Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual report pursuant to section 13 OR 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

Commission File Number: 0-18933

Rochester Medical Corporation

     
Minnesota   41-1613227
State of Incorporation   IRS Employer Identification No.

One Rochester Medical Drive
Stewartville, Minnesota 55976

Address of Principal Executive Offices

Telephone Number: (507) 533-9600

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock without par value


Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes    X    No    

Check if no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    X   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes     No    X   

The issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $14,655,372.

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates based upon the closing Nasdaq sale price on March 31, 2003 was $44,711,175.

Number of shares outstanding on December 4, 2003 was 5,428,431 Common Shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its January 22, 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1. Business
ITEM 2. Properties
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EX-3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company
EX-23 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
EX-24 Power of Attorney
EX-31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
EX-31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
EX-32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
EX-32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

Overview

     Rochester Medical Corporation (the “Company”) develops, manufactures and markets a broad line of innovative, technologically enhanced latex-free urinary continence and urine drainage care products for the extended care and acute care markets. The Company’s extended care products include a line of male external catheters for managing male urinary incontinence and a line of intermittent catheters for managing both male and female urinary retention. The extended care products also include the FemSoft® Insert, a soft, liquid-filled, conformable urethral insert for managing female stress urinary incontinence in adult females. The Company’s acute care products include a line of standard Foley catheters and its RELEASE-NF® Catheter, an antibacterial Foley catheter that reduces the incidence of hospital acquired urinary tract infection (“UTI”). A small percentage of the Company’s extended care products also are used in the acute care market.

     The Company markets its products under its Rochester Medical® brand through a direct sales force in the United States and independent distributors in international markets. The Company also supplies its products to several large medical product companies for sale under brands owned by these companies.

     The Company makes its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K available free of charge through its website, at www.rocm.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with (or furnishes such material to) the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information contained on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered to be part of this Form 10-K.

Extended Care Products

     Male External Catheters. The Company’s male external catheters are self-care, disposable devices for managing male urinary incontinence. The Company manufactures and markets four models of silicone male external catheters: the UltraFlex®, Pop-On®, Wide Band® and Natural® catheters. The UltraFlex catheter has adhesive positioned midway down the catheter sheath. The “Pop-On” catheter has a sheath that is shorter than that of a standard male external catheter and has adhesive applied to the full length of the sheath. It is designed to accommodate patients who require shorter-length external catheters. The Company’s Wide Band self-adhering male external catheter has an adhesive band which extends over the full length of the sheath, providing approximately 70% more adhesive coverage than other conventional male external catheters. The full length and forward placement of the Wide Band adhesive is designed to reduce adhesive failure and the resulting leakage, which is a common complaint among users of male external catheters. The Natural catheter is a non-adhesive version of the Company’s male external catheter.

 


Table of Contents

     All models of the Company’s male external catheters are produced in five sizes for better patient fit. The Company’s male external catheters are made from silicone, a non-toxic and biocompatible material that eliminates the risks of latex-related skin irritation. Silicone catheters are also odor free and have greater air permeability than catheters made from other materials, including latex. Air permeability reduces skin irritation and damage from catheter use and thereby increases patient comfort. The Company’s silicone catheters are transparent, permitting visual skin inspection without removal of the catheters and aiding proper placement of the catheters. The Company’s catheters also have a kink-proof funnel design to ensure uninterrupted urine flow. The self-adhering technology and patented forward-placement of the adhesive simplifies application of the catheters and provides a strong bond to the skin for greater patient confidence and improved wear.

     The Company also manufactures and sells male external catheters made from a proprietary non-latex, non-silicone material to certain private label customers. Certain of these catheters use the same self-adhesive technology as the Company’s silicone male external catheters. Like the silicone male external catheters, these non-silicone catheters eliminate the risk of latex reactions and latex-related skin irritations. The non-silicone catheters also are odor free.

     Intermittent Catheters. The Company’s Personal Catheters® are a line of disposable intermittent catheters manufactured from silicone. The Company produces the Personal Catheters in three lengths for male, female, and pediatric use and in multiple diameters. The Company produces three distinct versions of the Personal Catheter: the basic Standard Personal Catheter, the Antibacterial Personal Catheter and the Hydrophilic Personal Catheter. The Antibacterial Personal Catheter provides site-specific delivery of nitrofurazone, a drug that has been proven effective in reducing urinary tract infections. The Hydrophilic Personal Catheter becomes extremely slippery when moistened, providing a very low friction surface for ease and comfort during insertion and removal. All of the Personal Catheter designs are latex-free and PVC-free, eliminating the allergen, toxin or disposal concerns commonly associated with latex and PVC catheters.

     FemSoft Insert. The FemSoft Insert is a disposable device for the management of stress urinary incontinence in active women. It is a soft, conformable urethral insert that assists the female urethra and bladder neck to control the involuntary loss of urine. The device can be simply inserted, worn and removed for voiding by most women. It requires no inflation, deflation, syringes or valving mechanisms.

     The FemSoft Insert is a minimally invasive device that provides a patient with effective control of her urinary function and eliminates the need for pads or liners that can cause embarrassment, restrict mobility and compromise lifestyle. In addition, the soft, liquid-filled silicone membrane of the FemSoft Insert has been designed to conform to anatomical variations of the urethra and follow the movements of the urethra during normal activities, thereby reducing leakage without chafing or abrasion of the delicate tissues of the urethra.

     The FemSoft Insert is a prescription device that requires a woman to visit her physician. The physician will fit the patient with the proper size and instruct the patient on proper application of the FemSoft Insert.

-2-


Table of Contents

Acute Care Products

     Foley Catheters. The Company’s RELEASE-NF Catheter is a silicone Foley catheter that has been designed to reduce the incidence of hospital acquired UTI. Using patented technology, the RELEASE-NF Catheter incorporates nitrofurazone, an effective broad-spectrum antibacterial agent, into the structure of the catheter, permitting sustained release of a controlled dosage directly into the urinary tract to retard the onset of infection.

     The Company also offers standard silicone Foley catheters in a two-lumen version for urinary drainage management and in a three-lumen version for irrigation of the urinary tract. These Foley catheters are available in all adult and pediatric sizes. All of the Company’s silicone Foley catheters eliminate the risk of the allergic reactions and tissue irritation and damage associated with latex Foley catheters. The Company’s Foley catheters are transparent which enables healthcare professionals to observe urine flow. Unlike the manufacturing processes used by producers of competing silicone Foley catheters, in which the balloon is made separately and attached by hand in a separate process involving gluing, the Company’s automated manufacturing processes allow the Company to integrate the balloon into the structure of the Foley catheter, resulting in a smoother, more uniform exterior that may help reduce irritation to urinary tissue.

     The Company’s Foley catheters are packaged sterile in single catheter strips and sold under the Rochester Medical brand and under private label arrangements. In addition, the Company sells its Foley catheters in bulk under private label arrangements for packaging in kits with tubing, collection bags and other associated materials.

Technology

     The Company uses proprietary, automated manufacturing technologies and processes to manufacture continence care devices cost effectively. The production of the Company’s products also depends on its materials expertise and know-how in the formulation of silicone and advanced polymer products. The Company’s proprietary liquid encapsulation technology enables it to manufacture innovative products, such as its FemSoft Insert, that have soft, conformable, liquid-filled reservoirs, which cannot be manufactured using conventional technologies. Using this liquid encapsulation technology, the Company can mold and form liquid encapsulated devices in a variety of shapes and sizes in an automated process. The Company’s manufacturing technologies and materials know-how also allow the Company to incorporate a sustained release antibacterial agent into its products. The Company believes that its manufacturing technology is particularly well-suited to high unit volume production and that its automated processes enable cost-effective production. The Company further believes that its manufacturing and materials expertise, particularly its proprietary liquid encapsulation technology, may be applicable to a variety of other devices for medical applications. The Company plans to consider, commensurate with its financial and personnel resources, future research and development activities to investigate opportunities provided by the Company’s technology and know-how.

     The Company believes that its proprietary manufacturing processes, materials expertise, custom designed equipment and technical know-how allow it to simplify and further automate

-3-


Table of Contents

traditional catheter manufacturing techniques to reduce the Company’s manufacturing costs. In order to manufacture high quality products at competitive costs, the Company concurrently designs and develops new products and the processes and equipment to manufacture them.

Marketing and Sales

     To date, the majority of the Company’s revenues have been derived from sales of its male external catheters and standard Foley catheters to medical products companies for resale under brands owned by such companies. Private label arrangements are likely to continue to account for a significant portion of the Company’s revenues in the foreseeable future, particularly in international markets where the Company does not maintain a direct sales presence.

     The Company sells its products in the United States under the Rochester Medical brand name through a six-person direct sales force. The primary markets for the Company’s products are distributors, extended care facilities and individual hospitals and healthcare institutions.

     The Company relies on arrangements with medical product companies and independent distributors to sell the Company’s products in Europe and other international markets. These arrangements are conducted under the Rochester Medical brand name and under brands controlled by the medical product companies.

Manufacturing

     The Company designs and builds custom equipment to implement its manufacturing technologies and processes. The Company’s manufacturing facilities are located in Stewartville, Minnesota. The Company produces its Foley catheters on one production line and its male external catheters on other lines. The Company has constructed a separate manufacturing facility to house its liquid encapsulation manufacturing operations, and has installed the FemSoft Insert and intermittent catheter manufacturing line in this facility.

     The Company maintains a comprehensive quality assurance and quality control program, which includes documentation of all material specifications, operating procedures, equipment maintenance and quality control test methods. The Company has obtained ISO 9001 certification and CE mark quality system certification for its Foley catheter, male external catheter, intermittent catheter and FemSoft Insert production lines.

     The Company’s manufacturing facility has been designed to accommodate the specialized requirements for the manufacture of medical devices, including the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) requirements for Quality System Regulation (“QSR”).

Sources of Supply

     The Company obtains certain raw materials and components for a number of its products from a sole supplier or limited number of suppliers. The loss of such a supplier or suppliers, or a material interruption of deliveries from such a supplier or suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company believes that in most, if not all, cases the Company has identified other potential suppliers. In the event that the Company had to replace a supplier, however, the Company may be required to repeat biocompatibility and other testing of its products using the material from the new supplier and may be required to obtain additional regulatory clearances.

-4-


Table of Contents

Research and Development

     The Company believes that its ability to add new products to its existing continence care product lines is important to the Company’s future success. Accordingly, the Company is engaged in ongoing research and development to develop and introduce new products which provide additional features and functionality. In the future, consistent with market opportunities and the Company’s financial and personnel resources, the Company intends to perform clinical studies for other of its products in development.

     Research and development expense for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $875,000, $835,000 and $1,062,000, respectively.

Competition

     The continence care market is highly competitive. The Company believes that the primary competitive factors include price, product quality, technical capability, breadth of product line and distribution capabilities. The Company’s ability to compete is affected by its product development and innovation capabilities, its ability to obtain regulatory clearances, its ability to protect the proprietary technology of its products and manufacturing processes, its marketing capabilities, and its ability to attract and retain skilled employees, to maintain current distribution relationships, to establish new distribution relationships and to secure participation in purchase contracts with group purchasing organizations. The Company believes that it is important for the Company to differentiate its products in order to attract large customers, such as distributors, dealers, institutions and home care organizations.

     The Company’s products compete with a number of alternative products and treatments for continence care. The Company’s ability to compete with these alternative methods for urinary continence care depends on the relative market acceptance of alternative products and therapies and the technological advances in these alternative products and therapies. Any development of a broad-based and effective cure for a significant form of incontinence could have a material adverse effect on sales of continence care devices such as the Company’s products.

     The Company competes directly for sales of continence care devices under the Company’s own brand with larger, multi-product medical device manufacturers and distributors such as C.R. Bard, Inc., Maersk Medical, Kendall Healthcare Products Company, Hollister, Mentor, Astra Tech AB and Coloplast. Many of the competitive alternative products or therapies to the Company’s products are distributed by larger competitors including Johnson & Johnson Personal Products Company, Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Proctor & Gamble Company (for adult diapers and absorbent pads), and C.R. Bard, Inc. (for injectable materials). Many of the Company’s competitors, potential competitors and providers of alternative products or therapies have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and technical resources and experience than the Company. It is possible that other large healthcare and consumer products companies may enter this market in the future. Furthermore, academic

-5-


Table of Contents

institutions, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations will continue to conduct research, seek patent protection and establish arrangements for commercializing products in this market. Such products may compete directly with products which may be offered by the Company.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

     The Company’s success may depend in part on its ability to obtain patent protection for its products and manufacturing processes, to preserve its trade secrets and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. The Company may seek patents on certain features of its products and technology based on the Company’s analysis of various business considerations, such as the cost of obtaining a patent, the likely scope of patent protection and the benefits of patent protection relative to relying on trade secret protection. The Company also relies upon trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovations to develop and maintain its competitive position.

     The Company owns 19 United States patents and a number of corresponding foreign patents that generally relate to certain of the Company’s catheters and devices and certain of the Company’s production processes. In addition, the Company owns a number of pending United States and corresponding foreign patent applications. The Company may file additional patent applications for certain of the Company’s current and proposed products and processes in the future.

     There can be no assurance that the Company’s patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection of the Company’s products and technologies. The coverage sought in a patent application can be denied or significantly reduced before the patent is issued. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company’s patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide proprietary protection or commercial advantage to the Company.

     Should attempts be made to challenge, invalidate or circumvent the Company’s patents in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or courts of competent jurisdiction, including administrative boards or tribunals, the Company may have to participate in legal or quasi-legal proceedings therein, to maintain, defend or enforce its rights in these patents. Any legal proceedings to maintain, defend or enforce the Company’s patent rights can be lengthy and costly, with no guarantee of success. There also can be no assurance that the Company will file additional patent applications or that additional patents will issue from the Company’s pending patent applications.

     A claim by third parties that the Company’s current products or products under development allegedly infringe their patent rights could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is aware that others have obtained or are pursuing patent protection for various aspects of the design, production and manufacturing of continence care products. The medical device industry is characterized by frequent and substantial intellectual property litigation, particularly with respect to newly developed technology. Intellectual property litigation is complex and expensive, and the outcome of such litigation is difficult to predict. Any future litigation, regardless of outcome, could result in substantial expense to the Company

-6-


Table of Contents

and significant diversion of the efforts of the Company’s technical and management personnel. An adverse determination in any such proceeding could subject the Company to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed from such parties, if licenses to such rights could be obtained, and/or require the Company to cease using such technology. There can be no assurance that if such licenses were obtainable, they would be obtainable at costs reasonable to the Company. If forced to cease using such technology, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to develop or obtain alternate technology. Additionally, if third party patents containing claims affecting the Company’s technology are issued and such claims are determined to be valid, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to obtain licenses to such patents at costs reasonable to the Company, if at all, or be able to develop or obtain alternate technology. Accordingly, an adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent the Company from manufacturing, using or selling certain of its products, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

     There also can be no assurance that any third party does not currently have, has not applied for, or might not in the future apply for, additional patents in the United States or abroad which, if ultimately granted, might be infringed in such country by any of the Company’s products as currently configured or any other product of the Company and provide the basis for an infringement action in such country against the Company.

     The Company also relies on proprietary manufacturing processes and techniques, materials expertise and trade secrets applicable to the manufacture of its products. The Company seeks to maintain the confidentiality of this proprietary information. There can be no assurance, however, that the measures taken by the Company will provide the Company with adequate protection of its proprietary information or with adequate remedies in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company’s competitors will not independently develop or otherwise gain access to processes, techniques or trade secrets that are similar or superior to the Company’s. Finally, as with patent rights, legal action to enforce trade secret rights can be lengthy and costly, with no guarantee of success.

Government Regulation

     The manufacture and sale of the Company’s products are subject to regulation by numerous governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding foreign agencies. In the United States, the medical devices manufactured and sold by the Company are subject to laws and regulations administered by the FDA, including regulations concerning the prerequisites to commercial marketing, the conduct of clinical investigations, compliance with QSR and labeling.

     A manufacturer may seek from the FDA market authorization to distribute a new medical device by filing a 510(k) Premarket Notification (“510(k)”) to establish that the device is “substantially equivalent” to medical devices legally marketed in the United States prior to the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. A manufacturer may also seek market authorization for a new medical device through the more rigorous Premarket Approval (“PMA”) application process, which requires the FDA to determine that the device is safe and effective for the purposes intended.

-7-


Table of Contents

     The Company received FDA marketing authorization for its FemSoft Insert on September 30, 1999 pursuant to a PMA. As a condition of FDA approval of the Company’s PMA filing based on interim clinical study results, the Company was required to complete its most recent clinical study of the FemSoft Insert and submit the additional data to the FDA for its further consideration to determine whether such approval should be continued. The Company completed its latest clinical study in fiscal 2003 and submitted the additional data to the FDA, and currently is awaiting their response. There can be no assurance that these additional data will be sufficient in the FDA’s opinion to permit continued marketing of the device even though the PMA filing for the FemSoft Insert was initially approved by the FDA. All of the Company’s other marketed products have received FDA marketing authorization pursuant to 510(k) notifications.

     The Company is also required to register with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer. As such, the Company’s manufacturing facilities are inspected on a routine basis for compliance with QSR. These regulations require that the Company manufacture its products and maintain its documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and quality control activities. As a medical device manufacturer, the Company is further required to comply with FDA requirements regarding the reporting of adverse events associated with the use of its medical devices, as well as product malfunctions that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. FDA regulations also govern product labeling and can prohibit a manufacturer from marketing an approved device for unapproved applications. If the FDA believes that a manufacturer is not in compliance with the law, it can institute enforcement proceedings to detain or seize products, issue a recall, enjoin future violations and assess civil and criminal penalties against the manufacturer, its officers and employees.

     The Company may become subject to future legislation and regulations concerning the manufacture and marketing of medical devices. Such future legislation and regulations could increase the cost and time necessary to begin marketing new products and could affect the Company in other respects not currently foreseeable. The Company cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulations.

     Sales of medical devices outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. These laws and regulations range from simple product registration requirements in some countries to complex clearance and production controls in others. As a result, the processes and time periods required to obtain foreign marketing approval may be longer or shorter than those necessary to obtain FDA approval. These differences may affect the efficiency and timeliness of international market introduction of the Company’s products. For countries in the European Union (“EU”), medical devices must display a CE mark before they may be imported or sold. In order to obtain and maintain the CE mark, the Company must comply with the Medical Device Directive and pass an initial and annual facilities audit inspections to ISO 9001 by an EU inspection agency. The Company has obtained ISO 9001 quality system certification for the CE mark for the products its currently manufactures. In order to maintain certification, the Company is required to pass annual facilities audit inspections conducted by EU inspectors.

-8-


Table of Contents

     In addition, international sales of medical devices manufactured in the United States that have not been approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States are subject to FDA export requirements. These require that the Company obtain documentation from the medical device regulatory authority of the destination country stating that sale of the medical device is not in violation of that country’s medical device laws, and, under some circumstances, may require the Company to apply to the FDA for permission to export a device to that country.

Third Party Reimbursement

     In the United States, healthcare providers that purchase medical devices generally rely on third party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid, private health insurance plans and managed care organizations, to reimburse all or a portion of the cost of the devices. The Medicare program is funded and administered by the federal government, while the Medicaid program is jointly funded by the federal government and the states, which administer the program under general federal oversight. The Company believes its currently marketed products, including the RELEASE-NF Catheter, are generally eligible for coverage under these third party reimbursement programs. The Company has received Medicare reimbursement for the FemSoft Insert, and several private health insurance plans also offer this reimbursement. The competitive position of certain of the Company’s products may be partially dependent upon the extent of reimbursement for its products.

     The federal government and certain state governments continually consider various proposals to reform the Medicare and Medicaid health care reimbursement system. The Company is unable to evaluate what legislation may be drafted and whether or when any such legislation will be enacted and implemented. Certain of the proposals, if adopted, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

     In foreign countries, the policies and procedures for obtaining third party payment of reimbursement for medical devices vary widely. Compliance with such procedures may delay or prevent the eligibility of the Company’s branded and/or private label products for reimbursement, and have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to sell its branded or private label products in a particular foreign country.

Private Label Distribution Agreements

     The Company supplies a number of medical product companies with products on a private label basis. The Company’s practice has been to enter into written agreements with these distributors of the Company’s products.

     In two instances to date, the Company has entered into agreements with distributors providing for certain exclusive marketing and distribution rights. In fiscal 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Coloplast granting Coloplast exclusive marketing and distribution rights with respect to the Company’s Release-NF Foley catheters in certain geographic areas. In addition, during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement granting to another distributor exclusive marketing and distribution rights in certain geographic areas with respect to the Company’s hydrophilic intermittent catheters.

-9-


Table of Contents

Employees

     As of September 30, 2003, the Company employed 165 full-time employees, of whom 130 were in manufacturing, and the remainder in marketing and sales, research and development and administration. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement and believes its employee relations are good.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The executive officers of the Company as of December 1, 2003 are as follows:

                 
Name   Age   Position

 
 
Anthony J. Conway     59     Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
            President and Secretary
David A. Jonas     39     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Philip J. Conway     47     Vice President, Production Technologies
Richard D. Fryar     56     Vice President, Research and Development
Dara Lynn Horner     45     Vice President, Marketing
Martyn R. Sholtis     44     Corporate Vice President

     Anthony J. Conway, a founder of the Company, has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company since May 1988. In addition to his duties as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Anthony Conway actively contributes to the Company’s research and development and design activities. From 1979 to March 1988, he was President, Secretary and Treasurer of Arcon Corporation (“Arcon”), a company that he co-founded in 1979 to develop, manufacture and sell latex-based male external catheters and related medical devices. Prior to founding Arcon, Mr. Anthony Conway worked for twelve years for International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) in various research and development capacities. Mr. Anthony Conway is one of the named inventors on numerous patent applications that have been assigned to the Company, of which to date 19 have resulted in issued United States patents and 32 have resulted in issued foreign patents.

     David A. Jonas has served as the Company’s Treasurer since November 2000 and as its Chief Financial Officer since May 2001. From June 1, 1998 until May 2001, Mr. Jonas served as the Company’s Controller. From August 1999 until October 2001, Mr. Jonas served as the Company’s Director of Operations and had principal responsibility for the Company’s operational activities. Since November 2000, Mr. Jonas has had principal responsibility for the Company’s financial activities. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jonas was employed in various financial, financial management and operational management positions with Polaris Industries, Inc. from January 1989 to June 1998. Mr. Jonas holds a BS degree in Accounting from the University of Minnesota and is a certified public accountant.

     Philip J. Conway, a founder of the Company, has served as Vice President of Production Technologies of the Company since August 1999 and as a Director of the Company since May 1988. From 1988 to July 1999, Mr. Philip Conway served as Vice President of Operations of the Company. Mr. Philip Conway is responsible for plant design as well as new product and production processes, research, design and development activities. Since November 2001, he

-10-


Table of Contents

has had principal responsibility for the Company’s operational activities. From 1979 to March 1988, Mr. Philip Conway served as Plant and Production Manager of Arcon, a company that he co-founded. Prior to joining Arcon, Mr. Philip Conway was employed in a production supervisory capacity by AFC Corp., a manufacturer and fabricator of fiberglass, plastics and other composite materials. He is one of the named inventors on numerous patent applications that have been assigned to the Company, of which to date 19 have resulted in issued United States patents and 32 have resulted in issued foreign patents.

     Richard D. Fryar, a founder of the Company, has served as Vice President, Research and Development and as a director of the Company since May 1988. Mr. Fryar is responsible for overseeing the Company’s research and development and regulatory affairs activities. From 1984 to March 1988, Mr. Fryar was employed by Arcon, a company that he co-founded, in research and development capacities. From 1969 to 1984, he was employed by IBM in various research and development capacities. He is one of the named inventors on numerous patent applications that have been assigned to the Company, of which to date 19 have resulted in issued United States patents and 32 have resulted in issued foreign patents.

     Dara Lynn Horner joined the Company in November 1998 and serves as the Company’s Vice President of Marketing. From November 1998 until November 1999, Ms. Horner served as Marketing Director for the Company’s FemSoft Insert product line. Ms. Horner has principal responsibility for management of the Company’s marketing activities. From 1990 until joining the Company in 1998, Ms. Horner was employed by Lake Region Manufacturing, Inc., a medical device manufacturer, most recently as Marketing Director.

     Martyn R. Sholtis joined the Company in April 1992 and serves as the Company’s Corporate Vice President. Mr. Sholtis is responsible for all international and private label sales and for corporate business development activities. From 1985 to 1992 Mr. Sholtis was employed by Sherwood Medical, a company that manufactured and sold a variety of disposable medical products including urological catheters, most recently as Regional Sales Manager for the Nursing Care Division.

     Messrs. Anthony J. Conway, Philip J. Conway and Peter R. Conway, a director of the Company, are brothers.

ITEM 2. Properties

     The Company’s administrative offices and liquid encapsulation manufacturing facilities occupy a 52,000 square foot manufacturing and office facility on a 33 acre site owned by the Company and located in an industrial park in Stewartville, Minnesota. The Company’s male external and Foley catheter manufacturing facilities consists of a 34,000 square foot manufacturing and office building located on a nearby 3.5 acre site owned by the Company in the same industrial park.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

     The Company is not involved in any material legal proceedings.

-11-


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended September 30, 2003.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     The Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol ROCM. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low last sale prices for the Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.

                   
      High   Low
     
 
Fiscal 2002
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 6.50     $ 4.05  
 
Second Quarter
    6.23       4.90  
 
Third Quarter
    6.25       4.50  
 
Fourth Quarter
    7.85       5.35  
Fiscal 2003
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 8.70     $ 5.94  
 
Second Quarter
    11.00       7.90  
 
Third Quarter
    12.30       9.90  
 
Fourth Quarter
    11.84       10.06  

-12-


Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information As of September 30, 2003

                           
                      Number of securities
                      remaining available
      Number of securities           for future issuance
      to be issued upon   Weighted-average   under equity
      exercise of   exercise price of   compensation plans
      outstanding options,   outstanding options,   (excluding securities
Plan category   warrants and rights   warrants and rights   reflected in column
                    (a))
    (a)   (b)   (c)

 
 
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
    948,300     $ 8.42       198,250  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
    18,000     $ 13.88       32,000  
 
Total
    966,300     $ 8.52       230,250  


(1)   Includes shares issuable under the Company’s 1991 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
 
(2)   Includes shares issuable to persons other than full-time officers or employees of the Company pursuant to the exercise of stock options granted under the Company’s 1995 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan that do not qualify as “incentive stock options” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

Holders

     As of December 3, 2003, the Company had 155 shareholders of record. Such number of record holders does not reflect shareholders who beneficially own Common Stock in nominee or street name.

Dividends

     The Company has paid no cash dividends on its Common Stock, and it does not intend to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the future.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

     The following selected financial data of the Company as of September 30, 2003 and 2002 and for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are derived from, and should be read together with, the financial statements of the Company audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following selected financial data as of September 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 and for the fiscal years ended

-13-


Table of Contents

September 30, 2000 and 1999 are derived from audited financial statements not included herein. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the Financial Statements and Notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

                                             
        Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
       
        2003   2002   2001   2000   1999
       
 
 
 
 
                (in thousands, except per share data)        
Statements of Operations Data:
                                       
 
Net sales
  $ 14,655     $ 11,076     $ 8,302     $ 7,860     $ 7,341  
 
Cost of sales
    9,574       7,888       6,304       6,151       5,602  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
   
Gross profit
    5,081       3,188       1,998       1,709       1,739  
Operating expenses:
                                       
 
Marketing and selling
    2,225       2,196       2,545       4,589       3,944  
 
Research and development
    875       835       1,062       1,008       1,052  
 
General and administrative
    1,809       1,763       1,730       2,238       1,863  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total operating expenses
    4,909       4,794       5,337       7,835       6,859  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from operations
    172       (1,606 )     (3,339 )     (6,126 )     (5,120 )
Interest income, net
    158       212       384       595       719  
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
    330     $ (1,394 )   $ (2,995 )   $ (5,531 )   $ (4,401 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) per common share — basic and diluted
  $ .06     $ (.26 )   $ (.55 )   $ (1.04 )   $ (.83 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic
    5,380       5,329       5,339       5,341       5,333  
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — diluted
    5,654       5,329       5,339       5,341       5,333  
                                           
      As of September 30,
     
      2003   2002   2001   2000   1999
     
 
 
 
 
              (in thousands, except per share data)        
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
 
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
  $ 5,966     $ 4,464     $ 5,748     $ 8,859     $ 13,246  
 
Working capital
    10,398       8,523       8,319       10,329       15,486  
 
Total assets
    21,125       19,636       19,659       23,254       28,702  
 
Long-term debt and leases
    267                          
 
Accumulated deficit
    (23,726 )     (24,056 )     (22,661 )     (19,706 )     (14,175 )
 
Total shareholders’ equity
  $ 18,142     $ 17,144     $ 18,455     $ 21,573     $ 27,177  

-14-


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     Statements other than historical information contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “intend,” “designed,” “estimate,” “should” or “continue” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” below. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s opinion only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates these estimates and judgments. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     The Company believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

     Inventories

     Inventories are valued at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, or the current estimated market value of the inventory. The Company’s policy is to establish an excess and obsolete reserve for its products in excess of the expected demand for such products. At September 30, 2003, this reserve was $100,000, which was equal to the amount of the reserve at September 30, 2002. If actual future demand or market conditions differ from those projected by the Company, additional inventory valuation adjustments may be required. These valuation adjustments would be included in cost of goods sold.

-15-


Table of Contents

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is calculated by a combination of specific account identification as well as percentages of past due balances. At September 30, 2003, this allowance was $69,948 compared to $64,629 at September 30, 2002. If actual future demand or market conditions differ from those projected by the Company, additional receivables valuation adjustments may be required.

     Revenue Recognition

     The Company recognizes revenue from product sales upon shipment. Amounts received for upfront license fees under multiple-element supply and distribution arrangements are deferred and recognized over the period of supply, if such arrangements require the Company’s on-going services or performance.

     Income Taxes

     The carrying value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets assumes that the Company will be able to generate sufficient taxable income in the United States, based on estimates and assumptions. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its net deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. For the year ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded a $9.3 million valuation allowance related to its net deferred tax assets of $9.3 million. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase net income in the period such determination is made. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets and assesses the requirements for a valuation allowance.

Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from the statements of operations of the Company expressed as a percentage of net sales:

                           
      Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
     
      2003   2002   2001
     
 
 
Total net sales
    100 %     100 %     100 %
Cost of sales
    65       71       76  
 
   
     
     
 
Gross margin
    35       29       24  
Operating expenses:
                       
 
Marketing and selling
    15       20       30  
 
Research and development
    6       8       13  
 
General and administrative
    13       16       21  
 
   
     
     
 
Total operating expenses
    34       44       64  
Income (loss) from operations
    1       (15 )     (40 )
Interest income, net
    1