Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 |
| |
|
Or |
| |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number: 1-14260
The GEO Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
65-0043078 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
| |
One Park Place, Suite 700, 621 Northwest
53rd Street
Boca Raton, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
33487-8242
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number (including area code):
(561) 893-0101
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
| |
|
|
| Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
| |
|
|
| Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| |
|
|
|
None
|
|
None |
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an
accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the 7,040,265 shares of
common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 27, 2004 (based on the last reported sales price of
such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date of
$20.90 per share) was approximately $147,141,539. As of
March 18, 2005 the registrant had 9,532,204 shares of
common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the registrants definitive proxy
statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for its 2005 annual meeting of shareholders
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
As used in this report, the terms we,
us, our, GEO and the
Company refer to The GEO Group, Inc., its
consolidated subsidiaries and its unconsolidated affiliates,
unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise
requires.
General
We are a leading provider of government-outsourced services
specializing in the management of correctional, detention and
mental health facilities in the United States, Australia, New
Zealand, South Africa and Canada. We operate a broad range of
correctional and detention facilities including maximum, medium
and minimum security prisons, immigration detention centers,
minimum security detention centers and mental health facilities.
Our correctional and detention management services involve the
provision of security, administrative, rehabilitation,
education, health and food services, primarily at adult male
correctional and detention facilities. Our mental health
management services involve improving the quality of care,
innovative programming and active patient treatment. We also
develop new facilities based on contract awards, using our
project development expertise and experience to design,
construct and finance what we believe are state-of-the-art
facilities that maximize security and efficiency.
As of January 2, 2005, we operated a total of
43 correctional, detention and mental health facilities and
had over 35,266 beds under management or for which we had
been awarded contracts. We maintained an average facility
occupancy rate of 99.2% for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2005. For the fiscal year ended January 2,
2005, we had consolidated revenues of $614.5 million and
consolidated operating income of $39.3 million. Financial
information about our operations in different geographic regions
appears in Item 8. Financial Statements-Note 15
Business Segment and Geographic Information.
Our business was founded in 1984 as a division of The Wackenhut
Corporation, or TWC, and was incorporated in the State of
Florida in 1988. On May 8, 2002, TWC consummated a merger
with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Group 4 Falck A/S,
referred to as Group 4 Falck. As a result of the merger,
Group 4 Falck became the indirect beneficial owner of
TWCs 12 million share majority interest in GEO. On
July 9, 2003, we purchased all 12 million shares of
our common stock from Group 4 Falck. On November 25,
2003, our corporate name was changed from Wackenhut
Corrections Corporation to The GEO Group, Inc.
We formerly had, through our Australian subsidiary, a contract
with the Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous
Affairs, or DIMIA, for the management and operation of
Australias immigration centers. In 2003, the contract was
not renewed, and effective February 29, 2004, we completed
the transition of the contract and exited the management and
operation of the DIMIA centers. The accompanying discussion and
consolidated financial statements and notes reflect the
operations of DIMIA as a discontinued operation in all periods
presented.
Additional information regarding significant events affecting us
during the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 is set forth
in Item 7 below under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Company Operations
We offer services that go beyond simply housing offenders in a
safe and secure manner for our correctional and detention
facilities. We offer a wide array of in-facility rehabilitative
and educational programs. Inmates at most of our facilities can
also receive basic education through academic programs designed
to improve inmates literacy levels and enhance the
opportunity to acquire General Education Development
certificates. Most of our managed facilities also offer
vocational training for in-demand occupations to inmates who
lack marketable job skills. In addition, most of our managed
facilities offer life skills/transition planning programs that
provide inmates job search training and employment skills, anger
2
management skills, health education, financial responsibility
training, parenting skills and other skills associated with
becoming productive citizens. We also offer counseling,
education and/or treatment to inmates with alcohol and drug
abuse problems at most of the domestic facilities we manage.
Our mental health facilities management services primarily
involve the provision of acute mental health and related
administrative services to mentally ill patients that have been
placed under public sector supervision and care. At these mental
health facilities, we employ psychiatrists, physicians, nurses,
counselors, social workers and other trained personnel to
deliver active psychiatric treatment which is designed to
diagnose, treat and rehabilitate patients for community
reintegration.
Quality of Operations
We operate each facility in accordance with our company-wide
policies and procedures and with the standards and guidelines
required under the relevant management contract. For many
facilities, the standards and guidelines include those
established by the American Correctional Association, or ACA.
The ACA is an independent organization of corrections
professionals, which establishes correctional facility standards
and guidelines that are generally acknowledged as a benchmark by
governmental agencies responsible for correctional facilities.
Many of our contracts for facilities in the United States
require us to seek and maintain ACA accreditation of the
facility. We have sought and received ACA accreditation and
re-accreditation for all such facilities. We achieved a median
re-accreditation score of 99.3% in fiscal year 2004. We have
also achieved and maintained certification by the Joint
Commission on Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations, or
JCAHO, for both of our mental health facilities and two of our
correctional facilities. We have been successful in achieving
and maintaining accreditation under the National Commission on
Correctional Health Care, or NCCHC, in a majority of the
facilities that we currently operate. The NCCHC accreditation is
a voluntary process which we have used to establish
comprehensive health care policies and procedures to meet and
adhere to the ACA standards. The NCCHC standards, in most cases,
exceed ACA Health Care Standards.
Marketing and Business Proposals
Our primary potential customers are governmental agencies
responsible for local, state and federal correctional facilities
in the United States and governmental agencies responsible for
correctional facilities in Australia, New Zealand and South
Africa. Other primary customers include local agencies in the
U.S. responsible for mental health facilities, and other
foreign governmental agencies.
Governmental agencies responsible for correctional and detention
facilities generally procure goods and services through requests
for proposals. A typical request for proposal requires bidders
to provide detailed information, including, but not limited to,
descriptions of the following: the services to be provided by
the bidder, its experience and qualifications, and the price at
which the bidder is willing to provide the services (which
services may include the renovation, improvement or expansion of
an existing facility, or the planning, design and construction
of a new facility).
If the project meets our profile for new projects, we then will
submit a written response to the request for proposal. We
estimate that we typically spend between $100,000 and $200,000
when responding to a request for proposal. We have engaged and
intend in the future to engage independent consultants to assist
us in developing privatization opportunities and in responding
to requests for proposals, monitoring the legislative and
business climate, and maintaining relationships with existing
clients.
Our state and local experience has been that a period of
approximately 60 to 90 days is generally required from the
issuance of a request for proposal to the submission of our
response to the request for proposals; that between one and four
months elapse between the submission of our response and the
agencys award for a contract; and that between one and
four months elapse between the award of a contract and the
commencement of construction or management of the facility. If
the facility for which an award has been made must be
constructed, our experience is that construction usually takes
between 9 and 24 months, depending on the size and
complexity of the project; therefore, management of a newly
3
constructed facility typically commences between 10 and
28 months after the governmental agencys award.
Our federal experience has been that a period of approximately
60 to 90 days is generally required from the issuance of a
request for proposal to the submission of our response to the
request for proposals; that between twelve and eighteen months
elapse between the submission of our response and the
agencys award for a contract; and that between four and
eighteen weeks elapse between the award of a contract and the
commencement of construction or management of the facility. If
the facility for which an award has been made must be
constructed, our experience is that construction usually takes
between 9 and 24 months, depending on the size and
complexity of the project; therefore, management of a newly
constructed facility typically commences between 10 and
28 months after the governmental agencys award.
Facility Design, Construction and Finance
We offer governmental agencies consultation and management
services relating to the design and construction of new
correctional and detention facilities and the redesign and
renovation of older facilities. As of January 2, 2005, we
had provided services for the design and construction of
forty-two facilities and for the redesign and renovation of six
facilities.
Contracts to design and construct or to redesign and renovate
facilities may be financed in a variety of ways. Governmental
agencies may finance the construction of such facilities through
the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
a one time general revenue appropriation by the governmental
agency for the cost of the new facility; |
| |
| |
|
general obligation bonds that are secured by either a limited or
unlimited tax levy by the issuing governmental entity; or |
| |
| |
|
revenue bonds or certificates of participation secured by an
annual lease payment that is subject to annual or bi-annual
legislative appropriations. |
We may also act as a source of financing or as a facilitator
with respect to the financing of the construction of a facility.
In these cases, the construction of such facilities may be
financed through various methods including, but not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
funds from equity offerings of our stock; |
| |
| |
|
cash flows from operations; |
| |
| |
|
borrowings from banks or other institutions (which may or may
not be subject to government guarantees in the event of contract
termination); or |
| |
| |
|
lease arrangements with third parties. |
If the project is financed using direct governmental
appropriations, with proceeds of the sale of bonds or other
obligations issued prior to the award of the project or by us
directly, then financing is in place when the contract relating
to the construction or renovation project is executed. If the
project is financed using project-specific tax-exempt bonds or
other obligations, the construction contract is generally
subject to the sale of such bonds or obligations. Generally,
substantial expenditures for construction will not be made on
such a project until the tax-exempt bonds or other obligations
are sold; and, if such bonds or obligations are not sold,
construction and therefore, management of the facility, may
either be delayed until alternative financing is procured or the
development of the project will be suspended or entirely
cancelled. If the project is self-financed by us, then financing
is generally in place prior to the commencement of construction.
Under our construction and design management contracts, we
generally agree to be responsible for overall project
development and completion. We typically act as the primary
developer on construction contracts for facilities and
subcontract with national general contractors. Where possible,
we subcontract
4
with construction companies that we have worked with previously.
We make use of an in-house staff of architects and operational
experts from various correctional disciplines (e.g. security,
medical service, food service, inmate programs and facility
maintenance) as part of the team that participates from
conceptual design through final construction of the project.
This staff coordinates all aspects of the development with
subcontractors and provides site-specific services.
When designing a facility, our architects seek to utilize, with
appropriate modifications, prototype designs we have used in
developing prior projects. We believe that the use of these
designs allows us to reduce cost overruns and construction
delays and to reduce the number of officers required to provide
security at a facility, thus controlling costs both to construct
and to manage the facility. Our facility designs also maintain
security because they increase the area under direct
surveillance by correctional officers and make use of additional
electronic surveillance.
Competitive Strengths
|
|
|
Regional Operating Structure |
We operate three regional U.S. offices and three
international offices that provide administrative oversight and
support to our correctional and detention facilities and allow
us to maintain close relationships with our clients and
suppliers. Each of our three regional U.S. offices is
responsible for the facilities located within a defined
geographic area. The regional offices perform regular internal
audits of the facilities in order to ensure continued compliance
with the underlying contracts, applicable accreditation
standards, governmental regulations and our internal policies
and procedures.
|
|
|
Long Term Relationships with High-Quality Government
Customers |
We have developed long term relationships with our government
customers and have been successful at retaining our facility
management contracts. We have provided correctional and
detention management services to the United States Federal
Government for 18 years, the State of California for
16 years, the State of Texas for 16 years, various
Australian state government entities for 13 years and the
State of Florida for 10 years. These customers accounted
for approximately 65.7% of our consolidated revenues for the
fiscal year ended January 2, 2005. Our strong operating
track record has enabled us to achieve a high renewal rate for
contracts. Our government customers typically satisfy their
payment obligations to us through budgetary appropriations.
|
|
|
Full-Service Facility Developer |
We believe that our ability to provide comprehensive facility
development and design services enables us to retain existing
customers seeking to update their facilities and to attract new
customers by demonstrating the benefits of privatization. We
have developed an expertise in the design, construction and
financing of high quality correctional, detention and mental
health facilities.
|
|
|
Experienced, Proven Senior Management Team |
Our top three senior executives have over 48 years of
combined industry experience, have worked together at our
company for more than 13 years and have established a track
record of growth and profitability. Under their leadership, our
annual consolidated revenues have grown from $40.0 million
in 1991 to $614.5 million in 2004. Our Chief Executive
Officer, George C. Zoley, is one of the pioneers of the
industry, having developed and opened what we believe was one of
the first privatized detention facilities in the U.S. in
1986. In addition to senior management, our operational and
facility level management has significant operational expertise.
Our wardens have an average of 27 years of correctional and
detention industry experience.
5
Business Strategies
|
|
|
Provide High Quality, Essential Services at Lower
Costs |
Our objective is to provide federal, state and local
governmental agencies with high quality, essential services at a
lower cost than they themselves could achieve.
|
|
|
Maintain Disciplined Operating Approach |
We manage our business on a contract by contract basis in order
to maximize our operating margins. We typically refrain from
pursuing contracts that we do not believe will yield attractive
profit margins in relation to the associated operational risks.
Generally, we do not engage in speculative development and do
not build facilities without having a corresponding management
contract award in place. In addition, we have elected not to
enter certain international markets with a history of economic
and political instability. We believe that our strategy of
emphasizing lower risk, higher profit opportunities helps us to
consistently deliver strong operational performance, lower our
costs and increase our overall profitability.
|
|
|
Expand Into Complementary Government-Outsourced
Services |
We intend to capitalize on our long term relationships with
governmental agencies to continue to grow our correctional,
detention and mental health facilities management services and
to become a preferred provider of complementary
government-outsourced services. We believe that government
outsourcing of currently internalized functions will increase
largely as a result of the public sectors desire to
maintain quality service levels amid governmental budgetary
constraints. Based on our expansion into the mental health
services sector, we believe that we are well positioned to
continue to deliver higher quality services at lower costs in
new areas of privatization.
|
|
|
Pursue International Growth Opportunities |
As a global international provider of privatized correctional
services, we are able to capitalize on opportunities to operate
existing or new facilities on behalf of foreign governments. We
currently have operations in Australia, New Zealand, South
Africa and Canada. We intend to further penetrate the current
markets we operate in and to expand into new international
markets which we deem attractive. During the fourth quarter of
2004, we opened an office in the United Kingdom to vigorously
pursue new business opportunities in England, Wales and Scotland.
Facilities
The following table summarizes certain information with respect
to facilities that GEO (or a subsidiary or joint venture of
GEOs) operated under a management contract or had an award
to manage as of January 2, 2005.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Design | |
|
|
|
|
|
Security | |
|
Commencement | |
|
|
|
Renewal | |
|
Type of | |
| Facility Name & Location |
|
Capacity | |
|
Customer |
|
Facility Type | |
|
Level | |
|
of Current Term | |
|
Duration | |
|
Option | |
|
Ownership | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Domestic Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen Correctional Center
Kinder, Louisiana
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
LA DPS&C |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
Medium/ Maximum |
|
|
September 2003 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
One, Two-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Aurora ICE Processing Center Aurora, Colorado
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
ICE |
|
Federal Detention Facility |
|
Minimum/ Medium |
|
|
September 2004 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
Four, Six Months |
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Bridgeport Correctional Center Bridgeport, Texas
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
September 2004 |
|
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
|
One, One- year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Broward Transition Center Deerfield Beach, Florida
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
ICE/ Broward County |
|
Federal & Local Detention Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
October 2004/ October 2004 |
|
1 year/ 1 year |
|
Four, One-year/ Unlimited, One-Year |
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
6
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Design | |
|
|
|
|
|
Security | |
|
Commencement | |
|
|
|
Renewal | |
|
Type of | |
| Facility Name & Location |
|
Capacity | |
|
Customer |
|
Facility Type | |
|
Level | |
|
of Current Term | |
|
Duration | |
|
Option | |
|
Ownership | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Central Texas Detention Facility
San Antonio, Texas(2)
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
Bexar County/ TDCJ |
|
Federal & Local Detention Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
January 2002 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
One, Two-year |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Central Valley MCCF
McFarland, California
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
CDC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
December 1997 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Cleveland Correctional Center
Cleveland, Texas
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
January 2004 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Coke County JJC
Bronte, Texas
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
TYC |
|
State Juvenile Correctional Facility |
|
Medium/ Maximum |
|
|
September 2004 |
|
|
|
2 year |
|
|
Unlimited, Two-year |
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Desert View MCCF
Adelanto, California
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
CDC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
December 1997 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
East Mississippi Correctional Facility Meridian, Mississippi
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
MDOC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
Mental Health |
|
|
April 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
|
One, Two-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
George W. Hill Correctional Facility Thornton, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
Delaware County |
|
Local Detention Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
June 2003 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
Unlimited, Three- year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Golden State MCCF
McFarland, California
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
CDC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
December 1997 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Guadalupe County Correctional Facility Santa Rosa, New Mexico(3)
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
NMCD |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
June 2004 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
Unlimited, 1-year |
|
|
Own |
|
|
Karnes Correctional Center
Karnes City, Texas(2)
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
Karnes County |
|
Federal & Local Detention Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
January 1998 |
|
|
|
30 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Kyle Correctional Center
Kyle, Texas
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
September 2004 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
One, One- year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Lawrenceville Correctional Center Lawrenceville, Virginia
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
VDOC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
March 2003 |
|
|
|
5 year |
|
|
|
Ten, One- year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Lawton Correctional Facility Lawton, Oklahoma
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
ODOC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
July 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
|
Four, One-year |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Lea County Correctional Facility Hobbs, New Mexico(3)
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
NMCD |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
June 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
Unlimited, 1-year |
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Lockhart Secure Work Program Facilities Lockhart, Texas
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
January 2003 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Marshall County Correctional Facility Holly Springs, Mississippi
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
MDOC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
January 2004 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
Two, One-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
McFarland CCF,
McFarland, California
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
CDC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
January 2005 |
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Michigan Youth Correctional Facility Baldwin, Michigan
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
MIDOC |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
July 2003 |
|
|
|
4 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Own |
|
|
Moore Haven Correctional Facility Moore Haven, Florida
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
DMS |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
July 2002 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
Unlimited, Two-year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
7
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Design | |
|
|
|
|
|
Security | |
|
Commencement | |
|
|
|
Renewal | |
|
Type of | |
| Facility Name & Location |
|
Capacity | |
|
Customer |
|
Facility Type | |
|
Level | |
|
of Current Term | |
|
Duration | |
|
Option | |
|
Ownership | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
North Texas ISF
Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
March 2004 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
Four, One-year |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
Queens Private Correctional Facility Jamaica, New York
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
ICE |
|
Federal Detention Facility Federal & State |
|
Minimum/ Medium |
|
|
April 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
Three, One-year |
|
|
Lease-CPV |
|
|
Reeves County Detention Complex Pecos, Texas(2)
|
|
|
3,064 |
|
|
Reeves County |
|
Federal & State Correctional Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
November 2003 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Rivers Correctional Institution Winton, North Carolina
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
BOP |
|
Federal Correctional Facility |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
March 2001 |
|
|
|
4 years |
|
|
Seven, One-year |
|
|
Own |
|
|
Sanders Estes Unit
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
TDCJ |
|
State Correctional Facility |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
January 2004 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
Two, One-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
South Bay Correctional Facility South Bay, Florida
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
DMS |
|
State Correctional Facility Federal |
|
Medium/ Close |
|
|
June 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
Unlimited, Two-year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Taft Correctional Institution
Taft, California
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
BOP |
|
Correctional Facility |
|
|
Low/ Minimum |
|
|
|
August 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
Three, One-year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Val Verde Correctional Facility Del Rio, Texas(2)
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
Val Verde County |
|
Federal & Local Detention Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
January 2001 |
|
|
|
20 years |
|
|
Unlimited, Five-year |
|
|
Own |
|
|
Western Region Detention Facility at San Diego
San Diego, California
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
USMS/ ICE |
|
Federal Detention Facility |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
July 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
|
Two, One-year |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
| |
|
International Contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre Wacol, Australia
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
QLD DCS |
|
Reception & Remand Centre |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
December 2002 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
One, Five-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Auckland Central Remand Prison Auckland, New Zealand
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
NZ DOC |
|
|
National Jail |
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
July 2000 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
One, Two-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Fulham Correctional Centre Victoria, Australia
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
VIC MOC |
|
|
State Prison |
|
|
Minimum/ Medium |
|
|
September 2003 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
Four, Three- year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Junee Correctional Centre
Junee, Australia
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
NSW |
|
|
State Prison |
|
|
Minimum/ Medium |
|
|
April 2001 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
One, Three- year |
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Kutama-Sinthumule Correctional Centre Northern Province,
Republic of South Africa
|
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
RSA DCS |
|
|
National Prison |
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
July 1999 |
|
|
|
25 years |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Melbourne Custody Centre Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
VIC CC |
|
|
State Jail |
|
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
March 2003 |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
|
One, One- year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
New Brunswick Youth Centre Mirimachi, Canada(4)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
PNB |
|
Province Juvenile Facility |
|
|
All levels |
|
|
|
October 1997 |
|
|
|
25 years |
|
|
|
One, Ten- year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
|
Pacific Shores Healthcare
Victoria, Australia(5)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
VIC CV |
|
Health Care Services |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
December 2003 |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
Four, Six- months |
|
|
Manage only |
|
| |
|
Mental Health Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlantic Shores Hospital Fort Lauderdale, Florida(6)
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
N/A |
|
Private Psychiatric Hospital |
|
Mental Health |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Own |
|
|
South Florida State Hospital Pembroke Pines, Florida
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
DCF |
|
State Psychiatric Hospital |
|
Mental Health |
|
|
July 2003 |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
Two, Five-year |
|
|
|
Manage only |
|
8
Customer Legend:
| |
|
|
| Abbreviation |
|
Customer |
| |
|
|
|
LA DPS&C
|
|
Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections |
|
ICE
|
|
Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement |
|
TDCJ
|
|
Texas Department of Criminal Justice |
|
CDC
|
|
California Department of Corrections |
|
TYC
|
|
Texas Youth Commission |
|
MDOC
|
|
Mississippi Department of Corrections (East
Mississippi & Marshall County) |
|
NMCD
|
|
New Mexico Corrections Department |
|
VDOC
|
|
Virginia Department of Corrections |
|
ODOC
|
|