Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number: 0-23574

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended August 2, 2003

INDEX

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1—General

        In the opinion of management of PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc. (the "Company" or "PETCO"), the unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of August 2, 2003 and for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Because of the seasonal nature of the Company's business, the results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31, resulting in years of either 52 or 53 weeks. All references to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to January 31 of the following year. For example, references to fiscal 2003 refer to the fiscal year beginning on February 2, 2003 and ending on January 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for fiscal 2002 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 0-23574), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2003.

Note 2—New Accounting Standards

        In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which supersede Accounting Principles Board Opinion 17, Intangible Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment. Separable intangible assets with defined lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired before and after the statement's effective date. The Company completed its annual impairment assessment during the second quarter of 2003 and recorded $0.2 million of goodwill impairment in the second quarter of 2003, compared to $0.3 million of transitional impairment recorded in the second quarter of 2002. Non-compete agreements, which comprise all of the Company's intangible assets with defined lives, had a carrying value of $2.0 million and $4.9 million and accumulated amortization of $1.8 million at both February 1, 2003 and August 2, 2003, respectively. Amortization of non-compete agreements was $0.1 million and $0.05 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003 and $0.1 million for each of the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003, respectively.

        In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections as of April 2002, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 14, 2002. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4 which required that all gains and losses from debt extinguishment are to be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion, or APB, No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. During the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2002, the Company repurchased $30.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10.75% senior subordinated notes, and in connection therewith recorded an extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment of debt totaling $2,004, consisting of a $3,150 prepayment premium and the write-off of $186 in unamortized debt discount, net of a tax benefit of $1,332. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 145, the Company has reclassified this amount from an extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, to debt retirement costs, a component of recurring operations, for the twenty-six weeks ended

6

August 3, 2002. The related income tax benefit was reclassified to income taxes for the twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2002.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 requires that, subsequent to December 31, 2002, all costs associated with exit or disposal activities be recognized when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Management continually reviews the ability of stores to provide positive contributions to the Company's results. Prior to December 31, 2002, the Company charged costs associated with store closures to operations upon commitment to close a store within 12 months of the date of commitment. Store closing costs consist of lease obligations, property taxes and common area maintenance costs, net of contractual sub-lease income and are recorded in cost of sales and occupancy costs in the accompanying statements of operations. For the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August 3, 2002, there were none and $1,139 store closing costs charged against operations, respectively. During the first half of 2003, there were store closing cost reversals of $55 related to changes in estimates to previously recorded store closing accruals, resulting in a net reversal of store closing costs of $55 and a net impact of $35 for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August 2, 2003, respectively. The total accrued store closing costs were $2,702 and $2,342 as of February 1, 2003 and August 2, 2003, respectively, and are included in accrued expenses and deferred rent and other liabilities.

        In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Additionally, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the interim disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

        The Company accounts for stock option plans in accordance with the provisions of APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations which recognizes compensation expense on the grant date if the current market price of the stock exceeds the exercise price.

        Had compensation costs for the Company's stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards under these plans, consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123, the Company's net earnings (loss) would have been as reflected in the following table. No options were granted during the thirteen-weeks ended August 2, 2003. The weighted average fair value per share of the options granted during the thirteen-week period ended August 3, 2002 and the twenty-six week periods ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003 were an estimated $11.19, $8.70 and $7.25, respectively, on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: no dividend yield, volatility of 57%, 49% and 41% for the thirteen-week period ended August 3, 2002 and the twenty-six week periods ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003, respectively, risk-free interest rates of 4.3%, 4.2% and 3.0% for the thirteen-week period ended August 3, 2002 and

7

the twenty-six week periods ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003, respectively, and an expected life for all periods presented of five years.

        In January 2003, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, reached a consensus on Issue 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor. EITF 02-16 provides guidance on how a customer should account for cash consideration received from a vendor. The transition provisions apply prospectively to arrangements with vendors entered into or modified subsequent to December 31, 2002, do not allow for prior period reclassification, and require all amounts received from vendors to be accounted for as a reduction of the cost of the products purchased unless certain criteria are met to allow presentation as a reduction of related selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company adopted the provisions of EITF 02-16 during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Through the remainder of 2003, substantially all vendor support will initially be deferred as a reduction of the cost of inventory purchased from each supplier, and the support will be recognized into cost of sales as the related inventory is sold. For the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August 2, 2003, the adoption of EITF 02-16 resulted in the reclassification of $4.3 and $6.0 million of vendor consideration from an offset to selling, general and administrative expenses, to a $2.9 and $3.7 million reduction of cost of sales, and a $1.4 and $2.3 million deferral, reducing inventory, which will be recognized as a reduction of cost of sales in future periods.

Note 3—Net Earnings Per Share

        Basic net earnings (loss) per common share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share incorporates the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of potentially issuable common

8

stock. Net earnings (loss) and the weighted average number of common shares used to compute net earnings (loss) per common share, basic and diluted, are presented below:

        Options to purchase common shares that were outstanding for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended August 3, 2002 and August 2, 2003, but were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share because of their anti-dilutive impact on earnings (loss) per common share, were 38 and 80 and 31 and 113, respectively.

Note 4—Related Party Transactions

        In October 2000, the Company entered into a management services agreement with two entities who were sponsors of the Company's merger and recapitalization transaction. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company paid management fees in an aggregate amount of $0.3 million, and terminated the management services agreement and paid an aggregate amount of $12.5 million as a one-time termination fee, in the thirteen weeks ended August 3, 2002 to these two related parties.

        In February 2002, the Company redeemed, for approximately $239.8 million, all of the then outstanding shares of series A and series B preferred stock, primarily from related parties.

Note 5—Long-Term Debt

        The Company has a senior credit facility with a syndicate of banks that expires between October 2, 2006 and October 2, 2008. As of July 31, 2003, the senior credit facility consisted of a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and a $191.5 million term loan. On August 1, 2003, the Company made an early repayment of $50 million of the term loan from operating cash flows, incurring debt retirement costs of $1.6 million. In connection with the repayment, the Company entered into an amendment of the senior credit facility that resulted in an immediate interest rate reduction of 0.5% on the term loan and more favorable credit terms.

        As a result of the amendment, the senior credit facility now consists of a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and a $141.5 million term loan for a total commitment of $216.5 million. Borrowings under the senior credit facility are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets and bear interest (1) in the case of the revolving facility, at the Company's option, at the agent bank's base rate plus a margin of up to 2.25%, or LIBOR plus a margin of up to 3.25%, based on the Company's leverage ratio at the time, and (2) in the case of the term loan, at the Company's option, at the agent bank's base rate plus a fixed margin of 1.5%, or LIBOR plus a fixed margin of 2.5%. The effective interest rate of these borrowings at August 2, 2003 was 3.62%. The amended credit agreement contains certain

9

affirmative and negative covenants related to, among other things, indebtedness, interest and fixed charges coverage and consolidated net worth. At August 2, 2003, the Company was in full compliance with all of these covenants, the outstanding balance of the term loan was $141.5 million and there were no borrowings on the revolving credit facility, which had $56.3 million of available credit.

Note 6—Senior Subordinated Notes

        In October 2001, the Company issued $200 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10.75% senior subordinated notes maturing on November 1, 2011. Interest on the 10.75% senior subordinated notes accrues at a rate of 10.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually. The Company may redeem the 10.75% senior subordinated notes at its option at any time after November 1, 2006, in whole or in part, based upon an agreed upon schedule of redemption prices. At any time before November 1, 2004, the 10.75% senior subordinated notes may be redeemed from the proceeds of one or more qualifying public offerings of common stock of the Company at a redemption price of 110.75% of the principal amount of the 10.75% senior subordinated notes redeemed, plus accrued interest, so long as there remains outstanding at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 10.75% senior subordinated notes after giving effect to each such redemption.

        In March 2002, the Company repurchased $30.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10.75% senior subordinated notes and recorded an extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $2,004, consisting of a $3,150 prepayment premium and the write-off of $186 in unamortized debt discount, net of a tax benefit of $1,332. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No.145 as discussed above, the Company has reclassified this amount from an extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, to debt retirement costs, a component of recurring operations, for the twenty-six week period ended August 3, 2002.

Note 7—Initial Public Offering

        On February 27, 2002, the Company completed an initial public offering of 14,500 shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $254.8 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses. On March 14, 2002, the Company received additional net proceeds of approximately $17.7 million from the sale of 1,000 additional shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option. The Company used approximately $239.8 million of the net proceeds of its initial public offering to redeem in full all of the Company's then outstanding shares of series A and series B preferred stock. In connection with the initial public offering the Company also amended and restated its stockholders agreement and its securityholders agreement, terminated its management services agreement and used approximately $32.7 million of the net proceeds of the initial public offering, plus approximately $1.8 million in cash on-hand, to repurchase $30.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10.75% senior subordinated notes due 2011 at 110.5% of their face amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the repurchase date.

        Concurrent with the initial public offering, warrants to purchase 2,132 shares of common stock were exercised, all outstanding options prior to the initial public offering became fully vested and the Company issued options to purchase 573 shares of common stock.

10

        In connection with the initial public offering, the Company also effected a 2-for-1 stock split of its common stock. All references in the consolidated financial statements to the number of shares outstanding, price per share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.

Note 8—Secondary Offering

        On May 29, 2003, certain selling stockholders completed a public offering of 9,000 shares of the Company's common stock, pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement previously filed by the Company with the SEC. An additional 1,350 shares of common stock were sold by certain selling stockholders to cover over-allotments on June 9, 2003. On June 23, 2003, certain selling stockholders completed a privately negotiated sale of 1,880 shares of the Company's common stock pursuant to the shelf registration statement. All of the 12,230 shares were offered by selling stockholders and the Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling stockholders. Offering expenses of approximately $1.2 million were recorded by the Company as a direct charge to accumulated deficit during the second quarter of 2003. The Company terminated the shelf registration statement on June 30, 2003.

Note 9—Contingencies

        In July 2001, the Company received a copy of a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles alleging violations of the California Labor Code and the Business and Professions Code. The purported class of plaintiffs alleged that the Company improperly classified its salaried store managers and assistant store managers as exempt employees not entitled to overtime pay for work in excess of 40 hours per week. The relief sought included compensatory damages, penalties, preliminary and permanent injunctions requiring the Company to pay overtime compensation under California law, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys' fees and such other relief as the court deemed proper. In November 2001, the case was transferred to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego. In December 2002, the Company announced its intention to settle all claims related to this lawsuit. While the Company denies the allegations underlying the lawsuit, the Company agreed to the settlement to avoid possible disruption to its business from protracted litigation. In fiscal 2002, the Company expensed $2.1 million, after tax, for the settlement, which received final court approval on July 31, 2003.

        In June 2002, allegations were made in a complaint filed in the San Francisco Superior Court by the San Francisco City Attorney's office to the effect that certain associates have not properly cared for companion animals for sale in the Company's two San Francisco stores. The complaint, which has been subsequently transferred to the Santa Clara Superior Court, seeks damages, penalties and an injunction against the sale of companion animals in the Company's San Francisco stores. The complaint and related news reports have caused negative publicity and subsequently certain other California counties have indicated that they are reviewing the Company's animal care policies. The Company takes seriously any allegations regarding the proper care of companion animals and has taken steps to reiterate to all its associates the importance of proper care for all companion animals in all of the Company's stores. The Company is responding to the complaint and is defending it vigorously. The

11

complaint and any similar actions, which could be filed in the future, could cause negative publicity, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

        The District Attorneys of various California counties, through the San Diego District Attorney, have informed the Company that they are investigating certain alleged weights and measures violations. The investigation specifically concerns whether checkout price scanners used in the Company's stores identified prices that in some instances didn't match the posted prices for certain products, and whether the sale tags regarding those products were misleading. No legal action has been filed against the Company with respect to this investigation. Although the Company is working cooperatively with the District Attorneys to reach a satisfactory resolution of this matter, the Company cannot give any assurances that it will be able to resolve this matter on satisfactory terms or at all. The Company is unable at this time to determine whether any potential settlement of this matter, or the outcome of any litigation that might ensue if the Company is unable to settle this matter, will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition in any future period.

        In April 2003, three alleged applicants for employment instituted an action against over 100 retailers, including the Company, in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The complaint in the action was filed individually and on behalf of a purported class. The complaint alleges that the individual plaintiffs and the purported class members sought employment with the other retailers or the Company, and that the written employment application asked, in violation of the California Labor Code and Unfair Business Practices Act, about convictions for certain marijuana offenses and about convictions that resulted in the defendant being sent to a diversion program. The case in state court was stayed pending an initial status conference. One of the co-defendants has removed the action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Company has not made an appearance in the case, and no pleadings or discovery has been initiated. The Company intends to vigorously defend the action, including contesting the certification of the action as a class action, and is unable at this time to determine whether the outcome of the litigation will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition in any future period.

        The Company is also involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. While the results of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 10—Subsequent Events

        On August 4, 2003, the Company amended its senior credit facility which now consists of a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and a $141.5 million term loan for a total commitment of $216.5 million. The amendment resulted in an immediate interest rate reduction of 0.5% on the term loan, and more favorable credit agreement terms. See Note 5 for additional discussion.

Note 11—Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

        In October 2001, the Company issued $200 million in principal amount of its 10.75% senior subordinated notes due 2011 under which certain of its subsidiaries (the guarantor subsidiaries) serve as

12

guarantors on a full and unconditional basis. Certain other subsidiaries (the non-guarantor subsidiaries) do not guarantee such debt. In March 2002, the Company repurchased $30.0 million in aggregate principal amount of these notes.

        The Company has included the following tables which present the unaudited condensed consolidating balance sheets of PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc., as a parent company, its guarantor subsidiaries and its non-guarantor subsidiaries as of August 2, 2003 and February 1, 2003, and the related unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations and cash flows for the twenty-six weeks ended August 2, 2003 and August 3, 2002.

13

PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING GUARANTOR, NON-GUARANTOR AND
PARENT COMPANY BALANCE SHEET

August 2, 2003
(unaudited, in thousands)