Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number: 0-30863

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes ý    No o

        As of February 4, 2005, there were 37,295,603 shares of the registrant's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.
INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

NETWORK ENGINES, INC.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

        The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Network Engines, Inc. ("Network Engines" or the "Company") in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the accompanying notes included in the Company's 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        The information furnished reflects all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are of a normal recurring nature and are considered necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. It should also be noted that results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year or any future period.

        The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates reflected in these financial statements include accounts receivable and sales allowances, inventory valuation, valuation of goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets, warranty reserves and stock compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8, "Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings per Share". This consensus is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004, and would require the dilutive effect of shares from contingently convertible debt to be included in the diluted earnings per share calculation regardless of whether the contingency has been met. Adoption of the provisions of this consensus did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations.

        In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123(R)"). SFAS 123(R) is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and amends FASB Statement No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows". SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and stock purchases under employee stock purchase plans, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 123(R) in its fiscal 2005 fourth quarter. Although the Company has not yet determined whether the adoption of SFAS 123R will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123, it is evaluating the requirements under SFAS 123R and expects the adoption to have a significant adverse impact on its consolidated statements of operations and net loss per share.

4

        In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 clarifies that abnormal inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) are required to be recognized as current period charges. The provisions of SFAS 151 are effective for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 151 and does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

        Stock options and restricted stock issued to employees and members of the Company's board of directors are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations ("APB 25"). Accordingly, compensation expense is recorded for options and restricted stock awarded to employees and directors to the extent that the exercise or purchase prices are less than the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, where the number of shares and exercise or purchase price are fixed. The difference between the fair value of the Company's common stock and the exercise or purchase price of the stock option or restricted stock award is recorded as deferred stock compensation. Deferred stock compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying stock option or restricted stock. Upon cancellation of options with residual deferred compensation balances at the date of cancellation, the remaining amount of unrecognized deferred compensation is reversed as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. The Company follows the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS 123"), as amended by SFAS 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure". Stock-based awards to non-employees are accounted for at their fair value in accordance with SFAS 123.

        Prior to the Company's initial public offering in July 2000, the Company recorded deferred stock compensation of approximately $15.5 million for restricted stock and stock options granted at prices deemed to be below fair market value for financial reporting purposes. In connection with the Company's acquisition of TidalWire Inc. ("TidalWire") in the quarter ended December 31, 2002, the Company replaced all outstanding TidalWire common stock options with options for the purchase of 1,035,033 shares of the Company's common stock with an average exercise price of $0.36. The value of these options, based on the Black-Scholes valuation model was $578,000. Related to the unvested portion of the replaced stock options, the Company recorded $304,000 as deferred stock compensation expense based on the intrinsic value of those employee stock options. The Company recognized stock compensation expense of approximately $5,000 and $225,000 for the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During the quarter ended December 31, 2003, the Company reversed approximately $3,000, of deferred stock compensation due to the cancellation of unvested options held by terminated employees. There were no reversals of deferred stock compensation during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

        The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based employee awards for the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

5

        All options granted during the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the grant date and had weighted average grant prices of $2.53 and $6.07 per share, respectively.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments

        The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents; cash equivalents are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair market value. All securities purchased with an original maturity of greater than three months and that mature within 12 months from the balance sheet date are considered short-term investments. All investments are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income or loss, which is a separate component of stockholders' equity, until realized. The Company invests excess cash primarily in municipal bonds, money market funds and government agency securities. Details of the Company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are as follows (in thousands):

Comprehensive Loss

        During each period presented, comprehensive loss was equal to net loss.

6

Segment Reporting

        The Company is organized into two reportable business segments: OEM Appliance and Distribution. The Company's segments have been determined based upon the channels through which the segments sell products. Sales of server appliances to the Company's network equipment and Independent Software Vendors ("ISV") partners are included in the Company's OEM Appliance segment. Sales of server appliances and third-party data storage networking products to Value Added Resellers ("VARs") and systems integrators are included in the Company's Distribution segment. The accounting policies of these segments are the same as those described in the Company's summary of significant accounting policies in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004. The Company evaluates its segments' performance based on revenues and gross profit, and the Company's management regularly evaluates the Company's segments in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. There are no inter-segment sales or transfers. Management does not review assets as part of the assessment of segment performance; as such, segment asset information is not available.

        The following is a summary of the Company's operations by reporting segment (in thousands):

        All of the Company's long-lived assets were located in the United States as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Significant Customers

        The following table summarizes those customers who accounted for greater than 10% of the Company's net revenues or accounts receivable:

7

3. VALUATION OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND RELATED IMPAIRMENT

        On December 10, 2003, the Company amended its agreement with EMC regarding the distribution of EMC-approved Fibre Channel host bus adaptors ("HBAs"). This amendment required the Company to pay a royalty to EMC for each EMC-approved HBA sold by the Company. As a result of the negative effect of this amendment on the Company's gross profits related to sales of EMC-approved Fibre Channel HBAs, the Company's Distribution segment gross profits and the Company's consolidated gross profits and operating results, the Company considered this amendment to be a triggering event requiring examination for potential impairment of its goodwill, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, and intangible assets, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144. As a result, the Company conducted a detailed analysis of its goodwill and intangible assets as of December 10, 2003. This analysis resulted in the determination that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value and therefore goodwill was not impaired by this amendment. The Company's impairment analysis of its intangible assets resulted in the determination that the fair value of the intangible assets was less than the carrying amount of its intangible assets, which resulted in a charge to operations of approximately $3,614,000 in the quarter ended December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the Company's goodwill and intangible assets were carried at $7,769,000 and $0, respectively.

4. NET LOSS PER SHARE

        Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, excluding shares of common stock subject to repurchase by the Company ("restricted shares"). Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potential common stock outstanding during the period, if dilutive. Potential common stock includes incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options.

        The following table sets forth the potential common stock excluded from the calculation of net loss per share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive (in thousands):

5. INVENTORIES

        Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

8

6. CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees and Indemnifications

        Acquisition-related indemnifications—When, as part of an acquisition, the Company acquires all the stock of a company, the Company assumes liabilities for certain events or circumstances that took place prior to the date of acquisition. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make for such obligations is undeterminable. While the provisions of the agreements remain in effect indefinitely, the Company believes that the probability of receiving a claim is unlikely. As a result, the Company has not recorded a liability for these indemnification clauses as of December 31, 2004.

        The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of its business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally its business partners or customers, in connection with any patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to its products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these indemnifications as of December 31, 2004.

        Product warranties—The Company offers a warranty on certain of the products that it sells. Depending on the product sold, warranty obligations are fulfilled by the Company, a third-party contracted by the Company or the product manufacturer. Warranty terms vary in duration depending upon the product sold but generally provide for the repair or replacement of any defective products for periods of up to 36 months after shipment. Based upon historical experience and expectation of future conditions, the Company reserves for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the recognition of the related revenue. In addition, the Company records warranty expense based on its agreements with its third-party warranty fulfillment provider, whose fees are determined based on fixed periodic amounts as well as activity-based charges.

        The following table presents changes in the Company's product warranty liability for the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (in thousands):

Contingencies

Announcement Timing Lawsuit

        On March 17, 2004, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the "Court") consolidated a number of purported class action lawsuits filed against Network Engines, Inc. and certain individual Network Engines defendants (collectively the "Defendants"). These suits generally concern the timing of the announcement of an amendment to Network Engines' agreement

9

with EMC Corporation regarding the resale of EMC-approved Fibre Channel HBAs. The Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on June 4, 2004. The Defendants on August 13, 2004 filed a motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint. The Plaintiffs on October 12, 2004 filed an opposition to the Defendants' motion to dismiss. The Defendants filed a reply to the Plaintiff's opposition on November 12, 2004. The Court on November 22, 2004 denied the Company's motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint.

        Network Engines believes that the Plaintiffs' allegations are without merit, and it intends to pursue a vigorous defense. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this suit and its ultimate effect, if any, on the Company's financial condition; however, the Company's defense against this suit may result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. No amounts have been accrued for this matter.

TidalWire Acquisition Lawsuit

        A purported class action and derivative lawsuit was filed on January 7, 2003 in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware against the Company, and certain members of its Board of Directors relating to the acquisition of TidalWire Inc. The plaintiffs in the complaint alleged that the Company and the named directors of its Board of Directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, paying an excessive amount in the acquisition of TidalWire Inc. and purportedly failing to disclose material facts in the Company's Joint Proxy Statement/Information Statement distributed to stockholders for approval of the issuance of shares of the Company's Common Stock in the merger. The plaintiffs sought damages, rescission of the merger and other relief. On October 30, 2003, the court approved a settlement of the action negotiated by the parties, and that settlement became final on December 1, 2003. Under the settlement, all claims against the Company and its individual board members were dismissed with prejudice, and (a) the defendants in the lawsuit paid $600,000 to the Company, (b) plaintiff's attorney fees of $185,000 were paid out of that $600,000 amount and (c) in the disclosure for the Company's next annual meeting, the Company was required to detail certain information concerning relationships among its board members, which the Company has complied with. Payments to the Company under this settlement, net of payments of plaintiff's attorney fees, were recorded as an increase of $415,000 to additional paid-in capital during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

Initial Public Offering Lawsuit

        On or about December 3, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, Lawrence A. Genovesi (the Company's Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer), Douglas G. Bryant (the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and Administration), and the following underwriters of the Company's initial public offering: FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., Goldman Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (collectively, the "Underwriter Defendants"). An amended class action complaint, captioned In re Network Engines, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 01 Civ. 10894 (SAS), was filed on April 20, 2002.

        The suit alleges that the defendants violated the federal securities laws by issuing and selling securities pursuant to the Company's initial public offering in July 2000 ("IPO") without disclosing to investors that the Underwriter Defendants had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The suit also alleges that the Underwriter Defendants entered into agreements with certain customers whereby the Underwriter Defendants agreed to allocate to those customers shares of the Company's common stock in the offering, in exchange for which the customers

10

agreed to purchase additional shares of the Company's common stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. The suit alleges that such tie-in arrangements were designed to and did maintain, distort and/or inflate the price of the Company's common stock in the aftermarket. The suit further alleges that the Underwriter Defendants received undisclosed and excessive brokerage commissions and that, as a consequence, the Underwriter Defendants successfully increased investor interest in the manipulated IPO securities and increased the Underwriter Defendants' individual and collective underwritings, compensation and revenues. The suit seeks damages and certification of a plaintiff class consisting of all persons who acquired shares of the Company's common stock between July 13, 2000 and December 6, 2000

        In July 2002, the Company, Lawrence A. Genovesi and Douglas G. Bryant joined in an omnibus motion to dismiss the suit challenging the legal sufficiency of plaintiffs' claims. The motion was filed on behalf of hundreds of issuer and individual defendants named in similar lawsuits. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, and the Court heard oral argument on the motion in November 2002. On February 19, 2003, the Court issued an opinion and order denying the motion as to the Company. However, in October 2002, Lawrence A. Genovesi and Douglas G. Bryant were dismissed from this case without prejudice.

        On July 9, 2003, a Special Committee of the Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to negotiate a settlement of the pending claims substantially consistent with a memorandum of understanding negotiated among class plaintiffs, all issuer defendants and their insurers. The settlement would provide, among other things, for a release of the Company and the Individual Defendants for the conduct alleged in the amended complaint to be wrongful. The Company would agree to undertake other responsibilities under the settlement, including agreeing to assign, or not assert, certain potential claims that it may have against its underwriters. Any direct financial impact of the proposed settlement is expected to be borne by the Company's insurers. Any such settlement would be subject to various contingencies, including approval by the Court overseeing the litigation.

        The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this suit and its ultimate effect, if any, on the Company's financial condition; however, the Company's defense against this suit has and may continue to result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. No amounts have been accrued for this matter.

8. RESTRUCTURING CHARGE

        During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, the Company decided to discontinue sales of third-party data storage networking products. This decision was based on a review of this portion of the business and its prospects. As a result of the commoditization of Fibre Channel HBA technology and increasing competition in the market, the Company experienced declining gross profits related to its distribution of HBAs. In connection with this decision, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $366,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2004. Approximately $283,000 of the charge related to one-time termination benefits associated with terminating eleven employees in this portion of the business during the quarter. The Company also incurred $82,500 for a fixed payment related to its warranty fulfillment contract with an external service provider. The Company completed its sales of its remaining third-party data storage networking products during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

        The following table sets forth restructuring charge accrual activity during the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

11

        The Company expects remaining accrued amounts to be fully paid during the quarter ending March 31, 2005.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

        Robert M. Wadsworth, one of the Company's directors, is a managing director of the limited liability corporation that controls HarbourVest Partners (and its affiliates), one of the Company's significant stockholders. Mr. Wadsworth, is also a director of PSI Holding Group, Inc. ("PSI"), the parent company of Akibia, Inc. ("Akibia"). During the quarters ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, HarbourVest owned greater than 5% of the outstanding stock of the Company and greater than 5% of the outstanding stock of PSI. The Company has engaged Akibia to provide certain cust