SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
|
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
| For the fiscal year ended November 24, 2001 | ||
Commission file number: 000-24049
Charles River Associates Incorporated
| Massachusetts | 04-2372210 | |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
200 Clarendon Street, T-33, Boston, MA (Address of principal executive offices) |
02116-5092 (Zip code) |
|
617-425-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of February 8, 2002 (based on the closing sale price of $20.49 as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market as of that date) was approximately $156,119,000 based on information available to CRA as of February 8, 2002. Outstanding shares of common stock beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the registrant have been excluded from this computation because these persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The fact that these persons have been deemed affiliates for purposes of this computation should not be considered a conclusive determination for any other purpose.
As of February 8, 2002, CRA had outstanding 9,024,029 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required for Part III of this annual report is incorporated by reference from the registrants definitive proxy statement for its 2002 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrants fiscal year ended November 24, 2001.
CHARLES RIVER ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
| Page | ||||||
| PART I | ||||||
|
ITEM 1
|
BUSINESS | 2 | ||||
|
ITEM 2
|
PROPERTIES | 9 | ||||
|
ITEM 3
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 9 | ||||
|
ITEM 4
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | 9 | ||||
| PART II | ||||||
|
ITEM 5
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 10 | ||||
|
ITEM 6
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 11 | ||||
|
ITEM 7
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 13 | ||||
|
ITEM 7A
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK | 22 | ||||
|
ITEM 8
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 22 | ||||
|
ITEM 9
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 22 | ||||
| PART III | ||||||
|
ITEM 10
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT | 22 | ||||
|
ITEM 11
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 22 | ||||
|
ITEM 12
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 22 | ||||
|
ITEM 13
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS | 23 | ||||
| PART IV | ||||||
|
ITEM 14
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K | 23 | ||||
| SIGNATURES | 24 | |||||
1
PART I
Item 1 Business
Forward-Looking Statements
Except for historical facts, the statements in this annual report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are merely our current predictions of future events. These statements are inherently uncertain, and actual events could differ materially from our predictions. Important factors that could cause actual events to vary from our predictions include those discussed in this annual report under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Factors Affecting Future Performance. We assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements to reflect new information or developments. We urge readers to carefully review the risk factors described in this annual report and in the other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov.
Introduction
Charles River Associates, Inc. (CRA) is a leading economic and business consulting firm that applies advanced analytic techniques and in-depth industry knowledge to complex engagements for a broad range of clients. Founded in 1965, our firm provides original, authoritative advice to law firms, corporations, and governments around the world. We are often retained in high-stakes matters, such as multibillion-dollar mergers and acquisitions, new product introductions, major capital investment decisions, and complex litigation, the outcomes of which often have significant implications or consequences for the parties involved. The firm offers two types of services: legal and regulatory consulting and business consulting. We work with law firms and businesses involved in litigation and regulatory proceedings with expert advice on highly technical issues, such as the competitive effects of mergers and acquisitions, calculations of damages, measurement of market share and market concentration, liability analysis in securities fraud cases, and the impact of increased regulation. We use our expertise in economics, finance, and business analysis to offer our clients consulting services for strategic issues, such as establishing pricing strategies, estimating market demand, valuing intellectual property and other assets, assessing competitors actions, and analyzing new sources of supply. Our analytical expertise in advanced economic and financial methods is complemented by our in-depth expertise in specific industries, including chemicals, electric power and other energies, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, materials and manufacturing, media and telecommunications, aerospace and defense, and transportation.
We provide our services primarily through our highly credentialed and experienced staff of employee consultants. As of November 24, 2001, the firm employed 293 professionals, including 96 employee consultants with Ph.D.s and 89 employee consultants with other advanced degrees. Our consultants have backgrounds in a wide range of disciplines, including economics, business, corporate finance, materials sciences, and engineering. The firm is extremely selective in its hiring of consultants, recruiting from leading universities, industry, and government. Many of our employee consultants are nationally recognized as experts in their respective fields and have published scholarly articles, lectured extensively, and have been quoted in the press. To enhance the expertise we provide to our clients, we maintain close working relationships with a select group of renowned academic and industry experts, or outside experts.
We have domestic offices in Boston, Massachusetts; College Station, Texas; Los Angeles, Oakland, and Palo Alto, California; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Washington, D.C., as well as international offices in London, United Kingdom; Melbourne, Australia; Mexico City, Mexico; Toronto, Canada; and Wellington, New Zealand.
We have completed more than 4,700 engagements for clients including major law firms; domestic and foreign corporations; federal, state, and local government agencies; governments of foreign countries; public and private utilities; and national and international trade associations. Our clients come from a broad range of industries, and in fiscal 2001, no single client accounted for more than 10 percent of our revenues.
2
Industry Overview
Businesses are operating in an increasingly complex environment. Expanding access to powerful computers and software is providing companies with almost instantaneous access to a wide range of internal information, such as supply costs, inventory values, and sales and pricing data, as well as external information, such as market demand forecasts and customer buying patterns. The Internet has changed traditional distribution channels, thereby eliminating barriers to entry in many industries and spurring new competition. At the same time, markets are becoming increasingly global, offering companies the opportunity to expand their presence throughout the world and exposing them to increased competition and the uncertainties of foreign operations. Many industries are rapidly consolidating as companies pursue mergers and acquisitions in response to an increase in competitive pressures and to expand their market opportunities. In addition, companies are relying to a greater extent on technological and business innovations to improve efficiency, thus increasing the importance of strategically analyzing their businesses and developing and protecting new technology. As a result of this increasingly competitive and complex business environment, companies must constantly gather, analyze, and use available information to enhance their business strategies and operational efficiencies.
The increasing complexity and changing nature of the business environment is also forcing governments to modify their regulatory strategies. For example, industries such as healthcare are subject to frequently changing regulations and other industries, such as telecommunications and electric power, have been significantly impacted due to deregulation. These constant changes in the regulatory environment have led to frequent litigation and interaction with government agencies as companies attempt to interpret and react to the implications of this changing environment. Furthermore, as the general business and regulatory environment becomes more complex, corporate litigation has also become more complicated, protracted, expensive, and important to the parties involved.
As a result, companies are increasingly relying on sophisticated economic and financial analysis to solve complex problems and improve decision-making. Economic and financial models provide the tools necessary to analyze a variety of issues confronting businesses, such as interpretation of sales data, effects of price changes, valuation of assets, assessment of competitors activities, evaluation of new products, and analysis of supply limitations. Governments are also relying, to an increasing extent, on economic and finance theory to measure the effects of anticompetitive activity, evaluate mergers and acquisitions, change regulations, implement auctions to allocate resources, and establish transfer pricing rules. Finally, litigants and law firms are using economic and finance theory to help determine liability and to calculate damages in complex and high-stakes litigation. As the need for complex economic and financial analysis becomes more widespread, we believe that companies and governments are turning to outside consultants for access to the specialized expertise, experience, and prestige that are not available to them internally.
Competitive Strengths
Since 1965, we have been committed to providing sophisticated consulting services to our clients. We believe that the following factors have been critical to our success.
Strong Reputation for High-Quality Consulting. For more than 36 years, we have been a leader in providing sophisticated economic analysis and original, authoritative studies for clients involved in complex litigation and regulatory proceedings. As a result, we believe we have established a strong reputation among leading law firm and business clients as a preferred source of expertise in economics, finance, business, and strategy consulting, as evidenced by our high level of repeat business and significant referrals from existing clients. In fiscal 2001, approximately 83 percent of our revenues resulted from ongoing engagements and new engagements for existing clients. In addition, we believe our significant name recognition, which we developed as a result of our work on many high-profile litigation and regulatory engagements, has enhanced the development of our business consulting practice.
Highly Educated, Experienced, and Versatile Consulting Staff. We believe our most important asset is our base of employee consultants, particularly our senior consultants. Of our 293 employee consultants as of November 24, 2001, 173 were either officers, principals, or senior associates, nearly all of whom have a Ph.D. or a masters degree. Many of these senior employee consultants are nationally recognized as experts in their
3
Strong Corporate Culture. Our success has resulted in part from our strong corporate culture. We believe consultants are attracted to the firm because of our more than 36-year history; our strong reputation; the credentials, experience, and reputation of our employee consultants; the opportunity to work on an array of matters and with a broad group of renowned outside experts; and our collegial atmosphere. Our attractiveness as an employer is reflected in our relatively low turnover rate among employees, which was 6 percent for fiscal 2001.
Industry Expertise. By maintaining expertise in certain industries, we are able to offer clients creative and pragmatic advice tailored to their specific markets. This industry expertise differentiates us from many of our competitors and has been developed over decades of providing sophisticated consulting services to a diverse group of clients in industries such as chemicals, electric power and other energies, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, materials and manufacturing, media and telecommunications, aerospace and defense, and transportation. We believe we have developed a strong reputation and substantial name recognition within these specific industries, which has led to repeat business and new engagements from clients in those markets.
Broad Range of Services. By offering clients both legal and regulatory consulting services and business consulting services, we are able to satisfy an array of client needs, ranging from expert testimony for complex lawsuits to designing global business strategies. This broad range of expertise enables us to take an interdisciplinary approach to certain engagements, combining economists and experts in one area with specialists in other disciplines. We emphasize our diverse capabilities to clients and we regularly cross-market within our service areas. For example, a client that we assist in a litigation matter may later retain us for a business consulting assignment.
Access to Leading Academic and Industry Experts. To enhance the expertise we provide to our clients, we maintain close working relationships with a select group of outside experts. Depending on client needs, we use outside experts for their specialized expertise, assistance in conceptual problem-solving, and expert witness testimony. We work regularly with renowned professors at Brigham Young University, Cornell University, Georgetown University, Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, Texas A&M University, the University of California at Berkeley, the University of California at Los Angeles, the University of Toronto, the University of Virginia, and other leading universities. Outside experts also generate business for us and provide us access to other leading academic and industry experts. By establishing affiliations with prestigious outside experts, we further enhance our reputation as a leading source of sophisticated economic and financial analysis. We have exclusive relationships with 22 outside experts as of November 24, 2001.
Services
We offer services in two broad areas: legal and regulatory consulting and business consulting. In our legal and regulatory consulting practice, we usually work closely with law firms on behalf of one or more companies involved in litigation or regulatory proceedings. Many of the lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in which we are involved are high-stakes matters, such as obtaining regulatory approval of a pending merger or analyzing possible damages awards in a securities fraud case. The ability to formulate and effectively communicate powerful economic and financial arguments to courts and regulatory agencies is often critical to a successful outcome in litigation and regulatory proceedings. Through our highly educated and experienced consulting staff, we apply advanced analytic techniques in economics and finance to complex engagements for a diverse group of clients.
In our business consulting practice, we typically provide services directly to companies seeking assistance with strategic issues that require expert economic or financial analysis. Many of these matters involve mission-critical decisions for the client, such as positioning and pricing a new product or developing a new technological process. We apply a highly analytical, quantitative approach to help companies analyze and
4
Engagements in our two service areas often involve similar areas of expertise and address related issues, and it is common for our consultants to work on engagements in both service areas. We estimate that we derived approximately 53 percent of our revenues in fiscal 2001 from legal and regulatory consulting, approximately 42 percent from business consulting, and approximately 5 percent from NeuCo, our majority-owned subsidiary.
We offer our clients a wide range of legal, regulatory, and business consulting services, including the following:
Legal and Regulatory Consulting
|
Area of Expertise
|
Description of Services | |
| Antitrust | Expert testimony and analysis to support law firms involved in antitrust litigation. Areas of expertise include collusion, price signaling, monopolization, tying, exclusionary conduct, resale price maintenance, predatory pricing, and price discrimination. | |
| Mergers and Acquisitions | Economic analysis to assist clients in obtaining domestic and foreign regulatory approvals, in proceedings before agencies including the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice. Analysis includes simulating the effects of mergers on prices, estimating demand elasticities, designing and administering customer and consumer surveys, and studying possible acquisition-related synergies. | |
| Intellectual Property | Consulting and expert testimony in patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, and unfair competition disputes. Services include valuing property rights and estimating lost profits, reasonable royalties, unjust enrichment, and prejudgment interest. | |
| Transfer Pricing | Advising clients with foreign operations regarding the establishment of transfer prices to improve tax position. Analysis includes assessment of functions and risks, valuation of intangible assets, and analysis of variations in tax laws. Expert testimony for clients involved in domestic and foreign lawsuits relating to transfer pricing. | |
| Environment | Expert testimony and consulting for environmental disputes in litigation proceedings and before government agencies. Services include determining responsibility for cleanups; estimating damages for spills, disposals, and other environmental injuries; performing regulatory cost-benefit analysis; and developing innovative compliance techniques, such as emissions trading. | |
| International Trade | Expert testimony and consulting in international trade disputes. Expertise includes antidumping, countervailing duty examinations, and other disputes involving a wide range of industries and numerous countries. | |
| Damages | Calculation of damages and critiquing opposing estimates of damages in complex commercial litigation. Analysis of specific economic attributes, such as price and sales volume, using expertise in applied microeconomics and econometrics. |
5
Business Consulting
|
Area of Expertise
|
Description of Services | |
| Business Strategy | Advising clients on investment opportunities, cost-reduction programs, turnaround strategies, risk management, capital investments, due diligence investigations, valuations, and pricing strategies. Assessment of the strategic and financial fit of acquisition candidates. Analysis includes assessment of competitive advantages, efficiencies, and antitrust implications of acquisitions. | |
| Finance | Valuations of businesses, products, intellectual property, contracts, and securities. Expert testimony on valuation theory. Risk assessment for derivative securities. Computations of damages and liability analysis in securities fraud cases. | |
| Market Analysis | Advising clients on product introductions positioning, pricing strategies, competitive threats and probable market reactions to proposed actions. Analysis includes identifying and understanding market trends, measuring market size, estimating supply and demand balances, analyzing procurement strategies, and evaluating the impact of government regulations. | |
| Technology Management | Assisting clients in managing industrial technologies from assessment through implementation, including analysis of the development process for products and services. Assessing the commercialization of new technologies by quantifying the costs and benefits of obtaining and implementing new technology. Conducting competitive analyses through statistical comparisons of key factors, such as raw materials costs and productivity. |
NeuCo. NeuCo, our majority-owned subsidiary, develops and markets a family of neural network software tools and complementary application consulting services that are currently focused on electric utilities. NeuCos products and services are designed to help utilities maximize the use of their power plants by improving heat rate, reducing emissions, overcoming operating constraints, and increasing output capability. NeuCo earned revenues of approximately $1.1 million in fiscal 1999, $2.8 million in fiscal 2000, and $5.1 million in fiscal 2001. NeuCo sustained net losses after provision for income taxes of approximately $233,000 in fiscal 1999 and $139,000 in fiscal 2000, and generated a profit of approximately $839,000 in fiscal 2001. There are no assurances that NeuCo will remain profitable in the future.
Industry Expertise
We believe our ability to combine expertise in advanced economic and financial methods with in-depth knowledge of particular industries is one of our key competitive strengths. By maintaining expertise in certain industries, we provide clients practical advice tailored to their specific markets. This industry expertise, which we developed over decades of providing sophisticated consulting services to a diverse group of clients in many industries, differentiates us from many of our competitors. We believe that we have developed a strong reputation and substantial name recognition within specific industries, which has lead to repeat business and new engagements from clients in those markets. While we provide services to clients in a wide variety of industries, we have particular expertise in the following industries:
| | Aerospace and defense | |
| | Chemicals | |
| | Electric power and other energy industries | |
| | Financial services | |
| | Healthcare and pharmaceuticals |
6
| | Materials and manufacturing | |
| | Media and telecommunications | |
| | Transportation |
Clients
We have completed more than 4,700 engagements for clients that include major law firms; domestic and foreign corporations; federal, state, and local government agencies; governments of foreign countries; public and private utilities; and national and international trade associations. While we have particular expertise in a number of industries, we provide services to a diverse group of clients in a broad range of industries. No single client accounted for more than 10 percent of the firms revenues in fiscal 2001. Our policy is to keep the identities of our clients confidential unless our work for the client has already been publicly disclosed.
Human Resources
On November 24, 2001, we had 293 employee consultants, consisting of 63 officers, 110 other senior employee consultants (either principals or senior associates) and 120 junior consultants (either consulting associates, associates or analysts), and had 122 administrative staff members. Officers and principals generally work closely with clients, supervise junior consultants, provide expert testimony on occasion, and seek to generate business for us. Senior associates, consulting associates and associates typically serve as project managers and handle complex research assignments. Analysts gather and analyze data sets and complete statistical programming and library research.
We derive most of our revenues directly from the services provided by our employee consultants. The firms employee consultants were responsible for securing engagements that accounted for approximately 67 percent of our total revenues in fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001. Our top five employee consultants generated approximately 24 percent of our total revenues in fiscal 2000 and 19 percent in fiscal 2001. Our employee consultants have backgrounds in many disciplines, including economics, business, corporate finance, materials sciences, and engineering. Substantially all of our senior employee consultants, consisting of officers, principals, and senior associates have either a Ph.D. or a masters degree in addition to substantial management, technical, or industry expertise. Of our total senior employee consulting staff of 173 as of November 24, 2001, 82 have Ph.D.s in economics, 12 have Ph.D.s in other disciplines, and 70 have other advanced degrees. We believe our financial results and reputation are directly related to the number and quality of our employee consultants.
We are highly selective in our hiring of consultants, recruiting primarily from leading universities, industry, and government. We believe consultants choose to work at our firm because of our strong reputation; the credentials, experience, and reputation of our consultants; the opportunity to work on a diverse range of matters and with renowned outside experts; and our collegial atmosphere. We believe that our attractiveness as an employer is reflected in our relatively low turnover rate among employees. We use a decentralized, team hiring approach. The firm has designated two or more recruiting teams at each of our principal offices and given each team responsibility for identifying, interviewing, and hiring qualified candidates. We have a selective group of leading universities and degree programs from which we recruit candidates.
Our training and career development program for our employee consultants focuses on three areas: supervision, seminars, and scheduled courses. This program is designed to complement on-the-job experience and an employees pursuit of his or her own career development. New employee consultants participate in a structured program in which they are partnered with an assigned mentor. Through our ongoing seminar program, outside speakers make presentations and conduct discussions with our employee consultants on various topics. In addition, employee consultants are expected to present papers, discuss significant cases, or outline new analytical techniques or marketing opportunities periodically at in-house seminars. We also provide scheduled courses designed to improve an employees professional skills, such as presentation and sales and marketing techniques. We also encourage our employee consultants to pursue their academic interests by writing articles for economic and other journals.
7
Most of our officers have signed nonsolicitation agreements, which generally prohibit the employee from soliciting our clients for periods ranging from six to twelve months following termination of the persons employment with our firm and from soliciting our employees for periods ranging from one to two years after termination of the persons employment. In order to align each officers interest with the overall interests and profitability of the firm, we have adopted a policy requiring each of our officers to have an equity interest in our firm. All of our senior employee consultants who were stockholders before our initial public offering are parties to a stock restriction agreement that prohibits them from selling or otherwise transferring shares of our common stock held immediately before the initial public offering except under certain circumstances.
We maintain a discretionary bonus program through which we grant performance-based bonuses to our officers and other employees. Our compensation committee, in its discretion, determines the bonuses to be granted to our officers, and our chief executive officer, in his discretion, determines the bonuses to be granted to our other employees, based on recommendations of the various committees supervising the employees work.
In addition, we work closely with a select group of approximately 88 outside experts from leading universities and industry, who supplement the work of our employee consultants and generate business for us. In each of fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001, six of the firms exclusive outside experts were responsible for securing engagements that accounted for approximately 30 percent and 28 percent of revenues in those respective years. We believe outside experts choose to work with us because of the interesting and challenging nature of our work, the opportunity to work with our consultants, and the financially rewarding nature of the work. Twenty-two outside experts have entered into noncompetition agreements with us as of November 24, 2001.
Marketing
We rely to a significant extent on the efforts of our employee consultants, particularly our officers and principals, to market the firms services. We encourage our employee consultants to generate new business from both existing and new clients, and we reward our employee consultants with increased compensation and promotions for obtaining new business. In pursuing new business, our consultants emphasize our institutional reputation and experience, while also promoting the expertise of the particular employees who will work on the matter. Many of our consultants have published articles in industry, business, economic, legal, and scientific journals, and have made speeches and presentations at industry conferences and seminars, which serve as a means of attracting new business and enhancing their reputations. On occasion, employee consultants work with one or more outside experts to market our services.
We supplement the personal marketing efforts of our employee consultants with firmwide initiatives. We rely primarily on our reputation and client referrals for new business and undertake traditional marketing activities. The firm regularly organizes seminars for existing and potential clients featuring panel members that include our consultants, outside experts, and leading government officials. We have an extensive set of brochures organized around our service areas, which outline the firms experience and capabilities. We also provide information about our firm on our corporate Web site. We distribute publications to existing and potential clients highlighting emerging trends and noteworthy engagements. Because existing clients are an important source of repeat business and referrals, we communicate regularly with our existing clients to keep them informed of developments that affect their markets and industries.
In our legal and regulatory consulting practice, we derive much of our new business from referrals by existing clients. We have worked with leading law firms across the country and believe we have developed a reputation among law firms as a preferred source of sophisticated economic advice for litigation and regulatory work. For our business consulting practice, we also rely on referrals from existing clients but supplement referrals with a significant amount of direct marketing to new clients through conferences, publications, presentations, and direct solicitations.
It is important to us that we conduct business ethically and in accordance with industry standards and our own rigorous professional standards. We carefully consider the pursuit of each specific market, client, and engagement. Before we accept a new client or engagement, we determine whether a conflict of interest exists by circulating a client development report among our senior staff and by checking our internal client database.
8
Competition
The market for economic and business consulting services is intensely competitive, highly fragmented, and subject to rapid change. In general, there are few barriers to entry into our markets, and we expect to face additional competition from new entrants into the economic and business consulting industries. In the legal and regulatory consulting market, we compete primarily with other economic consulting firms and individual academics. We believe the principal competitive factors in this market are reputation, analytical ability, industry expertise, and service. In the business consulting market, we compete primarily with other business and management consulting firms, specialized or industry-specific consulting firms, the consulting practices of large accounting firms, and the internal professional resources of existing and potential clients. We believe the principal competitive factors in this market are reputation, industry expertise, analytical ability, service, and price. Many of our competitors have national and international reputations as well as significantly greater personnel, financial, managerial, technical, and marketing resources than we do. Some of our competitors also have a significantly broader geographic presence than we do. We may be unable to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with any new competitors.
Item 2 Properties
In the aggregate, we lease approximately 180,000 square feet of office space in Boston, Massachusetts and for our other offices. Of this total, we have subleased approximately 27,000 square feet of our office space to other companies.
All of our offices are electronically linked and have access to our core consulting tools. We believe our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current requirements and that suitable space will be available as needed.
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
We are not a party to any legal proceedings the outcome of which, in the opinion of our management, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001.
9
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information. We first offered our common stock to the public on April 23, 1998. Since that time, our common stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol CRAI. The following table provides the high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market for the periods indicated.
| Fiscal Year Ended November 25, 2000 | High | Low | ||||||
|
November 28, 1999 to February 18, 2000
|
$ | 35.23 | $ | 25.50 | ||||
|
February 19, 2000 to May 12, 2000
|
$ | 29.69 | $ | 12.25 | ||||
|
May 13, 2000 to September 1, 2000
|
$ | 22.00 | $ | 10.88 | ||||
|
September 2, 2000 to November 25, 2000
|
$ | 15.00 | $ | 9.88 | ||||
| Fiscal Year Ended November 24, 2001 | High | Low | ||||||
|
November 26, 2000 to February 16, 2001
|
$ | 10.63 | $ | 7.88 | ||||
|
February 17, 2001 to May 11, 2001
|
$ | 11.00 | $ | 7.75 | ||||
|
May 12, 2001 to August 31, 2001
|
$ | 18.18 | $ | 10.61 | ||||
|
September 1, 2001 to November 24, 2001
|
$ | 20.40 | $ | 12.70 | ||||
Stockholders. We had approximately 62 holders of record of our common stock as of February 8, 2002. This number does not include stockholders for whom shares were held in a nominee or street name.
Dividends. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and therefore do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our bank line of credit place restrictions on our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Unregistered Securities. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, we did not issue or sell any securities without registration under the Securities Act.
10
Item 6 Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data as of and for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended November 24, 2001, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.
| Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| November 29, | November 28, | November 27, | November 25, | November 24, | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues
|
$ | 44,805 | $ | 52,971 | $ | 73,970 | $ | 82,547 | $ | 109,804 | ||||||||||||
|
Costs of services
|
28,374 | 31,695 | 42,320 | 46,439 | 65,590 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Supplemental compensation(1)
|
1,233 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
15,198 | 21,276 | 31,650 | 36,108 | 44,214 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
10,509 | 11,934 | 17,448 | 21,837 | 31,556 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Special charge(2)
|
| | | 878 | | |||||||||||||||||
|
Income from operations
|
4,689 | 9,342 | 14,202 | 13,393 | 12,658 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Interest income, net
|
302 | 975 | 977 | 1,542 | 1,045 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Income before provision for income taxes and
minority interest
|
4,991 | 10,317 | 15,179 | 14,935 | 13,703 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Provision for income taxes(3)
|
(306 | ) | (4,262 | ) | (6,182 | ) | (6,166 | ) | (5,848 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Income before minority interest
|
4,685 | 6,055 | 8,997 | 8,769 | 7,855 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Minority interest
|
282 | 310 | 33 | 70 | (416 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net income(3)
|
$ | 4,967 | $ | 6,365 | $ | 9,030 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 7,439 | ||||||||||||
|
Basic and diluted net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 0.78 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.82 | ||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 0.78 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(4):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
6,329 | 7,570 | 8,477 | 8,728 | 9,107 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
6,329 | 7,620 | 8,571 | 8,774 | 9,218 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Pro forma income data (unaudited):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net income as reported
|
$ | 4,967 | $ | 6,365 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro forma adjustment(3)
|
(1,833 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 3,134 | $ | 6,377 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro forma net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 0.48 | $ | 0.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(4):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basic
|
6,459 | 7,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diluted
|
6,459 | 7,679 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Working capital
|
$ | 7,658 | $ | 32,890 | $ | 37,947 | $ | 42,722 | $ | 41,109 | ||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
20,435 | 53,335 | 73,510 | 80,280 | 96,890 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Total long-term debt
|
707 | 542 | 461 | 102 | 612 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Total stockholders equity
|
8,536 | 34,628 | 52,315 | |||||||||||||||||||