SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 | ||
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
Commission File Number 0-28074
Sapient Corporation
|
Delaware
|
04-3130648 | |
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
ONE MEMORIAL DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142
(617) 621-0200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Companys knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company was approximately $89,100,000 on June 30, 2002 based on the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on June 30, 2002. There were 119,905,809 shares of the Companys common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2003.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 5, 2003 are incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Report.
SAPIENT CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||||||
|
Item 1.
|
Business | 2 | ||||
|
Item 2.
|
Properties | 7 | ||||
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings | 7 | ||||
|
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 7 | ||||
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Companys Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters | 9 | ||||
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data | 9 | ||||
|
Item 7.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12 | ||||
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 44 | ||||
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 45 | ||||
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 85 | ||||
|
Item 10.
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the Company | 85 | ||||
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation | 85 | ||||
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | 85 | ||||
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 85 | ||||
|
Item 14.
|
Statement of Fees Paid to Independent Auditors | 85 | ||||
|
Item 15.
|
Controls and Procedures | 85 | ||||
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K | 86 | ||||
| Signatures | 87 | |||||
| Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 88 | |||||
| Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 89 | |||||
| Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 90 | |||||
| Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 91 | |||||
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements included in this Annual Report, other than statements of historical facts, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives are forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report, the words will, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, project and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risks described in Part II, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or strategic investments. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our expectation only as of the day this Annual Report was first filed with the SEC and should not be relied on as representing our expectations as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our expectations change.
1
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Sapient, a leading business and technology consultancy, helps Global 2000 clients achieve measurable business results through the rapid application and support of advanced technology, primarily on a fixed-price basis. We are focused on making technology matterSM, by identifying, implementing and supporting technology-enabled solutions that create near- and long-term business value for our clients. We create value for our clients through our unique approach: a passion for delivering measurable business results; a fundamentally different methodology; a commitment to fixed-price and fixed-time delivery; our expertise in globally distributed delivery; and our ability to design our solutions for adoption.
Through our global presence, we understand and address the business issues that our clients are facing in both local and global contexts. In addition to offices in nine cities throughout the United States, we have offices in Düsseldorf, London, Munich, New Delhi and Toronto, and we own 50% of the voting stock of a consulting joint venture in Milan. Further information about our international operations is located in Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. We employed approximately 1,425 people worldwide as of February 28, 2003.
We have leveraged this global presence to create our Global Distributed DeliverySM (GDD) model, which enables us to deliver complex, customized technology solutions across multiple geographies. Many distributed development models involve simply building software applications from a remote location or augmenting domestic project teams with resources that travel from overseas. Our GDD model, on the other hand, involves the complex, daily interaction of development teams in a remote location (typically highly skilled technology specialists in our New Delhi office) working closely with development and client teams in North America or Europe in a single, coordinated effort. In order to work effectively in this globally distributed environment, we have built extensive expertise in managing the daily transitions of software code, specifications and project management issues between the various development teams that are needed for continuous, around-the-clock project work. By utilizing our GDD model, we can deliver complex, high-quality solutions to our clients at a lower cost, and deliver these solutions more rapidly by working across multiple time zones. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, projects involving a GDD component accounted for 45% of our total service revenues.
We deliver our services in the United States primarily through six industry business units: financial services; technology and communications; consumer and transportation; automotive and industrial; public services; and energy services. We deliver our services in Europe primarily through our United Kingdom and Germany business units, and we deliver our services in Canada primarily through our Canadian business unit. Within our international business units, we focus our sales and delivery efforts on certain industry specializations. Through our global industry focus, we have developed an extensive understanding of our clients markets and are able to effectively address the market dynamics and business opportunities that our clients face. This understanding further enables us to identify and focus on critical, industry-specific business processes that are specifically enabled by advanced technologies. Further information about our operating segments is located in Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.
Sapient was incorporated in Delaware in 1991. Our executive offices are located at One Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142, and our telephone number is (617) 621-0200. Our stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol SAPE. Our Internet address is http://www.sapient.com. Material contained on our Web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report to Sapient, we, us or our refer to Sapient Corporation and its subsidiaries.
2
Our Services
We provide a wide range of business and technology consulting services that enable our clients to realize tangible business value from their advanced technology investments. We have many years of experience implementing advanced technologies that can improve our clients businesses, including more than twelve years of experience with client/server and UNIX solutions, more than ten years of experience integrating package applications with legacy systems, more than eight years of experience with Internet solutions and more than six years of experience with wireless technologies. More recently, we have been an early implementor of new technologies such as Microsoft.NET and Web Services. We combine this technology expertise with our design skills and our deep understanding of user needs to ensure that our client solutions are effectively adopted by their intended audiences. The following are examples of the types of services that generate business value for our clients:
Customer Relationship Management. We assist our clients in improving their customer relationships by focusing their business processes and technology infrastructure on the needs and wants of their customers. By increasing their customer focus, our clients can better retain their customers and reduce their costs of customer service. The primary aim of our customer relationship management solutions is to systematically use information about customer wants and needs to create and maintain the desired customer experience consistently across all channels of customer interaction. We focus on integrating our solutions across multiple sales channels and with diverse legacy systems, in order to create a user-centered experience that is consistent, reliable and easy-to-use.
High-Volume Transaction Systems. We have extensive experience designing and implementing online portals, exchanges, purchasing systems, retail Internet sites and other transaction-processing systems capable of reliably handling very large volumes of transactions. These systems also reduce processing time and lower our clients operating costs. We further enhance the value provided by these systems by integrating the online channel with other distribution systems such as catalog systems and in-store kiosks. We also assist our clients in improving and integrating their business processes to optimize the effectiveness of these transaction systems.
Interactive Brand Experiences. We enable our clients to strengthen their communications with prospective customers by designing and developing high-impact interactive marketing applications and Internet microsites. Our strong design capabilities and our expertise in understanding user experience create business value for our clients by allowing them to enhance their target customers understanding of, and interest in, our clients offerings.
Learning Services. We help our clients enhance interactions with their employees, customers and suppliers by developing learner-centered solutions that generate valuable feedback, improved user understanding and increased loyalty. These solutions include knowledge management systems and workflows, enhanced support tools, intranets and interactive training solutions. These learning solutions also offer cost savings to our clients by increasing the desired utilization of their technology systems and business processes by their employees, customers and suppliers.
Rapid Enterprise Architecture Planning (REAP). We partner with our clients to develop enterprise architecture blueprints in highly compressed time frames. Combining our deep expertise in diverse technologies, our understanding of our clients business issues and our collaborative FusionSM workshops, we can, within four to eight weeks, clarify and optimize our clients technology infrastructure, redefine their supporting organizational and business processes and develop a road map to achieving their desired technology portfolio.
Software Packages and Legacy Systems. We are often able to provide the most value to our clients by leveraging existing high-quality software packages and our clients own legacy systems in our solutions. We have many years of experience implementing solutions using package applications such as application integration packages, content management and delivery systems, customer relationship management software and order management systems. We combine our custom development expertise with these package applications, and we fully integrate the finished product with our clients legacy systems.
3
Supply Chain Management. We have a successful history of developing supply chain management solutions that generate improved efficiency and faster processing times throughout our clients supply chains: inventory; order management; customer and supplier integration; demand and production planning; and new product development. These solutions not only reduce cost by increasing efficiency, they can also improve customer loyalty by satisfying customer needs in a quicker time frame and at a lower price.
Support and Maintenance. In order to derive long-term value from an advanced technology solution, a client needs reliable, rapid, cost-effective support. We offer application support 24 hours per day utilizing our Global Distributed DeliverySM model, both for solutions that we develop and for systems developed by others. Our support capabilities help ensure very high up-time and improved performance, because of regular process improvements and system enhancements. Our preemptive maintenance further minimizes the risks of performance problems. By greatly reducing down-time and system performance problems, our support and maintenance offerings assist our clients in realizing significant long-term value from their technology investments.
Our Approach
Our approach is designed to address the biggest problem that most companies face when pursuing technology projects: the majority of technology projects are finished late or over budget, lack promised capabilities or simply are never finished. Because of our approach, we are able to commit to delivering our solutions within the price and time frame that we have promised to our clients. Our approach enables us to create advanced technology solutions that bring together business, user and technology requirements to solve the business problems that our clients are facing. These solutions are designed to deliver tangible business value to clients in the form of increased revenues, reduced costs and more effective utilization of assets. We believe that our approach differentiates us from our competitors, and that our clients derive substantial benefits from the following elements of this approach:
We focus on measurable business results. We are passionate about delivering measurable business results to our clients and we are willing to put our fees at risk against those results. We define our success by whether we enable our clients to attain their desired business value. For more than a decade, we have helped many of the worlds top companies realize significant value from their technology investments. Our culture is engineered around client value. It is collaborative, forthright and characterized by a determination to do whatever it takes to deliver meaningful results to our clients.
We use a fundamentally different methodology. We have a fundamentally different methodology for advanced technology projects, which is designed to rapidly create organizational ownership and momentum. The Sapient ApproachSM, which has been refined and improved continuously for twelve years, is designed to ensure the success of our clients technology investments. It is structured around an initial set of workshops (FusionsSM) that create alignment and momentum across all business and technology users. We then document the business, user and technical processes that will achieve the desired business value, and build and deploy a technology solution that addresses the clients needs within the promised time and price. We discover, assess, design and deliver these solutions at speed, while they still matter. From our industry-specific expertise that provides us with an understanding of the threats and opportunities our clients face, to our focused project planning and delivery methodologies, we have built our entire approach around rapid, collaborative delivery.
We are committed to fixed-price, fixed-time delivery. We have developed a strong legacy of delivering our solutions on a fixed-price, fixed-time basis, since our formation in 1991. Because of our extensive experience delivering these types of projects, and our expertise with large-scale, complex project management, we are able to successfully deliver our solutions within the price and time frame we have promised to our clients. Our fixed-price, fixed-time legacy helps our clients avoid the lost business value that occurs when technology projects are finished late or over budget, lack promised capabilities or are never finished.
We work on a globally distributed basis. We offer a fully integrated, Global Distributed DeliverySM capability. Through our GDD model, we are able to create high-value solutions for our clients quickly and at a competitive cost advantage, thereby increasing overall value. With team members located across different
4
Our solutions are designed for adoption. We provide proprietary research-driven insights into people that enable us to implement technology solutions that are designed for adoption. Technology solutions deliver real business value only if they are designed with a deep understanding of the people who must use the technology. Through our user research, strategy and design capabilities, we ensure that our client solutions are effectively adopted by their intended audiences.
The principal risks and uncertainties facing our business, operations and financial condition are discussed in Part II, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Risk Factors on page 39 of this Annual Report.
People and Culture
We have developed a strong corporate culture that is critical to our success, and we have defined six core values that inspire our work and serve as guides for every engagement: client-focused delivery; leadership; relationships; creativity; openness; and people growth.
To encourage the achievement of these core values, we actively reward teamwork and use adoption of our core values as a measure to evaluate performance and give promotions. Also, we have an intensive orientation program for new employees to introduce them to our core values, as well as a number of internal communications and training initiatives defining and promoting these core values.
As of December 31, 2002, we had 1,491 full-time employees, composed of 1,163 project personnel, 264 general and administration personnel and 64 sales and marketing personnel. Although our rate of voluntary turnover increased during portions of 2002, our voluntary turnover rate began to return closer to our targeted level of 15% during the three months ended December 31, 2002. We attribute our low turnover rates, in large part, to the high caliber of our employees and our commitment to maintaining the values on which our success has been based. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees.
Selling and Marketing
The role of Sapients marketing program is to create and sustain preference and loyalty for Sapient as our clients preferred business and technology consultants. Marketing is performed at the corporate and industry business unit levels in the United States, and at the geographic level in the other countries where we operate.
Our dedicated marketing personnel undertake a variety of marketing activities, including developing and implementing our overall marketing strategy, communicating and strengthening Sapients brand and reputation, sponsoring focused multi-client events to demonstrate our thought leadership, cultivating media and industry analyst relations, conducting market research and analysis, sponsoring and participating in targeted conferences, creating marketing assets to assist client-development teams and publishing our Web site, www.sapient.com.
Our sales professionals are primarily organized along industry lines, both within our United States business units and our other international offices. We believe that the industry and geographic focus of our sales professionals and of our business unit marketing teams enhances their knowledge and expertise in these industries and generates additional client engagements.
We continue to actively build relationships and strategic alliances with other technology companies and packaged technology vendors. These relationships involve a wide range of joint activities, including working jointly on client engagements, evaluating and recommending each others technology solutions to customers, and training and transferring knowledge regarding each others solutions. We believe that these relationships
5
Our written agreements with our clients contain varying terms and conditions, including, in some instances, the right of the client to terminate the agreement with limited advance notice or penalty. We do not believe it is generally appropriate to characterize these agreements as backlog.
Competition
The markets for the services we provide are highly competitive. We believe that we currently compete principally with large systems consulting and implementation firms and clients internal information systems departments. We have begun to compete with offshore outsourcing companies, and we expect competition from these companies to increase in the future, especially on development, support and maintenance and outsourcing engagements. We compete to a lesser extent with specialized e-business consulting firms, strategy consulting firms and packaged technology vendors. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, generate higher revenues and have greater name recognition than we do. These competitors are often able to offer greater scale and breadth of products and services, which, in some instances, has enabled them to significantly discount their services in exchange for revenues in other areas or at later dates.
We believe that the principal competitive factors in our markets include: ability to solve business problems; expertise and talent with advanced technologies; global presence; expertise in delivering complex projects on a globally distributed basis; quality and speed of delivery; price of solutions; industry knowledge; understanding of user experiences; and sophisticated project and program management capability.
We believe that we compete favorably when considering these factors, and that our ability to rapidly deliver business value to our clients through advanced technology solutions on a fixed-price basis, and our successful track record in doing so, distinguishes us from our competitors.
Intellectual Property Rights
We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements, and copyright and trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. We enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, subcontractors, vendors, consultants and clients, and limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information.
Our services involve the development of business and technology solutions for specific client engagements. Ownership of these solutions is the subject of negotiation and is frequently assigned to the client, although we often retain ownership of certain development tools and may be granted a license to use the solutions for certain purposes. Certain of our clients have prohibited us from marketing the solutions developed for them for specified periods of time or to specified third parties, and we anticipate that certain of our clients will demand similar or other restrictions in the future.
Where To Find More Information
We make our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all exhibits and amendments to these reports, available free of charge at our Web site, www.sapient.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with the Commission. We also make available on our Web site reports filed by our executive officers and Directors on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding their ownership of our securities. These materials are available in the Investor Relations portion of our Web site, under the link SEC Filings.
6
| Item 2. | Properties |
Our headquarters and principal administrative, finance, selling and marketing operations are located in approximately 47,000 square feet of leased office space in Cambridge, Massachusetts. We also lease offices in New York, Jersey City, San Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., Düsseldorf, London, Munich, New Delhi and Toronto.
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Not Applicable.
7
Executive Officers of Sapient
Below are the name, age and principal occupations for the last five years of each executive officer of Sapient, as of March 1, 2003. All such persons have been elected to serve until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
|
Sheeroy D. Desai
|
37 | Mr. Desai joined Sapient in 1991 and has served as Executive Vice President since September 1994. Mr. Desai served as Co-Chief Operating Officer from October 1999 until May 2000, and has served as Chief Operating Officer since April 2001. | ||
|
Jerry A. Greenberg
|
37 | Mr. Greenberg co-founded Sapient in 1991 and has served as Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer and as a Director since Sapients inception. | ||
|
Alan J. Herrick
|
37 | Mr. Herrick joined Sapient in 1995. Mr. Herrick was appointed as Vice President in December 1996 and was appointed as Executive Vice President in June 2002. | ||
|
Steven J. Hoffman
|
49 | Mr. Hoffman joined Sapient in January 2001 as Senior Vice President. Prior to joining Sapient, Mr. Hoffman served as President of Concrete Media, Inc., a business consulting company, from January 2000 to July 2000, and as Managing Director of Exchange Partners LLC, a business consulting company, from May 1996 to January 2000. | ||
|
Susan D. Johnson
|
37 | Ms. Johnson joined Sapient in February 1994 and served as Chief Financial Officer from February 1994 until January 2000. Ms. Johnson resumed the position of Chief Financial Officer in February 2002. Ms. Johnson has served as Senior Vice President since January 2000. | ||
|
Bradley T. Miller
|
41 | Mr. Miller joined Sapient in March 2000 as Corporate Controller. Mr. Miller was appointed as Vice President in August 2001 and as Chief Accounting Officer in November 2002. Prior to joining Sapient, Mr. Miller served as Vice President and Corporate Controller of JuniorNet Corporation, an Internet content provider, from September 1999 until March 2000, and as Director of Financial Reporting of Wang, Inc., a computer hardware and services company, from August 1996 to September 1999. | ||
|
J. Stuart Moore
|
41 | Mr. Moore co-founded Sapient in 1991 and has served as Co- Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer and as a Director since Sapients inception. | ||
|
Jane E. Owens
|
49 | Ms. Owens joined Sapient in September 2000 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining Sapient, Ms. Owens served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of The Dial Corporation, a consumer products company, from May 1997 to September 2000, and as Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of The Timberland Company, a footwear and apparel company, from September 1992 to May 1997. |
8
PART II
| Item 5. | Market for the Companys Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
Market Price of Common Stock
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol SAPE. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low intraday sale prices for our common stock.
| High | Low | ||||||||
|
2001
|
|||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 19.88 | $ | 6.97 | |||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 15.25 | $ | 5.23 | |||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 9.80 | $ | 3.15 | |||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 8.60 | $ | 3.54 | |||||
|
2002
|
|||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$ | 7.55 | $ | 3.50 | |||||
|
Second Quarter
|
$ | 5.75 | $ | 1.01 | |||||
|
Third Quarter
|
$ | 1.36 | $ | 0.67 | |||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
$ | 2.50 | $ | 0.91 | |||||
On February 27, 2003, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $1.99 per share. As of February 27, 2003, there were approximately 400 holders of record of our common stock and approximately 23,000 beneficial holders of our common stock.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Balance Sheet Data at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the Statement of Operations Data for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002 have been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for such years, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The Balance Sheet Data at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and the Statement of Operations Data for each of the two years ended December 31, 1999 have been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements for such years, not included in this Annual Report.
9
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Statement of Operations
Data(1)(2)(3)(4):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service revenues
|
$ | 173,811 | $ | 325,165 | $ | 502,964 | $ | 276,844 | $ | 164,872 | ||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Project personnel costs
|
133,275 | 230,581 | 247,981 | 134,638 | 80,543 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Selling and marketing costs
|
26,192 | 27,880 | 33,743 | 21,429 | 11,269 | |||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative costs
|
79,338 | 128,574 | 134,241 | 69,388 | 41,675 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Restructuring and other related charges
|
66,885 | 100,079 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
107,430 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
4,328 | 28,126 | 11,328 | 2,284 | 687 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation
|
3,161 | 4,449 | 2,165 | 2,029 | 4,499 | |||||||||||||||||
|
In-process research and development
|
| | | | 11,100 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisition costs
|
| | | 2,340 | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
420,609 | 519,689 | 429,458 | 232,108 | 149,773 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
(246,798 | ) | (194,524 | ) | 73,506 | 44,736 | 15,099 | |||||||||||||||
|
Gain on equity investment change in interest
|
1,755 | 1,407 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Other income (expense)
|
33 | (4,677 | ) | (1,250 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
4,312 | 9,393 | 11,678 | 4,227 | 2,925 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, net
equity loss from investees and loss from discontinued operations
|
(240,698 | ) | (188,401 | ) | 83,934 | 48,963 | 18,024 | |||||||||||||||
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
(18,585 | ) | (3,091 | ) | 33,925 | 18,506 | 8,660 | |||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) before net equity loss from
investees and loss from discontinued operations
|
(222,113 | ) | (185,310 | ) | 50,009 | 30,457 | 9,364 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net equity loss from investees
|
(349 | ) | (499 | ) | (878 | ) | (157 | ) | | |||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
(222,462 | ) | (185,809 | ) | 49,131 | 30,300 | 9,364 | |||||||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
(6,741 | ) | (3,959 | ) | (2,171 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
|
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (229,203 | ) | $ | (189,768 | ) | $ | 46,960 | $ | 30,300 | $ | 9,364 | ||||||||||
|
Basic net income (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$ | (1.78 | ) | $ | (1.50 | ) | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
| $ | (1.83 | ) | $ | (1.53 | ) | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.09 | |||||||||||
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
$ | (1.78 | ) | $ | (1.50 | ) | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||||
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
| $ | (1.83 | ) | $ | (1.53 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares
|
124,961 | 124,256 | 119,191 | 111,418 | 104,456 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average dilutive common share equivalents
|
| | 14,573 | |||||||||||||||||||