Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 or

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-4720

WESCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes X No      

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yes X No   

      The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 was: $416,099,000.

      The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Capital Stock as of March 15, 2004 was: 7,119,807.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Table of Contents

PART I

GENERAL

      Wesco Financial Corporation (“Wesco”) was incorporated in Delaware on March 19, 1959. Wesco, through subsidiaries, engages in three principal businesses: (1) the insurance business, through Wesco-Financial Insurance Company (“Wes-FIC”), which was incorporated in 1985 and engages in the property and casualty insurance business, and The Kansas Bankers Surety Company (“KBS”), which was incorporated in 1909, was purchased by Wes-FIC in 1996 and provides specialized insurance coverages for banks; (2) the furniture rental business, through CORT Business Services Corporation (“CORT”), which traces its national presence to the combination of five regional furniture rental companies in 1972 and was purchased by Wesco in 2000; and (3) the steel service center business, through Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc. (“Precision Steel”), which was begun in 1940 and acquired by Wesco in 1979. The subsidiaries are wholly owned, either directly or indirectly.

      Wesco’s operations also include, through another wholly owned subsidiary, MS Property Company (“MS Property”), management of owned commercial real estate in downtown Pasadena, California, a portion of which it seeks to redevelop. MS Property began its operations in late 1993, upon transfer to it of real properties previously owned by Wesco and by a former savings and loan subsidiary of Wesco.

      Since 1973, Wesco has been 80.1%-owned by Blue Chip Stamps (“Blue Chip”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire”). Thus, Wesco and its subsidiaries are controlled by Blue Chip and Berkshire. All of these companies may also be deemed to be controlled by Warren E. Buffett, who is Berkshire’s chairman and chief executive officer and economic owner of approximately 31% of its stock. Charles T. Munger, the chairman of Wesco, is also vice chairman of Berkshire, and consults with Mr. Buffett with respect to Wesco’s investment decisions and major capital allocations. Although operating decisions for Wesco’s businesses are made by the managers of those business units, Mr. Buffett is president and a director of Wesco Holdings Midwest, Inc. (“WHMI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Wesco, and a director of Wes-FIC, CORT and Precision Steel, which are wholly owned subsidiaries of WHMI.

      Wesco’s activities fall into three business segments — insurance, furniture rental and industrial. The insurance segment consists of the operations of Wes-FIC and KBS. The furniture rental segment consists of the operations of CORT. The industrial segment comprises Precision Steel’s steel service center and other operations. Wesco is also engaged in several activities not identified with the three business segments; these include (1) investment activity unrelated to the insurance segment, (2) MS Property’s real estate activities, and (3) parent company activities.

INSURANCE SEGMENT

      Wes-FIC was incorporated in 1985 to engage in the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance business. Its insurance operations are managed by National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), which is headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska. To simplify discussion, the term “Berkshire Insurance Group,” as used in this report, refers to NICO and certain other wholly owned insurance subsidiaries of Berkshire, individually or collectively, although Berkshire also includes in its insurance group the insurance subsidiaries that are 80.1%-owned through Berkshire’s ownership of Wesco.

      Wes-FIC’s high net worth (about $2.0 billion at December 31, 2003) has enabled Berkshire to offer Wes-FIC the opportunity to participate, from time to time, in contracts in which Wes-FIC effectively has reinsured certain property and casualty risks of unaffiliated property and casualty insurers. These arrangements have included excess-of-loss contracts. Excess-of-loss contracts include “super-catastrophe reinsurance,” which subjects the reinsurer to especially large amounts of losses from mega-catastrophes such as hurricanes or earthquakes. Super-catastrophe policies, which indem-

1

Table of Contents

      Wesco’s and Wes-FIC’s boards of directors have authorized automatic acceptance of retrocessions of super-catastrophe reinsurance offered by the Berkshire Insurance Group provided the following guidelines and limitations are complied with: (1) in order not to delay the acceptance process, the retrocession is to be accepted without delay in writing in Nebraska by agents of Wes-FIC who are salaried employees of the Berkshire Insurance Group; (2) any ceding commission received by the Berkshire Insurance Group cannot exceed 3% of premiums, which is believed to be less than the Berkshire Insurance Group could get in the marketplace; (3) Wes-FIC is to assume 20% or less of the total risk; (4) the Berkshire Insurance Group must retain at least 80% of the identical risk; and (5) the aggregate premiums from this type of business in any twelve-month period cannot exceed 10% of Wes-FIC’s net worth. Occasionally, the Berkshire Insurance Group will also have an upper-level reinsurance interest with interests different from Wes-FIC’s, particularly in the event of one or more large losses.

      Following is a summary of Wes-FIC’s more significant reinsurance agreements:

	•	A quota-share agreement entered into in 1985 whereby Wes-FIC effectively reinsured — through the Berkshire Insurance Group, as intermediary-without-profit — 2% of essentially all insurance business of a major property and casualty insurer written during a four-year coverage period that expired in 1989. Wes-FIC remains liable for its share of remaining unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, an estimate of which is included in insurance liabilities on Wesco’s consolidated balance sheet.
	•	Several contracts for super-catastrophe reinsurance retroceded by the Berkshire Insurance Group beginning in 1994, including 3% participations in two super-catastrophe reinsurance policies covering hurricane risks in Florida: (1) a 12-month policy effective June 1, 1996; and (2) a three-year policy effective January 1, 1997. No losses were incurred under these contracts.
	•	Participation to the extent of 10% in a catastrophic excess-of-loss contract effective for the 1999 calendar year covering property risks of a major international reinsurer, also retroceded by the Berkshire Insurance Group. No liabilities remain under this contract.
	•	A multi-year, quota-share arrangement, entered into in 2000 through NICO, as intermediary without profit, for participation in a pool of certain property and casualty risks written by a large, unaffiliated insurer, under which Wes-FIC’s participation increased from approximately 3.3% of certain risks associated with policy years 2000 through 2002 to 6% of certain risks associated with the 2003 and 2004 policy years. The terms of this arrangement are identical to those accepted by another member of the Berkshire Insurance Group, except as to the amount of the participation.
	•	Participation in four risk pools managed by a Berkshire Insurance Group member covering hull, liability, workers’ compensation and satellite exposures relating to the aviation industry, as follows: with respect to 2001, to the extent of 3% for each pool, with satellite exposures effective June 1; for 2002, 13% of the hull and liability pools, increasing to 15.5% in August, and 3% of the workers’ compensation pool (satellite exposures were not renewed in June); and, for 2003 and 2004, 10% of the hull and liability pools only. The Berkshire Insurance Group member provides a portion of the upper-level reinsurance protection to these aviation risk pools, and therefore to Wes-FIC, on terms that could cause some conflict of interest under certain conditions, e.g., in settling a large loss.

      The insurance industry, including Wes-FIC, experienced significant reinsurance and insurance losses from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (“TRIA”), enacted November 26, 2002, established for commercial property and casualty insurers

2

Table of Contents

      Assumed reinsurance is specifically excluded from TRIA participation. Thus, terrorism exclusions contained within reinsurance contracts remain in effect. Reinsurers are not required to offer terrorism coverage and are not eligible for federal reinsurance of terrorism losses. Wes-FIC, as a reinsurer, however, could indirectly benefit under TRIA essentially in proportion to applicable federal loss limitations that may be available to its ceding insurer customers. Although Wes-FIC’s (and thus Wesco’s) exposure to terrorism losses as a reinsurer or insurer, whether or not mitigated by TRIA, cannot be predicted, Wes-FIC’s management does not believe it likely that, on a worst-case basis, Wes-FIC’s shareholder’s equity would be severely impacted by future terrorism-related insurance losses under reinsurance or insurance contracts currently in effect.

      Although Wes-FIC has no active super-catastrophe reinsurance contracts in force, its management has indicated that Wes-FIC will likely have opportunities to participate in such business from time to time in the future. Management believes that an insurer in the reinsurance business must maintain large net worth in relation to annual premiums in order to remain solvent when called upon to pay claims when a loss occurs. In this regard, Wes-FIC is believed to operate differently from many other reinsurers in that risks it writes are entirely retained, while other reinsurers may retrocede portions of the risks to other reinsurers, thereby assuming contingent risks that such reinsurers will not be able to respond if called upon to pay off on risks reinsured. In this respect Wes-FIC and KBS are competitively well positioned, inasmuch as their net premiums written for calendar 2003 amounted to only 4% of their combined statutory surplus, compared to an industry average of about 130% based on figures reported for 2002.

      Wes-FIC is also licensed to write “direct” insurance business (as distinguished from reinsurance) in Nebraska, Utah and Iowa, and may write direct insurance in the non-admitted excess and surplus lines market in several other states, but the volume written to date has been minimal.

      In July 1996, Wes-FIC purchased KBS for approximately $80 million in cash. KBS provides specialized insurance coverage to more than 20% of the banks in the United States, mostly small and medium-sized banks in the Midwest. It is licensed to write business in 28 states. KBS is also subject to regulation by the Department of the Treasury. Its product line for financial institutions includes policies for crime insurance, check kiting fraud indemnification, Internet banking catastrophe theft insurance, directors and officers liability, bank employment practices, and bank insurance agents professional errors and omissions indemnity, as well as deposit guaranty bonds, which insure deposits in excess of federal deposit insurance limits. KBS, which for many years had minimized its risks arising from large losses through cessions to third party reinsurers, restructured its reinsurance program in 1998 in order to retain a much higher proportion of its premiums and risks of loss. Wesco’s

3

Table of Contents

      KBS markets its products in some states through exclusive, commissioned agents, and direct to insureds in other states. Inasmuch as the number of small midwestern banks is declining as the banking industry consolidates, KBS relies for growth on an extraordinary level of service provided by its dedicated employees and agents, and on new products such as deposit guaranty bonds, which were introduced in 1993 and currently account for approximately 45 percent of premiums written.

      A significant marketing advantage enjoyed by Berkshire’s insurance subsidiaries, including Wesco’s insurance segment, is the maintenance of extraordinary capital strength. The combined statutory surplus of Wesco’s insurance businesses totaled approximately $2 billion at December 31, 2003. This capital strength creates opportunities for the Wesco subsidiaries to participate in reinsurance and insurance contracts not necessarily available to many of their competitors.

      Standard & Poor’s Corporation, in recognition of Wes-FIC’s strong competitive position as a member of Berkshire’s group of insurance subsidiaries and its unusual capital strength, has assigned its highest rating, AAA, to Wes-FIC’s claims-paying ability. This rating recognizes the commitment of Wes-FIC’s management to a disciplined approach to underwriting and reserving, as well as Wes-FIC’s extremely strong capital base.

      Wesco’s and Wes-FIC’s boards are hopeful, but have no assurance, that the businesses of Wes-FIC and KBS will grow. They welcome the opportunity to participate in additional reinsurance retrocessions and other insurance arrangements with the Berkshire Insurance Group, as well as acquisitions of other insurance companies.

      Insurance companies are subject to regulation by the departments of insurance of the various states in which they write policies as well as the states in which they are domiciled and, if applicable, as is the case with KBS, by the Department of the Treasury. Regulations relate to, among other things, capital requirements, shareholder and policyholder dividend restrictions, reporting requirements, annual audits by independent accountants, periodic regulatory examinations, and limitations on the size and types of investments that can be made.

      Wes-FIC, which is operated by NICO, has no employees of its own. KBS has 16 employees.

FURNITURE RENTAL SEGMENT

      CORT, acquired in February 2000 by a subsidiary of Wesco, is the largest, and only national, provider of rental furniture, accessories and related services in the “rent-to-rent” (as opposed to “rent-to-own”) segment of the furniture industry. CORT rents high-quality furniture to corporate and individual customers who desire flexibility in meeting their temporary office, residential or trade show furnishing needs, and who typically do not seek to own such furniture. In addition, CORT sells previously rented furniture through company-owned clearance centers, thereby enabling it to regularly renew its inventory and update styles. CORT’s network of facilities (in 34 states and the District of Columbia) are 108 showrooms, 91 clearance centers and 84 warehouses, as well as three websites — www.cort1.com, www.relocationcentral.com and www.corttradeshow.com.

      CORT’s rent-to-rent business is differentiated from rent-to-own businesses primarily by the terms of the rental arrangements and the type of customer served. Rent-to-rent customers generally desire high-quality furniture to meet temporary needs, have established credit, and pay on a monthly basis. Typically, these customers do not seek to acquire the property on a permanent basis. In a typical rent-to-rent transaction, the customer agrees to rent furniture for a minimum of three months, subject to extension by the customer on a month-to-month basis. By contrast, rent-to-own arrangements are generally made by customers lacking established credit whose objective is the eventual ownership of the property; these transactions are typically entered into on a month-to-month basis and may require weekly rental payments.

4

Table of Contents

      CORT’s customer base includes Fortune 500 companies, small businesses, professionals, and owners and operators of apartment communities. CORT’s management believes its size, national presence, brand awareness, consistently high level of customer service, product quality and breadth of selection, depth and experience of management, and efficient clearance centers have been key contributors to the company’s success. CORT offers a wide variety of office and home furnishings, including commercial panel systems, televisions, housewares and accessories. CORT emphasizes its ability to furnish an apartment, home or entire suite of offices with high-quality furniture, housewares and accessories in two business days. CORT’s objective is to build upon these core competencies and competitive advantages to increase revenues and market share. Key to CORT’s growth strategies are (1) expanding its corporate customer base, (2) enhancing its ability to capture an increasing number of Internet customers through its on-line catalog and other web services, (3) making selective acquisitions, and (4) continuing to develop various products and services.

      In order to capitalize on the significant profit potential available from longer average rental periods and the higher average monthly rent typically available for office products, CORT’s strategy is to place greater emphasis on rentals of office furniture than on residential furniture. In order to promote longer office lease terms, CORT offers lower rates on leases where lease terms exceed six months. A significant portion of CORT’s residential furniture rentals are derived from corporate relocations and temporary assignments, as new and transferred employees of CORT’s corporate customers enter into leases for residential furniture. Sales personnel maintain contact with corporate relocation departments and present the possibility of obtaining fully furnished rental apartments as a lower-cost alternative to hotel accommodations. Thus, CORT offers its corporate rental customers a way to reduce the costs of corporate relocation while developing residential business with new and transferred employees.

      CORT’s Relocation Central Corporation subsidiary (“Relocation Central”), formed in 2001, provides the nation’s largest apartment locator service through its website (www.relocationcentral.com), customer call center and walk-in locations. More than 350 apartment communities refer their tenants to CORT. In an effort to sharply reduce the operating losses that Relocation Central has been sustaining during its start-up phase, CORT is in process of reorganizing Relocation Central’s operations, including relocating some of its operations to CORT facilities. As the two companies more closely align their marketing and sales efforts, CORT believes it will expand referral opportunities to new customer markets as well as expand business with corporate customers, who require the services of an apartment/home locator service and an interim provider of quality home and office furnishings.

      CORT also provides short-term rentals for trade shows and conventions. Its www.corttradeshow.com website assists in providing information to and gathering leads from prospects.

      Until the economy weakened beginning late in 2000, CORT was benefiting from an increasing demand for furniture rental services. CORT’s management believes that this favorable trend was caused by continued growth in management and professional employment, the increasing importance to American business of flexibility and outsourcing, and the impact of a more mobile and transitory population. CORT’s management attributes the decline in business to continued weakness of job growth in the economy, exacerbated by the terrorist activity on September 11, 2001. In 2003, CORT’s management reduced the number of facilities and employees, and it is believed CORT is well positioned to benefit from domestic job growth and any corresponding economic expansion.

      The rent-to-rent segment of the furniture rental industry is highly competitive. There are several large regional as well as a number of smaller regional and local rent-to-rent competitors. In addition, numerous retailers offer residential and office furniture under rent-to-own arrangements. Management believes that the principal competitive factors in the furniture rental industry are product value, furniture condition, extent of furniture selection, terms of rental agreement, speed of delivery, exchange privilege, option to purchase, deposit requirements and customer service.

5

Table of Contents

      The majority of CORT’s furniture sales revenue is from its clearance center sales. The remaining furniture sales revenue is derived primarily from lease conversions and sales of new furniture. The sale of previously leased furniture allows CORT to control inventory quantities and to maintain inventory quality at showroom level. On the average, furniture is typically sold through the clearance centers three years after its initial purchase by CORT.

      With respect to sales of furniture through its clearance centers, CORT competes with numerous new and used furniture retailers, some of which are larger than CORT. CORT’s management believes that price and value are its principal competitive advantages in this activity.

      CORT and Relocation Central have approximately 2,660 full-time employees, including 50 union members. Management considers labor relations to be good.

INDUSTRIAL SEGMENT

      Precision Steel, acquired in 1979, and one of its subsidiaries operate steel service centers in the Chicago and Charlotte metropolitan areas. The service centers buy stainless steel, low carbon sheet and strip steel, coated metals, spring steel, brass, phosphor bronze, aluminum and other metals, cut these metals to order, and sell them to a wide variety of customers.

      The service center business is highly competitive. Precision Steel’s annual sales volume of approximately 24 thousand tons of flat rolled products compares with the domestic steel service industry’s annual volume of approximately 13 million tons of comparable products. Precision Steel competes not only with other service centers but also with mills which supply metal to the service centers. Sales competition exists in the areas of price, quality, availability and speed of delivery. Because it is willing to sell in relatively small quantities, Precision Steel has been able to compete in geographic areas distant from its service center facilities. Competitive pressure is intensified by imports, a shift to production abroad and an increasing tendency of domestic manufacturers to use less costly materials in making parts.

      Precision Brand Products, Inc. (“Precision Brand”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Precision Steel that is also located in the Chicago area, manufactures shim stock and other toolroom specialty items, and distributes a line of hose clamps and threaded rod. These products are sold under the Precision Brand and DuPage names nationwide, generally through industrial distributors. This business is highly competitive. Precision Brand’s share of the toolroom specialty products market is believed to approximate .5%; statistics are not available with respect to its share of the market for hose clamps and threaded rod.

      Steel service raw materials are obtained principally from major domestic steel mills, and their availability was good until very recently, when the market drifted into near chaos caused by shortages. It is not clear how this is going to work out. Thus far in 2004, Precision Steel’s prices and profits have been higher. Precision Steel’s service centers maintain extensive inventories in order to meet customer demand for prompt deliveries; typically, processed metals are delivered to the customer within one week. Precision Brand normally maintains inventories adequate to allow for off-the-shelf service to customers within 24 hours.

      The industrial segment businesses are subject to economic cycles. These businesses are not dependent on a few large customers. The backlog of steel service orders increased to $4.7 million at December 31, 2003 from $4.1 million at December 31, 2002.

      There are 205 full-time employees engaged in the industrial segment businesses, about 40% of whom are members of unions. Management considers labor relations to be good.

ACTIVITIES NOT IDENTIFIED WITH A BUSINESS SEGMENT

      Certain of Wesco’s activities are not identified with any business segment. These extraneous operations include (1) investment activity unrelated to the insurance segment, (2) management of

6

Table of Contents

      Six full-time employees are engaged in the activities of Wesco and MS Property.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

      Wesco’s Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, and amendments thereto, may be accessed soon after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), through Wesco’s website, www.wescofinancial.com, or the SEC’s, www.sec.gov.

      MS Property owns a business block in Pasadena, California situated between the city hall and a large shopping mall. The mall has been redeveloped to include residential units and a multiscreen movie theater. The block’s improvements include a nine-story office building that was constructed in 1964 and has approximately 125,000 square feet of net rentable area, and a multistory garage with space for 425 vehicles. Of the 125,000 square feet of space in the office building, approximately 5,000 square feet are used by MS Property or leased to Blue Chip or Wesco. The remaining space is almost fully leased to outside parties, including Citibank (the ground floor tenant), law firms and others, under agreements expiring at dates extending to 2008. Adjacent to the building and garage is a vacant parcel; MS Property is seeking city approval of its plans to redevelop the parcel, together with a vacant parcel of land it owns in the next block.

      MS Property also owns several buildings that are leased to various small businesses in a small shopping center in Southern California.

      Wes-FIC’s place of business is the Omaha, Nebraska headquarters office of NICO.

      KBS leases 5,100 square feet of office space in a multistory office building in Topeka, Kansas under a lease that expires in 2007.

      CORT leases 23,800 square feet of office space in a multistory office building in Fairfax, Virginia, which it uses as its headquarters. It has an option to renew the lease for five years beyond its 2006 expiration.

      CORT carries out its rental, sales and warehouse operations in metropolitan areas in 34 states and the District of Columbia through 186 facilities, of which 20 were owned and the balance leased as of December 31, 2003. The leased facilities’ lease terms expire at dates ranging from 2004 to 2015. CORT has generally been able to extend expiration dates of its leases or obtain suitable alternative facilities on satisfactory terms. As leases expire, CORT has been eliminating redundant locations. Where locations are desirable, its management has been attempting to combine rental, clearance and warehouse operations rather than retain separate showrooms, because business and residential customers have been increasingly using the Internet, fax and telephone.

      CORT’s showrooms generally have 4,000 to 5,000 square feet of floor space. CORT regularly reviews the presentation and appearance of its furniture showrooms and clearance centers and periodically improves or refurbishes them to enhance their attractiveness to customers.

      Relocation Central leases 3,800 square feet of office space in a multistory office building in Santa Clara, California, which it uses as its headquarters. The lease expires in February 2005. Its apartment locator services are situated in 36 leased facilities in 15 metropolitan areas in 14 states under leases expiring at dates ranging from 2004 to 2007, as well as in ten of CORT’s showrooms.

      Precision Steel and its subsidiaries own three buildings housing their plant and office facilities, with usable area approximately as follows: 138,000 square feet in Franklin Park, Illinois; 63,000 square feet in Charlotte, North Carolina; and 59,000 square feet in Downers Grove, Illinois.

7

Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

      Wesco and its subsidiaries are not involved in any legal proceedings that are expected to result in detrimental financial impact material to its shareholders’ equity. However, see Note 8 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for an explanation of environmental actions brought against a subsidiary that could materially impact consolidated net income in any given fiscal period.

      None.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters

      Wesco’s capital stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange.

      The following table sets forth quarterly ranges of composite prices for American Stock Exchange trading of Wesco shares for 2003 and 2002, based on data reported by the American Stock Exchange, as well as cash dividends paid by Wesco on each outstanding share:

      There were approximately 550 shareholders of record of Wesco’s capital stock as of the close of business on March 1, 2004. It is estimated that approximately 6,200 additional Wesco shareholders held shares of Wesco’s capital stock in street name at that date.

8

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

      Set forth below and on the following page are selected consolidated financial data for Wesco and its subsidiaries. For additional financial information, attention is directed to Wesco’s audited 2003 consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report. (Amounts are in thousands except for amounts per share.)

9

Table of Contents