Back to GetFilings.com




1
===============================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission file number 0-23732

WINSTON HOTELS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

NORTH CAROLINA 56-1624289
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

2626 GLENWOOD AVENUE, SUITE 200
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(919) 510-6010
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share New York Stock Exchange
(Title of Class) (Name of Exchange upon Which Registered)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No|_|

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment of this Form 10-K. |_|

The aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share, at March 1, 2001, held by those persons deemed by the
registrant to be non-affiliates was approximately $133,153,144.

As of March 1, 2001, there were 16,926,678 shares of the registrant's
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Document Where Incorporated
- -------- ------------------


1. Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 8, 2001 Part III



===============================================================================

2


WINSTON HOTELS, INC.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT


INDEX



Page
----


PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS 3

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 9

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 12

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 12

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 13

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 14

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 16

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 21

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 22

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 22

PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 22

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 22

ITEM 12. SHARE OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS 22

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 22

PART IV.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON
FORM 10-K 23

SIGNATURES 27



2
3


PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS

Winston Hotels, Inc. ("WHI") operates so as to qualify as a real estate
investment trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes. During 1994, WHI
completed an initial public offering of its common stock ("Common Stock"),
utilizing the majority of the proceeds to acquire one hotel and a general
partnership interest (as the sole general partner) in WINN Limited Partnership
(the "Partnership"). The Partnership used a substantial portion of the proceeds
to acquire nine additional hotel properties. These ten hotels were acquired from
affiliates of WHI. WHI and the Partnership (collectively the "Company") began
operations as a REIT on June 2, 1994. As of December 31, 2000, WHI's ownership
in the Partnership was 92.86%.

During 1995 and 1996, WHI completed follow-on Common Stock offerings,
as well as a Preferred Stock offering in September 1997, and invested the net
proceeds from these offerings in the Partnership. The Partnership utilized the
proceeds to acquire 28 additional hotel properties. During 1998, the Company
added 13 additional properties to its portfolio, five of which were internally
developed. During 2000, the Company sold two hotels. As of December 31, 2000,
the Company owned 49 hotel properties (the "Current Hotels") in 12 states having
an aggregate of 6,723 rooms.

The Company also owns a 49% ownership interest in three joint ventures,
two of which each own an operating hotel and a third which owns a hotel under
development and expected to open in July 2001, collectively (the "Joint Venture
Hotels"). The Joint Venture Hotels consist of a Hilton Garden Inn located in
Windsor, CT, a Hampton Inn located in Ponte Vedra, FL and a Hilton Garden Inn,
currently under construction, located in Evanston, IL. Additionally, the Company
has provided mezzanine financing to two unrelated parties for two other hotels
in which the Company will have no ownership interest.

As of December 31, 2000, the Company leased 47 of the 49 Current Hotels
to CapStar Winston Company, L.L.C. ("CapStar Winston"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of MeriStar Hotels and Resorts, Inc. ("MeriStar"), one of the Current
Hotels to Bristol Hotel Tenant Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bass PLC of
London ("Bass") and one of the Current Hotels to Secaucus Holding Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Prime Hospitality Corp. ("Prime"). CapStar Winston
also currently leases one Joint Venture Hotel located in Ponte Vedra, FL and has
signed a lease agreement to lease the Joint Venture Hotel located in Evanston,
IL to be opened in July 2001. Bass also currently leases the Joint Venture Hotel
located in Windsor, CT. All 49 of the Current Hotels were leased pursuant to
separate percentage operating lease agreements that provide for rent payments
based, in part, on revenues from the Current Hotels (the "Percentage Leases").
Under the terms of the Percentage Leases, the lessees are obligated to pay the
Company the greater of base rent ("Base Rent") or percentage rent ("Percentage
Rent"). The Percentage Leases are designed to allow the Company to participate
in the growth in revenues at the Current Hotels by requiring that a portion of
each Current Hotel's room revenues in excess of specified amounts will be paid
to the Company as Percentage Rent.

NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Growth Strategy

The Company's growth strategy is to enhance shareholder value by
increasing cash available for distribution per share of Common Stock through:
(i) participating in any increased room revenue from the Current Hotels and any
subsequently acquired or developed hotels through Percentage Leases; (ii)
acquiring additional hotels, or ownership interests in hotels, that meet the
Company's investment criteria; (iii) selectively developing hotels to own and
hotel additions as market conditions warrant; (iv) leveraging off of its
management team's expertise, such as third party development and purchasing and
design services, and (v) mezzanine financing activities whereby the Company
initiates hotel loans to third party borrowers.

Internal Growth Strategy

The Company participates in any increased room revenue from the Current
Hotels through Percentage Leases. The Company believes that internal growth,
through increases in Percentage Rent has and, in the future, may result from:
(i) continued sales and marketing programs by the lessees and operators; (ii)
completion of refurbishment projects as needed at the Current Hotels; (iii)
maintaining hotel franchises with demonstrated market acceptance and national
reservation systems; and (iv) continuation of the industry-wide trend of
increasing average daily room rate ("ADR") and revenue per available room
("REVPAR").

The Percentage Leases provide that a percentage of room revenues in
specified ranges is paid as Percentage Rent. For most leases, the percentage of
room revenues paid as Percentage Rent increases as a higher specified level of
room revenues is achieved. Pursuant to each Percentage Lease, Base Rent and the
ranges of room revenues specified for purposes of calculating Percentage Rent
are


3
4


adjusted on a quarterly or annual basis for inflation beginning on the first
day after the first full fiscal year of the Percentage Lease, based on changes
in the United States Consumer Price Index ("CPI").

Acquisition Strategy

The Company intends to acquire additional hotels, or ownership
interests in hotels, with strong national franchise affiliations in the
mid-scale and upscale market segments, or hotel properties with the potential to
obtain such franchise affiliations. In particular, the Company will consider
acquiring limited-service hotels such as Hampton Inn and Fairfield Inn by
Marriott hotels; full-service hotels such as Hilton Garden Inn, Courtyard by
Marriott and Holiday Inn hotels; and extended-stay hotel properties such as
Homewood Suites by Hilton, Hampton Inn and Suites, Residence Inn, Spring Hill
Suites by Marriott and Staybridge by Holiday Inn (see "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Forward Looking
Statements").

The Company intends to consider investments in hotel properties that
meet one or more of the following criteria: (i) properties in locations with
relatively high demand for rooms, a relatively low supply of hotel properties
and barriers to easy entry into the hotel business, such as a scarcity of
suitable sites or zoning restrictions; (ii) successful hotels available at
favorable prices; and (iii) newly developed hotels that the developer does not
intend to own. The Company believes its relationship with each lessee and
franchisor will provide additional potential investment opportunities.

Additional investments in hotel properties may be made through the
Partnership, directly by WHI or with other entities. The Company's ability to
acquire additional hotel properties and develop hotels depends primarily on its
ability to obtain additional debt financing, proceeds from subsequent issuances
of Common Stock or other securities, proceeds from the sale of hotel properties
or co-investments from other investors.

Development Strategy

The Company intends to pursue hotel development as suitable
opportunities arise. The Company may finance 100% of such development or seek
partners who would co-invest in development or rehabilitation joint ventures.
The Company intends to consider development of hotels with strong national
franchise affiliations in markets where the Company believes that carefully
timed and managed development will yield returns to the Company that exceed
returns from any available hotels in those markets that meet the Company's
acquisition criteria (see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-- Forward Looking Statements"). The Company
earns certain fees from its joint venture development activity and also is
exploring other opportunities to use management's expertise to earn additional
fees through third party development.

In June 1999, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement to
jointly develop and own upscale hotels with Regent Partners, Inc., a leading
real estate development, investment and services firm and a wholly owned
subsidiary of J.A. Jones, Inc. ("Regent"). By combining Regent's expertise in
hotel development with the Company's, this approach offers each organization the
potential for attractive financial returns. Under the terms of the joint venture
agreement (the "Regent Joint Venture"), Regent and the Company co-develop the
hotels and receive fees for their respective services including development,
purchasing and, upon opening of the hotel, on-going asset management. The Regent
Joint Venture consists of two separate joint ventures, each of which owns one
hotel.

The Regent Joint Venture's initial project, a $16.5 million,
full-service 158-room Hilton Garden Inn in Windsor, CT, opened in September
2000. Construction has begun on the Regent Joint Venture's second project, a $20
million, 177-room Hilton Garden Inn in the Chicago suburb of Evanston, which is
scheduled to open in July 2001. The Company owns 49 percent of the Regent Joint
Venture. The Company has the right to acquire Regent's interests in each project
subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement.

In April 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with
Marsh Landing Investment, LLC to jointly develop an $8.5 million, 118-room
Hampton Inn in Ponte Vedra, FL. This hotel was opened in December 2000. The
Company owns 49% of the joint venture, and Marsh Landing Investment, LLC, a
company owned by Charles M. Winston and James H. Winston, owns the remaining
51%. Both Charles M. Winston and James H. Winston serve on the Company's Board
of Directors. The Company has the right to acquire Marsh Landing Investment,
LLC's interest subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement.

In addition to generating development, purchasing and asset management
fee income and thus enhancing the Company's revenues and cash flow, other
benefits of these joint venture agreements include expanding our affiliations
with leading upscale brands and the potential addition of new hotels to our
portfolio, despite the external capital constraints prevalent in today's real
estate market.


4
5


Mezzanine Financing

On July 5, 2000, the Company entered into a strategic alliance with
Noble Investment Group, Ltd. ("Noble") to partially finance and develop two
Hilton Garden Inn hotels, one in Atlanta (Sugarloaf), GA and one in Tampa, FL,
and to explore other similar upscale Hilton and Marriott opportunities. In July,
the Company provided $1.1 million in mezzanine funding for the 122-room Hilton
Garden Inn in Atlanta (Sugarloaf) and in February 2001, provided approximately
$2.2 million in mezzanine funding for the 153-room Hilton Garden Inn in Tampa.
Noble is responsible for providing the remainder of the funding and will own and
operate the hotels. Both projects are under construction; the Atlanta
(Sugarloaf) project is scheduled to open during the second quarter of 2001, and
the Tampa project is scheduled to open during the first quarter of 2002. In
connection with the alliance, the Company will co-develop the Atlanta
(Sugarloaf) project with Noble, will provide all development services for the
Tampa project, and will receive fees for its development services. The Company
continues to seek additional mezzanine financing opportunities.

Operations and Property Management

As of December 31, 2000, CapStar Winston leased 47 of the Current
Hotels, 38 of which they also operated. Interstate Management and Investment
Corporation ("IMIC") managed eight of the Current Hotels and Hilton Hotels
Corporation ("Hilton") managed one of the Current Hotels (collectively the
"Property Managers") pursuant to management agreements with CapStar Winston with
respect to each of such hotels. Bass and Prime each leased and operated one of
the Current Hotels. CapStar Winston and Bass also each leased and operated one
of the Joint Venture Hotels and CapStar Winston has signed a lease agreement to
lease and operate a third joint venture hotel to be opened in July 2001. The
lessees and the Property Managers seek to increase revenues at the Current
Hotels by using established systems to manage the Current Hotels for marketing,
rate achievement, expense management, physical facility maintenance, human
resources, accounting and internal auditing. They are trained in all aspects of
hotel operations, including negotiation of prices with corporate and other
clients and responsiveness to marketing requirements in their particular
markets, with particular emphasis placed on customer service. The lessees and
the Property Managers employ a mix of marketing techniques designed for each
specific Current Hotel, which include individual toll-free lines,
cross-marketing of the Current Hotels' billboards and direct marketing, as well
as taking advantage of national advertising by the franchisors of the Current
Hotels.

The lessees lease the Current Hotels pursuant to the Percentage Leases.
Under the Percentage Leases, the lessees, or the Property Managers, generally
are required to perform all operational and management functions necessary to
operate the Current Hotels. The lessees are entitled to all profits and cash
flow from the Current Hotels after payment of rent under the Percentage Leases
and other operating expenses, including, in the case of the nine Current Hotels
managed by the Property Managers, the management fee payable to the Property
Managers. The lessees, their affiliates and the Property Managers may manage
other hotel properties in addition to hotels owned by the Company, however, the
lessees and their affiliates may not build or develop a hotel or motel within
five miles of a hotel owned by the Company and leased by the lessee.

CapStar Winston is a wholly owned subsidiary of MeriStar, a New York
Stock Exchange company. As of December 31, 2000, MeriStar, the nation's largest
independent hotel management company, leased or managed 222 hotels with 48,054
rooms in 34 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Canada and the U.S.
Virgin Islands.

IMIC, a hotel development and management company, operates eight of the
Current Hotels under separate management agreements with CapStar Winston. Each
year, CapStar Winston pays IMIC a base management fee for each Current Hotel
managed by IMIC based on a percentage of the budgeted gross operating profit for
that year with incentive amounts based on actual gross operating profits if they
exceed budgeted amounts. IMIC has agreed that each year it will spend a
specified percentage of the gross revenues of each Current Hotel managed by IMIC
on repairs and maintenance of the hotel. CapStar Winston and the Company have
retained the right to control the expenditure of funds budgeted for capital and
non-routine items, including, at their discretion, approving plans and selecting
and overseeing contractors and other vendors. IMIC currently operates 28 hotels
in six states, including 24 limited-service hotels and 4 full-service,
convention or resort hotels.

Hilton manages one of the Current Hotels under a management agreement
with CapStar Winston. Each year, CapStar Winston pays Hilton a management fee
based on a percentage of the gross operating profit for the hotel managed by
Hilton with certain incentive amounts. Hilton is recognized internationally as a
preeminent hospitality company. Hilton develops, owns, manages or franchises
1,900 hotels, resorts and vacations ownership properties. Its portfolio includes
many of the world's best known and most highly regarded hotel brands, including
Hilton, Doubletree, Embassy Suites, Hampton Inn, Homewood Suitesby Hilton, Red
Lion Hotels & Inns and Conrad International.

Bass is one of the leading hotel operating companies in the world. As
of December 31, 2000, Bass operated more than 3,000 hotels in close to 100
countries, primarily full-service hotels in the upscale and mid-scale segments
of the hotel industry with branded hotels including Crowne Plaza, Holiday Inn,
Holiday Inn Select and Holiday Inn Express hotels.


5
6


Prime, a New York Stock Exchange company, is one of the nation's
premier lodging companies. Prime operates two proprietary brands, AmeriSuites
(all-suites) and Wellesley Inns (limited-service). It also owns and/or manages
hotels operated under franchise agreements with national hotel chains. As of
December 31, 2000, Prime Hospitality Corporation owned 135 hotels, operated 55
hotels under lease agreements with REITs and managed 24 hotels from third
parties.

Franchise Agreements

All of the Company's Current Hotels operate under franchise licenses
and the Company anticipates that most of the additional hotel properties in
which it invests will be operated under franchise licenses. Franchisors provide
a variety of benefits for franchisees which include national advertising,
publicity and other marketing programs designed to increase brand awareness,
training of personnel, continuous review of quality standards and centralized
reservation systems.

The hotel franchise licenses generally specify certain management,
operational, record keeping, accounting, reporting and marketing standards and
procedures with which the lessees must comply. The franchise licenses obligate
the lessees to comply with the franchisors' standards and requirements with
respect to training of operational personnel, safety, maintaining specified
insurance, the types of services and products ancillary to guest room services
that may be provided, display of signs, and the type, quality and age of
furniture, fixtures and equipment included in guest rooms, lobbies and other
common areas.

Of the Current Hotels' franchise licenses, one expires in 2006, three
expire in 2007, five expire in 2008, three expire in 2009, two expire in 2010,
three expire in 2011, two expire in 2012, two expire in 2014, two expire in
2016, 18 expire in 2017 and eight expire in 2018. The franchise agreements
provide for termination at the franchisor's option upon the occurrence of
certain events, including the lessees' failure to pay royalties and fees or
perform its other covenants under the franchise agreement, bankruptcy,
abandonment of the franchise, commission of a felony, assignment of the
franchise without the consent of the franchisor, or failure to comply with
applicable law in the operation of the relevant Current Hotel. The lessees are
entitled to terminate the franchise license only by giving at least 12 months
notice and paying a specified amount of liquidated damages. The franchise
agreements will not renew automatically upon expiration. The lessees are
responsible for making all payments under the franchise agreements to the
franchisors. Under the franchise agreements, the lessees pay a franchise fee of
an aggregate of between 3% and 5% of room revenues, plus additional fees that
amount to between 3% and 4% of room revenues from the Current Hotels.

Competition

The hotel industry is highly competitive with various participants
competing on the basis of price, level of service and geographic location. The
Current Hotels compete with other hotel properties in their geographic markets.
Some of the Company's competitors may have greater marketing and financial
resources than the Company, the lessees, and the Property Managers. Several of
the Current Hotels are located in areas in which they may compete with other
Current Hotels for business. The Company competes for acquisition opportunities
with entities that may have greater financial resources than the Company. These
entities may generally be able to accept more risk than the Company can
prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of a
hotel operator.

Employees

The Company had 29 employees as of March 1, 2001.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state and local laws and regulations, an owner
or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation
of certain hazardous or toxic substances on such property. Such laws often
impose such liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was
responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, a
person that arranges for the disposal or transports for disposal or treatment of
a hazardous substance at another property may be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous substances released into the environment at that
property. The costs of remediation or removal of such substances may be
substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to promptly
remedy such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to use or sell
such real estate or to borrow using such real estate as collateral. Certain
environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability
for the release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including
asbestos-containing materials ("ACMs") into the air, and third parties may seek
recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or
property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances,
including ACMs. In connection with the ownership and operation of the Current
Hotels, the Company, the lessees, or the Property Managers, as the case may be,
may be potentially liable for such costs.

Phase I environmental site assessments ("ESAs") were obtained on all of
the Current Hotels. The Phase I ESAs were intended to identify potential sources
of contamination for which the Current Hotels may be responsible and to assess
the status of environmental regulatory compliance. The Phase I ESAs included
historical reviews of the Current Hotels, reviews of certain public records,


6
7


preliminary investigations of the sites and surrounding properties, screening
for the presence of asbestos, PCBs and underground storage tanks, and the
preparation and issuance of a written report. The Phase I ESAs did not include
invasive procedures, such as soil sampling or ground water analysis. The Phase I
ESA reports have not revealed any environmental condition, liability or
compliance concern that the Company believes would have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, assets or results of operations, nor is the
Company aware of any such condition, liability or compliance concern.
Nevertheless, it is possible that these reports do not reveal all environmental
conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns or that there are material
environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns that arose at a
Current Hotel after the related Phase I ESA report was completed of which the
Company is unaware. Moreover, no assurances can be given that (i) future laws,
ordinances or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability,
or (ii) the current environmental condition of the Current Hotels will not be
affected by the condition of the properties in the vicinity of the Current
Hotels (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third
parties unrelated to the Company.

In addition to the ESAs, the Company also obtained asbestos surveys for
the Holiday Inn Select-Garland (Dallas), Texas and the Comfort Inn-Greenville,
South Carolina. In each of the asbestos surveys, the consultants discovered the
presence of ACMs. The Company is monitoring the presence of the ACMs with the
assistance of its consultants.

The Company believes that the Current Hotels are in compliance in all
material respects with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances and other environmental
matters. The Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any
material noncompliance, liability or claim relating to hazardous or toxic
substance or other environmental substances in connection with any of its
properties.

Tax Status

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, effective for its short taxable year
ended December 31, 1994. The Company believes that it qualifies for taxation as
a REIT, and with certain exceptions, the Company will not be subject to tax at
the corporate level on its taxable income that is distributed to the
shareholders of the Company. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and
operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute
at least 95% of its annual taxable income. For taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2000, the annual taxable income distribution requirement has been
lowered to 90%. Failure to qualify as a REIT will render the Company subject to
federal income tax (including any applicable minimum tax) on its taxable income
at regular corporate rates and distributions to the shareholders in any such
year will not be deductible by the Company. Although the Company does not intend
to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") as to its
REIT status, the Company has obtained the opinion of its legal counsel that the
Company qualifies as a REIT, which opinion is based on certain assumptions and
representations and is not binding on the Service or any court. Even if the
Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain
state and local taxes on its income and properties.

REIT Modernization Act

Prior to January 1, 2001, under the REIT qualification requirements of
the Internal Revenue Code, REITs generally were required to lease their hotels
to third party operators. Under the REIT Modernization Act of 1999 (the "RMA"),
which became effective January 1, 2001, REITs are permitted to lease their
hotels to wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries of the REITs ("TRS Lessees").
Under the RMA, the TRS Lessees may not operate the leased hotels and must enter
into management agreements with eligible independent contractors who will manage
the hotels. The Company has carefully considered opportunities presented by the
RMA and, at the present time, has decided to retain its existing relationship
with its lessees.

Seasonality

The Company's operations historically have been seasonal in nature,
reflecting higher REVPAR during the second and third quarters. This seasonality
and the structure of the Percentage Leases, which provide for a higher
percentage of room revenues above the minimum equal quarterly levels to be paid
as Percentage Rent, can be expected to cause fluctuations in the Company's
receipt of quarterly lease revenue under the Percentage Leases. In December
1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 101 ("SAB 101") which provides guidance on revenue recognition. The Company
adopted SAB 101 effective January 1, 2000. SAB 101, which requires that a lessor
not recognize contingent rental income until annual specified hurdles have been
achieved by the lessee, effectively defers recognition by the Company of a
significant portion of percentage lease revenue from the first and second
quarters, to the third and fourth quarters of the calendar year. SAB 101 has no
impact on the Company's FFO, or its interim or annual cash flow from its third
party lessees, and therefore, on its ability to pay dividends (see Note 2 to the
Company's consolidated financial statements).


7
8


Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table lists the executive officers of the Company:




NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------


Charles M. Winston 71 Chairman of the Board of Directors

Robert W. Winston, III 39 Chief Executive Officer

James D. Rosenberg 47 President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary

Joseph V. Green 50 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Kenneth R. Crockett 44 Executive Vice President of Development


CHARLES M. WINSTON. Charles Winston has served as Chairman of the Board
of Directors since March 15, 1994. Mr. Winston is a native of North Carolina and
a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with an A.B.
degree. Mr. Winston has more than 37 years of experience in developing and
operating full service restaurants and hotels. Mr. Winston is Robert Winston's
father and brother of James Winston, a director.

ROBERT W. WINSTON, III. Robert Winston has served as Chief Executive
Officer and Director of the Company since March 15, 1994. Mr. Winston served as
the Company's President from March 15, 1994 through January 14, 1999 and as
Secretary for the periods from March 1994 through May 1995 and from October 1997
until May 5, 1998. Mr. Winston is a native of North Carolina and a graduate of
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a B.A. degree in economics.
Mr. Winston is Charles Winston's son and James Winston's nephew.

JAMES D. ROSENBERG. Mr. Rosenberg assumed the title of President on
January 14, 1999. Mr. Rosenberg has also served as Chief Operating Officer since
January 5, 1998, Secretary since May 5, 1998, and served as Chief Financial
Officer from January 5, 1998 through May 18, 1999. Mr. Rosenberg is a CPA and a
graduate of Presbyterian College and received an MBA from the University of
South Carolina. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Rosenberg held the position of
Senior Vice President with Holiday Inn Worldwide since 1994 where he was
responsible for managing 85 hotels in seven countries. Prior to joining the
Holiday Inn organization, Mr. Rosenberg was a partner in Sage Hospitality
Resources and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Denver-based hospitality firm. Mr. Rosenberg started his career with Price
Waterhouse, L.L.P.

JOSEPH V. GREEN. Mr. Green assumed the title of Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer on May 18, 1999. Mr. Green has also served as
Executive Vice President - Acquisitions and Finance from January 1, 1998 through
May 18, 1999, after having advised Winston Hospitality, Inc. on matters
regarding hotel acquisitions and finance since 1993, including the initial
public offering of WHI. Mr. Green is a graduate of East Carolina University, was
awarded his J.D. degree from Wake Forest University School of Law and received a
Master of Laws in Taxation from Georgetown University.

KENNETH R. CROCKETT. Mr. Crockett was appointed Senior Vice President
of Development of the Company in September 1995 and Executive Vice President of
Development in January 1998. Mr. Crockett is a graduate of the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill with a B.S. degree in Business Administration.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Crockett was an Associate Partner for project
development in commercial real estate at Capital Associates, a real estate
development firm located in the Raleigh, North Carolina area.


8
9


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth certain unaudited information with respect
to the Current Hotels:



2000
------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Room Lease
of Revenues Revenues
Rooms ($000) ADR Occupancy % ($000)
------ --------- ------- ----------- --------

Hampton Inns
Boone, NC 95 $ 2,074 $ 82.45 72.33% 891
Brunswick, GA 128 2,112 59.87 75.28% 829
Cary, NC 130 1,920 64.65 62.43% 732
Charlotte, NC 125 2,590 81.46 69.49% 1,190
Chester, VA 66 1,286 69.78 76.32% 544
Duncanville, TX * 119 1,030 44.25 71.90% 350
Durham, NC 137 2,410 65.75 73.11% 992
Gwinnett, GA (Hampton Inn & Suites) 136 2,821 79.61 71.18% 1,428
Hilton Head, SC 124 2,349 80.60 63.69% 939
Jacksonville, NC 120 1,949 60.16 73.78% 779
Las Vegas, NV 128 2,232 59.94 79.50% 1,057
Perimeter, GA 131 2,452 84.75 60.33% 1,202
Raleigh, NC 141 2,960 74.08 77.42% 1,396
Southern Pines, NC 126 1,740 65.98 57.18% 620
Southlake, GA 124 2,319 66.34 76.42% 961
W. Springfield, MA 126 3,011 85.41 77.07% 1,460
White Plains, NY 156 5,257 111.72 82.42% 2,728
Wilmington, NC 118 2,022 69.44 67.41% 791
Comfort Inns
Augusta, GA 123 1,294 58.67 49.01% 378
Charleston, SC 128 2,390 75.65 67.44% 1,086
Chester, VA 122 2,008 64.02 70.25% 872
Clearwater/St. Petersburg, FL 120 1,548 58.84 60.09% 489
Durham, NC 138 2,607 68.45 75.40% 1,209
Fayetteville, NC 176 2,132 53.92 61.38% 917
Greenville, SC 190 1,428 53.33 38.50% 357
London, KY (Comfort Suites) * 62 68 50.60 36.32% 26
Orlando, FL (Comfort Suites) 214 3,732 61.44 77.56% 1,583
Raleigh, NC 149 1,492 46.77 58.49% 507
Wilmington, NC 146 1,993 57.53 64.83% 732
Homewood Suites
Alpharetta, GA 112 2,613 89.93 70.88% 1,284
Cary, NC 120 3,086 89.96 78.75% 1,861
Clear Lake, TX 92 2,460 92.54 78.94% 1,087
Durham, NC 96 2,178 78.92 78.53% 1,089
Lake Mary, FL 112 3,175 105.86 73.17% 1,624
Phoenix, AZ 126 2,364 81.72 62.73% 1,404
Raleigh, NC 137 3,322 89.43 74.08% 1,666
------- --------- -------- ------- ------

1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Room Lease
of Revenues Revenues
Rooms ($000) ADR Occupancy % ($000)
------ --------- ------- ----------- --------

Hampton Inns
Boone, NC 95 $ 1,896 $ 72.31 75.64% $ 787
Brunswick, GA 128 2,022 58.32 74.22% 785
Cary, NC 130 2,081 67.21 65.24% 859
Charlotte, NC 125 2,780 79.08 77.06% 1,327
Chester, VA 66 1,334 71.66 77.29% 582
Duncanville, TX * 119 1,221 49.83 56.39% 403
Durham, NC 137 2,582 68.19 75.72% 1,120
Gwinnett, GA (Hampton Inn & Suites) 136 2,799 78.57 71.77% 1,428
Hilton Head, SC 124 2,380 76.72 68.21% 975
Jacksonville, NC 120 1,872 58.62 72.90% 741
Las Vegas, NV 128 1,872 58.63 68.35% 926
Perimeter, GA 131 2,391 80.13 62.40% 1,173
Raleigh, NC 141 2,930 73.07 77.91% 1,391
Southern Pines, NC 126 2,065 63.90 70.28% 850
Southlake, GA 124 2,235 64.46 76.01% 921
W. Springfield, MA 126 2,850 80.14 77.69% 1,365
White Plains, NY 156 4,902 105.16 81.87% 2,510
Wilmington, NC 118 2,242 68.55 75.95% 946
Comfort Inns
Augusta, GA 123 1,413 57.39 54.85% 468
Charleston, SC 128 2,534 75.24 72.10% 1,194
Chester, VA 122 2,115 64.58 73.53% 958
Clearwater/St. Petersburg, FL 120 1,659 53.40 71.40% 576
Durham, NC 138 2,536 72.68 69.28% 1,176
Fayetteville, NC 176 2,198 54.08 63.28% 962
Greenville, SC 190 1,552 46.96 47.65% 423
London, KY (Comfort Suites) * 62 941 54.50 76.29% 394
Orlando, FL (Comfort Suites) 214 3,865 61.13 80.94% 1,705
Raleigh, NC 149 1,812 48.52 68.68% 657
Wilmington, NC 146 2,297 56.98 75.66% 949
Homewood Suites
Alpharetta, GA 112 2,611 90.44 70.61% 1,242
Cary, NC 120 3,252 89.63 82.85% 1,986
Clear Lake, TX 92 2,294 94.80 72.06% 987
Durham, NC 96 1,916 81.21 67.32% 890
Lake Mary, FL 112 2,999 91.82 79.89% 1,153
Phoenix, AZ 126 2,422 70.95 74.23% 1,285
Raleigh, NC 137 3,318 86.38 76.82% 1,589
------ --------- ------- ------- --------


9
10




2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Room Lease
of Revenues Revenues
Rooms ($000) ADR Occupancy % ($000)
------- --------- ------- ----------- --------

Holiday Inns
Abingdon, VA (Holiday Inn Express) 81 1,374 65.02 71.27% 645
Clearwater, FL (Holiday Inn Express) 127 2,452 72.59 72.67% 1,090
Dallas, TX (Holiday Inn Select) 244 4,079 72.00 63.44% 1,760
Secaucus, NJ 160 5,907 126.31 79.86% 3,181
Tinton Falls, NJ 171 4,803 98.81 77.66% 1,727
Courtyard by Marriott
Ann Arbor, MI 160 4,468 95.78 79.66% 2,162
Houston, TX 198 3,619 83.46 59.83% 1,642
Wilmington, NC 128 2,415 77.23 67.12% 976
Winston-Salem, NC 122 2,466 84.34 65.47% 1,253
Hilton Garden Inns
Albany, NY 155 3,830 88.85 75.98% 1,949
Alpharetta, GA 164 3,707 96.19 64.21% 2,333
Raleigh/Durham, NC 155 4,320 110.18 69.12% 2,476

Quality Suites - Charleston, SC 168 3,738 86.09 70.62% 1,616
Residence Inn - Phoenix, AZ 168 3,310 81.35 66.17% 1,721
Fairfield Inn - Ann Arbor, MI 110 2,068 72.02 71.31% 839
- ------------------------------------------------------- ------- --------- ------- ------- --------
TOTAL 6,904 $ 134,977 $ 78.24 69.11% $ 62,430
- ------------------------------------------------------- ------- --------- ------- ------- --------


1999
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Room Lease
of Revenues Revenues
Rooms ($000) ADR Occupancy % ($000)
------- --------- ------- ----------- --------

Holiday Inns
Abingdon, VA (Holiday Inn Express) 81 1,394 63.16 74.63% 667
Clearwater, FL (Holiday Inn Express) 127 2,496 68.49 78.61% 1,137
Dallas, TX (Holiday Inn Select) 244 4,179 72.80 64.45% 1,891
Secaucus, NJ 160 5,442 115.70 80.53% 2,765
Tinton Falls, NJ 171 4,414 91.67 77.15% 1,548
Courtyard by Marriott
Ann Arbor, MI 160 4,277 90.84 80.62% 2,055
Houston, TX 198 3,475 77.02 62.43% 1,565
Wilmington, NC 128 2,551 74.39 73.83% 1,082
Winston-Salem, NC 122 2,289 76.39 67.29% 1,121
Hilton Garden Inns
Albany, NY 155 3,286 92.12 63.05% 1,813
Alpharetta, GA 164 3,827 98.74 64.75% 2,071
Raleigh/Durham, NC 155 3,635 98.33 65.34% 2,030

Quality Suites - Charleston, SC 168 3,955 86.96 74.17% 1,789
Residence Inn - Phoenix, AZ 168 3,459 82.12 68.68% 1,799
Fairfield Inn - Ann Arbor, MI 110 2,019 69.71 72.14% 821
- ------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL 6,904 $ 134,886 $ 75.24 71.15% $ 62,237
- ------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------- ------- ------- -------


* Hotel sold during 2000.


10
11


THE PERCENTAGE LEASES

The Partnership leases the Current Hotels for remaining terms of 8 to
13 years pursuant to Percentage Leases, which provide for rent equal to the
greater of Base Rent or Percentage Rent. The Percentage Leases for the Current
Hotels contain the provisions described below. The Company intends that future
leases with respect to its hotel property investments will contain substantially
similar provisions, although the Company may, in its discretion, alter any of
these provisions with respect to any particular lease, depending on the purchase
price paid, economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant at the time.

Percentage Lease Terms

Each Percentage Lease for the Current Hotels has a non-cancelable
remaining term of 8 to 13 years, subject to earlier termination upon the
occurrence of certain contingencies described in the Percentage Lease.

Amounts Payable under the Percentage Leases

During the term of each Percentage Lease, the lessees are or will be
obligated to pay (i) the greater of Base Rent or Percentage Rent and (ii)
certain other additional charges. Base Rent accrues and is required to be paid
monthly. Percentage Rent consists of minimum percentage rent and excess
percentage rent, if any. Minimum percentage rent is calculated based primarily
on the amount of room revenue up to a predetermined threshold per the lease. The
percentage, which differs by hotel, is multiplied by this amount to calculate
minimum percentage rent. These percentages range from 23% to 81%. Excess
percentage rent is calculated based primarily on the amount of any room revenue
in excess of the predetermined threshold mentioned above. The percentage, which
differs by hotel, is multiplied by this amount to calculate excess percentage
rent. These percentages range from 5% to 80%. For most leases, the percentage
used to calculate excess percentage rent exceeds the percentage used to
calculate the minimum percentage rent. Percentage Rent is due either monthly or
quarterly.

Beginning in the fiscal year following the year in which most
Percentage Leases commence, and for each fiscal year thereafter, (i) the annual
Base Rent and (ii) the Percentage Rent formulas will be adjusted on a quarterly
or annual basis for inflation, based on changes in the CPI. The adjustment in
any quarter may not exceed 2%, which may be less than the change in CPI for the
quarter.

Other than real estate and personal property taxes, casualty insurance,
capital improvements and maintenance of underground utilities and structural
elements, which are obligations of the Company, the Percentage Leases require
the lessees to pay rent, insurance, all costs and expenses and all utility and
other charges incurred in the operation of the Current Hotels. The Percentage
Leases also provide for rent reductions and abatements in the event of damage
to, destruction of or a partial taking of any Current Hotel.

Maintenance and Modifications

Under the Percentage Leases, the Company is required to maintain the
underground utilities and the structural elements of the improvements, including
exterior walls (excluding plate glass) and the roof of such Current Hotel. In
addition, the Percentage Leases obligate the Company to fund periodic capital
improvements (in addition to maintenance of underground utilities and structural
elements) to the buildings and grounds comprising their respective Current
Hotels, and the periodic repair, replacement and refurbishment of furniture,
fixtures and equipment in their respective Current Hotels, up to an amount equal
to 5% of room revenues (7% of room revenues and food and beverage revenue for
one of its full-service hotels). These obligations will be carried forward to
the extent that the lessees have not expended such amounts, and any unexpended
amounts will remain the property of the Company upon termination of the
Percentage Leases. Except for capital improvements and maintenance of structural
elements and underground utilities, the lessees are required, at their expense,
to maintain the Current Hotels in good order and repair, except for ordinary
wear and tear, and to make non-structural, foreseen and unforeseen, and ordinary
and extraordinary repairs which may be necessary and appropriate to keep the
Current Hotels in good order and repair.

The lessees are not obligated to bear the cost of capital improvements
to the Current Hotels. With the consent of the Company, however, the lessees, at
their expense, may make non-capital and capital additions, modifications or
improvements to the Current Hotels, provided that such action does not
significantly alter the character or purposes of the Current Hotels or
significantly detract from the value or operating efficiencies of the Current
Hotels. All such alterations, replacements and improvements shall be subject to
all the terms and provisions of the Percentage Leases and will become the
property of the Company upon termination of the Percentage Leases. The Company
owns or will own substantially all personal property not affixed to, or deemed a
part of, the real estate or improvements thereon comprising the Current Hotels,
except to the extent that ownership of such personal property would cause the
rents under the Percentage Leases not to qualify as "rents from real property"
for REIT income test purposes.


11
12


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Other than the matter described below, the Company currently is not
involved in any pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine
litigation incidental to the business, nor are any such proceedings known to be
contemplated by governmental authorities. The lessees have advised the Company
that they currently are not involved in any material pending litigation, other
than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business,
substantially all of which is expected to be covered by liability insurance.

On July 16, 1999, Walton Construction Company, Inc. ("Walton") filed a
civil lawsuit in the State Court of Fulton County, Georgia naming the
Partnership as defendant. The Partnership removed the action to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on August 30, 1999.
The complaint alleges that the Partnership has not paid approximately $2,800,000
due under a contract entered into by the parties in connection with the
construction of the Partnership's Alpharetta, GA Homewood Suites Hotel. The
Partnership's answer, counterclaim and third party complaint (against Walton's
bonding company) were filed September 7, 1999. The Partnership disputes that
such monies are due to Walton based upon Walton's alleged inability to complete
construction on the hotel within the time set out in the construction contract.
The Partnership's counterclaims against Walton arise out of the construction
delays and construction deficiencies allegedly caused by Walton. On August 2,
1999, Walton initiated a virtually identical action in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. On February 29, 2000,
the Partnership answered Walton's complaint and counterclaimed for recovery of
damages due to the construction delays and construction deficiencies allegedly
caused by Walton. Simultaneously, the Partnership also filed a third party
action against Walton's bonding company for recovery on a performance bond. At
present, the Partnership's aggregate claim is estimated to exceed $2,100,000.

By order entered April 11, 2000, all proceedings in the Georgia action
were stayed so that the claims arising out of the Alpharetta hotel dispute could
be litigated in North Carolina.

Each party has served amended pleadings. Walton amended its complaint
on June 30, 2000 to add the Project Architect, Godwin Associates, P.A., as a
party defendant. The Partnership responded by agreeing to defend Godwin
Associates, P.A. A joint defense and a Tolling Agreement were entered into. On
July 12, 2000, the Partnership amended its third party complaint by adding a bad
faith claim against the bonding company. A first round of reciprocal document
productions was made in September, 2000. Supplemental productions by all parties
were made in December, 2000 and early January, 2001. All discovery is to close
by March 15, 2001. The case will be tried before the United States District
Court of the Eastern District of North Carolina and is not expected to occur
before July 20, 2001.

The Partnership believes that it has substantial and meritorious
defenses against the claims alleged against it, and the Partnership intends to
vigorously defend against these claims and pursue its own claims.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.


12
13


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY

WHI's Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under
the symbol "WXH." As of March 1, 2001, WHI had approximately 11,900 common
shareholders based on the number of shareholders of record and an estimate of
the number of participants represented by security position listings. The
following table sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high and low closing
prices for the Common Stock and the cash distributions declared per share:



PRICE RANGE CASH DISTRIBUTIONS DECLARED
-------------------------- ---------------------------
HIGH LOW PER SHARE
-------- -------- ---------

2000
First Quarter $ 8.50 $ 7.38 $ 0.28
Second Quarter 8.12 7.37 0.28
Third Quarter 8.93 7.06 0.28
Fourth Quarter 8.18 7.12 0.28

1999
First Quarter $ 9.75 $ 8.06 $ 0.28
Second Quarter 10.50 8.18 0.28
Third Quarter 10.31 8.37 0.28
Fourth Quarter 8.68 7.75 0.28


Although the declaration of distributions is within the discretion of
the Board of Directors and depends on the Company's results of operations, cash
available for distribution, the financial condition of the Company, tax
considerations (including those related to REITs) and other factors considered
important by the Board of Directors, the Company's policy is to make regular
quarterly distributions to its shareholders.


13
14


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial information for the
Company for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, and 1996, and
selected historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998,
1997, and 1996. This information should be read in conjunction with Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this
report.

WINSTON HOTELS, INC.
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)




2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
STATEMENTS OF INCOME:
Revenue:

Percentage lease revenue $ 62,430 $ 62,237 $ 54,945 $ 35,868 $ 26,611
Interest, joint venture and other income 1,289 433 249 234 97
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total revenue 63,719 62,670 55,194 36,102 26,708
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Expenses:
Real estate taxes and property and casualty
insurance 6,630 6,356 5,262 2,702 1,647
General and administrative 4,323 4,236 3,889 2,095 2,061
Interest 13,491 12,513 8,314 2,648 2,368
Depreciation 21,092 20,565 16,389 10,064 6,476
Amortization 933 834 465 520 368
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total expenses 46,469 44,504 34,319 18,029 12,920
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before loss on sale of properties, allocation
to minority interest and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle 17,250 18,166 20,875 18,073 13,788
Loss on sale of properties 850 239 -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before allocation to minority interest
and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle 16,400 17,927 20,875 18,073 13,788
Income allocation to minority interest 677 1,026 1,349 1,329 786
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle 15,723 16,901 19,526 16,744 13,002
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle - gross (720) -- -- -- --
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle - allocation to minority interest 52 -- -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle - net (668) -- -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Net income 15,055 16,901 19,526 16,744 13,002
Preferred stock distribution (6,938) (6,938) (6,938) (2,100) --
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income available to common shareholders $ 8,117 $ 9,963 $ 12,588 $ 14,644 $ 13,002
========= ========= ========== ========= =========
Earnings per share:
Net income per common share $ 0.48 $ 0.61 $ 0.77 $ 0.92 $ 1.01
========= ========= ========== ========= =========
Net income per common share assuming dilution $ 0.48 $ 0.61 $ 0.77 $ 0.91 $ 1.00
========= ========= ========== ========= =========

Weighted average number of common shares 16,890 16,467 16,286 15,990 12,922

Weighted average number of common shares assuming
dilution 18,188 18,108 18,040 17,555 13,768

Distributions per common share $ 1.12 $ 1.12 $ 1.09 $ 1.08 $ 1.01



14
15




BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash $ 167 $ 28 $ 33 $ 164 $ 234
Investment in hotel properties 366,882 388,870 397,861 279,485 196,682
Total assets 394,310 406,071 412,156 287,827 203,502
Total debt 172,672 174,475 173,085 44,081 42,800
Shareholders' equity 198,716 209,078 213,425 217,490 141,813

OTHER DATA:
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities $ 39,589 $ 39,952 $ 34,605 $ 27,811 $ 18,729
Investing activities (10,231) (12,658) (135,398) (82,349) (74,614)
Financing activities (29,219) (27,299) 100,662 54,468 53,623
Lessees' room revenue 134,977 134,886 117,752 79,526 58,956
Funds from operations (1) 31,268 31,793 30,326 26,037 20,581
Cash available for distribution 23,483 24,735 24,093 21,809 17,557


(1) Funds from operations ("FFO"), as defined by the National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trusts, is income (loss) before minority interest
(determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles),
excluding extraordinary items and gains (losses) from debt restructuring and
sales of operating properties, plus real estate-related depreciation and
amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures. The Company further adjusts FFO by subtracting preferred share
distributions and adding the change in deferred revenue during the period to
eliminate the impact of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (see Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements). The calculation of FFO may vary from entity
to entity and as such the presentation of FFO by the Company may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures of other reporting companies. FFO
is not intended to represent cash flows for the period. FFO has not been
presented as an alternative to operating income, but as an indicator of
operating performance, and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

The following table sets forth selected financial information for
CapStar Winston for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. This
information should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

CAPSTAR WINSTON COMPANY, L.L.C.
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)



YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000 DECEMBER 31, 1999 DECEMBER 31, 1998
----------------- ----------------- -----------------

Room revenue $ 126,884 $ 127,571 $ 113,451
Other revenue 14,664 14,144 12,182
----------- ---------- ----------
Total revenue 141,548 141,715 125,633
----------- ---------- ----------

Rooms expense 29,202 29,037 25,573
Percentage lease expense 57,995 58,551 52,720
Other expenses 74,606 53,240 46,745
----------- ---------- ----------
Total expenses 161,803 140,828 125,038
----------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) income $ (20,255) $ 887 $ 595
=========== ========== ==========



15
16


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
($ IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

Winston Hotels, Inc. ("WHI") operates so as to qualify as a real estate
investment trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes. During 1994, WHI
completed an initial public offering of its common stock ("Common Stock"),
utilizing the majority of the proceeds to acquire one hotel and a general
partnership interest (as the sole general partner) in WINN Limited Partnership
(the "Partnership"). The Partnership used a substantial portion of the proceeds
to acquire nine additional hotel properties. These ten hotels were acquired from
affiliates of WHI. WHI and the Partnership (collectively the "Company") began
operations as a REIT on June 2, 1994. As of December 31, 2000, WHI's ownership
in the Partnership was 92.86% (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements).

During 1995 and 1996, WHI completed follow-on Common Stock offerings,
as well as a Preferred Stock offering in September 1997, and invested the net
proceeds from these offerings in the Partnership. The Partnership utilized the
proceeds to acquire 28 additional hotel properties. The Company owned 31 hotels
as of December 31, 1996 and acquired seven hotels in 1997 (collectively the
"1997 Hotels"). During 1998, the Company added 13 additional properties to its
portfolio, five of which were internally developed (the "1998 Hotels"). During
2000, the Company sold two hotels. As of December 31, 2000, the Company owned 49
hotel properties (the "Current Hotels"), in 12 states, having an aggregate of
6,723 rooms.

The Company also owns a 49% ownership interest in three joint ventures,
two of which each own an operating hotel and a third which owns a hotel under
development and expected to open in July 2001, collectively (the "Joint Venture
Hotels"). The Joint Venture Hotels consist of a Hilton Garden Inn located in
Windsor, CT, a Hampton Inn located in Ponte Vedra, FL and a Hilton Garden Inn,
currently under construction, located in Evanston, IL. Additionally, the Company
has provided mezzanine financing to two unrelated parties for two other hotels
in which the Company will have no ownership interest.

As of December 31, 2000, the Company leased 47 of the 49 Current Hotels
to CapStar Winston Company, L.L.C. ("CapStar Winston"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of MeriStar Hotels and Resorts, Inc. ("MeriStar"), one of the Current
Hotels to Bristol Hotel Tenant Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bass PLC of
London ("Bass") and one of the Current Hotels to Secaucus Holding Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Prime Hospitality Corp. ("Prime"). CapStar Winston
also currently leases one Joint Venture Hotel located in Ponte Vedra, FL and has
signed a lease agreement to lease the Joint Venture Hotel located in Evanston,
IL, to be opened in July 2001. Bass also currently leases the Joint Venture
Hotel located in Windsor, CT. All 49 of the Current Hotels were leased pursuant
to separate percentage operating lease agreements that provide for rent payments
based, in part, on revenues from the Current Hotels (the "Percentage Leases").
Under the terms of the Percentage Leases, the lessees are obligated to pay the
Company the greater of base rent or percentage rent ("Percentage Rent"). The
Percentage Leases are designed to allow the Company to participate in the growth
in revenues at the Current Hotels by requiring that a portion of each Current
Hotel's room revenues in excess of specified amounts will be paid to the Company
as Percentage Rent.

CapStar Winston is a wholly owned subsidiary of MeriStar Hotels and
Resorts, Inc. ("MeriStar"). As of December 31, 2000, MeriStar, the nation's
largest independent hotel management company, leased or managed 222 hotels with
48,054 rooms in 34 states, the District of Columbia, Canada, Puerto Rico and the
U.S. Virgin Islands.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the periods ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, the differences in
operating results are primarily attributable to the adoption of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"). SAB 101 was issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission in December 1999 and adopted by the Company effective January 1,
2000. SAB 101 requires that a lessor not recognize contingent rental income
until annual specified hurdles have been achieved by the lessees. As a result of
SAB 101, the Company recognized an additional $221 of percentage lease revenue
for the year 2000. Had the Company not adopted SAB 101, the Company would have
reported percentage lease revenue totaling $62,209 for 2000, a decrease of $28
versus percentage lease revenue for 1999 totaling $62,237. SAB 101 has no impact
on the Company's Funds From Operations ("FFO"), or its interim or annual cash
flow from its third party lessees, and therefore, on its ability to pay
dividends. For the periods ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, the differences in
operating results are primarily attributable to the full year of operations of
the 1998 Hotels in 1999 versus the partial year of operations in 1998. The
Company sold its Comfort Suites hotel in London, Kentucky in February 2000 and
its Hampton Inn hotel in Duncanville, Texas in September 2000, resulting in a
total net loss of $850. The table below outlines the Company's hotel properties
owned as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.


16
17




December 31, 2000 December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998
-------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Acquisitions Properties Acquisitions Properties Acquisitions* Properties
during owned at during owned at during owned at
Type of Hotel the year year end the year year end the year year end
- ------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------- ----------

Limited-service hotels -- 29** -- 31 1 31
Extended-stay hotels -- 9 -- 9 6 9
Full-service hotels -- 11 -- 11 6 11
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total -- 49 -- 51 13 51
==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====


* Five of the total 13 hotels added in 1998 were internally developed
properties.

** The Company sold 2 hotels during 2000 as noted above.

In order to present a more meaningful comparison of operations, the following
comparisons are presented:

THE COMPANY:

- actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 2000 versus
actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999;
- actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999 versus
actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1998;
- actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999 versus
pro forma operating results for the year ended December 31, 1998, as if
the addition of the 1998 Hotels occurred on the later of January 1,
1998 or the hotel opening date (the Company made no acquisitions in
1999, therefore the pro forma 1999 results of operations would be
identical to the actual 1999 results of operations);

CAPSTAR WINSTON COMPANY, L.L.C.:

- actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 2000 versus
actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999;
- actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999 versus
actual operating results for the year ended December 31, 1998.

THE COMPANY

ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 VERSUS ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999

The Company had revenues of $63,719 in 2000, consisting of $62,430 of
percentage lease revenues and $1,289 of interest, joint venture and other
income. Percentage lease revenues increased $193 in 2000 from $62,237 in 1999.
This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in lease revenue due to
the Company's adoption of SAB 101 effective January 1, 2000, which resulted in
additional lease revenue recognition of $221. Had the Company not adopted SAB
101, lease revenue for 2000 would have been $62,209, a decrease of $28 from its
1999 lease revenue of $62,237. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease of
$1,348 in percentage lease revenue generated from the 1997 Hotels due to
competitive pressures resulting in lower occupancy rates. This decrease also
included a decrease of $421 in percentage lease revenue from the two hotels sold
during 2000. This decrease was offset by an increase of $1,741 in percentage
lease revenue generated from the 1998 Hotels due to higher occupancy rates and
average daily rates. Most of the 1998 Hotels are full service, up scale hotels,
while the 1997 Hotels are mostly limited service hotels.

Real estate taxes and property and casualty insurance expenses incurred
in 2000 were $6,630, an increase of $274 from $6,356 in 1999. Real estate taxes
increased $131 due to increased rates and property values in 2000. Property
insurance increased $143 due primarily to property coverage premium increases.
General and administrative expenses remained constant from $4,236 in 1999 to
$4,323 in 2000. Interest expense increased $978 to $13,491 in 2000 from $12,513
in 1999, primarily due to an increase in the annual weighted-average interest
rate of 0.72% from 7.05% in 1999 to 7.77% in 2000 and a decrease in capitalized
interest of $137 from $163 in 1999 to $26 in 2000, offset by a decrease in
weighted average borrowings from $178,038 in 1999 to $173,213 in 2000.
Depreciation expense increased $527 to $21,092 in 2000 from $20,565 in 1999,
primarily due to depreciation related to renovations and capital additions
completed during 2000 and the second half of 1999 offset by disposals of two
hotels sold during 2000. Amortization expense increased $99 to $933 in 2000 from
$834 in 1999. The increase is primarily attributable to twelve months of
amortization in 2000 of deferred financing costs associated with the Company's
new $140,000 line of credit, which originated in February 1999, versus eleven
months of amortization in 1999.


17
18


ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 VERSUS ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998

The Company had revenues of $62,670 in 1999, consisting of $62,237 of
percentage lease revenues and $433 of interest and other income. Percentage
lease revenues increased $7,292, or 13.3%, in 1999 from $54,945 in 1998. This
increase was primarily attributable to an increase in lease revenues from the
1998 Hotels due to a full year of operations in 1999 versus a partial year of
operations in 1998, partially offset by a decrease of $1,160 in lease revenue
generated from the 1997 Hotels, which decrease was primarily attributable to
competitive pressures.

Real estate taxes and property and casualty insurance expenses incurred
in 1999 were $6,356, an increase of $1,094 from $5,262 in 1998. The increase was
primarily attributable to a full year of operations for the 1998 Hotels in 1999
versus a partial year in 1998. General and administrative expenses increased
$347 to $4,236 in 1999 from $3,889 in 1998. The increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in the number of employees and related compensation
expense throughout the year, costs associated with efforts to form joint
ventures and costs associated with efforts to sell certain hotels. Interest
expense increased $4,199 to $12,513 in 1999 from $8,314 in 1998, primarily due
to an increase in weighted-average outstanding borrowings from $127,776 in 1998
to $178,038 in 1999, and a decrease of capitalized interest of $1,350 from
$1,513 in 1998 to $163 in 1999. Annual weighted-average interest rates decreased
0.58% from 7.63% in 1998 to 7.05% in 1999. Depreciation expense increased $4,176
to $20,565 in 1999 from $16,389 in 1998, primarily due to depreciation related
to the 1998 Hotels and renovations completed during 1999 and 1998. Amortization
expense increased $369 to $834 in 1999 from $465 in 1998. The increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in amortization of deferred financing
costs associated with the Company's new $140,000 line of credit, which
originated in February 1999, and the Company's $71,000 GE Capital Corporation
loan which originated in November 1998.

ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 VERSUS PRO FORMA - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998

The Company had revenues of $62,670 for the year ended December 31,
1999, consisting of $62,237 of percentage lease revenues and $433 of interest
and other income. Percentage lease revenues increased $5,356, or 9.4%, to
$62,237 in 1999 from $56,881 in 1998. This increase was primarily attributable
to the opening of 10 hotel properties in 1998 (the "1998 New Hotels"), partially
offset by a decrease of $935 in lease revenue generated from the hotels owned as
of December 31, 1997, which decrease was primarily attributable to competitive
pressures.

Real estate taxes and property and casualty insurance expenses incurred
in 1999 were $6,356, an increase of $722 from $5,634 in 1998. The increase was
primarily attributable to the 1998 New Hotels and an increase in tax rates and
assessed values in 1999. General and administrative expenses increased $338 to
$4,236 in 1999 from $3,898 in 1998. The increase was primarily attributable to
an increase in the number of employees and related compensation expense
throughout the year, costs associated with efforts to form joint ventures and
costs associated with efforts to sell certain hotels. Interest expense increased
$3,602 to $12,513 in 1999 from $8,911 in 1998. The increase was primarily due to
an increase in weighted-average borrowings from $137,932 in 1998 to $178,038 in
1999, and a decrease of capitalized interest of $1,350 from $1,513 in 1998 to
$163 in 1999. Annual weighted-average interest rates decreased 0.58% from 7.63%
in 1998 to 7.05% in 1999. Depreciation expense increased $3,845 to $20,565 in
1999 from $16,720 in 1998, primarily due to additional depreciation related to
the 1998 New Hotels and renovations completed during 1999 and 1998. Amortization
expense increased $372 to $834 in 1999 from $462 in 1998. The increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in amortization of deferred financing
costs associated with the Company's new $140,000 line of credit, which
originated in February 1999, and the Company's $71,000 GE Capital Corporation
loan, which originated in November 1998.

CAPSTAR WINSTON COMPANY, L.L.C.

ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 VERSUS ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999

CapStar Winston had room revenues of $126,884 in 2000, a decrease of
$687 from $127,571 in 1999. The decrease in room revenues was primarily due to
the sale of the Comfort Suites in London, Kentucky by the Company in February
2000, the sale of the Hampton Inn in Duncanville, Texas in September 2000, and a
decrease in occupancy rates from 71.0% to 68.6%. Although room revenues
decreased, RevPar increased 0.3% due to a decrease in total rooms available.
Food and beverage revenue increased $176 to $8,191 in 2000 from $8,015 in 1999.
This increase was due to a rise in room service, lounge, and banquet related
revenues. Telephone and other operating departments revenue increased $344 to
$6,473 in 2000 from $6,129 in 1999 due to a rise in revenues from movies/videos
and banquet production for limited service hotels.

CapStar Winston had total expenses in 2000 of $161,803, an increase of
$20,975 from $140,828 in 1999. The decrease was primarily attributable to an
asset impairment charge of $21,658 to adjust goodwill from the purchase
transaction with Winston. This charge is a non-cash adjustment to the carrying
value of those assets. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in
expenses attributable to the sale of the Comfort Suites in London, Kentucky in
February 2000 and the sale of the Hampton Inn in Duncanville, Texas in September
2000.


18
19


ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 VERSUS ACTUAL - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998

Total revenue increased $16,082 or 12.8%, to $141,715 from $125,633.
This increase was primarily related to an increase in room revenues of $14,120
or 12.4%, to $127,571 from $113,451. The increase in room revenues was due to an
increase of $14,058 for the 1998 Hotels and an increase of $62 for all other
hotels. Food and beverage revenue increased $1,802 to $8,015 in 1999 from $6,213
in 1998, primarily due to increased revenue from the 1998 Hotels.

Total expenses increased $15,790 or 12.6%, to $140,828 from $125,038.
This increase was primarily related to increased expenses generated by the 1998
Hotels.

Net income increased $292, to $887 from $595, primarily driven by the
operating results of the 1998 Hotels.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company finances its operations from operating cash flow, which is
principally derived from Percentage Leases. For the year ended December 31,
2000, cash flow provided by operating activities was $39,589 and funds from
operations, which is equal to net income before allocation to minority interest
(excluding gains/losses on sales of operating property), plus adjustments for
unconsolidated joint ventures, plus depreciation, less preferred share
distributions, plus the change in deferred revenue resulting from SAB 101, was
$31,268. Under federal income tax law provisions applicable to REITs prior to
January 1, 2001, the Company was required to distribute at least 95% of its
taxable income to maintain its tax status as a REIT. For taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2000, the taxable income distribution requirement has been
lowered to 90%. In 2000, the Company declared distributions of $25,861 to its
shareholders. The Company intends to fund cash distributions to shareholders out
of cash flow from operating activities. The Company may incur, or cause the
Partnership to incur, indebtedness to meet distribution requirements imposed on
the Company under the Internal Revenue Code (including the requirement that a
REIT distribute to its shareholders annually at least 90% of its taxable income)
to the extent that available capital and cash flow from the Company's
investments are insufficient to make such distributions.

The Company's net cash used in investing activities during the year
ended December 31, 2000 totaled $10,231, consisting of cash out flows for
mezzanine financing, capital expenditures, renovation of hotels and investments
in joint ventures, offset by proceeds from the sale of two hotels.

During 2000, the Company provided $1,080 in mezzanine financing to
Noble Investment Group, LLC ("Noble") to develop a Hilton Garden Inn in Atlanta
(Sugarloaf), GA (the "Sugarloaf Hotel"). The Company receives monthly interest
at annual rates based on 30-day LIBOR plus 7.36% until the earlier of (a)
prepayment of the loan, (b) the initial maturity date of December 5, 2001, or
(c) a period equal to the lesser of (1) the maturity date of the borrower's
qualified refinancing less 60 days, or (2) five years from June 30, 2000, the
date of the loan. In February 2001, the Company provided another mezzanine loan
totaling $2,186 to Noble to develop a Hilton Garden Inn in Tampa, FL (the "Tampa
Hotel"). The Company receives monthly interest at annual rates based on 30-day
LIBOR plus 8.44% until the earlier of (a) prepayment of the loan, (b) the
initial maturity date of January 1, 2004, or (c) a period equal to the lesser of
(1) the maturity date of the borrower's qualified refinancing less 60 days, or
(2) five years from February 2, 2001, the date of the loan. Both loans are
subject to prepayment penalties during the first three years. Once each hotel
opens, the Company also earns interest equal to 2% of gross revenues, 25% of
which is paid and the remainder is accrued ("Accrued Interest"). On the earlier
of prepayment or the maturity date of each loan, the Company also shall receive
the greater of the Accrued Interest or, with respect to the Sugarloaf Hotel, 15%
of the appreciation in value, and with respect to the Tampa Hotel, 20% of the
appreciation in value. In addition to earning interest income, the Company also
provides development and purchasing services to Noble during the hotels'
construction stage for additional fee income. The Company is co-developing the
Sugarloaf Hotel and developing the Tampa Hotel. During 2000, these fees totaled
$137, all related to services provided for the Sugarloaf Hotel. Both the
Sugarloaf Hotel and the Tampa Hotel are owned 100% by unaffiliated single
purpose entities (the "Borrowers"). The Company holds collateral equal to 100%
of the ownership interest in the Borrowers. The Borrowers are required to make
initial equity investments equal to 20% of the total cost of the respective
hotel, and there are certain default provisions under which the Company can step
in and take control of the Borrowers.

During 2000, the Company spent $7,373 or 5.5% of the lessees' room
revenue, in connection with the renovation of its Current Hotels. Per the
Percentage Leases, the Company is required to spend 5% of room revenues for its
hotels (7% of room revenues and food and beverage revenues for one of its full
service hotels) for periodic capital improvements and the refurbishment and
replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment at its Current Hotels. These
capital expenditures are funded from operating cash flow, and possibly from
borrowings under the Company's $140,000 line of credit (the "Line"), sources
which are expected to be adequate to fund such capital requirements. These
capital expenditures are in addition to amounts spent on normal repairs and
maintenance which have approximated 5.1% and 5.5% of room revenues in 2000 and
1999, respectively, and are paid by the lessees.


19
20


During 1999, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with
Regent Partners, Inc. (the "Regent Joint Venture") to jointly develop and own
upscale hotel properties. The Regent Joint Venture consists of two separate
joint ventures, each of which owns one hotel. The first hotel developed under
the Regent Joint Venture was a full service 158-room Hilton Garden Inn in
Windsor, CT, and was opened in September 2000. The second hotel, currently under
development, is a 177-room Hilton Garden Inn in Evanston, IL, and is scheduled
to open in July 2001. The Company has the right to acquire Regent's interests in
each project subject to the provisions of the Regent Joint Venture. The Company
owns a 49% ownership interest in the Regent Joint Venture. Additionally, in
April 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Marsh
Landing Investment, LLC to jointly develop an $8.5 million, 118-room Hampton Inn
in Ponte Vedra, FL. This hotel was opened in December 2000. The Company owns 49%
of the joint venture, and Marsh Landing Investment, LLC, a company owned by
Charles M. Winston and James H. Winston, owns the remaining 51%. Both Charles M.
Winston and James H. Winston serve on the Company's Board of Directors. The
Company has the right to acquire Marsh Landing Investment, LLC's interest
subject to the provisions of the joint venture agreement.

During 2000, the Company invested $6,999 in cash in the three joint
ventures. Under the terms of the joint ventures, the Company has provided, and
will continue to provide property development, purchasing and, upon opening of
the hotel, on-going asset management services for additional fee income. 51% of
such fee income is recognized as revenue, and 49% as a reduction of investment
in the joint ventures. Such income earned during 2000 totaled $308. Under the
terms of the operating agreement for each joint venture, the Company must
approve all major decisions, including refinancing or selling the respective
hotels, making loans, changes in partners' interests, entering into contracts of
$25,000 or more, and purchasing or acquiring assets.

The Company sold its Comfort Suites hotel in London, KY and its Hampton
Inn hotel in Duncanville, TX during 2000. The total proceeds were $5,461. The
Company also is considering the sale of certain other non-core hotels that lie
outside the Company's upscale segment focus and plans to use the proceeds to
reduce debt, invest in hotel properties, or provide mezzanine loans.

The Company's net cash used in financing activities during the year
ended December 31, 2000 totaled $29,219. This net use of cash was primarily due
to the payment of distributions to shareholders of $25,839 and the payment of
distributions to the Partnership's minority interest of $1,454. This amount also
includes principal payments totaling $1,103 related to the Company's $71,000
fixed rate note, and a net decrease in amounts outstanding under the $140,000
line of credit (the "Line") of $700. The Line is collateralized with 28 of the
Current Hotels. As of December 31, 2000, total outstanding debt on the Line was
$103,800. In accordance with the provisions of the Line, the Company's
availability under the Line totaled approximately $27,000. The Line requires the
Company to maintain certain financial ratios including maximum leverage, minimum
interest coverage and minimum fixed charge coverage, as well as certain levels
of unsecured and secured debt and tangible net worth, all of which the Company
was in compliance with as of December 31, 2000.

In August 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors
authorized the Company to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its Common Stock.
In making the determination of whether or not to buy shares of Common Stock,
management thoroughly analyzes the yield on such a buyback versus the yield from
alternative uses of capital. Management also considers that when borrowing under
the Line to purchase Common Stock, the Company's availability under the Line is
permanently impaired. To date, the Company has determined that a Common Stock
buyback is not in the best interest of its shareholders.

On December 18, 2000, the Company completed an interest rate swap on
$50,000 of its outstanding variable rate debt under the Line. This transaction
effectively replaced the Company's variable interest rate based on 30-day LIBOR
on $50,000 of outstanding debt under the Line with a fixed interest rate of
5.915% until December 18, 2002. The Line's interest rate spread is currently
1.45%, equaling a fixed rate of 7.365% on $50,000 until December 18, 2002.

The Company had $68,872 in debt at December 31, 2000 that was subject
to a fixed interest rate and fixed monthly payments with GE Capital Corporation.
This debt, a ten-year loan with a 25-year amortization period carries an
interest rate of 7.375% for the first 10 years. All unpaid principal and
interest are due on December 1, 2008. The GE Capital loan is collateralized with
14 of the Company's Current Hotels.

The Company intends to continue to seek additional mezzanine loan
opportunities and to acquire and develop additional hotel properties that meet
its investment criteria and is continually evaluating such opportunities. It is
expected that future mezzanine loans and hotel acquisitions will be financed, in
whole or in part, from additional follow-on offerings, from borrowings under the
Line, from joint venture agreements, from the net sale proceeds of hotel
properties and/or from the issuance of other debt or equity securities. There
can be no assurances that the Company will make any further mezzanine loans or
any investment in additional hotel properties, or that any hotel development
will be undertaken, or if commenced, that it will be completed on schedule or on
budget. Further, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to
obtain any additional financing.


20
21


RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARD

In June 1998, Financial Accounting Standard Board issued SFAS No. 133
("SFAS 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as
amended, which is required to be adopted in years beginning after June 15, 2000.
The Company adopted SFAS 133 effective January 1, 2001. SFAS 133 requires the
Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. If the
derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair
value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value
of the hedged asset, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or
recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in
earnings. Any ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be
immediately recognized in earnings and any derivatives that are not hedges must
be adjusted to fair value through earnings. Based on the Company's derivative
positions at December 31, 2000, it will report a liability of $245 for the fair
value of its interest rate swap and a corresponding offset in other
comprehensive income upon its adoption of SFAS 133 effective January 1, 2001.
The Company will also, upon adoption, report a reduction in an asset of $23 for
the fair value of its interest rate cap and a corresponding offset in the
Consolidated Statement of Income.

SEASONALITY

The Company's operations historically have been seasonal in nature,
reflecting higher REVPAR during the second and third quarters. This seasonality
and the structure of the Percentage Leases, which provide for a higher
percentage of room revenues above the minimum equal quarterly levels to be paid
as Percentage Rent, can be expected to cause fluctuations in the Company's
receipt of quarterly lease revenue under the Percentage Leases. SAB 101, which
requires that a lessor not recognize contingent rental income until annual
specified hurdles have been achieved by the lessee, effectively defers
recognition by the Company of a significant portion of percentage lease revenue
from the first and second quarters, to the third and fourth quarters of the
calendar year. SAB 101 has no impact on the Company's FFO, or its interim or
annual cash flow from its third party lessees, and therefore, on its ability to
pay dividends (see Note 2 to the Company's consolidated financial statements).

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains certain "forward looking" statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these
statements by use of words like "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate,"
"estimate," or "continue" or similar expressions. These statements represent the
Company's judgment and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual operating results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
the forward looking statements, including but not limited to the following
risks: properties held for sale will not sell, financing risks, development
risks including the risks of construction delays and cost overruns, lower than
expected occupancy and average daily rates, non-issuance or delay of issuance of
governmental permits, zoning restrictions, the increase of development costs in
connection with projects that are not pursued to completion, non-payment of
mezzanine loans, and other risk factors described in Exhibit 99.1 attached to
this report.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As of December 31, 2000, the Company's exposure to market risk for a
change in interest rates related solely to debt outstanding under its $140,000
line of credit (the "Line"). Debt outstanding under the Line totaled $103,800 at
December 31, 2000. The Line, which expires in February 2002, bears interest
generally at rates from 30-day LIBOR plus 1.45% to 30-day LIBOR plus 1.70%,
based, in part, on the Company's level of total indebtedness. The Company's
current interest rate is 30-day LIBOR plus 1.45%. During 1999, the Company
entered into an interest rate cap agreement to eliminate the exposure to
increases in 30-day LIBOR over 7.50%, and therefore from its exposure to
interest rate increases over 8.95% under the Line on a principal balance of
$25,000 for the period of March 23, 1999 through March 25, 2002. In addition, on
December 18, 2000, the Company completed an interest rate swap on $50,000 of its
outstanding variable rate debt under the Line. The agreement is a contract to
exchange floating rate interest payments for fixed interest payments
periodically over the life of the agreement without the exchange of the
underlying notional amounts. This transaction effectively replaces the Company's
variable interest rate based on 30-day LIBOR on $50,000 of the Line with a fixed
interest rate of 5.915% until December 18, 2002. The Line's interest rate spread
is currently 1.45%, equating to an effective fixed rate of 7.365% on $50,000
until December 18, 2002. The differential paid or received on interest rate
agreements is recognized as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of
the swap. The weighted average interest rate on the Line for 2000 was 7.76%.
(See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.) At December 31, 2000, the
Company had $53,800 of variable rate debt outstanding under the Line that was
exposed to fluctuations in the market rate of interest.


21
22


The definitive extent of the Company's interest rate risk under the
Line is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future
interest rates and business financing requirements. If interest rates increased
by 100 basis points, the Company's annual interest expense would have increased
by approximately $538, based on the amount of variable rate debt outstanding and
exposed to fluctuations in the market rate of interest at December 31, 2000. The
Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for
speculative purposes.

The following table presents the aggregate maturities and historical
cost amounts of the Company's GE Capital Corporation fixed rate debt principal
and interest rates by maturity dates at December 31, 2000:



MATURITY DATE FIXED RATE DEBT INTEREST RATE
------------- --------------- -------------

2001 $ 1,187 7.375%
2002 1,278 7.375%
2003 1,376 7.375%
2004 1,480 7.375%
2005 1,594 7.375%
Thereafter 61,957 7.375%
---------- ------
$ 68,872 7.375%
========== ======


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by this Item 8 are filed with this
report on Form 10-K immediately following the signature page and are listed in
Item 14 of this report on Form 10-K.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information on the Company's directors is incorporated by reference
from pages 5 and 6, "Proposal 1 - Election of Directors", in the Company's Proxy
Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held May 8, 2001. Information on the Company's executive officers is included
under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" on page 8 of this
report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

This information is incorporated by reference from pages 8 through 11,
"Executive Compensation", in the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with
respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 8, 2001.

ITEM 12. SHARE OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

This information is incorporated by reference from pages 2 through 4,
"Share Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners", in the Company's
Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held May 8, 2001.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

This information is incorporated by reference from page 14, "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions", in the Company's Proxy Statement to be
filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 8, 2001.


22
23


PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K

(a) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES. The financial statements and
schedules listed below are included in this report.



Financial Statements and Schedules Form 10-K Page
- ---------------------------------- --------------


WINSTON HOTELS, INC.:

Report of Independent Accountants 28
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 29
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 30
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 31
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 32
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 33
Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2000 41
Notes to Schedule III 43

CAPSTAR WINSTON COMPANY, L.L.C.:

Independent Auditors' Report 44
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 45
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 46
Statements of Members' Capital for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 47
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 48
Notes to Financial Statements 49


(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the
fourth quarter of 2000.


23
24



(c) EXHIBITS. The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are
listed below. Management contracts or compensatory plans are filed as
Exhibits 10.9, 10.12, 10.13 and 10.16.



Exhibit Description
------- -----------


3.1(10) Restated Articles of Incorporation

3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws

4.1(1) Specimen certificate for Common Stock, $0.01 par value per
share

4.2(4) Specimen certificate for 9.25% Series A Cumulative Preferred
Stock

4.3(10) Restated Articles of Incorporation

4.4