UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
or |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to . |
|
Commission File Number 001-32141
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| Bermuda (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
98-0429991 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
30 Woodbourne Avenue Hamilton HM 08, Bermuda (441) 296-4004 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive office) |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
||
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
| Common Stock, $0.01 per share | New York Stock Exchange, Inc. | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the close of business on June 30, 2004 was $1,286,944,005 (based upon the closing price of the Registrant's shares of the New York Stock Exchange on that date, which was $16.95). For purposes of this information, the outstanding shares of Common Stock which were owned by all directors and executive officers of the Registrant and by ACE Limited were deemed to be shares of Common Stock held by affiliates.
As of March 1, 2005, 75,711,675 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference to Part III of this report.
Some of the statements under "Business," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K may include forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These statements include forward-looking statements both with respect to us specifically and the insurance and reinsurance industries in general. Statements which include the words "expect," "intend," "plan," "believe," "project," "anticipate," "may," "will," "continue," "further," "seek," and similar words or statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or otherwise.
All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include the following:
The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive, and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statements you read in this Form 10-K reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity.
For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| |
|
Page |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||||
| Item 1. | Business | 1 | ||
| Item 2. | Properties | 34 | ||
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 34 | ||
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 34 | ||
PART II |
||||
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 36 | ||
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 37 | ||
| Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 39 | ||
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 70 | ||
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 71 | ||
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 131 | ||
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 131 | ||
PART III |
||||
| Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | 131 | ||
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 131 | ||
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 132 | ||
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 132 | ||
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | 132 | ||
PART IV |
||||
| Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K | 133 |
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Assured Guaranty Ltd. (hereafter "Assured Guaranty," "we," "us," "our" or the "Company") is a Bermuda-based holding company providing, through our operating subsidiaries, credit enhancement products to the public finance, structured finance and mortgage markets. Credit enhancement products are financial guarantees or other types of support, including credit derivatives, that improve the credit of underlying debt obligations. We apply our credit expertise, risk management skills and capital markets experience to develop insurance, reinsurance and derivative products that meet the credit enhancement needs of our customers. Under a reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer, in consideration of a premium paid to it, agrees to indemnify another insurer, called the ceding company, for part or all of the liability of the ceding company under one or more insurance policies that the ceding company has issued. A derivative is a financial instrument whose characteristics and value depend upon the characteristics and value of an underlying security or commodity. We market our products directly and through financial institutions, serving the U.S. and international markets.
Assured Guaranty Ltd. was incorporated in Bermuda in August 2003 for the purpose of becoming a holding company for ACE Limited's ("ACE") subsidiaries conducting ACE's financial and mortgage guaranty businesses. On April 28, 2004, subsidiaries of ACE completed an initial public offering ("IPO") of 49,000,000 of their 75,000,000 common shares of Assured Guaranty Ltd. We operate through wholly-owned subsidiaries including Assured Guaranty Re International Ltd. ("AGRI"), Assured Guaranty US Holdings Inc. and Assured Guaranty Finance Overseas Ltd. ("AGFOL"). Our principal operating subsidiaries are Assured Guaranty Corp. ("AGC") and AGRI.
1
Our Operating Segments
Our historical financial results include four operating segments: financial guaranty direct, financial guaranty reinsurance, mortgage guaranty and other. We primarily conduct our business in the United States and Bermuda; however, some of our clients are located in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia. The following table sets forth our gross written premiums by segment for the periods presented:
Gross Written Premiums By Segment
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
| Financial guaranty direct: | |||||||||||
| Public finance | $ | 5.7 | $ | 3.4 | $ | 1.5 | |||||
| Structured finance | 75.1 | 67.7 | 45.9 | ||||||||
| Total financial guaranty direct | 80.8 | 71.1 | 47.4 | ||||||||
Financial guaranty reinsurance: |
|||||||||||
| Public finance | 118.9 | 117.1 | 48.1 | ||||||||
| Structured finance | 41.4 | 46.0 | 36.5 | ||||||||
| Total financial guaranty reinsurance | 160.3 | 163.1 | 84.6 | ||||||||
| Mortgage guaranty | 24.4 | 24.4 | 47.6 | ||||||||
| Total operating segments | 265.5 | 258.6 | 179.7 | ||||||||
| Other | (74.6 | ) | 90.6 | 237.6 | |||||||
| Total | $ | 190.9 | $ | 349.2 | $ | 417.2 | |||||
Financial Guaranty Direct
Financial guaranty direct insurance provides an unconditional and irrevocable guaranty that protects the holder of a financial obligation against non-payment of principal and interest when due. Financial guaranty insurance may be issued to the holders of the insured obligations at the time of issuance of those obligations, or may be issued in the secondary market to holders of public bonds and structured securities. Both issuers of and investors in financial instruments may benefit from financial guaranty insurance. Issuers benefit because the insurance may have the effect of lowering an issuer's cost of borrowing to the extent that the insurance premium is less than the value of the difference between the yield on the insured obligation (carrying the credit rating of the insurer) and the yield on the obligation if sold on the basis of its uninsured credit rating. Financial guaranty insurance also increases the marketability of obligations issued by infrequent or unknown issuers, as well as obligations with complex structures or backed by asset classes new to the market. Investors benefit from increased liquidity in the secondary market, added protection against loss in the event of the obligor's default on its obligation, and reduced exposure to price volatility caused by changes in the credit quality of the underlying insured issue.
As an alternative to traditional financial guaranty insurance, credit protection relating to a particular security or issuer can be provided through a credit derivative, such as a credit default swap.
2
Under the terms of a credit default swap, the seller of credit protection makes a specified payment to the buyer of credit protection upon the occurrence of one or more specified credit events with respect to a reference obligation or entity. Credit derivatives typically provide protection to a buyer rather than credit enhancement of an issue as in traditional financial guaranty insurance. Credit derivatives may be preferred by some customers because they generally offer ease of execution and standardized terms.
Financial guaranty insurance is generally provided for structured finance and public finance obligations in the U.S. and international markets.
Structured FinanceStructured finance obligations are generally backed by pools of assets, such as residential mortgage loans, consumer or trade receivables, securities or other assets having an ascertainable cash flow or market value, which are generally held by a special purpose issuing entity. Structured finance obligations can be "funded" or "synthetic." Funded structured finance obligations generally have the benefit of one or more forms of credit enhancement, such as over-collateralization and excess cash flow, to cover credit risks associated with the related assets. Synthetic structured finance obligations generally take the form of credit derivatives or credit-linked notes that reference a pool of securities or loans, with a defined deductible to cover credit risks associated with the referenced securities or loans.
Public FinancePublic finance obligations consist primarily of debt obligations issued by or on behalf of states or their political subdivisions (counties, cities, towns and villages, utility districts, public universities and hospitals, public housing and transportation authorities), other public and quasi-public entities (including non-U.S. sovereigns and subdivisions thereof), private universities and hospitals, and investor-owned utilities. These obligations generally are supported by the taxing authority of the issuer, the issuer's or underlying obligor's ability to collect fees or assessments for certain projects or public services or revenues from operations. This market also includes project finance obligations, as well as other structured obligations supporting infrastructure and other public works projects.
Financial Guaranty Reinsurance
Financial guaranty reinsurance indemnifies a primary insurance company against part or all of a loss that the latter may sustain under a policy that it has issued. The reinsurer may itself purchase reinsurance protection ("retrocessions") from other reinsurers, thereby reducing its own exposure.
Reinsurance agreements take two major forms: "treaty" and "facultative." Treaty reinsurance requires the reinsured to cede, and the reinsurer to assume, specific classes of risk underwritten by the ceding company over a specified period of time, typically one year. Facultative reinsurance is the reinsurance of part or all of one or more specified policies, and is subject to separate negotiation for each cession.
Financial Guaranty Portfolio
The principal types of obligations covered by our financial guaranty direct and our financial guaranty reinsurance businesses are structured finance and public finance obligations. Because both businesses involve similar risks, we analyze and monitor our financial guaranty direct portfolio and our financial guaranty reinsurance portfolio on a combined basis. In the tables that follow, our reinsurance par outstanding is reported on a one-quarter lag due to the timing of receipt of reports prepared by
3
our ceding companies. The following table sets forth our financial guaranty net par outstanding by product line:
Net Par Outstanding By Product Line
| |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||||||
| Structured Finance: | |||||||||||
| Direct | $ | 28.4 | $ | 21.6 | $ | 18.6 | |||||
| Reinsurance | 12.7 | 13.3 | 12.4 | ||||||||
| Total structured finance | 41.1 | 34.9 | 31.0 | ||||||||
| Public Finance: | |||||||||||
| Direct | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | ||||||||
| Reinsurance | 51.3 | 50.5 | 47.5 | ||||||||
| Total public finance | 54.5 | 52.6 | 49.4 | ||||||||
| Total net par outstanding | $ | 95.6 | $ | 87.5 | $ | 80.4 | |||||
Structured Finance ObligationsWe insure and reinsure a number of different types of structured finance obligations, including the following:
Mortgage-Backed and Home EquityThese include obligations backed by closed-end first mortgage loans and closed- and open-end second mortgage loans or home equity loans on one-to-four family residential properties, including condominiums and cooperative apartments. Insured domestic residential mortgage loans tend to be concentrated in the "sub-prime" sector, characterized by lower quality borrowers and higher levels of structural credit protection through subordination and/or excess spread.
Collateralized Debt ObligationsThese include securities primarily backed by pooled corporate debt obligations, such as corporate bonds, bank loans or loan participations, asset-backed securities, residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and trust preferred securities. These securities are often issued in "tranches," with subordinated tranches providing credit support to the more senior tranches. Our financial guaranty exposures generally are to the more senior tranches of these issues. Prior to 2004 we also wrote equity layer credit protection on CDOs, which exposures are reported in our other segment.
Commercial ReceivablesThese include obligations backed by commercial mortgages, equipment leases, business loans and trade receivables. Credit support is derived from the cash flows generated by the underlying obligations, as well as property or equipment values as applicable. Additional credit protection for our exposure may be in the form of over-collateralization, excess spread, cash reserves, first loss letters of credit, subordinated securities or a combination of the foregoing. The properties backing commercial real estate-backed obligations include hotel properties, office buildings and warehouse properties.
Consumer ReceivablesThese include obligations backed by non-mortgage consumer receivables, such as automobile loans and leases, credit card receivables and other consumer receivables. Credit support is generally derived from the cash flows generated by the underlying obligations, as well as property, automobile or equipment values as applicable. Additional credit protection for our exposure may be in the form of over-collateralization, excess spread, cash reserves, first loss letters of credit, subordinated securities or a combination of the foregoing.
4
Single Name Corporate Credit DerivativesThese include credit derivative obligations wherein the underlying exposure is to the corporate debt, bank loan participations, trade receivables or other "borrowed money" obligations of a single corporate "reference entity." In early 2003, we substantially reduced the new single name corporate credit derivatives business we write and, in late 2003, we stopped writing this business. The remaining portfolio of single name corporate credit derivatives has an average remaining life of 1.1 years as of December 31, 2004.
Other Structured FinanceOther structured finance exposures in our portfolio include bonds or other securities backed by assets not generally described in any of the other three categories.
The following table sets forth our structured finance direct and reinsurance gross par written by bond type (stated as a percentage of total structured finance direct and reinsurance gross par) for the periods presented:
Structured Finance Gross Par Written by Bond Type
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed and home equity | 63.4 | % | 21.2 | % | 13.2 | % | |||||
| Collateralized debt obligations | 20.9 | % | 40.5 | % | 42.4 | % | |||||
| Commercial receivables | 6.5 | % | 19.1 | % | 11.7 | % | |||||
| Consumer receivables | 5.3 | % | 12.1 | % | 22.3 | % | |||||
| Single name corporate credit derivatives | | 1.5 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||||
| Other structured finance | 3.9 | % | 5.6 | % | 6.0 | % | |||||
| Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
| Total structured finance gross par written | $ | 15.2 | $ | 10.3 | $ | 12.3 | |||||
The following table sets forth our structured finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding by bond type (stated as a percentage of total structured finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding) as of the dates indicated:
Structured Finance Net Par Outstanding by Bond Type
| |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||||||
| Collateralized debt obligations | 42.0 | % | 46.1 | % | 39.5 | % | |||||
| Mortgage-backed and home equity | 29.0 | % | 15.5 | % | 13.3 | % | |||||
| Commercial receivables | 11.7 | % | 15.1 | % | 11.1 | % | |||||
| Consumer receivables | 8.4 | % | 11.3 | % | 14.3 | % | |||||
| Single name corporate credit derivatives | 3.9 | % | 6.7 | % | 15.3 | % | |||||
| Other structured finance | 5.0 | % | 5.3 | % | 6.5 | % | |||||
| Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
| Total structured finance par outstanding | $ | 41.1 | $ | 34.9 | $ | 30.8 | |||||
5
The table below shows our ten largest financial guaranty structured finance direct and reinsurance exposures by revenue source as a percentage of total financial guaranty net par outstanding as of December 31, 2004:
Ten Largest Structured Finance Exposures
| |
Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Percent of Total Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Internal Rating(1) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
($ in millions) |
|||||||
| Park Place (Ameriquest) PPSI 2004-MHQ1 Class A-1 | $ | 1,574 | 1.7 | % | AAA | |||
| Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc. 2004-R10 A-1 | 1,108 | 1.2 | % | AAA | ||||
| Argent Securities Inc. 2004-W11 Class A-1 | 992 | 1.0 | % | AAA | ||||
| Structured Finance Corporate Pool | 884 | 0.9 | % | AAA | ||||
| Bear Stearns ABS I Trust 2004-FR3 2-A | 747 | 0.8 | % | AAA | ||||
| Synthetic CDOIG Corporate | 740 | 0.8 | % | AAA | ||||
| Synthetic CDOIG ABS | 619 | 0.7 | % | AAA | ||||
| Synthetic CDOIG Corporate | 606 | 0.6 | % | A+ | ||||
| Synthetic CDOIG ABS | 594 | 0.6 | % | AAA | ||||
| Synthetic Credit Card Master Trust | 550 | 0.6 | % | AAA | ||||
| Total of top ten exposures | $ | 8,414 | 8.9 | % | ||||
Public Finance ObligationsWe insure and reinsure a number of different types of public obligations, including the following:
General Obligation BondsThese include full faith and credit bonds that are issued by states, their political subdivisions and other municipal issuers, and are supported by the general obligation of the issuer to pay from available funds and by a pledge of the issuer to levy ad valorem taxes in an amount sufficient to provide for the full payment of the bonds.
Tax-Backed BondsThese include a variety of obligations that are supported by the issuer from specific and discrete sources of taxation, and include tax-backed revenue bonds and general fund obligations, such as lease revenue bonds. Tax-backed obligations may be secured by a lien on specific pledged tax revenues, such as a gasoline or excise tax, or incrementally from growth in property tax revenue associated with growth in property values. These obligations also include obligations secured by special assessments levied against property owners and often benefit from issuer covenants to enforce collections of such assessments and to foreclose on delinquent properties. Lease revenue bonds typically are general fund obligations of a municipality or other governmental authority that are subject to annual appropriation or abatement; projects financed and subject to such lease payments ordinarily include real estate or equipment serving an essential public purpose. Bonds in this category also include moral obligations of municipalities or governmental authorities.
Municipal Utility BondsThese include the obligations of all forms of municipal utilities, including electric, water and sewer utilities and resource recovery revenue bonds. These utilities may be organized in various forms, including municipal enterprise systems, authorities or joint-action agencies.
Special Revenue BondsThese include college and university revenue bonds and housing revenue bonds relating to both single and multi-family housing, issued by states and localities,
6
supported by cash flow and, in some cases, insurance from such entities as the Federal Housing Administration.
Healthcare BondsThese include both obligations for capital construction or improvement of healthcare facilities and obligations providing funds for equipment purchase, in both cases typically secured by an underlying note of the not-for-profit corporation that owns or is to own and/or operate the related healthcare facility or healthcare system. In addition to healthcare facilities, obligors in this category include a small number of health maintenance organizations and long-term care facilities.
Other Public BondsThese include other debt issued, guaranteed or otherwise supported by U.S. national or local governmental authorities, as well as student loans, revenue bonds, investor-owned utility obligations and obligations of some not-for-profit organizations. Also included in this category are international public obligations, including the obligations of sovereign and sub-sovereign non-U.S. issuers, project finance transactions involving projects leased to or supported by payments from non-U.S. governmental or quasi-governmental entities, as well as other obligations having international aspects, but which otherwise would fall within the other described categories.
The following table sets forth our public finance direct and reinsurance gross par written by bond type (stated as a percentage of total public finance direct and reinsurance gross par written) for the years presented:
Public Finance Gross Par Written by Bond Type
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||||||
| General obligation | 25.7 | % | 16.5 | % | 21.8 | % | |||||
| Tax-backed | 22.2 | % | 22.8 | % | 27.9 | % | |||||
| Healthcare | 18.9 | % | 8.6 | % | 7.2 | % | |||||
| Municipal utilities | 12.4 | % | 24.8 | % | 17.6 | % | |||||
| Investor-owned utilities | 8.6 | % | 5.0 | % | 3.6 | % | |||||
| Transportation | 4.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 14.8 | % | |||||
| Housing | 2.4 | % | 3.3 | % | 2.6 | % | |||||
| Higher education | 2.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 2.3 | % | |||||
| Other public finance | 3.8 | % | 3.3 | % | 2.2 | % | |||||
| Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
| Total public finance gross par written | $ | 8.2 | $ | 6.8 | $ | 7.6 | |||||
7
The following table sets forth our public finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding by bond type (stated as a percentage of total public finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding) as of the dates indicated:
Public Finance Net Par Outstanding by Bond Type
| |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||||||
| General obligation | 23.3 | % | 22.4 | % | 23.1 | % | |||||
| Municipal utilities | 20.0 | % | 21.1 | % | 20.9 | % | |||||
| Tax-backed | 19.1 | % | 17.6 | % | 16.5 | % | |||||
| Transportation | 12.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 13.5 | % | |||||
| Healthcare | 12.1 | % | 10.8 | % | 11.4 | % | |||||
| Investor-owned utilities | 4.1 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.2 | % | |||||
| Structured municipal | 2.5 | % | 6.4 | % | 7.1 | % | |||||
| Housing | 2.5 | % | 2.0 | % | 1.9 | % | |||||
| Higher education | 2.0 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.8 | % | |||||
| Other public finance | 1.8 | % | 1.2 | % | 0.6 | % | |||||
| Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||
| Total public finance net par outstanding | $ | 54.5 | $ | 52.6 | $ | 49.6 | |||||
The table below shows our ten largest financial guaranty public finance direct and reinsurance exposures by revenue source as a percentage of total financial guaranty net par outstanding as of December 31, 2004:
Ten Largest Public Finance Exposures
| |
Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Percent of Total Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Internal Rating(1) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
($ in millions) |
|||||||
| New Jersey State General Obligation & Leases | $ | 845 | 0.9 | % | AA- | |||
| California State General Obligation & Leases | 834 | 0.9 | % | A- | ||||
| Long Island Power Authority | 711 | 0.7 | % | A- | ||||
| Denver Colorado Airport System | 626 | 0.7 | % | A | ||||
| Jefferson County Alabama Sewer | 606 | 0.6 | % | A | ||||
| Chicago Illinois General Obligation | 577 | 0.6 | % | A+ | ||||
| New York City General Obligation & Leases | 553 | 0.6 | % | A | ||||
| Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority | 544 | 0.6 | % | A- | ||||
| New York State Metro Trans Authority | 535 | 0.6 | % | A | ||||
| New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority | 522 | 0.6 | % | AA+ | ||||
| Total of top ten exposures | $ | 6,353 | 6.8 | % | ||||
8
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Internal Rating
The following table sets forth our financial guaranty portfolio as of December 31, 2004 by internal rating:
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Internal Rating
| Rating Category(1) |
Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Percent of Total Net Par Amount Outstanding |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
($ in billions) |
||||||
| AAA | $ | 29.7 | 31.1 | % | |||
| AA | 19.9 | 20.8 | % | ||||
| A | 31.4 | 32.8 | % | ||||
| BBB | 13.1 | 13.7 | % | ||||
| Below investment grade | 1.5 | 1.6 | % | ||||
| Total | $ | 95.6 | 100.0 | % | |||
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Geographic Area
The following table sets forth the geographic distribution of our financial guaranty portfolio as of December 31, 2004:
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Geographic Area
| |
Net Par Amount Outstanding |
Percent of Total Net Par Amount Outstanding |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
($ in billions) |
|||||||
| United States: | ||||||||
| California | $ | 7.5 | 7.8 | % | ||||
| New York | 5.5 | 5.7 | % | |||||
| Texas | 3.2 | 3.3 | % | |||||
| Illinois | 2.9 | 3.0 | % | |||||
| Florida | 2.8 | 2.9 | % | |||||
| New Jersey | 2.4 | 2.6 | % | |||||
| Pennsylvania | 2.1 | 2.2 | % | |||||
| Massachusetts | 1.8 | 1.9 | % | |||||
| Puerto Rico | 1.8 | 1.9 | % | |||||
| Washington | 1.7 | 1.8 | % | |||||
| Other states | 18.6 | 19.5 | % | |||||
| Mortgage and structured (multiple states) | 35.1 | 36.7 | % | |||||
| Total U.S. | 85.4 | 89.3 | % | |||||
| International | 10.2 | 10.7 | % | |||||
| Total | $ | 95.6 | 100.0 | % | ||||
9
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Issue Size
We seek broad coverage of the market by insuring and reinsuring small and large issues alike. The following table sets forth the distribution of our portfolio as of December 31, 2004 by original size of our exposure:
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Issue Size
| Original Par Amount Per Issue |
||
|---|---|---|