Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Commission file No. 000-32837
UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-2749762 |
|
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
| |
15305 Dallas Parkway, Suite 1600
Addison, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
75001
(Zip Code) |
(972) 713-3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
| |
|
|
| |
|
Name of Each Exchange |
| Title of Each Class |
|
on Which Registered |
| |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market
The Nasdaq Stock Market |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in
Parts I, II, III, and IV of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate market value of outstanding Common Stock held by
non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of June 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,097,916,482 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
March 9, 2005
|
|
|
28,803,610 |
|
| |
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III Portions of the registrants
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held May 3, 2005.
UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
| Note: |
The responses to Items 10 through 14 will be included in
the Companys definitive proxy statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held May 3, 2005. The required
information is incorporated into this Form 10-K by
reference to that document and is not repeated herein. |
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and the document incorporated herein by
reference, including, without limitation, statements containing
the words believes, anticipates,
expects, continues, will,
may, should, estimates,
intends, plans and similar expressions,
and statements regarding the Companys business strategy
and plans, constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which
the Company is unable to predict or control, that may cause the
Companys actual results, performance or achievements to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others,
the following: general economic and business conditions, both
nationally and regionally; foreign currency fluctuations;
demographic changes; changes in, or the failure to comply with,
laws and governmental regulations; the ability to enter into and
retain managed care provider arrangements on acceptable terms;
changes in Medicare, Medicaid and other government funded
payments or reimbursement in the U.S. and the United Kingdom;
liability and other claims asserted
1
against us; the highly competitive nature of healthcare; changes
in business strategy or development plans of healthcare systems
with which we partner; the ability to attract and retain
qualified physicians, nurses, other health care professionals
and other personnel; our significant indebtedness; the
availability of suitable acquisition and development
opportunities and the length of time it takes to accomplish
acquisitions and developments; our ability to integrate new
businesses with our existing operations; the availability and
terms of capital to fund the expansion of our business,
including the acquisition and development of additional
facilities and certain additional factors, risks and
uncertainties discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and the document incorporated herein by reference. Given these
uncertainties, investors and prospective investors are cautioned
not to rely on such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any
obligation and make no promise to update any such factors or
forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the results
of any revisions to any such factors or forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of changes in underlying
factors, to reflect new information as a result of the
occurrence of events or developments or otherwise.
2
PART I
General
United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (together with its
subsidiaries, we, the Company or
USPI) owns and operates short stay surgical
facilities including surgery centers and private surgical
hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom. We focus
on providing high quality surgical facilities that meet the
needs of patients, physicians and payors better than
hospital-based and other outpatient surgical facilities. We
believe that our facilities (1) enhance the quality of care
and the healthcare experience of patients, (2) offer
significant administrative, clinical and economic benefits to
physicians, (3) offer a strategic approach for our health
system partners to expand capacity and access within the markets
they serve and (4) offer an efficient and low cost
alternative to payors. We acquire and develop our facilities
through the formation of strategic relationships with physicians
and healthcare systems to better access and serve the
communities in our markets. Our operating model is efficient,
scalable and portable and we have adapted it to each of our
markets. We believe that our acquisition and development
strategy and operating model enable us to continue to grow by
taking advantage of highly-fragmented markets and an increasing
demand for short stay surgery.
Since physicians provide and influence the direction of
healthcare in the U.S. and U.K., we have developed our operating
model to encourage physicians to affiliate with us and to use
our facilities as an extension of their practices. We operate
our facilities, structure our strategic relationships and adopt
staffing, scheduling and clinical systems and protocols with the
goal of increasing physician productivity. We believe that our
focus on physician satisfaction, combined with providing high
quality healthcare in a friendly and convenient environment for
patients, will continue to increase the number of procedures
performed at our facilities each year.
Donald E. Steen, our chairman, and Welsh, Carson,
Anderson & Stowe formed USPI in February 1998. We
operate surgery centers and private surgical hospitals in the
United States and the United Kingdom. As of December 31,
2004, we operated 87 facilities, consisting of 84 in the United
States and three in the United Kingdom. Of the 84
U.S. facilities, 48 are jointly owned with major
not-for-profit healthcare systems. Overall, as of
December 31, 2004, we held ownership interests in 85 of the
facilities and operated the remaining two facilities under
management or service contracts. Our revenues for 2004 were
$389.5 million, up 25% from $310.6 million for 2003.
Available Information
We file proxy statements and annual, quarterly and current
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may
read and copy any document that we file at the SECs public
reference room located at 450 Fifth Street N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also call the Securities
and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the
operation of the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also
available to you free of charge at the SECs web site at
http://www.sec.gov. We also maintain a web site at
http://www.unitedsurgical.com that includes links to our
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any
amendments to those reports. These reports are available on our
website without charge as soon as reasonably practicable after
such reports are filed with or furnished to the SEC. We post our
audit and compliance committee, options and compensation
committee, and nominating and corporate governance committee
charters, our corporate governance guidelines, and our financial
code of ethics applicable to senior financial officers on our
web site. These documents are available free of charge to any
stockholder upon request. Information on our web site is not
deemed incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
Industry Background
We believe many physicians prefer surgery centers and private
surgical hospitals to general acute care hospitals. We believe
that this is due to the elective nature of the procedures
performed at our surgery centers
3
and private surgical hospitals, which allows physicians to
schedule their time more efficiently and therefore increase the
number of surgeries they can perform in a given amount of time.
In addition, these facilities usually provide physicians with
greater scheduling flexibility, more consistent nurse staffing
and faster turnaround time between cases. While surgery centers
and private surgical hospitals generally perform scheduled
surgeries, private acute care hospitals and national health
service facilities generally provide a broad range of services,
including high priority and emergency procedures. Medical
emergencies often demand the unplanned use of operating rooms
and result in the postponement or delay of scheduled surgeries,
disrupting physicians practices and inconveniencing
patients. Surgery centers and private surgical hospitals in the
United States and the United Kingdom are designed to improve
physician work environments and improve physician efficiency. In
addition, many physicians choose to perform surgery in
facilities like ours because their patients prefer the comfort
of a less institutional atmosphere and the convenience of
simplified admissions and discharge procedures.
According to Verispans 2004 Outpatient Surgery Center
Market Report, the number of outpatient surgery cases performed
in freestanding surgery centers increased 93% from
4.3 million in 1996 to an estimated 8.3 million in
2004. New surgical techniques and technology, as well as
advances in anesthesia, have significantly expanded the types of
surgical procedures that are being performed in surgery centers
and have helped drive the growth in outpatient surgery. Lasers,
arthroscopy, enhanced endoscopic techniques and fiber optics
have reduced the trauma and recovery time associated with many
surgical procedures. Improved anesthesia has shortened recovery
time by minimizing post-operative side effects such as nausea
and drowsiness, thereby avoiding the need for overnight
hospitalization in many cases. In addition, some states in the
United States now permit surgery centers to keep a patient for
up to 23 hours. This allows more complex surgeries,
previously only performed in an inpatient setting, to be
performed in a surgery center.
In addition to these technological and other clinical
advancements, a changing payor environment has contributed to
the rapid growth in outpatient surgery in recent years.
Government programs, private insurance companies, managed care
organizations and self-insured employers have implemented cost
containment measures to limit increases in healthcare
expenditures, including procedure reimbursement. These cost
containment measures have contributed to the significant shift
in the delivery of healthcare services away from traditional
inpatient hospitals to more cost-effective alternate sites,
including surgery centers. We believe that surgery performed at
a surgery center is generally less expensive than hospital-based
outpatient surgery because of lower facility development costs,
more efficient staffing and space utilization and a specialized
operating environment focused on cost containment.
Today, large healthcare systems in the United States generally
offer both inpatient and outpatient surgery on site. In
addition, a number of not-for-profit healthcare systems have
begun to expand their portfolios of facilities and services by
entering into strategic relationships with specialty operators
of surgery centers in order to expand capacity and access in the
markets they serve. These strategic relationships enable
not-for-profit healthcare systems to offer patients, physicians
and payors the cost advantages, convenience and other benefits
of outpatient surgery in a freestanding facility. Further, these
relationships allow the not-for-profit healthcare systems to
focus their attention and resources on their core business
without the challenge of acquiring, developing and operating
these facilities.
The United Kingdom provides government-funded healthcare to all
of its residents through a national health service. However, due
to funding and capacity limitations, the demand for healthcare
services exceeds the public systems capacity, resulting in
waiting lists for elective surgery of up to 18 months as
well as delays in obtaining cancer biopsies and other diagnostic
procedures. In response to these shortfalls, private healthcare
networks and private insurance companies have developed in the
United Kingdom. Approximately 11% of the U.K. population has
private insurance to cover elective surgical procedures, and
another rapidly growing segment of the population pays for
elective procedures from personal funds. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, in the United Kingdom, we derived
approximately 50% of our revenues from private insurance,
4
approximately 43% from self-pay patients, who typically arrange
for payment prior to surgery being performed, and approximately
7% from government payors.
Our Business Strategy
Our goal is to steadily increase our revenues and cash flows by
becoming a leading operator of surgery centers and private
surgical hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom.
The key elements of our business strategy are to:
|
|
|
| |
|
attract and retain top quality surgeons and other physicians; |
| |
| |
|
pursue strategic relationships with not-for-profit healthcare
systems; |
| |
| |
|
expand our presence in existing markets; |
| |
| |
|
expand selectively in new markets; and |
| |
| |
|
enhance operating efficiencies. |
|
|
|
Attract and retain top quality surgeons and other
physicians |
Since physicians provide and influence the direction of
healthcare in the U.S. and U.K., we have developed our operating
model to encourage physicians to affiliate with us and to use
our facilities as an extension of their practices. We believe we
attract physicians because we design our facilities, structure
our strategic relationships and adopt staffing, scheduling and
clinical systems and protocols to increase physician
productivity and promote their professional and financial
success. We believe this focus on physicians, combined with
providing high quality healthcare in a friendly and convenient
environment for patients, will continue to increase case volumes
at our facilities. In addition, in the United States, we
generally offer physicians the opportunity to purchase equity
interests in the facilities they use as an extension of the
physicians practices. We believe this opportunity attracts
quality physicians to our facilities and ownership increases the
physicians involvement in facility operations, enhancing
quality of patient care, increasing productivity and reducing
costs.
|
|
|
Pursue strategic relationships with not-for-profit
healthcare systems |
Through strategic relationships with us, not-for-profit
healthcare systems can benefit from our operating expertise and
create a new cash flow opportunity with limited capital
expenditures. We believe that these relationships also allow
not-for-profit healthcare systems to attract and retain
physicians and improve their hospital operations by focusing on
their core business. We also believe that strategic
relationships with these healthcare systems help us to more
quickly develop relationships with physicians, communities, and
payors. Generally, the healthcare systems with which we develop
relationships have strong local market positions and excellent
reputations that we use in branding our facilities. In addition,
our relationships with not-for-profit healthcare systems enhance
our acquisition and development efforts by (1) providing
opportunities to acquire facilities the systems may own,
(2) providing access to physicians already affiliated with
the systems, (3) attracting additional physicians to
affiliate with newly developed facilities, and
(4) encouraging physicians who own facilities to consider a
strategic relationship with us.
|
|
|
Expand our presence in existing markets |
Our primary strategy is to grow selectively in markets in which
we already operate facilities. We believe that selective
acquisitions and development of new facilities in existing
markets allow us to leverage our existing knowledge of these
markets and to improve operating efficiencies. In particular,
our experience has been that newly developed facilities in
markets where we already have a presence and a not-for-profit
hospital partner are the best use of the companys invested
capital.
5
|
|
|
Expand selectively in new markets |
We may continue to enter targeted markets by acquiring and
developing surgical facilities. In the United States, we expect
to do this primarily in conjunction with a local healthcare
system or hospital. We typically target the acquisition or
development of multi-specialty centers that perform high volume,
non-emergency, lower risk procedures requiring lower capital and
operating costs than hospitals. In addition, we will also
consider the acquisition of multi-facility companies.
In determining whether to enter a new market, we examine
numerous criteria, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
the potential to achieve strong increases in revenues and cash
flows; |
| |
| |
|
whether the physicians, healthcare systems and payors in the
market are receptive to surgery centers; |
| |
| |
|
the size of the market; |
| |
| |
|
the number of surgical facilities in the market; |
| |
| |
|
the number and nature of outpatient surgical procedures
performed in the market; |
| |
| |
|
the case mix of the facilities to be acquired; |
| |
| |
|
whether the facility is well-positioned to negotiate agreements
with insurers and other payors; and |
| |
| |
|
licensing and other regulatory considerations. |
Upon identifying a target facility, we conduct financial, legal
and compliance, operational, technology and systems reviews of
the facility and conduct interviews with the facilitys
management, affiliated physicians and staff. Once we acquire or
develop a facility, we focus on upgrading systems and protocols,
including implementing our proprietary methodology of defined
processes and information systems, to increase case volume and
improve operating efficiencies.
|
|
|
Enhance operating efficiencies |
Once we acquire a new facility in the U.S., we integrate it into
our existing network by implementing a specific action plan to
support the local management team and incorporate the new
facility into our group purchasing contracts. We also implement
our systems and protocols to improve operating efficiencies and
contain costs. Our most important operational tool is our
management system Every Day Giving Excellence, which
we refer to as USPIs EDGE. This proprietary measurement
system allows us to track our clinical, service and financial
performance, best practices and key indicators in each of our
facilities. Our goal is to use USPIs EDGE to ensure that
we provide each of the patients using our facilities with high
quality healthcare, offer physicians a superior work environment
and eliminate inefficiencies. Using USPIs EDGE, we track
and monitor our performance in areas such as (1) providing
surgeons the equipment, supplies and surgical support they need,
(2) starting cases on time, (3) minimizing turnover
time between cases, and (4) providing efficient schedules.
USPIs EDGE compiles and organizes the specified
information on a daily basis and is easily accessed over the
Internet by our facilities on a secure basis. The information
provided by USPIs EDGE enables our employees, facility
administrators and management to analyze trends over time and
share processes and best practices among our facilities. In
addition, the information is used as an evaluative tool by our
administrators and as a budgeting and planning tool by our
management. USPIs EDGE is now deployed in all but our most
recently acquired U.S. facilities.
Operations
|
|
|
Operations in the United States |
Our operations in the United States consist primarily of our
ownership and management of surgery centers. We have ownership
interests in 73 surgery centers and nine private surgical
hospitals and manage or operate, through agreements, two
additional surgery centers. Additionally, we own interests in
and expect to operate five surgery centers and one private
surgical hospital that are currently under construction. We also
have eleven projects under development, all of which include a
hospital partner, and numerous other potential
6
projects in various stages of consideration, which may result in
our adding additional facilities during 2005. Over 3,600
physicians have privileges to use our facilities. Our surgery
centers are licensed outpatient surgery centers; our private
surgical hospitals are licensed as hospitals. Both are generally
equipped and staffed for multiple surgical specialties and
located in freestanding buildings or medical office buildings.
Our average surgery center has approximately 12,000 square
feet of space with four operating rooms, as well as ancillary
areas for preparation, recovery, reception and administration.
Our surgery center facilities range from a 4,000 square
foot, one operating room facility to a 33,000 square foot,
nine operating room facility. Our surgery centers are normally
open weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to approximately
5:00 p.m. or until the last patient is discharged. We
estimate that a surgery center with four operating rooms can
accommodate up to 6,000 procedures per year. Our surgical
hospitals average 40,000 square feet of space with six
operating rooms, ranging in size from 17,000 to
68,000 square feet and having from 4 to 8 operating rooms.
Our surgery center support staff typically consists of
registered nurses, operating room technicians, an administrator
who supervises the day-to-day activities of the surgery center,
and a small number of office staff. Each center also has a
medical director, who is responsible for and supervises the
quality of medical care provided at the center. Use of our
surgery centers is generally limited to licensed physicians,
podiatrists and oral surgeons who are also on the medical staff
of a local accredited hospital. Each center maintains a peer
review committee consisting of physicians who use our facilities
and who review the professional credentials of physicians
applying for surgical privileges.
All but two of our surgical facilities are accredited by either
the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations or by the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory
Healthcare or are in the process of applying for such
accreditation. We believe that accreditation is the quality
benchmark for managed care organizations. Many managed care
organizations will not contract with a facility until it is
accredited. We believe that our historical performance in the
accreditation process reflects our commitment to providing high
quality care in our surgical facilities.
Generally, our surgical facilities are limited partnerships,
limited liability partnerships or limited liability companies in
which ownership interests are also held by local physicians who
are on the medical staff of the centers. Our ownership interests
in the centers range from 7.5% to 95%. Our partnership and
limited liability company agreements typically provide for the
monthly or quarterly pro rata distribution of cash equal to net
revenues from operations, less amounts held in reserve for
expenses and working capital. Our facilities derive their
operating cash flow by collecting a fee from patients, insurance
companies, or other payors in exchange for providing the
facility and related services a surgeon requires in order to
perform a surgical case. Our billing systems estimate revenue
and generate contractual adjustments based on a fee schedule for
over 75% of the total cases performed at our facilities. For the
remaining cases, the contractual allowance is estimated based on
the historical collection percentages of each facility by payor
group. The historical collection percentage is updated quarterly
for each facility. We estimate each patients financial
obligation prior to the date of service. We request payment of
that obligation at the time of service. Any amounts not
collected at the time of service are subject to our normal
collection and reserve policy. We also have a management
agreement with each of the facilities under which we provide
day-to-day management services for a management fee that is
typically a percentage of the net revenues of the facility.
Our partnership and limited liability company agreements
typically provide that if various regulatory changes take place
we will be obligated to purchase some or all of the ownership
interests of the physicians in the partnerships or limited
liability companies that own and operate the applicable surgery
centers. The regulatory changes that could trigger such an
obligation include changes that:
|
|
|
| |
|
make illegal the referral of Medicare and other patients to our
surgery centers by physicians affiliated with us; |
| |
| |
|
create the substantial likelihood that cash distributions from
the partnership or limited liability company to the physician
owners thereof will be illegal; or |
| |
| |
|
cause physician ownership interests in the partnerships or
limited liability companies to be illegal. |
7
Typically, our partnership and limited liability company
agreements allow us to use shares of our common stock as
consideration for the purchase of a physicians interest
should we be required to purchase these interests. In the event
we are required to purchase these interests and our common stock
does not maintain a sufficient valuation, we may be required to
use cash for the acquisition of a physicians interest. As
a result, the triggering of these obligations and the possible
termination of our affiliation with these physicians, which we
do not believe is likely, could have a material adverse effect
on us.
Our business depends upon the efforts and success of the
physicians who provide medical services at our facilities and
the strength of our relationships with these physicians. Our
business could be adversely affected by the loss of our
relationship with, or a reduction in use of our facilities by, a
key physician or group of physicians. The physicians that
affiliate with us and use our facilities are not our employees.
However, we generally offer the physicians the opportunity to
purchase equity interests in the facilities they use.
A key element of our business strategy is to pursue strategic
relationships with not-for-profit healthcare systems
(hospital partners) in selected markets. Of our 84
U.S. facilities, 48 are jointly-owned with not-for-profit
healthcare systems. Our strategy involves developing these
relationships in three primary ways. One way is by adding new
facilities in existing markets with our existing hospital
partners. An example of this is our relationship with the Baylor
Health Care System in Dallas, Texas. Our joint ventures with
Baylor own a network of 20 operational surgical facilities that
serve the approximately four million people in the Dallas/
Fort Worth area. These joint ventures have added new
facilities each year since their inception in 1999, including
three during 2004, and have an additional two facilities under
construction.
Another way we develop these relationships is through expansion
into new markets, both with existing hospital partners and with
new partners. An example of this strategy with an existing
partner is our expansion into new markets with Catholic
Healthcare West (CHW). Our relationship with CHW began in 1998
with a facility in Las Vegas, Nevada, expanded into Phoenix,
Arizona with three facilities, two of which were newly
developed, during 2003, and continues as we enter new markets in
California, where we have two facilities under construction and
an additional two under development, some of which we expect to
open in 2005. Another example of this strategy is our
relationship with Ascension Health, with whom we jointly own
facilities in Nashville, Tennessee and with whom we entered the
Baltimore, Maryland market through the acquisition of an equity
interest in a facility during 2004. During 2004 we entered the
Oklahoma market with a new partner, INTEGRIS Health, through the
acquisition of equity interests in two facilities, and opened
facilities with CHRISTUS Health in San Antonio, Texas, with
Bon Secours Health System in Newport News, Virginia, and
Providence Health System, in Mission Hills, California. We
expect projects currently under development to result in our
opening facilities in additional new markets with not-for-profit
hospital partners.
A third way we develop our strategic relationships with
not-for-profit healthcare systems is through the contribution of
our ownership interests in existing facilities to a joint
venture relationship. During 2003 and 2004 we added a
not-for-profit hospital partner to six facilities we had
previously operated without a hospital partner. We expect to add
a not-for-profit hospital partner in the future to some of the
remaining 36 facilities that do not yet have such a partner.
|
|
|
Operations in the United Kingdom |
We operate three private hospitals in greater London. We
acquired Parkside Hospital and Holly House Hospital in 2000 and
Highgate Hospital in 2003. Parkside Hospital, located in
Wimbledon, a suburb southwest of London, has 69 registered acute
care beds, including four high dependency beds and four
operating theatres, one of which is a dedicated endoscopy suite.
Parkside also has its own on-site pathology laboratory which
provides services to the on-site cancer treatment center. The
imaging department, which has been extensively upgraded in the
past three years, has an MRI scanner, CT scanner, and two X-ray
screening rooms, plus mammography, dental and ultrasound
services available. Approximately 415 surgeons,
anesthesiologists, and physicians, all of whom have been subject
to a strict credentialing process and continue to
8
participate in annual appraisal programs that Parkside shares
with a local hospital operated by the United Kingdoms
national health service, have admitting privileges to the
hospital. Parksides key specialties include orthopedics,
oncology, gynecology, neurosurgery, ear-nose-throat, endoscopy
and general surgery, and the hospital is currently expanding its
day case services.
Parkside Oncology Clinic opened in August 2003 and has state of
the art equipment designed to provide a wide range of cancer
treatments. The pre-treatment and planning suite houses a
dedicated CT scanner, which, along with the linear accelerators
and virtual simulation software, is linked to the
departments planning system. The clinic also has its own
pharmacy aseptic suite which provides chemotherapy to the day
case unit at the hospital.
Holly House Hospital, located in a suburb northeast of London
near Essex, has been an acute care hospital for over
20 years and has 55 registered acute care beds, including
three high dependency beds. The hospital has three operating
theatres and its own on-site pathology laboratory and pharmacy.
A diagnostic suite houses MRI and CT scanners, X-ray screening
rooms, mammography, ultrasound, and DEXA scanning as well as
Kodak Computer Radiography. Over 260 surgeons,
anesthesiologists, and physicians have admitting privileges at
the hospital, and there are well-established orthopedic,
plastic, IVF, and general surgery practices.
Highgate Hospital is a 32 bed acute care hospital located in the
affluent Highgate area of London. The hospital has an
established cosmetic surgery business and additional practices
including endoscopy and general surgery are being developed.
The following table sets forth the percentage of our revenues
determined based on internally reported case volume from our
U.S. facilities and internally reported revenue from our
U.K. facilities for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
each of the following specialties:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Specialty |
|
U.S. | |
|
U.K. | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Orthopedic
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
Pain management
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Gynecology
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
(1) |
|
General surgery
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Ear, nose and throat
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Gastrointestinal
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Plastic surgery
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Ophthalmology
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Also includes in vitro fertilization. |
9
The following table sets forth the percentage of our revenues
determined based on internally reported case volume from our
U.S. surgical facilities and internally reported revenue
from our U.K. facilities for the year ended December 31,
2004 from each of the following payors:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Payor |
|
U.S. | |
|
U.K. | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Private insurance
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Self-pay
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Government
|
|
|
27 |
(1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Based solely on case volume. Because government payors typically
pay less than private insurance, the percentage of our
U.S. revenue attributable to government payors is
approximately 10% for Medicare and 1% for Medicaid. |
The following table sets forth information relating to the
not-for-profit healthcare systems with which we are affiliated
as of December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Number of | |
| |
|
|
|
Facilities | |
| |
|
|
|
Operated with | |
| Healthcare System |
|
Geographical Focus |
|
USPI | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Single Market Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baylor Health Care System
|
|
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas |
|
|
20 |
|
|
Memorial Hermann Healthcare System
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
5 |
|
|
INTEGRIS Health
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Meridian Health System
|
|
New Jersey |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Covenant Health:
|
|
Eastern Tennessee |
|
|
1 |
|
| |
Fort Sanders Parkwest Medical Center
|
|
Knoxville, Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
Decatur General Hospital
|
|
Decatur, Alabama |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Mountain States Health Alliance:
|
|
Northeast Tennessee |
|
|
1 |
|
| |
Johnson City Medical Center
|
|
Johnson City, Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
Northside Cherokee Hospital
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
|
|
East Brunswick, New Jersey |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
|
|
Florida |
|
|
1 |
|
|
McLaren Health Care Corporation
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
(a |
) |
10
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Number of | |
| |
|
|
|
Facilities | |
| |
|
|
|
Operated with | |
| Healthcare System |
|
Geographical Focus |
|
USPI | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Multi-Market Systems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascension Health:
|
|
19 states and D.C. (b) |
|
|
6 |
|
| |
St. Thomas Health Services System (5 facilities)
|
|
Middle Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
| |
St. Agnes HealthCare (1 facility)
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic Healthcare West:
|
|
California, Arizona, Nevada |
|
|
4 |
|
| |
St. Josephs Hospital and Medical Center (3 facilities)
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
|
|
| |
St. Rose Dominican Hospital (1 facility)
|
|
Henderson, Nevada |
|
|
|
|
| |
Glendale Memorial Hospital and Health Center(a)
|
|
Glendale, California |
|
|
|
|
| |
St. Johns Regional Medical Center(a)
|
|
Oxnard, California |
|
|
|
|
| |
San Gabriel Valley Medical Center(a)
|
|
San Gabriel, California |
|
|
|
|
|
Bon Secours Health System:
|
|
Nine eastern states (c) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mary Immaculate Hospital
|
|
Newport News, Virginia |
|
|
1 |
|
| |
Memorial Regional Medical Center(a)
|
|
Richmond, Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
CHRISTUS Health:
|
|
Six states (d) |
|
|
1 |
|
| |
Christus Santa Rosa Health Corporation
|
|
San Antonio, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
Providence Health System:
|
|
Four western states (e) |
|
|
1 |
|
| |
Providence Holy Cross Medical Center
|
|
Mission Hills, California |
|
|
|
|
|
Adventist Health System:
|
|
Eleven states (f) |
|
|
(a |
) |
| |
Huguley Memorial Medical Center
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A joint venture agreement has been signed and projects have been
initiated, but no facilities in this joint venture are yet
operational. |
|
(b) |
|
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Connecticut, District of Columbia,
Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Missouri, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas,
Washington, and Wisconsin. |
|
(c) |
|
Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. |
|
(d) |
|
Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah. |
|
(e) |
|
Alaska, California, Oregon, and Washington. |
|
(f) |
|
Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky,
Michigan, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin. |
11
The following table sets forth information relating to the
facilities that we operated as of December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Date of | |
|
Number | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Acquisition | |
|
of | |
|
Percentage | |
| |
|
|
|
or | |
|
Operating | |
|
Owned by | |
| |
|
Facility |
|
Affiliation | |
|
Rooms | |
|
USPI | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Atlanta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Advanced Surgery Center of Georgia, Canton, Georgia(1) |
|
|
3/27/02 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
East West Surgery Center, Austell, Georgia |
|
|
9/1/00 |
(4) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Lawrenceville Surgery Center, Lawrenceville, Georgia |
|
|
8/1/01 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Northwest Georgia Surgery Center, Marietta, Georgia |
|
|
11/1/00 |
(4) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Orthopaedic South Surgical Center, Morrow, Georgia |
|
|
11/28/03 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Resurgens Surgical Center, Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
10/1/98 |
(4) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Roswell Surgery Center, Roswell, Georgia |
|
|
10/1/00 |
(4) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Chicago |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Same Day Surgery 25 East, Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
10/15/04 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Same Day Surgery Elmwood Park, Elmwood Park, Illinois |
|
|
10/15/04 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Same Day Surgery North Shore, Evanston, Illinois |
|
|
10/15/04 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Same Day Surgery River North, Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
10/15/04 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Same Day Surgery Six Corners, Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
10/15/04 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Dallas/ Fort Worth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Surgery Center of Arlington, Arlington, Texas(1) |
|
|
2/1/99 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Baylor Surgicare, Garland, Texas(1) |
|
|
6/1/99 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Bellaire Surgery Center, Fort Worth, Texas |
|
|
10/15/02 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Denton Surgicare, Denton, Texas(1) |
|
|
2/1/99 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Frisco Medical Center, Frisco, Texas(5) |
|
|
9/30/02 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Grapevine Surgicare, Grapevine, Texas |
|
|
2/16/02 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Irving-Coppell Surgical Hospital, Irving,Texas(5) |
|
|
10/20/03 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Surgery Center of Lewisville, Lewisville, Texas(1),(3) |
|
|
9/16/02 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Mary Shiels Hospital(5) |
|
|
4/1/03 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Medical Centre Surgicare, Fort Worth, Texas(1),(5) |
|
|
12/18/98 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Metroplex Surgicare, Bedford, Texas(1) |
|
|
12/18/98 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
North Texas Surgery Center, Dallas, Texas(1) |
|
|
12/18/98 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
| |
* |
|
|
|
Park Cities Surgery Center, Dallas, Texas |
|
|
6/9/03 |
|
|