessories, which are manufactured by its
subsidiaries B.W. Elliott Manufacturing Co., LLC ("BWE"), Gits Manufacturing,
LLC ("Gits"), Hudson Lock, LLC ("Hudson") and ESP Lock Products, LLC ("ESP").
ESP was merged into Hudson on December 31, 2003. No one customer accounted for
more than ten percent of sales of the Company for any of the three years ended
December 31, 2003. For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, three
customers, who are subsidiaries of one company, accounted for approximately 11%,
14% and 13% of sales, respectively, of the MEC business. (See Note 5 to the
Company's consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K for
information concerning the Company's business segments).
Acquisition History
The 1992 acquisition of BWE began the acquisition program of the Company to
acquire small to medium size manufacturers of essential niche components for use
in various OEM customer products. In 1993, the Company acquired an additional
product line that was consolidated into BWE's operations. During 1997 and 1998,
the Company added to the MEC's product offerings with the acquisitions of Hudson
and ESP. During 1999, the Company complemented its MEC product offerings and
formed its EC business through its acquisition of Valley Forge Corporation
("VFC"). The Company expanded its EC business with the acquisition of Acme in
November 2000 (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contained
elsewhere in this Form 10-K). On March 3, 2003, the Company acquired the
mechanical components business of Arens Controls, LLC. The product line, which
manufactures mechanical push-pull control solutions, was fully integrated into
BWE's Binghamton, New York manufacturing facility in November 2003.
The Company has historically acquired complementary or related manufacturing
businesses and sought to integrate them into existing operations. Following an
acquisition, management seeks to rationalize operations, reduce overhead costs,
develop additional cross-selling opportunities and establish new customer
relationships. As a result of its integration efforts and internal growth, the
Company's consolidated net sales have increased from approximately $9.1 million
in fiscal year 1992 to approximately $197.3 million for fiscal year 2003.
1
The Company continues to seek to make selective acquisitions of light industrial
manufacturing companies (see Note 2 to the Company's consolidated financial
statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K).
Electrical Components
The Company's EC business features three major product lines: (i) power
conversion products, (ii) specialty electrical components ("SPEC") and (iii)
electric utility components.
Power Conversion Products
The Company's acquisition of Acme enabled the Company's EC business to enter
into the production of power conversion products. Power conversion product net
sales were approximately 28% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Acme's primary products are transformers that
range in size from 1/4 KVA (1,000 volts x Amps) to 1,000 KVA. A transformer is
an electrical device designed to convert alternating current from one voltage to
another. A transformer has no moving parts and is a completely static
solid-state device, which insures a long and maintenance-free life under normal
operating conditions. It consists, in its simplest form, of two or more wires or
coils wound on a laminated steel core. The Company has 1,400 active transformer
models, which are sold through two primary sales channels, its wholesale
distribution network and through direct sales to OEMs. Products sold through the
wholesale distribution network are generally smaller sized transformer models.
Due to the small size of the average order, the margins achieved are generally
higher than those achieved selling to OEMs. In the OEM sales channel, customers
are offered custom-built products, which generally achieve lower margins as
products are price-reduced in anticipation of a higher volume of orders. The
Company believes the OEM sales channel will drive the transformer product line's
revenue growth. Transformer designs rarely change and most transformers have a
long useful life.
Acme operates in a segment of the transformer market, which was estimated by the
National Electrical Manufacturers Association to be approximately $300 million
for 2003. This segment is defined as being comprised of dry type transformers,
which are less than 600 volts and range from 1/4 to 1,000 KVA. The competition
in this segment is divided into two tiers: the large switch gear manufacturers,
that sell transformers as part of a package of products, such as General
Electric, Electrical Distribution Products, a division of Schneider Electric
("Square D"), Hammond Manufacturing Inc., Eaton Corporation and Siemens, and
transformer specialists, such as Acme, and Sola/Heavy-Duty. Acme supplies
products that comprise approximately 15% of the total market, which is
approximately one half that of General Electric and Square D's market share but
twice that of any other competitor.
In June 2001, the Company determined to retain the aerospace division of Acme as
part of the power conversion product line. This expanded the power conversion
product line to include battery charger systems and the manufacturing of fibrous
nickel cadmium batteries for use in such battery systems, power control systems,
power supplies and converters used primarily in aerospace applications. Major
customers of this product line include governmental defense manufacturers and
OEM aerospace manufacturers. The aerospace aftermarket is an increasing share of
the product line's revenues as the quantity of batteries and systems sold by the
Company that are designed into OEM applications has grown over the last five
years.
Specialty Electrical
Within the SPEC market, the Company's core market niches are the recreational
and industrial markets, where the Company sells to both OEM customers and
after-market retail customers under brand names such as Marinco, Guest, AFI,
Nicro, Park Power, and various private labels. In the recreational marine
market, where the Company sells the entire range of its product offerings, the
Company specifically targets the blue water/leisure boating and inland
fishing/bass boat market segments and has a strong market presence. Customers
include OEM boatbuilders, large retailers and wholesale distributors. The
Company's wiring devices and components are designed to withstand hostile
weather and corrosive environments, while remaining easy to install in less than
ideal conditions. SPEC products include; (i) weather and corrosion resistant
wiring devices, such as ship-to-shore electrical connectors for marine and
vehicle-to-outlet connectors for recreational vehicle applications; (ii) onboard
"potted" (i.e., completely insulated) battery chargers for outdoor applications
including bass boat and other marine applications; and (iii) various accessory
products such as plugs, receptacles, electrical switches, solar ventilation
products, and boat accessories such as horns, windshield wiper systems, lighting
products, and teak accessories. Net sales of the Company's SPEC products
accounted for approximately 24% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The SPEC product line enjoys a dominant market
position in its core market where the Company's brands are highly regarded by
both OEM and aftermarket customers.
2
Electric Utility Components
The Company's SPEC product line also has products targeted for industrial
applications. The market share of the Company's SPEC's products has grown
dramatically since these products were targeted to the industrial marketplace
approximately ten years ago. The primary product offerings include; (i) onboard
"potted" battery chargers for industrial and healthcare applications such as
fork and "scissor" lifts, personal mobility carts, and electric wheelchairs; and
(ii) specialty wiring devices designed for industrial applications where
protection from water, chemicals, dust, or other elements is required. Growth in
this market has resulted from the development of customized products for
applications such as outdoor power generators, movie and theatrical production,
and semiconductor equipment manufacturing.
The Company dominates the design and manufacture of high-voltage switchgear for
electric utilities in the power transmission segment of the electric utility
industry. While the Company competes in the distribution and substation segments
of the electric utility marketplace as well, it is in the transmission segment
that the Company has, over time, secured its relative position through superior
quality and service, and by creating high barriers to entry through
specialization, reputation, and investments in machinery and equipment. Net
sales of the Company's electric utility products were approximately 8% of the
Company's consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Significant customers include large utilities. The EC business switchgear
products consist primarily of air break switches, load break interrupters, and
accessory equipment. Air break switches are used for sectionalizing and routing
power from one point to another. Load break interrupters allow the
sectionalizing and routing of power under full load conditions. Accessory
equipment enables the utility operator to program parameters and related
functions that will automatically sectionalize and switch power flow in the
event of a fault. Once switched, the faulted line can be repaired, re-energized,
and returned to service with minimal downtime or loss of service revenue.
Mechanical Engineered Components
The MEC business features three major product lines: (i) flexible shafts for the
transmission of rotary power, (ii) turbocharger components, including wastegate
actuators, and (iii) medium-security locks and locking systems.
Flexible Shafts
The Company is the leading domestic designer and manufacturer of flexible shaft
products and assemblies. Net sales of flexible shaft products were approximately
13% of the Company's net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003. Flexible
shafting is constructed utilizing unique wire winding technology. Flexible shaft
assemblies are custom designed for the transmission of rotary power at low
torque levels (less than ten horsepower), and can be incorporated into almost
any machine, product, or device replacing conventional power transmission
components such as rigid shafts, gearboxes, universal joints, and couplings.
Flexible shafts are integrally designed into the OEM's final product to offer
benefits, such as lighter weight, fewer component parts, less assembly time, and
greater freedom in design, resulting in a lower manufacturing cost for the OEM's
final product. The flexible shaft assemblies are critical components utilized in
weed trimmers, concrete vibrators, lawn tractors, aircraft engines and wings,
plant processing equipment, large vessels such as Navy ships, nuclear power
plants, and many other applications in a variety of industries. The potential
applications for flexible shafting are limited only by the Company's ability to
develop new solutions to integrate flexible shafts into new OEM designs or to
displace conventional power transmission products in existing applications. In
2003, the Company expanded the product offerings of its flexible shaft product
line with the acquisition of the mechanical components business of Arens
Controls, LLC. The product line, which manufactures mechanical push-pull control
solutions, was fully integrated into BWE's Binghamton, New York manufacturing
facility in November 2003.
3
Turbocharger components
The Company is a primary outsource supplier of turbocharger components to the
domestic and international market for turbocharged diesel engines. The Company's
turbocharger components are essential components of diesel engine turbocharger
systems which, through the use of flow valve controls, increase engine power,
efficiency, and economy while reducing emissions. As the primary supplier of
turbocharger components and exhaust gas systems to major turbocharger and engine
OEMS, the Company's products can be found on a variety of truck, pick-up, and
heavy-duty diesel-operated platforms. End-use customers for the Company's
products include high-end truck and vehicle manufacturers such as Ford Motor
Company. Net sales of the Company's turbocharger components products accounted
for approximately 18% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The Company holds multiple patents and is very active in the
development of new products to expand the Company's product line, including
related emission control products. In addition, with operational expansion into
Thailand in 1999 and China in 2003, the product line has attracted new customers
as well as expanded business with existing customers.
Medium-Security Locks and Locking Systems
The Company competes in the medium-security segment for cylindrical lock
applications. Medium-security locks are used in applications that involve
non-life-threatening situations or when articles of low to moderate financial
value are being secured. The Company produces custom and specialty
medium-security locks and locking systems to meet OEM customers' specifications
for use in office furniture, point of sale terminals, bank bags, post office
boxes, storage lockers, and other applications. Net sales of the Company's lock
products were approximately 9% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The Company's lock products are typically small
and low-cost but are precision-engineered and custom-designed critical
components of a larger, more expensive end product. The Company also produces
locking systems, which provide a safety feature used to prevent multiple drawers
from being opened simultaneously in filing cabinets and desks. The Company sells
its lock products primarily to leading furniture OEMs.
The lock product line's net sales declined significantly during the three years
ended December 31, 2003. Net sales of the lock product line were approximately
$17.2 million, $21.8 million and $32.6 million for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Management attributes such decline to the
downturn in the economy plus the impact of foreign competition, both of which
have led to the product line becoming a commodity over that period. In February
2004, after reviewing the lock product line's 2003 operating performance as well
as its long-term strategic plan, the Board of Directors of KCI and KCLLC decided
that it would re-evaluate the long-term strategy related to its lock product
line during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The long-term revaluation will
entail in-depth review of the lock product line's strategic plan and the
underlying assumptions as to the future opportunities for this product line and
the execution risks of meeting the strategic plan's goals.
As the net sales eroded, the shift in manufacturing to Mexico has negatively
impacted customer service and quality. Further, the decline in net sales volume
has made it prohibitive to carry the dual overhead infrastructures of its
domestic and Mexico manufacturing facilities. As a result, management has
concluded to close the lock manufacturing facility in Mexico during fiscal 2004.
The assets of Mexico primarily relate to inventory and machinery and equipment
that would be moved back to the product line's Massachusetts location.
Sales and Marketing
The Company employs both salaried and commission-based sales personnel, as well
as independent sales representatives and distributors to facilitate the
marketing and sales of its products. The Company's sales and marketing teams
have adopted an integrated approach to product development, marketing and sales.
They seek to work closely with the Company's engineers to address customer
specific design requirements and the hurdles associated therewith, as well as
potential product profitability. In addition, the sales team is responsible for
keeping the Company's engineering, manufacturing and management personnel
advised of possible future trends and requirements of customers. The Company's
sales and marketing personnel also focus on bringing customers a level of
personal service the Company believes to be superior to its competitors.
4
Raw Materials and Suppliers
The primary raw materials used by the Company are copper, brass, zinc, stainless
steel, steel wire and rubber, all of which are commodity items, readily
available from a wide range of sources. The Company has enjoyed and continues to
enjoy good relations with its suppliers and has not suffered any significant
interruptions in the delivery of its required materials. Additionally, the
Company is not dependent on any single supplier. In the event a supply
arrangement is terminated, the Company would be forced to look elsewhere for its
raw materials. Management believes these can be obtained with minimal, if any,
business interruption. However, the prices for such materials can fluctuate, and
such fluctuations can be material. A significant increase in raw material prices
could adversely affect the results of operations of the Company.
Competition
While the Company faces competition in each of its business segments, management
believes that its products are able to achieve a significant share of their
related market niches due to a variety of factors. The Company's strategy is to
differentiate its products from its competitors', by providing high product
quality, customer service, superior design capabilities and proprietary,
vertically integrated manufacturing processes. The Company's strategy of
providing custom engineered solutions and a high level of service to its
customer base has protected and strengthened its market share in the markets
that it serves. Although it is possible other competitors may seek to serve
these markets, the Company believes significant barriers to entry exist,
including the unwillingness of OEMs to expand their vendor relationships for the
same products purchased, the availability of customized processes which enable
the Company to service its customers' needs on an efficient basis and the
capital investment required to purchase the equipment needed to manufacture
products of similar quality.
Environmental and Safety Regulations
The Company's operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental
laws and regulations, which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants
into the air and water and establish standards for treatment, storage and
disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company believes that it is in
substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The
Company also maintains environmental insurance at certain of its locations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, the Company employed 1,566 persons on a full-time
basis. Of these employees, 691 were employed in the EC business, 867 were
employed in the MEC business and the Company's corporate office had 8 employees
as of December 31, 2003. One of the Company's subsidiaries has a collective
bargaining agreement, which covered 75 employees. Neither KCLLC nor any of its
subsidiaries has ever had a work stoppage and each of KCLLC and its subsidiaries
considers its relationship with its employees to be satisfactory.
5
Item 2. Properties
At December 31, 2003 the Company's principal properties consisted of:
Manufacturing Use/ Corporate Square
Facility office Location Footage Owned/Leased
- ------------------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------- ------------ ------------------
KCLLC Corporate office Tarrytown, NY 3,000 Leased
Electrical Engineered
Components:
Acme Power conversion Lumberton, NC 128,000 Owned
Acme Power conversion Monterrey, Mexico 45,000 Leased
Acme Power conversion Tempe, AZ 35,000 Leased
Marinco SPEC Napa, CA 77,000 Leased
Guest SPEC Meriden, CT 33,000 Owned
Turner Utility switchgear Fairview Heights, IL 52,000 Owned
Turner Utility switchgear Milstadt, IL 45,000 Leased
Mechanical Engineered
Components:
BWE Flexible shaft products Binghamton, NY 250,000 Owned
Gits Turbocharger components Creston, Iowa 60,000 Owned
Gits Turbocharger components Chonburi, Thailand 17,000 Leased
Gits Turbocharger components Shanghai, China 28,000 Leased
Hudson (1) Lock products Hudson, MA 218,000 Owned
Hudson (1) Lock products Monterrey, Mexico 38,000 Leased
(1) Includes production from the Company's ESP facility, formerly in Leominster,
MA, the lease of which terminated in May 2003. All the production from the
Leominster facility was incorporated into the Lock product line's other
manufacturing facilities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
KCLLC's membership interests are not publicly traded (see "Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions").
6
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data for the three years ended December 31,
2003 was derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Company
included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following selected financial data for
the two years ended December 31, 2000 was derived from the consolidated
financial statements of the Company not included in this Form 10-K. The
financial data set forth includes the results of operations of its wholly owned
subsidiaries from their respective dates of acquisition. The data set forth
below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" and the Company's consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto.
Year ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Net Sales $197,290 $187,943 $193,817 $160,465 $144,400
Income from operations (a) 9,066 17,455 26,862 31,368 22,346
(Loss) income before cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle (c) (3,430) 1,526 4,731 2,672 4,843
Net (loss) income (a)(b) (c) (d) (3,430) (6,631) 4,731 (1,316) 4,815
Total assets as of the end of period 182,079 192,714 225,719 245,671 181,256
Long term debt (including current
maturities) as of the end of
period (e) (f) 132,757 143,844 165,837 182,711 149,149
(a) Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company stopped recording
goodwill amortization effective January 1, 2002. In June 2002, the
Company completed the assessment of its reporting units and its
initial assessment of impairment upon adoption. As a result, the
Company identified one reporting unit in the MEC business with a
book value of goodwill that exceeded its fair market value, which
was estimated using a valuation methodology that triangulates the
discounted cash flows, market multiples and transactional
multiples of the reporting units. In accordance with SFAS 142, the
Company, during the second quarter 2002, estimated the amount of
the impairment and recorded a cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, as of January 1, 2002, of approximately $7.8
million, net of taxes of approximately $3.4 million, to write down
the goodwill associated with the Company's lock product line
resulting from the market conditions of that product line. The
Company, as prescribed by SFAS 142, finalized its impairment
testing by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting
unit's goodwill to its carrying value during the third quarter to
determine the amount of the final impairment upon adoption of SFAS
142. As a result, the Company reduced the tax impact of the charge
by approximately $353,000 to reflect the proper deferred tax basis
of the adjusted goodwill. No further impairment charges were taken
against the Company's goodwill.
In December 2003 and 2002, in accordance with SFAS 142, the
Company performed its required annual fair value testing of its
recorded goodwill for its reporting units using a valuation
approach consistent with the one used upon adoption of SFAS 142.
As a result of the analyses, the Company recorded charges of
approximately $17.4 and $12.4 million for the years ended December
31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which is included in the
Company's operating expenses related to its lock reporting unit.
The lock reporting unit experienced a further decline of its fair
value during those periods primarily due to deterioration in those
years of its results of operations and projected future financial
results. Through December 31, 2003, the Company's cumulative
impairment of goodwill was approximately $40.9 million, all of
which related to its lock product line. At December 31, 2003, the
Company had written off all the goodwill related to its lock
product line.
(b) Effective May 31, 1997, the predecessors of BWE, Hudson and ESP
each elected to be treated as an S corporation, which caused the
shareholders of their then parent company, KCI, to be personally
liable for the taxes on the income of the Company. Through August
31, 1999, VFC was a C corporation and was responsible for paying
taxes on its income. Effective August 31, 1999, VFC was merged
into KCLLC and most of VFC's subsidiaries, as well as BWE, Hudson
and ESP, were converted to limited liability companies ("LLC").
Corporations that elect to be treated as S corporations and LLCs
are not liable for the majority of taxes on their income, which
are imposed instead on their shareholders or members. Accordingly,
subsequent to May 31, 1997 through December 31, 1998, the
provision for income taxes includes only those taxes applicable to
certain states.
7
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company's provision for
income taxes related primarily to VFC's consolidated taxable
income (as a C corporation) and the taxable income of the
subsidiaries not converted to LLC status. On May 22, 2000, KCI's S
election terminated and KCI became responsible for taxes on the
income of the Company (See Notes 1 and 9(a) to the consolidated
financial statements)
(c) Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
and net loss for the year ended December 31, 2000 reflects a
charge related to early extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.1 million.
(d) Net (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
reflects loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, of
approximately $4.0 million and $28,000 respectively.
(e) Does not include approximately $5.9 million related to accrued
stock appreciation rights as of December 31, 1999.
(f) Includes approximately $13.1 million of redeemable member's equity
at December 31, 1999.
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations General
KCLLC is the parent holding company of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the
Company. KCI, the sole member of KCLLC, holds no other assets other than its
investment in KCLLC and has no operations. The Company has two operating
business segments, its electrical components ("EC") business and mechanical
engineered components ("MEC") business. Through its two businesses, the Company
is a leading manufacturer of custom-engineered essential componentry for
application in a diverse array of end-use products. The Company targets original
equipment manufacturer ("OEM") markets where the Company believes its
value-added engineering and manufacturing capabilities, along with its timely
delivery, reliability and customer service, enable it to differentiate the
Company from its competitors and enhance profitability. Further, as the Company
leverages itself in order to acquire additional product lines, management uses
free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure defined by the Company as cash flow
from operations less cash flow used in investing activities) as a key indicator
of each product line. The EC business product offerings include power conversion
products, specialty electrical components and high-voltage utility switches. The
product offerings of the MEC business consist primarily of flexible shaft and
remote valve control components, turbo-charger actuators and medium security
lock products and accessories. The Company's EC business was formed through its
acquisition of VFC in 1999. The Company expanded the product offerings of its EC
business with the power conversion product lines it acquired through its
acquisition of Acme in November 2000. (See Note 2 to the Company's consolidated
financial statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K). The Company's MEC
business, which was comprised of its flexible shaft and lock product lines prior
to the VFC acquisition, was expanded with the addition of the Company's
turbocharger line, which it acquired in 1999 when the Company completed its
acquisition of VFC. Additionally, in March 2003 the Company acquired the
mechanical components product line of Arens Controls, LLC, which was a
complimentary product for the Company's flexible shaft product line.
The Company has historically acquired complementary or related manufacturing
businesses and sought to integrate them into existing operations. Following an
acquisition, management seeks to rationalize operations, reduce overhead costs,
develop additional cross-selling opportunities and establish new customer
relationships. As a result of its integration efforts and internal growth, the
Company's consolidated net sales have increased from approximately $9.1 million
in fiscal year 1992 to approximately $197.3 million for fiscal year 2003.
The Company continues to seek to make selective acquisitions of light industrial
manufacturing companies (see Note 2 to the Company's consolidated financial
statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K).
8
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, consolidated
statement of operations data for the Company expressed in dollar amounts (in
thousands) and as a percentage of net sales. The financial data set forth
includes the results of operations of KCLLC's wholly owned subsidiaries from
their respective dates of acquisition (see Note 2 to the Company's consolidated
financial statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K). The data set forth below
should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
----------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------
% of % of % of
Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
Net Sales $197,290 100.0% $187,943 100.0% $193,817 100.0%
Cost of Goods Sold 127,879 64.8 117,962 62.8 123,005 63.5
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
Gross Profit 69,411 35.2 69,981 37.2 70,812 36.5
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 41,457 21.0 38,689 20.6 40,802 21.1
Goodwill Impairment 17,374 8.8 12,350 6.6 - -
Amortization of goodwill - - - 3,558 1.8
Cumulative adjustment for Aerospace - - - (721) (0.4)
Other operating expenses 1,514 0.8 1,487 0.8 311 0.2
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
Income from operations 9,066 4.6 17,455 9.3 26,862 13.9
Interest expense (12,338) (6.3) (13,301) (7.1) (16,573) (8.6)
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
(Loss) income before provision for
taxes and cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle (3,272) (1.7) 4,154 2.2 10,289 5.3
Provision for income taxes 158 - 2,628 1.4 5,558 2.9
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
(Loss) income before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle (3,430) (1.7) 1,526 0.8 4,731 2.4
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle, net - - (8,157) (4.3) - -
----------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
Net (loss) income $(3,430) (1.7)% $ (6,631) (3.5)% $ 4,731 2.4%
=========== =========== ============ ============= ============ ============
9
A summary of the Company's segments is as follows:
Electrical Components Business Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
% of % of % of
Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales
----------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Net Sales $117,777 100.0% $121,051 100.0% $120,401 100.0%
Cost of Sales 72,056 61.2 75,779 62.6 77,683 64.5
----------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Gross Profit 45,721 38.8 45,272 37.4 42,718 35.5
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 26,436 22.4 26,549 21.9 25,858 21.5
Amortization of goodwill - - - - 1,824 1.5
Cumulative adjustment for Aerospace - - - - (721) (0.6)
----------- --------------- ------------ ------------- -------------- -----------
Income from operations $ 19,285 16.4% $18,723 15.5% $15,757 13.1%
=========== =============== ============ ============= ============== ===========
Mechanical Engineered Components Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002 2001
--------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------
% of % of % of
Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales Amount Net Sales
----------- --------------- ------------ -------------- ------------- -----------
Net Sales $79,513 100.0% $66,892 100.0% $73,416 100.0%
Cost of Sales 55,823 70.2 42,183 63.1 45,322 61.7
----------- --------------- ------------ -------------- ------------- -----------
Gross Profit 23,690 29.8 24,709 36.9 28,094 38.3
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 11,583 14.6 8,876 13.3 8,960 12.2
Goodwill Impairment 17,374 21.9 12,350 18.5 - -
Amortization of goodwill - - - - 1,734 2.4
1,514 1.9
Other expenses 1,487 2.2 311 0.4
----------- --------------- ------------ -------------- ------------- -----------
Income from operations $ (6,781) (8.5%) $ 1,996 3.0% $17,089 23.3%
=========== =============== ============ ============== ============= ===========
Year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002
Net Sales: Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 ("Fiscal 2003")
increased by approximately $9.3 million, or 5.0%, from approximately $187.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2002 ("Fiscal 2003") to approximately
$197.3 million for Fiscal 2003. This increase was the result of the
approximately $3.3 million, or 2.7%, decrease in the net sales of the EC
business offset by the approximately $12.6 million, or 18.9%, increase in net
sales of the MEC business.
The approximately $3.3 million decline in net sales of the EC business for the
Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 was driven by continuing soft economic
conditions, which have impacted the EC's power conversion product line. The
power conversion product line was down approximately $3.4 million, or 5.8% for
the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 as its construction, industrial and
aerospace end markets remain soft.
The approximately $12.6 million increase in net sales of the MEC business for
the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 was driven by increased sales of the
flexible shaft and the turbocharger product lines. Net sales of the flexible
shaft product line increased by approximately $7.0 million, or 36.6%, for the
Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. This increase was driven by new product
introductions as well as the acquisition of the mechanical components business
of Arens Controls, LLC ("Arens Controls"). The Company completed this
acquisition on March 3, 2003 (See Liquidity and Capital Resources), which
increased net sales of the flexible shaft product line by approximately $5.3
million for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. Net sales of the
turbocharger components product line increased by approximately $10.3 million,
or 39.3%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. This increase was
driven primarily by a new product introduction. The net sales of the lock
product line declined by approximately $4.6 million, or 21.2% for Fiscal 2003 as
compared to Fiscal 2002, driven primarily by continued softness in their end
markets as well as foreign competition.
10
Gross Profit: Gross profit declined by approximately $570,000, or 0.8%, for
Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002, resulting from the sum of the
approximately $449,000, or 1.0%, increase in the gross profit of the EC business
and the approximately $1.0 million, or 4.1%, decline in gross profit of the MEC
business for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002.
The approximately $449,000, or 1.0%, increase in gross profit of the EC business
for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 resulted primarily from the $1.0
million increase in gross profit from the specialty electrical product line plus
the approximately $290,000 gross profit increase of the utility product line,
offset by the approximately $1.1 decline in gross profit of the power conversion
product line in Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. The Company's specialty
electrical product line's increase in gross profit was mostly due to volume
increases in Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. The utility product line
experienced favorable gross margin mix as its parts business was a larger
percentage of its overall sales. The power conversion product line experienced a
decline in gross profit that was a combination of lower sales in Fiscal 2003 as
compared to Fiscal 2002 as well as lower high margin sales.
The approximately $1.0 million, or 4.1%, decline in gross profit of the MEC
business for Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 was driven primarily by the
lost volume and margin of the Company's lock product line, partially offset by
gross profit increases of the flexible shaft and turbocharger components product
lines related to volume increases of those two product lines as compared to
2002. In addition, the gross profit of the flexible shaft product line did not
grow in line with its net sales growth as its results were negatively impacted
by a change in the product mix sold as compared to Fiscal 2002. Further, the
acquisition of the mechanical components product line of Arens Controls
negatively impacted the gross margin of the flexible shaft product line as the
Company was working under an interim operating agreement with the seller until
that product line had been fully integrated into the Company's Binghamton, New
York facility, which was completed in November 2003 (See Liquidity and Capital
Resources). While sales of the flexible shaft product line increased by
approximately $7.0 million, or 36.6%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal
2002, gross profit only increased by approximately $628,000, or 6.7%. The
increase in gross profit for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002
resulting from the turbocharger components product line was approximately $2.8
million, or 31.1%. The lock product line experienced a decline in gross profit
of approximately $4.4 million, or 68.6%, resulting from lower revenues and
carrying a higher cost structure as it moves operations to Mexico.
The lock product line's net sales declined significantly during the three years
ended December 31, 2003. Net sales of the lock product line were approximately
$17.2 million, $21.8 million and $32.6 million for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As the net sales eroded, the shift in
manufacturing to Mexico has negatively impacted customer service and quality.
Further, the decline in net sales volume has made it prohibitive to carry the
dual overhead infrastructures of its domestic and Mexico manufacturing
facilities. As a result, management has concluded to close the lock
manufacturing facility in Mexico during fiscal 2004. The assets of Mexico
primarily relate to inventory and machinery and equipment that would be moved
back to the product line's Massachusetts location.
The gross profit, as a percentage of net sales ("GP percentage"), for the EC
business increased by approximately 1.4% for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to
Fiscal 2002. For the MEC business, the GP percentage declined by approximately
7.1% during the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. The change in GP
percentage for the EC business is the result of a change in product mix as
described above. The change in GP percentage for the MEC business is primarily
related to the impact of the acquisition of the mechanical components product
line of Arens Controls, as well as the margin decline of the lock product line,
as described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: Selling, general and
administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased approximately $2.8 million, or 7.2%,
for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. As a percentage of net sales,
SG&A increased to 21.0% for the Fiscal 2003 from 20.6% of net sales for the
Fiscal 2002. SG&A of the EC business decreased by approximately $113,000, or
0.4%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 and as a percentage of net
sales, increased approximately 0.5%. SG&A of the MEC business increased by
approximately $2.7 million, or 30.5%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal
2002 and as a percentage of net sales, increased approximately 1.3%.
11
The increase in SG&A expenses for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 is
primarily related to the increase in SG&A of the MEC business. The increase in
SG&A of the MEC business is primarily the result of the Company operating under
an interim operating agreement relating to the acquisition of the mechanical
components product line of Arens Controls, which was completed on March 3, 2003
(see Liquidity and Capital Resources). The Company was operating under the
interim operating agreement with the seller until November 2003. Furthermore
this product line expensed approximately $463,000 of moving and other costs
related to integrating the Arens Controls product line. In addition, higher
compensation costs drove the increase in SG&A of the turbocharger product line,
as a result of the growth in the operating performance of that product line
during the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. The lock product line had an
increase in SG&A resulting from the increased costs of operating its Mexico
production facility as compared to Fiscal 2002 as well as having severance costs
related to management changes made in 2003.
The decline in the SG&A of the EC business was driven by lower commission and
compensation expenses, somewhat offset by unfavorable freight and commission mix
related to the 2003 product sales. Higher insurance costs for the Fiscal 2003 as
compared to Fiscal 2002 also impacted the SG&A of both the MEC and EC business.
Lastly, during the Fiscal 2003, the Company paid approximately $325,000 of
professional fees related to an unsuccessful acquisition attempt.
Goodwill Impairment: In December 2003 and 2002, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets", the Company performed its required annual fair value testing of its
recorded goodwill for its reporting units. The fair value assessment was
estimated using a valuation methodology that triangulates the discounted cash
flows, market multiples and transactional multiples of the reporting units. As a
result of the analyses, the Company recorded impairment charges of approximately
$17.4 and $12.4 million for Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002, respectively, related
to its lock reporting unit. The lock reporting unit experienced a further
decline of its fair value during those periods, primarily due to a deterioration
of its results of operations and projected future financial results. In
addition, market multiples assigned to this product line also declined during
2002. Through December 31, 2003, the Company's cumulative impairment of goodwill
was approximately $40.9 million, all of which related to its lock product line.
At December 31, 2003 the Company had written off all the goodwill related to its
lock product line.
Other Expenses: Other expenses increased by approximately $27,000 for the Fiscal
2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. The expenses for Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002
were incurred primarily in moving manufacturing of the Company's lock products
to Mexico. In addition, certain start-up expenses were incurred in 2003 related
to establishing a production facility in China for the Company's turbocharger
product line. The lock product line's net sales declined significantly during
the three years ended December 31, 2003. As a result of this and other factors
described above, management has concluded to close the lock manufacturing
facility in Mexico during fiscal 2004. The assets of Mexico primarily relate to
inventory and machinery and equipment that would be moved back to the product
line's Massachusetts location.
Income from Operations: The decline in income from operations of approximately
$8.4 million, or 48.1%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002, resulted
from the decrease in gross profit of approximately $570,000 coupled with the
increases in SG&A expenses of approximately $2.8 million, goodwill impairment of
approximately $5.0 million and other expenses of approximately $27,000.
Interest Expense: Interest expense decreased by approximately $963,000, or 7.2%,
during the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002. This decrease is primarily
due to lower levels of outstanding borrowings during the Fiscal 2003 as compared
to Fiscal 2002.
Provision for Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes decreased by
approximately $2.5 million, or 94.0%, for the Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal
2002. The Company's effective tax rate on income before provision for income
taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the Fiscal
2003 was approximately 4.8%. The effective rate on income before provision for
income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the
Fiscal 2002 was approximately 63.3%. The decline in the effective rate from the
Fiscal 2002 to Fiscal 2003 was primarily driven by the Company's foreign tax
credits.
(Loss) income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle: (Loss)
income before cumulative effect in change in accounting principle increased by
approximately $5.0 million during the Fiscal 2003 from income of approximately
$1.5 million in Fiscal 2002 to a loss of approximately $3.4 million in Fiscal
2003. The increase in loss resulted from the decrease in income from operations
of approximately $8.4 million offset by the declines in interest expense and
provision for taxes of approximately $963,000 and $2.5 million, respectively,
due to the factors discussed above.
12
Cumulative effect of Change in Accounting Principle: In July 2001, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations"
and SFAS No. 142, which were effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2001. In June 2002, the Company completed the assessment of its reporting
units and its initial step one impairment test on January 1, 2002 financial
information. As a result, the Company identified one reporting unit in the MEC
business with a book value of goodwill that exceeded its fair market value,
which was estimated using valuation methodology involving discounted cash flows
and market and transactional multiples of the reporting units. In accordance
with SFAS 142, the Company estimated the amount of the impairment and recorded a
cumulative effect in change of accounting principle, as of January 1, 2002, of
approximately $7.8 million, net of taxes of approximately $3.4 million, to write
down the goodwill associated with the Company's lock product line resulting from
the current market conditions of that product line. The Company finalized its
impairment testing, as prescribed by SFAS 142, during the third quarter of 2002
to determine the amount of final impairment. As a result, the Company reduced
the tax impact of the charge by approximately $353,000 to reflect the proper
deferred tax basis of the adjusted goodwill.
Net loss: Net loss declined by approximately $3.2 million for the Fiscal 2003 as
compared to Fiscal 2002. (Loss) income before cumulative effect in change in
accounting principle increased by approximately $5.0 million as described above.
This was offset by the approximately $8.2 million increase in net income for the
Fiscal 2003 as compared to Fiscal 2002 resulting from the Company's cumulative
effect in change of accounting principle recorded during 2002.
Year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the year ended December 31, 2001
Net Sales: Net sales Fiscal 2002 decreased by approximately $5.9 million, or
3.0%, from approximately $193.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001
("Fiscal 2001") to $187.9 million for Fiscal 2002. This decrease was the result
of the approximately $650,000, or 0.5%, increase in the net sales of the EC
business offset by the approximately $6.5 million, or 8.9%, decrease in net
sales of the MEC business.
For the first five months of 2001, the results of operations of the aerospace
division of Acme ("Aerospace") were excluded from the consolidated results of
the Company due to its classification as being held for sale during that period.
Net sales of the EC business, pro forma to include the net sales of Aerospace
for the entire period in the results of operations for Fiscal 2001, declined by
approximately $4.3 million, or 3.5% for Fiscal 2002. The primary driver was the
decline in sales for the power conversion product line of the EC business. Net
sales of the power conversion business for Fiscal 2002, pro forma to include the
net sales of Aerospace for the entire period in the results of operations for
Fiscal 2001, declined by approximately $6.2 million or 9.7%. This decline was
the result of lower demand in the industrial and telecom markets for power
distribution products. The decline in the power conversion product sales were
slightly offset by growth in the Company's specialty electrical product sales,
which increased by approximately $3.8 million or 9.0%. However, weakness in the
utility marketplace resulted in the Company's utility product sales declining
approximately $1.9 million or 10.0%.
Net sales in the MEC business decreased by approximately $6.5 million from
approximately $73.4 million in Fiscal 2001 to approximately $66.9 million in
Fiscal 2002. This decrease is primarily related to the decline in sales of the
Company's lock product line, which has continued to experience softness in
demand across its major markets.
Gross Profit: Gross profit decreased by approximately $831,000, or 1.2%, from
approximately $70.8 million for Fiscal 2001 to approximately $70.0 million
Fiscal 2002, resulting from the $2.6 million, or 6.0%, increase in the gross
profit of the EC business less the decline in gross profit of the MEC business
for Fiscal 2002 of approximately $3.4 million, or 12.0%.
Gross profit of the EC business, pro forma to include the results of operations
of Aerospace for the entire period in the results of operations for Fiscal 2001,
increased by approximately $887,000 for Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001.
The gross profit gains resulted from productivity improvements experienced
during Fiscal 2002 as well as from a sales product mix that resulted in higher
margins.
The approximately $3.4 million decline in gross profit for the MEC business for
Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001 is primarily due to the decline in sales
of the lock product line of the MEC business for Fiscal 2002.
13
The gross profit, as a percentage of net sales ("GP percentage"), for the EC
business increased by approximately 1.9% for Fiscal 2002. For the MEC business,
the GP percentage declined by approximately 1.3% for Fiscal 2002. The GP
percentage for the EC business, pro forma to include the results of operations
of Aerospace for the entire period in the results of operations for Fiscal 2001,
increased by approximately 2.0% from 35.7% for Fiscal 2001 to 37.7% for Fiscal
2002. The increase in GP percentage for the EC business is the result of product
mix and productivity gains. The Company's power conversion product line
benefited from high margin aftermarket aerospace produce sales and from
significant productivity gains as it consolidated distribution operations,
negotiated material cost savings and increased labor efficiency at its Mexico
manufacturing facility. The Company's SPEC product line's margins benefited from
an increase in sales volume during Fiscal 2002. The decline in GP percentage of
the MEC business is primarily related to margin compression resulting from fixed
overheads being absorbed by lower sales levels primarily related to the lock
product line.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: Selling, general and
administrative ("SG&A") expenses declined by approximately $2.1 million, or
5.2%, from Fiscal 2001 to Fiscal 2002. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A
decreased by 0.5% from Fiscal 2001 to Fiscal 2002.
SG&A of the EC business increased by approximately $691,000, or 2.7%, for Fiscal
2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001 and, as a percentage of net sales, increased
0.5% for Fiscal 2002. SG&A of the EC business, pro forma to include the results
of operations of Aerospace for the entire period in Fiscal 2001, declined by
approximately $771,000, or 2.8%, for Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001,
and, as a percentage of net sales, SG&A, pro forma to include the results of
operations of Aerospace for the entire period in the results of operations for
Fiscal 2001, increased 0.1% for Fiscal 2002.
SG&A of the MEC business, which declined by approximately $84,000, or 0.9%, for
Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001, increased as a percentage of sales by
1.1% from Fiscal 2001 to Fiscal 2002.
The decrease in SG&A expenses for Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001 is
primarily related to the expenses of the former corporate office of Acme, which
was closed in October 2001. That office added approximately $2.3 million to the
consolidated SG&A expenses of the Company during Fiscal 2001, including
approximately $425,000 of depreciation. Upon the close of the Acme corporate
office, all remaining related expenses of that office terminated.
The decrease in the SG&A of the EC business, pro forma to include the results of
operations of Aerospace for the entire period in Fiscal 2001, was primarily
related to the Company's cost reduction initiatives put in place during Fiscal
2001 in response to the downturn in the economy and lower commissions due to the
lower sales volumes and commission mix of the sales volume.
Goodwill Impairment: In December 2002, in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets",
the Company performed its required annual fair value testing of its recorded
goodwill for its reporting units. The fair value assessment was estimated using
a valuation methodology that triangulates the discounted cash flows, market
multiples and transactional multiples of the reporting units. As a result of the
analysis, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $12.4 million, related
to its lock reporting unit, which experienced a further decline of its fair
value since the January 1, 2002 assessment, due to a deterioration in the
current year of its results of operations compared to its operating plan and
projected future financial results as well as a decline in the market multiple
ascribed to the product line in its fair market valuation. Through December 31,
2002, the Company's cumulative impairment of goodwill was approximately $23.5
million, all of which related to its lock product line.
Amortization of Goodwill: Goodwill amortization decreased by approximately $3.6
million during Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001, due to the Company
ceasing the amortization of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 as required by SFAS
142 (See Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle).
Acme Aerospace Division Cumulative Adjustment: On September 1, 2001, the
Company, based on management's conclusion that Aerospace, which had previously
been held for sale, was more valuable than what current market conditions
dictated, decided to retain rather than divest Aerospace. On that date and in
accordance with EITF 90-6, "Accounting for Certain Events Not Addressed in Issue
No. 87-11 Relating to an Acquired Operating Unit to be Sold," the Company
reallocated the Acme purchase price as if Aerospace had never been held for sale
and recorded a cumulative adjustment for the results of operations of Aerospace
from the date of acquisition through May 31, 2001 of $721,000, which had been
excluded from the results of operations of the Company and had been included in
goodwill.
14
Other Expenses: Other expenses increased by approximately $1.2 million for
Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001. For Fiscal 2002 and Fiscal 2001, the
other expenses include approximately $1.4 million of redundant facility and
start up expenses related to the Company's new lock production facility in
Mexico.
Income from Operations: Income from operations decreased by approximately $9.4
million, or 35.0%, from Fiscal 2001 to Fiscal 2002. This decrease resulted from
the decrease in gross profit of approximately $831,000 offset by the decreases
in SG&A expenses of approximately $2.1 million and goodwill amortization of
approximately $3.6 million. The decrease in operating expenses was reduced by
the $12.3 million charge taken for impairment of goodwill and by $721,000 of
cumulative income recorded during Fiscal 2001 related to the inclusion of
Aerospace in the Company's reporting and the increase in other operating
expenses of approximately $1.2 million discussed above.
Interest Expense: Interest expense declined by approximately $3.3 million, or
19.7%, during Fiscal 2002. This decrease is primarily due to lower levels of
outstanding borrowings during Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001, as well as
reduced rates of interest charged on the outstanding principal on the Company's
variable rate term loan during Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal 2001.
Provision for Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes declined by
approximately $2.9 million, or 52.7%, for Fiscal 2002 as compared to Fiscal
2001. The decline is primarily related to the decline in pretax income. In
addition, the Company was able to take advantage of certain foreign tax credits,
which reduced the Company's tax liability. The Company's effective tax rate for
Fiscal 2002, however, increased to 63.3% on income before taxes from Fiscal 2001
when the Company's effective tax rate was 54.0%. The increase in the effective
tax rate is primarily related to the impairment charges taken against goodwill,
which are not deductible for tax purposes.
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle: Income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle decreased by approximately
$3.2 million from approximately $4.7 million for Fiscal 2001 to approximately
$1.5 million for Fiscal 2002. The primary drivers of this decrease were the
approximately $9.2 million decrease in income from operations, the approximately
$3.3 million decrease in interest expense and the approximately $2.9 million
decrease in Company's provision for taxes due to the factors discussed above.
Cumulative effect of Change in Accounting Principle: In July 2001, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations"
and SFAS No. 142, which were effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2001.
The provisions of SFAS 141 provide specific criteria for the initial recognition
and measurement of intangible assets apart from goodwill. SFAS 141 also requires
that upon adoption of SFAS 142 the Company reclassify the carrying amount of
certain intangible assets.
The provisions of SFAS 142 (i) prohibit the amortization of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets, (ii) require that goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested annually for impairment (and in
interim periods if certain events occur which would impact the carrying value of
such assets), and (iii) require that the Company's operations be formally
identified into reporting units for the purpose of assessing potential future
impairments of goodwill.
In June 2002, the Company completed the assessment of its reporting units and
its initial step one impairment test on January 1, 2002 financial information.
As a result, the Company identified one reporting unit in the MEC business with
a book value of goodwill that exceeded its fair market value, which was
estimated using valuation methodology involving discounted cash flows and market
and transactional multiples of the reporting units. In accordance with SFAS 142,
the Company estimated the amount of the impairment and recorded a cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle, as of January 1, 2002, of
approximately $7.8 million, net of taxes of approximately $3.4 million, to write
down the goodwill associated with the Company's lock product line resulting from
the current market conditions of that product line. The Company finalized its
impairment testing, as prescribed by SFAS 142, during the third quarter to
determine the amount of final impairment. As a result, the Company reduced the
tax impact of the charge by approximately $353,000 to reflect the proper
deferred tax basis of the adjusted goodwill. No further impairment charges were
taken against the Company's goodwill.
Net (Loss) income: Net loss increased by approximately $11.4 million from net
income in Fiscal 2001 of approximately $4.7 million to a net loss in Fiscal 2002
of approximately $6.6 million. This increase resulted from the decline in Fiscal
2002 in income from continuing operations of approximately $3.2 million from
Fiscal 2001, primarily driven by the 2002 goodwill impairment charge of
approximately $12.4 million and the approximately $8.2 million charge taken to
reduce the Company's carrying value of its goodwill as of January 1, 2002.
15
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has historically generated funds from its operations and its working
capital requirements generally have not materially fluctuated from quarter to
quarter. The Company's other main sources of liquidity have historically been
the Company's $80.0 million of uncollateralized 10.5% senior notes due 2008 and
its outstanding credit facilities. The credit facility provides for a six-year
$40.0 million revolving credit facility, which as a result of the amendment
discussed below was reduced to $25.0 million until March 30, 2004, and a
six-year $100.0 million term loan facility. The obligations under the credit
agreement governing the credit facilities are guaranteed by the Company's
subsidiaries and KCI, are collateralized by all of the capital stock of the
subsidiaries, receivables, inventories, equipment and certain intangible
property. There were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility
at December 31, 2003. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments through
September 2006. Both the term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest
at fluctuating interest rates determined by reference to a base rate or the
London interbank offered rate ("LIBOR") plus an applicable margin which will
vary from 1.0% to 3.75% and require the payment of a commitment fee of ranging
from 0.375% to 0.5% on the unused portion of the facility as well as quarterly
commitment fees.
The credit facility also allows for up to $5.0 million of outstanding letters of
credit. At December 31, 2003, the Company had two letters of credit outstanding
for approximately $1.5 million. The letters of credit primarily relate to the
Company's workman's compensation insurance programs. Currently, the Company
believes that the $5.0 million allowance for letters of credit is sufficient for
its needs.
The credit agreement contains certain covenants and restrictions, which require
the maintenance of financial ratios and restrict or limit dividends and other
shareholder distributions, transactions with affiliates, capital expenditures,
rental obligations and the incurrence of indebtedness.
In September 2002, the Company amended its credit agreement (the "Amendment") to
provide for revised financial covenant ratios from September 30, 2002 through
March 30, 2004 from the original covenant ratios stipulated in the credit
agreement. The Company anticipated that certain of the original covenants, which
became more stringent over the term of the agreement, would not be met due to
the general decline in the economy. In addition, the Amendment revised the
Company's applicable margin on borrowings, the maximum allowable capital
expenditures through March 29, 2004 and reduced the amount allowed for permitted
acquisitions (as defined in the credit agreement) from $15 million to $7.5
million through March 30, 2004. Concurrent with the Amendment, the Company
voluntarily reduced the availability under its revolving credit facility by $15
million from $40 million to $25 million until March 30, 2004.
As a result of the impact of the domestic economy on the Company's business
coupled with the performance of the lock product line and cash spent on an
unsuccessful acquisition attempt during 2003, the Company would not have been
able to achieve the required step down in the financial covenants that was to
occur as of September 2003 in accordance with the Amendment. Accordingly, the
Company entered into a second amendment to its credit agreement (the "Second
Amendment"). The financial covenants as modified by the Second Amendment apply
from September 30, 2003 through March 30, 2005, at which time the financial
covenants return to the financial covenants in effect before the Amendment. At
December 31, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the credit agreement, as
amended.
The Company's remaining liquidity demands will be for capital expenditures,
general corporate purposes, and principal and interest payments on its
outstanding debt. The Company's senior notes require semiannual interest
payments on the outstanding principal. The term loan requires quarterly
principal payments. At December 31, 2003, the Company had prepaid its next
principal payment. Principal payments required for the next 12 months will be
approximately $12.1 million. Under the revolving credit facility and term loan,
the Company has the option to lock in a specified interest rate by entering into
a contract, for different periods, which cannot exceed 180 days. As the
underlying contract comes up for renewal, the interest associated with the
contract becomes due. The Company's outstanding commitments for capital
expenditures at December 31, 2003 were not material. The Company anticipates its
capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2004 to be approximately
$4.0 million. The expenditures are primarily needed to maintain its facilities,
expand its production capacity for new product introduction as well as fund the
Company's ongoing plan to expand foreign operations in order to take advantage
of profitable market opportunities. To the extent cash flow from operations is
insufficient to cover the Company's capital expenditures, debt service and other
general requirements, the Company would seek to utilize its borrowing
availability under its existing revolving credit facility, which it believes to
be sufficient for any such purpose.
16
KCI has no operations and is dependent on KCLLC for financial resources in the
form of capital distributions to meet its obligations. KCI obligations include
the liquidation preferences of $107.0 million for its preferred stock plus any
dividends payable in arrears (at December 31, 2003 there were approximately $3.9
million in cumulative dividends in arrears, payable in kind), which are
redeemable for cash at the option of the holder after June 2, 2009, the
requirement to purchase shares from its common shareholders under certain
circumstances and its tax obligations. Repurchases of KCI Common Stock are made
at fair market value as defined in KCI's shareholder agreement. At December 31,
2003 approximately 1.3 million KCI common shares plus potentially 191,000 shares
covered by stock options were subject to repurchase by KCI. The ability of KCLLC
to make such capital distributions will be limited by its available resources
and is limited by restrictions of debt and other agreements. KCLLC reflects the
tax obligations of KCI in its tax provision.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were approximately $20.4 million,
$22.4 million, and $21.9 million for Fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The net decrease in cash flows of approximately $2.0 million for Fiscal 2003
resulted primarily from the decline in net income plus non-cash charges of
approximately $2.5 million offset by the net increase in cash provided by the
operating assets of the business. For the Fiscal 2003, net income plus non-cash
charges totaled approximately $15.2 million versus the Fiscal 2002 of
approximately $17.8 million. The main driver between the two periods is the
decline in income from operations of approximately $8.4 million. Adding back the
goodwill impairment charges of both periods, which are non-cash charges, the
cash decline in income from operations is approximately $3.4 million. The
Company's primary working capital accounts (accounts receivable, inventory and
accounts payable) used net cash of approximately $1.1 million as compared to
Fiscal 2002, when the working capital accounts provided net cash of
approximately $5.0 million. The change in the cash provided by the working
capital accounts is primarily the result of servicing the demand for new product
introduction in certain product lines. In addition, as a result of relocating
production to Mexico, inventory levels of the Company's lock product line
slightly increased. The Company's prepaid expenses provided cash of
approximately $4.4 million primarily related to the utilization of prior year
tax overpayments to reduce current year estimated tax payments. In addition, the
Company's workers compensation program is more cash advantageous in 2003 as most
of the premium is paid as claims are processed versus in the past where the
Company was under a guaranteed cost program with premiums all due up front.
Accrued expenses provided net cash of approximately $1.9 million for Fiscal 2003
as compared to approximately $801,000 used by accrued expenses during Fiscal
2002. In Fiscal 2003, the Company's LIBOR contracts underlying the Company's
outstanding term debt did not come up for renewal until January 2004, at which
time the Company paid the accrued interest related to the contracts. In Fiscal
2002 such contracts were terminating on a 30-day cycle and therefore were fully
paid at the end of Fiscal 2002.
The approximately $444,000 increase in cash provided by operating activities for
Fiscal 2002 from Fiscal 2001 resulted primarily from the increase in the cash
provided by net income plus non cash adjustments which year over year increased
approximately $1.3 million, offset by the year over year net use of cash from
the operating assets of the business. The working capital accounts (accounts
receivable, inventory and accounts payable) provided net cash to operations of
approximately $5.0 million in Fiscal 2002 as compared to approximately $7.8
million in Fiscal 2001. The net cash flow decline from the working capital
accounts is due to certain of the Company's product lines operations rebounding
in Fiscal 2002 and the Company increasing inventory safety stock levels to
maintain high customer satisfaction as it continues to move production to
Mexico. Accrued expenses used net cash in operations of approximately $801,000
in Fiscal 2002 as compared to approximately $5.0 million in Fiscal 2001, which
is the result of accrued expenses returning to normalized levels at the end of
Fiscal 2001. As a result, accrued expenses at December 31, 2002 were fairly
constant as compared to accrued expenses at December 31, 2001, however, accrued
expenses at December 31, 2001 were significantly lower than the accrued expenses
as of December 31, 2000 primarily due to the Company having paid, during 2001, a
substantial portion of the December 31, 2000 accrued expenses related to the
acquisition of Acme.
17
Cash flows used in investing activities were approximately $8.2 million, $2.4
million and $3.5 million for Fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Capital
expenditures for the Fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $3.6 million,
$2.7 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The increase in capital
expenditures for Fiscal 2003 was primarily related to new tooling and machinery
to service demand related to new product introduction, add facility capacity for
the product line acquisition of Arens Controls and expand foreign manufacturing
operations. Proceeds from assets held for sale was approximately $364,000 and
$666,000 for Fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively, which was related to the sold
electronics division of Acme Electric Corporation.
On March 3, 2003, the Company acquired the mechanical components business of
Arens Controls for a purchase price of approximately $4.5 million and assumed
liabilities of approximately $642,000. The Company recorded the estimated excess
purchase price over net assets acquired of approximately $2.0 million as
goodwill. Other intangibles acquired in the transaction were not material. The
product line, which manufactures push-pull cable and related components, was
integrated into BWE's Binghamton, New York manufacturing facility. The Company
borrowed $2.0 million on its revolving credit facility to partially finance this
acquisition.
Cash flows from financing activities used net cash of approximately $11.2
million, $22.2 million and $17.2 million during Fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001,
respectively. The net cash used in financing activities for Fiscal 2003, 2002
and 2001 was primarily driven by the Company's repayment of debt (net of
borrowings) under its existing credit facilities of approximately $11.1 million,
$22.0 million and $16.3 million in Fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. At
December 31, 2003, the Company was one payment ahead of schedule under its
current term debt facility.
For Fiscal 2002, the Company paid deferred financing costs of approximately
$229,000, related to the Company's existing credit facilities.
During Fiscal 2003 and 2001, the KCLLC paid member withdrawals to KCI of
approximately $100,000 and $906,000, respectively. KCI used the funds received
during Fiscal 2003 and 2001, respectively, to repurchase outstanding shares of
its common stock from former shareholders.
The lock product line's net sales declined significantly during the three years
ended December 31, 2003. Net sales of the lock product line were approximately
$17.2 million, $21.8 million and $32.6 million for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Management attributes such decline to the
downturn in the economy plus the impact of foreign competition, both of which
have led to the product line becoming a commodity over that period. In February
2004, after reviewing the lock product line's 2003 operating performance as well
as its long-term strategic plan, the Board of Directors of KCI and KCLLC decided
that it would re-evaluate the long-term strategy related to its lock product
line during the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The long-term revaluation will
entail in-depth review of the lock product line's strategic plan and the
underlying assumptions as to the future opportunities for this product line and
the execution risks of meeting the strategic plan's goals. The Company believes
that a sale of this product line would generate after-tax proceeds at least
equal to the current carrying value of the assets of this product line (see Note
14 to the consolidating financial statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K).
As the net sales eroded, the shift in manufacturing to Mexico has negatively
impacted customer service and quality. Further, the decline in net sales volume
has made it prohibitive to carry the dual overhead infrastructures of its
domestic and Mexico manufacturing facilities. As a result, management has
concluded to close the lock manufacturing facility in Mexico during fiscal 2004.
The assets of Mexico primarily relate to inventory and machinery and equipment
that would be moved back to the product line's Massachusetts location.
Management believes that the Company's cash flow from operations, together with
its borrowing availability under its existing credit facilities, will be
adequate to meet its anticipated capital requirements for the next twelve
months.
18
Commitments and Contingencies
The following is a schedule of the Company's contractual obligations outstanding
at December 31, 2003:
Payments due by period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 1 More than 5
Contractual Obligations Total year 1-3 years 3-5 years years
- ------------------------------------- ------------ --------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
Long-term debt obligations $132,757 $12,196 $39,868 $80,693 $ -
Operating lease obligations 9,210 1,768 2,908 1,936 2,598
Accrued lease costs 469 - 212 257 -
Other long-term liabilities 1,335 - - - 1,335
Stand by letters of credit 1,468 - - - 1,468
------------ --------------- ---------------- --------------- -----------------
$145,239 $13,964 $42,988 $82,886 $ 5,401
============ =============== ================ =============== =================
Critical Accounting Policies
Financial Reporting Release No. 60, requires all companies to include a
discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of
financial statements. The following is a brief discussion of the more
significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company.
Revenue recognition: The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment of
products to customers, when title passes and all risks and rewards of
ownership have transferred. The Company considers revenue realized or
realizable and earned when the product has been shipped, the sales price
is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
Company reduces revenue for estimated customer returns.
Inventory: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, on a
first-in, first-out basis. The Company purchases materials for the
manufacture of inventory for sale in its various markets. The decision to
purchase a set quantity of a particular inventory item is influenced by
several factors including current and projected cost, future estimated
availability and existing and projected sales to produce certain items.
The Company evaluates the net realizable value of its inventories and
establishes allowances to reduce the carrying amount of these inventories
as deemed necessary.
Goodwill and other intangible assets: At December 31, 2003, the Company
has recorded approximately $80.2 million in goodwill and other intangible
assets related to acquisitions made in 2003 and prior years. The
recoverability of these assets is subject to an impairment test based on
the estimated fair value of the underlying businesses. These estimated
fair values are determined using a valuation methodology that triangulates
the discounted cash flows, market multiples and transactional multiples of
the reporting units. Factors affecting these future cash flows include:
the continued market acceptance of the products and services offered by
the businesses; the development of new products and services by the
businesses and the underlying cost of development; the future cost
structure of the businesses; and future technological changes.
Pension Plans: The Company's assets and liabilities recorded in connection
with the Company's pension plans use estimates that include but are not
limited to expected return on assets and life expectancy of participants.
In preparation of the consolidated financial statements the Company
reviews these estimates by reviewing current market conditions and
internal information at its disposal.
Management's Estimates
The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based on the Company's consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates
its estimates, including those related to product returns, bad debts,
inventories, intangible assets, pensions and post retirement benefits, warranty
obligations and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience, the use of external resources and various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
19
Significant estimates used by the Company that are subject to change include,
but are not limited to the following:
(i) The Company's allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required
payments for their open accounts receivable with the Company; if
the financial condition of the Company's customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances could be required;
(ii) Allowances established against its inventory carrying value to
record its inventories at net realizable value; if actual market
conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional inventory allowances may be required;
(iii) The Company's deferred tax assets primarily relate to deductible
tax intangibles resulting from the Company's acquisition
transactions and temporary differences in the basis of its working
capital accounts due to non-deductible reserves. The Company
records as necessary, valuation allowances against its deferred
tax assets. To date the Company believes that it will realize the
benefits from its deferred tax assets as it is expected to
generate taxable income in the future. If the Company were to
determine that it would not be able to realize its deferred tax
assets in the future, valuation allowances could be required;
(iv) The Company evaluates the carrying amounts of its long-lived
assets for recoverability; if the Company were to determine that
the value ascribed to any of its long-lived assets was not
recoverable an allowance could be required;
(v) The Company records the effects of its existing pension plans in
its financial statements using various assumptions and the use of
independent actuaries; if any of the underlying assumptions were
to change, the carrying value of the pension assets and
obligations may require adjustment; and,
(vi) The Company's financial covenants, as defined in its credit
facilities, were based, in part, by estimates of future results of
the Company's operations; if actual results were not to meet those
expectations, the Company may not meet its financial covenants and
may be required to obtain waivers for those covenants. Inflation
Inflation
Inflation has not been material to the Company's operations for the periods
presented.
Backlog
The Company's backlog of orders as of December 31, 2003, was approximately $28.4
million. The Company includes in its backlog only accepted purchase orders.
However, backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales. In addition,
purchase orders can generally be cancelled at any time without penalty.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This
Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures
certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and
equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is
within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of
those instruments were classified as equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial
instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is
effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15,
2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 had no material impact on the consolidated
operations or financial condition of the Company.
20
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement amends and
clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts
(collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB
Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities." This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified
after June 30, 2003, except as defined in the SFAS. The adoption of SFAS 149 had
no material impact on the consolidated operations or financial condition of the
Company.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46, "Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities." FIN 46 requires variable interest entities to be
consolidated by their primary beneficiaries. A primary beneficiary is the party
that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected losses or residual benefits.
FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January
31, 2003; for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15,
2003 for variable interest entities, which an enterprise holds a variable
interest that is acquired before February 1, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46 had no
material impact on the consolidated operations or financial condition of the
Company.
In November 2002, the FASB released FIN No. 45 "Guarantor's Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others." FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a
guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees it has issued. FIN 45 also clarifies that a guarantor is required to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee for guarantees issued or modified
after December 31, 2002, a liability for the fair value of the obligation
undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Company's adoption of the
interpretation and valuation of future guarantees had no material impact on the
Company's consolidated results of operations and financial position. See Note 6
regarding disclosures about the Company's warranty costs.
In July 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities". This statement sets forth various modifications to
existing accounting guidance which prescribes the conditions which must be met
in order for costs associated with contract terminations, facility
consolidations, employee relocations and terminations to be accrued and recorded
as liabilities in financial statements. This statement is effective for exit or
disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 146
did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated results of
operations and financial position.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations
that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Generally, forward-looking
statements include words or phrases such as "management anticipates," "the
Company believes," "the Company anticipates," and words and phrases of similar
impact, and include but are not limited to statements regarding future
operations and business environment. The forward-looking statements are made
pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from the forward-looking statements include the following: (i) industry
conditions and competition, (ii) operational risks and insurance, (iii)
environmental liabilities which may arise in the future and not covered by
insurance or indemnity, (iv) the impact of current and future laws and
government regulations, and (v) the risks described from time to time in the
Company's reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company's primary exposure to market risk is related to the variability in
interest rates associated with the $52.0 million outstanding under its term loan
and with any amounts outstanding under its $25 million revolving credit
facility. Under both the term loan and the revolving credit facility, the
Company has the option to lock in a certain interest rate based on either the
base rate, which is equivalent to prime, or LIBOR plus an applicable margin
specified in the agreement. Principally all of the borrowings under the term
loan are locked in at approximately 4.4% until April 2004, when the underlying
LIBOR contract is up for renewal. At December 31, 2003, the Company had no
amounts outstanding under its line of credit and was one payment ahead of
schedule on its term debt. A 1% change in the interest rate for the Company's
credit facilities in place at December 31, 2003 would have resulted in a change
in the Company's annual interest expense of approximately $603,000. The senior
notes bear a fixed rate of interest and therefore are not subject to market
risk. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments or believe that
material imbedded derivatives exist within its contracts.
As the Company has operations outside the United States of America, it is
subject to foreign currency exchange risk. To date those risks have not had a
material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Company's consolidated financial statements for the three years ended
December 31, 2003, together with the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated
February 27, 2004, are included elsewhere herein. See Item 15 for a list of the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Control Procedures
The management of KCLLC carried out an evaluation, with the participation of its
President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of December 31, 2003. Based upon that evaluation,
KCLLC's President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that KCLLC's disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by KCLLC in reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
There has not been any change in KCLLC's internal control over financial
reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 15d-15(d) under the
Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, KCLLC's
internal control over financial reporting.
The management of Key Components Finance Corp. ("Finance Corp.") carried out an
evaluation, with the participation of its President and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of December
31, 2003. Based upon that evaluation, Finance Corp.'s President and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that Finance Corp.'s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
Finance Corp. in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
There has not been any change in Finance Corp.'s internal control over financial
reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 15d-15(d) under the
Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Finance
Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees of the Company
The following table sets forth information with respect to the directors,
executive officers and other key employees of the Company as of December 31,
2003. All directors and officers of the Company hold office until the annual
meeting of stockholders next following their election, or until their successors
are elected and qualified.
Name Age Position
- ----------------------- ----- ---------------------
John S. Dyson 61 Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of KCI, KCLLC and Finance
Corp.
Clay B. Lifflander 41 Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of KCI, KCLLC and Finance
Corp.
Robert B. Kay 41 Director of KCI, KCLLC and Finance Corp. President of KCLLC and
Finance Corp.
Alan Rivera 41 Director of KCI and KCLLC, Vice President and Secretary of KCI
and KCLLC.
George M. Scherer 50 Director of KCI and KCLLC, Vice President of KCI and President
of BWE.
Philip E. Berney 40 Director of KCI and KCLLC.
Tom R. Wall, IV 44 Director of KCI and KCLLC.
Albert W. Weggeman 40 Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of KCLLC.
Keith A. McGowan 41 Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of KCLLC.
J. Marty O'Donohue 53 President of Marinco.
Daryl A. Lilly 43 President of Gits.
John S. Dyson has been Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of the KCI, KCLLC
and Finance Corp. since December 2003 and Chairman of the Board of Directors of
such companies since their inception through December 2003. Since 1996, Mr.
Dyson has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Millbrook Capital
Management ("Millbrook"), a management company providing executive level
services to the Company under the Management Agreement. From 1996 to December
2001 he served as Chairman of the Mayor of the City of New York's Council of
Economic Advisors. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Dyson served as Deputy Mayor for
Finance and Economic Development for the City of New York. From 1982 to 1993 Mr.
Dyson was the Chairman of Dyson-Sinclair Associates, a management company and
the predecessor of Millbrook. From 1976 to 1979, he served as Commissioner of
the New York State Department of Commerce. Mr. Dyson was Vice Chairman of
Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation from 1970 to 1975, at which time he was
appointed to the position of Commissioner of the New York State Department of
Agriculture.
Clay B. Lifflander has served as a director of KCI and KCLLC since their
inception. In December 2003, Mr. Lifflander was elected Co-Chairman of the Board
of Directors of KCI, KCLLC and Finance Corp. Mr. Lifflander served as the
Company's Chief Executive Officer from November 1999 until his resignation on
December 30, 2003. Before November 1999, Mr. Lifflander had been President of
KCI since its inception. Mr. Lifflander has been President of Millbrook since
1995, and from 1994 to 1995, Mr. Lifflander was President of the New York City
Economic Development Corporation. Previously, Mr. Lifflander was Managing
Director in the Mergers and Acquisitions Group at Smith Barney Inc., where he
worked from 1984 to 1994.
23
Robert B. Kay was elected President of KCLLC in November 1999. Prior to his
election he had served as the Chief Financial Officer of KCLLC since February
1999. Mr. Kay became a director of KCI and KCLLC in March 1999. From August 1998
through December 1998, Mr. Kay was the Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer, as well as a director, of Tiffen Manufacturing Corp., a manufacturer
and distributor of photographic and imaging products. From January 1994 through
August 1998, Mr. Kay was a Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of
Oxford Resources Corp. (renamed NationsBank Auto Leasing, Inc.), a publicly
traded consumer finance company.
Alan L. Rivera has been the Vice President, Secretary and a Director of KCI,
KCLLC and Finance Corp. since their inception. Since September 1996, Millbrook
has employed Mr. Rivera, as Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. From
1994 to 1996, Mr. Rivera served as Executive Vice President of Finance and
Administration and General Counsel of the New York City Economic Development
Corporation. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Rivera was an associate with the New York
City law firm of Townley & Updike, specializing in corporate finance matters,
and from 1987 to 1990, Mr. Rivera was an associate with Mudge, Rose, Guthrie,
Alexander and Ferdon, specializing in public finance matters.
George M. Scherer has been the Vice President-Manufacturing and a Director of
KCI and KCLLC since their inception. Mr. Scherer has been with BWE since 1978
when he began as Engineering Manager. He has served as the President and a
Director of BWE since 1982. Prior to joining BWE, Mr. Scherer was a product
application engineer for Stow Manufacturing Company, Inc. in Binghamton, N.Y.
from 1975 to 1978. Prior to his position at Stow Manufacturing Company, Inc.,
Mr. Scherer was a plant engineer at GAF Corporation in Binghamton, N.Y. from
1973 to 1975.
Philip E. Berney has served as a director since May 2000, and is a board
designee of Kelso. Mr. Berney joined Kelso & Company, a private investment firm
in 1999, as one of its Managing Directors. From 1986 to 1999, Mr. Berney worked
at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. where he was promoted to Senior Managing Director.
He also serves as a director of CDT Acquisition Corp. and Armkel, LLC.
Thomas R. Wall, IV has served as a director since May 2000, and is a board
designee of Kelso. Mr. Wall has held various positions of increasing
responsibility with Kelso & Company, a private investment firm, since 1983, and
currently serves as one of its Managing Directors. Mr. Wall also serves as a
director of AMF Bowling, Inc., Citation Corporation, Consolidated Vision Group,
Inc., Cygnus Publishing, Inc., IXL Enterprises Inc., Mitchell Supreme Fuel
Company, Mosler, Inc., Peebles Inc., and 21st Century Newspapers, Inc.
Mr. Albert W. Weggeman joined the Company in March 2001 as Vice President of
Operations. During February 2003, Mr. Weggeman was promoted to Chief Operating
Officer. From November 1997 to March 2001, Mr. Weggeman held positions in
General Electric Company ("GE") Industrial Systems division as Manager - Mergers
& Acquisitions, and most recently as President and General Manager of Midwest
Electric (a GE subsidiary). Prior to GE, Mr. Weggeman was the Director of
Marketing for Norton Coated Abrasives.
Keith A. McGowan was appointed the Chief Financial Officer of KCLLC in November
1999. Prior to this promotion, he had served as KCLLC's Principal Accounting
Officer since April 1999. From July 1997 to April 1998, he served as the Vice
President of Finance of Digitec 2000, Inc., a distributor of prepaid phone
products. From November 1985 to June 1997, Mr. McGowan was employed by BDO
Seidman, LLP, an accounting and consulting firm, where he was promoted to
Partner in July 1995.
J. Marty O'Donohue has been President of KCI's Specialty Electrical Group since
December 1998. Mr. O'Donohue was President of Marinco from February 2001 until
November 1998. Prior to joining Marinco he held senior management positions with
GardenAmerica Corporation, Epyx and Crown Zellerbach Corporation.
Daryl Lilly has been the President of Gits since June of 2000. From February
1999 through June 2000, Mr. Lilly served as Executive Vice President, Vice
President of Product Development and Engineering Manager for Gits. From January
1997 to February 1999, Mr. Lilly was the Plant Engineering Manager for Reman,
Inc. In addition to his experience with the Company, Mr. Lilly has 15 years of
experience in various automotive component manufacturing industries.
24
Code of Ethics
On March 10, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Code of
Ethics applicable to its President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating
Officer. The Code of Ethics is filed as a an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Since the Company is not a listed issuer, it is under no requirement to have an
audit committee. The Board of Directors believes it can conduct all of the
functions of an audit committee without unduly burdening the duties and
responsibilities of the Board members.
The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that Philip E. Berney meets
the SEC definition of an "audit committee financial expert." Mr. Berney is not
"independent" as such term is used under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Board of Directors of the Company has further determined that each of the
other members of the Board of Directors has significant finance or accounting
experience as a result of their experience or background.
25
Item 11. Executive Compensation
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The summary table sets forth information with respect to the compensation of
each of the named executive officers and key employees for services provided in
all capacities to the Company for the three years in the period ended December
31, 2002.
Long Term
Annual Compensation Compensation
Awards
Number
Securities of
Name and Principal Other Annual Underlying Options
Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation (2)
- ----------------------- ---- -------- ---