UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

Commission File No. 333-46607-12

(724) 588-2550
(Co-registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Commission File No. 333-46607

(302) 478-5723
(Co-registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether each of the co-registrants (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. o Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of each of the co-registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether each of the co-registrants is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes
þ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of each of the co-registrants. The aggregate market value shall be computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within 60 days prior to the date of filing.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the co-registrants’ classes of common stock, as of December 31, 2004:

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None

Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K
Year Ended December 31, 2004

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements which include, among other things, discussions of the Company’s (as defined) business and results of operations, position in its industries, future operations, liquidity and capital resources. These forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions made by management of the Company that, although believed to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon such statements and estimates. No assurance can be given that any of such statements or estimates will be realized and it is likely that actual results will differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

     The information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relates to Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Holding (PA)”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, Werner Holding Co. (DE), Inc. (“Holding (DE)”) and Werner Co., a Pennsylvania corporation and Holding (DE)’s wholly-owned subsidiary (“Werner”). Holding (PA) has no substantial operations or assets other than its investment in Holding (DE) and Holding (DE) has no substantial operations or assets other than its investments in its subsidiaries. As used herein and except as the context otherwise may require, the “Company” means Holding (PA), Holding (DE), Werner and all of their consolidated subsidiaries.

1

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

     Holding (PA), incorporated in 1945, and Holding (DE), incorporated in 1988, are the holding companies of Werner Co., a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of climbing products and aluminum extruded products. According to management’s estimates, Werner is the nation’s largest manufacturer and marketer of ladders and other climbing products. Werner’s climbing products include aluminum, fiberglass and wood ladders, scaffolding, stages and planks. The Werner brand name has over a 50 year history and Werner is the most recognized name by professional end-users of climbing products in the United States. In addition to climbing products, Werner manufactures and sells aluminum extruded products and more complex fabricated components to a number of industries, including the automotive, electronics, and architectural and construction industries.

Description of the Business

     The Company operates in two business segments, Climbing Products and Extruded Products.

     Climbing Products

     Werner manufactures approximately 1,100 stock keeping units of fiberglass, aluminum, and wood climbing products and accessories primarily under the Werner brand and selectively under the Keller and Stanley brands. The Company produces five principal categories of climbing equipment: (i) single and twin stepladders; (ii) extension, fixed, and multipurpose ladders; (iii) attic ladders; (iv) stages, planks, work platforms, and scaffolds; and (v) assorted ladder accessories. The majority of the Company’s climbing products sales are of either aluminum or fiberglass ladders. Through its development of proprietary aluminum extrusion and fiberglass pultrusion technology, and its broad sales and distribution system, the Company is a leader in the climbing products industry.

     The Company’s sales and marketing network is directed by an experienced in-house sales team of national and regional sales managers. The Company’s climbing products are sold directly and through approximately 45 independent, commissioned manufacturer’s representative organizations, which sell to four major distribution channels: (i) home improvement, (ii) hardware, (iii) professional and (iv) other retail. The Company’s sales organization is further supported by field merchandisers who assist customers with product merchandising, point-of-purchase signage and sales techniques.

     Extruded Products

     The Company is also a manufacturer of lineal extruded products and highly-engineered fabricated parts. The Company targets extruded products customers who require special metallurgy, tight tolerances, unusual shapes, painting, finishing and fabrication requirements. Werner has implemented sophisticated quality systems, and has been awarded ISO-9002, QS-9000 and TS 16949 certifications.

     Werner sells aluminum extrusions to customers in the automotive, electronics, architectural and construction industries who use them in a broad range of products including cellular phone panels, garage door lift systems, material handling and factory automation equipment, electrical connectors, recreational vehicle accessories, and commercial lighting and window wall systems.

     The Company’s extruded products sales organization is supplemented by approximately nine independent manufacturer’s representative organizations. The Company operates on a “make-to-order” basis with most extruded products customers.

2

Segments

     See Note O entitled “Segment Information” included in the notes to consolidated financial statements for financial information for each of the Company’s business segments.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

     The Company is a major consumer of aluminum and has contracts to provide most of its estimated aluminum requirements with three principal suppliers. These contracts include stipulated prices with provisions for price adjustments based on market prices. Two of these contracts will be renegotiable in 2005 and one will be renegotiable in 2007. The Company has several alternative sources for its aluminum requirements and does not believe that any one of these contracts is material to the Company’s operations.

     The Company follows various hedging strategies intended to mitigate the impact of raw material price fluctuations. From time to time, the Company has utilized futures and option contracts to hedge the risk associated with price fluctuations for a certain percentage of its forecasted aluminum raw material requirements. The Company’s practice is not to hold derivative commodity instruments, including aluminum futures and option contracts, for trading purposes. These futures and option contracts are placed with established metal brokers and can range up to two years in duration. The Company has several alternative brokers and does not believe that any one of these contracts is material to the operations of the Company.

     The Company also has contracts to purchase the basic materials required for fiberglass pultrusion with its principal suppliers. These contracts are typically one to three years in length. The Company has several alternative sources for these basic materials and does not believe that any one of these contracts is material to the operations of the Company.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

     No business segment is dependent, to any significant degree, on patents, licenses, franchises or concessions and the loss of these patents, licenses, franchises or concessions would not have a material adverse effect on any business segment. The Company owns numerous patents worldwide, none of which are material to the Company’s operations as a whole. These patents expire from time to time over the next 20 years. The Company holds licenses, franchises and concessions, none of which individually or in the aggregate is material to the Company’s operations as a whole. These licenses, franchises and concessions vary in duration from one to 15 years.

     The Company has numerous trademarks that are utilized in its businesses worldwide. The Werner logo trademark is material to both of the Company’s business segments. This well-known trademark enjoys a reputation for quality and value and, in the climbing products industry, is among the world’s most trusted brand names. While the Company believes its other trademarks are important to its business operations, the loss of any of these other trademarks would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations as a whole.

Sensitivity to Economic Cycles and Weather Conditions

     A significant percentage of the Company’s sales of climbing products is attributable to new residential and nonresidential construction in the United States, which are affected by such cyclical factors as interest rates, inflation, consumer spending habits and employment. Similarly, a significant percentage of the Company’s sales of extruded products is attributable to the new and used automobile and automotive parts markets, which are also affected by such cyclical factors. Sales of climbing equipment are also sensitive to prevailing weather conditions. Unusually severe weather can reduce or defer sales of climbing products by delaying home construction and elective home maintenance and discouraging do-it-yourself projects, which account for a growing portion of the Company’s sales.

3

Backlog

     Due to the Company’s ability to quickly meet production orders and its production forecasting systems, the Company has no significant backlog in climbing products. Most extruded products are produced on a make-to-order basis.

Competition

     Management estimates that, while it is the largest U.S. producer of climbing products, there were approximately 12 principal foreign and domestic competitors in 2004. Foreign manufacturers compete in U.S. markets primarily on the basis of price. The Company competes in its climbing products segment on the basis of its reputation for product quality, its well-known brands, its emphasis on customer service, the breadth of its product lines and its commitment to product innovation.

     In its extruded products business, the Company competes with integrated primary aluminum producers, large independent producers and numerous small independent producers located throughout the United States. The Company competes in its extruded products segment on the basis of its specialized extrusion capabilities, customer service and price.

     Some of the Company’s competitors in the climbing products and the extruded products markets have greater financial resources and are less leveraged than the Company. Some of the Company’s extruded products competitors are larger than the Company.

Employees

     The Company had approximately 1,800 salaried and hourly employees as of December 31, 2004. Of the 1,300 hourly employees, approximately 1,200 are covered by seven collective bargaining agreements which expire in 2005 through 2008. The Company plans to renegotiate and renew union contracts as they expire. The Company believes that its labor relations are satisfactory at all of its facilities. Additionally, the Juarez, Mexico facility utilized approximately 300 individuals on a contract basis to operate as of December 31, 2004.

Dependence on Key Customers

     During December 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into a long term strategic alliance with Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (“Lowe’s”). Under this arrangement, Lowe’s is the exclusive source for Werner® branded climbing equipment in the warehouse home center channel. Werner supplies all of Lowe’s climbing equipment requirements and with Lowe’s, jointly promotes and markets Werner® branded products. In addition, Werner has the opportunity to enter into new climbing equipment categories at Lowe’s. Lowe’s and Werner have jointly committed to developing strategic plans to increase ladder sales. Other than its alliance with Lowe’s, the Company does not have contractual agreements for the supply of products with most of its other climbing products customers. Sales to Lowe’s accounted for 32%, 22% and 18% of the Company’s net sales in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     During October 2003, the Company announced that its then largest customer, Home Depot, would no longer purchase aluminum and fiberglass stepladders from the Company but would instead source these products directly from China. Werner was also included in an extension ladder supplier line review at Home Depot that began in October 2003. After careful consideration and extensive analyses, taking into account the Company’s long-term interests, value and brand equity of Werner, the Company announced in December 2003 that it had decided to discontinue supplying Werner® branded products to Home Depot. In order to provide for an orderly transition, the Company continued supplying Werner® branded climbing equipment to Home Depot into the first quarter of 2004. The financial impact of no longer supplying Home Depot is significant (see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Executive Summary and Current Developments”). The loss of certain other key climbing products customers or a significant decrease in the volume of products supplied to any of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Sales to Home Depot accounted for 27% and 31% of the Company’s net sales in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     No extruded products customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s 2004 total net sales.

4

Environmental Regulation

     The Company’s operations are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, emissions to air, discharge to waters, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and other materials, and employee health and safety matters. Also, as an owner and/or operator of real property or a generator of hazardous substances, the Company may be subject to environmental cleanup liability, regardless of fault, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act or analogous state laws. The Company believes that its operations and facilities have been and are being operated in compliance in all material respects with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. However, the operation of manufacturing plants entails risks of financial exposure for environmental noncompliance and cleanup liabilities. Capital and operating expenditures for environmental compliance in 2004 were not material. There can be no assurance that the Company will not incur costs in the future for cleanup and other remedial activities that will have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with evolving environmental and health and safety laws, regulations or requirements that may be adopted or imposed in the future.

Previous Transactions

     The Recapitalization. On June 11, 2003, a recapitalization of the Company (the “Recapitalization”) was completed. On May 7, 2003, the Company entered into a Recapitalization and Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Recapitalization Agreement”) with Green Equity Investors III, L.P. (“GEI”), an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners L.P. (“Leonard Green”), and certain shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement (i) GEI invested $65.0 million in the Company in exchange for 65,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (see Note G to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein), (ii) the Company redeemed 39.66% of its outstanding shares of capital stock for payments totaling $147.0 million and (iii) the Company made certain other payments including $3.0 million to the holders of options to purchase the Company’s Class C Common Stock in consideration for the cancellation of certain of their vested options (collectively, the “Recapitalization”). The Series A Preferred Stock represented approximately 22% of the outstanding voting shares of capital stock as of the date of the Recapitalization. The Recapitalization was accounted for as a leveraged recapitalization at historical cost principally due to the fact that less than 80% of the voting securities were acquired. As part of the Recapitalization, the Company entered into a $230 million credit facility (see Note E to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein) with a syndicate of banks consisting of a $180 million Term Loan and a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Company used $115.4 million to repay in full its existing senior credit facility which was terminated as of the date of the Recapitalization.

5

Item 2. Properties.

     The Company believes its manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities are suitable and adequate. The Company also believes that its facilities are being utilized consistently with the Company’s plans. The Company’s principal facilities consist of the:

     As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s facility at Greenville, Pennsylvania primarily serves the extruded products segment of the Company’s business. All other facilities serve the climbing products segment of the Company’s business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     The Company is involved from time to time in various legal proceedings and claims incident to the normal conduct of its business. Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of any pending legal proceeding, the Company believes that such legal proceedings and claims, individually and in the aggregate, are either without merit, covered by insurance or adequately reserved for, and will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

     None.

6

Part II

Item 5. Market for Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

     There is no established public trading market for the common stock of either Holding (PA) or Holding (DE). As of December 31, 2004, all of the issued and outstanding shares of Holding (DE)’s common stock were held by Holding (PA). The number of shareholders of record of each class of common stock of Holding (PA) as of December 31, 2004 is as follows:

Class A Common Stock: 26 holders Class B Common Stock: 109 holders Class C Common Stock: 28 holders Class D Common Stock: 11 holders Class E Common Stock: 12 holders

     No dividends have been paid to common shareholders of Holding (PA) in the last two years and no dividends are expected to be declared in the near future. Holding (DE) declares and pays from time to time, certain cash dividends to its sole shareholder, Holding (PA), in order to allow Holding (PA) to pay certain obligations such as taxes and ordinary course operating expenses not exceeding $2,000,000 in any fiscal year. The Senior Credit Facility and the Indenture governing the Notes limit the Company’s ability to pay dividends on its capital stock.

     Holding (DE) has not issued or sold any equity securities within the past three years that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Holding (PA) has not issued or sold any equity securities within the past three years that were not registered under the Securities Act, except as follows:

     (a) On various dates from November 24, 1997 through December 31, 2004, pursuant to Holding (PA)’s Stock Option Plan, Holding (PA) has granted to key employees of Werner non-qualified incentive stock options, exercisable at prices ranging from $500.00 to $3,100.00 per share, to purchase up to an aggregate of 4,359 shares of Class C Common Stock as of December 31, 2004. See Note I entitled “Stock Incentive Plans” in the notes to consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.

     (b) On various dates from January 1, 1999 to October 14, 2002, certain members of Werner’s management purchased shares of Holding (PA)’s Class C Common Stock at purchase prices ranging from $2,421.29 to $3,100.00 per share, or an aggregate of approximately $5,878,000 pursuant to Management Stock Purchase Agreements. Certain of these individuals received secured loans from the Company pursuant to its Stock Loan Plan to finance a portion of the purchase price paid for the shares of Class C Common Stock in an aggregate amount of approximately $3,726,000. The balance of such loans, excluding interest thereon, is $610,000 at December 31, 2004. See Note I entitled “Stock Incentive Plans” in the notes to consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.

     (c) On June 11, 2003, as part of the Recapitalization, Holding (PA) sold to GEI 65,000 shares of Series A Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at an aggregate offering price of $65,000,000. See Note G entitled “Convertible Preferred Stock” in the notes to consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.

     (d) On November 10, 2003, as part of the settlement of a shareholders derivative action entitled Elizabeth Werner, et al v. Eric J. Werner, et al (Civil Action 98-503), Holding (PA) issued 100 shares of Class B Common Stock to the plaintiffs in exchange for the dismissal with prejudice of the lawsuit and the full release of claims.

     The transactions set forth in paragraph (a) above were undertaken in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act afforded by Rule 701 promulgated thereunder, as sales by an issuer to employees, directors or officers pursuant to written compensatory benefit plans or written contracts relating to the compensation of such persons. The transactions set forth in paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) above were undertaken in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act afforded by Section 4(2) thereof and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as sales not involving a public offering. The Company believes that exemptions other than those specified above may exist with respect to the transactions set forth above.

7

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

     The following selected consolidated financial data is that of Holding (PA). Holding (PA) is a guarantor of the 10% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 issued by Holding (DE) in 1997 (the “Notes”) and has no substantial operations or assets other than its investment in Holding (DE). As a result, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Holding (PA) are substantially the same as those of Holding (DE). This table contains selected financial data and is qualified by the more detailed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of Holding (PA). The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

See Notes to Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data.

8

Notes to Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data
(Dollars in Millions)

(a)	Recapitalization expense reflects costs incurred in connection with a recapitalization that occurred in 2003. See Note C to the consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.
(b)	As further described in Note P included in the notes to the financial statements, the Company implemented restructuring and other cost reduction initiatives beginning in 2003. Costs related to such activities totaled $24.3 in 2004 and $6.4 in 2003. The total costs incurred during 2004 includes $9.0 recorded in “Restructuring and other cost reduction initiatives”, $8.8 recorded in “Cost of sales” and $6.5 recorded in “Selling and distribution expenses.” The total costs incurred during 2003 includes $2.9 recorded in “Restructuring and other cost reduction initiatives”, $2.0 recorded in “Cost of sales” and $1.5 recorded in “Selling and distribution expenses.”
(c)	Other income (expense), net for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 includes $1.3, $0.7, $0.6, $1.3 and $1.9, respectively, of accounts receivable securitization expense.
(d)	The shareholders’ deficit occurred as a result of a redemption of common stock of $332.9 in connection with a recapitalization that occurred in 1997. The shareholders’ deficit increased in 2003 by $147.0 as a result of redemption of common stock that occurred in connection with the recapitalization that occurred in 2003. See Note C to the consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information.
(e)	Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the following components in 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000: depreciation of property, plant and equipment, $16.6, $12.9, $12.1, $10.4 and $9.1, respectively; and amortization, $5.0, $4.8, $3.8, $4.2 and $3.7, respectively. Depreciation and amortization excludes amortization of deferred financing fees and original issue discount.

9

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the text below, financial statement amounts have been rounded and the percentage changes are based on the financial statements.

Executive Summary

     Operations

     Werner is the largest U.S. manufacturer and marketer of ladders and other climbing products. Werner also manufactures and sells aluminum extruded products and more complex fabricated components. Werner’s climbing products are sold to four major distribution channels which include home improvement, other retail, hardware and professional. The Company’s climbing products segment generated 84% of the Company’s consolidated net sales during 2004. The extruded products business primarily involves “make-to-order” products for the automotive, electronics, architectural and construction industries. Extruded products generated 16% of consolidated net sales during 2004.

     Net sales recorded in 2004 totaled $446.2 million which is a decline of $54.9 million, or 11.0%, from net sales recorded in 2003. As previously disclosed, the Company discontinued supplying its then largest customer, Home Depot, during the first quarter of 2004. The decline in net sales was due to lower sales to Home Depot which was partially offset by increased sales to other customers. As also previously disclosed, the Company entered into a long term strategic alliance with Lowe’s which began in the first quarter of 2004. Under the arrangement, Lowe’s is the exclusive source for Werner® branded climbing equipment in the warehouse home center channel and Werner supplies all of Lowe’s climbing equipment requirements.

     Operating profit in 2004 was $8.9 million which is $39.1 million lower than 2003 operating profit of $48.0 million. The major factors negatively impacting profitability are rising raw material and freight costs, higher restructuring and related costs, lower unit sales volumes for climbing products, a less profitable product mix for climbing products, and increased costs for climbing products sales incentives, promotions and advertising initiated in response to competitive pricing pressures.

     Sales volumes in 2004 are significantly less than 2003. In order to better align the Company’s cost structure with the reduction in sales volumes, a restructuring and downsizing program was initiated in early 2004 which, in part, accelerated and expanded certain manufacturing and distribution optimization activities initiated in 2003. A summary of these initiatives include:

	•	In February 2004, the Company announced that it planned to gradually phase-out production at its Anniston, Alabama manufacturing and distribution facility. Manufacturing operations at this facility ceased effective November 1, 2004 and the distribution center is expected to cease operations during the second half of 2005. The Company intends to sell this facility. An active program to locate a buyer was initiated during the first quarter of 2005.
	•	During the third quarter of 2003, the Company began manufacturing ladder components and accessories at a leased facility located in Mexico. In early 2004, the Company began construction of a large manufacturing and ladder assembly plant in Juarez, Mexico. Construction was completed and production commenced during the third quarter of 2004. Production is expected to ramp-up until full capacity is achieved during 2006.
	•	In early 2004, the Company initiated a program to reduce costs by re-engineering its selling, general and administrative functions. This program will be continued through 2005.

     The manufacturing and distribution optimization activities initiated during 2003 included the transfer of all ladder fabrication and assembly operations in Greenville, Pennsylvania to other lower cost Company facilities. Substantially all production related to climbing products at the Greenville facility was discontinued during 2003 and the remaining operations related to climbing products are expected to cease during 2005. The Company also began an initiative that was completed in 2004 to focus the Greenville facility on the Extruded Products segment of the Company’s business. During 2004 the Company also ceased production of wood stepladders at its Carrollton, Kentucky manufacturing facility. Wood stepladder customers are being served by outsourcing

10

production to a third party. Wood attic ladder production continues at the Carrollton facility. In October 2004 the Company announced that it intended to build an addition to the Carrollton facility for use as a regional distribution center. This decision was re-evaluated during the first quarter of 2005 and an alternative regional distribution center was selected which will be leased under an operating lease beginning in 2005.

     Cumulative costs associated with the above-described activities through 2008, including costs associated with completing the initiatives begun in 2003, are expected to range from $55 million to $60 million. Aggregate costs of $30.7 million have been incurred for these activities through the end of 2004, including the $24.3 million incurred in 2004. The annual benefits expected to be realized upon implementation of the restructuring initiatives through 2008 are estimated to approximate $40 million. The restructuring program is expected to continue through 2008 although initiatives beyond those expected to be implemented during 2005 have not yet been finalized. Although management believes that these estimates are reasonable, no assurances can be given that the estimated costs will ultimately be incurred or that the estimated benefits will be realized. Accordingly, these estimates are forward-looking and may ultimately be materially different than currently estimated due to the uncertainty of the underlying estimates and assumptions. The estimated costs include facility exit costs, employee severance and related benefit costs, employee and equipment relocation costs, costs associated with disposal of fixed assets, duplicate freight and handling costs during transition and wind-down and start-up costs associated with manufacturing facilities.

     Financing Occurring Subsequent to December 31, 2004

     During May 2005 the Company successfully closed a $100 million Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan. Net proceeds of $91.7 million were used to repay amounts outstanding under the Company’s existing Senior Credit Facility including prepayment of $65.0 million of the Senior Credit Term Loan and the repayment of the total amount outstanding of $26.7 million under the Senior Credit Revolving Facility.

     Effective as of March 31, 2005 an agreement related to the Senior Credit Facility was executed to, among other things, waive the requirement to comply with the debt leverage and interest coverage ratios as of March 31, 2005 and to defer the requirement to provide audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 until May 10, 2005. Effective May 10, 2005 the Senior Credit Facility was amended in conjunction with the repayments described above to, among other things, initiate new financial covenant requirements beginning June 30, 2005 through December 31, 2007.

     The purpose of the Second Lien Term Loan and the amendment to the Senior Credit Facility was to provide the Company the liquidity and the covenant relief necessary to successfully complete the restructuring program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contain information that is pertinent to management’s discussion and analysis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, and in some cases, actuarial techniques. The Company constantly re-evaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those determined using the estimates described above. The Company believes that the following accounting policies are critical due to the degree of estimation required.

     The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business, performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accounts related to trade receivables is determined based on two methods. The amounts calculated from each of these methods are combined to determine the total amount reserved. First, an evaluation of specific accounts is conducted when information is available indicating a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations. Judgments are made in these specific cases based on available facts and circumstances, and a specific reserve for that customer may be recorded to reduce the receivable to the amount that is expected to be collected. These specific reserves are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received that impacts the amount reserved. Second, a reserve is established for all customers based on historical collection and write-off

11

experience. The collectibility of trade receivables could be significantly reduced if default rates are greater than expected or if an unexpected material adverse change occurs in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations.

     The Company must generate sufficient taxable income in future periods to realize the total value of its deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance that reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized is determined based on projections of taxable income. If the level of projected taxable income used to determine the valuation allowance is not achieved, the carrying value of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

     The Company maintains third party insurance coverage, subject to certain deductible provisions, for product liability and workers’ compensation claims which occur on or after March 31, 1998 and maintains a reserve for the insurance deductibles related to such claims. The reserve for product liability and workers’ compensation claims is determined on an undiscounted actuarial basis. The reserve includes an amount determined from loss reports for individual cases and an amount, based on past experience, for losses incurred but not reported. The determination of the reserve is primarily predicated on the assumption that selected claims reporting and payment patterns, and frequency and severity trends, will continue to apply. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the resulting reserve are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings currently. Actual claims experience will affect the amount of expense ultimately recognized.

     Pension assets and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are primarily affected by the market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected return on plan assets and the discount rate used to determine the present value of pension liabilities. Actual changes in the fair market value of plan assets and differences between the actual return on plan assets, the expected return on plan assets and changes in the selected discount rate will affect the amount of pension expense ultimately recognized.

The Recapitalization

     In June 2003, the Company completed a recapitalization with GEI, an affiliate of Leonard Green, and certain shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement (i) GEI invested $65.0 million in the Company in exchange for 65,000 shares of newly issued convertible preferred stock, (ii) the Company redeemed 39.66% of its outstanding shares of capital stock for payments totaling $147.0 million and (iii) the Company made certain other payments including $3.0 million to the holders of options to purchase the Company’s capital stock in consideration for the cancellation of certain of their vested options (collectively, the “Recapitalization”). The convertible preferred shares represented approximately 22% of the outstanding voting shares of capital stock as of the date of the Recapitalization.

     As part of the Recapitalization, the Company entered into a $230 million senior credit facility with a syndicate of banks consisting of a $180 million Term Loan and a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Company paid $115.4 million to repay in full its previous senior credit facility which was then terminated as of the date of the Recapitalization.

     The Recapitalization was accounted for as a leveraged recapitalization at historical cost principally due to the fact that less than 80% of the voting securities were acquired.

Results of Operations

     Year Ended December 31, 2004 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

     Net Sales. Net sales were down $54.9 million, or 11.0%, to $446.2 million for the year 2004 from $501.1 million for 2003.

     Net sales of climbing products decreased by $59.3 million, or 13.7%, to $373.5 million for 2004 from $432.8 million for 2003. The decline is due to lower sales to Home Depot partially offset by increased sales to other customers. The increase in sales to other customers is due to higher unit sales volumes in each of the Company’s distribution channels. This was due, in part, to sales to Lowe’s under the strategic alliance which began in the first quarter of 2004.

     Net sales of extruded products of $72.7 million for 2004 increased by $4.3 million, or 6.4% compared to net sales of $68.3 million recorded in 2003. The increase primarily reflects the impact of higher aluminum prices. Unit sales volumes in 2004 for extruded products were approximately equal to 2003 volumes.

12

     Gross Profit. Gross profit declined by $48.0 million, or 26.6%, to $132.8 million for 2004 from $180.8 million for 2003. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in 2004 declined to 29.8% from 36.1% for 2003. The lower gross profit is largely due to lower climbing products sales volumes, higher raw material costs, a less profitable product mix for climbing products, increased costs for climbing products sales incentives and promotions in response to competitive pricing pressures, increased costs related to new product development and introductions, and higher start-up and realignment costs. The decline in gross profit was partially offset by a decline in the provision for product liability and workers’ compensation claims of $4.6 million primarily due to favorable product liability claims experience. However, these expenses are expected to increase in 2005 due to the likelihood that claims experience will be less favorable than in 2004 and also due to the increased cost of providing insurance coverage in excess of deductible provisions. Previously, the Company has benefited from lower costs related to a five-year insurance program that ended on December 31, 2004. Cost of sales for 2004 and 2003 include costs of $8.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively, related to manufacturing inefficiencies associated with winding-down, starting-up and realigning facilities in connection with the Company’s restructuring and other cost reduction initiatives.

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were $27.4 million in 2004 compared to $28.6 million for 2003, a decline of $1.2 million or 4.4%. The decline in 2004 reflects the absence of all accruals for performance based incentive compensation and lower legal and professional fees. The decline was partially offset by severance and related costs of $1.3 million recorded in 2004 related to the separation of the chief executive officer, and higher depreciation related to capitalized computer hardware and software costs.

     Selling and Distribution Expenses. Selling and distribution expenses of $87.5 million in 2004 are $2.3 million, or 2.6%, less than expenses recorded in 2003. The decline in current year expense due to the impact of lower sales volumes and changes in customer mix was mostly offset by rising freight costs, higher advertising costs and costs totaling $6.5 million related to distribution inefficiencies associated with the Company’s restructuring and other cost reduction activities.

     Restructuring and other Cost Reduction Initiatives. The total costs incurred during 2004 and 2003 relating to the previously described restructuring and other cost reduction activities totals $24.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively. Costs in 2004 include $9.0 million of costs related to employee severance and equipment relocation and disposal costs in addition to $8.8 million recorded in Cost of sales and $6.5 million in Selling and distribution expenses for costs relating to winding down and starting up manufacturing facilities.

     Operating Profit. Operating profit declined by $39.1 million to $8.9 million for 2004. The decline primarily reflects the decline in net sales, a decline in profitability of the Climbing Products segment and an increase in costs of $17.9 million for restructuring and related activities recorded in 2004 compared to 2003. The reduction in operating profit due to these factors was partially offset by the absence of costs totaling $11.5 million that were expensed in 2003 related to the recapitalization of the Company that occurred on June 11, 2003.

     Operating profit of the Climbing Products segment decreased by $48.6 million to $12.7 million in 2004. The decline in profitability primarily reflects the decline in net sales of climbing products due mostly to lower unit sales volumes, rising raw material costs, a less profitable sales mix, increased costs for sales incentives, promotions and advertising, increased costs related to new product development and introductions, a charge for an allocated portion of severance costs related to separation of the chief executive officer, and higher restructuring and related costs. Operating costs for 2004 include $22.7 million for restructuring and related costs which were $16.9 million greater than similar costs incurred in 2003. The decline in profitability was partially offset by a lower provision for product liability and workers’ compensation claims in 2004.

     The Extruded Products segment incurred an operating loss of $1.0 million for 2004 compared to an operating profit of $2.1 million for 2003. The decline in operating profit of $3.1 million is primarily due to higher workers’ compensation costs and costs of $1.6 million for restructuring and related activities recorded in 2004 which were $1.0 million greater than similar costs incurred in 2003.

     Corporate and Other expenses decreased by $12.6 million for 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to the absence of costs totaling $11.5 million that were expensed in connection with a recapitalization of the Company that occurred in 2003. In addition, expense is lower in 2004 due to the absence of legal and professional fees associated with shareholders’ litigation that was settled in 2003.

13

     Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net was net expense of $1.4 million for 2004, an increase in expense of $1.4 million compared to 2003. The increase in expense is primarily due to higher costs associated with increased utilization of the accounts receivable securitization agreement and higher letter of credit fees during 2004.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $0.8 million to $25.2 million for 2004 from $24.4 million for 2003. The increase is due to higher average levels of debt outstanding and higher average interest rates in 2004 partially offset by the absence of a charge totaling $2.4 million related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees recorded in 2003 that was associated with the senior credit facility that was repaid and terminated in connection with a recapitalization of the Company.

     Income Taxes (Benefit). As a result of the 2004 pre-tax loss, an income tax benefit of $5.9 million was recorded which is $13.3 million less than the tax expense recorded in 2003. An effective tax rate of 33% was applied to the 2004 pre-tax loss, compared to an effective tax rate of 31% that was applied to 2003 pre-tax income. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets.

     Net Income (Loss). Net income declined by $28.1 million to a net loss $11.9 million for 2004 compared to net income of $16.2 million for 2003 as a result of all the above factors.

     Year Ended December 31, 2003 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

     Net Sales. Net sales were down $19.3 million, or 3.7%, to $501.1 million for 2003 from $520.4 million for 2002. Net sales of climbing products decreased by $11.5 million, or 2.6%, to $432.8 million for 2003 from $444.3 million in 2002. The sales decline primarily reflects lower unit sales volumes of aluminum and wood stepladders partially offset by higher sales of fiberglass extension ladders. Net sales of extruded products of $68.3 million for 2003 declined by $7.7 million, or 10.2%, compared to 2002 primarily reflecting lower unit sales volumes due to the continued softness in the markets served by this segment of the Company’s business and the restructuring of certain low margin accounts to improve profitability.

     Gross Profit. Despite lower sales, gross profit improved by $4.2 million, or 2.4%, to $180.8 million for 2003 from $176.6 million for 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in 2003 improved to 36.1% from 33.9% for 2002. The higher gross profit margin is largely due to the realignment of ladder fabrication and assembly operations in Greenville, Pennsylvania to lower cost facilities as well as on-going manufacturing productivity improvements and other manufacturing cost reduction initiatives. An improvement in the profitability of the product mix also contributed to the higher gross profit margin. These improvements more than offset the effects of lower aluminum extrusion production volumes. Cost of sales for 2003 includes costs of $2.0 million primarily related to manufacturing inefficiencies associated with the start-up and realignment of ladder fabrication and assembly operations that was initiated in the second quarter of 2003.

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were $28.6 million for 2003 compared to $30.0 million for 2002, a decrease of $1.4 million or 4.5%. Expenses for 2002 include severance cost of $1.6 million associated with the separation of a former executive officer. Excluding this one-time severance cost, general and administrative expenses were $0.2 million higher in 2003 than 2002 due to higher management advisory and consulting fees, higher pension expense, higher legal and professional expenses (related, in part, to new product development) and higher depreciation related to capitalized computer hardware and software costs all of which were largely offset by a lower provision for performance based incentive compensation. Pension expense increased in 2003 due to lower than expected returns on plan investments during the years 2000 through 2002 and a decrease in the discount rate used to value pension liabilities which reflects the general decline in interest rates.

     Selling and Distribution Expenses. Selling and distribution expenses increased by $7.8 million, or 9.5%, to $89.8 million for 2003 compared to $82.0 million in 2002 which reflects higher shipping and handling expenses to support supply chain initiatives to continue reducing cycle times and improving order fill rates. These cost increases more than offset the impact of lower unit sales volumes.

     Recapitalization Expense. Recapitalization expense recorded in 2003 totals $11.5 million and includes a noncash compensation charge of $4.6 million associated with modifying stock options in connection with the Recapitalization. Recapitalization expense also includes a compensation charge of $3.0 million related to cancellation payments for certain vested options, transaction bonus payments totaling $1.7 million paid to certain

14

officers and employees of the Company, a noncash charge of $1.3 million related to the deferred stock plan and, other professional fees and miscellaneous expenses totaling $0.9 million.

     Restructuring and Other Cost Reduction Initiatives. The Company transferred all ladder fabrication and assembly operations in Greenville, Pennsylvania to other lower cost Company facilities beginning in the second quarter of 2003. The Company also began an initiative to focus the Greenville facility on the Extruded Products segment of the Company’s business which will be completed in 2004. During the third quarter of 2003 the Company began manufacturing component parts and accessories at a leased facility in Mexico. The total costs incurred during 2003 relating to the optimization of the Company’s manufacturing and distribution operations were $6.4 million which includes $2.0 million recorded in Cost of sales and $1.5 million in Selling and distribution expenses.

     Operating Profit. Operating profit declined by $16.6 million to $48.0 million for 2003 from $64.6 million for 2002 primarily due to the recognition of $11.5 million of Recapitalization expense and $6.4 million of costs related to optimization of the Company’s manufacturing and distribution operations. If the impact of the Recapitalization expense and optimization costs is removed, in addition to removal of the prior year impact of the one-time severance cost of $1.6 million associated with the separation of a former executive officer, operating profit would have been $65.9 million in the current year which is $0.3 million, or 0.5%, less than 2002. Operating profit, as adjusted, was essentially equal to 2002 despite a decline in net sales of $19.3 million which reflects the positive impact of on-going manufacturing productivity improvements and other manufacturing cost reduction initiatives in addition to an improvement in the profitability of the product mix.

     Operating profit of the Climbing Products segment decreased $4.6 million to $61.3 million in 2003. If the impact of optimization costs totaling $5.8 million is removed, in addition to removal of the prior year impact of a one-time severance cost allocation of $1.3 million, operating profit of the Climbing Products segment would have declined by $0.1 million to $67.1 million in 2003 compared to 2002. The decrease primarily reflects the negative impact of lower sales and higher selling and distribution expenses which more than offset the operational improvements.

     Operating profit of the Extruded Products segment was $2.1 million for 2003 compared to $0.4 million for 2002. If the impact of optimization costs totaling $0.6 million is removed, operating profit would have been $2.7 million which is $2.3 million more than operating profit for 2002. The improvement in operating profit is primarily due to improvements in the profitability of the segment’s sales mix, improved manufacturing performance and lower allocated severance costs more than offsetting the effects of lower aluminum extrusion production volumes.

     Corporate and Other expenses increased by $13.8 million for 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to Recapitalization expense of $11.5 million recorded in 2003 in addition to higher legal and professional expenses associated with shareholders’ litigation that was settled on November 2003, and higher management advisory and consulting fees.

     Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net declined by $0.3 million from $0.3 million of other income recorded in 2002. During 2003 costs associated with the receivables purchase agreement, letter of credit fees and certain other costs were higher than in 2002.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $2.9 million to $24.4 million for 2003 from $21.5 million for 2002. The increase is primarily due to the recognition of $2.4 million of unamortized deferred financing fees in 2003 which was associated with the senior credit facility that was repaid and terminated effective on the date of the Recapitalization. In addition, the first quarter of 2002 included a charge of $0.4 million related to the accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees as a result of a voluntary repayment of debt that occurred in March 2002. After removing the impact of accelerating the recognition of unamortized deferred financing fees, interest expense is $0.9 million greater in 2003 primarily due to the higher average debt levels in 2003 resulting from the Recapitalization.

     Income Taxes. Income taxes declined by $8.6 million to $7.4 million for 2003 reflecting lower pre-tax income in 2003 and a decrease in the effective tax rate to 31% from 37% in 2002. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to lower estimated income tax accruals in 2003.

     Net Income. Net income declined by $11.2 million to $16.2 million in 2003 from net income of $27.4 million for 2002 as a result of all the above factors.

15

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Debt and Other Contractual Obligations

     The following table provides a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations by due date as of December 31, 2004.

16

     At December 31, 2004 the Company had $334.8 million of consolidated indebtedness. The balance of debt includes $133.8 million of Senior Subordinated Notes reflected net of unamortized original issue discount; a $155.0 million Term Loan; $26.7 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility, $14.3 million of capitalized lease obligations and $5.0 million of other debt. The Senior Credit Facility provides for the Term Loan and a $50 million Revolving Facility.

     The Senior Credit Facility and the Notes contain various restrictive covenants including restrictions on additional indebtedness, mergers, asset dispositions, restricted payments, prepayment and amendments of subordinated indebtedness. These covenants also prohibit, among other things, the payment of cash dividends. The financial covenants of the Senior Credit Facility require the Company to meet specific interest coverage and maximum leverage ratios and limit capital expenditures. The Company is in compliance with all its debt covenants as of December 31, 2004. Effective during May 2005 the Senior Credit Facility was amended (see Liquidity and Capital Resources—Amendment of the First Lien Senior Credit Facility Subsequent to December 31, 2004).

     The Company maintains a Receivables Purchase Agreement with a financial institution and its affiliate to provide additional financing capacity with a maximum availability of $50 million depending upon the level of accounts receivable and certain other factors. The agreement expires in May 2006 but is subject to the approval of annual renewals by both the Company and the financial institution. Under the Receivables Purchase Agreement the Company established a consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, Werner Funding Corporation (“Funding”), which is a special purpose bankruptcy-remote entity that acquires, on a daily basis, a variable percentage interest of certain eligible trade receivables generated by the Company. The purchases by Funding are financed through the sale of an undivided percentage ownership interest in such receivables to the affiliate of the financial institution. The Receivables Purchase Agreement represents “off-balance sheet financing” since the ownership interest of the affiliate in Funding’s accounts receivable results in assets being removed from the balance sheet rather than resulting in a liability to the affiliate of the financial institution. The Company has agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institution at market rates; therefore no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. As of December 31, 2004, the Company sold $61.6 million of accounts receivable in exchange for $34.0 million in cash and an undivided interest in the accounts receivable of $27.4 million. During January 2005, $3.1 million was paid to reduce the cash provided by the facility from $34.0 million to $30.9 million as required by the agreement primarily due to the reduction in the balance of accounts receivable from November to December month-end. Effective during April 2005 a commitment for a new Accounts Receivable Financing Facility was executed (see Liquidity and Capital Resources—Commitment for Accounts Receivable Financing Facility Obtained Subsequent to December 31, 2004).

     The Company satisfies its working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements primarily through a combination of its existing cash balance, operating cash flow and sales of accounts receivable under the Receivables Purchase Agreement. Additional liquidity in 2005 is provided from the refund received in March 2005 of $10.1 million of federal income taxes previously paid resulting from the carry-back of the 2004 net loss for federal income tax purposes to earlier profitable years. The Company believes it has sufficient funds available in the next twelve months to support debt service requirements, projected capital expenditures and working capital needs based on projected results of operations and the expected availability under both the Senior Credit Facility and the Receivables Purchase Agreement.

     The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal on existing indebtedness or to refinance its indebtedness (including the Notes), or to fund planned capital expenditures or to finance acquisitions (although the Company has not entered into any pending agreements for acquisitions), will depend on its future financial and operating performance, which to a certain extent is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control. Based on the current and anticipated level of operations, management believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility and sales of accounts receivable under the Receivables Purchase Agreement, will be adequate to meet the Company’s anticipated future requirements for working capital, budgeted capital expenditures, and scheduled payments of principal and interest on its indebtedness, including

17

the Notes, for the next twelve months. The Company, however, may need to refinance all or a portion of the principal of the Notes on or prior to maturity. There can be no assurance that the Company’s business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available under the Senior Credit Facility and the Receivables Purchase Agreement in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness, including the Notes, or make anticipated capital expenditures and fund potential future acquisitions, if any. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to effect any refinancing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

     The market value of the Company’s pension plan assets at the end of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was less than the accumulated benefit obligation which required the recognition of a minimum pension liability of $23.1 million ($14.5 million after-tax) and $20.9 million ($12.8 million after-tax), respectively, based on the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions. The minimum liability adjustment at December 31, 2004 resulted in an increase to noncurrent liabilities of $23.6 million, an increase to noncurrent deferred income tax assets of $8.5 million, an increase to shareholders’ deficit of $14.5 million and an increase in noncurrent intangible assets of $0.6 million.

     Pension expense declined by $0.6 million in 2004 to $2.8 million from $3.4 million in 2003 primarily due to a decline in service cost associated with a decline in the number of hourly participants covered by the plan and a greater expected return on plan assets in 2004 due to a higher level of trust assets. The assumption selected for the expected return on plan assets is 8.50%. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company changed the assumption to 8.0%. During 2004 the Company evaluated information provided by its independent investment manager and its pension consultants, including their review of asset class return expectations based on historical returns and long-term inflation assumptions. As a result of the review the Company reduced the assumption for the expected return on plan assets by 0.5% the effect of which would increase 2005 pension expense by approximately $0.2 million. The discount rate used to value pension liabilities for expense purposes declined to 6.25% in 2004 from 6.50% used in 2003. The decline in the discount rate reflects the general decline in long-term interest rates. The benchmark consistently used in determining the discount rate is Moody’s AA bond index plus or minus no more than 0.25%. Pension expense in 2005, which will be determined using a discount rate of 5.75%, is expected to be modestly higher due to the use of the lower discount rate and the lower expected return on plan assets. In addition, cash contributions to the pension plan of approximately $1.6 million will be required to be paid to the pension trust during 2005 to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). Contributions totaling $5.5 million were paid to the pension trust during 2004 to meet minimum funding requirements.

     Cash Flows

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $27.3 million for 2004 compared to $31.8 million of cash provided by operating activities during 2003. Cash provided by operating activities was reduced in the current period due to a year-over-year increase in inventory levels and the use of cash to reduce liabilities which primarily relates to the payment of deferred incentive compensation totaling $4.8 million to the Company’s chief executive officer who left the employ of the Company during 2004. Inventories increased by $7.6 million during 2004 largely reflecting the impact of the time lag for delivery of non-manufactured products sourced from China with FOB shipping point terms and the increase in production at existing facilities to ensure adequate inventory is available to maintain customer service levels while the Company rationalizes, optimizes and starts-up new manufacturing facilities. Additionally, $4.2 million less cash was generated in 2004 due to lower product liability and workers’ compensation noncash expense provisions and higher claims payments in 2004 compared to 2003. These reductions in cash provided by operating activities during 2004 were partially offset by the year-over-year increase of $14.0 million in borrowings under the Receivables Purchase Agreement and the year-over-year decline in accounts receivable due in large part to the collection of substantially all the remaining balance of receivables due from Home Depot. Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $31.8 million in 2003 compared to $41.8 million in 2002. The decline is primarily due to more cash being used to increase year-over-year levels of accounts receivable and inventories. In addition, $4.5 million less cash was generated in 2003 due to lower product liability and workers’ compensation noncash expense provisions and higher claims payments in 2003 compared to 2002. Also, more cash was used for payroll costs in 2003 resulting in a decrease in accrued payroll of $5.7 million due to different year-to-year pay period ending dates and a lower accrual for performance based incentive compensation.

     Net cash used for investing activities was $8.1 million in 2004 compared to $9.4 million in 2003 which primarily reflects lower capital expenditures partially offset by higher proceeds on sales of property plant and equipment in 2004. Net cash used in investing activities was $9.4 million in 2003 compared to $11.8 million in

18

2002 which primarily reflects lower capital expenditures during 2003 partially offset by proceeds of $0.5 million realized on the sale of certain property, plant and equipment.

     Net cash provided by financing activities was $8.2 million in 2004 compared to net cash used of $55.9 million during 2003. Financing activities in 2004 primarily reflect net borrowings of $26.7 million under the Revolving Facility partially offset by debt repayments of $18.4 million which include scheduled Term Loan payments totaling $17.5 million made in 2004. Financing activities in 2003 reflect transactions that primarily related to the Recapitalization of the Company that occurred in 2003. Net cash used for financing activities was $55.9 million for 2003 compared to net cash used of $17.2 million for 2002. As previously described, financing activities for 2003 reflects transactions that occurred on the date of the Recapitalization including proceeds from issuance of convertible preferred stock of $65.0 million, Term Loan proceeds of $180.0 million, payments of $147.0 million to redeem common stock, repayment of debt totaling $115.4 million and other payments totaling $24.7 million which includes payments of $3.0 million in connection with stock option cancellations.

     As a result of the cash flows described above, the balance of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2004 was $37.1 million which is $27.5 million greater than the cash balance at the end of 2003. At December 31, 2003 the balance of cash and cash equivalents was $9.6 million which was $33.6 million less than the balance at the end of 2002.

     Capital Expenditures

     The Company’s capital expenditures were $9.1 million, $9.9 million and $12.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Approximately $5 million of the amount expended in each of such years has been for the renewal and replacement of existing facilities and equipment; thus in an economic downturn, the Company believes it will be able to adjust the amount spent on capital expenditures without compromising the base need of its operations. The Company expects to spend approximately $10 million in 2005 for various capital projects, including cost reduction and new product development projects and maintenance capital projects. Renewals and replacement of existing facilities and equipment are expected to be lower going forward than the previous level of approximately $5 million.

     Seasonality, Working Capital and Cyclicality

     Sales of certain products of the Company are subject to seasonal variation. Demand for the Company’s climbing products is affected by residential housing starts and existing home sales, commercial construction activity, and overall home improvement expenditures. Due to seasonal factors associated with the construction industry, sales of products and working capital are typically higher during the second and third quarters than at other times of the year. The Company expects to use the Senior Credit Facility and/or the Receivables Purchase Agreement to meet any seasonal variations in its working capital requirements. The residential and commercial construction markets are sensitive to cyclical changes in the economy.

     Raw Material Costs and Inflation

     The Company purchases aluminum, resins, fiberglass and other raw materials from various suppliers. While all such materials are available from numerous independent suppliers, commodity raw materials are subject to price fluctuations. There have been historical periods of rapid and significant movements in the price of aluminum, both upward and downward. Historically, the Company has entered into futures and option contracts with respect to its purchases of aluminum to minimize or hedge commodity price fluctuations. See “Item 1. Business — Raw Materials and Suppliers” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

     Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123, which requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. Statement No. 123R supercedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company is a “nonpublic entity” as defined by Statement No. 123R; therefore, the provisions of the interpretation will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2006. As of the effective date, the Company will be required to follow a fair value approach using an option-pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes option valuation model, at the date of a stock option grant. The compensation cost calculated under the fair value method would be

19

amortized over the respective vesting period of the stock option. Based on the equity instruments awarded through December 31, 2004, the adoption of Statement No. 123R will not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs—An Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4. Statement No. 151 requires abnormal amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility, freight, handling costs and scrapped material costs to be recognized as current period charges. In addition, Statement No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Statement No. 151 is effective for costs incurred beginning January 1, 2006. The adoption of Statement No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

     On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (“the Jobs Act”) was signed into law. Among other things, the Jobs Act provides tax relief to U.S. domestic manufacturers by providing a tax deduction for “qualified production activities income.” For tax years 2005 through 2006, the deduction will equal 3% of the lesser of “qualified production activities income” or taxable income. The percentage rises to 6% in years 2007 through 2009 and 9% thereafter. In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, ‘Accounting for Income Taxes,’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“FSP 109-1”). FSP 109-1 requires companies to account for this deduction as a “special deduction” that will reduce the estimate of the annual effective tax rate in the period in which the tax deduction is claimed. The impact of this provision on 2005 and later years is currently being evaluated.

     Financing Subsequent to December 31, 2004

     On May 10, 2005 the Company executed a $100 million Senior Secured Second Lien Credit Facility (“Second Lien Facility”) and realized net proceeds of $94,500. Net proceeds of $91,700 were used to repay amounts outstanding under the Company’s existing First Lien Senior Credit Facility (“First Lien Facility”) and the remaining cash of $2.8 million was retained for general corporate purposes. The First Lien Facility debt repaid included prepayment of $65.0 million of the existing First Lien Term Loan, reducing the balance currently outstanding to $90.0 million, and repayment of the total amount outstanding of $26.7 million under the First Lien Revolving Credit Facility. The Second Lien Facility is scheduled to mature on the earlier of December 11, 2009, or May 15, 2007 if the Company’s 10% Senior Subordinated Notes are not refinanced, prior to that date, to a date later than June 11, 2010.

     The amount outstanding under the Second Lien Facility will bear interest based on management’s selection of a fluctuating rate option that includes: (i) LIBOR plus an interest margin of 10.00% or (ii) an alternate base rate plus an interest margin of 9.00%. In either case, 1.50% of the interest payable will be capitalized as additional loans under the Second Lien Facility. The alternate base rate is defined as the higher of the prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%. The Second Lien Facility is secured by all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries consistent with those securing the First Lien Facility, and will be guaranteed by each guarantor under the First Lien Facility. The liens securing the Second Lien Facility will be second in priority to the liens securing the First Lien Facility and the Accounts Receivables Financing Facility (see below).

     The financial covenants of the Second Lien Senior Credit Facility include a maximum ratio of total secured indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined. Covenants of the Second Lien Facility are substantially similar to those of the Company’s existing Senior Credit Facility as amended (see below).

     Amendment of the First Lien Senior Credit Facility Subsequent to December 31, 2004

     Effective as of March 31, 2005 an agreement related to the First Lien Facility was executed to, among other things, waive the requirement to comply with the debt leverage and interest coverage ratios as of March 31, 2005 and to defer the requirement to provide audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 until May 10, 2005.

     Effective as of May 10, 2005 the First Lien Facility was amended in conjunction with the execution of the Second Lien Facility described above to, among other things, eliminate the requirement to comply with previously existing debt leverage and cash interest coverage ratios and to initiate new financial covenant requirements. Each calendar quarter beginning June 30, 2005 through December 31, 2007 certain minimum EBITDA levels

20

must be attained and certain maximum ratios must be satisfied, including total secured indebtedness to EBITDA and total first lien secured indebtedness to EBITDA. In addition, the determination of the amount of net proceeds from asset sales that must be applied to prepay the First Lien Term Loan was modified to require 50% of the first $40.0 million of net proceeds and all net proceeds in excess of $40.0 million be applied to reduce the First Lien Term Loan. The amendment also permanently waived the requirement to comply with the debt leverage and interest coverage ratios as of March 31, 2005. The amendment provides for an increase of 0.50% in the annual rate charged on the Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility borrowings.

     The Company anticipates that it will comply with its amended debt covenants for the next twelve months; however, continued compliance is primarily based on its future financial and operating performance, which to a certain extent is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control.

     Commitment for Accounts Receivable Financing Facility Obtained Subsequent to December 31, 2004

     Effective April 29, 2005, the Company and Werner Funding Corporation (“Funding”, the Company’s wholly-owned special purpose bankruptcy-remote entity) obtained a commitment for an Accounts Receivable Financing Facility (“Receivables Facility”) with a financial institution that will provide a maximum $50 million revolving line of credit based on a borrowing base calculation. The amount available will be determined weekly and will be based on 82% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable reduced by certain amounts that primarily reflect the risk profile of the Company’s customers. The Receivables Facility will expire on the earlier of May 31, 2009 or upon the expiration of the First Lien Facility. Funding will acquire all of the Company’s trade receivables on a daily basis. The purchases by Funding will be financed through the sale of a variable percentage ownership interest in such receivables to the financial institution or institutions acceptable to it. The Company has agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institution; therefore, no servicing asset or liability will be recorded. The Receivables Facility will be collateralized by the assets of Funding.

     Fees on advances under the Receivables Facility will be determined based on management’s selection of an available fluctuating rate option that include LIBOR plus 2.00% or the prime lending rate plus 1.00%. The agreement also provides for an unused facility fee equal to 0.50% per annum on the unused portion of the Receivables Facility. Early termination fees of 2.00% and 1.00% of the aggregate facility will be payable if the Receivables Facility is terminated by the Company prior to the lapse of one and two years, respectively.

     Proceeds upon executing the Receivables Facility will be used to repurchase the total outstanding interest of $30.9 million under the existing Receivables Purchase Agreement and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the execution of the Receivables Facility. The Receivables Purchase Agreement will be terminated in conjunction with the execution of the Receivables Facility.

21

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

     Market Risk Disclosures. The following discussion about the Company’s market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

     The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on long-term debt obligations. The Company manages such risk through the use of a combination of fixed and variable rate debt. Currently, the Company does not use derivative financial instruments to manage its interest rate risk.

     The following table provides information about the Company’s debt obligations and financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates or applicable floating rate index.

     The Company does not have operations in foreign countries subject to material foreign currency exchange risk. International sales were not material to the Company’s operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. Accordingly, the Company is not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate risk. To date, the Company has not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments relative to foreign currency exchange rates.

     The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in the price of aluminum. The Company manages such risk through the use of aluminum futures and options contracts which is further detailed below. The Company does not actually take delivery of aluminum that is the subject of the futures or options contracts. The price of aluminum has increased during 2004 but the negative impact on the Company’s financial results has been somewhat mitigated by gains on aluminum futures contracts entered into under the Company’s hedging program when aluminum prices were lower. The cost of other raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company’s products that are not covered by the Company’s hedging program, including steel, fiberglass and plastic, also increased during 2004. The cost of all of these raw materials is expected to continue to rise during 2005.

     In the case of futures contracts relating to the Extruded Products segment of the business, the Company agrees to purchase aluminum in the future at a set price relative to a customer firm order commitment. The futures contract is liquidated prior to settlement. The difference between the price of aluminum on the date the Company enters into the contract and the price on the settlement date represents the financial gain or loss on the contract. These futures contracts qualify for hedge accounting and, therefore, the gain or loss is recognized in

22

earnings, together with the offsetting gain or loss due to the changes in the fair value of the firm commitment, in the period the customer order attributed to the firm commitment is shipped. At December 31, 2004, the Company had purchased futures contracts, maturing in 2005, for the delivery of 1.2 million pounds of aluminum at a weighted average contract settlement price of $0.8171 per pound. At December 31, 2003, the Company had purchased futures contracts, maturing in 2004, for the delivery of 0.2 million pounds of aluminum at a weighted average contract settlement price of $0.6599 per pound. The unrecognized gains and losses for the change in fair value of such futures contracts that qualify for hedge accounting at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were immaterial.

     At December 31, 2004, the Company had no outstanding futures contracts related to the Climbing Products segment. The unrecognized realized gain for the change in the fair value of futures contracts that qualify for hedge accounting that were closed prior to year-end was $0.2 million at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2003, the company had purchased futures contracts related to the Climbing Products segment, maturing in 2004, for the delivery of 21.3 million pounds of aluminum at a weighted average contract settlement price of $0.6635 per pound. The unrecognized gain (realized and unrealized) for the change in the fair value of such futures contracts that qualify for hedge accounting was $2.5 million at December 31, 2003.

23

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

24

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board
of Directors of Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc.:

     In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in shareholders’ equity (deficit) and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

	/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 4, 2005, except as it relates to Note U,
as to which the date is May 10, 2005

25

WERNER HOLDING CO. (PA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, except Per Share Amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

26

WERNER HOLDING CO. (PA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Per Share Amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

27

WERNER HOLDING CO. (PA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

28

WERNER HOLDING CO. (PA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

29

WERNER HOLDING CO. (PA), INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

30

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

A. Description of Business

     Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. through its subsidiaries is a manufacturer of climbing equipment which includes aluminum, fiberglass and wood ladders, scaffolding, stages and planks, and aluminum extruded products. The Company operates in two business segments, Climbing Products and Extruded Products.

B. Significant Accounting Policies

     Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements of Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. include its accounts and the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Werner Holding Co. (DE), Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”). Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. has no substantial operations or assets, other than its investment in Werner Holding Co. (DE), Inc. The consolidated financial position and results of operations of Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. are substantially the same as those of Werner Holding Co. (DE), Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

     Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Revenue Recognition — Consistent with the guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, sales are recorded when title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, which is generally upon customer receipt of the shipment. Sales are recorded net of allowances for damaged goods returns, as well as various sales incentives and cash discounts. The Company provides for an allowance for estimated damaged goods returns, which is recognized as a deduction from sales at the time of sale. The Company also offers their customers various on-going sales incentive programs for which the Company estimates the anticipated incentive to be paid and allocates a portion of the estimated cost to each underlying sales transaction with the customer.

     Shipping and Handling Fees and Expenses - All shipping and handling fees billed to customers are classified as revenues. Shipping and handling costs represent costs associated with shipping products to customers and handling finished goods. Shipping and handling costs of $51,557, $54,466 and $48,026 are included in the caption entitled, “Selling and distribution expenses” in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     Accounts Receivable — The Company provides credit to its customers in the normal course of business. The Company’s customers are not concentrated in any specific geographic region. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses which, when realized, have been within the range of management’s expectations. Write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable totaled $614, $180 and $444 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (net realizable value). Cost was determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 77% and 88% of the inventories at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

     Derivative Commodity Instruments - Derivatives are held as part of a formal risk management policy. For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting, the Company formally measures the effectiveness of its hedging relationships both at the hedge inception and on an ongoing basis by formally assessing the historical and probable future high correlation of changes in the fair value or expected future cash flows of the hedged item. The ineffective portions, which were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, are included in the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the ineffectiveness occurs. If the hedging relationship ceases to be highly effective or it becomes probable that an expected transaction will no longer occur, gains or losses on the derivative are included in the Company’s results of operations. The amount of such gains or losses was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

31

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     The Company’s derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting consist of aluminum futures and option contracts that are designated either as fair value or cash flow hedges. The Company utilizes aluminum commodity futures and option contracts to manage the market risk of changing prices associated with customer firm order commitments and a certain percentage of its forecasted sales. Generally, these contracts cover exposures of one year or less. Futures contracts obligate the Company to make or receive a payment equal to the net change in value of the contract at its maturity. Futures and option contracts that qualify are designated as hedges, correspond to the commitment or forecasted sales period, and are effective in hedging the Company’s exposure to changes in aluminum prices during that cycle. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had futures contracts to purchase aluminum totaling $991 and $14,298, respectively. At December 31, 2004, the Company had no outstanding futures contracts related to the Climbing Products segment. At December 31, 2004, unrecognized gains of $156, net of tax, related to the cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income and $167 of unrecognized gains related to fair value hedges is recognized in other current assets with an offset included in accrued liabilities. At December 31, 2003, unrecognized gains totaling $1,262, net of tax, on outstanding futures contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income with a corresponding offset in other current assets. Additionally, a total of $542 of unrecognized gains related to fair value hedges is recognized in other current assets with an offset included in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2003.

     Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in results of operations or in other comprehensive income, depending on whether a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting, and is designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value is recorded in other comprehensive income and is reclassified to the results of operations in the period in which earnings are impacted by the hedged item or in the period that the transaction no longer qualifies as a cash flow hedge. No derivative initially designated as a cash flow hedge ceased to qualify as a cash flow hedge during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. As of December 31, 2004, all of the $155 gain, net of tax, recognized in other comprehensive income is expected to be recognized in the Company’s results of operations over the next twelve months. For fair value hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative and the equal and offsetting change in the firm commitment are recorded on the balance sheet. The gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in results of operations in the period in which earnings are impacted by the hedged item. For derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the gain or loss is recognized in earnings in the period of change in aluminum prices.

     Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures that increase capacities or extend useful lives are capitalized. Depreciation is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives for buildings range from 40 to 45 years and for machinery and equipment range from 3 to 14 years. The net book value of capitalized lease assets, which primarily consist of manufacturing facilities, machinery and equipment, was $15,111 and $2,163 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Useful lives for capitalized lease assets are limited to the lease term.

     Interest is capitalized in connection with major capital projects. The capitalized interest is recorded as part of the asset to which it relates and is amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, interest costs of $78, $195 and $428, respectively, were capitalized. Interest costs incurred in 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $25,320, $24,602 and $21,900, respectively.

     Long-lived assets are periodically reviewed for impairment. Impairment is recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, or related group of assets, may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized at that time as the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets or group of assets. Measurement of fair value may be based upon appraisals, market values of similar assets or discounted cash flows.

     Internal Use Software - Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, requires the capitalization of certain costs applicable to internal use software, including associated hardware costs, external direct material and service costs, and

32

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

employee payroll and payroll related costs. Amortization of capitalized software costs was $3,176, $2,594, and $2,018 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The unamortized balance of computer software costs capitalized was $11,870 and $14,979 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Capitalized computer software costs, which are included in machinery and equipment in the accompanying balance sheet, are amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 7 years.

     Reserve for Product Liability and Workers’ Compensation Claims - The Company maintains third party insurance coverage, subject to certain deductible provisions, for product liability and workers’ compensation claims which occur on or after March 31, 1998 and maintains a reserve for the insurance deductibles related to such claims which totals $43,399 and $47,880 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The reserve for product liability and workers’ compensation claims is determined on an undiscounted actuarial basis and includes an amount derived from loss reports for individual cases and an amount, based on past experience, for losses incurred but not reported. The resulting actuarial loss estimates are expressed as a range of reasonable estimates which is expected to include the loss that ultimately will occur. The reserve is within the range of reasonable estimates. While management believes that the reserve is adequate, the ultimate liability may be in excess of or less than the amount provided. The methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting reserve are continually reviewed, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings currently. Accordingly, the reserve for product liability and workers’ compensation claims was reduced by approximately $6,200 during the fourth quarter of 2004 primarily as a result of a reduction in the actuary’s estimate of ultimate losses due to favorable product liability claims experience. Prior to March 31, 1998, the Company operated a captive insurance company that maintained reserves for product liability and workers’ compensation claims of the Company (see Note M).

     Stock-Based Compensation - The Company has a stock option plan which is described more fully in Note I. The Company measures stock-based compensation costs using the intrinsic value method of accounting pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. In connection with the Recapitalization (see Note C) the Company modified its existing stock options which resulted in a corresponding noncash compensation charge totaling $4,590 (see Note I). Accordingly, pro forma compensation costs are zero for periods subsequent to the Recapitalization related to the then-existing stock options because all such costs have been recorded as expense in the consolidated statement of income as a result of recording the noncash compensation charge. Stock options were granted during the second quarter of 2004 to purchase 3,082 shares of Class C Common Stock at an exercise price of $500 per share. Had compensation costs for stock options been determined using the fair market value method of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the effect on net income (loss) would have been as follows:

     The pro forma compensation costs indicated above are zero for periods after the Recapitalization primarily because all remaining outstanding options were modified. In connection with the Recapitalization (see Note C) the Company modified its existing stock options which resulted in corresponding noncash compensation charge totaling $4,590 (see Note I). Accordingly, pro forma compensation costs are zero for periods subsequent to the Recapitalization because all such costs have been recorded as expense in the consolidated statement of income as a result of recording the noncash compensation charge.

     The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002 estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $775.11. The fair value of each option grant was determined using weighted average assumptions of risk-free interest rates of 4.31% for grants in 2002 and an average life of options of 7.1 years and expected volatility and dividend yield of 0% for grants. No options were granted during 2003 and fair value of options granted during 2004 was zero.

33

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     Retirement Benefits - Net periodic pension cost is recognized for the cost of the Company’s qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans based on the requirements of FASB Statement No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions. The cost of benefits provided under the Company’s postretirement programs is determined based on the requirements of FASB Statement No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.

     Income Taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company has reflected the necessary deferred tax assets and liabilities in the accompanying balance sheets. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

     Deferred Financing Fees - Amortization of deferred financing fees is computed using the effective interest method and recognized as interest expense. Amortization of $2,356 and $394 of deferred financing fees was accelerated during 2003 and 2002, respectively (see Note E).

     Advertising - The Company expenses all advertising as incurred. These expenses totaled $13,429, $15,738 and $16,062 for years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

     Statement of Cash Flows - Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

     Fair Values of Financial Instruments — The Company’s disclosures for financial instruments are as follows:

     Cash and cash equivalents — The amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents bear interest at prevailing market rates and therefore approximate fair value.

     Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable - The amounts reported approximate fair value.

     Long-term debt - The carrying amounts of the Company’s borrowings under its credit agreements and the Variable Rate Demand Industrial Building Revenue Bonds, bear interest at prevailing market rates and therefore approximate their fair value at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The fair value (based upon prevailing market rates) of the outstanding borrowings of the Senior Subordinated Notes at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $112,050 and $78,300, respectively.

     Derivative instruments - The fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments is recorded in the balance sheet.

     Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123, which requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees. Statement No. 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company is a “nonpublic entity” as defined by Statement No. 123R; therefore, the provisions of the interpretation will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2006. As of the effective date, the Company will be required to follow a fair value approach using an option-pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes option valuation model, at the date of a stock option grant. The compensation cost calculated under the fair value method would be amortized over the respective vesting period of the stock option. Based on the equity instruments awarded through December 31, 2004, the adoption of Statement No. 123R will not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

34

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs—An Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4. Statement No. 151 requires abnormal amounts of inventory costs related to idle facility, freight, handling costs and scrapped material costs to be recognized as current period charges. In addition, Statement No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Statement No. 151 is effective for costs incurred beginning January 1, 2006. The adoption of Statement No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

     On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act (“the Jobs Act”) was signed into law. Among other things, the Jobs Act provides tax relief to U.S. domestic manufacturers by providing a tax deduction for “qualified production activities income.” For tax years 2005 through 2006, the deduction will equal 3% of the lesser of “qualified production activities income” or taxable income. The percentage rises to 6% in years 2007 through 2009 and 9% thereafter. In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, ‘Accounting for Income Taxes,’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“FSP 109-1”). FSP 109-1 requires companies to account for this deduction as a “special deduction” that will reduce the estimate of the annual effective tax rate in the period in which the tax deduction is claimed. The impact of this provision on 2005 and later years is currently being evaluated.

C. Recapitalization

     In June 2003, the Company completed a recapitalization with Green Equity Investors III, L.P. (“GEI”), an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners L.P. (“Leonard Green”), and certain shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the Recapitalization Agreement (i) GEI invested $65,000 in the Company in exchange for 65,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (see Note G), (ii) the Company redeemed 39.66% of its outstanding shares of capital stock for payments totaling $146,983 and (iii) the Company made certain other payments including $3,017 to the holders of options to purchase the Company’s Class C Common Stock in consideration for the cancellation of certain of their vested options (collectively, the “Recapitalization”). The Series A Preferred Stock represented approximately 22% of the outstanding voting shares of capital stock as of the date of the Recapitalization. The Recapitalization was accounted for as a leveraged recapitalization at historical cost principally due to the fact that less than 80% of the voting securities were acquired.

     As part of the Recapitalization, the Company entered into a $230,000 credit facility (see Note E) with a syndicate of banks consisting of a $180,000 Term Loan and a $50,000 Revolving Credit Facility. The Company used $115,421 to repay in full its previous senior credit facility which was then terminated as of the date of the Recapitalization.

     Additional sources of cash to complete the Recapitalization included the Company’s Receivables Purchase Agreement, existing cash on-hand and employee stock loan repayments related to the capital stock redeemed. The following is a summary of the sources and uses of cash resulting from, and in connection with, the Recapitalization:

35

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     Costs associated with the Recapitalization include $4,050 to obtain the consent of holders of the Company’s 10% Notes (see Note E), a one-time Leonard Green equity commitment fee of $2,500, transaction bonuses of $1,725 paid to certain officers and employees of the Company, a $1,000 credit refinance advisory services fee paid to INVESTCORP S.A. (“Investcorp”) and other fees primarily related to investment banking, legal and accounting services and other associated costs totaling $12,422.

     Recapitalization expense reflected on the income statement for the year ended December 31, 2003 totals $11,499 and includes a noncash compensation charge of $4,590 associated with modifying stock options (see Note I), payments totaling $3,017 in connection with stock option cancellations, transaction bonus payments totaling $1,725, a noncash charge of $1,301 related to the deferred stock plan (see Note I) and other miscellaneous costs totaling $866. Other costs totaling $19,106 incurred in connection with the Recapitalization were reflected as deferred financing costs, as a reduction of the proceeds from the issuance of the convertible preferred stock or as costs related to the repurchase of common stock.

D. Inventories

     Inventories are as follows:

36

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

E. Debt

     In 2003 the Company entered into a $230,000 Senior Credit Facility with a syndicate of banks consisting of a $180,000 Term Loan and a $50,000 Revolving Credit Facility (collectively, the “Senior Credit Facility”). The Senior Credit Facility will mature in May 2007 in the event the Company’s existing 10% Senior Subordinated Notes maturing November 15, 2007 (the “Notes”) are not refinanced or extended by May 2007. Otherwise, if the Notes are refinanced or extended by May 2007, the maturity date of the Senior Credit Facility will be the earlier of (i) six months prior to the new maturity date of the Notes or (ii) (A) for the Revolving Credit Facility, June 11, 2008 and (B) for the Term Loan, June 11, 2009. A summary of debt outstanding is as follows:

     Effective during May 2005 the Company successfully executed a $100,000 Senior Secured Second Lien Credit Facility (see Note U).

     Senior Credit Facility

     Subject to refinancing or extension of the Notes as discussed above, the remaining balance of the Term Loan is payable in aggregate principal amounts of $22,500 in 2005, $27,500 in 2006, $32,500 in 2007, $45,000 in 2008 and $27,500 in 2009. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest at alternative floating rate structures at management’s option and are collateralized by the capital stock of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and substantially all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, except for Werner Funding Corporation. The Term Loan interest rate was 5.47% and 3.88% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

     The Company may draw amounts under the $50,000 Revolving Credit Facility for general corporate purposes and working capital requirements. At December 31, 2004 and 2003 the amount outstanding under the revolver was $26,700 and $0, respectively. The revolver interest rate was 7.75% at December 31, 2004. The availability under the revolver is reduced by amounts issued under a letter of credit subfacility which totals $20,551 at December 31, 2004. An annual commitment fee of 0.75% is paid on the average daily unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility.

     The Senior Credit Facility was amended in May 2004 to change the debt leverage and interest coverage ratio covenants for years 2004 and 2005 to be less restrictive. The amendment provided for an increase in certain fees including an increase of 0.75% in the annual rate charged on the Term Loan and an increase of 0.25% in the annual commitment fee that is charged on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company incurred costs totaling $842 in connection with the Amendment during the second quarter of 2004. The costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the remaining life of the facility using the effective interest method along with previously existing unamortized costs.

37

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     Deferred financing fees totaling $7,165 were incurred in 2003 in connection with obtaining the Senior Credit Facility. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the life of the facility using the effective interest method. The remaining unamortized deferred financing fees totaling $2,356 associated with the credit facility terminated on the date of the Recapitalization were recognized as interest expense in 2003. Additional interest expense of $394 was recorded in 2002 due to accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees associated with changes in the then existing senior credit facility.

     A significant repayment of the Senior Credit Facility Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility occurred in May 2005 (see Note U).

The Notes

     The principal amount of the Notes is $135,000 and they mature on November 15, 2007. Interest at 10% on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15. The Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company ranking subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The Notes rank pari passu in right of payment with all other indebtedness of the Company that is subordinated to the senior indebtedness of the Company.

     In connection with the Recapitalization, consent fees totaling $4,050 were paid in 2003 to the holders of the Notes and certain other costs totaling $226 were incurred in connection with the modification of the Indenture to permit the redemption of common stock on the date of the Recapitalization. These fees and costs have been deferred and will be amortized over the remaining life of the Notes using the effective interest method.

     The Notes are redeemable at the Company’s option at 101.667% during the twelve months beginning November 15, 2004 and at 100% thereafter (expressed as a percentage of principal amount).

Industrial Building Revenue Bonds

     Variable Rate Demand Industrial Building Revenue Bonds totaling $5,000 were issued in order to finance the Company’s acquisition of land and equipment and the subsequent construction of a climbing products manufacturing facility located in Carrollton, Kentucky. During 2003 the Company announced that it would close the Kentucky manufacturing facility during 2004. As a result, the redemption of the bonds likely would have been required in 2004 if the facility had been closed. Accordingly, the liability for the bonds was classified as a current liability and included in the caption, “Current maturities of long-term debt” in the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2003. After further review of the Company’s distribution requirements during 2004, it was decided not to close the facility until other alternatives are evaluated, including expansion of the Carrollton facility for use as a regional distribution center. Since a final decision has not yet been made and production of attic ladders continues at that facility, the $5 million Bonds are not required to be repaid prior to maturity.

     The bonds bear interest at a variable rate established weekly which may not exceed 15% per annum (2.0% and 1.5% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively). The interest rate on the bonds may be converted to a fixed rate upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Prior to a conversion to a fixed rate, the bonds are subject to purchase from the holder upon demand at a price equal to principal plus accrued interest. On or prior to the date of conversion to a fixed rate, the bonds are subject to redemption, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company. After conversion to a fixed rate, the bonds are subject to redemption, as a whole or in part, at the Company’s option, on or after the tenth anniversary of the conversion, at annual redemption prices varying from 103% to 100% of the principal outstanding. Certain property and equipment having an original cost of $3,889 are pledged as collateral for the bonds.

Covenants

     The Senior Credit Facility and the Notes contain various restrictive covenants including restrictions on additional indebtedness, mergers, asset dispositions, restricted payments, prepayment and amendments of subordinated indebtedness. These covenants also prohibit, among other things, the payment of cash dividends.

38

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

The financial covenants of the Senior Credit Facility require the Company to meet specific interest coverage and maximum leverage ratios and limit capital expenditures.

     The Company is in compliance with all its debt covenants as of December 31, 2004. Effective as of March 31 and May 10, 2005, the Senior Credit Facility was amended to modify certain financial covenants and provide for other changes (see Note U).

Scheduled Principal Payments

     Subject to refinancing or extension of the Notes as discussed above, the aggregate amount of scheduled principal payments, excluding repayments of obligations under capital leases, is $22,500 in 2005, $27,500 in 2006, $167,500 in 2007, $71,700 in 2008, and $27,500 in 2009 and $5,000 thereafter.

Capitalized Lease Obligations

     Future minimum lease payments under capital leases are as follows:

     In March 2004, the Company executed a lease contract relating to the construction of a large manufacturing facility located in Juarez, Mexico. Under the contract, the obligations of an unrelated third party lessee were guaranteed by the Company. During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, construction was completed and the Company assumed all obligations under the lease. The lease met the accounting criteria to be categorized as a capital lease which resulted in an asset recorded in property, plant and equipment and an offsetting amount recorded as debt of $12,684. The amount recorded was based on the present value of the future lease payments. The Company has the option to purchase the leased property at the end of the initial term. The initial lease term is ten years and the Company also has two five-year options to extend the lease beyond its initial term.

F. Sale of Accounts Receivable

     The Company maintains a Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”) with a financial institution and its affiliate to provide additional financing capacity with a maximum availability of $50,000 depending upon the level of accounts receivable and certain other factors. The agreement expires in May 2006 but will continue subject to the approval of annual renewals by both the Company and the financial institution. Under the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Company established a consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary, Werner Funding Corporation (“Funding”), which is a special purpose bankruptcy-remote entity that acquires, on a daily basis, a variable percentage interest of certain eligible trade receivables generated by the Company. The purchases by Funding are financed through the sale of an undivided percentage ownership interest in such receivables to the affiliate of the financial institution. The Company has agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institution at market rates; therefore no servicing asset or liability has been recorded.

39

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

     As of December 31, 2004 and 2003 the Company had transferred, on a recurring basis, $61,564 and $84,549 of accounts receivable in exchange for $34,000 and $20,000 in cash and an undivided interest in accounts receivable of $27,355 and $64,483, respectively. In accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, the transactions have been recorded as a sale of receivables to a qualified special purpose entity. The ongoing cost associated with the Receivables Purchase Agreement, which represents a return to investors in the purchased interests, as well as the cost of implementation and the loss on the sale of accounts receivable, is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of income in the caption, “Other income (expense), net.” These costs totaled $1,259, $695 and $607 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The interest rates on the purchased interests at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were 2.20% and 1.13%, respectively. As of December 31, 2004 the Company had drawn the maximum available under the Receivables Purchase Agreement.

     The key economic assumptions used to measure the undivided interest at the date of the securitization for securitizations completed in 2004 were a discount rate of 3.95% and an estimated life of approximately two months. At December 31, 2004 an immediate adverse change in the discount rate or estimated life of 10% and 20% would not result in a significant reduction in the fair value of the undivided interest. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another.

     The accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 reflect an allowance for doubtful accounts that relates, in large part, to accounts receivable representing the undivided interest in the assets of the financial institution affiliate.

     Effective during April 2005 a commitment for a new Accounts Receivable Financing Facility was executed (see Note U).

G. Convertible Preferred Stock

Ranking and Liquidation Preference

     The $65,000 of Series A Preferred Stock issued in connection with the Recapitalization ranks senior to all outstanding classes of common stock of the Company with respect to dividends and as to distributions upon the liquidation, winding-up and dissolution of the Company. Each share had an initial liquidation preference of $1,000 and the holders thereof are entitled to receive dividends thereon at an annual rate equal to 14%, payable quarterly, from the date the Series A Preferred Stock was first issued until December 31, 2008. The dividends may be paid in cash or, at the election of the Company, in lieu of cash by increasing the liquidation preference by the amount of unpaid dividends. However, the Company’s debt covenants prohibit the payment of cash dividends (see Note E).

Preferred Dividends

     During 2004 and 2003 quarterly preferred dividends in the amount of $10,272 and $4,630, respectively, were paid and, in lieu of cash dividend payments, the liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock was increased by the amount of the dividends. The dividends were recorded by reducing additional paid-in capital and increasing the balance of convertible preferred stock. The dividends, which increased the liquidation preference of preferred stock to $79,902 as of December 31, 2004, are presented as an adjustment to arrive at net income attributable to common shareholders in the consolidated statements of income.

Conversion into Common Stock

     Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock can convert all or any of the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock into shares of Class F Common Stock of the Company, at any time or from time to time, at a conversion

40

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

rate equal to the liquidation preference divided by $4,929.66 (such multiple, the “Conversion Rate”). If dividends are unpaid at the election of the Company, the Conversion Rate will increase by 14% per year, compounded quarterly from the date of issue through the third anniversary. Therefore, over time (but in any event not beyond the third anniversary of the date issued), each share of Series A Preferred Stock will be convertible into a greater number of shares of Class F Common Stock. If all of the Series A Preferred shares had been converted as of December 31, 2004, 16,208 shares of Class F Common Stock would have been issued.

Redemption

     Each holder of Series A Preferred Stock will have the right to require the Company to redeem, in whole or in part, such holder’s shares if certain events occur (the “Put Events”). Put Events include a change of control, the sale of all or substantially all the assets of the Company, or an initial public offering (each as specifically defined by the Recapitalization Agreement). On or after January 1, 2007 and prior to December 31, 2008, any or all holders of Series A Preferred Stock may elect to have their shares redeemed, in whole or in part, (the “Elective Put”). The redemption price for the Put Events and the Elective Put will be 130.8% of the liquidation preference if the event giving rise to the redemption right occurs prior to the first anniversary of the date issued or, if the event giving rise to the redemption right occurs on or after the first anniversary of the date issued, at a redemption price equal to 112% in 2004, 110% in 2005, 108% in 2006 and 106% in 2007 and thereafter.

Preferred Stock Accretion

     As a result of the Elective Put discussed above, the Series A Preferred Stock will have a redemption price equal to 106% of the liquidation preference effective on January 1, 2007. At the date of issuance, the preferred stock was recorded net of associated issuance costs of $6,841. The recorded value of the preferred stock will be accreted to its redemption value through December 31, 2006 using the effective interest method. Accretion recorded during 2004 and 2003 was $3,114 and $1,559, respectively. The accretion of preferred stock is subtracted from net income in calculating net income attributable to common shareholders for purposes of presenting the consolidated statements of income.

Voting Rights

     The holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on all matters which the holders of common stock of the Company are entitled to vote, and are accorded such number of votes per share of Series A Preferred Stock as the number of common shares then issuable upon such share’s conversion.

     As long as any shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company will not amend its charter so as to affect adversely the special rights, powers, preferences, privileges or voting rights of the Series A Preferred Stock without the consent of the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

H. Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholder Agreement

     At closing of the Recapitalization, the Company, Investcorp and certain affiliates (the “Investcorp Investors”), GEI (with its affiliates, the “GEI Investors”), and certain members of the Werner and Solot families (the “Family Shareholders”) entered into an amended and restated shareholder agreement (the “Shareholder Agreement”) to provide, among other things, that the Board of Directors of the Company will consist of nine members initially, consisting of not less than four designated by the Investcorp Investors, two designated by the Family Shareholders and two designated by the GEI Investors, with the ninth director being the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On June 11, 2006, the GEI Investors will have the right to designate a third member to the Board of Directors, bringing the total at such time to ten directors. The right of the Investcorp Investors, the Family Shareholders or the GEI Investors to appoint directors under the Shareholder Agreement will terminate as to any such group if it ceases to own at least 50% of the aggregate equity position that it owned immediately after the closing of the Recapitalization.

41

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

Voting Rights

     Holders of the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of the Class D Common Stock are entitled to approximately 50.7 votes per share. Class C Common Stock and Class E Common Stock have no voting rights. Upon the occurrence of a sale of 100% of the outstanding equity securities of the Company, a sale of substantially all the assets of the Company or a public offering of any equity securities of the Company (“Triggering Event”), each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock, Class C Common Stock, Class D Common Stock and Class E Common Stock will convert into one share of Common Stock of the Company. This additional class of common stock with a par value of $.01 per share is authorized (125,896 shares under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation), but no shares were issued or outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003. When issued, this class of Common Stock of the Company will have one vote per share.

Other Agreements

     In connection with the Recapitalization, the Company’s agreement for management and consulting services with Investcorp International, Inc. (“III”), an affiliate of Investcorp, was amended to provide consulting services through November 24, 2007. The amended agreement provides for the Company to pay III an annual fee of $1,500 for the annual period ending November 24, 2003 and $1,000 for each annual period thereafter. The agreement will terminate on the earlier of November 24, 2007, the date on which III ceases to own at least 50% of the aggregate equity of the Company or on the date of an initial public offering, as defined.

     The Company entered into a management and consulting agreement with Leonard Green in connection with the Recapitalization. The agreement provides for the Company to pay Leonard Green $455 for services for the period through November 23, 2003 and $1,000 for services and expenses for each annual period thereafter through November 25, 2008. The agreement will terminate on the earlier of November 25, 2008, the date on which Leonard Green ceases to own at least 50% of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (including any shares of common stock issued upon conversion) or on the date of an initial public offering, as defined.

I. Stock Incentive Plans

Stock Option Plan

     The Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (the “Stock Option Plan”) is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Stock Option Plan, certain directors, employees and officers of the Company are given an opportunity to acquire shares of the Company’s Class C Common Stock (the “Class C Stock”) through the grant of non-qualified and qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock. The options granted under the Stock Option Plan are exercisable at no less than the fair market value of the Class C Stock at the time of grant and vest on the seventh anniversary of the grant date with the possibility for accelerated vesting based, in part, on the achievement of certain financial targets as provided for in the Stock Option Plan. The Stock Option Plan also provides for vesting of certain percentages of the options in the event of an Initial Public Offering or Approved Sale as defined in the Stock Option Plan. Options issued pursuant to the Stock Option Plan expire on the thirtieth day following the seventh anniversary of the grant date. A total of 6,504 shares of Class C Stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan.

     In connection with the Recapitalization (see Note C) the Company accelerated the vesting of 2,368 options, paid option holders $3,017 in consideration for the cancellation of 1,235 vested options, extended the life of the remaining vested options to 30 days after November 24, 2007 and cancelled the remaining 3,007 issued and outstanding unvested options. A noncash compensation charge totaling $4,590 associated with the extension of the life of the options was recorded effective on the date of the Recapitalization. The charge was determined based on the excess of the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the Recapitalization compared to the exercise price of the options.

42

Werner Holding Co. (PA), Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
(Dollars in Thousands, except Share Amounts)

Presented below is a summary of the Stock Option Plan activity: