UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2004

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission File No. 001-08430

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code (504) 587-5400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ü ] No [    ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes [ ü ] No [    ]

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at July 30, 2004 was 66,762,938.

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INDEX — FORM 10 - Q

2

PART I

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ASSETS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8

McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     We have presented our condensed consolidated financial statements in U.S. Dollars in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and GAAP footnotes required for complete financial statements. We have included all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of McDermott International, Inc. and its subsidiaries and controlled joint ventures. We use the equity method to account for investments in joint ventures and other entities we do not control, but over which we have significant influence. We have eliminated all significant intercompany transactions and accounts. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported to conform with the presentation at and for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004. We present the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements on the basis of continuing operations, unless otherwise stated.

     McDermott International, Inc., a Panamanian corporation (“MII”), is the parent company of the McDermott group of companies, which includes:

	•		J. Ray McDermott, S.A., a Panamanian subsidiary of MII (“JRM”), and its consolidated subsidiaries;
	•		McDermott Incorporated, a Delaware subsidiary of MII (“MI”), and its consolidated subsidiaries;
	•		Babcock & Wilcox Investment Company, a Delaware subsidiary of MI (“BWICO”);
	•		BWX Technologies, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary of BWICO (“BWXT”), and its consolidated subsidiaries; and
	•		The Babcock & Wilcox Company, an unconsolidated Delaware subsidiary of BWICO (“B&W”), and its consolidated subsidiaries.

     Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

     On February 22, 2000, B&W and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed a voluntary petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in New Orleans (the “Bankruptcy Court”) to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”). B&W and these subsidiaries took this action as a means to determine and comprehensively resolve their asbestos liability. B&W’s operations have been subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court since February 22, 2000 and, as a result, our access to cash flows of B&W and its subsidiaries is restricted.

     Due to the bankruptcy filing, we stopped consolidating the results of operations of B&W and its subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements, and we began presenting our investment in B&W on the cost method. During the year ended December 31, 2002, due to increased uncertainty with respect to the amounts, means and timing of the ultimate settlement of asbestos claims and the recovery of our investment in B&W, we wrote off our net investment in B&W. On December 19, 2002, drafts of a joint plan of reorganization and settlement agreement, together with a draft of a related disclosure statement, were filed in the Chapter 11 proceedings, and we determined that a liability related to the proposed settlement was probable and that the value was reasonably estimable. Accordingly, we established an estimate for the cost of the settlement of the B&W bankruptcy proceedings. We revalue this estimate on a quarterly basis to reflect

9

current conditions. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the revaluation of the estimated cost of the settlement resulted in an aggregate increase in the provision of $1.3 million and $16.4 million, respectively, primarily due to increases in our stock price. The increase in the provision includes tax benefits (expense) of $0.7 million and ($1.1) million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of June 30, 2004, our estimate for the cost of the settlement is $129.3 million. See Note 9.

     At a special meeting of our shareholders on December 17, 2003, our shareholders voted on and approved a resolution relating to a proposed settlement agreement that would resolve the B&W Chapter 11 proceedings. The shareholders’ approval of the resolution is conditioned on the subsequent approval of the proposed settlement by MII’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). We would become bound to the settlement agreement only when the plan of reorganization becomes effective, and the plan of reorganization cannot become effective without the approval of the Board within 30 days prior to the effective time of the plan. The Board’s decision will be made after consideration of any developments that might occur prior to the effective date, including any changes in the status of the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution legislation pending in the United States Senate. According to documents filed with the Bankruptcy Court, the asbestos personal injury claimants have voted in favor of the proposed B&W plan of reorganization. See Note 9 for information regarding developments in the B&W Chapter 11 proceedings and a summary of the components of the settlement.

     Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and recorded income of approximately $3.7 million as the cumulative effect of an accounting change, which is net of tax expense of $2.2 million. Prior to our adoption of SFAS No. 143, we accrued the estimated cost of remediation activities over the economic life of the related assets, and our accrued liabilities at December 31, 2002 totaled approximately $4.6 million more than the asset retirement obligations measured at January 1, 2003 under the provisions of SFAS No. 143. In addition, as of January 1, 2003, we recorded additions to property, plant and equipment totaling $1.3 million under the provision of SFAS No. 143.

     In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) that either do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial interest. In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN 46. FIN 46 applies immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to VIEs in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. For a variable interest in a VIE acquired before February 1, 2003, we adopted FIN 46 as of January 1, 2004, the revised effective date. At the date of adoption of FIN 46, we had no entities that required consolidation as a result of adopting its provisions, as amended.

     In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.” It does not change the measurement or recognition of pension and other postretirement benefit plans. It requires additional disclosures to those in the original SFAS No. 132 about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. It also requires disclosure of the components of net periodic benefit cost in interim financial statements. See Note 4 for the required interim financial statement disclosures. See also Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, for additional disclosures about our pension plans and postretirement benefits.

     In January 2004, the FASB issued a staff position in response to certain accounting issues raised by the enactment of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 on December 8, 2003. With regard to our financial reporting, the most significant issue concerns how and when to account for the federal subsidy to plan sponsors provided for in that Act. The staff position allows a company to defer recognizing the impact of the new legislation in its accounting for postretirement health benefits. If elected, the deferral is effective until authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is issued or until certain significant events occur, such as a plan amendment. We made this deferral election. In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements related to

10

the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” which provides authoritative guidance on accounting for the effects of the new Medicare prescription drug legislation. We must adopt this staff position as of July 1, 2004 and are currently reviewing its impact, which we believe will be immaterial.

NOTE 2 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

     We have several stock-based employee compensation plans. We account for those plans using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”), and related interpretations. Under APB 25, if the exercise price of the employee stock option equals or exceeds the fair value of the underlying stock on the measurement date, no compensation expense is recognized. If the measurement date is later than the date of grant, compensation expense is recorded to the measurement date based on the quoted market price of the underlying stock at the end of each reporting period.

     The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

NOTE 3 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

     On August 29, 2003, we completed the sale of Menck GmbH (“Menck”), a component of our Marine Construction Services segment. We received cash of $17.3 million and recorded a gain on sale of $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2003. We reported the gain on sale and results of operations for Menck in discontinued operations. Accordingly, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we reported the results of operations of Menck in discontinued operations. Condensed financial information for our operations reported in discontinued operations follows:

11

NOTE 4 – PENSION PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

     Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows: