UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Or
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 333-78573
333-78573-01
MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC
MUZAK HOLDINGS FINANCE CORP
(Exact Name of Registrants as Specified in their charter)
| DELAWARE |
04-3433730 | |
| DELAWARE |
04-3433728 | |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3318 LAKEMONT BLVD.
FORT MILL, SC 29708
(803) 396-3000
(Address, Including Zip Code and Telephone Number including Area Code of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Muzak Holdings Finance Corp. meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
MUZAK HOLDINGS FINANCE CORP
FORM 10-K INDEX
| Page | ||||
| PART I |
||||
| Business |
1 | |||
| Properties |
6 | |||
| Legal Proceedings |
7 | |||
| Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
7 | |||
| PART II |
||||
| Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
8 | |||
| Selected Financial Data |
9 | |||
| Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
11 | |||
| Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
19 | |||
| Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
19 | |||
| Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
19 | |||
| PART III |
||||
| Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants |
20 | |||
| Executive Compensation |
22 | |||
| Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
25 | |||
| Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
26 | |||
| Controls and Procedures |
28 | |||
| PART IV |
||||
| Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K |
29 |
Safe Harbor Statement
This Form 10-K contains statements which, to the extent they are not historical fact (such as when we describe what we believe, expect or anticipate will occur), constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Safe Harbor Acts). All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Safe Harbor Acts.
Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K include, but are not limited to, industry-based factors such as the level of competition in the business music industry, competitive pricing, concentrations in and dependence on satellite delivery capabilities, rapid technological changes, the impact of legislation and regulation, as well as factors more specific to the Company such as the substantial leverage and debt service requirements, restrictions imposed by the Companys debt facilities, the Companys history of net losses, the Companys ability to identify, complete and integrate acquisitions, the Companys future capital requirements, the Companys dependence on license agreements, and risks associated with economic conditions generally.
i
PART I
Muzak LLC (Muzak) is the leading provider of business music programming in the United States based on market share. Muzak is a wholly owned subsidiary of Muzak Holdings LLC (the Company) previously known as ACN Holdings, LLC. We refer to Muzak Holdings and its subsidiaries collectively as the Company. We believe that, together with our franchisees, we have a market share of approximately 60% of the estimated number of U.S. business locations currently subscribing to business music programming.
Our two core products are Audio ArchitectureSM and VoiceSM. We provide our products to numerous types of businesses including specialty retailers, restaurants, department stores, supermarkets, drug stores, financial institutions, hotels, health and fitness centers, business offices, manufacturing facilities and medical centers, among others. Our top twenty clients represent less than 18% of our revenues with no single client representing more than 5% of our revenues. Our clients typically enter into a non-cancelable five-year contract that renews automatically for at least one additional five-year term unless specifically terminated at the initial contract expiration date. Our average length of service per Audio Architecture client is approximately 12 years. We believe that our clients use our products because they recognize them as a key element in establishing their desired business environment, in promoting their corporate identities and in strengthening their brand images at a low monthly cost.
We also sell, install, and maintain equipment, such as sound systems, noise masking, drive-thru systems, and closed circuit television. We provide these services primarily for our business music and other clients.
We provide our products and services domestically through our integrated, nationwide network of owned operations and franchisees. We believe our nationwide network is the largest in the industry and provides us with a key competitive advantage in effectively marketing and servicing clients ranging from local accounts with single or multiple locations to national accounts with significant geographic presences. In 2002, 96% of our revenues were generated by our owned operations and the remaining 4% were generated from fees from our franchisees and other sources.
Financing Developments
During the first quarter of 2002, the Company explored various financing alternatives to fund continuing growth. As a result, the Company increased its aggregate revolver commitments under the Senior Credit Facility by $20.0 million, for a total commitment of $55.0 million and amended certain of its financial covenants for 2002 and 2003. The Company also amended certain of its financial covenants under the Securities Purchase Agreement. In addition, in March 2002 existing equity holders, including MEM Holdings LLC, contributed $10.0 million in the form of junior subordinated unsecured notes (the sponsor notes) to the Company, the proceeds of which were used to repay outstanding revolving loan balances. MEM Holdings owns 64.2% of the voting interests in the Company as of December 31, 2002. ABRY Broadcast Partners III and ABRY Broadcast Partners II are the beneficial owners of MEM Holdings. During 2002, the Company paid $1.9 million in financing fees related to the consummated transactions and paid $0.5 million in expenses associated with the exploratory efforts mentioned above.
We believe the increased commitment under the Senior Credit Facility and amended financial covenants will provide the Company with financial flexibility and with sufficient liquidity to fund its business plan for at least the next eighteen months. The Companys business plan is to continue to pursue organic growth opportunities. To ensure the Company has ample liquidity to pursue these opportunities and to meet its interest and debt service requirements in future years, we are continually evaluating various financing alternatives to determine accessibility to such capital.
Products
Audio Architecture is business music programming designed to enhance a clients brand image. Our in-house staff of audio architects analyze a variety of music to develop and maintain 60 core music programs in 10
1
genres. Programs include current top-of-the-charts hits to jazz, classic rock, urban, country, Latin, classical music and others. Our audio architects change our music programs on a daily basis, incorporating newly released original artists music recordings and drawing from our extensive music library. In designing our music programs, our audio architects use proprietary computer software that allows them to efficiently access the extensive library, avoid repeated songs and manage tempo and music variety to provide clients with high quality, seamlessly arranged programs. In addition, we offer individual music programs to clients who seek further customization beyond that offered by our core music programs.
Voice is telephone music and marketing on-hold as well as in-store messaging. Our Voice staff creates customized music and messages that allow clients telephone systems to deliver targeted music and messaging during their customers time on hold. In addition, they also provide customized in-store messages that allow our clients to deliver targeted music and messaging to support their in-store point of sale merchandising. Our fully integrated sound studios and editing and tape duplication facilities provide flexibility in responding to clients needs. Our telephone and satellite delivery technologies allow us to expeditiously change our clients music and messages.
In connection with the sale of our Audio Architecture and Voice products, we sell and lease various system-related products, principally sound systems. As part of a typical music programming contract, we provide music receiving or playback equipment to our client. Our business music clients generally purchase or lease audio equipment from us that supplements the music receiving or playback equipment.
We also sell, install and maintain non-music related equipment, such as drive-thru systems, closed circuit television, intercom and paging systems. We provide these services for our business music and other clients. Maintenance of program-receiving equipment that we provide to business music clients is typically included as part of the overall music service. Installation and maintenance of audio or other equipment not directly related to reception of our business music service is provided on a contractual or time-and-materials basis. All of the equipment is manufactured by third parties, although some items bear the Muzak® brand name.
We offer drive-thru systems service. This service provides for the maintenance and repair of intercom systems, headsets and radio transmitters commonly used in drive-thru systems found at our quick service restaurant clients. We receive recurring monthly revenues for each client location typically under a five-year contract. We respond to our clients repair calls which typically involve the repair of headsets. In most cases we are able to exchange the damaged headset for an operable headset which we send to our clients through overnight delivery. Our staff repairs the damaged item which then becomes available for future distribution to another client. We believe that quick turnaround is important to our clients as a significant portion of their revenues is derived from their drive-thru windows.
Nationwide Franchise Network
Our franchise network is nationwide, and we believe that this network is a strength that distinguishes us from our competitors. Our business relationships with our franchisees are governed by license agreements that have renewable ten-year terms. Under these agreements, the franchisee is granted an exclusive license to offer and sell our Audio Architecture and Voice products, as well as other products such as Dayparting and Weekparting. The franchisee is also permitted to use our registered trademarks within a defined territory which allows us to promote a uniform Muzak brand image nationally. The agreements also contain terms relating to distribution of services via our direct broadcast satellite distribution system and reciprocal exclusivity provisions which preclude franchisees from selling products which compete with our Audio Architecture and Voice products.
Pursuant to the agreements, each franchisee pays us a monthly fee based on the number of businesses within its territory and a monthly royalty equal to approximately 10% of its billings for music services. Typically, this combined fee and royalty payment represents approximately $5 per month per client location. However, this
2
monthly royalty is subject to adjustments, as we charge the franchisee additional amounts for on-premise tape services and other services. The agreements also provide franchisees with incentives to increase sales and guidelines regarding coordination of sales, installation and service to national client locations.
Distribution Systems
We transmit our offerings through various mediums including direct broadcast satellite transmission, local broadcast transmission, audio and videotapes and compact discs. During 2002, we served our music client locations through the following means: approximately 84% through direct broadcast satellite transmission, approximately 7% through local broadcast technology, and approximately 9% through on-premises tapes or compact discs.
Our transmissions via direct broadcast satellite to clients are primarily from transponders leased from Microspace and EchoStar Satellite Corporation (EchoStar). Microspace provides us with facilities for uplink transmission of medium-powered direct broadcast satellite signals to the transponders. Microspace, in turn, leases its transponder capacity on satellites operated by third parties. Such satellites include the Galaxy IIIC satellite operated by PanAmSat, through which a majority of our direct broadcast satellite client locations are served, and Telstar 4, operated by Loral Skynet. In January 2001, we contracted for transponder capacity on Telstar 4 in order to provide the signal for our recently introduced Encompass LE satellite receiver. The term of our transponder lease with Microspace for the Galaxy IIIC satellite ends in 2005 while the lease for Telstar 4 ends in 2017. Microspace can terminate its agreements with us immediately upon termination of its underlying agreements with PanAmSat and Loral Skynet. We regularly review the availability of alternate transponders.
Prior to the successful launch of the Galaxy IIIC satellite on June 15, 2002, the Company was leasing transponder capacity on PanAmSats Galaxy IIIR. The transition to Galaxy IIIC was a seamless one for the Companys clients. While Galaxy IIIC is operating within all performance and design specifications, the Company has secured insurance to cover costs of up to $5.0 million in the event of a Galaxy IIIC satellite failure. In addition, the Company maintains insurance that provides up to $1.25 million of coverage for costs in the event of the Telstar 4 satellite failure.
As part of our arrangements with EchoStar, we furnish 60 music channels to commercial subscribers and 52 of the 60 music channels to residential subscribers over EchoStars satellite system. Pursuant to the agreements with EchoStar, EchoStar pays us a programming fee for each of its residential subscribers and pays us, and our franchisees, a commission for sales made by EchoStar or its agents to commercial subscribers in the respective territories. We pay EchoStar a fee for uplink transmission of music channels to our clients and we rent space at EchoStars Cheyenne, Wyoming uplink facility. We also pay EchoStar a royalty and combined access fees on music programs sold by the Company, which are distributed by EchoStar to commercial subscribers. The term of each of our agreements with EchoStar ends in 2010.
EchoStar has agreed that it will not provide transponder space to, enter into or maintain distributor agreements or relationships with, or enter into any agreements for the programming or delivery of any audio services via direct broadcast satellite frequencies with, a specified group of our competitors. We have agreed that we will not secure transponder space for, enter into or maintain distributor agreements or relationships with, or enter into any agreement for the programming or delivery of any of our services with any competitor of EchoStar via direct broadcast satellite frequencies or with specified competitors of EchoStar via specified frequencies.
Competition
We compete with many local, regional, national and international providers of business music services. National competitors include DMX Music, Inc., Music Choice, and PlayNetworks. Local and regional competitors are typically smaller entities that target businesses with few locations.
3
We compete on the basis of service, the quality and variety of our music programs, versatility and flexibility, the availability of our non-music services and, to a lesser extent, price. Even though we are seldom the lowest-priced provider of business music in any territory, we believe that we can compete effectively due to the widespread recognition of the Muzak name, our nationwide network, the quality and variety of our music programming, the talent of our audio architects and our multiple delivery systems.
We also compete with companies that are not principally focused on providing business music services. Such competitors include traditional radio broadcasters that encourage workplace listening, satellite digital audio radio services, video services that provide business establishments with music videos or television programming, and performing rights societies (ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC) that license business establishments to play sources such as CDs, tapes, MP3 files, and the radio. While we believe that we compete effectively against such services for many of the same reasons stated above, such competitors have established client bases and are continually seeking new ways to expand such client bases and revenue streams.
There are numerous methods by which our existing and future competitors can deliver programming, including various forms of direct broadcast satellite services, wireless cable, fiber optic cable, digital compression over existing telephone lines, advanced television broadcast channels, digital audio radio service and the Internet. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:
| | compete successfully with our existing or potential new competitors, |
| | maintain or increase our current market share, |
| | use, or compete effectively with competitors that adopt new delivery methods and technologies, or |
| | keep pace with discoveries or improvements in the communications, media and entertainment industries such that our existing technologies or delivery systems that we currently rely upon will not become obsolete. |
Sales and Marketing
We employ a direct sales process in marketing products, which is focused on securing new client contracts and renewing existing contracts. Once we obtain a new client, there are only minimal maintenance costs associated with that client. As a result, we continually try to increase not only our market share but also the market penetration of both business music and marketing on-hold and in-store messaging products. We publish targeted, industry specific marketing materials and conduct extensive training of our sales force. Client agreements typically have a non-cancelable term of five years and renew automatically for at least one additional five-year term unless specifically terminated at the initial contract expiration date. Repeat clients comprise the core of the account base. We have local and national sales forces. Local account executives typically focus on clients that have fewer than 50 locations, which may include individual franchisees of national chains. In addition, we have various other sales positions to support the sales process. These consist of approximately 15 sales leads, 35 sales managers, and 5 multi-location specialists. A local account executive can engage the support of one of these individuals to assist in all aspects of the sale when dealing with clients having between 50 and 100 locations.
National Salesforce
Our national sales group is responsible for securing new national accounts and maintaining our existing client base of national accounts. We have a total of seven account executives and sales managers focused exclusively on selling services to clients that have at least 50 locations in at least 4 territories. Each owned operation and franchisee, is responsible for installing, servicing, and billing the accounts within its territory.
Local Salesforce
As of December 31, 2002, we had a team of approximately 215 local sales account executives. Local account executives typically focus on clients that have fewer than 50 locations, which may include individual franchisees of national chains. Our local account executives are compensated on commission.
4
Music Licenses
We license rights to re-record and distribute music from a variety of sources and pay royalties to songwriters and publishers through contracts negotiated with performing rights societies such as the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), and the Society of European Stage Authors and Composers (SESAC).
The industry-wide agreement between business music providers and BMI expired in December 1993. Since this time we have been operating under an interim agreement pursuant to which we have continued to pay royalties at the 1993 rates. Business music providers and BMI have been negotiating the terms of a new agreement. We are involved in a rate court proceeding, initiated by BMI in Federal Court in New York. At issue are the music license fees payable to BMI. The period from which such reasonable license fees are payable covers the period January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2002, and likely several years thereafter. BMI contends that those fee levels understate reasonable fee levels by as much as 100%. We are vigorously contesting BMIs assessment. We believe the eventual court ruling setting final fees for the period covered will require retroactive adjustment, upward or downward, likely back to January 1, 1994, and possibly will also entail payment of pre-judgment interest. Discovery in the proceeding has commenced and is not yet completed. As of February 28, 2003, a trial date had not been set.
The industry-wide agreement between business music providers and ASCAP expired in May 1999. We began negotiations with ASCAP in June 1999, and we have continued to pay ASCAP royalties at the 1999 rates. The agreement between business music providers and ASCAP allowed either party to pursue a rate court proceeding in federal court in New York to seek a court determined reasonable rate if a mutually acceptable rate was not obtained by November 29, 2002. ASCAP notified the Company that it would pursue such rate court proceeding and on January 29, 2003 made an application to the court to commence such a proceeding.
We cannot predict what the terms of the new BMI or ASCAP agreements with business music providers will be or when agreements will be reached, although BMI and ASCAP have indicated that they are seeking royalty rate increases and a retroactive royalty rate increase.
In 2002, we paid approximately $8.5 million in royalties to ASCAP, BMI and to SESAC. Increases in the fees we must pay under these agreements could adversely affect our operating margin, and, therefore, our results of operations.
In connection with ASCAPs periodic audit program, ASCAP conducted audits during 2001 of our license fee calculations in local sales offices and for national accounts. Based on those audits, ASCAP indicated that they believed our past license fee calculations were incorrect and additional license fees were due. We settled the discrepancy with respect to all sales offices and national accounts for all open audit periods prior to and including 2001 and paid such settlement in December 2001. In 2002, BMI conducted an audit of our license fee calculations in local sales offices and for national accounts. All discrepancies for all open audit periods prior to and including 2001 were settled and we paid such settlement in September 2002. In light of the audit results, the Companys 2002 license fees to ASCAP and BMI were higher than in the past and future license fees may be similarly affected.
In October 1998, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act was enacted. The Act provides for a statutory license from the copyright owners of master recordings to make and use ephemeral copies of such recordings. Ephemeral copies refer to temporary copies of master sound recordings made to enable or facilitate the digital transmission of such recordings. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act did not specify the rate and terms of the license. As a result, the United States Copyright Office convened a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel to recommend an ephemeral royalty rate. In February 2002, the Panel recommended an ephemeral royalty rate of ten percent (10%) of gross proceeds applicable to the use of ephemeral copies. That recommendation was subject to review by the Librarian of Congress, who could have modified or adopted such recommendation.
5
In June 2002, the Librarian of Congress published his final decision to adopt the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels recommendation of a ten percent (10%) ephemeral royalty rate, which covers the period from October 1998 through December 31, 2002. As required by such determination, we remitted payment on October 20, 2002 for royalties payable for the period from October 28, 1998 through August 31, 2002. We believe that the United States Copyright Office will once again convene a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, sometime in 2003, to recommend an ephemeral royalty rate for the period from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007.
With respect to future revenue subject to such ephemeral royalty rate, we believe our exposure is minimal, as we believe our current satellite technologies do not require use of ephemeral copies. Nonetheless, there can be no assurances that the collective for the copyright owners will refrain from investigating or otherwise challenging the applicability of the statute to our satellite technologies.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, the Company increased its estimated reserve for prior period licensing royalties and related expenses by $3.1 million to $4.0 million. This charge is recorded in cost of music and other business services revenues.
Government Regulation
We are subject to governmental regulation by the United States and the governments of other countries in which we provide services. We provide music services in a few areas in the United States through 928 to 960 megahertz frequencies licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Additionally, the FCC licenses the frequencies used by satellites on which we transmit direct broadcast satellite services in the United States. If the FCC or any other person revokes or refuses to extend any of these licenses, we would be required to seek alternative transmission facilities. Laws, regulations and policy, or changes therein, in other countries could also adversely affect our existing services or restrict the growth of our business in these countries.
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, we had 1,420 full-time and 71 part-time employees. Approximately 145 of our technical and service personnel are union members. These personnel are located in 14 offices, 13 of which are represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and one of which is represented by the Communication Workers of America. Of the 13 offices represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, four offices are negotiating new contracts to replace contracts that expired late 2001 and 2002. The four offices that are currently negotiating new contracts are Boston, Massachusetts, St. Louis, Missouri, Peoria, Illinois, and Dallas, Texas.
In each case, we believe that we will be able to negotiate a new contract but cannot speculate as to when such negotiations will be concluded.
We otherwise believe that our relations with our employees and with the unions that represent them are generally good.
Available Financial Information
Muzaks most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q can be found on the Companys website, www.muzak.com. Muzaks annual report on Form 10-K will be available on the Companys website as soon as reasonably practical.
The Company leases its headquarters located at 3318 Lakemont Boulevard, Fort Mill, South Carolina. The telephone number of our headquarters is (803) 396-3000. Our headquarters consists of approximately 100,000 square feet which accommodates our executive offices, operations, national sales, marketing, technical, finance and administrative staffs, and a warehouse. We also have local sales offices in various locations, and lease space
6
at two satellite uplink facilities and warehouses in various locations. Approximately 95% of the total square footage of all of the Companys facilities is leased and the remainder is owned.
The Company considers all of its properties, both owned and leased, suitable for its existing needs.
The Company is subject to various proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. Management believes that such proceedings are routine in nature and incidental to the conduct of its business, and that none of such proceedings, if determined adversely to the Company, would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
7
PART II
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Muzak is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company does not have an established public trading market for its equity securities. The equity securities of the Company are held by MEM Holdings LLC, AMFM Systems Inc., New York Life Capital Partners, Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, and BancAmerica Capital Investors I, L.P., and by current or former management. ABRY Broadcast Partners III and ABRY Broadcast Partners II are the beneficial owners of MEM Holdings.
The Companys bank agreement, the indentures with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes of Muzak, the indenture with respect to the Companys Senior Discount Notes, and the Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and BancAmerica Capital Investors I, L.P, and various Investors, restrict the ability of the Company to make dividends and distributions in respect of their equity.
During 2002, the Company issued and repurchased its membership units in the following transactions:
| | During 2002, the Company issued 502 Class B-1 Units, 508 Class B-2 Units, and 515 Class B-3 Units to members of management. |
| | During 2002, the Company repurchased 209 Class B-1 Units, 211 Class B-2 Units, and 212 Class B-3 Units from members of management. |
All of such issuances were deemed exempt from registration under the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4 (2) thereof, as transactions not involving a public offering.
8
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below is Selected Financial Data for the Company for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, and the period from October 7, 1998 to December 31, 1998 and for Audio Communications Network, Inc. (the Predecessor Company) for the period from January 1, 1998 to October 6, 1998. The table should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.
| Period From October 7, 1998 Through December 31, 1998 |
Predecessor Company |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
Year Ended December 31, 2000 |
Year Ended December 31, 1999 |
Period From January 1, 1998 Through October
6, |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Statement Of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Revenues(1) |
$ |
217,756 |
|
$ |
203,361 |
|
$ |
192,148 |
|
$ |
130,016 |
|
$ |
5,914 |
|
$ |
18,917 |
| ||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations |
|
(2,597 |
) |
|
(11,921 |
) |
|
(3,550 |
) |
|
2,723 |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
(906 |
) | ||||||
| Interest expense |
|
36,533 |
|
|
39,390 |
|
|
46,288 |
|
|
29,609 |
|
|
888 |
|
|
2,520 |
| ||||||
| Net Loss(2) |
|
(37,982 |
) |
|
(51,197 |
) |
|
(50,611 |
) |
|
(26,212 |
) |
|
(1,002 |
) |
|
(3,428 |
) | ||||||
| Balance Sheet Data (At Period End): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
$ |
476,246 |
|
$ |
498,324 |
|
$ |
540,075 |
|
$ |
488,243 |
|
$ |
72,927 |
|
$ |
43,854 |
| ||||||
| Intangible assets, net |
|
270,756 |
|
|
292,546 |
|
|
324,544 |
|
|
314,364 |
|
|
49,039 |
|
|
24,152 |
| ||||||
| Working Capital (deficit) |
|
1,260 |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
10,297 |
|
|
(10,253 |
) |
|
(41,676 |
) |
|
(1,726 |
) | ||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
377,769 |
|
|
361,920 |
|
|
370,171 |
|
|
382,328 |
|
|
42,677 |
|
|
34,589 |
| ||||||
| Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Capital expenditures for property and equipment |
$ |
37,384 |
|
$ |
41,476 |
|
$ |
43,638 |
|
$ |
28,708 |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
$ |
3,538 |
| ||||||
| Cash flows provided by (used in) operations |
|
31,589 |
|
|
38,035 |
|
|
(3,456 |
) |
|
(14,394 |
) |
|
1,167 |
|
|
1,593 |
| ||||||
| Cash flows used in investing activities(1) |
|
(38,789 |
) |
|
(42,908 |
) |
|
(90,109 |
) |
|
(336,911 |
) |
|
(68,336 |
) |
|
(3,538 |
) | ||||||
| Cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
6,398 |
|
|
4,444 |
|
|
94,302 |
|
|
352,287 |
|
|
68,072 |
|
|
1,655 |
| ||||||
| EBITDA(3) |
|
67,654 |
|
|
63,167 |
|
|
57,505 |
|
|||||||||||||||