Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents
 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 26, 2002
 
Commission File Number 33-72574
 

 
THE PANTRY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
 
56-1574463
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
1801 Douglas Drive
Sanford, North Carolina
27330-1410
(Address of principal executive offices)
 

 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (919) 774-6700
 

 
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE
 
18,107,597 SHARES
(Class)
 
(Outstanding at January 27, 2003)
 


Table of Contents
 
THE PANTRY, INC.
 
FORM 10-Q
 
DECEMBER 26, 2002
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
    
Page

Part I—Financial Information
    
    
  
3
  
4
  
5
  
6
  
16
  
28
  
29
      
Part II—Other Information
    
  
30
  
S-1
 

2


Table of Contents
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
 
Item 1.    Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
 
    
December 26, 2002

    
September 26, 2002

 
ASSETS
                 
Current assets:
                 
Cash and cash equivalents
  
$
21,596
 
  
$
42,236
 
Receivables, net
  
 
34,168
 
  
 
34,316
 
Inventories (Note 2)
  
 
79,709
 
  
 
84,437
 
Prepaid expenses
  
 
4,419
 
  
 
3,499
 
Property held for sale
  
 
838
 
  
 
388
 
Deferred income taxes
  
 
863
 
  
 
1,414
 
    


  


Total current assets
  
 
141,593
 
  
 
166,290
 
    


  


Property and equipment, net (Note 6)
  
 
425,086
 
  
 
435,518
 
    


  


Other assets:
                 
Goodwill
  
 
277,874
 
  
 
277,874
 
Deferred financing cost, net
  
 
8,426
 
  
 
8,965
 
Environmental receivables (Note 3)
  
 
11,696
 
  
 
11,696
 
Other assets
  
 
9,037
 
  
 
9,355
 
    


  


Total other assets
  
 
307,033
 
  
 
307,890
 
    


  


Total assets
  
$
873,712
 
  
$
909,698
 
    


  


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                 
Current liabilities:
                 
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 4)
  
$
42,913
 
  
$
43,255
 
Current maturities of capital lease obligations
  
 
1,521
 
  
 
1,521
 
Accounts payable
  
 
80,328
 
  
 
93,858
 
Accrued interest
  
 
6,515
 
  
 
13,175
 
Accrued compensation and related taxes
  
 
7,932
 
  
 
10,785
 
Income taxes payable
  
 
46
 
  
 
—  
 
Other accrued taxes
  
 
11,097
 
  
 
17,463
 
Accrued insurance
  
 
10,420
 
  
 
9,687
 
Other accrued liabilities (Note 5)
  
 
13,847
 
  
 
19,969
 
    


  


Total current liabilities
  
 
174,619
 
  
 
209,713
 
    


  


Long-term debt (Note 4)
  
 
451,086
 
  
 
460,920
 
    


  


Other liabilities:
                 
Environmental reserves (Note 3)
  
 
13,232
 
  
 
13,285
 
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
  
 
39,264
 
  
 
38,360
 
Deferred revenue
  
 
48,842
 
  
 
51,772
 
Capital lease obligations
  
 
15,046
 
  
 
15,381
 
Other noncurrent liabilities (Notes 5 and 6)
  
 
13,879
 
  
 
5,063
 
    


  


Total other liabilities
  
 
130,263
 
  
 
123,861
 
    


  


Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 4)
                 
Shareholders’ equity (Notes 5, 8 and 9):
                 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,107,597 issued and outstanding at December 26, 2002 and September 26, 2002
  
 
182
 
  
 
182
 
Additional paid-in capital
  
 
128,002
 
  
 
128,002
 
Shareholder loans
  
 
(483
)
  
 
(708
)
Accumulated other comprehensive deficit, net
  
 
(1,235
)
  
 
(2,112
)
Accumulated deficit
  
 
(8,722
)
  
 
(10,160
)
    


  


Total shareholders’ equity
  
 
117,744
 
  
 
115,204
 
    


  


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  
$
873,712
 
  
$
909,698
 
    


  


 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

3


Table of Contents
 
THE PANTRY, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
    
Three Months Ended

 
    
December 26, 2002

    
December 27, 2001

 
    
(13 weeks)
    
(13 weeks)
 
Revenues:
                 
Merchandise sales
  
$
242,340
 
  
$
237,238
 
Gasoline sales
  
 
401,933
 
  
 
334,313
 
Commissions
  
 
6,704
 
  
 
5,822
 
    


  


Total revenues
  
 
650,977
 
  
 
577,373
 
    


  


Cost of sales:
                 
Merchandise
  
 
162,567
 
  
 
159,925
 
Gasoline
  
 
362,419
 
  
 
301,969
 
    


  


Total cost of sales
  
 
524,986
 
  
 
461,894
 
    


  


Gross profit
  
 
125,991
 
  
 
115,479
 
    


  


Operating expenses:
                 
Operating, general and administrative expenses
  
 
93,141
 
  
 
88,976
 
Depreciation and amortization
  
 
13,092
 
  
 
13,392
 
    


  


Total operating expenses
  
 
106,233
 
  
 
102,368
 
    


  


Income from operations
  
 
19,758
 
  
 
13,111
 
    


  


Other income (expense):
                 
Interest expense (Note 7)
  
 
(12,188
)
  
 
(12,343
)
Miscellaneous
  
 
434
 
  
 
25
 
    


  


Total other expense
  
 
(11,754
)
  
 
(12,318
)
    


  


Income before income taxes
  
 
8,004
 
  
 
793
 
Income tax expense
  
 
(3,084
)
  
 
(318
)
    


  


Net income before cumulative effect adjustment
  
 
4,920
 
  
 
475
 
Cumulative effect adjustment, net of tax (Note 6)
  
 
(3,482
)
  
 
—  
 
    


  


Net income
  
$
1,438
 
  
$
475
 
    


  


Earnings per share (Note 9):
                 
Basic
  
$
0.08
 
  
$
0.03
 
Diluted
  
$
0.08
 
  
$
0.03
 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4


Table of Contents

 

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

    

Three Months Ended


 
    

December 26, 2002


    

December 27, 2001


 
    

(13 weeks)

    

(13 weeks)

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                 

Net income

  

$

1,438

 

  

$

475

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                 

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

13,092

 

  

 

13,392

 

Provision for deferred income taxes

  

 

3,084

 

  

 

317

 

Loss on sale of property and equipment

  

 

202

 

  

 

92

 

Impairment of long-lived assets

  

 

75

 

  

 

—  

 

Fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives

  

 

(219

)

  

 

(235

)

Provision for closed stores

  

 

642

 

  

 

40

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal

  

 

3,482

 

  

 

—  

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

                 

Receivables

  

 

180

 

  

 

1,151

 

Inventories

  

 

4,728

 

  

 

7,538

 

Prepaid expenses

  

 

(920

)

  

 

(757

)

Other noncurrent assets

  

 

134

 

  

 

40

 

Accounts payable

  

 

13,530

 

  

 

(14,162

)

Other current liabilities and accrued expenses

  

 

(19,575

)

  

 

(20,509

)

Reserves for environmental expenses

  

 

(53

)

  

 

141

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

  

 

(2,817

)

  

 

(2,184

)

    


  


Net cash used in operating activities

  

 

(10,057

)

  

 

(14,661

)

    


  


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                 

Additions to property held for sale

  

 

(482

)

  

 

(230

)

Additions to property and equipment

  

 

(2,400

)

  

 

(2,802

)

Proceeds from sale of property held for sale

  

 

1,186

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

  

 

1,437

 

  

 

729

 

    


  


Net cash used in investing activities

  

 

(259

)

  

 

(2,303

)

    


  


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                 

Principal repayments under capital leases

  

 

(335

)

  

 

(239

)

Principal repayments of long-term debt

  

 

(10,176

)

  

 

(18,676

)

Repayments of shareholder loans

  

 

225

 

  

 

10

 

Other financing costs

  

 

(38

)

  

 

(891

)

    


  


Net cash used in financing activities

  

 

(10,324

)

  

 

(19,796

)

    


  


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  

 

(20,640

)

  

 

(36,760

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  

 

42,236

 

  

 

50,611

 

    


  


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  

$

21,596

 

  

$

13,851

 

    


  


Cash paid (refunded) during the period:

                 

Interest

  

$

18,629

 

  

$

17,932

 

    


  


Taxes

  

$

(46

)

  

$

(66

)

    


  


 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

5


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
NOTE 1— BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Pantry, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Transactions and balances of each of these wholly owned subsidiaries are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
 
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the accounting records of The Pantry, Inc. and its subsidiaries and all amounts at December 26, 2002 and for the three months ended December 26, 2002 and December 27, 2001 are unaudited. References herein to “The Pantry” or “the Company” include all subsidiaries. Pursuant to Regulation S-X, certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The information furnished reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented, and which are of a normal, recurring nature.
 
We suggest that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2002.
 
Our results of operations for the three months ended December 26, 2002 and December 27, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year. The convenience store industry in our marketing areas generally experiences higher levels of revenues and profit margins during the summer months than during the winter months. Also, we have historically achieved higher revenues and earnings in our third and fourth quarters.
 
Accounting Period
 
We operate on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Thursday in September. Our 2003 fiscal year ends on September 25, 2003 and is a 52-week year. Fiscal 2002 was also a 52-week year.
 
The Pantry
 
As of December 26, 2002, we operated 1,280 convenience stores located in Florida (488), North Carolina (331), South Carolina (246), Georgia (56), Mississippi (54), Kentucky (39), Virginia (30), Indiana (14), Tennessee (14) and Louisiana (8). Our stores offer a broad selection of products and services designed to appeal to the convenience needs of our customers, including gasoline, car care products and services, tobacco products, beer, soft drinks, self-service fast food and beverages, publications, dairy products, groceries, health and beauty aids, money orders and other ancillary services. In our Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina and Indiana stores, we also sell lottery products. Self-service gasoline is sold at 1,248 locations, 953 of which sell gasoline under major oil company brand names including Amoco®, BP®, Chevron®, Citgo®, Mobil®, Shell® and Texaco®.

6


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS No. 143”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 requires us to recognize an estimated liability associated with the removal of our underground storage tanks. See Note 6 for a discussion of our adoption of SFAS No. 143.

 

Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”). This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of and Accounting Principles Board No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operation—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure (“SFAS No. 148”), an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”). This statement was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to SFAS No. 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. The interim disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are discussed in Note 8.

 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS No. 146”). This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

In November, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). The consensus requires that certain cash consideration received by a customer from a vendor should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customer’s income statement. However, that presumption is overcome if certain criteria are met. If the presumption is overcome, the consideration would be presented as revenue if it represents a payment for goods or services provided by the reseller to the vendor, or as an offset to an expense if it represents a reimbursement of a cost incurred by the reseller. EITF 02-16 should be applied in annual and interim financial statements for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing, but has not yet determined, the impact of EITF 02-16 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 
NOTE 2—INVENTORIES
 
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out method, except for gasoline inventories for which cost is determined using the weighted average cost method. Inventories consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
 
    
December 26, 2002

    
September 26, 2002

 
Inventories at FIFO cost:
                 
Merchandise
  
$
76,255
 
  
$
79,535
 
Gasoline
  
 
20,721
 
  
 
21,669
 
    


  


    
 
96,976
 
  
 
101,204
 
Less adjustment to LIFO cost:
                 
Merchandise
  
 
(17,267
)
  
 
(16,767
)
    


  


Inventories at LIFO cost
  
$
79,709
 
  
$
84,437
 
    


  


 
NOTE 3—ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
 
As of December 26, 2002, we were contingently liable for outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $28.3 million primarily related to several self-insured programs, vendor contract terms and regulatory requirements. The letters of credit are not to be drawn against unless we default on the timely payment of related liabilities.
 
We are involved in certain legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based on a review of such legal proceedings, we believe the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
 
Environmental Liabilities and Contingencies
 
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws. We make financial expenditures in order to comply with regulations governing underground storage tanks adopted by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. In particular, at the federal level, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, requires the EPA to establish a comprehensive regulatory program for the detection, prevention and cleanup of leaking underground storage tanks.
 
Federal and state regulations require us to provide and maintain evidence that we are taking financial responsibility for corrective action and compensating third parties in the event of a release from our underground storage tank systems. In order to comply with these requirements, we maintain letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $1.1 million in favor of state environmental agencies in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana and Indiana. We also rely on reimbursements from applicable state trust funds. Legislative and administrative rulemaking amendments in Indiana that became effective in November 2001 enable us to reduce our Indiana financial responsibility coverage from $1.0 million to $60 thousand. In Florida, we meet our financial responsibility requirements by state trust fund coverage through December 31, 1998 and meet such requirements thereafter through private commercial liability insurance. In Georgia, we meet our financial responsibility requirements by state trust fund coverage through December 29, 1999 and meet such requirements thereafter through private commercial liability insurance and a letter of credit. In Mississippi, we meet our financial responsibility requirements through coverage under the state trust fund.

8


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 
Regulations enacted by the EPA in 1988 established requirements for:
 
 
 
installing underground storage tank systems;
 
 
 
upgrading underground storage tank systems;
 
 
 
taking corrective action in response to releases;
 
 
 
closing underground storage tank systems;
 
 
 
keeping appropriate records and
 
 
 
maintaining evidence of financial responsibility for taking corrective action and compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage resulting from releases.
 
These regulations permit states to develop, administer and enforce their own regulatory programs, incorporating requirements which are at least as stringent as the federal standards. The Florida rules for 1998 upgrades are more stringent than the 1988 EPA regulations. We believe our facilities in Florida meet or exceed such rules. We believe all company-owned underground storage tank systems are in material compliance with these 1988 EPA regulations and all applicable state environmental regulations.
 
State Trust Funds.    All states in which we operate or have operated underground storage tank systems have established trust funds for the sharing, recovering and reimbursing of certain cleanup costs and liabilities incurred as a result of releases from underground storage tank systems. These trust funds, which essentially provide insurance coverage for the cleanup of environmental damages caused by the operation of underground storage tank systems, are funded by an underground storage tank registration fee and a tax on the wholesale purchase of motor fuels within each state. We have paid underground storage tank registration fees and gasoline taxes to each state where we operate to participate in these trust fund programs. We have filed claims and received reimbursements in North Carolina, South Carolina, Kentucky, Indiana, Georgia, Florida and Tennessee. We also have filed claims and received credits against our trust fund deductibles in Virginia. The coverage afforded by each state fund varies but generally provides up to $1.0 million per site or occurrence for the cleanup of environmental contamination, and most provide coverage for third-party liabilities. Costs for which we do not receive reimbursement include:
 
 
 
the per-site deductible;
 
 
 
costs incurred in connection with releases occurring or reported to trust funds prior to their inception;
 
 
 
removal and disposal of underground storage tank systems and
 
 
 
costs incurred in connection with sites otherwise ineligible for reimbursement from the trust funds.
 
The trust funds generally require us to pay deductibles ranging from $5 thousand to $150 thousand per occurrence depending on the upgrade status of our underground storage tank system, the date the release is discovered and/or reported and the type of cost for which reimbursement is sought. The Florida trust fund will not cover releases first reported after December 31, 1998. We obtained private insurance coverage for remediation and third party claims arising out of releases reported after December 31, 1998. We believe that this coverage exceeds federal and Florida financial responsibility regulations. In Georgia, we opted not to participate in the state trust fund effective December 30, 1999. We obtained private insurance coverage for remediation and third party claims arising out of releases reported after December 29, 1999. We believe that this coverage exceeds federal and Georgia financial responsibility regulations. During the next five years, we may spend up to $1.5 million for remediation. In addition, we estimate that state trust funds established in our operating areas or other responsible third parties (including insurers) may spend up to $11.7 million on our behalf. To the extent

9


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

those third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make such payments. This could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent upon the continued maintenance and continued solvency of the various funds.

 

Several of the locations identified as contaminated are being remediated by third parties who have indemnified us as to responsibility for cleanup matters. Additionally, we are awaiting closure notices on several other locations that will release us from responsibility related to known contamination at those sites. These sites continue to be included in our environmental reserve until a final closure notice is received.

 

NOTE 4—LONG-TERM DEBT

 

Long-term debt consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):

 

    

December 26, 2002


    

September 26, 2002


 

Senior subordinated notes payable; due October 15, 2007; interest payable semi-annually at 10.25%

  

$

200,000

 

  

$

200,000

 

Tranche A term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 3.5%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2004

  

 

21,906

 

  

 

26,906

 

Tranche B term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 4.0%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2006

  

 

175,712

 

  

 

176,185

 

Tranche C term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 4.25%; principal due in quarterly installments through July 31, 2006

  

 

72,938

 

  

 

73,125

 

Acquisition term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 3.5%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2004

  

 

23,000

 

  

 

27,500

 

Notes payable to McLane Company, Inc.; zero (0.0%) interest, with principal due in annual installments through February 26, 2003

  

 

297

 

  

 

297

 

Other notes payable; various interest rates and maturity dates

  

 

146

 

  

 

162

 

    


  


Total long-term debt

  

 

493,999

 

  

 

504,175

 

    


  


Less—current maturities

  

 

(42,913

)

  

 

(43,255

)

    


  


Long-term debt, net of current maturities

  

$

451,086

 

  

$

460,920

 

    


  


 

At December 26, 2002, our senior credit facility consists of a $45.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires January 31, 2004 and bears interest of LIBOR plus 3.5%, and $293.6 million in outstanding term loans. Our revolving credit facility is available for working capital financing, general corporate purposes and issuing commercial and standby letters of credit. As of December 26, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and we had approximately $16.7 million in available borrowing capacity. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are limited by our outstanding letters of credit of approximately $28.3 million. Furthermore, the revolving credit facility limits our total outstanding letters of credit to $30.0 million. The LIBOR associated with our senior credit facility resets periodically and as of December 26, 2002, was 1.38%.

 

10


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

The remaining annual maturities of our long-term debt are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Year Ended September:


    

2003

  

$

33,079

2004

  

 

52,912

2005

  

 

88,654

2006

  

 

119,354

2007

  

 

—  

Thereafter

  

 

200,000

    

Total long-term debt

  

$

493,999

    

 

As of December 26, 2002, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to all outstanding borrowings and substantially all of our net assets are restricted as to payment of dividends and other distributions.

 

NOTE 5—DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

We enter into interest rate swap and collar agreements to modify the interest rate characteristics of our outstanding long-term debt and have designated each qualifying instrument as a cash flow hedge. We formally document our hedge relationships, including identifying the hedge instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transaction. At hedge inception, and at least quarterly thereafter, the Company assesses whether derivatives used to hedge transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of the hedged item. We measure effectiveness by the ability of the interest rate swaps to offset cash flows associated with changes in the variable LIBOR rate associated with our term loan facilities using the hypothetical derivative method. To the extent the instruments are considered to be effective, changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). To the extent the instruments are considered ineffective, any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are immediately recognized in earnings (interest expense). When it is determined that a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting, and any gains or losses on the derivative instrument are recognized in earnings. Interest income of $219 thousand and $235 thousand was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively, for the mark-to-market adjustment of those instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting.

 

The fair values of our interest rate swaps and collars are obtained from dealer quotes. These values represent the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate the agreement taking into consideration the difference between the contract rate of interest and rates currently quoted for agreements of similar terms and maturities. At December 26, 2002, other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities include derivative liabilities of $6.2 million and $699 thousand, respectively. At September 26, 2002, other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities include derivative liabilities of $7.9 million and $699 thousand, respectively.

 

11


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

The components of accumulated other comprehensive deficit, net of related taxes, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

    

December 26, 2002


    

September 26, 2002


 

Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133 (net of related taxes of $59 at December 26, 2002 and $93 at September 26, 2002)

  

$

(107

)

  

$

(158

)

Unrealized losses on qualifying cash flow hedges (net of related taxes of $743 at December 26, 2002 and $1,261 at September 26, 2002)

  

 

(1,128

)

  

 

(1,954

)

    


  


Accumulated other comprehensive deficit

  

$

(1,235

)

  

$

(2,112

)

    


  


 

The pretax, tax and net-of-tax effects on the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended


    

December 26, 2002


  

December 27, 2001


    

Pre-tax


  

Tax (Expense)

or Benefit


    

Net-of-Tax

Amount


  

Pre-tax


  

Tax (Expense)

or Benefit


    

Net-of-Tax

Amount


Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133

  

$

85

  

$

(34

)

  

$

51

  

$

85

  

$

(33

)

  

$

52

Unrealized gains (losses) on qualifying cash flow hedges

  

 

1,343

  

 

(517

)

  

 

826

  

 

721

  

 

(278

)

  

 

443

    

  


  

  

  


  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  

$

1,428

  

$

(551

)

  

$

877

  

$

806

  

$

(311

)

  

$

495

    

  


  

  

  


  

 

NOTE 6—ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

 

Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 and as a result, we recognize the future cost to remove an underground storage tank over the estimated useful life of the storage tank in accordance with SFAS No. 143. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation with a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset is recorded at the time an underground storage tank is installed. We will amortize the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining life of the respective underground storage tanks.

 

The estimated liability is based on historical experience in removing these tanks, estimated tank useful lives, external estimates as to the cost to remove the tanks in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is a discounted liability using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate of approximately 9%. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in tank removal costs, tank useful lives or if federal and/or state regulators enact new guidance on the removal of such tanks.

 

Upon adoption, we recorded a discounted liability of $8.4 million, which is included in other noncurrent liabilities, increased net property and equipment by $2.7 million and recognized a one-time cumulative effect adjustment of $3.5 million (net of deferred tax benefit of $2.2 million). We will amortize the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining lives of the respective underground storage tanks. Pro forma effects on earnings from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change for the three months ended December 27, 2001, assuming the adoption of SFAS No. 143 as of September 28, 2001, were not material to net earnings or earnings per share.

 

12


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

A reconciliation of the Company’s liability for the three months ended December 26, 2002, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Upon adoption at September 27, 2002

  

$

8,443

Accretion expense

  

 

  134

    

Total asset retirement obligation

  

$

8,577

    

 

NOTE 7—INTEREST EXPENSE

 

The components of interest expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

    

Three Months Ended


 
    

December 26, 2002


    

December 27, 2001


 

Interest on long-term debt

  

$

9,379

 

  

$

10,255

 

Interest rate swap settlements

  

 

2,475

 

  

 

1,859

 

Interest on capital lease obligations

  

 

547

 

  

 

484

 

Fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives

  

 

(219

)

  

 

(235

)

Miscellaneous

  

 

6

 

  

 

(20

)

    


  


Total interest expense

  

$

12,188

 

  

$

12,343

 

    


  


 

NOTE 8—STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER EQUITY INSTRUMENTS

 

On January 1, 1998, we adopted an incentive and non-qualified stock option plan. Pursuant to the provisions of the plan, options may be granted to officers, key employees, consultants of our Company or any of our subsidiaries and certain members of the board of directors to purchase up to 1,275,000 shares of our Company’s common stock. On June 3, 1999, we adopted a new 1999 stock option plan providing for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to officers, directors, employees and consultants, with provisions similar to the 1998 stock option plan and up to 3,825,000 shares of the Company’s common stock available for grant. The plans are administered by the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors. Options are granted at prices determined by the board of directors and may be exercisable in one or more installments. Additionally, the terms and conditions of awards under the plans may differ from one grant to another. Under the plans, incentive stock options may only be granted to employees with an exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of the related common stock on the date the option is granted. Fair values are based on the most recent common stock sales.

 

During the first quarter fiscal 2002, options to acquire 200,000 shares of common stock were granted under the 1999 plan with an exercise price of $5.12 per share. During the first quarter fiscal 2003, we granted options to acquire 355,000 shares of common stock under the 1999 plan with exercise prices ranging from $1.66-$1.70 per share. These options vest over three years and have contractual lives of seven years. Subsequent to December 26, 2002, we granted options to acquire 35,000 shares of common stock under the 1999 plan with an exercise price of $3.97 per share. These options vest over three years and have contractual lives of seven years.

 

13


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 26, 2002:

 

Exercise Prices


  

Date Issued


    

Number Outstanding at December 26, 2002


    

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life


  

Number of Options Exercisable


    

Weighted-Average Exercise Price


$8.82

  

1/1/98

    

289,935

    

5 years

  

289,935

    

$

8.82

$11.27

  

8/25/98

    

94,860

    

5 years

  

94,860

    

$

11.27

$13.00

  

6/8/99, 9/30/99

    

150,000

    

4 years

  

150,000

    

$

13.00

$10.00

  

12/29/00

    

259,500

    

6 years

  

86,500

    

$

10.00

$5.12

  

11/26/01

    

180,000

    

6 years

  

60,000

    

$

5.12

$4.00

  

3/26/02

    

40,000

    

7 years

  

0

    

$

4.00

$1.66

  

10/22/02

    

20,000

    

7 years

  

0

    

$

1.66

$1.70

  

11/13/02

    

335,000

    

7 years

  

0

    

$

1.70

           
         
        

Total

         

1,369,295

         

681,295

        

 

All options granted vest over a three-year period, with one-third of each grant vesting on the anniversary of the initial grant. There were 355,000 options granted, none exercised, 110,910 options forfeited and none that expired during the first quarter fiscal 2003. There were 200,000 options granted, none exercised, none forfeited and none that expired during the first quarter fiscal 2002. All stock options are granted at estimated fair market value of the common stock at the grant date.

 

The Pantry’s stock option plans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Had compensation cost for the plan been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, The Pantry’s pro-forma net income (loss) for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been approximately $1.4 million and $414 thousand, respectively. Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been $0.08 and $0.02, respectively. Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been $0.08 and $0.02, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

    

Three Months Ended


 
    

December 26, 2002


      

December 27, 2001


 

Weighted-average grant date fair value

  

$

0.67

 

    

$

1.77

 

Weighted-average expected lives (years)

  

 

2.00

 

    

 

2.00

 

Weighted-average grant date fair value-exercise price equals market price

  

$

0.67

 

    

$

1.77

 

Weighted-average grant date fair value-exercise price greater than market price

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

Risk-free interest rate

  

 

1.76%-2.21

%

    

 

2.84

%

Expected volatility

  

 

70.37

%

    

 

59.63

%

Dividend yield

  

 

0.00

%

    

 

0.00

%

 

NOTE 9—EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

We compute earnings per share data in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options using the “treasury stock” method.

 

14


Table of Contents
 
The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
 
    
Three Months Ended

    
December 26, 2002

  
December 27, 2001

Net income
  
$
1,438
  
$
475
Earnings per share—basic:
             
Weighted average shares outstanding
  
 
18,108
  
 
18,109
    

  

Net income per share—basic
  
$
0.08
  
$
0.03
    

  

Earnings per share—diluted:
             
Weighted average shares outstanding
  
 
18,108
  
 
18,109
Dilutive impact of options and warrants outstanding
  
 
53
  
 
10
Weighted average shares and potential dilutive shares outstanding
  
 
18,161
  
 
18,119
    

  

Net income per share—diluted
  
$
0.08
  
$
0.03
    

  

 
Options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, because their inclusion would have been antidilutive, were 3.4 million for both the three months ended December 26, 2002 and December 27, 2001.

15


Table of Contents

 

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Additional discussion and analysis related to our Company is contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2002.

 

Introduction

 

The Pantry, Inc. is the leading convenience store operator in the southeastern United States and the second largest independently operated convenience store chain in the country with 1,280 stores in 10 southeastern states. Our operating strategy is to provide value to our customers by maintaining high store standards and offering a wide selection of quality products at competitive prices. We sell general merchandise, petroleum products and other products and services targeted to appeal to consumers desire for convenience.

 

Total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were $651.0 million compared to $577.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 12.7%. The revenue increase is primarily attributable to a 22.4% increase in our average gasoline retail price per gallon and comparable store improvements in merchandise and commission revenue. We believe the comparable store merchandise and commission revenue improvements are primarily attributable to our efforts to reposition our merchandise and gasoline offerings, remain competitively priced on key products, including gasoline, and enhance promotional activity to drive customer traffic. These improvements were realized despite continued volatility in crude oil markets and generally weak economic conditions.

 

Our first quarter fiscal 2003 EBITDA was $32.9 million and our net income was $1.4 million, or 8 cents per diluted share, compared to EBITDA of $26.5 million, net income of $475 thousand or 3 cents per diluted share in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. First quarter fiscal 2003 adjusted net income was $4.8 million, or 26 cents per diluted share, compared to $334 thousand, or 2 cents per diluted share, for the first quarter fiscal 2002. See discussion and tables below for information regarding these adjustments.

 

We continue to focus our attention on those aspects of our business we can influence in an effort to position the Company for improved results as the business climate in the Southeast improves. Primarily our management team is focused on the following key initiatives:

 

    Enhancing our merchandise offering to ensure that our stores are fully stocked with a broad selection of competitively priced products, brands and services our customers are looking for and will return to our locations to purchase;

 

    Enhancing our gasoline offering to better rationalize our offering according to consumer preferences in various markets, consolidate the brands that we offer, expand our proprietary Kangaroo brand where appropriate and renegotiate our agreements and partnerships with suppliers;

 

    Improving our competitive position through our merchandise and gasoline initiatives and our evaluation of the performance of each store to make the necessary adjustments to ensure that we maintain the appropriate balance between volume and gross profit;

 

    Remodeling and upgrading our retail facilities by sensibly applying capital and technology in all areas of our business and

 

    Strengthening our financial position by maintaining a disciplined approach to discretionary spending and reducing debt.

 

We believe our retail network, merchandise programs, purchasing leverage and in-store execution will allow us to improve comparable store sales and control store operating expenses as the economy improves. In the

 

16


Table of Contents

current environment, we continue to review our merchandise programs and are repositioning certain aspects to drive customer traffic. In an effort to enhance our competitive position, we continued to reposition our pricing and promote key merchandise categories. Over time, we believe these refinements coupled with our efforts to remain competitively priced on key product categories will positively impact comparable store merchandise sales and gross profit.

 

On the technology front, we rolled out checkout scanning systems across key locations throughout our retail network during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. We believe the benefits of scanning include a range of potential improvements from enhanced store merchandising and more effective in-store promotions to improved inventory controls. We will continue to evaluate and invest in strategic technology-based initiatives designed to improve operating efficiencies, strengthen internal controls and promote our long-term financial objectives.

 

Given current market conditions and its impact on operating income, we have substantially reduced the pace of our acquisitions and expect to acquire a few additional stores in fiscal 2003, as selective opportunities arise. However, this does not represent a change in our long-term strategic direction. When the environment is once again favorable, we plan to continue to sensibly acquire premium chains located in our existing and contiguous markets.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we closed nine stores. Historically, the stores we close are under performing in terms of volume and profitability and, generally, we benefit from closing the locations by reducing direct overhead expenses and eliminating certain fixed costs.

 

Throughout fiscal 2003, we plan to focus primarily on the operations side of our business with a renewed effort to enhance in-store merchandising. In fiscal 2003, we anticipate reducing our average outstanding borrowings through scheduled principal payments and we plan to continue to seek ways to improve top-line growth and enhance long-term profitability.

 

17


Table of Contents
Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended December 26, 2002 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 27, 2001
 
The table below provides a summary of our statements of operations and details our pro forma adjustments related to fair market value changes in non-qualifying derivatives and the adoption of SFAS No. 143 (amounts in millions, except per share, margin and store data):
 
    
Three Months Ended
December 26, 2002 [a]

    
Three Months Ended
December 27, 2001 [a]

 
    
As reported

      
Adjustments

    
As adjusted

    
As reported

    
Adjustments

    
As adjusted

 
Total revenues
  
$
651.0
 
    
$
—  
 
  
$
651.0
 
  
$
577.4
 
  
$
—  
 
  
$
577.4
 
Cost of sales
  
 
525.0
 
    
 
—  
 
  
 
525.0
 
  
 
461.9
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
461.9
 
    


    


  


  


  


  


Gross profit
  
 
126.0
 
    
 
—  
 
  
 
126.0
 
  
 
115.5
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
115.5
 
Operating, general and administrative expenses
  
 
93.1
 
    
 
—  
 
  
 
93.1
 
  
 
89.0
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
89.0
 
Depreciation and amortization
  
 
13.1
 
    
 
—  
 
  
 
13.1
 
  
 
13.4
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
13.4
 
    


    


  


  


  


  


Income from operations
  
 
19.8
 
    
 
—  
 
  
 
19.8
 
  
 
13.1
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
13.1
 
Interest and miscellaneous expenses [b]
  
 
11.8
 
    
 
0.2
 
  
 
12.0
 
  
 
12.3
 
  
 
0.2
 
  
 
12.6
 
Income before taxes
  
 
8.0
 
    
 
(0.2
)
  
 
7.8
 
  
 
0.8
 
  
 
(0.2
)
  
 
0.6
 
Tax expense [c]
  
 
(3.1
)
    
 
0.1
 
  
 
(3.0
)
  
 
(0.3
)
  
 
0.1
 
  
 
(0.2
)
    


    


  


  


  


  


Net income before cumulative effect adj
  
 
4.9
 
    
 
(0.1
)
  
 
4.8
 
  
 
0.5
 
  
 
(0.1
)
  
 
0.3
 
Cumulative effect adjustment [d]
  
 
(3.5
)
    
 
3.5
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
—  
 
  
 
—  
 
    


    


  


  


  


  


Net income
  
$
1.4
 
    
$
3.4
 
  
$
4.8
 
  
$
0.5
 
  
$
(0.1
)
  
$
0.3
 
Earnings per diluted share
  
$
0.08
 
    
$
0.18
 
  
$
0.26
 
  
$
0.03
 
  
$
(0.01
)
  
$
0.02
 
Selected Financial Data:
                                                       
EBITDA
  
$
32.9
 
                      
$
26.5
 
                 
Merchandise margin
  
 
32.9
%
                      
 
32.6
%
                 
Gasoline gallons
  
 
283.8
 
                      
 
287.9
 
                 
Gasoline margin per gallon
  
$
0.1392
 
                      
$
0.1123
 
                 
Gasoline retail per gallon
  
$
1.42
 
                      
$
1.16
 
                 
Comparable store data:
                                                       
Merchandise sales %
  
 
3.3
%
                      
 
1.4
%
                 
Gasoline gallons %
  
 
–0.7
%
                      
 
0.8
%
                 
Number of stores:
                                                       
End of Period
  
 
1,280
 
                      
 
1,318
 
                 
Weighted-average store count
  
 
1,285
 
                      
 
1,320
 
                 

[a]
 
These financial tables may not foot due to rounding.
[b]
 
Fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 have been adjusted to eliminate the non-cash fair market value adjustments associated with non-qualifying derivative instruments.
[c]
 
The adjustment to income tax expense reflects the tax impact of the adjustment outlined above.
[d]
 
Fiscal 2003 has been adjusted to exclude the cumulative effect of change in accounting principles related to the adoption of SFAS No. 143.
 
Total Revenue.    Total revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $651.0 million compared to $577.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $73.6 million or 12.7%. The increase in total revenue is primarily attributable to a 26 cents per gallon or 22.4% increase in our average gasoline retail price per gallon, a comparable store merchandise revenue increase of 3.3% and an $882 thousand increase in commission revenue. These increases were partially offset by a comparable store gasoline gallon volume decline of 0.7%.

18


Table of Contents

 

Merchandise Revenue.    Merchandise revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $242.3 million compared to $237.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $5.1 million or 2.2%. The increase is primarily attributable to a 3.3% increase in comparable store merchandise revenue compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002 partially offset by lost revenue from closed stores. The increase in comparable store merchandise revenue is primarily attributable to our efforts to enhance and reposition our merchandise offerings, increased promotional activity and more aggressive pricing in key categories in an effort to drive customer traffic.

 

Gasoline Revenue and Gallons.    Gasoline revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $401.9 million compared to $334.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $67.6 million or 20.2%. The increase in gasoline revenue is primarily attributable to the 26 cents per gallon, or 22.4% increase in the average gasoline retail price per gallon partially offset by a 0.7% decline in comparable store gasoline gallon volume.

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, gasoline gallons sold were 283.8 million compared to 287.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, a decrease of 4.1 million gallons or 1.4%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the comparable store gasoline gallon sales decline coupled with lost gallon volume from closed stores.

 

Commission Revenue.    Commission revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $6.7 million compared to $5.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $882 thousand or 15.1%. The increase is primarily due to the January 2002 introduction of South Carolina’s Educational Lottery program.

 

Total Gross Profit.    Total gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $126.0 million compared to $115.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $10.5 million or 9.1%. The increase in gross profit is primarily attributable to increases in gasoline gross profit per gallon, merchandise margin and commission revenue.

 

Merchandise Gross Profit and Margin.    Merchandise gross profit was $79.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $77.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $2.5 million or 3.2%. This increase is primarily attributable to the increased merchandise revenue discussed above and a 30 basis points increase in our merchandise margin. Merchandise margin increased to 32.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 from the 32.6% reported for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

 

Gasoline Gross Profit and Per Gallon Margin.    Gasoline gross profit was $39.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $32.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $7.2 million or 22.2%. The increase is primarily attributable to a 2.7 cents per gallon increase in gasoline margin, partially offset by the comparable store gallon decline. Gasoline gross profit per gallon was 13.9 cents in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to 11.2 cents for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

 

Operating, General and Administrative Expenses.    Operating, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 totaled $93.1 million compared to $89.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $4.2 million or 4.7%. This increase is primarily due to higher insurance costs and costs associated with store closings.

 

Income from Operations.    Income from operations totaled $19.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $13.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $6.6 million or 50.7%. The increase is primarily attributable to the increases in gasoline and merchandise gross margins as discussed above, an increase in commission revenue and positive comparable store merchandise revenue.

 

EBITDA.    EBITDA represents income from operations before depreciation and amortization and non-recurring charges. EBITDA for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 totaled $32.9 million compared to EBITDA of $26.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $6.3 million or 23.9%. The increase is attributable to the increases in merchandise and gasoline gross profit as discussed above.

 

19


Table of Contents

 

EBITDA is not a measure of performance under generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as a substitute for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data, or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. We have included information concerning EBITDA as one measure of our cash flow and historical ability to service debt and we believe investors find this information useful. EBITDA as defined may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

 

Interest Expense.    Interest expense is primarily interest on the borrowings under our senior credit facility and senior subordinated notes. Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $12.2 million compared to $12.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The impact of a general decline in interest rates, a decrease in our weighted average borrowings and the change in fair market value of our non-qualifying interest rate derivatives was offset by an increase in our interest rate swap settlement payments of $616 thousand.

 

Income Tax Expense.    We recorded income tax expense of $3.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $318 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase in income tax expense was primarily attributable to the increase in pre-tax income partially offset by a decline in our effective tax rate to 38.5% compared to 40.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

 

Cumulative Effect Adjustment.    We recorded a one-time cumulative effect charge of $3.5 million relating to the disposal of our underground storage tanks in accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 143.

 

Net Income.    Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $1.4 million compared to net income of $475 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase is attributable to the items discussed above. Adjusted net income, which excludes the fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives and the cumulative effect adjustment, was $4.8 million compared to adjusted net income of $333 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash Flows from Operations.    Due to the nature of our business, substantially all sales are for cash, and cash provided by operations is our primary source of liquidity. We rely primarily upon cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary from time to time by borrowings under our senior credit facility, sale-leaseback transactions, asset dispositions and equity investments, to finance our operations, pay interest and debt amortization and fund capital expenditures. Cash used by operating activities declined from $14.7 million for the first quarter fiscal 2002 to $10.1 million for the first quarter fiscal 2003. We had $21.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand at December 26, 2002.

 

Capital Expenditures.    Capital expenditures (excluding all acquisitions) were approximately $2.9 million for the first quarter fiscal 2003. Capital expenditures are primarily expenditures for existing store improvements, store equipment, new store development, information systems and expenditures to comply with regulatory statutes, including those related to environmental matters.

 

We finance substantially all capital expenditures and new store development through cash flow from operations, a sale-leaseback program or similar lease activity, vendor reimbursements and asset dispositions. Our sale-leaseback program includes the packaging of our owned convenience store real estate, both land and buildings, for sale to investors in return for their agreement to lease the property back to us under long-term leases. Generally, the leases are operating leases at market rates with terms of twenty years with four five-year renewal options. The lease payments are based on market rates applied to the cost of each respective property. We retain ownership of all personal property and gasoline marketing equipment. Our senior credit facility limits or caps the proceeds of sale-leasebacks that we can use to fund our operations or capital expenditures. Under our sale-leaseback program, we received $1.2 million for the three months ended December 26, 2002. Vendor reimbursements primarily relate to oil-company payments to either enter into long-term supply agreements or to upgrade gasoline marketing equipment including canopies, gasoline dispensers and signs.

 

20


Table of Contents

 

For the first quarter fiscal 2003, we received approximately $1.6 million in proceeds from asset dispositions and vendor reimbursements bringing total proceeds including sale-leaseback transactions to $2.8. Therefore, our net capital expenditures, excluding all acquisitions, for the first quarter fiscal 2003 were $125 thousand. We anticipate that net capital expenditures for fiscal 2003 will be in the range of $22.0 to $25.0 million.

 

Long-Term Debt.    Our long-term debt consisted of $200.0 million of senior subordinated notes, $293.6 million outstanding under our senior credit facility and $443 thousand in other notes payable with various interest rates and maturity dates.

 

We have outstanding $200.0 million of 10 1/4% senior subordinated notes due 2007. Interest on the senior subordinated notes is due on October 15 and April 15 of each year.

 

As of December 26, 2002, our senior credit facility consisted of a $45.0 million revolving credit facility and $293.6 million in outstanding borrowings under term loans. Our revolving credit facility is available for working capital financing, general corporate purposes and issuing commercial and standby letters of credit. As of December 26, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. We had outstanding letter of credit of $28.3 million issued under the revolving credit facility. As of December 26, 2002, we had $16.7 million available for borrowing or additional letters of credit under the credit facility. The revolving credit facility limits our total outstanding letters of credit to $30.0 million. In fiscal 2003, we anticipate amending our senior credit facility to include, among other things, amending our limit on outstanding letters of credit. Until our revolving credit facility terms are amended, we may have to finance certain purchase obligations and insurance liabilities with cash deposits or other financing alternatives.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities.    For the three months ended December 26, 2002, we used cash on hand to make principal repayments of $10.2 million.

 

Cash Requirements.    We believe that cash on hand, together with cash flow anticipated to be generated from operations, short-term borrowings for seasonal working capital needs and permitted borrowings under our credit facilities including such amendments described above will be sufficient to enable us to satisfy anticipated cash requirements for operating, investing and financing activities, including debt service, for the next twelve months. The revolving credit facility matures January 31, 2004. The Company believes it will be able to refinance or obtain an extension of this credit facility under acceptable terms.

 

Shareholders’ Equity.    As of December 26, 2002, our shareholders’ equity totaled $117.7 million. The $2.5 million increase from September 26, 2002 is attributable to the net income for the period coupled with a decrease in our accumulated other comprehensive deficit related to our derivative instruments.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

 

Contractual Obligations.    The following table shows our expected long-term debt amortization schedule, future capital lease commitments (including principal and interest) and future operating lease commitments as of December 26, 2002:

 

Contractual Obligations

(Dollars in thousands)

 

   

2003


 

2004


 

2005


 

2006


 

2007


 

Thereafter


 

Total


Long-term debt

 

$

33,079

 

$

52,912

 

$

88,654

 

$

119,354

 

$

—  

 

$

200,000

 

$

493,999

Capital lease obligations

 

 

2,586

 

 

3,275

 

 

2,949

 

 

2,728

 

 

2,648

 

 

20,975

 

$

35,161

Operating leases

 

 

37,999

 

 

49,186

 

 

47,028

 

 

44,583

 

 

43,259

 

 

337,910

 

$

559,965

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

73,664

 

$

105,373

 

$

138,631

 

$

166,665

 

$

45,907

 

$

558,885

 

$

1,089,125

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents
 
Contractual obligations for fiscal 2003 include only payments to be made for the remaining 39 weeks of fiscal 2003.
 
Letter of Credit Commitments.    The following table shows the expiration dates of our standby letters of credit issued under our senior credit facility as of December 26, 2002:
 
Other Commitments
(Dollars in thousands)
 
    
2003

  
2004

  
2005

  
2006

  
2007

  
Thereafter

  
Total

Standby letters of credit
  
$
18,778
  
$
9,503
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
—  
  
$
28,281
 
Other commitments for fiscal 2003 include only standby letters of credit that expire during the remaining 39 weeks of fiscal 2003. At maturity, we expect to renew a significant number of our standby letters of credit.
 
Environmental Considerations.    Environmental reserves of $13.2 million as of December 26, 2002 represent estimates for future expenditures for remediation, tank removal and litigation associated with 754 known contaminated sites as a result of releases and are based on current regulations, historical results and certain other factors. We estimate that approximately $11.7 million of our environmental obligation will be funded by state trust funds and third party insurance.
 
Florida environmental regulations require all single-walled underground storage tanks to be upgraded/replaced with secondary containment by December 31, 2009. In order to comply with these Florida regulations, we will be required to upgrade or replace underground storage tanks at approximately 160 locations. We anticipate that these capital expenditures will be approximately $16.0 million and will begin during our fiscal 2004. The ultimate costs incurred will depend on several factors including future store closures, changes in the number of locations upgraded or replaced and changes in the costs to upgrade or replace the underground storage tanks.
 
Other Commitments.    We make various other commitments and become subject to various other contractual obligations that we believe to be routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business. Management believes that such routine commitments and contractual obligations do not have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
 
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (“SFAS No. 143”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 requires us to recognize an estimated liability associated with the removal of our underground storage tanks. See Note 6 for a discussion of our adoption of SFAS No. 143.
 
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”). This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of and Accounting Principles Board No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operation—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and how the results of a

22


Table of Contents

discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure (“SFAS No. 148”), an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”). This statement was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to SFAS No. 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. The interim disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are discussed in Note 8.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

 

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS No. 146”). This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

In November, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). The consensus requires that certain cash consideration received by a customer from a vendor should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customer’s income statement. However, that presumption is overcome if certain criteria are met. If the presumption is overcome, the consideration would be presented as revenue if it represents a payment for goods or services provided by the reseller to the vendor, or as an offset to an expense if it represents a reimbursement of a cost incurred by the reseller. EITF 02-16 should be applied in annual and interim financial statements for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing, but has not yet determined, the impact of EITF 02-16 on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Risk Factors

 

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making a decision to invest in our common stock, our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility. Any of these risk factors, or others not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could negatively impact our results of operations or financial condition in the future. In that case, the trading price of our common stock, our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

 

Our Operating Results and Financial Condition are Subject to Fluctuations Caused by Many Factors.    Our annual and quarterly results of operations are affected by a number of factors which can adversely effect our revenue, profitability or cash flow, including without limitation:

 

    Competitive pressures from convenience store operators, gasoline stations and other non-traditional operators located in our markets;

 

    Changes in economic conditions generally and in the markets we serve;

 

    Unfavorable weather conditions;

 

    Political conditions in crude oil producing regions, including South America and the Middle East;

 

    Volatility in crude oil and wholesale petroleum costs;

 

    Wholesale cost increases of tobacco products;

 

23


Table of Contents

 

    Consumer behavior, travel and tourism trends;

 

    Changes in state and federal environmental and other regulations;

 

    Financial leverage and debt covenants;

 

    Changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities, credit facilities and trade credit;

 

    The interests of our controlling stockholder;

 

    Acts of war and terrorism and

 

    Other unforeseen factors.

 

The Convenience Store Industry Is Highly Competitive and Impacted by New Entrants.    The industry and geographic areas in which we operate are highly competitive and marked by ease of entry and constant change in terms of the number and type of retailers offering the products and services found in our stores. We compete with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drugstores, discount stores, club stores and mass merchants. In recent years, several non-traditional retail segments entering the gasoline retail business including supermarkets, club stores and mass merchants have impacted the convenience store industry. These non-traditional gasoline retailers have obtained a share of the motor fuels market and their market share is expected to grow. In some of our markets, our competitors have been in existence longer and have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry. To remain competitive, we must constantly analyze consumer preferences, competitive offerings and competitive prices to ensure we offer a selection of products and services consumers demand at competitive prices. We must also maintain and upgrade our customer service levels, facilities and locations to remain competitive and drive customer traffic to our stores. Major competitive factors include, among others, location, ease of access, gasoline brands, pricing, product and service selections, customer service, store appearance, cleanliness and safety.

 

Changes in Economic Conditions may Influence Consumer Preferences and Spending Patterns.    Changes in economic conditions generally or in the Southeast could adversely impact consumer spending patterns and travel and tourism in our market areas. Approximately 47% of our stores are located in coastal, resort or tourist destinations. Historically, travel and consumer behavior in such markets is more severely impacted by weak economic conditions.

 

Unfavorable Weather Conditions Could Adversely Affect Our Business.    Substantially all of our stores are located in the Southeast region of the United States. Though the Southeast is generally known for its mild weather, the region is susceptible to severe storms including hurricanes, thunderstorms, extended periods of rain, ice storms and heavy snow. Approximately 51% of our stores are located in coastal areas and Florida. Inclement weather conditions as well as severe storms in the Southeast could damage our facilities or could have a significant impact on consumer behavior, travel and convenience store traffic patterns as well as our ability to operate our locations. In addition, we typically generate higher revenues and gross margins during warmer weather months in the Southeast, which fall within our third and fourth quarters. If weather conditions are not favorable during these periods, our operating results and cash flow from operations could be adversely affected.

 

Political Conditions in Oil Producing Regions Could Impact the Price of Wholesale Petroleum Costs and Our Operating Results.    General political conditions and instability in oil producing regions particularly in the Middle East and Venezuela could significantly impact crude oil supplies and wholesale petroleum costs. In addition, the supply of gasoline for our unbranded locations and our wholesale purchase costs could be adversely impacted in the event of a shortage as our gasoline contracts do not guarantee an uninterrupted, unlimited supply of gasoline. Significant increases and volatility in wholesale petroleum costs could result in significant increases in the retail price of petroleum products and in lower gasoline gross margin per gallon. Increases in the retail price of petroleum products could impact consumer demand for gasoline. These factors could materially impact our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit and overall customer traffic.

 

Volatility in Crude Oil and Wholesale Petroleum Costs Could Impact Our Operating Results.    In the past three fiscal years, our gasoline revenue accounted for approximately 61.0% of total revenues and our gasoline gross profit accounted for approximately 28.2% of total gross profit. Crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum

 

24


Table of Contents

markets are marked by significant volatility. This volatility makes it is extremely difficult to predict the impact future wholesale cost fluctuations will have on our operating results and financial condition. These factors could materially impact our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit and overall customer traffic.

 

Wholesale Cost Increases of Tobacco Products Could Impact our Merchandise Gross Profit.    Sales of tobacco products have averaged approximately 13.9% of our total revenue over the past three fiscal years. Significant increases in wholesale cigarettes costs and tax increase on tobacco products, as well as national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States, may have an adverse effect on unit demand for cigarettes domestically. In general, we attempt to pass price increases on to our customers, however due to competitive pressures in our markets, we may not be able to do so. These factors could materially impact our retail price of cigarettes; cigarette unit volume and revenues; merchandise gross profit and overall customer traffic.

 

Changes in Consumer Behavior, Travel and Tourism Could Impact Our Business.    In the convenience store industry, customer traffic is generally driven by consumer preferences and spending trends, growth rates for automobile and truck traffic and trends in travel, tourism and weather. To meet consumer demands and remain competitive, we must stock our locations with the right mix of products consumers prefer and constantly compare our assortment of products to market research data. If we are unable to obtain and offer an appropriate mix of products, our operating results may be impacted and we may lose customers to other convenience store chains or other channels.

 

We are Subject to State and Federal Environmental and Other Regulations.    Our business is subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations including, but not limited to, environmental regulations, employment laws and regulations, regulations governing the sale of alcohol and tobacco, minimum wage requirements and other laws and regulations.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may, as the owner or operator of our locations, be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of contamination at these or our former locations, whether or not we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such contamination. The failure to properly remediate such contamination may subject us to liability to third parties and may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow money using such property as collateral. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at sites where they are located, whether or not such site is owned or operated by such person. Although we do not typically arrange for the treatment or disposal of hazardous substances, we may be deemed to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, may be liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as other related costs, including governmental fines, and injuries to persons, property and natural resources.

 

Compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks may require significant capital expenditures and the remediation costs and other costs required to clean up or treat contaminated sites could be substantial. We pay tank fees and other taxes to state trust funds in support of future remediation obligations. These state trust funds or other responsible third parties including insurers are expected to pay or reimburse us for remediation expenses less a deductible. To the extent third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make these payments, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent on the continued viability of these funds.

 

In the future, we may incur substantial expenditures for remediation of contamination that has not been discovered at existing locations or locations, which we may acquire. We cannot assure you that we have identified all environmental liabilities at all of our current and former locations; that material environmental conditions not known to us do not exist; that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose material environmental liability on us; or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our locations. In addition, failure to comply with any environmental regulations or an increase in regulations could affect operating results and financial condition.

 

25


Table of Contents

 

State laws regulate the sale of alcohol and tobacco products. A violation or change of these laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations because state and local regulatory agencies have the power to approve, revoke, suspend or deny applications for, and renewals of, permits and licenses relating to the sale of these products or to seek other remedies.

 

Any appreciable increase in the statutory minimum wage rate would result in an increase in our labor costs and such cost increase, or the penalties for failing to comply with such statutory minimums, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

From time to time, regulations are proposed which, if adopted, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

We Depend on One Principal Supplier for The Majority of Our Merchandise.    We purchase over 50% of our general merchandise, including most tobacco products and grocery items, from a single wholesale grocer, McLane Company, Inc. We have a contract with McLane until 2007, but we may not be able to renew the contract upon expiration. A change of suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, cost of goods, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our Financial Leverage and Debt Covenants Impact Our Fiscal and Financial Flexibility.    We are highly leveraged, which means that the amount of our outstanding debt is large compared to the net book value of our assets, and we have substantial repayment obligations under our outstanding debt. We will have to use a portion of our cash flow from operations for debt service, rather than for our operations or to implement our growth strategy. As of December 26, 2002, we had consolidated debt including capital lease obligations of approximately $510.6 million and shareholders’ equity of approximately $117.7 million. As of December 26, 2002, our availability under our senior credit facility for borrowing or issuing additional letters of credit was approximately $16.7 million.

 

We are vulnerable to increases in interest rates because the debt under our senior credit facility is at a variable interest rate and although in the past we have on occasion entered into certain hedging instruments in an effort to manage our interest rate risk, we cannot assure you that we will continue to do so, on favorable terms or at all, in the future.

 

Our senior credit facility contains numerous financial and operating covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities such as acquiring or disposing of assets, engaging in mergers or reorganizations, making investments or capital expenditures and paying dividends. These covenants require that we meet interest coverage, net worth and leverage tests. The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility permit us and our subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional debt, subject to limitations.

 

Any breach of these covenants could cause a default under our debt obligations and result in our debt becoming immediately due and payable which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For the twelve-month period ending September 27, 2001, we failed to satisfy two financial covenants required by our senior credit facility. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we received a waiver from our senior credit group and executed an amendment to the senior credit facility that included, among other things, a modification to financial covenants and certain increases in the floating interest rate. Our ability to respond to changing business conditions and to secure additional financing may be restricted by these covenants, which may become more restrictive in the future. We also may be prevented from engaging in transactions, including acquisitions that may be important to our long-term growth strategy.

 

Changes in Our Credit Ratings or Trade Credit Terms Could Adversely Impact our Financial Condition and Operating Flexibility.    If the Company’s credit ratings are downgraded, our financial flexibility, borrowing costs, product supply costs and ability to obtain future financing on acceptable terms may be affected. Furthermore, we rely on credit terms provided by our major suppliers including our major wholesaler, gasoline suppliers and other suppliers. Material changes in these credit terms could impact our operating results and financial condition.

 

26


Table of Contents
 
The Interests of The Pantry’s Controlling Stockholder May Conflict With Our Interests and The Interests of Our Other Stockholders.    As a result of its stock ownership and board representation, Freeman Spogli is in a position to affect our corporate actions such as mergers or takeover attempts in a manner that could conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. As of December 13, 2002, Freeman Spogli owned 11,815,538 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,346,000 shares of common stock. Freeman Spogli’s beneficial ownership of The Pantry, including shares underlying warrants, at December 13, 2002 was approximately 69.2%. In addition, four of the nine members of our board of directors are representatives of Freeman Spogli.
 
Because We Depend on Our Senior Management’s Experience and Knowledge of Our Industry, We Would be Adversely Affected if Senior Management Left The Pantry.    We are dependent on the continued efforts of our senior management team, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, Peter J. Sodini. Mr. Sodini’s employment contract terminates in September 2004. If, for any reason, our senior executives do not continue to be active in management, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain additional qualified senior personnel as needed in the future. In addition, we do not maintain key personnel life insurance on our senior executives and other key employees.
 
Future Sales of Additional Shares into The Market May Depress The Market Price of The Common Stock.    If our existing stockholders sell shares of common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, or if the market perceives such sales could occur, the market price of our common stock could decline. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate or to use equity as consideration for future acquisitions.
 
As of December 26, 2002, there are 18,107,597 shares of our common stock outstanding. Of these shares, 6,250,000 shares are freely tradable. 11,815,538 shares are held by affiliate investment funds of Freeman Spogli. Pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, affiliates of The Pantry can resell up to 1% of the aggregate outstanding common stock during any three month period. In addition, Freeman Spogli has registration rights allowing them to require us to register the resale of their shares. If Freeman Spogli exercises its registration rights and sell shares of common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline.
 
Our Charter Includes Provisions Which May Have The Effect of Preventing or Hindering A Change in Control and Adversely Affecting The Market Price of Our Common Stock.    Our certificate of incorporation gives our board of directors the authority to issue up to five million shares of preferred stock and to determine the rights and preferences of the preferred stock, without obtaining shareholder approval. The existence of this preferred stock could make it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of The Pantry by means of a tender offer, merger, proxy contest or otherwise. Furthermore, this preferred stock could be issued with other rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock, and, therefore, issuance of the preferred stock could have an adverse affect on the market price of our common stock. We have no present plans to issue any shares of our preferred stock.
 
Other provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or hinder a change in management even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These governance provisions could affect the market price of our common stock.
 
We may, in the future, adopt other measures that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing an unsolicited takeover, even if such a change in control were at a premium price or favored by a majority of unaffiliated stockholders. These measures may be adopted without any further vote or action by our stockholders.

27


Table of Contents

 

Acts of War and Terrorism Could Impact Our Business.    Acts of war and terrorism could impact general economic conditions and the supply and price of crude oil. In addition, these events may cause damage to our retail facilities and disrupt the supply of the products and services we off in our locations. The factors could impact our revenues, operating results and financial condition.

 

Any of the above factors may cause actual results to vary materially from anticipated results, historical results or recent trends in operating results and financial condition.

 

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

 

Quantitative Disclosures.    We are exposed to market risks inherent in our financial instruments. These instruments arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business and, in some cases, relate to our acquisitions of related businesses. We are subject to interest rate risk on our existing long-term debt and any future financing requirements. Our fixed rate debt consists primarily of outstanding balances on our senior subordinated notes and our variable rate debt relates to borrowings under our senior credit facility.

 

The following table presents the future principal cash flows and weighted average interest rates based on rates in effect at December 26, 2002, on our existing long-term debt instruments. Fair values have been determined based on quoted market prices as of January 27, 2003.

 

Expected Maturity Date

as of December 26, 2002

(Dollars in thousands)

 

    

Fiscal 2003


    

Fiscal 2004


    

Fiscal 2005


    

Fiscal 2006


    

Fiscal 2007


    

Thereafter


    

Total


    

Fair Value


Long-term debt

  

$

33,079

 

  

$

52,912

 

  

$

88,654

 

  

$

119,354

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

200,000

 

  

$

493,999

 

  

$

479,998

Weighted average interest rate

  

 

8.53

%

  

 

7.79

%

  

 

8.11

%

  

 

9.18

%

  

 

10.25

%

  

 

10.25

%

  

 

8.56

%

      

 

In order to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, we have entered into interest rate swap arrangements in which we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The interest rate differential is reflected as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of the swaps. Fixed rate swaps are used to reduce our risk of increased interest costs during periods of rising interest rates. At December 26, 2002, the interest rate on 77.0% of our debt was fixed by either the nature of the obligation or through the interest rate swap arrangements compared to 72.5% at December 27, 2001.

 

The following table presents the notional principal amount, weighted average pay rate, weighted average receive rate and weighted average years to maturity on our interest rate swap contracts:

 

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

(Dollars in thousands)

 

    

December 26, 2002


    

December 27, 2001


 

Notional principal amount

  

$

180,000

 

  

$

180,000

 

Weighted average pay rate

  

 

6.12

%

  

 

6.12

%

Weighted average receive rate

  

 

1.42

%

  

 

2.00

%

Weighted average years to maturity

  

 

0.62

 

  

 

1.62

 

 

28


Table of Contents
 
Effective February 1, 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate collar arrangement covering a notional amount of $55.0 million. The interest rate collar agreement expires in February 2003, and has a cap rate of 5.70% and a floor rate of 5.03%. As of December 26, 2002, the fair value of our swap and collar agreements represented a liability of $6.9 million.
 
Qualitative Disclosures.    Our primary exposure relates to:
 
 
 
interest rate risk on long-term and short-term borrowings;
 
 
 
our ability to pay or refinance long-term borrowings at maturity at market rates;
 
 
 
the impact of interest rate movements on our ability to meet interest expense requirements and exceed financial covenants and
 
 
 
the impact of interest rate movements on our ability to obtain adequate financing to fund future acquisitions.
 
We manage interest rate risk on our outstanding long-term and short-term debt through our use of fixed and variable rate debt. We expect the interest rate swaps mentioned above will reduce our exposure to short-term interest rate fluctuations. While we cannot predict or manage our ability to refinance existing debt or the impact interest rate movements will have on our existing debt, management evaluates our financial position on an ongoing basis.
 
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
 
Based on the Company’s most recent evaluation, which was completed within 90 days of the filing of this Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective. There have been no significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the most recent evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

29


Table of Contents

THE PANTRY, INC.

 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION.

 

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

 

(a)    Exhibits

 

10.1

  

Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between The Pantry and Peter J. Sodini

 

(b)    Reports on Form 8-K

 

On December 23, 2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K attaching the certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

30


Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
THE PANTRY, INC.
 
By:
 
/s/    DANIEL J. KELLY

   
Daniel J. Kelly
Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
(Authorized Officer and Principal
Financial Officer)
     
   
Date: February 3, 2003

31


Table of Contents
THE PANTRY, INC.
 
I, Peter J. Sodini, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Pantry, Inc.;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 
a.
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b.
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c.
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a.
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b.
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date: February 3, 2003
/s/    PETER J. SODINI            
Peter J. Sodini
Chief Executive Officer

S-1


Table of Contents
THE PANTRY, INC.
 
I, Daniel J. Kelly, certify that:
 
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Pantry, Inc.;
 
 
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 
a.
 
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 
b.
 
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 
c.
 
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
a.
 
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 
b.
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 
6.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
Date: February 3, 2003
/s/    DANIEL J. KELLY            
Daniel J. Kelly
Chief Financial Officer

S-2


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.


  

Description of Document


10.1

  

Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Peter J. Sodini and The Pantry

 

34