Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)  

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              

Commission file number 1-7516


KEANE, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Massachusetts
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
  04-2437166
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

100 City Square, Boston, Massachusetts
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

02129
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (617) 241-9200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class
Common Stock, $.10 par value
  Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes o    No ý

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Yes ý    No o

        The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2003, was approximately $669,882,000. As of March 5, 2004, there were 63,522,027 shares of common stock, $.10 par value per share and no shares of Class B common stock, $.10 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

        Documents Incorporated by Reference. The Registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be used in connection with the Registrant's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 27, 2004. The information required in response to Items 10-14 of Part III of this Form 10-K is hereby incorporated by reference to such proxy statement.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
    PART I    
Item 1.   BUSINESS   3
Item 2.   PROPERTIES   9
Item 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS   10
Item 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS   10
    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY   10

 

 

PART II

 

 
Item 5.   MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS   15
Item 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA   16
Item 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS   17
Item 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK   35
Item 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA   36
Item 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE   77
Item 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES   77

 

 

PART III

 

 
Item 10.   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT   77
Item 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION   77
Item 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS   77
Item 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS   77
Item 14.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES   77

 

 

PART IV

 

 
Item 15.   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K   78
SIGNATURES   79

2


PART I

        This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For purposes of these Acts, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed a forward-looking statement. For example, statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "estimates," "intends," "may," "projects," "will," "would," and similar expressions may be forward-looking statements. However, we caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this annual report because these statements speak only as of the date when made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. There are a number of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements, including without limitation, the factors set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption "CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS."

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

        Keane, Inc. is a leading provider of Information Technology ("IT") and Business Consulting services. In business since 1965, our mission is to help clients improve business and IT effectiveness through outsourcing services. We help clients plan, build, and manage applications software through our Business Consulting, Application Development and Integration ("AD&I"), and Application Development and Management Outsourcing ("Application Outsourcing") services. We also optimize clients' internal processes through Business Process Outsourcing ("BPO") services through Worldzen, Inc. ("Worldzen"), our majority owned subsidiary.

        We deliver our IT services through an integrated network of local branch offices in North America and the United Kingdom ("UK"), and through Advanced Development Centers ("ADCs") in the United States ("U.S."), Canada, and India. This global delivery model enables us to provide our services to customers onsite, at our nearshore facilities in Canada, and through our offshore development centers in India. Our branch offices are supported by centralized Strategic Practices and Quality Assurance Groups.

        Our clients consist primarily of Global 2000 companies across several industries. We have specific expertise and depth of capability in financial services, insurance, healthcare, and the public sector. We strive to build long-term relationships with our customers by improving their business and IT performance, reducing their costs, and increasing their organizational flexibility. We achieve recurring revenue as a result of our multi-year outsourcing contracts and our long-term client relationships.

        We are a Massachusetts corporation headquartered in Boston. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "KEA." We maintain a Web site with the address www.keane.com. Our Web site includes links to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct, and our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters. We are not including the information contained in our Web site as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge, through our Web site our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file these materials with, or otherwise furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

        Our registered trademarks include EZ-Access®. Our trademarks include: Keane, the Keane logo, Enterprise Application Integration, Keane InSight, and VistaKeane. Our service marks include: Application Development and Integration Services, and Application Development and Management

3



Outsourcing Services. All other trademarks, service marks, or tradenames referenced in this Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.

SERVICES

        We improve our clients' business performance by maximizing the effectiveness of IT organizations. We apply our rigorous processes and management discipline to applications and business processes, enabling clients to reduce costs and increase organizational flexibility and efficiency. We focus on three synergistic service offerings: Plan services, which include Business Consulting and Program Management; Build services, including AD&I, and Manage services, including Application Outsourcing and BPO. Services are delivered using our global delivery model, from operations in the U.S., UK, Canada, and India.

        In 2003, we entered the growing BPO market through the acquisition of a majority interest in Worldzen. Worldzen specializes in complex processes within the financial services, insurance, and healthcare industries, and provides back-office processes for multiple industries. As part of our investment, we contributed certain assets of our Keane Consulting Group ("KCG") to Worldzen. Worldzen's services augment our Plan and Manage service offerings.

Plan services

        Business Consulting.    Our Business Consulting services play an important role in our ability to help clients manage their businesses. During 2003, we provided the majority of our Business Consulting services through KCG. As part of our investment in Worldzen, we contributed certain assets of KCG to Worldzen on October 17, 2003.

        KCG helps companies maximize productivity, reduce costs, and create capacity for future growth by identifying high-value business opportunities and implementing our operations improvement recommendations. KCG takes a broad view of business processes, organizational design, and technology architecture. KCG provides operations improvement services in three core areas: insurance and financial services, manufacturing and distribution, and technology. Typical KCG client engagements include streamlining customer processes and operations and optimizing supply chains. Typically, KCG's Business Consulting engagements deliver specific, tactical recommendations for process improvement, often resulting in a follow-on BPO engagement. On a going forward basis, KCG will be fully integrated into Worldzen, our majority owned subsidiary.

        IT Consulting.    Our IT Consulting services include several offerings that help companies develop and implement their IT and business process improvement strategies. Many clients engage us to provide Project Management services to ensure consistency of quality and delivery over multiple projects within a client organization. Other Plan services include Network Integration Planning, Strategic Information Planning, and Package Selection.

Build services

        AD&I.    As application software becomes more complex, it requires sophisticated integration between front-end and back-end systems to enhance access to critical corporate data, enable process improvements, and improve customer service. Many of our AD&I projects focus on solutions for Enterprise Application Integration ("EAI"), supply chain, and customer service problems.

        As a result of our significant expertise and experience, we have become a top-tier provider of large, complex software development and integration projects for Global 2000 companies. We also provide AD&I services to the public sector, which includes agencies within the U.S. Federal Government, various states, and other local government entities.

4



        Given the existing economic environment, many clients have deferred investments in new information systems. As a result, we have concentrated our short-term marketing efforts on helping clients to better integrate and enhance existing IT applications, and on projects that rapidly improve efficiency and lower costs immediately.

        We believe that we are well positioned to bid on and win large-scale AD&I projects from both the commercial and public sector markets due to our core competencies in project management, integration, and global delivery. We anticipate that these competencies, together with our long-term relationships with Global 2000 companies, particularly those clients for which we provide Application Outsourcing services, will enable us to benefit from an economic recovery and an increase in spending on information technology.

        Healthcare Solutions.    Our Healthcare Solutions Division ("HSD") develops and markets a complete line of open-architecture financial management, patient care, clinical operations, enterprise information, long-term care, and practice management systems for healthcare organizations. In addition, HSD provides healthcare-related IT consulting, outsourcing, and IT integration services. Because the healthcare market is less cyclical in nature than most of the commercial IT market, our HSD business complements our commercial AD&I revenue and typically acts as a stabilizing influence on Build revenue during periods of slower economic growth.

        HSD's products help healthcare organizations overcome the challenge of providing higher quality patient care while administering more efficient operations through the use of information technology. HSD's core healthcare solutions include EZ-Access, Keane InSight, and VistaKeane. EZ-Access is a browser-based family of healthcare information systems designed to improve access to patient data, reduce the occurrence of medical errors, and protect client investment in information technology. EZ-Access includes our widely installed Patcom Plus, a patient management system that is considered a market leader by industry analysts. Keane InSight is a comprehensive healthcare information system that provides immediate access to patient information using secure, browser-based technology. VistaKeane is a fully integrated financial and clinical solution for long-term and post-acute care providers. HSD's customers include integrated delivery networks, hospitals, long-term care facilities, and physician group practices. HSD currently provides proprietary software and services to more than 280 hospital-based clients and approximately 4,000 long-term care facilities throughout the U.S.

        In addition, our broad range of services help healthcare clients address ongoing Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") requirements. HIPAA is Federal legislation designed to improve efficiency in the national healthcare system and protect the privacy of health information. It is expected to have far-reaching implications on the healthcare industry's IT infrastructure and business operations. Our HIPAA-related services include Enterprise Assessment and Planning, Compliance Implementation, and Ongoing Compliance Management.

Manage services

        Application Outsourcing.    Our Application Outsourcing services help clients manage existing business systems more efficiently and more reliably, improving the performance of these applications while frequently reducing costs. Under our Application Outsourcing service offering, we assume responsibility for managing a client's business applications with the goal of instituting operational efficiencies that enhance flexibility, freeing up client personnel resources, and achieving higher user satisfaction. We seek to obtain competitive advantages in the application outsourcing market by targeting our Global 2000 client base and generating measurable operational and financial benefits to our clients. We achieve these client benefits through the use of our world-class methodologies, continuous process improvement, and our global delivery model.

        Forty-seven of our Application Outsourcing engagements have been independently assessed at Level 3 or 4 on the Software Engineering Institute's ("SEI") Capability Maturity Model ("CMM"). In

5



addition, two of our ADCs in India, located in Hyderabad and Delhi, are independently evaluated at Level 5 on the SEI CMM and comply with ISO 9001: 2000 standards. Our ADC in Halifax, Nova Scotia, has also been independently evaluated at Level 5 on the SEI CMM. The SEI CMM has five levels of process maturity, and many IT organizations typically operate at Level 1, the lowest level of maturity. Since 1997, we have used the SEI CMM as a standard for objectively measuring our success in improving our clients' application management environments. The SEI CMM has become the industry's standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of an IT environment and the process maturity of outsourcing vendors.

        Our global delivery model offers customers the flexibility and economic advantage of allocating work among a variety of delivery options, including onsite at a client's facility, nearshore in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and offshore at one of our three locations in India. This integrated, highly flexible mix of cost-effective onsite, nearshore, and offshore delivery is now a component of most new outsourcing engagements. The distribution of work across multiple locations is typically based on a client's cost, technology, and risk management requirements. Our project management approach ensures common methodologies and disciplines across locations, and provides a single point of accountability to the client.

        Application Outsourcing provides us with large, long-term contracts. These client engagements usually span three to five years. Application Outsourcing projects typically supply us with contractually obligated recurring revenue and with an ability to cross-sell other solutions. We believe that our ability to consistently provide measurable business value within an existing client account fosters profitable, long-term client relationships by strongly positioning us to win additional outsourcing engagements, as well as development and integration projects.

        Business Process Outsourcing.    We acquired a majority interest in Worldzen, a provider of BPO services, on October 17, 2003. Worldzen specializes in providing BPO services to clients with complex processes in the financial services, insurance, and healthcare industries, and to clients with back office processes in several industries. Worldzen's BPO services are designed to reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of our clients' business transactions, enabling companies to focus on their more profitable activities, and avoid the overhead and management distraction of non-core back-office processes. Worldzen provides these low-cost, high-value outsourcing services from operations in both the U.S. and India.

STRATEGY

        Our goal is to be recognized as one of the world's great IT services firms by our clients, employees, and shareholders. We believe that we can achieve this goal by helping clients improve their business and IT effectiveness through the consistent delivery of high-value outsourcing services. Specifically, we believe that one of the most significant business trends over the next five years will be corporations leveraging Application Outsourcing, BPO, and offshore delivery to achieve meaningful cost reductions and business improvement. We believe that our depth of capability in each of these areas, along with our strong customer relationships and unique process management methodologies, will enable us to capitalize on this market opportunity.

        We have five major strategic priorities for 2004. We believe these strategic priorities will position us to take advantage of expected market growth driven by a recovery in IT spending, and the convergence of Application Outsourcing, BPO, and offshore delivery.

Achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth.

        We believe that we can achieve long-term revenue expansion by growing our Application Outsourcing and BPO businesses, as well as by leveraging our strong position in less cyclical vertical industries such as healthcare and the public sector. We expect to increase our operating margins over

6



the short-term by improving billing rates and utilization as the IT services sector recovers, and by aggressively controlling selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expenses. Longer term, we will increasingly leverage lower-cost offshore resources in providing outsourcing services, while continuously adjusting our expenses to ensure cost-effective delivery. We expect our ability to effectively manage our working capital, most notably Days Sales Outstanding ("DSO"), and capital spending will enable us to generate strong operating cash flow. We plan to use excess cash to complete attractive acquisitions and to continue to repurchase shares of our common stock from time-to-time.

Strengthen our position as an industry leader in innovative, full lifecycle Application Outsourcing initiatives.

        We believe industry analysts and clients recognize us as one of the leading application outsourcing vendors in North America. Our ability to provide high-quality service to our clients has been significantly enhanced by our global delivery model, with capability onsite, at nearshore facilities in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and at three facilities in India. We expect to intensify our efforts during 2004 to position Keane as a full lifecycle, global provider of outsourcing, and a means for clients to gain the economic advantage of offshore delivery while reducing their associated risks. We also seek opportunities to proactively target our existing customer base of Global 2000 customers, and our deep expertise in specific industry verticals, to cross-sell our Application Outsourcing services.

Continue to rapidly build offshore/nearshore scale and capabilities.

        Global sourcing has become an important component of our clients' overall sourcing strategies. Use of offshore delivery enables clients to gain access to a large pool of cost-effective technical personnel, while enhancing productivity via a 24 hours a day, seven days a week development approach. As a result, we believe offshore delivery is critical for success in today's IT services market. During 2003, we significantly enhanced our offshore sourcing capabilities, doubling the size of our operations in India. During 2004, we plan to continue to build scale in our India operations. In addition, we plan to continue to invest in nearshore facilities in Halifax, Nova Scotia, to support new opportunities.

Acquire market share and enhance our BPO solutions.

        Integration between technology and business processes is an increasing trend, and is changing the way clients buy IT and business services. We believe that this convergence of applications and BPO represents a near-term opportunity to build market share, as companies are engaging long-term outsourcing partners now. Accordingly, one of our priorities is building scale and capability in our BPO operations, both through Worldzen and potential additional investments.

Align our operating model with our strategic focus.

        Over the long term, we anticipate that our mix of services will shift to reflect the emerging market opportunity in offshore outsourcing. We plan to prioritize investment in offshore delivery, Application Outsourcing, vertical expertise, and BPO operations in order to develop the capabilities to support and grow these segments. These investments may include future capital spending and acquisitions. We expect to continue to adapt our operating model and infrastructure in accordance with market trends and conditions.

7


COMPETITION

        The IT services market is highly competitive and driven by continual changes in client business requirements and advances in technology. Our competition varies by the type of service provided and by geographic markets.

        We compete with traditional players in the IT services industry, including large integrators (such as Accenture ("ACN"), Electronic Data Systems ("EDS"), Computer Sciences Corporation ("CSC"), IBM Global Services ("IBM"), and Perot Systems ("PER")); offshore solution providers, including Wipro ("WIT") and Infosys ("INFY"); IT solutions providers (such as Sapient Corporation ("SAPE"), American Management Systems ("AMSY"), BearingPoint ("BP"), and Ciber ("CBR")); and management consulting firms (such as McKinsey and Booz Allen). Some of these competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than we do.

        We believe that the basis for competition in the IT services industry includes the ability to create an integrated solution that best meets the needs of an individual customer, provide competitive cost pricing models, develop strong client relationships, generate recurring revenue, and offer flexible client-service delivery options. We believe that we compete favorably with respect to these factors. However, we may not be able to continue to compete successfully with our existing competitors or to compete successfully with any new competitors.

CLIENTS

        Our clients consist primarily of Global 2000 organizations, government agencies, and healthcare organizations. These organizations generally have significant IT budgets and frequently depend on service providers for outsourcing services.

        In 2003, we derived our revenue from the following industry groups:

Industry

  Percentage of Revenue
 
Healthcare   21.9 %
Financial services   20.4  
Government   18.6  
Manufacturing   17.6  
High Technology/Software   7.2  
Other   4.5  
Energy/Utilities   4.2  
Retail/Consumer goods   4.0  
Telecommunications   1.6  

        Our 10 largest clients accounted for approximately 36%, 29%, and 32% of our total revenues during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. Our two largest clients during 2003 were various agencies within the Federal Government and PacifiCare, with approximately 9.2% and 6.5% of our total revenues, respectively. In 2002 and 2001, the Federal Government and IBM were our two largest clients. Federal Government contracts accounted for approximately 7.6% and 6.9% of our total revenues in 2002 and 2001, respectively. IBM accounted for approximately 4.4% and 6.5% of our total revenues in 2002 and 2001, respectively. A significant decline in revenue from the Federal Government or PacifiCare would have a material adverse effect on our total revenue. With the exception of the Federal Government, PacifiCare, and IBM, no single client accounted for more than 5% of our total revenues during any of the three years ended on or before December 31, 2003.

        In accordance with industry practice, many of our orders are terminable by either the client or us on short notice. Moreover, any and all orders relating to the Federal Government may be subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contract or subcontractors at the election of the Federal

8



Government. We had orders at December 31, 2003 of approximately $1.4 billion, in comparison to orders of approximately $1.5 billion at December 31, 2002. Because our clients can cancel or reduce the scope of their engagements on short notice, we do not believe that backlog is a reliable indication of future business.

SALES, MARKETING, AND ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

        We market our services and software products through our direct sales force, which is based in our branch offices and regional areas, as well as through our Application Outsourcing Corporate Practice. Our account executives are assigned to a limited number of accounts so they can develop an in-depth understanding of each client's individual needs and form strong client relationships. Under the direction of our Senior Vice President of Business Development and Regional Sales Vice Presidents, these account executives identify IT services needs within clients and are responsible for developing a solution that meets these requirements. In addition, account executives ensure that clients receive responsive service that achieves their objectives. Account executives receive in-depth training in our sales processes and service offerings and are supported by enterprise knowledge management systems in order to efficiently share organizational learning. Account executives collaborate with our Application Outsourcing Corporate Practice, other branch offices, and our Global Services Group as needed to address specialized customer requirements.

        Our Application Outsourcing Corporate Practice employs specialized senior sales professionals to respond to client requirements and to pursue and close large, strategic outsourcing engagements. Application Outsourcing engagements provide a strong base of recurring revenue and afford the opportunity to cross-sell our other strategic services.

        We focus our marketing efforts on organizations with significant IT budgets and recurring software development and outsourcing needs. We maintain a corporate branding campaign focused on communicating our value proposition of reliably delivering application solutions with quantifiable business results. These branding efforts are actively executed through multiple channels.

EMPLOYEES

        On December 31, 2003, we had 7,381 employees, including 6,182 business and technical professionals whose services are billable to clients. We sometimes supplement our technical staff by utilizing subcontractors, which as of December 31, 2003, consisted of 466 full-time subcontractors.

        We believe our growth and success are dependent on the caliber of our people and will continue to dedicate significant resources to hiring, training and development, and career advancement programs. Our efforts in these areas are grounded in our core values, namely: respect for the individual, commitment to client success, achievement through teamwork, integrity, continuous improvement, and commitment to shareholder value. We strive to hire, promote, and recognize individuals and teams who embody these values.

        We generally do not have employment contracts with our key employees. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement and we believe that our relations with our employees are good.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

        Our principal executive office as of December 31, 2003, was located at 100 City Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02129, in an approximately 95,000 square foot office building which is leased from Gateway Developers LLC ("Gateway LLC"). John Keane Family LLC is a member of Gateway LLC. The members of John Keane Family LLC are trusts for the benefit of John F. Keane, Chairman of the

9



Board of Keane, and his immediate family members. (See Item 13 "CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS")

        Based upon our knowledge of rental payments for comparable facilities in the Boston area, we believe that the rental payments under the lease for 100 City Square, which will be approximately $3.2 million per year ($33.00 per square foot for the first 75,000 square feet and $35.00 per square foot for the remainder of the premises) for the first six years of the lease term and approximately $3.5 million per year ($36.00 per square foot for the first 75,000 square feet and $40.00 per square foot for the remainder of the premises) for the remainder of the lease term, plus specified percentages of any annual increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses, were, at the time we entered into the lease, as favorable to us as those which could have been obtained from an independent third party.

        At December 31, 2003, we leased and maintained sales and support offices in more than 70 locations in North America, the UK, and India. The aggregate annual rental expense for our sales and support offices was approximately $14.1 million in 2003. The aggregate annual rental expense for all of our facilities was approximately $15.0 million in 2003. For additional information regarding our lease obligations, see Note 15 "RELATED PARTIES, COMMITMENTS, AND CONTINGENCIES" in the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        In April 1998, First Command (formerly United Services Planning Association, Inc. & Independent Research Agency for Life Insurance, Inc.) filed a complaint in the District Court for Tarrant County, Texas (Civil Action No. 96-173235-98), against us and two of our employees alleging that we misrepresented our ability to complete a project contracted for by the plaintiffs and concealed from the plaintiffs material facts related to the status of the project. During the Third Quarter of 2003, in order to avoid further costs, we settled the claim in full with payment to the plaintiffs in the amount of $3.5 million, of which $1.6 million was previously accrued.

        During the First Quarter of 2003, we received a $7.3 million award in connection with an arbitration proceeding initiated by us in 2000 against Signal Corporation for a breach of an agreement between Signal Corporation and our Federal Systems subsidiary.

        We are involved in other litigation and various legal matters, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. We believe that these matters are without merit and intend to defend vigorously against them.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        None.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY:    The executive officers and directors of Keane as of March 5, 2004 are as follows:

Name

  Committee
  Age
  Position
John F. Keane       72   Chairman of the Board and Director
Brian T. Keane       43   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
John J. Leahy       45   Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
Russell J. Campanello       48   Senior Vice President
Robert B. Atwell       55   Senior Vice President
Russell A. Cappellino       62   Senior Vice President
Georgina L. Fisk       35   Vice President
             

10


Raymond W. Paris       66   Senior Vice President
Gary D. Rader       45   Senior Vice President
Laurence D. Shaw       42   Vice President
Maria A. Cirino   (2)(3)   40   Director
John H. Fain       55   Director
Philip J. Harkins   (2)(3)   56   Director
Winston R. Hindle, Jr.   (1)(3)   73   Director
John F. Keane, Jr.       44   Director
James T. McBride   (1)(3)   58   Director
John F. Rockart   (1)(2)   72   Director
Stephen D. Steinour   (1)(2)   45   Director
James D. White   (2)(3)   43   Director

(1)
Audit Committee

(2)
Compensation Committee

(3)
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (From February 2003 to February 2004, we had separate Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. These two committees were reconstituted in February 2004 into a single Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.)

        All Directors hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers of Keane serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

        Mr. John Keane, the founder of Keane, has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since Keane's incorporation in March 1967. Mr. Keane served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Keane from 1967 to November 1999. Mr. John Keane is a director of Firstwave Technologies, a public company that provides Internet-based customer relationship management solutions, and American Power Conversion Corporation, a designer, developer, and manufacturer of power protection and management solutions for computer, communications, and electronic applications. Mr. John Keane is the father of Mr. Brian Keane, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Keane, and Mr. John Keane, Jr., a director of Keane.

        Mr. Brian Keane joined Keane in 1986 and has served as Keane's President and Chief Executive Officer since November 1999 and as a director of Keane since May 1998. From September 1997 to November 1999, Mr. Keane served as Executive Vice President and a member of the Office of the President of Keane. From December 1996 to September 1997, he served as Senior Vice President. From December 1994 to December 1996, he was an Area Vice President of Keane. From July 1992 to December 1994, Mr. Keane served as a Business Area Manager, and from January 1990 to July 1992, he served as a Branch Manager. Mr. Keane has served as a trustee of Mount Holyoke College since May 2000. Brian Keane is a son of John Keane, the founder, and Chairman of Keane, and the brother of John Keane, Jr., a director.

        Mr. Leahy joined Keane in August 1999 as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. From 1982 to August 1999, Mr. Leahy was employed by PepsiCo, Inc., a multinational consumer products corporation, during which time he held a number of positions, serving most recently as Vice President of Business Planning and Development for Pepsi-Cola International.

        Mr. Campanello joined Keane in September 2003 as Senior Vice President of Human Resources. From July 2000 to February 2003, he served as Chief People Officer at NerveWire, a technology and business consulting company. From January 1998 to July 2000, he led the human resource function at Genzyme Corporation, a biotechnology company.

11



        Mr. Atwell initially joined Keane in 1974 and held a number of positions through 1986. Mr. Atwell left Keane from 1986 to 1991. In 1991, Mr. Atwell rejoined Keane when we acquired a branch of Broadway and Seymour, a regional applications services company where Mr. Atwell was serving as Vice President. Since that time, Mr. Atwell has held several positions with Keane and has held the position of Senior Vice President of North American Branch Operations since 1999.

        Mr. Cappellino joined Keane as Senior Vice President, Offshore Solutions in March of 2002. From 1995 to March 2002, Mr. Cappellino served as Chairman and CEO of SignalTree Solutions Holding, Inc. ("SignalTree Solutions"). SignalTree Solutions was acquired by Keane in March 2002. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Cappellino was President of Network Solutions and Vice President/General Manager of Worldwide Telecommunications Marketing at Tandem Computers.

        Ms. Fisk joined Keane in August 1998 as Marketing Manager of Keane Ltd in the UK. From October 2000 to January 2001, Ms. Fisk served as the Director of Marketing of Keane Ltd in the UK. Since January 2001, Ms. Fisk has served as Director of Marketing for Keane, Inc. and in January 2004, was promoted to Vice President, Marketing of Keane, Inc.

        Mr. Paris joined Keane in November 1976. Mr. Paris has served as Senior Vice President of Healthcare Solutions since January 2000 and served as Vice President and General Manager of the Healthcare Solutions Practice from August 1986 to January 2000. Mr. Paris also served as Area Manager of the Healthcare Solutions Practice from 1981 to 1986.

        Mr. Rader joined Keane in 1987 as a consultant. From 1987 through December 2003, Mr. Rader served as Sales Representative, Sales Manager, Branch Manager, and most recently as a Group Vice President. In January of 2004, Mr. Rader was named Senior Vice President of Business Development.

        Mr. Shaw joined Keane in September 2002 as Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Keane Ltd. From 1996 to September 2002, Mr. Shaw was employed by Headstrong, a global restructuring corporation, during which time he held a number of positions, serving most recently as Chief Operating Officer of European Operations.

        Ms. Cirino has served as a director of Keane since July 2001. Since February 2000, Ms. Cirino has held the position of CEO and Chairman of Guardent, Inc., a managed security services corporation. On February 27, 2004, Guardent was acquired by VeriSign, Inc., a provider of critical infrastructure services for Internet and telecommunications networks. Since then, Ms. Cirino has held the position of Senior Vice President of VeriSign Managed Security Services. From November 1999 to February 2000, Ms. Cirino served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Razorfish Inc., a strategic digital communications company. From July 1997 to November 1999, Ms. Cirino served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for iCube, Inc., a communications company, which was acquired by Razorfish in November 1999.

        Mr. Fain has served as a director of Keane since November 2001 and served as Senior Vice President of Keane from November 2001 to March 2002. Prior to joining Keane, Mr. Fain was the founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Metro Information Services Inc. ("Metro"), a provider of IT consulting, and custom software development services and solutions, which was acquired by Keane in November 2001. Mr. Fain's role at Metro also included serving as President from July 1979 until January 2001.

        Mr. Harkins has served as a director of Keane since February 1997. Mr. Harkins is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Linkage, Inc., an organizational development company founded by Mr. Harkins in 1988. Prior to 1988, Mr. Harkins was Vice President of Human Resources of Keane.

        Mr. Hindle has served as a director of Keane since February 1995. Mr. Hindle is currently retired. From September 1962 to July 1994, Mr. Hindle served as a Vice President and, subsequently, Senior

12



Vice President of Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer systems and services firm. Mr. Hindle is also a director of Mestek, Inc., a public company which manufactures and markets industrial products.

        Mr. John Keane, Jr. has served as a director of Keane since May 1998. Mr. Keane is the founder of ArcStream Solutions, Inc., a consulting and systems integration firm focusing on cable and wireless solutions, and has been its President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2000. From September 1997 to July 2000, he was Executive Vice President and a member of the Office of the President of Keane. From December 1996 to September 1997, he served as Senior Vice President. From December 1994 to December 1996, he was an Area Vice President. From January 1994 to December 1994, Mr. Keane served as a Business Area Manager. From July 1992 to January 1994, he acted as manager of Software Reengineering, and from January 1991 to July 1992, he served as Director of Corporate Development. John Keane, Jr. is a son of John Keane, the founder and Chairman of Keane, and a brother of Brian Keane.

        Mr. McBride has served as director of Keane since October 2003. Prior to his retirement in 2002, Mr. McBride spent 32 years with Deloitte & Touche, LLP, most recently as National Managing Partner of Marketing and Sales.

        Dr. Rockart has served as a director of Keane since Keane's incorporation in March 1967. Dr. Rockart has been a Senior Lecturer Emeritus at the Alfred J. Sloan School of Management of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT") since July 2002. Dr. Rockart served as a Senior Lecturer at the Alfred J. Sloan School of Management of MIT from 1974 to July 2002 and was the Director of the Center for Information Systems Research from 1998 to 2000. Dr. Rockart is also a director of Selective Insurance Group, a public holding company for property and casualty insurance companies.

        Mr. Steinour has served as a director of Keane since July 2001. Since July 2001, Mr. Steinour has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. From January 1997 to July 2001, Mr. Steinour served as Vice Chairman of Citizens Financial Group, a commercial bank holding company. From October 1992 to December 1996, Mr. Steinour served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, as well as Managing Director of the Citizens Wholesale Banking Division within Citizens Financial Group.

        Mr. White has served as director of Keane since February 2004. Since July 2002, Mr. White has served as the Senior Vice President of Business Development for The Commercial Operations North America of The Gillette Company. From June 1986 to May 2002, Mr. White was employed by Nestlé, during which time he held a number of positions, serving most recently as the Vice President of Customer Interface for Nestlé Purina Pet Care Company.

13



        The compensation of the non-employee members of the Board of Directors is as follows:

Compensation

  Amount
Annual retainer   $20,000

Additional compensation:

 

 
Fee per Board Meeting      2,000
Annual fee for Chairperson of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee      5,000
Annual fee for Chairperson of Compensation Committee     15,000
Annual fee for Chairperson of Audit Committee     25,000
Committee meetings and telephonic meetings of the Board   No additional fee (part of annual retainer)
Initial stock option grant for a new Director   10,000 shares of common stock to be granted on the date of election. These options vest in three equal annual installments and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.
Annual stock option grant   5,000 shares of common stock to be granted on the date of each Annual Meeting. These options vest in three equal annual installments and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

        The compensation of our non-employee directors is determined on an approximate 52-week period (the "Annual Directors Term") that runs from annual meeting date to annual meeting date rather than on a calendar year. A director may elect to receive his or her annual fee or meeting attendance fees for an Annual Directors Term in the form of shares of common stock in lieu of cash payments. If a director elects to receive shares of common stock in lieu of cash as payment for the annual fee or meeting attendance fees, the number of shares to be received by the director will be determined by dividing the dollar value of the annual fee or the meeting attendance fees owed by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on the last day of the Annual Directors Term.

        Directors generally make their elections as to the form of compensation for his or her annual fee or meeting attendance fees in July of each year and such election is valid for the Annual Directors Term beginning in the calendar year in which the election is made.

        Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive stock options under our stock incentive plans. During 2003, we did not grant stock options to non-employee directors, other than the initial stock option grant or the annual stock option grant discussed above. Directors who are officers or employees of Keane do not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors.

14



PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

        Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $.10 par value per share; 503,797 shares of Class B common stock, $.10 par value per share, and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share. As of March 5, 2004, there were 63,522,027 shares of common stock outstanding and held of record by approximately 2,500 registered stockholders and no shares of Class B common stock or preferred stock outstanding. Effective February 1, 2004, each share of our Class B common stock, $.10 par value per share, was automatically converted into one share of common stock.

COMMON STOCK

        Voting.    Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to stockholders. Voting for directors is non-cumulative.

        On January 13, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors voted to convert all of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis, effective February 1, 2004. As of December 31, 2003, the Class B common stock represented less than 1% of our outstanding equity, but had approximately 4.3% of the combined voting power of our combined stock.

        Dividends and Other Distributions.    The holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefore. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of Keane, holders of common stock have the right to ratable portions of our net assets after the payment of all debts and other liabilities.

        Other Matters.    The holders of common stock have no preemptive rights or rights to convert their stock into any other securities and are not subject to future calls or assessments by Keane. The common stock was listed on the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") under the symbol "KEA" through October 29, 2003. On October 30, 2003, we began trading our common stock on the NYSE under the symbol "KEA." All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences, and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock, which we may designate and issue in the future.

PREFERRED STOCK

        Our articles of organization authorize the issuance of up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time-to-time in one or more series, and our Board of Directors is authorized to determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions, including the dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption price or prices, and liquidation preferences, of any series of preferred stock, and to fix the number of shares of any such series of preferred stock without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The voting and other rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of shares of preferred stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from acquiring, a majority of the outstanding voting stock of Keane. We have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

15



PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY

        Our common stock was traded on the AMEX from January 1, 2003 to October 29, 2003 under the symbol "KEA." We began trading our common stock on the NYSE under the symbol "KEA" on October 30, 2003. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price per share as reported by AMEX and NYSE, as the case may be.

Stock Price
Period

  High
  Low
2003            
First Quarter   $ 10.09   $ 6.90
Second Quarter     14.00     7.80
Third Quarter     15.19     12.30
Fourth Quarter     15.13     12.72

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 
First Quarter   $ 19.18   $ 14.30
Second Quarter     16.82     12.30
Third Quarter     12.70     5.99
Fourth Quarter     10.10     5.29

        The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on March 5, 2004 was $15.25.

        We have not paid any cash dividend since June 1986. We currently intend to retain all of our earnings to finance future growth and therefore do not anticipate paying any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. Our $50.0 million credit facility with two banks contains restrictions that may limit our ability to pay cash dividends in the future.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Years ended December 31,

  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
 
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

   
   
   
 
Income Statement Data:                                
Revenues   $ 804,976   $ 873,203   $ 779,159   $ 871,956   $ 1,041,092  
Operating income     42,180     10,357     19,753     27,921     116,466  
Net income     29,222     8,181     17,387     20,354     73,074  
Basic earnings per share     0.44     0.11     0.25     0.29     1.02  
Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.44   $ 0.11   $ 0.25   $ 0.29   $ 1.01  
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding     65,771     74,018     68,474     69,646     71,571  
Diluted weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding     66,423     74,406     69,396     69,993     72,395  

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total cash and marketable securities   $ 206,136   $ 68,255   $ 129,243   $ 115,212   $ 142,763  
Total assets     797,987     685,674     679,903     463,594     519,307  
Total debt (1)     193,371     45,647     15,357     8,616     11,403  
Stockholders' equity     458,132     490,584     529,173     370,677     422,799  
Book value per share   $ 7.20   $ 7.06   $ 7.00   $ 5.48   $ 5.95  
Number of shares outstanding     63,629     69,521     75,509     67,675     71,051  

Financial Performance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Revenue (decline) growth     (7.8 )%   12.1 %   (10.6 )%   (16.2 )%   (3.3 )%
Net margin     3.6 %   0.9 %   2.2 %   2.3 %   7.0 %

(1)
Includes $40,500, $40,888, and $13,000 in accrued building costs for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

16


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. For purposes of these Acts, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed a forward-looking statement. For example, statements containing the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "estimates," "intends," "may," "projects," "will," "would," and similar expressions may be forward-looking statements. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There are a number of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements, including without limitation the factors set forth below under the caption "CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS." These factors and the other cautionary statements made in this annual report should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this annual report. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance, or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements in this annual report, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

        The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report.

OVERVIEW

        We help clients improve business and IT effectiveness through outsourcing services. We plan, build, and manage application software through our Business Consulting, AD&I, and Application Outsourcing services. We develop long-term relationships with customers by providing a broad range of service offerings delivered on a local basis. We also optimize clients' internal processes through BPO services through Worldzen, our majority owned subsidiary. Our IT services are delivered through an integrated network of local branch offices in North America, the UK, and through ADCs in the U.S., Canada, and India. This global delivery model enables us to provide our services to customers onsite, at our nearshore facilities in Canada, and through our offshore development centers in India. Our centralized Strategic Practices and our Quality Assurance Groups support branch offices. The Practices focus on developing repeatable approaches to common customer needs and challenges, and help to gather and institutionalize our best practices. We believe that our blend of onsite, nearshore, and offshore capabilities enables us to further improve the efficiency and economic advantage of the services that we provide our customers.

        In order for us to remain successful in the near term, we must continue to maintain and grow our client base, provide high-quality service and satisfaction to our existing clients, and take advantage of cross-selling opportunities. In the current economic environment, we must provide our clients with service offerings that are appropriately priced, satisfy their needs, and provide them with measurable business benefit. We believe that maximizing the generation of cash from our operations is fundamental to building long-term per share value. We believe that selling and delivering Application Outsourcing and cross-selling our other services is critical to our long-term success. Attracting, retaining, motivating, and developing talented sales, management, and technical professionals is another essential component to our success. In addition, our ability to leverage SG&A expenses over a broader base of revenue is crucial to increasing net income and cash provided from operations.

17



APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. The actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

        Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Application of these policies is particularly important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. We believe that the accounting policies described below meet these characteristics. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize revenue as services are performed or products are delivered in accordance with contractual agreements and generally accepted accounting principles. For general consulting engagements, revenue is recognized on a time and materials basis as services are delivered. For the majority of our outsourcing engagements, we provide a specific level of service each month for which we bill a standard monthly fee. Revenue for these engagements is recognized in monthly installments over the billable portion of the contract. These installments may be adjusted to reflect changes in staffing requirements and service levels consistent with terms of the contract. Costs of transitioning the employees and ensuring we meet required service level agreements may be capitalized over defined periods of time.

        For fixed-price engagements, revenue is recognized on a proportional performance basis over the life of the contract. We use estimated labor-to-complete to measure the proportional performance. Proportional performance recognition relies on accurate estimates of the cost, scope, and duration of each engagement. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of the work to be performed, then future revenues may be negatively affected or losses on existing contracts may need to be recognized. All future anticipated losses are recognized in the period they are identified.

        Revenue associated with application software products is recognized as the software products are installed and as implementation services are delivered. Software maintenance fees on installed products are recognized on a pro-rated basis over the term of the agreement.

        In all consulting engagements, outsourcing engagements, and software application sales, the risk of issues associated with satisfactory service delivery exists. Although we believe these risks are adequately addressed by our adherence to proven project management methodologies, proprietary frameworks, and internal project audits, the potential exists for future revenue charges relating to service delivery issues. Historically, we have not experienced major service delivery issues.

Allowance for Bad Debts

        Each accounting period, we evaluate accounts receivable for risk associated with a client's inability to make contractual payments or unresolved issues with the adequacy of our services. Billed and unbilled receivables that are specifically identified as being at risk are provided for with a charge to revenue in the period the risk is identified. Considerable judgment is used in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables, including reviewing the financial stability of the client, evaluating the successful mitigation of service delivery disputes, and gauging current market conditions. If our

18



evaluation of service delivery issues or a client's ability to pay is incorrect, we may incur future reductions to revenue.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill and other intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of these assets. This process is subjective and requires judgment at many points throughout the analysis. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets not previously recorded. As of December 31, 2003, our goodwill totaled $292.9 million.

        We review our identifiable intangible assets for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144 ("SFAS 144"), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." In determining whether an intangible asset is impaired, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows from the asset, intended use of the asset, and other related factors. If the estimates or the related assumptions used to determine the value of the intangible assets change, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. As of December 31, 2003, our intangible assets totaled $71.0 million.

Income Taxes

        We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 ("SFAS 109"), "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have recorded a valuation allowance for the tax benefits of certain subsidiary net operating losses and the minimum pension liability. Our policy is to establish reserves for taxes that may become payable in future years as a result of an examination by the tax authorities. In accordance with SFAS No. 5 ("SFAS 5"), "Accounting for Contingencies," we establish the reserves based upon our assessment of exposure associated with permanent tax differences and interest expense applicable to both permanent and temporary difference adjustments. The tax reserves are analyzed periodically and adjusted as events occur to warrant the adjustment to the reserve.

Stock-based Compensation

        We grant stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the shares at the date of grant. We also grant restricted stock for a fixed number of shares to employees for nominal consideration. We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 ("APB 25"), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." In accordance with APB 25, we recognize compensation expense based on the difference between the market value at grant date and the grant price and record the compensation expense ratably over the restriction period. We do not recognize compensation expense on our stock option grants as the stock options are granted at the market price at the date of grant.

        We adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 ("SFAS 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure," an amendment to SFAS No. 123 ("SFAS 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Had we adopted the accounting provisions of SFAS 148, we would have recorded additional compensation expense and reduced net income by approximately $4.6 million, $11.3 million, and $10.3 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

19



Restructuring

        We have recorded restructuring charges and reserves associated with restructuring plans approved by management in the last five years. As of January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 146 ("SFAS 146"), "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which requires us to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to exit or disposal plan exists. These reserves include estimates pertaining to employee separation costs and real estate lease obligations. The reserve associated with lease obligations could be materially affected by factors such as the ability to obtain subleases, the creditworthiness of our sub-lessees, market value of properties, and the ability to negotiate early termination agreements with lessors. While we believe that our current estimates regarding lease obligations are adequate, future events could require adjustments to these estimates. Based on the assumptions included in our analysis as of December 31, 2003, to the extent that we are unable to maintain all of our current, contractual subleases, we could incur an additional restructuring charge up to approximately $2.7 million. In addition, if we are able to negotiate early terminations of our operating leases or to obtain a sublessee, we would record a reduction to the restructuring liability and a corresponding expense reduction. In 2003, we recorded an expense reduction of $1.0 million associated with early lease terminations and unanticipated subleases.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        In this section, we discuss our results of operations. We measure our revenue performance by comparing the growth in Plan, Build, and Manage service revenues. We evaluate our improvement in profitability by comparing gross m