UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| (Mark One) | |
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 | |
| or | |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to | |
Commission file number 0-21196
Mothers Work, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
13-3045573 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
| 456 North Fifth Street, Philadelphia, PA (Address of principal executive offices) |
19123 (Zip Code) |
|
| (215) 873-2200 Registrant's telephone number, including area code |
||
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | ||
| Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|---|---|---|
| None | N/A |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: | ||
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights (Title of class) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý .
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of March 28, 2002, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $49,598,879.
On December 20, 2002, there were 5,265,348 shares of the Registrant's common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on February 7, 2003 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
General
We are the leading designer and retailer of maternity apparel in the United States with 909 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada. We operate our stores under the Motherhood Maternity® ("Motherhood"), Mimi Maternity® ("Mimi") and A Pea in the Pod® brands and also sell our merchandise on the Internet at our MaternityMall.com and brand-specific websites. In a high-service store environment, our strategy is to fulfill all of an expectant mother's clothing needs, including casual and career wear, formal attire, underwear and outerwear. We use a vertically integrated business model to ensure that we offer the broadest assortment of in-stock, fashionable merchandise. Our three retail brands collectively target all of the price segments in maternity apparel, ranging from Motherhood at value prices to A Pea in the Pod at luxury prices. Our stores include 146 leased departments, primarily Motherhood-branded, within department and specialty stores. We have achieved 12.9% compounded annual sales growth over the past five years, resulting in sales of $453.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002. We plan to open approximately 100 new stores in fiscal 2003, net of store closings, primarily under the Motherhood Maternity brand and, to a lesser extent, the Mimi Maternity brand.
Mothers Work was founded by Dan and Rebecca Matthias in 1982 as a mail order maternity apparel catalog. We began operating retail stores in 1985 and completed our initial public offering in 1993. We acquired Motherhood and A Pea in the Pod in 1995 and eSpecialty Brands, LLC ("iMaternity") in October 2001 to increase our industry presence, address multiple price points in maternity apparel and improve operating productivity. Since the acquisitions of Motherhood and A Pea in the Pod, we have developed and grown these brands along with our Mimi brand. In connection with each of our acquisitions, we have consolidated some overlapping locations and closed under-performing stores, resulting in increased sales per square foot and better absorption of store overhead.
Retail Concepts
Motherhood. Motherhood serves the value-priced portion of the maternity apparel industry with the greatest number of customers and is our largest chain, with 616 stores as of September 30, 2002. Motherhood is positioned with everyday low prices, broad assortment, fashion and quality. We believe that the Motherhood customer shops at moderate-priced department stores and discount stores when she is not expecting. Motherhood stores average approximately 1,500 square feet and are located primarily in enclosed malls, strip and power centers and central city business districts. Motherhood stores include 92 outlet locations that carry predominantly Motherhood-branded product, as well as some closeout merchandise. In addition, as of September 30, 2002, we operate 132 Motherhood leased departments in department and specialty stores such as Macy's, Rich's, Lazarus and Babies "R" Us. Between 1998 and 2000, we successfully broadened Motherhood's customer base by lowering price points approximately 40% to 45%. This new price position significantly expanded the brand's target market, increased revenues per store and increased unit volumes. We opened 93 new Motherhood stores and outlets in fiscal 2002, net of store closings. The Motherhood stores opened in fiscal 2002 include 58 conversions from acquired iMaternity locations. We currently have 10 Motherhood stores in Canada, of which 2 were opened after September 30, 2002, and believe that we can open additional stores in Canada, as well as in other international locations. We may also have the opportunity to grow the number of our Motherhood leased departments in the United States.
Mimi. As of September 30, 2002, we had 104 Mimi stores that serve the middle market price segment of the maternity apparel industry. The brand is positioned as young, contemporary, fun and affordable. We believe that the Mimi customer shops at department stores and specialty apparel chains when she is not expecting. Mimi stores average approximately 1,600 square feet and are located
2
primarily in regional malls, lifestyle centers and central business districts. The stores carry Mimi-branded product, as well as a small selection of maternity merchandise developed by contemporary vendors exclusively for Mimi. We opened 30 Mimi stores in fiscal 2002, excluding leased departments and net of store closings. The Mimi stores opened in fiscal 2002 include 20 conversions from acquired iMaternity locations. As of September 30, 2002, we also operate 13 Mimi leased departments in Marshall Field's and Bloomingdale's. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, one Mimi store was opened in Canada. Mimi was historically price positioned just below A Pea in the Pod. When Motherhood's prices were lowered, there was an opportunity for Mimi to broaden its customer base by including lower price points. Mimi was, therefore, recently repositioned and its merchandise price points now range from just above Motherhood to the lower end of A Pea in the Pod. This repositioning has resulted in an expansion of Mimi's target market, and we believe that we now have the opportunity to significantly increase the number of Mimi stores over time.
A Pea in the Pod. A Pea in the Pod is the premier maternity brand in the United States. The brand is positioned as exclusive, designer and aspirational. As of September 30, 2002, our 43 A Pea in the Pod stores average approximately 2,300 square feet and are located in the most upscale venues, including Madison Avenue, Oak Street, Beverly Hills, South Coast Plaza and Bal Harbour. We also operate one A Pea in the Pod leased department in the Macy's flagship store in Herald Square in New York City. In addition to offering A Pea in the Pod and Mimi brands, we seek out designer and contemporary manufacturers and help them develop maternity versions of their styles exclusively for our A Pea in the Pod stores. Publicity, including celebrities wearing our clothes, is an important part of the marketing and positioning of the brand. As scarcity is part of the concept's luxury image, we have chosen to further develop the brand primarily by optimizing our customers' in-store experience rather than by opening new stores. We therefore continuously upgrade the quality of the locations, our store designs, the product styling and our publicity to enhance our brand image.
Our Competitive Strengths
We are the leader in maternity apparel. We are the only nationwide chain of maternity specialty stores in the United States and believe that our brands are the most recognized in maternity apparel. We have established a broad distribution network, with stores in a wide range of geographic areas and retailing venues. In addition, we have a leading position at every price point of maternity apparel through our three distinct brands. Our leadership position enables us to gain a unique understanding of the needs of our maternity customers, as well as keep abreast of fashion and product developments. We enhance our leadership position, increase market penetration and further build our brands by operating leased departments in department and baby specialty stores.
We offer a wide product assortment. A primary consideration for expectant mothers shopping for maternity clothes is product assortment, as pregnant women need to replace almost their entire wardrobe. We believe that we offer the widest selection of merchandise in the maternity apparel industry. We also offer product for multiple seasons, as pregnant women's clothing needs vary depending on their due date. Our ability to offer a broad assortment of product is due, in large part, to our vertically integrated business model, which includes our extensive in-house design and contract manufacturing capabilities, as well as our rapid inventory replenishment system.
We are vertically integrated. We design, contract manufacture and distribute approximately 90% of our merchandise. We believe that vertical integration enables us to offer the widest product selection in maternity apparel, to respond quickly to fashion trends and to ensure industry-leading in-stock levels. We combine our in-house design expertise, domestic and international sourcing capabilities, a rapid inventory replenishment process and extensive proprietary systems to enhance operational and financial results.
3
We utilize a rapid inventory replenishment system. Since maternity apparel is a niche industry, store profitability is optimized in smaller store formats. We are able to profitably offer a wide selection of merchandise in stores averaging approximately 1,600 square feet due, in large part, to our rapid inventory replenishment system. Our proprietary system enables us to offer more than 3,000 stock keeping units, or SKUs, per store without dedicating retail space to storage. We coordinate the rapid replenishment of inventory for all of our stores through our distribution center, which sends individually tailored selections to specific store locations between two and six times per week.
We have proprietary systems that support our business. In order to support our vertically integrated business model, we have developed a fully integrated, proprietary enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. This system includes point-of-sale (POS) systems, our TrendTrack merchandise analysis and planning system, our materials requirement planning (MRP) system and our web-based, global sourcing and logistics systems. These systems also support our automated picking and sorting systems and other aspects of our logistics infrastructure. We believe that our proprietary systems are critical to our competitive strengths of offering a broad product assortment, responding quickly to fashion trends, helping to reduce manufacturing costs and rapidly replenishing inventory in our stores.
We are able to obtain prime real estate locations. We believe that we are able to obtain attractive real estate locations due to the brand awareness of our concepts, our multiple price point approach and our sought after maternity customer. We are the only maternity apparel retailer to provide mall operators with the ability to choose from three differently priced concepts, depending on the mall's target demographics. We are also able to provide multiple stores for malls that want to offer their maternity customers a range of price alternatives. In addition, in the case of multi-mall operators, we have the flexibility to supply packages of stores in multiple malls. As a result, we have been able to locate stores in many of what we believe are the most desirable shopping malls in the country and are able to obtain attractive locations within these malls.
We have a highly experienced management team. Dan Matthias, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Rebecca Matthias, President and Chief Operating Officer, founded the company 20 years ago and are leaders in maternity apparel retailing. In recent years, we have added to our management team and have a management team with significant experience in all aspects of the retail and apparel business.
The Maternity Apparel Industry
We are unaware of any data on the size of the maternity apparel industry. However, based on our own analysis, we believe there are approximately $1.2 billion of maternity clothes sold each year in the United States. In addition, we believe that there is an opportunity to grow the market by selling maternity clothes to pregnant women who currently purchase loose-fitting or larger-sized non-maternity clothing as a substitute for maternity wear. We also believe that the market can grow by reducing the amount of "hand-me-down" and "borrowing" associated with maternity apparel. This opportunity is particularly relevant in the value-priced segment where low-priced, fashionable apparel could provide an economical alternative to secondhand maternity wear. Further, we believe that the demand for maternity apparel is relatively stable when compared to non-maternity apparel. Expectant mothers continue to need to replace their clothes and the current rate of approximately four million U.S. births per year has remained stable over the last decade. We believe that maternity apparel is also less fashion sensitive than specialty apparel in general, as demand is driven by the need to replace wardrobe basics as opposed to current fashion trends.
Brands
We operate our maternity stores under three concepts offering a full range of casual and career wear, formal attire, underwear and outerwear. We have positioned our three brands to target the entire
4
spectrum of pregnant women, serving a smaller customer base at the highest price points and broadening the market as the price points are reduced. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our portfolio of stores as of September 30, 2002, including each store concept's target location, brand positioning, price range for dresses and average store size:
| Brand |
Description of Target Location |
Brand Positioning |
Dress Price Range |
Average Store Size (square feet) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motherhood |
Moderate regional malls and department stores |
Broad assortment, fashion, quality and everyday low price |
$17-$69 |
1,500 |
||||
Mimi |
Mid-priced regional malls and lifestyle centers |
Young, contemporary, fun and affordable |
$40-$168 |
1,600 |
||||
A Pea in the Pod |
Exclusive, high-end regional malls and affluent residential areas |
Exclusive, designer and aspirational |
$150-$450 |
2,300 |
Major regional malls with several department stores and a wide range of price points may be able to accommodate more than one maternity store. We have the ability to address multiple price alternatives at a given mall, with Motherhood as our value-oriented brand, Mimi as our mid-priced brand and A Pea in the Pod as our luxury brand. As of September 30, 2002, we had at least two of our store concepts in 63 major regional malls.
Internet Operations
We believe that many pregnant women turn to the Internet for maternity-related information and products, including on-line purchases of maternity clothes. Our websites are therefore important for educating existing and potential customers about our brands and driving traffic to our stores. Our websites profitably sell merchandise and provide store location information. Each of our concepts has its own dedicated website that is reached primarily through the brand name, for example Motherhood.com. Our content site and portal, MaternityMall.com, is another likely way for a consumer to reach one of our brand-specific websites. In addition to providing links to all of our websites, MaternityMall.com contains maternity advice and information, related baby product information and editorial content. We also operate the iMaternity.com website, which is currently featured on iVillage.com and sells Motherhood merchandise. The replenishment capabilities of our distribution center and stores enable us to incorporate Internet fulfillment into our existing operations.
Brand-Specific Operations Teams
To obtain maximum efficiencies, we are organized primarily along functional lines, such as merchandising, store operations, design and production. Since our business consists of three separate brands requiring decisions on a brand-specific basis, we have recently built teams by brand where the functional leaders for each brand work together. Each brand team is led by the head merchant, except for Motherhood which is led by the division president, and includes the director of stores for that brand, the head designer, the head planner and the key production manager. These teams also include visual, fabric purchasing and other necessary professionals. All senior members of each brand team are eligible for a bonus based on the cash flow target for that brand.
5
Store Operations
Typically, the maternity customer, especially the first-time mother, seeks more advice and assistance than the typical non-maternity customer. Therefore, we aim to employ skilled, motivated sales associates who are trained to provide the high level of service and reassurance needed by our customers. We attempt to provide a boutique level of attentive service that differentiates us from our competitors, particularly so from moderate and discount stores. Our centralized merchandising and store operations also enable our store associates to focus primarily on selling and maintaining the appearance of the stores. In addition, visual merchants coordinate with the merchandising department to develop space allocation plans, design store display windows and define and enhance the product presentation.
Each of our three store brands has a director of stores. At Motherhood and Mimi, the management reporting chain consists of regional managers, district managers and store managers. At A Pea in the Pod, due to its smaller number of stores, the district managers report to the director of stores. Our store, district and regional managers are eligible to receive incentive-based compensation related to store-level performance.
Merchandising, Design and Inventory Planning
Merchandising. We strive to maintain an appropriate balance between new merchandise and proven styles, as well as between basic and fashion items. Our merchandising decisions are based on current fashion trends, as well as input from our designers and outside vendors. This information is used in conjunction with the item-specific sales data provided by our proprietary merchandising and replenishment system. Each brand has its own team of merchants, designers and planners. These teams are led by the head merchant of the brand, except for Motherhood, which is led by the division president. The head merchants and the President of Motherhood report to the Executive Vice President-General Merchandise Manager.
Design. Our design department creates and produces samples and patterns for our manufactured products under the guidance of the merchandising department. This capability differentiates us from many of our competitors, who source their products from a limited number of maternity wear vendors. The design of our products begins with a review of European and New York runway trends, current non-maternity retail trends, fashion reporting service slides and fabric samples. The designers review our best selling items from prior seasons and integrate current fashion ideas from the non-maternity apparel segment.
Inventory Planning and Allocation. Our planning and allocation department is responsible for planning future inventory purchases and markdowns, as well as targeting overall inventory levels and turnover. We establish target inventories for each store using our inventory planning system with the goals of optimizing our merchandise assortment and turnover, maintaining adequate depth of merchandise by style and managing closeout and end-of-season merchandise consolidation. Our proprietary capabilities enable us to continually monitor and respond more quickly to consumer demand and are integral to our inventory management program. These capabilities are facilitated by our TrendTrack system, which provides daily product sell-through data and merchandising information.
Production and Distribution
We design and manage the production for approximately 90% of our merchandise. We contract our sewing to factories throughout the world, including domestic facilities, and we continue to seek additional contractors for our sourcing needs. No individual contractor represents a material portion of our sewing. A majority of our merchandise is purchased "full package," as finished products made to our specifications, typically utilizing our patterns, markers and designs. Fabric, trim and other supplies
6
are obtained from a variety of sources. As we have expanded our stores and increased volumes, we have been able to reduce our product costs, thereby increasing gross margins.
Our production and quality assurance personnel monitor production at contractor facilities in the United States and work with our agents abroad to ensure quality control, compliance with our design specifications and timely delivery of finished goods. This quality control effort is enhanced by our worldwide Internet-based contracting and logistics systems, which include advanced features such as measurement specifications and digital photography. We also use an established, recognized third party to monitor working conditions at our contractors' facilities on a worldwide basis.
Finished garments from contractors and other manufacturers are received at our distribution facility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where they are inspected using statistical sampling methods and stored for picking. Our distribution facility utilizes the latest fulfillment technology to serve as a replenishment center, as opposed to solely a distribution center. The facility sends an individually tailored selection from our approximately 25,000 SKUs to our store locations two to six times per week. Store replenishment decisions are made automatically based upon target inventories established by the allocation department and individual store sales data. Shipments from the distribution facility use several automated systems, including our pick-to-light system for flat-packed goods and our hanging garment sortation system, which speed deliveries and reduce costs.
Shipments to stores are tracked by our proprietary delivery tracking software. Freight routed through zone-skipping, over-the-road carriers running 24 hours per day and delivered locally by a variety of local carriers is supplemented by a small percentage of second-day air, providing one to three-day delivery to our store locations.
Management Information and Control Systems
We believe that our proprietary systems are instrumental to our ability to offer the broadest assortment of maternity merchandise and accomplish rapid replenishment of inventory. We continuously develop, maintain and upgrade our systems and currently employ an in-house team of programmers. Our stores have point-of-sale terminals that provide information used in our customized TrendTrack merchandise analysis and planning system. This system provides daily financial and merchandising information that is integral to monitoring trends and making merchandising decisions. The TrendTrack system has numerous features designed to integrate our retail operations with our design, manufacturing and financial functions. These features include custom merchandise profiles for each store, rapid inventory replenishment, item-tracking providing daily updated selling information for every style, classification open-to-buy and inventory control, as well as the daily collection of credit card sales data.
As part of our proprietary ERP system, we employ a comprehensive MRP system to manage our production inventories, documentation, work orders and scheduling. This system provides a perpetual inventory of raw materials, actual job costing, scheduling and bill of materials capabilities. The foundation of our ERP system is a perpetual inventory of finished goods by location across all of our retail stores, which interfaces directly with our distribution facility.
We are in the process of rolling out a proprietary, upgraded point-of-sale system to our stores. This Internet-based system provides real-time access to financial and merchandising information in addition to rapid credit authorization. We believe that this new system will significantly reduce the amount of training required for new sales associates and store managers. In addition, we anticipate that the system will improve our customer relationship management capabilities by allowing the creation of customized promotional and marketing strategies. The rollout of this system to stores is scheduled to continue through fiscal 2003.
7
Given the importance of our management information systems, we have taken extensive measures to ensure their responsiveness and security. Our hardware and communications systems are based on a redundant and multiprocessing architecture, which allows their continued operation on a parallel system in the event that there is a disruption within the primary system. Our main computer system, located in our Philadelphia facility, is duplicated by a fully mirrored system in a separate part of the building that can assume full operations. In addition, our software programs and data are backed up and stored off-site. Our communications links come from two telephone frame rooms, are delivered through feeds under two streets and are further backed up by microwave links.
Pricing
Each of our brands targets customers in different price points of the maternity apparel industry. Our Motherhood brand is positioned primarily on everyday low prices, Mimi employs middle-market pricing and A Pea in the Pod employs luxury pricing. None of our concepts use point-of-sale high/low promotional strategies to drive traffic into the stores. Our price reductions are permanent and are used to accelerate the sale of slower selling merchandise. Merchandise that is selling slowly is quickly marked down, moved to another store where the item is selling faster or moved to a Motherhood outlet store.
Advertising and Marketing
We believe that the power of our brands, customer referrals and our convenient mall locations drive traffic into our stores. Therefore, we have modest advertising and marketing expenditures. Our advertising and publicity efforts include in-store marketing, prenatal consumer-targeted advertising and our Internet websites. We also run full-page ads for all of our brands in pregnancy-targeted publications, as well as prenatal issues of leading baby magazines. We advertise in several key prenatal magazines, including American Baby, Pregnancy and Shape Fit Pregnancy. A Pea in the Pod and Mimi are also advertised in fashion magazines, such as Vogue and In Style. In addition, we produce and distribute maternity brochures quarterly to obstetric and gynecological offices, as well as to customers, doctors' offices and hospitals upon request. Certain initiatives that we began in fiscal 2000 to drive editorial coverage in magazines, TV and newsprint were focused initially on A Pea in the Pod and have recently been expanded to include Motherhood and Mimi.
Competition
Our business is highly competitive. The following are several important factors in competing successfully in the retail industry: breadth of selection in sizes; colors and styles of merchandise; product procurement and pricing; ability to anticipate fashion trends and customer preferences; inventory control; reputation; quality of merchandise; store design and location; and advertising and customer service. We face competition in our maternity apparel lines from various sources, including department stores, specialty retail chains, discount stores, independent retail stores and catalog and Internet-based retailers. In the value-priced maternity apparel business, we face competition from retailers such as JC Penney, Kmart, Kohl's, Target, Sears and Wal-Mart, as well as web-based maternity operations, including those of Gap and Old Navy. Gap and Old Navy also currently offer a selection of maternity clothes in selected stores, and the former has announced plans to carry a selection of maternity clothes in certain of its Baby Gap stores. Many of these competitors are larger and have significantly greater financial resources than us. Our mid- and luxury-priced merchandise faces a highly fragmented competitive landscape that includes locally based, single unit retailers, as well as a handful of multi-unit maternity operations, none of which have more than twelve stores.
8
iMaternity Acquisition
On October 17, 2001, we acquired iMaternity which, at the time of the acquisition, operated a total of 166 Dan Howard and Mothertime Maternity clothing stores, including some under the trade name iMaternity, as well as the iMaternity.com website. Consistent with our plan, we closed 88 of the iMaternity stores where we believed we could transfer a sufficient portion of the sales to our existing stores within the same market while eliminating acquired store expenses and improving inventory utilization. We converted the remaining iMaternity stores to either Motherhood or Mimi locations. We also consolidated the iMaternity field sales organization and closed the acquired iMaternity headquarters, manufacturing facilities and Internet development center as part of our integration plan.
Employees
At September 30, 2002, we had 2,471 full-time and 2,154 part-time employees. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good.
Executive Officers of the Company
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers:
| Name |
Age |
Position |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan W. Matthias | 59 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Rebecca C. Matthias | 49 | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
| David Mangini | 58 | Executive Vice PresidentGeneral Merchandise Manager | ||
| Edward M. Krell | 40 | Senior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer |
Dan W. Matthias founded Mothers Work in 1982 and has served as Chairman of the Board since our inception. From 1983 to 1993, he served as our Executive Vice President, and since January 1993, Mr. Matthias has been our Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Mothers Work, Mr. Matthias had been involved in the computer and electronics industry, serving as a director of Zilog, Inc. and as the President of a division of a subsidiary of Exxon Corporation.
Rebecca C. Matthias founded Mothers Work in 1982 and has served as a director and our President since our inception. Since January 1993, Ms. Matthias has served as our Chief Operating Officer. In 1992, she was chosen as "Regional Entrepreneur of the Year" by Inc. magazine and Merrill Lynch Corporation. Prior to 1982, she was a construction engineer for the Gilbane Building Company. Ms. Matthias also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of Drexel University.
David Mangini has served as Executive Vice President-General Merchandise Manager since August 2001. Prior to joining Mothers Work, Mr. Mangini served as Today's Man's Chief Merchandising Officer from 1999 to 2000. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Mangini served as Chief Operating Officer of Gadzooks. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Mangini was an officer at Limited, Inc., including President and Chief Executive Officer of its Structure brand.
Edward M. Krell has served as Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer since January 2002. Prior to joining Mothers Work, Mr. Krell served as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Mammoth Sports Group, Inc., an Internet and catalog retailer of golf equipment and accessories from December 1999 to July 2000 and as an independent financial consultant from July 2000 to January 2002. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Krell served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at London Fog Industries, Inc., a wholesale and retail distributor of rainwear and outerwear. Mr. Krell began his career as an investment banker with Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated.
9
Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. Other than the husband and wife relationship between Dan and Rebecca Matthias, there are no family relationships among any of our other executive officers.
Trademarks
We own trademark and service mark rights that we believe are sufficient to conduct our business as currently operated. We own several trademarks, including Mothers Work®, A Pea in the Pod®, Mimi Maternity®, Motherhood®, Motherhood Maternity Outlet®, Steena® and MaternityMall.com®. As a result of the iMaternity acquisition, we also own iMaternity®, Dan Howard®, Mothertime® and iMaternity.com marks. Additionally, we own the marks Real Time Retailing®, What's Showing is Your Style®, Motherhood is Everything Good... and Maternity Redefined®. We are not aware of any pending claims of infringement or other challenges to our rights or to the use of our marks.
We own our principal executive offices and distribution facility, which is located at 456 North Fifth Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19123, subject to a mortgage under the terms of which we owe approximately $3.3 million as of September 30, 2002. This facility consists of approximately 312,000 square feet, of which 32,000 square feet is dedicated to office space and the remaining square footage to warehousing and distribution. Our lease for a fabric facility space located at 10430 Drummond Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19152, expired on November 30, 2002. On August 26, 2002, we entered into a 10-year lease for a facility located at 2001 Kitty Hawk Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the Philadelphia Naval Business Center. The area leased at this facility consists of approximately 64,000 square feet of warehouse and office space. To facilitate our store expansions in Canada, we entered into a three-year lease commencing November 1, 2002 for approximately 12,000 square feet of warehouse and office space in Mississauga, Ontario in Canada. We believe that these facilities, together with our existing distribution facility, will be adequate to support our anticipated distribution needs over the next few years. Our facilities are subject to state and local regulations that range from building codes to health and safety.
We lease our store premises for terms averaging from seven to ten years. Certain leases allow us to terminate our obligations in the event that the applicable store does not achieve a specified sales volume. Some of these leases also provide for contingent payments based on sales volume, escalations of the base rent, as well as increases in operating costs, marketing costs and real estate taxes.
As of September 30, 2002, the following number of store leases, excluding leased departments, are set to expire as listed in the table below. We do not expect the expiration of any leases to have a materially adverse impact on our business or operations.
| Fiscal Year Leases Expire |
Number of Stores |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 86 | |
| 2004 | 115 | |
| 2005 | 88 | |
| 2006 | 74 | |
| 2007 | 81 | |
| 2008 and later | 319 | |
| Total | 763 | |
In addition, we have arrangements with department and specialty stores, including Bloomingdale's, Lazarus, Marshall Field's, Macy's, Rich's and Babies "R" Us to lease maternity departments in their stores. These leased departments typically involve the lease partner collecting all of the revenue from
10
the leased department and remitting all but a fixed percentage to us. In most of the arrangements, we provide staffing for the leased departments.
On July 17, 2002, a purported class action was filed against us in the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County. The complaint alleges that, under California law, certain former and current employees should have received overtime compensation, meal breaks and rest breaks. We are currently a party to an action alleging similar claims under Washington law in Spokane County Superior Court. The plaintiffs in these cases are seeking unspecified actual damages, penalties and attorneys' fees. At this stage in these proceedings, we are unable to predict the outcome of these cases, which we are vigorously defending. As appropriate, we have undertaken preliminary steps to mediate certain of these claims. We understand that similar proceedings have been brought in California against other retail companies.
In addition, from time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Although the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to currently pending actions, including the matters specifically described above, cannot be accurately predicted, we do not believe that the resolution of any pending action will have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable.
11
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "MWRK." The following table sets forth for the periods indicated below the reported high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
| |
High |
Low |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2001: | ||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, 2000 | $ | 11.00 | $ | 6.00 | ||
| Quarter ended March 31, 2001 | 9.38 | 7.00 | ||||
| Quarter ended June 30, 2001 | 8.10 | 7.07 | ||||
| Quarter ended September 30, 2001 | 11.90 | 7.50 | ||||
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2002: |
||||||
| Quarter ended December 31, 2001 | $ | 9.75 | $ | 6.90 | ||
| Quarter ended March 31, 2002 | 16.75 | 8.95 | ||||
| Quarter ended June 30, 2002 | 40.25 | 15.16 | ||||
| Quarter ended September 30, 2002 | 40.10 | 26.00 | ||||
As of December 20, 2002, there were 426 holders of record and 2,011 estimated beneficial holders of our common stock.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our initial public offering and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our new senior notes significantly restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. Further, our credit facility prohibits us from declaring or paying dividends. Even if we were not prohibited by our credit facility or restricted under the terms of our new senior notes from being able to pay dividends, any future payment of dividends would still be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based upon certain restrictive financial covenants, earnings, capital requirements and our financial condition, among other factors, at the time any such dividend is considered.
12
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data
The following tables set forth selected consolidated statement of operations data, pro forma statement of operations data, operating data, cash flow and other data, and balance sheet data as of and for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal years presented below are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. You should read this information in conjunction with the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report.
| |
Year Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|||||||||||||
| |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | 453,159 | $ | 388,306 | $ | 366,283 | $ | 299,735 | $ | 298,991 | ||||||||
| Cost of goods sold(1) | 211,689 | 194,320 | 183,300 | 150,402 | 158,047 | |||||||||||||
| Gross profit | 241,470 | 193,986 | 182,983 | 149,333 | 140,944 | |||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 207,728 | 172,795 | 157,809 | 127,390 | 139,322 | |||||||||||||
| Restructuring charges(2) | - | | | | 10,635 | |||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 33,742 | 21,191 | 25,174 | 21,943 | (9,013 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | (13,961 | ) | (14,867 | ) | (15,877 | ) | (15,132 | ) | (15,181 | ) | ||||||||
| Other income | | 594 | | | | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary item | 19,781 | 6,918 | 9,297 | 6,811 | (24,194 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Income tax provision (benefit) | 7,358 | 3,456 | 4,249 | 3,424 | (7,477 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before extraordinary item | 12,423 | 3,462 | 5,048 | 3,387 | (16,717 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, net of tax(3) | 1,635 | | | | | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 10,788 | 3,462 | 5,048 | 3,387 | (16,717 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock | 3,942 | 1,491 | 1,389 | 1,251 | 1,168 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders(3) | $ | 6,846 | $ | 1,971 | $ | 3,659 | $ | 2,136 | $ | (17,885 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) per shareBasic: |
||||||||||||||||||
| Before extraordinary item | $ | 2.17 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 0.60 | $ | (5.00 | ) | |||||||
| Extraordinary loss | (0.42 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) per shareBasic | $ | 1.75 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 0.60 | $ | (5.00 | ) | |||||||
| Income (loss) per shareDiluted: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Before extraordinary item | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.57 | $ | (5.00 | ) | |||||||
| Extraordinary loss | (0.38 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) per shareDiluted(3) | $ | 1.61 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.57 | $ | (5.00 | ) | |||||||
| Average shares outstandingBasic | 3,914 | 3,456 | 3,443 | 3,538 | 3,577 | |||||||||||||
| Average shares outstandingDiluted | 4,261 | 3,605 | 3,641 | 3,754 | 3,577 | |||||||||||||
13
| |
Year Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
|||||||||||||
| |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|||||||||||||||||
| Pro Forma Statement of Operations Data(4): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders(3) | $ | 6,846 | $ | 1,971 | $ | 3,659 | $ | 2,136 | $ | (17,885 | ) | |||||||
| Goodwill amortization | | 2,207 | 2,216 | 2,216 | 2,218 | |||||||||||||
| Pro forma net income (loss) available to common stockholders(3) | $ | 6,846 | $ | 4,178 | $ | 5,875 | $ | 4,352 | $ | (15,667 | ) | |||||||
| Income (loss) per shareBasic: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Before extraordinary item | $ | 2.17 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 1.23 | $ | (4.38 | ) | |||||||
| Extraordinary loss | (0.42 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) per shareBasic | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 1.23 | $ | (4.38 | ) | |||||||
| Income (loss) per shareDiluted: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Before extraordinary item | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 1.16 | $ | (4.38 | ) | |||||||
| Extraordinary loss | (0.38 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) per shareDiluted(3) | $ | 1.61 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.61 | $ | 1.16 | $ | (4.38 | ) | |||||||
14
| |
Year Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||||||||||
| |
(in thousands, except ratios and operating data) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Data(1): | |||||||||||||||||||
| Same store sales increase (decrease)(2) | 2.2 | % | (2.4 | )% | 8.3 | % | 12.9 | % | 13.4 | % | |||||||||
| Average net sales per gross square foot(3) | $ | 363 | $ | 365 | $ | 390 | $ | 382 | $ | 354 | |||||||||
| Average net sales per store(3) | $ | 517,000 | $ | 520,000 | $ | 545,000 | $ | 521,000 | $ | 455,000 | |||||||||
| Gross square footage at period end(4) | 1,313,000 | 1,100,000 | 980,000 | 856,000 | 741,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of stores at period end | |||||||||||||||||||
| Motherhood Maternity | 616 | 523 | 480 | 416 | 345 | ||||||||||||||
| Mimi Maternity | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||