Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x		QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from _________________ to ___________________

Commission File Number: 333-43129

BIG 5 CORP.

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (310) 536-0611

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports). Yes [X] No [   ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

     There were 1,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share outstanding at August 14, 2002.

Table of Contents

BIG 5 CORP.

INDEX

-2-

Table of Contents

BIG 5 CORP.

Condensed Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

BIG 5 CORP.

Condensed Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

-4-

Table of Contents

BIG 5 CORP.

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

-5-

Table of Contents

BIG 5 CORP.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Presentation and Description of Business

     We operate in one business segment, as a sporting goods retailer under the Big 5 Sporting Goods name carrying a broad range of hardlines, softlines and footwear, operating 261 stores at June 30, 2002 in California, Washington, Arizona, Oregon, Texas, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Colorado. We are wholly owned by Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation, our parent company.

     In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to present fairly and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) the financial position as of June 30, 2002 and December 30, 2001 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001. It should be understood that accounting measurements at interim dates inherently involve greater reliance on estimates than those at fiscal year-end. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission; however, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001.

(2) Reclassifications

     Certain prior year balances in the accompanying condensed financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

(3) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     On June 29, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets and requires that goodwill amortization be discontinued and replaced with periodic tests of impairment. A two-step impairment test is used first to identify potential goodwill impairment and then to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any.

     SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Impairment losses that arise due to the initial application of this standard are reported as a

-6-

Table of Contents

cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, which must be completed within six months of the effective date of the standard, will identify potential goodwill impairment. The second step of the goodwill impairment test, which must be completed prior to the issuance of a company’s next annual financial statements, will measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any.

     In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill amortization was discontinued as of December 31, 2001. There was no cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle upon adoption.

     The following adjusts reported net income to exclude goodwill amortization:

(dollars in thousands)

     In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which provides new guidance on the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of and also broadens the definition of what constitutes a discontinued operation and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective December 31, 2001, and the adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

(4) Related Party Transactions

     During the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2002, we, on behalf of our parent company, repurchased $2.5 million ($2.8 million face value) of our parent company’s senior discount notes due 2008. Subsequent to this purchase, amounts due from our parent company in connection with this purchase were forgiven, resulting in a non-cash dividend to our parent of $2.5 million.

-7-

Table of Contents

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

DISCUSSION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies require us to make significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our unaudited condensed financial statements.

Valuation of Inventory

     We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Management has evaluated the current level of inventories in comparison to planned sales volume and other factors and based on this evaluation, has recorded adjustments to cost of goods sold for estimated decreases in value. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual results if future economic conditions, consumer demand and competitive environments differ from our expectations. We are not aware of any events or changes in demand or price that would indicate to us that our inventory valuation may be too high at this time.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

     Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net cash flows estimated by us to be generated by these assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We are not aware of any events or changes in circumstances that would indicate to us that our long-lived assets are over-valued or that would require an impairment consideration at this time.

-8-

Table of Contents

     RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year.

     13 Weeks Ended June 30, 2002 Compared to 13 Weeks Ended July 1, 2001

     The following table sets forth selected items from our operating results as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated: