Back to GetFilings.com




Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)  

ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM            TO            .

Commission File No. 1-8796

QUESTAR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Utah
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  87-0407509
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

180 East 100 South, P.O. Box 45433, Salt Lake City, Utah
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

84145-0433
(Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(801) 324-5000

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of each class
  Name of each exchange on
which registered

Common Stock, Without Par Value, with Common Stock Purchase Rights   New York Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

        The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock, without par value, held by nonaffiliates on February 28, 2003, was $2,257,946,193 (based on the closing price of such stock).

        On February 28, 2003, 82,259,784 shares of the registrant's common stock, without par value, were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference.    Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III. The sections of the Proxy Statement labeled "Committee Report on Executive Compensation" and "Cumulative Total Shareholder Return" are expressly not incorporated into this document.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Heading

   
    PART I

Items 1. and 2.

 

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
        General
        Market Resources, General
        Market Resources, Exploration and Production
        Properties
        Market Resources, Gathering, Processing, Marketing, and Risk Management
        Market Resources, Regulation
        Market Resources, Competition and Customers
        Regulated Services, Introduction
        Regulated Services, Retail Distribution
        Regulated Services, Transmission and Storage
        Regulated Services, Other Services
        Other Operations
        Employees
        Environmental Matters
        Research and Development

Item 3.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Item 4.

 

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

 

PART II

Item 5.

 

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 6.

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Item 7.

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Item 7A.

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Item 8.

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Item 9.

 

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

 

PART III

Item 10.

 

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Item 11.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 12.

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Item 13.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

 

PART IV

Item 14

 

EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

GLOSSARY

SIGNATURES


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT, 2002

PART I

ITEMS 1. AND 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES.

General

        Registrant Questar Corporation ("Questar" or "the Company") is an integrated natural gas company that is involved in the full spectrum of natural gas activities through two divisions—Market Resources and Regulated Services. Market Resources engages in energy development and production; gas gathering and processing; and wholesale gas and hydrocarbon liquids marketing, risk management, and storage. Regulated Services, through two primary subsidiaries, conducts interstate gas transmission and storage activities and retail gas distribution services. The Company is also involved in providing integrated information technology and communication data-hosting services.

        Questar was organized in 1984 and became a publicly held entity when the shareholders of Questar Gas Company ("Questar Gas," then known as Mountain Fuel Supply Company) approved a corporate reorganization. Questar was created to provide organizational and financial flexibility and to achieve a more clearly defined separation of utility and nonutility activities. Questar is a "holding company," as that term is defined in the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, because Questar Gas is a natural gas utility. The Company, however, qualifies for and claims an exemption from provisions of such act applicable to registered holding companies.

        As is noted in the following chart, Questar's Market Resources unit includes a subholding company, Questar Market Resources, Inc. ("QMR"), which owns Wexpro Company ("Wexpro"), Questar Exploration and Production Company ("Questar E&P"), Questar Gas Management Company ("QGM"), and Questar Energy Trading Company ("QET"). Questar's Regulated Services unit also includes a subholding entity—Questar Regulated Services Company ("QRS")—in addition to Questar Gas, Questar Pipeline Company ("Questar Pipeline") and Questar Energy Services, Inc. ("QES").

        The Company's information technology and communication activities are conducted by Questar InfoComm, Inc. ("Questar InfoComm") which, in turn, currently owns approximately 89 percent of Consonus, Inc. ("Consonus").


CHART

        As a diversified provider of energy services, Questar believes that its structure enhances its operating flexibility to take advantage of the earnings growth potential of exploration and production operations, gathering and processing, and wholesale marketing as it continues to take advantage of opportunities to expand its regulated activities through customer additions, new pipeline projects, and expanding hub services. Questar's management is convinced that experience in the various activities along the natural gas value chain—production, gathering, processing, transportation, storage, and distribution—enable the Company to develop and implement strategies for taking advantage of opportunities associated with the expected demand for natural gas and for services relating to the effective use of natural gas. Questar intends to continue emphasizing the ownership of assets—reserves, pipelines, storage reservoirs, and distribution systems, and is committed to operating them efficiently.

        Financial information concerning the Company's lines of business, including information relating to the amount of total revenues contributed by any class of similar products or services responsible for 10 percent or more of consolidated revenues, is presented in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

        The Company's activities are summarized below.

2



Market Resources, General.

        The Market Resources unit is the primary growth area within the Company. Over the next five years, Questar expects to spend approximately 60 percent of its total capital budget in Market Resources, primarily to expand oil and gas reserves through drilling and acquisitions; enlarge an infrastructure of gathering systems, processing plants, and storage facilities; and continue risk management activities. The diversity of activities within the group enhances a basic strategy to pursue complementary growth. As Questar E&P, for example, finds and acquires new reserves, QGM will have opportunities to expand gathering and processing activities, and QET will have more physical production to support its marketing and storage programs.

Market Resources, Exploration and Production

        The Company has been in the exploration and production ("E&P") business since its organization in 1935. Through the ensuing years, the Company's E&P activities have generated substantial economic benefits for the Company and its shareholders and customers and have expanded in size and geographic location. In 2002, QMR sold non-core reserves for attractive prices and expanded production volumes, but its financial results were negatively impacted by lower-than-expected natural gas prices, particularly in the Rocky Mountain region.

        Questar E&P, in its own name and through subsidiaries, conducts a blended program of low-cost development drilling and low-risk reserve acquisition. It has a large inventory of proved undeveloped properties. It will also continue to identify promising exploration prospects and farm them out to entities that are willing to assume the initial drilling risks. (Under farm out arrangements, a party acquires an economic interest in the underlying leases in exchange for assuming the risk and financial responsibility for initial drilling.)

        Questar E&P also maintains a geographical balance and diversity, while focusing its activities in core areas where it has accumulated geological knowledge and has significant expertise. Core areas of activity are the Rocky Mountain region primarily in Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado; and the Midcontinent region primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. During 2002, QMR sold nonstrategic properties in western Canada and the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado.

        Natural gas remains the primary focus of the Company's E&P operations. As of year-end 2002, the Company had proved reserves (excluding Questar Gas's cost-of-service reserves) of 950.4 billion cubic feet ("Bcf") of gas and 27.2 million barrels ("MMbbls") of oil and natural gas liquids ("NGL"), compared to 998.0 Bcf of gas and 31.1 MMbbls of oil and NGL as of the same date in 2001. (The 2001 numbers include Canadian reserves. When Canadian reserves are excluded, the Company had 936.1 Bcf of gas and 27.7 MMbbls of oil and NGL at year-end 2001.)    On an energy-equivalent ratio of six thousand cubic feet ("Mcf") of natural gas to one barrel ("Bbl") of crude oil, natural gas comprised approximately 85.4 percent of proved reserves (excluding cost-of-service reserves) at year-end 2002. Proved developed gas reserves constituted 56.9 percent of the total non-regulated proved gas reserves reported.

        The E&P group's drilling activities occurred in two core operating areas: Midcontinent and Rocky Mountains, including the Uinta Basin in eastern Utah and Pinedale Anticline in western Wyoming. During 2002, the E&P companies and Wexpro, on a combined basis, participated in 277 gross wells (158.1 net), compared to 337 gross wells (130.3 net) in 2001. The 277 wells included 217 gas wells, 10 oil wells, 7 dry holes and 43 wells in progress (drilling, waiting on completion, or being evaluated) at year-end. The overall drilling success (on a net well count basis) in 2002 was 98 percent, compared to 95 percent in 2001.

3



        QMR's Pinedale activities in 2002 continue to merit special emphasis. As of year-end 2002, Questar E&P and Wexpro reported 51 producing wells and two awaiting completion or drilling. Five wells currently producing from the Mesaverde Formation will also be completed in the Lance Formation. Drilling results and initial production tests confirmed reserve expectations of 4.8 to 8.0 Bcfe per well, depending on location and the number of formations drilled. As of December 31, 2002, the gross daily production capacity from the 51 QMR wells in Pinedale was estimated at 126 million cubic feet of gas equivalent ("MMcfe"), compared to 79 MMcfe as of year-end 2001.

        Questar E&P and Wexpro conduct drilling activities in Pinedale when government restrictions and weather conditions permit. On a combined basis, they have an approximate 60 percent average working interest in 14,800 acres in the Mesa Area of the Pinedale Anticline. The original Pinedale drilling program projected 135 to 150 locations, based on 80-acre spacing. The number of potential locations doubled when QMR determined that it was appropriate to drill on the basis of 40-acre spacing. Given the "tight" nature of the sands at Pinedale, QMR is reviewing the economic possibilities of moving to 20-acre spacing.

        QMR's activities in Pinedale illustrate its long-term approach. The underlying leasehold acreage was held by production as a result of three wells drilled much earlier. Pinedale gas reserves are contained in tight sands with a low permeability. While Questar E&P and Wexpro recognized the presence of gas at Pinedale, they did not drill additional wells on the leases until other companies developed new well completion techniques that hydraulically fractured tight sandstone formations over multiple intervals and successfully used such techniques to complete wells in similar tight reservoirs in a nearby field.

        Recently, Questar E&P and Wexpro have established production in the Mesaverde Formation that is geologically similar and immediately beneath the Lance Formation. It is expensive to drill wells in Pinedale; the cost reflects the completion depth of the wells, the need for special handling and multiple stimulations, and governmental orders that impose surface-use limitations and restrict drilling activities to the period between May and December.

        During 2002, QMR aggressively developed the Uinta Basin properties in eastern Utah obtained with the mid-2001 acquisition of Shenandoah Energy, Inc. ("SEI"). QMR drilled or participated in 150 wells in this region during 2002 and increased gross operated production capacity to 107 MMcfe per day by year-end 2002. Financial results were negatively affected by low prices that forced curtailment of production during part of the year. Questar E&P plans to continue drilling activities to maintain current production volumes and will pursue additional drilling to target unrecovered oil volumes from the Green River Formation in addition to gas volumes from the deeper Wasatch Formation.

        Questar E&P's gas production increased from 70.6 Bcf in 2001 to 79.7 Bcf in 2002, despite self-imposed curtailments in response to low Rockies prices. The increase in production was attributable to expanded development activities that more than offset the natural decline in some producing areas and the sale of producing reserves. Questar E&P received an average realized selling price of $2.58 per Mcf in 2002, compared to $3.21 per Mcf in 2001. (Realized prices reflect hedging activities.)

        Gas volumes are produced from two primary regions—the Midcontinent area and the Rocky Mountain area. Production from each of these areas is generally priced below the Henry Hub pricing center in Louisiana, reflecting demand and access to transportation, but prices were significantly higher in the Midcontinent area than in the Rocky Mountains.

        Prices for Rocky Mountain gas volumes declined significantly, reflecting a basis differential of more than $2 per Mcf during some months in 2002, compared to the normal basis differential of $.40-$.60 per Mcf. Prices fell to as low as $.72 per Mcf net-to-the-well for gas volumes, causing Questar E&P to shut in production. The increase in basis differential resulted from an increase in production volumes

4



in the Rocky Mountain area with no expansion of transportation capacity to markets outside the region. Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River") is currently expanding its pipeline system that transports gas from southwestern Wyoming to the California markets. This expansion is scheduled to be in service by mid-2003 and should relieve the problem for the next several years.

        QMR, through QET, is committed to hedging production volumes to remove some volatility from realized prices and resulting net income. For 2003, QMR (excluding cost-of-service volumes) has hedged over 90 percent of production from proved developed producing reserves in the Rocky Mountain area for an average price of $3.04 per Mcf. See Item 7 and Notes 1 and 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

        During 2002, the E&P companies produced 2.8 MMbbls of oil and NGL, compared to 2.5 MMbbls in 2001. The production was sold at an average net realized price of $20.39 per barrel in 2002, compared to $19.22 per barrel in 2001. These prices reflect hedges; unhedged prices for crude oil were higher than hedged prices in 2002 ($22.93 per barrel compared to $20.39 per barrel.)

        Questar E&P continued to generate Section 29 tax credits during 2002, which is the last year that such credits were available under current law. These tax credits are available for production from wells that meet specified criteria, including a requirement that drilling of the wells was commenced prior to January 1, 1993. Eligible properties are often referred to as "tight sands," "coal seams," or "low permeability formations" from which it is generally less economic to produce gas. During 2002, Questar E&P recorded $4.9 million in Section 29 credits, compared to $5.0 million in 2001

        The production of oil and gas is subject to regulation by appropriate federal and state agencies in the United States. In general, these regulatory agencies are authorized to make and enforce regulations to prevent waste of oil and gas, protect the correlative rights and opportunities to produce oil and gas by owners of a common reservoir, and protect the environment. Many leases held or operated by the E&P group are federal leases subject to additional regulatory requirements. As illustrated by the actions taken by the Bureau of Land Management for Pinedale, agencies are generally imposing more restrictions on access to leasehold acreage, thereby increasing the planning time to obtain drilling permits and limiting the E&P group's flexibility to adapt quickly to increase drilling activity.

        Questar E&P maintains regional offices in Denver, Colorado; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

        Wexpro Company.    Wexpro was incorporated in 1976 as a subsidiary of Questar Gas. Questar Gas's efforts to transfer producing properties and leasehold acreage to Wexpro resulted in protracted regulatory proceedings and legal adjudications that ended with a court-approved settlement agreement that was effective August 1, 1981.

        Wexpro, unlike Questar E&P, does not acquire leasehold acreage for exploration activities. It conducts gas and oil development and production activities on certain producing properties located in the Rocky Mountain region under the terms of the settlement agreement. (The terms of the settlement agreement are described in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.) Wexpro produces gas from specified properties for Questar Gas and is reimbursed for its costs plus a return on its successful investment. The after-tax return, which is calculated on net investment adjusted for working capital and deferral taxes, averaged 20.5 percent in 2002. Wexpro's allowed return is adjusted annually based on a specified formula in the settlement agreement. At year-end 2002, Wexpro's net investment base adjusted for working capital and deferred taxes was $164.5 million compared to $161.3 million at year-end 2001. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Wexpro bears all dry hole costs. The settlement agreement is monitored by the Utah Division of Public Utilities, the staff of the Public Service Commission of Wyoming and experts retained by these agencies.

5



        The gas volumes produced by Wexpro for Questar Gas are reflected in the latter's rates at cost-of-service prices. Cost-of-service gas, plus the gas attributable to royalty interest owners, satisfied 45 percent of Questar Gas's system requirements during 2002. Questar Gas relies upon Wexpro's drilling program to develop the properties from which the cost-of-service gas is produced. During 2002, the average wellhead cost (net of revenue credits) of Questar Gas's cost-of-service gas was $2.28 per decatherm ("Dth"), which was lower than Questar Gas's average price for field-purchased gas.

        Wexpro participates in drilling activities in response to the demands of other working interest owners, to protect its rights, and to meet the needs of Questar Gas. Wexpro, in 2002, produced 44.2 Bcfe of natural gas and hydrocarbon liquids from Questar Gas's cost-of-service properties and added reserves of 58.7 Bcfe through drilling activities and reserve estimate revisions.

        Wexpro, under the terms of the Wexpro agreement, owns oil-producing properties. The revenues from the sale of crude oil produced from such properties are used to recover operating expenses and provide Wexpro with a return on its investment. In addition, Wexpro receives 46 percent of any residual income. The remaining income is received by Questar Gas and is used to reduce natural gas costs reflected in customer rates.

        Wexpro has an ownership interest in the wells and facilities related to its oil properties and in the wells and facilities that have been installed to develop and produce gas properties described above since August 1, 1981 (a date specified by the settlement agreement referred to above). Wexpro maintains an office in Rock Springs, Wyoming, in addition to its principal office in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Properties

        Reserves.    The following table sets forth Questar E&P's estimated proved reserves, the estimated future net revenues from the reserves and the standardized measure of discounted net cash flows as of December 31, 2002. These proved reserve volumes do not include cost-of-service reserves managed and developed by Wexpro for Questar Gas. The reserves were collectively estimated by Ryder Scott Company; H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc.; Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.; and Malkewicz Hueni Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. QMR does not have any long-term supply contracts with foreign governments, or reserves of equity investees or of subsidiaries with a significant minority interest. All properties are located in the United States due to the sale of Canadian properties in the last half of 2002.

 
  December 31, 2002
Estimated proved reserves      
  Natural gas (Bcf)     950.4
  Oil and NGL (MMbbls)     27.2
Total proved reserves (Bcfe)     1,113.4
Proved developed reserves (Bcfe)     660.0
Estimated future net revenues before future income taxes (in thousands)(1)   $ 2,576,332
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows (in thousands)(2)   $ 899,626

(1)
Estimated future net revenue represents estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, using average year-end 2002 prices of $3.34 per Mcf for natural gas and $28.46 per barrel for oil and NGL, net of estimated production and development costs (but excluding the effects of general and administrative expenses; debt service; depreciation, depletion and amortization; and income tax expense).

6


(2)
The standardized measure of discounted net cash flows prepared by the Company represent the present value of estimated future net revenues after income taxes, discounted at 10 percent.

        Estimates of the Company's proved reserves and future net revenues are made using sales prices estimated to be in effect as of the date of such reserve estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties (except to the extent a contract specifically provides for escalation). Estimated quantities of proved reserves and future net revenues are affected by natural gas and oil prices, which have fluctuated widely in recent years. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating natural gas and oil reserves and their estimated values, including many factors beyond the control of the producer. The reserve data set forth in this document are estimates.

        Reference should be made to Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for additional information pertaining to the Company's proved natural gas and oil reserves as of the end of each of the last three years.

        QMR will file estimated reserves as of December 31, 2002, with the Energy Information Administration in the Department of Energy on Form EIA-23. Although QMR uses the same technical and economic assumptions when it prepares the EIA-23, it is obligated to report reserves for wells it operates, not for all wells in which it has an interest, and to include the reserves attributable to other owners in such wells.

        The following charts illustrate QMR's reserve statistics for the years ended December 31, 1998 through 2002:


Gas and Oil Reserves (Bcfe)*

Year
  Year-End Reserves
  Annual Production
  Reserve Life (Years)
1998   574.1   65.3   8.8
1999   597.6   76.6   7.8
2000   730.1   82.3   8.9
2001   1,184.4   85.6   13.8
2002   1,113.4   96.3   11.6

*
Does not include cost-of-service reserves managed and developed by Wexpro for Questar Gas.

7



Proportion of Proved Developed to Proved Reserves
and Proportion of Gas Reserves (Bcfe)*

Year
  Total Proved
Reserves

  Proved Developed
Reserves

  Proved Developed
Percent of Total

  Natural Gas Percentage of
Proved Reserves

 
1998   574.1   506.0   88 % 85 %
1999   597.6   503.9   84 % 86 %
2000   730.1   566.4   78 % 88 %
2001   1,184.4   719.7   61 % 84 %
2002   1,113.4   660.0   59 % 85 %

*
Does not include cost-of-service reserves managed and developed by Wexpro for Questar Gas.

        The following table summarizes proved reserves by the Company's major operating areas at December 31, 2002:

 
  Proved Reserves*
  Percent of Total
 
 
  (Bcfe)

   
 
Midcontinent   273.5   25 %
Rocky Mountain Region
(excluding Pinedale and Uinta Basin)
  128.7   11 %
Pinedale Anticline   321.1   29 %
Uinta Basin   390.1   35 %
   
 
 
    1,113.4   100 %
   
 
 

*
Does not include cost-of-service reserves managed and developed by Wexpro for Questar Gas.

        Production.    The following table sets forth the Company's net production volumes, the average sales prices per Mcf of gas, per barrel of oil and per barrel of NGL produced, and the production cost per Mcfe for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Production costs include direct lifting costs (labor, repairs and maintenance, materials, supplies and workovers), and the costs of administration of production offices, insurance and property and severance taxes, but is exclusive of

8



depreciation and depletion applicable to capitalized lease acquisitions, exploration and development expenditures.

 
  Year ended December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
United States (excluding cost-of-service activities)                  
  Volumes produced and sold                  
    Gas (Bcf)     74.9     63.9     61.7
    Oil and NGL (MMbbl)     2.3     1.8     1.5
  Average realized selling price (includes hedges)                  
    Gas (per Mcf)   $ 2.61   $ 3.21   $ 2.80
    Oil and NGL (per Bbl)     20.26     18.14     19.61
  Average selling Price (without hedges)                  
    Gas (per Mcf)   $ 2.17   $ 3.83   $ 3.32
    Oil and NGL (per Bbl)     23.31     23.45     27.66
  Production costs per Mcfe                  
    Lease operating expense   $ .51   $ .55   $ .42
    Production taxes     .20     .29     .27
   
 
 
    Production cost per Mcfe   $ .71   $ .84   $ .69
   
 
 
 
  Year ended December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
Canada                  
  Volumes produced and sold                  
    Gas (Bcf)     4.8     6.7     7.3
    Oil and NGL (MMbbls)     .5     .7     .7
  Average realized selling price (includes hedges)(1)                  
    Gas (per Mcf)   $ 2.22   $ 3.25   $ 2.83
    Oil and NGL (per Bbl)     21.03     21.98     22.29
  Average selling price (without hedges)(1)                  
    Gas (per Mcf)   $ 2.22   $ 3.98   $ 3.05
    Oil and NGL (per Bbl)     21.03     22.35     7.15
  Production costs per Mcfe(1)                  
    Lease operating expense   $ .92   $ .74   $ .72
    Production taxes                 .03
   
 
 
    Production cost per Mcfe   $ .92   $ .74   $ .75
   
 
 

Cost of Service (Wexpro-operated)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Volumes produced                  
    Gas (Bcf)     41.2     37.9     41.5
    Oil and NGL (MMbbl)     .5     .5     .6

(1)
In United States dollars.

9


        Productive Wells.    The following table summarizes QMR's productive wells as of December 31, 2002.(1)(2) All of these wells are located in the United States.


(1)
Although many of QMR's wells produce both gas and oil, a well is categorized as either a gas well or an oil well based upon the ratio of gas to oil production volumes.

(2)
Each well completed to more than one producing zone is counted as a single well. There were 55 gross wells with multiple completions.

Gas Wells
  Oil Wells
  Total Wells
Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
3,427   1,598   885   485   4,312   2,083

        QMR also holds numerous overriding royalty interests in gas and oil wells, a portion of which are convertible to working interests after recovery of certain costs by third parties. After converting to working interests, these overriding royalty interests will be included in QMR's gross and net well count.

        Leasehold Acreage.    The following table summarizes developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage in which the Company owns a working interest as of December 31, 2002. "Undeveloped Acreage" includes (i) leasehold interests that already may have been classified as containing proved undeveloped reserves; and (ii) unleased mineral interest acreage owned by the Company. Excluded from the table is

10


acreage in which the Company's interest is limited to royalty, overriding royalty, and other similar interests.


Leasehold Acreage—December 31, 2002

 
  Developed(1)
  Undeveloped(2)
  Total
 
  Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
United States                        
  Arizona       480   450   480   450
  Arkansas   32,322   10,513   510   400   32,832   10,913
  California   344   112   3,376   1,137   3,720   1,249
  Colorado   160,594   111,941   218,306   96,979   378,900   208,920
  Idaho       44,174   10,642   44,174   10,642
  Illinois   172   39   14,267   3,989   14,439   4,028
  Indiana       1,620   466   1,620   466
  Kansas   134   134   16,000   3,772   16,134   3,906
  Kentucky       13,723   5,468   13,723   5,468
  Louisiana   14,436   9,186   1,230   1,170   15,666   10,356
  Michigan       6,200   1,266   6,200   1,266
  Minnesota       313   104   313   104
  Mississippi   2,862   1,902   1,334   668   4,196   2,570
  Montana   25,285   10,186   308,989   56,590   334,274   66,776
  Nevada   320   280   680   542   1,000   822
  New Mexico   84,273   67,066   36,101   14,879   120,374   81,945
  North Dakota   1,013   371   144,312   21,532   145,325   21,903
  Ohio       202   43   202   43
  Oklahoma   1,469,170   258,418   63,678   39,702   1,532,848   298,120
  Oregon       43,868   7,670   43,868   7,670
  South Dakota       204,398   107,828   204,398   107,828
  Texas   152,409   50,765   60,254   46,360   212,663   97,125
  Utah   79,046   63,915   250,432   124,190   329,478   188,105
  Washington       26,631   10,149   26,631   10,149
  West Virginia   969   114       969   114
  Wyoming   228,757   143,157   441,097   255,565   669,854   398,722
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
Total

 

2,252,106

 

728,099

 

1,902,175

 

811,561

 

4,154,281

 

1,539,660
   
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
Developed acres are acres assignable to productive wells.

(2)
Undeveloped acreage is leased acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas and oil regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves

        Substantially all the leases summarized in the preceding table will expire at the end of their respective primary terms unless the existing leases are renewed or production has been obtained from the acreage subject to the lease prior to that date, in which event the lease will remain in effect until

11



the cessation of production. The following table sets forth the gross and net acres subject to leases summarized in the preceding table that will expire during the periods indicated:

 
  Acres Expiring
 
  Gross
  Net
Twelve Months Ending        
  December 31, 2003   118,371   49,697
  December 31, 2004   113,767   51,684
  December 31, 2005   82,988   46,863
  December 31, 2006   84,171   43,651
  December 31, 2007 and later   1,502,878   619,666

        Drilling Activity.    The following table summarizes the number of development and exploratory wells drilled by the QMR, including the cost-of-service wells drilled by Wexpro, during the years indicated.

 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2002
  2001
  2000
 
  Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
  Gross
  Net
Development Wells                        
  United States                        
    Completed as natural gas wells   206   143.9   238   110.4   211   79.8
    Completed as oil wells   9   7.0   13   9.6   9   1.4
    Dry holes   5   2.4   11   4.3   12   5.0
    Waiting on completion   29     46     36  
    Drilling   6     10     14    
  Canada                        
    Competed as natural gas wells   8   2.1   7   1.8   11   1.1
    Completed as oil wells   1   .2   2   .5   8   2.3
    Dry holes   1   .4   1   .1   2   1.1
    Waiting on completion   1         2  
    Drilling           1  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Total Development Wells   266   156.0   328   126.7   306   90.7
   
 
 
 
 
 

12



 


 

2002


 

2001