Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM          TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-4221

UTICA AT TWENTY-FIRST STREET, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74114

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [  ]

At March 31, 2003, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates was $1,218,694,981.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 15, 2003: 50,168,655.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the following documents have been incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K as indicated:

Table of Contents

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS REPORT INCLUDES “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. ALL STATEMENTS OTHER THAN STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, STATEMENTS REGARDING THE REGISTRANT’S FUTURE FINANCIAL POSITION, BUSINESS STRATEGY, BUDGETS, PROJECTED COSTS AND PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF MANAGEMENT FOR FUTURE OPERATIONS, ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS GENERALLY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS “MAY”, “WILL”, “EXPECT”, “INTEND”, “ESTIMATE”, “ANTICIPATE”, “BELIEVE”, OR “CONTINUE” OR THE NEGATIVE THEREOF OR SIMILAR TERMINOLOGY. ALTHOUGH THE REGISTRANT BELIEVES THAT THE EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, IT CAN GIVE NO ASSURANCE THAT SUCH EXPECTATIONS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT. IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE REGISTRANT’S EXPECTATIONS ARE DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT UNDER THE CAPTION “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 5, AS WELL AS IN MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION ON PAGES 10 THROUGH 33 OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT. ALL SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN AND ORAL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE REGISTRANT, OR PERSONS ACTING ON ITS BEHALF, ARE EXPRESSLY QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY SUCH CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS. THE REGISTRANT ASSUMES NO DUTY TO UPDATE OR REVISE ITS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN INTERNAL ESTIMATES OR EXPECTATIONS OR OTHERWISE.

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 3, 1940, and is successor to a business originally organized in 1920. The Company is primarily engaged in contract drilling of oil and gas wells for others. The contract drilling business accounts for the major portion of its operating revenues. The Company is also engaged in the ownership, development, and operation of commercial real estate.

The Company is organized into two separate autonomous operating entities, being contract drilling and real estate. Both businesses operate independently of the other. Both the contract drilling and real estate businesses are conducted through wholly owned subsidiaries. Operating decentralization is balanced by a centralized finance division, which handles all accounting, information technology, budgeting, insurance, cash management, and related activities.

The Company’s contract drilling business is composed of three business segments: domestic land drilling, domestic offshore platform drilling and international drilling. The Company’s domestic contract drilling is conducted primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming, and Louisiana, and offshore from platforms in the Gulf of Mexico and California. The Company also operated during fiscal 2003 in seven international locations: Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Bolivia, Equatorial Guinea, and Hungary.

The Company’s real estate investments are located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where the Company maintains its executive offices.

Prior to October 1, 2002, the Company was engaged in the exploration, production and sale of crude oil and natural gas business (“exploration and production business”). During fiscal 2002, the Company transferred the assets and liabilities of its exploration and production business to its wholly owned subsidiary, Cimarex Energy Co. On September 30, 2002, the Company distributed the common stock of Cimarex Energy Co. to the Company’s stockholders and completed a merger of Key Production Company, Inc. with a subsidiary of Cimarex Energy Co. As a result of this transaction, Cimarex Energy Co. became a separate publicly-traded company that owned and operated the exploration and production business. The Company does not own any common stock of Cimarex Energy Co.

CONTRACT DRILLING

The Company believes that it is one of the major land and offshore platform drilling contractors in the western hemisphere. Operating principally in North and South America, the Company specializes in medium to deep drilling in major gas producing basins of the United States and in drilling for oil and gas in international locations. In the United States, the Company draws its customers primarily from the major oil companies and the larger independents. In South America, the Company’s current customers include the Venezuelan state petroleum company and major international oil companies.

In fiscal 2003, the Company received approximately 68% of its consolidated revenues from the Company’s ten largest contract drilling customers. BP plc, Shell Oil Company, and ExxonMobil Corporation (respectively, “BP”, “Shell” and “ExxonMobil”), including their affiliates, are the Company’s three largest contract drilling customers. The Company performs drilling services for BP, Shell, and ExxonMobil on a world-wide basis. Revenues from drilling services performed for BP, Shell and ExxonMobil in fiscal 2003 accounted for approximately 16%, 15% and 11%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenues from continuing operations for the same period.

The Company provides drilling rigs, equipment, personnel, and camps on a contract basis. These services are provided so that the Company’s customers may explore for and develop oil and gas from onshore areas and from fixed platforms, tension-leg platforms and spars in offshore areas. Each of the drilling rigs consists of engines, drawworks, a mast, pumps, blowout preventers, a drillstring, and related equipment. The intended well depth and the drilling site conditions are

1

Table of Contents

the principal factors that determine the size and type of rig most suitable for a particular drilling job. A land drilling rig may be moved from location to location without modification to the rig. A helicopter rig is one that can be disassembled into component part loads of approximately 4,000-20,000 pounds and transported to remote locations by helicopter, cargo plane, or other means. A platform rig is specifically designed to perform drilling operations upon a particular platform. While a platform rig may be moved from its original platform, significant expense is incurred to modify a platform rig for operation on each subsequent platform. In addition to traditional platform rigs, the Company operates self-moving minimum-space platform drilling rigs and drilling rigs to be used on tension-leg platforms and spars. The minimum-space rig is designed to be moved without the use of expensive derrick barges. The tension-leg platforms and spars allow drilling operations to be conducted in much deeper water than traditional fixed platforms.

During fiscal 1998, the Company put to work a new generation of six highly mobile/depth flexible rigs (individually the “FlexRig”)*. The FlexRig has been able to significantly reduce average rig move times compared to similar depth-rated traditional land rigs. In addition, the FlexRig allows a greater depth flexibility of between 8,000 to 18,000 feet and provides greater operating efficiency. The original six rigs were designated as FlexRig1 rigs. Subsequently, the Company built and completed 12 new FlexRig2 rigs. During fiscal 2001, the Company announced that it would build an additional 25 new FlexRigs. These new rigs, known as “FlexRig3”, are the next generation of FlexRigs which incorporate new drilling technology and new environmental and safety design. This new design includes integrated top drive, AC electric drive, hydraulic BOP handling system, hydraulic tubular make-up and break-out system, split crown and traveling blocks and an enlarged drill floor that enables simultaneous crew activities. All 25 of these FlexRigs were completed by June of 2003. During fiscal 2003, the Company began constructing seven more FlexRig3s at an approximate cost of $11,250,000 each. Two of the seven were completed in fiscal year 2003. The other five will be completed by March 2004. All FlexRigs will be available for work in the Company’s domestic and international drilling operations.

The Company’s drilling contracts are obtained through competitive bidding or as a result of negotiations with customers, and sometimes cover multi-well and multi-year projects. Each drilling rig operates under a separate drilling contract. Most of the contracts are performed on a “daywork” basis, under which the Company charges a fixed rate per day, with the price determined by the location, depth, and complexity of the well to be drilled, operating conditions, the duration of the contract, and the competitive forces of the market. The Company has previously performed contracts on a combination “footage” and “daywork” basis, under which the Company charged a fixed rate per foot of hole drilled to a stated depth, usually no deeper than 15,000 feet, and a fixed rate per day for the remainder of the hole. Contracts performed on a “footage” basis involve a greater element of risk to the contractor than do contracts performed on a “daywork” basis. Also, the Company has previously accepted “turnkey” contracts under which the Company charges a fixed sum to deliver a hole to a stated depth and agrees to furnish services such as testing, coring, and casing the hole which are not normally done on a “footage” basis. “Turnkey” contracts entail varying degrees of risk greater than the usual “footage” contract. The Company did not accept any “footage” or “turnkey” contracts during fiscal 2003. The Company believes that under current market conditions “footage” and “turnkey” contract rates do not adequately compensate contractors for the added risks. The duration of the Company’s drilling contracts are “well-to-well” or for a fixed term. “Well-to-well” contracts are cancelable at the option of either party upon the completion of drilling at any one site. Fixed-term contracts customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an “early termination payment” to be paid to the contractor if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term.

While current fixed term contracts are for one to five year periods, some fixed term and well-to-well contracts are expected to be continued for longer periods than the original terms. However, the contracting parties have no legal obligation to extend the contracts. Contracts generally contain renewal or extension provisions exercisable at the option of the customer at prices mutually agreeable to the Company and the customer. In most instances contracts provide for additional payments for mobilization and demobilization.

*   The term “FlexRig” as used herein is a Company trademark registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

2

Table of Contents

DOMESTIC LAND DRILLING

The Company believes it is a major land drilling contractor in the domestic market. At the end of September 2003, the Company had 83 of its land rigs available for work in the United States. The 17-rig increase from fiscal 2002 to 2003 was due to the delivery of 19 new FlexRigs and the transfer of two rigs to the Company’s international operations. The Company’s land operations contributed approximately 53% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization in fiscal 2003 was 81%, down from 84% in fiscal 2002. However, the 22,588 activity days in fiscal 2003 were up from the fiscal 2002 total of 17,478 due to the increase in rig count. The Company’s fleet of FlexRigs and highly mobile rigs maintained an average utilization of approximately 95% during fiscal 2003 while the Company’s conventional rigs had an average utilization rate of approximately 58%. At the close of fiscal 2003, 68 land rigs were working out of 83 available rigs.

DOMESTIC OFFSHORE PLATFORM DRILLING

The Company’s offshore platform operations contributed approximately 22% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization in fiscal 2003 was 51%, down from 83% in fiscal 2002. At the end of this fiscal year, the Company had five of its 12 offshore platform rigs under contract and it continued to work under management contracts for three customer-owned rigs. It is likely during the first six months of calendar 2004 that two platform rigs will be placed on standby status and will receive lower standby rates.

INTERNATIONAL DRILLING

General

The Company’s international drilling operations began in 1958 with the acquisition of Sinclair Oil Company’s drilling rigs in Venezuela. Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is one of the leading drilling contractors in Venezuela. Beginning in 1972, with the introduction of its first helicopter rig, the Company expanded into other Latin American countries.

The Company’s international operations contributed approximately 21% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization in fiscal 2003 was 39%, down from 51% in fiscal 2002.

Venezuela

Venezuelan operations continue to be a significant part of the Company’s operations. During fiscal 2003, the Company sold three workover/drilling rigs, leaving the Company with 11 land drilling rigs in Venezuela at the end of fiscal 2003. The Company worked exclusively for the Venezuelan state petroleum company during fiscal 2003, and revenues from this work accounted for approximately 6% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during the fiscal year. The Company had six rigs working in Venezuela at the end of fiscal 2003.

The Company’s rig utilization rate in Venezuela has decreased from approximately 41% during fiscal 2002 to approximately 33% in fiscal 2003. Even though the Company is, at this time, unable to predict future fluctuations in its utilization rates during fiscal 2004, the Company believes that the prospects are good for returning at least two of its idle rigs back to work in Venezuela during fiscal 2004.

Ecuador

At the end of fiscal 2003, the Company owned eight rigs in Ecuador. The Company’s utilization rate was approximately 85% during fiscal 2003, down from approximately 93% in fiscal 2002. Revenues generated by Ecuadorian drilling operations contributed approximately 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenues during fiscal 2003. The Ecuadorian drilling contracts are primarily with large international oil companies.

3

Table of Contents

Colombia

During fiscal 2003, the Company owned three drilling rigs in Colombia. The Company’s utilization rate in Colombia was approximately 21% during fiscal 2003, down from approximately 31% in fiscal 2002. The revenues generated by Colombian drilling operations contributed approximately 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenues in fiscal 2003. At the end of fiscal 2003, the Company was operating one rig in Colombia, which has since ceased operations.

Other Locations

In addition to its operations in Venezuela, Ecuador and Colombia, in fiscal 2003, the Company owned six rigs in Bolivia and two rigs in Argentina. At the end of fiscal 2003, no rigs were operating in Bolivia or Argentina. However, as of the end of November, 2003, one rig was operating in each of Bolivia and Argentina.

During fiscal 2003, the Company continued operations under a management contract for a customer-owned platform rig located offshore Equatorial Guinea. Also, during the fiscal year, the Company moved one FlexRig each to Hungary and Chad. The rig in Hungary began operations in July 2003 and the rig in Chad is currently expected to commence drilling operations in December of 2003.

REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS

The Company’s real estate operations are conducted exclusively within the metropolitan area of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its major holding is Utica Square Shopping Center, consisting of 15 separate buildings, with parking and other common facilities covering an area of approximately 30 acres. The Company in fiscal 2003, with the assistance of an architectural consulting firm, has determined that the gross usable area within the buildings of the shopping center is 441,588 square feet, composed of retail space of 382,801 usable square feet, office space of 39,400 usable square feet, storage space of 2,404 usable square feet and common area space of 16,983 usable square feet. The Company’s real estate operations occupy approximately 4,140 square feet of general office and storage space. In calendar 2003, the Company renovated and converted a vacated department store to multi-tenant retail, office, and storage space. Occupancy in the shopping center increased from 80% in fiscal 2002 to 85% in fiscal 2003 with the addition of a children’s clothing store located within the newly-renovated space.

Following the demolition of an eight-story medical office building in 2002, the Company undertook a redevelopment of that site, adding two new restaurant locations. Two new upscale restaurants containing 8,305 and 7,143 square feet, respectively, have been completed and are operating at such locations.

At the end of the 2003 fiscal year, the Company owned 11 of a total of 73 units in The Yorktown, a 16-story luxury residential condominium with approximately 150,940 square feet of living area located on a six-acre tract adjacent to Utica Square Shopping Center. Seven of the Company’s units are currently leased.

The Company owns an eight-story office building located diagonally across the street from Utica Square Shopping Center, containing approximately 87,000 square feet of net leasable general office space. This building houses the Company’s principal executive offices. The Company has leased from a third party approximately 114,000 square feet of office space and intends to relocate its principal executive offices to such space by the end of calendar 2003. Following the relocation, the Company intends, during calendar 2004, to raze the former headquarters building. Thereafter, the Company will investigate future development opportunities for this site.

The Company owns and leases to third parties multi-tenant warehouse space. Three warehouses known as Space Center, each containing approximately 165,000 square feet of net leasable space, are situated in the southeast part of Tulsa at the intersection of two major limited-access highways. Present occupancy is 98%, which is down from 100% in fiscal 2002. The Company also owns approximately 1.5 acres of undeveloped land lying adjacent to such warehouses.

4

Table of Contents

In July of 2003, the Company sold approximately 14.91 acres of undeveloped land in Southpark. The sales price totaled approximately $2.2 million. Southpark is located in a high growth area of southeast Tulsa and is suitable for mixed commercial and light industrial development. Subsequent to such sale and at the end of fiscal 2003, the Company owned approximately 220 acres in Southpark consisting of approximately 207 acres of undeveloped real estate and approximately 13 acres of multi-tenant warehouse area. The warehouse area is known as Space Center East and consists of two warehouses, one containing approximately 90,000 square feet and the other containing approximately 112,500 square feet. Present occupancy is 96%, which is up from 93% in fiscal 2002. The Company believes that a high quality office park, with peripheral commercial, office/warehouse, and hotel sites, is the best development use for the remaining land. However, no development plans are currently pending.

The Company owns a five-building complex called Tandem Business Park. The project is located adjacent to and east of the Space Center East facility and contains approximately six acres, with approximately 88,084 square feet of office/warehouse space. Occupancy has increased from 80% to 84% during fiscal 2003. The Company also owns a 12 building complex, consisting of approximately 204,600 square feet of office/warehouse space, called Tulsa Business Park. The project is located south and east of the Space Center facility, separated by a city street, and contains approximately 12 acres. During fiscal 2003, occupancy has decreased from 96% to 86%.

The Company owns two service center properties located adjacent to arterial streets in south central Tulsa. The first, called Maxim Center, consists of one office/warehouse building containing approximately 40,800 square feet and located on approximately 2.5 acres. During fiscal 2003, occupancy has remained at 94%. The second, called Maxim Place, consists of one office/warehouse building containing approximately 33,750 square feet and located on approximately 2.25 acres. During fiscal 2003, occupancy has remained at 17%.

FINANCIAL

Information relating to Revenue and Operating Profit by Business Segments may be found on pages 58 through 60 of the Company’s Annual Report.

EMPLOYEES

The Company had 2,929 employees within the United States (10 of which were part-time employees) and 1,008 employees in international operations as of September 30, 2003.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the risks and factors discussed elsewhere in the Company’s Annual Report, the Company cautions that the following “Risk Factors” could affect its actual results in the future.

1. Competition

Competition in the Contract Drilling Business

The contract drilling business is highly competitive. Competition in contract drilling involves such factors as price, rig availability, efficiency, condition of equipment, reputation, operating safety, and customer relations. Competition is primarily on a regional basis and may vary significantly by region at any particular time. Land drilling rigs can be readily moved from one region to another in response to changes in levels of activity, and an oversupply of rigs in any region may result, leading to increased price competition.

Although many contracts for drilling services are awarded based solely on price, the Company has been successful in establishing long-term relationships with certain customers which have allowed the Company to secure drilling work even though the Company may not have been the lowest bidder for such work. The Company has continued to

5

Table of Contents

attempt to differentiate its services based upon its engineering design expertise, operational efficiency, safety and environmental awareness. This strategy is less effective when lower demand for drilling services intensifies price competition and makes it more difficult or impossible to compete on any other basis than price.

Competition in the Real Estate Business

The Company has numerous competitors in the multi-tenant leasing business. The size and financial capacity of these competitors range from one-property sole proprietors to large international corporations. The primary competitive factors include price, location, and configuration of space. The Company’s competitive position is enhanced by the location of its properties, its financial capability and the long-term ownership of its properties. However, many competitors have financial resources greater than the Company and have more contemporary facilities.

2. Operating Risks

The drilling operations of the Company are subject to the many hazards inherent in the business, including inclement weather, blowouts and well fires. These hazards could cause personal injury, suspend drilling operations, seriously damage or destroy the equipment involved, and cause substantial damage to producing formations and the surrounding areas. The Company’s offshore platform drilling operations are also subject to potentially greater environmental liability, adverse sea conditions and platform damage or destruction due to collision with aircraft or marine vessels.

3. Indemnification and Insurance Coverage

The Company believes that it has adequate insurance coverage for comprehensive general liability, public liability, property damage, workers compensation, and employer’s liability. No insurance is carried against loss of earnings or business interruption. The Company is unable to obtain significant amounts of insurance to cover risks of underground reservoir damage, however, the Company is generally indemnified under its drilling contracts from this risk. The majority of the Company’s insurance coverage has been purchased through fiscal 2004. No assurance can be given that all or a portion of the Company’s coverage will not be cancelled during fiscal 2004 or that insurance coverage will continue to be available at rates considered reasonable. Additionally, no assurance can be given that the Company’s insurance and indemnification arrangements will adequately protect it against all liabilities that could result from the hazards of its drilling operations. Incurring a liability for which the Company is not fully insured or indemnified could materially affect the Company’s results of operations.

4. Volatility of Oil and Gas Prices

The Company’s operations can be materially affected by low oil and gas prices. The Company believes that any significant reduction in oil and gas prices could depress the level of exploration and production activity and result in a corresponding decline in demand for the Company’s services. Worldwide military, political and economic events, including initiatives by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, may affect both the demand for, and the supply of, oil and gas. Fluctuations during the last few years in the demand and supply of oil and gas have contributed to, and are likely to continue to contribute to, price volatility. Any prolonged reduction in demand for the Company’s services could have a material and adverse effect on the Company.

5. International Uncertainties and Local Laws

International operations are subject to certain political, economic, and other uncertainties not encountered in domestic operations, including increased risks of terrorism, kidnapping of employees, expropriation of equipment as well as expropriation of a particular oil company operator’s property and drilling rights, taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions, currency rate fluctuations, and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted. There can be no assurance that there will not be changes in local laws, regulations,

6

Table of Contents

and administrative requirements or the interpretation thereof which could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of the Company’s operations or on the ability of the Company to continue operations in certain areas.

Because of the impact of local laws, the Company’s future operations in certain areas may be conducted through entities in which local citizens own interests and through entities (including joint ventures) in which the Company holds only a minority interest, or pursuant to arrangements under which the Company conducts operations under contract to local entities. While the Company believes that neither operating through such entities nor pursuant to such arrangements would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations or revenues, there can be no assurance that the Company will in all cases be able to structure or restructure its operations to conform to local law (or the administration thereof) on terms acceptable to the Company.

Although the Company attempts to minimize the potential impact of such risks by operating in more than one geographical area, during fiscal 2003, approximately 21% of the Company’s consolidated revenues were generated from the international contract drilling business. Approximately 86% of the international revenues were from operations in South America and approximately 87% of South American revenues were from Venezuela and Ecuador.

6. Currency Risk

General

Contracts for work in foreign countries generally provide for payment in United States dollars, except for amounts required to meet local expenses. However, government owned petroleum companies are more frequently requesting that a greater proportion of these payments be made in local currencies. Based upon current information, the Company believes that exposure to potential losses from currency devaluation is minimal in Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Equatorial Guinea. In those countries, all receivables and payments are currently in U.S. dollars. Cash balances are kept at a minimum which assists in reducing exposure.

Argentina

In 2002, Argentina suffered a 60% devaluation of the peso. As a consequence, the Company secured agreements with its customers that limited the portion of the accounts receivable that will be paid in pesos with the balance of such accounts receivable to be paid in U.S. dollars. The Company did not experience Argentine currency losses in fiscal 2003.

Venezuela

The Company is exposed to risks of currency devaluation in Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. In Venezuela, approximately 60% of the Company’s invoice billings are in U.S. dollars and 40% are in the local currency, the bolivar. The significance of this arrangement is that even though the dollar-based invoices may be paid in bolivars, the Company, historically, has usually been able to convert the bolivars into U.S. dollars in a timely manner and thus avoid, in large measure, devaluation losses pertaining to the dollar-based invoices. However, this arrangement is effective only in the absence of exchange controls. In January 2003, the Venezuelan government put into effect exchange controls that fixed the exchange rate at 1600 bolivars to one U.S. dollar and also prohibited the Company, as well as other companies, from converting the bolivar into U.S. dollars through the Central Bank. As a result of these exchange controls, the Company has been unable since January 2003 to convert its bolivar cash balances into U.S. dollars. As of September 30, 2003, the Company’s bolivar balance was approximately 14 billion bolivars or approximately $8.8 million. Historically, the Company has kept bolivar cash balances at necessary minimum levels. Absent existing exchange controls, the Company would have converted approximately 95% of the bolivars (13.3 billion bolivars) into $8.3 million.

7

Table of Contents

As part of the exchange controls regulation, the Venezuelan government provided a mechanism by which companies could request conversion of bolivars into U.S. dollars. In compliance with such regulations, the Company on October 1, 2003, submitted a request to the Venezuelan government seeking permission to dividend earnings, which effectively will convert 14 billion bolivars into U.S. dollars. The Company is unable to predict if or when this request will be approved.

As stated above, the Company is exposed to risks of currency devaluation in Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. From August of 2002 to August of 2003, there was a 13% devaluation of the bolivar. As a result, the Company experienced a $624,000 devaluation loss. This 13% devaluation loss may not be reflective of the actual potential for future devaluation losses because of the exchange controls that are currently in place. While the Company is unable to predict future devaluation in Venezuela, if fiscal 2004 activity levels are similar to fiscal 2003 and if a 25% to 50% devaluation would occur, the Company could experience potential currency devaluation losses ranging from approximately $3,200,000 to $5,100,000.

In late August 2003, the Venezuelan state petroleum company agreed, on a prospective basis, to pay a portion of the Company’s dollar-based invoices in U.S. dollars. While this is a positive development in light of the existing exchange controls, there is no guarantee as to how long this arrangement will continue. Were this agreement to end, the Company would revert back to receiving these payments in bolivars and thus increase bolivar cash balances and exposure to devaluation.

7. Governmental Instability in Venezuela

Governmental instability continues to exist in Venezuela. In the event that extended labor strikes occur or turmoil increases, the Company could experience shortages in material and supplies necessary to operate some or all of its Venezuelan drilling rigs.

During the mid-1970s, the Venezuelan government nationalized the exploration and production business. At the present time it appears the Venezuelan government will not nationalize the contract drilling business. Any such nationalization could result in the Company’s loss of all or a portion of its assets and business in Venezuela.

8. Government Regulation and Environmental Risks

Many aspects of the Company’s operations are subject to government regulation, including those relating to drilling practices and methods and the level of taxation. In addition, various countries (including the United States) have environmental regulations which affect drilling operations. Drilling contractors may be liable for damages resulting from pollution. Under United States regulations, drilling contractors must establish financial responsibility to cover potential liability for pollution of offshore waters. Generally, the Company is indemnified under drilling contracts from liability arising from pollution, except in certain cases of surface pollution. However, the enforceability of indemnification provisions in foreign countries may be questionable.

The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with all legislation and regulations affecting its operations in the drilling of oil and gas wells and in controlling the discharge of wastes. To date, compliance has not materially affected the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of the Company, although these measures may add to the costs of operating drilling equipment in some instances. Additional legislation or regulation may reasonably be anticipated, and the effect thereof on operations cannot be predicted.

9. Interest Rate Risk

In 2002, the Company entered into a $200,000,000 intermediate-term unsecured debt obligation with staged maturities from five to 12 years with varying fixed interest rates for each maturity series. There was $200 million outstanding

8

Table of Contents

at September 30, 2003, of which $25 million is due in 2007 and the remaining $175 million is due 2009 through 2014. The average interest rate during the next four years on this debt is 6.3%, after which it increases to 6.4%. The fair value of this debt at September 30, 2003 was approximately $226.5 million.

At September 30, 2003, the Company had in place a committed unsecured line of credit totaling $125,000,000. There was $30,000,000 borrowed against the line of credit and $13,747,260 of outstanding letters of credit as of September 30, 2003. The Company’s line of credit interest rate is based on LIBOR plus 87 to 112.5 basis points based on the Company’s EBITDA to net debt ratio. As the Company draws on this line of credit, it is subject to the interest rates prevailing during the term at which the Company had outstanding borrowings. Although market interest rates were at historical lows during fiscal year 2003, interest rates could rise for a number of various reasons in the future and increase the Company’s total interest expense, depending upon the amount borrowed against the credit line.

10. Equity Price Risk

At September 30, 2003, the Company owned stocks in other publicly held companies with a total market value of $169,546,000. These securities are subject to a wide variety of market-related risks that could substantially reduce or increase the market value of the Company’s holdings. Except for the Company’s holdings in its equity affiliate, Atwood Oceanics, Inc., the portfolio is recorded at fair value on its balance sheet with changes in unrealized after-tax value reflected in the equity section of its balance sheet. Any reduction in market value would have an impact on the Company’s debt ratio and financial strength.

11. Reliance on Small Number of Customers

In fiscal 2003, the Company received approximately 68% of its consolidated revenues from the Company’s ten largest contract drilling customers and approximately 42% of its consolidated revenues from the Company’s three largest customers (including their affiliates). The Company believes that its relationship with all of these customers is good; however, the loss of one or more of its larger customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

12. Key Personnel

The Company utilizes highly skilled personnel in operating and supporting its businesses. In times of high utilization, it can be difficult to find qualified individuals. Although to date the Company’s operations have not been materially affected by competition for personnel, an inability to obtain a sufficient number of qualified personnel could materially impact the Company’s results of operations.

13. Changes in Technologies

Although the Company takes measures to ensure that it uses advanced oil and natural gas drilling technology, changes in technology or in the Company’s competitors’ equipment could make the Company’s equipment less competitive or require significant capital investments to keep its equipment competitive.

14. Concentration of Credit

The concentration of the Company’s customers in the energy industry could cause them to be similarly affected by changes in industry conditions and, as a result, could impact the Company’s exposure to credit risk. The Company cannot offer assurances that losses due to uncollectible receivables will be consistent with expectation.

9

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

CONTRACT DRILLING

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company’s domestic drilling rigs as of September 30, 2003:

10

Table of Contents

11

Table of Contents