Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


x           ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2002

o            TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 333-19495


RADNOR HOLDINGS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  23-2674715
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 

  Three Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 300
100 Matsonford Road, Radnor, Pennsylvania
(address of principal executive offices)
   
19087
(Zip Code)
 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 610-341-9600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the act:  None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x       No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Yes o       No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

As of March 11, 2003 there were 600 shares of the Registrant’s Voting Common Stock ($.10 par value), 245 shares of the Registrant’s Nonvoting Common Stock ($.10 par value) and 5,400 shares of the Registrant’s Class B Nonvoting Common Stock ($.01 par value) outstanding. The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of such date was $0.




Table of Contents

RADNOR HOLDINGS CORPORATION
2002 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

 

 

Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART I

 

 

 

 

 

1.

 

Business

 

 

 

Industry Overview

1

 

 

Products

2

 

 

Sales, Marketing and Customers

2

 

 

Manufacturing

3

 

 

Raw Materials

5

   

Risks Attendant to Foreign Operations

5

 

 

Proprietary Technology and Trademarks

5

 

 

Competition

6

 

 

Employees

6

 

 

Environmental Matters

6

 

 

 

 

2.

 

Properties

 

 

 

Packaging

8

 

 

Specialty Chemicals

8

 

 

 

 

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

9

 

 

 

 

4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

 

5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stock Matters

10

 

 

 

 

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

11

 

 

 

 

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

12

 

 

 

 

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

18

 

 

 

 

8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

18

 

 

 

 

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

 

 

 

10.

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

20

 

 

 

 

11.

 

Executive Compensation

22

 

 

 

 

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

24

 

 

 

 

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

26

 

 

 

 

14.

Controls and Procedures

26
       

 

 

PART IV

 

 

 

 

 

15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

27


 



Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.         BUSINESS

Radnor Holdings Corporation (the “Company”, “Radnor”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a leading worldwide manufacturer and distributor of foam packaging and specialty chemical products for the foodservice, insulation and protective packaging industries. We have been manufacturing EPS and related products sold to the foodservice, insulation and protective packaging industries for more than 25 years. In the foodservice industry, we are the second largest manufacturer of foam cup and container products, and we estimate that we have a 35% share of the US foam cup and container market segment. We are also a leading worldwide producer of EPS. In fiscal 2002, we produced more than 13 billion foam cups for hot and cold drinks, foam bowls and containers and thermoformed lids and 360 million pounds of EPS. We supply 100% of our own EPS needs in addition to supplying EPS to other manufacturers of foodservice, insulation and protective packaging products.

Financial information concerning the Company’s business segments appears in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 herein.

Industry Overview

Packaging. We compete within the foodservice industry, which includes products manufactured with paper, plastic, foam and other materials. The foam segment of the disposable cup and container market, in which we primarily operate, is highly concentrated. We believe Radnor and its primary competitor account for more than 80% of the market. A recent independent industry analysis of the US foam cup and container market through 2010 projects an annual growth rate of approximately 3%. The market for other plastic and paper cups and containers is significantly more fragmented.

The factors that originally gave rise to the use of disposable products continue to support the market’s growth. These include lower labor, maintenance and energy costs as compared to reusable products, as well as sanitary considerations and growth in the consumption of take-out foods and beverages. The expansion of fast-food restaurant chains and warehouse retailers and the consolidation of some foodservice distributors into larger companies with a national presence have also increased the use of disposable products.

Within the disposable product market, foam cup and container usage has increased significantly over the last two decades as a result of factors unique to this segment. These factors include the superior insulating qualities of foam, lower production costs and the flexibility in sizing and molding of foam products. In addition, demand for larger sizes and specialized products contributes to growth of the foam packaging segment. Although the success of foam cups to date has been primarily in the hot drink segment, we believe that there continue to be significant growth opportunities in the sale of cold drink cups, particularly in the large (16 through 64 ounce) sizes, including specialized products such as car carrier cups, on which we make higher margin.

Specialty Chemicals. We compete in the North American and European EPS markets. In North America, we sell EPS to the insulation, protective packaging and foodservice industries. A recent independent industry analysis estimated the US EPS market to have been in excess of 400,000 metric tons in 2000 and projected an annual growth rate of approximately 3% through 2010. This market is concentrated, with Radnor and three other competitors accounting for over 90% of the North American market.

In Europe, we sell EPS to the insulation and protective packaging industries. The EPS market in Europe includes a broader range of product applications and is more fragmented than the North American market. A recent independent industry analysis estimated the European EPS market to have been in excess of 995,000 metric tons in 2000 and projected an annual growth rate of approximately 3% through 2005.

 


1


Table of Contents

Products

Packaging. Radnor manufactures a broad range of foam packaging products, including cups, bowls and containers, and thermoformed plastic lids. The use of foam provides an insulating feature to our products, allowing them to be used for both hot and cold beverages and food products while enhancing comfort for the end user. Foam cups are manufactured in varying sizes (4 to 64 ounces) for both hot and cold beverages and are sold under numerous brand names, including the WinCup, COMpac, Profit Pals, STYROcup, Big Cool and Simplicity brand names. Foam bowls and other containers are made in varying sizes (3.5 to 32 ounces) for both hot and cold food products and are sold under the STYROcontainers brand name. Our thermoformed leak-resistant plastic lids feature a “stacking ring” that minimizes the shifting of a second cup when placed on top of the first cup. Other enhanced lid features include vents, tear-away tabs and straw slots, depending on the intended use. Cups, bowls, containers and lids are designed so that the same lid can be interchanged with many different cup, bowl or container sizes, which simplifies inventory and display area requirements. For example, our 10 cup-2 lid product line allows two different lids to fit with ten different size cups.

Our cups, bowls and containers are available with custom offset or embossed printing. We also manufacture a broad range of custom-designed foam containers for many of our large national accounts. A significant component of this business is the manufacturing of containers for customers, which use the containers for dried noodle products sold through retail grocery and supermarket chains. We also supply our products in private label packaging for certain of our customers.

We work continuously with our customers to develop new products. One of our early customer-driven developments was the “flare” cup design which replaced the heavier rim typically built into the top of a foam cup with a smooth, flared edge that improves the stability of the cup’s construction. The flare cup was well-received by customers because it combined the favorable appearance of paper with the insulating qualities of foam. More recently, our car carrier cups have addressed the end user’s desire for a cup that can contain larger volumes of liquid while fitting into an automobile’s cup carrier slots.

Specialty Chemicals. In North America, we manufacture EPS for our internal consumption, in addition to selling directly to third-party manufacturers of foodservice, insulation and protective packaging products. EPS is categorized by size, with the smallest size, or cup-grade, used to manufacture foam cups and containers. Larger sizes are sold to manufacturers of insulation and protective packaging products and include EPS modified for fire retardancy and non-modified EPS.

We manufacture a broad range of EPS formulations in Europe for conversion into a variety of standard and specialized insulation and packaging products. This EPS is made primarily for the insulation and protective packaging industries and includes a range of bead sizes and densities for conversion by customers into light and heavy insulation boards as well as various shape products, such as insulated fish packaging boxes. We work closely with our European customers to incorporate special product features into our EPS, such as fire retardancy, specialty coatings, higher thermal insulation qualities and antistatic properties.

Sales, Marketing and Customers

Packaging. Radnor sells its disposable foam packaging products in the foodservice industry through a 36-person sales organization and through an extensive network of 57 independent sales representatives. Sales and marketing efforts are directed by our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing and are supported by 12 senior sales managers averaging more than ten years’ experience in the foodservice industry. We believe our experienced sales team and long-term representative relationships enhance our ability to provide high levels of customer service and specialized marketing programs, including custom-designed foam products. Major end users of these products include fast-food restaurants, full-service restaurants, hospitals, nursing homes, educational institutions, airlines, business offices, movie theaters and other leisure time concessionaires, such as sports stadiums.

 


2


Table of Contents

We sell disposable foam packaging products in the foodservice industry to more than 1,400 national, institutional and retail accounts throughout the United States, in Mexico and in other countries. This customer base, which includes many of the foodservice industry’s largest companies, can be divided into three major categories:

National Accounts. National accounts are customers that utilize foam products in the sale of their own products and consist primarily of large fast-food restaurant chains and convenience stores. During fiscal 2002, sales to these customers accounted for approximately 11.8% of our net sales.

Institutional Accounts. Institutional accounts are customers that purchase foam products with a view toward reselling such products in bulk to institutional end users, such as hospitals, nursing homes, educational institutions, airlines, movie theaters and similar leisure time concessionaires, such as sports stadiums. These customers, representing approximately 44.5% of our net sales in fiscal 2002, are primarily large foodservice distributors.

Retail Accounts. Retail accounts are customers that purchase foam products for resale to actual consumers of the products and consist primarily of supermarket chains and discount stores. In fiscal 2002, retail customers accounted for approximately 9.3% of our net sales.

Approximately 8.5% of our foam product sales are made pursuant to contracts under which product prices are automatically adjusted based on changes in prices of EPS and other raw materials. Substantially all of our other foam product sales are made pursuant to contracts or other arrangements under which we have the right to change product prices on 30 to 60 days’ prior written notice.

Specialty Chemicals.In North America, we sell EPS through a dedicated sales force averaging 19 years experience and two broker organizations to manufacturers of foam protective packaging and insulation products. In Europe, we market through our Europe-wide sales office network. In support of these sales and marketing efforts, we employ people who are knowledgeable about chemical engineering and manufacturing processes in order to provide technical assistance to our customers.

In Europe, we sell EPS to 200 primarily mid-sized companies throughout Europe. We have actively pursued these customers because they provide potential for higher margins and because of their increased reliance on our technical support, which results in a greater ability to foster long-term customer relationships. We sell approximately 25% of our European EPS production to our former European insulation business pursuant to a long-term supply agreement.

No customer represented more than 7.2% of our net sales for fiscal 2002, although the five largest accounts represented approximately 28.1% of such sales.

Manufacturing

Our highly automated manufacturing facilities produced more than 13 billion foam cups, bowls and containers and thermoformed lids and 360 million pounds of EPS in fiscal 2002. Our foam products for the foodservice industry are made with custom-designed foam cup molding machines, lid production machines and foam cup and container printing machines. Our ten U.S. foam plants and our Polish foam plant generally operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week and 355 days a year. We also operate six plants located in the United States, Canada and Europe that manufacture EPS from styrene monomer. These plants generally operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Manufacturing Process. The manufacture of EPS, the primary raw material in the manufacture of foam products, has two steps: polymerization and impregnation. In the polymerization phase, styrene monomer, which is a commodity petrochemical derived primarily from benzene and ethylene, is suspended in water and then treated with chemicals and catalysts to produce polystyrene crystal in various sizes, each of which has different end-use applications, including general purpose polystyrene. To produce EPS, the crystal is impregnated with a high-purity pentane gas.

 


3


Table of Contents

We manufacture our foam cups and containers utilizing a custom molding process. First, the cup-grade EPS is blended with a lubricating agent and then pre-expanded so that the EPS is of the appropriate density. This pre-expanded EPS is then fed through special screeners to remove undersized and oversized beads. The pre-expanded EPS is then injected into machine molds and fused by injecting steam into the mold cavity. After the EPS is fused, the mold shells are cooled, the mold halves are opened and the finished cups are ejected. The finished products are vacuum tested, counted and packaged.

Our lid products are produced from high-impact polystyrene, or HIPS, which is subjected to heat and pressure, after which the product is extruded through a thin die. The lids are then trimmed for finished goods packing, while the scrap is ground and reintroduced into the original material blend.

Quality Control. Our manufacturing quality control program for foam foodservice products involves automated testing of all products for leaks. In addition, random testing is performed at least hourly at each facility for four or five attributes: seepage, weight, appearance, strength and, where applicable, print. We centrally collect the resulting data, subject it to statistical analysis and review the results. In addition, each machine operator and packer performs various quality checks during the production process. We also obtain random samples of finished foam packaging products from our various manufacturing facilities and perform an analysis similar to that described above at our Phoenix laboratory.

In addition to our own programs, certain of our larger customers have established their own product standards and perform periodic manufacturing audits at our facilities, either through their own personnel or through an independent testing group such as ASI Food Safety Consultants. We also submit products to third-party laboratories for microbiologic and physical tests to assure that we conform to or exceed industry product safety standards.

We utilize our quality, service, manufacturing and customer partners to enact and follow through on initiatives consistent with total quality management and good manufacturing practices. Through these programs, we work with our customers to ensure product quality and to create new products that reflect the present and future needs of our customers.

Our North American EPS quality control laboratory includes infrared spectrograph and atomic absorption units. Our laboratory chemists are capable of performing complex chemical and atomic analysis of styrene monomer, polystyrene crystal, expandable polystyrene and all other material components of EPS production. This gives us the ability to customize EPS formulas to meet any special customer requirements. The EPS quality control program includes testing every production batch of EPS to ensure it meets specific customer requirements. Each batch is tested for particle sizes, pentane gas volume and, if the EPS is to be used for insulation, their fire retardation capability.

In Europe, our sophisticated quality control laboratory is complemented by a fully equipped analytical laboratory containing three fully instrumented, automatically controlled pilot reactors, a fully equipped reactor bay, including a reactor and equipment for screening and coating, as well as two complete lines for converting EPS into insulation boards and shape-molded products. Testing equipment for analytical and quality audit work includes electronic balancers, equipment for testing burning behavior, gas chromatographs, sweep electron microscopes, colorimeters, flexural/compressive strength testers, an izod impact tester and lambda value testers. We regularly test our EPS for a range of key attributes that vary by specific product. Our European facilities are either ISO 9001 or ISO 9002 certified and both are also ISO 14001 certified.

Engineering. We employ more than 77 full-time technical personnel, including 27 full-time engineers and engineering managers, based in the Phoenix, Corte Madera, Fort Worth and Canadian facilities. The engineering staff uses computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing systems to design advanced, three-dimensional models of products and molds. Once an electronic image of the machine and mold part design is generated, the part can be custom manufactured. We have the capacity to construct all of the proprietary equipment, machines and molds used in the production, testing and packaging of our foam products. We have also developed

 


4


Table of Contents

and are installing in our manufacturing facilities automated materials handling equipment that includes in-line printing, automatic case packaging equipment and more advanced molding machines.

We continually examine how to improve our manufacturing process efficiencies. Sophisticated infra-red imaging systems, providing real-time video displays, are used to evaluate the thermal efficiency of molds and machines under development. We also can create special prototype mold forms for new lid designs and single-cavity cup and container molds, both of which enhance our ability to evaluate customer design requests rapidly.

The managing director of our European EPS operations is an engineer, as are each of the managers and supervisors of the production facilities located in Europe. In Europe, we also employ two full-time engineers who are responsible for process and production engineering and interact regularly with research and development personnel based in the analytical laboratory as well as senior technical support staff responsible for assisting the sales team.

Raw Materials

Radnor’s foam products are manufactured from EPS, which is produced from styrene monomer. Styrene monomer is a commodity petrochemical that is readily available throughout the world in bulk quantities from numerous large, vertically integrated chemical companies. Styrene monomer prices have fluctuated significantly as a result of changes in petrochemical prices and the capacity, supply and demand for styrene monomer. For example, the contract price for styrene monomer ranged from $.35 to $.43 per pound during 2000 and fell to $.25 per pound in 2001 before increasing to $.38 per pound in January 2003. Although future styrene monomer prices cannot be predicted with accuracy, prices are forecasted by independent industry surveys and producer reports to remain stable or decline over the next year. While the Company has been able to pass on the majority of past price increases to customers, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to increase prices if styrene monomer costs rise in the future.

The Company has historically purchased a majority of its styrene monomer requirements under a variety of long-term supply contracts. These contracts provide a supply of styrene under several different pricing mechanisms and with volume discounts. The various pricing mechanisms include those tied to raw material prices, spot market indices, contract indices and varying mixtures of the three. Under these contracts, which expire through 2006, the Company acquires a minimum of approximately 75% of its current styrene monomer needs.

High-purity pentane, which is used as the expanding agent in the production of EPS, is available from a limited number of suppliers. Should high-purity pentane become unavailable, however, high-purity butane may be substituted as the expanding agent.

The raw materials we use for the manufacture of thermoformed lids are primarily plastic resins such as HIPS, which are available from a number of sources. Our HIPS resin supplies are purchased under various agreements that contain minimum and maximum purchase requirements. The price we pay for HIPS resin is determined at the time of purchase.

Risks Attendant to Foreign Operations

The Company conducts its businesses in numerous foreign countries and, as a result, is subject to risks customarily encountered in foreign operations, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and controls, import and export controls, and other economic, political and regulatory policies of local governments. The Company’s foreign entities report their assets, liabilities and results of operations in the currency in which the entity primarily conducts its businesses. The foreign currencies are ultimately translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes.

Note 10 to the Company’s financial statements included under Item 8 herein contains information with respect to the geographic composition of the Company’s operations and financial position as of and for the years ended December 27, 2002, December 28, 2001 and December 29, 2000.

Proprietary Technology and Trademarks

We have developed a broad array of proprietary technology that is utilized in various stages of our manufacturing operations. We rely primarily upon confidentiality agreements and restricted plant access to protect our proprietary technology. We own several patents relating to our cup design and our EPS manufacturing processes. However, we do not consider these patents material to our operations.

We hold 27 trademarks registered in the United States, several of which are also registered in other countries. We also hold a number of unregistered trademarks. We do not consider any of these trademarks material to our operations.

 


5


Table of Contents

Competition

We compete in the highly competitive foodservice industry. The foam segment of the disposable cup and container market is highly concentrated and, within this segment, we compete principally with Dart Container Corp., which has significantly greater financial resources than we have and controls the largest share of this market segment. We do not believe that companies operating in related markets are likely to enter the foam segment due to the significant investment that would be required.

We believe that competition within the foam segment of the market is based primarily on customer service, product quality and the price at which products are offered. We believe that our market position is attributable to our high level of customer service and product quality, strategically located manufacturing facilities, proprietary technology and experienced management team.

We also compete with the paper segment, which is significantly more fragmented than the foam segment. We believe that competition between foam and paper is based on product appearance, quality and price.

In North America, the EPS industry is highly concentrated. Management believes that each of NOVA Chemicals, Inc., Huntsman Chemical Corp. and BASF Corporation, which are larger than we are and have greater financial resources than we have, controls a significant share of the market for supplying EPS to manufacturers of insulation and protective packaging products. We believe that competition within this industry is primarily based on price, although customer service, support and specialized product development can be significant competitive factors, particularly among the smaller manufacturers of foam insulation and protective packaging products.

The European EPS industry is more fragmented than in North America. Several companies, including BASF Corporation, NOVA Chemicals, Inc. and B.P. Amoco PLC are larger and have more substantial financial resources than we have. We believe that competition is based primarily on price, although technical support, specialized product development and consistently high quality beads are important factors to many of our customers.

Employees

As of December 27, 2002, we had 1,692 full-time employees. We have never experienced a material labor strike or other labor-related work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Our U.S. employees are not represented by any union. In Canada, approximately 65% of our employees are represented by a union and are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. In Finland, over 80% of our employees are represented by one of three unions and we are subject to two collective bargaining agreements. The European Union directives regarding employment are applicable to us in Finland; however, the terms of the collective bargaining agreements will control employment relationships to the extent that these agreements address relevant issues in a more detailed manner and include benefits exceeding the minimum standards established by the directives.

We are dependent on the management experience and continued services of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, Michael T. Kennedy. The loss of the services of these officers could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our continued growth depends on our ability to attract and retain experienced key employees.

Environmental Matters

Our facilities are used for manufacturing or warehousing of foam container products or the EPS from which such products are manufactured. Many of these facilities are subject to federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations relating to, among other things, emissions to air such as pentane, styrene and particulate matter, discharges to water, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous and nonhazardous materials and wastes.

 


6


Table of Contents

In 1996, the soil and shallow groundwater at our domestic EPS facilities were found to contain elevated levels of various contaminants. However, based on the results of soil and groundwater testing, material remediation efforts with respect to these conditions have not been, and we believe will not be, required. We own and operate, or owned or operated, underground storage tanks, also referred to as USTs, at several of our facilities for the storage of liquid pentane and heavy fuel oil. Leak detection or containment systems are in place at each facility with USTs that we currently own or operate. USTs are generally subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and remediation of polluted soils and groundwater resulting from leaking USTs. In addition, if any leakage from our USTs were to migrate onto the property of others, we could be subject to civil liability to third parties for remediation costs or other damages.

Some of our facilities have been alleged or are known to have failed to comply with various reporting or permitting obligations under applicable environmental laws and regulations. The resolution of these allegations and failures has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, nor do we believe that any future costs of achieving and maintaining compliance with these laws and regulations will have that effect. It is possible that we could incur significant fines, penalties or capital costs associated with any confirmed noncompliance with these laws and regulations. Moreover, there can be no assurance that recently promulgated or future environmental laws or regulations, including regulations affecting the volume of and permitting for air emissions both in the United States and in Europe, will not require us to incur substantial expenditures or significantly modify our operations.

Certain of our current and former facilities are located in industrial areas and have been in operation for many years. As a consequence, it is possible that historical or neighboring activities have affected properties currently or formerly owned or operated by us and that, as a result, additional environmental issues may arise in the future, the precise nature of which we cannot now predict.

 


7


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.         PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 8,000 square feet in Radnor, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Philadelphia, for our executive offices. We believe that our present facilities are adequate for our current operations and that we will be able to lease or otherwise acquire any additional facilities as may be required for our future operations.

We also own or lease manufacturing, warehouse, office, machine assembly and utilities facilities at the locations shown in the following table:

Packaging

 

Location

 

Use

 

Approximate
Floor Space
Sq. Ft.

 

Corte Madera, California

 

Manufacturing, warehouse, machine assembly and office (leased)

 

88,000

 

Richmond, California

 

Warehouse (leased)

 

103,000

 

Higginsville, Missouri

 

Manufacturing and warehouse

 

68,000

 

Warrensburg, Missouri

 

Warehouse (leased)

 

10,000

 

Jacksonville, Florida

 

Manufacturing and warehouse (leased)

 

128,000

 

Edison, New Jersey

 

Warehouse (leased)

 

95,000

 

Metuchen, New Jersey

 

Manufacturing

 

84,000

 

Mount Sterling, Ohio

 

Manufacturing and warehouse

 

56,000

 

Shreveport, Louisiana

 

Manufacturing and warehouse

 

73,000

 

Stone Mountain, Georgia

 

Manufacturing and warehouse (partially leased)

 

377,000

 

Phoenix, Arizona

 

Machine assembly (leased)

 

12,000

 

Tolleson, Arizona

 

Manufacturing, warehouse and office

 

170,000

 

West Chicago, Illinois

 

Manufacturing, warehouse and office (partially leased)

 

350,000

 

El Campo, Texas

 

Manufacturing and warehouse

 

91,000

 

Lodz, Poland

 

Manufacturing and warehouse (leased)

 

31,000

 

Specialty Chemicals

 

Location

 

Use

 

Approximate
Floor Space
Sq. Ft.

 

Fort Worth, Texas

 

Manufacturing, warehouse and office (partially leased)

 

208,000

 

Saginaw, Texas

 

Manufacturing, warehouse and office

 

60,000

 

Baie D’Urfe, Quebec

 

Manufacturing, warehouse and office

 

74,000

 

Porvoo, Finland

 

Manufacturing, warehouse, machine assembly, utility and office (partially leased)

 

112,000

 

Kokemaki, Finland

 

Manufacturing, warehouse, utility and office (leased)

 

52,000

 


 


8


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. After taking into consideration legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, management believes that these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4.          SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There are no matters to be reported hereunder.

 


9


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.          MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCK MATTERS

Market Information

There currently exists no established public trading market for the Company’s Voting Common Stock, $.10 par value, Nonvoting Common Stock, $.10 par value, or Class B Nonvoting Common Stock, $.01 par value.

Holders

As of March 11, 2003, there were 3 holders of record of the Company’s Voting Common Stock, 11 holders of record of the Company’s Nonvoting Common Stock and 7 holders of record of the Company’s Class B Nonvoting Common Stock.

Dividends

No dividends were declared or paid during the years ended December 27, 2002 or December 28, 2001. The declaration and payment of dividends are subject to the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend on various factors, including restrictions on dividends contained in the Company’s credit agreements and the indentures pursuant to which the Company issued its 10% Senior Notes due 2003 on December 5, 1996 (the “Series A Notes”) and its 10% Series B Senior Notes due 2003 on October 15, 1997 (the “Series B Notes”) and its 11% Senior Notes due 2010 on March 11, 2003.

 


10


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.          SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents summary consolidated financial data for the Company. The following data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere herein.

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 


 

 

 

Dec. 25,
1998

 

Dec. 31,
1999

 

Dec. 29,
2000

 

Dec. 28,
2001

 

Dec. 27,
2002

 

 

 


 


 


 


 


 

 

 

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Results of Operations (1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

303,586

 

$

310,470

 

$

353,752

 

$

325,734

 

$

323,182

 

Cost of goods sold

 

220,691

 

226,509

 

277,254

 

250,719

 

243,501

 

 

 


 


 


 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

82,895

 

83,961

 

76,498

 

75,015

 

79,681

 

Distribution expense

 

23,004

 

24,535

 

26,003

 

25,176

 

22,621

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

31,414

 

36,277

 

36,252

 

31,304

 

26,959

 

Gain on sale of business (2)

 

 

 

 

(10,493

)

 

 <