Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K



ý

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

or

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              .

Commission File Number 001-32141


Assured Guaranty Ltd.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  98-0429991
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

30 Woodbourne Avenue
Hamilton HM 08, Bermuda
(441) 296-4004
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrant's principal executive office)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class


 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 per share   New York Stock Exchange, Inc.


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes o    No ý

        The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the close of business on June 30, 2004 was $1,286,944,005 (based upon the closing price of the Registrant's shares of the New York Stock Exchange on that date, which was $16.95). For purposes of this information, the outstanding shares of Common Stock which were owned by all directors and executive officers of the Registrant and by ACE Limited were deemed to be shares of Common Stock held by affiliates.

        As of March 1, 2005, 75,711,675 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Certain portions of Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference to Part III of this report.





FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Some of the statements under "Business," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K may include forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These statements include forward-looking statements both with respect to us specifically and the insurance and reinsurance industries in general. Statements which include the words "expect," "intend," "plan," "believe," "project," "anticipate," "may," "will," "continue," "further," "seek," and similar words or statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or otherwise.

        All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include the following:


        The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive, and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

        If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward-looking statements you read in this Form 10-K reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity.

        For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
PART I        
Item 1.   Business   1
Item 2.   Properties   34
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings   34
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   34

PART II

 

 

 

 
Item 5.   Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities   36
Item 6.   Selected Financial Data   37
Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   39
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   70
Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   71
Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   131
Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures   131

PART III

 

 

 

 
Item 10.   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   131
Item 11.   Executive Compensation   131
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   132
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   132
Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services   132

PART IV

 

 

 

 
Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K   133


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

        Assured Guaranty Ltd. (hereafter "Assured Guaranty," "we," "us," "our" or the "Company") is a Bermuda-based holding company providing, through our operating subsidiaries, credit enhancement products to the public finance, structured finance and mortgage markets. Credit enhancement products are financial guarantees or other types of support, including credit derivatives, that improve the credit of underlying debt obligations. We apply our credit expertise, risk management skills and capital markets experience to develop insurance, reinsurance and derivative products that meet the credit enhancement needs of our customers. Under a reinsurance agreement, the reinsurer, in consideration of a premium paid to it, agrees to indemnify another insurer, called the ceding company, for part or all of the liability of the ceding company under one or more insurance policies that the ceding company has issued. A derivative is a financial instrument whose characteristics and value depend upon the characteristics and value of an underlying security or commodity. We market our products directly and through financial institutions, serving the U.S. and international markets.

        Assured Guaranty Ltd. was incorporated in Bermuda in August 2003 for the purpose of becoming a holding company for ACE Limited's ("ACE") subsidiaries conducting ACE's financial and mortgage guaranty businesses. On April 28, 2004, subsidiaries of ACE completed an initial public offering ("IPO") of 49,000,000 of their 75,000,000 common shares of Assured Guaranty Ltd. We operate through wholly-owned subsidiaries including Assured Guaranty Re International Ltd. ("AGRI"), Assured Guaranty US Holdings Inc. and Assured Guaranty Finance Overseas Ltd. ("AGFOL"). Our principal operating subsidiaries are Assured Guaranty Corp. ("AGC") and AGRI.

1


Our Operating Segments

        Our historical financial results include four operating segments: financial guaranty direct, financial guaranty reinsurance, mortgage guaranty and other. We primarily conduct our business in the United States and Bermuda; however, some of our clients are located in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia. The following table sets forth our gross written premiums by segment for the periods presented:


Gross Written Premiums By Segment

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
  ($ in millions)

Financial guaranty direct:                  
  Public finance   $ 5.7   $ 3.4   $ 1.5
  Structured finance     75.1     67.7     45.9
   
 
 
    Total financial guaranty direct     80.8     71.1     47.4
   
 
 

Financial guaranty reinsurance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Public finance     118.9     117.1     48.1
  Structured finance     41.4     46.0     36.5
   
 
 
    Total financial guaranty reinsurance     160.3     163.1     84.6
   
 
 
Mortgage guaranty     24.4     24.4     47.6
   
 
 
    Total operating segments     265.5     258.6     179.7
Other     (74.6 )   90.6     237.6
   
 
 
    Total   $ 190.9   $ 349.2   $ 417.2
   
 
 

        Financial guaranty direct insurance provides an unconditional and irrevocable guaranty that protects the holder of a financial obligation against non-payment of principal and interest when due. Financial guaranty insurance may be issued to the holders of the insured obligations at the time of issuance of those obligations, or may be issued in the secondary market to holders of public bonds and structured securities. Both issuers of and investors in financial instruments may benefit from financial guaranty insurance. Issuers benefit because the insurance may have the effect of lowering an issuer's cost of borrowing to the extent that the insurance premium is less than the value of the difference between the yield on the insured obligation (carrying the credit rating of the insurer) and the yield on the obligation if sold on the basis of its uninsured credit rating. Financial guaranty insurance also increases the marketability of obligations issued by infrequent or unknown issuers, as well as obligations with complex structures or backed by asset classes new to the market. Investors benefit from increased liquidity in the secondary market, added protection against loss in the event of the obligor's default on its obligation, and reduced exposure to price volatility caused by changes in the credit quality of the underlying insured issue.

        As an alternative to traditional financial guaranty insurance, credit protection relating to a particular security or issuer can be provided through a credit derivative, such as a credit default swap.

2



Under the terms of a credit default swap, the seller of credit protection makes a specified payment to the buyer of credit protection upon the occurrence of one or more specified credit events with respect to a reference obligation or entity. Credit derivatives typically provide protection to a buyer rather than credit enhancement of an issue as in traditional financial guaranty insurance. Credit derivatives may be preferred by some customers because they generally offer ease of execution and standardized terms.

        Financial guaranty insurance is generally provided for structured finance and public finance obligations in the U.S. and international markets.

        Structured Finance—Structured finance obligations are generally backed by pools of assets, such as residential mortgage loans, consumer or trade receivables, securities or other assets having an ascertainable cash flow or market value, which are generally held by a special purpose issuing entity. Structured finance obligations can be "funded" or "synthetic." Funded structured finance obligations generally have the benefit of one or more forms of credit enhancement, such as over-collateralization and excess cash flow, to cover credit risks associated with the related assets. Synthetic structured finance obligations generally take the form of credit derivatives or credit-linked notes that reference a pool of securities or loans, with a defined deductible to cover credit risks associated with the referenced securities or loans.

        Public Finance—Public finance obligations consist primarily of debt obligations issued by or on behalf of states or their political subdivisions (counties, cities, towns and villages, utility districts, public universities and hospitals, public housing and transportation authorities), other public and quasi-public entities (including non-U.S. sovereigns and subdivisions thereof), private universities and hospitals, and investor-owned utilities. These obligations generally are supported by the taxing authority of the issuer, the issuer's or underlying obligor's ability to collect fees or assessments for certain projects or public services or revenues from operations. This market also includes project finance obligations, as well as other structured obligations supporting infrastructure and other public works projects.

        Financial guaranty reinsurance indemnifies a primary insurance company against part or all of a loss that the latter may sustain under a policy that it has issued. The reinsurer may itself purchase reinsurance protection ("retrocessions") from other reinsurers, thereby reducing its own exposure.

        Reinsurance agreements take two major forms: "treaty" and "facultative." Treaty reinsurance requires the reinsured to cede, and the reinsurer to assume, specific classes of risk underwritten by the ceding company over a specified period of time, typically one year. Facultative reinsurance is the reinsurance of part or all of one or more specified policies, and is subject to separate negotiation for each cession.

        The principal types of obligations covered by our financial guaranty direct and our financial guaranty reinsurance businesses are structured finance and public finance obligations. Because both businesses involve similar risks, we analyze and monitor our financial guaranty direct portfolio and our financial guaranty reinsurance portfolio on a combined basis. In the tables that follow, our reinsurance par outstanding is reported on a one-quarter lag due to the timing of receipt of reports prepared by

3


our ceding companies. The following table sets forth our financial guaranty net par outstanding by product line:


Net Par Outstanding By Product Line

 
  As of December 31,
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
  ($ in billions)

Structured Finance:                  
  Direct   $ 28.4   $ 21.6   $ 18.6
  Reinsurance     12.7     13.3     12.4
   
 
 
    Total structured finance     41.1     34.9     31.0
Public Finance:                  
  Direct     3.2     2.1     1.9
  Reinsurance     51.3     50.5     47.5
   
 
 
    Total public finance     54.5     52.6     49.4
   
 
 
    Total net par outstanding   $ 95.6   $ 87.5   $ 80.4
   
 
 

        Structured Finance Obligations—We insure and reinsure a number of different types of structured finance obligations, including the following:

4


        The following table sets forth our structured finance direct and reinsurance gross par written by bond type (stated as a percentage of total structured finance direct and reinsurance gross par) for the periods presented:


Structured Finance Gross Par Written by Bond Type

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
Mortgage-backed and home equity     63.4 %   21.2 %   13.2 %
Collateralized debt obligations     20.9 %   40.5 %   42.4 %
Commercial receivables     6.5 %   19.1 %   11.7 %
Consumer receivables     5.3 %   12.1 %   22.3 %
Single name corporate credit derivatives         1.5 %   4.4 %
Other structured finance     3.9 %   5.6 %   6.0 %
   
 
 
 
  Total     100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
   
 
 
 
  Total structured finance gross par written   $ 15.2   $ 10.3   $ 12.3  

        The following table sets forth our structured finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding by bond type (stated as a percentage of total structured finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding) as of the dates indicated:


Structured Finance Net Par Outstanding by Bond Type

 
  As of December 31,
 
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
Collateralized debt obligations     42.0 %   46.1 %   39.5 %
Mortgage-backed and home equity     29.0 %   15.5 %   13.3 %
Commercial receivables     11.7 %   15.1 %   11.1 %
Consumer receivables     8.4 %   11.3 %   14.3 %
Single name corporate credit derivatives     3.9 %   6.7 %   15.3 %
Other structured finance     5.0 %   5.3 %   6.5 %
   
 
 
 
  Total     100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
   
 
 
 
  Total structured finance par outstanding   $ 41.1   $ 34.9   $ 30.8  

5


        The table below shows our ten largest financial guaranty structured finance direct and reinsurance exposures by revenue source as a percentage of total financial guaranty net par outstanding as of December 31, 2004:


Ten Largest Structured Finance Exposures

 
  Net Par Amount
Outstanding

  Percent of Total
Net Par Amount
Outstanding

  Internal
Rating(1)

 
  ($ in millions)

Park Place (Ameriquest) PPSI 2004-MHQ1 Class A-1   $ 1,574   1.7 % AAA
Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc. 2004-R10 A-1     1,108   1.2 % AAA
Argent Securities Inc. 2004-W11 Class A-1     992   1.0 % AAA
Structured Finance Corporate Pool     884   0.9 % AAA
Bear Stearns ABS I Trust 2004-FR3 2-A     747   0.8 % AAA
Synthetic CDO—IG Corporate     740   0.8 % AAA
Synthetic CDO—IG ABS     619   0.7 % AAA
Synthetic CDO—IG Corporate     606   0.6 % A+
Synthetic CDO—IG ABS     594   0.6 % AAA
Synthetic Credit Card Master Trust     550   0.6 % AAA
   
 
   
  Total of top ten exposures   $ 8,414   8.9 %  
   
 
   

(1)
These ratings represent our internal assessment of the underlying credit quality of the insured obligations. Our scale is comparable to the nationally recognized rating agencies.

        Public Finance Obligations—We insure and reinsure a number of different types of public obligations, including the following:

6


        The following table sets forth our public finance direct and reinsurance gross par written by bond type (stated as a percentage of total public finance direct and reinsurance gross par written) for the years presented:


Public Finance Gross Par Written by Bond Type

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
General obligation     25.7 %   16.5 %   21.8 %
Tax-backed     22.2 %   22.8 %   27.9 %
Healthcare     18.9 %   8.6 %   7.2 %
Municipal utilities     12.4 %   24.8 %   17.6 %
Investor-owned utilities     8.6 %   5.0 %   3.6 %
Transportation     4.0 %   14.0 %   14.8 %
Housing     2.4 %   3.3 %   2.6 %
Higher education     2.0 %   1.7 %   2.3 %
Other public finance     3.8 %   3.3 %   2.2 %
   
 
 
 
  Total     100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
   
 
 
 
  Total public finance gross par written   $ 8.2   $ 6.8   $ 7.6  

7


        The following table sets forth our public finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding by bond type (stated as a percentage of total public finance direct and reinsurance net par outstanding) as of the dates indicated:


Public Finance Net Par Outstanding by Bond Type

 
  As of December 31,
 
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
General obligation     23.3 %   22.4 %   23.1 %
Municipal utilities     20.0 %   21.1 %   20.9 %
Tax-backed     19.1 %   17.6 %   16.5 %
Transportation     12.6 %   13.2 %   13.5 %
Healthcare     12.1 %   10.8 %   11.4 %
Investor-owned utilities     4.1 %   3.5 %   3.2 %
Structured municipal     2.5 %   6.4 %   7.1 %
Housing     2.5 %   2.0 %   1.9 %
Higher education     2.0 %   1.8 %   1.8 %
Other public finance     1.8 %   1.2 %   0.6 %
   
 
 
 
  Total     100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
   
 
 
 
  Total public finance net par outstanding   $ 54.5   $ 52.6   $ 49.6  

        The table below shows our ten largest financial guaranty public finance direct and reinsurance exposures by revenue source as a percentage of total financial guaranty net par outstanding as of December 31, 2004:


Ten Largest Public Finance Exposures

 
  Net Par Amount
Outstanding

  Percent of Total
Net Par Amount
Outstanding

  Internal
Rating(1)

 
  ($ in millions)

New Jersey State General Obligation & Leases   $ 845   0.9 % AA-
California State General Obligation & Leases     834   0.9 % A-
Long Island Power Authority     711   0.7 % A-
Denver Colorado Airport System     626   0.7 % A
Jefferson County Alabama Sewer     606   0.6 % A
Chicago Illinois General Obligation     577   0.6 % A+
New York City General Obligation & Leases     553   0.6 % A
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority     544   0.6 % A-
New York State Metro Trans Authority     535   0.6 % A
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority     522   0.6 % AA+
   
 
   
  Total of top ten exposures   $ 6,353   6.8 %  
   
 
   

(1)
These ratings represent our internal assessment of the underlying credit quality of the insured obligations. Our scale is comparable to the nationally recognized rating agencies.

8


        The following table sets forth our financial guaranty portfolio as of December 31, 2004 by internal rating:


Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Internal Rating

Rating Category(1)

  Net Par
Amount
Outstanding

  Percent of Total Net
Par Amount
Outstanding

 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
AAA   $ 29.7   31.1 %
AA     19.9   20.8 %
A     31.4   32.8 %
BBB     13.1   13.7 %
Below investment grade     1.5   1.6 %
   
 
 
  Total   $ 95.6   100.0 %
   
 
 

(1)
These ratings represent our internal assessment of the underlying credit quality of the insured obligations. Our scale is comparable to the nationally recognized rating agencies.

        The following table sets forth the geographic distribution of our financial guaranty portfolio as of December 31, 2004:


Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Geographic Area

 
  Net Par Amount
Outstanding

  Percent of Total Net
Par Amount
Outstanding

 
 
  ($ in billions)

 
United States:            
  California   $ 7.5   7.8 %
  New York     5.5   5.7 %
  Texas     3.2   3.3 %
  Illinois     2.9   3.0 %
  Florida     2.8   2.9 %
  New Jersey     2.4   2.6 %
  Pennsylvania     2.1   2.2 %
  Massachusetts     1.8   1.9 %
  Puerto Rico     1.8   1.9 %
  Washington     1.7   1.8 %
  Other states     18.6   19.5 %
  Mortgage and structured (multiple states)     35.1   36.7 %
   
 
 
    Total U.S.     85.4   89.3 %
  International     10.2   10.7 %
   
 
 
    Total   $ 95.6   100.0 %
   
 
 

9


        We seek broad coverage of the market by insuring and reinsuring small and large issues alike. The following table sets forth the distribution of our portfolio as of December 31, 2004 by original size of our exposure:


Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Issue Size

Original Par Amount Per Issue