Back to GetFilings.com

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File No. 000-22609

Qwest Communications International Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o     No ý.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý    No o.

        At November 30, 2003, 1,768,301,330 shares of common stock were outstanding.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

        The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited. Qwest Communications International Inc. ("Qwest," "we," "us," the "Company" and "our") prepared these condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. In compliance with those instructions, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted.

        In the third quarter of 2002, we entered into contracts for the sale of our directory publishing business. In November 2002, we closed the sale of our directory publishing business in seven of the 14 states in which we offered these services. In September 2003, we completed the sale of the directory publishing business in the remaining states. As a consequence, the results of operations of our directory publishing business are included in income from discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. See Note 4—Discontinued Operations including Assets Held for Sale.

        We made certain reclassifications to prior balances to conform to the current year presentation. Also, in connection with the preparation of this Form 10-Q, we moved $124 million of tax expense we improperly reflected in our quarter ended June 30, 2002 consolidated financial statements (which are included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "2002 Form 10-K")) into our quarter ended September 30, 2002 consolidated financial statements. These statements include all the adjustments necessary to fairly present our condensed consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows as of June 30, 2003 and for all periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2002 Form 10-K. Due to the number of subsequent events and updates that have occurred since the end of the period covered by these condensed consolidated financial statements, for the convenience of the reader we have generally included these items in their related footnotes. The condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 and the statement of cash flows for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results or cash flows expected for the full year.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements and cumulative effects of adoption

        On January 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" ("SFAS No. 143"). This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs, generally referred to as asset retirement obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation required to be settled under law or written or oral contract. If a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, the fair value of the liability will be recognized in the period it is incurred, or if not, in the period a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. This cost is initially capitalized and then amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. We have determined that we have legal asset retirement obligations associated with the removal of a limited group of long-lived assets and recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle charge upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 of $28 million (liability of $43 million net of an asset of $15 million) as of January 1, 2003.

        Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 143, we have included in our group depreciation rates estimated net removal costs (removal costs less salvage). These costs have historically been reflected in the calculation of depreciation expense and therefore recognized in accumulated depreciation. When the assets were actually retired and removal costs were expended, the net removal costs were recorded as a reduction to accumulated depreciation. While SFAS No. 143 requires the recognition of a liability for asset retirement obligations that are legally binding, it precludes the recognition of a liability for asset retirement obligations that are not legally binding. Therefore, upon adoption of SFAS No. 143, we reversed the net removal costs within accumulated depreciation for those fixed assets where the removal costs exceeded the estimated salvage value and we did not have a legal removal obligation. This resulted in income from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $365 million pretax upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. The net income impact for the six months ended June 30, 2003 is $206 million ($365 million less the $28 million of charges disclosed above, net of income taxes of $131 million).

        On a going forward basis, the net costs of removal related to these assets will be charged to our consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the costs are incurred. As a result, the adoption of SFAS No. 143 is expected to decrease our depreciation expense on an annual basis by approximately $32 million and increase operating expenses related to the accretion of the fair value of our legal asset retirement obligations by approximately $6 million annually beginning January 1, 2003. Based on historical charges and activity through the date of filing of this Form 10-Q, we believe that recurring removal costs will be approximately $35 million to $45 million annually which will be charged to our consolidated statement of operations as incurred.

        In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123," ("SFAS No. 148"), which is effective for financial statements related to periods ending after December 15, 2002. SFAS No. 148 requires the following expanded disclosure regarding stock-based compensation. We account for our stock-based compensation arrangements under the intrinsic-value recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees". Under the intrinsic-value method, no compensation expense is recognized for options granted to employees when the strike price of those options equals or exceeds the value of the underlying security on the measurement date. Any excess of the stock price on the measurement date over the exercise price is recorded as deferred compensation and amortized over the service period during which the stock option award vests using the accelerated method described in FASB Interpretation No. 28, "Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans".

        Had compensation cost for our stock-based compensation plans been determined under the fair value method in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), our net (loss) income and basic and diluted (loss) income per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

        The pro forma amounts reflected above may not be representative of the effects on our reported net income or loss in future years because the number of future shares to be issued under these plans is not known and the assumptions used to determine the fair value can vary significantly.

Earnings per share

        The weighted average number of shares used for computing basic and diluted (loss) income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was 1.734 billion and 1.678 billion, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was 1.720 billion and 1.672 billion, respectively. For the periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, the effect of approximately 129 million and 127 million, respectively, of outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted (loss) income per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.

Note 2: Asset Impairment Charges

        Effective June 30, 2002, pursuant to SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS No. 144"), a general deterioration of the telecommunications market, downward revisions to our expected future results of operations and other factors indicated that our investments in long-lived assets may have been impaired at that date. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we performed an evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets using gross undiscounted cash flow projections. For impairment analysis purposes, we grouped our property, plant and equipment and projected cash flows as follows: traditional telephone network, national fiber optic broadband network, international fiber optic broadband network, wireless network, web hosting and application service provider ("ASP") assets, assets held for sale and out-of-region digital subscriber line ("DSL") assets. Based on the gross undiscounted cash flow projections, we determined that all of our asset groups except our traditional telephone network were impaired at June 30, 2002. For those asset groups that were impaired, we then estimated the fair value using a variety of techniques which are presented in the table below. For those asset groups that were impaired, we determined that the fair values were less than our carrying amount by $10.613 billion in the aggregate of which $120 million has been reclassified to income from discontinued operations for certain web hosting centers in our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.

        Calculating the estimated fair value of the asset groups as listed above involves significant judgments and a variety of assumptions. For calculating fair value based on discounted cash flows, we forecasted future operating results and future cash flows, which included long-term forecasts of revenue growth, gross margins and capital expenditures. We also used a discount rate based on an estimate of the weighted average cost of capital for the specific asset groups. Comparable market data was obtained by reviewing recent sales of similar asset types in third-party market transactions.

        A brief description of the underlying business purpose of each of the asset groups that were impaired as a result of our analysis as of June 30, 2002 is as follows:

•

Our national fiber optic broadband network ("National Network") provides long-distance voice services, data and Internet services and wholesale services to business, residential and wholesale customers outside of our local service area.



•

Our international fiber optic broadband network ("International Network") provides the same services to the same types of customers, only outside of the United States.



•

Our wireless network provides personal communications service ("PCS") in select markets in our local service area.



•

Our web hosting and ASP assets provide business customers shared and dedicated hosting on our servers as well as application hosting services to help design and manage customers' websites and hosting applications.



•

Assets held for sale primarily consist of excess network supplies. See Note 4—Discontinued Operations including Assets Held for Sale for further information.



•

Our out-of-region DSL assets provide DSL service to customers outside our local service area.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the fair value of the impaired assets becomes the new basis for accounting purposes. As such, approximately $1.9 billion in accumulated depreciation was eliminated in connection with the accounting for the impairments as of June 30, 2002. The impact of the impairments has reduced our annual depreciation and amortization expense by approximately $1.3 billion, effective July 1, 2002.

        In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recorded other asset impairment charges of $6 million associated with the write-down of other real estate assets that were held for sale.

Subsequent Event-Asset Impairment

        In August 2003, we entered into a services agreement with a subsidiary of Sprint Corporation ("Sprint") that allows us to resell Sprint wireless services, including access to Sprint's nationwide PCS wireless network, to consumer and business customers, primarily within our local service area. We plan to begin offering these Sprint services under our brand name in early 2004. Our wireless customers who are currently being serviced through our proprietary wireless network will be transitioned at our cost onto Sprint's network. Due to the anticipated decrease in usage of our own wireless network following the transition of our customers onto Sprint's network, in the third quarter of 2003 we performed an evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived wireless network assets.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we compared gross undiscounted cash flow projections to the carrying value of the long-lived wireless network assets and determined that certain asset groups were not expected to be recovered through future projected cash flows. For those asset groups that were not recoverable, we then estimated the fair value using market prices for similar assets. Cell sites, switches, related tools and equipment inventory and certain information technology systems that support the wireless network were determined to be impaired by $230 million.

        Estimating the fair value of the asset groups involved significant judgment and a variety of assumptions. Comparable market data was obtained by reviewing recent sales of similar asset types.

Note 3: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

        On January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142"), which requires companies to cease amortizing goodwill and intangible assets which have indefinite useful lives. SFAS No. 142 also requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be reviewed for impairment upon adoption on January 1, 2002 and annually thereafter, or more often if events or circumstances warrant. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill impairment may exist if the carrying value of the reporting unit to which it is allocated exceeds its estimated fair value.

        Based on the transition provisions of SFAS No. 142, we reclassified the $50 million net carrying value of our assembled workforce intangible asset, which was recognized in connection with the June 30, 2000 acquisition of U S WEST, Inc. (the "Merger"), into goodwill effective January 1, 2002. The assembled workforce intangible asset no longer met the criteria for recognition as a separate intangible asset apart from goodwill. Amortization of goodwill, including the addition to goodwill from the reclassification of the assembled workforce intangible asset, ceased on January 1, 2002. We also ceased amortizing our intangible assets with indefinite lives, including trademarks, trade names and wireless spectrum licenses on January 1, 2002.

        In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we performed a transitional impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives as of January 1, 2002. The first step of the transitional test of impairment was performed by comparing the fair value of our reporting units to the carrying values of these reporting units to which goodwill was assigned. Because we do not maintain balance sheets at the reporting unit level, we allocated all assets and liabilities to each of the reporting units based on various methodologies that included specific identification and allocations based primarily on revenues, voice grade equivalents (the amount of capacity required to carry one telephone call) and relative number of employees. Goodwill was allocated to reporting units based on the relative fair value of each reporting unit. We did not allocate any goodwill to our wireless and directory publishing reporting units because they were not expected to benefit significantly from the synergies of the Merger and are not considered sources of the goodwill which arose from the Merger.

        Upon implementation of SFAS No. 142, we identified 13 reporting units. Goodwill was allocated to four of these reporting units on a relative fair value basis. Reporting units that were non-revenue producing or that were not expected to benefit significantly from the syn