Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended November 28, 2004

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                               to                              

Commission file number 333-117081-27


SEALY MATTRESS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
20-1178482
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Sealy Drive
One Office Parkway
Trinity, North Carolina
(Address of principal executive offices)



27370
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code—(336) 861-3500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of February 28, 2005: not applicable.

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

        Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in File 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o    No ý

        The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2005: 1,000.

DOCUMENTS OR PARTS THEREOF INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:    None





PART I

Item 1.    Business

        Sealy Mattress Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company", "we", "our" or "us"), through our subsidiaries, is the largest bedding manufacturer in the world and manufactures and markets a complete line of conventional bedding (innerspring) products including mattresses and box springs. Our conventional bedding products include the SEALY®, SEALY POSTUREPEDIC®, STEARNS & FOSTER® and BASSETT® brands and account for approximately 88.4% of our total net sales for the year ended November 28, 2004. We maintain our own component parts manufacturing capability and produce substantially all of our mattress innerspring requirements and approximately 48% of our boxspring component parts requirements. In addition to our innerspring bedding, we also produce a variety of foam latex bedding products, though sales of such products were not significant in 2004. Our subsidiary, Sealy, Inc., provides corporate and administrative services for the Company. Additional information about the Company can be found at our website: www.sealy.com. Information contained on our website does not constitute part of the Annual Report and is not incorporated herein by reference.

        On April 6, 2004 our parent company, Sealy Corporation, completed a merger with affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. ("KKR") whereby KKR acquired approximately 92% of Sealy Corporation's capital stock. Certain of Sealy Corporation's stockholders prior to the merger, including affiliates of Bain Capital, LLC and others, retained approximately an 8% interest in Sealy Corporation's stock. In connection with the merger, Sealy Corporation recapitalized substantially all of its outstanding debt. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 included herein) for a full description of the effects of the merger and recapitalization. Subsequent to the recapitalization, we received as contributed capital all of Sealy Corporation's 100% interest in Sealy Mattress Company, and we replaced Sealy Corporation as the parent-guarantor of the 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 issued by Sealy Mattress Company. Accordingly, we are now the reporting guarantor-parent company. The information regarding our results of operations included in this Annual Report reflects the operations of Sealy Corporation through April 6, 2004. Likewise, the information regarding our assets, liabilities and stockholders' deficit included in this Annual Report includes the assets, liabilities and stockholders' deficit of Sealy Corporation immediately following the merger on April 6, 2004.

        Industry and Competition.    According to industry sales data compiled by the International Sleep Products Association ("ISPA"), a bedding industry trade group, over 700 manufacturers of mattresses and box springs make up the U.S. conventional bedding industry, generating wholesale revenues of $5.04 billion during calendar year 2003. ISPA estimated that the industry experienced a 5.8% increase in sales in 2003—with a unit increase of 1.8%. According to Furniture Today, approximately 38% of conventional bedding is sold through furniture stores and 30% through specialty sleep shops. Most of the remaining conventional bedding is sold to department stores and membership warehouse clubs. We estimate that approximately 70% of conventional bedding is sold for replacement purposes, and the Better Sleep Council reports that the average time between consumer purchases of mattresses in 2004 is 10.3 years. Factors such as disposable income, sales of homes, a trend toward more bedrooms per home, growth in the U.S. population, and heightened consumer awareness of the bedding category also have an effect on bedding purchases.

        We believe that sales by companies with recognized national brands account for more than half of total conventional bedding sales. We supply such nationally recognized brands as Sealy, Sealy Posturepedic, Stearns & Foster and Bassett. We consider Sealy branded products to be the most well

2



recognized in the domestic conventional bedding industry. Competition in conventional bedding is generally based on quality, product innovation and performance, brand name recognition, service and price. Our largest competitors include Simmons Company and Serta, Inc. We believe that we derive a competitive advantage over our conventional bedding competitors as a result of strong consumer recognition of multiple nationally recognized branded products (Sealy, Stearns & Foster and Bassett), as well as our high quality and innovative product offerings.

        Products.    We manufacture a complete line of conventional bedding options in various sizes ranging in retail price from under $300 to approximately $5,000 per queen size set. The Sealy brand mattress, including the new UniCased® Posturepedic, is the largest selling mattress brand in North America. Approximately 93% of the Sealy brand, Stearns & Foster brand and Bassett brand conventional bedding products sold in North America are produced by us, with the remainder being produced by Sealy Mattress Company of New Jersey, Inc. ("Sealy New Jersey"), a licensee. The Stearns & Foster product line consists of top quality, premium mattresses sold under the Stearns & Foster brand name. The Bassett brand, licensed from Bassett Furniture Industries beginning in 2000, is sold primarily to Bassett Furniture Direct and BJ's Wholesale Club. In addition to our innerspring bedding, we also produce a variety of foam latex bedding products. These are sold principally through our European subsidiary under the Pirelli brand name.

        Customers.    Our customers include furniture stores, national mass merchandisers, specialty sleep shops, department and other stores. In addition, our contract division sells bedding products primarily to the hospitality industry, including many of the leading hotel chains, resorts and cruise lines. The top five conventional bedding customers accounted for approximately 20.2% of our net sales for the year ended November 28, 2004 and no single customer accounted for over 10.0% of our net sales.

        Sales and Marketing.    Our sales depend primarily on our ability to provide quality products with recognized brand names at competitive prices. Additionally, we work to build brand loyalty with our end-use consumers, principally through targeted national advertising and cooperative advertising with our dealers, along with superior "point-of-sale" materials designed to emphasize the various features and benefits of our products which differentiate them from other brands.

        Our national account and regional account sales force is organized along customer lines, and our field sales force is generally structured based on regions of the country and districts within those regions. We have a comprehensive training and development program for our sales force, including our University of Sleep curriculum, which provides ongoing training sessions with programs focusing on advertising, merchandising and sales education, including techniques to help analyze a dealer's business and profitability.

        Our sales force emphasizes follow-up service to retail stores and provides retailers with promotional and merchandising assistance, as well as extensive specialized professional training and instructional materials. Training for retail sales personnel focuses on several programs, designed to assist retailers in maximizing the effectiveness of their own sales personnel, store operations, and advertising and promotional programs, thereby creating loyalty to, and enhanced sales of, our products.

        Suppliers.    We are dependent upon a single supplier for certain key structural components of our new UniCased® Posturepedic line of mattresses. Such components are purchased under a four-year supply agreement, and are manufactured in accordance with a proprietary design exclusive to the supplier. We have incorporated the UniCased® method of construction into substantially all of our Sealy brand products, and have also incorporated the similar TripLCased® construction into some Stearns & Foster branded products. Under the terms of the supply agreement, we have committed to make minimum purchases of the components totaling $70 million through 2006. We believe that our supply requirements will exceed the minimum purchase commitments over the life of the agreement. We purchase our other raw materials and certain components from a variety of vendors. We purchase approximately 52% of our

3



Sealy and Stearns & Foster box spring parts from a single third-party source and manufacture the remainder of these parts. Except for our dependence regarding certain structural components for the UniCased® and TripLCased® mattresses, we do not consider ourselves to be dependent upon any single outside vendor as a source of supply to our conventional bedding business, and we believe that sufficient alternative sources of supply for the same, similar or alternative components are available.

        Manufacturing and Facilities.    We manufacture most conventional bedding to order and have adopted "just-in-time" inventory techniques in our manufacturing process to more efficiently serve our dealers' needs and to minimize their inventory carrying costs. Most bedding orders are scheduled, produced and shipped within five days of receipt. This rapid delivery capability allows us to minimize our inventory of finished products and better satisfy customer demand for prompt shipments.

        We operate 17 bedding manufacturing facilities and three component manufacturing facilities in 16 states, plus three facilities in Canadian provinces, and one each in Puerto Rico, France, Italy, Mexico, Argentina and Brazil. We believe that through the utilization of extra shifts, we will be able to continue to meet growing demand for our products without a significant investment in facilities. See Item 2, "Properties," herein. We also operate a Research and Development center in High Point, North Carolina with a staff which tests new materials and machinery, trains personnel, compares the quality of our products with those of our competitors and develops new products and processes. We have developed advanced proprietary methods (Digital Image Analysis) of dynamically measured spinal morphology on any human subject in any sleep position. This technology is expected to enhance Sealy's Posturepedic brand leadership and market position.

        We distinguish ourselves from our major competitors by internally sourcing the majority of our requirements for component parts through our component manufacturing facilities, which manufacture component parts exclusively for use by our bedding plants and licensees. Our component plants currently provide substantially all of our mattress innerspring unit requirements, and supply approximately 48% of our Sealy box spring parts requirements. The three component manufacturing sites are located in Rensselaer, Indiana; Delano, Pennsylvania; and Colorado Springs, Colorado. See Item 2, "Properties," herein.

        In addition to reducing the risks associated with relying on single sources of supply for certain essential raw materials, we believe the vertical integration resulting from our component manufacturing capability provides us with a competitive advantage. We believe that we are the only conventional bedding manufacturer in the United States with substantial innerspring and formed wire component-making capacity.

        We have wholly owned subsidiaries in Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Brazil, France, Italy and Argentina which have marketing and manufacturing responsibilities for those markets. We have three manufacturing facilities in Canada and one each in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Argentina, Brazil, France and Italy which comprise all of the company-owned manufacturing operations outside of the U.S. at November 28, 2004. In 2000, we formed a joint venture with our Australian licensee to import, manufacture, distribute and sell Sealy products in Southeast Asia. Except for our European subsidiaries, which manufacture mostly latex foam products, the remainder of our international subsidiaries manufacture and sell primarily conventional innerspring bedding.

        We utilize licensing agreements in certain international markets. Licensing agreements allow us to reduce exposure to political and economic risk abroad by minimizing investments in those markets. Twelve foreign license agreements exist, which provide exclusive rights to market the Sealy brand in Thailand, Japan, the United Kingdom, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Israel, Jamaica, Saudi Arabia, Bahamas and the Dominican Republic. We operate a sales office in Korea and use a contract manufacturer to service the Korean market. In addition, we ship products directly into many small international markets.

4



        At November 28, 2004, there are 17 separate license arrangements in effect with six domestic and eleven foreign independent licensees. Sealy New Jersey (a bedding manufacturer), Klaussner Corporation Services (a furniture manufacturer), Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. (a crib mattress manufacturer), Pacific Coast Feather Company (a pillow, comforter and mattress pad manufacturer), Chairworks Manufacturing Group Limited (an office seating manufacture), and KCB Enterprises (a futon manufacturer) are the only domestic manufacturers that are licensed to use the Sealy trademark, subject to the terms of license agreements. Pacific Coast Feather also has a license to use the Stearns & Foster brand on certain approved products. Under license agreements between Sealy New Jersey and us, Sealy New Jersey has the perpetual right to use certain of our trademarks in the manufacture and sale of Sealy brand and Stearns & Foster brand products in selected markets in the United States.

        Our licensing group generates royalties by licensing Sealy brand technology and trademarks to manufacturers located throughout the world. We also provide our licensees with product specifications, quality control inspections, research and development, statistical services and marketing programs. In the fiscal years ended November 28, 2004, November 30, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the licensing group as a whole generated gross royalties of approximately $15.6 million, $13.7 million and $12.2 million, respectively.

        See the International section for international licensees.

        Sealy, Stearns & Foster and Bassett bedding offer limited warranties on our manufactured products. The periods for "no-charge" warranty service vary among products. Prior to fiscal year 1995, such warranties ranged from one year on promotional bedding to 20 years on certain Posturepedic and Stearns & Foster bedding. All currently manufactured Sealy Posturepedic models, Stearns & Foster bedding, Bassett and some other Sealy-brand products offer a 10-year non-prorated warranty service period. Our TrueForm™ visco elastic line of bedding, introduced late in the first quarter of 2005, will carry a 20 year warranty. In fiscal 2000, we amended our warranty policy to no longer require the mattress to be periodically flipped. We also accept, upon occasion, other returns from some of our retailers as an accommodation.

        We own, among others, the Sealy and Stearns & Foster trademarks and tradenames and also own the Posturepedic, and University of Sleep trademarks, service marks and certain related logos and design marks. We also license the Bassett and Pirelli tradenames in various territories under certain long term agreements.

        As of November 28, 2004 we had 6,399 full-time employees. Approximately 70% of our employees at our 25 North American plants are represented by various labor unions with separate collective bargaining agreements. Due to the large number of collective bargaining agreements, we are periodically in negotiations with certain of the unions representing our employees. We consider our overall relations with our work force to be satisfactory. We have only experienced one work stoppage in the last ten years due to labor disputes. Due to the ability to shift production from one plant to another, these lost workdays have not had a material adverse effect on our financial results. We have not encountered any significant organizing activity at our non-union facilities in that time frame. Our current collective bargaining agreements, which are typically three years in length, expire at various times beginning in fiscal 2005 through 2007. As of November 28, 2004, our domestic manufacturing plants employed 644, 885 and 1,398 employees covered under collective bargaining agreements expiring in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007,

5


respectively. At our international facilities, there were 824, 557 and 721 employees covered under collective bargaining agreements expiring in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

        Our third quarter sales are typically 10% to 15% higher than other quarters. See Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 herein.

        Most of our sales are by short term purchase orders. Since the level of production of products is generally promptly adjusted to meet customer order demand, we have a negligible backlog of orders. Most finished goods inventories of bedding products are physically stored at manufacturing locations until shipped (usually within 5 days of accepting the order).

        Our conventional bedding product lines are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations relating to flammability and other standards. We believe that we are in material compliance with all such laws and regulations, including the new California flame retardant regulations related to manufactured mattresses and box springs which became effective January 1, 2005. We do not expect the impact of those regulations to be significant to our results of operations or financial position.

        Our principal waste products are foam and fabric scraps, wood, cardboard and other non-hazardous materials derived from product component supplies and packaging. We also periodically dispose (primarily by recycling) of small amounts of used machine lubricating oil and air compressor waste oil. We are, generally, subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and amendments and regulations thereunder and corresponding state statutes and regulations. We believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable federal, state and local country environmental statutes and regulations. Except as set forth in Item 3. "Legal Proceedings" below, compliance with federal, state or local provisions which have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, should not have any material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. We are not aware of any pending federal environmental legislation which would have a material impact on our operations. Except as set forth in Item 3. "Legal Proceedings," we have not been required to make and do not expect to make any material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in the foreseeable future.

6


Item 2.    Properties

        Our principal executive offices are located on Sealy Drive at One Office Parkway, Trinity, North Carolina, 27370. Corporate and administrative services are provided to the Company by Sealy, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company).

        We administer our component operations at our Rensselaer, Indiana facility. Our leased facilities are occupied under operating leases, which expire from fiscal 2005 to 2033, including renewal options.

        The following table sets forth certain information regarding manufacturing and distribution facilities operated by the Company at January 31, 2005:

Location

   
  Approximate
Square
Footage

  Title
United States            
  Arizona   Phoenix   76,000   Owned(a)
  California   Richmond
South Gate
  238,000
185,000
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)
  Colorado   Colorado Springs
Denver
  70,000
92,900
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)
  Florida   Orlando
Lake Wales(c)(d)
  97,600
179,700
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)
  Georgia   Atlanta   292,500   Owned(a)
  Illinois   Batavia   212,700   Leased
  Indiana   Rensselaer
Rensselaer
  131,000
124,000
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)
  Kansas   Kansas City   102,600   Leased
  Maryland   Williamsport   144,000   Leased
  Minnesota   St. Paul   93,600   Owned(a)
  New York   Green Island   257,000   Leased
  North Carolina   High Point   151,200   Owned(a)
  Ohio   Medina   140,000   Owned(a)
  Oregon   Portland   140,000   Owned(a)
  Pennsylvania   Clarion
Delano
  85,000
143,000
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)
  Tennessee   Memphis(b)(d)   225,000   Owned(a)
  Texas   Brenham
North Richland Hills
  220,000
124,500
  Owned(a)
Owned(a)

Canada

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Alberta   Edmonton   144,500   Owned(a)
  Quebec   Saint Narcisse   76,000   Owned(a)
  Ontario   Toronto   80,200   Leased
Argentina   Buenos Aires   85,000   Owned
Brazil   Sorocaba   92,000   Owned
Puerto Rico   Carolina   58,600   Owned(a)
Italy   Silvano d'Orba   170,600   Owned(a)
France   Saleux   239,400   Owned
Mexico   Toluca   157,100   Owned
       
   
        4,628,700    
       
   

(a)
We have granted a mortgage or otherwise encumbered our interest in this facility as collateral for secured indebtedness.

(b)
In April 2001, we ceased operations at this facility.

(c)
In April 2002, we ceased operations at this facility.

(d)
These properties are being actively marketed for sale and have been written down to their estimated net realizable values.

7


        In addition to the locations listed above, we maintain additional warehousing facilities in several of the states where our manufacturing facilities are located. We consider our present facilities to be generally well maintained and in sound operating condition.

        In December 2004, we sold our Randolph, Massachusetts facility that had been previously closed in May 2004.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        We are subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        We are currently conducting an environmental cleanup at a formerly owned facility in South Brunswick, New Jersey pursuant to the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act. We and one of our subsidiaries are parties to an Administrative Consent Order issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Pursuant to that order, we and our subsidiary agreed to conduct soil and groundwater remediation at the property. We do not believe that our manufacturing processes were the source of contamination. We sold the property in 1997 and retained primary responsibility for the required remediation. We have completed essentially all soil remediation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection approval, and have concluded a pilot test of the groundwater remediation system. We have received approval from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection of a remediation plan for the sediment in Oakeys Brook adjoining the site, which we expect to start in 2005. We have recorded a reserve of $2.5 million for the estimated future costs associated with completing this remediation project, and it is reasonably possible that up to an additional $0.3 million may be incurred to complete the project.

        We are also remediating soil and groundwater contamination at an inactive facility located in Oakville, Connecticut. Although we are conducting the remediation voluntarily, we obtained Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection approval of the remediation plan. We have completed essentially all soil remediation under the remediation plan and are currently monitoring groundwater at the site. We have identified cadmium in the groundwater at the site and intend to address that during 2005. We have recorded a reserve of approximately $0.5 million associated with the additional work and ongoing monitoring. We believe the contamination at the site is attributable to the manufacturing operations of previous unaffiliated occupants of the facility.

        We removed three underground storage tanks previously used for diesel, gasoline, and waste oil from our South Gate, California facility in March 1994 and remediated the soil in the area. Since August 1998, we have been working with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region to monitor ground water at the site.

        While uncertainty exists as to the ultimate resolution of the South Brunswick, Oakville, and South Gate environmental matters, based on facts currently known, we believe that the accruals recorded are adequate and do not believe the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or future operations; however, in the event of an adverse decision by one or more of the governing environmental authorities, these matters could have a material adverse effect.

        In 2000, Montgomery Ward, a customer of Sealy, declared bankruptcy and filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the district of Delaware. In 2003, the bankruptcy trustee filed a claim of $3.7 million associated with certain alleged preferential payments by Montgomery Ward to Sealy. In December of 2004, we reached a settlement of this matter with the bankruptcy trustee for $0.2 million and are awaiting approval of this matter from the bankruptcy court.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        None.

8



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

        There is no established public trading market for any class of our common equity or that of our parent company, Sealy Corporation.

        As of January 31, 2005, there were 24 holders of record of the Class A shares of Sealy Corporation, which owns 100% of our common equity.

        On July 16, 2004 our parent, Sealy Corporation, paid a cash dividend of approximately $0.62 per share of common stock. Any payment of future dividends and the amounts thereof will be dependent upon our earnings, fiscal requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Certain restrictive covenants contained in out senior credit agreements and the indenture governing our 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 currently limit our ability to make dividend or other payments.

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

        The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial and other data of the Company for the years ended November 28, 2004, November 30, 2003, December 1, 2002, December 2, 2001, and November 26, 2000.

        The selected consolidated financial and other data set forth in the following tables has been derived from the our audited consolidated financial statements. The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, covering our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended November 28, 2004, and the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, covering our Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended November 30, 2003, and December 1, 2002, are included elsewhere herein. These tables should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.


SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

 
  Year Ended
November 28,
2004

  Year Ended
November 30,
2003

  Year Ended
December 1,
2002

  Year Ended
December 2,
2001

  Year Ended
November 26,
2000

 
 
  (in millions)

 
Statement of Operations Data:                                
  Net sales(a)   $ 1,314.0   $ 1,189.9   $ 1,189.2   $ 1,154.1   $ 1,070.1  
  Costs and expenses(a)(b)(c)(d)     1,360.8     1,153.4     1,165.0     1,162.6     1,012.7  
  Income (loss) before income tax and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     (46.8 )   36.5     24.1     (8.5 )   57.4  
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(e)                 (0.2 )    
  Net income (loss)     (38.3 )   18.3     16.9     (20.8 )   30.1  
   
 
 
 
 
 
                                 

9


Other Data:                                
  Depreciation and amortization of intangibles(b)   $ 25.4   $ 24.9   $ 22.5   $ 31.9   $ 27.1  
  Income from operations     22.2     105.9     99.8     93.9     123.0  
  Cash flows provided by (used in):                                
    Operating activities(c)     43.5     87.1     100.3     11.3     70.2  
    Investing activities(c)     (7.4 )   0.6     (39.5 )   (62.9 )   (43.9 )
    Financing activities(c)     (116.1 )   (14.7 )   (45.1 )   45.5     (19.0 )
  EBITDA(f)     48.5     129.9     119.2     101.4     153.4  
  Capital expenditures     22.8     13.3     16.8     20.1     24.1  
  Interest expense     69.9     68.5     72.6     78.0     69.0  
  Ratio of EBITDA to interest expense     0.7 x   1.9 x   1.6 x   1.3 x   2.2 x
  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(g)         1.5 x   1.3 x       1.8 x
 
  November 28,
2004

  November 30,
2003

  December 1,
2002

  December 2,
2001

  November 26,
2000

 
 
  (dollars in millions)

 
Balance Sheet Data:                                
  Total assets   $ 897.3   $ 959.1   $ 904.9   $ 903.1   $ 830.0  
  Long-term obligations, net of current portion     965.8     699.6     719.9     748.3     651.8  
  Total debt     974.3     747.3     753.2     778.1     686.2  
  Stockholders' deficit     (383.7 )   (76.2 )   (115.7 )   (132.9 )   (93.3 )

10


 
  Fiscal Year
 
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
 
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ (38.3 ) $ 18.3   $ 16.9   $ (21.0 ) $ 30.1  
  Interest expense     69.9     68.5     72.6     78.0     69.0  
  Income Taxes     (8.5 )   18.2     7.2     12.5     27.2  
  Depreciation     24.2     23.8     21.4     18.4     14.2  
  Amortization     1.2     1.1     1.1     13.5     12.9  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  EBITDA   $ 48.5   $ 129.9   $ 119.2   $ 101.4   $ 153.4  
Adjustments to EBITDA to arrive at cash flow from operations:                                
  Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                 0.2      
  Interest expense     (69.9 )   (68.5 )   (72.6 )   (78.0 )   (69.0 )
  Income taxes     8.5     (18.2 )   (7.2 )   (12.5 )   (27.2 )
  Non-cash charges against (credits to) net income:                                
    Equity in losses (income) of investees             5.6     4.0     (0.5 )
    Business closure and impairment charges         1.8     8.2     30.7      
    Deferred income taxes     (16.2 )   (0.7 )   (2.1 )   (4.9 )   (0.9 )
    Non-cash interest expense     3.1     9.6     22.1     20.2     18.5  
    Non-cash charges associated with the recapitalization     42.2                  
  Other, net     2.2     (3.1 )   (3.9 )   (8.7 )   5.7  
  Changes in operating assets & liabilities     25.1     36.3     31.0     (41.1 )   (9.8 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Cash flow from operations   $ 43.5   $ 87.1   $ 100.3   $ 11.3   $ 70.2  
   
 
 
 
 
 


 
  Fiscal Year
 
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Pre-tax income (loss) from operations   $ (46.8 ) $ 36.5   $ 24.1   $ (8.5 ) $ 57.4
Fixed charges:                              
Interest expense, including amortization of debt discount and financing costs     69.9     68.5     72.6     78.0     69.0
Rentals—33%     5.1     4.5     4.5     4.4     3.3
   
 
 
 
 
Total Fixed charges     75.0     73.0     77.1     82.4     72.3
   
 
 
 
 
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges   $ 28.2   $ 109.5   $ 101.2   $ 73.9   $ 129.7
   
 
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         1.5x     1.3x         1.8x
   
 
 
 
 

11


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

        Sealy Mattress Corporation, through our subsidiaries, is the largest bedding manufacturer in the world, with a 21% domestic market share in 2003. We estimate that our market share has increased slightly in 2004. We manufacture and market a complete line of conventional bedding (innerspring) products including mattresses and box springs, holding leading positions in key market segments such as luxury bedding products and among leading retailers. According to Home Furnishing News in 2003, the Sealy brand ranked 9th among the top 150 home products brands. Our conventional bedding products include the SEALY®, SEALY POSTUREPEDIC®, STEARNS & FOSTER® and BASSETT® brands and account for approximately 88.4% of the our total net sales for the year ended November 28, 2004. In addition to our innerspring bedding, we also produce a variety of foam latex bedding products. Though sales of such products were not significant in 2004, we expect to experience growth in these product lines in 2005 as we seek to strengthen our competitive position in the specialty bedding (non-innerspring mattress) market. We distinguish ourselves from our major competitors by maintaining our own component parts manufacturing capability and producing substantially all of our mattress innerspring requirements and approximately 48% of our boxspring component parts requirements. We believe that our industry is resilient to economic downturns due in part to the large portion of purchases, approximately 70%, which are for mattress replacements. The growth of the bedding industry has been supported by economic and demographic factors such as increasing disposable income among the "baby boomer" segment of the population, an increase in the number of bedrooms per home and also second home purchases, and growing awareness of the health benefits of quality sleep.

        On April 6, 2004 our parent company, Sealy Corporation, completed a merger with affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. ("KKR") whereby KKR acquired approximately 92% of Sealy Corporation's capital stock. In connection with the merger, we recapitalized substantially all of our outstanding debt. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 herein) for a full description of the effects of the merger and recapitalization. Although we incurred substantially increased levels of debt in the recapitalization, our cost of capital was reduced due to lower interest rates on the new debt compared with our earlier financing, and our total interest costs have remained comparable with 2003. Due to our strong operating profitability and cash flow (exclusive of the effects of the recapitalization, which included expenses of $133.1 million, of which $42.4 million was non-cash), we have been able to repay $90 million of our senior secured term debt significantly ahead of schedule. Our strategy in 2005 will be to continue to deleverage our business through additional prepayments of our long-term debt as permitted by our senior credit agreements and our operating cash flow.

        In 2004, we successfully completed the rollout of our new single-sided, "no-flip" Sealy UniCased® and Stearns & Foster TripLCased® product lines in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, representing the broadest product redesign in our history. The manufacture and sale of these products began early in 2003, however our profitability was limited during that time period as we worked to gain manufacturing efficiency with the new products and supported our customers' transition to the new products with price rollbacks. In 2004, with these issues substantially behind us, we began to realize the anticipated contribution of these products to our sales growth and profitability. Our 2004 profitability has been further enhanced by rapid growth among our high-end price point ($1,000 and up) luxury bedding lines. Our shares of the Luxury and Ultra-Luxury product segments are greater than our overall market share, and our Stearns & Foster and Luxury Posturepedic lines directly target these segments.

        The growth of the specialty bedding market both domestically and internationally, including latex foam, visco-elastic and air-adjustable mattress products, presents both a challenge and opportunity to our

12



company. While certain of our competitors hold a significantly higher share of this market at the end of 2004, we have responded by creating our own separate marketing department for specialty bedding and we conducted extensive consumer research which has lead to the launch of our own TrueForm™ visco-elastic bedding product line late in the first quarter of 2005. We believe that by successfully leveraging our strong brand advantage and our marketing and distribution capabilities, we have the potential to make significant gains in the specialty bedding market.

        Our industry continues to be challenged by the high cost of steel and petroleum products, which affect the cost of our steel innerspring and our polyurethane foam and polyethylene component parts. Thus far, we have been able to successfully address these cost pressures though a price increase announced in May of 2004 and cost reduction efforts. We expect the cost of these components to remain elevated above their recent historical averages throughout 2005.

        Historically, the bedding industry has had limited exposure to competition from imports due to high shipping costs, short lead times, the large number of finished goods SKUs and the importance of brands. Recently, however Chinese bedding manufactures have begun to explore the feasibility of exporting their products into the United States. We do not expect that competition from Chinese bedding imports will have a significant impact on our business. We believe that by focusing on further improvements in the efficiency of our supply chain, controlling costs, and continuing to invest in product innovation and our brands, we can ensure that our domestically produced products will remain competitive with Chinese bedding imports. Furthermore, we believe that the relatively low labor content of our domestically produced mattresses lessens any competitive advantage provided by lower Chinese labor costs.

        Our analysis and discussion of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements that have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (US GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. US GAAP provides the framework from which to make these estimates, assumptions and disclosures. We choose accounting policies within US GAAP that our management believes are appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating results and financial position in a consistent manner. Our management regularly assesses these policies in light of current and forecasted economic conditions. Our accounting policies are stated in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 included herein). We believe the following accounting estimates are critical to understanding our results of operations and affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements:

        Cooperative Advertising and Rebate Programs—We enter into agreements with our customers to provide funds to the customer for advertising and promotion of our products. We also enter into volume and other rebate programs with our customers whereby funds may be rebated to the customer. When sales are made to these customers, we record liabilities pursuant to these agreements. We periodically assess these liabilities based on actual sales and claims to determine whether all of the cooperative advertising earned will be used by the customer or whether the customers will meet the requirements to receive rebated funds. We generally negotiate these agreements on a customer-by-customer basis. Some of these agreements extend over several periods and are linked with supply agreements. Most of these agreements coincide with our fiscal year, however our customers typically have ninety days following the end of a period to submit claims for reimbursement of advertising and promotional costs. Therefore, significant estimates are required at any point in time with regard to the ultimate reimbursement claimed by our customers. Subsequent revisions to such estimates are recorded and charged to earnings in the period in which they are identified. Costs of these programs totaled $171.4 million in 2004 of which $41.9 is recorded as a reduction of sales.

13



        Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—We actively monitor the financial condition of our customers to determine the potential for any nonpayment of trade receivables. In determining our reserve for bad debts, we also consider other general economic factors. Our management believes that our process of specific review of customers combined with overall analytical review provides an accurate evaluation of ultimate collectibility of trade receivables. Our loss experience was $3.1 million, or approximately 0.2 percent of sales in 2004.

        Warranties and Product Returns—Our warranty policy provides a 10-year non-prorated warranty service period on all currently manufactured Sealy Posturepedic, Stearns & Foster and Bassett bedding products and some other Sealy-branded products and a 20-year warranty period on our True Form™ visco-elastic product introduced late in the first quarter of 2005. Our policy is to accrue the estimated cost of warranty coverage at the time the sale is recorded based on historical trends of warranty costs. Our estimate involves an average lag time in days between the sale of a bed and the date of its return applied to the current rate of warranty returns. Our accrued warranty liability totaled $13.9 million as of November 28, 2004.

        I