U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594
FORM 10-K
|
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
Commission File No. 333-12570
STRESSGEN BIOTECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
Yukon Territory, Canada |
|
N/A |
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
350-4243 Glanford Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent of Stressgen Biotechnologies, Inc. |
|
92121 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
|
|
Registrants
Telephone Number, including area code: (250) 744-2811 |
||
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ý No o
As of June 30, 2003 and February 12, 2004, the common shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant had an aggregate market value of approximately U.S. $77,830,916 and $95,621,515, respectively. These amounts respectively represented approximately Cdn. $105,484,240 (based on the June 30, 2003 closing price of Cdn. $1.71 per common share, as reported on The Toronto Stock Exchange, and 61,686,690 outstanding common shares) and $126,134,340 (based on the February 12, 2004 closing price of Cdn. $1.74 per common shares as reported on The Toronto Stock Exchange and approximately 72,491,000 outstanding common shares). These numbers are provided only for the purposes of this report and do not represent an admission by either the Registrant or any non-affiliate as to the status of any person.
The Companys accounts are maintained in Canadian dollars. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all dollar amounts are stated in Canadian dollars except where otherwise indicated.
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our forward-looking statements, which are typically indicated by words such as intend, plan, anticipate and expect, include statements regarding the results of on-going research, development efforts and the scope of future operations. Such statements are only predictions. Actual results may differ materially from those implied by our forward-looking statements, due to factors including uncertainties associated with product development, the risk that products do not demonstrate statistically significant results in clinical trials, our dependence upon collaborative partners, our need for additional financing and the risk that we will not obtain approval to market our products. These and other risks are discussed in this Form 10-K, including under the caption Factors that May Affect Future Performance. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements as circumstances change.
Item 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the commercialization, development and research of proprietary immunotherapeutics to treat human diseases. Our platform technology involves using recombinant DNA methods to covalently link together heat shock proteins (Hsp), also known as stress proteins, to proteins such as viral or cancer antigens. The resulting CoValTM fusion proteins are designed to stimulate immune responses to the disease-specific antigen present in the fusion. By targeting immune responses to a specific antigen, CoValTM fusions use the bodys immune system to combat infectious diseases or cancer.
Most of our resources are devoted to developing our lead product candidate, which we call HspE7. HspE7 is a fusion between an Hsp and a human papillomavirus (HPV) antigen called E7. The product is in development for indications caused by HPV such as genital warts, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), cervical cancer and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN).
If HspE7 is approved, it could be useful to treat a large number of patients and a broad spectrum of HPV diseases. There are approximately 5.5 million new genital HPV infections each year; more than 20 million people in the U.S. are currently infected with the virus. An analysis of healthcare costs associated with sexually transmitted diseases showed that the costs of HPV-related diseases ranked second only to the costs of HIV. HspE7 has the potential to reduce or eliminate recurrence and treat chronic conditions in people already infected with HPV.
HspE7 is important not only as a potential treatment for HPV-related indications but also as a demonstration of the efficacy of CoValTM fusions. We believe that clinical results will show that fusions developed with our proprietary technology safely and effectively stimulate the immune
1
system to recognize and fight specific diseases. The type of immune responses induced by CoValTM fusions, as demonstrated in preclinical research, indicates that the Hsp fusion platform technology may apply to the immunotherapy of a wide spectrum of diseases, including cancer and bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections. Robust preclinical and encouraging clinical data from the HspE7 program have led us to concentrate our current efforts on the treatment of viral diseases. We are performing research studies on potential treatments for hepatitis B (HBV) and herpes simplex and are evaluating the use of our technology to develop a fusion protein to treat infections caused by hepatitis C (HCV).
In addition to our biopharmaceutical business, we have a profitable bioreagent business. We supply stress proteins, antibodies and other bioreagents globally for use in academic, medical and commercial research. The production and sale of bioreagents enhances our business strategy by building a market presence in stress proteins and strengthening strategic relationships with other companies, academic institutions and stress response researchers.
Business Strategy
Our business objective is to be a leader in the development and commercialization of novel immunotherapeutics for the treatment of virally-induced human disease. Our strategy includes the following elements:
Commercialize HspE7. We intend to commercialize our lead product, HspE7 for the treatment of conditions caused by HPV.
Develop Candidates to Treat Additional Disease Targets. We plan to develop promising CoValTM fusion product candidates for the treatment of additional viral diseases, alone or with corporate partners.
In-License Synergistic Products. We seek to strengthen our pipeline by in-licensing drug candidates that will complement our product line.
Use Our Core Competencies to Build Our Bioreagent Business. By producing and selling compounds used in biotechnology research, we will generate revenue, build our market presence, further our relationship with stress response researchers, and capitalize on strategic opportunities for product discovery and development.
Scientific Overview
Our technology uses Hsp covalently fused to antigens to activate the immune system.
The Immune System
The human immune system is the bodys natural defense mechanism to prevent and combat disease. The immune system protects the body by specifically recognizing and destroying invading viruses, bacteria and other pathogens. In addition, the immune system is capable of
2
recognizing and eliminating abnormal cells from the body, such as cells infected with viruses and to some degree precancerous and cancerous cells.
Scientists currently describe the human immune system as using two complementary mechanisms to respond to pathogens, labeled innate and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity, which is a front-line defense, includes dendritic cells, macrophages, natural killer cells and gamma delta T cells. These cells typically recognize structural components, including antigens, common to disease-causing organisms and generate a prompt, but relatively non-specific response. Adaptive or acquired immunity, which can be triggered by an innate immune response or operate independently, involves B cells and T cells. Adaptive immunity generates a tailor-made or antigen-specific response.
B cells make antibodies that prevent infection by attaching to invading pathogens and aiding in their disposal before they can infect cells. T cell responses are useful not only for helping antibody production, but also for eradicating existing infected or diseased cells. These two types of immune defenses are called humoral (B cell) and cellular (T cell) immunity. While both types of immune defenses may cooperate to defend against infection, scientists believe that once infection has been established, cellular immunity is required to eradicate such diseased cells.
Induction of a cellular immune response begins with the processing and presentation of antigens by specialized immune system cells called antigen presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. Once inside dendritic cells, protein antigens are broken down into small fragments, called peptides. These peptides are then presented on the dendritic cell surface. T cells continually scan the surface of dendritic cells for these peptides. When T cells recognize displayed peptides as being foreign, they replicate rapidly and then search for and kill diseased cells displaying those same peptides on their surface.
Peptides are presented to T cells through two distinct pathways designated as the class I and class II pathways. Presentation of such peptides by the class I and class II pathways activate different T cell subsets referred to as CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells. CD4+ T cells, which are also known as T helper (Th) cells, are further subdivided into Th1 and Th2 cells. Activated Th1 and Th2 cells release molecules known as cytokines, which trigger other immune cells to produce either a predominantly cellular (Th1) or antibody-mediated (Th2) immune response. Immune responses mediated by the cellular side of the immune system are characterized by the induction of CD8+ T cells called cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) or killer T-cells. Killer T cells are capable of directly killing pathogen-infected cells and cancerous cells.
Stress or Heat Shock Proteins
Hsp are present in cells of all organisms from bacteria to mammals. The structure and function of Hsp are similar across these diverse life forms. Hsp play a major role in the generation of immune responses and appear to activate both innate and adaptive immunity. Some scientists refer to Hsp as molecular chaperones due to their role in transporting peptides within intracellular compartments. Hsp appear to activate both innate and adaptive immunity by interacting with newly identified Hsp receptors on antigen presenting cells such as dendritic cells. Interaction of Hsp with such receptors may have at least two important consequences:
3
cytokine secretion by the dendritic cell that promotes cellular immunity and internalization of the Hsp and bound polypeptides by the dendritic cell into the class I pathway of antigen presentation.
Scientific Foundation of Stressgen Technology
Dendritic cells express receptors that specifically recognize Hsp. As a result, they can capture and process Hsp fusions, which are Hsp covalently linked to antigens. The Hsp fusions then induce cellular immune responses to the antigen present in the fusions, such as a viral protein. Preclinical data from both in vitro and in vivo models demonstrate that Hsp fusions trigger innate immune responses; the cells from the innate response signal the adaptive immune system to use its protection mechanisms. We seek to develop a new class of therapeutic products based on this ability of Hsp fusions to induce antigen-specific CTL responses.
We call Hsp fusions immunotherapeutics based on their ability to stimulate the bodys own immune system to attack a pathogen, as does a vaccine. Unlike existing preventative vaccines, Hsp fusions trigger the immune system to respond to infected cells and cancers already present in the body. Since preclinical research has shown that Hsp fusions induce CD8+ CTL responses in CD4+-deficient animals, it is possible that even immunosuppressed individuals such as HIV+ patients and transplant recipients may be treated effectively with our platform technology.
Potentially, Hsp fusions can be created with any number of disease-specific protein antigens. Our most developed product, HspE7, is a recombinant fusion protein composed of the HPV protein E7 and a bacterial Hsp. In all types of HPV infection, whether low risk, including warts or high risk, including pre-cancer and cancer, the E7 protein theoretically provides a precise target by which the immune system can recognize and attack HPV-infected cells. Induction of E7-specific cellular immunity by Hsp fusions offers a new approach to the immunotherapy of HPV-associated diseases.
In pre-clinical studies conducted using an animal model, administration of HspE7 has been shown to prevent the growth of, and cause the destruction of, tumors that express the HPV E7 protein. Only the fusion protein induces significant tumor regression and long-term survival in these studies. Neither the E7 antigen nor the Hsp alone, nor a mixture of the two, is effective. The requirement for a covalent attachment between the Hsp and the E7 protein may be explained by the presence of Hsp receptors on dendritic cells. By virtue of its covalent attachment to the Hsp, the E7 protein is targeted to the dendritic cell, internalized and presented as E7 peptides by the class I pathway to activate killer T cells. These E7-specific killer T cells may then be able to survey for and destroy E7 containing cancer cells.
Clinical observations made in phase II trials for AIN and genital warts indicate that treatment with HspE7 leads to disease improvement or clearance that is not restricted to lesions containing a specific type of HPV. These original and surprising findings demonstrate the potential for HspE7 to treat diseases caused by multiple HPV types. Although the E7 protein present in HspE7 was derived from HPV type 16, which is known to be associated with about half of all cervical cancers and about 20% of pre-cancerous lesions known as anogenital dysplasias, our clinical data strongly suggests that HspE7 can induce cross-reactive T cell responses in genital warts and RRP, which primarily are caused by HPV types 6 and 11.
4
Human Papillomavirus Indications
HPV indications can be easily recognizable, like genital warts, or latent. Infected individuals with no visible symptoms may not be aware that they have a persistent viral infection, increasing their risk of developing complications and of transmitting the virus to others. HPV is highly contagious and can be spread even when condoms are used. Fifty to 75% of sexually active men and women acquire genital HPV infection at some point in their lives.
Although there are over 100 different types of HPV, most research focuses on the approximately one-third infecting genital epithelial tissue and primarily spread through sexual contact. Researchers differentiate among the HPV types using letter and number designations. The E7 protein from high-risk HPV types (associated with a high risk of cancer) is involved in the malignant transformation of infected epithelial cells. These HPV types cause premalignant and cancerous cervical and anal conditions, including high-grade and low-grade dysplasias and cancer. Low-risk types of HPV typically cause internal and external genital warts.
Genital Warts
Approximately two-thirds of people who have sexual contact with a partner with genital warts develop warts themselves, usually within three months of contact, according to the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (the NIAID). The incidence of genital warts is an estimated 1 million new cases in the U.S. each year, according to a July 1999 NIAID Fact Sheet. Of those patients, an estimated 67% are women. Although the lesions may spontaneously regress, recurrence is typical. The lesions also frequently reappear after treatment.
Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis is caused by the same types of papillomavirus that cause genital warts. In fact, the term papilloma means wart. Rather than infecting genital tissue, the papillomas in RRP occur primarily on the vocal cords of children born to mothers infected with HPV. The papillomas can spread into the trachea and lungs. Over 2,000 new cases of pediatric RRP and over 3,500 new cases of adult RRP are diagnosed annually in the U.S., according to a study published in 1995 based upon a survey of members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, members of the American Bronchoesophagological Association and certified U.S. otolaryngologists. Patients with RRP can die from airway obstruction, cancerous transformation, overwhelming spread of the disease, growth of papillomas in the lungs or complications of surgical treatments. There are no drugs or immunotherapies approved for RRP in the U.S. Pediatric patients tend to have about 5 surgeries per year and some children have hundreds of procedures during their lifetime.
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, also known as cervical dysplasia, is characterized by the presence in the cervix of abnormal cells that often precede cervical cancer. The abnormal cells are associated with the malignant transformation of epithelial cells infected with HPV virus. Such cells can be detected through regular Pap smear screening. In the U.S. more than 1.2
5
million women a year are diagnosed with low-grade cervical dysplasia, according to National Cancer Institute estimates. Another 200,000 to 300,000 are diagnosed with high-grade cervical dysplasia in the U.S. each year, according to a December 1999 report of the Centers for Disease Control. Worldwide, the problem is much larger. The current treatment for CIN, which involves local surgical techniques, is not always effective. Surgical treatment may not remove all dysplastic cells and does not treat the underlying viral infection. In addition, surgery can result in complications such as reduced fertility.
CIN often precedes cervical cancer, a worldwide public health problem particularly in countries where routine Pap smears are not practiced. American Cancer Society estimates for 2002 predicted that approximately 13,000 women in the U.S. would be diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer and that about 4,100 patients would die from the disease. Globally there are approximately 500,000 new cases of cervical cancer identified each year, resulting in nearly 300,000 deaths. Cervical cancer is the second most important cancer in women after breast cancer, according to a World Health Organization February 1999 press release. Although death rates from cervical cancer have been decreasing, invasive cervical cancer continues to be associated with extreme morbidity.
Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia is characterized by the presence of abnormal cells that may precede anal cancer. Data extrapolated from studies of homosexual and bisexual men and the anal cancer population suggests that there may be 500,000 new cases per year in the U.S. Patients are not commonly screened for AIN; however, there is increasing awareness of the condition. No standard therapies exist for AIN.
Indications Targeted in Early Stage Development and Research Programs
All of the indications described above are associated with HPV, so are candidates for treatment with HspE7. We are also using our platform technology to create fusions of heat shock proteins with antigens from other sources. We are testing CoValTM fusions of heat shock proteins with antigens from hepatitis B and herpes simplex to determine whether to advance treatments for those indications into pre-clinical testing and clinical trials. We consider hepatitis C another logical target for a CoValTM fusion.
Hepatitis B
Chronic hepatitis B is a disease of the liver caused by the hepatitis B virus. Infection with HBV is characterized by jaundice, fatigue, abdominal pain and other symptoms, with many patients developing liver cirrhosis and cancer. Although safe and effective preventative vaccines exist, there are estimated to be 1,000,000 to 1,250,000 cases of chronic hepatitis B in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In addition, there are between 140,000 and 320,000 new cases of hepatitis B in the U.S. each year, resulting in 4,000 to 5,000 deaths according to the American Social Health Association. Worldwide, about 1,000,000 deaths are attributable to HBV infection and its complications annually, according to the World Health Organization. Due to the large infected population and small percentage of the public
6
being vaccinated for the disease, the need for new and effective therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus infection remains great.
Hepatitis C
Hepatitis C causes symptoms similar to those of hepatitis B, but is caused by the hepatitis C virus. Chronic hepatitis C can cause cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer. HCV is spread through contact with blood and other bodily fluids. Currently, there are six known hepatitis C genotypes, and more than 50 subtypes. The relative prevalence of different genotypes differs by geographic region. It is estimated that 3.9 million people in the U.S. (1.8% of the population) have been infected with HCV and that 2.7 million are chronically infected. Worldwide there is an estimated 200 million cases. In the U.S. 8,000 to 10,000 deaths each year are currently attributed to HCV. Although about 80% of patients are currently asymptomatic, researchers predict that over the next 10 to 20 years chronic hepatitis C will become a major burden on the health care system as patients progress to end-stage liver disease. The efficacy of current treatments varies depending upon the genotype of the virus, but no currently available therapy can eradicate the virus or do more than delay the progression of the disease. No vaccine is available.
Herpes Simplex Virus
Herpes Simplex Virus causes genital herpes. The prevalence of herpes simplex type-2 (HSV-2) has increased by 30% since the late 1970s and is now detectable in about one in five persons 12 years of age or older in the US, according to the NIAID. An estimated 45 million Americans are already infected with genital herpes, and there are an additional 500,000 to 1,000,000 new cases each year, the NIAID has written. Since HSV remains dormant in infected persons for their lifetime, genital herpes is a recurrent disease, consisting of alternating episodes of virus reactivation with virus shedding, followed by resolution of the outbreak and return to virus dormancy. Some episodes of reactivation are associated with skin blistering in the genital region, causing physical and psychological discomfort. Because most episodes of the infection are asymptomatic, people having an outbreak may not be aware that they are transmitting herpes. As a result, HSV-2 is expected to continue to spread rapidly. Except in newborns, genital herpes is not life-threatening. Nonetheless, it is distressing and can contribute to the spread of other sexually transmitted diseases.
HspE7 Development Program
We are dedicating most of our resources to commercializing HspE7 as quickly as we can. The focus of our HspE7 development program has evolved over time to take advantage of the results from clinical trials, to ensure we are addressing the broadest potential market for the product, and to capitalize upon the resources of third-parties interested in using HspE7 to treat specific indications.
We originally designed HspE7 to be a non-surgical approach for reducing the risk of progression of CIN to cervical cancer. Because surgical treatments exist for CIN and cervical cancer, we realized that it might be easier and faster to obtain regulatory approval for other HPV indications.
7
We began focusing on AIN, which leads to anal cancer, based on the advice of scientific advisors, the similarities of those conditions to CIN and cervical cancer, the clear unmet medical needs for the conditions and the lack of widely accepted standard treatments for AIN. The U.S. National Cancer Institute has recognized the potential of HspE7 to prevent cancers caused by HPV. As a result, in 1999 its Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis signed a Clinical Trials Agreement with us to sponsor clinical trials using HspE7.
Our cancer-related research indirectly led us to explore HspE7 for the treatment of genital warts. In the course of an AIN clinical trial, we discovered that genital warts regressed in patients with both AIN and genital warts. The size of the genital warts market made it more attractive commercially than AIN or CIN. To further accelerate the time to market, we sought orphan drug status for RRP, a life-threatening condition in which the warts occur in the upper airways. As we had hoped, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted orphan drug status for HspE7 for the treatment of RRP. We continued to accrue clinical trials data regarding AIN and genital warts while we began an RRP trial.
Our AIN and genital warts data drew the interest of potential collaborators. In June 2002 we signed a second agreement with the U.S. National Cancer Institute, in this case with the Division of Cancer Prevention, to sponsor additional clinical trials. In the same month, we signed a collaboration agreement with Roche for the development of HspE7, which we restated in December 2003. In December 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration also designated HspE7 as a Fast Track Product development program for the treatment of patients suffering from RRP.
We have recently completed an open-label RRP trial in pediatric patients requiring frequent surgery and an AIN trial; we are analyzing the results. The AIDS Malignancy Consortium of the National Cancer Institute is evaluating HspE7 in HIV-positive patients with high-grade anal dysplasia. Several other trials with HspE7 are planned. Based on our findings from the clinical trials we have run to date, advice from an ad hoc clinical advisory board, market research, and our experience with the regulatory approval process, we are targeting RRP as the first market for HspE7. We hope to expand the indications for HspE7 to some or all of genital warts, AIN, anal cancer, CIN, and cervical cancer after the product is approved for RRP.
Data from HspE7 Clinical Trials
Most of our clinical trials have been conducted in the U.S. using a 500 ug dose of HspE7 given once a month for a total of three doses over 60 days. We have released findings based on data from clinical trials including:
An interim review of data from our open-label pediatric RRP trial in 27 patients
a 6 month low dose, double-blind placebo controlled trial of AIN patients, most of whom then rolled-over to a 6 month 3x500 ug dose open label arm
8
an open registry of AIN patients, to follow up from a completed low dose, double-blind, placebo controlled trial and a completed 3x500 ug dose open-label trial, for a total of 24 months
a chart review of patient from the registry or its predecessor trials, following for a total of 24 months a subset of AIN patients who also had genital warts
The results suggest that the 3x500 ug dose of HspE7 is active against multiple types of HPV. Data from these studies showed that:
treatment with HspE7 increased the time interval between required RRP surgeries and reduced the frequency of surgery in these patients with moderate and severe RRP;
44% of AIN patients achieved complete resolution of high grade anal dysplasia, a precursor to anal cancer, by 15 months
95% of AIN patients showed pathological downgrade from high grade anal dysplasia to low grade dysplasia or no dysplasia by 15 months, indicating that HspE7 could potentially eliminate the need for surgery
80% of AIN patients who also had genital warts achieved complete remission of genital warts at 24 months, indicating broad-spectrum efficacy of HspE7
Results from a double blind placebo controlled phase II trial in measurable external warts showed that, at six months:
Genital warts decreased in size by a median of 53% compared to a median of 16% in patients treated with placebo
The complete response rate for patients with genital warts varied depending on the gender of the patient and location of the warts. Women had a 62% complete response rate, compared to 20% of female patients treated with placebo. Men with anal and perianal genital warts achieved a 42% complete response rate, compared to 25% of such patients treated with placebo. As with alternative treatments, penile warts responded less well than patients with warts in other locations.
Observations of complete response in genital warts patients during the time period 12 to 24 months from treatment, and of few or no recurrences to date, contrasts with the data for treatment of warts with surgery or topical therapy in which rapid recurrence is common.
Safety data for treatment with HspE7 continue to be accumulated. The predominant adverse experience noted from HspE7 treatment at various doses and schedules is injection site reaction, mild to moderate in severity, clearing in hours to days without treatment. Mild to moderate flu-like symptoms are also observed in some patients.
9
Status of Early Stage Research Programs
We are using our proprietary technology of fusing heat shock proteins to antigens to create Hsp fusions with antigens other than E7. Our most active early stage programs involve therapies for chronic hepatitis B infection and herpes simplex virus. We are compiling preclinical data to support an Investigational New Drug filing for a fusion of an Hsp and a selected HBV antigen. In mice our HBV fusions have been shown to elicit cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) that recognize the HBV antigen, suggesting such T cells would be capable of killing HBV-infected cells. The T cells have also shown to produce the cytokine interferon gamma, which is known to have anti-viral activity. The results of these preclinical studies demonstrate the potential efficacy of Hsp-HBV antigen fusions in the immunotherapy of chronic HBV infection. We believe that our HBV program could offer hope in countering the diseases significant worldwide impact on human health.
We are assessing the development of Hsp fusion proteins for the immunotherapy of genital herpes. Presently, we are including a number of HSV-2 proteins in Hsp fusions and testing them in animal models for induction of immune responses to the HSV antigens. An immunotherapy that can induce cellular immunity specific for HSV-2 antigens may lead to a treatment for genital herpes to reduce the number or duration of reactivation episodes or prevent them entirely.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property protection policy is to file and prosecute patent applications relevant to the inventions that we consider meaningful to our business. We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain a competitive position. We devote substantial management attention and resources to maintaining patents and licenses and conducting an assertive patent prosecution strategy.
We have a worldwide, exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute for our core fusion technology, giving us rights to various patents, pending applications, continuation-in-part applications and their foreign counterparts. Pursuant to the license agreement we fund the prosecution of the patent applications, which currently include applications in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Japan. Two U.S. patents, which will expire in 2019, and a European patent, which will expire in 2014, have been granted based on these Whitehead applications. We are vigorously defending challenges to these patents, which cover Hsp fusions with viral or cancer-associated antigens and their use as immunotherapeutics. Independently, we have filed additional patent applications directed to Hsp fusions with other viral antigens, including HPV E6 and E7, and their use as immunotherapeutics. U.S. and European patents based on these applications were granted in 2003. We also hold issued U.S. patents related to the detection of elevated levels of Hsp expression. Some of the U.S. patent applications received pre-GATT filing status, meaning that their terms extend for 17 years after the date of grant, rather than 20 years from the earliest date of filing.
Interpretation and evaluation of biopharmaceutical or biotechnology patent claims present complex and often novel legal and factual questions. We cannot be sure that our pending applications will result in issued patents, that the issued patents will be held valid and
10
enforceable if challenged, or that a competitor will not be able to circumvent an issued patent by the development or adoption of a competitive non-infringing product or process.
Research and Development Collaborations
We have two clinical trials agreements with the U.S. National Cancer Institute for the co-development of our lead product, HspE7, in the treatment of cancer. The NCI is the U.S. governments principal institute for cancer research and training. The clinical trials agreements allow the NCI to develop a general plan for clinical development of HspE7 for cancer-related indications, solicit clinical research protocols from independent investigators and cooperative research groups, and sponsor and fund their studies. We are expected to provide clinical grade HspE7 for the investigators to use in their studies but do not provide funding. The first clinical trial sponsored by the NCI, testing HspE7 in HIV-positive patients with high-grade anal dysplasia, began in December 2002. The collaboration with the NCI enables studies of HspE7 for the treatment of dysplasias and cancer to progress, while we focus on RRP.
A third-party investigator from a university is running a phase I/II trial of HspE7 in cervical dysplasia under the investigators investigational new drug application. As with the NCI trials, we have access to data from the trial in return for providing HspE7.
We have a number of collaborative or sponsored research agreements that we believe provide us with important sources of research data and could lead to technology development opportunities. We have entered into an agreement with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to test our hepatitis B candidate in preclinical models. We are also sponsoring academic institutions to evaluate our hepatitis B candidate in animal models and to perform herpes simplex research with our CoValTM fusions.
Manufacturing
We are currently working with an independent contractor to develop a quality controlled and quality assured process for producing HspE7, based on a set of standard operating procedures, analytical methods and specifications that will allow HspE7 to be manufactured in commercial quantities in accordance with current good manufacturing practice and other regulations. We expect that our dependence on third-parties for the process development and manufacture of heat shock protein fusions will continue for the foreseeable future.
Bioreagent Business
Our bioreagent business supplies biomedical research reagents to researchers in not-for-profit research organizations and commercial institutions worldwide. The primary products of the business involve antibodies, proteins, DNA products, ELISA kits, lysates and extracts, for use in studying cellular stress response pathways, including oxidative stress, apoptosis, neurobiology and more. Although we contract with third-party distributors in thirty-five countries, our primary markets are in North America, Europe and Asia. Sales have been approximately 65% from the U.S., 5% from Canada, 20% from Europe and 10% from the rest of the world, in each of the last three years. We do not believe that any single customer is material to our bioreagent
11
business. Demand for our products tends to increase slightly when academic institutions in the Northern Hemisphere are in session.
We manufacture products for inventory and ship products shortly after the receipt of orders, and anticipate that we will continue to do so in the future. Accordingly, we currently do not have a significant backlog and do not anticipate that we will develop a material backlog in the future. We believe the quantity of inventory we maintain is adequate to ensure reasonable customer service while limiting the volatility of inventory levels. Inventory quantities can fluctuate significantly as we balance varying customer demand against fluctuating supplies of reagents available to us. We buy materials for our products from many suppliers, and we are not dependent on any one supplier or group of suppliers. Raw materials are generally readily available at competitive prices from a number of suppliers. We believe that we will be able to continue to acquire and produce our products in quantities sufficient to meet our customers current requirements.
We require patent licenses to sell many of our products. However, because our sales are spread over more than 400 products, we believe that no individual patent or license is material to our bioreagent business. In each of the last three years, three product groups have contributed more than 15% of the revenue of the bioreagent business: monoclonal antibodies have contributed approximately 30% of revenue; polyclonal antibodies have contributed approximately 35% of revenue and proteins have contributed approximately 20% of revenue.
Government Regulation and Product Approval Process
In the U.S. the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates drugs and biological products. In Canada the Food and Drug Act (Canada), and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, govern the production and manufacturing of our products and our research and development activities; the Health Products and Food Branch (HPFB) Inspectorate enforces these rules and regulations. In these and other jurisdictions, applicable drug licensing laws require carefully controlled research and testing of products, governmental review and approval of results prior to marketing therapeutic products, licensure of manufacturing facilities and adherence to good manufacturing practices during production.
The principal activities which must be completed before obtaining approval for marketing in the U.S. and Canada are the completion of (1) development of a well-controlled process of manufacturing, (2) preclinical studies of safety and pharmacology, and (3) studies of safety and efficacy in humans. Pre-clinical studies are conducted to test chemistry, pharmacology and efficacy. Successful pre-clinical results, which entail achieving potentially valuable pharmacological activity combined with an acceptably low level of toxicity, enable the manufacturer of the new drug to file an investigational new drug application to begin clinical trials involving humans. An investigational new drug application must be filed with and accepted by the FDA or HPFB, as applicable, before human clinical trials may begin.
Phase I clinical trials consist of testing a product in a small number of humans for its safety (toxicity), dose tolerance and pharmacokinetic properties including absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. Phase II clinical trials usually involve a larger patient population than is required for phase I trials and are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a product in
12
patients having the disease or medical condition for which the product is indicated. These trials also serve to identify possible common short-term side effects and risks in a larger group of patients. Potential dosing regimens may also be evaluated during phase II trials. Phase III clinical trials involve conducting tests in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed sites to establish clinical safety and effectiveness. These trials usually involve comparison to a standard treatment or to no treatment. These trials also generate information from which the overall benefit-risk relationship relating to the drug can be determined and provide a basis for drug labeling.
Two key factors influencing the rate of progression of clinical trials are the rate at which patients can be accrued to participate in the research program and whether effective treatments are currently available for the disease the drug is intended to treat. Patient accrual can depend upon the incidence and severity of the disease and the alternative treatments available.
Upon completion of all clinical studies, the results of these studies are submitted to the U.S. FDA as part of a biologics license application, in the case of a biological product, or to Canadas HPFB as part of a new drug submission, to obtain approval to commence marketing the product. An establishment license application to produce a product must also be submitted for approval by the FDA or HPFB. Additional requirements would apply for an application to market a human prophylactic vaccine.
After a marketing approval is obtained, further studies, including post-market studies, may be required to provide additional data on safety and efficacy necessary to gain approval for the use of a product as a treatment for clinical indications other than those for which the product was initially tested. Also, the FDA or HPFB may require post-market surveillance programs to monitor a products side effects.
As well as receiving pre-licensing approval, manufacturing facilities must conform on an ongoing basis with Good Manufacturing Practices, or GMP. After the establishment is licensed for the manufacture of any product, manufacturers are subject to periodic inspections by regulatory authorities.
Whether or not FDA or HPFB approval has been obtained, approval of a product by comparable regulatory authorities in Europe and other countries will be necessary prior to commencement of marketing the product in such countries. Each country may impose their own requirements and may refuse to grant, or may require additional data before granting, an approval even though the relevant product has been approved by another authority.
We are also subject to various federal, state, local and international laws, regulations and recommendations relating to safe working conditions, laboratory manufacturing practices and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances, including radioactive compounds and infectious disease agents, used in connection with our research work.
Competition
We are subject to competition from products that use different approaches or means of accomplishing a similar therapeutic effect as our CoValTM fusion products. Many pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies also focus their research and product development
13
programs on the treatment of the same therapeutic indications as ours, including HPV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, herpes simplex virus and cancer.
Potential competitors that are developing products to treat HPV indications use approaches including therapeutic vaccines, immunotherapies, immunomodulators, topical therapies and small molecule drugs. For example, Transgene S.A., Zycos Inc. and Xenova Group plc are conducting clinical trials with different formulations of HPV antigens as therapeutic vaccines and immunotherapies.
Other potential competitors are performing research and developing therapeutic products based on the intrinsic nature of stress proteins to assist the body in fighting infection and related cancers. While our technology focuses on heat shock proteins covalently fused to antigens, there are other ways to potentially use heat shock proteins to modulate immune responses. Companies including Antigenics Inc. and Mojave Therapeutics, Inc. are using stress protein-related approaches to stimulate or modulate the bodys immune system in therapeutic applications. Other companies such as Conforma Therapeutics and Vernalis plc are developing small molecule drugs to modulate heat shock protein expression in cells as another approach for cancer therapy.
Competition in our industry may increase over time due to rapid and substantial changes in technology, and other critical inputs required for product development and commercialization. Many of our competitors have greater human and financial resources dedicated to product development and human clinical testing than we do, as well as substantial marketing and financial resources. Acquisitions of, or investments in, competing pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies by other firms could increase such competitors financial, marketing and other resources. Technological developments could render our proposed products or technologies non-competitive.
The diseases we are targeting are currently managed through a variety of therapeutic and surgical approaches. For example, genital warts can be treated by topical creams and ointments, cryosurgery, freezing, electro-cauterization and laser treatment. Some papillomas and cancers caused by HPV can be treated surgically.
In the stress protein bioreagent market current direct competition is limited. A few companies have a broad line of competing products, such as Affinity Bioreagents Inc.; several larger companies have introduced a limited range of similar products as ours. Many of our product licenses are non-exclusive, so competition from other suppliers could increase in the future.
Human Resources
As of January 31, 2004 we employed approximately 95 personnel, of which over 50 were engaged in, directly or indirectly, research and development efforts. Of the scientific persons employed, two hold an M.D., twelve hold Ph.D.s, and the balance hold either M.Sc. or B.Sc. degrees or