Back to GetFilings.com




QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-20508


MTR GAMING GROUP, INC.
(exact name of Company as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE   IRS NO. 84-1103135
(State of Incorporation)   (IRS Employer Identification)

STATE ROUTE 2, SOUTH, P.O. BOX 356, CHESTER, WEST VIRGINIA 26034
(Address of principal executive offices)

(304) 387-5712
(Company's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each Class: COMMON STOCK $.00001 PAR VALUE

Name of each exchange on which registered: NASDAQ STOCK MARKET

        Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K of Section 299.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Company's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

        The aggregate market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates (all persons other than executive officers or directors) of the Company on March 25, 2003 (based on the closing sale price per share on the NASDAQ Stock Market on that date) was $159,967,335.

        Our common stock outstanding at March 25, 2003 was 28,167,335 shares.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1.   BUSINESS   1
    CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION   1
    COMPANY HISTORY   1
        Introduction   2
        Mountaineer Race Track & Gaming Resort   3
        Nevada Properties   5

 

 

BUSINESS STRATEGY

 

5

 

 

COMPETITION

 

8
        Gaming Operations   8
        Racing and Parimutuel Operations   8
    EMPLOYEES   9
    REGULATION AND LICENSING   9
        General   9
        West Virginia Racing and Gaming Regulation   10
        Nevada Gaming Regulation   12
        Impact of Resort Hotel Legislation   16
        Pennsylvania Racing Regulation   16
        IRS Regulations and Currency Transaction Reporting   17
        Restrictions on Share Ownership and Transfer   17
        Environmental Matters   17
        Compliance With Other Laws   17
    CERTAIN RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS   18

ITEM 2.

 

PROPERTIES

 

23
    Hotel, Gaming, Racing and Other Property   23
    Equipment Leases   24

ITEM 3.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

24

ITEM 4.

 

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

25

ITEM 5.

 

MARKET FOR COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

25

ITEM 6.

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

25

ITEM 7.

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

26
        Overview   27
        Results of Operations   27
    Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001   28
        Operating Revenues and Costs   28
        Gaming Operations   29
        Parimutuel Commissions   32
        Food, Beverage and Lodging   33
        Other Operating Revenues   34
        Marketing and Promotions Expense   34
        General and Administrative Expenses and Interest   35

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

 

35
        Operating Revenues and Costs   35

i


        Gaming Operations   36
        Parimutuel Commissions   38
        Food, Beverage and Lodging Operations   39
        Other Operations   40
        Marketing and Promotions Expense   40
        General and Administrative Expenses and Interest   40

 

 

Liquidity and Sources of Capital

 

41
        Commitments and Contingencies   42

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

44
        Revenue Recognition   44
        Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles   45
        Self-Insurance   45
        Frequent Players Program at Mountaineer   45
        Income Taxes   45
        Newly Issued Accounting Standards   45

ITEM 7A.

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

 

46

ITEM 8.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

46

ITEM 9.

 

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

46

PART III

ITEM 10.

 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

 

47
        Business Experience   47

ITEM 11.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

51
        Summary Compensation Table   51
        Option Grants in 2002   52
        Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option
        Values
  52
        Equity Compensation Plan Information   53
        Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance   53
        Employment Agreements   53
        Compensation of Directors   55

ITEM 12.

 

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

55

ITEM 13.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

56

ITEM 14.

 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

57

PART IV

ITEM 15.

 

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

57
        Report of Independent Auditors   57
        Consolidated Financial Statements   57
        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   57
        Exhibits   58
Signatures   61
        Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts   62

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

F-1

ii



ITEM 1. BUSINESS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION:

        This document includes "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this document, including, without limitation, the statements under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Liquidity and Sources of Capital" regarding our strategies, plans, objectives, expectations, and future operating results are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, could, would, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, will, likely, continue and similar terms and phrases, and include all discussions of our plans for the design, development, construction and operation of proposed racetracks and our plans for acquisition of properties and operations. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable at this time, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Such statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause the statements made to be incorrect and/or for actual results to differ materially. Those risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to weather conditions or road conditions limiting access to our properties and the cyclical and seasonal nature of our business, adverse changes in West Virginia video lottery laws or the rates of taxation of video lottery operations, legalization of new forms of gaming in our target markets, which would lead to increased competition, other significant competition, general economic conditions affecting the resort business, dependence upon key personnel, changes in the number of diluted shares, leverage and debt service, expiration or non-renewal of gaming licenses, costs associated with maintenance and expansion of Mountaineer Park's infrastructure to meet the demands attending increased patronage, costs and risks attending construction, expansion of operations, continued dependence on Mountaineer for the vast majority of our revenues, disruption in developing and integrating our Pennsylvania and Ohio operations and other facilities we may expand and/or acquire, extensive regulation by gaming and racing authorities, environmental laws and potential exposure to environmental liabilities, limited public market and liquidity, shares eligible for future sale, impact of anti-takeover measures, and other risks detailed from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings and press releases. We do not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law.

COMPANY HISTORY

        Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, we own and operate the Mountaineer Racetrack & Gaming Resort in Chester, West Virginia and the Ramada Inn and Speedway Casino in North Las Vegas, Nevada. During 2002 we also owned and operated a hotel in Reno, Nevada, which we sold in 2003. We have obtained a license to build a thoroughbred racetrack and operate parimutuel wagering in Erie, Pennsylvania, which we intend to build, subject to favorable resolution of a legal challenge to the grant of the license and various land acquisition and development risks. We and our newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary, Racing Acquisition, Inc., are parties to a Merger Agreement by which we would acquire all of the issued and outstanding stock of Scioto Downs, Inc., which owns and operates a harness horse racing track with parimutuel wagering in Columbus, Ohio. Consummation of the merger is subject to customary conditions, including receipt of all necessary governmental approvals and the approval of the shareholders of Scioto Downs, Inc.

        We were incorporated in March 1988 in Delaware under the name "Secamur Corporation," a wholly owned subsidiary of Buffalo Equities, Inc. ("Buffalo"), and later "spun-off" through the sale of its stock to the stockholders of Buffalo in January 1989. In June 1989, we merged with Pacific International Industries, Inc., which had been engaged in the contract security guard services business in Southern California since its inception in February 1987. Upon completion of the merger, we were

1



renamed Excalibur Security Services, Inc. to reflect its new line of business. After operating unprofitably, we filed a voluntary petition for reorganization with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in December 1990 and became a Chapter 11 debtor-in-possession. The Bankruptcy Court approved our sale of its security guard services business in May 1991, and confirmed our plan of reorganization in December 1991. The plan of reorganization authorized us to acquire, primarily, specified gaming and oil and gas businesses. Upon confirmation of the plan of reorganization, we changed our name to Excalibur Holding Corporation. In connection with management's decision to operate as a gaming company, we were renamed Winners Entertainment, Inc. in August 1993. At the annual meeting of stockholders on October 15, 1996, our stockholders approved a change of our name from Winners Entertainment, Inc. to MTR Gaming Group, Inc. Since 1998, we have operated only in the gaming and entertainment business.

INTRODUCTION

        We own and operate the Mountaineer Racetrack & Gaming Resort, a destination hotel/resort and entertainment facility providing, pursuant to the West Virginia Racetrack Video Lottery Act of 1994, as amended (the "Lottery Act"), slot machine gaming and thoroughbred horse racing with parimutuel wagering. Mountaineer is one of only four racetracks in West Virginia permitted to operate slot machines. Mountaineer is strategically located at the northern tip of West Virginia's northwestern panhandle, primarily serving residents of the Ohio Valley (including Cleveland and Youngstown) and western Pennsylvania (including Pittsburgh). Mountaineer currently competes directly with only one other facility with respect to its slot machines, a greyhound racetrack with slot machines, located 50 miles from Mountaineer in Wheeling, West Virginia, which offers only limited amenities as compared to Mountaineer. In addition, Mountaineer is the only racetrack in the state permitted to operate slot machines apart from the racetrack. Accordingly, approximately 2,500 of Mountaineer's 3,000 slot machines are located in a casino-like gaming area that is integrated with the hotel and convention facilities. We also own and operate the Ramada Inn and Speedway Casino in North Las Vegas, Nevada. Unless stated otherwise, references to total revenues, revenues and gross profit are before deducting promotional allowances.

        Since introducing slot machines at Mountaineer in 1994, we have achieved growth in revenues and EBITDA. Our total revenues have increased more than tenfold, from $24.9 million in 1995 to $266.3 million in 2002. During this period, the number of slot machines operated at Mountaineer increased from 800 to 3,000. Similarly our EBITDA has grown from ($3.4) million in 1995 to $46.1 million in 2002. Our growth continues to remain strong as our total revenues and EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2002 grew 21.9% and 8.8%, respectively, over 2001 despite operating disruptions from recently completed expansion projects, including, among other things, a new 258-room luxury hotel. We attribute much of this increase not only to increases in the number of slot machines operated, but also to periodic legislative enhancements that have permitted more popular types of games and, most recently, higher wagering limits. We expect that our recent investments in infrastructure and amenities, which allow us to provide our patrons a higher quality, diversified gaming and entertainment experience, will continue to drive growth in our revenues and EBITDA. To this end, we will seek to broaden our customer base by expanding our marketing campaign to promote Mountaineer as a destination hotel, convention and resort facility with the addition of our new luxury hotel and convention center.

        In order to leverage our expertise and capitalize on new development opportunities, we are expanding our racing operations to Pennsylvania and Ohio. In September 2002, the Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission unanimously granted us a license to build a new thoroughbred horse racetrack in Erie, Pennsylvania and to conduct parimutuel wagering. We plan to build the new racetrack and commence operations as soon as practicable, subject to favorable resolution of a pending judicial review of our license, the ability to obtain clear title to the property to which our license relates and which we currently have under option and other construction-related risks. We also recently entered

2



into a merger agreement to purchase Scioto Downs, Inc., which owns and operates a harness horse racing facility with parimutuel wagering in Columbus, Ohio. In the event Pennsylvania and/or Ohio enact new gaming laws, like those in West Virginia that permit slot machines at racetracks, we would expect our racing facilities in these states to benefit from the addition of slot machines. However, if proposed legislation is passed in Pennsylvania legalizing slot machines at racetracks, Mountaineer would also compete with the Meadows, a harness horse racing track in Washington, Pennsylvania, should it install slot machines, or any other facility ultimately licensed and built within Mountaineer's target market.

        Overview.    Since acquiring Mountaineer in 1992, we have renovated and expanded its facilities in order to maximize the benefits of the Lottery, which permits us to operate slot machines at Mountaineer, and subsequent amendments that have permitted additional types of gaming machines and made their operation more profitable. We continue to focus on expanding the reach of our extensive customer base at Mountaineer and improving our operating results. We have invested approximately $156 million in capital improvements and expansion projects at Mountaineer from 2000 through 2002. As a result, Mountaineer has become a diverse entertainment and convention complex and destination resort with:

3


        Slot Machine Operations.    Mountaineer's revenues and profits are driven primarily by its slot machine operations and to a lesser extent its lodging, food and beverage operations, parimutuel wagering, convention center, events center, and recreational facilities fees. Mountaineer currently operates 3,000 slot machines in various configurations of denominations and coin drop/ticket out machines.

        Mountaineer has enjoyed strong growth in its slot business as a result of positive legislation (Las Vegas style coin drop machines permitted by amendment in June 1999; relief from limitation on ratio of machines in hotel versus horse racetrack buildings from 1:1 between 1994 and June 1998 to 2:1 in June 1998, elimination of the ratio in 2000, and increase in the maximum slot wager from $2 to $5 in 2001), increases in machine count (from 400 in 1994, to 800 in 1995, to 1,000 in 1997, to 1,200 in July of 1998, to 1,345 in 1999, to 1,905 in 2000, to 2,500 in September 2001, to 3,000 in July 2002), progressive advertising and marketing, and increased patronage resulting from Mountaineer's development into a destination resort.

        Mountaineer derives revenues from the operation of gaming in the form of net win on the gross terminal income, or the total cash deposited into a machine less the value of credits cleared for winning redemption tickets, tokens or coins. Pursuant to the Lottery Act, Mountaineer's commission is fixed at 47% of the net win after deducting an administrative fee of 4% of gross terminal revenues first paid to the State of West Virginia. Additionally, net win in excess of Mountaineer's net win for the year ended June 30, 2001, or "Excess Net Terminal Income" as it is referred to in a 2001 amendment of the Lottery Act, is subject to a 10% surcharge. Mountaineer's threshold for Excess Net Terminal Income is fixed at approximately $162.0 million. However, the amendment created a capital reinvestment fund to which the State will contribute 42% of the surcharge. Generally, for each dollar a horse racetrack expends on capital improvements for the horse racetrack and adjacent property, the horse racetrack will receive a dollar from the capital reinvestment fund. Further, after deducting the administrative fee and the surcharge from the Excess Net Terminal Income, the racetracks will receive 42% (as opposed to 47%) of the remaining net win.

        Racing and Parimutuel Wagering Operations.    Mountaineer offers live thoroughbred horse racing on dirt and grass surfaces before expansive clubhouse and grandstand viewing areas with enclosed seating (770 seats and 2,800 seats respectively) for year-round racing. In August 2000, Mountaineer also began exporting its signal to other outlets in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. Those outlets (more than 600 off-track wagering facilities thus far) simulcast Mountaineer's races and conduct parimutuel wagering. Mountaineer also conducts parimutuel wagering on horse and greyhound racing simulcast via closed circuit television from other prominent racetracks around the country.

        Mountaineer's revenues from racing operations are derived mainly from three sources: commissions earned on parimutuel wagering on live races held at Mountaineer; commissions earned on races conducted at other "host" racetracks and broadcast live (i.e., import simulcast) at Mountaineer; and, since August 11, 2000, fees paid to Mountaineer by other racetracks and off track wagering facilities that broadcast Mountaineer's races live (i.e., export simulcast). In parimutuel wagering, patrons bet against each other rather than against the operator of the facility or with pre-set odds. The dollars wagered form a pool of funds from which winnings are paid based on odds determined solely by the wagering activity. The horse racetrack acts as a stakeholder for the wagering patrons and deducts from the amounts wagered a "take-out" or gross commission, from which the horse racetrack pays state and county taxes and racing purses.

        Lodging, Food and Beverage Operations.    With the May 2002 opening of the 258-room Grande Hotel at Mountaineer, the resort now has 359 hotel rooms. Because the hotel provides direct access to the Speakeasy Gaming Saloon, the spa and retail plaza, the gourmet steakhouse, the buffet, the 125-seat Gatsby restaurant for casual dining, and the convention center, we view the hotel as a focal point in marketing our gaming and racing products as well as the remainder of the resort's

4



entertainment offerings. We also offer various dining and lounge facilities in the horse racetrack buildings, including the horse racetrack's Clubhouse Restaurant, which is open a minimum of 210 days annually on live race days and offers seating for 770 customers with full lunch and dinner menus and a private buffet.

        Amenities and Recreational Activities.    As part of its transformation into a destination resort, Mountaineer offers a number of amenities and recreational activities intended to enhance the entertainment experience of its slot and racing patrons.

        In January 1999, Mountaineer purchased the Woodview Golf Course. Woodview is an eighteen-hole par 71 course measuring approximately 6,550 yards on a 170-acre tract, which is located approximately seven miles from Mountaineer in New Cumberland, West Virginia.

        In August 2000, Mountaineer opened the Harvey E. Arneault Memorial Arena and Events Centre. Known as the "Harv," this 69,000 square foot facility is a tent-like fabric structure that seats approximately 5,000 patrons for concerts, boxing matches and other entertainment offerings. The Harv is just a short walk from the hotel and Speakeasy Gaming Saloon and has a state-of-the-art stage, permanent bleachers and food and beverage concessions and has hosted such entertainers as Bill Cosby, Wayne Newton, Paul Anka and Englebert Humperdink.

        In February 2001, Mountaineer opened its Fitness Centre. Also a fabric structure, this 12,000 square foot facility has a full complement of weight training and cardiovascular equipment as well as aerobics classes, a health bar, and locker rooms with steam and sauna rooms.

        Mountaineer also offers tennis, outdoor swimming and indoor swimming, which is located at the new Grande Hotel.

        We own and operate the Ramada Inn and Speedway Casino, which is located on approximately 6.1 acres at the intersection of Cheyenne Boulevard and Interstate 15 in North Las Vegas. Approximately five miles from the Las Vegas Motor Speedway, the property includes a 131-room hotel and a casino with approximately 400 slot machines and ten table games. The Speedway Property has earned positive EBITDA over the last five quarters. We have the necessary licenses to conduct non-restricted gaming at the Speedway Property until October of 2003, and must seek renewal in order to continue operating gaming after such time.

        During 2002, we also owned an eleven-story, 236-room hotel/casino property (we had closed the casino in July of 2001) in Reno. On March 11, 2003, we sold the Reno Property for total consideration of approximately $3.0 million (approximately $0.8 million in cash at closing and an approximately $2.2 million promissory note secured by a first mortgage on the Reno Property). We estimate that the sale of the Reno Property will have an annual positive impact of approximately $1.2 million on our EBITDA, as a result of the elimination of the Reno Property's negative contribution to our EBITDA.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

        Our business strategy involves further developing our operations at Mountaineer as a destination resort and convention facility, continuing the growth of Mountaineer's export simulcast business, seeking to acquire other gaming and/or parimutuel businesses (with a particular emphasis on such opportunities in Pennsylvania and Ohio, and improving profitability at the Speedway Property.

5


        Our strategy is to focus our marketing on the recently implemented expansion as well as add new amenities in order to expand Mountaineer's target market and further distinguish Mountaineer from competitors whose facilities may have some but not all of the entertainment venues available at Mountaineer. The development of a destination resort is likewise aimed at distinguishing Mountaineer from any new competition that could result from the enactment of gaming legislation in neighboring states. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Sources of Capital."

6


7


COMPETITION

        We face substantial competition in each of the markets in which our gaming facilities are located. See the section of this Annual Report entitled "BUSINESS—Certain Risks Related to Our Business—We face significant competition from other gaming and racing facilities, and increased competition could have a material adverse effect on us."

        Specific competitive factors relating to our primary gaming markets include the following:

        Mountaineer's racing and parimutuel operations compete directly for wagering dollars with Wheeling Downs, which is located approximately 50 miles from Mountaineer; Thistledown and Northfield Park, which are located approximately 85 miles to the northwest in Cleveland, Ohio; and The Meadows, located approximately 40 miles southeast of Mountaineer in Washington, Pennsylvania. Wheeling Downs conducts parimutuel greyhound racing and video lottery gaming. Thistledown and Northfield conduct parimutuel horse racing but not video lottery gaming. The Meadows conducts live harness racing and provides import simulcasting, but does not have video lottery gaming. If legislation proposed in February 2003 is passed in Pennsylvania legalizing slot machines at racetracks, The Meadows also would be permitted to operate slot machines. Since commencing export simulcasting in August of 2000, Mountaineer also competes with racetracks across the country to have its signal carried

8


by off-track wagering parlors. In general, Mountaineer also competes with other tracks for participation by quality racehorses.

        Currently, ten groups have applied for the three remaining licenses to operate racetracks in Pennsylvania, four of which have applied to operate horse racetracks in or around Pittsburgh. If any of these groups build racetracks in our target markets, they may compete with our thoroughbred horse racing at Mountaineer and Presque Isle Downs. In addition, to the extent that Pennsylvania legalizes gaming, they may directly compete with our slot operations at Mountaineer, and if we are permitted to implement gaming at Presque Isle Downs, they may compete with that facility.

        If we are successful in executing our plans to build Presque Isle Downs in Erie, Pennsylvania, that facility will face competition from other racetracks in Pennsylvania and off-track wagering facilities in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, as well as from casinos in Western New York and northern Ohio. Moreover, because Presque Isle Downs will be a new facility, all of its competitors will be more established.

        If we are successful in consummating our merger with Scioto Downs, that facility competes directly with other racetracks in Ohio, including Beulah Park, a thoroughbred horse racetrack which is located approximately nine miles from Scioto Downs; River Downs Horse Racing in Cincinnati, Ohio; and to a lesser extent, casino gambling on riverboats in Indiana and Native American lands in Michigan. Further, Scioto Downs faces competition from off-track wagering facilities in Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2002, we and our subsidiaries had approximately 1,860 employees (approximately 1,660 in connection with operations at Mountaineer and the remainder in Nevada) of whom approximately 54 were represented by a labor union under a collective bargaining agreement. The union representing parimutuel clerks at Mountaineer has been expanded in recent years to cover certain employees providing off-track betting services at the Speakeasy Gaming Saloon. The collective bargaining agreement was extended until November 30, 2003. We believe that our employee relations are good.

REGULATION AND LICENSING

General

        All of our gaming operations are subject to extensive regulations and could be subjected at any time to additional or more restrictive regulations. We are also subject to the provisions of West Virginia law that govern the conduct of horse racing in West Virginia (the "West Virginia Racing Act") and the operation of slots in West Virginia (the "Lottery Act"). In addition, if we successfully implement our plan to build Presque Isle Downs, our horse racing operations there will be subject to extensive regulation under the Pennsylvania Racing Act, and if we consummate the merger with Scioto Downs, we will also be subject to the applicable Ohio statutes and the rules and regulations of the Ohio Racing Commission. Our live racing, parimutuel wagering and slot operations are contingent upon the continued governmental approval of such operations as forms of legalized gaming.

        The regulations and oversight applicable to our operations are intended primarily to safeguard the legitimacy of gaming activity and its freedom from inappropriate or criminal influences. Our material licenses are subject to annual or other periodic renewal and governmental authorities may refuse to grant permission to continue to operate existing facilities. The failure to obtain or maintain in effect required regulatory approvals is expected to constitute an event of default under our various financing agreements and would have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.

9



West Virginia Racing and Gaming Regulation

        The powers and responsibilities of the Racing Commission include, among other things, (i) granting permission annually to maintain racing licenses and schedule race meets, (ii) approving simulcasting activities, (iii) licensing all officers, directors, racing officials and certain other employees of the licensee, and (iv) approving all contracts entered into by the licensee affecting racing and parimutuel wagering operations. Such powers and responsibilities extend to the approval and/or oversight of all aspects of racing and parimutuel wagering operations. In order to conduct simulcast racing, Mountaineer is required under West Virginia law to hold a minimum of 210 live race days each year. West Virginia law requires that at least 80% of Mountaineer's employees must be citizens and residents of West Virginia and must have been such for at least one year. In addition, certain activities, such as simulcasting races, require the consent of the representatives of a majority of the horse owners and trainers at Mountaineer.

        Mountaineer's export simulcast activities to sites outside of West Virginia are subject to regulation by other state racing commissions, as well as the provisions of the Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act of 1978, which prohibit Mountaineer from accepting off-track wagering on simulcast racing without the approval of the Racing Commission and, subject to certain exceptions, of any other currently operating horse racetrack within 60 miles, or if none, of the closest horse racetrack in any adjoining state. We believe we have received all necessary approvals to conduct our current operations at Mountaineer; however, such approvals are subject to renewal and approval annually. The failure to receive or retain approvals or renewals of approvals, or a delay in receiving such approvals and renewals, could cause the reduction or suspension of racing and parimutuel wagering as well as of gaming operations at Mountaineer and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        On February 3, 2003, Mountaineer was served with a complaint filed by the Mountaineer Park Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association ("HBPA") purportedly pursuant to the Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act. The suit alleges that a December 29, 2000 letter agreement between the HBPA and Mountaineer with respect to the terms and conditions of simulcasting became null and void as of February 1, 2003, because the parties did not agree, in the context of the simulcasting agreement, to increase the number of live racing days at Mountaineer from not fewer than a statutorily mandated minimum of 210 to not fewer than 250 days requested by the HBPA. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, case number 5:03-CV-14, and seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Mountaineer from engaging in interstate off-track wagering until it reaches agreement with the HBPA. Mountaineer believes the suit is frivolous and therefore opposed the request for a preliminary injunction and filed a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, on the grounds that a separate contract between the parties executed on the same date and in effect through December 31, 2003 with respect to live racing makes plain the HBPA's agreement that Mountaineer "shall each year request a license from the West Virginia Racing Commission to conduct racing for not less than the minimum number of days [210] required by state law." Mountaineer has satisfied this requirement. On March 6, 2003, the Court denied the HBPA's request for a preliminary injunction, and found specifically that the simulcasting agreement remains in full force and effect and that our continued simulcasting at Mountaineer does not violate the Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act. If a permanent injunction were granted and an agreement were not reached, we would be prohibited from simulcasting at Mountaineer, although we would not be prohibited from conducting live racing or other gaming operations at Mountaineer.

        Pursuant to the Lottery Act, each of the two West Virginia horse racetracks and two West Virginia dog racetracks licensed prior to January 1, 1994 and which conduct a minimum number of days of live racing, may apply for an annual license to operate gaming at its racetrack. The Lottery Act likewise requires that the operator of Mountaineer be subject to a written agreement with the horse owners, breeders and trainers who race horses at Mountaineer (the "Mountaineer Horsemen") concerning the

10



proceeds of video lottery in order to conduct gaming operations. Mountaineer is party to the requisite agreement with the Mountaineer Horsemen which expires on January 1, 2004. The Lottery Act also requires Mountaineer to have a written agreement with the parimutuel clerks concerning the proceeds of video lottery in order to operate gaming. Mountaineer is party to the requisite agreement with its parimutuel clerks, which expires on November 30, 2003. The absence of an agreement with the Mountaineer Horsemen or the parimutuel clerks at Mountaineer, or the termination or non-renewal of such agreements, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Lottery Commission has broad powers to approve and monitor all operations of the gaming machines, the specification of the machines and the interface between the terminals and the West Virginia Central Lottery System. The Lottery Commission also acts upon requests for increases in the number of gaming machines. The Lottery Commission's denial of a request to increase the number of machines at Mountaineer could limit Mountaineer's growth and thus adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Lottery Commission licenses all persons who control the licensed entity or are key personnel of the gaming operation to ensure their integrity and absence of any criminal involvement.

        The conduct of gaming by a racing facility is subject to the approval of the voters of the county in which the facility is located. If such approval is obtained, the facilities may continue to conduct video lottery activities unless the matter is resubmitted to the voters pursuant to a petition signed by at least 5% of the registered voters, who must wait at least five years to bring such a petition. If approval is denied, another vote on the issue may not be held for a period of two years. Gaming was approved in Hancock County, the location of Mountaineer, on May 10, 1994. If such approval were ever revoked pursuant to the Lottery Act, it would have a material adverse effect on us.

        In order to qualify as a "video lottery game," as the term is defined under the Lottery Act, a game must, among other things, be a game of chance, which utilizes an interactive electronic terminal device allowing input by an individual player. Such a game may not be based on any of the following game themes: roulette, dice, or baccarat card games. Moreover, video lottery machines must meet strict hardware and software specifications, including minimum and maximum pay-out requirements, and must be connected to the Lottery Commission's central control computer by an on-line or dial-up communication system. Only machines registered with and approved by the Lottery Commission may offer video lottery games.

        Under the Lottery Act, racetracks that conduct gaming, as well as persons who service and repair gaming machines and validation managers (persons who perform video lottery ticket redemption services) are required to be licensed by the Lottery Commission. The licensing application procedures are extensive and include inquiries into, and an evaluation of, the character, background (including criminal record, reputation and associations), business ability and experience of an applicant and the adequacy and source of the applicant's financing arrangements. In addition, a horse racetrack applicant must hold a valid racing license, have an agreement regarding video lottery revenues with the representatives of a majority of the horsemen, the parimutuel clerks and the breeders for the horse racetrack and post a bond or irrevocable letter of credit in such amount as the Lottery Commission shall determine. Finally, no license will be granted until the Lottery Commission determines that each person who has "control" of an applicant meets all of the applicable licensing qualifications. Persons deemed to have control of a corporate applicant include: (i) any holding or parent company or subsidiary of the applicant who has the ability to elect a majority of the applicant's board of directors or to otherwise control the activities of the applicant; and (ii) key personnel of an applicant, including any executive officer, employee or agent, who has the power to exercise significant influence over decisions concerning any part of the applicant's business operations.

11


        Video Lottery machines may only be operated in the grandstand building of a horse racetrack where parimutuel wagering is permitted; provided, however, that if a horse racetrack was authorized by the Lottery Commission prior to November 1, 1993 to operate video lottery machines in another area of the horse racetrack's facilities, such horse racetrack may continue to do so. Accordingly, Mountaineer may operate video lottery machines at the hotel's Speakeasy Gaming Saloon as well as the horse racetrack.

        The Lottery Act imposes extensive operational controls relating to, among other matters, security and supervision, access to the machines, hours of operation, general liability insurance coverage and machine location. In addition, the Lottery Act prohibits the extension of credit for video lottery play and requires Lottery Commission approval before any video lottery advertising and promotional activities are conducted. The Lottery Act provides for criminal and civil liability in the event of specified violations.

        All revenues derived from the operation of video lottery games must be deposited with the Lottery Commission to be shared in accordance with the provisions of the Lottery Act. Under such provisions, each horse racetrack must electronically remit to the Lottery Commission its "gross terminal income" (total cash deposited into video lottery machines less the value of credits cleared for winning redemption tickets, tokens, or coins). To ensure the availability of such funds to the Lottery Commission, each horse racetrack must maintain in its account an amount equal to or greater than the gross terminal income to be remitted. If a horse racetrack fails to maintain this balance, the Lottery Commission may disable all of the horse racetrack's video lottery machines until full payment of all amounts due is made. From the gross terminal income remitted by a licensee, the Lottery Commission will deduct 4% to cover its costs of administering video lottery at the licensee's horse racetrack and divide the remaining amounts as follows: 47% is returned to the horse racetrack, 30% is paid to the State's general revenues fund, 15.5% is deposited in the horse racetrack's fund for the payment of purses, and the remaining 7.5% is divided among tourism promotion, Hancock County, the Racetrack Employees Pension Fund, and other programs. In April 2001, West Virginia amended the Lottery Act to establish among other things a new distribution scheme for the portion of each horse racetrack's net win in excess of that track's net win for the year ended June 30, 2001 (referred to as the "Excess Net Terminal Income"). After deducting the administrative fee, the Excess Net Terminal Income will be subject to a 10% surcharge. The remaining Excess Net Terminal Income after the surcharge (and the administrative fee) will be distributed as follows: 42% is returned to the horse racetrack, 41% is paid to the State's general revenues fund, 9.5% is deposited in the horse racetrack's fund for the payment of purses, and the remaining 7.5% is divided among tourism promotion, Hancock County, the Racetrack Employees Pension Fund, and other programs. The amendment also creates a capital reinvestment fund to which the State will contribute 42% of the surcharge attributable to each horse racetrack. Generally, for each dollar a horse racetrack expends on capital improvements for the horse racetrack and adjacent property, the horse racetrack will receive a dollar from the capital reinvestment fund.

        Pursuant to both the Racing Commission's and Lottery Commission's regulatory authority, we may be investigated by either body at virtually any time. Accordingly, we must comply with all gaming laws at all times. Should either body consider us to be in violation of any of the applicable laws or regulations, each has the plenary authority to suspend or rescind our licenses. While we have no knowledge of any non-compliance, and believe that are in full compliance with all relevant regulations, should we fail to comply with such regulations, our business would be materially adversely affected.

Nevada Gaming Regulation

        The laws, regulations, and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Control Board (the "Board"), the Nevada Gaming Commission (the "Commission"), and the City of North Las Vegas ("North Las Vegas") (the Board, the Commission, and North Las Vegas are hereinafter collectively referred to herein as the "Nevada Gaming Authorities") are based upon declarations of public policy

12



which are concerned with, among other things: (i) the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (ii) the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures; (iii) the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities; (iv) the prevention of cheating and fraudulent practices; and (v) the provision of a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Any changes in such laws, regulations, and procedures could have an adverse effect on the operations of the Company and Speakeasy Las Vegas.

        In order to operate non-restricted gaming at the Speedway Property, we, Speakeasy Las Vegas and certain officers and directors are required to be licensed or found suitable as operators and owners of a casino by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A gaming license requires the periodic payment of fees and taxes and is not transferable. We are also required to be registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation ("Registered Corporation") and as such, we are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other information that the Nevada Commission may require. No person may become a stockholder of, or receive any percentage of profits from, Speakeasy Las Vegas without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. In October 2001, we and all relevant affiliates obtained from the Nevada Gaming Authorities the necessary licenses or approvals to engage in gaming activities at the Speedway Property. We elected not to pursue renewal of the license to operate non-restricted gaming at the Reno Property. With respect to the license of the Speedway Property, the Nevada Gaming Authorities issued a license for a term of two years, after which we will have to seek renewal in order to continue conducting gaming operations at this location.

        The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, us or Speakeasy Las Vegas in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a gaming licensee. Officers, directors, and certain key employees of Speakeasy Las Vegas must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Officers, directors, and our key employees who are actively and directly involved in gaming activities of Speakeasy Las Vegas may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and in addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensing, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.

        If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director, or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with us or Speakeasy Las Vegas, the companies involved would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require us or Speakeasy Las Vegas to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

        We and Speakeasy Las Vegas must submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities, and similar financial transactions by us and the Nevada subsidiaries will have to be reported to, or approved by, the Nevada Commission.

13



        If it were determined that we or Speakeasy Las Vegas had violated the Nevada Gaming Control Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the "Nevada Act"), the gaming licenses could be limited, conditioned, suspended, or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, we, Speakeasy Las Vegas and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Nevada Act at the discretion of the Nevada Commission.

        Any beneficial holder of our voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and have his suitability as a beneficial holder of our voting securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.

        The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires more than five percent of our voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10 percent of our voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. Under certain circumstances, an "institutional investor," as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more then 10 percent, but not more than 15 percent, of our voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of our board of directors, any change in our corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies, or operations, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding our voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only include: (i) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (ii) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in its management, policies, or operations; and (iii) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership, or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of the investigation.

        Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner of securities if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the common stock of a Registered Corporation beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or Speakeasy Las Vegas, we (i) pay that person any dividend or interest upon our voting securities, (ii) allows that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (iii) pays remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise, or (iv) fails to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities for cash at fair market value.

        The Nevada Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of any debt security of a Registered Corporation to file applications, be investigated, and be found suitable to own the debt security of a Registered Corporation. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Registered Corporation can be sanctioned,

14



including the loss of its approvals, if without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, it: (i) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever; (ii) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities; (iii) pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or (iv) makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.

        We must maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada, which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We also must render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Nevada Commission has the power to require our stock certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Act. Likewise, we may not make a public offering of our securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire, or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes.

        Changes in control of us through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby he obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Nevada Board and Nevada Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Registered Corporation. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors, and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

        The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada gaming licensees, and Registered Corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada's gaming industry and to further Nevada's policy to: (i) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates; (ii) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (iii) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before we can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by our Board of Directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation's stockholders for the purposes of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.

        Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is under common control with such persons (collectively, "Licensees"), and who is or proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $15,000 to pay the expenses of investigation of the Nevada Board of their participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. A Licensee is also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if it knowingly violates any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fails to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engages in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or

15



employs a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the grounds of personal unsuitability.

Impact of Resort Hotel Legislation

        The Speedway Property is subject to legislation passed in 1991 by the Nevada Legislature, which is commonly referred to as the Resort Hotel Legislation. The key portions of this legislation are found in Section 463.1605 of the Nevada Revised Statutes ("NRS"). NRS 463.1605 and essentially provide that the Nevada Commission shall not approve a non-restricted gaming license for an establishment located in either Clark County or Washoe County, Nevada, unless the establishment is a resort hotel. A resort hotel is defined to include an establishment held out to the public as a hotel with more than 200 rooms available for sleeping accommodations, at least one bar with capacity for more than 30 patrons, and at least one restaurant with capacity for more than 60 patrons. A county, city or town may require resort hotels to meet standards in addition to those required by NRS 463.1605 as a condition to issuance of a gaming license by the particular county, city or town. The Speedway Property, which does not have more than 200 rooms, is exempt from NRS 463.1605 because it held a non-restricted gaming license prior to the enactment of NRS 463.1605. The grandfathered exemption, however, would be lost in the event gaming is abandoned within the meaning of the statute and local regulations. The March 1999 commencement of gaming operations at the Speedway Property preserved the grandfathered status of the Speedway Property. The failure to keep the grandfathered exemption to NRS 463.1605 and the local regulations governing resort hotels (by abandonment of gaming operations) would have a material adverse effect on us.

Pennsylvania Racing Regulation

        If we successfully implement our plan to build Presque Isle Downs, our horse racing operations there will be subject to extensive regulation under the Pennsylvania Racing Act, which established the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission (the "Pennsylvania Racing Commission"), which is responsible for, among other things:

        —granting permission annually to maintain racing licenses and schedule races;

        —approving, after a public hearing, the opening of off-track wagering facilities ("OTWs");

        —approving simulcasting activities;

        —licensing all officers, directors, racing officials and certain other employees of a company; and

        —approving all contracts entered into by a company affecting racing, parimutuel wagering and OTWs.

        As in most states, the regulations and oversight applicable to our planned Pennsylvania operations are intended primarily to safeguard the legitimacy of the sport and its freedom from inappropriate or criminal influences. The Pennsylvania Racing Commission has broad authority to regulate in the best interests of racing and may disapprove the involvement of certain personnel in our operations, deny approval of certain acquisitions following their consummation or withhold permission for a proposed OTW site for a variety of reasons, including community opposition. The Pennsylvania legislature also has reserved the right to revoke the power of the Pennsylvania Racing Commissions to approve additional OTWs and could, at any time, terminate parimutuel wagering as a form of legalized gaming in Pennsylvania or subject such wagering to additional restrictive regulation.

        The Pennsylvania Racing Act requires that any shareholder proposing to transfer beneficial ownership of 5% or more of our shares file an affidavit with us setting forth certain information about the proposed transfer and transferee, a copy of which we are required to furnish to the Pennsylvania Racing Commission. The certificates representing our shares owned by 5% beneficial shareholders are

16



required to bear certain legends prescribed by the Pennsylvania Racing Act. In addition, under the Pennsylvania Racing Act, the Pennsylvania Racing Commission has the authority to order a 5% beneficial shareholder of a company to dispose of his common stock of such company if it determines that continued ownership would be inconsistent with the public interest, convenience or necessity or the best interest of racing generally.

IRS Regulations and Currency Transaction Reporting

        The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, requires operators of casinos located in the United States to file information returns for U.S. citizens, including names and addresses of winners, for all winnings in excess of stipulated amounts. The IRS also requires operators to withhold taxes on certain winnings of nonresident aliens. Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department and the gaming regulatory authorities in certain domestic jurisdictions in which we operate casinos require the reporting of currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number.

Restrictions on Share Ownership and Transfer

        Unless prior approval of the West Virginia Lottery Commission is obtained, the sale of five percent or more of the voting stock of the license holder or any corporation that controls the license holder or the sale of a license holder's assets (other than in the ordinary course of business), or any interest therein, to any person not previously determined by the Lottery Commission to have satisfied the licensing qualifications, voids the license.

Environmental Matters

        We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern activities that may have adverse environmental effects, such as discharges to air and water, as well as the management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. These laws are complex, and subject to change. From time to time, our operations may not be in compliance with such laws and regulations. As a result, we may incur costs, penalties or other liabilities. For example, water discharges from our racetrack operations at our Mountaineer facility have been the subject of past enforcement actions by state regulators. We have satisfied the requirements of those past proceedings, and implemented measures to maintain compliance on a going forward basis. While such liabilities have not in the past had a material impact on our business, we cannot assure you that compliance with environmental laws and regulations will not have such an impact in the future.

        We also are subject to laws and regulations that create liability and clean up responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. Under certain of these laws and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of property may be liable for the costs of remediating hazardous substances or petroleum products on its property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or caused, the presence of the contaminants, and regardless of whether the practices that resulted in the contamination were legal at the time they occurred. The presence of, or failure to remediate properly, such substances may materially adversely affect the ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow funds using such property as collateral. Additionally, the owner of a site may be subject to claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Based on currently available information, we believe, although we cannot assure you, that such liabilities will not have a material impact on our business.

Compliance With Other Laws

        We are also subject to a variety of other rules and regulations, including zoning, construction and land-use laws and regulations in Nevada, West Virginia, and, upon commencement of operations at

17



Presque Isle Downs and Scioto Downs, respectively, Pennsylvania and Ohio, laws governing the serving of alcoholic beverages. Mountaineer and the Speedway Property derive a significant portion of their other revenues from the sale of alcoholic beverages. Any interruption or termination of the ability to serve alcoholic beverages at those properties, or the inability to sell alcoholic beverages at Presque Isle Downs or Scioto Downs, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Certain Risks Related to Our Business

        Dependence Upon Mountaineer.    We are dependent upon Mountaineer for the vast majority of our revenues. Accordingly, we may be subject to greater risks than a geographically diversified gaming operation, including, but not limited to the following risks faced by our Mountaineer operations:

        The occurrence of any of these or similar events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        Agreements with Horsemen and Parimutuel Clerks.    We depend on agreements with our horsemen and parimutuel clerks to operate our business. The Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act, the West Virginia Racing Act and, if our racing operations commence in Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Pennsylvania Racing Act and the Ohio State Racing Act, respectively, require that, in order to simulcast races, we have written agreements with the horse owners and trainers at our West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio racetracks. In addition, in order to operate slot machines in West Virginia, we are required to enter into written agreements regarding the proceeds of the slot machines with a representative of a majority of the horse owners, trainers and breeders and a representative of a majority of the parimutuel clerks. We have the requisite agreements in place with the horsemen until January 1, 2004 and with the parimutuel clerks until November 30, 2003.

        If we fail to maintain operative agreements with the horsemen, as a horse racetrack, we will not be permitted to conduct live racing and export and import simulcasting at that horse racetrack, and, in West Virginia, we will not be permitted to operate our slot machines. In addition, our simulcasting agreements are subject to the horsemen's approval. If we fail to renew or modify existing agreements on satisfactory terms, this failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

        On February 3, 2003, we were served with a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia by the Mountaineer Park Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective

18



Association ("HBPA"). The complaint alleges that a December 29, 2000 letter agreement with respect to the terms and conditions of simulcasting became null and void as of February 1, 2003, because the parties did not agree, in the context of the simulcasting agreement, to increase the number of live racing days at Mountaineer from not fewer than a statutorily mandated minimum of 210 to not fewer than 250 days. The complaint seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction pursuant to the Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act prohibiting us from engaging in interstate off-track wagering until such agreement is reached. On March 6, 2003, the Court denied the HBPA's request for a preliminary injunction, and found specifically that the simulcasting agreement remains in full force and effect and that our continued simulcasting at Mountaineer does not violate the Federal Interstate Horse Racing Act. If a permanent injunction were granted and an agreement were not reached, then we would be prohibited from simulcasting at Mountaineer, although we would not be prohibited from conducting live racing or other gaming operations at Mountaineer.

        Losses from Parimutuel Wagering.    We have in the past suffered, and we may continue in the future to suffer, losses from our parimutuel wagering business. For the year ended December 31, 2000, our parimutuel wagering business had an operating loss of $573,000. For the year ended December 31, 2001, our parimutuel wagering business, for the first time since we acquired Mountaineer, earned an operating profit ($1.2 million, prior to deducting general and administrative expenses), and for the year ended December 31, 2002, our parimutuel business earned an operating profit of $1.3 million, prior to deducting general and administrative expenses. However, we cannot assure you that this operation will continue to be profitable. Even if our parimutuel wagering operation fails to generate a profit, we are required to continue our parimutuel wagering business in order to maintain our gaming license at Mountaineer. Failure to maintain our gaming license would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

        Minimum Live Racing Days.    If we fail to meet the minimum live racing day requirements at Mountaineer, we would be prohibited under West Virginia law from conducting simulcast racing or conducting gaming operations at Mountaineer. In order to conduct simulcast racing or conduct gaming operations, Mountaineer is required under West Virginia law to hold a minimum of 210 live race days each year. Live racing days typically var