Back to GetFilings.com
================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM 10-K
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to _____
_______________
Commission File Number: 001-11747
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
Delaware 22-6650372
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. ID)
1900 MARKET STREET, SUITE 701
PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19103
(215) 751-1900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value Nasdaq National Market
----------------------------- ----------------------
Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants (Name of exchange on which registered)
- -----------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _____
-----
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ____
The approximate aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant was $90,007,431 as of June 20, 2000. The number of shares of the
registrant's common stock outstanding as of June 20, 2000 was 28,194,194.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III of this report, to the extent not set forth
herein, is incorporated by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy
statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2000,
which definitive proxy statement shall be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report
relates.
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2000
INDEX
Page
----
PART 1............................................................................................. 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS............................................................................... 1
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES............................................................................. 9
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS...................................................................... 9
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.................................... 10
PART II............................................................................................ 11
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS............................... 11
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION......................................................... 12
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.. 13
YEAR 2000 READINESS................................................................................ 18
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.............................. 20
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA............................................ 21
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE... 45
PART III........................................................................................... 46
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT..................................... 46
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION................................................................. 46
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT......................... 46
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS......................................... 46
PART IV............................................................................................ 47
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K...................... 47
SIGNATURES......................................................................................... 51
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Form 10-K constitute "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from
any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important
factors include, among others: dependence on arrangements with self-regulatory
organizations; dependence on proprietary technology; technological changes and
costs of technology; industry trends; competition; ability to develop markets;
changes in business strategy or development plans; availability, terms and
deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; changes in
government regulation; general economic and business conditions; and other
factors referenced in this Form 10-K.
PART 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Ashton Technology Group, Inc. ("Ashton", or the "Registrant")
(collectively with its subsidiaries and affiliated companies, the "Company") was
formed as a Delaware corporation in February 1994 to engage in the development
and commercialization of online transaction systems for participants in the U.S.
and international financial markets. The Company's objective was to take
advantage of commercial opportunities through the application of advanced
telecommunication and computing technologies to the area of financial electronic
commerce ("e-commerce").
During the past two years, Ashton's strategic plan has transitioned the
Company into an evolving network of affiliated companies that develop and market
technology-based products and services which provide businesses and consumers
unique execution of financial transactions within global electronic
marketplaces. Ashton utilizes advanced telecommunication, computing, data and
information security, and Internet technologies, to develop electronic
transaction and distribution systems and products for the global financial
services industry. As of March 31, 2000, Ashton's subsidiaries and affiliated
companies include:
1) Universal Trading Technologies Corporation ("UTTC"(TM)).
2) Electronic Market Center, Inc. ("eMC"(TM)).
3) Ashton Technology Canada, Inc. ("Ashton Canada").
4) ATG International, Inc. ("International").
5) Kingsway ATG Asia, Ltd. ("KAA").
6) Gomez Advisors, Inc. ("Gomez").
Ashton's operating strategy is to maximize the value of each of the
companies within its network. Ashton provides the initial strategic investment
capital, recruits or forms the management team, develops technology for the
network companies, and employs innovative financial strategies to unlock
stockholder value. This strategy enables Ashton to leverage the collective
knowledge of the network companies and create a critical mass from which to
enhance the value of its individual businesses. Ashton believes this strategy
will result in each of its subsidiaries and affiliated companies being valued on
different and disparate bases by the financial markets.
Ashton expects to generate revenues through licensing payments from its
affiliated companies for the use of Ashton-developed technology. Each of
Ashton's majority-owned subsidiaries is expected to generate revenues based upon
a transaction-pricing model whereby users pay a transaction fee for use of the
Company's products and services. Ashton will also seek opportunities to realize
gains through the selective sale of investments in its subsidiaries or
affiliated companies, or through the sale of minority interests to outside
investors by its subsidiaries or affiliated companies. Management believes this
approach enhances stockholder value and provides capital to support the growth
of the Company.
1
Since its inception, Ashton has focused on investment in and development of
its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Ashton has not realized an operating
profit and has generated a significant accumulated deficit as a result of its
reported losses. Computer Science Innovations, Inc. ("CSI(R)") and Gomez have
been Ashton's only significant sources of revenue to date. CSI(R) and Gomez
were consolidated subsidiaries of Ashton through November 6, 1997 and December
31, 1999, respectively. Ashton sold CSI(R) on November 6, 1997, and has
presented the financial information related to CSI(R) as a discontinued
operation in its financial statements. Since its inception in 1997, Gomez has
generated substantially all of the Company's revenues. As of December 31, 1999,
Ashton began accounting for its investment in Gomez under the equity method of
accounting. As a result, Ashton consolidated Gomez's operating results only
through December 31, 1999. Pursuant to the equity method of accounting, Ashton
has increased the carrying amount of its remaining investment in Gomez to zero,
and will not provide for any future losses of Gomez which would reduce the
carrying amount to below zero. In the event Gomez has future earnings, Ashton
will recognize its share of those earnings only after the earnings exceed
Ashton's share of net losses not recognized.
Universal Trading Technologies Corporation
UTTC and its subsidiaries market, deploy, and operate intelligent matching
and online transaction systems through secure public and private communications
networks and the world wide web. UTTC's systems enable institutional customers
and financial intermediaries to transact efficiently and cost effectively in a
global trading environment. UTTC's systems provide:
. a neutral environment - with exchange-standard surveillance and
regulatory rules;
. global accessibility - through the MCI/Worldcom network and the
world wide web;
. seamless integration - into existing investment management
systems, securities exchanges, alternate trading systems,
electronic communication networks, and broker systems;
. electronic connectivity - to post-trade clearing and settlement
mechanisms, and
. absolute trading anonymity and confidentiality - total data
security through the use of encryption, electronic
authentication, and firewalls.
UTTC's target customers are securities exchanges, institutions, money
managers, broker-dealers, and other members of the professional investment
community, enabling them to trade at lower transaction costs in an electronic
global trading environment.
UTTC's subsidiaries include:
NextExchange Inc. ("NextExchange"). NextExchange was formed in February
1999 as a wholly owned subsidiary of UTTC in order to pursue opportunities
available as a result of the SEC's articulated support for non-mutualized,
"for profit" securities exchanges. UTTC intends to leverage its technology
platforms to create an all-electronic, screen-based registered business-to-
business ("B2B") exchange that provides a highly liquid, efficient and fair
securities market for trading equities, options and other securities.
These "NextExchange" concepts reflect the creation of a fully electronic,
global distribution network linking institutional pools of liquidity while
assuring the best possible price with the lowest possible transaction
costs. The Company has developed the initial design specifications of the
NextExchange systems platform, which incorporates its electronic Public
Limit Order Book ("ePLOB(TM)"), electronic Auction System ("eAS(TM)") and
electronic Options Crossing Network ("eOX") designs. The Company has met
with potential strategic business partners to discuss the development,
financing and deployment of the NextExchange concepts. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to finance the development of or to
deploy its NextExchange concepts.
Croix Securities, Inc. ("Croix"). Croix was formed in February 1999 as a
wholly owned subsidiary of UTTC to act as an introducing broker on behalf
of institutions using the Company's volume-weighted average pricing system
("eVWAP"(TM)) on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange ("PHLX"). Croix intends
to expand its operations to provide electronic broker-dealer services and
analytical services, and to become a full service agency execution group
utilizing the Company's intelligent matching systems and other contra-side
liquidity tools to assist clients in the execution of their trades,
including residual eVWAP trades.
REB Securities, Inc. ("REB"). REB is a wholly owned broker-dealer
subsidiary of UTTC that operates as the facilities manager for the eVWAP,
and does not engage in any other broker-dealer activities.
2
Electronic Market Center, Inc.
In June 1998, Ashton formed eMC as a wholly owned subsidiary. eMC will
develop, operate and market a global electronic distribution channel offering a
full range of financial products and services. eMC will be designed for
interactive Internet market access by clients of member users. eMC will offer
financial intermediaries access to eMC's technology, distribution and
communications network. Through eMC, these financial intermediaries can provide
online financial products to their clients and to clients of other member users.
eMC expects to provide its clients with distribution and transactional
technology, and broad "best of breed" product content. It is envisioned that
this connectivity of distribution and content will evolve into a "virtual market
community", enabling eMC's clients to maintain and expand their traditional
customer relationships.
On April 18, 2000, eMC acquired 100% of the stock of E-Trustco.com Inc. E-
Trustco is a business-to-business electronic trust company. It will be designed
to provide an electronic professionally managed investment advice program - in
the form of multi-manager wrap accounts - to partners such as online brokers. E-
Trustco will offer and outsource comprehensive and objective financial advisory
services using a sophisticated electronic delivery system and patent-pending
process. The process segregates advice into tactical and strategic components,
accomplished using a platform of independent investment managers working in
conjunction with E-Trustco's staff of investment consultants.
E-Trustco represents the first content to be distributed through the eMC
platform. eMC is developing additional content and distribution channels of the
eMC business model, which could include additional acquisitions and strategic
alliances. eMC does not currently have any understandings, commitments or
agreements with respect to any material acquisition, joint venture, or strategic
alliance.
Ashton Technology Canada, Inc.
On December 20, 1999, Ashton entered into an agreement to create a joint
venture company, Ashton Technology Canada, Inc. ("Ashton Canada") to develop,
market and operate intelligent matching, online transaction systems and
distribution systems for seamless use by U.S. and Canadian financial
intermediaries. On June 8, 2000, Ashton Canada entered into an agreement with
the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSE") to operate, market and deploy Ashton's
proprietary eVWAP, as a facility of the TSE. It is anticipated that Ashton
Canada will deploy and begin operation of the eVWAP in late 2000 or early 2001.
Ashton International, Inc.
Ashton formed International as a wholly owned subsidiary in July 1998 to
explore opportunities for marketing and licensing the Company's products and
services abroad. International has not commenced operations. As joint ventures
and strategic alliances with parties in Canada, Asia and elsewhere are
developed, the investments in the joint ventures or strategic alliances are held
directly by Ashton, instead of International. As such, it is anticipated that
International will be eliminated by Ashton during the year ended March 31, 2001.
Kingsway-ATG Asia, Ltd.
On December 16, 1999, Ashton finalized a joint venture agreement with
Kingsway International to create Kingsway ATG Asia, Ltd. ("KAA"). KAA will
develop, market and operate intelligent matching, online transaction systems,
and distribution systems for seamless use by U.S. and Asian financial
intermediaries. In association with Ashton, KAA anticipates developing a Web-
based system to provide IPO and secondary stock offerings to Asian customers. On
May 4, 2000, KAA applied for registration as a dealer with the Securities and
Futures Commission in Hong Kong.
Gomez Advisors, Inc.
Gomez was formed in May 1997 as a subsidiary of Ashton to provide strategic
consulting services to financial institutions seeking to utilize the Internet to
establish customer relationships. From its inception in May 1997 through March
1999, Gomez primarily derived revenues from consulting contracts with e-commerce
businesses.
3
Gomez now focuses on providing decision support to consumers that want to
transact online and information to businesses that want to attract and retain
online consumers. Gomez offers these services through its publicly available
gomez.com Web site and through its GomezPro Web site, which is available to
businesses on a subscription basis.
During the quarter ended December 31, 1999, Gomez completed a round of
financing with investors such as BancBoston Ventures, Softbank, HarbourVest
Partners, Dolphin Communications Partners, John Hancock Global Technology Fund,
and West End Venture Partners. On April 20, 2000, Gomez filed for an initial
public offering of its common stock. Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc.,
U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., and the Robinson-Humphrey Company LLC are
underwriting the offering. The registration statement has not yet become
effective, and there can be no assurance that Gomez will consummate its IPO.
As of March 31, 2000, Ashton's investment in Gomez consists of 4,405 shares
of Series A Preferred Stock, which will automatically be converted into
4,405,000 shares of Gomez common stock upon completion of Gomez's initial public
offering.
Products and Services
Ashton continues to invest in the development of new products, services and
affiliated companies in order to remain competitive and meet the demands of the
rapidly changing securities and financial services industries. A significant
portion of Ashton's research and development efforts includes enhancements of
existing software and systems including the eVWAP. Ashton is also investing in
the deployment of the eVWAP and other intelligent matching systems in the Asian
and Canadian markets.
The Company's priorities are as follows:
(i) implementation of new computer hardware to replace equipment
purchased in 1996 in order to support anticipated growth in
transaction volume;
(ii) enhancements to the eVWAP including additional features and
functionality;
(iii) introduction of derivative intelligent matching products such as
Nasdaq securities, Market-on-Close, and intraday eVWAP;
(iv) development of eMC; and
(v) development of the NextExchange concepts.
In connection with such product development and capital expenditures, the
Company will incur substantial expenditures in anticipation of growth in
securities transaction volumes and revenues. In the event this projected revenue
is not realized, the Company may not be able to reduce such expenditures quickly
and, as a result, the Company could experience additional losses. Conversely,
sudden surges in transaction volumes could result in increased revenues and
reduced cash expenditures.
The technologies underlying the Company's products and services are subject
to rapid evolution and change. The Company's future success depends upon its
ability to respond quickly and successfully to technological advances by
developing and introducing new and improved products and services. The Company
may not be able to respond to such advances. Competitors, including those with
greater financial and other resources, could also succeed in developing
technologies, products, or services that could directly compete with the
Company's products.
eVWAP
The eVWAP is the first product designed and developed by Ashton. It is
operated by UTTC as a facility of the PHLX. It is a fully automated system that
permits its participants to buy, sell, or short-sell eVWAP-eligible securities
before the market opens (pre-open) at the eVWAP. The eVWAP is the average price
for a specific stock, weighted by the volume of shares of that stock traded
"regular way" during the day on all securities exchanges throughout the United
States as reported to the Consolidated Tape.
Participants may submit large-sized orders and execute large-sized trades
without market impact because of the end-to-end anonymity of the system that
electronically protects the participant's identity, order, match (trade),
residual
4
(if any), and contra-side identity all the way through the settlement and
clearing process. The Company believes that there are no other trading systems
that provide this degree of end-to-end anonymity. Participants are
electronically informed of their (binding) matches and residuals (if any) at
approximately 9:20 AM EST, and are informed of the associated eVWAP pricing at
approximately 4:20 PM EST, shortly after the eVWAP calculations are completed
for the day. The pre-open eVWAP, as provided only by eVWAP, provides "mutual
satisfaction" and "best execution" within a highly liquid, totally anonymous,
electronic trading environment and should be distinguished from time-sliced or
volume-weighted composite prices that do not provide assurances of such
advantages. PHLX transaction fees, the only cost other than clearing and
settlement, for using the system are low and competitive due to the low manual
overhead associated with this fully automated, high capacity, and highly
reliable electronic matching system.
eVWAP is available to securities exchanges, broker/dealers, institutions,
money managers, and other financial intermediaries and end users. Interested
firms must enroll with UTTC'S subsidiary REB or the PHLX in order to become
active participants in the eVWAP matching sessions that will occur every trading
day automatically at 9:15 AM EST. Non-members must arrange for a PHLX/SCCP
(Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia) member to sign a simple one page
"bilateral give-up clearing agreement" to obtain direct access to eVWAP. The
system has been designed to afford a variety of electronic access mechanisms so
that participating firms and their trading room environments can easily and
securely integrate to eVWAP using eVWAP-supplied, global, secure communications
services, as well as FIX pathways and the Internet. Participants need only read
the eVWAP "shrink wrap" license agreement to utilize eVWAP-supplied software,
hardware, and communications pathways.
For all eVWAP match executions, eVWAP will provide automated post-market
clearing and settlement. This is accomplished via a straight-through process
engineered to electronically provide necessary transaction data directly to each
clearing firm and to protect contra-side identity by inserting the SCCP omnibus
account in the middle of each transaction.
On March 24, 1999, the SEC approved the PHLX's proposed rule change
relating to the Company's eVWAP trading system. On August 27, 1999, UTTC and the
PHLX began a controlled, live trading period of the eVWAP with a group of PHLX
floor specialists and "upstairs" customers involving twenty New York Stock
Exchange listed equity securities. This initial trading period successfully met
management's expectations for the first phase rollout of the eVWAP.
The second phase of the eVWAP commenced in November 1999 with the Company
working with certain major clearing firms to clear and settle trades through the
eVWAP. On January 3, 2000, Ashton announced that eight national brokerage firms
had agreed to clear and settle trades by institutions, pension funds, and money
managers utilizing eVWAP directly through UTTC or UTTC's subsidiary, Croix. On
April 3, 2000, the number of securities eligible for trading on the eVWAP was
increased from twenty to fifty. From April 4, 2000 until June 20, 2000, the
eVWAP crossed an average of 105,000 revenue shares per day.
Management believes value-added trading features and liquidity are the two
critical success factors in deploying any electronic trading system. Management
believes the key components of deploying its eVWAP includes:
. Functionality - the ability to provide the functions that the financial
community needs to process transactions in a global electronic marketplace.
. Scalability - the ability to scale the systems up as the number of users
and transactions increase.
. Reliability - ensuring fault-tolerant performance levels and meeting
regulatory back-up requirements.
. Extensibility - the ability to rapidly develop, test, and deploy new
systems, technology, features and functionality.
. Integration - the need to communicate with back-office systems and to
implement easy, secure, interoperability with potential customers and
business partners.
Management also recognizes that increased liquidity is necessary to enhance
the match efficiency of the eVWAP and to attract active participation in the
system. Established electronic trading systems such as Instinet and ITG's POSIT
have taken years to obtain their current levels of liquidity. In addition, there
are currently 14 alternative trading systems (including electronic communication
networks) competing for the same institutional liquidity. In light of these
factors, management believes it is necessary to ensure that early adapters of
the eVWAP experience positive results before further increasing the number of
securities.
5
The Company's objective is to ensure that a sufficient number of
institutions have indicated they are ready to actively participate in the eVWAP.
When such critical mass is obtained, management will then orchestrate a "ramp
up" in system transactions. To assist in achieving this objective, UTTC
modified its sales and marketing efforts during April 2000 to (i) restructure
the composition of the sales force; (ii) focus on key client relationships which
are expected to produce the majority of the system's initial volume; and (iii)
negotiate partnerships with select vendors of trade order management systems to
allow users additional flexibility to route orders directly to eVWAP.
The third stage of the rollout is planned to provide the connectivity to
the larger institutions and broker-dealers, who aggregate orders from multiple
locations, and is projected to demonstrate eVWAP volume growth and liquidity.
As of June 20, 2000, UTTC has enrolled 69 entities representing 233 individual
users. UTTC's staff is currently working with several large institutions to
implement the eVWAP within those organizations.
The Company's revenue will depend on the volume of securities traded on the
eVWAP, UTTC's marketing capabilities, and user acceptance of the eVWAP.
National and international economic and political conditions and broad trends
may also affect securities trading volumes. Any one or all of these factors
could result in lower share volumes offered through the eVWAP and could
adversely affect the Company's results of operations. Variations in transaction
volume could result in significant volatility in operating results.
Regulation
Government Regulation
The Company, and its transaction systems are subject to significant
government regulation, under both federal and state laws, and self-regulatory
organization ("SRO") oversight. The SEC is primarily responsible for the
administration of the federal securities laws, while SROs are responsible for
the day-to-day regulation of their broker-dealer members. The SEC and SROs are
also charged with protecting the interests of the investing public and the
integrity of the securities markets. The eVWAP has been developed as a facility
of the PHLX, an SRO, and its operation in accordance with PHLX rules, is
subject to regulatory oversight by the SEC. On March 24, 1999, the SEC granted
approval to the PHLX to operate the eVWAP and on August 30, 1999 the eVWAP
commenced operation on the PHLX. In 1998, the SEC adopted amendments to Rule 19b
- -4 and Regulation ATS under the Exchange Act that will impact how the Company
may launch new trading systems and products, including modifications to the
eVWAP (see "Exchange Regulation, Regulation ATS and Market Structure").
Ashton, in the offering of its securities to the public and the listing of
its securities on the Nasdaq National Market, is regulated by the SEC and by the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. ("Nasdaq"), an SRO. Broker-dealers such as REB and
Croix are subject to regulation by the SEC, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD"), an SRO, and the PHLX with respect to all
aspects of the securities business, including sales practices, record keeping,
capital structure, and conduct of directors, officers and employees.
The Company plans to operate NextExchange as a registered national
securities exchange pursuant to Section 6 under the Exchange Act. Registered
securities exchanges are subject to pervasive federal regulatory
responsibilities, including filing and receiving approval of any rule changes
with the SEC before any rule, policy and/or practice of the exchange may be
implemented. Registered securities exchanges are SROs and accordingly, must
establish comprehensive surveillance programs to oversee trading by their
broker-dealer members. NextExchange intends to capitalize on the SEC's new views
supporting the concept of for-profit, non-member owned securities exchanges (see
"Exchange Regulation, Regulation ATS and Market Structure").
eMC's subsidiary, E-Trustco.com, Inc., intends to operate as a registered
investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 (the "1940 Act"). Registered investment advisers are required to follow
extensive recordkeeping, advertising and disclosure requirements under the 1940
Act and are subject to periodic inspection by the SEC. In addition, E-Trustco
plans to operate its wholly owned subsidiary, The Manhattan Trust Company, as a
state-chartered trust company under the banking laws of the State of
Connecticut. If approved as a state-chartered trust company, The Manhattan Trust
Company will be subject to extensive banking regulation by the State of
Connecticut Department of Banking. These regulations include minimum capital
requirements, periodic reporting and inspections, qualification and bonding
requirements for directors and senior personnel, and limitations on the
transactions of the trust company's business and investments. The Manhattan
Trust Company may also be subject to the banking laws and regulations of other
states in which it is qualified to do business.
6
The Company is unable to currently predict whether it will be able to
comply with all the regulations applicable to it or with additional regulations
which may be adopted. These could have a material impact on the Company, its
products, its business partners, or its customers.
Exchange Regulation, Regulation ATS and Market Structure
The Company believes the business and regulatory environment for
introducing new trading systems has become more flexible based on proposals
adopted by the SEC in December 1998 regarding alternative trading systems
("ATSs") and pilot trading systems. These new rules permit ATSs to choose
whether to register as national securities exchanges or to register as broker-
dealers which must comply with additional requirements depending on their
activities and trading volume. Additionally, the rules allow certain pilot
trading systems to be launched for up to two years by registered national
securities exchanges and associations without prior approval from the SEC (the
"Pilot Rule"). The ATS regulations and Pilot Rule became effective on April 20,
1999.
The Company believes that the SEC, in these new rules, underscored the
importance of ATSs' growing importance in executing transactions in both New
York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listed and Nasdaq securities. The SEC estimated
that ATSs executed approximately 20 percent of the volume in Nasdaq securities
and four percent of the volume in NYSE listed securities. The SEC projected that
these figures will triple in the next three years. The Company believes that the
implications of the new regulatory market structure include:
. Regulation ATS requirements are fewer and less burdensome for start-up
ATSs reflecting their smaller initial volume levels. ATSs with larger
volumes are now subject to regulations approaching those imposed upon
registered securities exchanges.
. Securities exchanges may now be operated as for-profit, non-member
enterprises and existing securities exchanges could relinquish their
registered exchange status to operate broker-dealer ATSs.
. The SEC expressed a clear view that new technology and global
competition are driving the new regulatory structure.
Beginning in 1999, the SEC introduced several initiatives, which, if
implemented, will revolutionize the structure of the equity security and options
markets in the United States. The Company believes that many of these
initiatives are also motivated by advances in technology (e.g., the Internet,
----
global telecommunications) and global competition (e.g., after-hours trading).
----
Moreover, the Company believes that many of these new initiatives are designed
to facilitate the participation of ATSs in the new market structure. Some of
the SEC's new initiatives include:
. After-hours trading. The SEC has encouraged the NYSE, Nasdaq and other
-------------------
SROs to allow their equity and options markets to continue trading
after the traditional 4:00 p.m. close.
. Decimalization. The SEC has ordered all SROs that allow trading in
--------------
equity securities to price those securities in decimals rather than in
fractions.
. Market Fragmentation. The SEC has approved the rescission of NYSE
--------------------
Rule 390, which prohibits certain NYSE member firms from trading in
certain NYSE-listed securities away from a national securities
exchange. The SEC also proposed a wide ranging release on market
fragmentation, which is the inefficiency that results when an investor
cannot receive the best execution of a trade across multiple markets
that trade the same security.
. Intermarket Trading System. The SEC adopted amendments to the national
--------------------------
market system plan to expand the NASD's Intermarket Trading
System/Computer Assisted Execution System ("ITS/CAES") to all listed
securities. Previously, ITS/CAES was only available for securities
listed after April 26, 1979, so-called "Rule 19c-3 Securities."
7
. Market Information Fees and Revenues. The SEC is examining the
------------------------------------
efficacy of how the SROs currently charge for market data. New
initiatives in this area may dramatically increase the availability of
real-time market data to investors through the Internet and otherwise.
. Unlisted Trading Privileges. The SEC has proposed amendments that
---------------------------
would permit unlisted trading privileges (i.e., trading of a security
----
on a national securities exchange on which that security is not
originally listed) to commence after the first trade in that security
immediately after its initial public offering. The prior rule required
the non-listing securities exchanges to wait for one day before they
could exercise unlisted trading privileges.
. Options Market Linkage. The SEC has proposed the adoption of a plan
----------------------
to link all five of the U.S. options markets into a single, integrated
market. The single market would, at a minimum, allow execution of
orders across different options markets, allow automatic execution of
small orders, and allow communication and supervision between markets.
Each of the foregoing initiatives by the SEC may present opportunities for
ATSs that operate in the new environment of electronic commerce and Internet-
based securities trading. However, the Company is unable to predict, at this
juncture, whether any or all of these initiatives by the SEC will be adopted
and, if so, whether they will have a material impact on the Company, its
products, its business partners, or its customers.
Net Capital Requirement and Credit Risk
As registered broker-dealers, Croix and REB are subject to the SEC's
uniform net capital rule. The net capital rule is designed to measure the
general integrity and liquidity of a broker-dealer and requires that at least a
minimum part of its assets be kept in a relatively liquid form.
Both Croix and REB are required to maintain minimum net capital of $5,000.
As of March 31, 2000, Croix had net capital of $143,509, which exceeded
minimum net capital requirements by $138,509 and REB had net capital of
$116,757, which exceeded minimum net capital requirements by $111,757. For a
discussion of regulatory capital, see Item 7. "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and
Capital Resources". Although the Company believes that the combination of its
existing net regulatory capital and operating cash flows will be sufficient to
meet regulatory capital requirements, a shortfall in net regulatory capital
would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of
operations.
A change in the net capital rule, imposition of new rules or any unusually
large charge against capital could limit certain operations of Croix and REB,
such as trading activities that require the use of significant amounts of
capital.
Although Croix and REB are registered as broker-dealers, they generally do
not perform traditional broker-dealer services. Croix and REB do not act as
market-makers with respect to any securities or otherwise as principal in any
securities transactions; they act only on an agency basis. Therefore, the
Company does not have exposure to credit risks in the way that traditional
broker-dealers have such exposure. The relatively low credit risk of the
businesses is reflected in the minimal net capital requirements imposed on Croix
and REB as broker-dealers.
Competition
Ashton and its subsidiaries operate in several competitive markets. The
Company's competition in the commercial markets principally comes from larger,
better-established companies, many of which have financial, sales and marketing
resources substantially greater than Ashton. In online trading systems, the
eVWAP will compete with other electronic trading systems, including Reuters
N.A.'s Instinet, Investment Technology Group, Inc.'s POSIT system and Optimark
Technologies, Inc.'s Optimark system. The Company believes that competitive
criteria include quality of trade execution, pricing, and reliability of post-
execution processing and settlement operations. The eVWAP will also compete with
various national and regional securities exchanges for trade execution services.
8
The Company's success is heavily dependent upon the acceptance of the eVWAP
by institutional investors. Failure to obtain such acceptance could result in
lower share volumes and a lack of liquidity on the eVWAP. Market and customer
acceptance of the eVWAP will depend upon, among other things, eVWAP's
operational performance including liquidity in the system. In addition, the
eVWAP's institutional customers may reduce or discontinue the use of the eVWAP
at any time. While UTTC continues to solicit customers to use the eVWAP there
can be no assurance that UTTC will attract sufficient trading volume to the
eVWAP. Failure to market and introduce the eVWAP or to obtain a critical
threshold level of trading volume could result in a material adverse effect on
UTTC and the consolidated operations of the Company.
The trade execution and analytical services to be offered by Croix will
compete with services offered by leading brokerage firms and other information
service and transaction processing firms.
eMC anticipates that it will compete directly with investment advisors and
investment managers that offer services directly to customers or through defined
benefit 401(k) and other managed plans. eMC expects to also compete directly and
indirectly with a variety of financial intermediaries and portals which
distribute financial products and services to consumers. eMC expects that
competition will also arise from "next generation" financial services providers
with newer technology or alternative business models.
Proprietary Rights
The Company's success depends to some degree on the protection of its
proprietary rights. The Company regards its respective products as proprietary
and relies primarily on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, trade
secret protection, employee and third party confidentiality and non-disclosure
agreements, license agreements, and other federal and state intellectual
property protection methods to protect its proprietary rights. The Company does
not currently hold any material patents and has not filed for copyright
protection. The Company has filed "intent-to-use" or "actual use" documents with
the U.S Patent & Trademark Office for all of the Company's products presently
available or currently being developed. In April, 1999, The Dover Group, Inc.
assigned all right, title, and interest to the registered mark "VWAP(R)" to UTTC
for a nominal consideration (see "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data"). Accordingly, UTTC has the exclusive ownership interest in the "VWAP(R)"
mark. Ashton's products are generally licensed to customers on a "right to use"
basis pursuant to a non-transferable license that generally restricts the
customer's use to internal purposes. On September 23, 1999, certain directors of
Ashton's eMC subsidiary filed an application for a patent covering the "I.M.A.P.
Process", the business process governing the E-Trustco business model. This
patent application is still pending, and it is anticipated that it will be
assigned to eMC by September 23, 2000.
Employees
As of March 31, 2000, the Company and its subsidiaries employed a total of
43 people.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
On December 23, 1999, Ashton entered into a ten-year lease for
approximately 11,000 square feet of office space at 1835 Market Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. This location will become the principal
offices of the Company. It is anticipated that the Company will relocate to the
new office space by July 31, 2000.
The Company currently leases approximately 10,000 square feet of office
space at 1900 Market Street, Suite 701, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
pursuant to a lease expiring in May 2005. When the Company's headquarters are
relocated to 1835 Market Street, the technology group will remain at this
location.
In anticipation of future expansion, the Company is also considering office
leases in New York City and Hartford, CT. The New York City office will support
UTTC's sales and marketing staff while the Hartford office will be the principal
office of eMC.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
9
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
10
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
On May 2, 1996, Ashton completed an initial public offering of 2,472,500
shares of common stock ("common stock") at an offering price of $4.50 per share
and 2,472,500 redeemable common stock purchase warrants ("warrants") at an
offering price of $0.25 per warrant. The common stock and the warrants are
traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbols, "ASTN" and "ASTNW",
respectively. The following sets forth the range of high and low bid prices
per share for the common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market:
High Low
---- ---
2000
First Quarter $11.56 $6.50
1999
Fourth Quarter $ 8.25 $5.00
Third Quarter $13.81 $4.69
Second Quarter $18.00 $3.53
First Quarter $ 4.09 $1.91
1998
Fourth Quarter $ 3.16 $1.09
Third Quarter $ 3.63 $1.38
Second Quarter $ 4.13 $2.03
First Quarter $ 4.38 $1.13
The following sets forth the high and low bid prices for the warrants as
reported on the Nasdaq National Market:
High Low
---- ---
2000
First Quarter $ 7.50 $3.33
1999
Fourth Quarter $ 4.88 $2.50
Third Quarter $ 9.13 $2.75
Second Quarter $12.13 $1.38
First Quarter $ 1.88 $0.63
1998
Fourth Quarter $ 1.63 $0.50
Third Quarter $ 1.38 $0.25
Second Quarter $ 1.63 $0.75
First Quarter $ 1.88 $0.19
On June 20, 2000, the closing price of the common stock was $3.25 and the
closing price of the warrants was $1.97.
As of March 31, 2000, there were approximately 321 holders of record of
common stock, and approximately 90 holders of record of warrants.
During the past three fiscal years, the Company issued six classes of
convertible preferred stock (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
Stockholders' Equity").
No dividends have been declared on the common stock through March 31, 2000,
and the Board of Directors has no current intention to declare or pay dividends
on the common stock in the foreseeable future.
11
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following selected consolidated financial data are derived from the
Company's consolidated financial statements. The financial statements have been
audited by Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP, the Company's independent auditors. Such
data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements,
including the related notes thereto, as well as Item 7. "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".
Year Ended March 31
-------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Statement of Operations Data:
Total revenues $ 3,860 $ 1,434 $ 314 $ -- $ --
Total expenses 19,062 16,032 7,556 5,516 2,567
Loss from continuing operations (6,232) (14,317) (8,345) (6,397) (2,588)
Income from discontinued operations of CSI -- -- 68 (205) --
Loss on disposal of CSI -- -- (386) -- --
Net loss (6,232) (14,276) (8,675) (6,842) (2,588)
Net loss per common share (0.32) (1.80) (1.46) (0.93) (0.49)
Weighted average shares outstanding 24,930 10,954 7,520 7,341 5,240
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents 15,365 2,667 816 61 31
Securities available for sale 9,906 -- -- -- --
Investments in affiliates 1,091 -- -- -- 709
Total assets 31,024 5,654 2,998 3,367 1,404
Total stockholders' equity 25,163 4,445 1,237 1,063 (1,559)
12
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Company's results of operations and
liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes of the Company for the years
ended March 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998.
Overview
Ashton is an evolving network of affiliated companies that develop and
market technology-based products and services which provide businesses and
consumers unique execution of financial transactions within global electronic
marketplaces. Ashton utilizes advanced telecommunication, computing, data and
information security, and Internet technologies, to develop electronic
transaction and distribution systems and products for the global financial
services industry. As of March 31, 2000, Ashton's subsidiaries and affiliated
companies include:
1) Universal Trading Technologies Corporation ("UTTC") and its three
subsidiaries:
. REB Securities, Inc. ("REB")
. Croix Securities, Inc. ("Croix")
. NextExchange, Inc. ("NextExchange").
2) Electronic Market Center, Inc. ("eMC"(TM)).
3) Ashton Technology Canada, Inc. ("Ashton Canada").
4) ATG International, Inc. ("International").
5) Kingsway ATG Asia, Ltd. ("KAA").
6) Gomez Advisors, Inc. ("Gomez").
Ashton's operating strategy is to maximize the value of each of the
companies within its network. Ashton provides the initial strategic investment
capital, recruits or forms the management team, develops technology for the
network companies, and employs innovative financial strategies to unlock
stockholder value. This strategy enables Ashton to leverage the collective
knowledge of the network companies and create a critical mass from which to
enhance the value of its individual businesses.
Ashton expects to generate revenues through licensing payments from its
affiliated companies for the use of Ashton-developed technology. Each of
Ashton's majority-owned subsidiaries is expected to generate revenues based upon
a transaction-pricing model whereby users pay a transaction fee for use of the
Company's products and services. Ashton will also seek opportunities to realize
gains through the selective sale of investments in its subsidiaries or
affiliated companies, or through the sale of minority interests to outside
investors by its subsidiaries or affiliated companies. Management believes this
approach enhances stockholder value and provides capital to support the growth
of the Company.
Since its inception, Ashton has not realized an operating profit and has
generated a significant accumulated deficit as a result of its reported losses.
Gomez was Ashton's primary source of revenues for the years ended March 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998. In September 1999, Gomez commenced the private placement
of its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of Gomez's sale of a
portion of its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock on December 30, 1999, the
Company's ownership percentage in Gomez was reduced to below 50%. As of
December 31, 1999, Ashton began accounting for its investment in Gomez under the
equity method of accounting. As a result, Ashton consolidated Gomez's operating
results only through December 31, 1999. Pursuant to the equity method of
accounting, Ashton has increased the carrying amount of its remaining investment
in Gomez to zero. The increase of $5,568,475 was reported as a gain during the
year ended March 31, 2000. Ashton will not provide for any future losses of
Gomez which would reduce the carrying amount to below zero. In the event Gomez
has future earnings, Ashton will recognize its share of those earnings only
after the earnings exceed Ashton's share of net losses not recognized.
The Company's limited operating history and dependence upon the operation
of its eVWAP make the prediction of future operating results difficult.
Although the Company has activated eVWAP and attempted to develop
13
additional sources of revenue, there can be no assurance that the Company will
generate the anticipated revenues from the operation of the eVWAP or other
sources.
The Company continues to invest in the development of new products,
services and affiliated companies in order to remain competitive and meet the
demands of the rapidly changing securities and financial services industries. A
significant portion of the Company's research and development efforts includes
enhancements of existing software and systems including the eVWAP. The Company
is also investing in the deployment of the eVWAP and other intelligent matching
systems in the Asian and Canadian markets.
The Company intends to continue to increase its investments in research and
development, sales and marketing and related infrastructure. Such increases
will be dependent upon factors including, but not limited to, operation of the
eVWAP, success in hiring the appropriate personnel, successful development of
new products and services, regulatory approval of its new products and services,
market acceptance of the Company's products and services, and development of a
revenue stream from the Company's products, services and affiliated companies.
Due to such anticipated increases in the Company's operating expenses, the
Company's operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
Results of Operations for the Year Ended March 31, 2000 Compared to the Year
Ended March 31, 1999
The net loss applicable to common stock totaled $7,947,480, or $0.32 per
share, for the year ended March 31, 2000 compared to $19,693,644, or $1.80 per
share, last year. The Company recorded a net loss of $6,231,648, or $0.25 per
share for the year ended March 31, 2000, compared to a net loss of $14,276,485,
or $1.30 per share, last year.
The Company's revenues totaled $3,869,084 for the year ended March 31,
2000, and $1,434,438 for the year ended March 31, 1999. UTTC generated $32,135
from the operation of eVWAP during the year ended March 31, 2000, and Gomez
generated the balance of the revenues. The results of operations of Gomez were
consolidated with Ashton's results of operations through December, 31, 1999.
Therefore, the Gomez revenues included in the year ended March 31, 2000 are for
the nine-month period ended December 31, 1999. The revenues in the year ended
March 31, 1999 were generated entirely by Gomez.
In the year ended March 31, 2000, $1,351,400 or 35% of Gomez's revenues
were from subscriptions and related data and analysis services from its GomezPro
web site, which it began selling in March 1999. For the years ended March 31,
2000 and 1999, Gomez generated $1,730,549 and $448,108, respectively, from
advertising, sponsorship, and transaction-based revenues. Consulting and
advisory service revenues declined as a percentage of total revenues due to
Gomez's introduction of its GomezPro web site and Research Station. Total
consulting and advisory service revenues were $755,001 or 20% of Gomez's
revenues in the year ended March 31, 2000, compared to $941,250 or 66% of
revenues in the year ended March 31, 1999.
The costs of revenues represent salaries associated with the delivery of
Gomez's consulting and advisory services, and amounts paid in connection with
transaction-based revenues. Costs of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2000
were $644,510 or 16.7% of total revenues, compared to $168,000 or 11.7% of total
revenues for the year ended March 31, 1999. The increase as a percent of total
revenues is primarily due to the increase in advertising and sponsorship
revenues and the related increase in amounts paid for transaction-based
revenues.
During the years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company amortized
system development costs related to the eVWAP totaling $95,354 and $190,707,
respectively. The Company has not capitalized computer software costs related
to the eVWAP since the second quarter of fiscal 1999, when the application
development stage of the eVWAP was completed. As of March 31, 2000, the
capitalized computer software asset had been completely amortized.
Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation of property and
equipment, comprised primarily of computer equipment, and amortization of
intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization for the year ended March 31,
2000 increased to $715,956 from $515,240 for the year ended March 31, 1999, due
to an increase in the computer equipment purchased. Capital expenditures
increased to $2,591,268 for the year ended March 31, 2000 compared to $644,403
last year. The increase is primarily due to Gomez's purchase of computer
equipment and software to accommodate additional staff and to support the
increased traffic on its web site and network servers.
14
In February 1998, Ashton entered into a consulting agreement with
Continental Capital & Equity Corporation ("Continental") whereby Ashton issued
300,000 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $475,125, in exchange for
promotional services through February 1999. During August 1998, Ashton amended
the consulting agreement with Continental and issued 250,000 additional shares
of common stock, with a fair market value of $416,657, in exchange for
additional promotional services and a reduction in cash payments required
pursuant to a previous consulting agreement. During the year ended March 31,
1999, Ashton recorded a deferred consulting expense of $416,657 as a reduction
to stockholders' equity as a result of amending the consulting agreement. During
the years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, $285,208 and $569,730, respectively,
was reflected as a non-cash compensation charge for the amortization of these
deferred consulting expenses. The deferred consulting expenses relating to the
agreement with Continental was fully amortized during the year ended March 31,
2000.
The Company recorded a non-cash compensation charge of $66,161 and $258,327
in the years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, related to the
issuance of non-employee stock options to consultants and professional advisors.
In August 1998, the Company entered into employment agreements with certain
members of Gomez management. Pursuant to the employment agreements, an
aggregate of 3,000,000 Gomez options were granted at an exercise price of $.01
per share. In addition, 1,400,000 Gomez options with an exercise price of $.01
per share were granted to certain officers and directors of Ashton. During the
year ended March 31, 1999, Gomez and the Company recognized a total non-cash
compensation charge of $4,864,860 to reflect the difference between the
estimated fair market value of the vested Gomez stock options at the date of
grant and the exercise price of those options. The options were exchanged for
Gomez common stock on January 22, 1999 pursuant to an exchange agreement among
Gomez, Ashton and other affiliates. (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements - Stockholders' Equity").
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses totaled $17,255,007
and $9,225,551 for the years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. For
the year ended March 31, 2000, Gomez's SG&A totaled $8,325,399, or 48% of the
Company's total SG&A, compared to $2,329,370 or 25% in the year ended March 31,
1999. Although the year ended March 31, 2000 includes Gomez SG&A for a period of
only nine months, or through December 31, 1999, compared to a period of twelve
months in the year ended March 31, 1999, Gomez SG&A increased by $5,996,029, or
257%. The increase in Gomez's SG&A was due primarily to the growth in staff and
related expenses incurred in building Gomez's infrastructure, and increased
advertising and marketing costs related to introduction of new products and
services.
Excluding Gomez, the Company's SG&A for the year ended March 31, 2000
totaled $8,929,608 compared to $6,896,181 during the year ended March 31, 1999.
The increase in SG&A is primarily a result of the growth in staff of Ashton,
UTTC, and Croix, and is partially offset by decreases in consulting and
professional fees.
Interest income increased to $1,169,910 for the year ended March 31, 2000
from $146,816 for the year ended March 31, 1999, as a result of the higher cash
and cash equivalents and securities available for sale balances. (see
"Liquidity and Capital Resources").
Other expense for the year ended March 31, 2000 is comprised of a charge of
$416,632 for the value of UTTC common stock issued to a former director in
satisfaction of the terms of an agreement executed on June 29, 1999 between the
former director and the Company. Other income for the year ended March 31, 1999
includes $290,080 from the settlement with Alliant Techsystems, Inc. payable as
a result of judgments rendered in favor of the Company, offset by the payment of
$47,500 to David Rosensaft (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
Commitments, Contingencies and Settlements"), and the $105,000 reduction in the
carrying value of the Company's investment in E.Com International, Inc.
During the year ended March 31, 2000, the Company recorded a gain of
$5,568,475 as a result of a change in the accounting for its investment in Gomez
to the equity method (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies"). Ashton also realized a gain of $2,550,000
during the year ended March 31, 2000 on the redemption of 500 shares of its
Gomez Series A Preferred Stock.
15
Equity in income of affiliates for the year ended March 31, 2000 totaled
$90,508. This amount represents Ashton's portion of the earnings of KAA, which
were primarily derived from unrealized gains on KAA's trading securities
portfolio.
Results of Operations for the Year Ended March 31, 1999 Compared to the Year
Ended March 31, 1998
The net loss applicable to common stock totaled $19,693,644, or $1.80 per
share, for the year ended March 31, 1999 compared to $10,989,131, or $1.46 per
share, for the year ended March 31, 1998.
During the year ended March 31, 1999, the Company incurred a net loss of
$14,276,485, or $1.30 per share, as compared to a net loss of $8,674,902, or
$1.15 per share, during the prior year. The net loss for the year ended March
31, 1998 includes the discontinued operations of Computer Science Innovations,
Inc. ("CSI(R)"). Excluding discontinued operations, the net loss for the year
ended March 31, 1998 totaled $8,345,442, or $1.11 per share. In addition, the
results for the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 are not directly comparable
since Gomez was incorporated in May 1997 and operated for approximately ten
months of the year ended March 31, 1998.
On a consolidated basis, the Company's revenue for the year ended March 31,
1999 totaled $1,434,438 compared to $313,659 for the year ended March 31, 1998.
Gomez generated all of the Company's revenue for both years. Substantially all
of Gomez's revenue for the period from its inception (May 22, 1997) to March 31,
1998 was generated from advisory engagements with clients seeking to improve the
quality of their Internet service offerings. For the year ended March 31, 1999,
Gomez's consulting revenue increased 203% to $941,250 due to an increase in the
number of consulting engagements. For the year ended March 31, 1999,
advertising revenue totaled $249,156, or 17% of total revenue, and sponsorship
and transaction-based revenues totaled $198,952, or 14% of total revenue.
Costs of revenues for the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 were $168,000
and $79,000, respectively, and represent the costs associated with the delivery
of Gomez's advisory services, including the costs of salaries for personnel
providing the advisory services.
During the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company capitalized
system development costs related to the eVWAP totaling $61,375 and $224,686,
respectively. The Company has ceased capitalization of computer software costs
related to the eVWAP. During the years ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, the
Company amortized software development costs in the amount of $190,707 and
$196,974, respectively.
Depreciation consists primarily of depreciation of property and equipment,
mainly computer equipment. Depreciation for the year ended March 31, 1999
increased to approximately $477,000 from $327,000 the prior year due to an
increase in the computer equipment purchased. Capital expenditures increased to
$644,403 for the year ended March 31, 1999 compared to $348,392 for the prior
year.
During the year ended March 31, 1999, the Company recorded a deferred
consulting expense of $416,657 as a reduction to stockholders' equity as a
result of amending the consulting agreement with Continental described above.
During the year ended March 31, 1999, $569,730 was reflected as a non-cash
charge for the amortization of deferred consulting expenses compared to $39,844
during the year ended March 31, 1998.
The Company also incurred a noncash charge of $497,876 in the year ended
March 31, 1999 related to the issuance of non-employee stock options to
consultants providing marketing services to the Company. During the year ended
March 31, 1998, the Company recognized a noncash compensation charge of
$1,804,917 related to the issuance of non-employee stock options to consultants
and professional advisors. The Company utilized both common stock and stock
options in payment of services as a means to conserve cash.
In August 1998, the Company entered into employment agreements with certain
members of Gomez management. Pursuant to the employment agreements, an
aggregate of 3,000,000 Gomez options were granted at an exercise price of $.01
per share. In addition, 1,400,000 Gomez options with an exercise price of $.01
per share were granted to certain officers and directors of Ashton. During the
year ended March 31, 1999, Gomez and the Company recognized a total non-cash
compensation charge of $4,864,860 to reflect the difference between the
estimated fair market value of the vested Gomez stock options at the date of
grant and the exercise price of those options. The options were exchanged for
Gomez common stock on January 22, 1999 pursuant to an exchange agreement among
Gomez, Ashton and other affiliates. (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements - Stockholders' Equity").
16
Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A"), excluding the
noncash compensation charges, totaled $9,225,551 and $5,108,899 for the years
ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. For the year ended March 31, 1999,
Gomez's SG&A totaled $2,329,370, or 25% of the Company's total SG&A, compared to
$503,637 from the period from Gomez's inception (May 22, 1997) to March 31,
1998. The increase in Gomez's SG&A was due primarily to a full year of
operation, growth in staff, leasing of office facilities and other expenses
incurred in building Gomez's infrastructure. As of March 31, 1999, Gomez had 25
employees compared to six employees as of March 31, 1998.
Excluding Gomez, the Company's SG&A for the year ended March 31, 1999
totaled $6,896,181 compared to $4,605,262 during the year ended March 31, 1998.
The increase in SG&A is primarily a result of growth in staff and increases in
marketing, consulting and professional fees. As of March 31, 1999, Ashton and
UTTC employed a total of 27 employees compared to 17 employees at March 31,
1998.
Other income for the year ended March 31, 1999 includes $290,080 from the
settlement with Alliant Techsystems, Inc. payable as a result of judgments
rendered in favor of the Company, offset by the payment of $47,500 to David
Rosensaft, and the $105,000 reduction in the carrying value of the Company's
investment in E.Com International. During the year ended March 31, 1998, the
Company incurred total other expenses of $1,102,731 consisting of $760,000 for
the settlement of the Rosensaft litigation (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements - Commitments, Contingencies and Settlements"), and $342,731 for
interest paid on the UTTC notes payable. The notes were exchanged for Ashton
Series B Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 1998.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2000, the Company's consolidated total assets were $31,023,911
compared to $5,653,737 at March 31, 1999. Current assets at March 31, 2000
totaled $25,839,570 and current liabilities were $861,304. Stockholders' equity
at March 31, 2000 increased to $25,162,607 from $4,444,978 at March 31, 1999 due
to the private placement of 20,000 shares of its Series F Preferred Stock for
gross proceeds of $20,000,000, the issuance of 1,582,685 shares of its common
stock for proceeds of $7,908,713 in connection with Ashton's Private Equity Line
of Credit Agreement (see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
Stockholders' Equity"), and the exercise of stock options and warrants. The
increase in stockholders' equity resulting from the issuance of stock was
partially offset by the net loss applicable to common stock of $7,947,480 and
net issuance costs of approximately $1,800,000.
At March 31, 2000, the Company's principal sources of liquidity consisted
of cash and cash equivalents of $15,365,439 and securities available for sale of
$9,906,220, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $2,667,347 at March 31,
1999. The increase in cash and cash equivalents and securities available for
sale is primarily a result of (i) the private placement of 20,000 of Ashton's
Series F Convertible Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of $20,000,000 in August
1999; (ii) the private placement of UTTC's Series TK Convertible Preferred Stock
for gross proceeds of $2,000,000 in June 1999; (iii) the private placement of
UTTC's Series KW Convertible Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of $3,000,000 in
January 2000; and (iv) the redemption of 500 shares of Gomez Series A Preferred
stock in January 2000 resulting in proceeds to Ashton of $2,550,000. (see "Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - Stockholders' Equity").
On April 3, 1998, Ashton entered into the Private Equity Agreement with the
Private Equity Investors, which provided for an aggregate commitment of
$18,000,000 to Ashton, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions (see
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Stockholders' Equity"). During
the years ended March 31, 1999 and 2000, Ashton drew down $12,250,000 and
$5,750,000, respectively, resulting in an aggregate utilization of the entire
$18,000,000. As of March 31, 2000, the Private Equity Agreement has expired and
Ashton cannot utilize this source of funds.
Gomez generated substantially all of the Company's revenues for the years
ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. As of December 31, 1999, the Company began
accounting for its remaining investment in Gomez under the equity method of
accounting rather than consolidating Gomez's results of operations with the
results of the Company. As a result, Gomez will no longer provide any revenues
to the Company.
17
The Company's future revenues will be dependent upon the Company's ability
to deploy its eVWAP and customer utilization of the eVWAP. The Company
believes, on a forward-looking basis, it will begin to generate more significant
revenues during its fiscal year ending March 31, 2001. The level and timing of
such revenue is dependent upon, among other factors, the Company's assumptions
regarding (i) the ramp-up of the eVWAP implementation; (ii) the trading volume
experienced by the eVWAP trading system; and (iii) the pricing the Company is
able to obtain for eVWAP trade execution. Until adequate revenue is derived
from the eVWAP trading system, the Company's cash and cash equivalents,
investments and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet the
presently anticipated cash requirements of the Company for a period of
approximately sixteen months.
The Company's future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including the timing for the ramp-up of the eVWAP, market acceptance of the
Company's products, the timing and extent of spending to support new products
and affiliated company development efforts and the timing of introductions of
new products and enhancements to existing products. The Company may need
additional financing in the future if (i) the Company experiences unexpected
costs, (ii) there are continued delays in expanding the eVWAP, or (iii) the
Company fails to successfully develop markets for its products. Ashton and its
subsidiaries will also require additional financing to fund development of its
products and launch the Canadian and Asian joint ventures. Such financing may be
raised through spin-offs, additional equity offerings, borrowings, or other
collaborative relationships, which may require Ashton to share ownership of its
subsidiaries, joint ventures, and/or revenue from products and services. There
can be no assurance that additional equity or debt financing, if required, will
be available on acceptable terms or at all.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 100
Restructuring and Impairment Charges. In December 1999, the SEC issued SAB No.
101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. SAB No. 100 expresses the
views of the SEC staff regarding the accounting for and disclosure of certain
expenses not commonly reported in connection with exit activities and business
combinations. This includes the accrual of exit and employee termination costs
and the recognition of impairment charges. SAB No. 101 expresses the views of
the SEC staff in applying generally accepted accounting principles to certain
revenue recognition issues. SAB No. 100 became effective in November 1999 and
SAB No. 101 is effective for periods beginning after March 15, 2000. The
Company believes that the adoption of the guidance provided in SAB No. 100 and
SAB No.101 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) No.98-1, Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. The Company had
adopted SOP No. 98-1 effective April 1, 1999. Adoption of this Statement has
not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In April 1998, the AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of
Start-Up Activities. SOP No. 98-5 requires all costs associated with pre-
opening, pre-operating, organization activities to be expensed as incurred. The
Company has adopted SOP No. 98-5 effective April 1, 1999. Adoption of this
Statement has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Year 2000 Readiness
The "Year 2000" or "Y2K" issue was the result of the failure of certain
information systems and automated equipment to properly recognize and process
dates containing the year 2000 and beyond. There were concerns that computer
programs and automated equipment with time sensitive software might recognize a
date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. In preparation for
such possibilities, during fiscal 1999 and 2000, the Company reviewed its
potential Y2K risks arising from three primary sources: (i) internal software,
hardware and equipment utilized in the operations of the Company; (ii)
applications the Company has developed or was developing for use by its
customers; and (iii) third parties with which the Company had material
relationships. The Company determined that none of its mission critical systems
and equipment and none of the applications it developed for customers presented
Y2K compliance issues. None of the third party vendors with whom the Company has
material agreements experienced any Y2K compliance issues.
18
To date, the Company has not observed any instances that would indicate
that the Company's efforts in addressing the Year 2000 issue were not
successful. The Year 2000 issue has not had a material impact on the Company's
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The possibility still
exists that interruptions to the Company and/or key customer and supplier
operations or business activities could occur as a result of lingering Y2K
issues. Such interruptions, if they were to occur, could have a material adverse
impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
Subsequent Events
On April 20, 2000, Gomez filed a registration statement for an initial
public offering of its common stock. As of March 31, 2000, Ashton's investment
in Gomez consisted of 4,405 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which will be
automatically converted into 4,405,000 shares of Gomez common stock upon
completion of Gomez's initial public offering. The registration statement has
not yet become effective, and there can be no assurance that Gomez will
consummate its IPO
On April 18, 2000 eMC acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of E-
Trustco.com Inc. in exchange for 2,000,000 shares of eMC's common stock. E-
Trustco will initially be operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of eMC, and
will be headquartered in Hartford, CT. E-Trustco is a business-to-business
electronic trust company which outsources an electronic, professionally managed
investment advice program in the form of multi-manager wrap accounts to partners
such as online brokers. E-Trustco will offer and outsource comprehensive and
objective financial advisory services using a sophisticated electronic delivery
system and patent-pending process. As of March 31, 2000, Ashton and Ashton's
management owned 100% of the voting equity of eMC. As a result of the
acquisition of E-Trustco, Ashton and its management own approximately 78% of
the voting equity of eMC.
19
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Price Risk
Ashton's cash management strategy seeks to optimize excess liquid assets by
preserving principal, maintaining liquidity to satisfy working capital and
regulatory requirements, and minimizing risk while maximizing its return. For
working capital purposes, the Company invests primarily in money market
instruments. Cash which is not needed for normal operations is invested in
instruments with appropriate maturities and levels of risk to correspond to
expected liquidity needs. The Company currently has investments in government
agency and corporate bonds with maturities of less than one year. Ashton does
not use derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. At March
31, 2000, cash and cash equivalents and securities owned totaled 25,271,659.
The Company also makes venture capital and other strategic investments in
affiliated companies that it believes will support the growth of the Company.
These investments require approval of the Company's Board of Directors. At
March 31, 2000, investments in affiliates totaled $1,090,508.
Although Croix and REB are registered as broker-dealers, they generally do
not perform traditional broker-dealer services. Croix and REB do not act as
market-makers with respect to any securities or otherwise as principal in any
securities transactions; they act only on an agency basis. Croix and REB have
not engaged in proprietary trading and have not held positions at any time
during the year. Therefore, the Company does not have exposure to credit risks
in the way that traditional broker-dealers have such exposure. The relatively
low credit risk of the businesses is reflected in the minimal net capital
requirements imposed on Croix and REB as broker-dealers.
Interest Rate Risk
Ashton's exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the interest-
bearing portion of its investment portfolio. The Company's policy is to invest
in high quality credit issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any
one issuer. The interest-bearing investment portfolio primarily consists of
short-term, high-credit quality money market funds, government agency bonds and
corporate bonds. These investments totaled $25,271,659 at March 31, 2000. Due
to the conservative nature of the Company's portfolio, a sudden change in
interest rates would not have a material effect on its value.
Foreign Currency Risk
Ashton has joint ventures in Canada (Ashton Technology Canada, Inc.), and
in Hong Kong (Kingsway-ATG Asia, Ltd.), which were formed to develop, market and
operate intelligent matching, online transaction systems, and distribution
systems for seamless use by U.S., Canadian and Asian financial intermediaries.
Ashton's investments in these joint-ventures expose it to currency exchange
fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar and the Canadian Dollar, and between the
U.S. Dollar and the Hong Kong Dollar. To the extent Ashton's international
activities recorded in their local currencies increase in the future, the
exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates will correspondingly
increase. The Company has not engaged in any foreign currency hedging
activities. Foreign currency cash balances are generally kept at levels
necessary to meet current operating and capitalization needs of these foreign
joint ventures.
20
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Independent Auditor's Report................................................................ 22
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2000 and 1999...................................... 23
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998.... 24
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998.... 25
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended
March 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998......................................................... 26
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................................................. 28
21
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
The Ashton Technology Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Ashton
Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended March 31, 2000. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Ashton
Technology Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2000 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
- -------------------------------
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York
April 27, 2000
22
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31,
----------------------------
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 15,365,439 $ 2,667,347
Securities available-for-sale 9,906,220 --
Accounts receivable and other current assets 446,066 308,249
Current portion of notes receivable 121,845 112,499
------------ ------------
Total current assets 25,839,570 3,088,095
Notes receivable, net of current portion 2,605,172 717,284
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation 944,292 1,017,179
Exchange memberships 266,652 196,900
Investments in affiliates 1,090,508 --
Capitalized software development costs -- 95,354
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization 19,521 58,563
Other assets 258,196 480,362
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 31,023,911 $ 5,653,737
============ ============
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 861,304 $ 675,841
Other liabilities -- 532,918
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 861,304 1,208,759
Minority interest 5,000,000 --
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - shares authorized: 3,000,000
250,000 shares designated as Series A - (liquidation preference
$10 per share); shares issued and outstanding: none and 125,219 -- 1,252,188
590,000 shares designated as Series B - (liquidation preference
$10 per share); shares issued and outstanding: 64,200 and 417,500 642,000 4,175,000
105,000 shares designated as Series C $.01 par value - (liquidation
preference equals stated value); shares issued and outstanding: none -- --
10 shares designated as Series D $.01 par value - (liquidation preference
equals stated value); shares issued and outstanding: none -- --
10 shares designated as Series E $.01 par value - (liquidation preference
$1,000,000 per share); shares issued and outstanding: none -- --
20,000 shares designated as Series F $.01 par value - (liquidation preference
equals stated value of $1,000 per share); shares issued and
outstanding: 8,000 and none 8,000,000 --
Common stock - par value: $.01; shares authorized: 60,000,000;
shares issued and outstanding: 28,118,594 and 20,569,172 281,186 205,692
Additional paid-in capital 64,294,258 39,133,830
Deferred consulting expense -- (285,208)
Accumulated deficit (47,981,286) (40,036,524)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (73,551) --
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 25,162,607 4,444,978
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 31,023,911 $ 5,653,737
============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues $ 3,869,084 $ 1,434,438 $ 313,659
------------ ------------ ------------
Expenses:
Costs of revenues 644,510 168,000 79,000
Development costs 95,354 190,707 196,974
Depreciation and amortization 715,956 515,240 326,736
Non-cash compensation charges 351,369 5,932,466 1,844,761
Selling, general and administrative 17,255,007 9,225,551 5,108,899
------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses 19,062,196 16,031,964 7,556,370
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from operations (15,193,112) (14,597,526) (7,242,711)
------------ ------------ ------------
Interest income 1,169,910 146,816 50,265
Interest expense (797) -- (392,996)
Other income (expense) (416,632) 133,222 (760,000)
Gain on deconsolidation of Gomez 5,568,475 -- --
Gain on redemption of Gomez preferred stock 2,550,000 -- --
Equity in income of affiliates 90,508 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss from continuing operations (6,231,648) (14,317,488) (8,345,442)
------------ ------------ ------------
Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries -- 41,003 --
Minority interest in income from discontinued operations of CSI -- -- (11,465)
Income from discontinued operations of CSI (less income tax of $42,000) -- -- 67,935
Loss on disposal of CSI -- -- (385,930)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net Loss $ (6,231,648) $(14,276,485) $ (8,674,902)
============ ============ ============
Dividends attributed to preferred stock (1,259,757) (1,113,277) --
Beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock -- (4,270,435) (2,206,480)
Dividends in arrears on preferred stock (456,075) (33,447) (107,749)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss applicable to common stock $ (7,947,480) $(19,693,644) $(10,989,131)
============ ============ ============
Net loss per common share from continuing operations $ (0.32) $ (1.80) $ (1.42)
Net loss per common share from discontinued operations $ -- $ -- $ (0.04)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss per common share $ (0.32) $ (1.80) $ (1.46)
============ ============ ============
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 24,929,977 10,953,818 7,519,555
============ ============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended March 31,
--------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss $ (6,231,648) $(14,276,485) $ (8,674,902)
Income from disconinued operations of CSI -- -- (67,935)
Minority interest in income from discontinued operations of CSI -- -- 11,465
Loss on sale of discontinued operations of CSI -- -- 385,930
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss from continuing operations (6,231,648) (14,276,485) (8,345,442)
------------ ------------ ------------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 811,310 705,947 326,736
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries -- (41,003) --
Non-cash compensation charge for common stock options 66,161 5,362,736 1,804,917
Common stock issued for consulting services 285,208 569,730 39,844
Writedown E.Com investment -- 105,000 --
UTTC common stock issued in connection with termination agreement 416,632 -- --
Gain on deconsolidation of Gomez (5,568,475) -- --
Gain on redemption of Gomez preferred stock (2,550,000) -- --
Equity in income of affiliates (90,508) -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase)/ decrease in receivables and prepayments (2,170,835) (177,406) 261,537
Decrease in stock subscriptions receivable -- 245,000 --
Decrease in other assets 165,436 (415,009) (6,863)
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,981,293 (1,440,637) 344,732
(Decrease)/ increase in other liabilities (432,532) 532,918 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in continuing operations (13,317,958) (8,829,209) (5,574,539)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations of CSI -- -- 50,045
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (13,317,958) (8,829,209) (5,524,494)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of securities available for sale (9,968,771) -- --
Purchase of investment in E.Com -- -- (105,000)
Purchase of property and equipment (2,591,268) (644,403) (348,392)
Purchase of exchange membership (69,752) -- --
Increase in notes receivable (2,000,000) (380,000) --
Cash received from notes receivable 102,766 111,876 32,466
Capitalized software development costs -- (61,375) (224,686)
Investment in affiliates (1,000,000) -- --
Proceeds from sale of CSI, net of cash disposed -- -- 154,108
Effect of deconsolidation of Gomez 2,554,511 -- --
Proceeds from redemption of Gomez preferred stock 2,550,000 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (10,422,514) (973,902) (491,504)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Preferred stock dividends paid in cash (535,829) (319,062) --
Issuance costs for common stock (575,000) (725,000) --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 5,750,000 7,250,000 --
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock 2,855,027 -- --
Issuance costs for preferred stock and notes payable (682,563) (863,000) (1,159,163)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock 20,000,000 6,275,000 4,930,000
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable -- -- 3,000,000
Issuance costs for Gomez preferred stock (611,898) 36,840 --
Proceeds from issuance of Gomez preferred stock 5,500,000 -- --
Proceeds from issuance of Gomez common stock 500 -- --
Issuance costs for UTTC preferred stock (261,673) -- --
Proceeds from issuance of UTTC preferred stock 5,000,000 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 36,438,564 11,654,778 6,770,837
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 12,698,092 1,851,667 754,839
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 2,667,347 815,680 60,841
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 15,365,439 $ 2,667,347 $ 815,680
============ ============ ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest $ 797 $ 147,388 $ 364,938
Cash paid during the year for taxes $ 36,943 $ 6,619 $ 20,198
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities
Purchase of exchange membership and www.VWAP.com -- $ 255,463 --
Exchange of UTTC notes for Ashton preferred stock -- -- $ 2,975,000
Forgiveness of note payable in connection with sale of CSI -- -- $ 500,000
Receipt of note receivable in connection with sale of CSI -- -- $ 594,125
Issuance of warrants in connection with Series F preferred stock $ 645,000 -- --
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
THE ASHTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Year ended March 31,
------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------- --------------------------
Shares Amount Shares Amount
------------- ------------ ------------ -------------
Common stock
Balance at beginning of year 20,569,172 $ 205,692 8,143,571 $ 81,436
Issuance of common stock in connection with puts 696,570 6,966 4,810,788 48,108
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock 5,563,148 55,631 7,062,421 70,624
Issuance of common stock for consulting services -- -- 250,000 2,500
Issuance costs in connection with preferred stock -- -- 20,000 200
Exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock 1,289,704 12,897 -- --
Issuance of common stock and stock options for asset acquisitions -- -- 100,000 1,000
Preferred stock dividends -- -- 182,392 1,824
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 28,118,594 281,186 20,569,172 205,692
------------------------------------------------------
Series A Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year 125,219 1,252,188 250,000 2,500,000
Issuance of Series A preferred stock -- -- -- --
Preferred stock dividends -- -- 1,969 19,688
Conversion of Series A preferred stock to common stock (125,219) (1,252,188) (126,750) (1,267,500)
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year -- -- 125,219 1,252,188
------------------------------------------------------
Series B Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year 417,500 4,175,000 460,000 3,188,875
Issuance of Series B preferred stock -- -- 127,500 1,275,000
Issuance of Series B preferred in exchange of UTTC notes payable -- -- -- --
Issuance costs in connection with preferred stock -- -- 5,000 50,000
Recognition of beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock -- -- -- 1,411,125
Conversion of Series B preferred stock to common stock (353,300) (3,533,000) (175,000) (1,750,000)
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 64,200 642,000 417,500 4,175,000
------------------------------------------------------
Series C Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year -- -- 55,000 550,000
Issuance of Series C preferred stock -- -- -- --
Conversion of Series C preferred stock to common stock -- -- (55,000) (550,000)
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------
Series D Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year -- -- -- --
Issuance of Series D preferred stock 3.00 3,000,000
Issuance costs in connection with preferred stock 0.15 150,000
Preferred stock dividends 0.02 23,950
Conversion of Series D preferred stock to common stock (3.17) (3,173,950)
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------
Series E Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year -- -- -- --
Issuance of Series E preferred stock 2.00 2,000,000
Issuance costs in connection with preferred stock 0.10 100,000
Conversion of Series E preferred stock to common stock (2.10) (2,100,000)
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------
Series F Preferred Stock
Balance at beginning of year -- -- -- --
Issuance of Series F preferred stock 20,000 20,000,000 -- --
Conversion of Series F preferred stock to common stock (12,000) (12,000,000) -- --
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year 8,000 8,000,000 -- --
------------------------------------------------------
Deferred Consulting Expense
Balance at beginning of year (285,208) (438,281)
Issuance of common stock for consulting services -- (416,657)
Amortization of deferred consulting expense 285,208 569,730
------------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of year -- (285,208)
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
1998
------------------------------
Shares Amount
-------------- --------------
Common stock
Balance at beginning of year 7,562,500 $ 75,625
Issuance of common stock in connection with puts -- --
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock 281,071 2,811
Issuance of common stock for consulting services 300,000 3,000
Issuance costs in connection with preferred stock -- --
Exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock -- --
Issuance of common stock and stock options for asset acquisitions -- --