Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K

     
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
 
OR
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    For the transition period from          to

Commission File No: 000-24931


S1 Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
  58-2395199
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
3500 Lenox Road, NE, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia
 
30326
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(404) 923-3500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Not Applicable

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Title of Class

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ         No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

     As of March 21, 2002, the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock of the registrant issued and outstanding on such date, excluding 3,449,008 shares held by all affiliates of the registrant, was approximately $929,066,984. This figure is based on the closing sales price of $15.70 per share of the registrant’s common stock on March 21, 2002, and excludes shares held by directors and executive officers because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This reference to affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. Shares of common stock outstanding as of March 21, 2002: 62,625,249

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K into which the document is incorporated:

     Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 23, 2002, which the registrant intends to file no later than 120 days after December 31, 2001, are incorporated by reference in Part III.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
Employment Agreement
Separation Agreement
Subsidiaries of S1
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Financial Statements of Yodlee, Inc.


Table of Contents

S1 CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

             
Page

PART I
Item 1.
  Business     1  
Item 2.
  Properties     21  
Item 3.
  Legal Proceedings     21  
Item 4.
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     21  
PART II
Item 5.
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     21  
Item 6.
  Selected Financial Data     22  
Item 7.
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     23  
Item 7A.
  Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk     42  
Item 8.
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     43  
Item 9.
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     79  
PART III
Item 10.
  Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     79  
Item 11.
  Executive Compensation     79  
Item 12.
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     79  
Item 13.
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     80  
PART IV
Item 14.
  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K     80  
Signatures     84  

i


Table of Contents

PART I

      This annual report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K by reference contain forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements include statements with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends” or similar terminology identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made using information currently available to us. Because these statements reflect our current views concerning future events, they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Therefore, actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. The risk factors described below provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Except as provided by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

Item 1.     Business

Business Overview

      In 2001, we operated and managed S1 in two business segments: one focused on selling our product offering to financial institutions and one focused on selling a subset of our products, the contact center automation products (from our subsidiary, Edify Corporation), to a variety of industries such as retail, telecommunications, travel and transportation and financial services. You should also read our segment disclosures which are included in Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report.

 
Financial Institutions Segment

      We provide enterprise software solutions for financial organizations including banks, credit unions, investment firms and insurance companies on a global basis. Our solutions automate the channels by which financial institutions interact with their customers. These channels include full-service channels that support a person-to-person interaction such as talking to a teller in a bank branch or working with an insurance agent or a customer support representative over the phone. Our applications support self-service channels, or person-to-machine interactions, such as the Internet, interactive voice response units (IVR) or automated teller machines (ATMs). They also support automated, or machine-to-machine, interactions. Our applications are designed to support all of the financial institution’s market segments from retail end-users to small businesses to large corporations, as well as financial institution employees including bank tellers, insurance agents, contact center representatives and financial advisors.

      We provide a comprehensive set of solutions for banking, brokerage and insurance, as well as customer relationship management (CRM) and wealth management, for global, national, regional and local financial organizations. We also provide statutory financial reporting software solutions. We offer aggregation services through our reseller relationship with Yodlee, Inc.

      Our products are designed to run on-premise at a financial institution location or be hosted in a data center (either an S1 data center or a third party’s facility). The products can be easily branded and extended to meet the specifications of the financial institution. We offer a variety of services to assist in implementing and supporting our applications, as well as hosting services that allow a financial institution to outsource, to S1, the ongoing operations and maintenance of their applications. We provide professional services for the installation and integration of our products, including on-premise installation at the financial institution’s location, installation at an S1 data center or installation at third-party data processing centers. In addition, we provide training, consulting and product enhancement services, enabling our customers to customize applications to meet particular business needs and strategies.

1


Table of Contents

 
Contact Center Automation Segment

      Through our Edify Corporation subsidiary, which comprises our contact center automation segment, we provide voice self-service systems. Our contact center automation segment offers customer interaction technology solutions that allow organizations to automate, integrate and personalize interactions with customers, primarily through the voice and email channels, yielding stronger, more profitable relationships. These technologies are designed to address a customer’s question or need in an automated manner allowing the interaction to be addressed without human intervention. Calls that do require human assistance can automatically be routed to the most appropriate person. The technologies also provide much of the contact center infrastructure making the management and routing of customer contacts more efficient and effective. This segment sells these products horizontally to a variety of industries.

General Background

      To date, we have derived a significant portion of our revenues from licensing our solutions and providing professional services. We generate recurring data center revenues by charging our data center customers a monthly fixed fee or a fee based on the number of their end users who use the solutions we provide, subject to a minimum charge. We also generate recurring revenue by charging customers who license our products a periodic fee for software maintenance.

      Over the last three years, we have made numerous strategic acquisitions that were undertaken to provide additional technology, product and service offerings, industry expertise, a broader client base and an expanded geographic presence. In March 2002, we acquired the assets and subsidiaries of Point Holdings, Ltd., a Dublin, Ireland based multi-channel CRM application provider. In February 2002, we acquired Regency Systems, Inc., a Dallas, Texas based provider of telephone and Internet banking applications and web design services for community and mid-market banks. In September 2001, we acquired Software Dynamics Inc. (SDI), a West Hills, California based provider of branch automation, teller, call center and CRM solutions for financial institutions. In April 2000, we acquired Davidge Data Systems, Inc., a New York, New York based provider of order routing services to brokerage firms and Q-Up Systems, Inc., an Austin, Texas based provider of Internet financial services solutions to community and mid-market banks. In November 2000, we acquired Level Next, Inc., a provider of global trade finance systems. In November 1999, we acquired Edify Corporation, a Santa Clara, California based global provider of Internet and voice e-commerce portal solutions; FICS Group, N.V., a Brussels, Belgium based vendor of financial electronic commerce and regulatory reporting software; and VerticalOne Corporation, then an Atlanta based consolidator, organizer and presenter of personal account information via the Internet. We sold VerticalOne to Yodlee, Inc. in January 2001. As of December 31, 2001, we held an approximately 32% interest in Yodlee.

Industry Background

      Financial institutions interact with their customers through a variety of channels, including but not limited to the branch, call center, phone, ATM and the Internet. The use of these channels has evolved over the years. Initially financial institutions offered only full-service (person-to-person) interactions, where their customers would need to come to them for any type of transaction or inquiry. The customer might be able to call the financial institution instead of going there, but they still had to talk to somebody. There was no concept of self-service. The market then evolved with the use of the phone as a mechanism to execute transactions: customers could check balances, transfer funds, purchase stocks, etc. In addition, the ATM was introduced as a way for customers to receive and deposit funds at their convenience. In the 1990’s, another channel was added, the Internet. As the Internet became a viable channel for commerce, many thought it would replace most of these other channels, but the financial institutions found out that other channels didn’t go away but that their customers now had more options and wanted to use them all.

      As each of these channels was introduced and proliferated, financial institutions took a tactical approach in expanding their offerings, incrementally adding these new channels as they fit in with their evolving business plans. By and large, each channel became an independent product, with little crossover between lines of business or little integration between the channels themselves, which led to operating inefficiencies, little or no

2


Table of Contents

ability to share customer information and inconsistent customer experiences. Today’s consumers demand increased access to their finances. Some want instant and ubiquitous access to account information. Others want to pay bills, transfer funds, receive alerts and trade stocks — anytime, anywhere. Still other consumers prefer real-time services, requesting to see transactions, make credit applications and receive rate quotes as they happen. Consumers want services to be available to them through all of these channels at their convenience and understand enough about technology to expect the financial institution to be able to deliver this. The increasing competition in the financial services industry due to new entrants and convergence also put pressure on financial institutions to be able to deliver products and services that allow them to retain their current customers, increase their share-of-wallet while decreasing their costs.

      We started in this industry in 1995 as the founder of Security First Network Bank. In 1998, we sold our banking operations to focus on being a provider of Internet banking software and changed our name to S1 Corporation. Ultimately we evolved into a provider of integrated eFinance software that delivered transactional support for banking, brokerage and insurance over the Internet. Through acquisitions, we broadened our product line to address not only the Internet channel but also the branch, call center and voice channels as well. We believe that with the next generation of applications, the integration of all of these channels will become paramount for the financial institution as competition for products and services escalates. As more and more products become available to financial services consumers, it will prove increasingly difficult for financial institutions to differentiate their products from other providers.

      We believe that a key point of competitive advantage will center on how well financial institutions provide a unified experience for their customers across all points of interaction. Financial institutions will need to deliver a consistent and compelling experience to their customers and provide them with products and services that better meet their needs and are relevant to their stage in life. While this sounds straightforward, we believe it is very challenging to a financial institution dealing with multiple channels, all using different technologies, integrated with a variety of legacy applications. Financial institutions are now driven by technology and must attempt to keep up with the rapid pace of change. They have to determine how to leverage what they have today while moving to new technologies that will protect their investments and better position them for the future. Continuing economic pressures and cost and resource cutting have forced them to try and do more with less. In addition, many financial institutions are struggling to absorb acquired businesses and rationalize the technologies and systems involved.

      We believe these factors will drive financial institutions to pursue an enterprise solution that helps them automate and integrate their channels while leveraging single points of integration to their back office systems and better sharing customer information. This type of solution would reduce costs by using single points of integration to the legacy applications, decreasing operational complexity and eliminating multi-vendor coordination, as well as drive revenue by enhancing cross-selling opportunities, and increasing customer loyalty. We are taking action to deliver a fully integrated solution that automates and integrates the front-office applications, while providing a technology platform to simplify integration and operations as well as speed implementation and time to market. Our activities over the course of 2001 laid the groundwork for delivery of this type of enterprise application.

      The same market factors driving financial services towards automation and integration across channels are evident in other industries served by our contact center automation business. In tough economic times, highly competitive markets such as retail, travel and telecom have to execute on multiple objectives that include reducing costs and retaining customers. Each of these industries, much like financial institutions, deploy large contact centers and branches employing many hundreds of customer service representatives. To reduce costs, the volume of customer interactions handled by the highest cost channel, the customer service representative, must be migrated to self-service customer contact channels such as voice response, email, wireless and Web and leverage technologies such as speech recognition and natural language processing. At the same time the workload of customer service representatives is greatly reduced, and the value to the customer is greatly enhanced by seamlessly integrating self-service interactions with customer transactional and preference data across the enterprise. We have developed a platform, based on the experience gained from handling call volumes in some of the world’s largest contact centers, that spans all of the contact channels, be it phone, web, email or wireless.

3


Table of Contents

The S1 Solution

      In 2001, we evolved the focus of our solutions from the Internet to a multi-channel approach across multiple front-office applications. We spent the first half of 2001 building our new J2EE-based technology platform and beginning to consolidate our various Internet-based offerings on this platform. The S1 Enterprise Platform, S1 Personal Banking and S1 Business Banking were released for general availability in the first quarter of 2002. The acquisition of SDI allowed us to broaden our strategy and solution set moving our focus beyond the Internet to all of the interaction channels. With the addition of SDI, we renamed our entire product family S1 Enterprise and began to integrate our product lines together allowing us to fulfill our integrated, multi-channel, front-office vision.

      Our direction for the S1 Enterprise, is to take a holistic approach to unifying the multiple channels, applications, and customer segments that define a financial institution. By taking a customer-centric view, we intend that the S1 Enterprise will enable financial institutions to deliver a personalized, compelling experience to their retail, small business and corporate customers. By supporting all customer interaction channels — including full-service channels such as branches, agents and call centers; self-service channels such as ATM and the Web; and automated interactions such as Open Financial Exchange (OFX) — we intend that S1 Enterprise will enable financial institutions to deliver a common customer experience while helping them rapidly deploy new products and services. S1 Enterprise offers banking, investment, insurance, wealth management and CRM applications that can be used by both financial institution customers and internal users, such as tellers, agents, brokers, and customer service representatives. We provide flexible, customizable solutions with a modular approach so financial institutions can innovate their enterprise at their own pace, while increasing revenue, lowering costs and building stronger customer loyalty.

      We believe that the S1 Enterprise, when fully implemented, will offer a number of important benefits to our customers including the following:

  •  S1 Enterprise Will Turn Static Financial Institution Data into Actionable Information — Financial institutions have a wealth of valuable customer information stored throughout their organizations. Their customers also have multiple financial relationships with other providers. S1 Enterprise will help financial institutions collect the data from internal and external systems, giving greater insight into customers and the ability to deliver more personalized service. S1 Enterprise will feature fully integrated CRM capabilities so that our financial institution clients can leverage customer information and marketing programs across all customer touchpoints, helping them create profitable and satisfying customer interactions. Our CRM approach goes beyond the traditional approach by turning information such as alerts, awards and promotions into actionable information at the delivery channel of choice for the financial institution’s customer. This includes all delivery channels — not just the call center.
 
  •  S1 Enterprise Will Deliver Compelling, Personalized Products and Services — In order to build customer loyalty, financial institutions need to deliver personalized products and services that are timely, relevant and accurate. S1 Enterprise will help them understand their customer’s buying behaviors, attitudes toward technology and short and long-term financial goals. S1 Enterprise will help financial institutions create more cross-selling opportunities, while maximizing the existing relationships they have established to up-sell and reduce customer churn. Such personalized service increases opportunities for cross sell and creates more effective push marketing.
 
  •  S1 Enterprise Will Provide Cost Effective Integration of Multiple Applications and Channels — The S1 Enterprise will deliver integrated solutions across self-service channels such as the Web and phone, and will provide tools to support the full-service channels, including tellers, insurance agents, brokers, call center representatives and private bankers. Delivering all of these services from a common platform will enable financial institutions to achieve significant cost savings over time. With the deployment of one application, they get the most comprehensive functionality on an open, flexible, and operable industry platform. With multiple applications, they begin to see true economies of scale with the single platform already in place. While this not only reduces integration, maintenance and implementation costs, it can also leverage the cross-channel CRM capabilities for more effective

4


Table of Contents

  personalization and sales opportunities. All of this capability is delivered while still leveraging the existing investments in back-office system interfaces.

S1 Vision and Strategy

      Our objective is to be the leading global provider of integrated enterprise solutions that enable financial institutions to improve the way they service their customers by integrating all delivery channels expanding the total financial relationship and increasing profits. To achieve this objective, we intend to pursue the following activities:

 
Achieve Financial and Operational Stability

      Our priority in 2001 was to ensure that S1 was in the strongest possible operational and financial position to capitalize on this vision. This initiative included the rationalization of our operating cost structure and assets, a necessary task after completing six acquisitions in 1999 and 2000. Combined with a concerted focus on cost control, this rationalization was the impetus behind the improvement in our gross margin from 41% in 2000 to 59% in 2001. These and other operational accomplishments were a significant turning point in our financial performance. Revenues increased 19% in 2001 to $278.3 million. Similarly, we reduced our net loss per share to $3.74 per share in 2001 from $21.77 per share in 2000. Finally, we stabilized our cash flow during 2001, generating $11.9 million in cash flow from operations and ending the year with $148.5 million in cash. We expect to continue our focus on cost control.

      We added new senior executives in 2001, including such key appointments as Matthew Hale as Chief Financial Officer; Peter Dunning as Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Americas; Steve Ely as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing; and Vic Syracuse as Senior Vice President of Operations and Technical Support. We also named retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Coca-Cola Company, M. Douglas Ivester, to our Board of Directors.

 
Re-write our Technological Architecture to Realize the Full Potential of our Enterprise Solutions

      Due to rapid growth and numerous acquisitions, S1 products encompassed several overlapping technologies and applications. In order to realize the full potential of our solution, and make the most effective use of our development resources, it was imperative to re-write the technological architecture underlying many of our products. Our initial focus was on converging our Internet-based products to a single platform. From that point, we plan to integrate products serving other channels into the platform so we can leverage their functionality and deliver true multi-channel integration.

      A key component of the S1 Enterprise family of products is the S1 Enterprise Platform, which not only provides integration across all of a financial institution’s channels, but enables them to leverage the interfaces built to their back end systems, share customer data across the organization, and deliver comprehensive, integrated marketing programs. S1 Enterprise Platform technology features an open, flexible and operable architecture that incorporates existing legacy and third-party applications, while also helping the financial institution move toward a standard platform that unifies its channel strategy. This platform also provides the most robust transactional and CRM capabilities for both end-user customers and internal users alike. An n-tier, component-based architecture, the S1 Enterprise Platform utilizes common industry standards such as J2EE and XML for integrating third-party solutions, existing systems and evolving technology standards. In addition, the S1 Enterprise Platform facilitates a common customer experience by supporting multiple delivery channels, such as Web, call centers, wireless, branch, ATMs and advisors.

      The S1 Enterprise Platform will serve as a common base for S1 product deployments. Its layered framework ensures that all applications are consistent in their interpretation and presentation of all data and that they can be extended, upgraded, maintained and operated. By the end of 2002, it will also allow all applications and channels to access customer information through a single database. This approach reduces a financial services provider’s operating costs and total cost of ownership, thereby enhancing return on investment.

5


Table of Contents

      In order to make the S1 Enterprise Platform as customer-centric as possible, we enlisted 14 financial institutions to take part in our innovative Market Leadership Program (MLP). These 14 MLP partners worked directly with our product management and development teams in 2001 to develop and refine our Enterprise Platform offering, as well as the first two products to be deployed on the platform, S1 Personal Banking and S1 Business Banking. In doing so, the MLP partners had the opportunity to incorporate their business requirements into the product design, as well as to acquire a hands-on knowledge of the products. For us, the MLP has contributed customer insights into our product development process and provided a base of customers to validate the products’ functionality and technical architecture. MLP partners also create a group of customers we use as references. Early releases of the S1 Enterprise Platform, along with S1 Personal Banking and S1 Business Banking were delivered to our MLP partners in November 2001. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we added over ten new Enterprise customers, which we define as customers using products across more than one channel such as the Internet and the branch. The S1 Enterprise Platform, S1 Personal Banking and S1 Business Banking were released for general availability in the first quarter of 2002.

 
Increase Revenues by Cross-Selling our Products and Services to Existing Customers

      With the expansion of our product line and customer base through acquisitions and with our integrated application approach, we intend to increase revenues by selling additional products and services to our existing customers. We believe that opportunities for cross-selling our products and services will increase as we continue to expand our Enterprise Platform.

 
Increase Emphasis on Selling Packaged Products

      We are increasing our emphasis on selling packaged solutions instead of highly-customized, tool-kit-oriented solutions. As the market moves from early adopters to the mainstream majority, our customers are more focused on implementing packages that can be extended and customized as opposed to buying tool-kits that require a high degree of customization and result in more expensive ongoing maintenance and issues with upgrades.

 
Grow Our Sales Channel Program through Strategic Alliances with Key Partners

      In 2001, we focused on expanding our relationship with International Business Machines Corporation. We ported some of our existing Internet-based products to the IBM Z-series platform (OS/ 390) and have been working jointly on implementing this solution for one of our joint customers. We believe IBM will be a key distribution partner for us and we expect they will do a significant amount of implementation and integration work associated with the S1 Enterprise family of products. We have also initiated relationships with other large systems integrators on which we expect to focus in 2002.

      Our emphasis on delivery of packaged products will result in the delivery of “channel ready” products that can be more easily sold and implemented by other organizations. We plan to add key partners to extend our sales channel program.

 
Pursue Strategic Initiatives to Enhance our Core Product Offerings and Increase our Customer Base

      In September 2001, we acquired SDI, a provider of branch automation, teller, call center and CRM solutions for financial institutions. SDI’s branch and call center capabilities addressed key channels not previously offered by S1. The acquisition also expanded our customer base significantly, adding over 1,000 additional financial institutions, and created considerable synergies through the inclusion of the branch application as part of our overall S1 Enterprise solution.

      In February 2002, we acquired Regency Systems, Inc., which will strengthen our solutions set with telephone banking applications targeted at the community and regional segment of the bank market. In addition, the Regency acquisition brought several hundred new financial institutions into the S1 customer base. In March 2002, we acquired the assets and subsidiaries of Point Holdings, Ltd., which will expand our presence in Europe. We plan to pursue strategic acquisitions that will (i) provide additional technology, product and service offerings and industry expertise, (ii) broaden our client base and (iii) expand our

6


Table of Contents

geographic presence. As we have done in the past, we may as opportunities arise divest non-core product lines in order to more effectively focus on our business.

S1 Products

      Our products are classified in eight major groups: Banking Solutions, Insurance Solutions, CRM Solutions, Investment Solutions, Wealth Management Solutions, Financial Reporting, Account Aggregation and Customer Contact Solutions.

 
S1 Banking Solutions

      The year 2001 has been a transition for our Internet-based banking offerings. In November 2001, we delivered the limited availability release of our S1 Personal Banking and S1 Business Banking products running on the new S1 Enterprise Platform. Over time, we expect our existing Internet-banking products will converge with these new products and customers will be migrated to them.

  •  S1 Personal Banking — gives individual consumers anytime, anywhere access to all of their banking accounts, including deposit, credit card and loan accounts. Functions include the ability to view statements, account activity, and cleared and pending transactions online, to transfer funds between accounts and to pay bills electronically.
 
  •  S1 Business Banking — is a comprehensive banking product geared to the unique needs of small business owner-operators. Available services include daily account balance and transaction reporting, disbursement services, payroll, account transfers, wires, and electronic tax payments. Personalization options simplify cash management tasks for easy organization and management of company funds.

      Our current, Internet-based banking products that will converge with the products above include:

  •  S1 Internet Banking System (IBS) — is targeted towards the community banking market. Functions include the ability to view statements, account activity, and cleared and pending transactions online, to transfer funds between accounts and to pay bills electronically.
 
  •  S1 IBS Cash Management System — is targeted towards the community banking market. Functions include integrated front and back office systems, multiple payment vehicles such as domestic and SWIFT wires, ACH, and EFTPS, integration with the IBS retail Internet banking application and EDI data display.
 
  •  S1 Consumer Banking — is a comprehensive online retail banking solution, targeted towards larger financial institutions, with industry leading functionality that addresses customer life goals and enables them to maximize customer loyalty and revenue. Customers can view statements, account activity, and cleared and pending transactions online, transfer funds between accounts and pay bills electronically.

      In the commercial banking area, we offer the following Internet-based applications:

  •  S1 Corporate Banking — is a comprehensive Internet-based cash management solution for large corporations. This application offers multi-lingual, multi-currency and multi-delivery channel capability to perform such functions as information reporting, global payments, check services, file services and customer administration on a global basis.
 
  •  S1 Trade Finance — is an international trade finance system providing the ability to generate a wide range of trade-specific documents and over 100 customer reports, as well as delivering a complete “Bank Site” web application.

      With the acquisition of SDI, we formed the S1 Full-Service Banking Group (S1 FSBG),which offers S1 ZEUS. S1 ZEUS is a branch automation application that includes products for sales and service, teller, call center, and customer relationship management (CRM).

  •  S1 ZEUS Teller — provides a base set of transactions and core services necessary for fulfilling the rigorous requirements of today’s teller environment, including host communications, sharing and

7


Table of Contents

  storing of information, cumulative totals, electronic journal, transaction security and approval, and balancing aids.
 
  •  S1 ZEUS Sales and Service — includes a base set of transactions, sales tools, and core services that expedite selling new products, as well as servicing existing accounts.
 
  •  S1 ZEUS Call Center — provides the customer information, sales and service capabilities, process flows, reporting, and fulfillment management that are exclusive to call center operations. The ZEUS Call Center application integrates with other call center technologies, including IVR systems, computer telephony integration servers, and automatic call distributor systems.

     S1 Insurance Solutions

      S1 Insurance solutions include products for both the customer and the agent or intermediary. The applications support product sales capabilities as well as self-service capabilities for the property and casualty and life and annuity markets.

  •  S1 Consumer Insurance — provides the features and functionality to enable financial institutions to improve customer service, acquire new business and reduce costs by providing anytime, anywhere access to meet insurance needs. Customers can view policy information, request changes to their policies, initiate the claims process and get insurance quotes as well as apply and purchase products online.

     S1 CRM Solutions

  •  S1 Customer Center — a virtual financial lobby, the S1 Customer Center provides customers with a destination web site or portal giving them access to product information, news and other content, as well as community pages and bulletin boards. The S1 Customer Center enables financial institutions to efficiently create, manage and quantify their web presence.
 
  •  S1 Relationship Management — delivers both pre- and post-login portal capabilities, that can be personalized by the end-user, as well as targeted marketing features. This product is designed for the larger financial institution with a sophisticated customer segmentation strategy.
 
  •  S1 vCSR — the S1 vCSR (virtual customer service representative) family of products provides applications that provide real-time fulfillment and complete knowledge of the customer allowing financial institutions to: understand what the customer says and what they type, know how satisfied they are with the service and how important they are as a customer, fulfill their request and speak the information they need, email it, fax it, or send it to their wireless device of choice, inform the human CSR about the reason for a customer call and suggest action and speak to the customer, help them find what they need on the web site, or connect them with the most qualified person to provide assistance. These solutions are sold into the financial services market under the S1 brand; they are sold horizontally in other industries under the Edify brand.
 
  •  S1 ZEUS CRM — provides a complete customer centric, end-to-end CRM solution. The application features easy to use analytical and segmentation tools, comprehensive campaign development and management capabilities, and a unique methodology to drive the results of CRM out to all channels. It permits real time access to customer contact and value information, as well as target campaigns, and significantly enhances the value of CRM efforts.

     S1 Investment Solutions

  •  S1 Consumer Investments — is an online brokerage program that allows a consumer to trade stocks, mutual funds, options and bonds as well as track and manage their portfolio. S1 Consumer Investments provides everything investors need to manage their investment accounts, make trades, obtain market research and track orders.

8


Table of Contents

  •  S1 Institutional Investments — provides delivers products that support order-routing connectivity, middleware and network services to facilitate retail and professional trading.

     S1 Wealth Management Solutions

      S1 Wealth Management provides the ability for a financial institution advisor — private bankers, brokers, insurance agents, or customer support representatives — to collaborate online with their clients allowing them to help build wealth for their customers, while securing loyal, long-term relationships. Financial institution clients also have online access to financial planning tools, advice and market research.

     Financial Reporting

      Our financial reporting application, FiRE, aims to ease the burden of regulatory reporting for banks, mutual funds, pension brokers, and other financial institutions. It benefits organizations by empowering them to comply with the reporting stipulations of central banks, monetary authorities, and other financial regulators — in up to 21 countries. It also provides comptrollers, regulatory specialists, managers, and other internal staff with a set of added value tools for building a financial data warehouse and generating their financial reports.

     Account Aggregation

      Through our reseller agreement with Yodlee, Inc., which is described more fully in Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, we provide account aggregation capabilities, which allow the delivery of an integrated balance sheet consolidating, organizing and presenting a consumers’ personal account information, from a variety of providers, for confidential viewing and access.

     Customer Contact Solutions

      Edify develops customer contact solutions for all customer contact channels, including Web, voice, wireless and email communications. In addition to the Virtual CSR (or vCSR), as described above, we offer the following applications as part of our Edify Enterprise, a full function, enterprise CRM system:

  •  Edify Desktop — The Edify Desktop is the primary computer-based resource utilized by the live Customer Service Representative (CSR) while interacting with a customer. Edify Desktop utilizes a web browser-based environment which presents all information necessary for the effective and efficient handling of a customer inquiry.
 
  •  Universal Queue (Uqueue) — In a multi-channel contact center, not all customer contacts are created equal in terms of importance, required response times, or the best resource to assign for servicing. Uqueue enables this process in an automated, high volume, and multi-channel environment. The Uqueue is capable of managing the prioritization and routing of customer contacts originating over any channel.
 
  •  Unified Reports Server — Reporting and analysis empowers managers with the timely, enterprise-wide information they need to react efficiently. The Unified Reports Server provides a detailed, enterprise-level view of the contact center, allowing managers to measure the efficiency of operations and personalize customer interactions.
 
  •  Edify CTI Server — provides an essential link between the enterprise’s telephone switching systems and other components of the Edify Enterprise suite of customer interaction solutions, by allowing Edify Enterprise vCSR Suites and Edify Contact Center Suite to both monitor and control events occurring on the telephony switch. Computer Telephony Integration (CTI) is an essential part of any total customer interaction solution. This is true whether the enterprise uses a “traditional” circuit-switched telephony infrastructure, an Internet Protocol (IP) telephony system, or, as in many cases today, a combination of the two.

9


Table of Contents

  •  Edify Chat and Cobrowse — quickly integrates your website into your call center, permitting customers to summon assistance from an agent at the click of a button. Edify Chat & Cobrowse enables organizations the immediate benefits of higher cross-sell and up-sell conversions, accelerated web-channel acceptance and increased customer satisfaction, activity, and loyalty.
 
  •  The Edify Customer Feedback and Analysis application — designed to help companies achieve success in their target financial metrics by utilizing an automated customer feedback and analysis process to obtain insights into drivers of purchasing decisions, customer satisfaction and customer preference.

S1 Services

      We provide services to assist our customers in the planning, implementation and customization of their applications as well as ongoing maintenance and support and, if desired, application-hosting services.

     S1 Hosting Services

      Our hosting services provide operational management and control across the full range of banking, brokerage, insurance, loan, credit card and content applications and information. We provide managed operations for financial institutions through our data center facilities in Norcross, Georgia, Singapore and the United Kingdom. With more than six years of experience in building and operating data centers for financial applications, our mature operating environment was created to address mission-critical operational issues, such as security, recovery and availability. Our data centers are hardened facilities that can scale to support large volumes of customers.

 
S1 Customer Support

      The S1 Customer Support team offers various levels of service to meet an organization’s support needs and budgets:

  •  Technical Support — Customer support engineers will work to provide solutions on S1 products;
 
  •  Software Release — Software upgrades that include enhancements to the software as well as operations and performance improvements;
 
  •  Online Support — The S1 Support Website is designed to provide “one-stop” access to technical information for S1 products. The S1 Support Website provides access to technical FAQs, download patches, the latest documentation, and support bulletins; and
 
  •  Client Advocate — All customers are assigned an S1 Client Advocate, whose primary responsibility is to ensure seamless support between S1 and our customers, as well as identification of joint areas of improvement. This provides a much stronger support experience for our customers.

 
S1 Professional Services

      Our professional services team helps financial institutions bring their solutions to market — rapidly and efficiently. Our professional services organization is engaged in the following activities:

  •  Project Management — Our project manager is responsible for keeping a project on schedule and within budget throughout the implementation cycle;
 
  •  Custom Software Development — Our developers will customize our solution to meet the specific business requirements of our customers — from analysis and design to building and testing;
 
  •  Technical Services — Our team will design, implement and test the servers and network infrastructure to support our solutions. Our expertise includes software integration, database services, networking and the applications skills required to deliver secure, robust solutions;
 
  •  Educational Services — Our training professionals help financial institution employees use our solutions to better serve their customers; and

10


Table of Contents

  •  Web Design Services — S1 Web Technologies is available to assist with delivery of a complete web presence for financial institutions.

Clients and Markets

      We provide solutions to global financial services organizations as well as regional and local financial institutions. Currently, we serve more than 3,700 banks, credit unions, insurance providers and investment firms. In addition, we provide our contact center automation technology to companies in the consumer goods, manufacturing, healthcare, technology and telecommunications industries.

      In 1999, 2000 and 2001, we reported revenues of $84.9 million, $187.8 million and $226.5 million from our financial institutions segment and revenues of $8.0 million, $43.8 million and $51.8 million from our contact center automation segment, respectively.

      During 2001, we provided implementation, hosting and product enhancement services for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through our financial institutions segment. We derived 40%, 31% and 28% of our total revenues from State Farm in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Although we expect continued concentrations of revenue from this customer, we believe the percentage of our total revenues from this customer will decrease in 2002.

Strategic Alliances and Partners

      We have built a global network of alliances, allowing us to more fully extend our expertise, capabilities, and reach within the financial services industry. We have established strategic, technology, and channel relationships with a number of organizations. We have alliances with companies such as Fiserv, Inc., IBM, KPMG LLP and NCR Corporation as well as with numerous core processing vendors, bill payment providers, credit card processing vendors and printed product vendors.

Sales and Marketing

      We sell our solutions to small, mid-sized and large financial organizations. Our sales force is comprised of professionals structured in three major regional groups: (i) the Americas region, (ii) the Europe, Middle East and Africa region (EMEA) and (iii) the Asia-Pacific and Japan (APJ) region. We reported revenues of $92.9 million, $233.9 million and $278.3 million for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively, of which 88%, 83% and 76%, respectively, were attributed to sales in the United States.

      Within each region, we divide our sales force into two teams: named accounts and field sales. The named accounts sales team manages our relationships with existing customers and markets our products to the largest financial organizations in the world. The named accounts sales force focuses on developing long-term relationships with senior management of large financial organizations, typically including these organizations’ chief executive officers and the heads of their retail banking and information technology divisions. The sales cycle for these large financial organizations generally lasts from 6 to 18 months. Contracts with these large financial organizations typically have multi-year terms. Once we have established a relationship with these organizations and their senior management teams, the sales team continues to market additional products and services to them.

      Our field sales team focuses on building successful relationships with smaller financial organizations. In addition, the field sales team assumes responsibility for relationships with distribution partners, thereby maximizing our market penetration through the reseller channel. The sales cycle for these small to mid-sized financial organizations typically lasts from six to nine months, and the contracts entered into with them typically provide for direct delivery and service requirements which we perform over a shorter period of time than those contracts with large financial organizations.

      Our sales support team provides functional and technical sales support to maximize the client’s understanding of S1’s solutions.

11


Table of Contents

      In addition to internal sales efforts and joint efforts with distribution partners like IBM and NCR, S1 markets its products and services in other ways to build awareness of the S1 brand. Our marketing efforts include participating in and exhibiting at industry conferences and trade shows, maintaining memberships in key industry organizations and establishing close relationships with industry analysts to help guide product development and marketing efforts.

      Edify markets its products worldwide through a direct sales force as well as through multiple value-added resellers, OEMs, outsourcers, distributors and systems integrators, including: Datamat Spa, Bell South Corporation, Digital Datavoice Corporation, Digital Voice Systems Inc., Electronic Data Systems Corporation, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Ltd., iSi-Dentsu of America, Inc., MCI group — an operating unit of WorldCom, Inc., NCR Corporation, NEC Corporation, Rockwell International Corporation, Unisys Corporation, Vystys Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Viecore Inc. Edify also partners with leading technology providers to extend the capabilities of both its own and its partners’ products. Edify’s partners include Siebel Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Compaq Computer Corporation, Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc. and Speechworks International, Inc.

Product Development

      Our product development efforts are focused on:

  •  Developing the S1 Enterprise Platform. We developed and are continuing to enhance a new technological architecture for the S1 Enterprise family of products. Utilizing leading industry standards such as J2EE, the S1 Enterprise Platform is an open, flexible and scalable architecture that will serve as a common base for S1 product deployments. Its layered framework ensures that all applications are consistent in their interpretation and presentation of all data and that they can be consistently extended, upgraded, maintained and operated. It also allows all applications and channels to access customer information via a single database.
 
  •  Collaborating with Customers to Develop and Refine our Product Offering. In order to make the S1 Personal Banking and Business Banking products as customer-centric as possible, we enlisted 14 financial institutions to take part in our innovative Market Leadership Program. These 14 MLP partners worked directly with product management and the software development team to develop and refine our offering. In doing so, the MLP partners had the opportunity to incorporate their business requirements into the product design, as well as to acquire a hands-on knowledge of the product. For us, the MLP has contributed invaluable customer insights into our product development process and provided a base of customers to validate the products’ functionality and technical architecture.
 
  •  Enhancing Existing Products and Services. We are developing new functions and features across our entire product line in order to provide a broader range of capabilities and continue to best meet our customers needs.

      We spent approximately $24.6 million, $70.5 million and $55.6 million on product development efforts in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

      In order to optimize available research and development resources and meet development timeframes, we established a relationship with an Indian based development organization in 2001 to assist us with portions of our product development. We expect to expand this relationship in 2002 to a newly created development center in India.

Competition — Financial Institutions Segment

      The market for financial software is competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to technological change. We currently perceive our primary competition as coming from three areas: (1) in-house development organizations of financial institutions, (2) point solution providers and (3) core processing vendors. We believe that these strategies are inefficient for financial organizations, particularly during a time when many financial institutions are seeking to integrate their offerings.

12


Table of Contents

 
In-house Development Organizations

      We believe financial organizations may encounter the following challenges when building financial software in-house:

      • building, maintaining and upgrading the in-house solution is very costly;

  •  attracting and retaining the necessary technical personnel can be difficult; and
 
  •  technological development may be too far outside the financial organization’s core competencies for them to be effective or successful.

 
Point Solution Providers

      These vendors offer solutions for a specific line of business and/or channel for the financial institution. In the retail Internet banking space, we compete with Digital Insight Corporation, Financial Fusion (a division of Sybase) and Corillian Corporation. In branch banking, we compete with Argo Data Resource, Inc. and WebTone Technologies, Inc. In business banking, we compete with Fundtech Ltd., Politzer & Haney and Metavante Corporation. We believe the disadvantages associated with a point solution approach include:

  •  integrating additional applications and channels with multiple vendors greatly lengthens a financial organization’s time-to-market;
 
  •  operating and upgrading solutions from multiple vendors is very costly; and
 
  •  a single technology approach does not provide an integrated view of the customer.

 
Core Processing Vendors

      These vendors offer data processing services and outsourcing for the financial institutions’ systems of record. In this space we see companies such as Metavante, Fiserv and Jack Henry and Associates, Inc. Many of these companies offer front-office products at a sharp discount to augment their back-office capabilities. We believe the primary disadvantage of this approach is that these front office applications will lag behind the market to some degree in terms of functions and features and are secondary to the vendor behind their back-office products and services.

Competition — Contact Center Automation Segment

      The market for contact center automation products is divided into several distinct categories, voice solutions, eServices solutions and contact center solutions. Edify competes with different vendors in each category, but few span more than one category.

 
Voice Solutions

      Our primary competitors in the voice solution category are InterVoice-Brite, Inc., IBM, Avaya Inc. and Nortel Networks Corporation. We believe our solution is more attractive to customers because:

  •  our software based platform does not require proprietary voice hardware;
 
  •  we use a patented visual and integrated developed environment instead of proprietary scripting tools;
 
  •  our solution provides industry leading scalability;
 
  •  we have integrated customer analytics; and
 
  •  we offer multiple speech recognition engines.

13


Table of Contents

 
eServices

      We compete with Siebel Systems, Inc., Kana Inc. and eGain Communications Corp. in the eServices market. Our products have the following advantages:

  •  one platform that supports and integrates all customer contact channels and is more cost efficient to integrate with other enterprise systems;
 
  •  natural language understanding technology for both voice and text based interactions; and
 
  •  applications that automate the fulfillment of customer specific transactional and relationship information in addition to topic based search requests.

 
Contact Center Solutions

      In this category, we compete with companies such as Avaya, Nortel Networks, Aspect Telecommunications Corporation and Interactive Intelligence Inc. We believe our key advantages include:

  •  our single software based platform that supports and integrates all customer self-service channels;
 
  •  a CSR desktop that supports multiple media sessions and a unified view of every customer;
 
  •  reporting and management tools that provide a unified view of every customer and interaction across any number of customer contact channels; and
 
  •  integrated customer analytics.

Government Regulation

      We are subject to examination, and are indirectly regulated by, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the various state financial regulatory agencies that supervise and regulate the banks and thrift institutions for which we provide data processing services. Matters subject to review and examination by federal and state financial institution regulatory agencies include our internal controls in connection with our performance of data processing services and the agreements giving rise to those processing activities.

      Laws and regulations which apply to communications and commerce over the Internet are becoming more prevalent. Currently, there are Internet laws regarding copyrights, taxation and the transmission of specified types of material. Congress also adopted legislation imposing obligations on financial institutions to notify their customers of the institution’s privacy practices, restrict the sharing of non-public customer data with non-affiliated parties at the customer’s request, and establish procedures and practices to protect and secure customer data. These privacy provisions are implemented by regulations with which compliance is now required. Additionally, there are many legislative and regulatory actions pending at the state and federal level with respect to privacy. Further, our clients and we may be faced with state and federal requirements that differ drastically, and in some cases conflict. In addition, the European Union enacted its own privacy regulations and is currently considering other Internet-related legislation. The law of the Internet, however, remains largely unsettled, even in areas where there has been some legislative action. It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws such as those governing intellectual property, privacy, libel and taxation apply to the Internet. In addition, the growth and development of the market for online financial services, including online banking, may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business online. We are also subject to encryption and security export laws which, depending on future developments, could adversely affect our business.

Employees

      As of March 15, 2002, we had approximately 1,640 employees, including 697 in customer support and professional services, 234 in sales and marketing and 378 in product development. In addition to full-time

14


Table of Contents

employees, we have used the services of various independent contractors for professional services projects and product development.

Risk Factors

      You should consider carefully the following risks before you decide to buy our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or a part of the money you paid to buy our common stock.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate and any fluctuations could adversely affect the price of our common stock

      Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly to date. If we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors as a result of any future fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, the market price of our common stock would likely decline. We expect that we may experience fluctuations in future quarters because:

  •  we cannot accurately predict the number and timing of contracts we will sign in a period, in part because the budget constraints and internal review processes of existing and potential clients are not within our control;
 
  •  many of our clients’ orders tend to be relatively large, and in any given period a substantial portion of our revenues may be attributable to a few clients;
 
  •  the length of our sales cycle to large financial organizations generally lasts from 6 to 18 months, which adds an element of uncertainty to our ability to forecast revenues;
 
  •  if we fail to introduce new or enhanced products, or if our competitors introduce new or enhanced products, sales of our products and services may not achieve expected levels and/or may decline;
 
  •  our ability to expand the mix of distribution channels through which our products are sold may be limited;
 
  •  our products may not achieve widespread consumer acceptance, which could cause our revenues to be lower than expected;
 
  •  our sales may be constrained by the timing of releases of third-party software that works with our products; and
 
  •  a significant percentage of our expenses is relatively fixed, and we may be unable to reduce expenses if revenues decrease.

Acquisitions may be costly and difficult to integrate, divert management resources or dilute stockholder value

      We acquired three companies in 1999, three companies in 2000, one company in 2001 and two companies in the first quarter of 2002. We sold one of these acquired companies in January 2001. The continued integration of these companies and any future acquisitions into our existing operations is a complex, time-consuming and expensive process and may disrupt our business. We have encountered substantial difficulties, costs and delays in integrating the acquired operations with our own and may continue to do so in the future. Among the issues related to integration are:

  •  potential incompatibility of business cultures;
 
  •  potential delays in rationalizing diverse technology platforms;
 
  •  potential difficulties in coordinating geographically separated organizations;

15


Table of Contents

  •  potential difficulties in re-training sales forces to market all of our products across all of our intended markets;
 
  •  potential difficulties implementing common internal business systems and processes;
 
  •  potential conflicts in third-party relationships; and
 
  •  the loss of key employees and diversion of the attention of management from other ongoing business concerns.

We depend on a limited number of clients for a significant portion of our revenue and, if any of those clients terminates its contract, our revenues and financial performance would decline

      Our business success depends in part on our relationships with a limited number of large clients. We had one client that accounted for 40%, 31% and 28% of our total revenue in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Although the percentage of total revenue that this one client accounts for has declined, we expect that we will continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of clients in the future. A substantial number of our client contracts do not allow our clients to terminate their contracts prior to the termination date without payment of liquidated damages. These damages are usually insufficient to replace the ongoing revenue we would have otherwise earned.

Market volatility may affect the price of our common stock

      The trading prices of Internet stocks in general, and ours in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations. Since reaching a high in 2000, our stock price has declined significantly. Any further negative change in the public’s perception of the prospects of Internet or e-commerce companies could further depress our stock price regardless of our results of operations. Other broad market and industry factors may decrease the trading price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Market fluctuations, as well as general political and economic conditions such as a recession or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations, also may decrease the trading price of our common stock. In addition, our stock price could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to the following factors:

  •  actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results;
 
  •  announcements of new products, product enhancements, technological innovations or new services by us or our competitors;
 
  •  changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
 
  •  conditions or trends in the Internet and online commerce industries;
 
  •  changes in the market valuations of other Internet or online service companies;
 
  •  developments in Internet regulations;
 
  •  announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
 
  •  unscheduled system downtime of our products in either a hosted or in-house environment;
 
  •  additions or departures of key personnel; and
 
  •  sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market.

We have experienced substantial losses and may not achieve profitable operations in the foreseeable future

      We incurred losses in 1999, 2000 and 2001. In November 2000 and June 2001, we approved restructuring plans related to the streamlining of our worldwide operations. We continue to review our cost structure on a worldwide basis and look for additional ways to streamline our operations. We believe our efforts to streamline operations, including headcount reductions and consolidation of our operating facilities, have resulted in costs

16


Table of Contents

savings that have improved our margins and our cash flows from operating activities during 2001. We cannot ensure that our efforts to streamline our operations will improve our financial performance, or that we will be able to achieve profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. We generally are unable to reduce our expenses significantly in the short-term to compensate for any unexpected delay or decrease in anticipated revenues. As a result, we may continue to experience losses, which could negatively impact the value of our common stock.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could negatively affect our stock price

      If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares issued when options and warrants are exercised or shares of our preferred stock are converted into common stock, the market price of our common stock could fall. As of March 21, 2002, we had 62.6 million shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no exercise of outstanding options or warrants or conversion of preferred stock. As of March 21, 2002, there were outstanding employee stock options to purchase 17.4 million shares of our common stock, options and warrants to acquire 300,000 shares of our common stock, and 1.6 million shares of preferred stock convertible into an aggregate of 8.7 million shares of our common stock. The common stock issuable after vesting and upon exercise of these options and warrants and upon conversion of this preferred stock will be eligible for sale in the public market from time to time. Our series D convertible preferred shares must be converted by April 30, 2002 which will result in the issuance of 7.0 million shares of our common stock. The possible sale of a significant number of these shares may cause the market price of our common stock to fall. Some of the holders of restricted shares of our common stock, our preferred stock and vested options or warrants have rights that may require us to register shares of common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By exercising their registration rights and causing a large number of shares to be sold in the public market, these stockholders could cause the market price of our common stock to fall.

A significant portion of our clients are in the rapidly consolidating financial services industry, which is subject to economic changes that could reduce demand for our products and services

      For the foreseeable future, we expect to derive most of our revenue from products and services we provide to the banking industry and other financial services firms such as insurance and securities brokerage companies. Changes in economic conditions and unforeseen events, like recession or inflation, could occur and reduce consumers’ use of banking services. Any event of this kind, or implementation for any reason by banks of cost reduction measures, could result in significant decreases in demand for our products and services. Mergers and acquisitions are pervasive in today’s banking industry. Our existing clients may be acquired by or merged into other financial institutions which already have their own financial Internet software solution or decide to terminate their relationships with us for other reasons. As a result, our sales could decline if an existing client is merged into or acquired by another company.

Network or Internet security problems could damage our reputation and business

      Despite our security measures, the core of our network infrastructure could be vulnerable to unforeseen computer problems. Although we believe we have taken steps to mitigate much of the risk, we may in the future experience interruptions in service as a result of the accidental or intentional actions of Internet users, current and former employees or others. Unknown security risks may result in liability to us and also may deter financial organizations from licensing our software and services. Although we intend to continue to implement and establish security measures, there can be no assurance that measures we have implemented will not be circumvented in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The occurrence of any of these problems could reduce product demand from potential customers and cause existing customers to terminate their license or data center contracts with us. These problems could also require us to spend significant capital to remedy any failure and could subject us to costly litigation with clients or their end users.

17


Table of Contents

Our market is highly competitive and, if we are unable to keep pace with evolving technology, our revenue and future prospects may decline

      The market for our products and services is characterized by rapidly changing technology, intense competition and evolving industry standards. We have many competitors who offer various components of our suite of applications or who use a different technology platform to accomplish similar tasks. In some cases, our existing clients also use some of our competitors’ products. Our future success will depend on our ability to develop, sell and support enhancements of current products and new software products in response to changing client needs. If the completion of the next version of any of our products is delayed, our revenue and future prospects could be harmed. In addition, competitors may develop products or technologies that the industry considers more attractive than those we offer or that render our technology obsolete.

We are engaged in software development activities in countries other than the United States, which may not be successful and which may put our intellectual property at risk

      In order to optimize available research and development resources and meet development timeframes, we established a relationship with an Indian based development organization in 2001 to assist us with portions of our product development. We expect to expand this relationship in 2002 to a newly created development center in India. While our experience to date with these activities has been positive, there is no assurance that this will continue. Specifically, there are a number of risks associated with this activity, including but not limited to the following:

  •  communications and information flow may be less efficient and accurate as a consequence of the time, distance and language differences between our primary development organization and the Indian based activities, resulting in delays in development or errors in the software developed;
 
  •  ramp-up time for our Indian based development efforts may adversely impact the ability to meet anticipated schedules;
 
  •  the quality of the development efforts undertaken in India may not meet our requirements because of language, cultural and experiential differences, resulting in potential product errors and/or delays; and
 
  •  there is the potential for misappropriation of our intellectual property that might not be readily discoverable.

We may become involved in litigation over proprietary rights, which may be costly and time consuming

      Other parties may assert that our products, trademarks or other proprietary rights require a license of intellectual property rights or infringe, or may infringe, on their intellectual property rights. Any claims, with or without merit, could:

  •  be time-consuming;
 
  •  result in costly litigation;
 
  •  cause product shipment delays;
 
  •&nbs