UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2005

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 0-24663

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

The Registrant had 21,365,723 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of May 6, 2005.

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other interim period.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of its financial statements follows:

Principles of Consolidation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Foreign Currency

     The functional currency of the Company’s international subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and have not been material.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

     The Company invests its excess cash in money market accounts, certificates of deposit, high-grade commercial paper, high grade corporate bonds and debt obligations of various government agencies. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

     The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, the Company has classified all of its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale at April 2, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The investments are reported at fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Investments that have contractual maturities of more than twelve months are included in long-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue Recognition

     The Company sells its BIS monitors primarily through a combination of a direct sales force and distributors. The Company sells its BIS Module Kits to original equipment manufacturers who in turn sell them to the end-user. BIS Sensors are sold through a combination of a direct sales force, distributors and original equipment manufacturers. Direct product sales are structured as sales, sales-type lease arrangements or sales under the Company’s Equipment Placement (“EP”) program. Sales, sales-type lease agreements and sales under the EP program are subject to the Company’s standard terms and conditions of sale and do not include any customer acceptance criteria, installation or other post shipment obligations (other than warranty) or any rights of return. The Company’s BIS monitor is a standard product and does not require installation as it can be operated with the instructions included in the operator’s manual.

4

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

     The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when earned in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. For product sales, revenue is not recognized until title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. The Company’s revenue arrangements with multiple elements are divided into separate units of accounting if specified criteria are met, including whether the delivered element has stand-alone value to the customer and whether there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items. The consideration received is allocated among the separate units based on their respective fair values, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are applied to each of the separate units.

     The Company follows SFAS No. 13, Accounting For Leases, for its sales-type lease agreements. Under the Company’s sales-type leases, customers purchase BIS Sensors and the BIS monitor for the purchase price of the BIS Sensors plus an additional charge per BIS Sensor to pay for the purchase price of the BIS monitor and related financing costs over the term of the agreement. In accordance with SFAS No. 13, the minimum lease payment, consisting of the additional charge per BIS Sensor, less the unearned interest income, which is computed at the interest rate implicit in the lease, is recorded as the net investment in sales-type leases. The Company recognizes equipment revenue under sales-type lease agreements either at shipment or delivery in accordance with the agreed upon contract terms with interest income recognized over the life of the sales-type lease. The cost of the BIS monitor acquired by the customer is recorded as costs of revenue in the same period.

     In addition, the Company reviews and assesses the net realizability of its investment in sales-type leases at each reporting period. This review includes determining, on a customer specific basis, if a customer is significantly underperforming relative to the customer’s cumulative level of committed BIS Sensor purchases as required by the sales-type lease agreement. If a customer is underperforming, the Company records an allowance for lease payments as a charge to revenue to reflect the lower estimate of the net realizable investment in sales-type lease balance.

     As of April 2, 2005, the Company does not consider any sales-type lease agreement, against which an allowance for lease payments has been established, an impaired asset.

     Under the Company’s EP program, the customer is granted the right to use the BIS monitors for a mutually agreed upon period of time. During this period, the customer purchases BIS Sensors at a price that typically includes a premium above the list price of the BIS Sensors to cover the rental of the equipment, but without any minimum purchase commitments. At the end of the agreed upon period, the customer has the option of purchasing the BIS monitors, continuing to use them under the EP program or returning them to the Company. Under the EP program, no equipment revenue is recognized as the equipment remains the Company’s property and title does not pass to the customer, and the criteria for sales-type leases under SFAS No. 13 are not met. The BIS monitors under the EP program are depreciated over two years and the depreciation is charged to costs of revenue. BIS Sensor revenue is recognized either at shipment or delivery of the BIS Sensors in accordance with the agreed upon contract terms.

     The Company’s obligations under warranty are limited to repair or replacement of any product that the Company reasonably determines to be covered by the warranty. The Company records an estimate for its total warranty obligation in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.

     In connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement and OEM Product Development Agreement with Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) discussed in Note 9, the Company recorded approximately $6,300,000 of deferred revenue in August 2002. The deferred revenue is being recognized ratably over the term of the OEM product development and distribution agreement with BSC, which represents the Company’s best estimate of its period of significant continuing obligation to provide BSC exclusive distribution rights to newly developed technology. The term of the OEM product development and distribution agreement continues until such time that BSC is no longer distributing the Company’s products under the agreement, but in no event will extend beyond December 31, 2014.

5

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

Research and Development Costs

     The Company charges research and development costs to operations as incurred. Research and development costs include costs associated with new product development, product improvements and extensions, clinical studies and project consulting expenses.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     Estimates are used in determining the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts based on the Company’s historical collections experience, historical write-offs of its receivables, current trends, credit policy and a percentage of the Company’s accounts receivable by aging category. The Company also reviews the credit quality of its customer base as well as changes in its credit policies. The Company continually monitors collections and payments from its customers and adjusts the allowance for doubtful accounts as needed.

Inventory

     The Company values inventory at the lower of cost or estimated market value, and determines cost on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess or obsolete inventory primarily based on production history and on its estimated forecast of product demand. The medical device industry in which the Company markets its products is characterized by rapid product development and technological advances that could result in obsolescence of inventory. Additionally, the Company’s estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case it would need to change its estimate of the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. If revisions are deemed necessary, the Company would recognize the adjustments in the form of a charge to its costs of revenue at the time of the determination.

Warranty

     Equipment that the Company sells is generally covered by a warranty period of one year. The Company accrues a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based on historical experience and an expectation of future conditions. Warranty expense for the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, and accrued warranty cost, included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at April 2, 2005, was as follows:

Shipping and Handling Costs

     Shipping and handling costs are included in costs of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.

Advertising Costs

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. These costs are included in sales and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

6

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

Property and Equipment

     Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related equipment. Equipment held under capital leases is stated at the lower of the fair market value of the equipment or the present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease, and is amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lives of the related assets or the term of the leases. Repair and maintenance expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. The Company does not develop software for internal use and the costs of software acquired for internal use are accounted for in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.

Income Taxes

     The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences, utilizing currently enacted tax rates, of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized, net of any valuation allowance, for the estimated future tax effects of deductible temporary differences and tax operating loss and credit carryforwards.

Concentration of Credit Risk

     Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash, cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable and investment in sales-type lease receivables. To minimize the financial statement risk with respect to accounts receivable and investment in sales-type lease receivables, the Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses and such losses, in the aggregate, have not exceeded management’s expectations. The Company maintains cash, cash equivalents and investments with various financial institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit quality of investments and Company policy is designed to limit exposure to any one institution or type of investment. The primary objective of the Company’s investment strategy is the safety of the principal invested. The Company does not maintain foreign exchange contracts or other off-balance sheet financial investments.

Single or Limited Source Suppliers

     The Company currently obtains certain key components of its products from single or limited sources. The Company purchases components pursuant to purchase orders rather than long-term supply agreements and generally does not maintain large volumes of inventory. The Company has experienced shortages and delays in obtaining certain components of its products in the past. The Company may experience similar shortages and delays in the future. The disruption or termination of the supply of components or a significant increase in the costs of these components from these sources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations and cash flows.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

     In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, basic net income (loss) per share amounts for the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004 were computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during those periods and diluted net income (loss) per share was computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and other dilutive securities, as applicable, during those periods.

     For the three months ended April 2, 2005, the Company has included in the calculation of the Company’s diluted net income per share approximately 2,293,000 shares related to common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock under the treasury stock method.

7

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

     Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share amounts for the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004 were determined as follows:

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Other than the Company’s net income (loss), the only other element of comprehensive income (loss) impacting the Company is the unrealized gains (losses) on its investments for all periods presented.

Stock-Based Compensation

     SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires the measurement of the fair value of stock options or warrants to be included in the statement of income or disclosed in the notes to financial statements. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation for employees using the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25 and has adopted the fair value disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure. The Company has computed the weighted-average fair value of options granted in the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model pursuant to SFAS No. 123. The following table shows the weighted average assumptions used in the applicable periods and the weighted average fair market value of the options granted in each period.

8

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

     If the Company had recognized compensation cost for these awards consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) and pro forma net income (loss) per common share would have increased to the following pro forma amounts:

     The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. Also, because options vest over several years and the Company expects to grant options in future years, the above pro forma results of applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123 are not necessarily representative of the pro forma results in future years.

Use of Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The estimated fair market values of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, investment in sales-type leases, accounts payable and long-term debt, approximate their carrying values.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment, or SFAS No. 123R, which is a revision of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123. SFAS 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Under SFAS No. 123R, companies must calculate and record in the income statement the cost of equity instruments, such as stock options or restricted stock, awarded to employees for services received; pro forma disclosure is not longer permitted. The cost of the equity instruments is to be measured based on fair value of the instruments on the date they are granted (with certain exceptions) and is required to be recognized over the period during which the employees are required to provide services in exchange for the equity instruments.

9

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

     SFAS No. 123R provides two alternatives for adoption: (1) a “modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted subsequent to the effective date of this statement as well as for the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of the effective date; or (2) a “modified retrospective” method which follows the approach in the “modified prospective” method, but also permits entities to restate prior periods to record compensation cost calculated under SFAS No. 123 for the pro forma disclosure. Since the Company currently accounts for stock options granted to employees and shares issued under its employee stock purchase plan in accordance with the intrinsic value method permitted under APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation expense generally is recognized. The Company expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, although it will have no impact on the Company’s overall financial position. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R on periods after adoption cannot be accurately estimated at this time, as it will depend on the market value and the amount of share based awards granted in future periods. However, had the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share included in Note 2 to the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements.

     In April 2005, the SEC deferred the deadline for adoption of SFAS 123R’s provisions on share-based payment. Specifically, SEC registrants previously required to adopt SFAS 123R’s provisions at the beginning of the first interim period after June 15, 2005 may now adopt the provisions at the beginning of their first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005, under the new SEC rule. As such, the Company intends to adopt SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006.

	(3)	Comprehensive Income (Loss)
		The Company’s total comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

	(4)	Investment in Sales-Type Leases
		The components of the Company’s net investment in sales-type leases are as follows:

10

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

(5)

Inventory

Inventory consists of the following:

(6)	Segment Information and Enterprise Reporting

     The Company operates in one reportable segment as it markets and sells one family of anesthesia monitoring systems. The Company does not disaggregate financial information by product or geographically, other than sales by region and sales by product, for management purposes. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are located within the United States. All of the Company’s products are manufactured in the United States.

     Revenue by geographic region and as a percentage of total revenue is as follows:

     The Company did not have sales in any individual country, other than the United States, that accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total revenue for the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004.

(7) Related Party Transactions

     Through May 2002, the Company loaned, on a full recourse basis, an aggregate of $1,491,000, to certain officers, employees and a consultant of the Company. All loans are evidenced by promissory notes bearing interest with rates ranging from 5.00% to 8.00% per annum. The loans are payable over periods ranging from one to five years and in each case are secured by certain assets of the borrower, including shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the borrower. At April 2, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the aggregate outstanding balance on these loans was approximately $46,000 and $47,000, respectively. At April 2, 2005, the entire $46,000 was classified as short-term and included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

11

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

(8) Loan Agreements

     In May 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with a commercial bank for a revolving line of credit. The Company is entitled to borrow up to $5,000,000 under the revolving line of credit, which expires in May 2005 and, subject to annual review by the commercial bank, may be extended at the discretion of the commercial bank. Interest on any borrowings under the revolving line of credit is, at the election of the Company, either the prime rate or at LIBOR plus 2.25%. Up to $1,500,000 of the $5,000,000 revolving line of credit is available for standby letters of credit. At April 2, 2005, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit with the commercial bank of approximately $80,000. At April 2, 2005 there was no outstanding balance under this revolving line of credit.

     The revolving line of credit agreement contains restrictive covenants that require the Company to maintain liquidity and net worth ratios and is secured by certain investments of the Company, which are shown as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the extension of the revolving line of credit in May 2004, the Company is required to maintain restricted cash in an amount equal to 102% of the outstanding amounts under the revolving line of credit agreement. Prior to the amendment in May 2004, the Company was required to maintain restricted cash in an amount equal to 102% of the $5,000,000 commitment, or $5,100,000. At April 2, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants contained in the revolving line of credit agreement. At April 2, 2005, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit was 5.75%. The Company is currently in the process of negotiating a one year extension to the revolving line of credit with the commercial bank.

     In August 2002, the Company entered into an agreement for a $5,000,000 revolving line of credit with BSC in connection with a strategic alliance (see Note 9).

(9) Strategic Alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation

     On August 7, 2002, the Company formed a strategic alliance with BSC. In connection with this strategic alliance, the Company sold 1,428,572 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price per share of $7.00 to BSC pursuant to a stock purchase agreement. Gross cash proceeds from this sale of common stock were $10,000,004. In addition, the Company granted BSC an option under an OEM product development and distribution agreement to distribute newly developed technology for monitoring patients under sedation in a range of less-invasive medical specialties. The Company allocated the fair market value between the common stock and the option to be the exclusive distributor. The excess of $4.41 per share paid by BSC over the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 7, 2002, or approximately $6,300,000 in total, was attributed to the value of the rights provided to BSC under the OEM product development and distribution agreement.

     Approximately $4,800,000 of the aggregate purchase price is recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at April 2, 2005, which represents the unamortized portion of the purchase price in excess of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 7, 2002. The deferred revenue is being recognized ratably over the term of the OEM product development and distribution agreement, which represents the Company’s best estimate of its period of significant continuing obligation to provide BSC exclusive distribution rights to newly developed technology. The term of the agreement continues until such time that BSC is no longer distributing the Company’s products, but in no event will extend beyond December 31, 2014 pursuant to an amendment to the OEM product development agreement entered into with BSC in January 2005. On January 31, 2005, the Company amended its OEM product development agreement with BSC to provide a two year extension to the period during which BSC may exercise an option to distribute sedation management technology for interventional and specialty medical procedure suites. The amendment extends until December 31, 2006 BSC’s right to exercise its option and also extends until the end of 2014 the term of BSC’s distribution rights. This amendment will reduce the revenue that the Company records on a quarterly basis by approximately $31,000. Approximately $123,000 and $154,000, respectively, was recognized as revenue in the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.

12

ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(tabular amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

     As part of the strategic alliance with BSC, the Company also entered into an agreement pursuant to which BSC has agreed to provide the Company a $5,000,000 revolving line of credit, which expires in August 2007 and may be extended at the discretion of BSC. Interest on any borrowings under this revolving line of credit is at a rate equal to the LIBOR rate at which BSC, under its own revolving credit facility, is entitled to borrow funds, plus any additional amounts payable thereon by BSC under such revolving credit facility, plus eighty basis points. The Company’s revolving line of credit with BSC is secured by the Company’s inventory and certain of the Company’s accounts receivable and contains certain restrictive covenants covering the collateral. At April 2, 2005, there was no outstanding balance under this revolving line of credit, and the Company was in compliance with all covenants contained in the revolving line of credit agreement.

     On April 7, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with BSC to issue and sell 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to BSC pursuant to a stock purchase agreement. The Company completed the sale on June 8, 2004. The purchase price per share was $16.21 and the aggregate gross proceeds from the transaction were $8,105,000. In connection with this sale of common stock, the Company has granted BSC the right to require the Company to register these shares for resale under the Securities Act of 1933.

(10) Shareholder Rights Plan

     On November 29, 2004, the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan. In connection with the adoption of this plan, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of the Company’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 10, 2004. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of the Company’s Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a purchase price of $150.00 per share in cash. The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date as defined in the Rights Agreement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2004 and will expire upon the close of business on November 29, 2014 unless earlier redeemed or exchanged as defined in the Rights Agreement.

13

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Overview

     We develop, manufacture and market an anesthesia monitoring system that we call the BIS® system. The BIS system is based on our patented core technology, the Bispectral Index, which we refer to as the BIS index. The BIS system provides information that allows clinicians to better assess and manage a patient’s level of consciousness in the operating room and intensive care settings and administer the precise amount of anesthesia needed by each patient. Our proprietary BIS system includes our BIS monitor, BIS Module Kit or BISx system, which allows original equipment manufacturers to incorporate the BIS index into their monitoring products, and our group of sensor products, which we collectively refer to as BIS Sensors. In January 2005, we introduced our semi-reusable sensor product in the international market, excluding Japan.

     Our latest generation of stand-alone monitor, the A-2000® BIS Monitor, was cleared for marketing by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, in February 1998. Our latest version of the BIS system, the BIS XP system, was cleared for marketing by the FDA in June 2001. The BIS XP system offers enhanced performance capabilities and expanded benefits as compared with the previous version of our BIS system, enabling more precise measurement of brain activity to assess the level of consciousness. In addition to our A-2000 BIS Monitor, we offer original equipment manufacturers our BIS Module Kit for integration into equipment sold by the original equipment manufacturers. Our BISx system, which was cleared for marketing by the FDA in February 2004, is our latest BIS monitoring system for integration into the equipment sold by original equipment manufacturers. The BISx system provides the BIS XP functionality in a single device approximately the size of a hockey puck, simplifying the incorporation of the BIS XP system into third-party patient monitoring systems.

     We derive our revenue primarily from sales of BIS monitors, our original equipment manufacturer products (including BIS Module Kits and the BISx system) and related accessories, which we collectively refer to as Equipment, and sales of BIS Sensors. For management purposes, we segregate our revenue by export sales by region and sales by products as shown in the following table:

     At April 2, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments of approximately $29.0 million and working capital of approximately $35.2 million.

     We follow a system of fiscal quarters as opposed to calendar quarters. Under this system, the first three quarters of each fiscal year end on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar quarter and the last quarter of the fiscal year always ends on December 31.

14

     We believe our ability to grow our revenue is directly related to our ability to sell our Equipment to healthcare organizations and influence our customers after they purchase our Equipment to continue to purchase and use our BIS Sensors. We believe the increase in our installed base of Equipment resulting from the sale of BIS monitors and the sale of original equipment manufacturers’ equipment incorporating our BIS Module Kit or BISx system has been the primary reason for the growth in revenue from the sale of BIS Sensors. In order to successfully grow our revenue, we need to continue to focus on both selling our Equipment and improving our per monitor and per original equipment manufacturer product sensor utilization rate. To achieve this growth, we continue to implement new sales and marketing programs. We expect that as we grow our business, revenue from the sale of BIS Sensors will continue to contribute an increasing percentage of total revenue. Additionally, we believe that, over time, revenue from the sale of BIS Module Kits and our BISx system will increase as a percentage of total Equipment revenue as healthcare organizations purchase our technology as part of an integrated solution offered by our original equipment manufacturers.

     We were profitable for the fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2004 and April 2, 2005. We believe that maintaining our gross profit margin and controlling the growth of our operating expenses are important factors in sustaining profitability. To maintain our gross profit margin we believe we must continue to focus on maintaining our average unit sales prices of our BIS Sensors, increasing revenue from the sale of BIS Sensors as a percentage of total revenue, as BIS Sensors have a higher gross profit margin than Equipment, and continuing to reduce the costs of manufacturing our products.

     For those healthcare organizations desiring to acquire our BIS monitors directly from us, we offer two options. Our customers have the option either to purchase BIS monitors outright or to acquire BIS monitors pursuant to a sales-type lease agreement whereby the customer contractually commits to purchase a minimum number of BIS Sensors per BIS monitor per year. Under our sales-type leases, customers purchase BIS Sensors and the BIS monitor for the purchase price of the BIS Sensors plus an additional charge per BIS Sensor to pay for the purchase price of the BIS monitor and related financing costs over the term of the agreement. We also grant these customers an option to purchase the BIS monitors at the end of the term of the agreement, which is typically three to five years. We recognize Equipment revenue under sales-type lease agreements either at shipment or delivery in accordance with the agreed upon contract terms with interest income recognized over the life of the sales-type lease. The cost of the BIS monitor acquired by the customer is recorded as costs of revenue in the same period. Sales-type leases accounted for approximately 2% and 3% of total revenue in the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.

     Under certain limited circumstances, we also offer customers the opportunity to use the BIS monitors under our Equipment Placement program, which we refer to as the EP program. Under the EP program, the customer is granted the right to use the BIS monitors for a mutually agreed upon period of time. During this period, the customer purchases BIS Sensors at a price that includes a premium above the list price of the BIS Sensors to cover the rental of the equipment, but without any minimum purchase commitments. At the end of the agreed upon period, the customer has the option of purchasing the BIS monitors, continuing to use them under the EP program or returning them to us.

     We have subsidiaries in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom to facilitate the sale of our products into the international market. We are continuing to develop our international sales and distribution program through a combination of distributors and marketing partners, including companies with which we have entered into original equipment manufacturer relationships.

     In January 1998, we entered into a distribution agreement with Nihon Kohden Corporation to distribute BIS monitors in Japan. Although Nihon Kohden has received approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare for marketing in Japan our A-1050 EEG Monitor with BIS and our A-2000 BIS Monitor, Nihon Kohden has requested, but has not yet received, approval to market the BIS XP system in Japan. In January 2002, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare granted reimbursement approval for use of our BIS monitors. With this approval, healthcare providers in Japan are eligible to receive partial reimbursement of 1,000 Yen each time BIS monitoring is used. In July 2002, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare approved our BIS module for marketing in Japan. Sales to Nihon Kohden represented approximately 23% and 12%, respectively, of international revenue for the three months ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.

     Various factors may adversely affect our quarterly operating results through the second fiscal quarter of 2005 and beyond. These factors may have a potentially adverse effect on Equipment revenue and gross profit margin on Equipment as we continue to shift the focus of our placements from BIS monitors to BIS modules and BISx systems. In addition, in Japan, Nihon Kohden is awaiting approval of the BIS XP system, and we believe customers in Japan may continue to delay purchases of our products or may choose not to purchase our products pending this approval.

15

Critical Accounting Policies

     Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes a summary of our significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements. In preparing these financial statements, we have made estimates and judgments in determining certain amounts included in the financial statements. The application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. We do not believe there is a significant likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. We believe that our critical accounting policies and estimates are as follows:

   Revenue Recognition

     We sell our BIS monitors primarily through a combination of a direct sales force and distributors. Our original equipment manufacturer products are sold to original equipment manufacturers who in turn sell them to the end-user. BIS Sensors are sold through a combination of a direct sales force, distributors and original equipment manufacturers. Direct product sales are structured as sales, sales-type lease arrangements or sales under our EP program. We recognize revenue from product sales when earned in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. For product sales, revenue is not recognized until title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer.

     We also recognize revenue from prepaid license and royalty fees. This revenue is deferred until product shipment or delivery in accordance with the terms of the agreement and license and royalty fees are earned in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements. In August 2002, we recorded approximately $6,300,000 of deferred revenue related to an OEM product development and distribution agreement with Boston Scientific Corporation. The deferred revenue is being recognized ratably over the term of the OEM product development and distribution agreement, as amended, which represents our best estimate of our period of significant continuing obligation to provide Boston Scientific Corporation exclusive distribution rights to newly developed technology. We amended the OEM product development and distribution agreement in January 2005 and extended the estimate of our period of significant continuing obligation by two years. This will reduce the revenue that we record on a quarterly basis by approximately $31,000 in 2005 and beyond. If our estimate of the period of significant continuing obligation is revised, this may have an impact on our revenue recognition of the deferred revenue related to the Boston Scientific Corporation agreement.

     We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 13, Accounting For Leases, for our sales-type lease agreements. Under our sales-type leases, customers purchase BIS Sensors and the BIS monitor for the purchase price of the BIS Sensors plus an additional charge per BIS Sensor to pay for the purchase price of the BIS monitor and related financing costs over the term of the agreement. The minimum lease payment, consisting of the additional charge per BIS Sensor, less the unearned interest income, which is computed at the interest rate implicit in the lease, is recorded as the net investment in sales-type leases. We recognize Equipment revenue under sales-type lease agreements either at shipment or delivery in accordance with the agreed upon contract terms with interest income recognized over the life of the sales-type lease. The cost of the BIS monitor acquired by the customer is recorded as costs of revenue in the same period. We review and assess the net realizability of our investment in sales-type leases at each reporting period. This review includes determining, on a customer specific basis, if a customer is significantly underperforming relative to the customer’s cumulative level of committed BIS Sensor purchases as required by the sales-type lease agreement. If a customer is underperforming, we record an allowance for lease payments as a charge to revenue to reflect the lower estimate of the net realizable investment in sales-type lease balance.

16

     We recognize revenue either at shipment or delivery in accordance with the agreed upon contract terms with distributors and original equipment manufacturers in accordance with SAB No. 104. Sales to distributors and original equipment manufacturers include a clause in the contracts that indicates that customer acceptance is limited to confirmation that our products function in accordance with our applicable product specifications in effect at the time of delivery. Formal acceptance by the distributor or original equipment manufacturer is not necessary to recognize revenue provided that we objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the acceptance provisions are satisfied. Each product is tested prior to shipment to ensure that it meets the applicable product specifications in effect at the time of delivery. Additionally, we have historically had a minimal number of defective products shipped to distributors and original equipment manufacturers and any defective products are subject to repair or replacement under warranty as distributors and original equipment manufacturers do not have a right of return.

  Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts by using estimates based on our historical collections experience, current trends, historical write-offs of our receivables, credit policy and a percentage of our accounts receivable by aging category. We also review the credit quality of our customer base as well as changes in our credit policies. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers. While credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, our credit loss rates in the future may not be consistent with our historical experience. To the extent we experience a deterioration in our historical collections experience or increased credit losses, bad debt expense would likely increase in future periods.

  Inventories

     We value inventory at the lower of cost or estimated market value, and determine cost on a first-in, first-out basis. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess or obsolete inventory primarily based on production history and on our estimated forecast of product demand. The medical device industry in which we market our products is characterized by rapid product development and technological advances that could result in obsolescence of inventory. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we would need to change our estimate of the provision required for excess or obsolete inventory. If revisions are deemed necessary, we would recognize the adjustments in the form of a charge to costs of revenue at the time of the determination. Therefore, although we continually update our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated declines in demand or technological developments, such as the introduction of new products by our competitors, could have a significant negative impact on the value of our inventory, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.

  Warranty

     Equipment that we sell generally is covered by a warranty period of one year. We accrue a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services. Our estimate of costs to service our warranty obligations is based on our historical experience and expectation of future conditions. While our warranty costs have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, to the extent we experience an increased number of warranty claims or increased costs associated with servicing those claims, our warranty expenses will increase, and we may experience decreased gross profit margin and cash flow.

17

Results of Operations

     The following tables present, for the periods indicated, expenses and other financial information expressed as a percentage of revenue and a summary of our total revenue. This information has been derived from our unaudited consolidated statements of operations included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should not draw any conclusions about our future results from the results of operations for any period.

Three Months Ended April 2, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended April 3, 2004

     Revenue. The 36% increase in revenue from the sale of BIS Sensors in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase of approximately 35% in the number of BIS Sensors sold as a result of growth in the installed base of BIS monitors and original equipment manufacturer products. The increase in the number of BIS Sensors sold was combined with an increase in both the domestic and international sensor average selling price. During this period, domestic sensor units sold increased approximately 24% with an increase in the domestic average selling price of approximately 4% while international sensor units sold increased approximately 82% with an increase in the average selling price of approximately 2%. Our installed base of BIS monitors and original equipment manufacturer products increased approximately 26% to 25,895 units at April 2, 2005 compared with 20,613 units at April 3, 2004.

     The 28% increase in revenue from the sale of Equipment in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004 was primarily driven by a 112% increase in original equipment manufacturer product revenue. The increase in original equipment manufacture product revenue was the result of an increase in the number of original equipment manufacturer products shipped during this period. In the three months ended April 2, 2005, the number of original equipment manufacturer products shipped to our original equipment manufacturers increased approximately 175%, from 377 original equipment manufacturer products shipped in the first quarter of 2004 compared with 1,035 original equipment manufacturer products shipped in the first quarter of 2005.

18

     Our gross profit margin was approximately 74% of revenue in the first quarter of 2005 compared with a gross profit margin of approximately 78% of revenue in the first quarter of 2004. The decrease in the gross profit margin in the first quarter of 2005 from the same quarter in the prior year was primarily the result of three factors. First, we had an increase in both revenue and unit shipments of our original equipment manufacturer products which have lower margins compared with our BIS monitors. Second, we had an increase of approximately 61% in sales of our BIS monitors with a corresponding decrease in our average monitor selling prices. Finally, international revenue increased as a percentage of total revenue from 19% in the first quarter of 2004 to 24% in the first quarter of 2005. International revenue carries a lower margin as we sell primarily through distributors in the international market while in the U.S. we sell through a direct sales force.

Expense Overview

     Research and Development. The slight increase in research and development expenses in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in salary expense of approximately $126,000, offset by a decrease in clinical study expenses of approximately $77,000. The increase in salary expense reflects annual salary increases which became effective in January 2005. We expect research and development expenses to increase in the second quarter of 2005 compared with the first quarter of 2005 as we continue to invest in clinical studies in an effort to expand applications for our technology, including our continued initiatives into neuroscience.

     Sales and Marketing. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in operating expenses associated with our international subsidiaries of approximately $380,000, an increase of approximately $256,000 in compensation and benefits of which approximately $163,000 relates to an increase in commissions expense and a portion of the increase relates to annual salary increases, and an increase in recruiting fees of approximately $44,000. The $380,000 increase in our international operating expenses was the result of an increase of approximately $271,000 in compensation and benefits partly due to annual salary increases, and an increase of approximately $45,000 in travel and entertainment expenses. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in the second quarter of 2005 compared with the first quarter of 2005.

     General and Administrative. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004 was primarily attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits of approximately $103,000 as a result of increased headcount and annual salary increases, an increase in accounting and tax services of approximately $87,000 and an increase in recruiting fees of approximately $26,000. We expect general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2005 to remain consistent with the first quarter of 2005.

     Interest Income. Interest income increased to approximately $376,000 in the three months ended April 2, 2005 from approximately $209,000 in the three months ended April 3, 2004, an increase of approximately 80%. The increase in interest income was primarily attributable to an increase in our cash, cash equivalent and investment balance in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with the three months ended April 3, 2004. We expect interest income in the second quarter of 2005 to decrease slightly compared with the first quarter of 2005.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to approximately $13,000 in the three months ended April 2, 2005 from approximately $29,000 in the three months ended April 3, 2004, a decrease of approximately 55%. The decrease in interest expense in the three months ended April 2, 2005 was a result of lower average outstanding debt obligations. We expect interest expense in the second quarter of 2005 to remain relatively constant compared with the first quarter of 2005 as we do not anticipate that our outstanding debt obligations will increase.

19

     Net Income (Loss). As a result of the factors discussed above, for the three months ended April 2, 2005, we had net income of approximately $1.1 million compared with a net loss of approximately $796,000 for the three months ended April 3, 2004 We did not record a provision for income taxes for the quarter ended April 2, 2005 as we have significant deferred tax assets available to offset any income tax liabilities and expenses. At April 2, 2005, we had a full valuation allowance against these gross deferred tax assets as we have determined that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Our liquidity requirements have historically consisted of research and development expenses, sales and marketing expenses, capital expenditures, working capital and general corporate expenses. From our inception through January 2000, we financed our operations primarily from the sale of convertible preferred stock. Through April 2, 2005, we raised approximately $85.7 million from private equity financings, received approximately $3.4 million in equipment financing and received approximately $5.1 million of financing related to our investment in sales-type leases. We also received approximately $2.8 million of financing under a term loan in December 1999. The outstanding principal on the equipment and term loans was paid in May 2001. In February 2000, we completed our initial public offering of an aggregate of 4,025,000 shares of common stock and received net proceeds of approximately $54.6 million.

     In May 2001, we entered into an agreement with Bank of America (formerly Fleet National Bank), for a $5.0 million revolving line of credit, which expires in May 2005. The revolving line of credit contains restrictive covenants that require us to maintain liquidity and net worth ratios and is secured by certain investments, which are shown as restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the extension of our revolving line of credit agreement in May 2004, we are now required to maintain restricted cash in an amount equal to 102% of the outstanding amounts under the revolving line of credit. Prior to the extension in May 2004, we were required to maintain restricted cash in an amount equal to 102% of the $5.0 million commitment. At April 2, 2005, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the revolving line of credit agreement. Interest on any borrowings under the revolving line of credit is, at our election, either the prime rate or at LIBOR plus 2.25%. At April 2, 2005, the interest rate on the line of credit was 5.75%. Up to $1.5 million of the $5.0 million revolving line of credit is available for standby letters of credit. At April 2, 2005, there was no amount outstanding under this line of credit and we had standby letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $80,000. We are currently in the process of negotiating a one year extension to the revolving line of credit with Bank of America.

     In August 2002, we entered into a strategic alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation whereby we sold 1,428,572 shares of our common stock at a purchase price per share of $7.00 to Boston Scientific Corporation. Gross cash proceeds from this sale of common stock were approximately $10.0 million. Note 9 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes additional information relating to the strategic alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation.

     In connection with our strategic alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation, we also entered into an agreement with Boston Scientific Corporation for a revolving line of credit under which we are entitled to borrow up to $5.0 million. The revolving line of credit expires in August 2007 and may be extended at the discretion of Boston Scientific Corporation. Interest on any borrowings under this revolving line of credit is at a rate equal to the LIBOR rate at which Boston Scientific Corporation, under its own revolving credit facility, is entitled to borrow funds, plus any additional amounts payable thereon by Boston Scientific Corporation under such revolving credit facility, plus eighty basis points. Our revolving line of credit with Boston Scientific Corporation is secured by our inventory and certain of our accounts receivable and contains certain restrictive covenants covering the collateral. At April 2, 2005, there was no outstanding balance under this revolving line of credit and we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the revolving line of credit agreement.

     On April 7, 2004, in order to raise cash for working capital and other general corporate purposes, we entered into another stock purchase agreement with Boston Scientific Corporation to issue and sell to Boston Scientific Corporation an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $16.21 per share. We completed the sale on June 8, 2004. Gross cash proceeds from this sale of common stock were approximately $8.1 million.

     We expect to meet our short-term liquidity needs through the use of cash and short-term investments on hand at April 2, 2005. We believe that the financial resources available to us, including our current working capital, our long-term investments and available revolving lines of credit will be sufficient to finance our planned operations and capital expenditures through at least the end of 2006. However, our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the resources required to further develop our marketing and sales organization domestically and internationally, to finance our research and development programs, to implement new marketing programs, to finance our sales-type lease program and to meet market demand for our products.

20

     We expect to fund the growth of our business over the long term through cash flow from operations and through issuances of capital stock, promissory notes or other securities. Any sale of additional equity or debt securities may result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us at all. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more aspects of our business development activities, which could harm the growth of our business.

     Working capital at April 2, 2005 was approximately $35.2 million compared to approximately $34.2 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in working capital from December 31, 2004 to April 2, 2005 was primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $1.3 million in our accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

     Cash Used for Operations. We used approximately $2.7 million of cash for operations in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with approximately $2.9 million in the three months ended April 3, 2004. Cash used for operations in the three months ended April 2, 2005 was primarily driven by a decrease in accrued liabilities of approximately $1.8 million and an increase in other assets of approximately $1.5 million. These were partially offset by net income of approximately $1.1 million and an increase in accounts payable of approximately $508,000. The decrease in accrued liabilities of $1.8 million was primarily driven by a decrease in accrued bonus as we paid our 2004 bonuses in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in other assets relates to the renewal of our commercial insurance lines and directors and officers insurance of approximately $692,000 and an increase of approximately $630,000 in receivables from stock option exercises.

     Cash Used for Investing Activities. We used approximately $2.4 million of cash from investing activities in the three months ended April 2, 2005 compared with approximately $1.9 million of cash provided by investing activities in the three months ended April 3, 2004. The cash used by investing activities in the three months ended April 2, 2005 was primarily the result of the net purchases of investments of approximately $2.0 million and capital expenditures of approximately $412,000 related to leasehold improvements to our facilities and the purchase of computer hardware and machinery and equipment. In the three months ended April 3, 2004, we received approximately $1.8 million, net, of proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities and invested approximately $160,000 primarily related to expenditures for the purchase of computer hardware and third-party software.

     Cash Provided from Financing Activities. We received approximately $1.2 million of cash from financing activities in the three months ended April 2, 2005 primarily as a result of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options granted under our stock option plans of approximately $1.4 million, offset by payments of principal on debt related to our investment in sales-type leases of approximately $118,000. In the three months ended April 4, 2004, we received approximately $1.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of our common stock upon the exercise of stock options granted under our stock option plans, offset by approximately $210,000 of payments of principal on debt related to out investment in sales-type leases.

     In July 1999, we entered into an agreement under which we can sell a portion of our existing and future investment in sales-type leases to Americorp Financial, Inc. Through April 2, 2005, we sold approximately $5.1 million of our investment in sales-type leases. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — A replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, the proceeds from these sales are classified as debt. Payments on the outstanding principal under this debt match the timing of the payments due on the underlying investment in sales-type leases. At April 2, 2005, approximately $379,000 is recorded as debt on our unaudited consolidated balance sheet.

     We had capital expenditures of approximately $412,000 for the quarter ended April 2, 2005, which related primarily to leasehold improvements to our facilities and the purchase of computer hardware and third-party software. At April 2, 2005, we did not have any commitments for capital expenditures. We anticipate that the level of capital expenditures in the second quarter of 2005 will remain constant with the level of capital expenditures during the first quarter of 2005.

     In February 2005, we entered into an agreement with the supplier of our electronic memory device used in the XP family of our disposable sensors to purchase a sufficient quantity of these electronic memory devices to maintain our inventory levels through at least the end of 2005. This commitment is expected to be approximately $1.4 million.

21

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which are typically established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Income Taxes

     We have net operating loss and research and development tax credit carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that began expiring in 2002 and will continue to expire through 2023 if not utilized.

     The net operating loss and research and development tax credit carryforwards are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service. Ownership changes, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 in the Internal Revenue Code, may limit the amount of these tax attributes that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined based on our value immediately prior to the ownership change. Subsequent ownership changes may further affect the limitation in future years. We have substantial net operating loss carryforwards that have generated significant deferred tax assets. We have provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets as we have determined that it is more likely than not that we will not be able to fully utilize these net operating loss carryforwards.

Effects of Inflation

     We believe that inflation and changing prices over the past year have not had a significant impact on our revenue or on our results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment, or SFAS No. 123R, which is a revision of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, or SFAS 123. SFAS 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Under SFAS No. 123R, companies must calculate and record in the income statement the cost of equity instruments, such as stock options or restricted stock, awarded to employees for services received; pro forma disclosure is not longer permitted. The cost of the equity instruments is to be measured based on fair value of the instruments on the date they are granted (with certain exceptions) and is required to be recognized over the period during which the employees are required to provide services in exchange for the equity instruments.

     SFAS No. 123R provides two alternatives for adoption: (1) a “modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted subsequent to the effective date of this statement as well as for the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of the effective date; or (2) a “modified retrospective” method which follows the approach in the “modified prospective” method, but also permits entities to restate prior periods to record compensation cost calculated under SFAS No. 123 for the pro forma disclosure. Since we currently account for stock options granted to employees and shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan in accordance with the intrinsic value method permitted under APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation expense generally is recognized. We expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have a significant impact on our results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R on periods after adoption cannot be accurately estimated at this time, as it will depend on the market value and the amount of share based awards granted in future periods. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share included in Note 2 to the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

     In April 2005, the SEC deferred the deadline for adoption of SFAS 123R’s provisions on share-based payment. Specifically, SEC registrants previously required to adopt SFAS 123R’s provisions at the beginning of the first interim period after June 15, 2005 may now adopt the provisions at the beginning of their first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005, under the new SEC rule. As such, we intend to adopt SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006.

22

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including information relating to our ability to maintain profitability, information with respect to market acceptance of our BIS system, continued growth in sales of our BIS monitors, original equipment manufacturer products and BIS Sensors, our dependence on the BIS system, regulatory approvals for our products, our ability to remain competitive and achieve future growth, information with respect to other plans and strategies for our business and factors that may influence our revenue for the fiscal quarter ending July 2, 2005 and thereafter. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ significantly from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. The following important factors represent some of the current challenges to us that create risk and uncertainty. Failure to adequately overcome any of the following challenges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, business or financial condition. In addition, subsequent events and developments may cause our expectations to change. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our expectations change.

We will not continue to be profitable if hospitals and anesthesia providers do not buy and use our BIS system in sufficient quantities.

     Our customers may determine that the cost of the BIS system exceeds cost savings in drugs, personnel and post-anesthesia care recovery resulting from use of the BIS system. In addition, hospitals and anesthesia providers may not accept the BIS system as an accurate means of assessing a patient’s level of consciousness during surgery or in the intensive care unit. If extensive or frequent malfunctions occur, healthcare providers may also conclude that the BIS system is unreliable. If hospitals and anesthesia providers do not accept the BIS system as cost-effective, accurate and reliable, they will not buy and use the BIS system in sufficient quantities to enable us to continue to be profitable.

     The success of our business also depends in a large part on continued use of the BIS system by our customers and, accordingly, sales by us of BIS Sensors. We expect that over time, sales of BIS Sensors will increase as a percentage of our revenue as compared to sales of Equipment as we build our installed base of monitors and modules. If use of our BIS system, and accordingly, sales of our BIS Sensors, do not increase, our ability to grow our revenue could be adversely affected.

We depend on our BIS system for substantially all of our revenue, and if the BIS system does not gain widespread market acceptance, then our revenue will not grow.

     We began selling our current BIS system in early 1998 and introduced the latest version, the BIS XP system, at the end of the third fiscal quarter of 2001. We also offer BIS monitoring systems, including the BISx system, for the integration into equipment sold by original equipment manufacturers. To date, we have not achieved widespread market acceptance of the BIS system for use in the operating room or in the intensive care unit from healthcare providers or professional anesthesia organizations. Because we depend on our BIS system for substantially all of our revenue and we have no other significant products, if we fail to achieve widespread market acceptance for the BIS system, we will not be able to sustain or grow our product revenue.

Various market factors may adversely affect our quarterly operating results through the second fiscal quarter of 2005 and beyond.

     Various factors may adversely affect our quarterly operating results through the second fiscal quarter of 2005. First, we continue to shift the focus of our placements from BIS monitors to original equipment manufacturer products which may lead to a reduction in Equipment revenue and gross margin on Equipment. Second, in Japan, Nihon Kohden is awaiting approval of the BIS XP system from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare which may cause delays in purchasing decisions by customers in Japan, or these potential customers may choose not to purchase our products. The continuation of difficult worldwide economic conditions, reductions in hospital purchasing programs and the cost of transitioning our installed base to the BIS XP system may also adversely impact our revenue and operating results through the second fiscal quarter of 2005 and beyond. Additionally, on October 7, 2004, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, or JCAHO, issued a Sentinel Event Alert aimed at preventing and managing the impact of anesthesia awareness. The Alert identifies the incidence of awareness, describes common underlying causes and suggests steps for healthcare professionals and institutions to take in order to manage and prevent future occurrences and recommends healthcare organizations develop and implement policies to address anesthesia awareness. While we believe this report is favorable to our business, industry organizations and others in the anesthesia community may not agree with the position

23

taken in the Alert and, accordingly, potential benefits to our business that could have resulted from this Alert may not be realized.

Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results could cause our stock price to decrease.

     Our operating results have fluctuated significantly from quarter to quarter in the past and are likely to vary in the future. These fluctuations are due to several factors relating to the sale of our products, including:

	•	the timing and volume of customer orders for our BIS system,
	•	implementation of, and our subsequent reduction on the focus of, our EP program,
	•	use of and demand for our BIS Sensors,
	•	transition of sales focus from BIS monitors to original equipment manufacturer products,
	•	customer cancellations,
	•	introduction of competitive products,
	•	regulatory approvals,
	•	changes in management,
	•	turnover in our direct sales force,
	•	effectiveness of new marketing and sales programs,
	•	communications published by industry organizations or other in the anesthesia community that are unfavorable to our business,
	•	reductions in orders by our distributors and original equipment manufacturers, and
	•	the timing and amount of our expenses.

     Because of these fluctuations, it is likely that in some future quarter or quarters our operating results could fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If our quarterly operating results are below expectations in the future, the market price of our common stock would likely decrease. In addition, because we do not have a substantial backlog of customer orders for our BIS system, revenue in any quarter depends on orders received in that quarter. Our quarterly results may also be adversely affected because some customers may have inadequate financial resources to purchase our products or may fail to pay for our products after receiving them. In particular, hospitals continue to experience financial constraints, consolidations and reorganizations as a result of cost containment measures and declining third-party reimbursement for services, which may result in decreased product orders or an increase in bad debt allowances in any quarter.

If the estimates we make, and the assumptions on which we rely in preparing our financial statements prove inaccurate, our actual results may vary from those reflected in our financial statements.

     Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, the amounts of charges accrued by us and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. This includes estimates on warranty reserves, inventory valuations and allowances for doubtful accounts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance, however, that our estimates, or the assumptions underlying them, will be correct.

24

If approval of our BIS XP system is not obtained in Japan, our revenue and operating results could be adversely affected.

     In Japan, Nihon Kohden is awaiting approval of the BIS XP system from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Until approval is obtained, customers in Japan may delay their purchasing decisions with respect to our products or may decide not to purchase our products at all. As a result, if approval for this product is not obtained in Japan in the near future, or at all, it could limit the growth of our international revenue.

We may need additional financing for our future capital needs and may not be able to raise additional funds on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

     We believe that the financial resources available to us, including our current working capital and available revolving lines of credit, will be sufficient to finance our planned operations and capital expenditures through at least the end of 2006. If we are unable to increase our revenue and maintain positive cash flow, we will need to raise additional funds. We may also need additional financing if:

	•	the research and development costs of our products currently under development increase,
	•	we decide to expand faster than currently planned,
	•	we develop new or enhanced services or products ahead of schedule,
	•	we decide to undertake new sales and/or marketing initiatives,
	•	we are required to defend or enforce our intellectual property rights,
	•	sales of our products do not meet our expectations domestically or internationally,
	•	we need to respond to competitive pressures, or
	•	we decide to acquire complementary products, businesses or technologies.

     We can provide no assurance that we will be able to raise additional funds on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If future financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our future operations which would significantly limit our ability to implement our business plan. In addition, we may have to issue securities that may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our common stock.

Cases of awareness with recall during monitoring with the BIS system could limit market acceptance of BIS systems and could expose us to product liability claims.

     Clinicians have reported to us cases of possible awareness with recall during surgical procedures monitored with the BIS system. In most of the cases that were reported to us, when BIS index values were recorded at the time of awareness, high BIS index values were noted, indicating that the BIS index correctly identified the increased risk of awareness with recall in these patients. However, in a small number of these reported cases, awareness with recall may not have been detected by monitoring with the BIS system. We have not systematically solicited reports of awareness with recall. It is possible that additional cases of awareness with recall during surgical procedures monitored with the BIS system have not been reported to us. Anesthesia providers and hospitals may elect not to purchase and use BIS systems if there is adverse publicity resulting from the report of cases of awareness with recall that were not detected during procedures monitored with the BIS system. If anesthesia providers and hospitals do not purchase and use the BIS system, then we may not sustain or grow our product revenue. Although our multi-center, multinational clinical studies have demonstrated that the use of BIS monitoring to help guide anesthetic administration may be associated with the reduction of the incidence of awareness with recall in adults using general anesthesia and sedation, we may be subject to product liability claims for cases of awareness with recall during surgical procedures monitored with the BIS system. These claims could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. Moreover, if the patient safety benefits of BIS monitoring are not persuasive enough to lead to wider adoption of our BIS technology, our business could be adversely affected.

25

We may not be able to compete with new products or alternative techniques developed by others, which could impair our ability to remain competitive and achieve future growth.

     The medical device industry in which we market our products is characterized by rapid product development and technological advances. Our competitors have introduced commercially anesthesia monitoring products which have been cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. If we do not compete effectively with these monitoring products, our revenue will be adversely affected. Our current or planned products are at risk of obsolescence from:

	•	other new monitoring products, based on new or improved technologies,
	•	new products or technologies used on patients or in the operating room during surgery in lieu of monitoring devices,
	•	electrical or mechanical interference from new or existing products or technologies,
	•	alternative techniques for evaluating the effects of anesthesia,
	•	significant changes in the methods of delivering anesthesia, and
	•	the development of new anesthetic agents.

     We may not be able to improve our products or develop new products or technologies quickly enough to maintain a competitive position in our markets and continue to grow our business.

If we do not successfully develop and introduce enhanced or new products we could lose revenue opportunities and customers.

     As the market for our BIS system matures, we need to develop and introduce new products for anesthesia monitoring or other applications. In 2002, we introduced commercially the BIS Extend Sensor for patients who are typically monitored for an extended period of time, such as in intensive care unit settings. We do not know whether the use of the BIS system in the intensive care unit will achieve market acceptance. In addition, we have begun to research the use of BIS monitoring to diagnose and track neurological diseases, and face at least the following two related risks:

	•	we may not successfully adapt the BIS system to function properly for procedural sedation, when used with anesthetics we have not tested or with patient populations we have not studied, such as infants, and
	•	our technology is complex, and we may not be able to develop it further for applications outside anesthesia monitoring, such as the diagnosis and tracking of neurological diseases.

     If we do not successfully adapt the BIS system for new products and applications both within and outside the field of anesthesia monitoring, or if such products and applications are developed but not successfully commercialized, then we could lose revenue opportunities and customers.

If we do not develop and implement a successful sales and marketing strategy, we will not expand our business.

     In the past, we have experienced high turnover in our direct sales force. It is possible that high turnover may occur in the future. If new sales representatives do not acquire the technological skills to sell our products in a timely and successful manner or we experience high turnover in our direct sales force, we may not be able to sustain and grow our product revenue. In addition, in order to increase our sales, we need to continue to strengthen our relationships with our international distributors and continue to add international distributors. Also, we need to continue to strengthen our relationships with our original equipment manufacturers and other sales channels and increase sales through these channels. On an ongoing basis, we develop and introduce new sales and marketing programs and clinical education programs to promote the use of the BIS system by our customers. If we do not implement these new sales and marketing and education programs in a timely and successful manner, we may not be able to achieve the level of market awareness and sales required to expand our business. We have only limited sales and marketing experience both in the United States and internationally and may not be successful in developing and implementing our strategy. Among other things, we need to:

	•	provide or assure that distributors and original equipment manufacturers provide the technical and educational support customers need to use the BIS system successfully,
	•	promote frequent use of the BIS system so that sales of our disposable BIS Sensors increase,

26

	•	establish and implement successful sales and marketing and education programs that encourage our customers to purchase our products or the products that are made by original equipment manufacturers incorporating our technology,
	•	manage geographically dispersed operations, and
	•	modify our products and marketing and sales programs for foreign markets.

Our third-party distribution and original equipment manufacturer relationships could negatively affect our profitability, cause sales of our products to decline and be difficult to terminate if we are dissatisfied.

     Sales through distributors could be less profitable than direct sales. Sales of our products through multiple channels could also confuse customers and cause the sale of our products to decline. We do not control our original equipment manufacturers and distribution partners. Our partners could sell competing products, may not incorporate our technology into their products in a timely manner and may devote insufficient sales efforts to our products. In addition, our partners are generally not required to purchase minimum quantities. As a result, even if we are dissatisfied with the performance of our partners, we may be unable to terminate our agreements with these partners or enter into alternative arrangements.

We may not be able to generate enough additional revenue from our international expansion to offset the costs associated with establishing and maintaining foreign operations.

     A component of our growth strategy is to expand our presence in international markets. We conduct international business primarily in Europe and Japan and we are attempting to increase the number of countries in which we do business. It is costly to establish international facilities and operations and to promote the BIS system in international markets. We have encountered barriers to the sale of our BIS system outside the United States, including less acceptance by anesthesia providers for use of disposable products, such as BIS Sensors, delays in regulatory approvals outside of the United States, particularly in Japan, and difficulties selling through indirect sales channels. In addition, we have little experience in marketing and distributing products in these markets. Revenue from international activities may not offset the expense of establishing and maintaining these international operations.

We may not be able to meet the unique operational, legal and financial challenges that we will encounter in our international operations, which may limit the growth of our business.

     We are increasingly subject to a number of challenges which specifically relate to our international business activities. These challenges include:

	•	failure of local laws to provide adequate protection against infringement of our intellectual property,
	•	protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competitors, which could slow our growth in international markets,
	•	difficulties in terminating or modifying distributor arrangements because of restrictions in markets outside the United States,
	•	less acceptance by foreign anesthesia providers of the use of disposable products, such as BIS Sensors,
	•	delays in regulatory approval of our products,
	•	currency conversion issues arising from sales denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar,
	•	foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations,
	•	longer sales cycles to sell products like the BIS system to hospitals and outpatient surgical centers, which could slow our revenue growth from international sales, and
	•	longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable.

If we are unable to meet and overcome these challenges, our international operations may not be successful which would limit the growth of our business and could adversely impact our results of operations.

27

We may experience customer dissatisfaction and our reputation could suffer if we fail to manufacture enough products to meet our customers’ demands.

     We rely on third-party manufacturers to assemble and manufacture the components of our BIS monitors, original equipment manufacturer products and a portion of our BIS Sensors. We manufacture substantially all BIS Sensors in our own manufacturing facility. We have only one manufacturing facility. If we fail to produce enough products at our own manufacturing facility or at a third-party manufacturing facility for any reason, including damage or destruction of our facility, or experience a termination or modification of any manufacturing arrangement with a third party, we may be unable to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis. Our failure to deliver products on a timely basis could lead to customer dissatisfaction and damage our reputation.

Our reliance on sole-source suppliers could adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ demands for our products in a timely manner or within budget.

     Some of the components that are necessary for the assembly of our BIS system, including some of the components used in our BIS Sensors, are currently provided to us by sole-source suppliers or a limited group of suppliers. We purchase components through purchase orders rather than long-term supply agreements and generally do not maintain large volumes of inventory. We have experienced shortages and delays in obtaining some of the components of our BIS systems in the past, and we may experience similar shortages or delays in the future. The disruption or termination of the supply of components could cause a significant increase in the costs of these components, which could affect our profitability. A disruption or termination in the supply of components could also result in our inability to meet demand for our products, which could lead to customer dissatisfaction and damage our reputation. If a supplier is no longer willing or able to manufacture components that we purchase and integrate into the BIS system, we may attempt to design replacement components ourselves that would be compatible with our existing technology. In doing so, we would incur additional research and development expenses, and there can be no assurance that we would be successful in designing or manufacturing any replacement components. Furthermore, if we are required to change the manufacturer of a key component of the BIS system, we may be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could delay our ability to manufacture BIS systems in a timely manner or within budget.

We may be required to bring litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, which may result in substantial expense and may divert our attention from the implementation of our business strategy.

     We believe that the success of our business depends, in part, on obtaining patent protection for our products, defending our patents once obtained and preserving our trade secrets. We rely on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and patent, trademark and trade secret laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology. These legal measures afford only limited protection, and competitors may gain access to our intellectual property and proprietary information. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets and to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. Any litigation could result in substantial expense and diversion of our attention from the growth of the business and may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property rights.

We may be sued by third parties which claim that our products infringe on their intellectual property rights, particularly because there is substantial uncertainty about the validity and breadth of medical device patents.

     We may be exposed to litigation by third parties based on claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that the validity and breadth of claims covered in medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. Any litigation or claims against us, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs, could place a significant strain on our financial resources and could harm our reputation. In addition, intellectual property litigation or claims could force us to do one or more of the following:

	•	cease selling, incorporating or using any of our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, which would adversely affect our revenue,
	•	obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, and
	•	redesign our products, which may be costly and time-consuming.

28

We could be exposed to significant product liability claims which could divert management attention and adversely affect our cash balances, our ability to obtain and maintain insurance coverage at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts and our reputation.

     The manufacture and sale of our products expose us to product liability claims and product recalls, including those which may arise from misuse or malfunction of, or design flaws in, our products or use of our products with components or systems not manufactured or sold by us. Product liability claims or product recalls, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or to pay significant damages. We currently maintain product liability insurance; however, it may not cover the costs of any product liability claims made against us. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts. In addition, publicity pertaining to the misuse or malfunction of, or design flaws in, our products could impair our ability to successfully market and sell our products.

Several class action lawsuits have been filed against the underwriters of our initial public offering which may result in negative publicity and potential litigation against us that would be costly to defend and the outcome of which is uncertain and may harm our business.

     The underwriters of our initial public offering are named as defendants in several class action complaints which have been filed allegedly on behalf of certain persons who purchased shares of our common stock between January 28, 2000 and December 6, 2000. These complaints allege violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Primarily they allege that there was undisclosed compensation received by our underwriters in connection with our initial public offering. While we and our officers and directors have not been named as defendants in these suits, based on comparable lawsuits filed against other companies, there can be no assurance that we and our officers and directors will not be named in similar complaints in the future. In addition, the underwriters may assert that we are liable for some or all of any liability that they are found to have to the plaintiffs, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of the underwriting agreement we entered into as part of the initial public offering, or otherwise.

     We can provide no assurance as to the outcome of these complaints or any potential suit against us or our officers and directors. Any conclusion of these matters in a manner adverse to us could have a material adverse affect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, the costs to us of defending any litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Such litigation could also substantially divert the attention of our management and our resources in general. Even if we are not named as defendants in these lawsuits, we may also be required to incur significant costs and our management may be distracted by being required to provide information, documents or testimony in connection with the actions against our underwriters. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation or other proceedings and the negative publicity associated with this litigation could harm our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Boston Scientific Corporation may be able to affect corporate actions requiring stockholder approval because it owns a significant amount of our common stock, and, if our strategic alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation is not successful, our operating results could be adversely affected.

     As of May 1, 2005, Boston Scientific Corporation owned approximately 27% of our outstanding common stock. If Boston Scientific Corporation maintains or increases its ownership of our outstanding common stock, it may have the ability to affect corporate actions requiring stockholder approval. On August 7, 2002, we formed a strategic alliance with Boston Scientific Corporation. In connection with this strategic alliance, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we granted Boston Scientific Corporation an option to distribute newly developed technology for monitoring patients under sedation in a range of less-invasive medical specialties. If such products are not successfully developed, marketed and sold under the agreement in a manner consistent with our expectations, the growth of our business and our operating results will be adversely affected. Even if we successfully develop new sedation management technology for less-invasive medical procedures, Aspect and Boston Scientific Corporation may not successfully market and sell this new technology.

We may not reserve amounts adequate to cover product obsolescence, claims and returns, which could result in unanticipated expenses and fluctuations in operating results.

     Depending on factors such as the timing of our introduction of new products which utilize our BIS technology, as well as warranty claims and product returns, we may need to reserve amounts in excess of those currently reserved for product obsolescence, excess inventory, warranty claims and product returns. These reserves may not be adequate to cover all costs associated with these items. If these reserves are inadequate, we would be required to incur unanticipated expenses which could result in unexpected fluctuations in quarterly operating results.

29

We may not be able to compete effectively, which could result in price reductions and decreased demand for our products.

     We are facing increased competition in the domestic level of consciousness monitoring market as a result of a number of competitors’ monitoring systems which have been cleared by the FDA. These products are marketed by well-established medical products companies with significant resources. We may not be able to compete effectively with these and other potential competitors. We may also face substantial competition from companies which may develop sensor products that compete with our proprietary BIS Sensors for use with our BIS monitors or with third-party monitoring systems or anesthesia delivery systems that incorporate the BIS index. We also expect to face competition from companies currently marketing conventional electroencephalogram, or EEG, monitors using standard and novel signal-processing techniques. Other companies may develop anesthesia-monitoring systems that perform better than the BIS system and/or sell for less. In addition, one or more of our competitors may develop products that are substantially equivalent to our FDA-approved products, in which case they may be able to use our products as predicate devices to more quickly obtain FDA approval of their competing products. Medical device companies developing these and other competitive products may have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. Competition in the sale of anesthesia-monitoring systems could result in price reductions, fewer orders, reduced gross margins and loss of market share.

Our ability to market and sell our products and generate revenue depends upon receipt of domestic and foreign regulatory approval of our products and manufacturing operations.

     Before we can market new products in the United States, we must obtain clearance from the FDA. If the FDA concludes that any of our products do not meet the requirements to obtain clearance of a premarket notification under Section 510(k) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, then we would be required to file a premarket approval application. The premarket approval application process is lengthy, expensive and typically requires extensive preclinical and clinical trial data. We may not obtain clearance of a 510(k) notification or approval of a premarket approval application with respect to any of our products on a timely basis, if at all. If we fail to obtain timely clearance or approval for our products, we will not be able to market and sell our products, which will limit our ability to generate revenue. We may also be required to obtain clearance of a 510(k) notification from the FDA before we can market certain previously marketed products which we modify after they have been cleared. We have made certain enhancements to our currently marketed products which we have determined do not necessitate the filing of a new 510(k) notification. However, if the FDA does not agree with our determination, it will require us to file a new 510(k) notification for the modification and we may be prohibited from marketing the modified device until we obtain FDA clearance.

     The FDA also requires us to adhere to current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations, which include production design controls, testing, quality control, storage and documentation procedures. The FDA may at any time inspect our facilities to determine whether adequate compliance has been achieved. Compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations for medical devices is difficult and costly. In addition, we may not continue to be compliant as a result of future changes in, or interpretations of, regulations by the FDA or other regulatory agencies. If we do not achieve continued compliance, the FDA may withdraw marketing clearance or require product recall. When any change or modification is made to a device or its intended use, the manufacturer may be required to reassess compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations, which may cause interruptions or delays in the marketing and sale of our products.

     Sales of our products outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary from country to country. The time required to obtain approvals from foreign countries may be longer than that required for FDA approval, and requirements for foreign licensing may differ from FDA requirements.

     The federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of our products are subject to future changes, as are administrative interpretations of regulatory agencies. If we fail to comply with applicable federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including product seizures, recalls, withdrawal of clearances or approvals and civil and criminal penalties.

If we do not retain our senior management and other key employees, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.

     Our president and chief executive officer, Nassib Chamoun, joined us at our inception in 1987. Our chairman, J. Breckenridge Eagle, began serving as a director in 1988. Many other members of our management and key employees have extensive experience with us and other companies in the medical device industry. Our success is substantially dependent on the ability, experience and performance of these members of our senior management and other key employees. Because of their ability and experience, if we lose one or more of the members of our senior management or other key employees, our ability to successfully implement our business strategy could be seriously harmed.

30

If we do not attract and retain skilled personnel, we will not be able to expand our business.

     Our products are based on complex signal-processing technology. Accordingly, we require skilled personnel to develop, manufacture, sell and support our products. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate additional skilled personnel, particularly sales representatives who are responsible for customer education and training and post-installation customer support. Consequently, if we are not able to attract and retain skilled personnel, we will not be able to expand our business.

Failure of users of the BIS system to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party payors could limit market acceptance of the BIS system, which could prevent us from sustaining profitability.

     Anesthesia providers are generally not reimbursed separately for patient monitoring activities utilizing the BIS system. For hospitals and outpatient surgical centers, when reimbursement is based on charges or costs, patient monitoring with the BIS system may reduce reimbursements for surgical procedures, because charges or costs may decline as a result of monitoring with the BIS system. Failure by hospitals and other users of the BIS system to obtain adequate reimbursement from third-party payors, or any reduction in the reimbursement by third-party payors to hospitals and other users as a result of using the BIS system could limit market acceptance of the BIS system, which could prevent us from achieving profitability.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

  Interest Rate Exposure

     Our investment portfolio consists primarily of high-grade commercial paper, high grade corporate bonds and debt obligations of various governmental agencies. We manage our investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy. The primary objectives of our investment policy are to preserve principal, maintain a high degree of liquidity to meet operating needs, and obtain competitive returns subject to prevailing market conditions. Investments are made with an average maturity of 12 months or less and a maximum maturity of 24 months. These investments are subject to risk of default, changes in credit rating and changes in market value. These investments are also subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates increase. Due to the conservative nature of our investments and relatively short effective maturities of the debt instruments, we believe interest rate risk is mitigated. Our investment policy specifies the credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of exposure from any single issue, issuer or type of investment.

     Our investment in sales-type leases, line of credit agreements and sales-type lease debt agreements are also subject to market risk. The interest rates implicit in our sales-type leases and on our sales-type lease debt agreements are fixed and not subject to interest rate risk. The interest rates on our line of credit agreements are variable and subject to interest rate risk. The interest rate risk related to the lines of credit is mitigated primarily by the fact that the lines of credit, when drawn on, are generally outstanding for short periods of time in order to fund short-term cash requirements.

  Foreign Currency Exposure

     Most of our revenue, expenses and capital spending are transacted in U.S. dollars. The expenses and capital spending of our two international subsidiaries are transacted in the respective country’s local currency and subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk. Our foreign currency transactions are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing rates. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in current period income or loss as incurred. Currently, all material transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, and we have not entered into any material transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies.

31

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

	(a)	Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
		Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of April 2, 2005. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of April 2, 2005, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
	(b)	Changes in Internal Controls.
		No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

32

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5. Other Information.

     On January 12, 2005, we entered into a Capital Equipment Supplier Agreement with Novation, LLC. Novation provides purchasing opportunities to certain participating health care providers, which it refers to as its members.

     Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the supplier agreement, we will make the Quatro Sensor, Pediatric Sensor, Extend Sensor, Standard Sensor and the A-2000 XP Monitor, which we collectively refer to as the products, and services related hereto, available for purchase or lease to the members at prices established in the supplier agreement. We have agreed to adjust the prices and services offered in connection with the products in the future if necessary to assure market competitiveness. Novation has agreed to market the purchasing or leasing arrangements for the products covered by the supplier agreement to the members. In return for the services rendered by Novation pursuant to the supplier agreement, we will pay a fee to Novation based upon a percentage of the net sales of products to the members and an additional fee if the growth of business generated by Novation exceeds the growth of our business from other sources. The members are not subject to any minimum purchase obligations under the terms of the supplier agreement and have retained the right to contract directly with the members in exceptional circumstances.

     The supplier agreement went into effect on February 15, 2005 and expires on February 14, 2008. Either party may terminate the supplier agreement prior to its expiration for any reason by providing 90 days advanced written notice. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement immediately upon written notice in the event of a breach by the other party that remains uncured for a period of thirty days or due to the bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party.

     If, during the term of the supplier agreement, we introduce new technology that provides the same functionality as the products, (i) we have agreed to provide each member the opportunity to upgrade any product purchased, leased or ordered pursuant to the supplier agreement or (ii) we and Novation will agree to the terms for making upgrades available to members. In the event that we fail to disclose the existence of this new technology or we do not agree to terms of upgrades, Novation will have the right to terminate any products superseded by the new technology and may elect to contract with other suppliers for similar technology. If another supplier makes available a product which provides incremental patient care benefits and/or incremental safety benefits over the products, Novation may contract with a third party vendor, terminate the supplier agreement and allow the members to re-bid that line of products so members have access to the new technology at all times.

     We have agreed to maintain certain insurance coverage, including product liability insurance, during the term of the supplier agreement and to indemnify Novation, the members and authorized distributors against certain liabilities arising from (i) bodily injury or property damage caused by the products, (ii) our acts or omissions and (iii) any claim that the products infringe any United States patents. Novation has agreed to indemnify us for any violation of Novation’s representations and warranties set forth in the supplier agreement.

     The foregoing summary of the supplier agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the supplier agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits
		The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

33

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

34

EXHIBIT INDEX