Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

001-13836
(Commission File Number)


TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Bermuda   98-0390500
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)

Second Floor, 90 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of registrant's principal executive office)

441-292-8674
(Registrant's telephone number)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares, Par Value $0.20   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o.

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III or this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes ý No o.

        The aggregate market value of voting common shares held by nonaffiliates of registrant was approximately $25,608,291,520 as of March 31, 2003.

        The number of common shares outstanding as of December 2, 2003 was 1,999,091,242.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Portions of the registrant's proxy statement filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant's fiscal year in connection with the registrant's 2004 annual general meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

        See pages 33 to 36 for the exhibit index.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
  Page
Part I        

Item 1.

 

Business

 

1

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

14

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

14

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

24

Part II

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market For the Registrant's Common Shares and Related Security Holder Matters

 

26

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

27

Item 7.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

28

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

28

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

29

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

29

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

29

Part III

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

32

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

32

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

32

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

32

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

32

Part IV

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

 

33

Signatures

 

37

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

38


PART I

Item 1. Business

Introduction

        Tyco International Ltd. ("we" or "Tyco") is a diversified manufacturing and service company that, through its subsidiaries:

        See Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for certain segment and geographic financial data relating to our business.

        Tyco's operating strategy is to be a low-cost, high-quality producer and provider in each of the markets we serve. We promote our leadership position by investing in existing businesses and developing new markets. Although acquisitions of complementary businesses have been an important part of Tyco's growth in the past, our business strategy now focuses on enhancing internal growth and operational efficiency for existing Tyco businesses. We plan to achieve this goal through new product innovation, increased market share, increasing the service and repair components of our existing businesses and continued geographic expansion. We are also implementing initiatives across our business segments to achieve best-in-class operating practices utilizing six sigma measurements. Additionally, we announced that we are evaluating the proposed disposition of some non-core businesses to be effected during the next year. Leveraging the strengths of our existing operations, we seek to enhance value for our shareholders through operational excellence and maximization of cash flows. We are continuing to strive towards the highest standards of corporate governance so that we can earn the respect and confidence of our shareholders, employees, suppliers and customers and the financial community.

I. Fire and Security

        Tyco is the world's leading provider of both electronic security services and fire protection services. With fiscal 2003 revenues of $11,292.8 million, our Fire and Security businesses currently comprise 31% of our total revenues. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 revenues totaled $10,639.0 million or 30% of our total revenues and $7,473.0 million or 22% of our total revenues, respectively. The group's products and services include:

Electronic Security Services

        We are the world's leading provider of electronic security products and services and event monitoring, which includes the monitoring of burglar alarms, fire alarms, medical alert systems, such as

1



our Personal Emergency Response Systems, and other activities where around-the-clock monitoring and response are required. We offer regular inspection and maintenance services to ensure that systems will function properly and can be upgraded as technology or risk profiles change. We are also a leading supplier of electronic security solutions to the retail, commercial and industrial marketplaces, offering anti-theft, video surveillance, access control, electronic asset protection and security management systems, products and services. These and other security services are provided principally through our ADT operating companies.

        Electronically monitored security systems are tailored to our customers' specific needs and involve the installation and use on a customer's premises of devices designed for intrusion detection and access control, as well as reaction to various occurrences or conditions, such as movement, fire, smoke, flooding, environmental conditions, industrial processes and other hazards. These detection devices are connected to microprocessor-based control panels, which communicate to a monitoring center (located remotely from the customer's premises) where alarm and supervisory signals are received and recorded. In most systems, control panels can identify the nature of the alarm and the areas within a building where the sensor was activated. Depending upon the type of service for which the subscriber has contracted, monitoring center personnel respond to alarms by relaying appropriate information to the local fire or police departments, notifying the customer or taking other appropriate action, such as dispatching employees to the customer's premises. In some instances, the customer may monitor the system at its own premises or the system may be connected to local fire or police departments.

        Whether systems are monitored by the customer at its premises or connected to one of our monitoring centers, we usually provide support and maintenance through service contracts. Systems installed at customers' premises may be owned by us or by our customer.

        We market our electronic security services to commercial and residential customers through both a direct sales force and an authorized dealer network, the ADT dealer program. Throughout fiscal 2003, we re-focused our ADT dealer program, in order to increase the return on investment of accounts purchased through the program. A separate national accounts sales force services large commercial customers. We also utilize advertising, telemarketing and direct mail to market our services.

        We provide residential electronic security services primarily in North America and Europe, with a growing presence in the Asia-Pacific region. Our commercial customers include financial institutions, industrial and commercial businesses, federal, state and local governments, defense installations, and health care and educational facilities. Our customers are often prompted to purchase security systems by their insurance carriers, which may offer lower insurance premium rates if a security system is installed or require that a system be installed as a condition to coverage. It has been our experience that the majority of commercial and residential monitoring contracts are renewed after their initial terms. In general, relocations account for the largest number of residential discontinuances while business closures comprise the largest single factor impacting commercial contract attrition.

        Through our acquisition of Sensormatic in November 2001, we became the leader in anti-theft systems. The majority of the world's leading retailers use our systems to protect against shoplifting and employee theft. We manufacture these electronic article surveillance systems and generally sell them through our direct sales force in North and South America, Europe, Australia and Asia. A growing trend in the loss protection industry is for security labels to be applied to goods at the point of manufacture. In most cases, we sell these labels directly to the manufacturers or their packaging agents. We also develop and distribute access control and video surveillance systems, which are sold through direct and distributor channels.

        We manufacture certain alarm, detection and activation devices and central monitoring station equipment both for installation by us and for sale to other installers, although we out-source some of the electronic components we install.

        The security business in North America is highly competitive, with a number of major firms and some 12,000 smaller regional and local companies. Similarly, Tyco competes with several national

2



companies and several thousand regional and local companies in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America and South Africa. Competition is based primarily on price in relation to quality of service. We believe that the quality of our electronic security service is higher than that of many of our competitors and, therefore, our prices may be higher than those charged by our competitors.

Fire Protection Contracting and Services

        We design, fabricate, install and service automatic fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm and detection systems and special hazard suppression systems in buildings, industrial plants and off-shore installations, as well as respiratory systems and other life-saving devices. Tyco's fire protection businesses utilize a worldwide network of sales offices, operating globally under various trade names including SimplexGrinnell, Wormald, Mather & Platt, Total Walther, Dong Bang, Zettler, Ansul, Scott and Tyco.

        We install fire protection systems in both new and existing buildings. Our fire protection systems are purchased by owners, construction engineers and mechanical or general contractors. In recent years, the retrofitting of existing buildings has grown as a result of legislation mandating the installation of fire protection systems, especially in hotels, healthcare facilities, educational establishments and other buildings accessible to the general public. We continue to focus on system maintenance and inspection, which have become more significant parts of our business.

        The majority of the fire suppression systems installed by Tyco are water-based. However, we are also the world's leading provider of custom designed special hazard fire protection systems which incorporate specialized extinguishing agents such as foams, dry chemicals and gases, in addition to spill control products designed to absorb, neutralize and solidify spills of hazardous materials. These are often especially suited to fire protection in certain manufacturing, power generation, petrochemical, offshore oil exploration, transportation, data processing, telecommunications, commercial food preparation, mining and marine applications.

        We manufacture and distribute Scott and Sabre breathing systems for use by firefighters and other first responders, military and civilian aircrews and passengers, and for industrial applications. Military forces from 25 countries use our breathing apparatus and 600,000 U.S. firefighters rely on our Scott Air-PakR brand of self-contained breathing apparatus. Scott and Sabre products are sold globally through a network of distributors. Scott is considered the world leader in respiratory protection innovation for first responders.

        In Australia, New Zealand and Asia, Tyco engages in the installation of electrical equipment in new and existing structures and provides specialized electrical contracting services, including applications for railroad, bridge and tunnel construction.

        The majority of the mechanical components (and, in North America, a high proportion of the pipe) used in our fire protection systems are manufactured by Tyco's Engineered Products and Services segment. We use computer-aided-design technology that reduces the time required to design systems for specific applications and coordinates the fabrication and delivery of system components. We also have fabrication plants worldwide that cut, thread and weld pipe, which is then shipped with other prefabricated components to job sites for installation.

        Competition in the fire protection contracting business varies by region. In North America, Tyco competes with hundreds of smaller contractors on a regional or local basis for the installation of fire protection, alarm and detection systems. In Europe, Tyco competes with many regional or local contractors on a country-by-country basis. In Australia, New Zealand and Asia, we compete with a few large fire protection contractors, as well as with many smaller regional or local companies. Tyco competes for fire protection systems contracts primarily on the basis of price, service and quality.

II.    Electronics

        Tyco is the world's leading supplier of passive electronic components and a leading provider of undersea fiber optic networks and services. With fiscal 2003 revenues of $10,355.0 million, our Electronics businesses currently comprise 28% of our total revenues. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 revenues

3



totaled $10,464.1 million or 30% of our total revenues and $13,545.6 million or 40% of our total revenues, respectively. The group's products and services include:

Tyco Electronics

        Tyco Electronics is comprised of the Electronic Components, Wireless, Electrical Contracting Services, Power Systems and Printed Circuit Group reporting units. These businesses design, manufacture and market a broad range of electronic, electrical and electro-optic passive and active devices and a number of interconnection systems and connector-intensive assemblies, as well as wireless products including radar sensors, global positioning satellite systems components, silicon and gallium arsenide semiconductors and microwave sub-systems. Tyco Electronics' products have potential uses wherever an electronic, electrical, computer or telecommunications system is involved. Tyco Electronics manufactures and sells more than 500,000 parts in over 750 global product lines, including power systems, terminals, fiber optic components, printed circuit board and cable connectors and assemblies, cable and cabling systems, and related application tools and application tooling equipment. Products are sold under the AMP, Agastat, Axicom, Augat, Buchanon, Critchley, Dulmison, Elo-Touch, M/A-COM, Potter & Brumfield, Raychem, Schrack and Tyco Electronics trade names, among others.

        Tyco Electronics markets via direct sales and distributors to customers including original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") and their subcontractors, utilities, government agencies, value-added resellers and those who install, maintain and repair equipment. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, direct sales represent 87% of revenue while the remaining revenue is via distributors. These customers are found in the automotive, communications equipment manufacturers, telecommunications service providers, computer, aerospace, military, household appliance, industrial machinery and equipment, consumer electronics, energy and networking industries. In total, Tyco Electronics serves over 250,000 customers located in over 55 countries, and maintains a strong local presence in the geographic areas in which it operates, including the Americas, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.

        The markets that Tyco Electronics operates in are highly competitive. Tyco Electronics faces competition across its product lines from other companies ranging in size from large, diversified manufacturers to small, highly specialized manufacturers. Competition is on the basis of breadth of product offering, product innovation, price, quality and service.

Tyco Submarine Telecommunications

        Tyco Submarine Telecommunications (formerly TyCom) is a leading provider of undersea fiber optic networks and services. Tyco Submarine Telecommunications' products and services include: designing, manufacturing and installing undersea cable communications systems; servicing and maintaining major undersea cable networks; and designing, manufacturing and installing a global undersea fiber optic network, known as the Tyco Global Network ("TGN"). Tyco Submarine Telecommunications operates, maintains and sells bandwidth capacity on the TGN. In the near term, due to market conditions in the telecommunications industry, the focus of Tyco Submarine Telecommunications is on maintenance services on existing systems, small network construction projects and selling bandwidth capacity on the TGN. As part of its divestiture program, Tyco intends to sell the TGN.

4



III.  Healthcare

        Tyco is a world leader in the medical products industry. With fiscal 2003 revenues of $8,571.9 million, our Healthcare businesses currently comprise 23% of our total revenues. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 revenues totaled $7,899.1 million or 22% of our total revenues and $7,065.3 million or 21% of our total revenues, respectively. The group's products include:

        The Tyco Healthcare Group consists of three primary reporting units: Medical Devices & Supplies, Pharmaceuticals and Retail.

Medical Devices & Supplies

        Medical Devices & Supplies consists of five primary divisions: Medical, Surgical, Respiratory, Imaging, and International.

Medical

        The Kendall Division markets and manufactures a broad range of wound care products; needles and syringes; sharps disposables; vascular therapy products; electrodes; operating room kits and trays; urological care products; enteral feeding products; incontinence care products; and nursing care products. These products are marketed via a combination of direct sales representatives and third-party distributors to hospitals, surgi-centers, alternate care facilities and homes worldwide.

        The Medical Division consists of many market-leading brands such as KERLIX and CURITY wound care dressings, WINGS adult incontinence products, SCD compression devices, T.E.D. anti-embolism stockings, MONOJECT MAGELLAN safety needles and syringes, KANGAROO enteral feedings systems, DEVON O.R. surgical kits, and MEDI-TRACE diagnostic and monitoring electrodes.

Surgical

        The Surgical Division develops, manufactures and markets a broad spectrum of widely recognized surgical products that are used around the world in operating rooms, emergency rooms, surgi-centers and physician offices.

        U.S. Surgical is a market leader in innovative wound closure products and advanced surgical devices. Its Auto Suture business offers a complete line of surgical devices and laparoscopic instruments for general and specialty procedures. The recently formed Syneture business is the evolution of U.S. Surgical/Davis & Geck from a product-driven suture organization to one focused on clinical solutions for wound closure with advanced suture and biosurgery therapies. Valleylab is a leading manufacturer and marketer of a wide array of electro-surgical, ultrasonic and radiation ablation devices. Among Valleylab's leading brand names are the FORCE FX electro-surgical generator; the LIGASURE vessel occlusion system and the COOL-TIP RF (radio frequency) system.

Respiratory

        Tyco Healthcare's Respiratory Group develops and markets an extensive line of products and services that: help facilitate and monitor anesthesia; diagnose and treat respiratory disease; and provide life support for critically ill patients. These products are sold around the world and are used in the hospital and the home.

        Nellcor continues to drive advancements in pulse oximetry technology with the introduction of the OXIMAX pulse oximetry system. For critically ill patients or for those undergoing surgery, the MALLINCKRODT endotracheal, and SHILEY tracheotomy tubes are industry leaders. Puritan

5



Bennett is known around the world for its critical care ventilators, and the HELIOS liquid oxygen system for patients in need of oxygen therapy at home.

Imaging

        Mallinckrodt Imaging is devoted to improving the diagnostic sciences of X-ray, MRI and Nuclear medicine. By developing, manufacturing, and marketing contrast agents, radiopharmaceuticals and delivery systems, Mallinckrodt Imaging helps enhance the utility and quality of images obtained via these procedures. Mallinckrodt Imaging partners with radiologists, cardiologists and nuclear medicine physicians to improve the quality of diagnosis in multiple disease states through well known branded diagnostic pharmaceuticals, including OPTIRAY X-ray contrast media, OPTIMARK MRI contrast media, and thallium and TECHNESCAN MAG3 radiopharmaceutical. The Mallinckrodt family of imaging products is sold into hospitals, radiopharmacies and alternate site imaging centers throughout the world.

International

        Tyco Healthcare International is responsible for the marketing, distribution and export of all Tyco Healthcare Group products (excluding Pharmaceuticals and Retail products) outside of the United States. Tyco Healthcare International markets directly to hospitals and medical professionals, as well as through independent distributors, with a worldwide presence. Although the mix of product lines offered varies from country to country, its operations are organized primarily into four geographic regions: Europe, Japan, the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America.

Pharmaceuticals

        Tyco Healthcare's Mallinckrodt Pharmaceutical Division comprises three businesses—Bulk Pharmaceuticals (active pharmaceutical ingredients), Dosage Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals. The Bulk Pharmaceuticals business is the largest producer of narcotics in the United States and of acetaminophen worldwide. Ninety-five percent of these products are used within the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture dosage form drugs. The Dosage Pharmaceuticals business has three distinct divisions: generic narcotic pharmaceuticals, branded central nervous systems products and contract pharmaceutical manufacturing for third parties. These products are sold to major wholesalers and drug store chains primarily in the United States. The Specialty Chemicals business includes a wide array of specialty chemicals targeted at: research and development and analytical laboratories; process materials used to manufacture biopharmaceuticals; and specialty chemicals used to manufacture semiconductor chips, many of which are sold under the J.T. Baker name in the United States.

Retail

        The Retail Division of Tyco Healthcare develops, manufactures and markets a wide variety of retail brand products for the North American retail markets. The Retail Division supplies a broad majority of retail mass merchandisers, food stores and drug stores in these markets. The division is recognized within continental North America as the industry leader for retail brand adult incontinent care, infant care and feminine hygiene products. Through our "first-to-market" approach, Tyco Healthcare's Retail Division helps retailers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger, Albertson's, CVS, Loblaw and Toys R Us manage their categories and build their own store brand presence with the high-quality products consumers demand.

        Tyco Healthcare's competitors include Johnson & Johnson, Becton Dickinson and C.R. Bard, among others, and competition is based on breadth of product offerings, quality of product, service and price.

IV.    Engineered Products and Services

        Tyco is the world's leading manufacturer of industrial valves and controls. With fiscal 2003 revenues of $4,684.4 million, our Engineered Products and Services businesses currently comprise 13%

6



of our total revenues. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 revenues totaled $4,709.3 million or 13% of our total revenues and $4,170.8 million or 12% of our total revenues, respectively. The group's products and services include:

        Tyco Engineered Products and Services is comprised of four primary business units: Tyco Flow Control, Tyco Electrical & Metal Products, Tyco Infrastructure Services and Tyco Fire & Building Products.

Tyco Flow Control

        Tyco Flow Control manufactures both standard and highly specialized gate, globe, check, butterfly, ball, safety relief and other valves in a wide variety of configurations, body types, materials, pressure ratings and sizes. We also manufacture related equipment, instrumentation and products such as valve actuators, gauges, positioners, valve control systems and vapor control products. These products are manufactured in Tyco's facilities located in North America, Europe, South America and the Asia-Pacific region. The group's products are used in various applications including power generation, chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas, water distribution, wastewater, pulp and paper, commercial irrigation, mining, industrial process, food and beverage, plumbing and HVAC. Tyco Flow Control also provides engineering, design, inspection, maintenance, repair and commissioning services.

        Tyco's valves and related products are sold under many trade names, including Keystone, Grinnell, Hindle, KTM, Flow Control Technologies, Gachot, Richards, Sapag, Winn, Vanessa, Raimondi, Fasani, Sempell, Descote, Klein, Biffi, Morin Actuators, Westlock Controls, Crosby, Anderson Greenwood, Yarway, Valvtron, Neotecha, Belucci, Intecva, Bayard, Belgicast, Whessoe Varec, Bailey Birkett, Cash, Erhard, Schmieding and Frischhut.

        We sell valves and related products in most geographic areas directly through our internal sales force and in some geographic areas through a network of independent distributors and manufacturers' representatives. The valve industry is highly fragmented and we compete against a number of international, national and local manufacturers as well as against specialized manufacturers on the basis of price, delivery, breadth of product line and specialized product capability.

        In Australia, Tyco Flow Control also manufactures ductile iron and steel pipe, steel pipe fittings, valves and related products primarily for the water industry at several locations under the trade name Tyco Water. We also manufacture a line of plastic pipe and fittings in Australia and Malaysia.

        Tyco Thermal Controls manufactures and sells self-regulating and polymeric heaters, mineral insulated heaters and cable products, specialty heaters and related controllers and instrumentation. These products are sold under the RAYCHEM HTS, PYROTENAX and ISOPAD brand names on a worldwide basis. Our Tracer Industries unit provides turnkey design, installation and service of industrial heat tracing systems.

Tyco Electrical & Metal Products

        Tyco Electrical & Metal Products manufactures steel and related products primarily in North America and Europe. Our products include steel electrical conduit, pre-wired armored cable, flexible electrical conduit, metal framing systems, cable tray and cable ladder and related products utilized in

7



the construction, industrial and original equipment markets. In North America, our Allied Tube & Conduit ("Allied") division is the leading manufacturer of steel electrical conduit, and our AFC Cable Systems division is the leading manufacturer of steel and aluminum pre-wired armored cable. Georgia Pipe manufactures plastic conduit. Allied manufactures metal framing and support systems and electrical cable tray and cable ladders in North America and sells them under the Powerstrut, Unistrut and T.J. Cope trade names.

        Allied manufactures and distributes welded steel tubular products in North America and in the United Kingdom. In the United Kingdom, welded and drawn steel tubing is manufactured under the trade names of Newman Monmore, Newman Phoenix, Tyco Tube Components and HUB LeBas. We manufacture and distribute specialty steel strip products in the United Kingdom under the JB&S Lees, Firth Cleveland Steel Strip and Ductile Stourbridge trade names. In Brazil, tube is manufactured and sold under the trade names of Frefer and Dinaco. These businesses serve a wide spectrum of customers and applications ranging from automotive, fire protection, security and safety containment, recreational equipment, commercial construction and traffic control systems. Products compete on the basis of price, availability and breadth of product line.

Tyco Infrastructure Services

        Tyco Infrastructure Services provides a broad range of environmental, consulting and engineering services through its Earth Tech business. Earth Tech's principal services consist of a full-spectrum of water, wastewater, environmental and hazardous waste management services. We also provide infrastructure and transportation design and construction services for institutional, civic, commercial and industrial clients; design, construction management, project financing and facility operating services for water and wastewater treatment facilities for municipal and industrial clients; and transportation engineering and consulting. Earth Tech operates through a network of offices in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Mexico, Brazil, Germany, Portugal, Sweden, China, Australia and Thailand. Earth Tech competes with a number of international, national, regional and local companies on the basis of price and the breadth and quality of services.

Tyco Fire & Building Products

        Tyco Fire & Building Products manufactures and sells a wide variety of products to fire protection contractors and fabricators of fire protection systems. These products include a complete line of fire sprinkler devices, specialty valves, plastic pipe and pipe fittings and ductile iron pipe couplings. We manufacture these products in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, China and Malaysia and sell them under the GEM, STAR, CENTRAL, GRINNELL and CENTRAL SPRAYSAFE brand names. In North America, a complete line of steel sprinkler pipe is manufactured by our metal products unit (Allied), thus enabling us to offer a complete line of fire protection systems and services. Tyco also produces a complete line of specialty fastening products for the building industry that are manufactured in the United Kingdom under the trade names of Lindapter and Ancon and metal framing and support products that are manufactured in the United Kingdom and Germany.

        Central Sprinkler maintains a network of distribution facilities in the United States that stock and sell a full line of fire protection products directly to contractors and installers. GEM Sprinkler and Star Sprinkler sell fire protection products through a network of independent distributors. In Canada, Central America, South America and the Asia-Pacific region, we sell fire protection products through independent distribution and in some cases directly to fire protection contractors. In Europe and the Middle East, we operate a number of company-owned distribution facilities which stock and sell a full line of fire protection, mechanical, building products and other flow control products. Competition for the sale of fire products is based on price, delivery, breadth of product line and specialized product capability. The principal competitors are specialty products manufacturing companies based in the United States, with other smaller competitors in Europe and Asia.

8


V. Plastics and Adhesives

        Tyco Plastics and Adhesives consists of Tyco Plastics, A&E Products, Tyco Adhesives and Ludlow Coated Products. With fiscal 2003 revenues of $1,897.2 million, our Plastics and Adhesives businesses currently comprise 5% of our total revenues. Fiscal 2002 and 2001 revenues totaled $1,878.3 million or 5% of our total revenues and $1,747.4 million or 5% of our total revenues, respectively. The group's products include:

Tyco Plastics

        Tyco Plastics manufactures polyethylene-based film, packaging products, bags and sheeting in a wide range of sizes, gauges, strengths, stretch capacities, clarities and colors. Tyco Plastics' products include: RUFFIES, a national brand consumer trash bag sold to mass merchants, grocery chains and other retail outlets, and FILM-GARD, a leading plastic sheeting product sold to consumers and professional contractors through Do-It-Yourself outlets, home improvement centers and hardware stores. FILM-GARD products are produced in various sizes for a variety of uses, including painting, renovation, construction, landscaping and agriculture. Additionally, in the United States, Tyco Plastics is the largest producer of stretch film, the largest producer of can liners for the away-from-home market, and a leading supplier of custom packaging products used for primary food packaging and the beverage industries. Tyco Plastics sells its products directly to retailers for resale, to distributors for resale or directly to end-users. Tyco Plastics competes with other nationally recognized brands as well as many smaller regional producers on the basis of price, delivery, breadth of product line and specialized product capabilities. Manufacturing facilities are located throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom to ensure superior customer service and competitive transportation costs.

A&E Products

        A&E Products is the leading manufacturer of plastic garment hangers worldwide, operating from over 50 distribution points in 30 countries. A&E Products also operates hanger-recycling facilities in the United States and Europe. The reused hangers are purchased from various retailers and then sorted, processed and packaged for sale back to the apparel market. A&E Products' Catering division manufactures and markets disposable dinnerware products to the retail and foodservice industries. The Catering division markets their many product lines under brand names including SCROLLWARE, PRESTIGE, LEGACY and OPULENCE.

Tyco Adhesives

        The Tyco Adhesives division manufactures and markets specialty adhesive products and tapes for industrial applications, including external corrosion protection products for oil, gas and water pipelines. Tyco Adhesives also produces duct, foil, strapping, packaging and electrical tapes and spray adhesives for industrial and consumer markets worldwide, and manufactures cloth and medical tapes for Tyco Healthcare and others. Products are sold under the MANULI tapes, POLYKEN, NASHUA tape, RAYCHEM, BETHAM, NATIONAL and PATCO brand names.

Ludlow Coated Products

        Ludlow Coated Products produces a variety of specialty laminates and coated products principally derived from paper, film, foil and fabrics. Ludlow's products are key components of many end use products such as industrial packaging steel wrap and food packaging materials and also include housewraps, material handling slip sheets and flexible intermediate bulk containers. Ludlow markets its

9



specialty laminates and coated products through its own sales force and through independent manufacturers' representatives. Ludlow competes with many large manufacturers of laminates and coated products on the basis of price, service, marketing coverage and custom application engineering, and sells its products to manufacturers, producers and converters. It has various specialized competitors in different markets.

Backlog

        At September 30, 2003, we had a backlog of unfilled orders of $11,533.9 million, compared to a backlog of $11,015.5 million at September 30, 2002. We expect that approximately 83% of our backlog at September 30, 2003 will be filled during fiscal 2004. Backlog by reportable industry segment is as follows ($ in millions):

 
  September 30,
 
  2003
  2002
Fire and Security   $ 6,964.7   $ 6,691.5
Electronics     2,071.0     2,076.5
Engineered Products and Services     2,061.4     1,873.4
Healthcare     327.4     239.7
Plastics and Adhesives     109.4     134.4
   
 
    $ 11,533.9   $ 11,015.5
   
 

        Backlog for Fire and Security includes recurring "revenue-in-force," which represents one year's fees for security monitoring and maintenance services under contract. The amount of recurring revenue-in-force at September 30, 2003 and 2002 is $3,606.7 million and $3,483.9 million, respectively. Within the Fire and Security segment, backlog increased primarily due to favorable foreign currency exchange rates.

        Within the Electronics segment, backlog remained level. Backlog for Engineered Products and Services increased primarily due to several new contracts and, to a lesser extent, due to favorable foreign currency exchange rates. Backlog in the Healthcare and Plastics and Adhesives segments represents unfilled orders, which, in the nature of the businesses, are normally shipped shortly after purchase orders are received. We do not view backlog in the Healthcare and Plastics and Adhesives segments to be a significant indicator of the level of future sales activity.

Properties

        Our operations are conducted in facilities throughout the world aggregating approximately 120.2 million square feet of floor space, of which approximately 66.0 million square feet are owned and approximately 54.2 million square feet are leased. These facilities house manufacturing, distribution and warehousing operations, as well as sales and marketing, engineering and administrative offices.

        Within the Fire and Security segment, the fire protection contracting and service business operates through a network of offices located in North America, Central America, South America, Europe, the Middle East and the Asia-Pacific region. Fire protection components are manufactured at locations in North America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan. The electronic security services business operates through a network of monitoring centers and sales and service offices and other properties in North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America and South Africa. The Fire and Security segment occupies approximately 24.4 million square feet, of which 7.1 million square feet are owned and 17.3 million square feet are leased.

        The Electronics segment has manufacturing facilities in North America, Central and South America, Europe, Asia and Australia. The group occupies approximately 31.5 million square feet, of which 20.0 million square feet are owned and 11.5 million square feet are leased.

10



        The Healthcare segment has manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe and Asia. The group occupies approximately 23.9 million square feet, of which 13.8 million square feet are owned and 10.1 million square feet are leased.

        The Engineered Products and Services segment has manufacturing, warehouses and distribution centers throughout North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region and Central and South America. The group occupies approximately 28.7 million square feet, of which 17.3 million square feet are owned and 11.4 million square feet are leased.

        The Plastics and Adhesives segment has manufacturing facilities in North America, Europe & Asia. The group occupies approximately 11.3 million square feet, of which 7.8 million square feet are owned and 3.5 million square feet are leased.

        In the opinion of management, our properties and equipment are in good operating condition and are adequate for our present needs. We do not anticipate difficulty in renewing existing leases as they expire or in finding alternative facilities. See Note 22 to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our rental obligations.

Research and Development

        The amounts expended for Tyco-sponsored research and development during fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 were $670.6 million, $633.4 million and $572.0 million, respectively. Customer-funded research and development expenditures were $22.8 million, $20.4 million and $40.4 million, respectively.

        Tyco-sponsored research and developement expense by segment is as follows: ($ in millions):

 
  For the Year Ended September 30,

 

 

2003


 

2002


 

2001

Electronics   $ 372.2   $ 381.3   $ 410.4
Healthcare     156.9     134.3     135.6
Fire and Security     102.8     87.0     13.8
Engineered Products and Services     32.5     23.6     4.7
Plastics and Adhesives     6.2     7.2     7.5
   
 
 
    $ 670.6   $ 633.4   $ 572.0
   
 
 

        Approximately 5,500 full-time scientists, engineers and other technical personnel were engaged in our product research and development activities as of September 30, 2003.

        Research activity at Tyco Electronics focuses specifically on new product development and a continuous expansion of technical capabilities. Tyco Healthcare focuses on technologies to complement existing product lines and applying expertise to refine and successfully commercialize such products and technologies and on acquiring rights to new products. Research activity in Fire and Security relates mostly to the design of fire and intrusion alarm products and emergency alarm systems, as well as products related to electronic article surveillance. The Engineered Products and Services segment focuses on improvements in hydraulic design, which controls the motion of fluids, resulting in new fire protection devices and flow control products. Tyco Plastics and Adhesives research activities consist primarily of new and improved product development.

Raw and Other Purchased Materials

        We are a large buyer of steel and plastic resin in the United States. We are also a large buyer of copper, brass, gold, electronic components, chemicals and additives, thin and flexible copper clad materials, zinc, paper, ink, foil, adhesives, cloth, wax, pulp and cotton. Certain of the components used in the Fire Protection business, principally certain valves and fittings, are purchased for installation in

11



fire protection systems or for distribution. The majority of our electronic security systems are purchased from suppliers and are manufactured to our specification. Materials are purchased from a large number of independent sources around the world. There have been no shortages in materials which have had a material adverse effect on our businesses. From time to time, we may decide to hedge our exposure to prices in base and precious metals by the usage of forward contracts with banks that have at least an A+/A1 credit rating by Standard & Poor's and Moody's. In addition, long-term supply contracts, using fixed or variable pricing, are entered into in order to manage our exposure to potential supply disruptions.

Patents and Trademarks

        We own a portfolio of patents, which principally relate to electrical and electronic products, healthcare products, fire protection devices, electronic security systems, flow control products, pipe, tubing and cable manufacture, and plastic and adhesive products. We also own a portfolio of trademarks and are a licensee of various patents and trademarks. All product names indicated in CAPS throughout the document are trademarks owned by, or licensed to, the Company or its subsidiaries. Although these have been of value and are expected to continue to be of value in the future, in the opinion of management the loss of any single patent would not materially affect the conduct of the business in any of our segments. In addition, management believes that the likelihood of losing key trademarks is remote. In several cases, one product may be sold under more than one patent or trademark minimizing our risk of loss of business due to the loss of such intellectual property. The patents and licenses have estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years. As of September 30, 2003, we had approximately $130.4 million of trademarks not subject to amortization.

Employees

        Tyco employed 258,600 people at September 30, 2003, of which 102,900 are employed in the United States and 155,700 are outside the United States. We have collective bargaining agreements with labor unions covering 48,200 employees at certain of our North American, European and Asia-Pacific businesses. We believe that our relations with the labor unions are generally satisfactory. In April 1994, following lengthy negotiations, contracts between our Grinnell subsidiary and a local union of the United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters was not renewed. Employees in those locations, representing 64% of Grinnell Fire Protection's North American union employees at the time, went on strike. The strike ended in January 2001. In January 2002, Grinnell Fire Protection and Simplex Time Recorder Co. began doing business as SimplexGrinnell LP (an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyco). SimplexGrinnell has reinstated relevant terms of the expired collective bargaining agreement and has resumed negotiations with the local union over a new agreement. SimplexGrinnell made the majority of payments necessary in order to compensate certain employees (approximately 2% of SimplexGrinnell's employee population) for losses they may have experienced as a result of changes in their wages and benefits that Grinnell implemented in 1994 and the company continues in proceedings to resolve all outstanding issues relative to the employees impacted. Despite the Company's good faith attempts to continue negotiations, the Union called another strike in September 2003. This strike has not had any material effect on the Company's operations.

Proposed Legislation and Governmental Scrutiny

        In the normal course of business, we provide services and sell products to various government agencies. Changes in legislation or governmental policies can have an impact on our worldwide operations. In addition, we have been the focus of increased governmental scrutiny arising from actions taken by prior management. For example, we are currently assessing the potential impact of various legislative proposals that would deny U.S. federal government contracts to U.S. companies that move their corporate location abroad, and we recently responded to a Governmental Services Administration ("GSA") action due to concerns the GSA has expressed as a result of the alleged serious criminal

12



misconduct of our former CEO, CFO and General Counsel. The legislative proposals could cover the 1997 acquisition of Tyco International Ltd., a Massachusetts corporation, by ADT Limited (a public company that had been located in Bermuda since the 1980's with origins dating back to the United Kingdom since the early 1900's), as a result of which ADT changed its name to Tyco International Ltd. and became the parent to the Tyco group. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the State of California adopted legislation that purports to limit the eligibility of certain Bermuda and other foreign-chartered companies to participate in certain state contracts. Although the California law provides that waivers may be issued permitting such companies to participate in state contracts under certain circumstances, it is unclear how that waiver authority will be exercised. In addition, various other states and municipalities in the U.S. have proposed similar legislation. There also is similarly proposed tax legislation, which could substantially increase our corporate income taxes and, consequently, decrease future net income and increase our future cash outlay for taxes.

        Tyco's revenues related to U.S. federal government and California state contracts account for less than 2% and 0.1%, respectively, of total net revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. We are unable to predict, with any level of certainty, the likelihood or final form in which any proposed legislation might become law, or the nature of regulations that may be promulgated under any such future legislative enactments or the impact such enactments and increased regulatory scrutiny may have on our governmental business or on non-governmental customers' willingness to do business with us. As a result of these uncertainties, we are unable to assess the impact on us of any proposed legislation or regulatory scrutiny in this area and can provide no assurances that they will not be materially adverse.

        See Item 3. "Legal Proceedings" for a description of investigations initiated by certain government agencies.

Environmental Matters

        We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws governing, among other things, the generation, storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials; emissions or discharges of substances into the environment; and the health and safety of our employees. The cost of compliance with environmental laws, however, has not had, and based on current information and applicable laws, is not expected to have, a material adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. See Item 3. "Legal Proceedings" for a description of a pending legal proceeding regarding alleged Clean Water Act violations involving one of our businesses within the Electronics segment.

        Certain environmental laws assess liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at their properties or at properties at which they have disposed of hazardous substances. In addition to cleanup actions brought by governmental authorities, private parties could bring personal injury or other claims due to the presence of or exposure to hazardous substances. We have received notification from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and from state environmental agencies, that conditions at a number of sites where we and others disposed of hazardous wastes require cleanup and other possible remedial action and may require that we reimburse the government or otherwise pay for the cost of cleanup of those sites and for natural resource damages. We have projects underway at several current and former manufacturing facilities to investigate and remediate environmental contamination resulting from past operations.

13


        The ultimate cost of cleanup at disposal sites and manufacturing facilities is difficult to predict given uncertainties regarding the extent of the required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations and alternative cleanup methods. Based upon our experience, current information and applicable laws, we believe that it is probable that we will incur remedial costs in the range of approximately $142 million to $451 million. As of September 30, 2003, we believe that the best estimate within this range is approximately $270 million, of which $32 million is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $238 million is included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In view of our financial position and reserves for environmental matters of $270 million, we believe that any potential payment of such estimated amounts or additional monetary damages will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, annual results of operations or liquidity.

Available Information

        Our Internet website is http://www.tyco.com. We make available free of charge on our website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, reports filed pursuant to Section 16 and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the SEC. In addition, we have posted the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee, as well as our Board of Governance Principles, on our website at www.tyco.com under the headings "Our Commitment—Governance." These charters and principles are not incorporated by reference. We will also provide a copy of these documents to shareholders upon request.

Item 2. Properties

        See Item 1. "Business—Properties" for information relating to our owned and leased properties.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Securities Class Actions

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, Tyco and certain of our former directors and officers have been named as defendants in more than two dozen securities class actions.

        Most of the securities class actions have now been transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. In six of the actions, plaintiffs have moved to have their cases remanded to state courts.

        On January 28, 2003, the court-appointed lead plaintiffs in the New Hampshire securities actions filed a Consolidated Securities Class Action Complaint against certain of our former directors and officers, our auditors and Tyco. As to Tyco and certain of its former directors and officers, the complaint asserts causes of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 14(a) of that Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, as well as Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Claims against our former directors and officers are also asserted under Sections 20(a) and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The complaint asserts that the Tyco defendants violated the securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, the following: Tyco's mergers and acquisitions and the accounting therefor, as well as allegedly undisclosed acquisitions; misstatements of Tyco's financial results; the impact of a new accounting standard (SAB 101, promulgated in 1999) on our earnings performance; compensation of certain of our former executives; their improper use of our funds for personal benefit and their improper self-dealing real estate transactions; their sales of Tyco shares; payment of $20 million to one of our former directors and a charity of which he is a trustee; and the criminal investigation of our former Chief Executive Officer. The plaintiffs seek class certification, compensatory damages, rescission, disgorgement and attorneys' fees and expenses.

        On March 31, 2003, Tyco made a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint. The other defendants moved to dismiss shortly thereafter. Tyco's motion remains pending before the Court.

14


        A class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Ezra Charitable Trust v. Tyco International Ltd. & E. Breen on May 28, 2003, plaintiff purports to represent a class of purchasers of Tyco securities between December 30, 2002 and March 12, 2003. Plaintiff names as defendants Tyco and Edward D. Breen, Tyco's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The complaint asserts a cause of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against both defendants. As against defendant Breen, the complaint asserts a cause of action under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that defendants violated the securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, Tyco's financial and operating condition and financial prospects for Tyco and its ADT business segment and the results of its investigation of its former management. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        Three plaintiffs filed a civil complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California (Los Angeles County) in Hess v. Tyco International, Ltd., et al. on June 2, 2003. Plaintiffs name as defendants Tyco and twelve of our former officers and directors. The complaint asserts four causes of action under the California Corporate Securities Laws of 1968. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs purchased, in exchange for releases of claims against Tyco, Tyco common shares based on Tyco's materially false and misleading statements and omissions about the Company's finances, business operations and share value. The Company has not been served with the complaint.

        Four plaintiffs filed a civil complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in Wilson v. Tyco International Ltd. et al on June 3, 2003. Plaintiffs name as defendants Tyco International Ltd., Tyco International (US), Tyco Acquisition Corp. VII and Earth Tech EMS Holdings Inc., d/b/a Earth Tech. The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation and exemplary damages. Plaintiffs allege that during the course of negotiations for the acquisition of two companies by Earth Tech, a division of Tyco, defendants made material misrepresentations to plaintiffs and that after the contracts of sale had been finalized, breached material terms of the contracts. Plaintiffs also allege that defendants engaged in accounting manipulations that caused significant harm to the two companies and that, as a result, plaintiffs were denied fair payment for their companies, which lost fair market value. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has conditionally transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. On December 9, 2003, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation vacated the conditional transfer order.

        A class action complaint was filed on July 1, 2003 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Chang v. Tyco International Ltd. & Breen. Plaintiff purports to represent a class of purchasers of Tyco Securities between December 30, 2002 and March 12, 2003. Plaintiffs name as defendants Tyco and Edward D. Breen, Tyco's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The complaint asserts a cause of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against both defendants. As against defendant Breen, the complaint asserts a cause of action under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that defendants violated the securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, Tyco's financial and operating condition and financial prospects for Tyco and its ADT business segment and the results of its investigation of its former management. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        A class action was filed on July 28, 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Stumpf v. Tyco International, Ltd. et. al. Plaintiff purports to represent a class of purchasers of TyCom, LTD ("TyCom") securities between July 26, 2000 and October 19, 2001. Plaintiff names as defendants, Tyco, TyCom, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Citigroup and certain former Tyco and TyCom executives. The complaint asserts causes of action under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against Tyco, TyCom, and certain former executives. The complaint

15



alleges the TyCom registration statement and prospectus was inaccurate, misleading and failed to disclose facts necessary to make the registration statement and prospectus not misleading. Further, the complaint alleges the defendants violated securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, executive compensation and Tyco's and TyCom's finances and business prospects. On November 10, 2003, the District Court of New Jersey granted one plaintiff's motion for appointment as lead plaintiff and consolidated the action with O'Loughlin v. Tyco International, Inc. et al., described below. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        A law firm issued a press release on August 8, 2003 announcing that it was retained by former Tyco shareholders to file claims against Tyco and Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith. The press release states that the complaint will assert causes of action against Tyco and Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder for issuing a series of materially false and misleading statements. The press release also states that a claim will be brought against Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith under federal and state securities laws for issuing fraudulent research reports about Tyco in the hopes of attracting investment banking business for Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith. The Company has not been served with the complaint.

        A class action was filed on September 26, 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, O'Loughlin v. Tyco International, Ltd. et. al., purporting to represent a class of purchasers of TyCom securities between July 26, 2000 to October 19, 2001. Plaintiffs name as defendants, Tyco, TyCom, Goldman, Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Citigroup and certain former Tyco and TyCom executives. The complaint asserts causes of action under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against Tyco, TyCom, and certain former executives. The complaint alleges the TyCom registration statement and prospectus was inaccurate, misleading and failed to disclose facts necessary to make the registration statement and prospectus not misleading. Further, the complaint alleges the defendants violated securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, executive compensation and Tyco's and TyCom's finances and business prospects. Tyco has sought an order from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, on November 27, 2002, the State of New Jersey, on behalf of several state pension funds, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against Tyco, our auditors, and certain of our former directors and officers. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. On March 24, 2003, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. By order dated March 26, 2003, the District Court of New Hampshire assigned the case to the Securities Actions pending before it.

        As against all defendants, the amended complaint asserts causes of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, for common law fraud, aiding and abetting common law fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Claims are asserted against the individual defendants under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 24(d) of the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, Sections 421-B:25(II) & (III) of the New Hampshire Uniform Securities Law, and for breaches of fiduciary duties. Claims are also asserted against certain of the individual defendants under Section 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; against Tyco under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 24(c) of the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, and the New Jersey RICO Statute on the basis of respondeat superior liability; against Tyco and certain of the individual defendants under Section 14(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder; and against Tyco, our auditors, and certain of the individual defendants for violation of, aiding and abetting violation of, and conspiracy to violate the New Jersey RICO Statute. Finally, claims are

16



asserted against the individual defendants and our auditors for aiding and abetting the individual defendants' breaches of fiduciary duties.

        The amended complaint asserts that the defendants violated the securities laws and otherwise engaged in fraudulent acts by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, the following: unauthorized and improper compensation of certain of our former executives; their improper use of our funds for personal benefit and their improper self-dealing real estate transactions; their improper accounting practices; payment of $20 million to one of our former directors and a charity of which he is a trustee; criminal conduct of certain former executives; and the criminal investigation of our former Chief Executive Officer. Plaintiffs seek damages, including treble damages and punitive damages, along with attorneys' fees and costs.

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, a class action was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois in June 2002, Brazen v. Tyco International et al. Plaintiff asserts claims under the Securities Act of 1933, and seeks class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys' fees and expenses. Plaintiff purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their Mallinckrodt Inc. stock for shares of Tyco in connection with the October 17, 2000 merger of the two companies. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the Mallinckrodt acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefore.

        The defendants removed the action from Illinois state court to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiff moved to have his action remanded to the Illinois state court. In December 2002, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. On August 7, 2003, plaintiff renewed his motion for remand, and on August 25, 2003, Tyco opposed the motion. The motion is pending before the Court.

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, in November 2002, a class action complaint, Schuldt Limited Partnership v. Tyco International Ltd., et al., was filed in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida, asserting causes of action against Tyco and certain of our former directors and officers under the Securities Act of 1933. Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Plaintiff has moved to have the action remanded to the Florida state court.

        The complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their Sensormatic Electronics Corp. ("Sensormatic") stock for shares of Tyco in connection with our acquisition of Sensormatic. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the Sensormatic acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefor. Plaintiff seeks class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys' fees and expenses.

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, in December 2002, four additional class action complaints were filed in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida: (1) Hromyak v. Tyco International Ltd., et al.; (2) Rappold v. Tyco International Ltd., et al.; (3) Myers v. Tyco International Ltd., et al.; and (4) Goldfarb v. Tyco International Ltd., et al. Plaintiffs in each of these actions also assert claims against Tyco, certain of our former directors and officers, and in three instances our auditors under the Securities Act of 1933, and seek class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys' fees and expenses. Defendants removed these four actions from Florida state court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the actions to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Plaintiffs in these actions have moved to have their cases remanded to the Florida state court.

        The Hromyak complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their United States Surgical Corporation ("US Surgical") stock for shares of Tyco in connection with our acquisition of US Surgical in or about October of 1998. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the US Surgical acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefor.

17


        The Rappold complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their InnerDyne, Inc. ("InnerDyne") stock for shares of Tyco in connection with our acquisition of InnerDyne in or about December of 2001. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the InnerDyne acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefor.

        The Myers complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their TyCom shares for shares of Tyco in connection with our acquisition of TyCom in or about December of 2001. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the TyCom acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefor.

        The Goldfarb complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of persons who exchanged their Scott Technologies, Inc. ("Scott") stock for shares of Tyco in connection with our acquisition of Scott in or about May of 2001. The complaint alleges that the registration statement filed in connection with the Scott acquisition contained false and misleading statements concerning, among other things, financial disclosures concerning certain of our mergers and acquisitions and accounting therefor.

        Defendants removed these four actions from Florida state court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and they have been transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Plaintiffs in these four actions have moved to have their cases remanded to the Florida state court.

        On January 31, 2003 a civil action was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Cirella v. Tyco International et al. Plaintiff names as defendants, Tyco International Ltd., Dennis Kozlowski, Mark H. Swartz and Mark A. Belnick. Plaintiff Philip M. Cirella alleges that he was a shareholder in CIT who received common shares of Tyco when it acquired CIT in 2000, and later purchased additional Tyco shares with Marguerite Cirella. Plaintiffs assert a cause of action against all defendants for violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a cause of action against the individual defendants for violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaint alleges that the defendants failed to disclose related-party transactions, including the following: providing interest free loans, forgiving personal loans, purchasing personal properties, using company funds to purchase personal items, selling individual Tyco shares while concealing information from investors, and failing to disclose an ongoing criminal investigation of Kozlowski, all of which resulted in an artificially inflated share price. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and costs against all defendants and punitive exemplary damages against the individual defendants. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        A class action was filed on December 9, 2003, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Davis v. Kozlowski, et.al. purporting to represent a class of persons who held Tyco securities prior to December 13, 1999 through June 3, 2003. Plaintiff names as defendants L. Dennis Kozlowski, Mark Swartz, Mark Belnick, Frank Walsh, Michael Ashcroft, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Phua Young and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith. The complaint asserts claims of common law fraud against all defendants, breach of fiduciary against individual defendants, negligent misrepresentation against PricewaterhouseCoopers and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty against PricewaterhouseCoopers and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith. The Company has not received service of the complaint.

18



Shareholder Derivative Litigation

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, five actions have been filed purporting to bring suit derivatively on behalf of Tyco against certain former officers and certain former directors of Tyco and against Tyco as a nominal defendant.

        Two of these actions were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. A third action was transferred to that Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The fourth derivative action is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (New York County). Plaintiffs in that state court action have agreed to stay the action pending resolution of the federal action. The fifth derivative action, O'Brien v. Ashcroft, et al., was filed in the Superior Court of New Hampshire (Rockingham County) on January 7, 2003. The complaint alleges causes of action against thirteen of our former officers and directors for breach of fiduciary duties, ultra vires acts and waste of corporate assets. These claims are based on allegations of, among other things, unauthorized and improper compensation of certain of our former executives; their improper use of our funds for personal benefit; and payment of $20 million to one of our former directors and a charity of which he is trustee. The complaint alleges causes of action against our auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"), for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, professional negligence and breach of contract. These claims are based on allegations that PwC, among other things, violated Generally Accepted Accounting Standards and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in connection with its auditing of the Company's financial statements and negligently performed its professional duties in a manner that permitted the wrongful conduct of the individual defendants. On October 31, 2003, the O'Brien action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiff to allow the plaintiff to invervene in the consolidated derivative class action pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        On January 29, 2003, plaintiffs in the actions pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire filed a Verified Stockholders' First Consolidated and Amended Derivative Complaint against certain former officers and certain former directors of Tyco, our auditors, and Tyco as a nominal defendant. As to our former personnel, the complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty and waste of corporate assets. As against our auditors, the complaint asserts causes of action for negligence, negligent misrepresentations, and breach of contract. The action alleges that individual defendants engaged in, permitted and /or acquiesced in the following alleged improper conduct: using Tyco funds for personal benefit, including misappropriation of funds from our Key Employee Loan Program and relocation programs; engaging in improper self-dealing real estate transactions; entering into improper undisclosed retention agreements; and filing false and misleading financial statements with the SEC that were based on improper accounting methods. Plaintiffs seek money damages and attorneys' fees and expenses.

        On March 17, 2003, Tyco moved to dismiss the consolidated and amended complaint on the ground that Tyco is already pursuing claims against four of its former officers and directors, and Tyco should remain in control of its claims and potential claims. The other defendants have since moved to dismiss as well. These motions remain pending before the court.

        Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File their Verified Stockholders' Second Consolidated and Amended Derivative Complaint on June 12, 2003. The proposed second amended complaint drops as defendants Tyco's auditors, and adds as defendants each of the members of the current Board of Directors of Tyco. The second amended complaint alleges that the defendants who are current directors of Tyco engaged in, permitted and/or acquiesced in the following alleged improper conduct: making misstatements and omissions in order to disclose certain accounting issues slowly over time to maintain an allegedly artificial inflation of Tyco's share price; making misstatements and omissions in the February 2003 proxy statement against reincorporation in Delaware and against a proposal to separate the positions of CEO and Chairman; and other allegedly improper conduct. Plaintiffs seek money

19



damages and attorneys' fees and expenses. Tyco has opposed plaintiffs' motion for leave to file the amended complaint. The motion is pending before the court.

ERISA Litigation and Investigation

        As previously reported in our periodic filings, Tyco and certain of our current and former employees, officers and directors, have been named as defendants in eight class actions brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"). The complaints purported to bring claims on behalf of the Tyco International (US) Inc. Retirement Savings and Investment Plans and the participants therein.

        Two of the actions were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, and the six remaining actions were transferred to that Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. All eight actions have been consolidated in the District Court in New Hampshire.

        On February 3, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint asserting causes of action under ERISA. That complaint named as defendants Tyco and certain of its present and former officers and directors, its wholly-owned subsidiary Tyco International (US) Inc., its retirement committee, and certain of its present and former officers, directors and employees. The complaint asserts that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by negligently misrepresenting and negligently failing to disclose material information concerning, among other things, the following: related-party transactions and executive compensation; Tyco's mergers and acquisitions and the accounting therefor, as well as allegedly undisclosed acquisitions; and misstatements of Tyco's financial results. The complaint also asserts that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by allowing the Plans to invest in Tyco shares when it was not a prudent investment. The plaintiffs seek a declaration that the defendants are not entitled to protection under ERISA's safe harbor provision; an order compelling the defendants to make good to the Plans all losses caused by the defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty; imposition of a constructive trust on any amounts by which any defendant was unjustly enriched; an order enjoining future violations of ERISA; actual damages in the amount of any losses the Plans suffered; costs and attorneys' fees, and an order for equitable restitution and other appropriate equitable monetary relief.

        On April 4, 2003, Tyco and several other defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint. Shortly thereafter the other defendants also moved to dismiss. Tyco's motion to dismiss remains pending before the court.

        We and certain of our current and former executives have received requests from the United States Department of Labor for information concerning the administration of the Tyco International (US) Inc. Retirement Savings and Investment Plans. The current focus of the Department's inquiry concerns losses allegedly experienced by the plans due to investments in our shares. The Department of Labor has authority to bring suit on behalf of the plans and their participants against those acting as fiduciaries to the plans for recovery of losses and additional penalties, although it has not informed us of any intention to do so.

Tyco Litigation Against Former Senior Management

        Tyco International Ltd v. Mark A. Belnick, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 02-CV-4644, Filed June 17, 2002. As previously reported in our periodic filings, we have filed a civil complaint against our former Executive Vice President and Chief Corporate Counsel for breach of fiduciary duty and other wrongful conduct. The action alleges that the defendant: solicited and accepted cash and share bonuses without Board approval; took interest-free loans from our relocation program without Board approval; failed to disclose to the Board and to the SEC his Retention Agreement and compensation; failed to advise the Board of the improper conduct of other officers;

20



refused to cooperate with internal investigations; and engaged in other improper conduct. The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, inducement to breach fiduciary duty, conspiracy to breach fiduciary duty, fraud and other wrongful conduct and seeks to recover compensation and profits received from employment at Tyco, repayment of all loans fraudulently procured, with interest, damages for the harm caused to us, and punitive damages. Discovery in this action has been stayed as a result of a motion by the New York County District Attorney's Office. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire.

        Tyco International Ltd. v. Frank E. Walsh, Jr., United States District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 02-CV-4633, Filed June 17, 2002. As previously reported in our periodic filings, we have filed a civil complaint against a former director for breach of fiduciary duty, inducing breaches of fiduciary duty, and related wrongful conduct involving a $20 million payment in connection with a 2001 acquisition by Tyco. The action alleges causes of action for restitution, breach of fiduciary duty and inducing breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust, and seeks recovery for all of the losses suffered by us as a result of the defendant director's conduct. On December 17, 2002, Mr. Walsh paid $20 million in restitution to Tyco, which was deposited by the Company in January 2003, as a result of a plea bargain agreement with the New York County District Attorney. Our claims against Mr. Walsh are still pend