SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO _____________
Commission file number 000-21783
8X8, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2445 Mission College Blvd.
Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 727-1885
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: COMMON STOCK, PAR
VALUE $.001 PER SHARE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Based on the closing sale price of the Registrant's common stock on the NASDAQ National Market System on May 13, 2002, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $20,798,332. Shares of the Registrant's common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the Registrant's outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of shares of the Registrant's common stock outstanding as of May
13, 2002 was 28,236,372.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

8X8, INC.
INDEX TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2002
|
Part I. |
|
Page |
|
Item 1. |
Business | |
|
Item 2. |
Properties | |
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings | |
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | |
|
Part II. |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Security Holder Matters | |
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data | |
|
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
|
Item 7a. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | |
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | |
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures | |
|
Part III. |
|
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | |
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation | |
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | |
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | |
|
Part IV. |
|
|
|
Item 14. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K | |
|
Signatures |
|
PART I OVERVIEW Statements contained in this Report on Form 10-K
regarding our expectations, beliefs, estimates, intentions or strategies are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act and include statements regarding our
plans to conduct trials of our IP voice telephony service offering with follow-
on video capabilities; our research and development plans for our various
product groups; our expectation concerning the adequacy of our facilities; our
estimates of litigation exposure and our beliefs about the sufficiency of our
manufacturing arrangements. All forward-looking statements included in this
Report are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we
assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. You should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of a number of factors, including a shifting of internal
research and development focus based on changes in the market or adequacy of
funding; a failure of customers to adopt iPBX systems due to concerns about
VoIP technology or advances in competing systems; our business may grow in an
unanticipated manner causing us to require different types of facilities;
ordinary course litigation may cause a greater than anticipated impact due to
factual matters or issues beyond our control; and our ability to source our
products may be interrupted if our manufacturers cease operations or no longer
desire to do business with us. Please also see the section entitled "Factors
That May Affect Future Results" for additional risks that may impact our
business. 8x8, Inc., or 8x8, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) develop and market telecommunication technology for Internet Protocol,
or IP, telephony and video applications. The Company has three product lines:
voice and video semiconductors and related software; software that implements
the functionality of a private branch exchange, or PBX, over data networks; and
videophones, telephones and communication services that work over broadband
networks. The Company has two primary subsidiaries, Netergy Microelectronics,
Inc., or Netergy, and Centile, Inc., or Centile, that comprise two of its three
product lines. In February 2002, we announced that we were beginning a new
effort to add video capabilities to Netergy's existing family of voice-over-IP,
or VoIP, semiconductors, along with software and systems support for the latest
compression standards for video. Netergy, formed in December 2000, provides voice and video
semiconductors and related communication software to original equipment
manufacturers, or OEMs, of telephones, terminal adapters, and other endpoint
communication devices and to other semiconductor companies. Netergy's
technologies are used to make IP telephones and media hubs and to voice-enable
cable and digital subscriber line, or DSL, modems, wireless devices, and other
broadband technologies. Netergy's video semiconductors are used in applications
such as communication terminals (including videophones, telephones and room
videoconferencing systems) that allow video communication over telephone
networks, a company's internal networks (e.g., a local area network, or LAN) and
the Internet. Centile, formed in March 2001, develops and markets hosted
iPBX solutions that allow service providers to offer, to small and medium-sized
businesses over broadband networks, the features and functions found in a
typical business phone system. A hosted iPBX solution is a software application
that implements the functionality of a business phone system over the same data
connection that a business uses for connection to the Internet. The phone
system software runs on servers that are located at a central data center so
that the only phone system equipment that is required at the customer site are
telephones. Centile's hosted iPBX solution was commercially released and became
generally available in March 2001. At the parent company level, 8x8 is developing its third product
line that includes consumer videophones, telephones, and communication software
and services that work over broadband networks. In January 2002, the
Company announced two new consumer products, the DV324 desktop videophone, a
videophone for analog phone lines, and the Behind-U privacy peripheral for
personal computers. In November 2001, 8x8 announced its enhanced Service Logic
Execution Environment, or eSLEE, a high-performance service logic and execution
engine that provides a framework for deploying scalable telecommunications
applications. The eSLEE succeeds the service creation environment, or SCE,
technology that 8x8 acquired as a result of the acquisition of U|Force, Inc. in
fiscal 2001. In May 2002, 8x8 announced that it was developing an end-to-end,
internet-based voice and video communications platform and service, the Packet8
IP telephony platform and service, based upon 8x8's eSLEE and related
technology. The Company was founded as Integrated Information Technology,
Inc. in 1987 and completed its initial public offering on July 2, 1997 under the
name 8x8, Inc. In August 2000, the Company changed its name to Netergy Networks,
Inc., but subsequently changed it back to 8x8, Inc. in July 2001. INDUSTRY BACKGROUND Traditional telecommunication networks use a fixed
electrical path that travels through a series of switches across the network.
These networks were designed solely to carry low-fidelity audio signals with a
high level of reliability. Although these networks are indeed reliable for their
initially intended use, these networks are not well suited to service the
explosive growth of digital communications applications. Traditional networks transmit data at very low rates and
resolutions, making them poorly suited for delivering high-fidelity audio,
entertainment-quality video or other rich multimedia content. Traditional
networks are also expensive to build because each subscriber's telephone must be
individually connected to the central office switch, which is usually several
miles away from a typical subscriber's location. The digital component of the
traditional telecommunications infrastructure is also less efficient than modern
networks because it allots fixed bandwidth throughout the duration of each call,
whether or not voice is actually being transmitted. Further, it is difficult for
telecommunication service providers to provide new or differentiated services or
functions, like video communications, that the network was not designed to
accommodate. In contrast to the traditional telecommunications
infrastructure or public switched telephone network (PSTN), data networks --
such as the Internet or a corporate LAN -- utilize a "packet-switched" system in
which information between two communicating terminals (for example, a PC
downloading a page from a web server) is transmitted in the form of small data
packets that travel through a series of switches, routers, and hubs across the
network. Packet-switched networks have been built mainly for carrying non real-time data.
The advantages of such networks are their efficiency, flexibility,
and scalability. Bandwidth is only consumed when needed. Networks can be built
in a variety of configurations to suit the number of users, client/server
application requirements and desired availability of bandwidth. Furthermore,
many terminals can share the same connection to the network. The exponential
growth of the Internet in recent years has proven the scalability of these
underlying packet networks. The most common protocol used for communicating on
these packet networks is Internet Protocol, or IP. As broadband connectivity has become more available and less
expensive, it is now possible for service providers to offer voice and video
services that run over these IP networks to businesses and consumers. Providing
such services has the potential to both substantially lower the cost of
telephone and equipment costs to these customers and to increase the breadth of
features available to the end-user. Services like full-motion, two-way video are
now supported by the bandwidth spectrum commonly available to broadband
customers, whether business or residential. To enable such new products to take
hold, service and equipment suppliers need semiconductor products and software
to connect input and output devices to the networks and the software that runs
on the network that enables these input/output devices to be easily installed,
operated, and managed, as well as to replace common functionalities of the
legacy switched network, such as billing and operator/directory assistance. TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS The Company has developed a broad range of
communication technologies, including semiconductors, embedded software, system
designs, telephony call management software, and consumer voice and video
systems that enable communication services over IP networks. The Company has leveraged its technologies to develop the
following product lines: semiconductors and embedded software designed for IP
telephony and videoconferencing applications, developed and marketed by Netergy;
hosted iPBX solutions, developed and marketed by Centile; and consumer systems
and communication software and services, developed and marketed by 8x8. SEMICONDUCTORS AND EMBEDDED SOFTWARE Netergy develops and markets a range of technology
products, including semiconductors, embedded software, system software, and
reference designs, that allow telecommunication equipment OEMs to: i) build
voice and video IP phones, ii) build IP-to-analog phone adapter products, and
iii) add IP telephony functions to DSL, cable, and wireless modems.
Additionally, Netergy provides semiconductors and embedded software for use in
videoconferencing applications. The following sections describe Netergy's
technology and products in more detail. Technology SEMICONDUCTOR ARCHITECTURE -- Netergy's semiconductors
are based on programmable processor architectures that enable implementation of
IP telephony and videoconferencing applications in a highly efficient manner.
Netergy's semiconductor architectures employ 32-bit reduced instruction set
computer, or RISC, microprocessor cores, which execute the embedded applications
software. Some of Netergy's semiconductors also employ a 64-bit Single
Instruction Multiple Data, or SIMD, digital signal processor, or DSP, to
accelerate the execution of signal processing intensive operations. Furthermore,
Netergy's Audacity-T2 and T2U semiconductors benefit from the unique feature of
not requiring any external SRAM or DRAM to operate. Netergy's RISC processor cores use a proprietary instruction
set specifically designed for multimedia communication applications. The RISC
cores control the overall chip operation and manage the input/output interface
through a variety of specialized ports that connect the chip directly to
external host, audio, and network subsystems. The cores are programmable in the
C programming language and allow customers to add their own features and
functionality to the device software provided by Netergy. Netergy's DSP core
architecture is a SIMD processor that implements computationally intensive
video, audio, and graphics processing routines as well as certain digital
communication protocols. The DSP cores are programmable with a proprietary
instruction set consisting of variable-length 32-bit and 64-bit microcode
instructions that provide the flexibility to improve algorithm performance,
enhance audio and video quality, and maintain compliance with changing digital
audio, video, graphics, and communication protocol standards. The DSP cores
access their instructions through an internal bus that interfaces to on-chip
SRAM and read-only memory, or ROM, that is pre-programmed with video and audio
processing subroutines. EMBEDDED SOFTWARE -- Netergy has developed a broad range of
embedded application software that runs on its semiconductor products. Netergy's
application software allows the use of its semiconductors in systems that
conform to various emerging and established international telephony standards
for audio and video encoders and decoders (also known as codecs) and call
signaling protocols. By refining its software, Netergy can enhance quality,
address new standards, and add significant features and functionality to systems
that contain the semiconductor products. In addition, certain customers have
licensed source code to which they add proprietary features and custom
interfaces and, in some cases, port to other semiconductor or processor
architectures. Call signaling protocol stacks are complex software programs
required to make voice calls over IP networks, including the Internet. Codecs
format and compress digital audio and video signals so they can be represented
and efficiently transmitted in a digital form. Developing functional VoIP and
video software and obtaining interoperability with other VoIP and video systems
requires significant development time, which is why many OEMs choose to license
it instead. Netergy's protocol stacks support the four most commonly deployed
VoIP protocols, along with seven codecs. Netergy is also developing new video compression algorithm
technology that is based on the H.26L standard. The H.26L standard is a new
algorithm being jointly specified by standards bodies in the International
Teleconferencing Union, or ITU, and the Motion Pictures Expert Group, or MPEG,
with the goal of improving video compression ratios by a factor of two against
any current video algorithm specification at any bit rate. For a given bit rate,
implementations of the new H.26L video codec are expected to improve the picture
quality of video streaming, telephony, and entertainment applications beyond the
quality of pictures that are available today from either the MPEG-2 or MPEG-4
algorithms. SYSTEM DESIGN -- Netergy has developed expertise in
integrating its semiconductors and software with peripheral components to
produce complete IP telephony and multimedia communication systems. Netergy's
system technology consists of modular subsystems that can be combined and
rearranged to interface to various networks (such as analog telephone, ISDN,
Ethernet LAN, wireless, and home networks) and to various telephony devices,
such as the analog phones in a home or FAX machines in an office environment.
Products AUDACITY-T2 IP TELEPHONY PROCESSOR -- The Audacity-T2
semiconductor performs the digital processing functions required to build an IP
phone, including formatting digital audio data for transmission over packet
networks (such as Ethernet, the Internet, DSL links and digital cable systems).
The chip can also be used in two-port analog telephone terminal adapters or
gateway applications. AUDACITY-T2U IP TELEPHONY PROCESSOR -- The Audacity-T2U
semiconductor has all of the functionality of the Audacity-T2 processor but runs
at faster processing speeds, features more on-chip memory, and contains an extra
interface for connecting the chip to interfaces commonly found on DSL modem
chipsets. The additional on-chip memory and higher processing speed enable the
Audacity-T2U to address more advanced products, such as higher-end IP phones and
four-port terminal adapters or gateways. VERACITY SOFTWARE -- The Veracity software suite is a
comprehensive package of VoIP call control protocols, standard network
protocols, and audio processing functions. Veracity software stacks can run on
either the Audacity family of semiconductors or on third-party VoIP processors.
These stacks are designed for cost competitive, high quality applications,
including VoIP/VoDSL gateways, Ethernet PBXs, and IP phones. VP7 AUDIO COMPRESSION ENGINE -- The VP7 audio compression
engine, or VP7, is a synthesizable core that can be integrated into custom
semiconductor designs to add voice compression capability (e.g., telephony
applications). For example, the VP7 has been integrated into STMicrolectronics'
STV0397 semiconductor. The VP7 is based on Netergy's proprietary DSP
architecture. REFERENCE DESIGN KITS -- Netergy currently supplies the
following reference design kits for its semiconductor products: Netergy's reference design kits are intended to serve as
prototype system products and allow a customer to leverage Netergy's system
design expertise to accelerate the time to market with new products. Each
reference design is provided with schematics, bills of materials, or BOMs,
documentation, embedded software, and a software development environment that
enables a customer to add new features and otherwise customize the software.
VIDEOCONFERENCING SEMICONDUCTORS -- Netergy's family of
videoconferencing semiconductors includes the VCP, LVP, VPIC, and VCPex. These
semiconductors are used in H.323, H.320, and H.324 videoconferencing
applications, including group videoconferencing systems, personal computer, or
PC, videophone add-in boards, consumer videophones, and video monitoring
systems. These semiconductors are based on Netergy's proprietary architecture,
which combines a custom RISC microprocessor, a high performance DSP core, SRAM,
and proprietary software on a single chip. The integrated semiconductors perform
the core processing functions required by LAN, ISDN, and analog telephone-based
video communication and other digital video applications.
Revenues derived from the sale of videoconferencing semiconductor products were
$4.1 million, $9.5 million and $11.3 million for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Revenues derived from videoconferencing
technology licenses and related maintenance revenues, as well as royalties
earned under such licenses, the majority of which were non-recurring in nature,
were $3.6 million, $3.1 million and $4.3 million for the fiscal years ended March
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. HOSTED IPBX SOLUTIONS Centile has developed and markets a hosted iPBX,
which is a software-driven telephony solution that allows network service
providers and PBX resellers to offer PBX functionality as a business
communication service over broadband IP networks. The following sections
describe Centile's technology and products in more detail. Technology Typically, today's businesses require an individual phone
for each office worker. The phones include various productivity functions, such
as voicemail, transfer and hold capability, and other services. Small and
medium-sized enterprises will generally deploy dozens of such phones. Until
recently, there were two ways that businesses could obtain this type of phone
service: i) subscribe to Centrex services from their local telephone company, or
ii) buy a dedicated piece of hardware that operates as a business PBX system. In
a Centrex service, the telephone company provides a telephone line from its
central office switch for each "extension" and associates all of the lines with
a central number assigned to the business. Centrex, however, scales poorly for
both regulatory and architectural reasons. It is expensive on a per-line basis
when compared to enterprise-owned PBXs, which typically deliver additional
functionality as well. In addition, Centrex services do not offer the ability
for easy integration with computer programs, require long lead times to
implement service changes, and are difficult to manage. Rather than subscribe to individual telephone lines for each
employee (as with Centrex), most companies purchase a dedicated PBX system, a
telephone switch that allows dozens or hundreds of employees to share a few
incoming and outgoing telephone lines, resulting in a more efficient use of
those lines. Traditional PBXs use circuit-switched technology and must be
installed on the enterprise premise because every phone is connected to it by an
individual cable. These systems are expensive (from $20,000 to $200,000 or more,
depending on the number of extensions), difficult to manage, maintain, and use,
typically require vendor-specific telephones and cannot be easily integrated
with data processing systems. Suppliers have recently offered versions of these
dedicated PBXs that run over a company's LAN. Often, these offerings have the
same costs and drawbacks of the legacy PBX systems. With the availability of broadband IP connectivity to
businesses, however, a third alternative has emerged: hosted iPBX services. In
this model, the service provider delivers PBX functionality over an IP
connection, which reduces the scaling problems by allowing many extensions to
share a single connection. This solution also offers many of the advantages of
an enterprise-owned PBX and further enables integration with enterprise data
processing systems and support of call centers, while eliminating the capital
and maintenance investments required for dedicated on-site hardware that
provides the PBX functionality. TELEPHONY CALL MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE -- Centile's telephony
call management software (the iPBX server software, hosted iPBX, or iPBX) uses
an IP network for its switching fabric and media connections, and provides the
call routing, setup, and teardown necessary to establish a connection between
two terminals on an IP network. It also provides a variety of more complex PBX
features such as call transfers, web-based control, voice message retrieval, and
conferencing. The iPBX software runs on a cluster of carrier-grade server
platforms that are located in a data center. A cluster typically consists of
both active and backup servers. Each active server runs several copies or
"instances" of the iPBX software simultaneously. Each instance is dedicated to a
particular enterprise end customer. The server cluster in the data center is
linked to customer sites with a dedicated broadband IP link such as a T1 line.
On the customer premise, terminal adapters or IP telephones are connected to the
IP link via an IP router and Ethernet hubs or switches. Terminal adapters
connect standard analog telephones and fax machines to the IP network. To address scalability and reliability issues, Centile uses a
modular and distributed architecture for the iPBX system. In this architecture,
a single instance of the iPBX server software provides complete PBX
functionality. A single instance is designed to support approximately 100
extensions. This limitation minimizes both the processing capacity and memory
requirements of the server platform, allowing less powerful, less expensive
servers to be used. Multiple iPBX instances can be run on each server and larger
enterprises can be served by combining instances together to form a single
larger PBX. The system can be scaled in overall capacity by adding more servers.
Much of the flexibility of the iPBX is due to the use of
abstraction layers between the core iPBX engine and the devices with which it
interfaces and controls. To allow it to interface to a variety of different
telephone sets, PSTN gateways, and softswitches, the iPBX uses software drivers
that support various industry standard and proprietary call setup and teardown
protocols. Currently, the iPBX supports session initiation protocol, or SIP,
media gateway control protocol, or MGCP, H.323v2, and a variety of third-party
proprietary protocols. To allow easy integration with computer programs (computer
telephony integration, or CTI), the iPBX supports Sun Microsystems' Java
Telephony Application Program Interface, or JTAPI, version 1.3 for telephony
call control. JTAPI provides an industry standard series of function calls to
allow computer programs to control PBXs from more than one manufacturer.
Computer programs interfaced to the PBX might provide a graphical user interface
to make it easier to transfer calls or initiate conference calls, or they might
connect a company's customer relationship management software directly to the
phone system, displaying customer information on a computer screen when that
customer calls for support. The iPBX solution was designed to address the shortcomings of
traditional Centrex service offerings in a number of ways as described below:
Products IPBX SERVER SOFTWARE -- The Centile iPBX server software
runs on a cluster of five Sun Microsystems carrier grade server platforms and
provides software PBX functionality over IP networks. The iPBX software was
designed specifically to allow service providers to deliver hosted iPBX services
to small and medium-sized business customers. The Centile iPBX allows service
providers to support up to eighty discrete iPBXs per cluster, each dedicated to
an individual customer, and up to five thousand total extensions. The server clusters running the iPBX server software are
located in a service provider's data center. It is connected to the customer's
premise using any broadband IP connection, though deployments to date have
generally utilized a T1 connection. For telephone sets, customers can use
terminal adapters to adapt standard analog telephones to IP service or they can
use IP phones. The iPBX server software connects to the PSTN and the long-
distance IP backbone through a gateway. Service providers control and configure the iPBX server
software via a Web interface, allowing the system administrator to manage the
iPBX from any location using any workstation with a browser. The administrator
interface is designed to provide control of phone number block assignments, dial
plans, service provisioning, direct dial phone number assignments, iPBX status,
and bandwidth management. The iPBX supports voicemail, interactive voice
response, automatic call distribution, auto attendants, directory service,
unified messaging modules, and operation, service, and support, or OSS,
integration. MULTIPBX - Introduced in May 2002, the MultiPBX combines the
iPBX server software with a complete package of VoIP and data equipment suited
for a building owner who desires to offer converged voice and data services
through a multi-tenant building. The product can support thousands of user
extensions in its standard configuration and can be located anywhere within the
building. Regular PSTN phones can be used with the MultiPBX and all regular
PSTN functions are supported with these phones: message waiting indicator,
caller ID, transfer, conference and others. IP phones can also be used to
enable the more advanced features of the system at the user's desktop. The
MultiPBX is able to place and receive local and long distance calls via a PSTN
gateway integrated with the product. Interoffice and telecommuter calls can be
carried directly via a Virtual Private Network, or VPN, or directly across the
Internet, thus offsetting communication costs for distant offices and remote
facilities. MH4 & MH16 MEDIA HUBs -- Terminal adapters and media hubs
are customer premise equipment that adapt conventional telephony equipment, such
as analog telephones and fax machines, for IP service. Centile's MH4 and MH16
media hub products support four and sixteen analog lines, or ports,
respectively. Centile currently uses its MH4 and MH16 products, along with
certain IP phones and terminal adapters developed by third parties, in its
hosted iPBX and MultiPBX business communication service deployments. Each media hub supports as many simultaneous connections as
it has analog lines, and multiple media hubs can be used in an IP telephony
system to provide as many lines as required. Because it uses a standard touch-tone
telephone as both its audio and user interface, media hub-based systems are
both reliable and cost-effective, especially when compared to proprietary
digital PBX telephones. MH4 and MH16 media hubs support the MGCP IP telephony
standard with Centile extensions for auto-discovery and configuration. All media
hubs deployed by Centile incorporate FLASH memory for remote upgrade capability
so that the Centile iPBX server software can, as required, upgrade media hubs
automatically via the network. IPBX USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE -- Centile has announced three
user interface applications for its hosted iPBX solution: ComCenter,
Switchboard, and Administrator. All of these applications are designed to
harness the graphical capabilities of personal computers and workstations to
make the hosted iPBX easy to use. The Centile ComCenter software with Call Announcer is
designed for the end users of the iPBX. It provides Caller ID, call transfers,
conference call setup, on-screen directories, contact management, and call
logging. It also lets users set up and control their voicemail, listen to
messages, set call forwarding numbers and filters, and set up personal speed
dial numbers. The Centile Switchboard software, or Switchboard, is the
attendant interface for the iPBX. Switchboard runs on a personal computer or
workstation to allow attendants to route incoming calls to an enterprise with a
point-and-click interface. Switchboard provides caller ID for multiple incoming
calls, extension status, two-click call transfers, corporate voice mailbox
management, and multi-attendant support. Its graphical interface minimizes
training and improves attendant productivity. With the iPBX, customers control their own moves, adds, and
changes using the Centile Administrator, or Administrator. To add additional
lines, the customer simply connects an additional media hub to the IP network.
The Centile Auto Discovery mechanism automatically configures the media hub. The
customer then uses Administrator to assign extension numbers, associate user
names, and create a voicemail account for each line. Administrator also allows
the customer to define hunt groups, set user permissions, define phone button
functions, and set voicemail parameters, all with a point-and-click
interface. CONSUMER SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE PLATFORM AND SERVICES Technology COMMUNICATION SERVICES -- In order to scale IP
communication networks to large numbers of customers, the software that controls
the communication network needs to incorporate the same infrastructure and
switching components that have enabled the Internet to scale to its current
level of deployment. Whereas the Centile iPBX system incorporates all of the
configuration, network management, dial plans, and messaging facilities needed
to operate the system in a single coherent package appropriate for a PBX system,
an IP communication network that scales to millions and millions of users should
use standard, open services that are widely deployed today. Such services
include the Internet Message Access Protocol, or IMAP, a messaging interface
that is used by e-mail clients; Domain Name Server, or DNS, for resolving names
and addresses; and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, or LDAP, for directory
functions. 8x8 is developing a distributed service platform for IP
communication networks called Packet8. Packet8 ties together these standard
Internet services with a collection of multimedia endpoints, including Windows
XP messenger clients, SIP phones, SIP-based 3G mobile phones, set-top boxes, and
legacy video devices such as H.323 and H.324 video endpoints. Packet8 is built
on Linux servers that run 8x8's
eSLEE software and is composed of a collection of software packages running on
the eSLEE that serve as proxies for linking Internet network resources together
to form an IP communications network. These proxies are based on the Session
Initiation Protocol, or SIP, and include functions for call routing,
registration, messaging, firewall/network address translation, or NAT,
traversal, 911 call handling, billing, and media and gateway services. This
distributed architecture also has the advantage that the software proxies can
manage the signaling traffic between endpoints or the Internet infrastructure
and enable endpoints that would otherwise be unable to communicate with each
other to be interoperable. The distributed proxy structure also allows signaling
and media traffic that would otherwise be blocked by NAT or firewall
configurations to traverse those obstructions without requiring any changes to
the physical NAT or firewall mechanisms. Thus, a consumer broadband subscriber
with a home gateway, who would otherwise be unable to access VoIP or video
telephony media without constructing a Virtual Private Network, or VPN, to
encapsulate the home network private IP addresses, can now connect an IP phone
to the home network without any special configuration and immediately access
media services via the translation services of 8x8's proxy architecture. Packet8
is being designed to comply with applicable emergency (911), eavesdropping
(CALEA), and other regulatory requirements needed by any broad-based
communications network. The Packet8 architecture is designed to enable the use of
video media in addition to VoIP traffic and includes a video voicemail function
built into the SIP proxy that can process video messages left by video-enabled
endpoints. CONSUMER SYSTEMS -- 8x8 is reselling private-branded analog
videophones and is planning to resell IP phones, some of which are manufactured by
some of Netergy's OEM semiconductor customers. These phones incorporate certain unique
software modifications to the protocol and application code that enable them to
take advantage of 8x8's Packet8 distributed IP services platform. The original
design of the videophone and IP phone systems is based on some of Netergy's
semiconductor reference designs. 8x8 has also developed a motion detection peripheral, the
Behind-U workstation alert system, that can be used to signal a personal
computer or other device to detect movement and convey that information to the
computing device. The Behind-U system does not use any of Netergy's
semiconductor products. Products DV324 DESKTOP VIDEOPHONE -- 8x8's DV324 product is a
videophone with an integrated display and camera that is compatible with the
H.324 standard, and therefore works over standard analog phone lines. The
videophone can also be used to make a normal audio PSTN call. Controls on the
videophone and the on-screen menu system enable the user to adjust the quality
of the video that is sent and received, electronically pan/tilt/zoom the near-end and
far-end cameras, take a high-resolution snapshot image, and turn on
privacy mode to block outgoing video. The phone supports two sets of audio/video
inputs (for connecting external cameras, camcorders or digital cameras) and one
audio/video output port (for connecting an external TV or other display device)
and supports caller-ID, auto-answer (so the phone can be used as a monitoring
device), and 10 configurable speed-dial numbers. BEHIND-U WORKSTATION ALERT SYSTEM -- The Behind-U system
consists of an infrared motion sensor that plugs into the keyboard port on a
personal computer and associated software. The Behind-U monitors an area for
motion and relays the motion information to the software application running on
the PC. The software can be configured to notify the PC user that motion has
been detected, or can be used to temporarily hide the information currently
displayed on the computer screen. SIP IP PHONE -- 8x8 is working with several partners to
private-label an IP phone that is intended to be sold
in conjunction with the Packet8 IP voice telephony services offering. The phone
specifications include features to support multiple "virtual" lines of
IP telephony, an integrated Ethernet interface, speakerphone capability,
programmable feature buttons and on-hook dialing. The phone is designed to be
compatible with other SIP protocol devices. PACKET8 IP VOICE TELEPHONY SERVICE OFFERING -- 8x8 is
planning to conduct initial trials of its Packet8 voice telephony service
offering, with plans to integrate video capabilities into the service at a later
date. CUSTOMERS AND MARKETING SEMICONDUCTORS AND EMBEDDED SOFTWARE Customers Netergy sells its IP telephony semiconductors, embedded
software, and reference designs to OEMs of VoIP and VoDSL products, such as
Alcatel Microelectronics, D-Link, Ericsson and Telsey. Netergy has also
separately licensed a VoIP semiconductor core and embedded VoIP software to
STMicroelectronics. Netergy sells its video semiconductors and reference board
designs to OEMs of videoconferencing systems for the business, consumer, and
video monitoring markets, such as GE Interlogix, Leadtek Research, Mitsubishi,
Polycom, Sony, and VCON Telecommunications. Leadtek Research and GE Interlogix
represented 13% and 12% of the Company's fiscal 2002 revenues, respectively. Sales and Marketing Netergy markets its semiconductor, embedded software, and
reference design products through its own direct sales force and third-party
sales representatives. Netergy supports its domestic and international direct
sales efforts from its headquarters in Santa Clara, California and a European
office in Marlow, United Kingdom. Netergy's sales and marketing personnel
typically provide support to OEM customers through its application engineering
team and periodic training sessions. Netergy sells its products to customers on
an order-to-order basis and has long-term agreements with only a limited number
of customers. As such, order backlog at any given time generally is not significant
and may not be a reliable indicator of future revenues. Competition Netergy competes with both manufacturers of digital
signal processing semiconductors and software products developed for the OEM
VoIP marketplace. Netergy also competes with manufacturers of videoconferencing
semiconductors and related firmware. Intense competition, declining average
selling prices, and rapid technological changes characterize the markets for
Netergy's products. The principal competitive factors in the market for IP
telephony and videoconferencing semiconductors and embedded software include
product definition, product design, system integration, chip size, code size,
functionality, time-to-market, adherence to industry standards, price, and
reliability. Netergy has a number of competitors in this market including: Agere
Systems, Analog Devices, Atmel, Broadcom, DSP Group, Motorola, Radvision, Texas
Instruments/Telogy Networks, TriMedia Technologies, Winbond, and Zarlink
Semiconductor. HOSTED IPBX SOLUTIONS Customers At the beginning of 2001, we decided that the long trials
and time-to-market constraints of the CLEC and service provider market, as well
as the decreasing availability of cash to certain competitive local exchange
carriers, or CLECs, in the North American market, required that we provide a
hosted business communication service offering to PBX resellers in addition to
its existing service provider offering. In March 2001, Centile was formed to
conduct the operations of the hosted iPBX business and initiated the service in
conjunction with Dialink, a CLEC based in the San Francisco Bay Area. Centile is
still actively marketing the product to service providers in Europe, Asia and
North America. Centile has announced licensing agreements with Song Networks AB,
formerly Tele1 Europe Holding AB, and Oy Datatie AB, an ELISA group company. Sales and Marketing Centile markets the hosted iPBX software product through
a direct sales force. In addition, Centile intends to establish relationships
with PBX and other system integrators that can serve as resellers. The sales
force operates from the Company's headquarters in Santa Clara, California and
from its European office in Sophia-Antipolis, France. Competition Centile currently competes with suppliers of traditional
PBXs, Centrex equipment, and newer generation IP-based PBX or Centrex solutions
that seek to sell such products to telecommunication service providers or to the
small and medium-size enterprise marketplace. The main competition includes
Avaya, Commworks Corporation, Mitel, Nortel Networks, and several other
providers of traditional and newer generation IP-based solutions, such as
Broadsoft, Inc., Cisco Systems, Shoreline Communications, Syndeo Corporation,
Sylantro, VocalData, Inc., Vocaltec Communications, and Vertical Networks. As an IP-based solution, the hosted iPBX product competes by
leveraging the innate efficiencies of IP architectures and combining those
efficiencies with certain required features from competitive legacy products.
The principal competitive factors in the market for hosted iPBX solutions
include product reliability, product feature parity, interface design,
scalability, time-to-market, adherence to standards, price, functionality, and
IP network delivery/design. CONSUMER SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE PLATFORM AND SERVICES Customers In May 2001, 8x8 announced the first customer license of
its service creation technologies to Lucent. In January 2002, 8x8 introduced the
DV324 Desktop Videophone and Behind-U products and announced that these products
would be sold direct to end-users from 8x8's website. 8x8 has also announced
that Michigan State University has ordered DV324 Desktop Videophones for its
mental health and hospice patients. 8x8 plans to engage in early trials of its
Packet8 IP communication software platform and services offering for which no
customers have been announced. Sales and Marketing 8x8 markets its consumer systems through its direct sales
force and third-party resellers. Sales of the products to end-users are also
conducted from the 8x8's website. 8x8 plans to market its Packet8 IP
communication services offering via its own direct sales force and through
third-party resellers. Competition 8x8's consumer systems products compete with other
providers of videophones and videoconferencing systems, including Innomedia,
MotionMedia, and various software offerings that implement videophone
functionality on a personal computer, such as CU-SeeMe and Intel's videophone
software that is bundled with their webcam offerings. The main competitors for
the Company's eSLEE and Communication Services product line are deltaThree,
Dynamicsoft, Inc., GoBeam, Nortel Networks, Pagoo, Sylantro
Systems, Tekelec, Telcordia, Telsis, Ubiquity Software and Vonage. This market
is characterized by rapid technological change, intense competition, and
first-mover advantage. Principal competitive factors in the market for 8x8's products
include product feature parity, interface design, product reliability,
performance, time-to-market, adherence to standards, price, functionality, and
IP network delivery/design. MANUFACTURING Netergy outsources the manufacturing of its
semiconductors to independent foundries, and its primary semiconductor wafer
supplier is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, or TSMC. Netergy
also relies on various independent third party companies for the assembly and
testing of its semiconductors. Our reliance on overseas wafer fabrication, sort,
assembly and test contractors and our maintenance of inventories at contractors'
facilities entails certain political and economic risks, including political
instability and expropriation, currency controls and exchange fluctuations, and
changes in tariff and freight rates. Furthermore, in the event overseas wafer
fabrication, sort, assembly or test operations, or air transportation to or from
foreign foundries or contractors, were disrupted for any reason, our operations
could be severely harmed. The principal raw materials utilized in the semiconductor
production process are polished silicon wafers, ultra-pure metals, chemicals and
gases. Encapsulation materials that enclose the chip and provide the external
connecting leads are provided by the independent assembly contractors. Shortages
could occur in various essential materials due to interruption of supply or due
to increased demand in the industry. Shortages have occurred in our history and
order lead times have been extended in the industry on occasion without
significantly harming us. However, future shortages, if any, could severely harm
our operations. Netergy does not have long-term purchase agreements with its
contract manufacturers or its component suppliers. Centile outsources the manufacturing of its media hubs and
8x8 outsources the manufacturing of its videophones to third-party
manufacturers, who are generally also semiconductor customers of Netergy.
Neither Centile nor 8x8 have long-term purchase agreements with their contract
manufacturers. We may not be able to obtain alternative manufacturing sources if
our current subcontractors become unavailable. If we are able to find
alternative subcontractors, a switchover to a new supplier would take time and
might result in an interruption in sales. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development expenses in the fiscal years
ending March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $11.6 million, $18.7 million, and
$11.9 million, respectively. The development of new products and the enhancement
of existing products by the Company and its subsidiaries are essential to their
success. The Company's current and future research and development
efforts relate primarily to VoIP semiconductors and embedded software, video
semiconductors and embedded software, hosted iPBX systems, and telecommunication
services technologies, including the development of new endpoints. Areas of
emphasis will include: enhanced versions of Netergy's Audacity semiconductor
family and architecture to provide higher performance, enhanced functionality,
and further integration of certain essential system functions and interfaces;
enhanced versions of 8x8's video communication processor technology to provide
support for H.26L and other new video compression algorithms; enhanced versions
of Centile's hosted iPBX business communication service to include additional
call control features, system management capabilities, additional protocol and
telephony device support, and new graphical user interface and web-based
applications; and enhanced versions of 8x8's eSLEE platform and Packet8
telecommunication services offering. Future developments may also focus on
emerging audio and video telephony standards and protocols, quality and
performance enhancements to multimedia compression algorithms, and additional
features supporting all of the Company's products. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS Our ability to compete depends, in part, on our
ability to obtain and enforce intellectual property protection for our
technology in the United States and internationally. We currently rely
primarily on a combination of trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks and
licenses to protect our intellectually property. At this time we have forty-nine
United States patents and a number of United States and foreign patents
pending, none of which we consider critical to our business. Our patents expire
on dates ranging from 2012 to 2018. We cannot predict whether our pending
patent applications will result in issued patents. Due to rapid technological
change, we believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of
our personnel, new product developments and enhancements to existing products
are more important than the various legal protections of our technology to
establishing and maintaining technology leadership. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary
information, we require our employees to sign agreements providing for the
maintenance of confidentiality and also the assignment of rights to inventions
made by them while in our employ. There can be no assurance that our means of
protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be
adequate or that competition will not independently develop technologies that
are similar or superior to our technology, duplicate our technology or design
around any of our patents. We are also subject to the risks of adverse claims
and litigation alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of
others. The semiconductor and software industries are subject to frequent
litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. In
addition, the laws of foreign countries in which our products are or may be sold
do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the
laws of the United States. Our failure to protect our proprietary information
could cause our business and operating results to suffer. We rely upon certain technology, including hardware and
software, licensed from third parties. There can be no assurance that the
technology licensed by us will continue to provide competitive features and
functionality or that licenses for technology currently utilized by us or other
technology which we may seek to license in the future will be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. The loss of, or inability to maintain
existing licenses could result in shipment delays or reductions until equivalent
technology or suitable alternative products could be developed, identified,
licensed and integrated, and could harm our business. These licenses are on
standard commercial terms made generally available by the companies providing
the licenses. The cost and terms of these licenses individually are not material
to our business. LICENSING AND DEVELOPMENT ARRANGEMENTS The Company has entered into licensing and
development arrangements with its customers to promote the design, development,
manufacture, and sale of the Company's products. In order to encourage the use of its semiconductors, Netergy
has licensed portions of its systems technology and software object code for its
semiconductors to virtually all of its semiconductor customers. Moreover, many
of Netergy's OEM customers have licensed portions of the software source code
for its semiconductors. Netergy intends to continue to license its
semiconductor, software, and systems technology to other companies, many of
which are current or potential competitors. Such arrangements may enable these
companies to use Netergy's technology to produce products that compete with the
Company's IP telephony and video products. Netergy has also licensed the right to manufacture certain of
its videoconferencing and IP telephony semiconductor products to several
original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. These licenses generally provide for
the payment of royalties; however, royalty obligations under a license of our
video compression technology to ESS Technology, Inc. that provided 13% of our
revenues in fiscal 2002 have now expired. Only certain of these OEM licensees
may sell semiconductors based on the licensed technology to third parties,
including STMicroelectronics, or STM, and Alcatel Microelectronics, while other
licensees are limited to sales of such semiconductors as part of multimedia
communication systems or sub-systems. Item 13 of this Report provides further
information regarding the Company's license and other arrangements with STM. Centile may, in the future, license its source code for
portions or all of the hosted iPBX technology to other companies. Such
arrangements may enable these companies to use the technology to produce
products that compete with Centile's products. In March 2002, 8x8 licensed certain Very Long Instruction
Word, or VLIW, microprocessor cores, related tools and MPEG4 video compression
firmware from STM for use in the Company's Internet protocol, or IP, video
communication processor development initiatives. Additionally, 8x8 agreed to
license STM certain of its existing and future H.263 and H.26L firmware
implementations for use with STM's semiconductor products. The licenses are non-
exclusive, non-transferable and non-assignable and provide for the sharing of
updates and enhancements to the licensed technology, subject to certain
limitations. The agreement includes provisions that allow the Company to
manufacture semiconductor devices that contain the ST200 core at STM or at other
third-party fabrication facilities. The Company is required to pay STM per-unit
royalties based upon shipments of products that incorporate the VLIW technology.
In addition, STM is required to pay the Company certain per-unit royalties based
upon shipments of STM semiconductor products that contain the Company's
H.263 and H.26L video technology. In addition, 8x8 has licensed source code for its service
creation environment, or SCE, product to Lucent. The SCE product was the
predecessor of the eSLEE product. Under the agreement, Lucent has licensed the
technology for use in its Enhanced Service Authoring Environment (eSAE), which
enables carriers and application developers to design innovative new services
for converged voice and data networks. The Company may continue to license its
communication services platform and video source code to other companies. Such
arrangements may enable these companies to use the technology to produce
products that compete with the Company's consumer systems and communication
services products. The Company expects to continue licensing its technology to
others, many of whom may be located outside of the United States. In addition to
licensing its technology to others, the Company from time to time will take a
license to technology owned by third parties and currently relies upon certain
technology, including hardware and software, licensed from third parties. INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS Financial information relating to our segments and
information on revenues generated in different geographic areas are set forth in
Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of
this Report. In addition, information regarding risks attendant to our foreign
operations are set forth under the heading "Factors that May Affect Future
Results" later in this Report. EMPLOYEES As of March 31, 2002, the Company employed 106
persons, including 6 in manufacturing operations, 60 in research and
development, 17 in sales and marketing, and 23 in general and administrative
capacities. None of the Company's employees are represented by a labor union or
are subject to a collective bargaining arrangement. The Company believes that
relations with employees are good. The Company's principal operations are located in an
approximately 45,000 square foot facility in Santa Clara, California that is
leased through May 2003. Design, limited manufacturing, research and
development, sales and marketing, and administrative activities are performed in
this facility. The Company also leases facilities for its sales office and
research and development operation in Marlow, United Kingdom and for its
research and development operation in Sophia-Antipolis, France. The Company
believes that its existing facilities are adequate to meet its current and
foreseeable future needs. For additional information regarding the Company's
obligations under leases see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements
contained in Part II, Item 8. The Company is involved in various legal claims and
litigation that have arisen in the normal course of the Company's operations.
While the results of such claims and litigation cannot be predicted with
certainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not
have a significantly adverse effect on the Company's financial position or
results of operations. However, should the Company not prevail in any such
litigation, its operating results and financial condition could be adversely
impacted. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND
RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS The Company completed its initial public offering on July
2, 1997 under the name 8x8, Inc. From that date through April 3, 2000, the
Company's common stock, $0.001 par value per share, was traded on the NASDAQ
National Market (the NASDAQ) under the symbol "EGHT." From April 4, 2000 through
July 18, 2001, the Company's common stock was traded on the NASDAQ under the
symbol "NTRG." From July 19, 2001 the Company's common stock has traded under
the symbol "EGHT." The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock
and has no present plans to do so. As of May 13, 2002, there were 272 holders of
record of the Company's common stock. The following table sets forth the range
of high and low closing prices for each period indicated:
|
Period |
High |
Low |
|
|
Fiscal 2002: |
|||
|
First quarter |
$ 2.32 |
$ 0.65 |
|
|
Second quarter |
$ 1.48 |
$ 0.60 |
|
|
Third quarter |
$ 1.11 |
$ 0.68 |
|
|
Fourth quarter |
$ 1.30 |
$ 0.84 |
|
|
Fiscal 2001: |
|||
|
First quarter |
$ 29.63 |
$ 7.67 |
|
|
Second quarter |
$ 12.94 |
$ 6.63 |
|
|
Third quarter |
$ 9.06 |
$ 1.50 |
|
|
Fourth quarter |
$ 4.72 |
$ 0.78 |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Years Ended March 31, (1)
----------------------------------------------------------
2002 (2) 2001(6)(3) 2000(4)(6) 1999(5) 1998
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total revenues............................ $ 14,691 $ 18,228 $ 25,384 $ 31,682 $ 49,776
Net income (loss)......................... $ (9,105) $ (74,399) $ (24,848) $ (19,224) $ 3,727
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic................................... $ (0.33) $ (2.99) $ (1.38) $ (1.28) $ 0.31
Diluted................................. $ (0.33) $ (2.99) $ (1.38) $ (1.28) $ 0.25
Total assets.............................. $ 19,653 $ 39,145 $ 59,983 $ 28,709 $ 46,429
Convertible subordinated debentures....... $ -- $ 6,238 $ 5,498 $ -- $ --
Contingently redeemable common stock...... $ 813 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Accumulated deficit....................... $ (137,276) $ (128,146) $ (53,747) $ (28,899) $ (9,675)
Total stockholders' equity................ $ 13,234 $ 21,632 $ 47,390 $ 18,823 $ 36,443
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, including our statements regarding our assumptions underlying our critical accounting determinations concerning revenue, allowances for doubtful accounts, valuation of goodwill, tax allowances and reserves for legal issues; the anticipated continued decline in videoconferencing semiconductor revenues; factors that could impact our gross margins; the sufficiency of cash to fund our ongoing obligations through at least March 31, 2003, efforts to raise additional financing, the acquisition of or investment in other businesses and products, commitment of resources, and reduction in operating costs including the possible sale or cessation of certain business segments and the possible further reduction of personnel and suspension of salary increases and capital expenditures. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including our good faith assumptions being incorrect, our business expenses being greater than anticipated due to competitive factors or unanticipated development or sales costs; revenues not resulting in the manner anticipated due to a continued slow down in technology spending, particularly in the telecommunications market; our failure to generate investor interest or to sell certain of our assets or business segments. The forward-looking statements may also be impacted by the additional risks faced by us as described in this Report, including those set forth under the section entitled "Factors that May Affect Future Results." All forward-looking statements included in this Report are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.
OVERVIEW
8x8, Inc., or 8x8, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) develop and market telecommunication technology for Internet Protocol, or IP, telephony and video applications. The Company has three product lines: voice and video semiconductors and related software; software that implements the functionality of a private branch exchange, or PBX, over data networks; and telephones, videophones, and communication services that work over broadband networks.
The Company has two primary subsidiaries, Netergy Microelectronics, Inc. (Netergy) and Centile, Inc. (Centile). Netergy provides voice and video semiconductors and related communication software to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, of telephones, terminal adapters, and other endpoint communication devices and to other semiconductor companies. Netergy's technologies are used to make IP telephones and to voice-enable cable and digital subscriber line, or DSL, modems, wireless devices, and other broadband technologies. Centile develops and markets hosted iPBX solutions that allow service providers to offer to small and medium-sized businesses over broadband networks the features and functions that are commonly found in a typical business phone system. A hosted iPBX solution is a software application that implements the functionality of a business phone system over the same data connection that a business uses for connection to the Internet. The phone system software runs on servers that are located at a central data center so that the only phone system equipment that is required at the customer site are telephones. The phone system can also be accessed and controlled from any web browser on the Internet. 8x8 is developing its third product line that includes consumer telephones, videophones, and communication software and services that work over broadband networks, at the parent company level. 8x8 sells videophones that work over normal phone lines and is planning to initiate trials of its IP telephony software and service offering that is designed to enable customers to communicate with IP telephones and videophones using an Internet based communications software platform and service.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company does not have any ownership interest in any special purpose entities that are not wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiaries of the Company.
We have identified the policies below as some of the most critical to our business and the understanding of our results of operations. These policies require critical judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Although we believe our judgments and estimates are appropriate and correct, actual future results may differ from our estimates. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion of the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.
Use of estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and equity and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates, particularly estimates relating to litigation and other contingencies, have a material impact on our financial statements, and are discussed in detail throughout our analysis of the results of operations.
In addition to evaluating estimates relating to the items discussed above, we also consider other estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to bad debts, the valuation of inventories, goodwill, income taxes, and financing operations. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets, liabilities and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Additional information regarding risk factors that may impact our estimates is included below under "Factors that May Affect Future Results."
Revenue recognition
Our revenue recognition policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Report. As described below, significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments or utilized different estimates.
At the time of each revenue transaction we assess whether the revenue amount is fixed and determinable and whether or not collection is reasonably assured. We assess whether the fee is fixed and determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. If a significant portion of a fee is due after our normal payment terms, which are thirty to ninety days from invoice date, we account for the fee as not being fixed and determinable. In these cases, we recognize revenue as the fees become due. We assess collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. We generally do not request collateral from our customers. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.
For arrangements with multiple obligations (for example, undelivered maintenance and support), we allocate revenue to each component of the arrangement using the residual value method based on the fair value of the undelivered elements, which is specific to the Company. This means that we defer revenue from the arranged fee that is equivalent to the fair value of the undelivered elements. Fair values for the ongoing maintenance and support obligations for our technology licenses are based upon separate sales of renewals to other customers or upon renewal rates quoted in the contracts. The Company bases the fair value of services, such as training or consulting, on separate sales of these services to other customers. We recognize revenue for maintenance services ratably over the contract term. Our training and consulting services are billed based on hourly rates and we generally recognize revenue as these services are performed.
If an arrangement includes acceptance criteria, revenue is not recognized until we can objectively demonstrate that the software or service can meet the acceptance criteria. If the software license arrangement obligates us to deliver unspecified future products, revenue is recognized on a subscription basis, ratably over the term of the contract.
Our ability to enter into revenue generating transactions and recognize revenue in the future is subject to a number of business and economic risks discussed below under "Factors that May Affect Future Results."
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We must make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable. Management specifically analyzes accounts receivable, including historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit- worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The accounts receivable balance was $1.2 million, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $286,000 as of March 31, 2002. One customer represented $684,000, or 45%, of our gross accounts receivable at March 31, 2002. Based upon the customer's past payment history, discussions with the customer and our review of their financial condition, outstanding balances were considered collectible and therefore no portion of this balance was specifically reserved for at March 31, 2002.
Valuation of inventories
We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by us, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Valuation of goodwill and long-lived and intangible assets
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
When we determine that the carrying value of goodwill, long-lived assets and intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Net goodwill and intangible assets amounted to $1.5 million as of March 31, 2002. Net long-lived assets were $3.1 million as of March 31, 2002.
Effective April 1, 2002, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" became effective and as a result, we will reclassify workforce related intangibles of $11,000 to goodwill and cease to amortize approximately $1.5 million of remaining goodwill associated with the acquisition of Odisei. We recorded approximately $763,000 of amortization on goodwill and intangible assets related to assembled workforce during fiscal 2002 and would have recorded approximately $707,000 of amortization during fiscal 2003. In lieu of amortization, we are required to perform an initial impairment review of our goodwill in fiscal 2003 and an annual impairment review thereafter. We expect to complete our initial review during the quarter ended September 30, 2002. There can be no assurance that at the time the review is completed a material impairment charge will not be recorded.
Accounting for income taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. In the event that we determine that we would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Significant management judgment is required in determining the valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets, which primarily consist of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $47.3 million as of March 31, 2002, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize most of our deferred tax assets before they expire. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction in which we operate and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable.
Litigation
Management's current estimated range of liability related to pending litigation involving the Company is based on claims for which our management can estimate the amount and range of loss. We have recorded the minimum estimated liability related to those claims, where there is a range of loss. Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount and range of loss on pending litigation, management is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. As additional information becomes available, we will assess the potential liability, if any, related to our pending litigation and revise our estimates. Such revisions in our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operation and financial position.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth consolidated statement of operations data for each of the years ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, expressed as the percentage of our total revenues represented by each item. Cost of product revenues is presented as a percentage of product revenues and cost of license and other revenues is presented as a percentage of license and other revenues. You should read this information in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Report:
Year Ended March 31,
-------------------------
2002 2001 2000
------- -------- --------
Product revenues..................................... 41 % 70 % 82 %
License and other revenues........................... 59 % 30 % 18 %
------ ------- -------
Total revenues............................. 100 % 100 % 100 %
------ ------- -------
Cost of product revenues............................. 43 % 41 % 41 %
Cost of license and other revenues................... 2 % 32 % 3 %
------ ------- -------
Total cost of revenues..................... 19 % 38 % 34 %
------ ------- -------
Gross profit............................... 81 % 62 % 66 %
------ ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Research and development........................... 79 % 103 % 47 %
Selling, general and administrative................ 65 % 99 % 84 %
In-process research and development................ -- % 25 % 40 %
Amortization of intangibles........................ 5 % 60 % 2 %
Restructuring charge............................... -- % 183 % -- %
------ ------- -------
Total operating expenses................... 149 % 470 % 173 %
------ ------- -------
Loss from operations................................. (68)% (408)% (107)%
Other income, net.................................... 7 % 14 % 11 %
Interest expense..................................... (6)% (8)% (2)%
------ ------- -------
Loss before provision for income taxes............... (67)% (402)% (98)%
Provision for income taxes........................... -- % -- % -- %
------ ------- -------
Net loss before extraordinary gain and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle .......... (67)% (402)% (98)%
Extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt, net.... 5 % -- % -- %
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.. -- % (6)% -- %
------ ------- -------
Net loss............................................. (62)% (408)% (98)%
====== ======= =======
REVENUES
Product revenues were $6.0 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of $6.8 million from the $12.8 million reported in fiscal 2001. The decrease in product revenues in fiscal 2002 was due to decreases in sales of video monitoring and consumer videophone systems totaling $969,000, resulting from our decision to terminate further development and sales of these product lines in prior years, a slight decrease in IP telephony semiconductor sales, a $305,000 decrease in media hub system revenues, and a $5.4 million decrease in revenue derived from our videoconferencing semiconductor products. The decrease in media hub system revenues as compared to the prior year period was due primarily to a decline in sales to a significant customer. The significant decrease in videoconferencing semiconductor revenues was due primarily to a significant decrease in unit shipments, offset partially by increases in average selling prices, or ASPs. Factors that contributed to the significant decrease in unit shipments of our videoconferencing semiconductors as compared to the prior year, and that we anticipate will result in a continued decline in revenues derived from videoconferencing semiconductors for the foreseeable future, include:
Product revenues were $12.8 million in fiscal 2001, a decrease of $8.0 million from the $20.8 million reported in fiscal 2000. The decrease in product revenues in fiscal 2001 was primarily due to decreases in sales of video monitoring and consumer videophone systems for the reasons discussed above, and a decrease in average selling prices for our videoconferencing semiconductors. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in IP telephony semiconductor revenues resulting from the commercial release of our Audacity-T2 product in fiscal 2001.
License and other revenues were $8.6 million in fiscal 2002, an increase of $3.2 million from the $5.4 million recognized in fiscal 2001. License and other revenues recognized in fiscal 2002, the majority of which are considered to be non-recurring in nature, consist primarily of technology licenses and related maintenance revenues, as well as royalties earned under such licenses. License and other revenues for fiscal 2001 also included $1.2 million of professional service revenues associated with our Canadian operations. No professional service revenues were recognized in fiscal 2002 due to the elimination of the professional services organization as part of the restructuring of our Canadian operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001. The negative impact of eliminating professional service revenues in fiscal 2002 was more than offset by the following:
License and other revenues increased $853,000 from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 due primarily to U|Force professional service revenues of $1.2 million recognized in fiscal 2001 and a $646,000 increase in revenue associated with licenses of Netergy's embedded IP telephony firmware technology, offset by a decrease in royalties earned under the video compression technology license agreement discussed above.
Revenues from our ten largest customers in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 accounted for approximately 73%, 48%, and 35%, respectively, of our total revenues. Three customers represented more than 10% of our total revenues in fiscal 2002. These customers, ESS Technology, Inc., Leadtek Research, and GE Interlogix, represented 13%, 13% and 12% of our total revenues, respectively. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, no customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues.
Sales to customers outside the United States represented 61%, 69%, and 47% of total revenues in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The following table illustrates our net revenues by geographic area. Revenues are attributed to countries based on the destination of shipment (in thousands):
Year Ended March 31,
-------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------- ----------- -----------
United States........................... $ 5,777 $ 5,632 $ 13,381
Europe.................................. 4,126 5,862 5,808
Taiwan.................................. 2,026 2,739 1,737
Japan................................... 1,119 1,188 2,351
Other................................... 1,643 2,807 2,107
----------- ----------- -----------
$ 14,691 $ 18,228 $ 25,384
=========== =========== ===========
COST OF REVENUES AND GROSS PROFIT
The cost of product revenues consists of costs associated with components, semiconductor wafer fabrication, system and semiconductor assembly and testing performed by third-party vendors, and direct and indirect costs associated with purchasing, scheduling, and quality assurance. Gross profit from product revenues was $3.4 million, $7.6 million, and $12.3 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Product gross margin was 57%, 59% and 59% for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
The $4.1 million decrease in gross profit from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002 is due primarily to a significant decrease in sales of our videoconferencing semiconductors and video monitoring systems. Gross profit in fiscal 2002 was also impacted by a decrease in product gross margins due to lower average selling prices realized on sales of our IP telephony semiconductors, and to a lessor extent, an increase in inventory reserves associated with our media hub products in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The decrease in margins was mitigated to some extent by an increase in average selling prices realized on the sale of our videoconferencing semiconductors and the reversal of $143,000 of reserves associated with our semiconductor products in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 due to the sale of inventory that had been specifically reserved for in fiscal 2001. The $4.7 million decrease in gross profit from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 is due primarily to a significant decrease in sales of our video monitoring and consumer videophone products due to our exit from those businesses. Gross profit in fiscal 2001 was also impacted by lower average selling prices realized on sales of our videoconferencing semiconductors and an increase in reserves associated with our semiconductor products, offset by a significant increase in IP telephony semiconductor sales.
Gross profit from license and other revenues, which were largely nonrecurring, was $8.4 million, $3.7 million, and $4.4 million in fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Associated gross margins were 98%, 68%, and 97% in fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000. The significant increase in gross margin from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002 was due to the elimination of our professional service organization as part of the restructuring of our Canadian operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001.
Our gross margin is affected by a number of factors including, product mix, the recognition of license and other revenues for which there may be no or little corresponding cost of revenues, product pricing, the percentage of direct sales and sales to resellers, and manufacturing and component costs. The markets for our products are characterized by falling average selling prices. In the likely event that we encounter significant price competition in the markets for our products, we could be at a significant disadvantage compared to our competitors, many of whom have substantially greater resources, and therefore may be better able to withstand an extended period of downward pricing pressure. To respond to competitive pricing pressures, we will be required to introduce differentiated products and continue to reduce costs as a means of maintaining our margins. We may not be successful in our development efforts or product cost reduction measures and may face continued erosion of margins.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel, system prototype design and fabrication, mask, prototype wafer, and equipment costs necessary for us to conduct our development efforts. Research and development costs, including software development costs, are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses were $11.6 million, $18.7 million, and $11.9 million for fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The significant decreases in research and development expenses in fiscal 2002 as compared to fiscal 2001 were due to the following:
Higher research and development expenses during fiscal 2001 as compared to fiscal 2000 were due primarily to increases in personnel resulting from the acquisition of U|Force and increases in hosted iPBX development efforts, higher third-party consulting expenses associated with the development of a graphical user interface for the hosted iPBX product, higher depreciation and maintenance expenses as a result of additional lab equipment and computer aided design tools, and increased stock compensation charges of approximately $325,000 related to stock option bonus programs.
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general, and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related overhead costs for sales, marketing, finance, human resources, and general management. Such costs also include advertising, sales commissions, trade show, and other marketing and promotional expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $9.5 million, $18.1 million, and $21.3 million in fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The significant decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses in fiscal 2002 as compared to fiscal 2001 was due to the following:
The decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses during the year ended March 31, 2001 as compared to the comparable period in the prior year is due primarily to a one-time $6.4 million charge related to the sale of 3.7 million shares of our common stock to STMicroelectronics that we recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000. The charge reflected the discount from the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the related agreement. The decrease also reflected lower headcount and other costs required to support ViaTV and video monitoring sales, promotion, and support activities due to our exit from the consumer videophone and video monitoring businesses. These decreases were substantially offset by increased expenses associated with the addition of the U|Force sales, marketing, finance, and corporate organizations, costs incurred related to our name change, and increased stock compensation charges.
IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES
We incurred in-process research and development charges of $4.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2001 related to the acquisition of U|Force, Inc. (U|Force), and $10.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2000 related to the acquisition of Odisei S.A. (Odisei). A discussion of these acquisitions follows below.
U|Force, Inc.
The Company's consolidated financial statements reflect the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of U|Force, Inc. on June 30, 2000 for a total purchase price of $46.8 million. U|Force, based in Montreal, Canada, was a developer of IP-based software applications and a provider of professional services. U|Force was also developing a Java-based service creation environment (SCE) designed to allow telecommunication service providers to develop, deploy, and manage telephony applications and services to their customers. The purchase price was comprised of 8x8 common stock with a fair value of approximately $38.0 million comprised of: (i) 1,447,523 shares issued at closing of the acquisition, and (ii) 2,107,780 shares to be issued upon the exchange or redemption of the exchangeable shares (the Exchangeable Shares) of Canadian entities held by former employee shareholders or indirect owners of U|Force stock. The Exchangeable Shares held by U|Force employees were subject to certain restrictions, including our right to repurchase the Exchangeable Shares if an employee departed prior to vesting. In addition, we also agreed to issue one share of preferred stock (the Special Voting Share) that provides holders of Exchangeable Shares with voting rights equivalent to the shares of common stock into which their shares are convertible. We also assumed outstanding stock options to purchase shares of U|Force common stock for which the Black-Scholes pricing model value of approximately $6.5 million was included in the purchase price. Direct transaction costs related to the merger were approximately $747,000. Additionally, the Company advanced $1.5 million to U|Force upon signing the acquisition agreement, but prior to the close of the transaction. This amount was accounted for as part of the purchase price. The following table summarizes the composition of the purchase price (in thousands):
Value of common stock and Exchangable Shares issued...... $ 38,042
Value of stock otions assumed............................ 6,546
Cash advanced to U|Force prior to closing................ 1,500
Direct transaction costs................................. 747
---------
$ 46,835
=========
The purchase price was allocated to tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the book value of U|Force's assets and liabilities, which we believe approximated their fair value. Intangible assets acquired included amounts allocated to U|Force's in-process research and development. The in-process research and development related to U|Force's initial products, the SCE and a unified messaging application, for which technological feasibility had not been established and the technology had no alternative future use. The estimated percentage complete for the unified messaging and SCE products was approximately 44% and 34%, respectively, at June 30, 2000. The fair value of the in-process technology was based on a discounted cash flow model, similar to the traditional "Income Approach," which discounts expected future cash flows to present value, net of tax. In developing cash flow projections, revenues were forecasted based on relevant factors, including estimated aggregate revenue growth rates for the business as a whole, characteristics of the potential market for the technology, and the anticipated life of the technology. Projected annual revenues for the in-process research and development projects were assumed to ramp up initially and decline significantly at the end of the in-process technology's economic life. Operating expenses and resulting profit margins were forecasted based on the characteristics and cash flow generating potential of the acquired in-process technologies. Risks that were considered as part of the analysis included the scope of the efforts necessary to achieve technological feasibility, rapidly changing customer markets, and significant competitive threats from numerous companies. We also considered the risk that if we failed to bring the products to market in a timely manner, it could adversely affect sales and profitability of the combined company in the future. The resulting estimated net cash flows were discounted at a rate of 25%. This discount rate was based on the estimated cost of capital plus an additional discount for the increased risk associated with in-process technology. The value of the acquired U|Force in-process research and development, which was expensed in the second quarter of fiscal 2001, approximated $4.6 million. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. Amounts allocated to goodwill, the value of an assumed distribution agreement, and workforce were being amortized on a straight-line basis over three, three, and two years, respectively. The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
In-process research and development............... $ 4,563
Distribution agreement............................ 1,053
Workforce......................................... 1,182
U|Force net tangible assets....................... 1,801
Goodwill.......................................... 38,236
---------
$ 46,835
=========
Our consolidated financial statements include the results of the operations of U|Force from the date of the acquisition, June 30, 2000, the beginning of our second quarter of fiscal 2001.
Odisei S.A.
In May 1999, we acquired Odisei, a privately held, development stage company based in Sophia Antipolis, France, that was developing software for managing voice-over IP networks. The consolidated financial statements reflect the acquisition of Odisei on May 24, 1999 for approximately 2,868,000 shares of 8x8's common stock and approximately 121,000 of contingent shares, which were subsequently issued to Odisei employee shareholders in March 2000. The purchase price was approximately $13.6 million, which includes approximately $295,000 of acquisition-related costs. The purchase price was allocated to tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the book value of Odisei's current assets and liabilities, which we believed approximated their fair value. Intangible assets acquired included amounts allocated to Odisei's in-process research and development. The in-process research and development related to Odisei's initial product for which technological feasibility had not been established and was estimated to be approximately 60% complete. The fair value of the in-process technology was based on a discounted cash flow model, which discounted expected future cash flows to present value, net of tax. In developing cash flow projections, revenues were forecasted based on relevant factors, including estimated aggregate revenue growth rates for the business as a whole, characteristics of the potential market for the technology, and the anticipated life of the technology. Projected annual revenues for the in-process research and development projects were assumed to ramp up initially and decline significantly at the end of the in-process technology's economic life. Operating expenses and resulting profit margins were forecasted based on the characteristics and estimated cash flow generating potential of the acquired in-process technology. Associated risks include the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in completing the project and thereby achieving technological feasibility, and risks related to the impact of potential changes in market conditions and technology. The resulting estimated net cash flows were discounted at a rate of 27%. This discount rate was based on the estimated cost of capital plus an additional discount for the increased risk associated with in-process technology. The value of the acquired Odisei in-process research and development, which was expensed in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, was $10.1 million. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. Until the adoption of SFAS 142 on April 1, 2002, amounts allocated to goodwill and workforce were being amortized on a straight-line basis over five and three years, respectively. The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
In-process research and development............... $ 10,100
Workforce......................................... 200
Net tangible liabilities.......................... (219)
Goodwill.......................................... 3,481
---------
$ 13,562
=========
Our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 included the results of Odisei from the date of acquisition.
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets charged to operations was $763,000, $11.0 million and $614,000 during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, after a significant number of employees had resigned, we discontinued our Canadian operations acquired in conjunction with the acquisition of U|Force in June 2000. We closed our offices in Montreal and Hull, Quebec and laid-off all remaining employees resulting in the cessation of the research and development efforts and the sales and marketing and professional services activities associated with the U|Force business. As a result of the restructuring, we recorded a one-time charge of $33.3 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2001. The restructuring charges consisted of the following (in thousands):
Employee separation............................... $ 765
Fixed asset losses and impairments................ 2,084
Intangible asset impairments...................... 30,247
Lease obligation and termination.................. 220
---------
$ 33,316
=========
Employee separation costs represent severance payments related to the 96 employees in the Montreal and Hull offices who were laid-off.
The impairment charges for fixed assets of approximately $2.1 million included write-offs of abandoned and unusable assets of approximately $1.4 million, a loss on sale of assets of $567,000, and a charge for assets to be disposed of $172,000. The loss on sale of assets of $567,000 was attributable to the sale of office, computer, and other equipment of the Montreal office. We received common stock of the purchaser valued at approximately $412,000 as of the date of sale. Fair value of assets to be disposed of was measured based on expected salvage value, less costs to sell. Assets to be disposed of consist of computer equipment with a fair value of $57,000 at March 31, 2001. Substantially all of these assets were liquidated during fiscal 2002.
The impairment charges for intangible assets represented the write-off of the unamortized intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of U|Force. The charges of approximately $30.2 million included: $28.7 million for the goodwill related to the acquisition, $739,000 for the assembled workforce, and $789,000 related to a distribution agreement. The impairments were directly attributable to the cessation of operations in Canada. We performed an evaluation of the recoverability of the intangible assets related to these operations in accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of." The lack of estimated future net cash flows related to the acquired products necessitated an impairment charge to write-off the remaining unamortized goodwill. The distribution agreement asset was written off because we will no longer provide products and services to customers under that agreement.
We terminated the lease for our primary facility in Montreal in March 2001, but we were required to pay rent on the facility through May 31, 2001. We terminated the lease for our facility in Hull, Quebec in fiscal 2002. Accrued obligations related to remaining lease commitments on the Montreal and Hull facilities totaled $212,000 at March 31, 2001. There are no remaining restructuring related accruals at March 31, 2002.
Cash payments related to the restructuring during the quarter ended March 31, 2001, which included all employee separation costs and certain lease termination costs, approximated $920,000. The payments made in fiscal 2002 related to the terminations of the Montreal and Hull facility leases totaled $225,000.
OTHER INCOME, NET
In fiscal 2002, 2001, and 2000, other income, net, was approximately $1.0 million, $2.6 million, and $2.8 million, respectively. The decrease in other incom