Back to GetFilings.com



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549


FORM 10-K


Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004


Commission File Number 000-27622


HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Virginia

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)


54-1796693

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

340 West Main Street

Abingdon, Virginia

(Address of principal executive offices)


24210-1128

(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (276) 628-9181


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of Each Class

Name of each exchange

on which registered

None

n/a


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $1.25 par value

(Title of class)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes _X_  No ___


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ X ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ___  No _X_


State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $57,826,780


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.  As of March 10, 2005, there were 2,662,049 shares of Common Stock.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004—Part II

Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders—Part III






 

Table of Contents

 
  

Page Number

Part I

  
   

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 2.

Properties

16

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

17

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

17

   
   

Part II

  
   

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder    Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

18

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

19

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion  and Analysis of Financial Condition

  and Results of Operation

20

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

39

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

42

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on

  Accounting and Financial Disclosure

42

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

42

Item 9B.

Other Information

43

   
   

Part III

  
   

Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

43

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

43

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and

  Management and Related Stockholder Matters

43

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

43

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

43

   
   

Part IV

  
   

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

44

   
   















2





Forward-Looking Information


Certain information in this report may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are generally identified by phrases such as “the Company expects,” “the Company believes” or words of similar import. These statements speak only as of the date of this report. The statements are based on current expectations, are inherently uncertain, are subject to risks, and should be viewed with caution. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, the following factors:


·

The ability to successfully manage the Company’s growth or implement its growth strategies if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future;

·

The ability to continue to attract low cost core deposits to fund asset growth;

·

Maintaining capital levels adequate to support the Company’s growth;

·

Maintaining cost controls and asset qualities as the Company opens or acquires new branches;

·

Reliance on the Company’s management team, including its ability to attract and retain key personnel;

·

The successful management of interest rate risk;

·

Changes in general economic and business conditions in the Company’s market area;

·

Changes in interest rates and interest rate policies;

·

Risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values;

·

Competition with other banks and financial institutions, and companies outside of the banking industry, including those companies that have substantially greater access to capital and other resources;

·

Demand, development and acceptance of new products and services;

·

Problems with technology utilized by the Company;

·

Changing trends in customer profiles and behavior; and

·

Changes in banking and other laws and regulations applicable to the Company.






















3




Part I.


Item I.  Business


History and Business


Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a one-bank holding company organized under the laws of Virginia in 1995 and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA). The Company conducts the majority of its business operations through its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Highlands Union Bank (the “Bank”). The Company has two direct subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004: the Bank, which was formed in 1985, and Highlands Capital Trust I (HCTI), a statutory business trust (the “Trust”) which was formed in 1998. The Company is also an owner in Davenport Financial Fund, LLC. This Fund’s primary purpose is to invest in Mid-Atlantic bank stocks for investment purposes. The Company posts all reports required to be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on its web site at www.hubank.com.

Highlands Union Bank

The Bank is a Virginia state chartered bank that was incorporated in 1985. The Bank has two wholly owned subsidiaries, Highlands Union Insurance Services, Inc. (HUIS), which was formed in 1999 and Highlands Union Financial Services, Inc. (HUFS), which was formed in 2001. The Bank operates a full-service banking business from its headquarters in Abingdon, Virginia, and its ten area full service branch offices. The Bank offers general retail and commercial banking services to individuals, businesses and local government unit customers. These products and services include accepting deposits in the form of checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, interest-bearing demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and time deposits; making real estate, commercial, revolving, consumer, credit card and agricultural loans; offering letters of credit; providing other consumer financial services, such as automatic funds transfer, collections, night depository, safe deposit, travelers checks and savings bond sales; and providing other miscellaneous services normally offered by commercial banks. The Bank makes loans in all major loan categories, including commercial, commercial and residential real estate, construction and consumer loans. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had total assets of $562.19 million. Total deposits at this date were $471.80 million. The Bank’s net income for 2004 was $4.90 million which produced a return on average assets of 0.89% and a return on average stockholders' equity of 13.16%. Refer to Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios.

Highlands Union Insurance Services, Inc.

Highlands Union Insurance Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in 1999. The Bank, through Highlands Union Insurance Services, Inc., joined a consortium of approximately forty-seven other financial institutions to form Bankers’ Insurance, LLC. Bankers’ Insurance, LLC, as of December 31, 2004, had purchased seven full service insurance agencies across the state of Virginia. HUIS is used to sell insurance services through the Bankers’ Insurance, LLC.

Highlands Union Financial Services, Inc.

Highlands Union Financial Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in 2001   HUFS was formed in order for the Bank to continue to offer third-party mutual



4




funds, annuities and other financial services to its customers in all market areas served. Currently HUFS works through Independent Community Bankers Financial Services, Inc. (ICBFS) an arm of Independent Community Bankers Association, to offer its third-party financial services. In the first quarter of 2005, HUFS expects to end its association with ICBFS, Inc. and to begin offering investment services through Bankers Investments, LLC, a joint effort of Virginia Banks originally sponsored by the Virginia Bankers Association.

Commercial Loans

The Bank makes both secured and unsecured loans to businesses and to individuals for business purposes. Loan requests are granted based upon several factors including credit history, past and present relationships with the bank, marketability of collateral and the cash flow of the borrowers. Unsecured commercial loans must be supported by a satisfactory balance sheet and income statement. Collateralized business loans may be secured by a security interest in marketable equipment, accounts receivable, business equipment and/or general intangibles of the business. In addition, or as an alternative, the loan may be secured by a deed of trust lien on business real estate. The risks associated with commercial loans are related to the strength of the individual business, the value of loan collateral and the general health of the economy.

Residential Real Estate Loans

Loans secured by residential real estate are originated by the Bank. The Bank also offers secondary market fixed rate mortgages through multiple sources. These loans and servicing rights are generally sold immediately into the secondary market and fees received are booked into income. These loans must meet certain criteria generally set by the secondary market. All residential loans originated by the Bank are held in the bank's loan portfolio. Residential real estate loans carry risk associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral.

Construction Loans

The Bank makes loans for the purpose of financing the construction of business and residential structures to financially responsible business entities and individuals. These loans are subject to the same credit criteria as commercial and residential real estate loans. In addition to the risks associated with all real estate loans, construction loans bear the risks that the project will not be finished according to schedule, the project will not be finished according to budget and the value of the collateral may at any point in time may be less than the principal amount of the loan. Construction loans also bear the risk that the general contractor, who may or may not be the bank's loan customer, is unable to finish the construction project as planned because of financial pressures unrelated to the project. Loans to customers that are made as permanent financing of construction loans may likewise under certain circumstances be affected by external financial pressures.

Consumer Loans

The Bank routinely makes consumer loans, both secured and unsecured. The credit history, cash flow and character of individual borrowers is evaluated as a part of the credit decision. Loans used to purchase vehicles or other specific personal property and loans associated with real estate are usually secured with a lien on the subject vehicle or property. Negative changes in a customer's financial circumstances due to a large number of factors, such as illness



5




or loss of employment, can place the repayment of a consumer loan at risk. In addition, deterioration in collateral value can add risk to consumer loans.

Sales and Purchases of Loans

The Bank will occasionally buy or sell all or a portion of a loan. The Bank will consider selling a loan or a participation in a loan, if: (i) the full amount of the loan will exceed the bank's legal lending limit to a single borrower; (ii) the full amount of the loan, when combined with a borrower's previously outstanding loans, will exceed the bank's legal lending limit to a single borrower; (iii) the Board of Directors or an internal Loan Committee believes that a particular borrower has a sufficient level of debt with the bank; (iv) the borrower requests the sale; (v) the loan to deposit ratio is at or above the optimal level as determined by bank management; and/or (vi) the loan may create too great a concentration of loans in one particular location or in one particular type of loan. The Bank will consider purchasing a loan, or a participation in a loan, from another financial institution if the loan meets all applicable credit quality standards and (i) the bank's loan to deposit ratio is at a level where additional loans would be desirable; and/or (ii) a common customer requests the purchase.

The following table sets forth, for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the percentage of total operating revenue contributed by each class of similar services which contributed 15% or more of total operating revenues of the Company during such periods.

Period

Class of Service

Percentage of Total Revenues

   

December 31, 2004

Interest and Fees on Loans

72.21%

December 31, 2003

Interest and Fees on Loans

72.97%

December 31, 2002

Interest and Fees on Loans

75.44%

Market Area

Highlands Union Bank Market Area

The Bank’s primary market area consists of all of Washington County, Virginia portions of Smyth County, Virginia, the City of Bristol, Virginia, the City of Bristol, Tennessee and adjacent portions of Sullivan County, Tennessee, the Town of Rogersville, Tennessee and adjacent portions of Hawkins County, the Town of Banner Elk and adjacent portions of Avery County, North Carolina and the Town of Boone and adjacent portions of Watauga County, North Carolina. The local economy is diverse and is oriented toward retail and service, light manufacturing, higher education and agriculture.

The independent city of Bristol, Virginia is located in far southwestern Virginia and lies directly on the Virginia-Tennessee state line. Washington County surrounds Bristol to the west, north and east. The community is part of the Johnson City-Kingsport-Bristol Combined Statistical Area (CSA). The three largest employment sectors include services, manufacturing and retail trade. The Tri-Cities is home to more than 140 manufacturing and distribution firms. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 5.0% as of August 2004. Per capita income reported in 2002 is $24,343.00. Bristol / Washington County's largest employer is Bristol Compressors located between Bristol and Abingdon, Virginia. Bristol Compressors is a subsidiary of York International and manufactures reciprocating compressors from 1 to 25 tons and, through a joint venture in Scroll Technologies, scroll compressors from 2 to 7 -1/2 tons. These compressors are used in York International’s products and are sold to original equipment



6




manufacturers and wholesale distributors. Approximately 75% of Bristol Compressor's revenues are attributable to sales of products to other air conditioning equipment manufacturers or wholesale distributors.


The Bank has a branch office located in Marion which is the county seat of Smyth County, Virginia. Marion is approximately 30 miles northeast of Abingdon, Virginia. The three largest employment sectors include services, manufacturing and retail trade. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 4.5% as of November 2004. Per capita income reported in 2002 is $20,817.00. Smyth County’s largest employer is General Dynamics. General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, a business unit of Virginia-based General Dynamics, is headquartered in Burlington, Vermont. The company designs, develops and produces high-performance armament systems; a full range of advanced composite-based products; biological and chemical detection systems; tactical deception equipment; and mobile shelter systems. The Smyth County facility currently employs more than 650 people and includes three manufacturing sites totaling more than one million square feet.


Bristol, Tennessee is located in Sullivan County Tennessee and is Bristol, Virginia’s twin city. Bristol, Tennessee’s three largest employment sectors include services, manufacturing and retail trade. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 5.8% for 2003. Per capita income reported in 2001 was $25,809.00. Bristol, Tennessee’s largest employer is Exide Technologies Battery Plant. This plant is approximately 631,000 square feet and is used for battery manufacturing. The plant currently employs approximately 1,000 workers.


Rogersville, Tennessee is located in Hawkins County approximately 45 miles southwest of Bristol, Tennessee. Rogersville’s three largest employment sectors include services, manufacturing and retail trade. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 7.1% for 2003. Per capita income reported in 2001 was $20,066.00. In Hawkins County, large manufacturers include AFG Industries, with 900 employees; TRW Corp., with 700; Hutchinson Sealing Systems, with 520; Rockwell Automation, Dodge Division, with 420; International Playing Card & Label, with 270; and Cooper Standard Automotive, with 520.


Boone, North Carolina is located in Watauga County in the northwestern mountains of North Carolina.  Watauga County’s three largest employment sectors include private industry, education services and retail trade. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 1.5% as of September 2004. Per capita income reported in 2002 was $24,265.00. Watauga County, North Carolina’s largest employer is Appalachian State University. Appalachian State is the sixth largest university in the University of North Carolina system. Employment at Appalachia State University has remained relatively stable over the past three years.


Banner Elk, North Carolina is located in Avery County in the northwestern mountains of North Carolina.  Avery County’s three largest employment sectors include private industry, government and health care / social assistance. The latest unemployment figures reflect an unemployment rate of 2.4% as of September 2004. Per capita income reported in 2002 was $22,876.00. Avery County, North Carolina’s largest employers are Avery Health Care System and Ethan Allen, Inc.


Competition


The banking and financial service business in Virginia, generally, and in the Bank’s market areas specifically, is highly competitive. The increasingly competitive environment is a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems and new competition from non-traditional financial services. The Company's bank subsidiary competes for



7




loans and deposits with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, securities and brokerage companies, ortgage companies, money market funds, credit unions and other non-bank financial service providers. Many of these competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization, have greater access to capital markets and offer a broader array of financial services than the Bank. In order to compete, the Bank relies upon service-based business philosophies, personal relationships with customers, specialized services tailored to meet customers' needs and the convenience of office locations and extended hours of operation. In addition, the banks are generally competitive with other financial institutions in their market areas with respect to interest rates paid on deposit accounts, interest rates charged on loans and other service charges on loans and deposit accounts.


Certain Regulatory Considerations


The Company and the Bank are subject to various state and federal banking laws and regulations which impose specific requirements or restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight with respect to virtually all aspects of operations. As a result of the substantial regulatory burdens on banking, financial institutions, including the Company and the Bank are disadvantaged relative to other competitors who are not as highly regulated, and their costs of doing business are much higher. The following is a summary of the material provisions of certain statutes, rules and regulations which affect the Company and the Bank. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions referred to below, and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations which are applicable to the businesses of the Company and the Bank. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the business and prospects of the Company and the Bank.


Highlands Bankshares, Inc.


The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the BHCA and Chapter 13 of the Virginia Banking Act, as amended (the Virginia Banking Act). The activities of the Company also are governed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.


The Bank Holding Company Act. The BHCA is administered by the Federal Reserve Board, and the Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and any additional information the Federal Reserve Board may require under the BHCA. The Federal Reserve Board also is authorized to examine the Company and its subsidiaries. The BHCA requires every bank holding company to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board before (i) it or any of its subsidiaries (other than a bank) acquires substantially all the assets of any bank; (ii) it acquires ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if after the acquisition it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares of the bank; or (iii) it merges or consolidates with any other bank holding company.


The BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, require that, depending on the particular circumstances, either Federal Reserve Board approval must be obtained or notice must be furnished to the Federal Reserve Board and not disapproved prior to any person or company acquiring "control" of a bank holding company, such as the Company, subject to certain exemptions. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the Company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities of the Company. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging the rebuttable control presumption.


Under the BHCA, a bank holding company is generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities, unless the Federal Reserve Board, by order or regulation, has found



8




those activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be incident to banking. The Federal Reserve Board imposes certain capital requirements on the Company under the BHCA, including a minimum leverage ratio and a minimum ratio of "qualifying" capital to risk-weighted assets. Subject to its capital requirements and certain other restrictions, the Company can borrow money to make a capital contribution to the Bank, and these loans may be repaid from dividends paid from the Bank to the Company (although the ability of the Bank to pay dividends are subject to regulatory restrictions). The Company can raise capital for contribution to the Bank by issuing securities without having to receive regulatory approval, subject to compliance with federal and state securities laws.


    The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLBA), enacted on November 12, 1999, broadly rewrote financial services legislation. The GLBA permits significant combinations among different sectors of the financial services industry; allows for significant expansion of financial service activities by Bank holding companies and provides for a regulatory framework by various governmental authorities responsible for different financial activities; and offers certain financial privacy protections to consumers. The GLBA repealed affiliation and management interlock prohibitions of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act and, by amending the Bank Holding Company Act, the GLBA added new substantive provisions to the non-banking activities permitted under the BHCA with the creation of the financial holding company. The GLBA preempts most state laws that prohibit financial holding companies from engaging in insurance activities. The GLBA permits affiliations between banks and securities firms within the same holding company structure, and the Act permits financial holding companies to directly engage in a broad range of securities and merchant banking activities.


    The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act has led to important changes in the manner in which financial services are delivered in the United States. Bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks are able to offer a much broader array of financial services; however, there is greater competition in all sectors of the financial services market.


    The Virginia Banking Act. All Virginia bank holding companies must register with the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the Commission) under the Virginia Banking Act. A registered bank holding company must provide the Commission with information with respect to the financial condition, operations, management and inter-company relationships of the holding company and its subsidiaries. The Commission also may require such other information as is necessary to keep itself informed about whether the provisions of Virginia law and the regulations and orders issued under Virginia law by the Commission have been complied with, and may make examinations of any bank holding company and its subsidiaries. The Virginia Banking Act allows bank holding companies located in any state to acquire a Virginia bank or bank holding company if the Virginia bank or bank holding company could acquire a bank holding company in their state and the Virginia bank or bank holding company to be acquired has been in existence and continuously operated for more than two years. The Virginia Banking Act permits bank holding companies from throughout the United States to enter the Virginia market, subject to federal and state approval.


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. On July 30, 2002, the President signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) implementing legislative reforms intended to address corporate and accounting fraud. In addition to the establishment of a new accounting oversight board that enforces auditing, quality control and independence standards and is funded by fees from all publicly traded companies, the law restricts provision of both auditing and consulting services by accounting firms. To ensure auditor independence, any non-audit services being provided to an audit client requires pre-approval by the issuer’s audit committee members. In addition, the audit partners must be rotated. The Act requires chief executive officers and chief financial officers, or their equivalent, to certify to the accuracy of periodic reports filed with the SEC, subject to civil and criminal penalties if they knowingly or willfully violate this certification requirement. In addition, under the Act, legal counsel is required to report evidence of a material violation of the securities laws or a breach of fiduciary duty by a company to its chief executive



9




officer or its chief financial officer, and, if such officer does not appropriately respond, to report such evidence to the audit committee or other similar committee of the board of directors or the board itself.


Longer prison terms and increased penalties are also applied to corporate executives who violate federal securities laws, the period during which certain types of suits can be brought against a company or its officers has been extended, and bonuses issued to top executives prior to restatement of a company’s financial statements are subject to disgorgement if such restatement was due to corporate misconduct. Executives are also prohibited from insider trading during retirement plan “blackout” periods, and loans to company executives are restricted. The Act accelerates the time frame for disclosures by public companies, as they must immediately disclose any material changes in their financial condition or operations. Directors and executive officers must also provide information for most changes in ownership in a company’s securities within two business days of the change.


The Act also prohibits any officer or director of a company or any other person acting under their direction from taking any action to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead any independent public or certified accountant engaged in the audit of the company’s financial statements for the purpose of rendering the financial statement’s materially misleading. The Act also requires the SEC to prescribe rules requiring inclusion of an internal control report and assessment by management in the annual report to stockholders. In addition, the Act requires that each financial report required to be prepared in accordance with (or reconciled to) accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and filed with the SEC reflect all material correcting adjustments that are identified by a “registered public accounting firm” in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the SEC.


Effective August 29, 2002, as directed by Section 302(a) of the Act, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer are each required to certify that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The Act imposes several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls; they have made certain disclosures to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about the Company’s internal controls; and they have included information in the Company’s quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls during the last quarter.


Highlands Union Bank


General. The Bank, as a state chartered member of the Federal Reserve, is subject to regulation and examination by the Virginia State Corporation Commission and the Federal Reserve Board. In addition, the Bank is subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Deposits in the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to a maximum amount (generally $100,000 per depositor, subject to aggregation rules). The Federal Reserve Board and the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions regulate or monitor all areas of the Bank’s operations, including security devices and procedures, adequacy of capitalization and loss reserves, loans, investments, borrowings, deposits, mergers, issuances of securities, payment of dividends, interest rates payable on deposits, interest rates or fees chargeable on loans, establishment of branches, corporate reorganizations and maintenance of books and records. The Federal Reserve Board requires the Bank to maintain certain capital ratios. The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve Board to prepare quarterly reports on the Bank’s financial condition and to conduct an annual audit of its financial affairs in compliance with minimum standards and procedures prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board. The Bank also is required by the Federal Reserve Board to adopt internal control structures and procedures in order to safeguard assets and



10




monitor and reduce risk exposure. While appropriate for safety and soundness of banks, these requirements impact banking overhead costs.


The Bank is organized as a Virginia-chartered banking corporation and is regulated and supervised by the Bureau of Financial Institutions (BFI) of the Virginia State Corporation Commission. In addition, as a federally insured bank, the Bank is regulated and supervised by the Federal Reserve Board, which serves as its primary federal regulator and is subject to certain regulations promulgated by the FDIC. Under the provisions of federal law, federally insured banks are subject, with certain exceptions, to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to their affiliates, on investments in the stock or other securities of affiliates and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral from any borrower. In addition, these banks are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or the providing of any property of service.


The Virginia State Corporation Commission and the Federal Reserve Board conduct regular examinations of the Bank reviewing the adequacy of the loan loss reserves, quality of the loans and investments, propriety of management practices, compliance with laws and regulations and other aspects of the bank's operations. In addition to these regular examinations, Virginia chartered banks must furnish to the Federal Reserve Board quarterly reports containing detailed financial statements and schedules.


Community Reinvestment Act. The Bank is subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (the CRA), which requires the appropriate federal bank regulatory agency, in connection with its regular examination of a bank, to assess the bank's record in meeting the credit needs of the community served by the bank, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The focus of the regulations is on the volume and distribution of a bank's loans, with particular emphasis on lending activity in low and moderate-income areas and to low and moderate-income persons. The regulations place substantial importance on a bank's product delivery system, particularly branch locations. The regulations require banks, including the Bank to comply with significant data collection requirements. The regulatory agency's assessment of the bank's record is made available to the public. Further, this assessment is required for any bank which has applied to, among other things, establish a new branch office that will accept deposits, relocate an existing office, or merge, consolidate with or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of a federally regulated financial institution. Management expects that the banks' compliance with the CRA, as well as other fair lending laws, will face ongoing government scrutiny and that costs associated with compliance will continue to increase. The Bank received "Satisfactory" CRA ratings in the last examination by bank regulators.


Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991. The difficulties encountered nationwide by financial institutions from the 1980’s through 1991 prompted federal legislation designed to reform the banking industry and to promote the viability of the industry and of the deposit insurance system.  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), which became effective on December 19, 1991, bolsters the deposit insurance fund, tightened bank and thrift regulation and trimmed the scope of federal deposit insurance as summarized below.


FDICIA requires each federal banking regulatory agency to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating to (i) internal controls, information systems and audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest rate exposure; (v) asset growth; (vi) compensation, fees and benefits; and (vii) such other operational and managerial standards as the agency determines to be appropriate.  The compensation standards would prohibit employment contracts, compensation or benefit arrangements, stock option plans, fee arrangements or other compensatory arrangements that provide excessive compensation, fees or benefits or could lead to material financial loss.  In addition, each federal banking regulatory agency must prescribe by regulation standards specifying (i) a maximum ratio of classified assets to capital; (ii) minimum earnings sufficient to absorb losses without impairing capital; (iii) to the extent feasible, a minimum ratio of market



11




value to book value for publicly traded shares of depository institutions and depository institution holding companies; and (iv) such other standards relating to asset quality, earnings and valuation as the agency determines to be appropriate.  If an insured institution fails to meet any of the standards promulgated by regulation, then such institution will be required to submit a plan to its federal regulatory agency specifying the steps it will take to correct the deficiency.


Prompt corrective action measures adopted in FDICIA and which became effective on December 19, 1992, impose significant restrictions and requirements on depository institutions that fail to meet their minimum capital requirements.  Under Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDI Act”), the federal banking regulatory agencies have developed a classification system pursuant to which all depository institutions are placed into one of five categories based on their capital levels and other supervisory criteria:  well capitalized, adequately capitalized; undercapitalized; significantly undercapitalized; and critically undercapitalized.  


The Bank met the requirements at December 31, 2004 to be classified as “well capitalized.”  This classification is determined solely for the purposes of applying the prompt corrective action regulations and may not constitute an accurate representation of the Bank’s overall financial condition.


An undercapitalized depository institution is required to submit a capital restoration plan to its principal federal regulator.  The federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital and is guaranteed by the parent holding company.  If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it will be treated as if it were significantly undercapitalized.


Unless its principal federal regulator has accepted its capital plan, an undercapitalized bank may not increase its average total assets in any calendar quarter.  If an undercapitalized institution’s capital plan has been accepted, asset growth will be permissible only if the growth is consistent with the plan and the institution’s ratio of tangible equity to assets increases during the quarter at a rate sufficient to enable the institutions to become adequately capitalized within a reasonable time.


An institution that is an undercapitalized depository institution may not solicit deposits by offering rates of interest that are significantly higher than the prevailing rates on insured deposits in the institution’s normal market areas or in the market area in which the deposits would otherwise be accepted. An undercapitalized depository institution may not branch, acquire an interest in another business or institution or enter a new line of business unless its capital plan has been accepted and its principal federal regulator approves the proposed action.


An insured depository institution may not pay management fees to any person having control of the institution nor may an institution, except under certain circumstances and with prior regulatory approval, make any capital distribution if, after making such payment or distribution, the institution would be undercapitalized.


Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks.  Critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.


If its principal federal regulator determines that an adequately capitalized institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or is engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice, it may require the institution to submit a corrective action plan, restrict its asset growth and prohibit branching, new acquisitions and new lines of business.  An institution’s principal federal regulator may deem it to be engaging in unsafe or unsound practices if it receives a less than satisfactory rating for asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity in its most recent examination.


In addition, regulators were required to draft a new set of non-capital measures of bank safety, such as loan underwriting standards and minimum earnings levels, effective December 1,



12




1993.  The legislation also requires regulators to perform annual on-site bank examinations, place limits on real estate lending by banks and tightens auditing requirements.


Section 36 of FDICIA significantly affects financial institutions with more then $500 million in total assets. Highlands Union Bank came under the provisions beginning in January of 2004.


Key FDICIA requirements include the following:



Audit committees must be comprised of independent outside directors--regardless of bank size.



Institutions must have an adequate system of internal control according to some generally accepted framework.



Section I agreed-upon-procedures testing of compliance with laws and regulations must be performed by either internal audit or the entity's independent public accountants.



Section II agreed-upon-procedure testing of compliance with laws and regulations must be performed by the entity's independent public accountant if management elected to have internal auditors perform Section I agreed-upon procedures.



Management must perform its own investigation and review of the effectiveness of internal controls and compliance with laws.



A management report must be submitted and signed by the chief executive officer and chief accountant (or chief financial officer), which states management's responsibility for the internal control system, an assessment of the effectiveness of the system at fiscal year-end, and an assessment of compliance with laws and regulations during the fiscal year.



An independent public accountant's report that attests to management's assertions concerning the bank's internal control and procedure for financial reporting is required.


Branching. In 1986, the Virginia Banking Act was amended to remove the geographic restrictions governing the establishment of branch banking offices. Subject to the approval of the appropriate federal and state bank regulatory authorities, the Bank as a state bank, may establish a branch office anywhere in Virginia.


The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the Interstate Act) allows bank holding companies to acquire banks in any state, without regard to state law, except that if the state has a minimum requirement for the amount of time a bank must be in existence, that law must be preserved. Under the Virginia Banking Act, a Virginia bank or all of the subsidiaries of Virginia holding companies sought to be acquired must have been in continuous operation for more than two years before the date of such proposed acquisition. The Interstate Act also permits banks to acquire out-of-state branches through interstate mergers, if the state has not opted out of interstate branching. De novo branching, where an out-of-state bank holding company sets up a new branch in another state, requires a state's specific approval. An acquisition or merger is not permitted under the Interstate Act if the bank, including its insured depository affiliates, will control more than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in the United States, or will control 30% or more of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions in any state.


Virginia has, by statute, elected to opt-in fully to interstate branching under the Interstate Act. Under the Virginia statute, Virginia state banks may, with the approval of the Virginia State Corporation Commission, establish and maintain a de novo branch or acquire one or more branches in a state other than Virginia, either separately or as part of a merger. Procedures also are established to allow out-of-state domiciled banks to establish or acquire branches in Virginia, provided the "home" state of the bank permits Virginia banks to establish or acquire branches within its borders. The activities of these branches are subject to the same laws as Virginia domiciled banks, unless such activities are prohibited by the law of the state where the bank is organized. The Virginia State Corporation Commission has the authority to examine and supervise out-of-state state banks to ensure that the branch is operating in a safe and sound



13




manner and in compliance with the laws of Virginia. The Virginia statute authorizes the Bureau of Financial Institutions to enter into cooperative agreements with other state and federal regulators for the examination and supervision of out-of-state banks with Virginia operations, or Virginia domiciled banks with operations in other states. Likewise, national banks, with the approval of the OCC, may branch into and out of the state of Virginia. Any Virginia branch of an out-of-state state chartered bank is subject to Virginia law (enforced by the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions) with respect to intrastate branching, consumer protection, fair lending and community reinvestment as if it were a branch of a Virginia bank, unless preempted by federal law.


The Interstate Act. The Interstate Act permits banks and bank holding companies from throughout the United States to enter Virginia markets through the acquisition of Virginia institutions and makes it easier for Virginia bank holding companies and Virginia state banks to acquire institutions and to establish branches in other states. Competition in market areas served by the Company has increased as a result of the Interstate Act and the Virginia interstate banking statutes.


Deposit Insurance. The FDIC establishes rates for the payment of premiums by federally insured financial institutions. A Bank Insurance Fund (the BIF) is maintained for commercial banks, with insurance premiums from the industry used to offset losses from insurance payouts when banks fail. Beginning in 1993, insured depository institutions like the Bank paid for deposit insurance under a risk-based premium system. Beginning in 1997, all banks, including the Bank, were subject to an additional FDIC assessment which funds interest payments for bank issues to resolve problems associated with the savings and loan industry. This assessment will continue until 2018-2019. The assessment will vary over the period from 1.29 cents to 2.43 cents per $100 of deposits.


Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the GLBA) allows banks, with primary regulator approval, to acquire financial subsidiaries to engage in any activity that is financial in nature or incidental to a financial activity, as defined in the Bank Holding Act, except (i) insurance underwriting, (ii) merchant or insurance portfolio investments, and (iii) real estate development or investment. Well-capitalized banks are also given the authority to engage in municipal bond underwriting.


To establish or acquire a financial subsidiary, a bank must be well-managed, and the consolidated assets of its financial subsidiary must not exceed the lesser of 45% of the consolidated total assets of the bank or $50 billion. The relationship between a bank and a financial subsidiary are subject to a variety of supervisory enhancements from regulators.


USA Patriot Act. The USA Patriot Act became effective in late 2001. It was passed to facilitate the sharing of information among government entities and financial institutions to combat terrorism and money laundering. The USA Patriot Act creates an obligation on banks to report customer activities that may involve terrorist activities or money laundering.


Government Policies. The operations of the Bank are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the policies of various regulatory authorities. In particular, the Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant influence on overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits and affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for time and savings deposits. Federal Reserve Board monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.


Limits on Dividends and Other Payments. As a state member bank subject to the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, the Bank must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year would exceed the total of its net profits, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, for that year, combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. In addition, a state member bank may not pay a dividend in an amount greater than its undivided profits then on hand after


14




deducting its losses and bad debts. For this purpose, bad debts are generally defined to include the principal amount of loans which are in arrears with respect to interest by six months or more, unless such loans are fully secured and in the process of collection. Moreover, for purposes of this limitation, a state member bank is not permitted to add the balance in its allowance for loan losses account to its undivided profits then on hand; however, it may net the sum of its bad debts as so defined against the balance in its allowance for loan losses account and deduct from undivided profits only bad debts as so defined in excess of that account.


In addition, the Federal Reserve Board is authorized to determine, under certain circumstances relating to the financial condition of a state member bank, that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice and to prohibit payment thereof. The payment of dividends that depletes a bank's capital base could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.


Virginia law also imposes restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. A Virginia state bank is permitted to declare a dividend out of its "net undivided profits", after providing for all expenses, losses, interest and taxes accrued or due by the bank. In addition, a deficit in capital originally paid in must be restored to its initial level, and no dividend can be paid which could impair the bank's paid in capital. The Bureau of Financial Institutions further has authority to limit the payment of dividends by a Virginia bank if it determines the limitation is in the public interest and is necessary to ensure the bank's financial soundness.


The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) provides that no insured depository institution may make any capital distribution (which would include a cash dividend) if, after making the distribution, the institution would not satisfy one or more of its minimum capital requirements.


Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines which are applicable to the Company and the Bank. The Federal Reserve Board guidelines redefine the components of capital, categorize assets into different risk classes and include certain off-balance sheet items in the calculation of risk-weighted assets. The minimum ratio of qualified total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8.0%. At least half of the total capital must be comprised of Tier 1 capital for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.0%. The remainder may consist of a limited amount of subordinated debt, other preferred stock, certain other instruments and a limited amount of loan and lease loss reserves.


In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has established minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total average assets less intangibles) guidelines that are applicable to the Company and the Bank. These guidelines provide for a minimum ratio of 4.0% for banks that meet certain specified criteria, including that they have the highest regulatory CAMELS rating and are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk. All other banks will be required to maintain an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points, based upon their particular circumstances and risk profiles. The guidelines also provide that banks experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets.


Bank regulators from time to time have indicated a desire to raise capital requirements applicable to banking organizations beyond current levels. In addition, the number of risks which may be included in risk-based capital restrictions, as well as the measurement of these risks, is likely to change, resulting in increased capital requirements for banks. The Company and the Bank are unable to predict whether higher capital ratios would be imposed and, if so, at what levels and on what schedule.






15




Other Legislative and Regulatory Concerns


Other legislative and regulatory proposals regarding changes in banking and the regulation of banks, thrifts and other financial institutions are periodically considered by the executive branch of the federal government, Congress and various state governments, including Virginia. New proposals could significantly change the regulation of banks and the financial services industry. It cannot be predicted what might be proposed or adopted or how these proposals would affect the Company.


Other Business Concerns


The banking industry is particularly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, as the spread between the rates which must be paid on deposits and those which may be charged on loans is an important component of profit. In addition, the interest which can be earned on a bank's invested funds has a significant effect on profits. Rising interest rates typically reduce the demand for new loans, particularly the real estate loans which represent a significant portion of the Bank’s loan demand.

The Company’s relationship with its employees is considered to be good. Employment has remained very stable over the last several years with very little turnover. There are no employment contracts in existence for any employee or officer.


Registrant's Organization and Employment


The Company, the Bank, HCTI, HUFS and HUIS are organized in a holding company/subsidiary structure. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had no employees, except for officers, and it conducted substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries. All cash compensation paid to the Company’s officers was paid by the subsidiary bank, including fees paid to its directors. Stock based compensation, through the form of stock options, is paid / granted through the Company. During 2004, compensation paid to HUFS officers and employees was paid through HUFS up through August. Due to new NASD rulings requiring financial service division employees be paid through the Bank, these employees became Bank employees September 1, 2004.

At December 31, 2004, the Bank employed 235 full time equivalent employees at its main office, operations center and branch offices. The Company, HCTI, HUFS and HUIS had no  employees at this time.


Company Website


The Bank maintains a website at www.hubank.com. The Company makes available through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, free of charge, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after the material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Item 2. Properties


The Company’s and the Bank’s headquarters are located at 340 W. Main Street, Abingdon, Virginia. In addition to the Bank's Main Office location, the Bank owns ten branch offices: one in the Town of Abingdon, Virginia; one in Washington County, Virginia, two in the City of Bristol, Virginia; one in the Town of Glade Spring, Virginia; one in the Town of Marion, Virginia; one in the City of Bristol, Tennessee; one in the Town of Rogersville, Tennessee; one in the Town of Boone, North Carolina; and one in the Town of Banner Elk, North Carolina. The



16




Bank owns the land and buildings of all of these branch offices as well as the main office for the Company and Bank. The Bank also owns the land and building used for Financial Services, Collections, Human Resources and Credit Cards in Abingdon, Virginia. The Bank owns a piece of vacant land in Marion, Virginia that used to house a drive-up ATM. The Bank owns a vacant piece of land in Bristol, Tennessee that is being held for a potential future branch site. The Bank leases office space in Abingdon, Virginia for operational purposes and leases office space in West Jefferson, North Carolina for a loan production office. The Company owns the land and buildings used as the Bank’s Operations Center and Technology House in Abingdon, Virginia. The Company also owns the land and vacant building on property adjacent to the Company’s Operation Center in Abingdon, Virginia.


All of the Company’s existing properties are in good operating condition and are adequate for the Company’s present and anticipated future needs.


The Bank owns all its computer and data processing hardware and is a licensee of the software it utilizes.


Item 3.  Legal Proceedings


The Company is not currently involved in any pending legal proceedings, other than routine litigation incidental to the Bank’s banking business. These proceedings are not material to the Company or the Bank.



Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


None.



























17




Part II


Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity,  Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Common Stock Information and Dividends

There are two distinct markets for the registrants stock as of December 31, 2004. Highlands Bankshares, Inc.’s common stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) and the Pinksheets by five broker dealers under the symbol HBKA.OB. The second market is the Company’s local market. The Company maintains a list of individuals who are interested in purchasing its common stock and connects these people with shareholders who are interested in selling their stock. These parties negotiate the per share price independent of the Company. The stock transfer agent of the Company attempts to keep a record of what the stock sales are trading at by asking the parties about the trade price per share.  Please refer to the table below entitled Common Stock Performance for a breakdown of the trades for the four quarters of 2004 and 2003. It is the opinion of management that this range accurately reflects the market value of the Company’s common stock for the periods presented.


Common Stock Performance – December 31, 2004

     
 

High

Low

Quarterly Average

Dividends per Share

     

First Quarter

$28.00

$25.80

$27.79

$     -

     

Second Quarter

$29.00

$25.75

$27.09

$0.12

     

Third Quarter

$30.00

$25.50

$27.99

$     -

     

Fourth Quarter

$30.00

$25.75

$29.41

$     -


Common Stock Performance – December 31, 2003

     
 

High

Low

Quarterly Average

Dividends per Share

     

First Quarter

$26.00

$26.00

$26.00

$     -

     

Second Quarter

$26.00

$26.00

$26.00

$0.10

     

Third Quarter

$27.00

$26.00

$26.01

$     -

     

Fourth Quarter

$28.00

$25.50

$27.58

$     -



The Company’s primary source of funds for dividend payments is dividends from its subsidiary bank. Bank regulatory agencies restrict dividend payments of the subsidiaries, as more fully disclosed in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


As of March 10, 2005, the Company had approximately 1,291 shareholders of record.


Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities


The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the fourth quarter of 2004.


18


Item 6. Selected Financial Data


The Company and Subsidiaries Selected Consolidated Financial Data:


(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)