Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
     
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005
 
Or
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the transition period from           to
Commission file number: 1-14260
 
The GEO Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Florida
  65-0043078
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
One Park Place, Suite 700, 621 Northwest 53rd Street
Boca Raton, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices)
  33487-8242
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number (including area code):
(561) 893-0101
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
     
Title of Each Class   Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
     
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
  New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
     
Title of Each Class   Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
     
None
  None
      Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o
      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     þ
      Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yes þ          No o
      The aggregate market value of the 7,040,265 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 27, 2004 (based on the last reported sales price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date of $20.90 per share) was approximately $147,141,539. As of March 18, 2005 the registrant had 9,532,204 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
      Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for its 2005 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
             
        Page
         
 PART I
   Business     2  
       General     2  
       Company Operations     2  
       Quality of Operations     3  
       Marketing and Business Proposals     3  
       Facility Design, Construction and Finance     4  
       Competitive Strengths     5  
       Business Strategies     6  
       Facilities     6  
       Competition     10  
       Employees and Employee Training     10  
       Business Regulations and Legal Considerations     11  
       Insurance     11  
       Business Concentration     11  
       Securities and Exchange Commission     12  
   Properties     12  
   Legal Proceedings     12  
   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     13  
 
 PART II
   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     13  
       Equity Compensation Plan Information     13  
       Sales of Unregistered Securities     14  
   Selected Financial Data     15  
   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     15  
       Introduction     15  
       Critical Accounting Policies     18  
       Results of Operations     21  
       Financial Condition     26  
       Commitments and Contingencies     31  
       Forward Looking Statements — Safe Harbor     33  
       Risk Factors     34  
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     44  
   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     46  
       Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accountants     50  
       Consolidated Statements of Income     53  
       Consolidated Balance Sheets     54  
       Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     55  
       Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income     56  
       Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     57  
   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     90  
   Controls and Procedures     90  
   Other Information     90  
 
 PART III
 Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14     92  
 
 PART IV
  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules     92  
 Signatures     96  
 Amendment to the Senior Officer Retirement Plan
 Employment Agreement - John J. Bulfin
 Employment Agreement - Jorge A. Dominicis
 Employment Agreement - John M. Hurley
 Employment Agreement - Donald H. Keens
 Subsidiaries of the Company
 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
 Section 302 CEO Certification
 Section 302 CFO Certification
 Section 906 CEO Certification
 Section 906 CFO Certification

1


Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1. Business
      As used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “GEO” and the “Company” refer to The GEO Group, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and its unconsolidated affiliates, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.
General
      We are a leading provider of government-outsourced services specializing in the management of correctional, detention and mental health facilities in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada. We operate a broad range of correctional and detention facilities including maximum, medium and minimum security prisons, immigration detention centers, minimum security detention centers and mental health facilities. Our correctional and detention management services involve the provision of security, administrative, rehabilitation, education, health and food services, primarily at adult male correctional and detention facilities. Our mental health management services involve improving the quality of care, innovative programming and active patient treatment. We also develop new facilities based on contract awards, using our project development expertise and experience to design, construct and finance what we believe are state-of-the-art facilities that maximize security and efficiency.
      As of January 2, 2005, we operated a total of 43 correctional, detention and mental health facilities and had over 35,266 beds under management or for which we had been awarded contracts. We maintained an average facility occupancy rate of 99.2% for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005. For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005, we had consolidated revenues of $614.5 million and consolidated operating income of $39.3 million. Financial information about our operations in different geographic regions appears in “Item 8. Financial Statements-Note 15 Business Segment and Geographic Information.”
      Our business was founded in 1984 as a division of The Wackenhut Corporation, or TWC, and was incorporated in the State of Florida in 1988. On May 8, 2002, TWC consummated a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Group 4 Falck A/S, referred to as Group 4 Falck. As a result of the merger, Group 4 Falck became the indirect beneficial owner of TWC’s 12 million share majority interest in GEO. On July 9, 2003, we purchased all 12 million shares of our common stock from Group 4 Falck. On November 25, 2003, our corporate name was changed from “Wackenhut Corrections Corporation” to “The GEO Group, Inc”.
      We formerly had, through our Australian subsidiary, a contract with the Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, or DIMIA, for the management and operation of Australia’s immigration centers. In 2003, the contract was not renewed, and effective February 29, 2004, we completed the transition of the contract and exited the management and operation of the DIMIA centers. The accompanying discussion and consolidated financial statements and notes reflect the operations of DIMIA as a discontinued operation in all periods presented.
      Additional information regarding significant events affecting us during the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005 is set forth in Item 7 below under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Company Operations
      We offer services that go beyond simply housing offenders in a safe and secure manner for our correctional and detention facilities. We offer a wide array of in-facility rehabilitative and educational programs. Inmates at most of our facilities can also receive basic education through academic programs designed to improve inmates’ literacy levels and enhance the opportunity to acquire General Education Development certificates. Most of our managed facilities also offer vocational training for in-demand occupations to inmates who lack marketable job skills. In addition, most of our managed facilities offer life skills/transition planning programs that provide inmates job search training and employment skills, anger

2


Table of Contents

management skills, health education, financial responsibility training, parenting skills and other skills associated with becoming productive citizens. We also offer counseling, education and/or treatment to inmates with alcohol and drug abuse problems at most of the domestic facilities we manage.
      Our mental health facilities management services primarily involve the provision of acute mental health and related administrative services to mentally ill patients that have been placed under public sector supervision and care. At these mental health facilities, we employ psychiatrists, physicians, nurses, counselors, social workers and other trained personnel to deliver active psychiatric treatment which is designed to diagnose, treat and rehabilitate patients for community reintegration.
Quality of Operations
      We operate each facility in accordance with our company-wide policies and procedures and with the standards and guidelines required under the relevant management contract. For many facilities, the standards and guidelines include those established by the American Correctional Association, or ACA. The ACA is an independent organization of corrections professionals, which establishes correctional facility standards and guidelines that are generally acknowledged as a benchmark by governmental agencies responsible for correctional facilities. Many of our contracts for facilities in the United States require us to seek and maintain ACA accreditation of the facility. We have sought and received ACA accreditation and re-accreditation for all such facilities. We achieved a median re-accreditation score of 99.3% in fiscal year 2004. We have also achieved and maintained certification by the Joint Commission on Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations, or JCAHO, for both of our mental health facilities and two of our correctional facilities. We have been successful in achieving and maintaining accreditation under the National Commission on Correctional Health Care, or NCCHC, in a majority of the facilities that we currently operate. The NCCHC accreditation is a voluntary process which we have used to establish comprehensive health care policies and procedures to meet and adhere to the ACA standards. The NCCHC standards, in most cases, exceed ACA Health Care Standards.
Marketing and Business Proposals
      Our primary potential customers are governmental agencies responsible for local, state and federal correctional facilities in the United States and governmental agencies responsible for correctional facilities in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Other primary customers include local agencies in the U.S. responsible for mental health facilities, and other foreign governmental agencies.
      Governmental agencies responsible for correctional and detention facilities generally procure goods and services through requests for proposals. A typical request for proposal requires bidders to provide detailed information, including, but not limited to, descriptions of the following: the services to be provided by the bidder, its experience and qualifications, and the price at which the bidder is willing to provide the services (which services may include the renovation, improvement or expansion of an existing facility, or the planning, design and construction of a new facility).
      If the project meets our profile for new projects, we then will submit a written response to the request for proposal. We estimate that we typically spend between $100,000 and $200,000 when responding to a request for proposal. We have engaged and intend in the future to engage independent consultants to assist us in developing privatization opportunities and in responding to requests for proposals, monitoring the legislative and business climate, and maintaining relationships with existing clients.
      Our state and local experience has been that a period of approximately 60 to 90 days is generally required from the issuance of a request for proposal to the submission of our response to the request for proposals; that between one and four months elapse between the submission of our response and the agency’s award for a contract; and that between one and four months elapse between the award of a contract and the commencement of construction or management of the facility. If the facility for which an award has been made must be constructed, our experience is that construction usually takes between 9 and 24 months, depending on the size and complexity of the project; therefore, management of a newly

3


Table of Contents

constructed facility typically commences between 10 and 28 months after the governmental agency’s award.
      Our federal experience has been that a period of approximately 60 to 90 days is generally required from the issuance of a request for proposal to the submission of our response to the request for proposals; that between twelve and eighteen months elapse between the submission of our response and the agency’s award for a contract; and that between four and eighteen weeks elapse between the award of a contract and the commencement of construction or management of the facility. If the facility for which an award has been made must be constructed, our experience is that construction usually takes between 9 and 24 months, depending on the size and complexity of the project; therefore, management of a newly constructed facility typically commences between 10 and 28 months after the governmental agency’s award.
Facility Design, Construction and Finance
      We offer governmental agencies consultation and management services relating to the design and construction of new correctional and detention facilities and the redesign and renovation of older facilities. As of January 2, 2005, we had provided services for the design and construction of forty-two facilities and for the redesign and renovation of six facilities.
      Contracts to design and construct or to redesign and renovate facilities may be financed in a variety of ways. Governmental agencies may finance the construction of such facilities through the following:
  •  a one time general revenue appropriation by the governmental agency for the cost of the new facility;
 
  •  general obligation bonds that are secured by either a limited or unlimited tax levy by the issuing governmental entity; or
 
  •  revenue bonds or certificates of participation secured by an annual lease payment that is subject to annual or bi-annual legislative appropriations.
      We may also act as a source of financing or as a facilitator with respect to the financing of the construction of a facility. In these cases, the construction of such facilities may be financed through various methods including, but not limited to, the following:
  •  funds from equity offerings of our stock;
 
  •  cash flows from operations;
 
  •  borrowings from banks or other institutions (which may or may not be subject to government guarantees in the event of contract termination); or
 
  •  lease arrangements with third parties.
      If the project is financed using direct governmental appropriations, with proceeds of the sale of bonds or other obligations issued prior to the award of the project or by us directly, then financing is in place when the contract relating to the construction or renovation project is executed. If the project is financed using project-specific tax-exempt bonds or other obligations, the construction contract is generally subject to the sale of such bonds or obligations. Generally, substantial expenditures for construction will not be made on such a project until the tax-exempt bonds or other obligations are sold; and, if such bonds or obligations are not sold, construction and therefore, management of the facility, may either be delayed until alternative financing is procured or the development of the project will be suspended or entirely cancelled. If the project is self-financed by us, then financing is generally in place prior to the commencement of construction.
      Under our construction and design management contracts, we generally agree to be responsible for overall project development and completion. We typically act as the primary developer on construction contracts for facilities and subcontract with national general contractors. Where possible, we subcontract

4


Table of Contents

with construction companies that we have worked with previously. We make use of an in-house staff of architects and operational experts from various correctional disciplines (e.g. security, medical service, food service, inmate programs and facility maintenance) as part of the team that participates from conceptual design through final construction of the project. This staff coordinates all aspects of the development with subcontractors and provides site-specific services.
      When designing a facility, our architects seek to utilize, with appropriate modifications, prototype designs we have used in developing prior projects. We believe that the use of these designs allows us to reduce cost overruns and construction delays and to reduce the number of officers required to provide security at a facility, thus controlling costs both to construct and to manage the facility. Our facility designs also maintain security because they increase the area under direct surveillance by correctional officers and make use of additional electronic surveillance.
Competitive Strengths
Regional Operating Structure
      We operate three regional U.S. offices and three international offices that provide administrative oversight and support to our correctional and detention facilities and allow us to maintain close relationships with our clients and suppliers. Each of our three regional U.S. offices is responsible for the facilities located within a defined geographic area. The regional offices perform regular internal audits of the facilities in order to ensure continued compliance with the underlying contracts, applicable accreditation standards, governmental regulations and our internal policies and procedures.
Long Term Relationships with High-Quality Government Customers
      We have developed long term relationships with our government customers and have been successful at retaining our facility management contracts. We have provided correctional and detention management services to the United States Federal Government for 18 years, the State of California for 16 years, the State of Texas for 16 years, various Australian state government entities for 13 years and the State of Florida for 10 years. These customers accounted for approximately 65.7% of our consolidated revenues for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005. Our strong operating track record has enabled us to achieve a high renewal rate for contracts. Our government customers typically satisfy their payment obligations to us through budgetary appropriations.
Full-Service Facility Developer
      We believe that our ability to provide comprehensive facility development and design services enables us to retain existing customers seeking to update their facilities and to attract new customers by demonstrating the benefits of privatization. We have developed an expertise in the design, construction and financing of high quality correctional, detention and mental health facilities.
Experienced, Proven Senior Management Team
      Our top three senior executives have over 48 years of combined industry experience, have worked together at our company for more than 13 years and have established a track record of growth and profitability. Under their leadership, our annual consolidated revenues have grown from $40.0 million in 1991 to $614.5 million in 2004. Our Chief Executive Officer, George C. Zoley, is one of the pioneers of the industry, having developed and opened what we believe was one of the first privatized detention facilities in the U.S. in 1986. In addition to senior management, our operational and facility level management has significant operational expertise. Our wardens have an average of 27 years of correctional and detention industry experience.

5


Table of Contents

Business Strategies
Provide High Quality, Essential Services at Lower Costs
      Our objective is to provide federal, state and local governmental agencies with high quality, essential services at a lower cost than they themselves could achieve.
Maintain Disciplined Operating Approach
      We manage our business on a contract by contract basis in order to maximize our operating margins. We typically refrain from pursuing contracts that we do not believe will yield attractive profit margins in relation to the associated operational risks. Generally, we do not engage in speculative development and do not build facilities without having a corresponding management contract award in place. In addition, we have elected not to enter certain international markets with a history of economic and political instability. We believe that our strategy of emphasizing lower risk, higher profit opportunities helps us to consistently deliver strong operational performance, lower our costs and increase our overall profitability.
Expand Into Complementary Government-Outsourced Services
      We intend to capitalize on our long term relationships with governmental agencies to continue to grow our correctional, detention and mental health facilities management services and to become a preferred provider of complementary government-outsourced services. We believe that government outsourcing of currently internalized functions will increase largely as a result of the public sector’s desire to maintain quality service levels amid governmental budgetary constraints. Based on our expansion into the mental health services sector, we believe that we are well positioned to continue to deliver higher quality services at lower costs in new areas of privatization.
Pursue International Growth Opportunities
      As a global international provider of privatized correctional services, we are able to capitalize on opportunities to operate existing or new facilities on behalf of foreign governments. We currently have operations in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada. We intend to further penetrate the current markets we operate in and to expand into new international markets which we deem attractive. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we opened an office in the United Kingdom to vigorously pursue new business opportunities in England, Wales and Scotland.
Facilities
      The following table summarizes certain information with respect to facilities that GEO (or a subsidiary or joint venture of GEO’s) operated under a management contract or had an award to manage as of January 2, 2005.
                                                             
    Design           Security   Commencement       Renewal   Type of
Facility Name & Location   Capacity   Customer   Facility Type   Level   of Current Term   Duration   Option   Ownership
                                 
Domestic Contracts
                                                           
Allen Correctional Center
Kinder, Louisiana
    1,538     LA DPS&C   State Correctional Facility   Medium/ Maximum     September 2003       3 years       One, Two-year       Manage only  
Aurora ICE Processing Center Aurora, Colorado
    356     ICE   Federal Detention Facility   Minimum/ Medium     September 2004       1 year     Four, Six Months     Lease-CPV  
Bridgeport Correctional Center Bridgeport, Texas
    520     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       September 2004       1 Year       One, One- year       Manage only  
Broward Transition Center Deerfield Beach, Florida
    300     ICE/ Broward County   Federal & Local Detention Facility     Minimum     October 2004/ October 2004   1 year/ 1 year   Four, One-year/ Unlimited, One-Year     Lease-CPV  

6


Table of Contents

                                                             
    Design           Security   Commencement       Renewal   Type of
Facility Name & Location   Capacity   Customer   Facility Type   Level   of Current Term   Duration   Option   Ownership
                                 
Central Texas Detention Facility
San Antonio, Texas(2)
    643     Bexar County/ TDCJ   Federal & Local Detention Facility     All levels       January 2002       3 years       One, Two-year       Lease  
Central Valley MCCF
McFarland, California
    550     CDC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       December 1997       10 years       N/A       Lease-CPV  
Cleveland Correctional Center
Cleveland, Texas
    520     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Medium       January 2004       1 year       N/A       Manage only  
Coke County JJC
Bronte, Texas
    200     TYC   State Juvenile Correctional Facility   Medium/ Maximum     September 2004       2 year     Unlimited, Two-year     Lease  
Desert View MCCF
Adelanto, California
    568     CDC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       December 1997       10 years       N/A       Lease-CPV  
East Mississippi Correctional Facility Meridian, Mississippi
    1,000     MDOC   State Correctional Facility   Mental Health     April 2003       2 years       One, Two-year       Manage only  
George W. Hill Correctional Facility Thornton, Pennsylvania
    1,851     Delaware County   Local Detention Facility     All levels       June 2003       3 years     Unlimited, Three- year     Manage only  
Golden State MCCF
McFarland, California
    550     CDC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       December 1997       10 years       N/A       Lease-CPV  
Guadalupe County Correctional Facility Santa Rosa, New Mexico(3)
    600     NMCD   State Correctional Facility     Medium       June 2004       1 year     Unlimited, 1-year     Own  
Karnes Correctional Center
Karnes City, Texas(2)
    579     Karnes County   Federal & Local Detention Facility     All levels       January 1998       30 years       N/A       Lease-CPV  
Kyle Correctional Center
Kyle, Texas
    520     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       September 2004       1 year       One, One- year       Manage only  
Lawrenceville Correctional Center Lawrenceville, Virginia
    1,536     VDOC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       March 2003       5 year       Ten, One- year       Manage only  
Lawton Correctional Facility Lawton, Oklahoma
    1,918     ODOC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       July 2003       2 years       Four, One-year       Lease-CPV  
Lea County Correctional Facility Hobbs, New Mexico(3)
    1,200     NMCD   State Correctional Facility     All levels       June 2003       2 years     Unlimited, 1-year     Lease-CPV  
Lockhart Secure Work Program Facilities Lockhart, Texas
    1,000     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       January 2003       1 year       N/A       Manage only  
Marshall County Correctional Facility Holly Springs, Mississippi
    1,000     MDOC   State Correctional Facility     Medium       January 2004       5 years       Two, One-year       Manage only  
McFarland CCF,
McFarland, California
    224     CDC   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       January 2005       1 year       N/A       Lease-CPV  
Michigan Youth Correctional Facility Baldwin, Michigan
    480     MIDOC   State Correctional Facility     Maximum       July 2003       4 years       N/A       Own  
Moore Haven Correctional Facility Moore Haven, Florida
    750     DMS   State Correctional Facility     Medium       July 2002       3 years     Unlimited, Two-year     Manage only  

7


Table of Contents

                                                             
    Design           Security   Commencement       Renewal   Type of
Facility Name & Location   Capacity   Customer   Facility Type   Level   of Current Term   Duration   Option   Ownership
                                 
North Texas ISF
Fort Worth, Texas
    400     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       March 2004       3 years       Four, One-year       Lease  
Queens Private Correctional Facility Jamaica, New York
    200     ICE   Federal Detention Facility Federal & State   Minimum/ Medium     April 2003       2 years     Three, One-year     Lease-CPV  
Reeves County Detention Complex Pecos, Texas(2)
    3,064     Reeves County   Federal & State Correctional Facility     All levels       November 2003       10 years       N/A       Manage only  
Rivers Correctional Institution Winton, North Carolina
    1,200     BOP   Federal Correctional Facility     Low       March 2001       4 years     Seven, One-year     Own  
Sanders Estes Unit
    1,000     TDCJ   State Correctional Facility     Minimum       January 2004       3 years       Two, One-year       Manage only  
South Bay Correctional Facility South Bay, Florida
    1,318     DMS   State Correctional Facility Federal   Medium/ Close     June 2003       2 years     Unlimited, Two-year     Manage only  
Taft Correctional Institution
Taft, California
    2,048     BOP   Correctional Facility     Low/ Minimum       August 2003       2 years     Three, One-year     Manage only  
Val Verde Correctional Facility Del Rio, Texas(2)
    784     Val Verde County   Federal & Local Detention Facility     All levels       January 2001       20 years     Unlimited, Five-year     Own  
Western Region Detention Facility at San Diego San Diego, California
    700     USMS/ ICE   Federal Detention Facility     Maximum       July 2003       2 years       Two, One-year       Lease  
 
International Contracts:
                                                           
Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre Wacol, Australia
    710     QLD DCS   Reception & Remand Centre     All levels       December 2002       5 years       One, Five-year       Manage only  
Auckland Central Remand Prison Auckland, New Zealand
    381     NZ DOC     National Jail       Maximum       July 2000       5 years       One, Two-year       Manage only  
Fulham Correctional Centre Victoria, Australia
    845     VIC MOC     State Prison     Minimum/ Medium     September 2003       3 years     Four, Three- year     Manage only  
Junee Correctional Centre
Junee, Australia
    750     NSW     State Prison     Minimum/ Medium     April 2001       5 years     One, Three- year     Manage only  
Kutama-Sinthumule Correctional Centre Northern Province, Republic of South Africa
    3,024     RSA DCS     National Prison       Maximum       July 1999       25 years       None       Manage only  
Melbourne Custody Centre Melbourne, Australia
    67     VIC CC     State Jail       All levels       March 2003       2 years       One, One- year       Manage only  
New Brunswick Youth Centre Mirimachi, Canada(4)
    N/A     PNB   Province Juvenile Facility     All levels       October 1997       25 years       One, Ten- year       Manage only  
Pacific Shores Healthcare
Victoria, Australia(5)
    N/A     VIC CV   Health Care Services     N/A       December 2003       3 years     Four, Six- months     Manage only  
 
Mental Health Facilities
                                                           
Atlantic Shores Hospital Fort Lauderdale, Florida(6)
    72     N/A   Private Psychiatric Hospital   Mental Health     N/A       N/A       N/A       Own  
South Florida State Hospital Pembroke Pines, Florida
    325     DCF   State Psychiatric Hospital   Mental Health     July 2003       5 years       Two, Five-year       Manage only  

8


Table of Contents

Customer Legend:
     
Abbreviation   Customer
     
LA DPS&C
  Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections
ICE
  Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
TDCJ
  Texas Department of Criminal Justice
CDC
  California Department of Corrections
TYC
  Texas Youth Commission
MDOC
  Mississippi Department of Corrections (East Mississippi & Marshall County)
NMCD
  New Mexico Corrections Department
VDOC
  Virginia Department of Corrections
ODOC