Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| (Mark One) | |
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 OR |
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
Commission File No. 0-30321
QUESTAR MARKET RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| State of Utah (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
87-0287750 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45601, Salt Lake City, Utah (Address of principal executive offices) |
84145-0601 (Zip code) |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (801) 324-2600 |
||
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
None
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933:
71/2% Notes Due 2011
7% Notes Due 2007
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of February 28, 2003. $0.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of February 28, 2003: 4,309,427 shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value. (All shares are owned by Questar Corporation.)
Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K Report with the reduced disclosure format.
Questar Market Resources, Inc. (the "Company" or "QMR," which is a reference that includes the Company's subsidiaries) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Questar Corporation ("Questar"), which is a publicly traded and integrated natural gas company. Questar has two principal business unitsRegulated Services and Market Resources. QMR and its subsidiaries comprise the Market Resources unit of Questar and engage in gas and oil exploration, development and production; gas gathering and processing; wholesale gas and hydrocarbon liquids marketing, risk management, and natural gas storage.
QMR is a subholding company that conducts business through Wexpro Company ("Wexpro"), Questar Exploration and Production Company ("Questar E&P"), Questar Gas Management Company ("QGM"), and Questar Energy Trading Company ("QET"). The corporate organization is shown in the following chart.
The Market Resources unit is the primary growth area within the Company. Over the next five years, Questar expects to spend approximately 60 percent of its total capital budget in Market Resources, primarily to expand gas and oil reserves through drilling and acquisitions; enlarge an infrastructure of gathering systems, processing plants, and storage facilities; and continue risk management activities. The diversity of activities within the group enhances a basic strategy to pursue complementary growth. As Questar E&P, for example, finds and acquires new reserves, QGM will have opportunities to expand gathering and processing activities, and QET will have more physical production to support its marketing and storage programs.
Business Strategy. QMR has the following strategies in its business:
QMR's activities are described below:
Gas and Oil Exploration and Production.
Questar E&P conducts a blended program of low-cost development drilling and low-risk reserve acquisition. It has a large inventory of proved undeveloped properties. It will continue to identify promising exploration prospects and farm them out to entities that are willing to assume the initial drilling risks. (Under farm out arrangements, a party agrees to assume the risk and financial responsibility for initial drilling in order to acquire an economic interest in the underlying leases and resulting production.)
Questar E&P also maintains a geographical balance and diversity, while focusing its activities in core areas where it has accumulated geological knowledge and has significant expertise. Core areas of activity are the Rocky Mountain region, primarily in Wyoming, Utah and Colorado; and the Midcontinent region, primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. During 2002, QMR sold nonstrategic properties in western Canada and the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado.
Pinedale Anticline. QMR's Pinedale activities in 2002 continue to merit special emphasis. As of year-end 2002, Questar E&P and Wexpro reported 51 producing wells and two awaiting completion or drilling. Drilling results and initial production tests confirmed reserve expectations of 4.8 to 8.0 Bcfe per well, depending on location and the number of formations drilled. As of December 31, 2002, the production capacity from the 51 QMR wells in Pinedale was estimated at 126 million cubic feet of gas equivalent ("MMcfe"), compared to 79 MMcfe as of the period a year earlier. (See the Glossary of Commonly Used Gas and Oil Terms immediately prior to the signature pages.)
Questar E&P and Wexpro conduct drilling activities in Pinedale when government restrictions and weather conditions permit. On a combined basis, they have an approximate 60 percent average working
interest in 14,800 acres in the Mesa Area of the Pinedale Anticline. The original Pinedale drilling program projected 135 to 150 locations, based on 80-acre spacing. The number of potential locations doubled when QMR determined that it was appropriate to drill on the basis of 40-acre spacing. Given the "tight" nature of the sands at Pinedale, QMR is reviewing the economic possibilities of moving to 20-acre spacing.
QMR's activities in Pinedale illustrate its long-term approach. The underlying leasehold acreage was held by production as a result of three wells drilled much earlier. Pinedale gas reserves are contained in tight sands with low permeability. While Questar E&P and Wexpro recognized the presence of gas at Pinedale, they did not drill additional wells on the leases until other companies developed new well completion techniques that hydraulically fractured tight sandstone formations over multiple intervals and successfully used such techniques to complete wells in similar tight reservoirs in a nearby field.
Recently, Questar E&P and Wexpro have established production in the Mesaverde Formation that is geologically similar and immediately beneath the Lance Formation. It is expensive to drill wells in Pinedale; the cost reflects the completion depth of the wells, the need for special handling and multiple stimulations, and governmental orders that impose surface-use limitations and restrict drilling activities to the period between May and December.
Uinta Basin. During 2002, QMR aggressively developed the Uinta Basin properties in eastern Utah obtained with the mid-2001 acquisition of Shenandoah Energy, Inc. ("SEI"). QMR drilled or participated in 150 wells in this region during 2002 and increased gross operated production capacity to 107 MMcf of natural gas per day by year-end 2002. Financial results were negatively affected by low prices that forced curtailment of production during part of the year. Questar E&P plans to continue drilling activities to maintain current production volumes and will pursue additional drilling to target unrecovered oil volumes from the Green River Formation in addition to gas volumes from the deeper Wasatch Formation. It will also evaluate the deeper potential in the underlying Mancos and Blackhawk formations.
Natural Gas Focused. Natural gas remains the primary focus of the Company's E&P operations. As of year-end 2002, the Company had proved reserves (excluding cost-of-service reserves) of 950.4 billion cubic feet ("Bcf") of gas and 27.2 million barrels ("MMbbls") of oil and natural gas liquids ("NGL"), compared to 998.0 Bcf of gas and 31.1 MMbbls of oil and NGL as of the same date in 2001. (The 2001 numbers include Canadian reserves. When Canadian reserves are excluded, the Company had 936.1 Bcf of gas and 27.7 MMbbls of oil and NGL at year-end 2001.) On an energy-equivalent ratio of six thousand cubic feet ("Mcf") of natural gas to one barrel ("Bbl") of crude oil, natural gas comprised approximately 85.4 percent of proved reserves (excluding cost-of-service reserves) at year end 2002. Proved developed gas reserves constituted 56.9 percent of the total non-regulated proved gas reserves reported. See Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this report for additional information concerning QMR's reserves.
The Questar E&P group's gas production increased from 70.6 Bcf in 2001 to 79.7 Bcf in 2002, despite self-imposed curtailments reflecting low Rockies prices. The increase in production was attributable to expanded development activities, which more than offset the natural decline in some producing areas and the sale of producing reserves. Questar E&P received an average realized selling price of $2.58 per Mcf in 2002, compared to $3.21 per Mcf in 2001. (Realized prices reflect hedging activities.)
Gas volumes are produced from two primary regionsthe Midcontinent area and the Rocky Mountain area. Production from each of these areas is generally priced below the Henry Hub pricing center in Louisiana, reflecting demand and access to transportation, but prices were significantly higher in the Midcontinent area than in the Rocky Mountains.
Prices for Rocky Mountain gas volumes declined significantly in the second and third quarters of 2002, reflecting a basis differential of more than $2 per Mcf, compared to the normal basis differential of $.40-$.60 per Mcf. Prices fell to as low as $.72 per Mcf net-to-the-well for some gas volumes, causing Questar E&P to shut in production. The increase in basis differential resulted from an increase in production volumes in the Rocky Mountain area with no expansion of transportation capacity to markets outside the region. Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River") is currently expanding its pipeline system that transports gas from southwestern Wyoming to California markets. This expansion is scheduled to be in service by mid-2003 and should relieve the problem for the next several years.
Questar E&P continued to generate Section 29 tax credits during 2002, which was the last year that such credits were available under current law. These tax credits are available for production from wells that meet specified criteria, including a requirement that drilling of the wells was commenced prior to January 1, 1993. Eligible properties are often referred to as "tight sands," "coal seams," or "low permeability formations" from which it is generally less economic to produce gas. During 2002, Questar E&P recorded $4.9 million in Section 29 credits, compared to $5.0 million in 2001.
During 2002, Questar E&P produced 2.8 MMbbls of oil and NGL, compared to 2.5 MMbbls in 2001. The production was sold at an average net-to-the-well realized price of $20.39 per barrel in 2002, compared to $19.22 per barrel in 2001. These prices reflect hedges; unhedged prices for crude oil were higher than hedged prices in 2002 ($22.93 per barrel compared to $20.39 per barrel.)
Questar E&P maintains regional offices in Denver, Colorado and Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in addition to its primary office in Salt Lake City, Utah.
QMR subsidiary Wexpro develops and produces gas supplies on certain producing properties owned by Questar's retail distribution utility, Questar Gas, in exchange for reimbursement of costs and a specified return on investment in successful gas wells. Wexpro was incorporated in 1976 as a subsidiary of Questar Gas. Questar Gas's efforts to transfer producing properties and leasehold acreage to Wexpro resulted in protracted regulatory proceedings and legal adjudications that ended with a court-approved settlement agreement that was effective August 1, 1981.
Wexpro, unlike Questar E&P, does not acquire leasehold acreage for exploration activities. It conducts gas and oil development and production activities on certain producing properties located in the Rocky Mountain region under the terms of the settlement agreement. (The terms of the settlement agreement are described in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.) Wexpro produces gas from specified properties for Questar Gas and is reimbursed for its costs plus a return on its successful investment. The after-tax return, which is calculated on net investment adjusted for working capital and deferral taxes, averaged 20.5 percent in 2002. Wexpro's allowed return is adjusted annually based on a specified formula in the settlement agreement. At year-end 2002, Wexpro's net investment base adjusted for working capital and deferred taxes was $164.5 million compared to $161.3 million at year-end 2001. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Wexpro bears all dry hole costs. The settlement agreement is monitored by the Utah Division of Public Utilities, the staff of the Public Service Commission of Wyoming and experts retained by these agencies.
The gas volumes produced by Wexpro for Questar Gas are reflected in the latter's rates at cost-of-service prices. Cost-of-service gas plus the gas attributable to royalty interest owners produced by Wexpro satisfied 45 percent of Questar Gas's system requirements during 2002. Questar Gas relies upon Wexpro's drilling program to develop the properties from which the cost-of-service gas is
produced. During 2002, the average wellhead cost of Questar Gas's cost-of-service gas (net of revenue credits) was $2.16 per Dth, which was lower than Questar Gas's average price for field-purchased gas.
Wexpro participates in drilling activities in response to the demands of other working interest owners, to protect its rights, and to meet the needs of Questar Gas. In 2002, Wexpro produced 44.2 Bcfe of natural gas and hydrocarbon liquids from Questar Gas's cost-of-service properties and added reserves of 58.7 Bcfe through drilling activities and reserve estimate revisions.
Wexpro, under the terms of the Wexpro agreement, owns oil-producing properties. The revenues from the sale of crude oil produced from such properties are used to recover operating expenses and provide Wexpro with a return on its investment. In addition, Wexpro receives 46 percent of any residual income. (The remaining income is received by Questar Gas and is used to reduce natural gas costs reflected in customer rates.)
Wexpro has an ownership interest in the wells and facilities related to its oil properties and in the wells and facilities that have been installed to develop and produce gas properties described above since August 1, 1981 (a date specified by the settlement agreement referred to above).
Wexpro maintains an office in Rock Springs, Wyoming, in addition to its principal office in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Gathering, Processing, Marketing and Risk Management.
QGM conducts gathering and processing activities in the Rocky Mountain and Midcontinent areas. Its activities are not subject to regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the "FERC") because the Natural Gas Act of 1938 specifically provides that the FERC's jurisdiction does not extend to facilities involved in the production or gathering of natural gas.
The year 2002 was the first full year of operation for Rendezvous Gas Services ("Rendezvous"), which is a joint venture that was developed by QGM and Western Gas Resources, Inc. ("Western Gas") to build and operate new gathering and compression facilities in the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming. This basin includes the Pinedale Anticline area in which Questar E&P and Wexpro have developed reserves as well as the Jonah field and other producing areas south of Pinedale. Rendezvous delivers gas volumes from this area for processing and blending to the Blacks Fork plant owned by QGM and to the nearby Granger plant owned by an affiliate of Western Gas.
In late 2002, QGM purchased the remaining 50 percent interest in the Blacks Fork processing plant that has a daily capacity of 84 MMcf and could be expanded to handle additional volumes gathered by Rendezvous. A processing plant strips NGL such as ethane, propane and butane from natural gas volumes to enable the producers to meet pipeline specifications for their gas volumes and to capitalize on historically higher prices for NGL when compared to equivalent volumes of natural gas. QGM recovered 23.4 million gallons (MMgal) of product in 2002 compared to 18.2 MMgal in 2001. QGM and Wexpro jointly own a processing facility located in the Canyon Creek area of southwestern Wyoming that has processing capacity of 43 MMcf per day. QGM also owns interests in several other processing plants in the Rocky Mountain and Midcontinent areas. As a consequence of a 2002 merger with an affiliate, QGM currently is responsible for the gathering and processing operations in the Uinta Basin of eastern Utah.
The majority of QGM's gathering systems were originally built as part of a regulated enterprise. They consist of 1,411 miles of gathering lines, compressor stations, field dehydration plants and measuring stations and were largely built to gather production from Questar Gas's cost-of-service properties. Under a contract with Questar Gas, QGM is obligated to gather the cost-of-service production for the life of the properties. During 2002, QGM gathered 40.7 MMdth of cost-of-service gas for Questar Gas, compared to 37.2 MMdth in 2001.
QGM also gathers gas for affiliates within QMR and for nonaffiliated customers. During 2002, QGM gathered 38.1 MMdth for QMR affiliates, compared to 27.0 MMdth in 2001, and gathered 112.2 MMdth for nonaffiliated customers, compared to 91.7 MMdth in 2001. (These numbers do not include any gas volumes for Rendezvous.)
QET conducts energy marketing activities. It combines gas volumes purchased from third parties and equity production (production that is owned by affiliates) to build a flexible and reliable portfolio. QET aggregates supplies of natural gas for delivery to large customers, including industrial users, municipalities, and other marketing entities. During 2002, QET marketed a total of 83.8 equivalent MMdth ("EMMdth") of third-party natural gas, compared to 91.8 EMMdth in 2001 and earned a margin of $.199 per equivalent Dth, compared to $.149 per equivalent Dth in 2001.
QET uses financial derivatives as a risk management tool to provide price protection for physical transactions involving equity production and marketing transactions. It executed hedges for equity production on behalf of the Questar E&P group with a variety of contracts for different periods of time with a number of counterparties, primarily banks. QET does not engage in speculative hedging transactions. (See Notes 1 and 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for additional information relating to hedging activities.)
As a wholesale marketing entity, QET concentrates on markets in the Pacific Northwest, Rocky Mountains, and Midwest that are close to reserves owned by affiliates or accessible by major pipelines. It has contracted for firm-transportation capacity on pipelines and firm-storage capacity at Clay Basin.
QET, through a limited liability company in which it has a 75 percent interest, operates the Clear Creek storage facility located in southwestern Wyoming. This facility has 3 Bcf of working gas capacity and is connected with pipelines owned by Questar Pipeline, Overthrust Pipeline Company, The Williams Companies, and Kern River.
QMR's operations are subject to various levels of government controls and regulation in the United States at the federal, state, and local levels. Such regulation includes requiring permits for the drilling and production of wells; maintaining bonding requirements in order to drill or operate wells; submitting and implementing spill prevention plans; filing notices relating to the presence, use and release of specified contaminants incidental to gas and oil production; and regulating the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, surface usage and restoration of properties upon which wells have been drilled, the plugging and abandoning of wells and the transportation of production. The Company's operations are also subject to various conservation matters, including the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration units, the number of wells that may be drilled in a unit, and the unitization or pooling of gas and oil properties. State conservation laws establish the maximum rates of production from gas and oil wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of gas and impose requirements for the ratable purchase of production.
Some of QMR's leases, including many of its leases in the Rocky Mountain area, are granted by the federal government and administered by federal agencies. These leases require compliance with detailed regulations on such things as drilling and operations and the calculation and payment of royalties.
Various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations affect the Company's operations and costs. These laws and regulations concern the generation, storage, transportation, disposal or discharge of contaminants into the environment and the general protection of public health, natural resources, wildlife, and the environment. They also impose substantial liabilities for any failure on the part of the Company to comply with them.
QMR faces competition in all aspects of its business including the acquisition of reserves and leases; obtaining goods, services, and labor; and marketing its production. Its competitors include multinational energy companies and other independent producers, many of which have greater financial resources than QMR.
QMR's business activities can be subject to seasonal variations. Historically, the demand for natural gas decreases during the summer months and increases during the winter months. Weather (both in terms of temperatures and moisture) can have dramatic impacts on natural gas prices and QMR's operations.
Transportation capacity can also have a significant impact on gas prices. The Rocky Mountain region produces more gas volumes than it can use, making it necessary to transport such volumes to markets outside the region. The lack of pipeline capacity or bottlenecks in pipeline systems can depress prices, as evidenced by the basis differential problems in the second and third quarters of 2002.
Questar E&P sells its natural gas production to a variety of customers including pipelines, gas marketing firms, industrial users, and local distribution companies. QMR vigorously evaluates counterparty risk and may require financial guarantees from parties that fail to meet its credit criteria. QMR's crude volumes are sold to refiners, remarketers and other companies, some of which have pipeline facilities near the producing properties. In the event pipeline facilities are not available, crude oil is trucked to storage, refining, or pipeline facilities.
The subsidiaries of QMR have important relationships with their affiliates as described above. Questar provides certain administrative services, e.g., public and government relations, financial and audit, to QMR and other members of the consolidated group. Questar, as a general rule, also sponsors the qualified and welfare plans in which QMR's employees participate. (Some QMR employees are not eligible to participate in the defined benefit Retirement Plan sponsored by Questar.) Each of the Company's subsidiaries is responsible for a proportionate share of the costs associated with these services and benefit plans.
As of December 31, 2002, QMR had 578 employees in the United States, compared to 581 at year-end 2001. None of these employees is represented under collective bargaining agreements. Employee relations are generally deemed to be satisfactory. QMR also periodically engages independent consulting petroleum engineers, environmental professionals, geologists, geophysicists, landmen and attorneys on a fee basis.
Reserves. The following table sets forth Questar E&P's estimated proved reserves, the estimated future net revenues from the reserves and the standardized measure of discounted net cash flows as of December 31, 2002. These proved reserve volumes do not include cost-of-service reserves managed and developed by Wexpro on behalf of Questar Gas. QMR's reserves were collectively estimated by Ryder Scott Company; H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc.; Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.; and Malkewicz Hueni Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. The Company does not have any long-term supply contracts with foreign governments, or reserves of equity investees or of subsidiaries with a significant minority interest. All properties are located in the United States due to the sale of Canadian properties in the last half of 2002.
| |
December 31, 2002 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated proved reserves | ||||
| Natural gas (Bcf) | 950.4 | |||
| Oil and NGL (MMbbls) | 27.2 | |||
Total proved reserves (Bcfe) |
1,113.4 |
|||
Proved developed reserves (Bcfe) |
660.0 |
|||
Estimated future net revenues before future income taxes (in thousands)(1) |
$ |
2,576,332 |
||
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows (in thousands)(2) |
$ |
899,626 |
||
Estimates of the Company's proved reserves and future net revenues are made using sales prices estimated to be in effect as of the date of such reserve estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties (except to the extent a contract specifically provides for escalation). Estimated quantities of proved reserves and future net revenues are affected by natural gas and oil prices, which have fluctuated widely in recent years. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating natural gas and oil reserves and their estimated values, including many factors beyond the control of the producer. The reserve data set forth in this document are estimates.
Reference should be made to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for additional information pertaining to the Company's proved natural gas and oil reserves as of the end of each of the last three years.
QMR will file estimated reserves as of December 31, 2002, with the Energy Information Administration in the Department of Energy on Form EIA-23. Although QMR uses the same technical and economic assumptions when it prepares the EIA-23, it is obligated to report reserves for wells it operates, not for all wells in which it has an interest, and to include the reserves attributable to other owners in such wells.
The following charts illustrate QMR's reserve statistics for the years ended December 31, 1998 through 2002:
| Year |
Year-End Proved Reserves |
Annual Production |
Reserve Life (Years) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 574.1 | 65.3 | 8.8 | |||
| 1999 | 597.6 | 76.6 | 7.8 | |||
| 2000 | 730.1 | 82.3 | 8.9 | |||
| 2001 | 1,184.4 | 85.6 | 13.8 | |||
| 2002 | 1,113.4 | 96.3 | 11.6 |
Proportion of Proved Developed to Proved Reserves
and Proportion of Gas Reserves (Bcfe)*
| Year |
Total Proved Reserves |
Proved Developed Reserves |
Proved Developed Percent of Total |
Natural Gas Percentage of Proved Reserves |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 574.1 | 506.0 | 88 | % | 85 | % | |||
| 1999 | 597.6 | 503.9 | 84 | % | 86 | % | |||
| 2000 | 730.1 | 566.4 | 78 | % | 88 | % | |||
| 2001 | 1,184.4 | 719.7 | 61 | % | 84 | % | |||
| 2002 | 1,113.4 | 660.0 | 59 | % | 85 | % |
Geographic Diversity of Producing Properties
The following table summarizes proved reserves by the Company's major operating areas at December 31, 2002:
| |
Proved Reserves* |
Percent of Total |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
(Bcfe) |
|
|||
| Midcontinent | 273.5 | 25 | % | ||
| Rocky Mountain Region | |||||
| (exclusive of Pinedale and Uinta Basin) | 128.7 | 11 | % | ||
| Pinedale Anticline | 321.1 | 29 | % | ||
| Uinta Basin | 390.1 | 35 | % | ||
| 1,113.4 | 100 | % | |||
Production. The following table sets forth the Company's net production volumes, the average sales prices per Mcf of gas, per barrel of oil and per barrel of NGL produced, and the production cost per Mcfe for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Production costs include direct lifting costs (labor, repairs and maintenance, materials, supplies and workovers), and the costs of administration of production offices, insurance and property and severance taxes, but is exclusive of
depreciation and depletion applicable to capitalized lease acquisitions, exploration and development expenditures.
| |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||
| United States (excluding cost-of-service activities) | |||||||||||
| Volumes produced and sold | |||||||||||
| Gas (Bcf) | 74.9 | 63.9 | 61.7 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGL (MMbbl) | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.5 | ||||||||
| Average realized selling price (includes hedges) | |||||||||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.61 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 2.80 | |||||
| Oil and NGL (per Bbl) | 20.26 | 18.14 | 19.61 | ||||||||
| Average selling price (without hedges) | |||||||||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.17 | $ | 3.83 | $ | 3.32 | |||||
| Oil and NGL (per Bbl) | 23.31 | 23.45 | 27.66 | ||||||||
| Production costs per Mcfe | |||||||||||
| Lease operating expense | $ | .51 | $ | .55 | $ | .42 | |||||
| Production taxes | .20 | .29 | .27 | ||||||||
| Production cost per Mcfe | $ | .71 | $ | .84 | $ | .69 | |||||
| |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||
| Canada | |||||||||||
| Volumes produced and sold | |||||||||||
| Gas (Bcf) | 4.8 | 6.7 | 7.3 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGL (MMbbls) | .5 | .7 | .7 | ||||||||
| Average realized selling price (includes hedges)(1) | |||||||||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.22 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 2.83 | |||||
| Oil and NGL (per Bbl) | 21.03 | 21.98 | 22.29 | ||||||||
| Average selling price (without hedges)(1) | |||||||||||
| Gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.22 | $ | 3.98 | $ | 3.05 | |||||
| Oil and NGL (per Bbl) | 21.03 | 22.35 | 27.15 | ||||||||
| Production costs per Mcfe(1) | |||||||||||
| Lease operating expense | $ | .92 | $ | .74 | $ | .72 | |||||
| Production taxes | .03 | ||||||||||
| Production cost per Mcfe | $ | .92 | $ | .74 | $ | .75 | |||||
Cost of Service (Wexpro-operated) |
|||||||||||
| Volumes produced | |||||||||||
| Gas (Bcf) | 41.2 | 37.9 | 41.5 | ||||||||
| Oil and NGL (MMbbl) | .5 | .5 | .6 | ||||||||
Productive Wells. The following table summarizes the Company's productive wells as of December 31, 2002.(1)(2)
All of these wells are located in the United States.
| Gas Wells |
Oil Wells |
Total Wells |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
|||||
| 3,427 | 1,598 | 885 | 485 | 4,312 | 2,083 | |||||
The Company also held numerous overriding royalty interests in gas and oil wells, a portion of which are convertible to working interests after recovery of certain costs by third parties. After converting to working interests, these overriding royalty interests will be included in the Company's gross and net well count.
Leasehold Acreage. The following table summarizes developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage in which the Company owns a working interest as of December 31, 2002. "Undeveloped Acreage" includes (i) leasehold interests that already may have been classified as containing proved undeveloped reserves; and (ii) unleased mineral interest acreage owned by the Company. Excluded from the table is acreage in which the Company's interest is limited to royalty, overriding royalty, and other similar interests.
Leasehold AcreageDecember 31, 2002
| |
Developed(1) |
Undeveloped(2) |
Total |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||||
| Arizona | | | 480 | 450 | 480 | 450 | ||||||||
| Arkansas | 32,322 | 10,513 | 510 | 400 | 32,832 | 10,913 | ||||||||
| California | 344 | 112 | 3,376 | 1,137 | 3,720 | 1,249 | ||||||||
| Colorado | 160,594 | 111,941 | 218,306 | 96,979 | 378,900 | 208,920 | ||||||||
| Idaho | | | 44,174 | 10,642 | 44,174 | 10,642 | ||||||||
| Illinois | 172 | 39 | 14,267 | 3,989 | 14,439 | 4,028 | ||||||||
| Indiana | | | 1,620 | 466 | 1,620 | 466 | ||||||||
| Kansas | 134 | 134 | 16,000 | 3,772 | 16,134 | 3,906 | ||||||||
| Kentucky | | | 13,723 | 5,468 | 13,723 | 5,468 | ||||||||
| Louisiana | 14,436 | 9,186 | 1,230 | 1,170 | 15,666 | 10,356 | ||||||||
| Michigan | | | 6,200 | 1,266 | 6,200 | 1,266 | ||||||||
| Minnesota | | | 313 | 104 | 313 | 104 | ||||||||
| Mississippi | 2,862 | 1,902 | 1,334 | 668 | 4,196 | 2,570 | ||||||||
| Montana | 25,285 | 10,186 | 308,989 | 56,590 | 334,274 | 66,776 | ||||||||
| Nevada | 320 | 280 | 680 | 542 | 1,000 | 822 | ||||||||
| New Mexico | 84,273 | 67,066 | 36,101 | 14,879 | 120,374 | 81,945 | ||||||||
| North Dakota | 1,013 | 371 | 144,312 | 21,532 | 145,325 | 21,903 | ||||||||
| Ohio | | | 202 | 43 | 202 | 43 | ||||||||
| Oklahoma | 1,469,170 | 258,418 | 63,678 | 39,702 | 1,532,848 | 298,120 | ||||||||
| Oregon | | | 43,868 | 7,670 | 43,868 | 7,670 | ||||||||
| South Dakota | | | 204,398 | 107,828 | 204,398 | 107,828 | ||||||||
| Texas | 152,409 | 50,765 | 60,254 | 46,360 | 212,663 | 97,125 | ||||||||
| Utah | 79,046 | 63,915 | 250,432 | 124,190 | 329,478 | 188,105 | ||||||||
| Washington | | | 26,631 | 10,149 | 26,631 | 10,149 | ||||||||
| West Virginia | 969 | 114 | | | 969 | 114 | ||||||||
| Wyoming | 228,757 | 143,157 | 441,097 | 255,565 | 669,854 | 398,722 | ||||||||
| Total U.S. | 2,252,106 | 728,099 | 1,902,175 | 811,561 | 4,154,281 | 1,539,660 | ||||||||
Substantially all the leases summarized in the preceding table will expire at the end of their respective primary terms unless the existing leases are renewed or production has been obtained from the acreage subject to the lease prior to that date, in which event the lease will remain in effect until
the cessation of production. The following table sets forth the gross and net acres subject to leases summarized in the preceding table that will expire during the periods indicated:
| |
Acres Expiring |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Gross |
Net |
|||
| Twelve Months Ending | |||||
| December 31, 2003 | 118,371 | 49,697 | |||
| December 31, 2004 | 113,767 | 51,684 | |||
| December 31, 2005 | 82,988 | 46,863 | |||
| December 31, 2006 | 84,171 | 43,651 | |||
| December 31, 2007 and later | 1,502,878 | 619,666 | |||
Drilling Activity. The following table summarizes the number of development and exploratory wells drilled by the QMR, including the cost-of-service wells drilled by Wexpro, during the years indicated.
| |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||
| |
Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
Gross |
Net |
||||||||
| Development Wells | ||||||||||||||
| United States | ||||||||||||||
| Completed as natural gas wells | 206 | 143.9 | 238 | 110.4 | 211 | 79.8 | ||||||||
| Completed as oil wells | 9 | 7.0 | 13 | 9.6 | 9 | 1.4 | ||||||||
| Dry holes | 5 | 2.4 | 11 | 4.3 | 12 | 5.0 | ||||||||
| Waiting on completion | 29 | | 46 | | 36 | | ||||||||
| Drilling | 6 | | 10 | | 14 | | ||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||
| Competed as natural gas wells | 8 | 2.1 | 7 | 1.8 | 11 | 1.1 | ||||||||
| Completed as oil wells | 1 | .2 | 2 | .5 | 8 | |||||||||