UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-14982
HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware |
43-0334550 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
555 Maryville University Drive
Suite 240
St. Louis, Missouri 63141
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(314) 216-2600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| (Title of each class) |
(Name of each exchange on which registered) | |
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share |
New York Stock Exchange | |
| Preferred Share Purchase Rights |
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the quarter ended June 30, 2002 was approximately $70,758,471.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on February 28, 2003 was 19,673,193 shares.
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersPart III
PART I
ITEM 1BUSINESS
General
Huttig Building Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation originally incorporated in 1913, is one of the largest domestic distributors of building materials used principally in new residential construction and in home improvement, remodeling and repair work. We distribute our products through 56 distribution centers serving 46 states. Our wholesale distribution centers sell principally to building materials dealers, national buying groups and home centers, who, in turn, supply the end-user. Our Builder Resource locations sell directly to professional builders and contractors. We produce softwood mouldings at our American Pine Products manufacturing facility in Prineville, Oregon.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, when we refer to Huttig, the Company or we, we mean Huttig Building Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries and predecessors unless the context indicates otherwise.
Industry Characteristics and Trends
The home building materials distribution industry is characterized by its substantial size and dependence on the cyclical and seasonal home building industry, its highly fragmented ownership structure and an increasingly competitive environment.
Residential construction activity is closely linked to a variety of factors directly affected by general economic conditions, including job and household formation, immigration patterns, interest rates, housing prices, availability of mortgage financing, regional demographics and consumer confidence. We monitor new housing starts on a national and regional basis as an important indicator of our potential future sales volume.
New housing starts in the United States totaled approximately 1.7 million in 2002 versus 1.6 million in 2001, including 1.5 million single family residences in 2002 versus 1.3 million in 2001, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Approximately 60% of single family new construction in 2002 occurred in markets that we serve. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, total spending on new residential construction in 2002 was $274 billion. We estimate that aggregate expenditures for residential repair and remodeling were an additional $168 billion and believe that sales of doors, windows and other millwork accounted for approximately $17 billion in 2002.
Prior to the 1970s, building materials were sold in both rural and metropolitan markets largely by local dealers, such as lumberyards and hardware stores. These dealers, who generally purchased their products from wholesale distributors, sold building products directly to homeowners, contractors and homebuilders. In the late 1970s and 1980s, in response, The Home Depot and Lowes began to alter this distribution channel, particularly in metropolitan markets. They began displacing local dealers by marketing a broad range of competitively priced building materials to the homeowner and small home improvement contractor. At the same time, some building materials manufacturers, such as Georgia Pacific and Weyerhauser, began selling their products directly to home center chains and to local dealers as well. In response, most wholesale distributors have been diversifying their businesses by seeking to sell directly to large contractors and homebuilders in selected markets and by providing home centers with fill-in and specialty products. Also, as large homebuilding companies seek to streamline the new residential construction process, building materials distributors have increasing opportunities to provide higher margin turnkey products and services.
The increasingly competitive environment faced by dealers also has prompted a trend toward industry consolidation and formation of buying groups to leverage their purchasing power, which we believe offers significant opportunities to a company like Huttig. Many distributors in the building materials industry are small,
1
privately-held companies that generally lack the purchasing power of a larger entity and may also lack the broad lines of products and sophisticated inventory management and control systems typically needed to operate a multi-branch distribution network. These characteristics are also driving the consolidation trend in favor of companies like us that operate nationally and have significant infrastructure in place to accommodate the needs of customers across geographic regions. Despite the decrease in total sales in 2002 compared to 2001, we increased sales to major and national accounts in 2002 by over 10%, with sales to our top 10 customers increasing by 7%.
Products
Each of our distribution centers carries a variety of products that vary by location. Our principal products are:
| | doors, including exterior and interior doors and pre-hung door units; |
| | millwork, including windows, mouldings, frames, stair products and columns; |
| | wood products, such as lumber, panels and engineered wood products; |
| | weatherization and metal products, including roofing, siding, insulation, flashing, housewrap, connectors and fasteners; and |
| | general building products, such as decking, drywall, kitchen and other miscellaneous building products. |
The following table sets forth information regarding the percentage of our net sales represented by our principal product categories sold during each of the last three fiscal years. While the table below generally indicates the mix of our sales by product category, changes in the prices of commodity wood products and in unit volumes sold typically change our product mix on a year-to-year basis.
| 2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
| Doors |
37 |
% |
35 |
% |
34 |
% | |||
| Millwork |
19 |
% |
18 |
% |
27 |
% | |||
| Wood Products |
19 |
% |
19 |
% |
17 |
% | |||
| Weatherization and Metal Products |
16 |
% |
19 |
% |
14 |
% | |||
| General Building Products |
9 |
% |
9 |
% |
8 |
% |
DoorsNet sales of doors totaled $316.8 million in 2002 versus $333.8 million and $364.1 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. We sell wood, steel and composite doors from various branded manufacturers such as Therma-Tru® and Masonite International®, as well as provide value-priced unbranded products. The pre-hanging of an interior or exterior door within its frame is a value-added service that we provide, allowing an installer to quickly place the unit in a house opening. We also assemble many exterior doors with added sidelites and transoms.
MillworkNet sales of millwork were $168.1 million in 2002 versus $167.2 million and $287.2 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Included in this category are windows, mouldings, frames, stair products and columns. In October 2000, Andersen® Windows terminated our distribution agreement. Andersen® windows sales accounted for $63.8 million in 2000. As a result of the termination of the distribution agreement, sales of windows declined to 6% of our total sales in both 2002 and 2001, compared with 12% in 2000. Mouldings, which made up 7% of our sales in each of the last three years, are a necessary complementary product line to doors and windows as part of a houses millwork package. Profitability of these highly competitive, commodity-priced products depends upon efficient plan operations, rapid inventory turnover and quick reaction to changing market conditions.
Wood ProductsNet sales of wood products were $164.5 million in 2002 versus $183.6 million and $182.4 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Growth of wood products as a percentage of sales from 2000 to 2002 has resulted primarily from additional value-added services and the sale of higher priced products. We
2
provide builders with the capability to purchase a houses framing and package of wood products from one source and have each component delivered when needed. Other wood products include panels and engineered wood products.
Weatherization and Metal ProductsNet sales of weatherization and metal products were $141.5 million in 2002 versus $174.5 million and $152.3 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Included in this category are products differentiated through branding or value-added characteristics. Branded products include Typar® housewrap, Simpson Strong-Tie® connectors and Owens Corning roofing and insulation. During 2002, we transitioned to Typar® housewrap, after our distributorship of Tyvek®, our former housewrap product, was terminated. As a result of transitioning to a new supplier in our former Tyvek® markets, housewrap sales in the west declined approximately $10.7 million in 2002 compared to 2001.
General Building ProductsNet sales of general building products amounted to $80.3 million in 2002 versus $86.0 million and $86.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Included in this category are decking, drywall, kitchen and other miscellaneous products.
Customers
During 2002, we served over 9,000 customers, and no single customer accounted for more than 7% of our sales. Building materials dealers represent our single largest customer group. Despite the advent of the home center chains, the trend toward consolidation of dealers and increased direct participation in wholesale distribution by some building materials manufacturers, we believe that the wholesale distribution business continues to provide sales growth opportunities. In addition, some manufacturers may seek to outsource the marketing function for their products, a role that we, as a large, national distributor, are well positioned to fill. Opportunities also exist for large distributors, like Huttig, that can perform increasing amounts of services such as pre-hanging doors, which we believe may enable us to enhance the value-added component of our business. We are also targeting home centers for sales of fill-in and specialty products.
The percentages of our revenues attributable to various categories of customers in each of the past three years are as follows:
| 2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
| Dealers |
73 |
% |
68 |
% |
66 |
% | |||
| Home Centers and Buying Groups |
13 |
% |
13 |
% |
12 |
% | |||
| Builders and Contractors |
10 |
% |
12 |
% |
13 |
% | |||
| Industrial and Manufactured Housing |
4 |
% |
7 |
% |
9 |
% |
Sales and Marketing
During 2001 and 2002, we transitioned from an organization managed in four geographic regions, each with their own sales and operations responsibilities, to a functionally designed management structure based on separate sales and operations organizations. Our sales organization consists of outside field sales personnel who serve customers on-site and who report directly to Field Sales Managers, who report to their respective Regional Sales Managers. Our outside sales force is supported by inside customer service representatives at each branch and is compensated by commissions based on sales margin.
We believe our sales organization has allowed us to expand our focus on sales and customer service and better positions us to pursue opportunities for sales growth. In 2002, we increased sales to national account customers by over 10%, increased sales to our top 10 customers by 7%, and began doing business with over 1,000 new customers. In 2003, in addition to continuing our focus on national accounts, we plan to expand our use of product specialists to help increase sales of branded products. Product specialists help drive sales of branded products, including Therma Tru® and Masonite® doors, Weather Shield® windows and Typar® housewrap, by focusing on sales to builders, architects and designers.
3
Each of our distribution centers is focused on meeting local market needs and offering competitive prices. Inventory levels, merchandising and pricing are tailored to local markets. Our single-platform information system provides each distribution center manager with real-time pricing, inventory availability and margin analysis to facilitate this strategy. We also support our distribution centers with centralized product management, credit and financial controls, training and marketing programs and human resources expertise.
Our marketing programs center on fostering strong customer relationships and providing superior service. This strategy is furthered by the high level of technical knowledge and expertise of our personnel. We have focused marketing efforts primarily on the residential new housing and remodeling markets, with slightly less effort directed toward the commercial and industrial markets. Certain of our suppliers advertise to the trade media and directly to individual consumers through nationwide print and other media.
Among our key marketing initiatives in 2002 was the development of a national product catalog, which we believe provides us with another critical tool to meet our customers needs. We also rolled out our Partners for Profit national campaign, which is designed to encourage customers to utilize exclusively our door hanging operations in exchange for preferred merchandising, stocking and pricing programs.
Product Management
In 2002, we purchased our products from more than 1,500 different suppliers, but approximately 70% of our purchases were from 70 suppliers. We purchased doors, which constituted approximately 37 % of our total inventory purchases, from four major suppliers. We believe that alternative sources of supply are readily available for substantially all of the products we offer, but we do believe that developing and maintaining key supplier relationships are important for us to obtain favorable pricing and service terms and avoid disruptions in supply of key products. We negotiate with our major vendors on a company-wide basis to obtain favorable pricing, volume discounts and other beneficial purchase terms and to provide our customers with the variety of product offerings they demand. A majority of our purchases are made from suppliers offering payment, discount and volume purchase programs. We have developed an effective coordinated purchasing program designed to allow us to lower costs through volume purchases, and we believe that we have greater purchasing power than many of our smaller, local independent competitors. With our single, company-wide information system platform, we are positioned to track and maintain appropriate levels of products at each of our distribution facilities. Distribution center managers are responsible for inventory selection and ordering on terms negotiated centrally. This approach allows the distribution centers to remain responsive to local market demand, while still maintaining purchasing leverage through volume orders. Distribution center managers are also responsible for inventory management at their respective locations.
We have distribution relationships with vendors on both exclusive and non-exclusive bases, depending on the product and the territory involved. These distributorships generally are terminable at any time by either party, in some cases without notice, and otherwise on notice ranging up to 60 days.
Competition
Our competition varies by product line, customer classification and geographic market. We compete with many local and regional building product distributors and, in certain markets and product categories, with national building product distributors and dealers. In certain markets we compete with national building materials suppliers with national distribution capability, such as Georgia-Pacific, Weyerhauser and other product manufacturers that engage in direct sales, while at the same time distributing products for some of these manufacturers. We also sell products to large home center chains such as The Home Depot and Lowes and, to a limited extent in certain markets, we compete with them for business from smaller contractors. Competition from such large home center chains for the business of larger contractors may increase in the future.
4
The principal factors on which we compete are:
| | availability of product; |
| | service and delivery capabilities; |
| | ability to assist with problem-solving; |
| | customer relationships; and |
| | breadth of product offerings. |
Our relative size, geographic coverage and financial position are advantageous in obtaining and retaining distributorships for important products. This relative size also permits us to attract experienced sales and service personnel and gives us the resources to provide company-wide sales, product and service training programs. By working closely with our customers and utilizing our information technology, our branches are able to maintain appropriate inventory levels and are well-positioned to deliver completed orders on time.
Seasonality and Working Capital
Various factors historically have caused our results of operations to fluctuate from period to period. These factors include levels of construction, home improvement and remodeling activity, weather, prices of commodity wood products, interest rates, competitive pressures, availability of credit and other local, regional and economic conditions. All of these factors are cyclical or seasonal in nature. We anticipate that fluctuations from period to period will continue in the future. Our first quarter and, occasionally, our fourth quarter are adversely affected by winter weather patterns in the Midwest and Northeast, which result in seasonal decreases in levels of construction activity in these areas. Because much of our overhead and expense remains relatively fixed throughout the year, our operating profits also tend to be lower during the first and fourth quarters.
We depend on cash flow from operations and funds available under our secured credit facility to finance seasonal working capital needs, capital expenditures and acquisitions. Our working capital requirements are generally greatest in the second and third quarters, which reflects the seasonal nature of our business. The second and third quarters are typically our strongest operating quarters, largely due to more favorable weather throughout many of our markets compared to the first and fourth quarters. We typically generate cash from working capital reductions in the fourth quarter of the year and build working capital during the first quarter in preparation for our second and third quarters. We also maintain significant inventories to meet rapid delivery requirements of our customers and to enable us to obtain favorable pricing, delivery and service terms with our suppliers. At December 31, 2002, inventories constituted approximately 36% of our total assets. We also closely monitor operating expenses and inventory levels during seasonally affected periods and, to the extent possible, manage variable operating costs to minimize seasonal effects on our profitability.
Credit
Huttigs corporate management establishes an overall credit policy for sales to customers and is responsible for all credit decisions. Our credit policies, together with monitoring of customer balances, have resulted in average bad debt expense of approximately 0.2% of net sales during the last three years. Approximately 98% of our sales in 2002 were made to customers to whom we had extended credit for those sales. The remaining 2% of sales in 2002 included cash purchases and purchases made with third-party credit cards, such as MasterCard, Visa and American Express.
Backlog
Our customers generally order products on an as-needed basis. As a result, virtually all product shipments in a given fiscal quarter result from orders received in that quarter. Consequently, order backlog represents only a very small percentage of the product sales that we anticipate in a given quarter and is not indicative of actual sales for any future period.
5
Tradenames
Historically, Huttig has operated under various tradenames in the markets we serve, retaining the names of acquired businesses for a period of time to preserve local identification. To capitalize on our national presence, we converted our branch operations to the primary tradename Huttig Building Products. Some branches continue to use historical tradenames as secondary tradenames to maintain local identity. Huttig has no material patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, or concessions other than the Huttig Building Productsñ name and logo and the Builder Resource® name and logo, which are registered trademarks.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental protection laws and regulations. We believe that we are in compliance, or are taking action aimed at assuring compliance, with applicable environmental protection laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that future environmental liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We have been identified as a potentially responsible party in connection with the cleanup of contamination at a formerly owned property in Montana. See Part I, Item 3Legal Proceedings.
In addition, some of our current and former distribution centers are located in areas of current or former industrial activity where environmental contamination may have occurred, and for which we, among others, could be held responsible. We currently believe that there are no material environmental liabilities at any of our distribution center locations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, we employed 2,352 persons, of which approximately 12.5% were represented by unions. We have not experienced any strikes or other work interruptions in recent years and have maintained generally favorable relations with our employees.
The following table shows the approximate breakdown by job function of our employees:
| Distribution Centers |
1,682 | |
| Manufacturing |
341 | |
| Sales & Marketing |
236 | |
| Corporate Administration |
93 | |
| Total |
2,352 | |
Available Information
Huttig files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, current reports on Form 8-K, and proxy statements pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in addition to other information as required. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1 (800) SEC-0330. We file this information with the SEC electronically, and the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. Huttig also maintains a web site at http://www.huttig.com that contains links to corporate, financial and other information about Huttig, including our SEC filings.
ITEM 2PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters are located at 555 Maryville University Drive, Suite 240, St. Louis, Missouri 63141, in leased facilities. Our manufacturing facility for softwood mouldings is a 280,000-square foot facility
6
that we own and is located in Prineville, Oregon. We lease approximately half of our distribution centers and own the rest. Warehouse space at distribution centers aggregates approximately 4.2 million square feet. Distribution centers range in size from 12,000 square feet to 160,000 square feet. The types of facilities at these centers vary by location, from traditional wholesale distribution warehouses, which may have particular value-added service capabilities such as pre-hung door operations, to traditional lumberyards and builder support facilities with broad product offerings and capabilities for a wide range of value-added services. We believe that our locations are well maintained and adequate for their purposes.
The following table sets forth the geographic location of our distribution centers as of December 31, 2002:
| Region |
Number of Locations | |
| Mid-Atlantic |
8 | |
| Midwest |
21 | |
| Northeast |
7 | |
| Northwest |
7 | |
| Southeast |
9 | |
| Southwest |
4 | |
| Total |
56 | |
ITEM 3LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in various lawsuits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of any lawsuits, claims or proceedings cannot be predicted, we do not believe that the disposition of any pending matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In April 2002, we filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the state of New York against The Rugby Group Ltd., our principal stockholder, and Rugby IPD Corp., a subsidiary of The Rugby Group Ltd., alleging that they breached their contractual obligations to indemnify and defend Huttig against asbestos-related liabilities and claims arising out of the business that was acquired in 1994 by Rugby Building Products, Inc. We acquired Rugby Building Products, Inc., a distributor of building materials, in December 1999, when we acquired the stock of its parent, Rugby USA, Inc., from The Rugby Group Ltd. In our lawsuit, we seek to recover sums we have spent to defend and, with respect to one lawsuit, settle our asbestos lawsuits, as well as a declaratory judgment that Rugby Group and Rugby IPD indemnify and defend us for these lawsuits and any similarly situated claims that may be asserted against us in the future. Rugby Group has denied any obligation to defend or indemnify us for any of these cases. There can be no assurance at this time that Huttig will recover any of its costs related to past or future asbestos-related claims from insurance carriers or from The Rugby Group or Rugby IPD Corp. or that such costs will not have a material adverse effect on Huttigs business or financial condition.
In November 2002, Huttig was dismissed from its one remaining lawsuit in California state court relating to exposure to asbestos contained in products allegedly distributed by Huttig as successor-in-interest to Rugby Building Products, Inc.
Huttig has been identified as a potentially responsible party in connection with the clean up of contamination at a formerly owned property in Montana that was used for the manufacture of wood windows. We are voluntarily remediating this property under the oversight of and in cooperation with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and are complying with a 1995 unilateral administrative order of the DEQ to complete a remedial investigation and feasibility study. The state agency has issued its final risk assessment of this property and we have submitted a work plan for conducting a feasibility study to evaluate alternatives for cleanup. When the DEQ approves the work plan, we will conduct the feasibility study, which will
7
evaluate several potential remedies, including continuation or enhancement of remedial measures already in place and operating. The DEQ then will select a final remedy, publish a record of decision and negotiate with us for an administrative order of consent on the implementation of the final remedy. Huttigs management currently believes that this process may take several more years to complete and intends to continue monitoring and remediating the site, evaluating cleanup alternatives and reporting regularly to the DEQ during this interim period. Based on experience to date in remediating this site, Huttigs management does not believe that the scope of remediation that the DEQ ultimately determines will have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition in excess of those amounts already accrued. Until the DEQ selects a final remedy, however, we can give no assurance as to the scope or cost to us of the final remediation order.
ITEM 4SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to our shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2002.
PART II
ITEM 5MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol HBP.
At February 28, 2003, there were approximately 3,002 holders of record of our common stock. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sale prices of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape during each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001:
| High |
Low | |||||
| 2002 |
||||||
| First Quarter |
$ |
6.40 |
$ |
5.15 | ||
| Second Quarter |
|
5.94 |
|
4.97 | ||
| Third Quarter |
|
5.14 |
|
3.39 | ||
| Fourth Quarter |
|
3.90 |
|
2.59 | ||
| 2001 |
||||||
| First Quarter |
|
5.00 |
|
3.87 | ||
| Second Quarter |
|
5.10 |
|
3.90 | ||
| Third Quarter |
|
6.50 |
|
5.00 | ||
| Fourth Quarter |
|
6.24 |
|
4.60 | ||
We have never declared, nor do we anticipate declaring or paying, any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future in order to make cash generated available for use in operations, debt reduction, stock repurchases and, if any, acquisitions. Provisions of our senior secured revolving credit facility contain various covenants which, among other things, limit our ability to incur indebtedness, incur liens, make certain types of acquisitions, declare or pay dividends or make restricted payments, consolidate, merge or sell assets. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources.
See Part III, Item 12, for information on securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
ITEM 6SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes certain selected financial data of Huttig for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2002. The information contained in the following table may not necessarily be
8
indicative of our past or future performance. Such historical data should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2002(1) |
2001 |
2000(2) |
1999(3) |
1998(3) | ||||||||||||
| (In Millions, Except Per Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||
| Net sales |
$ |
871.2 |
|
$ |
945.1 |
$ |
1,072.9 |
$ |
800.3 |
$ |
707.5 | |||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
|
6.1 |
|
|
7.7 |
|
7.3 |
|
6.6 |
|
5.6 | |||||
| Operating profit |
|
10.9 |
|
|
21.0 |
|
34.0 |
|
22.8 |
|
28.6 | |||||
| Interest expense, net |
|
9.4 |
|
|
10.0 |
|
11.1 |
|
7.8 |
|
6.9 | |||||
| Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
|
1.7 |
|
|
9.2 |
|
22.1 |
|
14.4 |
|
21.8 | |||||
| Provision for income taxes |
|
0.6 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
8.5 |
|
5.9 |
|
8.2 | |||||
| Net income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle |
|
1.1 |
|
|
5.7 |
|
13.6 |
|
8.5 |
|
13.6 | |||||
| Net income (loss) |
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
5.7 |
|
13.6 |
|
8.5 |
|
13.6 | |||||
| Net income (loss) per share (basic and diluted) |
|
(0.59 |
) |
|
0.28 |
|
0.66 |
|
0.59 |
|
1.17 | |||||
| Balance Sheet Data (at end of year): |
||||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
|
233.5 |
|
|
246.3 |
|
249.2 |
|
301.3 |
|
218.5 | |||||
| Debtbank and capital leases |
|
67.9 |
|
|
73.6 |
|
81.1 |
|
122.1 |
|||||||